Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | NAPOLETANO Pasqualina ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | ARIF Kader ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | AFCO | MÉNDEZ DE VIGO Íñigo ( PPE-DE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted, by 521 votes to 44 with 13 abstentions, a resolution on the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean.
The resolution considers that this process, adopted by the Heads of State and Government at the Summit for the Mediterranean held in Paris on 13 July 2008, contributes towards peace and prosperity and that it will constitute a step towards economic and regional integration as well as ecological and climatic cooperation between the Mediterranean countries. Plenary expresses its concern for the recrudescence of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict which has already affected the political dialogue among the partners of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership. Parliament hopes that the cooperation will gather pace again as soon as possible, making its contribution to the shared goal of peace in the Middle East.
Institutional aspect of the Union of the Mediterranean : Parliament considers that the Secretariat will be able to demonstrate major potential for revitalising Euro‑Mediterranean relations thanks to its operational capacity and the political value of its composition. It agrees that, from an EU perspective, the co presidency must be compatible with the external representation of the EU in accordance with the Treaty provisions in force and hopes in this regard, on the assumption that the Treaty of Lisbon will enter into force, that the European Union will ensure consistency and continuity in its representation in the new institutions of the Union for the Mediterranean.
Clarify projects and strengthen financing : Parliament points out that the projects financed within the framework of the Union for the Mediterranean should be supported by funding from the Community, from partner states and from private financing. It reiterates their support for the creation of a Euro-Mediterranean Investment Bank . Pending review of the financial perspective, MEPs state that the European Union’s share of funding for Mediterranean projects, while guaranteed, must not be to the detriment of the Euro-Mediterranean regional projects already in progress or scheduled. They hope that Parliament will be regularly updated on the stage reached in projects.
Reinforce democratic legitimacy of the Union for the Mediterranean : overall, Parliament supports the decision to bring a strong parliamentary dimension to the Union for the Mediterranean, thereby reinforcing its democratic legitimacy, however this should be further consolidated and its work better articulated with that of the other institutions of the Partnership, with the possibility being envisaged of granting it legal personality and entitling it to propose and assess economic and regional integration strategies and projects and allowing it to make recommendations to the meetings of foreign affairs ministers. It emphasises the need to include regional and local authorities in the new institutional framework as well as members of the civil society. Parliament underlines that participation in the Union for the Mediterranean does not constitute an alternative to enlargement of the EU and does not affect the accession prospects of any current or future candidate state.
Extend the scope of action : Parliament requests that all member countries of the Union for the Mediterranean are able to access the regional programmes already provided for under the Euro-Mediterranean partnership. It stresses the need for an extensive overhaul of Euro-Mediterranean policy as a whole that strengthens its political dimension . It also takes the view that the issues of peace and security, human rights and democracy, and cultural cooperation, must be addressed via the Euro-Mediterranean dimension. According to the Parliament, the Union for the Mediterranean should step up existing forms of cooperation under EuroMed in order to provide all partner countries with the chance of participating in the Union’s regional programmes and corresponding policies on the basis of priorities and objectives set by mutual agreement, pointing to the importance of extending the scope of Community programmes to include participation by partner countries, not least in the fields of education, research and professional training (student exchanges, etc.). In order to attain the ambitious objectives of the Barcelona Process, it is necessary rapidly to extend the areas of cooperation to cover water management, agriculture, food security, energy, professional training, culture, health, tourism, etc. Cooperation should also be sought in the area of energy.
Ease regional tension : Parliament hopes that the strengthening of Euro-Mediterranean relations will provide a boost to the development of an area of peace and prosperity. This aim can only be achieved through negotiated and comprehensive settlement of the conflicts in the region. Parliament believes that the EU must assume the role of leadership in the resolution of those conflicts by winning the confidence of all parties involved. Against this background, it welcomes the call made in the Marseilles Declaration to the parties concerned to endeavour to implement a process of gradual demilitarisation and disarmament of the Middle East with a view, in particular, to creating an area free of nuclear armaments and weapons of mass destruction.
Reinforcing the Human Rights aspect of the Barcelona Process : Parliament reiterates the importance of promoting human rights and the rule of law. It considers that, in order to ease tensions around the Mediterranean, intercultural and inter societal understanding among its peoples must be improved and it calls on all the parties concerned to further and promote respect for freedom of religion and belief and for minority rights and hope that a joint policy-making and institutional framework will be defined that facilitates greater mutual cooperation in the pinpointing of problems and in the search for common solutions .
Joint migration policies : Parliament calls on the different partners to inject fresh vigour into the management of joint migration policies in order to better harness human resources and exchanges between the peoples of the Mediterranean while also eschewing a ‘security-first’ approach. It considers that immigration issues must focus on the possibilities for legal migration, the combating of illegal migratory flows, on smoother integration of immigrant groups and on the exercising of the right of asylum. It highlights the importance of there being close cooperation and a spirit of joint responsibility between the Member States of the European Union and the Southern Mediterranean countries. Parliament urges the European Union and Member States to verify that human rights and fundamental freedoms are being fully respected in detention centres.
Fight poverty and reinforce exchanges : Parliament considers that all areas of cooperation should be covered. It also considers that, in order to permit the creation of a mutually beneficial Euro Mediterranean free trade area, the economic and commercial initiatives of the Union for the Mediterranean must favour the economic growth of the region, help improve its integration into the world economy and contribute to reducing the development gap between the Northern and Southern Mediterranean, whilst boosting social cohesion.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Pasqualina NAPOLETANO (PES, IT) on the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean. The committee considers that this process, adopted by the Heads of State and Government at the Summit for the Mediterranean held in Paris on 13 July 2008, contributes towards peace and prosperity and that it will constitute a step towards economic and regional integration as well as ecological and climatic cooperation between the Mediterranean countries. It points out that opening up the process to countries not involved in the partnership increases the likelihood of establishing parity in relations between the European Union and the Mediterranean partner countries and of tackling the problems of the region in a comprehensive way.
MEPs consider it necessary, however, for the strategic value of Euro-Mediterranean relations and the Barcelona Process acquis, including the involvement of civil society, to be reaffirmed in the shape of regional and sub-regional programmes and common guidelines for bilateral cooperation. MEPs call on the Council and the Commission in this respect to ensure the cohesion of European Union action, especially with regard to possible institutional developments (in particular the role of the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy as Vice-President of the Commission) and the utilisation of the Community budget.
