Progress: Procedure lapsed or withdrawn
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | BELET Ivo ( PPE) | GIEREK Adam ( S&D), HALL Fiona ( ALDE), RIVASI Michèle ( Verts/ALE), FORD Vicky ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna ( S&D) | |
Committee Legal Basis Opinion | JURI | LICHTENBERGER Eva ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 031
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 031Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 555 votes to 62, with 40 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation (Euratom) laying down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency (recast).
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the report drafted by Ivo BELET (EPP, BE) amending, under a special legislative procedure (European Parliament consultation), the proposal for a Council regulation (Euratom) laying down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency (recast).
Although this proposal is dealt with through the recasting technique, the committee proposes to substantially amend the proposal so as to ensure the legal certainty and coherence of the text.
Members propose detailed amendments to the codified parts of the proposal:
Legal basis : to ensure a high level of health protection for EU citizens in the event of radioactive contamination and to give democratic legitimacy to the adoption of this Regulation, the legal basis should be changed under the new Lisbon Treaty to give the European Parliament a decision-making role on a regulation potentially affecting public health. The proposal is to consider public health (Article 168) and consumer protection (Article 169(1)).
Specify the Commission’s role : Members wish to streamline the procedure in case of nuclear emergency by clearly giving a supervisory role to the Commission and clarifying the regime of its acts (adoption, revision). To this end, they suggest that the Commission should be empowered to:
· immediately apply the maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination as defined in the Annexes;
· adopt 'delegated acts' to revise and supplement the levels of contamination and the list of minor foodstuffs and feedingstuffs, to take due account of the latest technical progress.
The Commission shall be assisted by a committee of independent scientific experts on public health and food safety. The members of the committee shall be selected according to scientific criteria.
The Commission shall make public the composition of the committee of experts and its members' declaration of interests.
Limit the margins of manoeuvre given to Member States : Members aim to serve the interest of the citizens through a better management of the post-accident situation by limiting the intervention and margins of manoeuvre given to Member States. On the one hand, since the procedure of 'confirmation' or 'adaptation' of the application of the maximum permitted levels by the Council seems unnecessary and a source of legal uncertainty, the report suggests deleting this level of intervention. On the other hand, the initiatives of Member States as regards the revision or addition to the levels of contamination, as well as rules for implementing the regulation, are respectively streamlined through delegated/implementing acts regime.
Application : the report stipulates that this Regulation shall also apply to foodstuffs or feedingstuffs imported from third countries, in customs transit or intended for export. Member States shall monitor compliance with the maximum permitted levels. For that purpose Member States shall maintain a system of official controls of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs, and other activities as appropriate in the circumstances, including public communication on food and feed safety and risks, in accordance Regulation 178/2002.
Report : the Commission shall submit, by March 2012, a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the appropriateness of the maximum permitted levels laid down in Annexes I and III, and on the appropriateness of maintaining a list of minor foodstuffs as laid down in Annex II.
That report shall in particular examine the compliance of the maximum permitted levels with the effective dose limit of 1 mSv/y for members of the public under the conditions laid down in Directive 96/29 Euratom and consider the possible inclusion of additional relevant radio nucleides in Annex I and III.
In assessing the levels, the report shall focus on the protection of the most vulnerable population groups, in particular children, and examine whether it would be appropriate to set maximum permitted levels for all categories of population on that basis.
PURPOSE: to lay down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency (recast).
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation (Euratom).
LEGAL BASE: Article 31 of the European Atomic Energy Community Treaty
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.
CONTENT: the Commission initiated the codification of Council Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87 laying down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency, Commission Regulation (Euratom) No 944/89 and Commission Regulation (Euratom) No 770/90, and a relevant proposal was submitted to the legislative authority. The new Regulation was to have superseded the various acts incorporated in it.
In the course of the legislative procedure, it was acknowledged that a provision appearing in the proposal for a codified text provided for a reservation of implementing powers by the Council which was not justified in the recitals of Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87. In the light of the judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 May 2008 in Case C-133/06, it was considered necessary to insert a new recital in the new act replacing and repealing that Regulation in order to justify that reservation of implementing powers. Since the insertion of such a recital would imply a substantive change, and would therefore go beyond straightforward codification, it was considered necessary that point 8 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 - Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts - be applied, in the light of the Joint Declaration on that point.
Pursuant to Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87, the Commission, after being informed of a nuclear accident or of any other case of radiological emergency which is likely to lead or has led to a significant radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs, is to immediately adopt, if the circumstances so require, a Regulation rendering applicable pre-established maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination. The period of validity of such a Regulation is to be as short as possible and must not exceed three months. Within one month of its adoption and after consultation with experts, the Commission is to submit to the Council a proposal for a Regulation to adapt or confirm the provisions of the Regulation previously adopted by the Commission, in particular the establishment of maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination, based on Article 31 of the Euratom Treaty, in view of the need to protect the health of the population. Therefore, as a matter of urgency, it is appropriate for the Council to reserve the right to exercise directly the power to adopt those adjusted measures within this short timeframe. This is, however, without prejudice to the possibility that, in the long term after the nuclear accident or the radiological emergency, other legal instruments or another legal basis may be used for the purpose of controlling foodstuffs or feedingstuffs being placed on the market, for which this reservation of implementing powers will not apply. It is therefore appropriate to transform the codification of Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87, Regulation (Euratom) No 944/89 and Regulation (Euratom) No 770/90 into a recast in order to incorporate the necessary amendment.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implication for the Community budget.
