BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps
download json


2011/0139(NLE) EC/Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial compensation from 28 February 2011 to 27 February 2012. Protocol

Progress: Awaiting final decision

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead PECH HAGLUND Carl (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion DEVE LÖVIN Isabella (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) Maurice PONGA (icon: PPE PPE), Judith SARGENTINI (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion BUDG ALFONSI François (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 043-p2, TFEU 218-p6a

Events

2013/04/22
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Spanish delegation asked the Commission for a briefing on the state of play of the negotiations concerning the EU-Morocco fisheries protocol. This Agreement is especially important to Spain and some other Member States which supported these requests.

As regards Morocco, on the basis of a mandate granted to the Commission by the Council, negotiations for a new protocol to the fisheries partnership agreement were opened in early November 2012. A fifth round took place on 11-12 February 2013 and ended inconclusively . No dates have yet been scheduled for a sixth round. Progress has been slow and seems to be stalled especially on the issue of the financial counterpart from the EU and the issue of inserting a human rights clause .

For the Commission, the financial aspects are about to be resolved and the EU is waiting for Morocco to set a date for a new round of negotiations.

Therefore, Spain would like to be debriefed by the Commission on this matter and, where necessary, to know/assess whether or not the Commission requires some political guidance from the Council. It is recalled that since the Commission was granted the mandate to open negotiations by the Council in February 2012, the negotiations on a Protocol that, considering its importance for the fishing fleets of Spain and the Member State fishing fleets, is becoming ever more urgent, have been very drawn-out.

Documents
3234
2013/04/22
   CSL - Council Meeting
2012/02/14
   CSL - Council Meeting
2011/12/19
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
COM(2011)0939
EUR-Lex
2011/12/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
Documents
Results of vote in Parliament
2011/12/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

In voting against the Committee on Fisheries' recommendation (326 votes against, 296 in favour and 58 abstentions), the plenary decided to withhold its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol to the EU-Morocco fisheries agreement,

In withholding its consent, Parliament supported the original recommendation by rapporteur Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI), who had argued that the one-year extension of the current protocol was unacceptable for economic, ecological and legal reasons and that Parliament should therefore decline to consent to its conclusion. The Committee on Fisheries had nevertheless tabled a recommendation calling on Parliament to give its consent.

As Parliament's consent is needed for agreements of this kind, pursuant to Article 218(6)a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the European Union will not be in a position to conclude the Protocol.

Documents
T7-0569/2011
2011/12/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Documents
Debate in Parliament
2011/11/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.

The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.

It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.

It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.

Documents
A7-0394/2011
2011/11/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
A7-0394/2011
2011/11/22
   EP - Vote in committee
2011/11/09
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
PE472.388
2011/11/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
PE472.277
2011/10/19
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
PE474.038
2011/09/27
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
PE472.260
2011/09/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2011/07/13
   EP - LÖVIN Isabella (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2011/06/21
   CSL - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
11225/2011
2011/06/21
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to conclude a new Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and Morocco.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

BACKGROUND: the European Union negotiated with Morocco a new Protocol providing EU vessels with fishing opportunities in waters falling within the sovereignty or jurisdiction of Morocco.

On the conclusion of those negotiations, the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco was initialled on 25 February 2011.

The Protocol was signed in accordance with an EU Decision and has been applied on a provisional basis since 28 February 2011.

It is now appropriate for the Protocol to be concluded on behalf of the EU.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.

LEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) in conjunction with point (a) of Article 218(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

CONTENT: under the proposed Decision, the Protocol between the European Union and Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.

For further details on the main points of the Protocol, please refer to the summary of the previous initial legislative document dated 01/06/2011.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no budgetary implication for the Union budget.

