Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | PETI | MCGUINNESS Mairead ( PPE-DE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 227-p7
Legal Basis:
RoP 227-p7Events
The European Parliament adopted by 641 votes to 13, with 15 abstentions, a resolution on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the year 2008.
The resolution recalls that in 2008 the Committee on Petitions received 1 886 petitions, of which 1 065 were declared admissible and 821 were declared inadmissible.
MEPs welcome the involvement and contribution of petitioners at each meeting of the Committee on Petitions, which allows for a direct and open dialogue with European Parliament representatives . They encourage individual EU citizens and community associations to come forward with issues which concern the area of activity of the European Union and which affect them directly. The Commission is called upon to ensure that greater recognition is given to, and greater emphasis placed on, the petitions process.
The resolution urges national and regional parliaments, as representatives of EU citizens, to remain vigilant in relation to the way in which Member States apply the Treaties and EU legislative acts, notably as regards issues related to the environment, social and employment rights, the free movement of persons, goods and services, financial services, citizens' fundamental rights including their right to legitimately acquired property, recognition of their professional qualifications and all forms of discrimination.
The Parliament stresses that it cannot regard as admissible petitions which seek to appeal against decisions of competent authorities or judicial bodies of Member States and that information to that effect must be communicated in a clear and understandable way to the petitioners. It also notes that many petitions received by Parliament from individuals and associations largely concern matters which do not constitute an infringement of Community law and which should therefore be resolved by exhausting all legal avenues of redress existing in the Member States concerned.
MEPs call on the Commission, all Member States and their national, regional and local institutions, together with their Permanent Representatives, to cooperate fully with the responsible committee of the European Parliament when investigating allegations or proposals contained in petitions, on a loyal and constructive basis, with a view to finding solutions to issues raised through the petitions process. They request that a new interinstitutional agreement incorporating reinforced powers for committees of inquiry be negotiated in order to further strengthen the rights of EU citizens.
The Parliament is concerned by the large number of petitions received seeking voting rights for resident ‘non’-citizens of Latvia in local elections. It urges the European Commission to closely monitor and encourage the regularisation of the status of "non"-citizens in Latvia, many of whom were born in Latvia. It also calls: (i) for the implementation by all parties of UN Security Council Resolution 550 (1984) on the Cyprus issue , which would lead to the full restoration of property to its legitimate owners in Varosha; (ii) the Romanian authorities to adopt measures to conserve and safeguard Romania's cultural and architectural heritage ; (iii) the French authorities to prepare an epidemiological assessment to determine the impact on the area close to Fos-Berre, in the immediate vicinity of the incinerator plant under construction at Fos-sur-Mer .
The Commission is also called upon, inter alia, to: (i) ensure that the Habitats and Birds Directives are applied by the Member States in a manner which is consistent with the objective of ending biodiversity loss in the EU by 2010; (ii) step up its monitoring of the implementation of Directive 2006/114/EC concerning misleading and comparative advertising with regard to misleading business-directory companies.
MEPs welcome the constructive cooperation between the Ombudsman and the EU. They endorse the Ombudsman's repeated calls for the adoption of a Code of Good Administrative Behaviour , common to all EU institutions and bodies. Moreover, they believe that the Ombudsman, the Commission and Parliament should develop a common EU portal for the treatment of complaints addressed to the EU institutions.
The resolution recalls the recommendations contained in the 2007 Annual Report of the Committee on Petitions with a view to reviewing the administrative procedures for the treatment of petitions, such as, for instance, the transfer of the registration of petitions to the Petitions Committee secretariat, close cooperation with SOLVIT , further enhancement of the petitions database, the development of an EU portal for European citizens, etc. It welcomes the drafting by Members of a Code of Good Practice for the treatment of petitions, which would come into force at the beginning of the next parliamentary term.
Lastly, MEPs note that the " one-seat petition " signed by 1 500 000 people, which seeks to have the European Parliament meet in one location, has not yet been fully addressed. They recommend that the Committee on Petitions deal with this matter as a priority during the next parliamentary term.
The Committee on Petitions adopted an own-initiative report drawn up by Mairead McGUINNESS (EPP-ED, IE) on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the year 2008.
MEPs welcome the involvement and contribution of petitioners at each meeting of the Committee on Petitions, which allows for a direct and open dialogue with European Parliament representatives. They encourage individual EU citizens and community associations to come forward with issues which concern the area of activity of the European Union and which affect them directly. The Commission is called upon to ensure that greater recognition is given to, and greater emphasis placed on, the petitions process.
