Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | CHICHESTER Giles ( ECR) | VIDAL-QUADRAS Alejo ( PPE), KALFIN Ivailo ( S&D), PANAYOTOV Vladko Todorov ( ALDE), HARMS Rebecca ( Verts/ALE), PAKSAS Rolandas ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | TORVALDS Nils ( ALDE) | |
Committee Legal Basis Opinion | JURI | SPERONI Francesco Enrico ( EFD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 203, TFEU 114, TFEU 168-p4
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 203, TFEU 114, TFEU 168-p4Events
The Commission presents its report on the implementation of the work under the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme to Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia in 2019 and previous years.
In June 2019, the Commission established the mid-term evaluation report of the European Union nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia.
The present report follows up the evaluation and reviews the further accomplishments obtained in 2019.
Progress and performance
The Commission stated that to date, progress against the objectives is generally satisfactory and the cost of the work has been as planned.
Bulgaria - Kozloduy programme
The Kozloduy programme made significant progress on dismantling in the auxiliary buildings, e.g. completing the dismantling of equipment in the turbine hall in August 2019, a year earlier than scheduled. The plasma melting facility, a first-of-its-kind facility for the high-performance volume reduction of radioactive waste, started operations in November 2018 (target: March 2018) and continued with the support of the system provider until the end of 2019. It is now in industrial operation and the technical and financial evaluation of the first operational campaign will be finalised in 2020.
The similar design of the Kozloduy and Bohunice reactors provides an excellent opportunity to share experiences, methods and tools. This knowledge-sharing reduces risks and cost. The end date of the programme (2030) was reconfirmed.
Slovakia – Bohunice programme
The Bohunice decommissioning programme is the most advanced of the three programmes assisted by the EU and will probably see the first complete decommissioning of a VVER-type reactor. The programme made substantial progress in 2019. After completion of the dismantling of the turbine hall equipment and the auxiliary buildings, including the demolition of the four cooling towers, the dismantling of the large components in the reactor building started in earnest.
By July 2019, all 12 steam generators, each made up of 145 tonnes of steel, had been removed from the reactor building and transported to the former turbine hall. In the second half of 2019, the pressurisers were cut up and the construction started of two wet-cutting workshops in which the reactor internals will be segmented under water. The decommissioning is scheduled to be completed by 2025.
Lithuania – Ignalina programme
The reactor design includes a large graphite core. Its decommissioning is a first-of-a-kind challenge and is scheduled to last until 2038. The decommissioning process is therefore at an earlier stage: currently the spent-fuel assemblies are being safely stored in a new dedicated facility. The transfer operation is expected to last until July 2022. Meanwhile, preparations are under way to dismantle the reactor cores. A thorough process of identification and assessment of available options (scheduled for 2022) aims to mitigate the risks involved.
Main conclusions
In line with expectations, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia continued to make effective progress in decommissioning their nuclear power plants in 2019. Indications to date are that greatly improved safety levels will be achieved at the sites as a result of EU funding under the 2014-2020 MFF. The completion of the decommissioning programmes up to their planned end-state will require additional funding. In 2018, the Commission adopted proposals for the programmes continuation in 2021-2027. They lay down inter alia national contribution levels, thus removing remaining uncertainties regarding the required funding.
Future developments
The outlook for 2020 promises further major developments:
Bulgaria
- progress will have to be made on the management of legacy waste, and decontamination and dismantling activities in the reactor building;
Slovakia
- steady progress is expected in dismantling large components from the reactor building, including the reactor vessels, leading to the last stage of decommissioning;
Lithuania
- the very low-level waste disposal facility will be used for the first time;
- construction of the low-level waste disposal facility will start; and
- preparations for dismantling the irradiated graphite core will move to concrete action with expert support.
For the three programmes, the Commission will carry out a study on the earned value management systems already in place in order to identify best practices and possible routes for ongoing improvement.
The Commission presents its report on the implementation of the work under the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme to Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia in 2018 and previous years.
In June 2018, the Commission established the mid-term evaluation report of the European Union nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia.
The present report follows up the evaluation and reviews the further accomplishments obtained in 2018.
Progress and performance
Bulgaria - Kozloduy programme
The Kozloduy programme made significant progress in the dismantling of equipment in the turbine hall and in the controlled area. Important waste management infrastructures – key in order to proceed with the decommissioning – became operational in 2018. In parallel, construction works are underway for the National Disposal Facility, i.e. the low and intermediate level waste surface repository, which will receive large quantities of the decommissioned materials.
The mid-term evaluation report showed that the Bulgarian authorities concluded that the overall cost of the Kozloduy programme (estimate at completion) needed to be revised upward (+23%) and Bulgaria has correspondingly increased its national contributions. The end date of the programme (2030) was confirmed.
Slovakia – Bohunice programme
The Bohunice programme has substantially progressed in 2018. Decontamination & Dismantling (D&D) works in the turbine halls and auxiliary buildings were finalised in 2018 with the demolition of the four V1 NPP cooling towers. Furthermore, important D&D works have also been performed in the reactor-building: in 2018 the decontamination of the spent fuel pools and other tanks in the controlled area was finalised, while the dismantling of large components of the reactor coolant systems started.
Based on the revised decommissioning plan, the mid-term evaluation report concluded that the overall cost of the decommissioning programme (estimate at completion) is slightly decreasing and the completion date remains fixed at the end of 2025. This estimate is supported by a state-of-the-art plan for risks and contingencies, which provides a high level of confidence in the estimations made.
Lithuania – Ignalina programme
The removal of spent fuel assemblies from both reactor buildings (units 1 and 2) started in September 2016. The second reactor was defueled fully in February 2018, i.e. 9 months earlier than planned. Both reactors are defueled and transfer operations of spent fuel from the ponds to the Interim Spent Fuel Storage Facility continue steadily. As at 31 December 2018, more than 50% of spent fuel assemblies were safely loaded into casks and put into storage. According to the schedule, all spent fuel assemblies will be removed in July 2022.
Main conclusions
The report concluded that in line with the expectations set for the current MFF, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia continued making effective and efficient progress in decommissioning their reactors in 2018. The management system has increasingly proven to cope with challenges and setbacks due to the complexity of the programmes. The preparation and endorsement of the respective decommissioning plans in 2014 was a major milestone and defined the limits of the assistance programmes, with the financing needs to achieve the decommissioning end state eventually established. At the mid-term stage, these needs were confirmed for the Bohunice and the Ignalina programmes; for the Kozloduy programme, the due revision of the decommissioning plan resulted in an increase in cost estimates post-2020. The increase of estimates did not result in an equal increase of the programme’s envelope since Bulgaria committed to cover the increase to a large extent.
The mid-term evaluation report thus confirmed that no additional funding is needed in the current MFF (2014-2020) to achieve the objectives stated in the respective Council regulations and that the programmes should be continued after 2020.
National contribution levels are currently not established in the legal basis, which creates residual uncertainties. Appropriate national, relative to EU, contributions and defining a clear and formalised framework for ‘co-financing’ is expected to encourage greater national ownership and economy-seeking on the part of beneficiaries. The progress accomplished so far assures that greatly improved safety levels will be achieved at the sites as a result of EU funding in this MFF.
Knowledge sharing amongst the three beneficiaries has positively impacted the programmes and contributed to the latest successes.
Future developments
In the next period major expected developments in the field include:
- in Bulgaria: the steady progress of construction of the National Disposal Facility, the management of legacy waste and the start of major D&D works in the reactor building;
- in Slovakia: the final dismantling of the reactor cores;
- in Lithuania: the steady progress of defueling and the preparations for dismantling the irradiated graphite core, which is a first of a kind project of an unprecedented scale.
The Commission presented a report on the evaluation and implementation of the EU nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes in Bulgaria, Slovakia and Lithuania.
Context of the assessment : upon accession, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia committed themselves to shutting down eight nuclear reactors of Soviet design, before the end of their scheduled lifetime. For its part, the Union has agreed to provide financial assistance to these three Member States for the decommissioning of the reactors concerned:
Kozloduy nuclear power plant in Bulgaria, units 1 to 4; the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania; the Bohunice V1 nuclear power plant in Slovakia.
Two Council Regulations were adopted on 13 December 2013 to provide support to these decommissioning programmes in the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2014-2020, continuing the assistance provided in previous periods.
During the MFF 2014-2020, the Commission has reported three times on this subject.
The present report, as set out in the mid-term evaluation roadmap, analyses and presents: (i) to what extent the Kozloduy, Bohunice and Ignalina programmes have achieved their objectives in terms of results and impacts; (ii) the efficiency of the use of resources; and (iii) EU added value.
Main findings : the report concludes that Bulgaria, Slovakia and Lithuania have made effective and efficient progress towards decommissioning their reactors .
The decommissioning operators are all fully working on decommissioning activities. Slovakia has advanced the most and is currently carrying out Dismantling & Decontamination (D&D) in the reactor building at the Bohunice site. Decommissioning and decontamination is well advanced in the auxiliary buildings at the Kozloduy and Ignalina sites.
