Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | PECH | LÖVIN Isabella ( Verts/ALE) | |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | PONGA Maurice ( PPE) | Nirj DEVA ( ECR), Gabriele ZIMMER ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ROSBACH Anna ( EFD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 491 votes to 7, with 24 abstentions, a resolution on combating illegal fishing at the global level - the role of the EU.
Members believe that IUU fishing is one of the most serious threats facing the biodiversity of the world's oceans .
Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing has been reported to account for between 11 and 26 million tonnes a year, equivalent to at least 15% of world catches, making the economically, socially and environmentally sustainable management of the exploitation of the world's marine resources impossible.
Members underline that th e recent IUU and Control Regulations (Council Regulations 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (the ‘IUU Regulation’) and 1224/2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (the ‘Control Regulation’) respectively) provide the EU with powerful and ground-breaking tools to combat IUU fishing, by defining obligations and opportunities of both Member States and third countries as flag, coastal, port and market States. Parliament insists that the Commission and the control authorities in the Member States be provided with sufficient resources (human, financial, technological) enabling them to fully implement these regulations .
Promote legal fishing : Members call for the review of the common fisheries policy to be used to create incentives for legal fishing in the interests of the fish, the environment, consumers and producers in the EU. Parliament invites the Commission and the Member States:
to identify and sanction EU operators who violate EU legislation ; to ensure that illegal fishing is combated at sea and in inland waters and underlines the need to review the sufficiency of control mechanisms and their implementation; to cooperate with a view to the creation of a ‘ European coastguard ’ in order to boost common monitoring and inspection capacity and to effectively combat current or future dangers at sea such as terrorism, piracy, IUU fishing, trafficking or even marine pollution; to publish annual assessments of the performance of each Member State in implementing the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) that identify possible weak points needing improvement, and to use all possible means, including identifying Member States when they fail in their responsibilities, to ensure their full compliance, in order to create a reliable and transparent control regime; to increase the resources allocated to the fight against corruption and organised crime at all levels; to continue its efforts to promote the exchange of information in order to integrate maritime surveillance, in particular information aimed at harmonising coastguard services at European level.
Global sustainable development : the resolution points out that the fight against illegal fishing at world level is vital for global sustainable development and must therefore represent an essential and explicit part of Fisheries Partnership Agreements, trade policy commitments, development cooperation policy objectives and the European Union’s foreign policy priorities. Parliament calls on the EU to strongly insist that third countries effectively combat IUU fishing, in the context of trade agreements, Fisheries Partnership Agreements and the EU’s development policy. The Commission is called upon to increase the financial envelope for the fisheries sector in the agreements that it signs with developing countries as far as is necessary, so that these countries can consolidate their institutional, human and technical capacities to combat IUU fishing and thereby improve their compliance with the measures adopted by world and regional fisheries management organisations and with European legislation.
Objectives within the RFMOs : Members consider that the EU should pursue the following objectives in Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) to which it belongs :
establishment, for all fisheries under the remit of the RFMOs, of registers of fishing vessels, including support vessels, that are authorised to fish, as well as lists of vessels that are identified as IUU ( black lists ), to be updated frequently, published widely and coordinated among RFMOs; establishment of appropriate at-sea inspections and observer programmes; bans on transhipments at sea; development of catch documentation schemes, beginning with the major species in each RFMO; compulsory use of electronic tools including VMS, electronic logbooks and other tracking devices where relevant; compulsory and regular evaluations of the performance of individual RFMOs with a requirement that the recommendations be acted upon.
The resolution fully supports the current FAO initiative to develop a Global Record of Fishing Vessels , which should be compulsory and include vessels above 10 GT as soon as possible. It encourages the rapid development of a system for the evaluation of flag State performance currently underway at the FAO as a means of putting pressure on States that do not meet their international legal obligations.
In this context, Members call for the urgent adoption of measures to put an end to the use of ‘flags of convenience’ . They also support the efforts of the Commission to establish a public register listing the identities of ship owners that have been proven to have participated in IUU fishing. The resolution emphasises the need to ensure that EU interests are not involved in such forms of fishing piracy.
Parliament emphasises that the concept of market State responsibility must be more fully developed as a means of closing down the markets for the products of IUU fish. It believes that the EU must urgently discuss with other major market States, including but not limited to the US, Japan and China, how to cooperate among themselves and, as rapidly as possible, to develop international legal instruments that could halt, prosecute and punish trade in IUU fish, in line with the World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules and within the framework of the United Nations system.
