Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | CEDERSCHIÖLD Charlotte ( PPE-DE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 607 votes to 21, with 27 abstentions, a resolution on the creation of a European professional card for service providers.
The resolution stresses that greater mobility of persons and services between Member States and between regions is an essential element in achieving the Lisbon agenda for growth and jobs. However, mobility in the EU remains low, given that only 4% of the workforce has ever lived and worked in another Member State and approximately 2% currently lives and works in another Member State. Moreover, there are still major obstacles for persons wanting to work in another Member State : 20% of complaints received by SOLVIT in 2007 concerned the recognition of professional qualifications required to pursue a regulated profession.
Directive 2005/32/EC states that the introduction, at European level, of professional cards by professional associations or organisations could facilitate the mobility of professionals, in particular by speeding up the exchange of information between the host Member State and the Member State of origin. In its resolution on the impact and consequences of the exclusion of health services from the Directive on services in the internal market, the Parliament called for the setting up of a European card to provide access to information on the skills of health care professionals.
Promote cross-border mobility : the Parliament encourages all initiatives that aim to facilitate cross-border mobility as a means to the efficient functioning of the services and labour markets. It underlines, however, the need for a more efficient and coordinated approach by the Commission between initiatives that aim to facilitate and stimulate the mobility of professionals between Member States, such as EUROPASS (European CV), EURES (job mobility portal) and the European Qualifications Framework (EQF), as well as between the different associated Community funded or co-funded networks involved in these issues, such as SOLVIT, IMI, EUROGUIDANCE and ENIC/NARIC.
Transposition of Directive 2005/36/EC : MEPs call on the Commission to assess the transposition of Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and urge the Member States to strive for a more harmonised approach to the recognition of qualifications and competences, to simplify the administrative processes involved and to reduce the costs incurred by professionals.
Necessity of a European professional card : in some regulated and harmonised professions, such as lawyers and health professionals, European professional cards are in place or in development, but in other non- or less harmonised professions, the introduction of professional cards seems difficult. MEPs therefore call on the Commission to take stock of different initiatives concerning the development of professional cards and to report to Parliament on a representative inventory. They also call on the Commission to examine the initiatives in order to see whether a European professional card, in addition to other measures, could:
contribute to the security of citizens in the event of contact with a provider of cross-border services; lead to administrative simplification and cost reductions and, in the long term, replace paper-based files and dossiers and increase transparency; stimulate the provision of temporary services; stimulate the provision of appropriate services of a high standard in the European Union and third countries; serve as means of communication of appropriate information to recipients of services in order to increase consumer health and safety; serve as means of communication of appropriate information to employers (in the public and private sectors) in order to facilitate cross-borders recruitment.
Characteristics of a European professional card : if there is sufficient demand to develop one, MEPs believe that any professional card should be as simple, easy and liberal as possible. It should avoid any new bureaucratic burdens and could establish a "common language" in the qualifications of certain professions.
In any event, a European professional card should not have a negative effect on cross‑border mobility, and should only be used as proof of the right to move without being a condition for such movement. Information on a European professional card should be reliable, validated and updated by the competent national authorities and should comply with the highest standards of the protection of privacy. Where appropriate, information contained in EUROPASS CVs could also be included on the European professional card. MEPs believe that the professions themselves should finance the development and implementation of a European professional card, if felt appropriate.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Charlotte CEDERSCHIÖLD (EPP-ED, SE) on the creation of a European professional card for service providers.
The report stresses that greater mobility of persons and services between Member States and between regions is an essential element in achieving the Lisbon agenda for growth and jobs. However, there are still major obstacles for persons wanting to work in another Member State: 20% of complaints received by SOLVIT in 2007 concerned the recognition of professional qualifications required to pursue a regulated profession.
Directive 2005/36/EC states that the introduction, at European level, of professional cards by professional associations or organisations could facilitate the mobility of professionals, in particular by speeding up the exchange of information between the host Member State and the Member State of origin. In its resolution on the impact and consequences of the exclusion of health services from the Directive on services in the internal market, the Parliament called for the setting up of ‘a European card to provide access to information on the skills of health care professionals.
Based on theses facts, the report encourages all initiatives that aim to facilitate cross-border mobility as a means to the efficient functioning of the services and labour markets. In this context, MEPs call on the Commission to assess the transposition of Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and call on the Member States to strive for a more harmonised approach to the recognition of qualifications and competences, to simplify the administrative processes involved and to reduce the costs incurred by professionals.