PURPOSE: to lay down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency (recast).
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation (Euratom).
LEGAL BASE: Article 31 of the European Atomic Energy Community Treaty
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.
CONTENT: the Commission initiated the codification of Council Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87 laying down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency, Commission Regulation (Euratom) No 944/89 and Commission Regulation (Euratom) No 770/90, and a relevant proposal was submitted to the legislative authority. The new Regulation was to have superseded the various acts incorporated in it.
In the course of the legislative procedure, it was acknowledged that a provision appearing in the proposal for a codified text provided for a reservation of implementing powers by the Council which was not justified in the recitals of Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87. In the light of the judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 May 2008 in Case C-133/06, it was considered necessary to insert a new recital in the new act replacing and repealing that Regulation in order to justify that reservation of implementing powers. Since the insertion of such a recital would imply a substantive change, and would therefore go beyond straightforward codification, it was considered necessary that point 8 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 - Accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts - be applied, in the light of the Joint Declaration on that point.
Pursuant to Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87, the Commission, after being informed of a nuclear accident or of any other case of radiological emergency which is likely to lead or has led to a significant radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs, is to immediately adopt, if the circumstances so require, a Regulation rendering applicable pre-established maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination. The period of validity of such a Regulation is to be as short as possible and must not exceed three months. Within one month of its adoption and after consultation with experts, the Commission is to submit to the Council a proposal for a Regulation to adapt or confirm the provisions of the Regulation previously adopted by the Commission, in particular the establishment of maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination, based on Article 31 of the Euratom Treaty, in view of the need to protect the health of the population. Therefore, as a matter of urgency, it is appropriate for the Council to reserve the right to exercise directly the power to adopt those adjusted measures within this short timeframe. This is, however, without prejudice to the possibility that, in the long term after the nuclear accident or the radiological emergency, other legal instruments or another legal basis may be used for the purpose of controlling foodstuffs or feedingstuffs being placed on the market, for which this reservation of implementing powers will not apply. It is therefore appropriate to transform the codification of Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87, Regulation (Euratom) No 944/89 and Regulation (Euratom) No 770/90 into a recast in order to incorporate the necessary amendment.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implication for the Community budget.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)2217
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0055/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0001/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0001/2011
- Specific opinion: PE452.905
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE452.760
- Committee draft report: PE450.574
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1180/2010
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2010)0184
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2010)0184
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex COM(2010)0184
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1180/2010
- Committee draft report: PE450.574
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE452.760
- Specific opinion: PE452.905
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0001/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)2217
Activities
- Ivo BELET
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adam GIEREK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fiona HALL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rebecca HARMS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Romana JORDAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ROSBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Libor ROUČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csanád SZEGEDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
55 |
2010/0098(CNS)
2010/11/16
ITRE
55 amendments...
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Article 2(b) of the Euratom Treaty requires that the Council establish uniform safety standards to protect the health of workers and of the general public and ensure that they are applied, as further set out in Title Two, Chapter III, of the Euratom Treaty.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) In accordance with Article 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a high level of human health protection should be ensured in the definition and implementation of all EU policies and activities.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Following the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power-station on 26 April 1986, considerable quantities of radioactive materials were released into the atmosphere, contaminating foodstuffs and feedingstuffs in several European countries to levels significant from the health point of view; the soil was also contaminated with radioactive fallout, which increased the radioactivity of forest and agricultural foodstuffs obtained in the affected areas.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The need arises to set up a system allowing the European
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) On the basis of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in accordance with Articles 4 and 9 thereof, the Commission shall support research into the dangers of contamination of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs with radioactive isotopes and the effects of ionizing radiation (e.g. gamma rays) used for sterilisation on the quality of these products from the point of view of the chemical and radiological risk.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 b (new) (6b) The radiological safety of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs cannot be the subject of patents preventing the use of the appropriate safeguard technologies without purchasing licensed rights.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8)
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU in respect of the adaptation to technical progress of the maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs (Annexes I and III), and of the list of minor foodstuffs (Annex II). It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at EFSA and other experts level.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) On the basis of current data available in the field of radiation protection, derived reference levels have been established and these levels m
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10)
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) The criteria governing the placing on the market of foodstuffs and feedingstuffs should take into account the level of background radiation in the area concerned.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) In order to facilitate the adaptation of maximum permitted levels, procedures should be provided for allowing the regular consultation of experts
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) In order to facilitate the adaptation of maximum permitted levels, procedures should be provided for allowing the consultation of experts including the Group of Experts referred to in Article 31 of the Euratom Treaty.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) In the event of a nuclear accident or radioactive incident, consultation procedures should in each case determine whether dilution treatment is permitted, e.g. mixing of contaminated milk with uncontaminated milk.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) The adoption of the maximum permitted levels under this Regulation should be based on the protection requirements for the most critical and vulnerable population groups, in particular children and people in isolated geographic areas or those practising subsistence farming. The maximum permitted levels should be the same for the entire population and should be based on the lowest levels.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is appropriate for the Council to reserve the right to exercise directly the power to adopt a
