Progress: Awaiting Council's 1st reading position
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | FIDANZA Carlo ( ECR) | |
Former Responsible Committee | TRAN | RIQUET Dominique ( Renew) | |
Former Responsible Committee | TRAN | UGGIAS Giommaria ( ALDE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 1, 0, 0, -, p, 2
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 1, 0, 0, -, p, 2Events
The European Parliament adopted by 565 votes to 69 with 26 abstentions a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the allocation of slots at EU airports (recast). Parliament’s position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure amends the Commission proposal as follows:
Definition of airport slots: Parliament notes that the relevant theory and case law have not yet advanced sufficiently to produce an exhaustive legal definition of airport slots. As of now it is expedient to be able to work on the assumption that the use of slots in the public interest - hence not in any strict sense a public good - may serve as a guideline for a legal definition. It is therefore appropriate to formulate a definition of slots that establishes that they may become subject to rights and that governs the allocation of slots. Parliament adds that airport slots are non-material assets of public utility whose use is subject to the conditions laid down in this Regulation. They are therefore assigned by airport coordinators so as to ensure maximum transparency , in the interests of Member States, passengers, airport managers and air carriers.
‘Series of slots’ is amended to mean at least five slots which have been requested for the same time on the same day of the week regularly in the same scheduling period and allocated by the coordinator on that basis or, if that is not possible, allocated at approximately the same time, unless agreed otherwise through a local rule under the conditions referred to in the text. The Commission proposal had stated that ‘series of slots’ should mean at least 15 slots for a summer scheduling period and 10 slots for a winter scheduling period requested for the same time on the same day of the week for consecutive weeks.
Coordinator’s role: Members strengthened provisions regarding the independence of the coordinator. The draft regulation states that in legal terms, the coordinator's essential functions, which consist of allocating slots in an equal and non-discriminatory manner, shall be given to a natural or legal person who or which is not a service provider in the airport, an airline operating from the airport or the managing body of the airport in question. Parliament adds that in order to prove that he/she/it does not share common interests with any such entities, the coordinator or schedules facilitator must submit an annual declaration of his/her/its financial interests. Furthermore, the composition of the coordinator's board or supervisory function shall also be independent of the direct interests of the airport managing body, the airline users of that airport and any other entity representing a user or service provider. This shall not, however preclude representatives of such organisations from being members of a board or supervisory function, provided that voting rights are balanced.
Members also add that:
the coordinator or schedules facilitator, whether as a natural or legal person, must not have been employed by, or worked regularly with, the airport managing body or a service provider or airline operating at or from the airport in question during the two years preceding his/her/its appointment and during the two years from the cessation of his/her/its duties as a coordinator or schedules facilitator; the system of financing the coordinator's activities and those of the schedules facilitator shall be such as to guarantee the coordinator's independent status.
The financing referred to shall be provided by all the air carriers who operate in the coordinated and schedules facilitated airports, and by those airports in such a way as to ensure that the financial burden is distributed equitably among all interested parties and that the financing does not largely depend on a sole interested party. Member States shall launch a stakeholder consultation procedure, incorporating the possibility of an appeal, in order to ensure transparent, non-discriminatory charging correlating to the service provided by the coordinator or schedules facilitator. Collection of the air carriers’ payments shall be the responsibility of the airports concerned, which shall pay those amounts to the coordinator or schedules facilitator. Member States shall ensure that adequate financial, human, technical and material resources and expertise are at the disposal of the coordinator and the schedules facilitator, such as to enable them to carryout their duties at all times.
The coordinator and the schedules facilitator shall furthermore submit to the Commission, to the Member States and to all parties involved in their financing a separate annual financial report indicating in detail revenue and expenditure relating to their activities .
The electronic database for which the coordinator is responsible shall be freely accessible for all interested parties upon request, including the European Parliament, and contain the information prescribed in the text.
Local rules: Members specify that local rules shall concern the allocation and monitoring of slots and may be applied only where it can be proved that an airport reaches an alarming level of congestion and that performance or throughput improvements can therefore be delivered through locally applied rules. Such local rules shall be transparent and non-discriminatory, and shall be agreed on in the coordination committee. The Commission proposal had specified instead that the local guidelines might only concern the monitoring of the use of slots allocated or the amendment of the definition of a series of slots to reduce its length below 10 slots for the winter scheduling period or below 15 slots for the summer scheduling period, but under no circumstances below 5 slots.
Usage rate: under the Commission's proposal on airport slot allocation, a slot would be taken away from an airline if it is used less than 85% of the time. The current threshold is 80%. However, Parliament rejected the proposal to raise the slot series usage rate to 85% and maintains in the text an 80-20 ratio for series usage rates .
Members add that slots shall be returned to the pool when they are not being used after the expiry of a maximum period of six months . When a route no longer meets the requirement for Public Service Obligations slots reservation, the slots shall either be reserved for another route subject to public service obligations or shall remain with the air carrier which was using them if the requirement laid down in the Regulation has been met for the series concerned.
Financial sanctions: rather than using general fees, Members specify that the managing body of a coordinated airport must establish and apply effective, proportionate and dissuasive financial sanctions to deal with the return of slots after the agreed Historic Baseline Dates for the following winter or summer season, respectively, or the retention of unused slots with the aim of dissuading air carriers from belatedly returning slots to the pool, and must hold them liable for having reserved airport infrastructure without using it. The new text sets out a series of principles that must be respected in laying down sanctions. Members stipulate that the system of sanctions shall be revenue-neutral for the airport managing body and shall be aimed solely at increasing the efficiency of time slot allocation.
These sanctions must be in place not later than one year after the adoption of the Regulation. Member States shall duly inform the Commission, which shall assess the effectiveness of the sanctions in question.
Where a financial sanction is necessary, it shall apply to each individual failure by an air carrier to comply with the relevant provisions, and shall have a pre-determined minimum value , to be set by the Member State concerned. Multiple infringements may give rise to the imposition of a series of financial sanctions and may result in, for example, the doubling of the financial penalty for each further infringement. The coordinator shall be duly informed of the imposition of penalties. Decisions to impose financial sanctions shall be published by the coordinator.
Revenue from slots trading: Parliament specifies that Member States may adopt measures to a llocate a portion of the revenue generated from the slots trading to a fund in order to cover the costs of developing airport infrastructure and optimising related services . In the interests of complete transparency, the fund in question shall be determined and approved by an independent supervisory authority as referred to in Directive 2009/12/EC. The fund must at all times be managed in such a way as to ensure that the principles of separate accounting are followed, so that the financial amounts to be allocated from the fund to each airport can be established. The revenues generated from the slot trading at one airport shall be reinvested at the same airport.
Monitoring of secondary trading: Parliament approves the Commission’s view that the allocation and use of slots could be made more effective by introducing slot exchange mechanisms, by ensuring that the unused slots are made available to interested operators as soon as possible and in a transparent manner, and by reinforcing the underlying principles of the system with regard to the allocation, management and use of the slots. In addition, it is important that access to hub airports from regional airports be maintained where such routes are essential to the economy of the region in question. Therefore, concerns regarding efficient allocation of slots must continue to be balanced against the need to protect the external benefits of air transport services and in particular the value that they create for European regions.