Clarify projects and strengthen financing : MEPs point out that the projects financed within the framework of the Union for the Mediterranean should be supported by funding from the Community, from partner states and from private financing. They reiterate their support for the creation of a Euro-Mediterranean Investment Bank . Pending review of the financial perspective, MEPs state that the European Union’s share of funding for Mediterranean projects, while guaranteed, must not be to the detriment of the Euro-Mediterranean regional projects already in progress or scheduled. They hope that Parliament will be regularly updated on the stage reached in projects.
Reinforce democratic legitimacy of the Union for the Mediterranean : overall, MEPs support the decision to bring a strong parliamentary dimension to the Union for the Mediterranean, thereby reinforcing its democratic legitimacy, however this should be further consolidated and its work better articulated with that of the other institutions of the Partnership, with the possibility being envisaged of granting it legal personality and entitling it to propose and assess economic and regional integration strategies and projects and allowing it to make recommendations to the meetings of foreign affairs ministers. They emphasise the need to include regional and local authorities in the new institutional framework as well as members of the civil society.
Extend the scope of action : MEPs request that all member countries of the Union for the Mediterranean are able to access the regional programmes already provided for under the Euro-Mediterranean partnership.
They stress the need for an extensive overhaul of Euro-Mediterranean policy as a whole that strengthens its political dimension . They take the view that the issues of peace and security, human rights and democracy, and cultural cooperation, must be addressed via the Euro-Mediterranean dimension. According to MEPs, the Union for the Mediterranean should step up existing forms of cooperation under EuroMed in order to provide all partner countries with the chance of participating in the Union’s regional programmes and corresponding policies on the basis of priorities and objectives set by mutual agreement, pointing to the importance of extending the scope of Community programmes to include participation by partner countries, not least in the fields of education, research and professional training (student exchanges, etc.). In order to attain the ambitious objectives of the Barcelona Process, it is necessary rapidly to extend the areas of cooperation to cover water management, agriculture, food security, energy, professional training, culture, health, tourism, etc.
They strongly support the environmental dimension of the Barcelona Process and the related initiatives and projects, such as the new Euro-Mediterranean initiative for the de-pollution of the Mediterranean and the Mediterranean Project for Solar Energy.
Ease regional tension : MEPs hope that the strengthening of Euro-Mediterranean relations will provide a boost to the development of an area of peace and prosperity. This aim can only be achieved through negotiated and comprehensive settlement of the conflicts in the region. MEPs believe that the EU must assume the role of leadership in the resolution of those conflicts by winning the confidence of all parties involved. They stress the need to formally maintain cooperation in the field of combating international terrorism, drugs trafficking, organised crime and the trafficking of human beings and welcome the call made in the Marseilles Declaration to the parties concerned to endeavour to implement a process of gradual demilitarisation and disarmament of the Middle East with a view, in particular, to creating an area free of nuclear armaments and weapons of mass destruction.
Reinforcing the Human Rights aspect of the Barcelona Process : MEPs reiterate the importance of promoting human rights and the rule of law. They call for an assessment of what has been achieved so far and for adjustment of the instruments implemented under the partnership. They urge the Commission to set precise criteria for eligibility of those instruments, including as regards other international organisations such as the Council of Europe, and to put in place an effective system to monitor their implementation. In that connection, they call on all the parties concerned to further and promote respect for freedom of religion and belief and for minority rights and hope that a joint policy-making and institutional framework will be defined that facilitates greater mutual cooperation in the pinpointing of problems and in the search for common solutions. The Council and the Commission are called upon to enshrine the promotion of human rights and democracy in the objectives of this new initiative, to further strengthen the implementation of existing mechanisms such as the human rights clause contained in the Association agreements and the setting-up of subcommittees on human rights, and to create a mechanism for the implementation of that clause in the new generation of agreements and the ENP bilateral Action Plans. They emphasise that the instruments for promoting human rights available under the European Neighbourhood Policy must be exploited to the full, guaranteeing greater political cohesion between the European institutions.
Joint migration policies : MEPs call on the different partners to inject fresh vigour into the management of joint migration policies in order to better harness human resources and exchanges between the peoples of the Mediterranean while also eschewing a ‘security-first’ approach. They consider that immigration issues must focus on the possibilities for legal migration, the combating of illegal migratory flows, on smoother integration of immigrant groups and on the exercising of the right of asylum. They highlight the importance of there being close cooperation and a spirit of joint responsibility between the Member States of the European Union and the Southern Mediterranean countries. They note that the agreements between the European Union and Member States, of the one part, and the Mediterranean countries, of the other part, provide for cooperation measures in the field of immigration and political asylum, including the funding of immigration centres, and urge the European Union and Member States to verify that human rights and fundamental freedoms are being fully respected in those centres.
Fight poverty and reinforce exchanges : MEPs consider that, in order to permit the creation of a mutually beneficial Euro-Mediterranean free trade area, the economic and commercial initiatives of the Union for the Mediterranean must favour the economic growth of the region, help improve its integration into the world economy and contribute to reducing the development gap between the Northern and Southern Mediterranean, while boosting social cohesion. They also stress the need to encourage young people to create small businesses and believe it essential to achieve concrete and tangible targets in the social field; points out in this regard that the objective of a free trade area cannot be measured simply in terms of economic growth, but also and above all in terms of job creation; points out that youth and female unemployment is the foremost social emergency in the Mediterranean countries. They invite the Southern Mediterranean partner countries to develop south-south trade, as in the Agadir Economic Agreement signed by Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia.
This Commission working paper comprises a proposal for reinforced regional partnership on the Barcelona Process. The proposal concerns the 2009 work programme to be adopted at the 10th Euro- Mediterranean Meeting of Ministers of Foreign Affairs in Marseille, on 3-4 November 2008.
The 10th Euro-Mediterranean Foreign Ministers Meeting in Marseille will take place at a crucial time for the development of the EU's relations with the Mediterranean. The purpose of the meeting should be threefold:
to take stock of the progress made by the Partnership since the Lisbon Foreign Ministers' Meeting (5-6 November 2007), particularly in the implementation of the five-year work programme adopted at the 2005 Barcelona Summit; to discuss the future development of the Partnership, notably in the light of the 'Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean', and to agree on the institutional arrangements of the 'Barcelona Process.
Since the Euro-Med Ministerial Meeting in Lisbon (5-6 November 2007), important progress has been made in many areas of the Partnership, and regional cooperation has advanced in all four of its chapters (political dialogue; economic cooperation; cultural and human dimension; and migration, social integration, justice and security).
Most of the concrete initiatives agreed at the Lisbon Meeting have been implemented or will be before the end of 2008. Further steps need to be taken in 2009 to implement the five-year work programme in order to advance the regional integration process.