The Committee on Fisheries adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Isabella LÖVIN (Greens/EFA, SE) on combating illegal fishing at the global level - the role of the EU.
Members believe that IUU fishing is one of the most serious threats facing the biodiversity of the world's oceans . They underline that th e recent IUU and Control Regulations (Council Regulations 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (the ‘IUU Regulation’) and 1224/2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (the ‘Control Regulation’) respectively) provide the EU with powerful and ground-breaking tools to combat IUU fishing, by defining obligations and opportunities of both Member States and third countries as flag, coastal, port and market States.
The committee insists that the Commission and the control authorities in the Member States be provided with sufficient resources (human, financial, technological) enabling them to fully implement these regulations . Members call for the review of the common fisheries policy to be used to create incentives for legal fishing in the interests of the fish, the environment, consumers and producers in the EU.
The Commission and the Member States are invited:
to identify and sanction EU operators who violate EU legislation ; to ensure that illegal fishing is combated at sea and in inland waters and underlines the need to review the sufficiency of control mechanisms and their implementation; to cooperate with a view to the creation of a ‘ European coastguard ’ in order to boost common monitoring and inspection capacity and to effectively combat current or future dangers at sea such as terrorism, piracy, IUU fishing, trafficking or even marine pollution; to amend the requirements for all kinds of financial assistance so as to apply financial sanctions and the denial of funding opportunities to the owners of vessels proven to have fished illegally to pursue and prosecute vessels, owners, firms, companies or individuals involved in IUU fishing-related activities; to publish annual assessments of the performance of each Member State in implementing the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) that identify possible weak points needing improvement, and to use all possible means, including identifying Member States when they fail in their responsibilities, to ensure their full compliance, in order to create a reliable and transparent control regime; to increase the resources allocated to the fight against corruption and organised crime at all levels; to continue its efforts to promote the exchange of information in order to integrate maritime surveillance, in particular information aimed at harmonising coastguard services at European level.
The report points out that the fight against illegal fishing at world level is vital for global sustainable development and must therefore represent an essential and explicit part of Fisheries Partnership Agreements, trade policy commitments, development cooperation policy objectives and the European Union’s foreign policy priorities.
The report calls on the EU to strongly insist that third countries effectively combat IUU fishing, in the context of trade agreements, Fisheries Partnership Agreements and the EU’s development policy. Members stress the need to ensure that all third countries with which the EU has signed a Fisheries Partnership Agreement apply the rules of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) on core labour rights, particularly those concerning social dumping caused by IUU fishing.
Members consider that the EU should pursue the following objectives in Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) to which it belongs :
establishment, for all fisheries under the remit of the RFMOs, of registers of fishing vessels, including support vessels, that are authorised to fish, as well as lists of vessels that are identified as IUU ( black lists ), to be updated frequently, published widely and coordinated among RFMOs; establishment of appropriate at-sea inspections and observer programmes; bans on transhipments at sea; development of catch documentation schemes, beginning with the major species in each RFMO; compulsory use of electronic tools including VMS, electronic logbooks and other tracking devices where relevant; compulsory and regular evaluations of the performance of individual RFMOs with a requirement that the recommendations be acted upon.
The report fully supports the current FAO initiative to develop a Global Record of Fishing Vessels , which should be compulsory and include vessels above 10 GT as soon as possible. It encourages the rapid development of a system for the evaluation of flag State performance currently underway at the FAO as a means of putting pressure on States that do not meet their international legal obligations.
In this context, Members call for the urgent adoption of measures to put an end to the use of ‘flags of convenience’ . They also support the efforts of the Commission to establish a public register listing the identities of ship owners that have been proven to have participated in IUU fishing. The report emphasises the need to ensure that EU interests are not involved in such forms of fishing piracy.
