BETA


2009/2213(INI) EU strategy for the relations with Latin America

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio (icon: PPE PPE) MENÉNDEZ DEL VALLE Emilio (icon: S&D S&D), WEBER Renate (icon: ALDE ALDE), LUNACEK Ulrike (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion DEVE GRÈZE Catherine (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion INTA
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2010/05/05
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2010/05/05
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the EU strategy for relations with Latin America.

Parliament welcomed the Commission communication 'The European Union and Latin America: Global Players in Partnership', (see COM(2009)0495 ). It also welcomes the efforts of the Spanish presidency to secure the signing of the EU-Central America Association Agreement and the multi-party trade agreements with Colombia and Peru, as well as its clear commitment to re-launching negotiations between the EU and Mercosur. Members stress that support for the various regional integration processes in Latin America is a basic principle for the biregional strategic partnership, and they reaffirm that the ultimate goal of the EU-Latin America biregional strategic partnership is the creation of a Euro-Latin American global interregional partnership area, by, approximately, 2015, in the areas of politics, economics, trade and social and cultural affairs, intended to ensure sustainable development in both regions.

The political area of the biregional strategic partnership : Parliament calls on the Vice-President/High Representative (VP/HR) and on the Council to set clear guidelines for the best way of working closely together in order to foster effective multilateralism, ensure preservation of the environment , combat climate change, boost the UN's peacekeeping capacities, ensure achievement of the Millennium Goals, and tackle common threats to peace and security, including trafficking in illegal drugs and weapons, in line with the decisions reached in Lima. Members also call for the creation of appropriate mechanisms for institutional cooperation between the EuroLat Assembly and the various EU bodies, and reiterate that the future European External Action Service (EEAS) must ensure that the EP has valid interlocutors in the EU's delegations - above all in key regions such as Latin America - so as to guarantee full cooperation with Parliament.

Parliament goes on to make the following points:

a Euro-Latin American Charter for Peace and Security should be adopted, including strategies for joint political and security action in order to deal with the common challenges facing the members of the biregional strategic partnership; the internal stability of many Latin American partner countries continues to depend on the reform of the state, which must include participation in the decision-making process by all indigenous populations and other minorities; an independent judiciary and an effective policy of respect for human rights as part of a responsible administration subject to controls and operating transparently will give citizens a sense of security; and prevent them from becoming alienated from that system; with reference to the projects currently under way in Peru, Colombia and Bolivia, the funding allocated to programmes to eradicate drugs crops through alternative development programmes should be stepped up; climate change and global warming should remain a priority on the political agenda, with the need to agree joint positions in the various forums for dialogue on the environment and climate change.

Parliament deplores the fact that some countries' financial efforts have prioritised an excessive increase in military spending at a time when it is essential to reduce the effects of underdevelopment, poverty, pandemics, malnutrition, crime and natural disasters.

Economic area of the biregional strategic partnership : Parliament reiterates its proposal for the creation of a Euro-Latin American global interregional partnership area based on a 'WTO–Regionalism' compatible model in two stages. With a view to completing the first phase, it supports the resumption of negotiations on the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement, which affects 700 million people, and would be the world's most ambitious biregional agreement; the conclusion of negotiations on the EU-Central America Association Agreement before the Madrid summit; the revision of the 2003 political and cooperation agreement with the Andean Community; and the deepening of the existing Association Agreements with Mexico and Chile. In order to complete the second stage and with a view to reaching a global interregional partnership agreement by 2015, Members call for legal and institutional support and full geographical coverage to be provided for the various strands of the biregional strategic partnership, and for common provisions to be established that facilitate the exercise of the various freedoms, so as to create as broad a partnership as possible by deepening both the integration agreements within Latin America and the EU's partnership process with the various countries and regional groupings.