The paper details the meeting proposed for 2009 and discusses actions proposed under all four chapters.
PURPOSE: to propose a new framework for the “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean”.
CONTENT: the European Council of 13-14 March 2008 approved the principle of a Union for the Mediterranean and invited the Commission to present proposals defining the modalities of what will be called “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean”. In this context, the Commission has made an analysis of the achievements of the Barcelona process over the last 10 years and its contribution to dialogue, peace, stability and prosperity in this region. They have also taken into account the shortcomings and difficulties in this process of cooperation since 1995.
This communication sets out the Commission's proposals for developing the "Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean”. It assesses the achievements and outlines the future of the renewed processes.
Barcelona Process : assessment: the Barcelona Process has been the central instrument for Euro-Mediterranean relations since 1995. Representing a partnership of 39 governments and over 700 million people, it has provided a framework for continued engagement and development. It is also the only forum where all Mediterranean partners exchange views and engage in constructive dialogue. It represents a strong commitment to regional stability and democracy through regional cooperation and integration, and aims to build on that consensus to pursue the path to political and socio-economic reform and modernisation. However, the persistence of the conflict in the Middle East has challenged and stretched the Partnership to the limit of its abilities to preserve the channels of dialogue among all partners.
One of the main features of the Process is the institutionalised dialogue with different political and economic agents, including civil society, women’s organisations and the media.
In economic terms, the EU remains the main partner of Mediterranean countries both in trade of goods and services. Significant progress has been made towards the establishment of a Euro-Mediterranean free-trade area by 2010. Advances have been made in South- South economic integration but progress has been slow and remains below potential. Reforms are therefore needed if the EU's Mediterranean partners are to reap the potential benefits of globalisation and free trade with the EU.
Overall, the Partnership has witnessed a strong promotion of multilateral and bilateral relations, but now needs a qualitative and quantitative change, to spur investment and employment creation and optimise the use of human resources.
Scope and main objectives of the “Union for the Mediterranean” : the challenge of a new initiative is to enhance multilateral relations, increase co-ownership of the process and make it more visible to citizens. To do this, it should build on and reinforce the successful elements of the existing Barcelona Process. In this context, the elements of the original Barcelona Declaration should be retained alongside its goals (political dialogue, economic cooperation and free trade, and human, social and cultural dialogue) as well as the 5-year work programme adopted by the 2005 Barcelona Summit (migration, social integration, justice and security). The 2008 annual work programme adopted by Foreign Affairs Ministers in Lisbon in November 2007 should also be retained.
The new elements of the “Barcelona Process : Union for the Mediterranean” shall be based on a multilateral partnership , focusing on regional and trans-national projects for regional integration and cohesion. It will encompass all EU Member States and the European Commission, together with the other members and observers of the Barcelona Process (Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Jordan, Palestinian Authority, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Turkey and Albania), and the other Mediterranean coastal states (Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Monaco).
It will be complementary to the regional dimension of the EU enlargement policy. It will also be coherent and complementary with the EU- Africa Strategy.
This new initiative will give a new impulse to the Barcelona Process in at least three ways:
by upgrading the political level of the EU's relationship with its Mediterranean partners; by providing more co-ownership to our multilateral relations; by making these relations more concrete and visible through additional regional and sub-regional projects, relevant for the citizens of the region.
Upgrading of relations : the proposed decision to hold biennial summits of Heads of Government is a clear signal of the intention to upgrade the relationship. In principle, the summit meetings should take place alternately in the EU and in Mediterranean partner countries. The role of the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (EMPA) shall be confirmed as the Parliamentary dimension of the Barcelona Process.
Increased co-ownership : to build a stronger partnership, as envisaged by the Process, the establishment of a co-presidency and the setting-up of a joint secretariat have been proposed. Establishing a co-presidency would increase and improve the balance and the joint ownership of cooperation and would be compatible with the provisions on the external representation of the European Union in the Treaty of the European Union. For the first Summit (13 July 2008 in Paris), the rotating EU Presidency will hold the Presidency from the EU side. The selection of the co-president from the Mediterranean partner countries will require consensus and their mandate shall be for a period of two years. At the same time, another key instrument for enhancing co-ownership and promoting a more balanced partnership will be an improved system of institutional governance and the creation of a new secretariat. The secretariat shall perform the role of making proposals for joint initiatives to be decided by the political bodies and to ensure the necessary follow-up of project-related decisions taken at the highest level.
Projects and funding : the project dimension should be at the heart of the “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean”. The programmes developed under this initiative should promote regional cohesion and economic integration, and develop infrastructural interconnections. They should constitute visible and relevant projects for the citizens of the region (the communication lists the type of projects that could receive funding through existing instruments).
The priorities set out in the Regional Indicative Programme for the countries concerned will continue to apply and any potential EC contribution to the new regional projects will not be financed at the expense of the existing bilateral allocations under the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument or the Pre-accession Instrument. On the other hand, in order to bring added value to existing arrangements, the “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean” should be designed to mobilise additional funding for the region, mainly through regional projects. The Commission believes that additional funding for regional projects and activities should come mainly from the following sources:
private sector participation; bilateral cooperation from EU Member States; contributions from Mediterranean partners; international financial institutions, regional banks and other bilateral funds; the Euro-Mediterranean Investment and Partnership Facility (FEMIP); the ENPI (approx. € 50 million per year already programmed for the period 2007-2010).
Conclusions and next steps : the Commission invites the European Council at its meeting in June 2008 to discuss and endorse the proposals contained in this Communication. They can then become the agreed position of the EU to be put to the inaugural meeting of the “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean” planned for 13 July 2008 in Paris. The Commission will fully involve the European Parliament and the EMPA in the ongoing discussions on this new initiative.
PURPOSE: to propose a new framework for the “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean”.
CONTENT: the European Council of 13-14 March 2008 approved the principle of a Union for the Mediterranean and invited the Commission to present proposals defining the modalities of what will be called “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean”. In this context, the Commission has made an analysis of the achievements of the Barcelona process over the last 10 years and its contribution to dialogue, peace, stability and prosperity in this region. They have also taken into account the shortcomings and difficulties in this process of cooperation since 1995.
This communication sets out the Commission's proposals for developing the "Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean”. It assesses the achievements and outlines the future of the renewed processes.