The report emphasises that the concept of market State responsibility must be more fully developed as a means of closing down the markets for the products of IUU fish. It believes that the EU must urgently discuss with other major market States, including but not limited to the US, Japan and China, how to cooperate among themselves and, as rapidly as possible, to develop international legal instruments that could halt, prosecute and punish trade in IUU fish, in line with the World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules and within the framework of the United Nations system.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0516/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0362/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0362/2011
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE467.233
- Committee opinion: PE460.908
- Committee opinion: PE454.686
- Committee draft report: PE464.787
- Committee draft report: PE464.787
- Committee opinion: PE454.686
- Committee opinion: PE460.908
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE467.233
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0362/2011
Activities
- Giles CHICHESTER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kriton ARSENIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrew Henry William BRONS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ole CHRISTENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Derek Roland CLARK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Béla GLATTFELDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek Józef GRÓBARCZYK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elie HOARAU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Richard HOWITT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ian HUDGHTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara MATERA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gesine MEISSNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Guido MILANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel POC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maurice PONGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Phil PRENDERGAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ulrike RODUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francisco SOSA WAGNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jarosław WAŁĘSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
147 |
2010/2210(INI)
2011/04/18
ENVI
25 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that the EU's credibility on the global stage in the fight against Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing depends on the vigour with which it combats IUU fishing by its own fleet and the sale of IUU fish on its own markets;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States to
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that illegal fishing is combated at sea and in inland waters and
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that the fight against illegal fishing is a prerequisite for protecting marine ecosystems and vital for developing genuinely sustainable fisheries;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that catches from illegal fishing are not sold in or imported to Member States by setting a global database of DNA from fish stocks in order to identify the source of fish and aid prosecution;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Member States and the Commission to increase the fight against illegal fishing and to push for increased international attention and action by stepping up cooperation with international partners to improve monitoring, control and surveillance of IUU activities.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to increase the fight against illegal fishing in the international area, such as the WTO and other venues and to push for increased international attention and action.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Underlines that ecological sustainability is a vital prerequisite for the long-term economic and social viability of fishing activities and therefore calls for comprehensive, effective and transparent measures to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) fishing, including flag State measures, port State measures, coastal State measures, market-related measures and measures to ensure that nationals do not support or engage in IUU fishing;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Emphasizes the importance of improving transparency on IUU fishing activities and urges the Member States and the Commission to strengthen their efforts to publish information relevant to IUU fishing operations and to establish systems to share information with any potentially concerned State and international organisation;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on Member States and the Commission to support the implementation of port State measures at Regional Fishery Management Organizations and at the domestic level, and the prompt entry into force of the Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Stresses the need to promote the cooperation between EU Member States and Third countries to combat IUU fishing and to ensure that developing countries have the capacity to comply with the EU legislation;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 d (new) 7d. Urges the Commission to withhold aid from the European Fisheries Fund to all those vessels involved in IUU activities;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 e (new) 7e. Underlines the need to introduce a functional and efficient traceability system;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the Commission's decision to introduce a point-based fishing licence, an additional tool the Member States will be able to use to identify irregularities at each stage of the market chain and to impose strict penalties in case of infringement;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on the Commission to strengthen fisheries partnerships with developing countries, focusing its attention on their monitoring and surveillance capacities;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the importance of the consumer's right to always be certain that the product purchased has been legally fished;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the serious threat to biodiversity and sustainable marine environments posed by illegal fishing, as well as the social and economic impacts of extinguishing fish stocks and the potential threat to food security;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the threat to biodiversity and sustainable marine environments posed by over-fishing, exacerbated by illegal fishing, as well as the social and economic impacts of extinguishing fish stocks and the potential threat to food security;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that illegal fishing contributes to the excessive exploitation of fish stocks, damages marine ecosystems, is a form of unfair competition against honest fishermen, causes loss of income in the sector and jeopardises the survival of coastal communities, especially in developing countries;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that illegal fishing is a global problem which requires international cooperation and must be addressed both when it is undertaken by the fishing fleets of third parties as well as those of Member States; in this respect stresses the need for timely, detailed and accurate data regarding fishing vessels, especially those identified as engaging in IUU;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to assess whether imports of products from states which do not guarantee compliance with measures to combat illegal fishing could be suspended or banned, in compliance with the rules of the WTO;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for urgent measures to put an end to the use of 'flags of convenience', a practice which enables fishing vessels to operate illegally, with impunity, at a great cost to the marine environment, fish stocks, coastal communities and food security, particularly in developing countries and the legitimate fishing industry and stresses the need to ensure that there are no EU interests involved in such forms of fishing piracy;
