Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | RIES Frédérique ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 559 votes to 22, with 8 abstentions, a resolution on health concerns associated with electromagnetic fields (EMFs).
The resolution recalls that wireless technology (mobile phones, Wi-Fi/WiMAX, Bluetooth, DECT landline telephones) emits EMFs that may have adverse effects on human health. Most European citizens, especially young people aged from 10 to 20, use a mobile phone, while there are continuing uncertainties about the possible health risks, particularly to young people whose brains are still developing.
The dispute within the scientific community regarding the potential health risks arising from EMFs has intensified since 12 July 1999, when exposure limits for fields in the 0 Hz to 300 GHz range were laid down in Recommendation 1999/519/EC. Among the scientific projects arousing both interest and controversy is the Interphone epidemiological study, financed by an EU contribution of EUR 3.8 million, primarily under the Fifth Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, the findings of which have been awaited since 2006. The purpose is to establish whether there is a link between use of mobile phones and certain types of cancer, including brain, auditory nerve, and parotid gland tumours.
Reviewing the European standards for EMFs : the Commission is called upon to review the scientific basis and adequacy of the EMF limits as laid down in Recommendation 1999/519/EC and report to the Parliament. MEPs call for particular consideration of biological effects when assessing the potential health impact of electromagnetic radiation and for active research to address potential health problems by developing solutions that negate or reduce the pulsating and amplitude modulation of the frequencies used for transmission.
As well as, or as an alternative to, amending European EMFs limits, the Commission, working in coordination with experts from Member States and the industries concerned, should draw up a guide to available technology options serving to reduce exposure to EMFs.
Placement of masts and transmitters : the resolution calls for optimal placement of masts and transmitters. It calls for the sharing of masts and transmitters placed in this way by providers so as to limit the proliferation of poorly positioned masts and transmitters. Moreover, MEPs urge the authorities responsible for authorising the placement of mobile telephony antennas to reach agreement, jointly with the operators in that sector, on the sharing of infrastructure, in order to reduce the volume thereof.
Member States and local and regional authorities are called upon to create a one-stop shop for authorisation to install antennas and repeaters, and to include among their urban development plans a regional antenna plan.
Keeping certain establishments clear : MEPs consider that it is in the general interest to encourage solutions based on negotiations involving industry stakeholders, public authorities, military authorities and residents’ associations to determine the criteria for setting up new GSM antennas or high-voltage power lines. In this context, it is important to ensure at least that schools, crèches, retirement homes, and health care institutions are kept clear, within a specific distance determined by scientific criteria, of facilities of this type.
Research : MEPs stress the need to increase research and development (R&D) funding for the evaluation of potential long-term adverse effects of mobile telephony radio frequencies. The Commission is called upon to launch, during the 2009-2014 parliamentary term, an ambitious programme to gauge the electromagnetic compatibility between waves created artificially and those emitted naturally by the living human body, with a view to determining whether microwaves might ultimately have undesirable consequences for human health.
The Parliament proposes that the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE) be given the additional task of assessing scientific integrity in order to help the Commission forestall possible cases of risk, conflict of interests, or even fraud that might arise now that competition for researchers has become keener.
Interphone : the Parliament deplores the fact that, as a result of repeated postponements since 2006, the findings of the Interphone study have yet to be published. MEPs consider that it is up to the Commission to ask those in charge of the project why no definitive findings have been published and, should it receive an answer, to inform Parliament and the Member States without delay.
Overcoming the lack of information : MEPs call on the Member States to make available to the public, maps showing exposure to high-voltage power lines, radio frequencies and microwaves, and especially those generated by telecommunications masts, radio repeaters and telephone antennas. That information should be published on the internet.
MEPs also suggest to the Commission, to make for efficiency in policy and budget terms, that the Community funding earmarked for studies on EMFs be partly switched to finance a wide-ranging awareness campaign to familiarise young Europeans with good mobile phone techniques, such as the use of hands-free kits, keeping calls short, switching off phones when not in use (such as when in classes) and using phones in areas that have good reception.
The Commission is called upon to present a yearly report on the level of electromagnetic radiation in the EU, its sources, and actions taken in the EU to better protect human health and the environment.