Lastly, Parliament adds that the Commission shall monitor the secondary markets for slots based on the data received from co-ordinators and shall report on relevant trends, including those relating to regional and intra-Union connectivity, in its Annual Analysis of Air Transport Markets.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Giommaria UGGIAS (ALDE, IT) on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the allocation of slots at EU airports (recast). It recommends that the European Parliament’s position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Coordinator’s role: in legal terms, the coordinator's essential functions, which consist of allocating slots in an equal and non-discriminatory manner, shall be given to a natural or legal person who or which is not a service provider in the airport, an airline operating from the airport or the managing body of the airport in question. The committee adds that in order to prove that he/she/it does not share common interests with any such entities, the coordinator or schedules facilitator must submit an annual declaration of his/her/its financial interests. Furthermore, the composition of the coordinator's board or supervisory function shall also be independent of the direct interests of the airport managing body, the airline users of that airport and any other entity representing a user or service provider. This shall not, however preclude representatives of such organisations from being members of a board or supervisory function, provided that voting rights are balanced.
Members also add that:
the coordinator or schedules facilitator, whether as a natural or legal person, must not have been employed by, or worked regularly with, the airport managing body or a service provider or airline operating at or from the airport in question during the two years preceding his/her/its appointment and during the two years from the cessation of his/her/its duties as a coordinator or schedules facilitator; the system of financing the coordinator's activities and those of the schedules facilitator shall be such as to guarantee the coordinator's independent status.
The financing referred to shall be provided by all the air carriers who operate in the coordinated and schedules facilitated airports, and by those airports in such a way as to ensure that the financial burden is distributed equitably among all interested parties and that the financing does not largely depend on a sole interested party. Member States shall launch a stakeholder consultation procedure, incorporating the possibility of an appeal, in order to ensure transparent, non-discriminatory charging correlating to the service provided by the coordinator or schedules facilitator. Collection of the air carriers’ payments shall be the responsibility of the airports concerned, which shall pay those amounts to the coordinator or schedules facilitator. Member States shall ensure that adequate financial, human, technical and material resources and expertise are at the disposal of the coordinator and the schedules facilitator, such as to enable them to carryout their duties at all times.
The coordinator and the schedules facilitator shall furthermore submit to the Commission, to the Member States and to all parties involved in their financing a separate annual financial report indicating in detail revenue and expenditure relating to their activities .
Usage rate: under the Commission's proposal on airport slot allocation, a slot would be taken away from an airline if it is used less than 85% of the time. The current threshold is 80%. The committee states that raising the slot series usage rate to 85% seems excessive and is not an appropriate answer to congestion problems. This rate would also lead to carriers ‘flying empty’ in order not to lose their series allocation, which is hardly in keeping with the overriding need to address the environmental impact of this mode of transport. The rate would therefore seem to be of little economic or environmental benefit. An 80-20 ratio should therefore be maintained for series usage rates .
Financial sanctions: rather than using general fees, Members specify that the managing body of a coordinated airport must establish and apply effective, proportionate and dissuasive financial sanctions to deal with the return of slots after the agreed Historic Baseline Dates for the following winter or summer season, respectively, or the retention of unused slots with the aim of dissuading air carriers from belatedly returning slots to the pool, and must hold them liable for having reserved airport infrastructure without using it. The new text sets out a series of principles that must be respected in laying down sanctions.
Revenue from slots trading: Members specify that Member States may adopt measures to allocate a portion of the revenue generated from the slots trading to a fund in order to cover the costs of developing airport infrastructure and optimising related services . In the interests of complete transparency, the fund in question shall be determined and approved by an independent supervisory authority as referred to in Directive 2009/12/EC. The fund must at all times be managed in such a way as to ensure that the principles of separate accounting are followed, so that the financial amounts to be allocated from the fund to each airport can be established. The revenues generated from the slot trading at one airport shall be reinvested at the same airport.
Monitoring of secondary trading: lastly, the Commission shall monitor the secondary markets for slots based on the data received from co-ordinators and shall report on relevant trends, including those relating to regional and intra-Union connectivity, in its Annual Analysis of Air Transport Markets.
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
The Council agreed a general approach on a recast of the 1993 regulation on the allocation of landing and take-off slots at EU airports that face capacity problems.
The revision is intended to tackle growing airport congestion by introducing a series of measures:
airlines will be allowed to sell and buy slots ("secondary trading"); Member States will have the possibility of introducing charges for carriers that return unused slots to the slot pool when it is too late for re-allocation; the independence of, and cooperation between, slot coordinators will be strengthened, and the transparency of the allocation process will be enhanced; the Single European Sky (SES) network manager will be associated with the allocation process, so that the impact of capacity allocation at a given airport upon the whole European air traffic network can be taken into account.
The main outstanding issue that needed to be settled by ministers concerned the possibility for airlines to sell and buy slots . Some delegations requested the introduction of safeguards because of concerns about the possible negative impact of secondary trading on - economically less profitable - regional flights or about the potential speculative use of traded slots. Other delegations, however, as well as the Commission, stressed the need for a uniform application of the system, pointing to the risk of market fragmentation.
As a compromise acceptable to the majority of delegations, the text of the draft regulation tabled by the Presidency has been amended to allow Member States to apply temporary restrictions where a significant and demonstrable problem with secondary trading occurs . Such restrictions must be transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate, justified and communicated to the Commission, which has the right to oppose them. Member States will be obliged to comply with the Commission's decision, which must also be justified.
In addition, still within the framework of the secondary trading scheme, conditions have been slightly relaxed as regards the use of re-timed slots received after an exchange of newly acquired slots , which is allowed only in order to improve the slot timings for the services concerned. It was agreed that such re-timed slots need not necessarily be operated during a full scheduling period.
The compromise achieved also includes a number of changes to other parts of the Draft Regulation :
where the withdrawal of slots in the event of misuse would be disproportionate, the coordinator will have the alternative option of recommending the imposition of penalties; the provisions on slot cancellation due to a public holiday were removed since they are considered superfluous; slight changes were also made to the provisions on the procedures for emergency coordination, on access to the coordinator's database, on information to be provided by air carriers and on the information to be provided by the coordinator to the airport managing body.
As regards the changes proposed by the Commission to the current conditions for granting priority in slot allocation to carriers that already had the same slots in previous scheduling seasons ("historical slots") , the discussions in the Council's preparatory bodies had already shown that a large majority of Member States are against those changes. At the Council meeting, the Commission reaffirmed its proposal to raise the minimum rate at which carriers must effectively have used the slots allocated from the current 80% to 85% and the minimum number of slots to be requested for the same time on the same day of the week ("slot series") from the current 5 to 15 for the summer season and 10 for the winter season. Most Member States, on the contrary, prefer to keep the current system , pointing to the need for flexibility for airlines, notably in order to avoid empty flights being operated only in order to secure entitlement to the slots. However, it will be possible to increase the minimum number of slots required within the framework of local guidelines.
The European Parliament, whose approval is also required for the adoption of the Regulation, has not yet determined its position on the proposal.
PURPOSE: to recast Regulation (EEC) n° 95/93 on the allocation of airport slots in order to i) ensure optimal allocation and use of airport slots in congested airports; ii) ensure strengthened and effectively implemented slot allocation and use and iii) enhance fair competition and competitiveness of operators.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: the implementation of the Slot Regulation has significantly improved slot allocation at busy European airports in terms of neutrality and transparency, making a major contribution to the creation of the internal market in aviation.
Nowadays, however, there is much more competition. Since 1992, the number of intra-EU routes operated has more than doubled and there has been a 150 % increase in long-haul flights departing from European airports. In 1992, just 93 European routes were served by more than two airlines. In 2010 there were 479 such routes.
The slot-allocation system established in 1993 does not ensure the optimum allocation and use of slots and thus of airport capacity.