The programmes are generally on track to achieve the specific objectives of the Regulations with the funding provided in this MFF.
In addition, long-standing issues that were carried over from the previous financial framework have finally been resolved. Key infrastructures for managing spent fuel and radioactive waste have either become operational or is in its final stages of commissioning, giving new impetus to decommissioning activities.
Funding requirements and indicators : the evaluation shows that the preparation and endorsement of the respective decommissioning plans in 2014 was a major milestone and defined the limits of the assistance programmes, with the financing needs to achieve the decommissioning end state eventually established.
At the mid-term stage, these needs were confirmed for the Bohunice and the Ignalina programmes; for the Kozloduy programme, the ongoing revision of the decommissioning plan may result in an increase in cost estimates post-2020.
In addition, the detailed objectives and indicators provided a good basis for measuring progress towards the achievement of the specific objectives. However, the analysis also showed that it would be opportune to recalibrate these indicators in order to ensure continued effective monitoring and possible comparability between the programmes.
No additional funding will be needed in the 2014-2020 MFF . However, the raising of additional funds needed in the long term (post-2020) for the Ignalina programme calls for a careful follow-up in Lithuania.
The national contribution levels achieved appear suitable for sustaining proper efficiency; however, they are not established in the legal basis, which creates residual uncertainties.
An increase in national contributions compared to those of the Union and the establishment of a clear and formal framework for co-financing (whether at programme or project level) would encourage greater national ownership and more economical management by beneficiaries.
Safety and security : the analysis also demonstrated that greatly improved safety levels will be achieved at the sites as a result of EU funding in this MFF.
Major expected developments in the field include:
in Bulgaria : the steady progress of construction of the National Disposal Facility, the management of legacy waste and the start of major D&D works in the reactor building; in Slovakia : the final dismantling of the reactor cores; in Lithuania : the steady progress of defueling and the preparations for dismantling the irradiated graphite core, which is a first of a kind project of an unprecedented scale.
Perspectives : based on the results of this evaluation, the Commission deems that these measures should not be amended or suspended in the current MFF . The specific objectives remain valid while the implementation procedures should be preferably revised to benefit from the lessons learned. Any such update should aim to:
reinforce the role of the Monitoring Committees and that of the Programme Coordinator; further improve the governance system by streamlining the programme management cycle, refining the content of programming and monitoring documents; update and sharpen targets and indicators for multi-annual measures that go beyond 2020.
The Commission presented a report on the implementation of the work under the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme to Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia in 2016 and previous years.
Reminder of the objectives : upon their accession to the EU, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia committed to shut down eight Soviet-designed nuclear power plants before the end of their scheduled lifetime. In exchange, the EU committed to provide financial assistance for decommissioning the designated power plants, namely:
· Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) units 1 to 4 in Bulgaria ;
· Ignalina NPP in Lithuania ;
· Bohunice V1 NPP in Slovakia .
The objective of the nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes is to assist the relevant Member States in implementing the steady process towards the decommissioning end-state whilst maintaining the highest safety standards.
Programme management : the Commission recalled that it implemented the programmes in the framework of indirect management .
Since 2001, the implementation of the programmes’ budget has been entrusted to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), with contributions to three International Decommissioning Support Funds and to the Central Project Management Agency (CPMA) in Lithuania since 2003 and the Slovak Innovation and Energy Agency (SIEA) since 2016.
In accordance with the new governance approach for the multiannual financial framework 2014-2020, each of the Member States concerned has appointed a programme coordinator (ministerial or state secretary rank) who is responsible for programming, coordination and monitoring of the decommissioning programme at the national level.
In 2016, the Commission successfully implemented all actions following the 2015 internal audit on the governance and supervision of the programmes. It also accepted the recommendations made in September 2016 by the European Court of Auditors and started the mid-term evaluation in November 2016.
Budget and financing : the Commission adopted the 2014, 2015 and 2016 annual work programmes and the associated financing decisions committing the assigned budget through delegation agreements with EBRD (EUR 120.6 million for Kozloduy IDSF, EUR 9.0 million for Ignalina IDSF, EUR 30.3 million for Bohunice IDSF), CPMA (EUR 176.6 million) and SIEA (EUR 62.5 million).
On the basis of the Commission’s 2016 study, funding under the 2014-2020 MFF is adequate to achieve the objectives set out.
There is no financial shortfall expected in any of the 3 countries until 2020 . The raising of additional funds needed in the long term (post 2020) calls for a careful follow-up, especially in Lithuania.
Project progress and performance : the report concluded that Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia have advanced in the decommissioning of reactors :
· all the reactors are shut down, with all but one core defueled. In 2016, key milestones were reached; the issuance of the decommissioning license for Kozloduy Units 3 and 4; and restart of defueling of the Ignalina NPP;
· the Commission considered that three Member States further advanced dismantling activities to the extent that the decommissioning process is clearly irreversible and that none of the reactors can be restarted under economically viable conditions;
· programmes are progressing towards the most challenging phases of decommissioning. For example, in Bohunice, where the programme is furthest advanced, the operator started dismantling and decontamination of the reactor primary circuits and faced initial difficulties as the programme enters in the technically most challenging phase. However, the governance setup is proving to be apt for early detection of issues through monitoring and key performance indicators, and prompt identification of mitigation measures;
· the difficulties in commissioning the waste management infrastructure have now been mitigated and the relevant projects are back on track under strict monitoring.
Outlook : the Commission will perform the mid-term evaluation of the programmes and report the results to the Parliament and the Council by the end of 2017. In this context, the detailed implementation procedures will be revised to further streamline the programmes’ management.
Major expected developments in the field are:
Bulgaria : the start of construction of the National Disposal Facility and the finalisation of other key waste management infrastructures;
Lithuania : the steady progress of defueling and the preparations for dismantling the graphite core;
Slovakia : the decontamination of the primary circuit and the award of key contracts for dismantling.
The Commission presented a report on the implementation of the work under the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme to Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia in 2015 and previous years.
Reminder of the objectives : upon their accession to the EU, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia committed to close down eight Soviet-designed nuclear power plants before the end of their scheduled lifetime. In exchange, the EU committed to provide financial assistance to the three Member States for decommissioning the designated power plants, namely:
Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) units 1 to 4 in Bulgaria; Ignalina NPP in Lithuania; and Bohunice V1 NPP in Slovakia.
Since 2014, the scope of the nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes is to assist the relevant Member States in implementing the steady process towards the decommissioning end-state whilst ensuring that the highest safety standards are applied.
Management of the programme : the Commission recalled that it implements the assistance programmes through indirect management. Since 2001 implementation tasks have been entrusted to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), with contributions to three International Decommissioning Support Funds. In Lithuania since 2003 an increasing portion of the tasks have been entrusted to a national Central Project Management Agency (CPMA). In 2015, upon request of the Slovak Republic, the Commission services assessed the national Slovak Innovation and Energy Agency (SIEA) with the aim of establishing a new implementation channel for the Bohunice programme.
The report stated that the detailed objectives and indicators (proposed by the three Member States and approved by the Commission with the adoption of the procedures) enabled precise monitoring of the work progress based on quantitative information. Moreover, in cooperation with the beneficiaries, the Commission services introduced the earned value management methodology in the three programmes.
The assistance programmes are subject to regular audits and evaluations.
In 2015, the Commission services focussed their in-field monitoring on radiation protection systems , in line with the requirement to ensure application of the highest safety standards. The completion of this specific monitoring action is scheduled in 2016 and should bring additional indicators of safety related performance.
Budget and financing : the Commission adopted the 2014 and 2015 annual work programmes and the associated financing decisions on 30 October 2014 and 30 July 2015 respectively.
The relevant delegation agreements with the implementing bodies (EBRD, CPMA) were signed in June 2015. All funds earmarked for 2014 were committed under these agreements on 5 June 2015 (EBRD) and on 5 October 2015 (CPMA). The 2015 funds earmarked for Bulgaria and Lithuania were committed in 2015. For Slovakia, the 2015 commitment is pending finalisation of the delegation agreement with the SIEA, currently under negotiation.
The financing needs for completion of the decommissioning programmes have been established, as gaps were identified between the needs and the already secured funds, for which the EU assistance programme is a major contribution. On the basis of the presently available information, no financial shortfall is expected in any of the three countries until 2020 .
According to the Commission, the accomplishment of the objectives of the 2014-2020 financial framework will bring substantially improved safety conditions at all three sites. However, as at the end of 2014, the constitution of the required additional funds in the long term (after 2020) calls for a careful follow-up, especially in Lithuania.
Progress and performance : the report noted that significant progress has been made , not only in preparatory work and organisational changes, but also in the actual removal of buildings and equipment, and processing of radioactive waste. The following points were highlighted:
all the reactors are shut down, with all but one core defueled (Ignalina NPP Unit 2); key milestones were reached, decommissioning licenses were issued in Bulgaria and Slovakia, in Lithuania the commissioning of the spent fuel and waste management infrastructures entered the cold trials stage. These achievements represent significant steps towards enhanced safety at the sites; substantial progress has been achieved for all three decommissioning programmes, this is especially noticeable where dismantling activities have generated significant amounts of materials, mostly for clearance and then recycling.
