Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | HERCZOG Edit ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | PODIMATA Anni ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | CULT | TRÜPEL Helga ( Verts/ALE) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | GRAU I SEGÚ Martí ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | JURI | KARAS Othmar ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | ECON | HÖKMARK Gunnar ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | WEISGERBER Anja ( PPE-DE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The Commission presents a report on the implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe (SBA). It summarises the progress achieved in 2009, which has been the first full year of implementation of the SBA, focussing mainly on the measures contained in the SBA Action Plan and in the European Economic Recovery Plan . The report notes that both the Commission and Member States have taken substantial action to improve SMEs’ access to finance, to facilitate their access to EU and third country markets and to improve framework conditions for SMEs in particular by removing unnecessary administrative burdens.
The Commission has delivered on major actions announced in the SBA. It has adopted all five legislative proposals linked to the SBA:
· a general ‘block exemption’ regulation (GBER) adopted in July 2008 made it easier for governments to support SMEs through aid measures exempted from the notification obligation;
· the proposal on reduced VAT rates entered into force on 1 June 2009 and offers the Member States ample possibilities to boost economic activity notably in labour-intensive services.
The three other legislative proposals are still pending. The proposed recast of the late payments Directive and the proposal on a European Private Company Statute are both vitally important for the competitiveness of SMEs. The proposal on VAT invoicing aims at ensuring equal treatment of paper and electronic invoices and is estimated to have a maximum midterm reduction potential of EUR 18.4 billion if all businesses send all their invoices electronically.
Member States have also shown strong political commitment to implement the SBA, but vary as regards both the approach taken and the results achieved. Several Member States have 'transposed' the SBA as a whole into their national policy programmes.
Implementing the “Think Small First” principle : from January 2009, the Commission has systematically applied an “SME Test” to assess the impact on SMEs of all its major legislative and policy proposals. It proposed giving Member States the option of exempting micro-enterprises from accounting rules. It has also taken major steps to reach the EU target of a 25% reduction in administrative burdens set in March 2007, which particularly benefits SMEs. Reduction measures already adopted by the legislator are expected to lead to reduced costs of EUR 7.6 billion. Measures pending adoption by the Council and Parliament could add EUR 30.7 billion to that amount. All in all, the administrative burdens reduction proposed or currently under preparation by the Commission could exceed the initial target and reach 33% of the total of EUR 123.8 billion estimated burdens of EU origin.
The Commission welcomes the fact that all Member States have by now adopted national targets for reducing administrative burdens and that they are continuing to simplify the administrative environment for SMEs. For example, the average time and cost to start-up a private limited company is now 8 days (compared to 9 days in 2008) and the cost is EUR 417 (compared to EUR 463 in 2008).
Access to finance : the Commission has simplified state aid rules and has pointed clearly to the need to take better account of SMEs’ needs at Member State level. The new General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER) adopted as part of the SBA enlarges the categories of state aid covered by the exemption. Block exempted aid for SMEs amounted to EUR 2.8 billion in 2008, an increase of EUR 0.3 billion compared to 2007. The European Investment Bank (EIB) group has played a crucial role in easing SMEs’ access to finance in 2009. It has substantially increased its lending activity dedicated to SMEs from EUR 8.1 billion in 2008 to around EUR 11.5 billion in 2009. EUR 200 million has been allocated by the EIB for mezzanine finance for 2009.
The report notes the activities and contribution of the JASMINE and JEREMIE initiatives.
As a response to the financial and economic crisis, and often using the temporary framework on state aid, most Member States have also adopted policy measures to enhance SMEs’ access to liquidity, especially to bank lending, through the creation and extension of loan and guarantee schemes for SMEs. The EIB package of EUR 30 billion for loans to SMEs also allows some member countries to use a second level guarantee scheme.
Access to markets : to stimulate cross-border operations with the Single Market, the Commission and Member States jointly decided to lower the fees for EU-wide trade mark rights by 40% and to simplify the registration procedure from 1 May 2009. The Commission also increased EU financial support to EUR 2.1 million in 2009 to promote SMEs defence of their interests in the standardisation process and to improve SMEs use of European standards. As regards the external dimension, Market Access Teams have been established in 30 key export markets. The Commission is setting-up business centres in a selected number of these markets. These Centres will help EU SMEs wishing to set up and trade in these countries by providing business support services including market access assistance, finding commercial partners, logistical support and advice on issues such as protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) and standardisation.
Promoting Entrepreneurship : two major events in 2009, the First European SME Week which took place in 36 European countries and the Conference on the SBA/European Charter for small enterprises have contributed to promoting entrepreneurship among the general public, giving voice to entrepreneurs to present their career paths and providing opportunities for networking. A number of countries have anchored entrepreneurship education in their curricula
The report concludes that it remains of utmost importance to continue to implement the SBA Action Plan at all levels.
The European Parliament adopted by 536 votes to 47, with 47 abstentions, a resolution on a “Small Business Act”.
Parliament regrets that the Small Business Act (SBA) is not a legally binding instrument. considers that its truly innovative aspect is its intention to place the "Think Small First" principle at the heart of Community policies; calls on the Council and the Commission to join Parliament in the effort to establish the “Think First Principle” principle as a binding rule , in a form to be determined, in order to ensure that it is properly applied in all future Community legislation.
The resolution stresses the absolute necessity of implementing the 10 guiding principles at European, national and regional level. The Commission is called upon to further enhance the visibility and awareness of SME-related policy actions (through the bundling of existing Community instruments and funds for SMEs under a separate heading in the EU budget) and to set up a screening system for the monitoring of the progress achieved following implementation of the guiding principles.
MEPs stress the need to place particular emphasis on craft, family, micro- and individual enterprises at EU, national and regional level. They call for the acknowledgement of the specific characteristics of members of the liberal professions and note that the Commission's proposals lack a clear strategy for self-employed persons to improve their legal status and rights. They also stress that even more money should be invested in projects to endorse female entrepreneurs.
The resolution emphasises the need to develop a social and economic model that creates an appropriate security network for small and medium-sized entrepreneurs in the creative sector, where unstable working conditions are often encountered. In this context, it sees a need, in the framework of the SBA, for greater emphasis to be given to the area of labour law, especially in view of the concept of flexicurity, while taking into account the necessary social protection. MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to take into account the creative and cultural sector as a driver of economic and social development in the European Union.
The Parliament makes a number of recommendations that focus on 5 areas:
(1) Boosting R&D and innovation : stressing the importance of innovation for SMEs and the difficulties in taking advantage of research opportunities, MEPs consider that all Community research and technological programmes should be designed in a way that facilitates the cross-border participation of SMEs. They call on the Member States to multiply initiatives that lower the threshold for SMEs to have access to research. In particular, the resolution makes the following recommendations:
improve access to the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013); the Commission and the Member States should put in place better framework conditions aimed at creating an environment favourable to innovation by SMEs, in particular by introducing ways to improve the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) and to fight against counterfeiting more effectively throughout the European Union; a swift agreement should be reached on a Community Patent ensuring low-cost, efficient, flexible and high-quality legal protection, adapted to the needs of SMEs, as well as on a harmonised European patent litigation system; the links between educational institutions and SMEs should be strengthened , so that the promotion of self-employment, entrepreneurship culture and business awareness is included in the national education curricula. MEPs call for an ‘Erasmus for young entrepreneurs’ and an ‘Erasmus for apprentices’; the importance of encouraging young entrepreneurs and female entrepreneurs through, amongst other things, the introduction of tutoring and mentoring programmes.
(2) Ensure funding and access to finance : recalling that SMEs’ limited ability to access finance is a major impediment to their creation and growth, MEPs call for a combined effort on the part of financial institutions, the Commission and the Member States to ensure SMEs’ access to finance and to offer them the possibility of consolidating their capital by reinvesting their profit in the company. Parliament considers that payment of charges prior to SMEs’ commencing activities should not be required in order to ensure that they are able to build up their own funds and resources. In particular, the resolution:
calls for greater efforts to promote and provide information on the existence of European funds and state aids intended for SMEs, and for these two instruments to be more accessible and more easily understandable; calls for the creation of better conditions allowing SMEs to invest in skills training, not least through direct tax cuts; underlines the need to open up European risk capital markets by improving the availability of and access to venture capital, mezzanine finance and micro-credit; urges the creation at Community level of a harmonised time limit for payments , possibly shortened for payments to SMEs, and penalties for exceeding this limit.
MEPs welcome the recent initiative for a Joint Action to Support Micro-finance Institutions in Europe (JASMINE). They call on the Member States to take a proactive role in providing information on access to and application for microcredits and alternative forms of finance. They also emphasise the important role of the EIB and the European Investment Fund (EIF) in improving financing available to SMEs.
(3) Improving market access : the resolution stresses that standardisation can lead to innovation and competitiveness by facilitating access to markets and by enabling operability. The Commission is called upon to improve access to standards for SMEs and their participation in the standardisation process, as well as to further promote Community standards internationally. In this context, MEPs stress the need:
to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement by: (i) making more use of e-procurement; (ii) adapting the size of contracts; (iii) alleviating the administrative and financial burden in tendering; (iv) providing relevant and proportionate qualification criteria in specific tenders; (v) enhancing access to information on public tenders for SMEs and (vi) harmonising required documents; for a system consultancy service that would assist the everyday operation of SMEs during their whole lifecycle with the aim of optimising their investments; to improve information on market access and export opportunities within the Single Market and to strengthen information and advisory services, in particular the SOLVIT problem-solving network; to promote the implementation of interoperable electronic signatures and authentication certificates; to help SMEs defend themselves against unfair commercial practices , such as those of misleading directory companies, which should strengthen SMEs' confidence to operate cross-border.
Stressing that only 8% of all SMEs are involved in cross-border activities, MEPs call on the Member States to cooperate in harmonising administrative requirements that affect intra-Community activities and to swiftly transpose and implement the Services Directive.
MEPs also encourage the swift adoption of the statute for a European Private Company, the establishment of a common consolidated basis for company taxation , as well as the establishment of a 'one-stop-shop' for VAT in order to make it possible for entrepreneurs to fulfil their responsibilities in the business country of origin. Parliament encourages the setting up of European business support centres in China and India, and in all emerging markets.
(4) Fighting bureaucracy and red-tape : Parliament believes that there is an imperative need to cut red tape and to put in place a modern administration adapted to the needs of SMEs. It therefore encourages the promotion of ICT knowledge among SMEs. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to take initiatives in order to exchange and promote best practices, set benchmarks, and elaborate and promote guidelines and standards for SME-friendly administrative practices.
MEPs believe that SMEs, and in particular micro-enterprises, should be taxed in a way that reduces administrative efforts as far as possible. In this context, the Commission is called upon to apply the SME test to all new proposals for EU legislation affecting business including simplification of existing legislation.
In particular, the resolution:
stresses the need for proper and timely involvement of SMEs in policy making : the Commission’s consultation period should be extended to at least 12 weeks from the date on which the consultation is available in all Community languages; calls on the Commission to stimulate simplification and harmonisation of company law and, in particular, accounting rules within the internal market; encourages the setting up of a " statistics holiday " for micro enterprises; stresses the need for the introduction of common commencement dates for new Community legislation affecting SMEs and for SMEs to be informed concisely and comprehensibly of changes to legislation affecting them; considers it necessary to establish a unified system for setting up businesses in which the process is carried out step-by-step and it is possible for a business to be created in 48 hours; calls for a special EU website for SMEs which shall contain information and application forms for EU projects, national telephone numbers, links to partners, trade information, information on research projects as well as internet consultation, briefings and information about new regulation.