As highlighted by Eurocontrol and ACI-Europe, one of the key challenges facing Europe is airport congestion. According to Eurocontrol's Long Term Forecast in December 2010, even taking into account currently planned infrastructure enhancements, as much as 10% of demand for air transport will remain unmet in 2030 due to a shortage of airport capacity.
Therefore, it is necessary to review the Slot Regulation to determine to what extent it can be improved with a view to matching capacity to demand for air transport in all sectors (long-haul, regional, cargo, etc.).
This initiative is one of the actions necessary for the Single European Transport Area as described in the Commission's White Paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area — Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system . It is also part of the airport package of measures identified as a strategic initiative in the 2011 Commission Work Programme.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: three packages is as follows:
· the first policy package included measures to improve the effectiveness of slot allocation and the use of slots, without changing the administrative nature of the current system;
· the second package incorporated the elements of the first package but added several more, including market-based mechanisms (in the form of explicit provision for secondary trading across the EU). It also included several pro-competitive proposals, such as revision of the new entrant rule and making the criteria for granting priority for allocation of a slot for the following season (so-called grandfather rights) slightly stricter;
· the third package comprised all elements of the second package, but took the market-based mechanism a step further by withdrawing 'grandfather' or 'historical' slots and having them auctioned.
The Commission recommended that the second package be implemented as its benefits would be considerably higher than the costs incurred. For the 2012-25 period, the package was estimated to result in an average annual increase of 1.6 % (or 23.8 million) in the number of passengers carried, a net economic benefit of EUR 5.3 billion, as well as a significant increase in employment (up to 62 000 full-time jobs).
LEGAL BASIS: Article 100 (2) TFEU.
CONTENT: the main points of the proposal are as follows :
1) Introduction of the possibility for secondary trade in slots and increased competition
· in order to encourage greater slot mobility, the proposal expressly allows airlines to buy and sell slots ;
· it is also proposed to broaden the definition of 'new entrant', to help facilitate the growth of sustainable competitors and reduce the schedule fragmentation that occurs when slots are allocated to a larger number of airlines unable to translate these slots into a viable alternative to dominant carriers.
2) Strengthening the transparency of the slot allocation process and the independence of slot coordinators : the proposal:
· contains a number of provisions to ensure that the slot allocation process is supported by a sufficient degree of transparency;
· will allow stricter criteria for the independence of the coordinators with regard to any interested party to be defined;
· advocates enhanced cooperation between the coordinators, initially through the development of common projects covering, for instance, the development of common slot allocation software or even merging the coordination activities for airports situated in different Member States.
On the basis of progress made, the Commission could eventually propose, at a later stage, the creation of a European coordinator responsible for slot allocation at all European Union airports.
3) Integration of slot allocation with the reform of the European air traffic management system (Single European Sky): the proposal aims to make an important contribution to strengthening the management of the aviation network at European level by associating the European Network Manager with the slot allocation process:
· the Commission may request a capacity analysis at an airport, should the network manager deem this necessary for ensuring coherence with the airport operational plan. Such capacity analyses would be carried out in accordance with standards agreed at European level;
· the Commission could make recommendations to the Member State on the capacity assessment if the network manager suggests that it does not fully take into account the needs of the European network;
· the proposal also introduces a new category of airport: the 'network airport'. Such airports are not coordinated, but are identified as important since they may offer alternatives during times of network disruption. Thus, the proposal provides that coordinators gather information on the operations at these airports.
4) Amendment of the '80-20' rule and definition of a series of slots and resort to the airport charge system to discourage the late return of slots to the pool:
· in order for airlines to be granted priority for the allocation of a given slot in the next corresponding scheduling season, they need to have used at least 85 % of the allocated series of slots (instead of 80 % at present);
· the minimum series length (i.e. the minimum number of weekly slots required for priority allocation for the following corresponding season) is raised from 5 to 15 for the summer season and 10 for the winter season. Exceptions are provided for certain types of traffic (charter) to take the characteristics of regional airports into account;
· lastly, to ensure that slots reserved prior to the start of an operating season are in fact operated as planned by airlines, the proposal would authorise airports to use an airport charge system to dissuade air carriers from belatedly returning slots to the pool.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the EU budget.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to recast Regulation (EEC) n° 95/93 on the allocation of airport slots in order to i) ensure optimal allocation and use of airport slots in congested airports; ii) ensure strengthened and effectively implemented slot allocation and use and iii) enhance fair competition and competitiveness of operators.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: the implementation of the Slot Regulation has significantly improved slot allocation at busy European airports in terms of neutrality and transparency, making a major contribution to the creation of the internal market in aviation.
Nowadays, however, there is much more competition. Since 1992, the number of intra-EU routes operated has more than doubled and there has been a 150 % increase in long-haul flights departing from European airports. In 1992, just 93 European routes were served by more than two airlines. In 2010 there were 479 such routes.
The slot-allocation system established in 1993 does not ensure the optimum allocation and use of slots and thus of airport capacity.
As highlighted by Eurocontrol and ACI-Europe, one of the key challenges facing Europe is airport congestion. According to Eurocontrol's Long Term Forecast in December 2010, even taking into account currently planned infrastructure enhancements, as much as 10% of demand for air transport will remain unmet in 2030 due to a shortage of airport capacity.
Therefore, it is necessary to review the Slot Regulation to determine to what extent it can be improved with a view to matching capacity to demand for air transport in all sectors (long-haul, regional, cargo, etc.).
This initiative is one of the actions necessary for the Single European Transport Area as described in the Commission's White Paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area — Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system . It is also part of the airport package of measures identified as a strategic initiative in the 2011 Commission Work Programme.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: three packages is as follows:
· the first policy package included measures to improve the effectiveness of slot allocation and the use of slots, without changing the administrative nature of the current system;
· the second package incorporated the elements of the first package but added several more, including market-based mechanisms (in the form of explicit provision for secondary trading across the EU). It also included several pro-competitive proposals, such as revision of the new entrant rule and making the criteria for granting priority for allocation of a slot for the following season (so-called grandfather rights) slightly stricter;
· the third package comprised all elements of the second package, but took the market-based mechanism a step further by withdrawing 'grandfather' or 'historical' slots and having them auctioned.
The Commission recommended that the second package be implemented as its benefits would be considerably higher than the costs incurred. For the 2012-25 period, the package was estimated to result in an average annual increase of 1.6 % (or 23.8 million) in the number of passengers carried, a net economic benefit of EUR 5.3 billion, as well as a significant increase in employment (up to 62 000 full-time jobs).
LEGAL BASIS: Article 100 (2) TFEU.
CONTENT: the main points of the proposal are as follows :
1) Introduction of the possibility for secondary trade in slots and increased competition
· in order to encourage greater slot mobility, the proposal expressly allows airlines to buy and sell slots ;
· it is also proposed to broaden the definition of 'new entrant', to help facilitate the growth of sustainable competitors and reduce the schedule fragmentation that occurs when slots are allocated to a larger number of airlines unable to translate these slots into a viable alternative to dominant carriers.
2) Strengthening the transparency of the slot allocation process and the independence of slot coordinators : the proposal:
· contains a number of provisions to ensure that the slot allocation process is supported by a sufficient degree of transparency;
· will allow stricter criteria for the independence of the coordinators with regard to any interested party to be defined;
· advocates enhanced cooperation between the coordinators, initially through the development of common projects covering, for instance, the development of common slot allocation software or even merging the coordination activities for airports situated in different Member States.
On the basis of progress made, the Commission could eventually propose, at a later stage, the creation of a European coordinator responsible for slot allocation at all European Union airports.