The Commission noted that at the reference date for reporting, 30 June 2015, the performance was generally in line with expectations , with some points of excellence and some residual risks.
Outlook : the report noted that the issuing of licences in Bulgaria and Slovakia opened the way to starting the dismantling of core systems. In Lithuania, the commissioning of the spent fuel interim storage facility enters into its final stage with the transfer of spent fuel to the dry storage facility starting in 2017.
In the coming years, the clean-up activities will generate an increased flow of materials being removed from the nuclear installations.
The mid-term evaluation - due by the end of 2017 - will provide a substantiated assessment of the overall progress , of the short-term outlook as well as of the planning up to completion.
The Commission presents a report on the implementation of the work under the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme to Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia in the period 2010-2014.
Purpose of the measures : upon accession, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia committed to close down early eight older Soviet design nuclear power plants before the end of their scheduled lifetime. In exchange the Union agreed to assist financially the three Member States to decommission the power plants concerned:
· Kozloduy (KNPP) units 1 to 4 in Bulgaria,
· Ignalina (INPP) units 1 and 2 in Lithuania and
· Bohunice V1 (V1 NPP) units 1 and 2 in Slovakia.
EU assistance was implemented in three distinct periods. Two Council established a new legal base, providing further support to the decommissioning programmes for the period 2014- 2020. The previous implementation report describes the fulfilment of their initial commitment by the three Member States and the implementation of the assistance programme until 2009. This report describes the activities and results starting from 2010 and ending on 31 October 2014, except for financial data, which is reported on until 30 September 2014.
Main conclusions : during the period covered by the report, the focus passed to decommissioning activities. Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria have built on their closure commitment by continuing the decommissioning works at the shutdown reactors. Whilst some delays have been experienced significant progress has also been made, not only in preparatory work and organisational changes but as well in the actual removal of buildings and equipment.
The financing needs for the completion of the decommissioning programmes have been established. The financing plans identify the gap between the needs and the secured funds, to which the EU assistance programme makes a major contribution. The constitution of the additional funds calls for a careful follow-up.
Decommissioning window : the emphasis is moving gradually from work of a preparatory nature to dismantling and treatment of related waste. Currently, the facilities necessary for decommissioning, treatment and storage of radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel are under construction. The licensing documentation is prepared and dismantling has started. In Bulgaria and Slovakia the full decommissioning licences are expected shortly. Although delays occurred in some decommissioning projects, these are actively addressed to minimise their impact on the decommissioning end date, However, in Lithuania, delays to the overall timeline could not be avoided.
Energy window : the energy sector has benefited with projects in line with national energy policies. During the reporting period the focus shifted to decommissioning, though in Bulgaria a significant proportion of the assistance was allocated to the energy sector. The implementation of projects already started will continue for several years, but no new projects in the energy sector will be supported.
Outlook : the issuance of second stage decommissioning licenses in Bulgaria and Slovakia opens the way to the dismantling of core systems. This should translate next year into an increased flow of material being removed from the nuclear installation. The detailed objectives and indicators defined in the implementation procedures will allow precise monitoring of the progression of the work with quantitative information. In particular, the planned introduction of Earned Value Management (EVM) methodology in the three programmes will support project management at local level and further enhance the effectiveness of the Commission monitoring and reporting.
From 2015 a more detailed and quantitative description of the implementation of the work carried out with respect to the work programme will be based on reliable, consistent and comparable indicators.
The Commission services (DG ENER) and its shared resource directorate) are preparing an audit of the proposed national agency in Slovakia and generally support the evolution towards full ownership of the decommissioning at national level.
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1368/2013 of 13 December 2013 on Union support for the nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes in Bulgaria and Slovakia, and repealing Regulations (Euratom) No 549/2007 and (Euratom) No 647/2010 ( Regulation originally published OJ L 346, 20.12.2013 ).
The corrections concern the provisions relating to the following provisions:
-to recital 7, 2 nd sentence:
in place of : ‘Within the framework of this envelope, an amount of EUR 500 million in 2011 prices, which is approximately EUR 553 million in current prices, …’,
read : ‘Within the framework of this envelope, the amount of EUR 860 million in 2011 prices, which is approximately EUR 969 million in current prices, …’;
on page 3, the 1st subparagraph of Article 3(1):
in place of : ‘The financial envelope for the implementation of the Kozloduy and Bohunice programmes for the period from 2014 to 2020 shall be EUR 323 318 000 in current prices. That amount shall be distributed between the Kozloduy and Bohunice programmes as follows:
· EUR 208 503 000 for the Kozloduy programme for the period from 2014 to 2020;
· EUR 114 815 000 for the Bohunice programme for the period from 2014 to 2020.
read : ‘The financial envelope for the implementation of the Kozloduy and Bohunice programmes for the period from 2014 to 2020 shall be EUR 518 442 000 in current prices. That amount shall be distributed between the Kozloduy and Bohunice programmes as follows:
· EUR 293 032 000 for the Kozloduy programme for the period from 2014 to 2020;
· EUR 225 410 000 for the Bohunice programme for the period from 2014 to 2020’.
The European Parliament adopted by 554 votes to 17, with 72 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on Union support for the nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia.
Parliament approved the Commission proposal subject to the following amendments:
Definition of decommissioning : Parliament specified that the definition of 'decommissioning' is derived from the one found in the ECA Special Report n°16/2011. Decommissioning covers preparatory activities prior to the final and all the activities taking place after the reactors are shut down : (i) the removal and the final disposal of spent fuel elements, (ii) decontamination, (iii) dismantling and/or demolition of the nuclear installations, (iv) the disposal of remaining radioactive waste materials and (v) the environmental restoration of the contaminated site. The decommissioning process ends when the installation is released from any regulatory control and radiological restriction.
Objectives: the general objective of the Programme is to assist the Member States concerned to implement steady process towards the irreversible decommissioning end state of nuclear power plants named in the regulation, in accordance with Union law on nuclear safety.
Parliament stressed the need to safely manage the long term storage and disposal of decommissioning waste in accordance with a detailed national waste management plan, to be measured by the quantity and type of stored and disposed of waste. It stated that the effective control of the evolution of the decommissioning process should be based on the establishment of meaningful qualitative and quantitative performance indicators , which can be easily monitored and reported on as necessary.
Any of the decommissioning programmes may also include measures to maintain the requisite high level of shutdown safety at the nuclear power plants.
Budget : annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority without prejudice to the provisions of the Regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 and the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on cooperation in budgetary matters and sound financial management.
It is specified that the financial envelope shall cover for the period 2014 to 2020 for the three programmes (Kozloduy, Ignalina et Bohunice).
Financial envelope : the financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period 2014 to 2020 shall be EUR 969 260 000.
That amount shall be distributed among the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes for the period 2014-2020 as follows:
EUR 293 032 000 for the Kozloduy Programme; EUR 450 818 000 for the Ignalina Programme; EUR 225 410 000 for the Bohunice Programme.
Cofinancing : Parliament requested that every effort be made, on the one hand, to continue the co-financing practice established as part of pre-accession assistance and the assistance given over the period 2007-2013 for all three Member States' decommissioning efforts, and on the other, to attract co-financing from other sources as appropriate.
Arbitration procedure : disagreements over the interpretation of the Treaties and the award of contracts shall be submitted to an arbitration procedure. Resultant delays in construction may lead to the postponement of payment and reductions in the financial allocation. The Commission shall submit a report on this issue as part of the annual evaluation report referred to in the regulation.
Ex ante conditionalities : Parliament clarified the ex ante conditionalities to be fulfilled by Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia. These three countries must provide the Commission with the information showing that they fulfil the conditionalities by 1 January 2014.
The Commission shall assess the information provided, ensuring in particular that critical managerial, legal, financial and technical problems have been resolved or measures have been taken to solve them. If there is a reasoned opinion by the Commission in respect of an infringement for non-compliance with conditionality, the Commission may decide to suspend all or part of the Union financial assistance.
Annual work programme and implementing procedures : at the beginning of each year of the 2014-2020 period, the Commission shall adopt one joint annual work programme for Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes respectively specifying the objectives, expected results, target end dates, related performance indicators and timeline for the use of funds under each annual financial commitment.
At the end of each year of the 2014-2020 period, the Commission shall submit an evaluation report on the implementation of the joint annual work programmes. That report shall serve as a basis for the adoption of subsequent annual work programmes.
The Commission shall submit a yearly progress report on the implementation of the joint annual work programmes to the European Parliament and the Council.
Protection of financial interests : Members specified that by 31 March of the year following each accounting year, Member States shall report on the use of the financial envelope. The results of audits carried out by the Commission, the national audit bodies of the Member States in which the nuclear facilities to be declassified are situated and the Court of Auditors shall be communicated to the European Parliament .