The report urges national and regional parliaments , as representatives of EU citizens, to remain vigilant in relation to the way in which Member States apply the Treaties and EU legislative acts, notably as regards issues related to the environment, social and employment rights, the free movement of persons, goods and services, financial services, citizens' fundamental rights including their right to legitimately acquired property, recognition of their professional qualifications and all forms of discrimination.
MEPs call on the Commission, all Member States and their national, regional and local institutions, together with their Permanent Representatives, to cooperate fully with the responsible committee of the European Parliament when investigating allegations or proposals contained in petitions, on a loyal and constructive basis, with a view to finding solutions to issues raised through the petitions process. They request that a new interinstitutional agreement incorporating reinforced powers for committees of inquiry be negotiated in order to further strengthen the rights of EU citizens.
The committee is concerned by the large number of petitions received seeking voting rights for resident ‘non’-citizens of Latvia in local elections. It calls on: the Romanian authorities to adopt measures to conserve and safeguard Romania's cultural and architectural heritage; the French authorities to prepare an epidemiological assessment to determine the impact on the area close to Fos-Berre, in the immediate vicinity of the incinerator plant under construction at Fos-sur-Mer.
The Commission is also called upon, inter alia, to: ensure that the Habitats and Birds Directives are applied by the Member States in a manner which is consistent with the objective of ending biodiversity loss in the EU by 2010; step up its monitoring of the implementation of Directive 2006/114/EC concerning misleading and comparative advertising with regard to misleading business-directory companies.
MEPs welcome the constructive cooperation between the Ombudsman and the EU. They endorse the Ombudsman's repeated calls for the adoption of a Code of Good Administrative Behaviour , common to all EU institutions and bodies. Moreover, they believe that the Ombudsman, the Commission and Parliament should develop a common EU portal for the treatment of complaints addressed to the EU institutions.
The report recalls the recommendations contained in the 2007 Annual Report of the Committee on Petitions with a view to reviewing the administrative procedures for the treatment of petitions, such as, for instance, the transfer of the registration of petitions to the Petitions Committee secretariat, close cooperation with SOLVIT, further enhancement of the petitions database, the development of an EU portal for European citizens, etc. It welcomes the drafting by Members of a Code of Good Practice for the treatment of petitions, which would come into force at the beginning of the next parliamentary term.
Lastly, MEPs note that the "one-seat petition" signed by 1 500 000 people, which seeks to have the European Parliament meet in one location, has not yet been fully addressed. They recommend that the Committee on Petitions deal with this matter as a priority during the next parliamentary term.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3615
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0239/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0232/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0232/2009
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE421.247
- Committee draft report: PE418.130
- Committee draft report: PE418.130
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE421.247
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0232/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3615
Activities
Votes
Rapport McGUINNESS A6-0232/2009 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
50 |
2008/2301(INI)
2009/03/12
PETI
50 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. having regard to the growing number of EU citizens who petition Parliament, together with the efforts by the Committee on Petitions to further expedite its procedures in order to provide a better service for citizens seeking its assistance,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas increased concerns over energy supply security have resulted in projects for pipelines for natural gas, as well as for liquefied natural gas which, in particular when rushed through without proper evaluation of risks and alternatives, has raised petitioners' concerns over insufficient consideration of potential serious risks for the environment and human health and safety in respect, notably, of projects in the Baltic Sea, Wales and Ireland,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O b (new) Ob. whereas it is evident from the examination of petitions that the lists of projects mentioned in the Annexes to Directive 85/337 on environmental impact assessments(as amended by Directive 97/11) do not cover a number of important installations and activities which have emerged after the latest amendments to the Annexes, such as, re- gasification plants and bio-diesel plants,
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O c (new) Oc. whereas the many petitions on the Natura 2000 network have continued to show that ending loss of biodiversity constitutes a major challenge for the Union and that the Habitats and Birds Directives constitute basic and indispensable tools for fulfilling the EU's commitment to end biodiversity loss by 2010,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O d (new) Od. whereas the examination of petitions has also shown that the lack of sufficient sources of fresh water frequently is aggravated by other factors such as expanding demand for water due to excessive urbanisation and leisure projects, inadequate maintenance of infrastructure and prevention of leakage, intensive use of water by industrial agriculture and a pricing policy which does not encourage sustainable use of water,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. having regard to the recommendations made by the Committee on Petitions following a visit to Fos-sur-Mer,
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R a (new) Ra. whereas Ms Ann Abraham, the UK Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman addressed the committee in December 2008 and presented her findings, which took her four years to complete, yet there were no proposals for remedies for the victims,
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S S. recognising the positive and constructive cooperation with the European Ombudsman in 2008, the support provided by the Committee on Petitions for his recommendations contained in
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital T T. whereas in 2008 the Committee on Petitions received 1 884 petitions,