3) Integration of slot allocation with the reform of the European air traffic management system (Single European Sky): the proposal aims to make an important contribution to strengthening the management of the aviation network at European level by associating the European Network Manager with the slot allocation process:
· the Commission may request a capacity analysis at an airport, should the network manager deem this necessary for ensuring coherence with the airport operational plan. Such capacity analyses would be carried out in accordance with standards agreed at European level;
· the Commission could make recommendations to the Member State on the capacity assessment if the network manager suggests that it does not fully take into account the needs of the European network;
· the proposal also introduces a new category of airport: the 'network airport'. Such airports are not coordinated, but are identified as important since they may offer alternatives during times of network disruption. Thus, the proposal provides that coordinators gather information on the operations at these airports.
4) Amendment of the '80-20' rule and definition of a series of slots and resort to the airport charge system to discourage the late return of slots to the pool:
· in order for airlines to be granted priority for the allocation of a given slot in the next corresponding scheduling season, they need to have used at least 85 % of the allocated series of slots (instead of 80 % at present);
· the minimum series length (i.e. the minimum number of weekly slots required for priority allocation for the following corresponding season) is raised from 5 to 15 for the summer season and 10 for the winter season. Exceptions are provided for certain types of traffic (charter) to take the characteristics of regional airports into account;
· lastly, to ensure that slots reserved prior to the start of an operating season are in fact operated as planned by airlines, the proposal would authorise airports to use an airport charge system to dissuade air carriers from belatedly returning slots to the pool.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the EU budget.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Legislative proposal
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)111
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0495/2012
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Go to the page
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0379/2012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.307
- Committee draft report: PE491.255
- Contribution: COM(2011)0827
- Contribution: COM(2011)0827
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1444
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1443
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0827
- Legislative proposal: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0827
- Legislative proposal published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE491.255
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.307
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1444 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SEC(2011)1443
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0827 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)111
- Contribution: COM(2011)0827
- Contribution: COM(2011)0827
Amendments | Dossier |
262 |
2011/0391(COD)
2012/09/17
TRAN
262 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 13) 'series of slots' shall mean at least
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 13) ‘series of slots’ shall mean at least
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 13)
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 13)
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 13)
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 18) ‘
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 a (new) 18a) 'non-scheduled air service' shall mean a flight which does not meet all the conditions of Article 2 (16) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new) 21a) 'Regional Airport' shall mean a non- co-ordinated airport that operates regular scheduled flights between distinct geographical or political areas of a Member State.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point ii (ii) upon request from the Commission, in particular where new entrants encounter serious problems in securing landing and take off possibilities at the airport in question
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point ii (ii) upon request from the Commission, in particular where new entrants encounter serious problems in securing landing and take off possibilities at the airport in question
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 This analysis, based on commonly recognised methods which take account of the requirements of the network operational plan, as required by Annex V to Regulation (EU) No 677/2011, shall determine any shortfall in capacity, taking into account environmental constraints at the airport in question. The analysis shall consider the possibilities of overcoming such shortfall through new or modified infrastructure, operational changes, or any other change, and the time frame envisaged to resolve the problems.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. On the basis of the analysis, the Member State shall consult on the capacity situation at the airport with the managing body of the airport, the air carriers using the airport
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. On the basis of the analysis, the Member State shall consult on the capacity situation at the airport with the managing body of the airport, the air carriers using the airport regularly, their representative organisations, representatives of general aviation
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 5 Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission can ask the network manager to deliver an opinion on how the capacity is set in relation to the network operating needs.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission can ask the network manager to deliver an opinion on how the capacity is set in relation to the network operating needs.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 9 Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 9 Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 9 Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 10 10. If a decision is taken under paragraphs 6
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 10 Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 At a coordinated
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 At a coordinated or schedules facilitated airport, the Member State responsible shall ensure the determination of the coordination parameters twice yearly, while taking account of all relevant technical, operational , performance and environmental constraints as well as any changes thereto. These constraints shall be notified to the Commission.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. The Member State responsible for
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall encourage close cooperation between the coordinators and schedules facilitators to develop common projects at a European level.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall encourage close cooperation between the coordinators and schedules facilitators to develop common projects at a European level. In order to further improve the system for the allocation of slots at European airports and in the light of the progress
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point i i) in legal terms, the coordinator's essential functions, which consist of allocating slots in an equal and non-discriminatory manner, shall be given to a natural or legal person who or which is not a service provider in the airport, an airline operating from the airport or the managing body of the airport in question; in order to prove that they do not share common interests with these entities, the coordinator or schedules facilitator must submit an annual declaration of their financial interests;
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii a (new) (iia) The composition of the coordinator's board or supervisory function shall also be independent of the direct interests of the airport managing body, the airline users of that airport and any other entity representing a user or service provider, however this does not preclude representatives from such organisations being members of a board or supervisory function provided that voting rights are balanced.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii a (new) iia) to that end, the coordinator or schedules facilitator, whether as a natural or legal person, must not have been employed by, or worked regularly with, the airport managing body or a service provider or airline company operating at/from the airport in question for the two years preceding their appointment and for two years from the end of their duties as a coordinator or schedules facilitator.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii a (new) (iia) that the composition of the coordinator's board or supervisory function shall also be independent of the direct interests of the airport managing body, the airline users of that airport and any other entity representing a user or service provider, however this does not preclude representatives from such organisations being members of a board or supervisory function provided that voting rights are balanced.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The financing referred to under point (c) shall be provided by all the air carriers who operate in the coordinated and schedules facilitated airports, and by those airports in such a way as to ensure that the financial burden is distributed equitably among all interested parties and that the financing does not largely depend on a sole interested party. A stakeholder consultation procedure, with the possibility of appeal, shall be launched by Member States in order to ensure transparent, non-discriminatory charging correlating to the service provided by the coordinator or schedules facilitator. Collection of the air carriers’ payments shall be the responsibility of the airports concerned, which shall pay those amounts to the coordinator or schedules facilitator. The Member States shall
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The financing referred to under point (c) shall be provided by the air carriers who operate in the coordinated airports and by the airports in such a way as to ensure that the financial burden is distributed equitably among all interested parties and that the financing does not largely depend on a sole interested party. The Member States shall ensure that the financial, human, technical
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The financing referred to under point (c) shall be provided by the air carriers who operate in the coordinated airports and schedules facilitated airports and by the airports in such a way as to ensure that the financial burden is distributed equitably among all interested parties and that the financing does not largely depend on a sole interested party. The Member States shall ensure that adequat
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. At the end of each scheduling period, the coordinator or schedules facilitator shall submit to the Member States concerned and to the Commission an activity report describing the general slot allocation and/or schedules facilitation situation, examining, in particular, the application of Article 9(5) and Articles 13 and 18, as well as any complaints regarding the application of Articles 9 and 10 submitted to the coordination committee and the steps taken to resolve them. Upon request, the report shall be communicated to the legally interested parties. The report shall also contain the results of a survey conducted among the interested parties on the quality of services provided by the coordinator. The coordinator and the schedules facilitator shall furthermore submit to the Commission, Member States and upon request to all parties which has legal interest an annual financial report indicating in detail revenue and expenditure relating to their activities.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. At the end of each scheduling period, the coordinator or schedules facilitator shall submit to the Member States concerned
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. At the end of each scheduling period, the coordinator or schedules facilitator shall submit to the Member States concerned
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. At the end of each scheduling period, the coordinator or schedules facilitator shall submit to the Member States concerned