Interim and final evaluation : no later than end 2017 (rather than 2015), an interim evaluation report shall be established by the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States and the beneficiaries. On the basis of the results of that assessment, the Commission may review the appropriateness of the appropriations allocated to the Programme and their distribution amongst Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice, in agreement with the Union's budgetary authorities and in accordance with the provisions of multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020.
Final evaluation for the period 2014-2020 : provisions are introduced to define the framework of the evaluations of the Programme. No later than end 2017, an interim evaluation report shall be established by the Commission. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission may review the appropriateness of the appropriations allocated to the Programme and their distribution amongst the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes. A final evaluation following the implementation of the Regulation. The Commission shallsubmit the conclusions of these evaluations to the European Parliament and the Council.
PURPOSE: to provide EU support for nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.
BACKGROUND: in the context of their EU accession negotiations, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia made the commitment to close and subsequently decommission respectively the nuclear reactors Kozloduy units 1 to 4, Ignalina units 1 and 2 and Bohunice V1 units 1 and 2 by a commonly agreed date. This early closure represented an exceptional financial burden for the Member States concerned which was not commensurate with their economic strength.
In recognition of this fact and as an act of solidarity the European Union committed itself to continue to provide additional financial assistance for the decommissioning of these reactors, respectively the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes. The closure commitment of the three Member States as well as the commitment of the European Union to provide financial support was foreseen in the corresponding Accession Treaties.
The total financial assistance from the European Union to the three Member States until the end of 2013 foresees EUR 2 847,8 million (EUR 1 367 million for Lithuania, EUR 613 million for Slovakia and EUR 867,8 million for Bulgaria). Following the closure of all the nuclear power plants concerned, all the beneficiary countries committed to proceed with the implementation of their decommissioning plan and the first dismantling works of non-active facilities have started.
However, the updated decommissioning planning and decommissioning cost estimates provided by the Member States in early 2011 provide clear evidence that substantial additional financial resources will be required to complete decommissioning of the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice nuclear power plants in a safe manner . The three Member States do not have the required financial resources to ensure a seamless continuation and completion of safe decommissioning.
This is why the Commission is proposing the extension of financial support from the Union with the general objective of reaching an irreversible state within the decommissioning process of Kozloduy units 1 to 4, Ignalina units 1 and 2 and Bohunice V1 units 1 and 2 nuclear power plants , in accordance with their respective decommissioning plans, while keeping the highest level of safety.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the proposed Regulation has been the subject of an impact assessment concerning three possible policy options:
the baseline option that would consist in no further Union support beyond 2013; the ‘business as usual’ option with Union support for decommissioning and measures in the energy sector that are consequential to the closure of the nuclear reactor units; further, but reduced Union support dedicated to decommissioning only.
No further Union support under the baseline option would stop the decommissioning programmes and consequently jeopardize nuclear safety. The business as usual option would result in a much higher financial Union support with reduced added value. Further support to projects in the energy sector would lead to a distortion of competition and the continuing high level of financial Union support would not be a sufficient incentive for the Member States to take over the full financial responsibility for the completion of decommissioning.
The assessment of the impacts of the three options resulted in the conclusion that only the third option would allow the seamless continuation of decommissioning to reach an irreversible state within the decommissioning process , while at the same time supporting the transition towards full Member State funding of the safe completion of decommissioning.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty.
CONTENT: this proposal for a Council Regulation foresees an extension of financial support from the Union with the general objective to reach an irreversible state within the decommissioning process of Kozloduy units 1 to 4, Ignalina units 1 and 2 and Bohunice V1 units 1 and 2 nuclear power plants.
Objectives for each of the nuclear plants: the specific objectives for the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes are:
Kozloduy Programme:
performing dismantling in the turbine halls of units 1 to 4 and in auxiliary buildings; dismantling of large components and equipments in the reactor buildings of units 1 to 4 safely managing the decommissioning waste in accordance with a detailed waste management plan.
Ignalina Programme:
defueling of the reactor core of unit 2 and the unit 1 and 2 reactor fuel ponds into the dry spent fuel storage facility; safely maintaining the reactor units until defueling is completed; performing dismantling in the turbine hall and other auxiliary buildings and safely managing the decommissioning.
Bohunice Programme:
performing dismantling in the turbine hall and auxiliary buildings of reactor V1; dismantling of large components and equipments in the V1 reactor buildings; safely managing the decommissioning waste in accordance with a detailed waste management plan.
To meet the above presented general objective, specific objectives with their respective indicators are defined for the Kolzoduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes.
Conditions for the granting of funds: the proposed Regulation establishes ex ante conditionalities that Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia should satisfy before the Programme's funds are disbursed:
compliance with Union’s acquis; in particular in the area of nuclear safety the transposition into national law of the Council Directive 2009/71/Euratom on nuclear safety and the Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste; establishment of a national legal framework to provide adequate provisions for the timely accumulation of national financial resources for the safe completion of decommissioning; submission to the Commission of a revised detailed decommissioning plan.
The financial support of the Union should be linked and subject to the achievement of the expected results. Consequently, the proposed Regulation foresees the possibility to review the amount of the appropriations allocated to the Programme, as well as the distribution amongst the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes, in the light of the outcome of an evaluation addressing the progress achieved in decommissioning.
Co-funding by the Member States concerned : it is expected from the three Member States that they are ready to provide the required additional financing to cover the remaining financial needs in order to ensure efficient and effective use of the additional Union support as well as to ensure the transition towards full Member State funding for the completion of safe decommissioning.
Based on the current cost estimations for decommissioning, this means in the order of:
EUR 668 million for Bulgaria, EUR 1140 million for Lithuania and EUR 321 million for Slovakia.
New commitment appropriations will be entered into the EU budget until the end of 2017 for the Bohunice and Ignalina Programme and until the end of 2020 for the Kozloduy Programme. However, on the basis of these commitments appropriations, payment appropriations will continue for several more years, most likely at least until 2021 for Bohunice and Ignalina and until 2024 for Kozloduy .
Implementation and work programme : the Commission will adopt annual financial commitments through one joint annual work programme for the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes. An act setting out implementation procedures should define more operational details for the implementation of the financial Union support , inter alia detailed reporting and monitoring requirements. This act should further contain the revised decommissioning plans for the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes that would serve as baseline for the monitoring of the progress and the timely achievement of the expected results. This would also allow potential difficulties arising in the course of the implementation of project to be addressed more efficiently and effectively.
The current proposal foresees several simplifications: a single Council Regulation is foreseen for the financial Union support to Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia under the 2014 – 2020 Multiannual Financial Framework, instead of previously three separate and independent Regulations. This Regulation does not foresee any exceptions to the Financial Regulation.
Reports and review : a comprehensive review in the framework of an interim evaluation is scheduled for 2015. This will cover the efficiency of the use of resources and the results obtained.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: the programme shall cover the period 2014-2020. The overall budgetary envelope is EUR 552 947 000 at current prices. This amount is in line with the Commission proposal for the next Multi-Annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020: '' A Budget for Europe 2020 ''.
That amount shall be distributed among the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes as follows:
EUR 208 503 000 for the Kozloduy Programme for the period 2014 to 2020; EUR 229 629 000 for the Ignalina Programme for the period 2014 to 2017; EUR 114 815 000 for the Bohunice Programme for the period 2014 to 2017.
The split of the overall amount amongst the three individual programmes takes into account that Bulgaria has to decommission 4 units, Slovakia 2 units and Lithuania 2 units, for which no decommissioning experience is available and type and quantity of materials to be managed are of a different order of magnitude. The duration for the support is based on the principle of equal treatment since accession.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0663
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0235
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0082
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0215
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2018)0468
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2018)0344
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0328
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2016)0405
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0078
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)87
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2013/1368
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 346 20.12.2013, p. 0001
- Final act published in Official Journal: Corrigendum to final act 32013R1368R(01)
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 008 11.01.2014, p. 0031
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0471/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0119/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0119/2013
- Specific opinion: PE506.048
- Committee opinion: PE498.148
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.524
- Committee draft report: PE491.251
- Contribution: COM(2011)0783
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1387
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1388
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0783
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2011)1387
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2011)1388
- Committee draft report: PE491.251
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.524
- Committee opinion: PE498.148
- Specific opinion: PE506.048
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0119/2013
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)87
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0078 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2016)0405 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0328 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2018)0468 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0344
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0215 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0082 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0235 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0663 EUR-Lex
- Contribution: COM(2011)0783
Activities
- Martin SCHULZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A7-0119/2013 - Giles Chichester - Am 39 #
A7-0119/2013 - Giles Chichester - Am 40 #
A7-0119/2013 - Giles Chichester - Am 41 #
A7-0119/2013 - Giles Chichester - Am 38 #
A7-0119/2013 - Giles Chichester - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
190 |
2011/0363(NLE)
2012/10/04
ITRE
143 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) EUR 229 629 000 for the Ignalina Programme for the period 2014 to 20
Amendment 101 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) EUR [229 629 000] for the Ignalina Programme for the period 2014 to 20
Amendment 102 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) EUR [229 629 000] for the Ignalina Programme for the period 2014 to 20
Amendment 103 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) EUR [229 629 000] for the Ignalina Programme for the period 2014 to 20
Amendment 104 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) EUR 229 629 000 for the Ignalina Programme for the period 2014 to 20
Amendment 105 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) EUR
Amendment 106 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) EUR 114 815 000 for the Bohunice Programme for the period 2014 to 20
Amendment 107 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) EUR [114 815 000] for the Bohunice Programme for the period 2014 to 20
Amendment 108 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) EUR [114 815 000] for the Bohunice Programme for the period 2014 to 2017.