source: PE-462.889
2011/06/21
PECH
122 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Takes the view that the European Union already has instruments with which to discourage illegal fishing and is convinced that, since it is one of the largest markets for fish in the world, the dissuasive effect would have undoubted practical consequences if it uses these instruments properly; calls, therefore, for European Union export certificates not to be granted to or to be withdrawn from those states or contracting parties which do not cooperate with RFMOs in establishing instruments such as catch documentation systems or port state measures;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Stresses that one of the best weapons in the fight against IUU fishing is the trade weapon; once again deplores, therefore, the lack of coordination between DG MARE and DG TRADE, since whilst the former is setting itself more and more objectives in order to combat IUU fishing, the latter's exclusive aim appears to be to make Community markets more and more open to imports, whatever their origin and whatever control guarantees are in place, granting tariff preferences and rules of origin derogations that are serving only to hand European markets over to fleets and countries that have been identified as at least tolerating IUU fishing;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Considers in this context that greater responsibility should be attributed to the market, and particularly to importers, since the market is perhaps the most significant cause of IUU fishing;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Calls on Member States which detect firms or individuals profiting from IUU fishing to prosecute them as they do other perpetrators of environmental and/or economic crimes;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 c (new) 15c. Calls on both the Commission and the Member States to improve their information to consumers on various labelling schemes, e.g. the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) scheme, which create transparency and provide consumers with a guarantee that they are purchasing sustainable, legally landed fish;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 d (new) 15d. Urges that studies be carried out on how far consumers in the EU might be receptive to eating fish and shellfish which we normally do not eat or only export, so that we can eat more local produce, thus benefiting the environment, health and the fish and helping to combat IUU fishing;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 e (new) 15e. Urges, furthermore, that new techniques for effectively tracing fisheries products should be adopted as soon as possible, and highlights in particular the techniques, for example those using DNA analysis, described in the Commission report ‘Deterring Illegal Activities in the Fisheries Sector – Genetics, Genomics, Chemistry and Forensics to Fight IUU Fishing and in Support of Fish Product Traceability’ as a possible tool for combating IUU fishing;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Encourages the Commission to pursue the development of a global catch
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls upon the Commission, through the relevant programmes, to support research and development of techniques to improve traceability, including electronic tags to track fish, satellite tracking of fishing and support vessels and establish genetic databases to identify the origin of fish products;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas one of the objectives of the FAO Agreement on port state measures to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing is to eliminate 'ports of convenience' that provide a safe haven for IUU vessels and serve as a port of entry for the trade in illegal catches,
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission and Council to increase the resources allocated to the fight against corruption and organised crime at all levels;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Is alarmed at the use of such criminal activities as human trafficking, money laundering, corruption, handling of stolen goods, tax evasion and customs fraud by those engaged in IUU fishing, proving that a more comprehensive and integrated approach to the fight against IUU fishing should be explored;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Is alarmed at the use of such criminal activities as human exploitation and trafficking, money laundering, corruption, handling of stolen goods, tax evasion and customs fraud by those engaged in IUU fishing;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Is alarmed at the use of such criminal activities as human trafficking, money laundering, corruption, handling of stolen goods, tax evasion and customs fraud by those engaged in IUU fishing; reiterates that controls on imports from illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing should be strengthened and improved;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Is alarmed at the use of such criminal activities as human trafficking, money
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Fully endorses the recommendations of the UNODC report, including expanding international cooperation in investigating criminal activities at sea, improving transparency of fishing vessel ownership and activities and discouraging both the sale and the operation of fishing vessels
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Requests the Commission to examine the US Lacey Act and to consider whether certain of its elements might be useful in the European context, particularly the responsibility it imposes on retailers for the legality of fish;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Calls upon the Commission to include the above principles, where relevant, in the provisions of its bilateral fisheries agreements;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. Whereas the new EU control package, consisting of the IUU Regulation, the Control Regulation and the Fishing Authorisations Regulation, constitutes a comprehensive set of instruments to combat this scourge of the oceans, since it specifies the flag, coastal, port and market State responsibilities of both the EU Member States and third countries;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Points out that the fight against illegal fishing at world level is vital for global sustainable development and must therefore represent an essential and explicit part of fisheries partnership agreements, trade policy commitments, development cooperation policy objectives and the European Union's foreign policy priorities.
