Progress: Procedure lapsed or withdrawn
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | GARDINI Elisabetta ( PPE), CORREIA DE CAMPOS António Fernando ( S&D), PANAYOTOV Vladko Todorov ( ALDE), RIVASI Michèle ( Verts/ALE), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen ( ECR) | |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | TORVALDS Nils ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 007
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 007Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 524 votes to 91, with 64 abstentions, in the context of a special legislative procedure (European Parliament consultation), a legislative resolution Committee on the proposal for a Council decision on the adoption of a Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project (2014-2018).
Parliament gave a favourable opinion on the Commission proposal subject to amendments:
Financing : Parliament considered that the Programme should be funded through the Union's own resources as opposed to Member State contributions as proposed by the Commission.
Members called for the Programme to be financed through a maximum contribution of EUR 2 573 000 000 (in current values) over and above the ceilings of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), namely outside Heading 1A, and in addition to the budget for the Horizon 2020 programme, the EURATOM framework programme or other Union programmes, while maintaining the full powers of both arms of the budgetary authority.
Parliament proposed that the MFF regulation should set a ring-fenced maximum amount for contributions from the Union budget for the years 2014-2018 . Any cost overruns above this maximum amount shall not have any impact on the budgetary allocations for other projects and shall be financed through additional resources over and above the ceilings as appropriate.
Protection of EU financial interests : Parliament called on the Commission to put in place appropriate measures ensuring adequate risk control and the avoidance of cost overruns.
Given the magnitude and the past considerable shortcomings of the ITER project close scrutiny by the European Parliament will be required in its capacity as budgetary authority and discharge authority, and the Commission shall inform the European Parliament of the development of the Programme, in particular in terms of costs and schedule, on a regular basis.
The results of such audits, on-the-spot checks and inspections shall be forwarded to the European Parliament.
Scientific and technical objective : the resolution stated that the priorities proposed in the 2012 EFDA (European Fusion Development Agreement) should be taken into account in order to ensure that ITER will play a key role in the energy transition.
The demonstration of competitive electricity production by 2050 must be ensured . In response to that target, Parliament called on the Commission to review the Programme regularly and produce a progress report on an annual basis in response to physics, technological, budgetary and safety challenges.
Harnessing fusion energy is a significant challenge and in order to best meet some of this challenge, it is essential that the Union makes every effort to support and exploit the efforts of the Joint European Taurus (JET) facility in order to help bridge any knowledge or experience gap.
Implementation : the Commission shall submit a mid-term review of the progress of the Programme to the European Parliament and the Council for their opinion before 30 June 2016.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the report by Vladimir REMEK (GUE/NGL, CZ) on the proposal for a Council decision on the adoption of a Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project (2014-2018).
The committee gives a favourable opinion on the Commission proposal as amended:
Financing : Members consider that the Programme should be funded through the Union's own resources as opposed to Member State contributions as proposed by the Commission.
According to the committee, the Programme shall be financed through a maximum contribution of EUR 2 573 000 000 (in current values) over and above the ceilings of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), namely outside Heading 1A, and in addition to the budget for the Horizon 2020 programme, the EURATOM framework programme or other Union programmes, while maintaining the full powers of both arms of the budgetary authority.
The report proposes that the MFF regulation should set a ring-fenced maximum amount for contributions from the Union budget for the years 2014-2018 . Any cost overruns above this maximum amount shall not have any impact on the budgetary allocations for other projects and shall be financed through additional resources over and above the ceilings as appropriate.
Protection of EU financial interests : Members calls on the Commission to put in place appropriate measures ensuring adequate risk control and the avoidance of cost overruns.
Given the magnitude and the past considerable shortcomings of the ITER project close scrutiny by the European Parliament will be required in its capacity as budgetary authority and discharge authority, and the Commission shall inform the European Parliament of the development of the Programme, in particular in terms of costs and schedule, on a regular basis.
The results of such audits, on-the-spot checks and inspections shall be forwarded to the European Parliament.
Scientific and technical objective : the report states that the priorities proposed in the 2012 EFDA (European Fusion Development Agreement) should be taken into account in order to ensure that ITER will play a key role in the energy transition.
The demonstration of competitive electricity production by 2050 must be ensured . In response to that target, the Commission shall review the Programme regularly and produce a progress report on an annual basis in response to physics, technological, budgetary and safety challenges.
Harnessing fusion energy is a significant challenge and in order to best meet some of this challenge, it is essential that the Union makes every effort to support and exploit the efforts of the Joint European Taurus (JET) facility in order to help bridge any knowledge or experience gap.