Social area of the biregional strategic partnership : Parliament considers the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to be one of the most important objectives to be achieved by 2015, and suggests coordinating the positions of both regions on how to achieve the MDGs ahead of the MDG high-level meeting to be held in September 2010. Parliament also makes the following points:

the opening of a serious dialogue on topics linked to science, technology and innovation should boost the creation of a Euro-Latin American area of innovation and knowledge, with the agreement on innovation concluded with Chile being taken as an example to follow; decisive action must be taken against illiteracy, the rate of which remains high in some countries in the region, in particular among girls and women; promote and drive proactive policies which guarantee the effective social inclusion of the disabled; welcoming the recent ruling by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the Campo Algodonero feminicides in Mexico, as a precedent for the whole region, Members want the governments of the EU and Latin America and the Caribbean to use this ruling as a guideline for future work, and to ensure that their strong condemnation of violence against women is accompanied by properly funded protection and prevention programmes; Parliament recommends that the Latin American governments - hoping also that the EU will offer all possible support for this huge task and aware of the difficult social situation despite a reasonably sound economic outlook - adopt policies including investment in public works, strengthening of the internal market, support for SMEs, extension of credit facilities, greater investment in health and education, and more decided steps to deal with youth unemployment and gender discrimination in the workplace. Although it may not be easy to obtain suitable funding for the above objectives - it is necessary to build a fair, tax system capable of fighting tax avoidance, while also reviewing excessive military expenditure; creative proposals to ensure maximum social security coverage for the communities concerned should be proposed.

Mechanisms for reaching the ultimate goals of the strategic partnership

A. Institutional mechanisms : the resolution recommends that the biannual summits should be maintained, but stresses that relations with Latin America should not be restricted to a biannual vision but should be strengthened through a long-term vision. It proposes that a biregional political dialogue be opened with new triangular approaches on matters of common interest embracing EU-LAC-Asia, EU-LAC-Africa and EU-LAC-US, with a view to moving towards a Euro-Atlantic area comprising the US, Latin America and the EU. Parliament reiterates its proposal for the creation of a Europe-Latin America and Caribbean Foundation, whose primary purpose would be to help prepare the summits, follow up on the decisions and political courses of action adopted at the summits, and act as a forum for dialogue and coordination in the periods between summits for all the political, economic, institutional, academic and civil society bodies working to strengthen Euro-Latin American relations, including the EuroLat Assembly. The Foundation's budget should be limited but sufficient for it to carry out its tasks, financed by contributions from its EU and Latin American member states, the EU budget, and own resources generated by the Foundation itself or made available to it by sponsoring bodies with connections to the Euro-Latin American area.

B. Financial mechanisms : Parliament supports the Latin America Investment Facility proposed by the Commission. It notes that an amount of EUR 100 million has been set aside under the Community budget for the period up to 2013. It hopes that it will help extend the spread of the countries and sectors in which European investments are made. It emphasises the need to go beyond the purely assistance-based approach to development cooperation with Latin America - so that the financial resources from the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) are concentrated on the poorest countries and most vulnerable groups - and to establish new forms of cooperation with middle-income countries in Latin America through the Industrialised Countries Instrument (ICI+). To that end, plenary calls for better integration of the rights and needs of disabled people.

Lastly, Parliament stresses the importance and desirability of working towards harmonisation of the regulatory and supervisory aspects of the various Latin American financial systems, with a view to bridge-building and convergence as far as possible with the European system.

Documents
2010/05/05
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2010/04/20
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2010/03/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2010/03/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2010/03/17
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/03/17
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SANCHEZ-NEYRA (EPP, ES) on the EU strategy for relations with Latin America and welcomed the Commission communication 'The European Union and Latin America: Global Players in Partnership', (see COM(2009)0495 ). It also welcomes the efforts of the Spanish presidency to secure the signing of the EU-Central America Association Agreement and the multi-party trade agreements with Colombia and Peru, as well as its clear commitment to re-launching negotiations between the EU and Mercosur. Members stress that support for the various regional integration processes in Latin America is a basic principle for the biregional strategic partnership, and they reaffirm that the ultimate goal of the EU-Latin America biregional strategic partnership is the creation of a Euro-Latin American global interregional partnership area, by, approximately, 2015, in the areas of politics, economics, trade and social and cultural affairs, intended to ensure sustainable development in both regions.