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the EU is the world’s largest importer of fisheries products and one of the world’s major fishing powers, imposing on it a major responsibility to take a lead in mobilizing the international community in the fight against IUU fishing;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. having regard to the importance of exchanges of information and international cooperation in the fight against IUU fishing,
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that IUU fishing is one of the most serious threats facing the biodiversity of the world’s
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that IUU fishing is one of the most serious threats facing the biodiversity of the world's oceans
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that IUU fishing is one of the most serious threats facing the biodiversity of the world's oceans, and its consequences have incalculable social and economic repercussions not only on fishing businesses and regions but on society as a whole;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that IUU fishing is one of the most serious threats facing the biodiversity of the world's oceans, the prosperity of fishermen who fish in a lawful manner and European competitiveness;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that IUU fishing is possibly one of the most serious threats facing the biodiversity of the world's oceans;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that IUU fishing also constitutes unfair competition for European fishermen who are fishing legally and in a controlled manner and stresses the importance of the strict application of Community legislation on traceability to fish and aquaculture products landed in the EU and/or imported;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. whereas the EU, given its leading and publicly assumed role in the defence and preservation of sea and land ecosystems and its position as a major fisheries power and the world's largest market for fishery products, must play a key role in the fight against IUU fishing,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. C
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the new EU control package, consisting of the IUU Regulation, the Control Regulation and the Fishing Authorisations
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the new EU control package, consisting of the IUU Regulation, the Control Regulation and the Fishing Authorisations Regulation5 , constitutes a comprehensive set of instruments to combat this scourge of the oceans, since it specifies the flag, coastal, port and market State responsibilities of both the EU Member States and third countries as well as obligations with respect to the activities of their nationals;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the new EU control package, consisting of the IUU Regulation, the Control Regulation and the Fishing Authorisations Regulation5 , constitutes a
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the new EU control package, consisting of the IUU Regulation, the Control Regulation and the Fishing Authorisations Regulation, constitutes a
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that the European Fisheries Monitoring Agency must ensure that its annual programme of work includes fighting illegal fishing as a priority objective, encouraging coordination among Member States on the matter;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Insists that the Commission and the control authorities in the Member States be provided with sufficient resources (human, financial, technological) enabling them to fully implement these regulations
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Insists that the Commission and the control authorities in the Member States be provided with sufficient resources (human, financial, technological) to fully implement these regulations and that they should not shy away from identifying
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Insists that the
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the need to step up coordination between the responsible authorities and the sectors affected in order to improve their knowledge and assist in the application of and compliance with the obligations flowing from Community regulations;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the need, in the interest of the EU's credibility, for us to be fully in control of combating IUU fishing within the EU itself, and considers in this context that there is still some way to go before the EU is satisfactorily combating IUU fishing on its own territory;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls for the review of the common fisheries policy to be used to create incentives to legal fishing in the interests of the fish, the environment, consumers and producers in the EU;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Calls on the Commission to investigate whether recreational fishing in the EU exists on such a scale that it can really be classed as IUU fishing, and stresses the need to exempt recreational anglers, who are not regarded as being able to contribute to IUU fishing, from any regulation of recreational fishing;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the need to strengthen international cooperation, especially at European level, with a view to the more stringent control of IUU activity, notably by means of closer cooperation between Member States through the creation of a European coastguard corps that would make it possible to boost common monitoring and inspection capacity;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new) - having regard to the Commission’s JRC Reference Report ‘Deterring Illegal Activities in the Fisheries Sector – Genetics, Genomics, Chemistry and Forensics to Fight IUU Fishing and in Support of Fish Product Traceability’, published in 2011,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Urges the Commission to continue its efforts to promote the exchange of information in order to integrate maritime surveillance, in particular information aimed at harmonising coastguard services at European level;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Believes that the EU's objectives in the fight against IUU fishing must be backed up by the necessary resources, above all financial, to ensure their promotion, with Member States being allocated sufficient resources to allow them to implement the regulations in force; stresses, equally, that any future adoption of new methods (e.g. electronic tracking systems, etc) must ensure the availability at the level of the EU budget of the financial resources needed for their implementation;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to publish annual assessments of the performance of Member States in implementing the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and to use all possible means to ensure their full compliance;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to publish annual assessments of the performance of each Member State