(5) Turning sustainability into business : recognising that efforts to improve sustainability could become an important source of (eco-) innovation and a key asset for industry's competitiveness, MEPs call on the Commission to investigate how the Community could help SMEs to become more resource and energy efficient.
The resolution welcomes recent initiatives to assist SMEs in coping with environmental legislation by, inter alia, granting them reduced agency fees, ensuring their access to information on environmental standards or introducing specific exemptions from Community legislation.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own initiative report by Edit HERCZOG (PES, HU) on a ‘Small Business Act’, supporting the Commission's Communication which aims to drive an ambitious policy agenda to promote SMEs’ growth and to anchor the “Think Small First” approach in policy-making at all levels. It regrets, however, that the Small Business Act (SBA) is not a legally binding instrument and calls on the Council and the Commission to establish this principle as a binding rule, in a form to be determined, in order to ensure that it is properly applied in all future Community legislation.
The report stresses the absolute necessity of implementing the 10 guiding principles at European, national and regional level. The Commission is called upon to further enhance the visibility and awareness of SME-related policy actions (through the bundling of existing Community instruments and funds for SMEs under a separate heading in the EU budget) and to set up a screening system for the monitoring of the progress achieved following implementation of the guiding principles.
MEPs stress the need to place particular emphasis on craft, family, micro- and individual enterprises at EU, national and regional level. They call for the acknowledgement of the specific characteristics of members of the liberal professions and note that the Commission's proposals lack a clear strategy for self-employed persons to improve their legal status and rights. They also stress that even more money should be invested in projects to endorse female entrepreneurs.
The committee emphasises the need to develop a social and economic model that creates an appropriate security network for small and medium-sized entrepreneurs in the creative sector, where unstable working conditions are often encountered. In this context, MEPs see a need, in the framework of the SBA, for greater emphasis to be given to the area of labour law, especially in view of the concept of flexicurity, while taking into account the necessary social protection. MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to take into account the creative and cultural sector as a driver of economic and social development in the European Union.
The committee makes a number of recommendations that focus on 5 areas:
(1) Boosting R&D and innovation : stressing the importance of innovation for SMEs and the difficulties in taking advantage of research opportunities, MEPs consider that all Community research and technological programmes should be designed in a way that facilitates the cross-border participation of SMEs. They call on the Member States to multiply initiatives that lower the threshold for SMEs to have access to research. In particular, the report makes the following recommendations:
the Commission and the Member States should put in place better framework conditions aimed at creating an environment favourable to innovation by SMEs, in particular by introducing ways to improve the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) and to fight against counterfeiting more effectively throughout the European Union; the Small Business Act should take account of cooperative arrangements among SMEs (clusters); a swift agreement should be reached on a Community Patent ensuring low-cost, efficient, flexible and high-quality legal protection, adapted to the needs of SMEs, as well as on a harmonised European patent litigation system; Member States should increase their share of innovative public procurement and the participation of innovative SMEs in public procurement procedures; the links between educational institutions and SMEs should be strengthened, so that the promotion of self-employment, entrepreneurship culture and business awareness is included in the national education curricula. MEPs call for an ‘Erasmus for young entrepreneurs’ and an ‘Erasmus for apprentices’; the importance of encouraging young entrepreneurs and female entrepreneurs should be supported through, amongst other things, the introduction of tutoring and mentoring programmes; the Commission should assess SME participation in the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme and bring forward any necessary proposals.
(2) Ensure funding and access to finance : recalling that SMEs’ limited ability to access finance is a major impediment to their creation and growth, MEPs call for a combined effort on the part of financial institutions, the Commission and the Member States to ensure SMEs’ access to finance and to offer them the possibility of consolidating their capital by reinvesting their profit in the company. They consider that payment of charges prior to SMEs’ commencing activities should not be required in order to ensure that they are able to build up their own funds and resources. In particular, the report:
calls for greater efforts to promote and provide information on the existence of European funds and state aids intended for SMEs, and for these two instruments to be more accessible and more easily understandable; calls for the creation of better conditions allowing SMEs to invest in skills training, not least through direct tax cuts; underlines the need to open up European risk capital markets by improving the availability of and access to venture capital, mezzanine finance and micro-credit; calls for further investigation into how current banking rules and other financial regulations, including the transparency of credit ratings, could be improved to ease access to finance for SMEs; urges the creation at Community level of a harmonised time limit for payments, possibly shortened for payments to SMEs, and penalties for exceeding this limit.
MEPs welcome the recent initiative for a Joint Action to Support Micro-finance Institutions in Europe (JASMINE). They call on the Member States to take a proactive role in providing information on access to and application for microcredits and alternative forms of finance. They also emphasise the important role of the EIB and the European Investment Fund (EIF) in improving financing available to SMEs.
(3) Improving market access : the report stresses that standardisation can lead to innovation and competitiveness by facilitating access to markets and by enabling operability. The Commission is called upon to improve access to standards for SMEs and their participation in the standardisation process, as well as to further promote Community standards internationally. In this context, MEPs stress the need:
to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement by making more use of e-procurement, adapting the size of contracts and alleviating the administrative and financial burden in tendering; for a system consultancy service that would assist the everyday operation of SMEs during their whole lifecycle with the aim of optimising their investments; to improve information on market access and export opportunities within the Single Market and to strengthen information and advisory services, in particular the SOLVIT problem-solving network; to promote the implementation of interoperable electronic signatures and authentication certificates; to help SMEs defend themselves against unfair commercial practices, such as those of misleading directory companies, which should strengthen SMEs' confidence to operate cross-border.
Stressing that only 8% of all SMEs are involved in cross-border activities, MEPs call on the Member States to cooperate in harmonising administrative requirements that affect intra-Community activities and to swiftly transpose and implement the Services Directive.
MEPs also encourage the swift adoption of the statute for a European Private Company, the establishment of a common consolidated basis for company taxation, as well as the establishment of a 'one-stop-shop' for VAT in order to make it possible for entrepreneurs to fulfil their responsibilities in the business country of origin.
(4) Fighting bureaucracy and red-tape : MEPs believe that there is an imperative need to cut red tape and to put in place a modern administration adapted to the needs of SMEs. They therefore encourage the promotion of ICT knowledge among SMEs. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to take initiatives in order to exchange and promote best practices, set benchmarks, and elaborate and promote guidelines and standards for SME-friendly administrative practices.
MEPs believe that SMEs, and in particular micro-enterprises, should be taxed in a way that reduces administrative efforts as far as possible. In this context, the Commission is called upon to apply the SME test to all new proposals for EU legislation affecting business including simplification of existing legislation. In particular, the report:
stresses the need for proper and timely involvement of SMEs in policy making: the Commission’s consultation period should be extended from 8 to at least 12 weeks from the date on which the consultation is available in all Community languages; calls on the Commission to stimulate simplification and harmonisation of company law and, in particular, accounting rules within the internal market; stresses the need for the introduction of common commencement dates for new Community legislation affecting SMEs and for SMEs to be informed concisely and comprehensibly of changes to legislation affecting them; considers it necessary to establish a unified system for setting up businesses in which the process is carried out step-by-step and it is possible for a business to be created in 48 hours; calls for a special EU website for SMEs which shall contain information and application forms for EU projects, national telephone numbers, links to partners, trade information, information on research projects as well as internet consultation, briefings and information about new regulation.
(5) Turning sustainability into business : recognising that efforts to improve sustainability could become an important source of (eco-) innovation and a key asset for industry's competitiveness, MEPs call on the Commission to investigate how the Community could help SMEs to become more resource and energy efficient.
The report welcomes recent initiatives to assist SMEs in coping with environmental legislation by, inter alia, granting them reduced agency fees, ensuring their access to information on environmental standards or introducing specific exemptions from Community legislation.
The Council held an exchange of views on the Communication entitled "Priority for small and medium-sized undertakings (SMUs) first - A "Small Business Act" for Europe. The exchange of views made it possible to work out political guidelines to aid the Council's preparatory fora in discussion of draft conclusions with a view to the adoption of these at the next Competitiveness Council on 1 and 2 December 2008.
Delegations voiced their opinions, in particular, on identifying the priority measures laid down in the "Small Business Act" (SBA), which could have a rapid impact on growth against a background of economic slowdown.
A broad consensus emerged regarding the beneficial effects which implementation of the measures contained in the package could have on SMUs, in particular by facilitating access for SMUs to funding, by tending to reduction and simplification of administrative burdens and by favouring undertakings' access to the market.
The proposal to create an SBA for Europe put forward by the Commission in June 2007 had been the subject of an initial discussion at the informal meeting of ministers at Versailles (France) on 17 and 18 July 2008.
PURPOSE: to present an initiative entitled a “Small Business Act” for Europe (SBA) to fully unlock the growth and jobs potential of European SMEs.
CONTENT: in a globally changing landscape characterised by continuous structural changes and enhanced competitive pressures, the role of SMEs has become even more important as providers of employment opportunities but they very often face enormous bureaucratic hurdles and obstacles. European SMEs deserve to be better assisted to fully unlock their potential of long term sustainable growth and of more job creation.
At the heart of the SBA is the conviction that achieving the best possible framework conditions for SMEs depends first and foremost on society’s recognition of entrepreneurs. This is why the “Small Business Act” aims to improve the overall policy approach to entrepreneurship , to irreversibly anchor the “Think Small First” principle in policymaking from regulation to public service, and to promote SMEs’ growth by helping them tackle the remaining problems which hamper their development.
The SBA builds on the Commission’s and Member States’ policy achievements, creates a new policy framework which integrates the existing enterprise policy instruments, and builds in particular on the European Charter for Small Enterprises and the Modern SME policy. To implement this ambitious policy agenda, the Commission is proposing a genuine political partnership between the EU and Member States through:
A set of 10 principles to guide the conception and implementation of policies both at EU and Member State level :
create an environment in which entrepreneurs and family businesses can thrive and entrepreneurship is rewarded; ensure that honest entrepreneurs who have faced bankruptcy quickly get a second chance; design rules according to the “Think Small First” principle; make public administrations responsive to SMEs’ needs; adapt public policy tools to SME needs: facilitate SMEs’ participation in public procurement and better use State Aid possibilities for SMEs; facilitate SMEs’ access to finance and develop a legal and business environment supportive to timely payments in commercial transactions; help SMEs to benefit more from the opportunities offered by the Single Market; promote the upgrading of skills in SMEs and all forms of innovation; enable SMEs to turn environmental challenges into opportunities; encourage and support SMEs to benefit from the growth of markets.
A set of new legislative proposals which are guided by the “Think Small First” principle in four areas that particularly affect SMEs :
1) General Block Exemption Regulation on State Aids (GBER) : this Regulation, to be adopted shortly, will exempt from prior notification categories of State Aid already covered by existing regulations in the field of aid to SMEs, for training, employment, R&D and regional aid and possibly also for new categories of aid. The new Regulation will simplify and harmonise existing rules for SMEs and increase investment aid intensities for SMEs.