The political area of the biregional strategic partnership : the committee calls on the Vice-President / High Representative (VP/HR) and on the Council to set clear guidelines for the best way of working closely together in order to foster effective multilateralism, ensure preservation of the environment , combat climate change, boost the UN's peacekeeping capacities, ensure achievement of the Millennium Goals, and tackle common threats to peace and security, including trafficking in illegal drugs and weapons, in line with the decisions reached in Lima. Members also call for the creation of appropriate mechanisms for institutional cooperation between the EuroLat Assembly and the various EU bodies, and reiterate that the future European External Action Service (EEAS) must ensure that the EP has valid interlocutors in the EU's delegations - above all in key regions such as Latin America - so as to guarantee full cooperation with Parliament.

The committee goes on to make the following points:

a Euro-Latin American Charter for Peace and Security should be adopted, including strategies for joint political and security action in order to deal with the common challenges facing the members of the biregional strategic partnership; the internal stability of many Latin American partner countries continues to depend on the reform of the state, which must include participation in the decision-making process by all indigenous populations and other minorities; an independent judiciary and an effective policy of respect for human rights as part of a responsible administration subject to controls and operating transparently will give citizens a sense of security; and prevent them from becoming alienated from that system; with reference to the projects currently under way in Peru, Colombia and Bolivia, the funding allocated to programmes to eradicate drugs crops through alternative development programmes should be stepped up; climate change and global warming should remain a priority on the political agenda, with the need to agree joint positions in the various forums for dialogue on the environment and climate change.

Members deplore the fact that some countries' financial efforts have prioritised an excessive increase in military spending at a time when it is essential to reduce the effects of underdevelopment, poverty, pandemics, malnutrition, crime and natural disasters.

Economic area of the biregional strategic partnership : the committee reiterates its proposal for the creation of a Euro-Latin American global interregional partnership area based on a 'WTO–Regionalism' compatible model in two stages. With a view to completing the first phase, it supports the resumption of negotiations on the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement, which affects 700 million people, and would be the world's most ambitious biregional agreement; the conclusion of negotiations on the EU-Central America Association Agreement before the Madrid summit; the revision of the 2003 political and cooperation agreement with the Andean Community; and the deepening of the existing Association Agreements with Mexico and Chile. In order to complete the second stage and with a view to reaching a global interregional partnership agreement by 2015, Members call for legal and institutional support and full geographical coverage to be provided for the various strands of the biregional strategic partnership, and for common provisions to be established that facilitate the exercise of the various freedoms, so as to create as broad a partnership as possible by deepening both the integration agreements within Latin America and the EU's partnership process with the various countries and regional groupings.

Social area of the biregional strategic partnership : the committee considers the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to be one of the most important objectives to be achieved by 2015, and suggests coordinating the positions of both regions on how to achieve the MDGs ahead of the MDG high-level meeting to be held in September 2010. Members also make the following points:

the opening of a serious dialogue on topics linked to science, technology and innovation should boost the creation of a Euro-Latin American area of innovation and knowledge, with the agreement on innovation concluded with Chile being taken as an example to follow; decisive action must be taken against illiteracy, the rate of which remains high in some countries in the region, in particular among girls and women; welcoming the recent ruling by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the Campo Algodonero feminicides in Mexico, as a precedent for the whole region, Members want the governments of the EU and Latin America and the Caribbean to use this ruling as a guideline for future work, and to ensure that their strong condemnation of violence against women is accompanied by properly funded protection and prevention programmes; the committee recommends that the Latin American governments - hoping also that the EU will offer all possible support for this huge task and aware of the difficult social situation despite a reasonably sound economic outlook - adopt policies including investment in public works, strengthening of the internal market, support for SMEs, extension of credit facilities, greater investment in health and education, and more decided steps to deal with youth unemployment and gender discrimination in the workplace. Although it may not be easy to obtain suitable funding for the above objectives - it is necessary to build a fair, tax system capable of fighting tax avoidance, while also reviewing excessive military expenditure.

Institutional mechanisms : the report recommends that the biannual summits should be maintained, but stresses that relations with Latin America should not be restricted to a biannual vision but should be strengthened through a long-term vision. It proposes that a biregional political dialogue be opened with new triangular approaches on matters of common interest embracing EU-LAC-Asia, EU-LAC-Africa and EU-LAC-US, with a view to moving towards a Euro-Atlantic area comprising the US, Latin America and the EU. The committee reiterates its proposal for the creation of a Europe-Latin America and Caribbean Foundation, whose primary purpose would be to help prepare the summits, follow up on the decisions and political courses of action adopted at the summits, and act as a forum for dialogue and coordination in the periods between summits for all the political, economic, institutional, academic and civil society bodies working to strengthen Euro-Latin American relations, including the EuroLat Assembly. The Foundation's budget should be limited but sufficient for it to carry out its tasks, financed by contributions from its EU and Latin American member states, the EU budget, and own resources generated by the Foundation itself or made available to it by sponsoring bodies with connections to the Euro-Latin American area.

Financial mechanisms: the committee supports the Latin America Investment Facility proposed by the Commission. It notes that an amount of EUR 100 million has been set aside under the Community budget for the period up to 2013. It emphasises the need to go beyond the purely assistance-based approach to development cooperation with Latin America - so that the financial resources from the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) are concentrated on the poorest countries and most vulnerable groups - and to establish new forms of cooperation with middle-income countries in Latin America through the Industrialised Countries Instrument (ICI+). Lastly, Members support the efforts made by the EIB to finance projects in Latin America, while pointing out that if it is to fulfil its objectives the EIB will require more funding and contributions from both the EU and its Member States.

2010/02/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2010/02/19
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2010/02/04
   EP - GRÈZE Catherine (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2010/02/01
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2009/12/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2009/11/25
   EP - SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA A7-0111/2010 - AM 13 #

2010/05/05 Outcome: -: 512, +: 99, 0: 7
CY AT LU LV EE SI MT DK SE IE LT EL BE FI PT SK CZ NL BG HU RO GB FR DE PL ES IT
Total
5
16
4
8
6
5
4
11
17
7
11
17
18
13
18
10
19
24
16
19
33
32
66
82
42
49
65
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

4

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
icon: EFD EFD
16

Denmark EFD

2

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

Against (1)

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom EFD

3
icon: ECR ECR
40

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
70

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
160

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Austria S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
234

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

Against (2)

2

Malta PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Czechia PPE

2

Rapport SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA A7-0111/2010 - AM 30 S #

2010/05/05 Outcome: -: 521, +: 92, 0: 3
CY LU LV EE MT SI NL DK AT FI IE SE LT CZ SK PT EL BE BG HU GB RO FR DE ES PL IT
Total
4
4
8
6
4
5
24
12
16
11
7
17
11
18
10
17
18
20
16
19
32
33
65
84
48
42
64
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2
3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Belgium NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
17

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

2

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom EFD

3
icon: ECR ECR
39

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Lithuania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
160

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Austria S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
234

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Czechia PPE

2

Rapport SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA A7-0111/2010 - AM 31 #

2010/05/05 Outcome: -: 521, +: 77, 0: 3
CY LU LV EE MT DK SI IE AT SE FI PT CZ LT SK EL BE NL BG HU GB RO FR PL ES DE IT
Total
4
4
8
6
4
11
5
6
15
17
13
18
18
12
10
18
18
23
16
19
31
33
64
39
46
78
64
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2
3

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Belgium NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

2

Spain NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
18

Denmark EFD

2

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom EFD

3
icon: ECR ECR
38

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Lithuania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
154

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

3

Austria S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
229

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

Against (2)

2

Ireland PPE

2

Czechia PPE

2
AmendmentsDossier
161 2009/2213(INI)
2010/02/19 AFET 111 amendments...
source: PE-438.495
2010/02/26 AFET 50 amendments...
source: PE-439.288