MEPs stress that a European professional card could be an advantage even for non-regulated and non-harmonised professions, as it would have an information role particularly for employers and consumers, which would be the case for most liberal professions. They therefore call on the Commission to take stock of different initiatives concerning the development of professional cards and to report to Parliament on a representative inventory.
If there is sufficient demand to develop one, MEPs consider that a professional card should be as simple, easy and liberal as possible, avoiding any new bureaucratic burdens, and that it could establish a "common language" in the qualifications of certain professions.
In any event, a European professional card should not have a negative effect on cross-border mobility, and should only be used as proof of the right to move without being a condition for such movement. Information on a European professional card should be reliable, validated and updated by the competent national authorities and should comply with the highest standards of the protection of privacy.
Where appropriate, information contained in EUROPASS CVs could also be included on the European professional card.
Lastly, MEPs consider that the professions themselves should finance the development and implementation of a European professional card, if felt appropriate.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)2154
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0066/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0029/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0029/2009
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.346
- Committee draft report: PE414.372
- Committee draft report: PE414.372
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.346
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0029/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)2154
Activities
- Charlotte CEDERSCHIÖLD
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
23 |
2008/2172(INI)
2008/11/14
IMCO
23 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 23 May 2007 on the impact and consequences of the exclusion of health services from the Directive on services in the internal market1,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Points out that a European professional card could be an advantage even for non-regulated and non- harmonised professions, as it would have an information role particularly for employers and consumers, which would be the case for most liberal professions;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Invites the Commission to take stock of different initiatives to elaborate professional cards and to report to the European Parliament in a representative inventory.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 - introductory wording 11. Calls on the Commission to examine these initiatives and those presented by professionals in order to see whether a European professional card, in addition to other measures, could:
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point -a (new) -a) contribute to the security of citizens in the event of contact with a provider of cross-border services, as citizens can check the identity and qualifications of the service provider by means of the professional card,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point -a a (new) - aa) be suitable for the reliable provision of information on whether the service provider concerned is authorised to provide the services which it is offering,
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point a a) lead to administrative simplification and cost reductions and, in the long term, replace paper-based files and dossiers and increase transparency,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point b b) accelerate
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point c c) stimulate the provision of
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point d d) serve as means of communication of appropriate information to the recipients of services in order to
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point d a (new) da) serve as means of communication of appropriate information to employers (in the public and private sectors) in order to facilitate cross-borders recruitment;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas there are still major obstacles for people wanting to work in another Member State, and 20% of
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Is of the opinion that any professional card, if there is sufficient demand to develop one, should be as simple, easy and liberal as possible, avoiding any new bureaucratic burdens, and that it could establish a "common language" in the qualifications of certain professions;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises that the use of one or more European professional cards should allow for diversity, for instance to accommodate differences between professions or differences between Member States; considers that
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Point 14 a (new) 14a. Underlines that, in the event of the profession concerned already having a national professional card, it would, for practical reasons, be appropriate for the functions of the national card to be integrated into the European professional card;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises that information on a European professional card should be reliable, validated and
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas, in its above-mentioned resolution on the impact and consequences of the exclusion of health services from the Directive on services in the internal market, it called for the setting up of ‘a European card to provide access to information on the skills of health care professionals and to make that information available to patients’ and the development of ‘a reliable health information system for service providers, with an obligation for national authorities to share that information’;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the responsibility of the EU to further facilitate geographic and occupational mobility by enhancing
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses however the need for a more efficient and less redundant coordinated approach by the Commission between currently funded initiatives that aim to facilitate and stimulate the mobility of professionals between Member States, such as Directive 2005/36/EC, EUROPASS (European CV), EURES (job mobility portal) and the European Qualifications Framework (EQF), as well as between the different associated Community funded or co-funded networks involved in these issues, such as SOLVIT, IMI, EUROGUIDANCE, EURES, EUROPASS, ENIC/NARIC, MOBILNET, YOUR EUROPE for CITIZENS, contact points under Directive 2005/36/EC and Points of Single Contact under Directive 2006/12/EC;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasis the co-responsibility of civil society, including employers, unions
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
source: PE-415.346
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.372New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE414.372 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.346New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.346 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0029_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0029_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-29&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0029_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-29&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0029_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-66New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0066_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
IMCO/6/65385New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|