2) Regulation providing for a Statute for a European Private Company (SPE) : this Regulation provides for a Statute for an SPE that could be created and operate according to the same uniform principles in all Member States. The Commission will also come forward with the necessary amending proposals to ensure that this new company form can benefit from the existing corporate tax directives.
3) Directive on reduced VAT rates : this Directive, which will be proposed shortly, will offer Member States the option of applying reduced VAT rates principally for locally supplied services, which are mainly provided by SMEs.
4) As part of the SBA the following proposals will be prepared : i) a legislative proposal to further modernise, simplify and harmonise the existing rules on VAT invoicing to alleviate the burden on businesses; ii) an amendment to the Directive 2000/35/EC on late payments with a view to ensuring that SMEs are paid on time for any commercial transaction.
A set of new policy measures which implement these 10 principles according to the needs of SMEs both at Community and at Member State level.
The SBA includes an ambitious set of measures to allow SMEs to fully benefit from the Single Market and expand into international markets by orienting more resources to small companies' access to finance, Research & Development and innovation. They will also make it easier for them to participate in the standard-setting process , win public procurement contracts and turn environmental challenges into business opportunities.
In addition to the standing commitment to cut administrative burden by 25% by 2012 , the time needed to start a new company should be no more than one week, the maximum time to obtain business licenses and permits should not surpass one month and one-stop-shops should assist to facilitate start-ups and recruitment procedures.
Where practical, the Commission plans to use concrete dates in a year for the entry into force of regulations/decisions affecting business. Member States are invited to consider similar measures.
Lastly, the SBA seeks new ways to stimulate interest in entrepreneurship and cultivate a more entrepreneurial mindset, especially among young people. Young people, who want to start up a business, can now gain experience by spending time in an SME abroad via the just launched “ Erasmus for young entrepreneurs ” programme. This will help upgrade their skills and contribute to the networking among SMEs in Europe. Similar mobility programmes are also underway for apprentices.
The SBA should be fully embedded in the Growth and Jobs strategy. Member States are invited to take advantage of the update of the Lisbon cycle 2008 to reflect the SBA in their National Reform Programmes.
PURPOSE: to present an initiative entitled a “Small Business Act” for Europe (SBA) to fully unlock the growth and jobs potential of European SMEs.
CONTENT: in a globally changing landscape characterised by continuous structural changes and enhanced competitive pressures, the role of SMEs has become even more important as providers of employment opportunities but they very often face enormous bureaucratic hurdles and obstacles. European SMEs deserve to be better assisted to fully unlock their potential of long term sustainable growth and of more job creation.
At the heart of the SBA is the conviction that achieving the best possible framework conditions for SMEs depends first and foremost on society’s recognition of entrepreneurs. This is why the “Small Business Act” aims to improve the overall policy approach to entrepreneurship , to irreversibly anchor the “Think Small First” principle in policymaking from regulation to public service, and to promote SMEs’ growth by helping them tackle the remaining problems which hamper their development.
The SBA builds on the Commission’s and Member States’ policy achievements, creates a new policy framework which integrates the existing enterprise policy instruments, and builds in particular on the European Charter for Small Enterprises and the Modern SME policy. To implement this ambitious policy agenda, the Commission is proposing a genuine political partnership between the EU and Member States through:
A set of 10 principles to guide the conception and implementation of policies both at EU and Member State level :
create an environment in which entrepreneurs and family businesses can thrive and entrepreneurship is rewarded; ensure that honest entrepreneurs who have faced bankruptcy quickly get a second chance; design rules according to the “Think Small First” principle; make public administrations responsive to SMEs’ needs; adapt public policy tools to SME needs: facilitate SMEs’ participation in public procurement and better use State Aid possibilities for SMEs; facilitate SMEs’ access to finance and develop a legal and business environment supportive to timely payments in commercial transactions; help SMEs to benefit more from the opportunities offered by the Single Market; promote the upgrading of skills in SMEs and all forms of innovation; enable SMEs to turn environmental challenges into opportunities; encourage and support SMEs to benefit from the growth of markets.
A set of new legislative proposals which are guided by the “Think Small First” principle in four areas that particularly affect SMEs :
1) General Block Exemption Regulation on State Aids (GBER) : this Regulation, to be adopted shortly, will exempt from prior notification categories of State Aid already covered by existing regulations in the field of aid to SMEs, for training, employment, R&D and regional aid and possibly also for new categories of aid. The new Regulation will simplify and harmonise existing rules for SMEs and increase investment aid intensities for SMEs.
2) Regulation providing for a Statute for a European Private Company (SPE) : this Regulation provides for a Statute for an SPE that could be created and operate according to the same uniform principles in all Member States. The Commission will also come forward with the necessary amending proposals to ensure that this new company form can benefit from the existing corporate tax directives.
3) Directive on reduced VAT rates : this Directive, which will be proposed shortly, will offer Member States the option of applying reduced VAT rates principally for locally supplied services, which are mainly provided by SMEs.
4) As part of the SBA the following proposals will be prepared : i) a legislative proposal to further modernise, simplify and harmonise the existing rules on VAT invoicing to alleviate the burden on businesses; ii) an amendment to the Directive 2000/35/EC on late payments with a view to ensuring that SMEs are paid on time for any commercial transaction.
A set of new policy measures which implement these 10 principles according to the needs of SMEs both at Community and at Member State level.
The SBA includes an ambitious set of measures to allow SMEs to fully benefit from the Single Market and expand into international markets by orienting more resources to small companies' access to finance, Research & Development and innovation. They will also make it easier for them to participate in the standard-setting process , win public procurement contracts and turn environmental challenges into business opportunities.
In addition to the standing commitment to cut administrative burden by 25% by 2012 , the time needed to start a new company should be no more than one week, the maximum time to obtain business licenses and permits should not surpass one month and one-stop-shops should assist to facilitate start-ups and recruitment procedures.
Where practical, the Commission plans to use concrete dates in a year for the entry into force of regulations/decisions affecting business. Member States are invited to consider similar measures.
Lastly, the SBA seeks new ways to stimulate interest in entrepreneurship and cultivate a more entrepreneurial mindset, especially among young people. Young people, who want to start up a business, can now gain experience by spending time in an SME abroad via the just launched “ Erasmus for young entrepreneurs ” programme. This will help upgrade their skills and contribute to the networking among SMEs in Europe. Similar mobility programmes are also underway for apprentices.
The SBA should be fully embedded in the Growth and Jobs strategy. Member States are invited to take advantage of the update of the Lisbon cycle 2008 to reflect the SBA in their National Reform Programmes.
Documents
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2009)0680
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3244
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0100/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0074/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0074/2009
- Committee opinion: PE415.266
- Committee opinion: PE414.940
- Committee opinion: PE414.342
- Committee opinion: PE414.290
- Committee opinion: PE414.346
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE416.309
- Committee opinion: PE414.319
- Committee draft report: PE413.994
- Debate in Council: 2891
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2008)0394
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2101
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2102
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2008)0394
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2008)0394 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2101 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2102 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE413.994
- Committee opinion: PE414.319
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE416.309
- Committee opinion: PE414.290
- Committee opinion: PE414.346
- Committee opinion: PE414.342
- Committee opinion: PE414.940
- Committee opinion: PE415.266
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0074/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3244
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex COM(2009)0680
Activities
- Alexander Nuno PICKART ALVARO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 8/1 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 8/2 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 29 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 31 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 36 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 37 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 39 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 44 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 47 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 51 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 53 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 54/1 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 54/2 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 59 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 67 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 68/1 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 68/2 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 69 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 78 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 80 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 82 #
Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
330 |
2008/2237(INI)
2008/10/29
JURI
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the European Union institutions to recognise and take account of the specific features of SMEs in the area of the liberal professions, which also perform public tasks related to the public interest.
source: PE-415.125
2008/11/11
ECON
72 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the application of the "Think Small First" principle at Community
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas in many small family businesses women, despite their contribution to the activity, do not have the same legal status as their partners, being unpaid family workers or employees whilst the partner is the factory owner,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for the establishment of a 'one- stop-shop' for VAT in order to make it possible for entrepreneurs to fulfil their responsibilities in the business country of origin;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that there is a continuing gender gap in this area, in particular as regards pay, and that there are still fewer female entrepreneurs than there are male
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Believes that the transfer of SMEs should be made easier, especially in cases of retirement or illness of the owner and transfer to relatives or heirs;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that female entrepreneurship helps to attract women into the labour market and to improve their economic and social status;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Asks the Commission to quickly establish the network of female entrepreneur ambassadors, as well as the mentoring schemes aimed at inspiring women to set up their own businesses and provide first-line advice;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for better access for SMEs to public procurement
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Encourages Member States to cultivate an innovative mindset in young people through the national curricula and educational exchanges between them, European programmes and the pooling of best practices, especially in young women and women graduates, and to facilitate the implementation of their entrepreneurial projects;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the need for the following in order to facilitate SME participation in public procurement: relevant and proportionate qualification criteria in the specific tender, the division of tenders into smaller lots, and access to tender information in order to enhance the transparency of tender procedures;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Invites the Member States to develop specific women-targeted entrepreneurship education programmes in order to facilitate the creation of businesses by women;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Acknowledges that the widespread use of late payments, also from publicly funded bodies, creates a large-scale problem for SMEs since they are vulnerable to variations in cash flow;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Asks the Member States to include provisions in the legislation concerning the establishment of SMEs which can guarantee the equal legal ownership status of women when a family enterprise is set up;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Welcomes the ongoing review of Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions1and insists that the SME perspective is taken fully into account, reducing the occurrence and the abuse of late payments would facilitate for SMEs to use the full potential of the internal market to greater effect;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Asks the Member States to offer incentives for creating partnerships between women-owned and men-owned enterprises in order to reduce discrimination against women in the business environment;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the importance of a Statute for a European Private Company, provided that it is focused on SMEs that intend to engage in cross-border activities and cannot be misused by larger companies, to undermine and circumvent legal provisions in the Member States that foster a system of corporate governance that takes into account the interests of all stakeholders;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Invites Member States to implement systematic strategies to boost female entrepreneurship, as well as concrete measures facilitating female entrepreneurs' access to credit and banking services, in particular micro loans; asks Member States and the Commission to ensure that the
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the importance of a Statute for a European Private Company
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Asks the Member States to consider minimum standard rules on employees´ participation rights and gender equality programmes which must accompany the European private company statute; to ensure that workers’ participation rights are respected, the most appropriate approach would be, as in the case of the European Company and the European Co-operative Society, to complement the European private company statute with a separate directive on workers’ participation rights;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for an increase in funding for innovation within the scope of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme and for better access for SMEs to such funding to be ensured via the European Institute of Innovation and Technology; calls on the Commission, furthermore, significantly to reduce red tape within the 7th Framework Programme in order to ensure better access for SMEs;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Asks the Commission to add more detailed requirements, in particular with regard to the cross-border dimension of a European private company, its minimum capital requirement, the way in which its governing bodies will be able to take into account employees’ participation and women's representation and the transparency of its operations;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the application of the 'Think Small First' principle at Community and national level requires the consistent implementation of the internal market rules and the Services Directive1 and an efficient follow-up by the Commission in order to secure that all obstacles are eliminated in accordance with those rules and calls for a