Documents
11226/2011
2011/06/14
   EP - ALFONSI François (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2011/06/01
   EP - Preparatory document
Details

PURPOSE: to conclude a new Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the EU and Morocco.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

BACKGROUND: on the basis of a mandate from the Council, the Commission has conducted negotiations with Morocco on the renewal for one year of the Protocol to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and Morocco, which expired on 27 February 2011. A Protocol renewing the preceding Protocol was initialled on 25 February 2011. It is now appropriate to conclude the Protocol on behalf of the EU.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was undertaken. The Commission’s negotiating position was based in part on the results of an ex-post and ex-ante evaluation carried out by independent experts, as well as on a joint assessment of the scientific data on the state of stocks.

LEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) in conjunction with Article 218(6a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.

CONTENT: the proposal aims to extend, for the period of one year, the protocol to the fisheries partnership agreement between the EC and Morocco of 22 May 2006. The general aim is to continue the cooperation between the European Union and Morocco, thereby creating a partnership framework within which to develop a sustainable fisheries policy and sound exploitation of fisheries resources in the Moroccan fishing zones, in the interests of both Parties.

The main objective of the Protocol is to define the fishing opportunities offered to EU vessels based on the surplus available, as well as the financial contribution due, separately, for access rights and for sectoral support.

The main provisions may be summarised as follows :

Financial contribution : the overall annual contribution of EUR 36 100 000 under the Protocol is based on:

a maximum of 119 fishing permits for EU vessels in the categories of small-scale fishing, demersal fishing and tuna fishing, as well as a maximum catch tonnage of 60 000 tonnes in the category of industrial pelagic fishing, and EUR 13 500 000 in development aid for Morocco's sectoral fisheries policy. This support meets the objectives of the national fisheries policy.

Fishing opportunities : the Protocol – like its predecessor – provides for fishing opportunities in the following six categories:

small-scale pelagic fishing in the north: 20 seiners; small-scale fishing in the north: 30 bottom longliners; small-scale fishing in the south: 20 vessels; demersal fishing: 22 vessels; tuna fishing: 27 vessels; industrial pelagic fishing: 60 000 tonnes of catches.

Duration of the agreement : the Protocol will be valid from 28 February 2011 to 27 February 2012.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the total financial envelope for the Protocol is EUR 36.15 million for the extended year (including credits of an administrative nature financed by certain operational programmes.)

A total of EUR 142.000 is provided for administrative expenditure.

The total amounts to EUR 36.292 million.

Documents
COM(2011)0313
EUR-Lex
2011/03/15
   EP - HAGLUND Carl (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in PECH

Documents

Activities

AmendmentsDossier
6 2011/0139(NLE)
2011/10/18 DEVE 3 amendments...
source: PE-473.925
2011/10/19 PECH 3 amendments...
source: PE-474.038