Barcelona Process : assessment: the Barcelona Process has been the central instrument for Euro-Mediterranean relations since 1995. Representing a partnership of 39 governments and over 700 million people, it has provided a framework for continued engagement and development. It is also the only forum where all Mediterranean partners exchange views and engage in constructive dialogue. It represents a strong commitment to regional stability and democracy through regional cooperation and integration, and aims to build on that consensus to pursue the path to political and socio-economic reform and modernisation. However, the persistence of the conflict in the Middle East has challenged and stretched the Partnership to the limit of its abilities to preserve the channels of dialogue among all partners.
One of the main features of the Process is the institutionalised dialogue with different political and economic agents, including civil society, women’s organisations and the media.
In economic terms, the EU remains the main partner of Mediterranean countries both in trade of goods and services. Significant progress has been made towards the establishment of a Euro-Mediterranean free-trade area by 2010. Advances have been made in South- South economic integration but progress has been slow and remains below potential. Reforms are therefore needed if the EU's Mediterranean partners are to reap the potential benefits of globalisation and free trade with the EU.
Overall, the Partnership has witnessed a strong promotion of multilateral and bilateral relations, but now needs a qualitative and quantitative change, to spur investment and employment creation and optimise the use of human resources.
Scope and main objectives of the “Union for the Mediterranean” : the challenge of a new initiative is to enhance multilateral relations, increase co-ownership of the process and make it more visible to citizens. To do this, it should build on and reinforce the successful elements of the existing Barcelona Process. In this context, the elements of the original Barcelona Declaration should be retained alongside its goals (political dialogue, economic cooperation and free trade, and human, social and cultural dialogue) as well as the 5-year work programme adopted by the 2005 Barcelona Summit (migration, social integration, justice and security). The 2008 annual work programme adopted by Foreign Affairs Ministers in Lisbon in November 2007 should also be retained.
The new elements of the “Barcelona Process : Union for the Mediterranean” shall be based on a multilateral partnership , focusing on regional and trans-national projects for regional integration and cohesion. It will encompass all EU Member States and the European Commission, together with the other members and observers of the Barcelona Process (Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Jordan, Palestinian Authority, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Turkey and Albania), and the other Mediterranean coastal states (Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Monaco).
It will be complementary to the regional dimension of the EU enlargement policy. It will also be coherent and complementary with the EU- Africa Strategy.
This new initiative will give a new impulse to the Barcelona Process in at least three ways:
by upgrading the political level of the EU's relationship with its Mediterranean partners; by providing more co-ownership to our multilateral relations; by making these relations more concrete and visible through additional regional and sub-regional projects, relevant for the citizens of the region.
Upgrading of relations : the proposed decision to hold biennial summits of Heads of Government is a clear signal of the intention to upgrade the relationship. In principle, the summit meetings should take place alternately in the EU and in Mediterranean partner countries. The role of the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (EMPA) shall be confirmed as the Parliamentary dimension of the Barcelona Process.
Increased co-ownership : to build a stronger partnership, as envisaged by the Process, the establishment of a co-presidency and the setting-up of a joint secretariat have been proposed. Establishing a co-presidency would increase and improve the balance and the joint ownership of cooperation and would be compatible with the provisions on the external representation of the European Union in the Treaty of the European Union. For the first Summit (13 July 2008 in Paris), the rotating EU Presidency will hold the Presidency from the EU side. The selection of the co-president from the Mediterranean partner countries will require consensus and their mandate shall be for a period of two years. At the same time, another key instrument for enhancing co-ownership and promoting a more balanced partnership will be an improved system of institutional governance and the creation of a new secretariat. The secretariat shall perform the role of making proposals for joint initiatives to be decided by the political bodies and to ensure the necessary follow-up of project-related decisions taken at the highest level.
Projects and funding : the project dimension should be at the heart of the “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean”. The programmes developed under this initiative should promote regional cohesion and economic integration, and develop infrastructural interconnections. They should constitute visible and relevant projects for the citizens of the region (the communication lists the type of projects that could receive funding through existing instruments).
The priorities set out in the Regional Indicative Programme for the countries concerned will continue to apply and any potential EC contribution to the new regional projects will not be financed at the expense of the existing bilateral allocations under the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument or the Pre-accession Instrument. On the other hand, in order to bring added value to existing arrangements, the “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean” should be designed to mobilise additional funding for the region, mainly through regional projects. The Commission believes that additional funding for regional projects and activities should come mainly from the following sources:
private sector participation; bilateral cooperation from EU Member States; contributions from Mediterranean partners; international financial institutions, regional banks and other bilateral funds; the Euro-Mediterranean Investment and Partnership Facility (FEMIP); the ENPI (approx. € 50 million per year already programmed for the period 2007-2010).
Conclusions and next steps : the Commission invites the European Council at its meeting in June 2008 to discuss and endorse the proposals contained in this Communication. They can then become the agreed position of the EU to be put to the inaugural meeting of the “Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean” planned for 13 July 2008 in Paris. The Commission will fully involve the European Parliament and the EMPA in the ongoing discussions on this new initiative.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)1487/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0077/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0502/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0502/2008
- Committee opinion: PE414.349
- Committee opinion: PE412.166
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE414.032
- Committee opinion: PE412.192
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2499
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE412.142
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2008)0319
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2008)0319
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2008)0319 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE412.142
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2499 EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE412.192
- Committee opinion: PE412.166
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE414.032
- Committee opinion: PE414.349
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0502/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)1487/2
Activities
- Marek SIWIEC
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Pasqualina NAPOLETANO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Christopher BEAZLEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vito BONSIGNORE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Avril DOYLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- David HAMMERSTEIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie Anne ISLER BÉGUIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ioannis KASOULIDES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tunne KELAM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jamila MADEIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marios MATSAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Íñigo MÉNDEZ DE VIGO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Willy MEYER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vural ÖGER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miguel PORTAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luís QUEIRÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luca ROMAGNOLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Martine ROURE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore TATARELLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
147 |
2008/2231(INI)
2008/10/08
AFCO
27 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the experience gained in connection with the Barcelona Process to be used in order to inject new energy and vitality into relations between the European Union and its Mediterranean partners
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – introductory part 7. Considers it essential for the EMPA to be strengthened as the parliamentary dimension of the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – introductory part 7. Considers it essential for the EMPA to be strengthened as the parliamentary dimension of the Barcelona Process
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – indent 1 Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – indent 1 – that the EMPA should meet at least
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – indent 4 – that it should be mandatory for the EMPA to be consulted for its opinion on the main points and projects relating to the Barcelona Process
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – indent 5 – that the Council and Commission should be integrally associated with