Reducing exposure of local residents : the resolution encourages the introduction of a single standard designed to ensure that local residents would be subjected to as low a degree of exposure as possible when high-voltage grids were being extended. It also calls on the Member States to follow the example of Sweden and to recognise persons that suffer from electrohypersensitivity as being disabled so as to grant them adequate protection as well as equal opportunities.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Frédérique RIES (ALDE, BE) on health concerns associated with electromagnetic fields (EMFs).
The report recalls that wireless technology (mobile phones, Wi-Fi/WiMAX, Bluetooth, DECT landline telephones) emits EMFs that may have adverse effects on human health.
The dispute within the scientific community regarding the potential health risks arising from EMFs has intensified since 12 July 1999, when exposure limits for fields in the 0 Hz to 300 GHz range were laid down in Recommendation 1999/519/EC. Among the scientific projects arousing both interest and controversy is the Interphone epidemiological study, financed by an EU contribution of EUR 3 800 000, primarily under the Fifth Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, the findings of which have been awaited since 2006. The purpose is to establish whether there is a link between use of mobile phones and certain types of cancer, including brain, auditory nerve, and parotid gland tumours.
The European Commission is called upon to review the scientific basis and adequacy of the EMF limits as laid down in Recommendation 1999/519/EC and report to the Parliament. MEPs call for particular consideration of biological effects when assessing the potential health impact of electromagnetic radiation and for active research to address potential health problems by developing solutions that negate or reduce the pulsating and amplitude modulation of the frequencies used for transmission.
As well as, or as an alternative to, amending European EMFs limits , the Commission, working in coordination with experts from Member States and the industries concerned, should draw up a guide to available technology options serving to reduce exposure to EMFs.
The committee calls on the Member States and local and regional authorities to create a one-stop shop for authorisation to install antennas and repeaters, and to include among their urban development plans a regional antenna plan .
MEPs consider that it is in the general interest to encourage solutions based on negotiations involving industry stakeholders, public authorities, military authorities and residents’ associations to determine the criteria for setting up new GSM antennas or high-voltage power lines. In this context, it is important to ensure at least that schools, crèches, retirement homes, and health care institutions are kept clear, within a specific distance determined by scientific criteria, of facilities of this type.
The committee deplores the fact that, as a result of repeated postponements since 2006, the findings of the Interphone study have yet to be published. MEPs consider that it is up to the Commission to ask those in charge of the project why no definitive findings have been published and, should it receive an answer, to inform Parliament and the Member States without delay.
MEPs also stress the need to:
make available to the public, maps showing exposure to high-voltage power lines, radio frequencies and microwaves and to publish this information on the internet; finance a wide-ranging awareness campaign to familiarise young Europeans with good mobile phone techniques; increase research and development (R&D) funding for the evaluation of potential long-term adverse effects of mobile telephony radio frequencies; launch, during the 2009-2014 parliamentary term, an ambitious programme to gauge the electromagnetic compatibility between waves created artificially and those emitted naturally by the living human body; work with all relevant stakeholders (such as national experts, non-governmental organisations and industrial sectors) to improve the availability of, and access to, up-to-date information understandable to non-specialists on wireless technology and protection standards.
The committee proposes that the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE) be given the additional task of assessing scientific integrity in order to help the Commission forestall possible cases of risk, conflict of interests, or even fraud that might arise now that competition for researchers has become keener.