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas women are often prevented from developing economic activities by a lack of social and economic networks which could support their initiatives, and a different evaluation of the economic needs of women and men and the aggressivity of the business environment,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes the Commission proposal for a directive on reduced VAT rates, particularly as regards the focus of that proposal on SMEs that deliver labour- intensive and locally supplied services;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages Member States to facilitate female entrepreneurship in the SME sector by establishing appropriate professional and financial advice facilities and structures for upgrading the skills of female workers;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Urges Member States to direct more regional funds to research and development and to include SMEs to a greater extent in the respective programmes;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages Member States to facilitate female entrepreneurship in the SME sector by establishing appropriate professional and financial advice facilities that take full account of the gender aspects of enterprise development and which take into account women's wider roles in their families and/or communities;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that dynamic financial markets are essential for the financing of SMEs and underlines the need to open up European risk capital markets by improving the availability of and access to venture capital, mezzanine finance and micro- credit; draws attention, further, to the need to create and develop financing tools and arrangements tailored to the requirements of small enterprises which do not rely solely on the financial markets for their funding, in particular during periods marked by economic difficulties;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that the use of new technologies helps particularly young female entrepreneurs avoid administrative costs;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that dynamic financial markets are essential for the financing of SMEs and underlines the need to open up European risk capital markets by improving the availability of and access to venture capital, mezzanine finance and micro- credit; for this reason, opposes arrangements for the provision of credit to enterprises by the State, since the authorities cannot assess the prospects of SMEs any more effectively than actors on the capital markets;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Invites Member States to draw attention to businesses that take steps to promote equality between women and men, in particular as regards pay and access to jobs, and to facilitate a work-life balance;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that no analysis has been carried out at Community level in order to measure the impact of the various forms of Community funding on SMEs and the benefits they have gained from that funding; reiterates Parliament's call to the Commission to carry out all the requisite studies; regards it as fundamental that the rules and procedures governing access for the various categories of SME to these forms of funding and the relevant programmes should be simplified as far as possible; with that aim in view, calls on the Commission to hold talks with the organisations representing SMEs in an effort to eliminate the obstacles encountered;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Invites Member States to draw attention to businesses t
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that no analysis has been carried out at Community level in order to measure the impact of the various forms of Community funding on SMEs and the benefits they have gained from that funding; reiterates Parliament's call to the Commission to carry out all the requisite studies; regards it as fundamental that the rules and procedures governing access for the various categories of SME to these forms of funding and the relevant programmes should be simplified as far as possible; with that aim in view, calls on the Commission to hold talks with the organisations representing SMEs in an effort to eliminate the obstacles encountered;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take measures to remove inequalities related to social protection (especially maternity protection) for self-employed women;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recognises that training, research and development supported under the Small Business Act must be flexible enough to enable women, especially those who have children to look after, to follow their own individual requirements in terms of working hours;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to find suitable ways of monitoring more effectively the use made by intermediary financial, banking or administrative bodies of Community funding intended for small enterprises and micro- enterprises, and to make sure that all the funding in question reaches those undertakings, within a reasonable time- frame;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Recognises that any system of support offered to entrepreneurs, and particularly women entrepreneurs, including skills and enterprise management training and facilitated access to resources (including equipment, premises, transport and credit), must be on-going so as to help businesses survive beyond the basic start- up;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to find suitable ways of monitoring more effectively the use made by intermediary financial, banking or administrative bodies of Community funding intended for small enterprises and micro- enterprises, and to make sure that all the funding in question reaches those undertakings, within a reasonable time- frame;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the application of the "Think Small First" principle at Community and national level requires the consistent implementation of the internal market rules and the Services Directive1 and an efficient follow-up by the Commission in order to secure that all obstacles are eliminated in accordance with those rules and calls for a sector inquiry to be conducted with a view to facilitating fair and open competition for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) all over Europe; in that connection, emphasises that the Small Business Act does not introduce binding rules, but rather guidelines which are designed to act as practical benchmarks; 1 Directive 2006/123/EC of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 36).
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A c (new) Ac. whereas the lack, or reduced level, of social protection available to self- employed women constitutes a significant barrier for women setting up businesses,
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the importance of progress in bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations which would further reduce regulatory barriers to trade, which effect SMEs disproportionally;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that all legislation
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that legislation regarding SMEs must be supportive of their growth and must not create artificial limits for their ability to take the lead in the development of European Economy; calls, therefore, for the 'SME test' to incorporate procedures such as cost-benefit analyses or regular consultations of interest groups.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to stimulate simplification and harmonisation of company law and, in particular, accounting rules within the internal market in order to reduce the administrative burden for SMEs and increase the transparency for all relevant stakeholders; urges the Commission to promote strongly the use of new technology such as XBRL by presenting a roadmap for introducing XBRL reporting in the European Union with a view to making it mandatory within a reasonable time frame and to promote and support wide use of this open standard;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that the Small Business Act must aim to reduce hindrances for start- ups as well as for self-employed entrepreneurs while at the same time facilitating growth and the emergence of new businesses, providing means and opportunities for innovative processes and competitiveness in European industries;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Strongly opposes the planned introduction of a directive on reduced VAT rates for locally supplied services, as this would lead to distortion of competition and is likely to present challenges regarding the definition of the services concerned;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Calls on the public administrations in the Member States to create, on a coordinated basis, offices to serve as 'one- stop shops' offering support services and exchange of best practices for SMEs;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls, with that aim in view, for Community legislation to be drafted in such a way as to reflect the needs of the majority of enterprises and that this principle should be established as a binding rule, in a form to be determined, but one which would require Parliament, the Council and the Commission to ensure that the priorities inherent in the "Think Small First" principle are properly applied at Community level; calls for the intermediate representative organisations concerned to be directly involved in legislative processes at all levels; urges the Member States to implement this principle in national and region legislation.
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for the Small Business Act to take account of cooperative arrangements among SMEs (buying and marketing groups), since such groups have been shown to be less at risk of insolvency than individual enterprises.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Stresses the key role of SMEs in Europe's economic and social fabric and the vital need for them to benefit from the opportunities offered by the internal market, demographic and technological change, and the challenges of the environment and globalisation, with a view to meeting the goals of the Lisbon Strategy;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes with regret that women face difficulties in establishing and maintaining businesses owing to factors such as information gaps, lack of contacts and access to networking, gender discrimination and stereotyping, weak and inflexible supply of childcare facilities, difficulties in reconciling business and family obligations, as well as differences in the way women and men approach entrepreneurship;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Takes the view that the Commission should follow up on its communication of 5 July 2002 on a framework for the promotion of employee financial participation (COM(2002)0364); considers employee financial participation to be a potential safeguard for SMEs against the volatility and potential risks of the financial markets, and an opportunity for succession of the owner or shareholders of an SME by (some of) its employees, which could be stimulated through financial incentives;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Recalls the Commission communication entitled 'Tackling the corporation tax obstacles of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Internal Market - outlining a possible Home State Taxation pilot scheme' (COM(2005)0702); supports the idea of homestate taxation for SMEs and recommends that Member States make use of the pilot scheme;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Deplores Member States' practice of 'gold plating', which is especially harmful for SMEs, and calls upon the Commission to investigate what further measures might be taken to prevent it, including the introduction of a right of direct action for citizens; calls for follow-up impact assessments, analysing how decisions are in fact implemented in Member States and at local level;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Calls for the creation, on a structured basis, of mechanisms for dialogue, consultation and participation between SMEs and their representatives and the public authorities;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7 c. Calls on the Commission to draw up an annual report on SMEs, systematically presenting and commenting on the main data for the sector, with a view to establishing SMEs' situation, following their evolution and determining how far they are meeting the objectives set for the sector;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Calls on the Commission to add indicative timetables to the large number of actions proposed in the Small Business Act, in order to report annually on the achievements made and thereby ensure that progress is properly monitored;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Stresses that a suitable policy of legislative simplification, reduction of overheads, elimination of administrative costs, introduction of new technology and operational facilitation should help boost the efficiency of SMEs and microbusinesses, as well as promoting fairer competition on the internal market;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Believes that the information to be supplied by SMEs and microbusinesses to administrations, the public and the market should be in line with criteria of general interest and strict proportionality;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Hopes that the amendment of Directive 2000/35/ EC on combating late payments aimed at ensuring the prompt payment of SME debts in commercial transactions will provide for account to be taken of entrepreneurs’ family burdens and obligations, in particular as regards bringing up children;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1 d. Stresses the need to promote enterprise culture and a favourable business climate with a view to unleashing SMEs' full potential;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that there is a continuing gender gap in this area, in particular as regards pay
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for increased efforts to be made in implementing mutual recognition in order to facilitate cross-border activities of SMEs; believes there should be a common consolidated basis for company tax, and until such time as that exists supports adopting a system enabling SMEs carrying out cross-border activities to pay tax according to the rules of their country of origin;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that there is a continuing gender gap in this area, in particular as regards pay, and that there are still fewer female entrepreneurs, despite the interest shown, than there are male;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Believes that SMEs, and especially microbusinesses, should be taxed in accordance with their characteristics, in such a way as to facilitate the start-up phase and encourage innovation and investment throughout their lives;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that there is a continuing gender gap in this area, in particular as regards pay, and th
source: PE-415.225
2008/11/14
IMCO
30 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. Whereas small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) account for more than 99% of EU enterprises and are of the utmost importan