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – indent 5 a (new) – that parliamentary representatives of countries which are not part of the Barcelona Process should be invited to participate;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal for the establishment of a Joint Permanent Committee, composed of permanent representatives from all EU Member States and Mediterranean partner countries, which should lead to a reinforced and more balanced governance;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Considers that the secretariat of the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean should be composed of officials seconded from the countries participating in the process and should be integrated into the departments of the Commission
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Considers that the secretariat of the Barcelona Process
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of maintaining coherent institutions and avoiding any duplication thereof, and stresses that the Barcelona Process
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Considers that the secretariat of the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean should be integrated into the departments of the Commission and that its seat must be selected
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the secretariat of the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean must be tasked to draw up and manage projects as well as to coordinate the
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the secretariat of the Barcelona Process
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that the projects financed in the framework of the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean should be supported mainly using Community funds, funds from partner states as well as private financing;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses the need to establish a Euro-Mediterranean Investment and Development Bank capable of attracting direct foreign investment for the realisation of projects responding to the needs of the citizens in the region;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls for the drawing up of an institutional framework for the Barcelona Process
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers that in parallel with the enhancement of the parliamentary dimension, a similar development is required in achieving the involvement of civil society within the appropriate institutional structure of the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers that promoting cooperation of that type can also play a positive role as regards the creation and development of other similar regional unions.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Supports the principle of co-presidency, on a basis of parity, equality and joint governance, and, on the assumption that the Treaty of Lisbon will enter into force, considers that it should be consistent with the resulting institutional framework regarding the external representation of the European Union;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Supports the principle of co-presidency and, on the assumption that the Treaty of Lisbon will enter into force, considers that it should be consistent with the resulting institutional framework; considers that the biannual summit, the Joint Permanent Committee and the meetings of senior officials are useful tools for injecting greater efficiency and transparency into the Process;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Supports the principle of co-presidency
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need for the Euro- Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (EMPA) to be given an enhanced role in the process and supports the EMPA Bureau, which in a statement issued on 12 July 2008 called for that Assembly - as a legitimate parliamentary body - to become an integral part of the Barcelona Process
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Supports the demands made by the President of the European Parliament, who called in his speech to the Summit meeting in Paris on 13 July 2008 for the EMPA to be given the right to make proposals, to exercise democratic control and to monitor
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for the EMPA to be closely involved in preparations for the biannual summit meetings of Heads of State and the annual meetings of the Foreign Ministers of the countries which are members of the Barcelona Process
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – introductory part 7. Considers it essential for the EMPA to be est
source: PE-414.187
2008/10/13
INTA
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that ownership by the population will guarantee a strong partnership and the success of this initiative; considers that, for that to happen, political aspirations must be translated into specific, more easily comprehensible projects closer to the citizens; also considers that the UFM must incorporate local and regional authorities and the private sector into the operation of its mechanisms for the consultation and active participation of civil society (associations, social partners, etc.);
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Notes that, since the 2004 and 2007 enlargements, trade between the Union’s new Member States and its Mediterranean partners has been constantly increasing; calls for this trend to be taken into account and supported in the context of the partnership;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Also stresses the need to give the UFM a genuine parliamentary dimension, based on the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (EMPA), which must be regarded as the UFM’s legitimate parliamentary expression and which, as a consultative body, should have the right to submit proposals and evaluations.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Hopes that the UFM’s projects will be specific and unifying, and that they will reflect the needs of people in the region; stresses that they must contribute to balanced and sustainable development in the region and must foster regional and sub-regional inter-connections with a view to promoting integration and cohesion;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Recalls the first initiatives proposed at the Paris Summit for the Mediterranean on 13 July 2008: de-pollution of the Mediterranean, maritime and land highways, civil protection, the Mediterranean Solar Plan, higher education and research, and the Mediterranean Business Development Initiative;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Notes that at present only one of the six proposed projects focuses on economic and commercial issues; regrets that the Paris Declaration contains very few references to the economic and commercial aspects of the partnership, such as direct foreign investments, employment, the informal economy and poverty reduction;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls that, in the second part of the 2005 five-year Work Programme, entitled ‘Sustainable Socio-Economic Development and Reform’, the Euro- Mediterranean partners identified a number of priorities: on the one hand the need for an improved business climate, increased access to credit, consolidated macro-economic stability and improved public finance management, and on the other hand the need to deal with social issues, including social protection systems, poverty reduction and job creation, particularly for young people and women;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses the need to assess and take systematically into account, the social impact of liberalisation processes, particularly in terms of food security; further stresses that this impact may vary significantly from one sector to another and from one country to another;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that the Union must boost its support for the Mediterranean partners’ programmes aimed at facilitating the creation of a favourable climate whereby investments can be increased and economic cooperation and trade enhanced by means of technical and financial assistance mechanisms for the facilitation of trade;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls for consideration to be given to establishing specialised EU agencies in the partner countries with a view to providing these countries with concrete aid in areas such as investment promotion;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Stresses the importance of the informal sector and the mass economy in the countries of the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean; considers that, in the interests of the development of the region, support must be given to progressively integrating these activities into the formal economy;
source: PE-414.225
2008/10/16
AFET
99 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Agrees with the decision to place the emphasis on a multilateral framework by pinpointing certain large-scale projects to be implemented using the new instruments under the BP:UfM; nevertheless highlights the lack of any strategies for economic or regional integration in the Mediterranean basin to support those projects and the role of local communities in this context;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Takes the view that a ‘programme agreements’ approach should be adopted to implementation of the projects, drawing on the principle of subsidiarity to clearly define the financial, managerial and supervisory responsibilities of the various institutional levels: European Union, Member States, regions
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes the declaration of the heads of State and Government that the BP:UfM demonstrates a determination to favour the development of human resources and employment in line with the Millennium Development Goals, including by alleviating poverty, and looks forward to new initiatives, programmes and financial provisions to that end;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for new and broader means of funding to be identified for projects, including from the private sector; to this end, calls on the Council and the Commission to spell out and strengthen the role and initiatives of the Facility for Euro-Mediterranean Investment and Partnership (FEMIP) in terms of the projects selected; reiterates its support for the creation of a Euro-Mediterranean Investment Bank;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for new and broader means of funding to be identified for projects, including means from the private sector; reiterates its support for the creation of a Euro
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for new and broader means of funding to be identified for projects, including from the private sector; reiterates its support for the creation of a
