Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | PECH | KINDERMANN Heinz ( PSE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted, by 558 votes to 7 with 18 abstentions, a resolution on the application of a European cormorant management plan to minimise the increasing impact of cormorants on fish stocks, fishing and aquaculture.
The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration by Heinz KINDERMANN (PES, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Fisheries.
MEPs called on the Commission to consider all the legal means at its disposal to reduce the negative effects of cormorant populations on fishing and aquaculture and to propose solutions to the cormorant problem in this context. The Commission and the Member States are called upon, by promoting regular scientific research, to provide reliable and generally recognised data on the total size and structure of cormorant populations in Europe, as well as their fertility and mortality parameters. According to the report, the total population of cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) has grown twenty-fold over the past 25 years and is now estimated to comprise at least 1.7 to 1.8 million birds. Cormorants have caused proven permanent damage to aquaculture undertakings and stocks of many wild fish species in the inland waterways and along sea coasts in many Member States of the European Union. They have also caused permanent damage to vegetation in certain geographical areas and the risk of serious damage increases disproportionately the closer the cormorant population in a given region approaches the carrying capacity of the region’s large bodies of water, thus at the same time greatly reducing the effectiveness of local protective measures.
The Commission is also called upon to submit a cormorant population management plan in several stages , seeking to integrate cormorant populations into the environment as developed and cultivated by man in the long term without jeopardising the objectives of the Wild Birds Directive and Natura 2000 as regards fish species and marine and freshwater ecosystems. MEPs urge the Commission, in the interests of greater legal certainty and uniform interpretation, to provide without delay a clear definition of the term ‘serious damage’ as used in Article 9(1)(a), third indent, of the Wild Birds Directive (The Wild Birds Directive (79/409/EEC) of 2 April 1979). The Commission should also produce more generalised guidance on the nature of the derogations allowed under Article 9(1) of the Wild Birds Directive, including further clarification of the terminology where any ambiguity may exist.
In this context, MEPs suggest that, by means of systematic monitoring of cormorant populations supported by the EU and the Member States, a reliable, generally recognised and annually updated database should be drawn up on the development, size and geographical distribution of cormorant populations in Europe. They call on the Commission to put out to tender, and finance, a scientific project aimed at supplying an estimation model for the size and structure of the total cormorant population on the basis of currently available data on breeding population, fertility and mortality. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to foster in an appropriate manner the creation of suitable conditions for bilateral and multilateral scientific and administrative exchanges, both within the EU and with third countries.
The Commission and the Member States are also called to:
promote the sustainable management of cormorant populations by means of increased scientific and administrative coordination, cooperation and communication, and to create appropriate conditions for the drafting of a Europe-wide cormorant population management plan; make some of the funds earmarked in the EU budget for data collection in the fisheries sector, in particular under heading 11 07 02: ‘Support for the management of fishery resources (improvement of scientific advice)’, available for investigations, analyses and forecasts of the cormorant population on the territory of the European Union, in preparation for the future regular monitoring of these species.
The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report by Heinz KINDERMANN (PES, DE) on the application of a European c ormorant management plan to minimise the increasing impact of cormorants on fish stocks, fishing and aquaculture. The report calls on the Commission and the Member States, by promoting regular scientific research, to provide reliable and generally recognised data on the total size and structure of cormorant populations in Europe, as well as their fertility and mortality parameters. According to the report, the total population of cormorants ( Phalacrocorax carbo ) has grown twenty-fold over the past 25 years and is now estimated to comprise at least 1.7 to 1.8 million birds. C ormorants have caused proven permanent damage to aquaculture undertakings and stocks of many wild fish species in the inland waterways and along sea coasts in many Member States of the European Union. They have also caused permanent damage to vegetation in certain geographical areas and the risk of serious damage increases disproportionately the closer the cormorant population in a given region approaches the carrying capacity of the region’s large bodies of water, thus at the same time greatly reducing the effectiveness of local protective measures.
In this context, MEPs suggest that, by means of systematic monitoring of cormorant populations supported by the EU and the Member States, a reliable, generally recognised and annually updated database should be drawn up on the development, size and geographical distribution of cormorant populations in Europe. They call on the Commission to put out to tender, and finance, a scientific project aimed at supplying an estimation model for the size and structure of the total cormorant population on the basis of currently available data on breeding population, fertility and mortality.