Amendment 109 #
Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission will review the performance of the Programme and assess the progress of the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes against the milestones and target dates referred to in Art
Amendment 110 #
Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission will review the performance of the Programme and assess the progress of the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes against the milestones and target dates referred to in Art 2.3 by the end of 2015 within the framework of the interim evaluation referred to in Art. 8. Based on the results of this assessment, the Commission may review the amount of the appropriations allocated to the Programme, as well as the programming period and distribution amongst the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes respecting that the highest safety standards and steady process of decommissioning in accordance with respective decommissioning plans will not be endangered.
Amendment 111 #
Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission will review the performance of the Programme and assess the progress of the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes against the milestones and target dates referred to in Art 2.3 by the end of 2015 within the framework of the interim evaluation referred to in Art. 8. Based on the results of this assessment, the Commission
Amendment 112 #
Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission will review the performance of the Programme and assess the progress of the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes against the milestones and target dates referred to in Art 2.3 by the end of 2015 within the framework of the interim evaluation referred to in Art. 8. Based on the results of this assessment, the Commission may review the amount of the appropriations allocated to the Programme, as well as the programming period and distribution amongst the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes under the provisions of multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020.
Amendment 113 #
Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission will review the performance of the Programme and assess the progress of the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes against the milestones and target dates referred to in Art 2.3 by the end of 201
Amendment 114 #
Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission will review the performance of the Programme and assess the progress of the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes against the milestones and target dates referred to in Art 2.3 by the end of 201
Amendment 115 #
Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission will review the performance of the Programme and assess the progress of the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes against the milestones and target dates referred to in Art 2.3 by the end of 201
Amendment 116 #
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The financial allocation for the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes may also cover expenses pertaining to
Amendment 117 #
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The financial allocation for the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes may also cover expenses pertaining to preparatory, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities which are required for the management of the programme and the achievement of its objectives; in particular, studies, meetings of experts, training, information and communication actions, including corporate communication of the political priorities of the European Union as far as they are related to the general objectives of
Amendment 118 #
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Considering the substantial losses following the early closure of the units, every effort should be made to continue at a sufficient level the co-financing practice established under the preaccession assistance and the assistance given over the period 2007-2013 for all 3 Member States' decommissioning efforts as well as to attract co-financing from other sources as appropriate.
Amendment 119 #
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Disagreements on the interpretation of treaties and award of contracts must be submitted to an arbitration procedure. Resultant delays in construction may lead to postponement of payment and reductions in the financial allocation. An annual report on this issue shall be submitted to the European Parliament.
Amendment 120 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. By 1
Amendment 121 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 122 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 123 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 124 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) Comply with Union's acquis
Amendment 125 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 126 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) Establish in a national
Amendment 127 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) Establish a national legal framework to provide adequate
Amendment 128 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) Submit to the Commission a revised detailed decommissioning plan for the period 2014 – 2020 setting up main objectives and tasks broken down to the level of decommissioning activities, anticipated projects pipeline, schedule, cost structure and co-financing proportions. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with an internationally recognized standard for decommissioning cost estimation.
Amendment 129 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) Submit to the Commission a revised detailed decommissioning plan
Amendment 130 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) Submit to the Commission a revised solid and complete detailed decommissioning plan, including full cost estimates alongside a clear indication of the national co-financing and the way to secure this national funding in the long term;
Amendment 131 #
Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall assess the information provided on the fulfilment of the ex ante conditionalities when preparing the 2014 annual work programme as referred to in Article 6(1). I
Amendment 132 #
Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall assess the information provided on the fulfilment of the ex ante conditionalities when preparing the 2014 annual work programme as referred to in Article 6
Amendment 133 #
Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall assess the information provided on the fulfilment of the ex ante conditionalities when preparing the 2014 annual work programme as referred to in Article 6(1). It may decide, when adopting the annual work programme, to suspend all or part of the Union financial assistance pending the satisfactory completion of the ex ante conditionalities, provided that such suspension does not jeopardise security at the nuclear power stations referred to in Article 1.
Amendment 134 #
Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall assess the information provided on the fulfilment of the ex ante conditionalities when preparing the
Amendment 135 #
Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall assess the information provided on the fulfilment of the ex ante conditionalities when preparing the 2014 annual work programme as referred to in Article 6(1). It
Amendment 136 #
Article 5 a (new) Article 5a Annual work programmes 1. At the beginning of each year for the 2014-2020 period, the Commission shall adopt a joint annual work programme for Kozloduy, Bohunice and Ignalina Programmes specifying for each Programme the objectives, expected results, related performance indicators and timeline for the use of funds under each annual financial commitment. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 9(2). 2. At the end of each year of the 2014- 2020 period, the Commission establishes a progress report of the implementation of the work carried out in the previous years. This report shall be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council and shall serve as a basis for the adoption of the next joint annual work programme.
Amendment 138 #
Article 6 – paragraph 1 Amendment 139 #
Article 6 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 140 #
Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall, on the basis of the information received from the Member States, adopt one joint annual work programme for Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes specifying the objectives, expected results, related indicators and timeline for the use
Amendment 141 #
Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall adopt
Amendment 142 #
Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall adopt not later than 31 December 2014, detailed implementation procedures for the duration of the Programme. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 9(2). The act setting out the implementation procedures shall also define in more detail for the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes
Amendment 143 #
Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall adopt not later than 31 December 2014, detailed implementation procedures for the duration of the Programmes. The act setting out the implementation procedures shall also define in more detail for the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes the expected results, activities and the corresponding performance indicators. It will contain the revised detailed decommissioning plans as referred to under Article 4(1)(c) that shall serve as baseline for the monitoring of the progress and the timely achievement of the expected results.
Amendment 144 #
Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall adopt not later than
Amendment 145 #
Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, not later than 31 December 2014, detailed implementation procedures for the duration of the Programmes, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 9(2). The act setting out the implementation procedures shall also define in more detail for the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes the expected results, activities and the corresponding performance indicators. It will contain the revised detailed decommissioning plans as referred to under Article 4(1)(c) that shall serve as baseline for the monitoring of the progress and the timely achievement of the expected results.
Amendment 146 #
Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall adopt, not later than 31 December 201
Amendment 147 #
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission shall ensure the implementation of this Regulation and shall submit a yearly progress report on the implementation of the joint annual work programmes as referred to in paragraph 1 to the European Parliament and the Council. It shall carry out an interim evaluation, as provided for in Article 8 (1).
Amendment 148 #
Article 6 – paragraph 3 Amendment 151 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 2015, an interim evaluation report shall be established by the Commission, in close cooperation with the beneficiaries, on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures, at the level of results and impacts, the efficiency of the use of resources and its Union added value, in view of a decision amending or suspending the measures. Based on the results of this assessment, the Commission may review the appropriateness of the appropriations allocated to the Programme and their distribution amongst Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice. The evaluation shall additionally address the scope for simplification, its internal and external coherence, the continued relevance of all objectives. It shall take into account evaluation results on the long-term impact of the predecessor measures.
Amendment 152 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 201
Amendment 153 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 154 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 2015, an evaluation report shall be established by the Commission on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures, at the level of results and impacts, the efficiency of the use of resources and its Union added value, in view of a decision, within the provisions of multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 amending or suspending the measures. The evaluation shall additionally address the scope for simplification, its internal and external coherence, the continued relevance of all objectives. It shall take into account evaluation results on the long-term impact of the predecessor measures.
Amendment 155 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 201
Amendment 156 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 201
Amendment 157 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 201
Amendment 158 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 201
Amendment 159 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 201
Amendment 160 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 2015, a
Amendment 161 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 2015, an interim evaluation report shall be established by the Commission on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures, at the level of results and impacts, the efficiency of the use of resources and its Union added value, in view of a decision amending or suspending the measures. The evaluation shall additionally address the scope for simplification, its internal and external coherence, the continued relevance of all objectives. It shall take into account evaluation results on the long-term impact of the predecessor measures.