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. A
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The coordinator shall maintain, for each airport, an up-to-
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d d) remaining available slots with respect to each type of constraint taken into consideration in the coordination parameters. The database shall allow the air carriers to verify the availability of slots
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) remaining available slots with respect to each type of constraint taken into consideration in the coordination parameters. The database shall allow
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d d) remaining available slots with respect to each type of constraint taken into consideration in the coordination parameters. The database shall allow the air carriers and airports to verify the availability of slots
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) remaining available slots with respect to each type of constraint taken into consideration in the coordination parameters. The database shall allow the air carriers to verify the availability of slots
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point e (e) slots transferred or exchanged for a financial or other nature, indicating the identity of the air carriers involved and whether the transfer or exchange was made for compensation of a
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 This information shall be updated regularly. At the end of each season, the coordinator shall publish the activity report and financial report mentioned in paragraph 1.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 This information shall be updated regularly. At the end of each season, the coordinator shall publish the
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 This information shall be updated regularly. At the end of each season, the coordinator shall publish the activity and financial report mentioned in paragraph 1.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Air carriers operating or intending to operate at a schedules facilitated or coordinated airport
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Air carriers operating or intending to operate at a schedules facilitated or coordinated airport
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Air carriers operating or intending to operate at a schedules facilitated or coordinated airport
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Air carriers operating or intending to operate at a schedules facilitated or coordinated airport
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The format and scope of the information referred to in this article is determined in an agreed worldwide industry standard. The information provided shall be used for the purpose of this Regulation only.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 For all other airports with no particular designation status
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 For all other airports with no particular designation status, the
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Where an air carrier fails to provide the information referred to in paragraph 1, unless it can satisfactorily demonstrate that mitigating circumstances exist, or provides false or misleading information, the
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The format and scope of the information referred to in this article is determined in an agreed worldwide industry standard. The information provided shall be used for the purpose of this Regulation only.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 At a coordinated airport, the Member State responsible shall ensure that a coordination committee is set up. The same coordination committee may be designated for more than one airport. Membership of this committee shall be open at least to the air
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 At a coordinated airport, the Member State responsible shall ensure that a coordination committee is set up. The same coordination committee may be designated for more than one airport. Membership of this committee shall be open at least to the air carriers using the airport(s) in question regularly and their representative organisations, the managing body of the airport concerned, the relevant air traffic control authorities, the representatives of general aviation using the airport
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 At a coordinated airport, the Member State responsible shall ensure that a coordination committee is set up. The same coordination committee may be designated for more than one airport. Membership of this committee shall be open at least to the air carriers using the airport(s) in question regularly and their representative organisations, the managing body of the airport concerned, the relevant air traffic control authorities, the representatives of general aviation using the airport regularly
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 At a coordinated airport, the Member State responsible shall ensure that a coordination committee is set up. The same coordination committee may be designated for more than one airport. Membership of this coordination committee shall be
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 At a coordinated airport, the Member State responsible shall ensure that a coordination committee is set up. The same coordination committee may be designated for more than one airport. Membership of this committee shall be open at least to the air carriers using the airport(s) in question regularly and their representative organisations, the managing body of the airport concerned, the relevant air traffic control authorities, the representatives of general aviation
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a – point iv (iv) local guidelines related to the supervision of the use of slots allocated or the determination of capacity as provided for in Article 9(8);
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a – point vii a (new) (viia) any issues concerning the tasks and organization of the coordinator and the efficiency, costs and effectiveness of the coordinator.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The coordination committee shall draw up written rules of procedure covering, inter alia participation, elections, the frequency of meetings,
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The coordination committee shall draw up written rules of procedure covering, inter alia participation, elections, the frequency of meetings, voting and language(s) used.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Any member of the coordination committee may propose local guidelines as provided for in Article 9(8).
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Any member of the coordination committee may propose local guidelines as provided for in Article 9 (8).
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The coordinator shall set up a pool, which shall contain all the slots. All new slot capacity determined pursuant to Article 3(3) shall be placed in the pool. This procedure shall be without prejudice to regional airports connectivity to hub airports. If such connectivity is undermined Member States shall be permitted to intervene.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The coordinator shall set up a pool, which shall contain all the slots not allocated on the basis of Articles 10(2), (3). All new slot capacity determined pursuant to Article 3 (3)
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 10(2) and (3) of this Regulation and without prejudice to Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, slots placed in the pool shall be distributed among applicant air carriers. 50 % of these slots shall first be allocated to new entrants unless requests by new entrants are less than 50 %.
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 10(2) and (3) of this Regulation and without prejudice to Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, slots placed in the pool shall be distributed among applicant air carriers. 50 % of these slots shall first be allocated to new entrants unless requests by new entrants are less than 50 %.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Among requests from new entrants,
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to Article 10(2), in a situation where all slot requests cannot be accommodated to the satisfaction of the air carriers concerned, preference shall be given to commercial air
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to Article 10(2), in a situation where all slot requests cannot be accommodated to the satisfaction of the air carriers concerned, preference shall be given to commercial air
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to Article 10(2), in a situation where all slot requests cannot be accommodated to the satisfaction of the air carriers concerned, preference shall be given to
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. For non-scheduled air services, airport coordinators will reserve a number of slots per hour for an entire scheduling season for the sole use of non-scheduled and business aviation operations. This allocation will be based on the historical usage by non-scheduled air services in the previous equivalent scheduling season. Airport coordinators will allocate the reserved slots to non-scheduled air services in a non-discriminatory manner.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 In the case of services operated by a group of air carriers, only one of the participating air carriers can apply for the required slots. The air carrier operating such a service accepts responsibility for meeting the operating criteria required to
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry Union -wide or world-wide as well as local guidelines proposed by the coordination committee and approved by the Member State or any other competent body responsible for the airport in question, provided that such guidelines do not affect the independent status of the coordinator, comply with Union law, aim at improving the efficient use of airport capacity and have been notified in advance to and pre-approved by the Commission
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry Union -wide or world-wide as well as local guidelines proposed by the coordination committee and approved by the Member State or any other competent body responsible for the airport in question
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry Union -wide or world-wide as well as local guidelines proposed by the coordination committee and approved by the Member State or any other competent body responsible for the airport in question, provided that such guidelines do not affect the independent status of the coordinator, comply with Union law, aim at improving the efficient use of airport capacity
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry world-wide or Union -wide as well as local guidelines proposed by the coordination committee and approved by the Member State or any other competent body responsible for the airport in question, provided that such guidelines do not affect the independent status of the coordinator, comply with Union law, aim at improving the efficient use of airport capacity and have been notified in advance to and pre-approved by the Commission . The local guidelines
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry Union -wide or world-wide as well as local guidelines proposed by the coordination committee and approved by the Member State or any other competent body responsible for the airport in question, provided that such guidelines do not affect the independent status of the coordinator, comply with Union law, aim at improving the efficient use of airport capacity and have been notified in advance to and pre-approved by the Commission . The local guidelines may
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry Union -wide or world-wide as well as local guidelines proposed by the coordination committee and approved by the Member State or any other competent body responsible for the airport in question, provided that such
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry Union -wide or world-wide as well as local guidelines proposed by the coordination committee and approved by the Member State or any other competent body responsible for the airport in question, provided that such guidelines do not affect the independent status of the coordinator, comply with Union law, aim at improving the efficient use of airport capacity and have been notified in advance to and pre-approved by the Commission.