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Highlights the need for an administrative environment that is less complex, more flexible and less bureaucratic; calls, nevertheless, for a plan for the simplification of administrative procedures to be drawn up that will make management more flexible and eliminate unnecessary red tape;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Stresses that it is vital to give preferential treatment to SMEs in training policies, and in particular in lifelong learning programmes, establishing positive discrimination to facilitate the full integration of women in this sector and guarantee the balance between family life and employment;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines the importance of the Single Market for SMEs and notes that promoting SME access to the Single Market should be a priority;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Takes the view that it is essential to provide optimum access to start-up and spin-off financing for SMEs, especially micro-credits;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recognises the difficulty of setting up a new business owing to the diversity of systems established in the various Member States; therefore considers it necessary to establish a unified system for setting up businesses in which the process is carried out step by step and it is possible for a business to be created in 48 hours;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Points out that one in four cases of SMEs disappearing is due to late payment, in most cases on the part of public administrations; therefore recommends to the Member States that they introduce mechanisms to guarantee payment within the prescribed period and indeed that they consider applying administrative sanctions in this respect;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Points out that SMEs are particularly vulnerable in relation to the violation of intellectual property rights (IPRs); highlights the importance of creating a European Community patent to strengthen and protect innovation by European SMEs vis-à-vis their competitors; Calls on the Commission and Member States to step up the fight against counterfeiting and piracy in the internal market, to demand that their commercial partners apply the Agreement on Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) more strictly and to make whatever efforts may be necessary for the adoption of bilateral, regional or multilateral agreements to combat counterfeiting and piracy, such as the ACTA agreement;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Supports calls for the provision of advisory services by Member States to help SMEs defend themselves against unfair commercial practices, such as those of misleading directory companies, which should strengthen SMEs' confidence to operate cross-border; emphasises the importance of the Commission's role both in facilitating the coordination of, and in cooperating with, such advisory services to ensure the appropriate and efficient handling of cross-border complaints; insists, however, that in the event that such soft measures do not produce results, the Commission should be ready to initiate the appropriate legislative changes which would provide SMEs with similar protection to consumers where they are the weaker party in such transactions;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recognises that there are still certain restrictions on the ability of SMEs to fully exploit advantages offered by the internal market; therefore notes that both the legal and political framework of the internal market should be improved to facilitate cross-border operation by SMEs; also notes that a clear regulatory environment would offer SMEs increased incentives to trade in the internal market; considers that Member States should set up Single Points of Contact and web portals;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Encourages the Commission and Member States to facilitate the access of SMEs to public contracts, in particular by standardising the documents required and the different platforms for dematerialisation of public contracts, and by making more frequent use of phased payments;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas SMEs make an essential contribution to social cohesion, innovation, regional development and Europe’s ability to compete,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for action to promote the organisation and appropriate coordination of access to public procurement in order to guarantee that SMEs obtain the same advantages as the remaining tendering firms, support innovative solutions and thereby safeguard their regional development;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Stresses the need to guarantee that production costs for SMEs are not increased in their main areas, and to reduce tax on business transfers to foster and guarantee the continued existence of family firms;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to step up their efforts for promoting and providing information on the existence of Community funds and state aids, and to make these two kinds of instrument not only more accessible but also more comprehensible;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recognises that SME involvement in research and development is important both to increase SME competitiveness in the internal market and to increase the attractiveness of SMEs; is of the opinion that participation conditions in EU research Framework Programmes remain too bureaucratic and are a disincentive for SMEs;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Takes the view that the Member States should apply the SBA and its principles as a matter of priority, monitor it and complement that monitoring with an annual report reflecting the progress made by each Member State;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls for the simplification of requirements for SMEs to obtain financing in the context of public procurement; Takes the view that both financial institutions and banks should create programmes tailored to the needs of SMEs;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that the SBA
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines the importance of stakeholder input through public consultation by the Commission, but notes that the eight-week period for consultation represents a significant barrier to the interests of SMEs being taken into account; would therefore encourage the Commission to reconsider a longer consultation period to help meet policy objectives as well as to encourage SME involvement and representation;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas SMEs are not provided with sufficient support to defend themselves against unfair commercial practices that are conducted cross-border, such as those of misleading business directory companies,
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Considers that the Commission and the Member States should together ensure that the business environment does not present disincentives, whether through burdensome procedures, tax disincentives or other regulatory complexity, to people with specialist skills who wish to offer them on a self-employed basis.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Small Business Act (SBA) as a framework for a comprehensive political approach towards SMEs while respecting their diversity; calls however for further measures to ensure that they can benefit fully from the opportunities offered by the Single Market, notably by providing a graduated response so as to take account of their diversity, in particular with regard to cottage industries and small businesses;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recognises that pre-commercial procurement offers substantial rewards for SMEs both in facilitating SME participation in procurement practises and in helping to encourage SME involvement in research and development;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the importance of
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Reminds the Commission of the need to increase consultation at European level with the representative intermediate SME organisations, in which their participation in the preparation of the legislative process must be secured; repeats its call for improvement of the system of impact analyses with account also being taken of the reality of the different categories of SMEs;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that SMEs can benefit from pre- commercial procurement through risk sharing (given their more limited investment capabilities), through progressive growth (in size and experience) at each stage of the research and development process and through the bidding process, which is streamlined compared to traditional procurement;
source: PE-415.325
2008/11/20
EMPL
39 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has set in place a comprehensive political framework for dismantling bureaucracy for SMEs and with it has given a clear signal for the key role of the SMEs in economic growth, employment and innovation in Europe; stresses that currently most jobs being created in Europe are in SMEs; welcomes the fact that the Small Business Act does not provide for regulations, but carefully targeted guidelines as a 'benchmark';
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Sees a need for
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses, to that effect, the need to ensure that the diversity of SMEs is taken into account in the responses adopted, including as regards single-person limited liability businesses and/or individual undertakings which, owing to their statute, face specific problems in terms of development and in the field of social and fiscal matters and access to financing;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Member States to devote special attention to SMEs in respect of the specific approaches they adopt to flexicurity, since, on the one hand, SMEs enjoy leeway for greater flexibility, enabling them to respond quickly to changes on the market, but, on the other hand, need greater security for themselves and their workers; calls on Member States, therefore, to strengthen and amplify the second set of policy measures – for example by doing more than simply providing a second chance to honest entrepreneurs who have faced bankruptcy – and to launch active labour policies to take the strain of crisis situations and occupational problems in SMEs;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Considers it necessary to introduce measures to combat undeclared work, which is unarguably a source of unfair competition for highly labour-intensive SMEs;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is concerned about the
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is concerned about the continuing lack of qualified workforce, a situation which will worsen further in the future; points out that SMEs are in competition with larger businesses for qualified workers and that they should be supported particularly with targeted staff development and training; welcomes in this connection the measures the Commission has taken for cross-border experience exchanges for young business people, journeymen and apprentices (Erasmus) and for the creation of a European Credit System for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET);
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is concerned about the continuing lack of qualified workforce, a situation which will worsen further in the future; points out that SMEs are in competition with larger businesses for qualified workers and that they should be supported
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the European and national public authorities to provide strong support for craft industries and SMEs as regards the functioning of the job markets and to apply the principles of flexicurity, with a view to ensuring, inter alia, a degree of security to the heads, as well as the employees, of small enterprises, by: – devising institutional financial solutions for SMEs at a supra-enterprise level in order to help them commit more actively to continuous and lifelong training, – ensuring the availability on the market of tailor-made training that matches the specific requirements of SMEs at affordable prices, – supporting SMEs with flanking measures, such as advisory services in the field of internal flexibility (concerning, for example, new models for the organisation of working time) or ones helping SMEs offer better conditions for the reconciliation of family and working life;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has set in place a comprehensive political framework for SMEs and with it has given a clear signal for the key role of the SMEs in economic growth, employment, social cohesion and innovation in Europe; stresses that currently most jobs being created in Europe are in SMEs and that the majority of the new jobs being created are in craft industries and small businesses;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States to give a higher status in school education to entrepreneurship by introducing it as a key competence into national framework curricula for schools, particularly in general secondary education, in order to encourage more positive attitudes towards entrepreneurship in European society; asks the Commission to accompany the Member States in their efforts through 'best practice' procedures;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on sectors with a large proportion of SMEs to invest (or continue investing) in sector-specific forms of occupational training and retraining with a view to contributing to continuity in the sector; calls on sectors with no experience of joint activities in occupational training to initiate such activities so that they may themselves make an active contribution to overcoming potential qualification shortages on the labour market;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Draws attention to the fact that measures to promote and support entrepreneurship are of critical importance in the new Member States, where many people have lost their jobs because of structural economical changes;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points out that the problems in the business transfer process and the impact of an ageing population place almost 2.8 million jobs at risk every year; therefore requests the Member States swiftly to implement suitable policies and mechanisms, in particular by introducing diagnostic, information, advisory and support tools for the heads of enterprises concerned by business transfers;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Stresses that access to information technologies, networks and fibre optics are a condition for sustainable growth, as is indicated in the Lisbon Strategy;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Demands, in the context of impact assessment for new legislative proposals, the introduction of a compulsory 'SME test', the results of which would be assessed by an external, independent body; calls on the Commission in this connection to avail itself of procedures such as cost-benefit analyses or the regular consultation of stakeholders; asks the Commission to allow the SME associations more time in consultations on new legislative proposals;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the importance of encouraging female entrepreneurs through, amongst other things, the introduction of tutoring and mentoring programmes; points out that an increasing number of women work in SMEs, albeit primarily still in the smallest businesses (micro-businesses), and remain prey to stereotypes and prejudices when it comes to business transfers and successions, especially in the case of family businesses;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the importance of encouraging young entrepreneurs and female entrepreneurs through, amongst other things, the introduction of mentoring programmes; points out that an increasing number of women and young entrepreneurs work in SMEs;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has set in place a comprehensive political framework for SMEs and with it has given a clear signal for the key role of the SMEs in economic growth, employment and innovation in Europe; stresses that currently most jobs being created in Europe are in SMEs and that SMEs are thus one of the foundations for achieving the Lisbon Strategy targets as regards quantity and quality of jobs;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Draws attention to the fact that, in addition to the economic and sociological elements common to both genders, the lack of social protection or the reduced level of protection available to self- employed women, notably in the case of maternity protection, constitutes a serious obstacle to the participation of women in self-employed activities; therefore calls on the Member States to take measures to overcome this kind of obstacle;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points to the need for the issue of reconciling the working life and family life of female and male entrepreneurs to be addressed through operational policies and instruments, with reference to maternity, paternity, parental and family leave and leave for training and participation in associational life, providing for integrated forms of support and replacement services;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Invites Member States to enhance the inclusion of SMEs owned by underrepresented ethnic minorities in the mainstream economy by developing supplier diversity programmes which aim to provide equal opportunities to underrepresented businesses competing with larger undertakings for contracts;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Reiterates the importance of ensuring access to credit, including – though not solely – in the form of micro-credit, especially in the current period of crisis and turmoil on the financial market; points to the need to introduce guarantee funds and ‘honour loans’ for developing innovative projects geared towards sustainable development under a social and environmental banner;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Supports the development of micro- credit (up to EUR 25 000) through the Microfinance Fund to a value of EUR 40 million, in order to encourage new business start-up in particular and calls upon the European Investment Bank (EIB
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Is concerned that the present 'credit crunch' may have a disproportionately negative effect on cashflow for SMEs, as larger customers put pressure on smaller suppliers to grant extended payment terms; urges that the consultation period relating to the impact of the Late Payments Directive is re-activated in early 2009 so that the latest trends can be accurately monitored and assessed.