Amendment 162 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 163 #
Article 8 – paragraph 2 Amendment 164 #
Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall carry out ex-post evaluation in close cooperation with the Member States and beneficiaries. The ex- post evaluation shall examine the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programmes and
Amendment 165 #
Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall carry out ex-post evaluation in close cooperation with the beneficiary Member States
Amendment 166 #
Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall carry out ex-post evaluation in close cooperation with the beneficiary Member States
Amendment 167 #
Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. Evaluations shall take account of progress against performance indicators as referred to in Article 2(2) and against the ability of Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia to finance alone the nuclear power plants decommissioning, including radioactive waste and irradiated fuel elements as referred to in Article 4(1)(b) after 2020 at the latest.
Amendment 168 #
Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall
Amendment 169 #
Article 8 a (new) Article 8a Final Evaluation for the period 2014- 2020 1. The Commission shall carry out ex-post evaluation in close cooperation with the beneficiaries. The ex-post evaluation shall examine the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programme and its impact on decommissioning. 2. Before 31 December 2020, the Commission shall establish in close cooperation with the Member States and beneficiaries, a final evaluation report the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programme, as well as the effectiveness of financed measures in terms of impacts, use of resources and added value for the Union. 3. The final evaluation shall take account of progress against performance indicators as referred to in Article 2(2). 4. The Commission shall communicate the conclusions of this evaluation to the European Parliament and the Council. 5. The Commission, will take into account the various decommissioning expertise and strategies employed by these Member States, to explore possible ways of harmonising approaches of decommissioning in the Union in order to ensure timely accumulation of the necessary knowledge in order to improve the competiveness of the Union nuclear industry in that domain.
Amendment 170 #
Article 8 a (new) Article 8a Final evaluation Before 31 December 2020, the Commission shall establish in close cooperation with the Member States and beneficiaries, a final evaluation report concerning the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programmes, as well as the effectiveness of financed measures in terms of impacts, use of resources and added value for the Union. In case of Lithuania, the evaluation report shall identify further Union financial assistance needs till the decommissioning end state which is foreseen at the end of 2029 .
Amendment 28 #
Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 203 thereof and Protocol No 4 thereto,
Amendment 29 #
Citation 1 a (new) Having regard to Protocol No. 4 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded,
Amendment 30 #
Recital 2 a (new) (2a) Recognising that the premature shutdown and consequent decommissioning of the Ignalina Power Plant with two 1500 MW RBMK reactor units inherited from the Soviet union is of an unprecedented nature and represent for Lithuania an exceptional financial burden not commensurate with the size and economic strength of the country, Protocol No.4 states that the Union assistance under the Ignalina Programme will be seamlessly continued and extended beyond 2006, for the period of next financial perspectives. This extended programme will be based on the same elements and principles as during the 2004-2006 and 2007-2013 periods.
Amendment 31 #
Recital 4 (4) In line with the Accession Treaty obligations and with the support of Community assistance, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia have closed the nuclear power plants and made significant progress towards their decommissioning. Further work is necessary in order to continue the progress with the actual d
Amendment 32 #
Recital 4 (4) In line with the Accession Treaty obligations and with the support of Community assistance, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia have closed the nuclear power plants and made significant progress towards their decommissioning. Further work is necessary in order to continue the progress with the actual d
Amendment 33 #
Recital 4 (4) In line with the Accession Treaty obligations and with the support of
Amendment 34 #
Recital 4 (4) In line with the Accession Treaty obligations and with the support of Community assistance, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia have closed the nuclear power
Amendment 35 #
Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Recognising that the premature shutdown and consequent decommissioning of the Ignalina Power Plant with two 1500 MW reactor units, four units of Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant with overall capacity of 1760 MW and V1 Bohunice Power Plant with two units with the capacity of 880 MW posed a heavy long term burden on the citizens of the three countries in terms of energetic, financial, economic, environmental and social implications. In the case of Lithuania the closure of the plant represents an exceptional financial burden not commensurable with the size and the economic strength of the country.
Amendment 36 #
Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Recognising that the premature shutdown and consequent decommissioning of the Ignalina Power Plant with two 1500 MW RBMK reactor units inherited from the Soviet Union is of an unprecedented nature and represents for Lithuania an exceptional financial burden not commensurate with the size and economic strength of the country, Protocol No. 4 states that the Union assistance under the Ignalina Programme will be seamlessly continued and extended beyond 2006, for the period of next financial perspectives. This extended programme will be based on the same elements and principles as during the 2004-2006 and 2007-2013 periods.
Amendment 37 #
Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Recognising that the decommissioning of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant is of a long-term nature and represents for Lithuania an exceptional financial burden not commensurate with its size and economic strength, the Protocol No. 4 of the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia states that the Union assistance under the Ignalina Programme will be seamlessly continued and extended beyond 2006, for the period of next financial perspectives. This extended programme will be based on the same elements and principles as during the 2004-2006 and 2007-2013 periods.
Amendment 38 #
Recital 5 (5) The Union has committed to assist Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia in addressing the exceptional financial burden implied by the decommissioning process
Amendment 39 #
Recital 5 (5) The Union has committed to assist Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia in addressing the exceptional financial burden implied by the decommissioning process
Amendment 40 #
Recital 5 (5) The Union has committed to assist Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia in addressing the exceptional financial burden implied by the decommissioning process
Amendment 41 #
Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Underlines the European Court of Auditors'1 conclusions that the main decommissioning process in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia is still ahead and its finalisation faces a significant funding shortfall (around 2,5 billion euro), in particular major infrastructure projects have faced delays and cost-overruns in the main decommissioning process, cost estimates are not complete in the absence of key information on radioactive waste and/or the facilities and technologies required for their treatment, the Commission's supervision has focused on the budgetary execution and project implementation rather than on the achievement of the programme objectives as a whole. __________________ 1 ECA special report 16/2011 on EU financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia
Amendment 42 #
Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Whereas under the Programmes established for the period 2007-2013 the Commission's supervision has predominantly focussed on budgetary execution of the financial appropriations and project implementation, rather than on the extent of the progress achieved towards the Programmes' objectives as a whole.
Amendment 43 #
Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Whereas under the Programmes established for the period 2007-2013 the Commission's supervision has focussed mainly on budgetary execution of the financial appropriations and project implementation, rather than on the extent of the progress achieved towards the Programmes' objectives as a whole.
Amendment 44 #
Recital 5 b (new) (5b) Notes with deep concern the European Court of Auditors' conclusion that a broad variety of activities to mitigate the consequences of the nuclear reactors' early closure has been financed but the degree of mitigation achieved is not known; recalls that a high share of the EU funds were used until now for energy projects and not for the main aim of the financial assistance, namely nuclear power plants decommissioning; since the funds were not always used for the purposes for which they were intended, this Regulation should only support programmes for the decommissioning and dismantling of nuclear power plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia.
Amendment 45 #
Recital 6 (6) Following the request for further funding from Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia,
Amendment 46 #
Recital 6 (6) Following the request for further funding from Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia, provision has been made in the Commission proposal for the next Multi- Annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020:
Amendment 47 #
Recital 6 (6) Following the request for further funding from Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia, provision has been made in the Commission proposal for the next Multi- Annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020: ‘'A Budget for Europe 2020’‘5 for a sum of EUR 700 million from the general budget of the European Union for nuclear safety and decommissioning. From this the amount EUR 500 million in 2011 prices which is about EUR 553 million in the current prices is foreseen for a new Programme to further support the decommissioning of the Bohunice V1 units 1-2 and the Ignalina units 1-2 over the period from 2014 to 2017 and the Kozloduy units 1-4 nuclear power plants over the period from 2014 to 2020. Funding under this new Programme should be made available in a gradually
Amendment 48 #
Recital 6 (6) Following the request for further funding from Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia, provision has been made in the Commission proposal for the next Multi- Annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020: ‘'A Budget for Europe 2020’‘5 for a sum of EUR 700 million from the general budget of the European Union for nuclear safety and decommissioning. From this the amount EUR 500 million in 2011 prices which is about EUR 553 million in the current prices is foreseen for a new Programme to further support the decommissioning of the Bohunice V1 units 1-2 and the Ignalina units 1-2
Amendment 49 #
Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 50 #
Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 51 #
Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In the case of Lithuania, Protocol No. 4 states that "Union assistance under the Ignalina Programme will be seamlessly continued and extended beyond 2006", adding that "the overall average appropriations under the extended Ignalina Programme shall be appropriate for the period of the next Financial Perspectives". On the contrary, in the case of Bulgaria, Article 30 of the 2005 Act of Accession refers only to the period 2007-2009, and in the case of Slovakia the 2003 Treaty of Accession refers only to the period 2004-2006. Therefore, for further funding for Bulgaria and Slovakia, Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty must be applied, whereas Protocol No. 4 serves as a legal basis for Lithuania.
Amendment 52 #
Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Programmes, as well as the programming period and distribution amongst the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice programmes may be reviewed based on the results of the mid-term and the final evaluation report, respecting that the highest safety standards and steady process of decommissioning in accordance with respective decommissioning plans will not be endangered.