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry Union -wide or world-wide as well as local guidelines proposed by the coordination committee and approved by the Member State or any other competent body responsible for the airport in question, provided that such guidelines do not affect the independent status of the coordinator, comply with Union law, aim at improving the efficient use of airport capacity
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Series of slots are allocated from the slot pool by the coordinator with the utmost transparency and fairness to applicant carriers as permissions to use the airport infrastructure for the purpose of landing or take-off for the scheduling period for which they are requested, at the expiry of which they have to be returned to the slot pool as set up according to the provisions of Article 9.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Slots are non-material assets of public utility. They are assigned by airport coordinators so as to ensure maximum transparency, in the interests of Member Sates, citizens living near to the airport, passengers, airport managers, air carriers and airport employees and workers.
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Without prejudice to Articles 7, 12, 13 and 17,
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Without prejudice to Articles 7
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a a) a series of slots has been used by that air carrier
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) a series of slots has been used by that air carrier
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the coordinator that the
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the coordinator that the series of slots in question has been operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by that air carrier for at least 8
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the coordinator that the series of slots in question has been operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by that air carrier for at least 8
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the coordinator that the series of slots in question has been operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by that air carrier for at least 8
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the coordinator that the series of slots in question has been operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by that air carrier for at least 8
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the coordinator that the series of slots in question has been operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by that air carrier for at least 8
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the coordinator that the series of slots in question has been operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by that air carrier for at least 8
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the coordinator that the series of slots in question has been operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by that air carrier for at least 8
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) Non-scheduled air transportation contributes to regional cohesion and competitiveness. Where air carriers have regularly used slots for such transportation at an airport falling within the scope of this regulation, even where these slots do not always involve the same routes, priority shall be given to requests for continued usage of such slots.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 3. Re-timing of series of slots before the allocation of the remaining slots from the pool referred to in Article 9 to the other applicant air carriers shall be accepted only for operational reasons such as, changes in the type of aircraft used or route operated by the air carrier. It shall not take effect until expressly confirmed by the coordinator or, in the case of series of slots allocated to new entrants as defined in Article 2, if the slot timing for those requesting air carriers is better than the slot timing originally requested . It shall not take effect until expressly confirmed by the coordinator.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 3. Re-timing of a series of slots before the allocation of the remaining slots from the pool referred to in Article 9 to the other applicant air carriers shall be accepted only for operational reasons such as
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Slots allocated to an air carrier
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part If the 8
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part If the 8
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part If the 8
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part If the 8
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part If the 8
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part If the 8
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part If the 8
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part If the 8
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iii iii) serious disturbance of operations at the airports concerned, including those series of slots at other
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) serious disturbance of operations at the airports concerned, including those series of slots at other
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point c c) serious financial damage for a
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) serious financial difficulties
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 7 Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 7 7. If the conditions set out in paragraph (2)(a) and (b) are not met, the Commission
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 7 7. If the conditions set out in paragraph (2)(a) and (b) are not met, the Commission may however decide that priority for the allocation of the same series should be awarded to the air carriers for the following
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 7 7. If the conditions set out in paragraph (2)(a) and (b) are not met, the Commission may however decide that priority for the allocation of the same series should be awarded to the air carriers for the following scheduling period, if this is justified on imperative grounds of urgency linked to exceptional
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 a (new) Article 10a Auctioning of slots under a framework environmental criteria. The Commission shall propose a system of auctioning slots under a framework of environmental criteria, favorising airplanes with best performance on reduction of noise, gaseous emissions and climate impact.
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The managing body of a coordinated airport may decide to use the airport charges system with the aim of dissuading air carriers from belatedly returning slots to the pool referred to in Article 9 and to hold them liable for having reserved airport infrastructure without using it-the scheme shall be revenue neutral for the airport managing body. The following principles shall be respected:
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The managing body of a coordinated airport
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) this decision shall not affect the non- discriminatory and transparent character of the slot allocation process and the system of airport charges, and neither shall it create additional net revenues for the airport managing body;
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) this decision shall not discourage air carriers from developing services or entering the market
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) ea) the airport charge or incentive system must not result in financial gain for the airport management body and shall be aimed solely at increasing the efficiency of time slot allocation.
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. Where public service obligations have been imposed on a route in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, a Member State
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. Where public service obligations have been imposed on a route in accordance with Article
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transferred by an air carrier or between air carriers within a consortium from one route or type of service to another route or type of service operated by that same air carrier;
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b b) transferred between two air carriers
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b b) transferred between two air carriers,
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c c) exchanged, one for one, between air carriers
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c c) exchanged, one for one, between air carriers,
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) subparagraphs a-c will operate insofar as they do not jeopardise connectivity between regional and hub airports.
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The Member State take steps to ensure that 10% of the proceeds of the sale of the time slots is paid into a fund for the enlargement and infrastructural and technological improvement of airports. In the interests of complete transparency, that fund shall be managed by a transport supervisory authority as stipulated in Directive 2009/12/EC. The fund must always be managed in such a way as to ensure that the principles of separate accounting are followed, so that the financial amounts to be allocated from the fund to each airport can be established.
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) airport operations would not be prejudiced, taking into account all technical, operational
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Transfers of historical slots for a scheduling period that give rise to financial payments may not be sold on before the end of that scheduling period.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 For the transfers or exchanges referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers shall give the coordinator the details of any monetary or any other kind of compensation. The details regarding compensation for the transfers or exchanges are confidential and the coordinator shall only divulge such details to the Member State where the airport is situated or the Commission, upon their request. The transfers or exchanges may not be subject to restrictive conditions intended to limit the possibility for the air carrier wishing to obtain the slots to enter into competition with the air carrier which transfers or exchanges the slots, or with other members of a group of air carriers that it is part of.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 For the transfers or exchanges referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers shall give the coordinator the details of any monetary or any other kind of
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 For the transfers or exchanges referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers shall give the coordinator the details of any monetary or any other kind of compensation. The d
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new) Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new) Slots that have been newly allocated to incumbent airlines may not be transferred or exchanged for compensation or monetary gain for at least one equivalent scheduling season.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 a (new) Article 13a Member States may adopt measures aimed at earmarking some of the proceeds from the sale of time slots to a fund designed to support the enlargement of airport infrastructure.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 a (new) Article 13a Member States may set measures to allocate a portion of proceeds from slots trading to a fund for supporting the airports infrastructure expansion, including infrastructure to access the airport.
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 This Regulation shall not affect the powers
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. The
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – title Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. When an air carrier submits a flight plan, it shall include a reference to the slot allocated.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. When an air carrier submits a flight plan, it shall include a reference to the slot allocated. The network manager shall reject an air carrier's flight plan if the air carrier intends to land or take off at a coordinated airport, during the periods for which it is coordinated, without having a slot allocated by the coordinator.
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. When an air carrier submits a flight plan, it shall include a reference to the slot allocated. The network manager
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Fur the purposes of implementation of paragraph 1 of this article, any aircraft operator planning to operate an exempted flight as defined in Article 2(11) shall communicate to the coordinator their flight plan identification details.