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is appropriate for the Council to reserve the right to exercise directly the power to adopt a Regulation to timely endorse measures proposed by the Commission in the first month after a nuclear accident or a radiological emergency. The relevant proposal for the adaptation or confirmation of the provisions laid down in the Regulation adopted by the Commission, in particular the establishment of maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination, should be based on Article 31 of the Euratom Treaty, in view of the health protection of the population. This is without prejudice to the possibility that in the long term after the accident or the radiological emergency other legal instruments or another legal basis may be used for the purpose of controlling foodstuffs or feedingstuffs being placed on the market.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 a (new) (15a) In the event of a nuclear accident or radiological emergency which requires the maximum permitted levels to be applied, the public should be informed of the levels in force, both by the Commission and by each Member State. Furthermore, the public should also be provided with information about foodstuffs and feedingstuffs liable to accumulate stronger concentrations of radioactivity.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Compliance with the maximum permitted levels
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. In the event of the Commission
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. After consultation with experts, which shall include the group of experts referred to in Article 31 of the Euratom Treaty, hereinafter "group of experts' , the Commission shall submit to the Council a proposal for a Regulation to adapt or confirm the provisions of the Regulation referred to in Article 2(1) of this Regulation within one month of its adoption.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. When submitting the proposal for a
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. When submitting the proposal for a Regulation referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall take into account the basic standards laid down in accordance with Articles 30 and 31 of the Euratom Treaty, including the principle that all exposures shall be kept as low as reasonably achievable, taking the aspect of the protection of the health of the general public and economic and social factors into account.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Given the possibility of isotopes of solid elements escaping into the environment following a nuclear reactor accident, the list of maximum permitted levels of contamination of animal feed should be expanded and supplemented in accordance with Article 32 of the Treaty Establishing the European Atomic Energy Community to include other isotopes in addition to radioactive stable isotopes of caesium, such as transuranium elements and isotopes of strontium and iodine.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The Council shall, acting by a
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 The period of validity of
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. In order to ensure that the maximum permitted levels laid down in Annexes I and III take account of any new scientific data becoming available, the Commission shall
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. In order to ensure that the maximum permitted levels laid down in Annexes I and III take account of any new scientific data becoming available, the Commission shall
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Annexes I, II and III should take into account the effect of the partial decay of radioactive isotopes during the shelf life of preserved foodstuffs; depending on the type of contamination, e.g. with iodine isotopes, the radioactivity of these products should be constantly monitored.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. At the request of
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. At the request of a Member State or the Commission, the maximum permitted levels laid down in Annexes I and III may be revised or supplemented, upon the submission of a proposal from the Commission to the Council in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 31 of the Euratom Treaty.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. Each Member State shall provide the Commission with all information concerning the application of this Regulation, in particular concerning cases of non-compliance with the maximum permitted levels. The Commission shall communicate such information to the other Member States. The Commission shall impose sanctions in the event of the sale or export of foodstuffs or feedingstuffs exceeding the maximum permitted contamination levels.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a Each Member State and the Commission shall inform the public of the levels in force and provide information about foodstuffs liable to accumulate higher concentrations of radioactivity.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) Annex II should be completely redrafted on the basis of a classification of the intermediate and minor foodstuffs to be found on the EU consumer market; the basic principle of that classification should be consistency with Annex I.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 Council Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87 and Commission Regulations (Euratom) No 944/89 and No 770/90 are repealed, as shown in Annex IV.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I MAXIMUM PERMITTED LEVELS FOR FOODSTUFFS (Bq/kg)
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – column 4 – title Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – footnote 19 19 Infant food is defined as those foodstuffs intended for the feeding of infants during the first four to six months
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – row 0714 Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – row 1106 20 Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III MAXIMUM PERMITTED LEVELS OF RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION (CAESIUM-134,
source: PE-452.760
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=19363&j=0&l=en
|
events/3/date |
Old
2011-01-24T00:00:00New
2011-01-23T00:00:00 |
events/4/docs |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=CNS&year=2010&number=0098&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=CNS&year=2010&number=0098&appLng=EN |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1180)(documentyear:2010)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1180)(documentyear:2010)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.574New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-450574_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.760New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-452760_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.905&secondRef=01New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AL-452905_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0001_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0001_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=19363&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0001_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0001_EN.html |
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0/date |
|
committees/1/date |
|
committees/2/date |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.905New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.905&secondRef=01 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-1&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0001_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-1&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0001_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-55New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0055_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/02810New
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52010PC0184:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52010PC0184:EN
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
procedure/summary |
|
procedure/title |
Old
Case of nuclear accident or other radiological emergency: maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs. RecastNew
Case of nuclear accident or other radiological emergency: maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs |
activities/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting final decisionNew
Procedure lapsed or withdrawn |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|