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for new and broader means of funding to be identified for projects, including from the private sector; reiterates its support for the creation of a Euro-Mediterranean Investment Bank; welcomes the progress made thanks to the actions of the European Investment Bank (EIB) which, with its targeted investment programme (FEMIP), is facilitating the economic opening-up and modernisation of the Mediterranean countries and creating a favourable climate for investment, and particularly private sector investment;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the proposal ‘Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean’ (BP: UfM)
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that the projects financed within the framework of the BP:UfM should be supported mainly by funding from the Community and from partner states, as well as by private financing;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for the financing and political and economic supervision of the Union for the Mediterranean to be solely a public sector concern;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Urges the Member States and the Commission to propose strategies for developing intercultural dialogue and promoting the Alliance of Civilisations, in their areas of competence, and to provide continued political support for these;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance of the remittance of savings by migrants from Southern Mediterranean countries to their countries of origin, viewing this as an excellent and to date under-used lever for development; takes the view that the future Euro-Mediterranean Bank should centre its operations around those savings, inter alia, with a view to underpinning structural development projects;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the institutional arrangements proposed for the BP:UfM, and especially introduction of the co-presidency, biennial summits, a joint permanent committee
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the institutional arrangements proposed for the BP:UfM, and especially the co-presidency, biennial
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that the institutional arrangements proposed for the BP:UfM, and especially the co-presidency, biennial summit, joint permanent committee, senior officials’ meetings and creation of a joint secretariat, help to even out responsibilities within the partnership;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the decisions on the arrangements concerning the institutional set-up of this initiative to reflect the role played by EMPA and the European Parliament as an integral part of the institutional set-up establishing a legal basis for EMPA and a formal link between the executive and parliamentary branches of BP:UfM;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the decisions on the
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the proposal ‘Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean’ (BP:UfM), adopted by the Heads of State and Government at the Summit for the Mediterranean that took place in Paris on 13 July 2008 at the invitation of France and Egypt, constitutes a step towards economic and regional integration as well as cooperation in ecological and climate- related matters between the Mediterranean countries; welcomes the opening-up to countries not involved in the partnership and the objective of establishing parity relations between the European Union and the Mediterranean partner countries;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the decisions on the arrangements concerning the institutional set-up of this initiative to reflect the role played by EMPA and the European Parliament; invites the EMPA to involve civil society in the Northern and Southern Mediterranean countries more closely in its work;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the recognition of EMPA as the legitimate parliamentary expression of the BP:UfM; calls for EMPA’s role to be strengthened by
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the recognition of EMPA as the legitimate parliamentary expression of the BP:UfM; calls for EMPA’s role to be strengthened by entitling it to propose and assess
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Regards the EMPA as the most appropriate forum for transparent dialogue on human rights, democracy and cultural issues; considers that there needs to be a periodic evaluation of the progress achieved, and therefore welcomes the fact that the European Parliament presidency has made it a priority to have discussions in the plenary of the EMPA and for an annual report to be drafted on the human rights situation in the Euro-Med area; supports the dialogue between civilisations and encourages the upgrading of links between EMPA and the Anna Lindh Foundation, including the organisation of meetings between leading networks of the Anna Lindh foundation and the EMPA Culture Committee;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that one of the weakest points of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership has been the lack of awareness of public opinion and the absence of involvement of local communities in the development of the process; therefore calls for further and more effective efforts to enhance the visibility of the BP:UfM, improve people- to-people contacts and increase the participation of local communities and civil society organisations in the definition and adoption of the proposed projects;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Requests that civil society, local authorities and the social partners be fully involved in revitalising the Euro-Mediterranean partnership within the framework of the BP:UfM, not least through mechanisms to ensure they are consulted on the selection, implementation and monitoring of projects;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Highlights the fact that some of the countries participating in the BP:UfM
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Highlights the fact that some of the countries participating in the BP:UfM are not part of the Barcelona Process; calls on the Council, the Commission and all the States participating in the BP:UfM to maintain, in this connection, a cohesive framework of relations in which it is clear that the Union for the Mediterranean is an expression of that partnership process and that its purpose is political, economic and
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Highlights the fact that some of the countries participating in the BP:UfM are not part of the Barcelona Process; calls on the Council, the Commission and all the States participating in the BP:UfM to maintain, in this connection, a cohesive framework of relations in which it is clear that the Union for the Mediterranean is an expression of that partnership process and that its purpose is economic and regional integration between the countries of the Mediterranean basin; takes the view that the inclusion of all the Mediterranean countries in the BP:UfM provides the opportunity to deal with the problems of the region in a more comprehensive manner and to link and coordinate the process with already existing programmes such as the UNEP Mediterranean Action Plan in a more effective way;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Highlights the fact that some of the countries participating in the BP:UfM are not part of the Barcelona Process; calls on the Council, the Commission and all the States participating in the BP:UfM to
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the proposal ‘Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean’ (BP:UfM), adopted by the Heads of State and Government at the Summit for the Mediterranean that took place in Paris on 13 July 2008, is an instrument for peace and prosperity and constitutes a step towards economic and regional integration between the Mediterranean countries; welcomes the opening-up to countries not involved in the partnership and the objective of establishing parity relations between the European Union and the Mediterranean partner countries;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Underlines that the BP:UfM is a process that is parallel to, and distinct from, the accession negotiations currently under discussion in the EU;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Urges that, in line with the Paris Declaration, the presence of the Arab League at meetings of the BP:UfM should not endlessly be called into question, and hence be allowed to make an active contribution to discussions and to the peace process;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Takes the view that the BP:UfM should step up existing forms of cooperation under EuroMed in order to provide all partner countries with the chance of participating in the Union’s regional programmes and corresponding policies on the basis of priorities and objectives set by mutual agreement, pointing to the importance of extending and intensifying the scope of Community programmes to include participation by partner countries, not least in the fields of education, research and professional training (student exchanges, etc.);
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that the issues of peace and security, human rights and democracy, and cultural cooperation, must be addressed via the Euro-Mediterranean dimension; underlines that the Union for the Mediterranean is an expression of that dimension and that its role is to address regional, infrastructural and environmental issues by means of strategic plans and
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Emphasises that peace and political stability in the Mediterranean are crucial for collective and individual security far beyond its shores;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Condemns the State of Israel’s constant violations of international law and political undertakings, including specifically the Annapolis Agreement; deplores the upgraded status the EU has granted the State of Israel under the preferential economic association agreement;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Regrets the fact that, although the European Union and its Member States are the main donors of aid to Palestine, that aid will not solve the root cause of the conflict without a genuine political commitment from the EU;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Regrets that the process of the decolonisation of Western Sahara has still not been completed; calls on the Council and the Commission to make settlement of that conflict a priority of the Union for the Mediterranean; calls on the Council and the Commission to work within that framework towards holding a referendum on self-determination for Western Sahara, as called for in numerous United Nations resolutions;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 d (new) 12d. Condemns the role played in that situation by Morocco, as the occupying power in the terms of UN Security Council Resolutions No 3437(1979) and No 3519(1980); condemns the constant human rights violations committed against social activists within Morocco; deplores, in that respect, the fact that the EU has granted the Kingdom of Morocco advanced status;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Strongly supports the environmental dimension of the BP:UfM and the related initiatives and projects, such as the new Euro-Mediterranean initiative for the de- pollution of the Mediterranean and the Mediterranean Project for Solar Energy;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the proposal ‘Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean’ (BP:UfM), adopted by the Heads of State and Government at the Summit for the Mediterranean that took place in Paris on 13 July 2008, constitutes a step towards economic and regional integration between the Mediterranean countries, based on equality of treatment, solidarity, dialogue and respect for the specific characteristics of each country; welcomes the opening-up to countries not involved in the partnership and the objective of establishing parity relations between the European Union and the Mediterranean partner countries;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Hopes that the strengthening of Euro-