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that direct commitments from the Commission should be incorporated into the fourth set of proposed policy measures, not least in the ways to improve the possibility of accessing information, both on the relevant regulations and on planning and financing possibilities, including through the network of offices already in operation, such as Europe Direct offices;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. reiterates the importance awarded to the CSR of small-scale businesses, which necessitates horizontal links, networks and services; considers it ineffective to refer to EMAS certification, both because this will detract from existing certificates, and because it links in solely with the environmental challenge;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for account to be taken of SME cooperative arrangements in the Small Business Act, since it is established that such networks run less risk of insolvency than individual enterprises.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that, despite the clear commitment made in the original Small Business Charter, the voice of SMEs remains muted within the context of the social dialogue; urges that this deficit is formally corrected by appropriate proposals within the context of the Small Business Act;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the direct link made with current European-level legislative reform – private European company, review of state aid, reduced VAT rate, etc. – and with those requested by the European Parliament, such as that on micro-credit;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Notes approvingly the reversal in trend concerning encouragement to increase the scale of companies – as quite an important aspect, when accompanied by the right conditions, for the growth and development of the company and of employment – which cannot be subordinated to the expediency of keeping within any thresholds set in labour legislation in the Member States;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Points out that, in many Member States, labour legislation is diversified in scope, with multiple thresholds (even within the same country, owing to different regulatory institutions) and uncertainties as regards calculations, given the tendency to exclude atypical workers, which does not make it any easier to overcome the proliferation and fragmentation of employment relationships, as indicated in the European Parliament resolution of 29 November 2007 on common principles of flexicurity;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Sees a need for further development of the Small Business Act in the area of labour law, especially in view of the flexicurity principle, which enables SMEs in particular to respond more quickly to changes in the market and therefore to guarantee a higher level of employment and the competitiveness of the company, as well as international competitiveness, while taking into account the necessary social protection; in this connection refers to its resolution of 29 November 2007 on flexicurity;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Sees a need for further development of the Small Business Act in the area of labour law,
source: PE-415.216
2008/11/26
ITRE
183 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 (new) - having regard to the Council Conclusions of 13 March 2006 on SME policy for growth and employment, adopted at the 2715th Competitiveness Council in Brussels xxx,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the current patent system can have negative effects on SMEs,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Is very satisfied with the recent ‘Lisbonisation’ of the cohesion policy; believes that, by directing regional funds more towards entrepreneurship, initiatives in support of SMEs (e.g. under the JEREMIE Programme), basic and applied research and innovation, considerable funds could become available at local level to enhance business potential;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase their promotional and information efforts concerning the availability of EU funds and of state aid, and to make them both more accessible and comprehensible;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that SMEs’ limited ability to access finance is a major impediment to their creation and growth; encourages initiatives by the European Investment Bank (EIB) to boost the funding available for guarantees and other financial instruments for SMEs; also applauds in this respect the recent initiative to set up a Micro Credit Initiative; calls on Member States to take a proactive role in creation of appropriate conditions and incentives in order to make microcredits and other financing possibilities available to SMEs;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that SMEs’ limited ability to access finance is a major impediment to their creation and growth; encourages initiatives by the European Investment Bank (EIB) to boost the funding available for guarantees and other financial instruments for SMEs and to increase the volume of loans available on a mid-term basis to lending institutions in order to meet SMEs’ borrowing needs; also applauds in this respect the recent initiative to set up a Micro Credit Initiative;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative of increasing the availability of micro-credits and, with this in mind, encourages the creation of a micro-credit contact point in each Member State;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the EIB to rapidly put in place new financial instruments for SMEs; stresses, in the context of relations between banks and SMEs, the importance of improving the transparency of SMEs’ credit ratings and of the services charged to them by banks;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises the important role of the EIB in improving financing available to SMEs, particularly given the current
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises the important role of the EIB in improving financing available to SMEs, particularly given the current financial turmoil and its repercussions on the credit market; invites the Commission to investigate further how current banking rules and other financial regulations could be improved to ease access to finance for SMEs; calls on the Commission and the EIB further to promote the funding possibilities for SMEs through public information campaigns;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises the important role of the EIB in improving financing available to SMEs, particularly given the current financial turmoil and its repercussions on the credit market; invites the Commission to investigate further how current banking rules and other financial regulations and instruments could be improved to ease access to finance for SMEs, including lending by institutions that are not banks;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises the important role of the EIB and the European Investment Fund (EIF) in improving financing available to SMEs, particularly given the current financial turmoil and its repercussions on the credit market; invites the Commission to investigate further how current banking rules and other financial regulations could be improved to ease access to finance for SMEs;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas, as a key contribution to achieving an SME-friendly environment, the perception of the role of entrepreneurs and risk-taking has to change: entrepreneurship and the associated willingness to take risk should be applauded by political leaders and the media, and supported by administrations,
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative of reviewing Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions; urges the creation at Community level of a harmonised time limit and more binding penalties for exceeding this limit; also calls on the Member States to improve the payment culture in their public administrations;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Welcomes the measures proposed in the Small Business Act seeking to improve the supply of capital to SMEs; calls in particular, in the light of the financial crisis, for tried and tested state SME support programmes to be expanded and/or continued and for their support to be extended to financial intermediaries;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to simplify the procedures for accessing available financing and calls for broader dissemination of the information on the availability of that financing;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Notes the enormous potential of the EU Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP) in correcting market failures in SME financing, in promoting eco-innovation and in supporting entrepreneurial culture;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to expand financing in connection with microcredit initiatives, awarding particular attention to the activities of young entrepreneurs, especially in the start-up phase;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Stresses the importance of involving, as fully as possible, the Enterprise Europe Network. the national project management authorities, the chambers of commerce and industry and the public authorities in the promotion at local level of the opportunities offered by the European programmes for research, development and innovation and by the Structural Funds, including the Community initiative JEREMIE;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that public procurement covers around 16% of EU GDP; calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement through inter alia making more use of e-procurement, adapting the size of contracts to SMEs, alleviating their administrative and financial burden in tendering, and enhancing their access to information on public tenders;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that public procurement covers around 16% of EU GDP; calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that public procurement covers around 16% of EU GDP; calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement through inter alia making more use of e-procurement and to take stronger initiatives to exploit the existing multiple opportunities for attracting SMEs in procurements under the current procurement legislation;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that public procurement covers around 16% of EU GDP; calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas, as a key contribution to achieving an SME-friendly environment, the perception of the role of entrepreneurs and risk-taking has to change: entrepreneurship and the associated willingness to take risk should be applauded by political leaders and the media, and supported by administrations,
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that public procurement covers around 16% of EU GDP; calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that public procurement covers around 16% of EU GDP; calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen SME
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that public procurement covers around 16% of EU GDP; calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement through inter alia making more use of e-procurement, harmonisation of required documents, consolidation of national online platforms;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Notes that there is a need for a system consultancy service that would assist the everyday operation of SMEs during their whole lifecycle with the aim of optimising their investments;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Notes the Commission Communication of 16 July 2008 on strengthening green public procurement; urges Member States to comply with the Commission target of 50% of public procurement awarded for "green" contracts and according to a common set of green criteria by 2010; calls for specific reference to carbon footprint when awarding contracts; calls on the Commission to continue its work on setting common green public procurement criteria based on the life cycles of products;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Considers that advanced e-Business applications, based on the implementation of interoperable electronic signatures and authentication certificates, is a crucial driver of SME competitiveness and should be encouraged by the Commission and the Member States;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Recommends, in connection with public procurement, the establishment of practices such as: requiring contracting authorities to justify the non-splitting of contracts; extending the possibility of responding as a consortium to public calls for tender; and making the requirement to pay advances general practice for all public procurement contracts;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Points out that only 8% of all SMEs are involved in cross-border activities, which curtails possibilities for growth; considers that it is essential to boost the internal market; believes that Member States should cooperate in harmonising administrative requirements that affect intra-Community activities; calls on the Member States swiftly to transpose and implement the Services Directive paying special attention to the interests of SMEs and also encourages the swift adoption of the statute on a European Private Company;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Points out that only 8% of all SMEs are involved in cross-border activities, which curtails possibilities for growth; believes that Member States should cooperate in
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas SMEs, when initiating their processes of internationalisation, have to deal with specific problems, such as lack of international experience, scarcity of experienced human resources, a highly complex international regulatory framework, and the need to introduce changes in organisation and business culture,
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Points out that only 8% of all SMEs are involved in cross-border activities
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Stresses the importance of an internal market which favours SMEs by virtue of being based on transparent, simple and coherent rules, and which can thus foster cross-border trading by SMEs; further considers that the guiding principle of ‘Think Small First’ should not remain a mere slogan, in other words that any new (legislative or other) measure should be designed so that all SMEs can easily understand and implement it; also takes the view that these measures should not involve additional administrative burdens and believes that any new compliance costs charged to SMEs should result in better access to the internal market; finally, considers that SMEs should be able to develop as easily on cross-border markets as on their own domestic markets;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission continuously to enhance the framework requirements for access of SMEs to foreign markets and to support the provision of information; encourages the setting up of European business support centres in China and India, in close cooperation with national business support centres already operating there; calls on the Commission to include in its work programme the incorporation of equal treatment for SMEs in the rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) on access to public procurement contracts; calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to the problems encountered by SMEs with customs formalities, in particular by facilitating the adaptation of their computer systems as cheaply as possible to those used by national customs authorities, and by simplifying the arrangements for access to the status of economic operator;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to continuously enhance the framework requirements for the access of SMEs to foreign markets and to support the provision of information; encourages the setting up of European business support centres in China and India, in close cooperation with national business support centres already operating there; because poor SME participation in cross border activities can also be explained by the lack of language skills and multicultural competences, greater means of action are needed in order to achieve this challenge;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission continuously to enhance the framework requirements for access of SMEs to foreign markets and to
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission continuously to enhance the framework requirements for access of SMEs to foreign markets and to support the provision of information; encourages the setting up of European business support centres in China and India, in close cooperation with national business support centres already operating there; recalls, nevertheless, that SMEs need better access to information and qualified advice in their home countries;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Notes the need for implementation of the Services Directive in all Member States to ensure a well functioning and growing Single Market through growth within the services sector;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Considering there are currently 27 different systems in Europe for calculating a company’s taxable earnings, making it burdensome for SMEs to operate in more then one Member State, the set-up by Member States of an optional system of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), reducing for instance double taxation and installing one-stop-shops for tax information for companies, should be recommended;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls for the strengthening of the Market Access Teams set up by the Commission within its delegations in third countries, as well as for the creation in that same context of a service to be specifically responsible for following up problems related to SMEs, to consist of business specialists;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Believes that the programmes for the internationalisation of SMEs at national or regional level are an extremely useful tool and are yielding good results; calls for their continued cofinancing from the ERDF and for increased funding for transnational cooperation projects between sectoral associations aimed at supporting SMEs' export and internationalisation capacities, jointly opening new markets and developing joint marketing strategies in third countries;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas Parliament has frequently noted with regret that the lack of binding legal force of the European Charter for Small Enterprises has not enabled its genuine implementation and that its ten recommendations have for the most part gone unheeded; whereas it consequently requested the Council to look into that matter, in its above-mentioned resolution of 19 January 2006,