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2024-11-12Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-11-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-11-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-11-09Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-11-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-11-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-11-05Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-11-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-11-03Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-11-02Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-11-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-10-30Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-29Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-28Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-27Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-18Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-16Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-15Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-11Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-10-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-10-09Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-07Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-10-06Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-05Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-03Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-02Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-10-01Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-30Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-29Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-09-28Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-09-26Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-09-25Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-09-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-20Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-16Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-09-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-09-08Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-09-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-09-05Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-03Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-02Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-09-01Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-31Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-08-30Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-28Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-27Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-08-26Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-25Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-08-24Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-23Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-08-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-21Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-20Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-08-19Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-08-18Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-16Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-08-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-14Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-08-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-11Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-08-09Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-08-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-08-06Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-05Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-08-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-02Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-08-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-31Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-30Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-28Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-07-27Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-25Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-22Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-21Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-07-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-07-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-07-16Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-07-14Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-07-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-07-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-07-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-07-10Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-09Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-08Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-07-06Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-07-05Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-07-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-07-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-07-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-07-01Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-30Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-06-29Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-28Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-26Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-06-25Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-24Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-22Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-06-21Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-20Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-06-18Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-15Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-14Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-06-12Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-06-10Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-06-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-06-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-05Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-04Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-06-03Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-06-02Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-06-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-05-31Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-05-30Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-05-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-05-28Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-05-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-05-26Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-05-25Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-05-24Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-05-23Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-05-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-05-20Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-05-19Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-05-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-05-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-05-16Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
links/National parliaments/url
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/NLE-2011-0139
2024-05-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
links/National parliaments/url
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/NLE-2011-0139
2024-05-14Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
links/National parliaments/url
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/NLE-2011-0139
2024-05-13Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
links/National parliaments/url
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/NLE-2011-0139
2024-05-12Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
links/National parliaments/url
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/NLE-2011-0139
2024-05-11Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
links/National parliaments/url
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/NLE-2011-0139
2024-05-10Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
links/National parliaments/url
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/NLE-2011-0139
2024-05-09Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
links/National parliaments/url
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/NLE-2011-0139
2024-05-08Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
links/National parliaments/url
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/NLE-2011-0139
2024-05-07Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
links/National parliaments/url
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/NLE-2011-0139