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. bearing in mind that several of the recommendations adopted in the 2007 Annual Report are yet to be implemented by Parliament's authorities, such as the request for an urgent improvement of the administrative resources, including linguistic and legal expertise, of its Committee on Petitions in order to increase Parliament's capacity to conduct independent investigations of petitions addressed to it,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the involvement and contribution of petitioners at each meeting of the Committee on Petitions which allows for a direct and open dialogue with European Parliament representatives and continues to encourage individual EU citizens and community associations to come forward with issues which concern the area of activity of the European Union and which affect them directly, believing that this process enables the European Parliament as an institution to monitor the implementation of Community law in the Member States and to better defend and promote the fundamental rights of all EU citizens as defined in the EU Treaty;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the involvement of petitioners at each meeting of the Committee on Petitions and continues to encourage individual EU citizens and community associations to
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Urges
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Parliament cannot regard as admissible petitions which seek to appeal against decisions of competent authorities or judicial bodies of Member States; emphasises, moreover, that complaints need to meet the conditions of Rule 191(1) of Parliament's Rules of Procedure before they can be registered as petitions;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Parliament cannot regard as admissible petitions which seek to appeal against decisions of competent authorities or judicial bodies of Member States and that such information is communicated in a clear and understandable way to the petitioners;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that the European Parliament cannot deem as admissible, petitions which seek to appeal against decisions of competent member state authorities or judicial bodies, acting under the principle of subsidiarity, that is, when neither Community law nor the basic principles on which the Union is founded are relevant;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for the recommendations adopted in the 2007 Annual Report which have not yet been implemented to be implemented within a reasonable timeframe;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on all Member States and their national, regional and local institutions to fully cooperate with the responsible committee of the European Parliament and with the Commission when investigating allegations or proposals contained in petitions, on a loyal and constructive basis, with a view to finding solutions to issues raised through the petitions process;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the European Commission, all Member States and their national, regional and local institutions, together with their Permanent Representations, to fully cooperate with the responsible committee of the European Parliament when investigating allegations or proposals contained in petitions, on a loyal and constructive basis, with a view to finding solutions to issues raised through the petitions process;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that the recognition of the essential role and competence of national, regional and local authorities in proposing and implementing programmes and projects within the objectives of European cohesion funding must be accompanied by effective verification that authorities on all levels of government assume their respective responsibilities in assuring that European funding is not used for purposes which contravene EU law or the policies covered by the funding;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas several of the recommendations adopted in the 2007 Annual Report have yet to be implemented by Parliament's authorities, such as, for instance, closer cooperation with SOLVIT in the field of petitions and complaints regarding the internal market, and the establishment of a common EU portal for European citizens,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recalls that Parliament has considered that allegations of serious infringements of Community law, which the Committee on Petitions has deemed well founded in the course of the examination of petitions but which the Member State concerned refuses to admit and which are likely to set a precedent at the national level, should ultimately be examined by the ECJ in order to ensure consistency and coherence in Community law and the reality of the internal market;1
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Takes the view that, as there are clear indications that the objective of ending biodiversity loss in the EU by 2010 cannot be achieved, urgent action must be taken in order to render the application of the Habitats and Birds Directives more effective and calls on the Commission to do its utmost to ensure that the directives are applied by the Member States in a manner which is consistent with this objective;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Parliament and the Commission to promote to Member States the importance of forward thinking - especially in the area of planning approval - in helping to prevent potential breaches of provisions of Community law that have been adopted but are not as yet in force;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Is concerned by the large number of petitions before this committee seeking voting rights for resident ‘non’-citizens of Latvia in local elections; recalls that the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Committee, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe, the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe's Parliamentary Assembly have recommended making it possible for non- citizens to participate in local elections; urges the European Commission to closely monitor and encourage the regularisation of the status of ‘non’- citizens in Latvia, many of whom were born in Latvia;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Notes that many petitions received by the European Parliament from individuals and associations largely concern matters which do not constitute an infringement of Community law and should therefore be resolved by exhausting all legal channels of redress existing in the Member States concerned and once all appropriate action has been taken at national level the appropriate appeals body is the European Court of Human Rights;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls on the Commission to bring forward a proposal, as a matter of urgency, to remove the legal loophole which allows misleading business directories to continue to operate; the problem could be resolved by altering the wording of Annex A(21) to the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (2005/29/EC), specifically by replacing the word 'consumer' by the words 'target of the practice';
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the institution of the 'Citizens' Initiative' under the Treaty of Lisbon will result in even greater public participation in the activities and work of the European Union,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Notes that the One-Seat Petition signed by 1,5 million people, which seeks to have the European Parliament meet in one location, has not yet been fully addressed; recommends that the Petitions Committee deal with this matter as a priority during the next mandate;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 d (new) 9d. Notes that the issues raised in the Jugendamt petitions concerning children being taken into care, have not yet been fully addressed and need to be considered afresh early in the next parliamentary term;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Therefore, calls on responsible legislative committees to
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Recalls Parliament's request to the Commission to step up its monitoring of the implementation of Directive 2006/114/EC on misleading and comparative advertising with regard to misleading business-directory companies and to report to Parliament on the feasibility and possible consequences of extending the scope of Directive 2005/29/EC;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Endorses the Ombudsman's call to the Council to expand the language options of the websites of its Presidencies to the most widely spoken languages of the European Union with the aim of ensuring that citizens have direct access to the activities of the Council's Presidencies; refers in this respect to the French Council Presidency, which published its official website in compliance with the Ombudsman's recommendations;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Endorses the Ombudsman's call to the Commission, with reference to the implementation of the Working Time Directive, to handle complaints by citizens in conformity with principles of good administration in the field of the Commission's discretionary powers regarding the opening of infringement procedures;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Welcomes the constructive cooperation between the Ombudsman and the EU within the appropriate institutional framework ; endorses the Ombudsman's repeated calls for the need of a Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, common to all EU institutions and bodies, as approved by Parliament on 6 September 2001; is of the view that the Ombudsman, the Commission and the Parliament should develop a common EU portal for the treatment of complaints addressed to the EU institutions;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Urges the implementation by all parties of UN Security Council Resolution 550 ( 1984 ) on the Cyprus issue, which would lead to the full restoration of property to its legitimate owners in Varosha; in case there are no visible results by the end of 2008, the committee responsible might consider bringing the issue of the Famagusta petitioners to plenary;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Romanian authorities to adopt measures to conserve and safeguard Romania's cultural and architectural heritage, pursuant to Article 151 of the EC Treaty, referring to Parliament's Written Declaration P6_TA(2007)0435 on St Joseph's Roman Catholic Cathedral; with reference to the problems on restitution of property confiscated under the Communist regime, points out that, under Article 295 of the EC Treaty, property ownership is a matter of national competence;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Requests the French authorities to prepare an epidemiological assessment to determine the impact on the area close to Fos-Berre, in the immediate vicinity of the incinerator plant under construction at Fos-sur-Mer; recognises that Directive 1999/30/EC does not prohibit the construction of an incinerator in an area already affected by atmospheric pollution, but, under Directives 1999/30/EC and 96/62/EEC, measures are to be taken to ensure compliance with European standards on atmospheric pollution;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas failure to cooperate actively and in a timely manner with the work of the responsible committee in the interest of the correct application of Community law raises doubts about the desire and intent of the Member State concerned to
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Recalls the recommendations in the Committee's Annual Report of 2007 with a view to reconsidering the administrative proceedings on the treatment of petitions, such as, for instance, the transfer of the registration of petitions to the Petitions Committee secretariat, close cooperation with SOLVIT, further enhancement of the Petitions Database, the development of an EU portal for European citizens etc; welcomes the drafting by Members of a Code of Good Practice for the treatment of petitions, which would come into force at the beginning of the next parliamentary term;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. recognising the constructive contribution made to the petitions process by the services of the Commission, which regularly provide, at the request of the responsible committee, preliminary assessments of many petitions received,
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas Parliament has considered that it would be legitimate for it to make use of its powers under Article 230 of the EC Treaty, if this were necessary in order to put an end to a serious infringement of Community law which has been revealed in the course of the examination of a petition and where a significant difference of interpretation persists, despite efforts to resolve it, between Parliament and the Commission, as regards the action required under Community law for the protection of citizen's rights in the case concerned,
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas, under Article 230 of the EC Treaty, Parliament has the right to bring actions before the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ) under the same conditions as the Council and the Commission and, pursuant to Article 201 of the EC Treaty, Parliament is empowered to exercise control over the activities of the Commission and thus has at its disposal both the legal and the political instruments to respond more effectively to citizens' legitimate concerns,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N.
source: PE-421.247
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.130New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE418.130 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE421.247New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE421.247 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0232_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0232_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090421&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090421&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 227-p7
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 216-p8
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-232&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0232_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-232&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0232_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-239New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0239_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
PETI/6/68855New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 216-p8
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 216-p8
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Annual report on the Activity of the Petitions Committee 2008New
Annual report on the activity of the Petitions Committee 2008 |
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Secretariat GeneralNew
Secretariat-General |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|