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Considers that in order to ease tensions around the Mediterranean, intercultural and inter-societal understanding among its peoples must be improved, and that the Alliance of Civilisations must therefore be supported as a prime forum for dialogue contributing to stabilisation of the region;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Points out the need for greater involvement and permanent engagement of the EU, within the context of cooperation with its Mediterranean partners, in the search for solutions to the different conflicts which prevail in the region; considers that the EU must assume the role of leadership in the resolution of these conflicts by winning the confidence of all parties involved;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Welcomes the recent positive developments in the Middle East in the aftermath of the Annapolis Conference, namely the relaunch of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations on all issues with the aim of reaching a peace agreement by the end of 2008, the achievement of an Egyptian-brokered truce in Gaza, the initiation of talks between Israel and Syria under the auspices of Turkey, the establishment of diplomatic relations between Lebanon and Syria, and Egyptian leadership in achieving a truce in Gaza; emphasises that the settlement of these conflicts is a sine qua non for the success of the BP:UfM and that the EU should play an active mediation role in the peace process as the biggest donor; urges both Israel and the Palestinian Territories to take the necessary measures to facilitate the peace process, the most urgent of these being a cessation of further settlement development, discontinuance of rocket attacks and normalisation of the situation in Gaza;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Reiterates the importance of promoting human rights and the rule of law; in that connection, calls on all the parties concerned by the initiative to further and promote respect for religious freedom for all, and in particular for their respective religious minorities, with reference to the principle of reciprocity; calls for an assessment of what has been achieved so far and for adjustment of the instruments implemented under the partnership, including as regards other international organisations such as the Council of
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Reiterates the importance of promoting human rights and the rule of law; notes that there are still very serious violations, especially in the areas of freedom of religion, freedom of speech and discrimination against women; calls for an assessment of what has been achieved so far and for adjustment of the instruments implemented under the partnership, including as regards other international organisations such as the Council of Europe;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Reiterates the importance of promoting human rights and the rule of law; calls for an assessment of what has been achieved
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Reiterates the importance of promoting human rights and the rule of law; calls for an assessment of what has been achieved so far and for adjustment of the instruments implemented under the partnership, including as regards other international organisations
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Therefore calls on the Council and the Commission to clearly enshrine the promotion of human rights and democracy in the objectives of this new initiative, to further strengthen the implementation of existing mechanisms such as the human rights clause contained in the Association Agreements and to promote the creation of a mechanism for the implementation of that clause in the new generation of agreements, the ENP bilateral Action Plans and the setting-up of sub- committees on human rights;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the proposal ‘Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean’ (BP:UfM), adopted by the Heads of State and Government at the Summit for the Mediterranean that took place in Paris on 13 July 2008, constitutes a step towards economic and regional integration between the Mediterranean countries; welcomes the opening-up to countries not involved in the partnership and the objective of establishing parity relations between the European Union and the Mediterranean partner countries; points out, however, that continuation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may threaten achievement of several of the goals set out in this resolution, and therefore urges the parties directly and indirectly involved to redouble their efforts and display genuine political will to put an end to that conflict by securing a just and lasting peace;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Calls, moreover, for the setting-up of a Euro-Mediterranean Court of Human Rights giving all citizens of countries that have signed the Barcelona Declaration the right to lodge complaints in cases of human rights violations;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Expresses
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Expresses its concern at the prevailing tendency among Member State governments to adopt a ‘security-first’ approach in Mediterranean policies
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Notes that the agreements between the Member States of the European Union, of the one part, and the Mediterranean countries, of the other part, provide for cooperation measures in the field of immigration and political asylum, including the funding of immigration centres, as in the case of Italy and Libya, and urges the Union and the Member States to verify that human rights and fundamental freedoms are being fully respected in those centres;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Welcomes the proposal, contained in the Final Declaration of the Presidency of the Fourth Plenary Session, for the creation of a Euro-Mediterranean Energy Community supported by the EMPA; recognises the importance of strengthening cooperation in the field of energy between Euro-Mediterranean partners and the need to develop a regional energy market, with a view to the implementation of large-scale renewable energy and energy infrastructure projects in the Euro-Med region;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Believes it essential to achieve concrete and tangible targets in the social field; points out in this regard that the
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the fact that the Union for the Mediterranean has been promoted within the framework of the EU institutions;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Stresses the need formally to continue cooperation in combating international terrorism, drugs trafficking, organised crime and the trafficking of human beings;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Considers that, in parallel with the enhancement of the parliamentary dimension, a similar development is required with a view to involving civil society in the appropriate institutional structure of the BP:UfM;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Invites the partner Southern Mediterranean countries to develop south-south trade, following the example of the Agadir Economic Agreement signed by Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia, and stresses that the European Union institutions must respond positively to requests for technical support to promote such south-south economic integration;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the EU is and should continue to be committed to the fulfilment of the UN Millennium Development Goals,
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas participation in the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean does not constitute an alternative to enlargement of the EU and does not affect the accession prospects of any current or future candidate state,
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the widening economic, political and cultural gap between the two sides of the Mediterranean is liable to set back the objective of creating an area of peace, security and shared prosperity free of military bases and resulting in regional disarmament and cuts in military expenditure,
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the widening economic, political and cultural gap between the two sides, north and south, of the Mediterranean is liable to set back the objective of creating an area of peace, security and shared prosperity,
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas there is a need for an extensive and results-oriented overhaul of the relations between the European Union and the Mediterranean partner countries, which should start by capitalising on the work already done but also address the limitations and the shortfalls of the policies implemented to date and in particular the disappointing track record of the Barcelona Process,
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas there is a need for an extensive overhaul and deepening of the relations between the European Union and the Mediterranean partner countries, which should start by attaching value to equality between all partners and by capitalising on the work already done but also address the limitations of the policies implemented to date and in particular the disappointing track record of the Barcelona Process,
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Agrees with the decision to place the emphasis on a multilateral framework by pinpointing certain large-scale projects