Amendment 53 #
Recital 7 (7) The support covered by this Regulation
Amendment 54 #
Recital 7 (7) The support covered by this Regulation should ensure seamless continuation of decommissioning and concentrate on measures to
Amendment 55 #
Recital 7 (7) The support covered by this Regulation should ensure seamless continuation of decommissioning and concentrate on measures to
Amendment 56 #
Recital 7 (7) The support covered by this Regulation should ensure seamless continuation of decommissioning and concentrate on
Amendment 57 #
Recital 7 (7) The support covered by this Regulation should only ensure seamless continuation of decommissioning and concentrate on measures to reach an irreversible state within the safe decommissioning and dismantling process, as such bringing the greatest Union added value, while ensuring the transition towards Member State funding for the completion of d
Amendment 58 #
Recital 7 (7) The support covered by this Regulation should ensure seamless continuation of decommissioning and concentrate on measures to reach an irreversible state within the safe decommissioning process, as such bringing the greatest Union added value, while ensuring the transition towards Member State funding for the completion of decommissioning. The ultimate responsibility for nuclear safety remains with the Member States concerned, which also implies the ultimate responsibility for its financing, including the financing of decommissioning. Failure to comply with this obligation puts Union citizens at risk. This Regulation does not prejudice the outcome of any future State aid procedures that may be undertaken in accordance with Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty.
Amendment 59 #
Recital 7 a (new) (7a) As little progress has been made with regard to the final disposal of irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, and with a view to ending the export of these waste and the reprocessing of irradiated fuel elements abroad, the Union recognises also the need to expedite progress in this regards by means of financial support.
Amendment 60 #
Recital 10 a (new) (10a) The costs of the decommissioning activities covered by this Regulation should be established according to the internationally recognized standards for decommissioning cost estimation, such as for example the International Structure for Decommissioning Costing jointly published by the Nuclear Energy Agency, International Atomic Energy Agency and the Commission.
Amendment 61 #
Recital 11 (11) An effective control of the evolution of the decommissioning process will be ensured by the Commission in order to assure the highest Union added value of the funding allocated within this Regulation, although the final responsibility for the decommissioning rests with the Member States. This includes effective performance measurement and assessment of corrective measures during the programme. The control will be based on the pre- established by the Commission clear quantitative and qualitative relevant performance indicators.
Amendment 62 #
Recital 11 (11) An effective control of the evolution of the decommissioning process will be ensured by the Commission in order to assure the highest Union added value of the funding allocated within this Regulation, although the final responsibility for the decommissioning rests with the Member States. This includes effective performance measurement, through clear pre-set objectives scrutinized via viable performance indicators and assessment of corrective measures during the programme.
Amendment 63 #
Recital 12 (12) The financial interests of the Union should be protected through proportionate measures throughout the expenditure cycle, including the prevention, detection and investigation of irregularities, the recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where appropriate, penalties. The mechanism to be applied should be similar to the one used for shared management within cohesion policy
Amendment 64 #
Recital 13 a (new) (13a) The contribution under the Ignalina Programme may, for certain measures, amount up to 100 % of the total expenditure. Every effort should be made to continue the co-financing practice established under the pre-accession assistance and the assistance given over the period 2007-2013 for decommissioning efforts of Lithuania as well as to attract co-financing from other sources as appropriate.
Amendment 65 #
Article 1 This Regulation establishes the multi- annual Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programme 2014 - 2020 (‘the Programme’) laying down rules for the implementation of the Union's financial support for measures connected with the irreversible decommissioning of the Kozloduy (units 1 to 4; the Kozloduy Programme), Ignalina (units 1 and 2; the Ignalina Programme) and Bohunice V1 (units 1 and 2; the Bohunice Programme) nuclear power plants only.
Amendment 66 #
Article 1 This Regulation establishes the multi- annual Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programme 2014 - 2020 (‘the Programme’) laying down rules for further implementation of the Union's financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of the Kozloduy (units 1 to 4; the Kozloduy Programme), Ignalina (units 1 and 2; the Ignalina Programme) and Bohunice V1 (units 1 and 2; the Bohunice Programme) nuclear power plants.
Amendment 67 #
Article 1 a (new) Article 1a Definition Decommissioning covers preparatory activities prior to the final shut-down (such as elaboration of a decommissioning plan, preparing the licensing documentation and waste infrastructure projects) and all activities after the reactors are shut down, i.e. the removal and the final disposal of spent fuel elements, the decontamination, dismantling and/or demolition of the nuclear installations, the disposal of remaining radioactive waste materials and the environmental restoration of the contaminated site. The decommissioning process ends when the installation is released from any regulatory control and radiological restriction.
Amendment 68 #
Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The general objective of the Programme is to assist the Member States concerned to reach an irreversible state within the decommissioning process of Kozloduy units 1 to 4, Ignalina units 1 and 2 and Bohunice V1 units 1 and 2 nuclear power plants, in accordance with their respective decommissioning plans and with Council Directive 96/29/Euratom of 13 May 1996 laying down basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiation, while keeping the highest level of safety
Amendment 69 #
Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The general objective of the Programme is to assist the Member States concerned to reach an irreversible state within the decommissioning and dismantling process of Kozloduy units 1 to 4, Ignalina units 1 and 2 and Bohunice V1 units 1 and 2 nuclear power plants,
Amendment 70 #
Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The general objective of the Programme is to
Amendment 71 #
Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The general objective of the Programme is to
Amendment 72 #
Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The general objective of the Programme is to
Amendment 73 #
Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The general objective of the Programme is to assist the Member States concerned to reach an irreversible state within the decommissioning process of Kozloduy units 1 to 4, Ignalina units 1 and 2 and Bohunice V1 units 1 and 2 nuclear power plants, in accordance with their respective decommissioning plans, while keeping the highest level of safety in line with Council Directive 96/29/Euratom of 13 May 1996 laying down basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiation 1 and Council Directive 2009/71/ Euratom of 25 June 2009 establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations2. 1 OJ L 159, 29.6.1996, p. 1. 2 OJ L 172, 2.7.2009, p. 18.
Amendment 74 #
Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The general objective of the Programme is to assist the Member States concerned to
Amendment 75 #
Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The general objective of the Programme is to assist the Member States concerned to
Amendment 76 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Within the funding periods the main specific objectives for the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes are:
Amendment 77 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii (iii) safely managing at national level the decommissioning waste, including irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, in accordance with a detailed national waste management plan, to be measured by the quantity and type of conditioned waste;
Amendment 78 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii (iii) in accordance with Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste1, safely managing the decommissioning and long term disposal waste in accordance with a detailed waste management plan, to be measured by the quantity and type of conditioned waste; 1 OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 48.
Amendment 79 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii a (new) (iiia) commission and establishment of a national repository for safely managing the long term storage and final disposal of the removed irradiated fuel elements and all other radioactive waste resulting from the decommissioning and the dismantling of Kozloduy units 1 to 4, to be measured by the quantity and type of stored and disposed waste;
Amendment 80 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) safely maintaining the reactor units
Amendment 81 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii (iii) performing dismantling in the turbine hall and other auxiliary buildings and safely managing at national level the decommissioning waste, including irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, in accordance with a detailed national waste management plan, to be measured by the
Amendment 82 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii (iii) in accordance with Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom, performing dismantling in the turbine hall and other auxiliary buildings and safely managing the decommissioning and long term disposal waste in accordance with a detailed waste
Amendment 83 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii a (new) (iiia) commission and establishment of a national repository for safely managing the long term storage and disposal of the removed irradiated fuel elements and all other radioactive waste resulting from the decommissioning and the dismantling of Ignalina units 1 and 2, to be measured by the quantity and type of stored and disposed waste;
Amendment 84 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii a (new) (iiia) measures for the environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and modernisation measures of conventional production capacity to replace the production capacity of the two Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant reactors;
Amendment 85 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii b (new) (iiib) other measures which are consequential to the decision to close and decommission this plant and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, environmental upgrading and modernisation of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Lithuania as well as to enhancing the security of energy supply and improving energy efficiency in Lithuania;
Amendment 86 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii b (new) (iiib) Dismantling of reactor cores, reactor buildings and primary circuits;
Amendment 87 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii (iii) safely managing at national level the decommissioning waste, including irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, in accordance with a detailed national waste management plan, to be measured by the quantity and type of conditioned waste;
Amendment 88 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii (iii) in accordance with Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom, safely managing the decommissioning and long term disposal waste in accordance with a detailed waste management plan, to be measured by the quantity and type of conditioned waste;
Amendment 89 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii a (new) (iiia) commission and establishment of a national repository for safely managing the long term storage and disposal of the removed irradiated fuel elements and all other radioactive waste resulting from the decommissioning and the dismantling of Bohunice VI units 1 and 2, to be measured by the quantity and type of stored and disposed waste;
Amendment 90 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii b (new) (iiib) Dismantling of reactor cores, reactor buildings and primary circuits;
Amendment 91 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Any of the decommissioning programmes referred to in paragraph 2 may also include measures to maintain the needed high level of the shutdown safety at the nuclear power plants, including support with respect to plant personnel.