Implementation : the Commission shall submit a mid-term review of the progress of the Programme to the European Parliament and the Council for their opinion before 30 June 2016.
PURPOSE: to adopt a Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project (2014-2018).
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
BACKGROUND: the Agreement on the Establishment of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization for the Joint Implementation of the ITER Project was signed on 21 November 2006 by the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), the People's Republic of China, India, Japan, Korea, Russia and the United States of America. The ITER Agreement establishes the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization, which has full responsibility for constructing, operating, exploiting and de-activating the ITER facilities.
The ITER Agreement requires all parties to provide contributions to the ITER Organization through appropriate legal entities referred to as "Domestic Agencies".
The estimated costs for ITER construction increased compared to the initial estimates of 2001 . In its conclusions of 12 July 2010 on ITER status and possible way forward, the Council of the European Union limited the European contribution to the ITER construction phase to an amount of EUR 6.6 billion in 2008 value . According to those conclusions, the European contribution is funded by Euratom (80%) and by France (20%) and includes construction costs, running costs and contingencies. As a result of those conclusions, the Commission proposed to amend the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management as regards the multiannual framework (MFF) for the period 2007-2013 to provide additional funds for ITER for the period of 2012-2013.
For the period after 2013 the Commission in its communication “ A Budget for Europe 2020 ” proposed to fund the ITER project outside the MFF . Therefore a Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project should be established for the period of 2014 to 2018.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: t his proposal takes full account of the responses to a.
On the basis of the Communication of 29 June 2011, s everal options for the modalities of funding the ITER project outside the MFF have been examined. The creation of a Supplementary Research Programme funded with contributions from Member States will provide continuity for the project, in particular vis-à-vis our international partners. It will also avoid a renegotiation process to modify the ITER Agreement, a complex process surrounded by uncertainties.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 7 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community.
CONTENT: t he proposed Supplementary Research Programme covers the contributions to the construction of the ITER facility, procurement of equipment and installations and general technical and administrative support for the project during construction, and participation in commissioning and initial operation, as well as other ITER related activities, such as those under the Broader Approach Agreement.
Euratom will continue to participate in the governance , management and staffing of the ITER Organization and Fusion for Energy in accordance with the provisions of the agreement establishing the ITER Organization and the Council Decision establishing Fusion for Energy.
The Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project should be funded by contributions from the Member States based on a call rate applied to each Member State's Gross National Income (GNI) as defined for the purpose of calculating the GNI own resource contribution to the General Budget of the European Union. Those contributions shall be made to the General Budget of the European Union, and shall be assigned to that Programme .
Third countries which have concluded a cooperation agreement with Euratom in the field of controlled nuclear fusion that associates their respective research programmes with the Euratom programmes should also be able to contribute to that Programme.
The financial interests of the Union should be protected through proportionate measures throughout the expenditure cycle, including the prevention, detection and investigation of irregularities, the recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where appropriate, penalties.
The scientific and technical content of ITER activities are unchanged in this Supplementary Research Programme.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the Programme shall be financed through a maximum contribution of EUR 2.573 billion (in current values).
PURPOSE: to adopt a Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project (2014-2018).
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
BACKGROUND: the Agreement on the Establishment of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization for the Joint Implementation of the ITER Project was signed on 21 November 2006 by the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), the People's Republic of China, India, Japan, Korea, Russia and the United States of America. The ITER Agreement establishes the ITER International Fusion Energy Organization, which has full responsibility for constructing, operating, exploiting and de-activating the ITER facilities.
The ITER Agreement requires all parties to provide contributions to the ITER Organization through appropriate legal entities referred to as "Domestic Agencies".
The estimated costs for ITER construction increased compared to the initial estimates of 2001 . In its conclusions of 12 July 2010 on ITER status and possible way forward, the Council of the European Union limited the European contribution to the ITER construction phase to an amount of EUR 6.6 billion in 2008 value . According to those conclusions, the European contribution is funded by Euratom (80%) and by France (20%) and includes construction costs, running costs and contingencies. As a result of those conclusions, the Commission proposed to amend the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management as regards the multiannual framework (MFF) for the period 2007-2013 to provide additional funds for ITER for the period of 2012-2013.
For the period after 2013 the Commission in its communication “ A Budget for Europe 2020 ” proposed to fund the ITER project outside the MFF . Therefore a Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project should be established for the period of 2014 to 2018.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: t his proposal takes full account of the responses to a.