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 c (new) 19c. Believes it is desirable to encourage the creation of joint ventures or other partnership agreements between SMEs with a view to entering new markets, developing projects for direct investment in third countries, and participating in calls for tenders; calls on the Commission to mobilise resources, especially via the European territorial cooperation objective, so as to promote transnational cooperation between SMEs in the EU;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that there is an imperative need to cut red tape by at least 25% and to put in place a modern administration adapted to the needs of SMEs, therefore, encourages the better use of digital technology among SMEs to enable them to save time and money
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that there is an imperative need to cut red tape by at least 25% and to put in place a modern administration adapted to the needs of SMEs, to enable them to save time and money and to devote the resulting resources to their development; in this regard, calls on the Commission and the Member States to take initiatives in order to exchange and promote best administrative practices, set benchmarks (“naming and shaming”), and elaborate and promote guidelines and standards for SME-friendly administrative practices;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that there is an imperative need to cut red tape
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that there is an imperative need to cut red tape
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that there is an imperative need to cut red tape by at least 25% and to put in place a modern administration adapted to the needs of SMEs, to enable them to save time and money and to devote the resulting resources to their development; is convinced that it is also imperative in the near future to implement the proposals of the High Level Expert Group on the Reduction of Administrative Burdens in the areas of company law and electronic invoicing with a view to achieving the reduction targets;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that there is an imperative need to cut red tape by at least 25% where possible and to put in place a modern administration
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Member States to implement the ‘once only’ principle, since an undertaking should not be subjected ore than once to the requirement of identical administrative procedures declarations;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Emphasises the fundamental importance of evaluating the impact of future legislative initiatives on SMEs; therefore calls for systematic and targeted impact assessments for SMES, a so called ‘SME Test’ for all new proposals for EU legislation affecting business; urges the Commission also to apply the SME test when existing legislation is simplified and when assessments are made as to whether pending proposals for legislation should be withdrawn;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Emphasises the fundamental importance of evaluating the impact of future legislative initiatives on SMEs; therefore calls for the establishment of a mandatory systematic and targeted impact assessments for SMEs, a so called ‘SME test’ for all new proposals for EU legislation affecting business and encourages the Commission to promote the introduction of the initiative at Member State level;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph – 1 (new) –1. Calls on the Council to adopt an action plan for compulsory implementation of the constituent parts of the ‘Priority for SMEs’ principle at European, national and local level;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Emphasises the fundamental importance of evaluating the impact of future legislative initiatives on SMEs; therefore calls for systematic and targeted impact assessments for SMEs, a so called ‘SME test’ for all new proposals for EU legislation affecting business, which would present, whenever relevant, concrete proposals for simplification/reduction of administrative burdens for SMEs/micro- enterprises;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Emphasises the fundamental importance of evaluating the impact of future legislative initiatives on SMEs; therefore calls for systematic and targeted impact assessments for SMEs, a so called ‘SME test’ for all new proposals for EU legislation affecting business; considers it necessary that the results of the SME test are subject to an independent evaluation which should be available to the EU legislative bodies;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Emphasises the fundamental importance of evaluating the impact of future legislative initiatives on SMEs; therefore calls for systematic and targeted independent impact assessments for SMEs, a so called ‘SME test’ for all new proposals for EU legislation affecting business; specific attention should be paid to the impact on small and micro enterprises;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Points out that the Commission’s existing consultation period of 8 weeks should be extended to at least 12 weeks and that the consultation documents should be available in all languages;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Points out that the Commission’s existing consultation period of 8 weeks should be extended to at least 12 weeks and that the consultation documents should be available in all languages;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Points out that the Commission’s existing consultation period of 8 weeks should be extended to at least 12 weeks and that the consultation documents should be available in all languages;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Points out that the Commission’s existing consultation period of 8 weeks should be extended to at least 12 weeks
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Points out that the Commission’s
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Stresses the need to use appropriate timing in communication and interaction between SMEs and public authorities;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the need for the introduction of common commencement dates for new European legislation affecting
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph – 1 a (new) –1a. Calls on the Commission to adduce the ways and means of enabling the ‘Priority for SMEs’ principle to be applied as a compulsory component of future European legislation;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the need for
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the need for
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Encourages Member States to
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 24. Encourages Member States, without prejudice to what already exists (for instance: Enterprise Europe Network, Chambers of Commerce), to set up national dedicated information contact points and support agencies for SMEs, offering access to various sources of information, structured according to the entire life cycle of a business and very specific information on particular topics such as for instance public procurement;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Encourages Member States to set up national dedicated information contact points and support agencies, as well as physical or electronic one-stop-shops, for SMEs, offering access to various sources of information, structured according to the life cycle of a business, and facilitating start-up, recruitment, training, and business advising procedures;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Encourages Member States to set up national dedicated information contact points and support agencies for SMEs, offering access to various sources of information, structured according to the life cycle of a business, and providing assistance with the funding application proper;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Encourages Member States to set up national dedicated information contact points and support
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Encourages Member States to support SME associations which inform, advise and assist SMEs throughout their development in line with the 'one-stop shop’ principle;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Reiterates that the financial rules governing Community programmes often lead to unnecessarily bureaucratic, long and costly procedures, particularly for SMEs; calls on the Commission to enhance the role and visibility of the respective SME designates in the different policy areas; furthermore, encourages all initiatives which enable the development of an "SME spirit" in policy making within public authorities; calls on the Commission to submit proposals for the simplification of administrative requirements, particularly those concerning accounting, tax, social security and statistics, while ensuring that third parties, administrators and the SMEs themselves have access to an administrative information, accounting and management system compatible with their economic and social responsibilities;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Supports warmly the Commission's Communication of 25 June 2008, which aims to drive an ambitious policy agenda to promote SMEs’ growth through the
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Reiterates that the financial rules governing Community programmes often still lead to unnecessary bureaucratic, long and costly procedures particularly for the SMEs; calls on the Commission to enhance the role and visibility of the respective SME designates in the different policy areas; furthermore, encourages all initiatives allowing the development of "SME spirit" in policy making within public authorities; considers therefore that the Commission should encourage Member States to follow its example through its “Enterprise Experience Program” which allows European Civil Servants to familiarise themselves with SMEs;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Reiterates that the financial rules governing Community programmes often still lead to unnecessar
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Reiterates that the financial rules governing Community programmes often lead to unnecessar
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls for a special EU website for SMEs which shall contain information and application forms for EU projects, national telephone numbers, links to partners, trade information, information on research projects as well as internet consultation, briefings and information about new regulation;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on the Commission to set up a working party in which Member States can exchange their national practices best tailored to the interests of SMEs, particularly regarding arrangements for obtaining support in preventing difficulties;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Welcomes the Best Idea for Red Tape Reduction Award for the public authorities that have delivered innovative red tape reduction measures at a local, regional or national level;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Calls for 30 days payment from EU cohesion funds to already approved projects, so as to assure the continued progress, survival and effect of these projects;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Calls on the Commission to set up a working party among the Member States for the exchange of best national practice in the interest of SMEs, particularly on how to obtain support with preventing difficulties;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Recogni
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Stresses the need for closer involvement of local authorities, professional associations and chambers of commerce and industry in the context of promoting the interests of SMEs at national, European and international level;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Regrets, however, that the Small Business Act is not a legally binding instrument; calls on the Commission to propose a solution for making the 10 principles, and in particular the ‘Think Small First’ principle, compulsory in all future legislation affecting SMEs;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Welcomes recent initiatives to assist
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Welcomes recent initiatives to assist SMEs in coping with environmental legislation,
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. At the same time, warns that a specific framework should be put in place by Community Institutions to prepare industry and, more specifically SMEs, for the challenges coming from the recently proposed Sustainable Consumption and Production Action plan (SCP): this means, inter alia, preliminary economic and social impact assessments as well as thresholds and exemptions for products whose impacts on climate change is limited; at the same time this means preliminary information, longer implementation periods and technical and financial assistance for SMEs and, particularly the micro and small businesses, which will be impacted upon by the plan.; again, this could be achieved through a strengthening of ECAP;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. At the same time, warns that a specific framework should be put in place by Community Institutions to prepare industry and, more specifically SMEs, for the challenges coming from the recently proposed Sustainable Consumption and Production Action plan (SCP): this means, inter alia, preliminary economic and social impact assessments as well as thresholds and exemptions for products whose impacts on climate change is limited.; at the same time this means preliminary information, longer implementation periods and technical and financial assistance for the SMEs and, particularly the micro and small businesses, which will be impacted upon by the plan; again, this could be achieved through a strengthening of ECAP;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Rejects, however, the planned Directive on reduced VAT rates enabling Member States to apply reduced rates principally for locally supplied services, which are mainly provided by SMEs, since this would result in distortions of competition, further administrative burdens owing to demarcation problems and tax increases in other places;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) - having regard to the opinions of the High Level Expert Group on the Reduction of Administrative Burdens of 10 July 2008 in the priority area of company law, and of 22 October 2008 on Reform of the rules on invoicing in Directive 2006/112/EC (VAT Directive),
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to propose solutions to make the 10 guiding principles and especially the “Think Small First “ principle mandatory in all future Community legislation affecting SMEs;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to propose solutions to make the 10 guiding principles and especially the “Think Small First“ principle mandatory in all future Community legislation affecting SMEs;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the need to place particular emphasis on craft, family, micro- and individual enterprises at EU, national and regional level, since these are most vulnerable to heavy regulatory and fiscal environments; therefore, calls for specific impact assessments for these categories of SMEs, and urges the Commission and the Member States to take regulatory, administrative, fiscal and life-long learning measures specifically targeted for them;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that since most of the actions referred to in the corresponding communication are being, or could be, implemented under existing legal frameworks, the truly innovative aspect of the Small Business Act is its intention to place the ‘Think Small First’ principle at the heart of Community policies; emphasises, therefore the absolute necessity of implementing that principle at European, national and local level;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Asks the European Union institutions to undertake to apply the ‘Think Small First’ principle through a legal instrument that ensures its implementation in all Community programmes and legislation; requests the Commission to bring forward a proposal to that end; also recommends that Member States and their local and regional authorities, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, apply that principle at national and local level;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to further enhance the visibility and awareness of SME-related policy actions through the bundling of existing Community instruments and funds for SMEs; emphasises the important role of education and training for SMEs on the existing and alternative policies and tools for access to finance and markets and initiatives to improve SME participation in innovation and environment programmes;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to further enhance the visibility and awareness of SME-related policy actions through the bundling of existing Community instruments and funds for SMEs under a separate heading in the EU budget.