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio date: 2009-11-25T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio date: 2009-11-25T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.963
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE430.963
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.495
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE438.495
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.288
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE439.288
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.098&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-439098_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0111_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0111_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2010-03-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0111_EN.html title: A7-0111/2010
events/2
date
2010-03-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0111_EN.html title: A7-0111/2010
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100420&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20100420&type=CRE
events/5
date
2010-05-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0141_EN.html title: T7-0141/2010
summary
events/5
date
2010-05-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0141_EN.html title: T7-0141/2010
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio date: 2009-11-25T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2009-11-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: GRÈZE Catherine date: 2010-02-04T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2010-02-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRÈZE Catherine group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-111&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0111_EN.html
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-111&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0111_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-141
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0141_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: MENÉNDEZ DEL VALLE Emilio group: ALDE name: WEBER Renate group: Verts/ALE name: LUNACEK Ulrike group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: GUE/NGL name: MEYER Willy responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2009-11-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2010-02-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: GRÈZE Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • date: 2010-03-17T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: MENÉNDEZ DEL VALLE Emilio group: ALDE name: WEBER Renate group: Verts/ALE name: LUNACEK Ulrike group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: GUE/NGL name: MEYER Willy responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2009-11-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2010-02-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: GRÈZE Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-03-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-111&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0111/2010 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2010-04-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100420&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=18252&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-141 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0141/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2009-11-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2009-11-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2010-02-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRÈZE Catherine group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2010-02-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: GRÈZE Catherine
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
docs
  • date: 2010-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.963 title: PE430.963 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2010-02-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.495 title: PE438.495 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2010-02-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.288 title: PE439.288 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2010-03-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.098&secondRef=02 title: PE439.098 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2010-03-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-111&language=EN title: A7-0111/2010 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
events
  • date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2010-03-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SANCHEZ-NEYRA (EPP, ES) on the EU strategy for relations with Latin America and welcomed the Commission communication 'The European Union and Latin America: Global Players in Partnership', (see COM(2009)0495 ). It also welcomes the efforts of the Spanish presidency to secure the signing of the EU-Central America Association Agreement and the multi-party trade agreements with Colombia and Peru, as well as its clear commitment to re-launching negotiations between the EU and Mercosur. Members stress that support for the various regional integration processes in Latin America is a basic principle for the biregional strategic partnership, and they reaffirm that the ultimate goal of the EU-Latin America biregional strategic partnership is the creation of a Euro-Latin American global interregional partnership area, by, approximately, 2015, in the areas of politics, economics, trade and social and cultural affairs, intended to ensure sustainable development in both regions. The political area of the biregional strategic partnership : the committee calls on the Vice-President / High Representative (VP/HR) and on the Council to set clear guidelines for the best way of working closely together in order to foster effective multilateralism, ensure preservation of the environment , combat climate change, boost the UN's peacekeeping capacities, ensure achievement of the Millennium Goals, and tackle common threats to peace and security, including trafficking in illegal drugs and weapons, in line with the decisions reached in Lima. Members also call for the creation of appropriate mechanisms for institutional cooperation between the EuroLat Assembly and the various EU bodies, and reiterate that the future European External