The report encourages the introduction of a single standard designed to ensure that local residents would be subjected to as low a degree of exposure as possible when high-voltage grids were being extended. It also calls on the Member States to follow the example of Sweden and to recognise persons that suffer from electrohypersensitivity as being disabled so as to grant them adequate protection as well as equal opportunities.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3508
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0216/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0089/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0089/2009
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE418.284
- Committee draft report: PE416.575
- Committee draft report: PE416.575
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE418.284
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0089/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3508
Activities
- Gérard ONESTA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Véronique MATHIEU HOUILLON
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport RIES A6-0089/2009 COMM. RES #
Amendments | Dossier |
47 |
2008/2211(INI)
2009/01/30
ENVI
47 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas wireless technology (mobile phones, Wi-Fi/WiMAX, Bluetooth, DECT landline telephones) is considered to be a ‘clean’ technology, but that fact cannot be treated as proof of its harmlessness to human health
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I b (new) Ib. whereas it is necessary to continue investigations into intermediate and very low frequencies so that conclusions can be drawn as to their effects on health,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I b (new) Ib. Whereas MRI has been safely used over 25 years with over 500 million patients exposed to up to 100 times the exposure limit set by the Directive without evidence of harm to workers or patients.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I c (new) Ic. Whereas the MR safety standard IEC/EN 60601-2-33 establishes limit values for electromagnetic fields which have been set so that any danger to patients and workers is excluded.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Renews its call to the Council in its above-mentioned resolution of 4 September 2008 to update its Recommendation 1999/519/EC by laying down stricter exposure limits for all devices emitting electromagnetic waves in the frequency range between
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Renews its call to the Council in its above-mentioned resolution of 4 September 2008 to update its Recommendation 1999/519/EC by laying down stricter exposure limits for all devices emitting electromagnetic waves in the frequency range between 0.1 MHz and 300 GHz, taking into account the best available techniques on the market (BAT)
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Renews its call to the Council in its above-mentioned resolution of 4 September 2008 to update its Recommendation 1999/519/EC by laying down stricter exposure limits for all devices emitting electromagnetic waves in the frequency range between 0.1 MHz and 300 GHz
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls for particular consideration of biological effects when assessing the potential health impact of electromagnetic radiation, all the more that some studies have found the most harmful effects at lowest levels; calls for active research to address potential health problems by developing solutions that negate or reduce the pulsating and amplitude modulation of the frequencies used for transmission;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Maintains that as well as, or as an alternative to, amending European standards along the above lines, the Commission, working in coordination with experts from Member States and the industries concerned (electricity companies, telephone operators and manufacturers of electrical appliances including mobile phones), should draw up a guide to available technology options serving to reduce exposure to electromagnetic waves;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas wireless technology (mobile phones, Wi-Fi/WiMAX, Bluetooth, DECT landline telephones)
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that industry stakeholders can already influence certain factors, for example the distance between a given site and the transmitters, the height of the site in relation to the height of the base station, or the direction of a transmitting antenna in relation to living environments, and, indeed, should obviously do so in order to reassure, and afford better protection to, the people living close to such facilities;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that industry stakeholders can already influence certain factors, for example the distance between a given site and the transmitters, the height of the site in relation to the height of the base station,
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that industry stakeholders as well as relevant infrastructure managers and competent authorities can already influence certain factors, for example setting provisions with regards to the distance between a given site and the transmitters, the height of the site in relation to the height of the base station,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Invites the Member States and local and regional authorities to create a one-stop shop for authorisation to install antennas and repeaters, and to include among their urban development plans a regional antenna plan; such plans should, in particular, serve to regulate and pinpoint appropriate sites for the installation of antennas and repeaters, with a view to keeping those sources of electromagnetic waves as far away as possible from population centres and, above all, to preventing their installation close to sites in which vulnerable persons spend long periods of time, such as schools, hospitals and rest homes, etc.;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Urges the authorities responsible for authorising the siting of mobile telephony antennas to reach agreement, jointly with the operators in that sector, on the sharing of infrastructure, in order to reduce the volume thereof and the exposure of the public to electromagnetic fields;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers that, given the increasing numbers of legal actions and, for that matter, measures by public authorities having the effect of a moratorium, it is in the general interest to encourage solutions based on negotiations involving industry
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers that,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers that, given the increasing numbers of legal actions and, for that matter, measures by public authorities having the effect of a moratorium, it is in the general interest to encourage solutions based on negotiations involving industry stakeholders, public authorities, and residents’ associations
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers that, given the increasing numbers of legal actions and, for that matter, measures by public authorities having the effect of a moratorium, it is in the general interest to encourage solutions based on negotiations involving industry stakeholders, public authorities, and residents’ associations to determine the criteria for setting up new GSM antennas or high-voltage power lines, and to ensure at least that schools, crèches, rest homes, domestic homes and health care institutions are kept clear, within a reasonable distance, of facilities of this type;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas most European citizens, especially young people aged from 10 to
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers that, given the increasing numbers of legal actions and
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Proposes that the Commission consider the possibility of using funding from the Trans-European Energy Networks to investigate the effects of electromagnetic waves at very low frequencies, and particularly in electrical power lines,
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to present a yearly report on the level of electromagnetic radiation in the EU, its sources, and actions taken in the EU to better protect human health and the environment;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to find a solution enabling Directive 2004/40/EC to be implemented more rapidly and thus ensure that workers are properly protected against electromagnetic fields, just as they are already protected under two other Community acts against noise and vibration; Calls in that respect for an updating of the Directive on the exposure of workers in contact with medical imaging technologies, based on the findings of the latest studies and the opinion of the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly-Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR).