2024-05-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-05-05Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-05-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-05-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-05-02Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-05-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-04-30Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-29Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-28Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-04-27Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-04-23Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-04-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-21Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-20Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-04-18Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-16Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-15Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-13Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-04-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-04-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-04-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-04-03Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-02Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-04-01Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-31Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-30Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-03-26Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-03-25Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-24Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-23Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-03-22Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-21Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-20Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-19Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-03-16Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-03-12Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-11Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-10Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-09Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-03-08Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-03-06Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-06Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-06Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-03-05Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-03-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-03-02Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-03-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-02-29Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-02-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-02-16Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-02-15Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-02-14Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-02-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-02-11Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-02-10Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-02-09Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-02-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-02-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-02-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-02-05Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2024-02-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-02-03Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-02-02Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-02-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-01-31Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
2024-01-30Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2024-01-29Show (7) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0
date
2011-06-01T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Preparatory document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2011-06-21T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11226%2F11&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11226/2011
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
CSL
docs/5
date
2011-11-29T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0394_EN.html title: A7-0394/2011
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/5/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/7
date
2011-11-29T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0394_EN.html title: A7-0394/2011
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/1/date
Old
2011-06-20T00:00:00
New
2011-06-21T00:00:00
events/4/date
Old
2011-11-28T00:00:00
New
2011-11-29T00:00:00
2023-04-27Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0
date
2011-06-01T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Preparatory document
body
EC
docs/7
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/8
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2023-02-17Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0
date
2011-06-01T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Preparatory document
body
EC
docs/7
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
docs/8
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
2023-01-31Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2022-12-03Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
docs/7/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco.
  • The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol.
  • It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco.
  • It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0139&appLng=EN
2022-06-27Show (9) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0
date
2011-06-01T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Preparatory document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2011-06-21T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11226%2F11&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11226/2011
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
CSL
docs/5
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/7
date
2011-11-29T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0394_EN.html title: A7-0394/2011
summary
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/8
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
events/1/date
Old
2011-06-21T00:00:00
New
2011-06-20T00:00:00
events/4/date
Old
2011-11-29T00:00:00
New
2011-11-28T00:00:00
2022-05-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2022-05-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2022-05-01Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2022-04-30Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2022-04-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2022-04-28Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2022-04-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2022-01-31Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2021-05-07Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-PR-472260_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AM-474038_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-472277_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-472388_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/5/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-12-12-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
2021-05-03Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
events/2/body
EP
events/3/body
EP
events/7/body
EP
2021-04-26Show (12) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.260
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE474.038
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.277&secondRef=02
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
events/2
date
2011-09-13T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2
date
2011-09-13T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2011-11-22T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2011-11-22T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/5/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111212&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/7
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0569_EN.html title: T7-0569/2011
summary
events/7
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0569_EN.html title: T7-0569/2011
summary
2021-03-03Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: LÖVIN Isabella date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: LÖVIN Isabella date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: ALFONSI François date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: ALFONSI François date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
2021-02-16Show (7) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: LÖVIN Isabella date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: LÖVIN Isabella date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: ALFONSI François date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: ALFONSI François date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/7
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0569_EN.html title: T7-0569/2011
summary
events/7
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0569_EN.html title: T7-0569/2011
summary
In voting against the Committee on Fisheries' recommendation (326 votes against, 296 in favour and 58 abstentions), the plenary decided to withhold its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol to the EU-Morocco fisheries agreement,
2020-12-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref
96750
2020-10-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-09-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-08-09Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-07-10Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-06-16Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-05-25Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-05-09Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.260
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.260
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE474.038
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE474.038
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.277&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.277&secondRef=02
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0394_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0394_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111212&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111212&type=CRE