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to publish annual assessments of the performance of Member States in implementing the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) with the aim of making the EU's control policy transparent and reliable, and where necessary identifying the weak points that need to be improved;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Encourages the Commission and Member States to identify and sanction violators of EU rules to safeguard the Union’s credibility on this issue;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Deplores the fact that EU subsidies have been distributed to vessels that had previously been caught fishing illegally;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls for Member States to apply severe sanctions to vessels proven to have fished illegally, including the withdrawal of fishing licences and denial of access to port facilities;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Calls on the Commission to amend the requirements for all kinds of financial assistance so as to apply financial sanctions and the denial of funding opportunities to the owners of vessels proven to have fished illegally;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers that, given the high mobility of fish stocks, fishing fleets and the capital underlying the fleets, as well as the global nature of markets for fish, IUU fishing can
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers that, given the high mobility of fish stocks, fishing fleets and the capital underlying the fleets, as well as the global nature of markets for fish, IUU fishing can only be effectively fought by international cooperation; trusts that the EU’s efforts to combat IUU fishing will achieve such success that the measures may be used as an example to third countries to adopt similar practices;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers in this context that the EU should exert heavy pressure on countries which do not want to participate in combating IUU fishing;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Deplores the fact that some countries allow fishermen to fish unsustainable quotas, and calls on these countries to take seriously the threat to the marine environment and endangered fish stocks , and immediately reduce overfishing;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises that past limitations in monitoring and enforcement of oceans have been largely overcome by technological advances
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises that past limitations in monitoring
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises that past limitations in monitoring and enforcement of oceans have been largely overcome by technological advances, and that the key to combating IUU fishing today lies primarily with governments finding the political will to act effectively and responsibly;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that improving transparency in all aspects of the fishing industry and their activities, including agreeing on international criteria to establish the real
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the seas and oceans represent 99% of the available living space, and 71% of planet Earth is covered by oceans, which store 16 times as much carbon dioxide as the terrestrial world and play a fundamental role in the climate and life support systems of the entire planet, as well as providing a substantial portion of the global population with food, livelihoods, energy and transport routes,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that improving transparency in all aspects of the fishing industry and
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that improving transparency in all aspects of the fishing industry and their activities, including agreeing on international criteria to establish real, beneficial ownership of vessels and monitoring fishing vessels in international waters, is crucial;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to provide for the creation of a ‘European coastguard’ which would effectively combat current or future dangers at sea such as terrorism, piracy, IUU fishing, trafficking or even marine pollution;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Believes that the European Union should set an example by adopting and promoting a policy of transparency in decision-making in fisheries management in international bodies and in third countries with which the EU has fisheries relations;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Believes that vessel owners, companies or individuals caught and convicted of involvement in IUU fishing should face severe penalties and permanent bans from operating within the EU fisheries sector.
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Encourages the Commission and the Member States to expand their programmes of financial and technical support
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Encourages the Commission and the Member States to expand their programmes of financial, technological and technical support for surveillance programmes in the waters of developing countries, giving priority to regional programmes rather than bilateral ones;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that where IUU fishing is practised by the Community fleet this is partly thanks to management models that are ill-adapted to the realities of fishing in certain regions, as well as legal requirements (catch limits, fishing effort, etc) which do not reflect the real biological state of certain fish stocks;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Insists that as the mixing of IUU catches with legally caught EU fish is specifically prohibited, perpetrators must be severely punished and all licences to operate within the EU withdrawn.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas illegal, undeclared and unregulated (IUU) fishing represents a major environmental and economic problem worldwide and contributes to the exhaustion of fish stocks, while also creating economic difficulties for fishing communities which operate legally and complying with the rules and are dependent on their fishing activity,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Asks the Commission to add the FAO Port State Measures Agreement, the UN Fish Stock Agreement and the FAO Compliance Agreement to the list of instruments to be implemented for countries to be eligible for the Generalised System of Preferences plus, which is currently being revised; calls for the withdrawal of export licences for all countries which market products obtained by IUU fishing; considers that the EU should work with such countries in order to ban the marketing of these products;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recalls that the issue of IUU fishing is inseparable from that of fisheries partnership agreements in the context of trade which is subject to the rules of the WTO; stresses the problem of derogation from the rules of origin for some processed fishery products and in particular the case of Papua New Guinea, which prevents the traceability of such products and opens the way for IUU fishing;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission to actively promote the signing, ratification and implementation of the FAO Port State Measures Agreement, the UN Fish Stock Agreement, the FAO Compliance Agreement and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in the context of trade agreements, Fisheries Partnership Agreements and the EU’S development policy;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – indent 1 Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – indent 3 – extension of the list of specified measures to be taken by Contracting Parties (CPCs) as flag, coastal, port and market States, and States of beneficial ownership, within individual RFMOs;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – indent 5 Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – indent 6 a (new) - compulsory use of electronic tools including VMS, electronic logbooks and other tracking devices where relevant;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – indent 7 a (new) - declaration of financial interests with respect to fisheries for heads of delegations to RFMOs where they could lead to a conflict of interest;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls for an urgent expansion of the network of RFMOs to cover all high seas fisheries and areas