Action Service (EEAS) must ensure that the EP has valid interlocutors in the EU's delegations - above all in key regions such as Latin America - so as to guarantee full cooperation with Parliament. The committee goes on to make the following points: a Euro-Latin American Charter for Peace and Security should be adopted, including strategies for joint political and security action in order to deal with the common challenges facing the members of the biregional strategic partnership; the internal stability of many Latin American partner countries continues to depend on the reform of the state, which must include participation in the decision-making process by all indigenous populations and other minorities; an independent judiciary and an effective policy of respect for human rights as part of a responsible administration subject to controls and operating transparently will give citizens a sense of security; and prevent them from becoming alienated from that system; with reference to the projects currently under way in Peru, Colombia and Bolivia, the funding allocated to programmes to eradicate drugs crops through alternative development programmes should be stepped up; climate change and global warming should remain a priority on the political agenda, with the need to agree joint positions in the various forums for dialogue on the environment and climate change. Members deplore the fact that some countries' financial efforts have prioritised an excessive increase in military spending at a time when it is essential to reduce the effects of underdevelopment, poverty, pandemics, malnutrition, crime and natural disasters. Economic area of the biregional strategic partnership : the committee reiterates its proposal for the creation of a Euro-Latin American global interregional partnership area based on a 'WTO–Regionalism' compatible model in two stages. With a view to completing the first phase, it supports the resumption of negotiations on the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement, which affects 700 million people, and would be the world's most ambitious biregional agreement; the conclusion of negotiations on the EU-Central America Association Agreement before the Madrid summit; the revision of the 2003 political and cooperation agreement with the Andean Community; and the deepening of the existing Association Agreements with Mexico and Chile. In order to complete the second stage and with a view to reaching a global interregional partnership agreement by 2015, Members call for legal and institutional support and full geographical coverage to be provided for the various strands of the biregional strategic partnership, and for common provisions to be established that facilitate the exercise of the various freedoms, so as to create as broad a partnership as possible by deepening both the integration agreements within Latin America and the EU's partnership process with the various countries and regional groupings. Social area of the biregional strategic partnership : the committee considers the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to be one of the most important objectives to be achieved by 2015, and suggests coordinating the positions of both regions on how to achieve the MDGs ahead of the MDG high-level meeting to be held in September 2010. Members also make the following points: the opening of a serious dialogue on topics linked to science, technology and innovation should boost the creation of a Euro-Latin American area of innovation and knowledge, with the agreement on innovation concluded with Chile being taken as an example to follow; decisive action must be taken against illiteracy, the rate of which remains high in some countries in the region, in particular among girls and women; welcoming the recent ruling by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the Campo Algodonero feminicides in Mexico, as a precedent for the whole region, Members want the governments of the EU and Latin America and the Caribbean to use this ruling as a guideline for future work, and to ensure that their strong condemnation of violence against women is accompanied by properly funded protection and prevention programmes; the committee recommends that the Latin American governments - hoping also that the EU will offer all possible support for this huge task and aware of the difficult social situation despite a reasonably sound economic outlook - adopt policies including investment in public works, strengthening of the internal market, support for SMEs, extension of credit facilities, greater investment in health and education, and more decided steps to deal with youth unemployment and gender discrimination in the workplace. Although it may not be easy to obtain suitable funding for the above objectives - it is necessary to build a fair, tax system capable of fighting tax avoidance, while also reviewing excessive military expenditure. Institutional mechanisms : the report recommends that the biannual summits should be maintained, but stresses that relations with Latin America should not be restricted to a biannual vision but should be strengthened through a long-term vision. It proposes that a biregional political dialogue be opened with new triangular approaches on matters of common interest embracing EU-LAC-Asia, EU-LAC-Africa and EU-LAC-US, with a view to moving towards a Euro-Atlantic area comprising the US, Latin America and the EU. The committee reiterates its proposal for the creation of a Europe-Latin America and Caribbean Foundation, whose primary purpose would be to help prepare the summits, follow up on the decisions and political courses of action adopted at the summits, and act as a forum for dialogue and coordination in the periods between summits for all the political, economic, institutional, academic and civil society bodies working to strengthen Euro-Latin American relations, including the EuroLat Assembly. The Foundation's budget should be limited but sufficient for it to carry out its tasks, financed by contributions from its EU and Latin American member states, the EU budget, and own resources generated by the Foundation itself or made available to it by sponsoring bodies with connections to the Euro-Latin American area. Financial mechanisms: the committee supports the Latin America Investment Facility proposed by the Commission. It notes that an amount of EUR 100 million has been set aside under the Community budget for the period up to 2013. It emphasises the need to go beyond the purely assistance-based approach to development cooperation with Latin America - so that the financial resources from the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) are concentrated on the poorest countries and most vulnerable groups - and to establish new forms of cooperation with middle-income countries in Latin America through the Industrialised Countries Instrument (ICI+). Lastly, Members support the efforts made by the EIB to finance projects in Latin America, while pointing out that if it is to fulfil its objectives the EIB will require more funding and contributions from both the EU and its Member States.