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0569_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0569_EN.html
2020-02-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-02-15Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-02-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-02-02Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-01-25Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-01-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/body
EP
2020-01-11Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2020-01-05Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A7-2011-394&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0394_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-569
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0569_EN.html
2019-11-15Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
events/0
date
2011-06-01T00:00:00
type
Preparatory document
docs
summary
events/0
date
2011-06-01T00:00:00
type
Initial legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-394&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A7-2011-394&language=EN
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-569
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-569
2019-11-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2019-11-02Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2019-11-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf
2019-10-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2019-10-14Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2019-08-07Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
rapporteur
name: HAGLUND Carl date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2011-03-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HAGLUND Carl group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: LÖVIN Isabella date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2011-07-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LÖVIN Isabella group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: ALFONSI François date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2011-06-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ALFONSI François group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
2019-07-06Show (14) Changes | Timetravel
activities
  • date: 2011-06-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf title: COM(2011)0313 type: Initial legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52011PC0313:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Commissioner: DAMANAKI Maria type: Initial legislative proposal published
  • date: 2011-06-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11226%2F11&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Legislative proposal published title: 11226/2011 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Commissioner: DAMANAKI Maria type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2011-09-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ALFONSI François body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LÖVIN Isabella body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: ALDE name: HAGLUND Carl
  • date: 2011-11-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ALFONSI François body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LÖVIN Isabella body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: ALDE name: HAGLUND Carl
  • body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-394&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0394/2011 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ALFONSI François body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LÖVIN Isabella body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: ALDE name: HAGLUND Carl date: 2011-11-29T00:00:00
  • date: 2011-12-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111212&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20895&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-569 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0569/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2012-02-14T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 3145
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3234 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3234*&MEET_DATE=22/04/2013 type: Debate in Council title: 3234 council: Agriculture and Fisheries date: 2013-04-22T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
commission
  • body: EC dg: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries commissioner: DAMANAKI Maria
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2011-03-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HAGLUND Carl group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2011-06-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: ALFONSI François
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2011-07-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LÖVIN Isabella group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2011-07-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: LÖVIN Isabella
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2011-06-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ALFONSI François group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
PECH
date
2011-03-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Fisheries
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: HAGLUND Carl
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 3234 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3234*&MEET_DATE=22/04/2013 date: 2013-04-22T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 3145 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3145*&MEET_DATE=14/02/2012 date: 2012-02-14T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2011-06-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11225%2F11&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11225/2011 type: Document attached to the procedure body: CSL
  • date: 2011-09-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.260 title: PE472.260 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2011-10-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE474.038 title: PE474.038 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2011-11-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.277&secondRef=02 title: PE472.277 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-11-09T00:00:00 docs: title: PE472.388 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0939/COM_COM(2011)0939_EN.pdf title: COM(2011)0939 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=939 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
events
  • date: 2011-06-01T00:00:00 type: Initial legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf title: COM(2011)0313 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=313 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to conclude a new Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the EU and Morocco. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. BACKGROUND: on the basis of a mandate from the Council, the Commission has conducted negotiations with Morocco on the renewal for one year of the Protocol to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and Morocco, which expired on 27 February 2011. A Protocol renewing the preceding Protocol was initialled on 25 February 2011. It is now appropriate to conclude the Protocol on behalf of the EU. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was undertaken. The Commission’s negotiating position was based in part on the results of an ex-post and ex-ante evaluation carried out by independent experts, as well as on a joint assessment of the scientific data on the state of stocks. LEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) in conjunction with Article 218(6a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU. CONTENT: the proposal aims to extend, for the period of one year, the protocol to the fisheries partnership agreement between the EC and Morocco of 22 May 2006. The general aim is to continue the cooperation between the European Union and Morocco, thereby creating a partnership framework within which to develop a sustainable fisheries policy and sound exploitation of fisheries resources in the Moroccan fishing zones, in the interests of both Parties. The main objective of the Protocol is to define the fishing opportunities offered to EU vessels based on the surplus available, as well as the financial contribution due, separately, for access rights and for sectoral support. The main provisions may be summarised as follows : Financial contribution : the overall annual contribution of EUR 36 100 000 under the Protocol is based on: a maximum of 119 fishing permits for EU vessels in the categories of small-scale fishing, demersal fishing and tuna fishing, as well as a maximum catch tonnage of 60 000 tonnes in the category of industrial pelagic fishing, and EUR 13 500 000 in development aid for Morocco's sectoral fisheries policy. This support meets the objectives of the national fisheries policy. Fishing opportunities : the Protocol – like its predecessor – provides for fishing opportunities in the following six categories: small-scale pelagic fishing in the north: 20 seiners; small-scale fishing in the north: 30 bottom longliners; small-scale fishing in the south: 20 vessels; demersal fishing: 22 vessels; tuna fishing: 27 vessels; industrial pelagic fishing: 60 000 tonnes of catches. Duration of the agreement : the Protocol will be valid from 28 February 2011 to 27 February 2012. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the total financial envelope for the Protocol is EUR 36.15 million for the extended year (including credits of an administrative nature financed by certain operational programmes.) A total of EUR 142.000 is provided for administrative expenditure. The total amounts to EUR 36.292 million.