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Encourages the Member States to launch educational programmes for schools and universities giving young people basic knowledge and developing their skills in entrepreneurship;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Is strongly convinced that it is vital to introduce a follow-up mechanism to
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Member States to work hand-in-hand with business representatives for the definition of the priority areas for action, as well as for the implementation, monitoring and reporting of the actions;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the 23 million small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Hopes that the Commission and Member States will make a strong political commitment to ensuring that the measures adopted in the Small Business Act are actually implemented;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Encourages the setting up of a screening system for the monitoring of the progress of, and implementation by, the Commission and Member States; special emphasis should be devoted to the identification and consequent dissemination of best practices that help SMEs to realise their full potential;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Encourages the setting up of a screening system for the monitoring of the progress and the implementation made by the Commission and Member States; it is necessary in this respect to draw up as soon as possible an agenda of the actions the Commission and the Member States are required to implement;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Encourages the setting up of a screening system for the monitoring of the progress of, and implementation by Parliament, the Commission and Member States;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Would support the drawing-up of a schedule for the measures which the Commission and Member States must take in order to implement the Small Business Act;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Applauds the proposed introduction of a network of female entrepreneur
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes the need to ensure that SMEs have the ability to buy small, buy green and buy local, thus becoming more climate friendly and efficient;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Highlights the beneficial, stabilising role of SME associations for the traders, craft workers and members of the liberal professions belonging to them; calls on the Commission and the Member States to create a stronger framework for these associations and ensure an adequate margin for manoeuvre in terms of company law;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas SMEs have to be placed at the heart of all European
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the Commission’s mooting of reduced VAT rates for locally supplied services, which are primarily provided by SMEs;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Highlights the beneficial, stabilising role of SME associations for the traders, craft workers and members of the liberal professions belonging to them; calls on the Commission and the Member States to create a stronger framework for these associations and ensure an adequate margin for manoeuvre in terms of company law;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Envisages a need for further development of the Small Business Act in the area of labour law, especially in view of the flexicurity principle, which enables SMEs in particular to respond more quickly to changes in the market and therefore to guarantee a higher level of employment and the competitiveness of the company, as well as international competitiveness, while taking into account the necessary social protection; in this connection refers to its resolution of 29 November 2007 on flexicurity1; stresses that one of the main pillars of flexicurity is a simple and predictable labour law, which is of crucial importance to SMEs in particular, because these businesses often cannot afford to have a legal department;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Hopes that measures will swiftly be adopted on the general block exemption in respect of state aids, on the European private company statute and on reduced VAT rates;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Notes the need for the "Small Business Act" to support both small enterprises and medium sized enterprises so as to ensure that owners of both small enterprises and medium sized enterprises feel equally supported;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Considers it necessary to improve understanding of the real-life situations of SMEs in Europe, through a revitalisation of the European Observatory of SMEs;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the EU institutions to acknowledge the specific characteristics of the liberal professions, some of whose tasks include a general interest component, and to treat the liberal professions in the same way as other SMEs except where this contradicts existing law governing these professions;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Notes that, despite the clear commitment made in the European Charter for Small Enterprises, the voice of SMEs remain muted within the context of the social dialogue; urges that this deficit is formally corrected by appropriate proposals within the context of the Small Business Act;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Calls on the public authorities, on the basis of the principle that access to information is a precondition for obtaining information itself, and considering the importance of the Internet as a vehicle, to simplify institutional websites to the maximum to enable users to pinpoint and better understand the support mechanisms being offered;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the overwhelming majority of SMEs are
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the importance of innovation driven research for SMEs and the difficulties in taking advantage of research opportunities;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the importance of innovation for SMEs and the difficulties in taking advantage of research opportunities; believes that the focus should not only be on high-tech innovation, but that also low, mid tech and informal innovation should be considered; is convinced that the European Institute for Innovation and Technology could have an important role in boosting R&D and innovation for SMEs;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the importance of innovation for SMEs and the difficulties in taking advantage of research opportunities; considers it necessary to promote basic research and applied research; believes that the focus should not only be on high-tech innovation, but that also low, mid tech and informal innovation should be considered;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the need to reduce fiscal inequalities between Member States at Union level, as well as to establish a new system, as uniform as possible, of direct and indirect taxation;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Supports the Commission’s initiative to improve access to the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Development;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Is convinced that the flow and exchange of information and ideas should not be hindered by overly rigid rules on intellectual property rights (IPR) that could harm the necessary innovative environment in particular for SMEs which are especially vulnerable;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines the need for EU's different research programmes and technological platforms to be designed in a way that facilitates the participation of SMEs across the borders;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Notes the importance of creating cooperative networks of SMEs working in geographical and knowledge-based clusters with common goals of research and innovation and development of products;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. In order to ensure a level-playing field for SMEs, calls on the Commission to favour a market environment that is not conditioned by the dominant position of large companies on a geographical or sectoral level;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas SMEs are often micro enterprises, craft industries, family businesses and cooperatives which are the natural incubators of entrepreneurial culture and therefore play an important role in enhancing social inclusion and self-
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to create better framework
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to create better framework conditions aimed at promoting innovation by SMEs, in particular by introducing ways to improve the protection of intellectual property
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to create better framework conditions aimed at promoting innovation by SMEs, in particular by introducing ways to improve the protection of intellectual property and to fight against counterfeiting
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the activities of the Enterprise Europe Network platform, and encourages the Commission to use this instrument on an ongoing basis with a view to the best possible application at local level of the present rules on the operations of SMEs;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Takes the view that the full potential of e-commerce for SMEs is not yet fully exploited and that there is still much to be done to achieve a Single European Electronic Market for products and services where SMEs could play a leading role for the further integration of the EU markets;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that the participation of SMEs in clusters must be promoted in order to boost innovation and increase the competitiveness of the European economy; calls therefore on the Commission to support the improvement of cluster management, notably through the exchange of best practices and training programmes, to design and disseminate tools to assess the performance of clusters, to promote inter- cluster cooperation, and to further simplify administrative procedures for the participation of clusters in EU programmes;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is strongly convinced that patents
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is strongly convinced that patents (including the Community patent) play an increasingly important role in innovation and economic performance, since they enable innovators to capture the returns from innovative investments and provide the necessary security for investment, equity and loans; considers therefore that it is necessary to set up the Community patent in such a way that it will give to SMEs a more efficient framework for the protection of IPR;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is strongly convinced that
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is strongly convinced that patents (including the Community patent) could play an increasingly important role in innovation and economic performance, since they have the potential to enable innovators to capture the returns from innovative investments and provide the necessary security for investment, equity and loans;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas, despite their differences, Europe’s SMEs face many of the same challenges in re
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Draws attention to the problems that patents can present for SMEs on grounds of cost and lack of flexibility with the result that patent protection is not necessarily adapted to the current pace of the economy and in particular not for smaller actors thereby reinforcing monopolist behaviours;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Recommends a more flexible patent regime which could result in a positive reduction in the economic burden on innovative SMEs;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the need to promote innovative public procurement since it leads to added value for contracting authorities, citizens, and participating undertakings; in that respect, calls on the European Council to examine the perspective of establishing a quota, as regards public procurement in R&D and eco-innovation, in favour of R&D performing and innovative SMEs, clusters, and innovation and competitiveness poles;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the need to promote innovative public procurement
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the need to promote innovative public procurement, since it leads to added value for the contracting authorities, citizens, and participating undertakings; in order to promote innovative public procurement, calls on the Commission and Member States to use as an example the strategy applied for green public procurement, and on Member States who are "front runners" in the field of innovation to promote innovative public procurement in order to implant the innovation culture throughout the EU;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Takes the view that for international public procurement, where new technologies allow for cross-border e- commerce, new forms of, for example, combinatorial auctions for SME- consortia and online publication and advertising tenders allow for significant increases of procurement trade not only within the European Union but globally to encourage cross-border e-commerce;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Draws attention to the need for sufficient technical and skilled personnel; therefore, believes that more investment is needed in education and that the links between educational institutions and SMEs should be strengthened, so that entrepreneurship culture is promoted at all levels of national and regional education systems; encourages the further extension of individual mobility schemes such as „Erasmus for young entrepreneurs" and „Erasmus for apprentices"; urges the Member States, in collaboration with social partners and training providers, to set up lifelong learning programmes specifically tailored to SMEs’ needs that will be co-financed by the European Social Fund;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Draws attention to the need for sufficient technical and skilled personnel; therefore, believes that more investment is needed in education and that the links between educational institutions and SMEs should be strengthened; considers in this respect that it would be a positive step to include, in secondary and higher and further education curricula, modules that promote awareness of the world of business; encourages the further extension of individual mobility schemes such as
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Draws attention to the need for sufficient technical and skilled personnel; therefore, believes that more investment is needed in education and that the links between educational institutions and SMEs should be strengthened; stresses the need, therefore, to develop work-based initial vocational training, since this method of training is recognised as helping to enhance the competitiveness of SMEs, and encourages the further extension of individual mobility schemes such as
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Draws attention to the need for a coordination system with the lead of the National Academies of Science and research institutes for seeking innovation and to reduce barriers for SMEs;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas, despite their differences, Europe’s SMEs face many of the same challenges in realising their full potential, in areas such as relatively higher administration and compliance costs than larger enterprises, access to finance and markets, innovation and the environment,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Points out that the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Development contains a financial risk sharing mechanism which should enable access to be facilitated to loans from the European Investment Bank (EIB) for large-scale projects; calls on the Commission to assess SME recourse to that mechanism, and consequently to bring forward any necessary proposals;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Welcomes the launching of a single European network integrating the services currently provided by Euro Info Centres (EIC) and Innovation Relay Centres (IRC) in order to support SMEs in all their innovation and competitiveness efforts through a wide range of services;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Calls on the Commission to assess SME participation in the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme and to bring forward any necessary proposals;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Points out that the main source of funding for SMEs
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Points out that the main source of funding for SMEs
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Points out that the main source of funding for SMEs in Europe comes from their own
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Points out that the main source of funding for SMEs, whose vulnerability stems from their under-provision in capital, comes from their own activity; calls on Member States to provide better conditions to enable SMEs to reduce costs and reinvest the profit in the company, and which consequently should not require the payment of charges prior to SMEs’ commencing activities, in order to ensure that they are able to build up their own funds and resources;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Points out that the main source of funding for SMEs comes from their own activity; calls on Member States to provide better conditions to enable SMEs to reduce costs and reinvest the profit in the company; stresses also the need for SMEs to have access to finance in order to prevent them from facing bankruptcy in the wake of the current financial crisis;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Points out that the main source of funding for SMEs comes from their own activity; calls on Member States, particularly their regional and local governments, to provide better conditions to enable SMEs to reduce costs and reinvest the profit in the company;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas, as a key contribution to achieving an SME-friendly environment, the perception of the role of entrepreneurs and risk-taking has to change: entrepreneurship and the associated willingness to take risk should be applauded by political leaders and the media, and supported by administrations,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to step up their efforts to promote and provide information on the existence of European funds and State aids intended for SMEs, and to make these two instruments both more accessible and more easily understandable;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Member States, in the light of the current financial crisis, to encourage banks to guarantee SMEs access to credit on reasonable terms;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Member States to create better conditions allowing SMEs to invest in skills training, not least through direct tax cuts and compensation arrangements between tax authorities and the European Union;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises that capital taxation can be a deterrent to the transfer of businesses, in particular family businesses, increasing the risk of liquidation or closure of the company;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises that capital taxation can be a deterrent to the transfer of businesses, in particular family businesses, increasing the risk of liquidation or closure of the company; calls on Member States to review carefully their legal and fiscal framework to
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises that
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises that
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to devise tangible new solutions which remove the obstacle of the guarantees needed to access credit, including trying out new forms of support that supplement the current credit consortia procedures;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Is very satisfied with the recent "Lisbonisation" of the cohesion policy; believes that by directing regional funds more towards entrepreneurship, research and innovation, considerable funds could become available at local level to enhance business potential; also believes that the regional funds should be fully integrated with the EU's climate change goals and therefore urges that the Structural Funds should be directed at "green entrepreneurship projects" like micro- renewables, with strong environmental criteria for the infrastructure, research and business-related projects authorised with EU money;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Is very satisfied with the recent
source: PE-416.309
2008/12/10
CULT
5 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. recalls that the ‘sense of initiative and entrepreneurship’ is a key competence
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. recalls that the ‘sense of initiative and entrepreneurship’ is a key competence, calls on the Member States to include this in their Lifelong Learning strategies
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. emphasises that the creative sector is dominated by small and medium-sized structures and is especially important in terms of safeguarding sustainable regional employment;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. urges the Commission and the Member States to provide targeted promotion measures and individual support such as information, advice and opportunities to access venture capital for business start-ups in the SME sector;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. emphasises the need to develop a social and economic model that creates an appropriate security network for small and medium-sized entrepreneurs in the creative sector, where unstable working conditions are often encountered;
source: PE-416.590
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2102/COM_SEC(2008)2102_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2102/COM_SEC(2008)2102_EN.pdf |
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-414319_EN.html
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-414290_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-414346_EN.html
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-414342_EN.html
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-414940_EN.html
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-415266_EN.html
|
events/0/date |
Old
2008-06-25T00:00:00New
2008-06-24T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2101/COM_SEC(2008)2101_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2101/COM_SEC(2008)2101_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2102/COM_SEC(2008)2102_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2102/COM_SEC(2008)2102_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE413.994New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE413.994 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.319&secondRef=02
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.309New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.309 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.290&secondRef=02
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.346&secondRef=02
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.342&secondRef=02
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.940&secondRef=02
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.266&secondRef=03
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0074_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0074_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/5/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090309&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE |
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2101/COM_SEC(2008)2101_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2101/COM_SEC(2008)2101_EN.pdf |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-74&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0074_EN.html |
docs/11/body |
EC
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-74&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0074_EN.html |
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-100New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0100_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/6/64697New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises SMEs, craft industriesNew
3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), craft industries |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|