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls for an urgent expansion of the network of RFMOs to cover all high seas fisheries and areas, either by establishing new RFMOs or by expanding the mandate of existing ones; believes that vastly
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing has been reported to account for between 11 and 26 million tonnes a year, equivalent to at least 15% of world catches, making sustainable management - with the long-term integration of the economic, social and environmental dimension - of the exploitation of the world’s marine resources impossible,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Believes that the right to fish on the high seas must, to the extent possible under international law, be made conditional upon a State’s adherence to the relevant international bodies and full implementation of all management measures that they adopt;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Notes that the FAO is the main source for scientific expertise and recommendations when examining global fisheries and aquaculture issues due to fisheries development and management being better amalgamated with the preservation of biodiversity and protection of the environment;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Fully supports the current FAO initiative to develop a Global Record of Fishing Vessels, Refrigerated Transport Vessels and Supply Vessels, which should be compulsory and include vessels above 10 GT as soon as possible;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Fully supports the current FAO initiative to develop, as soon as possible, a Global Record of Fishing Vessels, which should not only be compulsory
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Emphasizes the need for international cooperation regarding the collection and exchange of timely, detailed and accurate data regarding fishing vessels and fishing operations, particularly those identified as engaging in IUU
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Encourages the rapid development of a system for the evaluation of flag State performance currently underway at the FAO as a means of putting pressure on States that do not meet their international legal obligations; urges that some effective mechanism be found for sanctioning States that do not ensure that vessels flying their flag do not support or engage in IUU fishing and abide by all relevant legislation;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Encourages the rapid development of a system for the evaluation of flag State performance currently underway at the FAO as a means of putting pressure on
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls for the urgent adoption of measures to put an end to the use of ‘flags of convenience’, a practice which enables fishing vessels to operate illegally, with impunity, at a great cost to the marine ecosystem, fish stocks, coastal communities, food security, particularly in developing countries, and the legitimate, law-abiding fishing industry;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas IUU fishing is not only harmful to the marine environment but also distorts the market to the detriment of consumers and of fishermen operating legally,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses the need for maximum transparency with regard to the success or failure of individual Member States in taking measures to combat IUU fishing, and advises the Commission that ‘naming and shaming’ is an important means of stimulating political action;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Supports the efforts of the Commission to establish a public register listing the identity of ship owners that have been proven to have participated in IUU fishing; believes the register should be in line with the one managed by the Control Agency in Vigo;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Believes that
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Recognizes the lack of international cooperation in management of the negative impacts of human activities other than fishing that affect the marine environment and calls upon the Commission to advocate the creation of a global body to fill this void, possibly under the auspices of the UN;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises that the concept of market State responsibility must be more fully developed as a means of closing down the markets for the products of IUU fish; believes that the EU must urgently discuss with other major market States, including but not limited to the US, Japan and China,
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises that the concept of market State responsibility must be more fully developed as a means of closing down the markets for the products of IUU fish; believes that the EU must urgently discuss with other major market States, including but not limited to the US, Japan and China, how to cooperate among themselves and, as rapidly as possible, to develop international legal instruments that could halt trade in IUU fish, possibly under the World Trade Organisation (WTO);
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Underlines that maintaining and developing the European fisheries sector depends in part on strict IUU monitoring of fishery products traded on European and global markets; stresses the importance of this sector for regional planning, food safety and safeguarding jobs and resources in Community waters;
source: PE-467.233
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/4/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE464.787New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-PR-464787_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.686&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-454686_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE460.908&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-460908_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.233New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AM-467233_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0362_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0362_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-362&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0362_EN.html |
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-362&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0362_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-516New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0516_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
PECH/7/03557New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|