On the basis of the Communication of 29 June 2011, s everal options for the modalities of funding the ITER project outside the MFF have been examined. The creation of a Supplementary Research Programme funded with contributions from Member States will provide continuity for the project, in particular vis-à-vis our international partners. It will also avoid a renegotiation process to modify the ITER Agreement, a complex process surrounded by uncertainties.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 7 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community.
CONTENT: t he proposed Supplementary Research Programme covers the contributions to the construction of the ITER facility, procurement of equipment and installations and general technical and administrative support for the project during construction, and participation in commissioning and initial operation, as well as other ITER related activities, such as those under the Broader Approach Agreement.
Euratom will continue to participate in the governance , management and staffing of the ITER Organization and Fusion for Energy in accordance with the provisions of the agreement establishing the ITER Organization and the Council Decision establishing Fusion for Energy.
The Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project should be funded by contributions from the Member States based on a call rate applied to each Member State's Gross National Income (GNI) as defined for the purpose of calculating the GNI own resource contribution to the General Budget of the European Union. Those contributions shall be made to the General Budget of the European Union, and shall be assigned to that Programme .
Third countries which have concluded a cooperation agreement with Euratom in the field of controlled nuclear fusion that associates their respective research programmes with the Euratom programmes should also be able to contribute to that Programme.
The financial interests of the Union should be protected through proportionate measures throughout the expenditure cycle, including the prevention, detection and investigation of irregularities, the recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where appropriate, penalties.
The scientific and technical content of ITER activities are unchanged in this Supplementary Research Programme.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the Programme shall be financed through a maximum contribution of EUR 2.573 billion (in current values).
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)87
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0468/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0211/2013
- Committee opinion: PE504.395
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE506.175
- Committee draft report: PE504.209
- Contribution: COM(2011)0931
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1295/2012
- Debate in Council: 3147
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0931
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0931
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0931 EUR-Lex
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1295/2012
- Committee draft report: PE504.209
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE506.175
- Committee opinion: PE504.395
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)87
- Contribution: COM(2011)0931
Votes
A7-0211/2013 - Vladimír Remek - Am 30 #
A7-0211/2013 - Vladimír Remek - Am 27rev #
A7-0211/2013 - Vladimír Remek - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
61 |
2011/0460(NLE)
2013/03/01
ITRE
59 amendments...
Amendment 13 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to the fact that the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community still does not entitle the European Parliament to be a co- legislator,
Amendment 14 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 2 – having regard to Article 7 of the Euratom Treaty, pursuant to which the Council merely consulted Parliament (C7- 0032/2012),
Amendment 15 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 16 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 17 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 18 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal in order for Euratom to stop the construction of the experimental reactor ITER and quit the ITER accord;
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 (1) The Agreement on the Establishment of the ITER(international thermonuclear experimental reactor) International Fusion Energy Organi
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The ITER Agreement allows the parties to withdraw from this agreement;
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 (3) In the framework of the negotiations to obtain the support of the other ITER parties to fix the site for ITER in Europe, the Agreement between the European Atomic Energy Community and the Government of Japan for the Joint Implementation of the Broader Approach Activities in the Field of Fusion Energy Research was concluded in 2007 setting out complementary joint fusion research activities in the territory of Japan to ensure the rapid start-up of high performance operation of ITER. The Broader Approach activities and other ITER related activities are channelled through the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy. The funding of the Broader Approach activities is mainly ensured by in kind contributions from some members of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy, while the remaining part of the Euratom contribution is covered by the Euratom budget. The 2012 European Fusion Development Agreement (EFDA) Roadmap to the Realisation of Fusion Energy identifies the need for the continuous financial support for key projects, and for research and development activities in key domains, until the start date of ITER's functioning, in order to resolve the scientific and technological challenges leading to the realisation of fusion energy.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 (4) The estimated costs for ITER construction
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 (4) The estimated costs for ITER construction increased compared to the initial estimates of 2001, on which the ITER Agreement was based. In its conclusions of 12 July 2010 on ITER status and possible way forward, the Council of the European Union
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 a (new) (4a) The maximum amount of ITER funding should be respected and not breached. Any cost overruns should not threaten the funding and successful implementation of other Union policies.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 a (new) (4a) The 2010 cost forecasts for the construction of ITER have still to be amended despite countless overruns;
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5)
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) For the period after 2013 the Commission in its communication ‘A Budget for Europe 2020’ proposed to fund the ITER project o
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) For the period after 2013 the Commission in its communication “A Budget for Europe 2020” rightly proposed to fund the ITER project outside the MFF
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 a (new) (5a) The European contribution to the cumulative total cost of constructing and running ITER, including contingencies, shall under no circumstances exceed the amount set out by the Council on 12 July 2010. Future budget overruns shall affect the European taxpayer or European budget in no way, shape or form. The Commission shall also carry out an assessment as soon as possible of how much it will cost to withdraw from service and decommission ITER.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 (6) The Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project should be funded
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 (6) The Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project should be funded
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 (6) The Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project should be funded
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 (6) The Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project should be funded by voluntary contributions from the Member States
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Despite cost containment measures which should continue to be implemented, the ITER project may continue to incur cost overruns due to its scientific nature, and to its high magnitude and technological risk. This should not threaten the limited resources of the Union Budget and the implementation of other important Union policies, namely in the Heading "Competiveness for growth and employment". The ring-fencing of the Union budget against such cost overruns needs to benefit from the appropriate legal safeguards.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Accordingly it is clear that the ITER project will not be funded from the EU general budget as set out in the multiannual financial framework (MFF). Its funding must be guaranteed separately and must in particular not be taken from the Category 1a research budget (Horizon 2020).