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 1. The coordinator shall withdraw the series of slots provisionally allocated to an air carrier in the process of establishing itself and place them in the pool on
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Air carriers that repeatedly or intentionally operate air services at a time significantly different from the slot allocated as part of a series of slots or use slots in a significantly different way from that indicated at the time of allocation shall lose their
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Air carriers that
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Air carriers that repeatedly
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall ensure that effective, proportionate and dissuasive
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1 –
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1 – Air carriers that repeated
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 – the return of slots series after 31 January for the following summer season or after 31 August for the following winter season, or the retention of unused slots; the penalty should in any case take account of the possible use of the mechanism provided by Article 11;
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 – the return of slots a
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Member States shall notify the European Commission of the penalty system they have implemented under this paragraph.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the 8
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the 8
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the 8
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the 8
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the 8
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if after an allotted time corresponding to
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if after an allotted time corresponding to
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if after an allotted time corresponding to
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to rights of appeal under national law, complaints regarding the application of Articles 7(2), 9, 10, 13, 17 and 18(1),(2), (3) and (4) shall be submitted to the coordination committee. The committee shall, within a period of one month following submission of the complaint, consider the matter and if possible make proposals to the coordinator in an attempt to resolve the problem. If the complaint cannot be settled, the Member State responsible may, within a further two month period, provide for mediation by an air carriers
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of this Regulation at the latest
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission will monitor the secondary markets for slots based on the data received from co-ordinators and will report on relevant trends, including those relating to regional and intra-EU connectivity, in its Annual Analysis of Air Transport Markets.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The slot allocation system established in 1993 does not ensure the optimum allocation and use of slots and thus of airport capacity. In the context of growing airport congestion and the limited development of major new airport infrastructure, the slots are a rare resource. Access to such resources is of crucial importance for the provision of air transport services and for the maintenance of effective competition. To this end, the allocation and use of slots could be made more effective by introducing market mechanisms, by ensuring that the unused slots are made available to interested operators as soon as possible and in a transparent manner, and by reinforcing the underlying principles of the system with regard to the allocation, management and use of the slots. At the same time,
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The slot allocation system established in 1993 does not ensure the optimum allocation and use of slots and thus of airport capacity. In the context of growing airport congestion and the limited development of major new airport infrastructure, the slots are a rare resource. Access to such resources is of crucial importance for the provision of air transport services and for the maintenance of effective competition. To this end, the allocation and use of slots could be made more effective by introducing market mechanisms, by ensuring that the unused slots are made available to interested operators as soon as possible and in a transparent manner, and by reinforcing the underlying principles of the system with regard to the allocation, management and use of the slots. In addition it is important that access to hub airports from regional airports should be maintained where such routes are essential to the economy of that region. At the same time, although the historical slots meet the need for stability in schedules for the airlines, during the future assessment of the application of this Regulation, a gradual introduction of other market mechanisms could be envisaged, such as withdrawing and auctioning historical slots.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The slot-allocation system established in 1993 does not ensure the optimum allocation and use of slots and thus of airport capacity. In the context of growing airport congestion and the limited development of major new airport infrastructure, the slots are a rare resource. Access to such resources is of crucial importance for the provision of air transport services and for the maintenance of effective competition. To this end, the allocation and use of slots could be made more effective by introducing
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The slot-allocation system established in 1993 does not ensure the optimum allocation and use of slots and thus of
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The allocation of slots at congested airports
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Experience has shown that secondary trading, that is the exchange of slots for financial or other compensation, does not benefit from a uniform and consistent legislative framework, including guarantees of transparency and competitive safeguards. It is therefore necessary to regulate the exchange of slots and prohibit secondary trading in slots in the European Union.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Situations where, owing to a lack of available slots, the benefits of liberalisation are unevenly spread and competition is distorted
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Situations where, owing to a lack of available slots, the benefits of liberalisation are unevenly spread and competition is distorted,
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Non-scheduled air transportation contributes to regional cohesion and competitiveness. Where air carriers have regularly used slots for such transportation at an airport falling within the scope of this regulation, even where these slots do not always involve the same routes, priority should be given to requests for continued usage of such slots.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) The progress made in implementing the Single European Sky has a major impact on the slot allocation process. The imposition of performance plans, which make the airports, the air navigation service providers and airspace users subject to performance improvement and monitoring measures, and the network management function, based on the establishment of a European network of routes and a central air traffic management, means it is necessary to update the slot allocation rules. It is therefore necessary to create an adequate framework allowing the network manager, the performance evaluation body and the national supervisory authorities to participate in the procedure of setting the airport capacity and coordination parameters.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) The progress made in implementing the Single European Sky has a major impact on the slot allocation process. The imposition of performance plans, which make the airports, the air navigation service providers and airspace users subject to performance improvement and monitoring measures, and the network management function, based on the establishment of a European network of routes and a central air traffic management, means it is necessary to update the slot allocation rules. It is therefore necessary to create an adequate framework allowing the network manager, the performance re
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) The flight plans and the slots should be better matched to better exploit airport capacity and improve flight punctuality
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) The flight plans and the slots should be better matched to better exploit airport capacity and improve flight punctuality. The flight plans can be rejected in a "no slot" situation.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) The Member State responsible for the schedules facilitated or coordinated airport should ensure the appointment of a schedules facilitator or a coordinator whose neutrality should be unquestioned. To this end, the coordinators' role and that of the schedules facilitators should be enhanced. Provision should be made for the legal, organisational, decision-making and financial independence of the coordinators with regard to stakeholders, the Member State and bodies subordinate to that State. To prevent the coordinator's activity and that of the schedules facilitator suffering from a lack of financial, technical or human resources or expertise, Member States should ensure that the
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Additional obligations should be introduced for air carriers with regard to sending information to the coordinators. Provision should be made for additional penalties for omitting information or sending false or misleading information. For
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Additional obligations should be introduced for air carriers with regard to sending information to the coordinators and schedules facilitators. Provision should be made for additional penalties for omitting information or sending false or misleading information. For network airports, the air carriers should have the obligation to communicate their flight intentions or other relevant information requested by the coordinator or schedules facilitator.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The Union should facilitate cooperation between the coordinators and schedules facilitators to allow them to exchange best practices with a view to the establishment of a European coordinator
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The Union should facilitate cooperation between the coordinators and schedules facilitators to allow them to exchange best practices
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The period of validity for a series of slots should be limited to the schedule planning period for which the series is granted. The priority for allocating a series of slots, even historical slots, should come from the allocation or confirmation by the coordinator and should be based on compliance with all the rules under this Regulation governing slot allocation and enabling that slot allocation to continue into the next scheduling season.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) It is necessary to retain special provisions,
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Since the environmental aspects may be taken into account in the coordination parameters and regional connectivity can also be fully ensured in the context of the public service obligations, experience has not demonstrated the usefulness of local rules. Furthermore, it cannot be excluded that such rules do not lead to discrimination in allocating slots. Consequently, the option of resorting to local rules should be restricted. All the technical, operational, performance and environmental constraints that should be applied by the coordinators or the facilitators should be defined in the coordination parameters. Recourse to local rules would also be reduced to monitoring the use of slots and the possibility of reducing the length of the series of slots in the cases provided for by this Regulation. With a view to promoting better use of airport capacity, two basic principles in slot allocation should be reinforced, namely the definition of a series of slots and the calculation of historical slots. At the same time, the flexibility given to air carriers should be better regulated with a view to preventing distortions in the application of this Regulation in the Member States. Therefore, better use of airport capacity should be encouraged. The integration of air and rail tickets for shorter rail connections between airports shall be supported.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Since the environmental aspects may be taken into account in the coordination parameters and regional connectivity can also be fully ensured in the context of the public service obligations, experience has not shown that local rules are useful. Furthermore, it cannot be excluded that such rules do not lead to discrimination in allocating slots. Consequently, the option of resorting to local rules should be restricted. All the technical, operational, performance and environmental constraints that should be applied by the coordinators or the facilitators should be defined in the coordination parameters. The resort to local rules would also be reduced to supervising the use of slots and the possibility of
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23)