Amendment 92 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Ignalina Programme referred to in point (b) of paragraph 2 may also include measures to maintain a high level of safety at the nuclear power plant's units under decommissioning, including support to plant's personnel
Amendment 93 #
Article 2 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 94 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 95 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period 2014 to 2020 shall be EUR
Amendment 96 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period 2014 to 2020 shall be EUR [552 947 000] in current prices.
Amendment 97 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 98 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) EUR 229 629 000 for the Ignalina Programme for the period 2014 to 20
Amendment 99 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) EUR 229 629 000 for the Ignalina Programme for the period 2014 to 20
source: PE-496.524
2012/11/16
BUDG
47 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) In line with the Accession Treaty obligations and with the support of Community assistance, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia have closed the nuclear power plants and made significant progress towards their decommissioning. Further work is necessary in order to continue the progress with the actual d
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) In line with the Accession Treaty obligations and with the support of Community assistance, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia have closed the nuclear power plants and made significant progress towards their decommissioning. Further work is necessary in order to continue the progress with the actual dismantling operations until an irreversible state within the safe decommissioning process is
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) (4a) The premature shutdown and consequent decommissioning of the Ignalina Power Plant with two 1500 MW RBMK reactor units inherited from the Soviet Union is of an unprecedented nature and represents for Lithuania an exceptional financial burden not commensurate with the size and economic strength of the country, Protocol No. 4 states that the Union assistance under the Ignalina Programme will be seamlessly continued and extended beyond 2006, for the period of next financial perspectives. This extended programme will be based on the same elements and principles as during the 2004-2006 and 2007-2013 periods.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Although the shutdown of all units concerned took place within the respective deadlines, the decommissioning programmes continue to encounter delays that are economically damaging and politically unacceptable; this should be tackled by the revised detailed decommissioning plan.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 b (new) (5b) As the programmes have not yet triggered the organisational changes needed for effective decommissioning, it should be ensured that the necessary transformation of organisational structures is performed.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Following the request for further funding from Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia,
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Following the request for further funding from Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia, provision has been made in the Commission proposal for the next Multi- Annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020: ‘'A Budget for Europe 2020’‘ for a sum of EUR
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Programmes, as well as the programming period and distribution amongst the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice programmes may be reviewed based on the results of the mid-term and the final evaluation report, respecting that the highest safety standards and steady process of decommissioning in accordance with respective decommissioning plans will not be endangered.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 b (new) (6b) The conclusions of the fact-finding mission of the Committee on Budgetary Control to Lithuania from 10 to 12 July 2012 which express support to the Commission proposal, on the basis of which additional EUR 230 million could be made available from 2014 to 2017 for the Ignalina Programme but also a statement on the fact that at that stage EU financial assistance should end and that any funding under the new Multiannual Financial Framework should be put in reserve until such times when the conditionality, as outlined in this Regulation, is met, and the effective use of the money can be guaranteed.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The decommissioning of the nuclear power plants covered by this Regulation should be carried out with recourse to the best available technical expertise,
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The activities covered by this Regulation and the operations which they support
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The financial interests of the Union
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The general objective of the Programme is to
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The general objective of the Programme is to assist the Member States concerned to reach an irreversible state within the
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period 2014 to 2020 shall be EUR 552 947 000 in current prices. It shall be paid to the Member States in which the nuclear facilities to be declassified are situated.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority without prejudice to the provisions of the Regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014- 2020 and the Interinstitutional Agreement xxx/201z between the European Parliament, Council and the Commission on cooperation in budgetary matters and sound financial management.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part That amount shall be indicatively distributed among the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes as follows:
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) EUR [229 629 000] for the Ignalina Programme for the period 2014 to 20
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) EUR [114 815 000] for the Bohunice Programme for the period 2014 to 2017.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission will review the performance of the Programme
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Considering the substantial losses following the early closure of the units, every effort should be made to continue at a sufficient level the co-financing practice established under the pre-accession assistance and the assistance given over the period 2007-2013 for all 3 Member States' decommissioning efforts as well as to attract co-financing from other sources as appropriate.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The allocation may also cover preparatory work for the construction of a final repository. Measures to deal with the consequences of closure and decommissioning may not be covered.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The financial allocation may also cover the technical and administrative assistance expenses necessary to ensure the transition between the Programme and the measures
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Disagreements on the interpretation of treaties and award of contracts must be submitted to an arbitration procedure. Resultant delays in construction may lead to postponement of payment and reductions in the financial allocation. An annual report on this issue shall be submitted by the Commission to the European Parliament.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) Submit to the Commission a revised detailed decommissioning plan that includes the specific objectives, projects schedule, project cost structures, co- financing proportions and an overall financial plan identifying sources for the national part of the funding in the long term.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall assess the information provided on the fulfilment of the ex ante conditionalities when preparing the 2014 annual work programme as referred to in Article 6(1). I
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall assess the information provided on the fulfilment of the ex ante conditionalities when preparing the 2014 annual work programme as referred to in Article 6(1).
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. The Programme shall be implemented by one or several of the forms provided for by Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 [New Financial Regulation], in particular, grants and procurements. Public procurement contracts financed by this programme shall preferably be awarded to EU companies or companies in states which comply with the principle of reciprocity in their commercial relations with the EU.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The annual work programmes and the acts setting out the implementation procedures referred to in paragraph 1 and 2 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 9(2). These shall be communicated to the European Parliament.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1(a) By 31 March of the year following each accounting year, the Member States shall report on the use of the financial envelope. These reports, certified by national audit bodies, shall be sent to the Commission and the Council to be incorporated into the general EU budget discharge procedure.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. The Commission or its representatives, the national audit bodies of the Member States in which the nuclear facilities to be declassified are situated and the Court of Auditors shall have the power of audit, on the basis of documents and on-the-spot, over all grant beneficiaries, contractors and subcontractors who have received Union funds under the Programme. The results of the audits shall be communicated to the European Parliament.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out on-the-spot checks and inspections on economic operators concerned directly or indirectly by such funding in accordance with the procedures laid down in Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the European Union in connection with a grant agreement or grant decision or a contract concerning Union funding. The results of the checks and inspections shall be communicated to the European Parliament.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Without prejudice to the first and second sub-paragraphs, cooperation agreements with third countries and international organisations and grant agreements and grant decisions and contracts resulting from the implementation of this Regulation shall expressly empower the Commission, the national audit body of the Member State concerned, the Court of Auditors and OLAF to conduct
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 2015, an interim evaluation report shall be established by the Commission, in close cooperation with the beneficiaries, on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures, at the level of results and impacts, the efficiency of the use of resources and its Union added value, in view of a decision amending or suspending the measures. Based on the results of this assessment, the Commission may review the appropriateness of the appropriations allocated to the Programme and their distribution amongst Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice. The evaluation
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 201
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 2015, an independent mid-term evaluation report shall be established
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall carry out ex-post evaluation in close cooperation with the beneficiary Member States
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. Evaluations shall take account of progress against performance indicators as referred to in Article 2(2). The assessment report shall be submitted to ENSREG (the European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group) for review.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. Evaluations shall take account of progress against performance indicators as referred to in Article 2(2) and fulfilment of requirements set out in Article 4(1)(c).
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall communicate the
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 a (new) Article 8 a Final Evaluation for the period 2014- 2020 1. The Commission shall carry out ex-post evaluation in close cooperation with the beneficiaries. The ex-post evaluation shall examine the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programme and its impact on decommissioning. 2. Before 31 December 2020, the Commission shall establish in close cooperation with the Member States and beneficiaries, a final evaluation report the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programme, as well as the effectiveness of financed measures in terms of impacts, use of resources and added value for the Union. 3. The final evaluation shall take account of progress against performance indicators as referred to in Article 2(2). 4. The Commission shall communicate the conclusions of this evaluation to the European Parliament and the Council. 5. The Commission shall take into account the various decommissioning expertise and strategies employed by these Member States to explore possible ways of harmonising approaches of decommissioning in the Union in order to ensure timely accumulation of the necessary knowledge in order to improve the competiveness of the Union nuclear industry in that domain.
source: PE-500.546
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0078/COM_COM(2015)0078_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0078/COM_COM(2015)0078_EN.pdf |
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=NLE&year=2011&number=0363&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0363&appLng=EN |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.251New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-491251_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.524New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-496524_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.148&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-498148_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.048&secondRef=01New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AL-506048_EN.html |
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0119_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0119_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/geographical_area/0 |
Lithuania
|
procedure/title |
Old
Nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes in Bulgaria and Slovakia 2014-2020New
Nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia 2014-2020 |
committees/0/date |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-119&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0119_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0471New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0471_EN.html |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/07871New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013R1368New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013R1368 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 114
|
procedure/legal_basis/2 |
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 168-p4
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
procedure/title |
Old
Nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes in Bulgaria and Slovakia 2014-2020New
Nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes in Bulgaria and Slovakia 2014-2020 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0783:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0783:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0783/COM_COM(2011)0783_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0783/COM_COM(2011)0783_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|