  • date: 2010-03-29T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-111&language=EN title: A7-0111/2010
  • date: 2010-04-20T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100420&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=18252&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-141 title: T7-0141/2010 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the EU strategy for relations with Latin America. Parliament welcomed the Commission communication 'The European Union and Latin America: Global Players in Partnership', (see COM(2009)0495 ). It also welcomes the efforts of the Spanish presidency to secure the signing of the EU-Central America Association Agreement and the multi-party trade agreements with Colombia and Peru, as well as its clear commitment to re-launching negotiations between the EU and Mercosur. Members stress that support for the various regional integration processes in Latin America is a basic principle for the biregional strategic partnership, and they reaffirm that the ultimate goal of the EU-Latin America biregional strategic partnership is the creation of a Euro-Latin American global interregional partnership area, by, approximately, 2015, in the areas of politics, economics, trade and social and cultural affairs, intended to ensure sustainable development in both regions. The political area of the biregional strategic partnership : Parliament calls on the Vice-President/High Representative (VP/HR) and on the Council to set clear guidelines for the best way of working closely together in order to foster effective multilateralism, ensure preservation of the environment , combat climate change, boost the UN's peacekeeping capacities, ensure achievement of the Millennium Goals, and tackle common threats to peace and security, including trafficking in illegal drugs and weapons, in line with the decisions reached in Lima. Members also call for the creation of appropriate mechanisms for institutional cooperation between the EuroLat Assembly and the various EU bodies, and reiterate that the future European External Action Service (EEAS) must ensure that the EP has valid interlocutors in the EU's delegations - above all in key regions such as Latin America - so as to guarantee full cooperation with Parliament. Parliament goes on to make the following points: a Euro-Latin American Charter for Peace and Security should be adopted, including strategies for joint political and security action in order to deal with the common challenges facing the members of the biregional strategic partnership; the internal stability of many Latin American partner countries continues to depend on the reform of the state, which must include participation in the decision-making process by all indigenous populations and other minorities; an independent judiciary and an effective policy of respect for human rights as part of a responsible administration subject to controls and operating transparently will give citizens a sense of security; and prevent them from becoming alienated from that system; with reference to the projects currently under way in Peru, Colombia and Bolivia, the funding allocated to programmes to eradicate drugs crops through alternative development programmes should be stepped up; climate change and global warming should remain a priority on the political agenda, with the need to agree joint positions in the various forums for dialogue on the environment and climate change. Parliament deplores the fact that some countries' financial efforts have prioritised an excessive increase in military spending at a time when it is essential to reduce the effects of underdevelopment, poverty, pandemics, malnutrition, crime and natural disasters. Economic area of the biregional strategic partnership : Parliament reiterates its proposal for the creation of a Euro-Latin American global interregional partnership area based on a 'WTO–Regionalism' compatible model in two stages. With a view to completing the first phase, it supports the resumption of negotiations on the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement, which affects 700 million people, and would be the world's most ambitious biregional agreement; the conclusion of negotiations on the EU-Central America Association Agreement before the Madrid summit; the revision of the 2003 political and cooperation agreement with the Andean Community; and the deepening of the existing Association Agreements with Mexico and Chile. In order to complete the second stage and with a view to reaching a global interregional partnership agreement by 2015, Members call for legal and institutional support and full geographical coverage to be provided for the various strands of the biregional strategic partnership, and for common provisions to be established that facilitate the exercise of the various freedoms, so as to create as broad a partnership as possible by deepening both the integration agreements within Latin America and the EU's partnership process with the various countries and regional groupings. Social area of the biregional strategic partnership : Parliament considers the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to be one of the most important objectives to be achieved by 2015, and suggests coordinating the positions of both regions on how to achieve the MDGs ahead of the MDG high-level meeting to be held in September 2010. Parliament also makes the following points: the opening of a serious dialogue on topics linked to science, technology and innovation should boost the creation of a Euro-Latin American area of innovation and knowledge, with the agreement on innovation concluded with Chile being taken as an example to follow; decisive action must be taken against illiteracy, the rate of