The Commission and the Member States are called upon to foster in an appropriate manner the creation of suitable conditions for bilateral and multilateral scientific and administrative exchanges, both within the EU and with third countries.
The Commission is also called upon to submit a cormorant population management plan in several stages, seeking to integrate cormorant populations into the environment as developed and cultivated by man in the long term without jeopardising the objectives of the Wild Birds Directive and Natura 2000 as regards fish species and marine and freshwater ecosystems. MEPs urge the Commission, in the interests of greater legal certainty and uniform interpretation, to provide without delay a clear definition of the term ‘serious damage’ as used in Article 9(1)(a), third indent, of the Wild Birds Directive ( The Wild Birds Directive (79/409/EEC) of 2 April 1979 ). The Commission should also produce more generalised guidance on the nature of the derogations allowed under Article 9(1) of the Wild Birds Directive, including further clarification of the terminology where any ambiguity may exist.
The Commission and the Member States are also called to:
promote the sustainable management of cormorant populations by means of increased scientific and administrative coordination, cooperation and communication, and to create appropriate conditions for the drafting of a Europe-wide cormorant population management plan; make some of the funds earmarked in the EU budget for data collection in the fisheries sector, in particular under heading 11 07 02: ‘Support for the management of fishery resources (improvement of scientific advice)’, available for investigations, analyses and forecasts of the cormorant population on the territory of the European Union, in preparation for the future regular monitoring of these species.
Lastly, MEPs called on the Commission to consider all the legal means at its disposal to reduce the negative effects of cormorant populations on fishing and aquaculture and to propose solutions to the cormorant problem in this context.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)401
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0583/2008
- Debate in Council: 2904
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0434/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0434/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE414.240
- Committee draft report: PE409.389
- Committee draft report: PE409.389
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE414.240
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0434/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)401
Votes
Rapport Kindermann A6-0434/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
20 |
2008/2177(INI)
2008/10/13
PECH
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. having regard to the proven and sustained damage
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to set up a working party with a binding mandate to carry out within one year a systematic study of the stakeholders’ positions and arguments for and against a pan-European cormorant management plan, to assess their plausibility on the basis of logical and scientific criteria and to submit a recommendation; the composition of the working party should reflect the degree to which the stakeholders are affected;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Urges the Commission, in the interest of better legal certainty and uniform interpretation, to provide without delay a clear
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission also to produce more generalised guidance on the nature of the derogations allowed under Article 9(1) of the Wild Birds Directive, including further clarification of the terminology where any ambiguity may be deemed to exist;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Urges the Commission and the Member States to promote the sustainable management of cormorant populations by means of increased scientific and administrative coordination, cooperation and communication, and to create appropriate conditions for the drafting of a Europe-wide cormorant population m
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Emphasises that the cormorant population could only be reduced by means of drastic measures which are likely to provoke wide-ranging public opposition, given that the cormorant is not only a resilient, but also a popular species; states, therefore, its preference for measures designed to prevent the cormorant population from growing any further, for example by reducing breeding rates and preventing the establishment of new colonies; calls for genuine, fair financial compensation for fishermen and fish farmers who are suffering losses as a result of existing or growing cormorant populations; calls for regular assessments of the measures and of the losses suffered by fishermen and fish farmers;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to consider all the legal means at its disposal to reduce the negative effects of eco
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission and the Member States,
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Ca (new) Ca. whereas, moreover, in many EU Member States these birds have caused proven permanent damage to vegetation in certain geographical areas,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the cormorant is a resilient species whose numbers have quickly recovered in several countries following the ending of intensive persecution; whereas, moreover, the cormorant is a species which appeals to the imagination,
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the sub-species of the cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis (
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Proposes that, by means of systematic monitoring of cormorant populations supported by the EU and the Member States, a reliable, generally recognised and annually updated database be drawn up on the development, size and geographical distribution of cormorant populations in Europe, with closer involvement on the part of fishery research institutes and fishery authorities;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Proposes that, by means of systematic monitoring of cormorant populations
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission and the
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to carry out a comparative study of the
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to set up a working party with a binding mandate to
source: PE-414.240
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52-p4
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.389New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE409.389 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.240New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE414.240 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0434_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0434_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-434&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0434_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-434&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0434_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-583New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0583_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
PECH/6/62797New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|