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) Auctioning slots in a framework of environmental criteria should be proposed by the Commission.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) To allow air carriers to adapt to imperative situations of urgency, such as a marked decline in traffic or an economic crisis that severely affects the activity of air carriers, affecting a lager part of the scheduling period, the Commission should be allowed to adopt urgent measures to ensure the consistency of measures to be taken at coordinated airports. These measures will allow air carriers to retain priority in allocating the same series for the following scheduling period even if the 8
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) To allow air carriers to adapt to imperative situations of urgency, such as a marked decline in traffic or an economic crisis that severely affects the activity of air carriers, affecting a lager part of the scheduling period, the Commission should be allowed to adopt urgent measures to ensure the consistency of measures to be taken at coordinated airports. These measures will allow air carriers to retain priority in allocating the same series for the following scheduling period even if the 8
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) To allow air carriers to adapt to imperative situations of urgency, such as a marked decline in traffic or an economic crisis that severely affects the activity of air carriers, affecting a lager part of the scheduling period,
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) To allow air carriers to adapt to imperative situations of urgency, such as a marked decline in traffic or an economic crisis that severely affects the activity of air carriers, affecting a lager part of the scheduling period, the Commission should be allowed to adopt urgent measures to ensure the consistency of measures to be taken at coordinated airports. These measures will allow the Commission to lower the time slot use threshold to under 85%, thereby enabling air carriers to retain priority in allocating the same series for the
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) To allow air carriers to adapt to imperative situations of urgency, such as a marked decline in traffic or an economic crisis that severely affects the activity of air carriers, affecting a lager part of the scheduling period, the Commission should be allowed to adopt urgent measures to ensure the consistency of measures to be taken at coordinated airports. These measures will allow air carriers to retain priority in allocating the same series for the following scheduling period even if the
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) To allow air carriers to adapt to imperative situations of urgency, such as a marked decline in traffic or an economic crisis that severely affects the activity of air carriers, affecting a lager part of the scheduling period, the Commission should be allowed to adopt urgent measures to ensure the consistency of measures to be taken at coordinated airports. These measures will allow air carriers to retain priority in allocating the same series for the following scheduling period even if the 8
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) To allow air carriers to adapt to imperative situations of urgency, such as a marked decline in traffic or an economic crisis that severely affects the activity of air carriers, affecting a larger part of the scheduling period, the Commission should be allowed to adopt urgent measures to ensure the consistency of measures to be taken at coordinated airports. These measures will allow air carriers to retain priority
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) (24a) This Regulation should allow for the flexibility requirements of business aviation and of charter flights so as to enable non-scheduled flights to be operated, especially in view of the fact that the operators concerned cannot build up a slot portfolio based on historical rights.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Experience shows that a significant number of slots are returned to the pool too late to be reallocated effectively. The airport managing body should be encouraged to use
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Experience shows that a significant number of slots are returned to the pool too late to be reallocated effectively.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Experience shows that a significant number of slots are returned to the pool too late to be reallocated effectively.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26a) In order to increase airport capacity, the Regulation should cover the possibility of Member States being able to use the proceeds of the sale of time slots following secondary trading for the purpose of optimising air traffic and developing new infrastructure.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) The application of the provisions of this Regulation
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30)
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 (33) The examination procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a) an air carrier requesting, as part of a series of slots, a slot at an airport on any day, where, if the carrier's request were accepted, it would in total hold fewer than
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a) an air carrier requesting, as part of a series of slots, a slot at an airport on any day, where, if the carrier's request were accepted, it would in total hold fewer than
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b – introductory part Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 3)
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6)
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 13)
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 13) ‘series of slots’ shall mean at least
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 13)
source: PE-496.307
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
Renew Europe groupNew
RE |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for EuropeNew
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe |
council/0/url |
Old
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3196*&MEET_DATE=29/10/2012New
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/calendar/?Category=meeting&Page=1&daterange=&dateFrom=2012-10-29&dateTo=2012-10-29 |
council/1/url |
Old
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3134*&MEET_DATE=12/12/2011New
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/calendar/?Category=meeting&Page=1&daterange=&dateFrom=2011-12-12&dateTo=2011-12-12 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/6 |
Old
New
|
docs/7 |
Old
New
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/docs |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/summary/10 |
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/6/docs/0/title |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Go to the page |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/summary/18 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22204&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=22204 |
events/10 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/1/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/thematicnote.do?id=2066000&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-priorities/thematic-note?id=2066000 |
procedure/Legislative priorities/2 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/2/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/thematicnote.do?id=41360&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-priorities/thematic-note?id=41360 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
TRAN/7/08024 |
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Regulation (EC) No 793/2004
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Regulation (EC) No 793/2004 2001/0140(COD) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1554/2003 2001/0140A(COD) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 894/2002 2002/0013(COD) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 545/2009 2009/0042(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/2 |
2001/0140(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/3 |
Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1554/2003
|
procedure/instrument/4 |
2001/0140A(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/5 |
Repealing Regulation (EC) No 894/2002
|
procedure/instrument/6 |
2002/0013(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/7 |
Repealing Regulation (EC) No 545/2009
|
procedure/instrument/8 |
2009/0042(COD)
|
procedure/legal_basis |
Old
New
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 100-p2 |
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
Old
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the RegionsNew
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22204&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2013-111-TA-7-2012-0495_en.docx |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/COD-2011-0391 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/COD-2011-0391 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/COD-2011-0391 |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/COD-2011-0391 |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/COD-2011-0391 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/COD-2011-0391 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/COD-2011-0391 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/COD-2011-0391 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/COD-2011-0391 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/COD-2011-0391 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/5/date |
Old
2012-03-25T00:00:00New
2012-03-26T00:00:00 |
docs/6/date |
Old
2012-02-05T00:00:00New
2012-02-06T00:00:00 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0827New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0827 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0827New
https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0827 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/date |
Old
2012-03-26T00:00:00New
2012-03-25T00:00:00 |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/date |
Old
2012-02-06T00:00:00New
2012-02-05T00:00:00 |
docs/7 |
|
events/0 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0391&appLng=EN |
procedure/Legislative priorities/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/2/body |
EP
|
events/4/body |
EP
|
events/5/body |
EP
|
events/8/body |
EP
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.255New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-491255_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.307New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-496307_EN.html |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6/docs |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Regulation (EC) No 793/2004 2001/0140(COD) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1554/2003 2001/0140A(COD) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 894/2002 2002/0013(COD) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 545/2009 2009/0042(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Regulation (EC) No 95/93 Repealing Regulation (EC) No 793/2004 2001/0140(COD) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1554/2003 2001/0140A(COD) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 894/2002 2002/0013(COD) Repealing Regulation (EC) No 545/2009 2009/0042(COD)
|
procedure/title |
Old
Allocation of slots at EU airports: common rules. RecastNew
Allocation of slots at EU airports |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.255New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.255 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.307New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.307 |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0379_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0379_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121211&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121211&type=CRE |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0495_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0495_EN.html |
events/10/body |
EP
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A7-2012-379&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0379_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-495New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0495_EN.html |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-379&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A7-2012-379&language=EN |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-495New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-495 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/date |
|
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
96864
|
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
96864
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/7/08024New
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
procedure/selected_topics |
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/transport/index_en.htmNew
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/mobility-and-transport_en |
other/1/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/transport/index_en.htmNew
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/mobility-and-transport_en |
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Old
Economic and Social Committee Committee of the RegionsNew
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0827:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0827:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0827:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=827New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0827/COM_COM(2011)0827(COR1)_EN.pdf |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0827:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0827:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0827:EN
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|