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Any cost overruns above the maximum amount of (...) laid down in Article 3 should not have any impact on other projects financed from the Union budget and should be financed through additional resources over and above the ceilings as appropriate.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 b (new) (7b) Both arms of the budgetary authority should agree that any postponement or rolling over of unmet payment appropriations related to the ITER project should be avoided and should commit to working together in order to avoid such a situation.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 8 (8) The Scientific and Technical Committee provided to the Commission, but not to Parliament, its opinion concerning the Euratom Research
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 8 a (new) (8a) Both arms of the budgetary authority should agree that any postponement or rolling over of unmet payment appropriations related to the ITER project should be avoided, and should commit to working together in order to avoid that such a situation occurs;
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 8 a (new) (8a) As called for in the priorities proposed in the 2012 EFDA fusion roadmap the Joint European Torus (JET) project should play a key role in the energy transition
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 The Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project is established for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018 (hereinafter the "Programme"). It shall finance activities
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 The Programme shall be financed through a maximum contribution of EUR 2,573 million (in current values)
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 The Programme shall be financed through
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 The Programme shall be funded
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 The Programme shall be funded by the Multiannual Financial Framework over and above the MFF ceilings, namely outside Heading 1A. Any cost overruns above the maximum contribution defined in Article 2 shall have no impact on the Union's Budget and shall be funded by contributions of the Member States, based on a call rate applied to each Member State's Gross National Income (GNI) as defined for the purposes of calculating GNI own resource contribution to the General Budget of the European Union. Those contributions shall be considered as external assigned revenue for the Programme in accordance with [Article XX of Regulation (EU) No XX/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council [New Financial Regulation]
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 The Programme shall be funded by voluntary contributions
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 The Programme shall be funded by contributions of the Member States, based on a call rate applied to each Member State's Gross National Income (GNI) as defined for the purposes of calculating GNI own resource contribution to the General Budget of the European Union. Those contributions shall be considered as external assigned revenue for the Programme in accordance with [Article XX of Regulation (EU) No XX/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council [New Financial Regulation]. The programme shall not be financed from the general budget of the EU as set out in the MFF.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 1 Third countries which have concluded a cooperation agreement with Euratom in the field of controlled nuclear fusion that associates their respective research programmes with the Euratom programmes (hereinafter "associated countries") may
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) The Commission shall submit a mid-term review of the progress of the 2014-2018 Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project to the Council and to Parliament, for its opinion, before 30 June 2016.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Commission shall take appropriate measures ensuring that, when actions financed under this Decision are implemented, the financial interests of the Union are protected by the application of preventive measures against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, by effective checks and, where irregularities are detected, by the recovery of the amounts wrongly paid and
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The Commission shall take appropriate measures ensuring that, when actions financed under this Decision are implemented, the financial interests of the Union are protected by the application of preventive measures against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, by effective checks and, where irregularities or errors are detected, by the recovery of the amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by effective, proportionate and deterrent penalties.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The European Parliament, the Commission or its representatives and the Court of Auditors shall have the power of audit, on the basis of documents and on- the-spot checks and inspections, over all grant beneficiaries, contractors, subcontractors and other third parties who have received Union funds under this Decision.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 Without prejudice to the first and second subparagraphs, cooperation agreements with third countries and international organisations, grant agreements, grant decisions and contracts resulting from the implementation of this Decision shall expressly empower the Commission, the Court of Auditors and the OLAF to conduct audits, on-the-spot checks and inspections. The results of the audits shall be forwarded to the European Parliament.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Commission shall take appropriate measures ensuring that, when actions financed under this Decision are implemented, the financial interests of the Union are protected by the application of preventive measures against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, by effective checks and, where irregularities are detected, by the recovery of the amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by effective, proportionate and deterrent penalties. The Commission shall also put in place appropriate measures ensuring adequate risk control and the avoidance of cost overruns.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. The Commission shall take appropriate measures ensuring that, when actions financed under this Decision are implemented, the financial interests of the Union are protected by the application of preventive measures against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, by effective checks and, where irregularities are detected, by the recovery of the amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by effective, proportionate and deterrent penalties. The Commission shall also put in place appropriate measures ensuring adequate risk control and the avoidance of cost overruns.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The Commission or its representatives and the Court of Auditors shall have the power of audit, on the basis of documents and on- the-spot checks and inspections, over all grant beneficiaries, contractors, subcontractors and other third parties who have received Union funds under this Decision. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament on the development of the programme in particular in terms of cost and schedule on a regular basis.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Additional funds for the ITER project will not be covered by the aforementioned budget. Furthermore, any unforeseen funding over the stated limit will not draw upon funds from parallel project funds.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Scientific and technological Objective – paragraph 1 The objective of the Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project shall be to implement ITER