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas there is a need for an extensive overhaul of the relations between the European Union and the Mediterranean partner countries, which should start by capitalising on the work already done but should also address the limitations of the policies implemented to date and in particular the disappointing track record of the Barcelona Process,
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the analysis of the achievements and shortcomings of the Barcelona Process should be duly taken into consideration so as to enable Euro-Mediterranean relations to be revisited in an efficient way and to give a new impetus to the Barcelona Process; whereas it is important in this regard to address the difficulties encountered in the development of cooperation and in the deepening of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership, such as the persistence of the conflict in the Middle East and serious political tensions in the region (as in the case of Western Sahara), the lack of progress in the field of democracy and human rights and the lack of public awareness of the process,
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the neighbourhood policy conducted with the Mediterranean countries has its limitations and, by placing the emphasis on bilateral relations, is proving to be lacking in balance and unable to contribute to a shared process of significant reform in the region,
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the neighbourhood policy conducted with the Mediterranean countries has its limitations and, by placing the emphasis on bilateral relations, is proving unable to contribute to a shared process of significant
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the 27 EU Member States, the Commission, the League of Arab States, and other Mediterranean states are part of the Group of Friends of the Alliance of Civilisations;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas there is a need to establish relations
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas since the launching of the Barcelona Process no substantial progress has been made in some of the partner countries as regards adherence to, and respect for, some of the common values and principles highlighted in the 1995 Barcelona Declaration to which they subscribed, especially as regards democracy, human rights and the rule of law,
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas there is a need to promote democratic, regional and economic integration between the countries of the Mediterranean basin,
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas there is a need to promote regional and economic integration between the countries of the Mediterranean basin,
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas there is a need to promote regional and economic integration between the countries of the Mediterranean basin; whereas genuine regional and economic integration can only be achieved if concrete progress is made as regards the settlement of the existing conflicts,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Agrees with the decision to place the emphasis on a multilateral framework by pinpointing certain large-scale projects to be implemented using the new instruments under the BP:UfM and based on the principle of variable geometry in its selection process and its implementation phase; nevertheless highlights the lack of any strategies for economic or regional integration in the Mediterranean
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas closer relations between the EU and the countries of the Mediterranean have led to a significant increase in trade between those countries (primarily via airports, ports and motorways) without, however, the necessary upgrading and modernisation of the corresponding infrastructure,
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the Heads of State and of Government recognised in the Declaration of the Paris Summit for the Mediterranean that the EMPA will be the legitimate parliamentary expression of the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean, declaring at the same time their strong support for the strengthening of the role of the EMPA in its relations with Mediterranean partners,
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. emphasising the importance of the role played by EMPA, which is the only parliamentary assembly enabling dialogue and cooperation in the Euro-Mediterranean area to bring together the 27 EU Member States and all the parties connected with the Middle East peace process,
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas it is important to ensure the involvement of local and regional authorities
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas it is important to ensure the involvement of local authorities, the social partners
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas it is important to ensure the involvement of the social partners and civil society in revitalising Euro-Mediterranean relations,
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. emphasising the need for a speedy and peaceful resolution of all conflicts involving Mediterranean countries and realising the importance of the maintenance of intercultural dialogue in this respect,
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 – having regard to the Declaration of the Paris Summit for the Mediterranean, held in Paris on 13 July 2008, as well as the conclusions of the international conferences held in Bethlehem on 21-23 May 2008 and in Berlin on 24 June 2008,
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 – having regard to the Declaration of the Bureau of the Euro
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) – having regard to the priorities for the European Parliament Presidency of the EMPA (March 2008 - March 2009),
source: PE-414.032
2008/11/11
FEMM
9 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on all States taking part in the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean to ratify both the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and all other United Nations and International Labour Organisation human rights instruments;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that no special consideration has been given to the situation of women in the Commission communication entitled 'Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean' and stresses that the 'projects' dimension should include the promotion of geographical, economic and social cohesion and always take into account the issue of equal opportunities for men and women and the gender perspective;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that it is essential that women from non-Community countries who have emigrated to EU Member States be granted citizenship rights, in order to ensure effective protection for the rights of women from the southern shore of the Mediterranean;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on all participants in the Barcelona Process to give special consideration to the establishment and public funding of projects to improve women's living conditions, particularly in the fields of
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on all participants in the Barcelona Process to give special consideration to the establishment and public funding of projects to improve women's living conditions, particularly
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the importance of promoting access by women to all levels of the education system, since a properly skilled workforce plays a decisive role not only in reducing gender inequalities but also in enhancing the competitiveness and social cohesion of an entire economy;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Member States and partners in the Barcelona Process to promote positive measures in the field of equal opportunities and the fight to prevent discrimination against women in all areas, with special reference to employment, family life and education, with the aim of combating violence against women and trafficking in human beings, and ensuring respect for and the promotion of the role of women in society, including by facilitating their access to positions of responsibility and decision-making positions.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that fostering women's involvement in the labour market in the Mediterranean area means developing the facilities and services required to ensure that women not only gain access to the labour market but are also able to remain in employment;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Points to the need for closer links between women's associations in the Mediterranean countries, with a view to fostering the development of civil society and the active involvement of women.
source: PE-415.212
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2499/COM_SEC(2008)2499_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2499/COM_SEC(2008)2499_EN.pdf |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AD-412192_EN.html
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-412166_EN.html
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-414349_EN.html
|
events/0/date |
Old
2008-05-20T00:00:00New
2008-05-19T00:00:00 |
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.142New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE412.142 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2499/COM_SEC(2008)2499_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2499/COM_SEC(2008)2499_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.192&secondRef=02
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.166&secondRef=02
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.032New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE414.032 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.349&secondRef=02
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0502_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0502_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16510&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090218&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090218&type=CRE |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-502&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0502_EN.html |
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0319/COM_COM(2008)0319_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0319/COM_COM(2008)0319_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-502&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0502_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-77New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0077_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/6/66775New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0319/COM_COM(2008)0319_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0319/COM_COM(2008)0319_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|