which remains high in some countries in the region, in particular among girls and women; promote and drive proactive policies which guarantee the effective social inclusion of the disabled; welcoming the recent ruling by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the Campo Algodonero feminicides in Mexico, as a precedent for the whole region, Members want the governments of the EU and Latin America and the Caribbean to use this ruling as a guideline for future work, and to ensure that their strong condemnation of violence against women is accompanied by properly funded protection and prevention programmes; Parliament recommends that the Latin American governments - hoping also that the EU will offer all possible support for this huge task and aware of the difficult social situation despite a reasonably sound economic outlook - adopt policies including investment in public works, strengthening of the internal market, support for SMEs, extension of credit facilities, greater investment in health and education, and more decided steps to deal with youth unemployment and gender discrimination in the workplace. Although it may not be easy to obtain suitable funding for the above objectives - it is necessary to build a fair, tax system capable of fighting tax avoidance, while also reviewing excessive military expenditure; creative proposals to ensure maximum social security coverage for the communities concerned should be proposed. Mechanisms for reaching the ultimate goals of the strategic partnership A. Institutional mechanisms : the resolution recommends that the biannual summits should be maintained, but stresses that relations with Latin America should not be restricted to a biannual vision but should be strengthened through a long-term vision. It proposes that a biregional political dialogue be opened with new triangular approaches on matters of common interest embracing EU-LAC-Asia, EU-LAC-Africa and EU-LAC-US, with a view to moving towards a Euro-Atlantic area comprising the US, Latin America and the EU. Parliament reiterates its proposal for the creation of a Europe-Latin America and Caribbean Foundation, whose primary purpose would be to help prepare the summits, follow up on the decisions and political courses of action adopted at the summits, and act as a forum for dialogue and coordination in the periods between summits for all the political, economic, institutional, academic and civil society bodies working to strengthen Euro-Latin American relations, including the EuroLat Assembly. The Foundation's budget should be limited but sufficient for it to carry out its tasks, financed by contributions from its EU and Latin American member states, the EU budget, and own resources generated by the Foundation itself or made available to it by sponsoring bodies with connections to the Euro-Latin American area. B. Financial mechanisms : Parliament supports the Latin America Investment Facility proposed by the Commission. It notes that an amount of EUR 100 million has been set aside under the Community budget for the period up to 2013. It hopes that it will help extend the spread of the countries and sectors in which European investments are made. It emphasises the need to go beyond the purely assistance-based approach to development cooperation with Latin America - so that the financial resources from the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) are concentrated on the poorest countries and most vulnerable groups - and to establish new forms of cooperation with middle-income countries in Latin America through the Industrialised Countries Instrument (ICI+). To that end, plenary calls for better integration of the rights and needs of disabled people. Lastly, Parliament stresses the importance and desirability of working towards harmonisation of the regulatory and supervisory aspects of the various Latin American financial systems, with a view to bridge-building and convergence as far as possible with the European system.
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/7/01582
New
  • AFET/7/01582
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.40.10 Relations with Latin America, Central America, Caribbean islands
New
6.40.10
Relations with Latin America, Central America, Caribbean islands
activities
  • date: 2009-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: MENÉNDEZ DEL VALLE Emilio group: ALDE name: WEBER Renate group: Verts/ALE name: LUNACEK Ulrike group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: GUE/NGL name: MEYER Willy responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2009-11-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2010-02-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: GRÈZE Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • date: 2010-03-17T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: MENÉNDEZ DEL VALLE Emilio group: ALDE name: WEBER Renate group: Verts/ALE name: LUNACEK Ulrike group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: GUE/NGL name: MEYER Willy responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2009-11-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2010-02-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: GRÈZE Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-03-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-111&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0111/2010 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2010-04-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100420&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=18252&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-141 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0141/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: MENÉNDEZ DEL VALLE Emilio group: ALDE name: WEBER Renate group: Verts/ALE name: LUNACEK Ulrike group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: GUE/NGL name: MEYER Willy responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2009-11-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2010-02-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: GRÈZE Catherine
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
links
other
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/7/01582
reference
2009/2213(INI)
title
EU strategy for the relations with Latin America
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
6.40.10 Relations with Latin America, Central America, Caribbean islands