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to find a solution enabling Directive 2004/40/EC to be implemented more rapidly and thus ensure that workers are properly protected against electromagnetic fields, just as they are already protected under two other Community acts against noise and vibration and to introduce a derogation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging under Article 1 of that Directive.
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to fund research into the effect of electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, in particular on bees;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Draws attention in this context to the appeal for caution from the coordinator of the Interphone study, Elisabeth Cardis, who, in the light of existing knowledge, recommends, as far as children are concerned, that mobile and cordless phones should not be used beyond reasonable limits and that corded landlines should be preferred;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Also suggests to the Commission, to make for efficiency in policy and budget terms, that the Community funding earmarked for studies on electromagnetic fields be switched to finance a wide- ranging awareness campaign to familiarise young Europeans with good mobile phone techniques, such as the use of hands-free kits, keeping calls short, not carrying phones on their person, switching off phones when not in use (such as when in classes) and using phones in areas that have good reception;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Also suggests to the Commission, to make for efficiency in policy and budget terms, that the Community funding earmarked for studies on electromagnetic fields be partly switched to finance a wide- ranging awareness campaign to familiarise young Europeans with good mobile phone techniques, such as
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas most European citizens, especially young people aged from 10 to 20,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Such awareness-raising campaigns should also familiarise young Europeans with the health risks associated with household devices and the importance of switching off devices rather than leaving them on stand-by;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to increase R&D funding for the evaluation of potential long-term adverse effects of mobile telephony radio frequencies; Calls also for an increase in public calls for proposals for investigation of the harmful effects of multiple exposure to different sources of electromagnetic waves, particularly where children are concerned;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Calls on the Commission, in line with energy efficiency standards for electrical and electronic appliances, to propose a ban on the stand-by mode for new equipment;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection and the WHO to be more transparent and open to dialogue with all stakeholders in standard setting;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Condemns certain particularly aggressive marketing campaigns by telephone operators in the run-up to Christmas and other special occasions, including for example the sale of mobile phones designed solely for children or free call time packages aimed at teenagers;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls, given its constant concern to improve consumer information, for the CENELEC technical standards to be amended with a view to imposing more stringent standards and labelling requirements whereby the transmitting power would have to be specified and every wireless-operated device accompanied by an indication that it emitted microwaves and whether it was harmful to pregnant women and children;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on Member States to follow the example of Sweden and to recognize persons that suffer from electrohypersensitivity as being disabled so as to grant them adequate protection as well as equal opportunities;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas most European citizens, especially young people aged from 10 to 20, use a mobile phone, an object serving a
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas most European citizens,
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas the Special Eurobarometer report on Electromagnetic Fields (No 272a of June 2007) indicates that the majority of citizens do not feel that the public authorities inform them adequately on measures to protect them from electromagnetic fields,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. Whereas the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) must not be threatened by Directive 2004/40/EC as MRI technology is at the cutting edge of research, diagnosis and treatment of life- threatening diseases for patients in Europe,
source: PE-418.284
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.575New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.575 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.284New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE418.284 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0089_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0089_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090401&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090401&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-89&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0089_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-89&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0089_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-216New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0216_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/6/65496New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|