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Scientific and technological Objective – paragraph 1 The objective of the Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project shall be to implement ITER as a major step towards the creation of prototype reactors for fusion power stations that are safe,
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Scientific and technological Objective – paragraph 2 The
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Scientific and technological Objective – paragraph 2 The first priority of the strategy to achieve the objective shall be the construction of ITER (a major experimental facility which demonstrates the scientific and technical feasibility of fusion power), followed by the construction of a demonstration fusion power plant. As well as the priorities proposed in the 2012 EFDA fusion roadmap in order to ensure that ITER will play a key role in the energy transition.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Rationale – paragraph 1 Fusion
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Rationale – paragraph 1 Fusion has the potential to make a major contribution to the realisation of a sustainable and secure energy supply for the Union a few decades from now. Its successful development would provide energy which is safe,
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Rationale – paragraph 1 Fusion has the potential to make a major contribution to the realisation of a sustainable and secure energy supply for the Union a few decades from now. Its
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Rationale – paragraph 1 a (new) The immense drain on financial and budgetary resources caused by the ITER project cannot be allowed to continue. ITER must, therefore either be fully built before the end of the Supplementary Programme or abandoned altogether.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Rationale – paragraph 2 Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Activities – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Activities – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Activities – paragraph 2 – point c (c) As appropriate, other activities in order to prepare the basis for the design of a demonstration reactor and related facilities, mainly those required to properly solve the remaining issues concerning DEMO construction and operation.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Activities – paragraph 2 – point c (c) As appropriate, other activities in order to prepare the basis for the design of a demonstration reactor and related facilities. This will include ensuring the continuance of the JET exploitation until the start date of ITER's full functioning.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Activities – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) To implement an industrial policy suitable for involving industry, including small and medium-sized enterprises, in order to foster competition and to prepare the European system for the fusion era.
source: PE-506.175
2013/03/06
BUDG
2 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) For the period after 2013 the Commission in its communication ‘A Budget for Europe 2020’13 proposed to fund the ITER project outside the MFF. Therefore a Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project should be established for the period of 2014 to 2018. On the basis of the overall cost to be agreed, the funding should be ring fenced in commitment appropriations in the MFF regulation in order to guarantee the funding for ITER without jeopardising other EU priorities like Horizon 2020 or the Erasmus Programme.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. The Commission or its representatives and the Court of Auditors shall have the power of audit, on the basis of documents and on-the-spot checks and inspections, over all grant beneficiaries, contractors, subcontractors and other third parties who have received Union funds under this Decision. Considers that the magnitude and the past severe shortcomings of the ITER project calls for close scrutiny from the European Parliament in its capacity of budget authority and discharge authority. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament on the development of the programme in particular in terms of cost and schedule on a regular basis.
source: PE-506.228
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0931/COM_COM(2011)0931_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0931/COM_COM(2011)0931_EN.pdf |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=NLE&year=2011&number=0460&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2011&number=0460&appLng=EN |
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1295)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1295)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.209New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-504209_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.175New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-506175_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.395&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-504395_EN.html |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0211_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0211_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0931/COM_COM(2011)0931_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0931/COM_COM(2011)0931_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-211&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0211_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0468New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0468_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/08406New
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0931:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0931:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0931/COM_COM(2011)0931_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0931/COM_COM(2011)0931_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting final decisionNew
Procedure lapsed or withdrawn |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|