  • date: 2011-06-21T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11226%2F11&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11226/2011 summary: PURPOSE: to conclude a new Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and Morocco. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. BACKGROUND: the European Union negotiated with Morocco a new Protocol providing EU vessels with fishing opportunities in waters falling within the sovereignty or jurisdiction of Morocco. On the conclusion of those negotiations, the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco was initialled on 25 February 2011. The Protocol was signed in accordance with an EU Decision and has been applied on a provisional basis since 28 February 2011. It is now appropriate for the Protocol to be concluded on behalf of the EU. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out. LEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) in conjunction with point (a) of Article 218(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: under the proposed Decision, the Protocol between the European Union and Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco is hereby approved on behalf of the Union. For further details on the main points of the Protocol, please refer to the summary of the previous initial legislative document dated 01/06/2011. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no budgetary implication for the Union budget.
  • date: 2011-09-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2011-11-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2011-11-29T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-394&language=EN title: A7-0394/2011 summary: The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drafted by Carl HAGLUND (ALDE, FI) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a new one-year Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco. The report as finally adopted in committee recommended that the European Parliament should give its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol. It should be noted that the result of the vote in committee did not reflect the rapporteur’s opinion on the conclusion of the Protocol, which had been provisionally applied since 28 February 2011. The rapporteur had recommended that Parliament should decline to give its formal consent to the extension of the fishing Protocol due to major shortcomings which he himself had witnessed. He claimed that the Agreement was a waste of taxpayers' money, was ecologically and environmentally unsustainable and had no significant macro-economic effect on either the EU or Morocco. It should also be noted that the committee vote did not reflect the two opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets.
  • date: 2011-12-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111212&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20895&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-569 title: T7-0569/2011 summary: In voting against the Committee on Fisheries' recommendation (326 votes against, 296 in favour and 58 abstentions), the plenary decided to withhold its consent to the conclusion of the new Protocol to the EU-Morocco fisheries agreement,
  • date: 2013-04-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3234*&MEET_DATE=22/04/2013 title: 3234 summary: The Spanish delegation asked the Commission for a briefing on the state of play of the negotiations concerning the EU-Morocco fisheries protocol. This Agreement is especially important to Spain and some other Member States which supported these requests. As regards Morocco, on the basis of a mandate granted to the Commission by the Council, negotiations for a new protocol to the fisheries partnership agreement were opened in early November 2012. A fifth round took place on 11-12 February 2013 and ended inconclusively . No dates have yet been scheduled for a sixth round. Progress has been slow and seems to be stalled especially on the issue of the financial counterpart from the EU and the issue of inserting a human rights clause . For the Commission, the financial aspects are about to be resolved and the EU is waiting for Morocco to set a date for a new round of negotiations. Therefore, Spain would like to be debriefed by the Commission on this matter and, where necessary, to know/assess whether or not the Commission requires some political guidance from the Council. It is recalled that since the Commission was granted the mandate to open negotiations by the Council in February 2012, the negotiations on a Protocol that, considering its importance for the fishing fleets of Spain and the Member State fishing fleets, is becoming ever more urgent, have been very drawn-out.
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries commissioner: DAMANAKI Maria
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
PECH/7/06231
New
  • PECH/7/06231
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.15.15.04 Fisheries agreements with Maghreb and Mediterranean countries
New
3.15.15.04
Fisheries agreements with Maghreb and Mediterranean countries
2017-09-21Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2017-04-11Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/
New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
activities/1/commission/0/DG/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/
New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en
other/1/dg/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/
New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en
2017-03-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52011PC0313:EN
2017-03-12Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52011PC0313:EN
2016-11-22Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2016-06-26Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2016-05-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2016-02-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2015-11-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52011PC0313:EN
2015-10-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2015-07-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2015-07-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf
2015-06-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52011PC0313:EN
2015-05-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
2014-11-09Show (5) Changes
activities
  • date: 2011-06-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0313/COM_COM(2011)0313_EN.pdf title: COM(2011)0313 type: Initial legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52011PC0313:EN body: EC type: Initial legislative proposal published commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/ title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Commissioner: DAMANAKI Maria
  • date: 2011-06-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11226%2F11&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Legislative proposal published title: 11226/2011 body: EC type: Legislative proposal published commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/ title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Commissioner: DAMANAKI Maria
  • date: 2011-09-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ALFONSI François body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LÖVIN Isabella body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: ALDE name: HAGLUND Carl
  • date: 2011-11-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ALFONSI François body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LÖVIN Isabella body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: ALDE name: HAGLUND Carl
  • body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-394&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0394/2011 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ALFONSI François body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LÖVIN Isabella body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: ALDE name: HAGLUND Carl date: 2011-11-29T00:00:00
  • date: 2011-12-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111212&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20895&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-569 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0569/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2012-02-14T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 3145
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3234 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3234*&MEET_DATE=22/04/2013 type: Debate in Council title: 3234 council: Agriculture and Fisheries date: 2013-04-22T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-06-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ALFONSI François
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: LÖVIN Isabella
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: ALDE name: HAGLUND Carl
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/ title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries commissioner: DAMANAKI Maria
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
PECH/7/06231
geographical_area
Morocco
reference
2011/0139(NLE)
subtype
Consent by Parliament
legal_basis
stage_reached
Awaiting final decision
instrument
Decision
title
EC/Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial compensation from 28 February 2011 to 27 February 2012. Protocol
type
NLE - Non-legislative enactments
subject
3.15.15.04 Fisheries agreements with Maghreb and Mediterranean countries
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation