Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | BÜTIKOFER Reinhard ( Verts/ALE) | RÜBIG Paul ( PPE), ULVSKOG Marita ( S&D), PANAYOTOV Vladko Todorov ( ALDE), SZYMAŃSKI Konrad ( ECR), TZAVELA Niki ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | SCHNIEBER-JASTRAM Birgit ( PPE) | Judith SARGENTINI ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | AFET | BROK Elmar ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | SÂRBU Daciana Octavia ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | LANGE Bernd ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | MERKIES Judith A. ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
When the European Parliament endorsed the Effective Raw Materials Strategy for Europe, it asked to be regularly informed on the development of non-energy raw materials in the framework of the RMI and on the fulfilment of the latter’s objectives via an annual progress report, also focusing on policy coherence with regard to trade, development and environmental policies and social impacts, as well as data on Critical Raw Materials (CRM). This report presents the state of play with respect to the implementation of the Raw Materials Initiative (RMI) and an overview of the ongoing initiatives while highlighting the joint interest for the EU and third countries rich in raw materials to work in partnership.
- Critical Raw materials: in June 2010, the Commission published an expert report, which established a methodology for the identification of raw materials deemed critical to the EU. The assessment was based on a quantitative methodology using the criteria of economic importance, supply risk and environmental country risk.
The critical raw materials list has proven successful in serving as a tool to raise the attention of policy-makers, promote co-ordination of national policies regarding mineral supply and critical materials, challenge trade distortive measures regarding critical raw materials, analyse the functioning of the markets, promote research (exploration, substitution, recycling) as well as promote access to deposits in the EU, address problems of illegal exports end-of-life products containing critical materials and undertaking measures for specific materials. In order to revise the list of critical raw materials by the first half of 2014, and to take into account inputs and recommendations from the public consultation and Parliament’s resolution, the Commission has contracted a study. The review will cover the current list of 14 critical raw materials; selected “nearly critical raw materials”, such as rhenium and tellurium; selected additional materials, such as hafnium, selenium and tin, and, lastly, wood and natural rubber. The Commission plans to issue a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the review of the critical raw materials list by the end of 2013.
- Stockpiling: to explore the option of stockpiling, the Commission contracted a study to carry out a preliminary assessment which analysed different stockpiling policies and practices, and examined the current raw material stockpiling schemes employed worldwide, as well as the potential costs and benefits of a stockpiling programme of critical raw materials. The study considered as a valid option the possibility of organising a voluntary stockpiling scheme by the industry with public financial support . It also recognises that stockpiling can only solve short-term problems whereas long-term shortage of raw materials requires structural solutions with regards to supply (substitution, recycling, domestic extraction).
- Raw Materials European Innovation Partnership (EIP): the EIP will aim to provide Europe with enough flexibility and alternatives in the supply of important raw materials, whilst taking into account the importance of mitigating the negative environmental impacts of some materials during their life cycle. It will address all stages of the value chain, as well as innovations in the area of substitution. One of its concrete targets is actually to support up to ten innovative pilot actions / demonstration plants in the various sectors of the value chain.
- Fair and sustainable supply of raw materials from global markets: with regard to the EU’s Trade Strategy for Raw Materials, the Commission will continue to monitor ongoing and future negotiations of FTAs and other bilateral frameworks to ensure that the issue of raw materials is considered and integrated, where appropriate. The EU has also engaged in raw materials dialogues and diplomacy . This aims to engage with partners through strategic partnerships and policy dialogues to exchange information and work together to address the challenges on raw materials' markets.
- Development policy: the EU’s development policy also has an important role to play in Raw Materials Diplomacy, building beneficial situations for both developing countries and the EU in the area of raw materials. In the context of the Strategic Partnership between Africa and the EU, both sides agreed to intensify their co-operation in the area of raw materials. Action has also been taken to promote financial transparency (e.g. the legislative proposal requiring the disclosure of payments to governments and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative). Among other things, the Commission is closely involved in international efforts to address the issue of conflict minerals and strongly supports the OECD's Due Diligence Guidance on Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals of Minerals from Conflict-affected and High Risk Areas. As regards traceability of mineral s, the Commission is exploring ways of improving transparency throughout the supply chain , including aspects of due diligence, thereby building on the experience of the well-established Kimberley Process, the EITI, the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Action plan and the Timber Regulation.
- Fostering sustainable supply within the EU: the Commission acts mainly as a facilitator for the exchange of best practice as many of the areas related to extractive industries fall within the competence of the Member States. Following the launch of the Commission's Raw Materials Initiative in 2008, an increasing number of Member States (such as France, Germany, Finland, Greece, the Netherlands and, recently, Portugal) have been developing national strategies , which can be considered as complementary to the EU raw materials strategy. Fulfilling its commitment to "further enhance the knowledge base necessary for an efficient raw materials strategy", the Commission launched several studies and research projects. With the aim of promoting research and skills , it is expected that, in the context of Horizon 2020, raw materials will be reflected as a societal challenge, with a dedicated budget.
- Boosting resource efficiency and promoting recycling: in 2012, the Commission also included sustainability issues – including waste – in the new integrated industrial policy . It also launched in 2012 a ' fitness check ' of five waste stream directives and waste management targets. The methodology for the preparation of Ecodesign Regulations for energy-related products (MEErP) is under review in order to strengthen resource efficiency aspects. The Commission is also currently assessing the impacts of possible future legislative and non-legislative measures to curb illegal shipments of waste .
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on an effective raw materials strategy for Europe in response to the Commission communication entitled “Tackling the challenges in commodity markets and on raw materials”.
Parliament considers that the EU requires a strong industrial base, which is highly dependent upon adequate supplies of raw materials (RM). However, worldwide demand for RM has been steadily increasing, especially for ‘technology metals’ and advances in new technologies will continue to increase demand for resources central to the development of these industries. International supply is partly restricted by export quotas, and prices are reaching record heights. Increased competition over RM can aggravate international relations and lead to resource conflicts. In this context, Parliament makes the following recommendations:
(1) A raw materials strategy and resource diplomacy : the re solution emphasises that the availability of fair access to, and stable and predictable prices of, RM are of vital importance for the development potential, competitiveness, innovation and preservation of European industry. Members believe that resource policy and resource diplomacy are of high importance for the EU , not only with regard to industrial policy and international trade but also as a transversal issue concerning different fields of domestic policy, as well as foreign and security policy.
The responsibility for a coherent and effective EU diplomacy must lie with the EEAS and the relevant Commission services – and especially with DG Trade with regard to trade issues – acting in close coordination with the Council and Parliament.
Parliament calls on the Commission to give adequate focus to commodity markets and the Raw Materials Initiative ( RMI ) separately, since the two fields differ in nature and require specific measures to address their divergent problems. It calls on the Commission: (i) to update regularly the critical raw materials (CRM) list and to observe non-scarce but strategically important RM with a view to countering tendencies towards inflation that give rise to concentrations in ownership of suppliers; (ii) to establish a 'risk radar for CRM', to analyse current and future needs and prices as well as the negative effects of shortages in potential CRM, especially REE, with regard to the renewable-energy, high-technology, defence and even automotive sectors; (iii) to analyse the supply chains depending on CRM, the refining capacity, also leading to semi-finished products, and the interaction between CRM and their associated base metals.
Parliament recommends the establishment of a high-level interdepartmental RM task force in 2011 , encompassing the relevant DGs, the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Environment Agency and the EEAS, to elaborate, monitor and review policies, including partnership agreements, to ensure strategic coherence and to promote the establishment of an early-warning system, inter alia for market distortion and resource-fuelled conflicts.
The Commission is called upon:
to set up a long-term 'European Raw Materials Roadmap to 2050' , which would identify future developments, threats and opportunities in the RM and CRM sectors and which could help European industries, academic and research institutions to engage in long-term planning and investment; to support Member States in developing their own RM strategies and to foster coordination and the exchange of best practice among them, including on the external dimension.
(2) Resource efficiency, re-use, recycling and substitution : Members note that overcoming the RM challenges provides an opportunity to invigorate the EU’s industrial base, technological capacity and know-how and to increase competitiveness and stable qualified employment via an ambitious industrial innovation strategy. They note that notwithstanding the importance of an effective trade policy and the use of own resources, good RM governance and increasing efficiencies, re-use, energy-efficient recycling, lowering resource use, also through improved product quality standards and the 'use-it-longer' principle, where appropriate, and employing green technologies will be key to competitiveness, sustainability and supply security in the medium to long term.
Members believe that:
any initiative in this regard should be based on proper impact assessments focusing on potential environmental, social, and competitiveness impacts; it is important to apply consistently the legally binding European Waste Hierarchy as set out in the Waste Framework Directive, which prioritises prevention, reuse and recycling, followed by recovery and disposal; social innovation , lifestyle changes and new concepts such as eco-leasing, chemical leasing and sharing should be supported by the Commission.
The Commission is called upon to: (i) consider extending, based on a thorough impact assessment, the ecodesign approach to RM ; (ii) develop a recycling strategy with retrieval as close to the source of waste as possible, including the purification of waste water; (iii) submit a proposal to amend the Landfill Directive; (iv) identify priorities for research and innovation into sustainable exploration and production methods, product lifecycles and recycling (cradle-to-cradle), substitution and resource efficiency.
(3) Sustainable supply in the EU: Parliament calls for non-fiscal policies to support domestic RM sectors in attracting investments. It welcomes, therefore, cooperation between national geological surveys; calls for increased collaboration between them and encourages the use of common standards and practices that would facilitate the exchange and exploitation of available geological data. Members ask the Commission to assess whether the creation of an EU Geological Service that pools the work of national surveys and works with international partners is necessary.
Noting the importance and supply of domestic RM supply in Europe , the resolution calls, therefore:
for better coordination with regard to exploration, extraction, distribution, processing, reusing and recycling; on the competent public authorities (national, regional and local) to apply clear, efficient and coordinated administrative procedures for the granting of authorisations to exploit domestic RM, possibly including establishing a one-stop shop to ease and accelerate the licensing process; on the Member States to draw up land use planning policies, including long-term estimates for regional and local mineral demand.
The Commission is called upon to assess the need for setting up a stockpiling mechanism for CRM , especially rare earth elements (REE), which would guarantee European companies access to strategic materials used in green, high-tech, defence and health industries and protection against monopolist pressure and price rises.
(4) International fair and sustainable supply of raw materials : noting the increasing incidence of trade restrictions and distortions of competition in trade in RM, Members call on the Commission to consistently monitor and address on regional, multi-and-bilateral levels the issue of export and import restrictions. They support the creation in the WTO of a monitoring tool on tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade on RM and REE and the setting-up in the G20 of a 'Raw Materials and Rare Earths Stability Board' . They stress the need for trade and technology dialogue with China.
Parliament welcomes the EU’s intention of pursuing an active RM diplomacy which encompasses various policies such as foreign, trade, environment and development policies and which promotes and strengthens democratic principles, human rights, regional stability, transparency and sustainable development. It believes that concrete priority actions and a comprehensive strategy for sustainable supply of REE need to be developed in the very short term.
The resolution stresses the role that corporate social responsibility plays by adhering to high environmental and social and labour standards abroad and applying best available technologies. In this context, Members call on the Commission to come forward with a proposal of its own on country-by-country reporting concerning conflict minerals and to establish legally binding requirements for extractive companies to publish their revenue payments for each project and country they invest in, following the example of the US Dodd-Frank bill.
Members consider that EU companies should be legally liable in their home countries for any violation of human rights, environmental standards or ILO core labour standards by their subsidiaries abroad and the entities they control.
Members are concerned about the continuing trade in, and use of, minerals from conflict zones, whose production gives rise to unacceptable violence and illegal activities. They call on the Commission and the EU’s strategic suppliers’ countries to jointly develop effective RM traceability systems from import through to recycling or disposal and to introduce a mutual certification scheme for RM and their trading chains (Certified Trading Chains), so that trade can be guaranteed to be fair.
In addition, the Commission is asked to take the necessary measures to ensure there is transparency on commodity markets and to act decisively against unjustified commodities speculation, leading to commodity market abuse.
(5) Agricultural products and commodity markets : Parliament supports the analysis provided by the Commission with regard to agricultural products in the context of global food security, with diminishing global food reserves and increasing population and hunger.
The role of financial instruments and speculative behaviour as a possible cause of instability must be seriously considered. In this context, Members ask the Commission to propose concrete measures to guarantee food security, tackle market instability and, with sustainable overall responsibility, reinforce the operability of the derivatives markets for agricultural commodities as a matter of urgency.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Reinhard BÜTIKOFER (Greens/EFA, DE) in response to the Commission communication entitled “Tackling the challenges in commodity markets and on raw materials”.
(1) A Raw Materials Strategy : the report emphasises that the availability of fair access to, and stable and predictable prices of, RM are of vital importance for the development potential, competitiveness, innovation and preservation of European industry. Members believe that resource policy and resource diplomacy are of high importance for the EU , not only with regard to industrial policy and international trade but also as a transversal issue concerning different fields of domestic policy, as well as foreign and security policy.
The responsibility for a coherent and effective EU diplomacy must lie with the EEAS and the relevant Commission services – and especially with DG Trade with regard to trade issues – acting in close coordination with the Council and Parliament.
The report calls on the Commission to give adequate focus to commodity markets and the Raw Materials Initiative ( RMI ) separately, since the two fields differ in nature and require specific measures to address their divergent problems. It calls on the Commission: (i) to regularly update the critical raw materials (CRM) list and to observe non-scarce but strategically important RM with a view to countering tendencies towards inflation that give rise to concentrations in ownership of suppliers; (ii) to establish a 'risk radar for CRM', to analyse current and future needs and prices as well as the negative effects of shortages in potential CRM, especially REE, with regard to the renewable-energy, high-technology, defence and even automotive sectors; (iii) to analyse the supply chains depending on CRM, the refining capacity, also leading to semi-finished products, and the interaction between CRM and their associated base metals.
The report recommends the establishment of a high-level interdepartmental RM task force in 2011 , encompassing the relevant DGs, the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Environment Agency and the EEAS, to elaborate, monitor and review policies, including partnership agreements, to ensure strategic coherence and to promote the establishment of an early-warning system, inter alia for market distortion and resource-fuelled conflicts.
The Commission is called upon:
to set up a long-term 'European Raw Materials Roadmap to 2050' , which would identify future developments, threats and opportunities in the RM and CRM sectors and which could help European industries, academic and research institutions to engage in long-term planning and investment; to support Member States in developing their own RM strategies and to foster coordination and the exchange of best practice among them, including on the external dimension; suggests that the upcoming communication on the external dimension of energy could serve as a template.
(2) Resource efficiency, re-use, recycling and substitution : Members note that overcoming the RM challenges provides an opportunity to invigorate the EU’s industrial base, technological capacity and know-how and to increase competitiveness and stable qualified employment via an ambitious industrial innovation strategy. They note that notwithstanding the importance of an effective trade policy and the use of own resources, good RM governance and increasing efficiencies, re-use, energy-efficient recycling, lowering resource use, also through improved product quality standards and the 'use-it-longer' principle, where appropriate, and employing green technologies will be key to competitiveness, sustainability and supply security in the medium to long term.
Members believe that:
· any initiative in this regard should be based on proper impact assessments focusing on potential environmental, social, and competitiveness impacts;
· it is important to apply consistently the legally binding European Waste Hierarchy as set out in the Waste Framework Directive, which prioritises prevention, reuse and recycling, followed by recovery and disposal;
· social innovation , lifestyle changes and new concepts such as eco-leasing, chemical leasing and sharing should be supported by the Commission.
The Commission is called upon to: (i) develop a recycling strategy with retrieval as close to the source of waste as possible, including the purification of waste water; (ii) submit a proposal to amend the Landfill Directive; (iii) support recycling partnerships with developing countries; (iv) support pilot projects like zero-waste zones; (v) evaluate how the European Investment Bank (EIB) can help reduce the financial risks of investments in breakthrough-technology recycling plants and other recycling initiatives.
(3) Sustainable supply in the EU : the report calls for non-fiscal policies to support domestic RM sectors in attracting investments. It welcomes, therefore, cooperation between national geological surveys; calls for increased collaboration between them and encourages the use of common standards and practices that would facilitate the exchange and exploitation of available geological data. Members ask the Commission to assess whether the creation of an EU Geological Service that pools the work of national surveys and works with international partners is necessary.
Noting the importance and supply of domestic RM supply in Europe , the report calls, therefore:
for better coordination with regard to exploration, extraction, distribution, processing, reusing and recycling; on the competent public authorities (national, regional and local) to apply clear, efficient and coordinated administrative procedures for the granting of authorisations to exploit domestic RM, possibly including establishing a one-stop shop to ease and accelerate the licensing process; on the Member States to draw up land use planning policies, including long-term estimates for regional and local mineral demand.
The Commission is called upon to assess the need for setting up a stockpiling mechanism for CRM , especially rare earth elements (REE), which would guarantee European companies access to strategic materials used in green, high-tech, defence and health industries and protection against monopolist pressure and price rises. The report underlines the fact that the role of the EU in any potential stockpiling programme should be limited to providing the legal framework and regulatory oversight.
(4) International fair and sustainable supply of raw materials : noting the increasing incidence of trade restrictions and distortions of competition in trade in RM, Members call on the Commission to consistently monitor and address on regional, multi-and-bilateral levels the issue of export and import restrictions. They support the creation in the WTO of a monitoring tool on tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade on RM and REE and the setting-up in the G20 of a 'Raw Materials and Rare Earths Stability Board' . The report stresses the need for trade and technology dialogue with China.
The committee welcomes the EU’s intention of pursuing an active RM diplomacy which encompasses various policies such as foreign, trade, environment and development policies and which promotes and strengthens democratic principles, human rights, regional stability, transparency and sustainable development. It believes that concrete priority actions and a comprehensive strategy for sustainable supply of REE need to be developed in the very short term.
The report stresses the role that corporate social responsibility plays by adhering to high environmental and social and labour standards abroad and applying best available technologies. In this context, Members call on the Commission to come forward with a proposal of its own on country-by-country reporting concerning conflict minerals and to establish legally binding requirements for extractive companies to publish their revenue payments for each project and country they invest in, following the example of the US Dodd-Frank bill.
Members consider that EU companies should be legally liable in their home countries for any violation of human rights, environmental standards or ILO core labour standards by their subsidiaries abroad and the entities they control.
Members are concerned about the continuing trade in, and use of, minerals from conflict zones, whose production gives rise to unacceptable violence and illegal activities. They call on the Commission and the EU’s strategic suppliers’ countries to jointly develop effective RM traceability systems from import through to recycling or disposal and to introduce a mutual certification scheme for RM and their trading chains (Certified Trading Chains), so that trade can be guaranteed to be fair.
In addition, the report calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures to ensure there is transparency on commodity markets and to act decisively against unjustified commodities speculation, leading to commodity market abuse.
(5) Agricultural products and commodity markets : the report supports the analysis provided by the Commission with regard to agricultural products in the context of global food security, with diminishing global food reserves and increasing population and hunger.
The role of financial instruments and speculative behaviour as a possible cause of instability must be seriously considered. In this context, Members ask the Commission to propose concrete measures to guarantee food security, tackle market instability and, with sustainable overall responsibility, reinforce the operability of the derivatives markets for agricultural commodities as a matter of urgency.
The Council adopted conclusions on regulation and supervision in commodity markets and related financial markets.
It welcomes the Commission Communication of 2 February 2011 on tackling the challenges in commodities markets and on raw materials, noting the ongoing discussion in international fora, in particular the G20.
The Council:
highlights that transparent and well functioning financial markets are crucial in ensuring appropriate price discovery and in shaping expectations of price formation for raw materials and commodities; concurs with the need to avoid excessive volatility and misalignments of prices with economic fundamentals; acknowledges that one of the main roles of commodity derivatives markets is to hedge the exposure of both producers and consumers of raw materials and commodities to risks associated with physical production and price uncertainty; takes note of the growing influence of financial actors in commodity markets, in particular the rise in financial investment flows into commodity derivative markets in recent years, including agricultural and oil markets, and recognises that the full effects of the interconnection of financial and raw materials markets must be fully apprehended; agrees that the transparency of commodity derivatives markets needs to be improved without compromising the positive functioning of these markets; and stresses the need to ensure effective regulation and supervision of trading in commodity derivatives as well as an adequate regulatory and supervisory framework governing physical markets; encourages the Commission to come forward with proposals for better transparency and regulation on derivative commodity markets , within the framework of the revision of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and the Market Abuse Directive (MAD) and bearing in mind that the proposal for regulating OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR) has already a bearing in this area.
The Council stresses the need to improve the quality and availability of data on physical markets and derivatives markets , in particular OTC (e.g. by strengthening the cooperation among the relevant bodies and adjusting the methodologies and processes for collecting data); to extend position reporting; and to give sufficient powers and tools to the respective supervisors to ensure a better coverage of physical and commodity derivatives markets, notably OTC, while preserving market liquidity. It emphasis the need for an effective regime to identify and prevent market abuses , in particular cross-market manipulation between physical markets and derivatives markets, and of reviewing both the effectiveness of the available instruments and enforcement mechanisms.
The Council recognises therefore the need for regulators to have the necessary instruments to prevent market abuses in an effective way, and notes the Commission's intention to consider the inclusion of the means to set position limits in its forthcoming MiFID proposal. It stresses the need for ensuring that financial market participants are subject to adequate and proportionate regulation and supervision , especially when trading in commodity derivatives.
Lastly, the Council calls for ongoing monitoring of commodity markets and for ensuring an effective regulation and supervision of raw materials markets and better cooperation between financial regulators and regulators of such markets.
The Council examined a recent Commission communication on raw materials and commodity markets and adopted conclusions on the subject.
It highlights that secure, open and affordable access to raw materials , including renewable raw materials, commodities and energy at undistorted and equitable prices is crucial to the sustainable competitiveness and growth of European industry, including small and medium sized enterprise. It recalls the importance of a competitive EU non-energy extractive industry , both in terms of value creation and employment and as a means of reducing the vulnerability of the European economy.
Considering that the two main issues at stake are excessive price volatility on the one hand and the risk of interruptions or reductions of supplies on the other hand, the Council calls for a considered, market-based EU response to these challenges, based on a coherent approach that takes into account, where appropriate: (i) the Raw Materials Initiative ; (ii) commodities and security in food markets; (iii) regulation of financial markets; (iv) energy policy; (v) external relations; (vi); competition; (vii) trade; (viii) development; (ix) industrial and environmental policies; (x) agriculture and forest policy.
Welcoming the communication from the Commission from 2 February 2011, the Council made the following recommendations:
(1) Fair, sustainable and undistorted trade in raw materials : the Council fully supports the intention of the Commission to reinforce it with the objective of ensuring the secure, sustainable and undistorted supply of raw materials in a manner that continues to integrate development objectives and thus takes into account, as appropriate, the level of development of individual developing trading partners, especially of LDCs.
The Commission is called upon to:
to pursue firmly the inclusion of binding disciplines on trade and investment measures related to raw materials; to speed up the establishment of a monitoring mechanism for export restrictions; to increase efforts to tackle existing barriers distorting raw materials markets through all appropriate means, mechanisms and instruments, including the Market Access Strategy and, where justified, through dispute settlement; to intensify outreach and diplomatic activities on raw materials with all relevant partners and in all relevant international fora.
(2) Sustainable supply of raw materials; relevant dialogues; partnerships; development policy : the Council calls for:
· continued support to the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative , the sharing of best practices with the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and regional development banks, as well as promoting transparency, good governance and sustainability standards throughout the raw materials supply chain in, amongst other things, EU development instruments;
· promoting transparency, good governance and sustainability standards throughout the raw materials supply chain in, amongst other things, EU development instruments;
· the Commission to come forward with initiatives on the disclosure of financial information by companies working in the extractive industry;
· the need for promoting the equal application of high, sustainable standards by both EU and non-EU companies operating in developing countries and the application of Best Available Technology Requirements, as well as the need to promote Corporate Social Responsibility and other relevant codes of conduct;
· the need for a " raw materials diplomacy " anchored in wider policies towards third countries.
(3) Fostering sustainable supply within the EU : the Council stresses the need for better coordination to improve the way in which Europe's own resources and raw materials are extracted, distributed, processed, re-used and recycled.
The Commission is encouraged to:
act as a facilitator in the exchange of best practices and to continue to offer its support for: (a) defining a minerals policy in the Member States based on principles of sustainable development; (b) setting up a policy for land-use planning for minerals in the Member States; (c) putting in place a clear process for authorisation of minerals exploration and extraction in the Member States; further promote innovation and research and development efforts in the raw materials value chain, including exploration, extraction, processing, recycling, ecodesign, resource-efficient production and substitution; assess the case for launching a European Innovation Partnership (EIP) on raw materials and to come forward with proposals for this as appropriate, whilst fully respecting the principle of subsidiarity; take coordinated action across different policy areas to make the use of resources and materials, as well as the design and production of goods, within the EU more efficient and more sustainable.
(4) Boosting resource efficiency and promoting recycling : the Council looks forward to the forthcoming EU roadmap for a resource efficient Europe, the roadmap for the way towards a European low-carbon economy by 2050 of April 2010, the European Energy Efficiency Plan 2020 of November 2010 , as well as other Commission initiatives to:
· address the main obstacles to efficiency and recycling,
· take effective action against the leakage of waste to sub-standard treatment within or outside the EU,
· encourage the retrieval (including recycling) of raw materials from mining waste,
· promote the development of the recycling industry across the entire value chain, for the benefit of European industry,
· stimulate innovation in resource-efficiency and design of recyclable products, and
· apply an integrated lifecycle approach in which consideration is given to the containing of hazardous substances resulting from recycling.
The Council encourages eco-innovation and looks forward to the forthcoming eco-innovation plan. It invites the Commission to ensure that its current and forthcoming initiatives and instruments promote products with improved material efficiency , optimal lifetimes and improved recycling and re-use potential . It calls for stronger cooperation in applied research in order to identify substitute solutions, including materials, that will reduce the EU’s dependence on raw materials , including critical raw materials.
Lastly, the Council supports the Commission's plans for promoting an annual public discussion on the security of supply of raw materials and commodities by means of a regular thematic event, for promoting awareness of the challenges ahead and for taking stock of progress achieved in these areas.
PURPOSE: to present an integrated strategic vision to overcome the obstacles on commodity markets and difficulties regarding raw materials.
BACKGROUND: in recent years, commodity markets have displayed increased volatility and unprecedented price movements . Prices in all major commodity markets, including energy, metals and minerals, agriculture and food, increased sharply in 2007 to reach a peak in 2008, declined strongly from the second half of 2008 and have been on an increasing trend again since the summer of 2009. Fluctuations in prices of agricultural commodities have consequences for farmers, the food industry and consumers, including in the poorest of countries.
Markets are experiencing the growing impact of finance : between 2003 and 2008, for example, institutional investors increased their investments in commodities markets from 13 billion euro in 2003 to between 170 and 205 billion euro in 2008. Investment by index traders in particular has increased strongly.
Faced with these developments, the European Commission has taken a number of initiatives: in 2008, it already drew attention to the strategic importance of defining policies for raw materials by launching the raw materials initiative (RMI). Since then, it has taken actions within this framework to address sustainable access to raw materials both within and outside the EU, as well as on resource efficiency and recycling. It also began an in-depth reflection on commodities market in general and on food prices and security of food supply in particular. In response to the financial crisis, it has launched a range of measures to improve the regulation, integrity and transparency of financial markets, and most recently it has made a proposal for the regulation of energy markets .
This Communication presents an overview of what has been achieved in each of these areas and of the steps which are planned to take the work forward. This work is part of the Europe 2020 strategy which is closely linked to the flagship initiative for a resource efficient Europe. It will feed into the work of the G20 which agreed at the Pittsburgh summit "to improve the regulation, functioning, and transparency of financial and commodity markets to address excessive commodity price volatility". This commitment was reinforced in November 2010 by the G20 summit in Seoul.
CONTENT: the European Commission presents an overview of the main developments that have affected the financial and physical commodity markets (energy, agriculture, raw materials) and outlines the measures taken since the launch of the raw materials initiative. These include:
the identification of 14 critical raw materials at EU level which display a particularly high risk of supply shortage in the next 10 years and which are particularly important for the value chain; the implementation of an EU trade strategy for raw materials; actions in the area of development in particular under the 10 th EDF or projects financed by the EU-Africa Infrastructure Fund, EIB lending to mining projects or the 7 th Framework Programme for R&D for geological surveys; the drawing up of guidelines specifying the points that need to be respected to ensure that the extraction of raw materials in the EU is compatible with the Natura 2000 criteria; the creation of new areas of research within the Framework Programme for R&D and the drawing up of “ End-of-Waste” criteria.
While significant progress has been made in implementing the RMI, further improvements are necessary. An integrated approach based on the three pillars is essential, as each contributes to the objective of ensuring a fair and sustainable supply of raw materials to the EU.
1) Fair and sustainable supply of raw materials from global markets (pillar 1): the Commission will follow the issues posed by critical raw materials in order to define priority actions. It will regularly update, at least every three years, the list of critical raw materials already identified.
The EU will actively pursue a " raw materials diplomacy " with a view to securing access to raw materials, in particular the critical ones, through strategic partnerships and policy dialogues. Among other things, the Commission proposes to:
enhance European financial and political support for the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), and help developing countries to implement it; examine ways to improve transparency throughout the supply chain and tackle in coordination with key trade partners situations where revenues from extractive industries are used to fund wars or internal conflicts; promote the application of EU standards by EU companies operating in the developing countries; examine, in co-operation with African national and regional authorities, how to promote the most appropriate infrastructure, and deal with related governance issues; help developing countries increase their geological knowledge to allow them to better estimate national mineral reserves, better plan budgets based on expected revenues from these reserves and give increased bargaining power vis-à-vis mining firms.
The Commission intends to reinforce the Raw Materials Trade Strategy in line with development and good governance objectives. The Commission considers that the EU should:
continue to develop bilateral thematic raw materials dialogues with all relevant partners, and strengthen ongoing debates in pluri – and multilateral fora (including e.g. G20, UNCTAD, WTO, OECD); carry out further studies to provide a better understanding of the impact of export restrictions on raw materials markets, and further embed raw materials issues, such as export restrictions and investment aspects, in ongoing and future EU trade negotiations in bilateral, plurilateral and multilateral frameworks.
2) Fostering sustainable supply within the EU (pillar 2): extractive industries fall under this category but its development is hindered by a heavy regulatory framework and competition with other land uses. Many regulatory issues in this area are the competence of Member States. The Commission therefore acts mainly as a facilitator for the exchange of best practices. At the same time, the Commission considers that the following practices are particularly important in promoting investment in extractive industries :
defining a National Minerals Policy, to ensure that mineral resources are exploited in an economically viable way, harmonised with other national policies, based on sustainable development principles and including a commitment to provide an appropriate legal and information framework; setting up a land use planning policy for minerals; identification and safeguarding of mineral resources (taking into account other land uses) including their protection from the effects of natural disasters; putting in place a process to authorise minerals exploration and extraction which is clear and understandable; increase the synergies between national geological surveys.
3) Boosting resource efficiency and promoting recycling (pillar 3): to promote a Europe that is more efficient in its use of resources, it is vital to strengthen the measures that counter obstacles that restrict recycling and to improve the implementation of the EU’s existing legislation in the waste field. In particular, the Commission proposes to:
review the Thematic Strategy on waste prevention and recycling in 2012 to develop best practices in collection and treatment of key waste streams, in particular those which contain raw materials with a negative impact on the environment; develop new initiatives to improve the competitiveness of the recycling industry in the EU, notably by introducing new market instruments that will encourage the development of secondary raw materials; consider mobilising funds from the 7th Framework Programme for R&D in order to improve techniques for detection, identification, tracking and location of illicit shipments; examine the feasibility of applying a global certification scheme for recycling facilities to the export of waste streams.
4) The regulation of financial markets: in view of these developments, the regulation of financial markets is a critical element. Regulatory initiatives have already been taken or are planned in the coming months to increase the integrity and transparency of the commodity derivatives market. The revision of Directive 2003/0006/EC on Market Abuse , in spring 2011, will aim to clarify what trading in commodity markets constitutes abuse, and to ensure that all venues and transactions where abusive practices can occur are properly covered under pan-EU rules.
In its communication, the European Commission also observes that further research is required to understand better the interaction between physical and financial commodities markets . The Commission intends to continue its work in the area, in the context of the G20 at global level.
PURPOSE: to present an integrated strategic vision to overcome the obstacles on commodity markets and difficulties regarding raw materials.
BACKGROUND: in recent years, commodity markets have displayed increased volatility and unprecedented price movements . Prices in all major commodity markets, including energy, metals and minerals, agriculture and food, increased sharply in 2007 to reach a peak in 2008, declined strongly from the second half of 2008 and have been on an increasing trend again since the summer of 2009. Fluctuations in prices of agricultural commodities have consequences for farmers, the food industry and consumers, including in the poorest of countries.
Markets are experiencing the growing impact of finance : between 2003 and 2008, for example, institutional investors increased their investments in commodities markets from 13 billion euro in 2003 to between 170 and 205 billion euro in 2008. Investment by index traders in particular has increased strongly.
Faced with these developments, the European Commission has taken a number of initiatives: in 2008, it already drew attention to the strategic importance of defining policies for raw materials by launching the raw materials initiative (RMI). Since then, it has taken actions within this framework to address sustainable access to raw materials both within and outside the EU, as well as on resource efficiency and recycling. It also began an in-depth reflection on commodities market in general and on food prices and security of food supply in particular. In response to the financial crisis, it has launched a range of measures to improve the regulation, integrity and transparency of financial markets, and most recently it has made a proposal for the regulation of energy markets .
This Communication presents an overview of what has been achieved in each of these areas and of the steps which are planned to take the work forward. This work is part of the Europe 2020 strategy which is closely linked to the flagship initiative for a resource efficient Europe. It will feed into the work of the G20 which agreed at the Pittsburgh summit "to improve the regulation, functioning, and transparency of financial and commodity markets to address excessive commodity price volatility". This commitment was reinforced in November 2010 by the G20 summit in Seoul.
CONTENT: the European Commission presents an overview of the main developments that have affected the financial and physical commodity markets (energy, agriculture, raw materials) and outlines the measures taken since the launch of the raw materials initiative. These include:
the identification of 14 critical raw materials at EU level which display a particularly high risk of supply shortage in the next 10 years and which are particularly important for the value chain; the implementation of an EU trade strategy for raw materials; actions in the area of development in particular under the 10 th EDF or projects financed by the EU-Africa Infrastructure Fund, EIB lending to mining projects or the 7 th Framework Programme for R&D for geological surveys; the drawing up of guidelines specifying the points that need to be respected to ensure that the extraction of raw materials in the EU is compatible with the Natura 2000 criteria; the creation of new areas of research within the Framework Programme for R&D and the drawing up of “ End-of-Waste” criteria.
While significant progress has been made in implementing the RMI, further improvements are necessary. An integrated approach based on the three pillars is essential, as each contributes to the objective of ensuring a fair and sustainable supply of raw materials to the EU.
1) Fair and sustainable supply of raw materials from global markets (pillar 1): the Commission will follow the issues posed by critical raw materials in order to define priority actions. It will regularly update, at least every three years, the list of critical raw materials already identified.
The EU will actively pursue a " raw materials diplomacy " with a view to securing access to raw materials, in particular the critical ones, through strategic partnerships and policy dialogues. Among other things, the Commission proposes to:
enhance European financial and political support for the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), and help developing countries to implement it; examine ways to improve transparency throughout the supply chain and tackle in coordination with key trade partners situations where revenues from extractive industries are used to fund wars or internal conflicts; promote the application of EU standards by EU companies operating in the developing countries; examine, in co-operation with African national and regional authorities, how to promote the most appropriate infrastructure, and deal with related governance issues; help developing countries increase their geological knowledge to allow them to better estimate national mineral reserves, better plan budgets based on expected revenues from these reserves and give increased bargaining power vis-à-vis mining firms.
The Commission intends to reinforce the Raw Materials Trade Strategy in line with development and good governance objectives. The Commission considers that the EU should:
continue to develop bilateral thematic raw materials dialogues with all relevant partners, and strengthen ongoing debates in pluri – and multilateral fora (including e.g. G20, UNCTAD, WTO, OECD); carry out further studies to provide a better understanding of the impact of export restrictions on raw materials markets, and further embed raw materials issues, such as export restrictions and investment aspects, in ongoing and future EU trade negotiations in bilateral, plurilateral and multilateral frameworks.
2) Fostering sustainable supply within the EU (pillar 2): extractive industries fall under this category but its development is hindered by a heavy regulatory framework and competition with other land uses. Many regulatory issues in this area are the competence of Member States. The Commission therefore acts mainly as a facilitator for the exchange of best practices. At the same time, the Commission considers that the following practices are particularly important in promoting investment in extractive industries :
defining a National Minerals Policy, to ensure that mineral resources are exploited in an economically viable way, harmonised with other national policies, based on sustainable development principles and including a commitment to provide an appropriate legal and information framework; setting up a land use planning policy for minerals; identification and safeguarding of mineral resources (taking into account other land uses) including their protection from the effects of natural disasters; putting in place a process to authorise minerals exploration and extraction which is clear and understandable; increase the synergies between national geological surveys.
3) Boosting resource efficiency and promoting recycling (pillar 3): to promote a Europe that is more efficient in its use of resources, it is vital to strengthen the measures that counter obstacles that restrict recycling and to improve the implementation of the EU’s existing legislation in the waste field. In particular, the Commission proposes to:
review the Thematic Strategy on waste prevention and recycling in 2012 to develop best practices in collection and treatment of key waste streams, in particular those which contain raw materials with a negative impact on the environment; develop new initiatives to improve the competitiveness of the recycling industry in the EU, notably by introducing new market instruments that will encourage the development of secondary raw materials; consider mobilising funds from the 7th Framework Programme for R&D in order to improve techniques for detection, identification, tracking and location of illicit shipments; examine the feasibility of applying a global certification scheme for recycling facilities to the export of waste streams.
4) The regulation of financial markets: in view of these developments, the regulation of financial markets is a critical element. Regulatory initiatives have already been taken or are planned in the coming months to increase the integrity and transparency of the commodity derivatives market. The revision of Directive 2003/0006/EC on Market Abuse , in spring 2011, will aim to clarify what trading in commodity markets constitutes abuse, and to ensure that all venues and transactions where abusive practices can occur are properly covered under pan-EU rules.
In its communication, the European Commission also observes that further research is required to understand better the interaction between physical and financial commodities markets . The Commission intends to continue its work in the area, in the context of the G20 at global level.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2013)0442
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)8668
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0364/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0288/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0288/2011
- Committee opinion: PE462.634
- Committee opinion: PE464.768
- Committee opinion: PE464.763
- Committee opinion: PE460.898
- Committee opinion: PE462.807
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE462.749
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE462.883
- Committee draft report: PE458.600
- Debate in Council: 3074
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0025
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0025
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0025 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE458.600
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE462.749
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE462.883
- Committee opinion: PE462.807
- Committee opinion: PE460.898
- Committee opinion: PE464.763
- Committee opinion: PE462.634
- Committee opinion: PE464.768
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0288/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)8668
- Follow-up document: COM(2013)0442 EUR-Lex
Activities
- Judith A. MERKIES
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bas BELDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lena EK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ioan ENCIU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Karl-Heinz FLORENZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adam GIEREK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Julie GIRLING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jolanta Emilia HIBNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eija-Riitta KORHOLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Riikka PAKARINEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladko Todorov PANAYOTOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel POC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Herbert REUL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Oreste ROSSI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Libor ROUČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daciana Octavia SÂRBU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Birgit SCHNIEBER-JASTRAM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csaba Sándor TABAJDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michael THEURER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ioannis A. TSOUKALAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
610 |
2011/2056(INI)
2011/04/18
ITRE
279 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 a (new) – having regard to the Commission Communication of 15 September 2009 entitled ‘Policy coherence for development - Establishing the policy framework for a whole-of-the-Union approach’ (COM(2009)458),
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A (new) A. whereas the Raw Materials Initiative has been criticized by developing countries and NGOs for undermining the development objectives of poor countries and for not complying with the EU’s commitment to policy coherence for development,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Believes that a tax for mineral resources is not an adequate tool
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Believes that a tax for mineral resources is not an adequate tool
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Believes that a tax for mineral resources owned is not an adequate
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Believes that a tax for mineral resources is not an adequate tool
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to extend the ecodesign instruments to RM, to work with standardisation bodies, to evaluate the feasibility of a top-runner programme for products with regard to resource efficiency, to strengthen advisory services on resource efficiency, particularly for SMEs,
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to extend the ecodesign instruments to RM, to work with standardisation bodies, to evaluate the feasibility of a top-runner programme for products with regard to resource efficiency, to strengthen advisory services on resource efficiency, particularly for SMEs, and calls on companies to make use of the Eco- Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS); calls on the Commission and the Member States to leverage public procurement in order to enhance resource-efficient products and products utilizing secondary RM; stresses the value of including resource use in product information and eco-labels in order to empower consumers; calls on the European standardisation bodies to streamline the issue of resource efficiency in the setting of standards; insists that the Commission launch a study on the hierarchy of raw materials, being a study to the setting of supply chains and the use of raw materials according to its highest added value in economic, environmental and social perspective;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to examine whether it would be appropriate to extend the ecodesign instruments to RM, to work with standardisation bodies, to evaluate the feasibility of a top-runner programme for products with regard to resource efficiency, to strengthen advisory services on resource efficiency, particularly for SMEs, and calls on companies to make use of the Eco- Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS); calls on the Commission and the Member States to leverage public procurement in order to enhance resource-efficient
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to extend the ecodesign instruments to RM, to work with standardisation bodies, to evaluate the feasibility of a top-runner programme for products with regard to resource efficiency, to strengthen advisory services on resource efficiency, particularly for
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission to review how the Eco-Design Directive, the Directive on End-of-Life Vehicles, the Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment and the Battery Waste Directive could be modified so as to increase recycling not just in general, but also for valuable raw materials including rare earths, e.g. by more specific requirements on dismantling, and to propose amendments to these acts accordingly;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B (new) B. whereas worldwide demand for raw materials has been steadily increasing, especially for ‘technology metals’,
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that rare earths are used in the production of monitors, mobile phones and other appliances in daily use, and they are essential for the manufacture of high-performance permanent magnets used in wind turbines, electric vehicles, catalytic converters for cars, circuits, optical fibre and high-temperature superconductors, and they are thus vital if the EU economy is to become eco-efficient;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the contribution of re-use and recycling to reducing greenhouse gases; calls on the Commission to launch an in- depth EU material flow analysis particularly to identify waste streams; calls on the Commission to propose a roadmap for the establishment of a waste implementation agency and a specific European body to carry out direct inspections; calls on the Commission to harmonise recycling standards and legislation; calls on the Member States’ industry associations to actively promote recycling among their members and to facilitate co-operation with research institutions and other sectors; notes the importance of decoupling the amount of manufactured waste from the increase of manufacturing production;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the contribution
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the contribution of recycling and re-use to reducing greenhouse gases; calls on the Commission to launch an in-depth EU material flow analysis
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the contribution
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the contribution of recycling to reducing greenhouse gases; calls on the Commission to launch an in-depth
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the contribution of recycling to reducing greenhouse gases; calls on the Commission to launch an in-depth EU material flow analysis particularly to identify waste streams; asks the Commission to increase recycling of RM;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the contribution of recycling to reducing greenhouse gases; calls on the Commission to launch an in-depth EU material flow analysis particularly to identify priority waste streams for recycling;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. As the use of raw materials is a significant source of GHG production, it is important to make the use of resources more efficient; calls the Commission to strengthen the legal framework for the circular economy, where material cycles are closed and nothing is lost;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses the need to invest in the recycling of raw materials and rare earths, since the mining, refining and recycling of rare earths has serious environmental consequences if not managed properly;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B (new) B. whereas labour productivity has developed much faster in the last decades than resource productivity, with estimates showing that labour costs represent less than 20% of a product and resources costs represent 40%, whereas this implies that swift action is needed to improve resource efficiency,
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes the importance of creating industrial synergies on recycling and helping companies
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes the importance of creating industrial synergies on recycling and helping companies discover how their under-used energy, waste and by-products can serve as
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes the importance of creating industrial synergies on recycling and helping companies discover how their
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Supports the development of wood waste recovery as an energy source to reduce dependence on raw materials, and also to attenuate competition between the traditional timber industry (furniture production, pallets, etc) and the green energy sector ; in fact, it is more useful to use wood as an energy source when it is at the end of its life;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to investigate whether closed landfills could be re-opened to recycle potential scrap material with best available technologies (BAT)
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to gradually introduce a general ban on waste landfill throughout the European Union, to investigate whether closed landfills could be re-opened to recycle potential scrap material with best available technologies (BAT), to also
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to investigate whether closed landfills could be re-opened to recycle potential scrap material with best available technologies (BAT) preceding it with an independent impact assessment and a cost-benefit analysis, to also examine remaining mining waste and metallurgical waste dumps, to complete a EU database on mining waste sites by 2012 and enforce the mining waste directive, to ensure that this waste is treated with the BAT, and to encourage the lifecycle management of buildings to ensure the recyclability of materials used in their construction;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to investigate whether closed landfills could be re-opened to recycle potential scrap material with best available technologies (BAT), to also examine remaining mining waste and metallurgical waste dumps, to complete a EU database on mining waste sites by 2012 and enforce the mining waste directive, to ensure that this waste is treated with the BAT, and to encourage the lifecycle management of buildings
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to investigate whether
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Urges the Commission to investigate and promote projects on urban mining as urban mining deposits can be much richer than primary mining ores, and a large part of valuable secondary raw materials can be extracted, re-used and recycled;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B (new) B. whereas in many developing countries the exploitation of natural resources has not been undertaken to the benefit of the population because of the existence of undemocratic regimes, fraud, corruption or armed conflicts,
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Calls on the Commission to stimulate/ invest in projects that bring about a societal change that reduces the use of raw materials and promotes the clever use and re-use of materials amongst consumers;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Requests the Commission to evaluate how the European Investment Bank (EIB)
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Requests the Commission to evaluate how the European Investment Bank (EIB) can help guarantee the efficiency and sustainability of new projects and reduce financial risks for investments in breakthrough-technology recycling plants;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to develop economic incentives for recycling currently uneconomical CRM including rare earths (REE)
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to develop economic incentives for recycling currently uneconomical CRM including rare earths (REE), to investigate how markets for recycled materials can be supported
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to develop economic incentives for recycling
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to develop economic incentives for recycling
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to develop economic incentives for recycling currently uneconomical CRM including rare earths (REE), to investigate how markets for recycled materials can be supported by inter alia green certificates for recycled materials
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to develop economic incentives for recycling currently uneconomical CRM including rare earths (REE), to investigate how markets for recycled materials can be supported by
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C (new) C. whereas advances in new technologies will continue to increase demand for resources central to the development of these industries,
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to develop targets and economic incentives for recycling currently uneconomical CRM including rare earths (REE), to investigate how markets for recycled materials can be supported by inter alia green certificates for recycled materials, eco-design requirements and fiscal incentives, and to ensure that cohesion policy and budgets are also leveraged to promote resource efficiency and recycling;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Emphasises the need to combat the illegal shipment of waste
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Emphasises the need to combat the illegal shipment of
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Emphasises the need to combat the illegal shipment of
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission to take into account the critical remarks from some Member States on the Council Regulation establishing criteria determining when certain types of scrap metal cease to be waste under Directive 2008/98/EC and requests the Commission to strengthen the requirements on product quality and improve the possibilities to check and ensure that scrap declared as end-of- waste scrap has the required quality;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to identify priorities and allocate budgets for research into lifecycle recycling (cradle-to-cradle), substitution and resource efficiency using FP7 and
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to identify priorities and allocate budgets for research into product lifecycles and recycling, materials substitution and available resource efficiency
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to identify priorities and allocate budgets for research into lifecycle recycling, substitution and resource efficiency using FP7 and FP8 funding, particularly for CRM such as REE; calls on the Commission to address within research programs existing challenges with regard to recycling and the aim of further increasing resource efficiency; insists on the importance of a European Innovation Partnership on RM; calls on the Commission to launch such a partnership in 2011;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to identify priorities and allocate budgets for research into lifecycle recycling, substitution and resource efficiency using FP7 and FP8 funding
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D (new) D. whereas international supply is partly restricted by export quotas and prices are reaching record heights,
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to identify priorities and allocate budgets for research into sustainable production methods and lifecycle recycling, substitution and resource efficiency using FP7 and FP8 funding, particularly for CRM such as REE; insists on the importance of a European Innovation Partnership on RM; calls on the Commission to launch such a partnership in 2011;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to identify priorities and allocate budgets for research
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls the Commission to create the ‘use-it-longer’ principle and to apply it to all EU legislation; this principle would lie on two pillars: 1. an informative campaign for changing consumer habits towards making more responsible decisions when purchasing goods and towards using them longer; 2. pressurizing the industry for putting quality into focus at the product development and production phase; therefore asks the Commission and the Member States to raise the time limits of compulsory warranty concerning consumer durables by a minimum of 30%;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets that substitution is not included in the Communication; recalls that in the mid-term substitution of critical materials offers an efficient solution to supply and environmental risks and therefore should be the main focus of additional research efforts; therefore, calls on the Commission to ramp up its work in this field, particularly for REE, by
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets that substitution is not included in the Communication; recalls that substitution of critical materials is an efficient alternative to supply and environmental risks; therefore, calls on the Commission to ramp up its work in this field, particularly for REE, by leveraging research
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets that substitution is not included in the Communication; recalls that the mid-term substitution of critical materials offers an efficient solution to supply and environmental risks; therefore, calls on the Commission to ramp up its work in this field, particularly for REE, by leveraging research funding;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets that substitution
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes co-operation between national geological surveys and the publication of an annual European RM Yearbook (ERMY); stresses that data on secondary resources and urban mining should be included; asks the Commission to assess whether the creation of an EU Geological Service that pools the work of national surveys and works with international partners is necessary; stresses the need for stronger cooperation between national geological services and encourages the use of common standards and practices that would facilitate the exchange and exploitation of available geological data; supports the Commission
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E (new) E. whereas in the manufacturing sector, the share of material cost as part of the total production costs is significantly higher than the share related to the pay roll of workers and that, in all sectors, the growing trend of the former is not expected to be reversed in the medium term at least,
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes co-operation between national geological surveys and the publication of an annual European RM Yearbook (ERMY); stresses that data on secondary resources and urban mining should be included; asks the Commission to assess
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes co-operation between national geological surveys and the publication of an annual European RM Yearbook (ERMY); stresses that data on secondary resources and urban mining should be included; asks the Commission to assess whether the creation of an EU Geological Service that pools the work of national surveys and works with international partners is necessary; supports the Commission
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes co-operation between national geological surveys and the publication of an annual European RM Yearbook (ERMY); stresses that data on secondary resources and urban mining should be included; asks the Commission to assess whether the creation of an EU Geological Service that pools the work of national surveys and works with international partners is necessary; supports the Commission
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Emphasises that the definition of national minerals policies, as proposed by the Commission, to ensure that mineral resources are exploited in an economically viable way, must not impede trade within the EU; stresses, too, that demand from neighbouring EU Member States should not be excluded from long- term regional and local demand estimates when land-use policies for raw materials are being determined;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Stresses the importance of domestic raw materials as the basis of raw- materials supply to European industry; calls, therefore, on the Member States to ensure the long-term security of raw material deposits of regional and trans- regional importance; calls, moreover, on the Commission to improve the framework conditions for the exploitation of domestic raw materials;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Welcomes the fact that other raw materials such as wood and natural rubber are included under the scope of the RMI; urges the Commission to also take materials other than minerals and metals fully into consideration as it proceeds with the implementation and further development of the RMI;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Notes the importance of establishing the raw materials strategy within the wider context of climate change, while boosting overall resource-efficiency and recycling; stresses that by reducing EU consumption of primary raw materials we can decrease our relative import- dependency;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Stresses that extraction activities must be carried out with due regard for the highest standards of workplace security and environmental protection so as to prevent accidents and rehabilitate the areas affected;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Calls for the Raw Materials Strategy to be coherent with other important European policies, especially within industry, research, environment, transport and Europe 2020;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F (new) F. whereas markets benefit from a fair and level playing field,
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Reaffirms that the NATURA 2000 guidelines provide a sound basis under which non-energy extraction activities must take place taking into account the principle of subsidiarity; notes that codes of
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Reaffirms that the NATURA 2000 guidelines provide
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Reaffirms that the NATURA 2000 guidelines provide a sound basis under which non-energy extraction activities must take place; notes that codes of practice to achieve technical, social and environmental excellence are important instruments; underlines that RM held in one Member State pose a strategic and economic potential for the EU as a whole and therefore, calls on the Commission to protect environmentally sensitive areas that might hold RM, such as the Arctic, Barents Sea and Greenland, and if possible extend existing partnership agreements with such countries to include financial aid for mining with the possibility to give undertakings in the EU priority access to the extracted RM;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Reaffirms that the NATURA 2000 guidelines provide a sound basis under which non-energy extraction activities must take place; notes that codes of practice to achieve technical, social, competitive and environmental excellence are important instruments;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Reaffirms that the NATURA 2000 guidelines provide a sound basis under which non-energy extraction activities must take place; urges, at the same time – with a view to avoiding shortages of supply and reducing the danger of EU dependency on imported raw materials – that access to domestic deposits of raw materials should not be prevented through excessive planning; notes that codes of practice to achieve technical, social and environmental excellence are important instruments; calls on the Commission to protect environmentally sensitive areas that might hold RM, such as the Arctic, Barents Sea and Greenland;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Reaffirms that the
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Reaffirms that the NATURA 2000 guidelines provide a sound basis under which non-energy extraction activities must take place; notes that codes of practice to achieve technical, social and environmental excellence are important instruments; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Reaffirms that the NATURA 2000 guidelines provide a sound basis under which non-energy extraction activities must take place; notes that codes of practice to achieve technical, social and environmental excellence are important instruments; calls on the Commission to protect environmentally sensitive areas that might hold RM, such as the Arctic, Barents Sea, Antarctica and Greenland;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Reaffirms that the NATURA 2000 guidelines provide a sound basis under which non-energy extraction activities must take place; notes that codes of practice to achieve technical, social and environmental excellence are important instruments; calls on the Commission to proportionally protect environmentally sensitive areas that might hold RM, such as the Arctic, Barents Sea and Greenland;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Draws the Commission’s attention to the fact that rational management of wood raw material is necessary throughout Union territory and not only in NATURA 2000 areas, since one of its assets is that it will certainly be available in the future provided it is managed rationally; calls on the Commission, together with the timber industry, to examine the scope for taking specific measures aimed at the sustainable exploitation of forestry resources, in particular via pilot projects;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G (new) G. whereas increased competition over raw materials can aggravate international relations and lead to resource conflicts,
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Urges the Commission to put as much effort as legally possible into stopping the export of recyclable materials and waste containing useful raw materials, thus improving Europe’s energy efficiency and carbon footprint; asks the Commission to consider the further use of the producer responsibility concept in support of this goal;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls for environmental, social and economic demands to be given equal weight in any new directives or regulations, or in the revision of existing ones, with a view to securing access to mineral deposits in a sustainable way;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Asks the Commission to develop measures to halt the export of recyclable waste and materials containing useful raw materials in order to improve Europe's resource efficiency and reduce the import dependency; emphasises the importance of integrating producers and consumers in this perspective;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Underlines the need for more transparent and predictable framework conditions on regulatory approval processes for setting up new mines for extraction of metals and minerals, while at the same time not compromising environmental standards;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Stresses the need for the EU to enter into negotiations with the Home Rule Government of Greenland on the access of EU to rare earths in Greenland;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Notes that the northern European countries and the Barents region have substantial deposits of ores, minerals and forests, a highly skilled work force and research centres, cutting edge technology and a favourable regulatory environment; believes that the northern European region can make a substantial contribution to the supply needs of raw materials for other European companies and thereby reduce European import dependence; believes that there is a clear need to increase awareness of the potential of northern Europe in the ongoing discussion over raw materials;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Emphasises the importance of encouraging the use of a combination of economic and legal instruments comparable to those used in the best performing Member States, including landfill bans and extension of the producer responsibility to prevent the further useless waste of raw materials through (illegal) export, land filling and incineration;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c (new) 20c. To ensure the competitiveness of European industry, raw materials need to reach consumers through a sustainable and well functioning transport system linking resource rich areas of the union to our industrial centres; calls on the Commission, therefore, to ensure that the revised guidelines on Trans-European Transport Networks (TEN-T) meet the needs of industry by providing smooth access to raw materials;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 d (new) 20d. Believes that it is important to stimulate regional or national RM clusters, where the domestic raw materials sector is allowed to flourish, with the help of strong partnerships between government, academia, industries and social partners; underlines that RM clusters and investments in R&D are essential for economic growth and societal development for areas rich in RM;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H (new) H. whereas despite long-term improvements, growth in the productivity of materials in the EU has been significantly slower than growth in the productivity of labour,
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes that the obligatory 'renaturation' of companies following raw material extraction often improves biodiversity in extraction areas compared to the state before the extraction; notes the importance of R&D in sustainable mining to further minimise the environmental footprint and possible adverse social and ecological effects;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes the importance of R&D in sustainable mining to minimise the environmental footprint and adverse social effects; notes that in order to reduce mining, the prevention, re-use and recycling practices, especially for the 14 CRM, need to be improved;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes the importance of R&D in developing sustainable m
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes the importance of R&D in
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Urges the Commission to take measures to prompt consideration being given to the re-opening of some mines, exploiting them sustainably so as to reduce the risk of European industry being faced with a shortage of raw materials;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Stresses the importance of using its own resources for the competitiveness and innovation of European industry; emphasizes the role of new mining technologies for sustainable mining;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Notes the importance of setting up land use planning policies for minerals that comprises a geological knowledge base;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the importance of skills and training and the role played by geologists and engineers; calls on the Commission to engage in a close dialogue with social partners in this context; calls on the Commission, in co-operation with social partners, the Member States and industry, to identify the need for and availability of trained personnel in the field of critical raw material research and development, extraction, refining, processing and recycling by 2012 and to share the findings with the European Parliament; in this context, calls on the Commission and Member States to support, in collaboration with industry and academia, education on critical minerals via the establishment of special programmes and courses at university and supporting undergraduates, graduates, post- doctorates and fellowships in this field via scholarships; supports, in this context, Erasmus programmes in this field such as the Erasmus Mundus Minerals and Environmental Programme;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the importance of skills and training and the role played by geologists and engineers; calls on the Commission to continue to use the EU grant programmes to support student exchanges in a sustainable way and also to engage in a close dialogue with social partners in this context;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the importance of skills and training and the role played by geologists and engineers; calls on the Commission to continue to use the EU exchange programmes to support student exchanges and to engage in a close dialogue with social partners in this context;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 b (new) – having regard to its resolution of 18 May 2010 on EU Policy Coherence for Development and the Official Development Assistance plus concept,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I (new) I. whereas these challenges can be an opportunity for new innovative partnerships of mutually beneficial cooperation between the EU and third countries,
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the importance of skills and training and the role played by geologists and engineers; calls on the Commission and Member States to increase support for the Erasmus Mundus Minerals and Environment Programme; and calls on the Commission to engage in a close dialogue with social partners in this context;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the importance of skills and training and the role played by geologists and engineers; calls on the Commission to engage in a close dialogue with social partners in this context in order to ensure a future adequate supply of highly-skilled human capital for the European industry;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the importance of skills and training and the role played by geologists
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the importance of skills and training and the role played by geologists
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the importance of skills and training and the role played by geologists and engineers; calls on the Commission to engage in a close dialogue with social partners, academia and industry representatives in this context;
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the importance of skills and training and the role played by geologists and engineers; calls on the
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22bis. Calls upon the Commission to ensure strictest enforcement of existing EU legislation; to include safety and standards of gold mining into the actions under the Flagship “Innovation Union”; to include a specific work item for the International Panel on Sustainable Resource Management (UNEP) on gold mining including aspects of safety, innovation, chemicals management, illegal mining as well as artisanal mining to find a long-term sustainable solution which will ensure that gold is produced or imported for use in the EU in a sustainable manner; and to consider the review of the Berlin II Guidelines on Small scale and artisanal mining;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls on the Commission, in the interests of EU policy consistency, to have regard, when preparing future legislation, to the sustainable provision of raw materials from European sources, and also to take into account, in the criteria for assessing the impact of such legislation, the fact that the exploitation of raw materials is confined to specific locations, as well as considerations of supply security and access to resources;
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Believes that stock-piling of raw materials, as suggested by the Commission, is not an appropriate instrument for securing the supply of raw materials; underlines the fact that the role of the EU in any potential stock-piling program should be limited to providing the legal framework and regulatory oversight;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Stresses the importance of the Barents Region as a producer of natural resources and a supplier of essential raw materials, such as minerals, metals and forestry products, for European and international markets;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J (new) J. whereas the actions proposed by the Commission to boost resource efficiency and recycling are mostly limited to assessments of what could be done, instead of concrete measures to be taken, and are therefore insufficient to reach the stated goals,
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Urges the Commission to intensify raw material recovery by means of ambitious recycling rules, proper and swift implementation of the waste framework directive, products recyclability objectives and the promotion of recycling and reuse in all EU legislation;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Calls on the Commission to include a comprehensive approach to improving transport infrastructure in its ambition to bring European raw materials to producers;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the EU
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the EU
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the EU’s intention to pursue an RM diplomacy,
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the EU
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the EU
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the EU
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the EU
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K (new) K. whereas the Commission states that better implementation and enforcement of existing waste legislation is essential for promoting a more resource-efficient Europe but fails to propose the establishment of a waste implementation agency and a specific European body to carry out direct inspections,
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Stresses that at present demand for timber exceeds available supply and that this trend is growing in the European Union; in order to curb deforestation and the disappearance of non-processed wood raw materials (rough timber) and thus ensure the survival of the timber industry and the protection of the environment, a strategy of sustainable management of forestry resources needs to be adopted not only within the European Union, but also beyond its frontiers. Calls on the Commission to pursue and extend its dialogue with third countries having major forestry resources, and first and foremost with the Union's associate countries;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Is concerned about the increasing incidence of trade restrictions and distortions of competition in the trade in raw materials from third countries; welcomes the Commission’s efforts, at bilateral and multilateral level, to counter this trend; encourages the Commission to continue its strategy of combating export duties and distortions of competition in the raw materials trade, and in particular to include bans on export duties in all forthcoming bilateral trade agreements;
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the Commission to make use of all its international networks including the diplomatic service to improve relations with RM and CRM supply countries and regions and thus facilitate the international trade in RM, and especially CRM; stresses that firm support for the economic, social and environmental development of resource rich countries could help build solid and democratic institutions, which will improve opportunities to enlarge and secure trade and supply of raw materials;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Europe´s raw materials policy should take the sustainable economic growth in the developing countries and their specific social standards into full account (as enshrined in Art. 208 TFEU) and ensure coherence between development policy and the RMI; therefore believes that the EU also should support developing countries to diversify their economies, reduce their dependence on raw materials exports and increase the value of their products through domestic manufacturing and processing;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Given the uneven geographical distribution of resources in the world, raw materials policy is vulnerable to monopolisation, which may entail unwarranted economic and political demands for strategic resources and materials to be sold; appropriate protection of raw material resources is therefore needed within the territory of the EU Member States, together with their efficient use under the subsidiarity principle;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the Commission to assess the need of setting up a stockpiling mechanism for CRM, especially REE, which would guarantee European companies access to strategic materials used in green, high-tech, defence and health industries and protection against monopolist pressure and price rises;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. Calls on the Commission to pursue a consistent trade policy concerning raw materials with the aim of the elimination of unfair trade practices such as export restrictions, export taxes and so-called dual pricing mechanisms at multilateral and bilateral level;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 c (new) 23c. Urges the Commission to stay firm on the elimination of export restrictions, export taxes and so-called dual pricing mechanisms on raw materials in all future bilateral free trade agreements (FTA) concluded;
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 d (new) 23d. Reminds the Commission of the fact that policies such as trade policy, environment, development, research and foreign affairs have to support a joint policy on raw materials supply;
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers it the responsibility of companies to procure resources;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L (new) L. whereas the increase of recycling of valuable materials, especially rare earths, requires intensive dismantling,
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers it the responsibility of companies to procure resources; nevertheless, asks the Commission to consider how concepts such as a European RM Holding could be supported non- financially; asks the Commission and the Member States to study Japan´s JOGMEC closely;
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Urges that strategic metals committees be set up in the Member States and invited to cooperate with each other as part of a European raw material strategy; this strategy would take advantage of the synergies between economic, mining, industrial and international policies and aim to safeguard supplies of strategic substances;
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Stresses that ensuring resource security is a key task for the European trade policy as well as for the Common Foreign and Security Policy; thus it shall be included in the agenda the of the European External Action Service and the High Representative/Vice-President;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Stresses that EU's trade policy on raw materials should be based on free trade and ensure that developing countries can benefit from international trade in raw materials;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the outcome of the WTO case against China and to make future use of WTO
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the outcome of the WTO case against China and to m
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls for countries which, for reasons of economic policy, impede trade in raw materials by means of unjustified measures that distort competition, or similar measures, to be denied easier access to the EU single market under the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP), and asks the Commission, in this regard, to reform the GSP so that its application may be suspended temporarily, in whole or in part, in the event of trade in raw materials being unjustifiably impeded;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls on the Commission to use its political leverage to reform the multilateral rules on export restrictions; calls on the Commission to support a reform agenda which should clearly define any exceptional circumstances that would allow WTO member countries to institute export restrictions with particular attention to trigger mechanisms, the duration and the extent of such measures; encourages the consistency of the Commission's efforts in this field with the EU's other policy priorities promoting economic development and environmental sustainability in low income developing countries – or vice-versa, which implies that the other EU policies should be consistent with its raw materials strategy;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls on the Commission to include prohibition of distortive raw materials practices (dual pricing, export restrictions) in regional, bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Calls on the Commission to reconsider preferential access to the EU under the new Generalized System of Preferences in case of distorted practices regarding access to raw materials;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M (new) M. whereas profitable recycling lies in reliable and efficient classification and separation technology as the value of recycled materials depends on the fraction purity;
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Notes the importance of Africa-EU relations and the Addis Ababa agreement of June 2010; insists that this partnership be based on mutual interests; in fostering sustainable mining practices it is important to exchange best practises on good governance, increased resource efficiency, reuse and recycling, management of tailings and waste-rock, rehabilitation of mine legacy, health and safety, protection of workers and the eradication of child labour;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Notes the importance of Africa-EU relations and the Addis Ababa agreement of June 2010; insists that this partnership be based on mutual interests; points out that the African Union stated in the African Mining Vision that African countries have not been able to benefit thus far from their competitive advantage in natural resources; therefore, measures need to be considered to ensure natural resource wealth benefits the population of resource rich countries;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Regrets that the Communication fails to name other regions or countries; calls on the Commission to closely monitor international agreements made by resource-rich countries, especially those with totalitarian regimes, which entail exclusive access to resources and to use all possible diplomatic means to guarantee fair access to those resources and proper functioning of international trade laws; calls on the Commission to establish other mutually beneficial partnerships with resource-rich countries; believes that the EU should offer ‘infrastructure-resource’, “knowledge- resource” and “education-resource” partnerships; calls on the EU to support resource-rich developing countries in developing their geological knowledge; proposes in this context the establishment of co-operatively financed chairs at geological faculties;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Regrets that the Communication fails to name other regions or countries; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Regrets that the Communication fails to
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Regrets that the Communication fails to name other regions or countries; calls on the Commission to establish other mutually beneficial partnerships with resource-rich countries such as a revised partnership agreement with the Home Rule Government of Greenland; believes that the EU should offer ‘infrastructure- resource’ partnerships; calls on the EU to support resource-rich developing countries in developing their geological knowledge; proposes in this context the establishment of co-operatively financed chairs at geological faculties;
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Regrets that the Communication fails to name other regions or countries; calls on the Commission to establish other mutually beneficial partnerships with resource-rich countries such as a revised partnership agreement with the Home Rule Government of Greenland; believes that the EU should offer ‘infrastructure- resource’ partnerships which involve European companies; calls on the EU to support resource-rich developing countries in developing their geological knowledge; proposes in this context the establishment of co-operatively financed chairs at geological faculties;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Regrets that the Communication fails to name other regions or countries; calls on the Commission to establish other mutually beneficial partnerships with resource-rich countries such as those of North America, Australia, Asia and the Mercosur region; believes that the EU should offer ‘infrastructure-resource’ partnerships; calls on the EU to support resource-rich developing countries such as India and Brazil in developing their geological knowledge; proposes in this context the establishment of co-operatively financed chairs at geological faculties;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Regrets that the Communication fails to name other regions or countries; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N (new) N. whereas an industrial innovation strategy focused on increasing efficiencies and recycling promotes sustainability, competitiveness and security of supply,
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Is concerned that a strategy for co- operation with China is not identified; stresses the need for a technology dialogue with China; calls on the Commission to examine how pilot projects on sustainable mining
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Is concerned that a strategy for co- operation, or even competition, with China is not identified; stresses the need for a technology dialogue with China; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Is concerned that a strategy for co- operation with China and other key international players is not identified; stresses the need for a technology dialogue with China; calls on the Commission to examine how pilot projects on sustainable mining, substitution or recycling of CRM can be established with
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Is concerned that a strategy for co- operation with China is not identified, this is problematic as China controls a substantial part of the raw materials market; stresses the need for a technology dialogue with China; calls on the Commission to examine how pilot projects on sustainable mining, substitution or recycling of CRM
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Is concerned that a strategy for co- operation with China is not identified; stresses the need for a technology dialogue with China; stresses the importance of proper controls and regulations and calls on the Commission to examine how pilot projects on sustainable mining, substitution or recycling of CRM can be established with China;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Recalls that China has a successful long-term strategy on REE that combines a vertical organization of its REE industry with strong R&D and has already achieved a significant competitive advantage in refining REE ores and producing alloys and end-products, while the EU industry lacks both access to REE raw materials and the industrial and scientific know-how for processing them; furthermore, China has imposed export restrictions and shipment taxes on REE aggravating the supply issue for the EU; emphasizes, in this context, the need for the EU to identify and examine the possible exploitation of alternative (non- Chinese) sources of REE;
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Considers that the police pursued under the strategic partnership between the EU and the Russian Federation is crucial in improving the raw materials balance in the common market in return for cooperation in modernising that country;
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Expresses firm opposition to the protectionist policies of the resource rich countries and calls on the Commission to take decisive measures to counteract protectionism at the WTO, G20 and the OECD;
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Considers that the EU's Raw Material strategy should reflect the differences between developed and major emerging economies on the one hand and Least Developed Countries on the other;
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Concurs that development policy plays a role in helping countries turn their resource wealth into sustainable and inclusive growth, inter alia by enhancing governance and transparency;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O (new) O. whereas the EU Member States, Australia and the United States have the potential to develop its own resources’ extraction of the critical raw materials (CRM), base metals and rare earth elements (REE),
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Concurs that development policy plays a role in helping countries turn their resource wealth into sustainable and inclusive growth, inter alia by enhancing governance and transparency;
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Concurs that development policy plays a role in helping countries turn their resource wealth into sustainable and inclusive growth, inter alia by enhancing
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Concurs that development policy plays a role in helping countries turn their resource wealth into sustainable and inclusive growth, inter alia by enhancing governance and transparency; does not consider development policy an RM diplomacy tool; agrees that trade agreements should provide the necessary flexibility to support developing countries in creating linkages from the extractive industry towards local industry; believes that countries' resource sovereignty must be respected in this context; notes that revenue from RM can play a crucial role in enabling Least Developed Countries to achieve the Millennium Development Goals;
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Concurs that development policy plays a role in helping countries turn their resource wealth into sustainable and inclusive growth, inter alia by enhancing governance and transparency; does not consider development policy an RM diplomacy tool; agrees that trade agreements should provide the necessary flexibility to support developing countries in creating linkages from the extractive industry towards local industry; believes that countries' resource sovereignty must be respected in this context; calls on the Commission to ensure coherence between development policy and raw materials policy;
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Concurs that development policy plays a role in helping countries turn their resource wealth into sustainable and inclusive growth, inter alia by enhancing governance and transparency;
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. The Member States' sovereignty over raw materials and their enhanced role in shaping the EU's raw materials policy, which is conditioned by many environmental, soil-related and geological limitations, as well as local traditions, needs to be backed by a greater contribution from public finances, e.g. pension funds, towards investment in efforts to obtain both primary and recycled materials;
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to help developing countries to overcome information asymmetry in negotiating RM and mining contracts through capacity- building; considers that an EU strategy on RM must be consistent with the overarching goal of eradication of poverty and policy coherence as enshrined in Article 208 of the Lisbon Treaty;
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to help developing countries to overcome information asymmetry in negotiating RM and mining contracts through capacity- building, both at national level and among local communities;
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to help developing countries to overcome information asymmetry in negotiating RM and mining contracts through capacity- building, both at national and local level;
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to help developing countries to overcome information asymmetry in negotiating RM and mining contracts through capacity- building and technology transfer;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O (new) O. whereas it is paramount to take timely and decisive steps in implementing an efficient strategy and delivering results on the European Raw Materials Initiative;
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Stresses the role that corporate social responsibility plays by adhering to high environmental and social and labour standards abroad and applying best available technologies; applauds in this context positive contributions through the UN´s Global Compact; calls on EU companies to develop an appropriate code of conduct for those operating in third countries; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Stresses the role that corporate social responsibility plays by adhering to high environmental and social and labour standards abroad and applying best available technologies; calls on EU companies to develop an appropriate code of conduct for those operating in third countries; calls on the Commission to follow the example of the US Dodd-Frank bill
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Stresses the role that corporate social responsibility plays by adhering to high environmental and social and labour standards abroad and applying best available technologies; calls on EU companies to develop an appropriate code of conduct for those operating in third countries, and to base their activities on the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises and ISO 26000; calls on the Commission to follow the spirit of the US Dodd-Frank bill concerning conflict minerals and urges the Commission to present a legislative proposal; supports the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI); believes that these standards should particularly be applied for projects receiving EU funding, such as from the EIB; calls on the Commission to strengthen the use of ‘fingerprinting’ technology in this context and to promote pilot projects based on the experiences of the ‘coltan fingerprint’;
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Stresses the role that corporate social
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Stresses the role that corporate social responsibility plays by adhering to high environmental and social and labour standards abroad and applying best available technologies; calls on EU companies to develop an appropriate code of conduct for those operating in third countries; calls on the Commission to follow the US Dodd-Frank bill concerning conflict minerals; supports the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI); believes that these standards should particularly be applied for projects receiving EU funding, such as from the EIB;
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the work on RM and sustainability in the OECD, G8 and G20; stresses the further need for a G20- dialogue on fair and sustainable access to raw materials in order to develop a common perspective for free trade in raw materials; supports the inclusion of non- OECD members in these discussions; calls for the creation of strategic co-operation between the EU, US and Japan on CRM
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the work on RM and sustainability in the OECD, G8 and G20; supports the inclusion of non-OECD members in these discussions; calls for the creation of strategic co-operation between the EU, US and Japan on CRM in sharing demand and supply data, common forecasting, exchanging best practice, analysing supply chains, investigating the possibility for joint strategic stocks, and the establishment of joint R&D projects; asks the Commission to investigate the feasibility of an international statistics initiative on CRM based on the example of the Joint Organisations Data Initiative (JODI), this would be beneficial for the industrial sectors such as the aerospace, automotive, chemicals, construction, equipment and machinery sectors;
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the work on RM and sustainability in the OECD, G8 and G20; calls on the Commission to promote the work of the OECD on the impact of export restrictions and about their use as a policy tool; supports the inclusion of non-OECD members in these discussions; calls for the creation of strategic co- operation between the EU, US and Japan on CRM in sharing demand and supply data, common forecasting, exchanging best practice, analysing supply chains, investigating the possibility for joint strategic stocks, and the establishment of joint R&D projects; asks the Commission to investigate the feasibility of an international statistics
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the work on RM and sustainability in the OECD, G8 and G20; supports the inclusion of non-OECD members in these discussions; calls for the creation of strategic co-operation between the EU, US and Japan on CRM in sharing demand and supply data, common forecasting, exchanging best practice, analysing supply chains, investigating the possibility for joint strategic stocks, and the establishment of joint R&D projects; asks the Commission to investigate the feasibility of an international statistics initiative on CRM based on the example of the Joint Organisations Data Initiative (JODI) as well as whether an international covenant for metals might be a useful tool;
Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the work on RM and sustainability in the OECD, G8 and G20; supports the inclusion of non-OECD members in these discussions; calls for the creation of strategic co-operation between the EU, US and Japan on CRM in sharing demand and supply data, common forecasting, exchanging best practice, technological know-how and patents, analysing supply chains, investigating the possibility for joint strategic stocks, and the establishment of joint R&D projects; asks the Commission to investigate the feasibility of an international statistics initiative on CRM based on the example of the Joint Organisations Data Initiative (JODI);
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission spearheaded the issue of non-energy, non- agricultural raw materials (RM) with its Raw Materials Initiative (RMI) in 2008; believes that resource policy and resource diplomacy are of high importance for the EU not only with regard to industrial policy and international trade, but also as a transversal issue concerning different fields of domestic policy as well as foreign and security policy; asks the Commission to pay as much attention to this issue as to the energy issue; sees this also as a task for the EEAS;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that in 2008 the Commission spearheaded the issue of
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 c (new) Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission spearheaded the issue of non-energy, non- agricultural raw materials (RM) with its Raw Materials Initiative (RMI) in 2008; calls strongly on the commission to move towards swift implementation of the RMI;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes the new Commission Communication and its move beyond the RMI to include commodity markets; calls on the Commission to give adequate focus to commodity markets and the RMI separately; stresses that the three pillars of the RMI form three approaches to solving the issue of raw materials; calls on the Commission to implement the raw materials strategy in a balanced way;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes the new Commission Communication and its move beyond the RMI to include commodity markets; calls on the Commission to give adequate focus to commodity markets and the RMI separately; notes, however, that the raw materials strategy must be anchored in a strong innovation and industrial policy for Europe;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes the new Commission Communication and its move beyond the RMI to include commodity markets; calls on the Commission to give adequate focus to commodity markets and the RMI separately, this will create a basis for developing raw materials security of supply for the European Union;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises that the availability of raw materials such as metallic minerals, industrial minerals, construction materials, wood and natural rubber is of vital importance for the development potential, competitiveness and preservation of European industry;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Highlights the fact that financial and commodity markets today are more intertwined than ever and that the price volatility of commodities is to a great extent the result of speculation;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines the vast supply of natural resources in Europe and the need for better coordination with regards to the method for extraction, distribution, processing, reusing and recycling;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission to proceed with the review of the Markets in Financial Services Directive in order to provide for more transparent trading by mandating trading of commodity derivatives on organised trading venues and giving regulators the power to set position limits;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 d (new) – having regard to the Council Conclusions of 10 March 2011 on tackling the challenges on raw materials and in commodity markets,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission’s work on identifying critical raw materials (CRM); calls on the Commission to follow this up by analysing the supply chains depending on CRM, the refining capacity and the interaction between CRM and their associated base metals; underlines the need to distinguish between raw materials in the first part of the supply chain and those which are in the last part as the size of export credits differ significantly according to the degree of processing, and that this should be taken into consideration in the analysis;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission’s work on identifying critical raw materials (CRM), as this will identify specific shortages of raw materials in Europe; calls on the Commission to follow this up by analysing the supply chains depending on CRM, the refining capacity and the interaction between CRM and their associated base metals;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission’s work on identifying critical raw materials (CRM); calls on the Commission regularly to update the raw materials list and to follow this up by analysing the supply chains depending on CRM, the refining capacity and the interaction between CRM and their associated base metals;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission’s work on identifying critical raw materials (CRM); calls on the Commission to follow this up by analysing the supply chains depending on CRM, the
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission’s work on identifying critical raw materials (CRM), which are all ‘technology metals’; calls on the Commission to follow this up by analysing the supply chains depending on CRM, the refining capacity and the interaction between CRM and their associated base metals; further efforts should be undertaken on establishing a risk radar for CRM; puts emphasis on tackling problems concerning supply of Rare Earth Elements (REE); underlines, however, that all CRM must be taken into account;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission’s work on identifying critical raw materials (CRM); calls on the Commission to follow this up by analysing the supply chains depending on CRM,
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission’s work on identifying critical raw materials (CRM); calls on the Commission to follow this up by analysing the supply chains depending on CRM, the refining capacity and the interaction between CRM and their associated base metals and the need to observe also non-scarce but important raw materials with a view to countering tendencies towards inflation giving rise to concentrations in ownership of suppliers;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Welcomes the fact that the Commission communication recognises that other critical raw materials fall under this strategy, such as natural rubber; suggests that, when the list of critical raw materials is next reviewed, due consideration should be given to the challenge posed by developing sustainable supplies of natural rubber; proposes that one of the specific targets of raw materials diplomacy should be developing sources of natural rubber outside the territory of South-East Asia;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the following criteria are taken into account for the classification of raw materials: the energy consumption used to obtain them, their final use, their possible substitution and their availability on the EU and global market;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises the sustainable and complementary meaning of the use of own resources in the EU Member States, the effective trade policy and a good raw materials’ governance, based on efficient use and recycling, for the European raw materials policy;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 22 a (new) – having regard to Article 208 of the TFEU on policy coherence for development,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls that, within the CRM, the criticality of different elements varies and hence their availability and prices are different;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that the restrictions in access to the critical raw materials (CRM), base metals and rare earth elements (REE) are a significant threat to the competitiveness and innovation of the European industry; these restrictions are a direct consequence of a weak use of own resources and of the trade protectionism policy of the resource- rich countries;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that effective governance of RM policy is key to an effective RM strategy; notes that an effective strategy must include a continuous dialogue with stakeholders concerned; emphasises the need for close co-
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that effective governance of RM policy is key to an effective strategy; emphasises the need for close co- ordination within the Commission and between Member States; recommends the establishment of an inter-departmental RM task force, as is the case in France and the United States, to elaborate, monitor and review policies including partnership agreements, to ensure strategic coherence and promote the establishment of an early- warning system; calls on the Commission to foster co-ordination between the Member States on the external dimension; believes the upcoming communication on the external dimension of energy could serve as a template;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that effective governance of RM policy is key to an effective strategy; emphasises the need for close co- ordination within the Commission and between Member States; recommends the establishment of an inter-departmental RM task force, as is the case in France and the United States, to elaborate, monitor and review policies including partnership agreements, to ensure strategic coherence and promote the establishment
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that effective governance of RM policy is key to an effective strategy; emphasises the need for close co- ordination within the Commission and the European Parliament and between Member States; recommends the establishment of an inter-departmental RM task force, as is the case in France and the United States, to elaborate, monitor and review policies, to ensure strategic coherence and promote the establishment of an early-warning system; calls on the Commission to foster co-ordination between the Member States on the external dimension; believes the upcoming communication on the external dimension of energy could serve as a template;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that demand for mineral and organic materials, water and air depends on a broad based innovatory policy in the field of materials substitution which is linked to their final use for the production of market products; it is therefore necessary to support innovatory solutions for obtaining construction materials for the building sector and machine industry, as well as materials for obtaining substances with specific physical and chemical properties, such as rare earth metals and copper;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recognises the existence of supply problems with raw materials for the wood- working industries and for the renewable energy sector and insists on the importance of the ‘cascade’ use of wood products (i.e. firstly for wood-based products, secondly recovered and reused or recycled and finally used for energy) as fundamental criteria in developing renewable energy policy criteria;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that the proper functioning of the raw materials market will provide the necessary incentives to businesses to use resources more efficiently, recycle and further invest in R&D activities for substitution; therefore, calls on the Commission to foster a proper functioning of the raw materials market.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to set up a long-term ‘European row materials 2050 roadmap’ that would identify potential future developments, threats and opportunities in the RM and CRM sectors and would help European industries, academic and research institutions engage in long term planning and investment;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 24 a (new) Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop a programme, in the context of the forthcoming research framework programme, for research and innovation in the field of new materials and materials that could in future replace existing raw materials for which there is a shortage of resources;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that the proper functioning of the market will provide the necessary incentives to businesses to use resources more efficiently, recycle and search for substitution; therefore, calls on the Commission to foster a proper functioning of the raw materials market;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that the proper functioning of the market will provide the necessary incentives to businesses to use resources more efficiently, recycle and search for substitution; therefore, calls on the Commission to foster a proper functioning of the raw materials market;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Urges the Commission to carry out a detailed analysis on the availability of wood taking into account the potential demand from both the forest based industries and the renewable energy sector (biomass);
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Insists that the European Parliament be regularly informed on the development of the RMI
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Insists that the European Parliament be regularly informed on the development of the RMI via an annual progress report which must include data on the measurement of critical raw materials extraction and use concerning its global environmental and social impact;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that markets – particularly for food, electricity and gas – must be correctly monitored, as that would make it possible to identify potential cases of abuse and to put an end to unjustified speculation;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines that the access to raw materials is fundamental to industry including SMEs, and that unpredictable price fluctuation is a big risk factor;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 24 b (new) – having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 18 May 2010 on the EU Policy Coherence for Development and the ‘Official Development Assistance plus’ concept1, 1 P/_TA(2010)0174
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 A
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 An opportunity for European industry: resource efficiency, re-use, recycling and substitution
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the RM challenges are also an opportunity to invigorate the EU’s industrial base and increase competitiveness via an ambitious industrial innovation strategy; notes that in the medium to long term increasing efficiencies, recycling and lowering resource use will be key to competitiveness, sustainability and supply
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the RM challenges are also an opportunity to invigorate the EU’s industrial base and increase competitiveness via an ambitious industrial innovation strategy; notes that in the medium to long term increasing efficiencies, recycling and lowering resource use will be key to competitiveness, sustainability and supply security; highlights the importance of applying consistently the legally binding European Waste Hierarchy as set out in the Waste Framework Directive, which prioritises prevention, reuse and recycling, followed by recovery and disposal; remarks that social innovation, lifestyle changes and new concepts such as eco-leasing, chemical leasing and sharing should be supported by the Commission;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the RM challenges are also an opportunity to invigorate the EU’s industrial base and increase competitiveness via an ambitious industrial innovation strategy; notes that
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the RM challenges are also an opportunity to invigorate the EU’s industrial base and increase competitiveness via an ambitious industrial innovation strategy; notes that
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the RM challenges are also an opportunity to invigorate the EU’s industrial base
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the RM challenges are also an opportunity to invigorate the EU’s industrial base and increase competitiveness via an ambitious industrial innovation strategy; notes that in the medium to long term increasing efficiencies, recycling
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the RM challenges are also an opportunity to invigorate the EU’s industrial base and increase competitiveness via an ambitious industrial innovation strategy; notes that in the medium to long term increasing efficiencies, recycling and lowering resource use and application of the ‘use-it- longer principle’ will be key to competitiveness, sustainability and supply security; remarks that social innovation, lifestyle changes and new concepts such as eco-leasing, chemical leasing and sharing should be supported by the Commission;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the RM challenges are also an
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A (new) A. whereas the complexity of the administrative processes and the lack of coordination between administrations result in delays of several years in obtaining authorisation for the exploitation of mineral resources; whereas such delays are excessive, increase the capital costs of investment and exclude small and medium-sized undertakings from the market,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that overcoming the RM challenges
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the RM challenges are also an opportunity to invigorate the EU’s industrial base and increase competitiveness via an ambitious industrial innovation strategy; notes that in the medium to long term increasing efficiencies, re-use, energy-efficient recycling and lowering resource use will be key to competitiveness, sustainability and supply security; remarks that social innovation, lifestyle changes and new concepts such as eco-leasing, chemical leasing and sharing should be supported by the Commission;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers it necessary to create a European framework for market surveillance and to assign to the new institutions responsible for the regulation of energy the necessary powers to ensure the proper functioning of the energy markets and a competitive and transparent internal market for European undertakings and citizens;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines that access to raw materials is fundamental to the whole industrial sector including SMEs, especially the unpredictable price fluctuation;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to launch a flagship initiative on resource efficiency;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to launch a flagship initiative on resource efficiency; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to launch a flagship initiative on resource efficiency; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to launch a flagship initiative on resource efficiency; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to launch a flagship initiative on resource efficiency; calls on the Commission to incorporate a resource efficiency improvement target of 3% per year net of GDP evolution; calls on the Commission to develop a reliable methodology for measuring resource efficiency taking into account the work of Eurostat in this field; calls on the EC to identify a long-term visionary goal, such as achieving a 6-10 ton resource-use per year per person by 2050;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A (new) A. whereas the EU requires a strong industrial base and green industry, which are highly dependent upon adequate supplies of raw materials, in order to move towards a low-carbon economy and to persist in competitiveness,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to launch a flagship initiative on resource efficiency;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to launch a flagship initiative on resource efficiency; calls on the Commission to incorporate a resource efficiency improvement target of 3% per year net of GDP evolution;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to launch a flagship initiative on resource efficiency; calls on the Commission to incorporate a resource efficiency improvement target
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Urges that information be disseminated on existing forestry measures under the Union’s various policies, which are currently under-used, especially those designed to improve the economic value of forests, such as the replanting provided for in rural development programmes, with a view to improving the availability of wood raw material;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Stresses the need to launch an information campaign at European level to promote timber and its uses, in all forms, because of its intrinsic qualities, its symbolic value, its environmental benefits, particularly in terms of its carbon storage properties, and its importance to rural activities;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Stresses the urgent need to adopt a ‘wood mobilisation plan’ at European level, as proposed in the conclusions to the Conference of Professional Forestry Organisations held on 26 September 2008 in Compiègne, France; calls for preference to be given in public tenders to the use of wood, as the primary eco- material; proposes that biomass, especially wood biomass, should be fully integrated into policies for the development of renewable energies;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Believes that a tax for mineral resources is not an adequate tool
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Believes that a tax for mineral resources is not an adequate tool
source: PE-462.749
2011/05/17
AFET
58 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A (new) A. Whereas in the context of a multi-polar global order Member States alone cannot secure anymore sufficient access to non- energy commodities such as raw materials and rare earths; whereas only an EU driven common approach can ensure a strategic and secure supply for European industries,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the importance of an open and constructive global dialogue on raw materials between resource-rich and resource-poor countries in order to increase understanding and bridge any differences; calls on the Commission to identify an adequate governance structure or forum that can facilitate such a dialogue; believes that the International Energy Forum (IEF) could serve as a template; calls on the Commission to particularly study the intergovernmental forum on mining, minerals, metals and sustainable development and see to what degree major actors such as the EU, US and China could join this forum; notes the important role of the French G20 Presidency in kick-starting such an international raw materials dialogue; calls on the French G20 Presidency in co- operation with the Commission to engage in a robust and consistent diplomatic effort during the G20 Presidency to establish an international forum on raw materials through regular bilateral and multilateral meetings with key G20 players;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the Commission to continue supporting the UNEP International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Calls on the Commission to promote an expansion of the work of the international metals study groups and the establishment of new metals study groups such as on iron or high-technology metals;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Calls on the Commission to promote Track-II diplomacy on raw materials by financially supporting the exchange of non-governmental organisations, academia and think tanks from the EU with other resource-relevant countries;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Calls on the Commission to organise regular events, such as JOGMEC's 'Metal Saloons', on raw materials with other resource-relevant countries with participation from a wide range of stakeholders (industry, academia, policymakers, NGOs, etc.) at least twice a year;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 f (new) 1f. Underlines that the primary goal of RM diplomacy should be to safeguard the security of RM and REE supplies to EU; stresses that it should not come to the detriment of Human Rights in the partner countries;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 g (new) 1g. Stresses that one of the aims of RM policy and diplomacy should be to avoid cases of monopoly in terms of directions of import of RM to Europe;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 h (new) 1h. Notes that RM policy, although independent, should be in synergy with other EU policies, especially with policies aimed at non-mineral RM (for example agricultural goods) and energy supplies;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 i (new) 1i. Considers that RM diplomacy, development policy and policies aimed at support for democratisation should be mutually beneficial and create synergies; calls therefore for Human Rights and Democratisation conditionality to be included into future agreements with partner countries;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital B (new) B. Whereas the supply of raw materials is fundamental for several industry applications; whereas export restrictions hinder the creation of open and transparent markets and can lead to a serious bottleneck to raw material supply and limit the innovation potential of European industries, and could create problems on the labour market,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that as part of the EU’s strategic cooperation with relevant key partners such as the USA,
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that as part of the EU’s strategic cooperation with relevant key partners such as the USA, Russia and Japan, China, Brazil and India an early-
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that as part of the EU’s strategic cooperation with relevant key partners such as the USA, Russia, China and Japan, an early-
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that as part of the EU’s strategic cooperation with relevant key partners such as the USA, Russia
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that as part of the EU’s strategic cooperation with relevant key partners such as the USA, Russia
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Believes that stronger emphasis placed at EU level on substitution in the raw materials strategy could also strengthen the negotiating position of the Union and its Members States;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out the role of relations with BRICS countries, as they both have vast RM resources and at the same time will absorb more RM in the future, thus creating stronger competition for European companies;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for an international agreement on regulatory standards on sustainable
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for international regulatory standards on recycling, sustainable mining and good governance which should be promoted through relevant fora, such as the G8 and the G20, the WTO, the OECD, UNCTAD, UNEP, the UNEP International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management, the international metals study groups, and the intergovernmental forum on mining, minerals, metals and sustainable development; stresses the importance of advancing corporate social responsibility and regulatory standards among the industry through the International Council on Mining and Metals;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for international regulatory standards on sustainable mining and good governance upholding the core, founding principles of human rights, labour rights, dignity and democracy and not infringing on the other countries right to development which should be promoted through relevant fora, such as the G8 and the G20, the WTO, the OECD, UNCTAD, UNEP;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital C (new) C. Whereas around 50% of worldwide raw material and rare earth resources, including critical raw materials, are located in fragile States or unstable regions,
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for international regulatory standards on sustainable mining and good governance which should be promoted through relevant fora, such as the G8 and the G20, the WTO, the OECD, UNCTAD, UNEP and its International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management, the International Metal Study Groups and other bodies, which are active in promoting a sustainable global governance structure for the exploitation, production and trade of raw materials;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Welcomes the will of the G8, G20 members to fight against the raw materials price volatility and calls for a development of concrete measures in order to secure raw materials supply and to curb speculation on those commodities;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the WTO to
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the WTO to monitor closely the
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the WTO to monitor closely the impact of export restrictions and other barriers on the price of raw materials; in this respect supports the creation in the WTO of a monitoring tool on tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade on Raw Materials and Rare Earths and the setting-up in the G-20 of a ‘Raw Materials and Rare Earths Stability Board’;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the inclusion of explicit guarantees on market access to raw materials in EU trade agreements and as a prerequisite for membership of the WTO
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the inclusion of explicit guarantees on market access to raw materials in EU trade agreements and as a prerequisite for membership of the WTO; calls for the undistorted access to and sustainable governance of raw materials to be included in all EU agreements with relevant third countries;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that competition for access to raw materials has often been a root cause of conflicts and wars, leading to the killing of millions of people in Central Africa and other regions of the world;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Reaffirms its support for the Madrid Declaration of the EU - Latin America Summit 2010, which explicitly recognises the principle of the sovereign right of States to manage and regulate their natural resources, while stressing that due attention should be paid to sustainability criteria;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines that standards and requirements concerning recycling and extraction of RM set upon European companies are in many cases higher than for companies in partner countries; calls therefore to include in international agreements clauses aimed at achieving reciprocity in these matters, to protect European companies from unfair competition;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance of innovation at all stage of use of raw materials from detection until the recycling;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Outlines the importance of bilateral cooperation on raw materials, as demonstrated by the EU and the African Union in June 2010, and encourages further efforts in the context of the Joint Africa-EU Action Plan for 2011-2013; calls for similar cooperation to be developed with other countries that are major producers of critical raw materials; proposes as one of the concrete targets of the raw material diplomacy source- diversification from South-East Asia towards Latin-America and Africa of certain raw materials of which the EU is import dependent;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Outlines the importance of bilateral cooperation on raw materials, as demonstrated by the EU and the African Union in June 2010, and encourages further efforts in the context of the Joint Africa-EU Action Plan for 2011-2013; calls for similar cooperation to be developed with other countries that are major producers of critical raw materials; stresses the importance of good governance and transparency; in this context, supports the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and Publish What You Pay (PWYP); calls on the Commission to follow the US Dodd- Frank bill on conflict minerals;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Is of the opinion that the EU and relevant third countries should work together consensually for their mutual benefit regarding raw material supply; calls therefore for support for developing countries which includes knowledge transfer in scientific and legal matters so as to establish sustainable capacity building and mining practices including human rights standards in these countries;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines the need of safeguarding fair access to RM in the Arctic region, which is vital to the EU as the main consumer of Arctic natural resources, in line with the European Parliament resolution of 20 January 2011 on a sustainable EU policy for the High North (2009/2214(INI));
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Welcomes the preparatory work by the Commission on a legislative proposal for extractive industry disclosure requirements for companies listed on EU stock exchanges; encourages the Commission to build on the USA disclosure provisions in Section 1504 of the “Dodd-Frank Act”; and calls for reporting requirements at country-by- country and project-by-project level without exemptions for company size or country opt-out clauses;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Welcomes the preparatory work by the Commission on a legislative proposal that will amend the 2004 Transparency Directive to include legally binding extractive industry disclosure requirements for companies listed on EU stock exchanges; calls for reporting at country-by-country and project-by-project level, without exemptions for company size or country opt-out clauses that would undermine the legislation; encourages the Commission to build on the USA oil, gas and mining disclosure provision (Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) ensuring consistency of regulation across jurisdictions, a level-playing field for the extractives industry, and that transparency, accountable governance and economic development benefit the citizens of the countries in which the industry operates;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission, when preparing the new external action instruments for the period after 2013, to
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission, when preparing the new external action instruments for the period after 2013, to include measures to support good governance and sustainable mining in the
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Outlines the importance of transparency and supports the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) as a good example for international transparency standards; believes that investments that receive support from the European Investment Bank should apply these standards in order to promote sustainable mining practices in relevant third countries;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Believes that the significant potentiality of the Arctic Region is linked to its natural resources and the industries based on them, such as oil, gas, forestry, mining and fishing industries; stresses the importance of sustainable development and the safe and controlled utilisation of natural resources in the Arctic Region, taking into account environmental, economical, social and cultural implications;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to support, in the spirit of true partnership, fragile states and governments of developing countries in the building up of an efficient management system for their raw materials, including advice on best practice in licensing issues, the negotiation of contracts providing for a just share in the profits for the population and for the society, the establishment of raw material processing industries, as well as in the prevention of ecological damages;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls the Commission to adopt measures for the improvement of transparency in the area of supply;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Believes that the responsibility for a coherent and effective EU diplomacy must lie with the EEAS, which will activate all relevant Commission services, in close coordination with the Council and Parliament;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Believes that the responsibility for a coherent and effective EU diplomacy must lie with the EEAS
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Believes that the responsibility for a coherent and effective EU diplomacy must lie with the EEAS, which will
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Believes that the EU should coordinate action with the US and other partners in seeking diversification of rare earth sources and in decreasing dependence from major raw material and rare earth suppliers; takes the view that such issues should be part of the agenda of the next EU-US Summits;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls on the European Defence Agency to contribute, in accordance with Article 42(3) of the TEU, to the identification of measures to strengthen the industrial and technological base of the defence sector with regards to raw materials;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the proposal for EU diplomacy on raw materials and rare earths with the aim of ensuring access to raw materials, especially those considered crucial, and of urgently establishing an international regulatory platform and ensuring open global markets;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the proposal for EU diplomacy on raw materials and rare earths with the aim of urgently establishing an international regulatory platform and
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the proposal for EU diplomacy on raw materials and rare earths with the aim of urgently establishing an international regulatory platform and ensuring open global markets; underlines that the raw materials diplomacy can also be an element of a strategy to promote human rights, good governance, conflict- resolution and regional stability;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the proposal for EU
source: PE-464.905
2011/05/26
DEVE
47 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Considers that the EU is dependent on imports of raw material resources for its industry, especially for its high technology sector, and that the EU raw material initiative aims at securing access to these resources;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the Commission to respect the rights of developing countries and accordingly allow export restrictions in their public interest, in order in particular to make the fight against hunger and poverty the top priority; calls, further, on the Commission to refrain, in all bilateral and multilateral negotiations, from pressing for an end to export restrictions by developing countries;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Underlines the importance for the European raw materials policy to take the sustainable economic growth in the developing countries and their specific social standards fully into account (as enshrined in Article 208 TFEU) and ensure coherence between development policy and the RMI; therefore believes that the EU also should support developing countries in diversifying their economies, reducing their dependence on raw materials exports and increasing the value of their products through domestic manufacturing and processing;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Considers that, despite the fact that developing countries, particularly in Africa, are endowed with rich mineral resources, the current trade pattern whereby developing countries export raw materials and buy manufactured products from industrialised countries has locked them in permanent poverty;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Points out with concern that, on the one hand, industrialised countries’ growing demand for agricultural raw materials and, on the other hand, developing countries’ demand for foreign currency are leading to developing countries renting or selling their fertile arable land to foreign investors and no longer being able to adequately supply the food production needs of their own population;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Calls on the Commission to think more about the reuse of resources, to sharply reduce the use of resources within the EU and to put in place a sustainable economic model in order to prevent emerging worldwide conflicts which could result from developing countries’ need for raw materials for their own independent development;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned over the
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned over the negative effects the expiry of the GSP regulations could have on developing countries classified as vulnerable by the Commission, as the revamped Raw Materials Initiative does not refer to GSP or GSP+ and does not propose alternative trade incentives for promotion of human rights, environmental standards, a
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that revenue from raw materials can play a crucial role in enabling Least Developed Countries to achieve the MDGs; calls on the Commission to help developing countries diversify their economies and reduce dependency on raw materials to protect exhaustible natural resources and to support Least Developed Countries with advice and capacity- building to enable effective alternative tax-generating mechanisms to be put in place;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to fully consider the development benefits that export restrictions and taxes on raw material entail for developing countries, given that export taxes are an important source of income, especially for Least Developed Countries, reducing the domestic price of industrial inputs and thus providing economic incentives to establish domestic processing industries and also enhance environmental protection by preventing the unlimited exploitation of natural resources;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the Raw Materials Initiative (RMI) has been criticized by developing countries and NGOs for undermining the development objectives of poor countries and for not complying with EU's commitments on policy coherence for development; recalls the obligations regarding policy coherence for development enshrined in Article 208 of the TFEU; asks the Commission to set up an inter-
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Notes that the price volatility of commodities is to an extent the result of speculation;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Asks the Commission to quickly present a legislative proposal
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Asks the Commission to quickly present a legislative proposal on transparency and accountability in the extractive industries founded on the standards of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and EITI+ + and on Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act dealing with conflict minerals; recalls that this was proposed by the Committee on Development as a parliamentary priority within the framework of the structured dialogue on the Commission Work Plan for 2012; stresses that transparency, corporate social responsibility and a functioning administration benefit both extracting companies and the societies of resource- rich developing countries;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Asks the Commission to quickly present a legislative proposal on transparency and accountability in the extractive industries, with binding targets founded on the standards of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and EITI+ + and on the Dodd-Frank Act dealing with conflict minerals; recalls that this was proposed by the Committee on Development as a parliamentary priority within the framework of the structured dialogue on the Commission Work Plan for 2012; stresses that transparency, corporate social responsibility and a functioning administration benefit both extracting companies and the societies of resource- rich developing countries;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Asks the Commission to quickly present a legislative proposal on transparency and accountability in the extractive industries founded on the standards of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and EITI+ + and on the Dodd-Frank Act dealing with conflict minerals; recalls that this was proposed by the Committee on Development as a parliamentary priority within the framework of the structured dialogue on the Commission Work Plan for 2012; stresses that transparency, corporate social responsibility and a functioning
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for a legislative proposal to deprive EU companies that do not apply EU standards when operating in developing countries from any form of European funding and expresses its strong concern regarding the numerous well-documented cases of EU companies violating environmental and labour standards and human rights;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recognises the legitimate rights of developing countries' governments and parliaments to enact policies and regulate foreign investment in public interest, in consultation with civil society, in a way that foreign investment benefit the local economy, creates domestic added value and foster development; emphasises that the EU Raw Material Strategy should not hinder this right;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the EU and African Union to propose and implement concrete actions in the area of capacity-building assistance to resource-rich developing countries under the Joint Africa-EU Strategy 2nd Action Plan 2011-2013 in cooperation with the Member States, industry and stakeholders; welcomes the approach of this Action Plan to provide training on best practices to negotiate mineral contracts and foster scientific cooperation in the mining sector, in addition to promoting good governance including transparency;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Considers that export restriction, which can take different forms such as export taxes or quota, is a development tool for raw materials exporting countries to give incentive for the development of domestic manufacturing or processing industries with a potential of higher value-added exports;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that the EU should support the construction of processing facilities within the resource-rich developing countries;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls the obligations regarding policy coherence for development enshrined in Article 208 of the TFEU; asks the Commission to set up an inter- departmental working group to devise a more detailed strategy on
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Reiterates that transparency initiatives in the sector of extractive industries are in effect pro-business; they create legal security and sustainable long-time partnerships and they act as safeguards against the reopening of negotiations or expulsion; notes that there are challenges to be addressed and that some contracts require confidentiality but should nevertheless be under public scrutiny; notes that the Ghanaian Petroleum Revenue Management Bill is a good example for retaining a certain confidentiality on the one hand while safeguarding parliamentary scrutiny on the other hand;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the country-by-country reporting for extractive industries envisaged by the Commission and asks the Commission to present a legislative proposal on the automatic disclosure of transnational corporations' profit and tax payment in each individual developing countries where they operate in order to fight against abuses of tax havens, tax evasion and illicit capital flights;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the promotion of more disclosure of financial information and the country-by-country reporting for extractive industries envisaged by the Commission;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the country-by-country reporting for extractive industries envisaged by the Commission; and also asks for greater transparency for European industries extracting raw materials in developing countries, by paying the relevant taxes and openly declaring their activities;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the country-by-country reporting for extractive industries envisaged by the Commission; stresses the importance of EU - UN cooperation with regards to the Kimberley Process;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to take measures to strengthen European companies’ direct liability and duty of care in respect of their actions in developing countries;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the EU to conclude fair and equitable trade with developing countries including technology transfer, which should serve as a model for sustainable trade policy with a set of social and environmental criteria;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for stronger international cooperation on strategic resources, with the launch of an open, inclusive, transparent process for discussing future worldwide raw materials use; takes the view that global initiatives in such a sensitive field may serve as confidence-
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for stronger international cooperation on strategic resources, with the participation of civil society networks such as Publish What You Pay (PWYP); takes the view that global initiatives in such a sensitive field may serve as confidence-
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls the obligations regarding policy coherence for development enshrined in Article 208 of the TFEU; asks the Commission to set up an inter- departmental working group to devise a more detailed strategy on raw materials that respects those obligations and that proposes a policy mix tailored to each of the most critical raw materials; recalls that illicit trafficking of raw materials is still among the root causes of permanent or long-standing conflicts in developing countries;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the EU to include investors' obligation and duties to respect human rights, environmental and ILO core labour standard while operating in developing countries; considers that EU companies should be legally liable in their home countries for violation of these rights by their subsidiaries abroad and for entities they control;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that the EU's Raw materials strategy should reflect differences between developed and major economies on one hand and Least Developed Countries on the other;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Asks the EIB and the Commission to consider more rigorously whether projects contribute to poverty eradication, sustainable development and inclusive growth
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that exploitation of natural resources should be pursued in order to help a country meet its broader social and economic goals, not as an end in itself;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Points out that artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) can play a vital role in local life, provide employment and support development goals when it is officially recognised, regulated, and supported; regrets the relative lack of knowledge and analytical tools in this area and underscores the need to increase its visibility, facilitate more effective ASM policy design and implementation, and monitor assistance efforts to help prevent poverty traps and conflicts associated with small-scale mining activities
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Points out that artisanal and small-scale
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Takes the view that a long-term goal of the EU should be the establishment of an international mechanism that aims at preventing the use of military force as a means to secure access to raw materials;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to support developing countries in diversifying their domestic economies and building up local production and processing capacity, in order to reduce their dependence on raw materials exports and enable sustainable development;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Asks the EC to investigate the idea of a commodities trading tax as a financing mechanism towards poverty eradication, access to education and health services and achievement of MDGs and beyond;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to introduce a) the reduction of the EU's consumption of raw materials, b) the reduction of the EU's dependency on imported raw materials and c) the creation of a sustainable and equitable system to manage the world's natural resources, as further key objectives of the Raw Materials Initiative;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Insists that the European Parliament be regularly informed on the development of the RMI and the fulfilment of its objectives via an annual progress report; asks for this report also to include an assessment of the RMI from the point of view of the EU's commitment on policy coherence for development;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Is concerned that the selection of twelve strategic raw materials is too broad for a coherent strategy to be outlined;
source: PE-465.033
2011/05/30
INTA
180 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that EU trade policy plays a strong role as a vehicle for improving EU access to raw materials on world markets and ensuring reliability and security of raw materials supply for the European industry;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Communication and in particular its focus on raw and recovered raw materials
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 g (new) 1g. Rejects the inclusion of explicit guarantees on market access to raw materials in EU trade agreements and rejects calls for making this access a prerequisite for membership of the WTO;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1 d. Welcomes its recognition of the importance of urban mining as a valuable source for retrieving, recycling and upcycling raw materials and is of the opinion that there is a dire need for more information on urban mining and therefore asks the Commission to assess especially the potential, but also possible limitations in this regard; points out the potential of re-use as a separate category, to extend the life of products and urges the Commission (EC) to develop re-use;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of trade in raw materials for economic growth and calls for an integrated raw materials diplomacy to be developed by the EU, based on its industrial and agricultural policy agenda and in line with its development and environment policy;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Regrets however the lack of proposals for concrete measures by the Commission and cautions that without such measures the stated goals are not likely to be reached;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the continuous importance of trade in raw materials for
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Reiterates that some end of life derived products have to be managed as waste, even if they are going to be recycled or remanufactured which is a huge burden adding significant cost over disposal and in many cases acts as a barrier to improved resource efficiency; calls on the Commission urgently to address this via pragmatic end-of-waste criteria measures to further streams as foreseen in the revised EU Waste Framework Directive1; 1 Directive 2008/98/EC
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of trade in raw materials for economic growth and
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Notes that lower consumption levels, prevention of waste generation and re-use are key components for the transition to a resource efficient economy;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of trade in raw materials for economic growth and calls for an integrated raw materials diplomacy to be developed by the EU, based on its industrial policy agenda and in line with its development and environment policy; also calls on the Commission to create synergies between all the European policies and stakeholders concerned, for example by setting up national strategic metals committees which bring together the public authorities, the companies – including SMEs – operating in this sector and civil society;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of legal trade in raw materials for economic growth and calls for an integrated EU strategy on raw materials
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of trade in raw materials for sustainable economic growth and calls for an integrated raw materials diplomacy to be developed by the EU, based on its industrial policy agenda and in line with its development and environment policy;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and targets for EU economic growth, make the decoupling of growth from raw material use even more essential; insists therefore that
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission, therefore, to produce a study on Europe’s imports of raw materials which, though not listed as critical (for example lithium, hafnium and nickel) are nevertheless of strategic importance in terms of meeting Europe’s industrial needs and producing consumer goods with high added value; the study should also assess our industries’ dependence on these raw materials and measures to secure their supply, as well as the environmental cost of extracting them and the alternatives which might be envisaged;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and targets for EU economic growth
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Renews its call on the Commission and the Council to promote Fair Trade in Raw Material , as well as other independently monitored trading initiatives contributing to raising social and environmental standards in supporting small and marginalised producers in developing countries, encourages public authorities in the European Union to integrate Fair Trade and sustainability criteria into their public tenders and purchasing policies;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and targets for EU economic growth, make the decoupling of growth from raw material use even more essential; insists therefore that
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to ensure access to raw materials and rare earths through fair trade agreements and strategic trade partnerships that will allow developing countries to diversify and industrialise their economies;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and targets for EU economic growth, make the decoupling of growth from virgin raw material use even more essential; insists therefore that reduction targets should be set to stabilise virgin material use and proposes an annual material EU efficiency target of
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that EU trade policy must play
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Communication and in particular its focus on raw and recovered raw materials from mineral resources and biotic resources, its emphasis on resource efficiency and recycling, and its recognition of the importance of urban mining as a valuable source for retrieving, recycling and upcycling RM; points out the potential of re-use as a separate category, to extend the life of products
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to ensure access to
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and targets for EU economic growth, make the decoupling of growth from raw material use even more essential;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to ensure access to raw materials and rare earths through fair trade and investment agreements and strategic trade partnerships that will allow developing countries to diversify and industrialise their economies; calls on the Commission in this context to incorporate compliance with ILO standards and international environmental standards into trade agreements;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to ensure regular and secured access to raw materials and rare earths through
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and targets for EU economic growth, make the decoupling of growth from raw material use even more essential;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to ensure access to raw materials and rare earths through fair trade agreements and strategic trade partnerships that will allow developing countries to diversify and industrialise their economies; calls on the Commission in this context to incorporate compliance with ILO standards and international environmental standards into every trade agreements;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and targets for EU economic growth, make the decoupling of growth from raw material use even more essential;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Takes note of the Commission's strategy in FTA, EPA and PCA negotiations with developing countries to ban the use of export taxes on raw materials; reminds that the use of export taxes is possible under WTO disciplines; considers export taxes as a legitimate policy tool of developing countries in the frame of development strategies in order to eradicate poverty, to promote domestic manufacturing and processing, to generate income for governments of developing countries, to stabilize commodity prices, and for reasons of environmental protection and the sustainable exploitation of natural resources; calls on the Commission to respect the right of developing countries to use export taxes in the public interest and to refrain from requesting the elimination of export taxes in all trade negotiations with developing countries;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Regards better resource management in developing countries as one of the key dimensions of guaranteeing a continuous access of EU industries to raw materials at a fair price; calls on the Commission to assist developing countries in setting up appropriate regulatory and transparent taxation frameworks according to the recommendations of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI); commends the Dodd-Frank Act in the US and calls on the Commission to consider the possibility of introducing EU legislation on financial disclosure standards and country-by-country reporting of extractive industries;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Urges
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Considers the new investment protection policy competence of the EU as a potentially helpful tool of fostering sustainable resource use by helping governments of developing countries to leverage more benefits from foreign investments; considers that EU investor rights particularly in resource rich developing countries must be carefully balanced with guaranteeing policy space for governments to protect food security and land reform programs, halt further deforestation, and enact environmental policies minimizing the negative impacts of resource extraction; considers that EU investment protection treaties with resource rich developing countries should allow for local content requirements and capital controls;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Urges the EC to
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for financial support to also be provided for the extraction of raw materials within the context of fair trade agreements and strategic trade partnerships, through direct subsidies or loans granted within the framework of the European budget or through EIB funding; stresses that this money may only be granted under clear, transparent, verifiable conditions, which must clearly lead to the development and improvement of local living conditions; emphasises that compliance with basic employment and environmental standards is a vital precondition for granting European funding;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Urges the EC to research the development of a RM hierarchy and to en
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Calls on the EU Member States to make sure that lending by national Export Credit Agencies and the EIB into extractive industry projects are assessed on their impact on EU policy goals, especially human rights, poverty eradication and coherence with general EU development policy goals, prior to any lending decision; calls on the EU to take the lead in implementing G8 and G20 summit declarations with regard to the phasing out of fossil fuels subsidies;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Urges the EC to research the development of a RM hierarchy to ensure the highest added value use of RM without compromising the environment; calls on the EC to map the competition for the same materials and to address non-essential consumption of RM with a specific focus on materials; believes that mapping should consider not only current supply- side constraints for critical materials, but future evolution of demand for various materials due to changes in technology, consumption and production, so as to avoid future bottlenecks and invest as necessary in substitutes; considers that such information should guide the direction of future Community innovation action;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for an international agreement on regulatory standards on sustainable extraction of raw materials and an efficient use of resources and recycling, aiming at the prevention of commodity speculation, the protection of ecologically sensitive areas and to minimize environmental impacts and social consequences as well as binding all parties to the respect of common environmental, social, labour and human rights standards and good governance; reiterates its support for the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI);
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Urges the EC to research the development of a RM hierarchy to ensure the highest added value use of RM without compromising the environment; calls on the EC to map the competition for the same materials and to address non-essential consumption of RM;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that not all raw materials markets behave in the same way and, in particular, raw materials markets in the agricultural sector are subject to strong seasonal and climatic factors and therefore require particular attention;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Communication and in particular its focus on raw and recovered raw materials from mineral resources and biotic resources, its emphasis on resource efficiency and recycling, and its recognition of the importance of urban mining as a valuable source for retrieving, i.e. reuse, recycling and upcycling RM; points out the potential of re-use as a separate category, to extend the life of products and urges the Commission (EC) to develop re-use;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Calls on the Commission to gather, analyse and publish data on the availability and accessibility and the commercial exchange of raw and recovered materials at EU level; considers furthermore that data should be collected to enable a comparison of material characteristics, options for substitution, most efficient use and exchange of best practices;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of the development, promotion and implementation of a life cycle approach for RM,
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to draw up rules on the social responsibility of European undertakings involved in the mining of raw materials in source countries; calls, for the moment, for a commitment to comply with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and ISO 26000 to be pushed through as quickly as possible;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of the development, promotion and implementation of a life cycle approach for RM, thus extending the highest quality and life of such materials, and the need for indicators to measure efficient and effective resource use, and points to the importance of the full implementation of
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to draw up
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of the development, promotion and implementation of a life cycle approach for RM, thus extending the highest quality and life of such materials, and the need for indicators to measure efficient and effective resource use
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to draw up
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of the development, promotion and implementation of a life cycle approach for RM, thus extending the highest quality and life of such materials, and the need for indicators to measure efficient and
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to draw
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to draw up rules on the social responsibility of European undertakings involved in the mining of raw materials in source countries; calls for these rules to include the principle of supply chain due diligence set out in the 2010 OECD Due Diligence Guidance;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of the development, promotion and implementation of a life cycle approach for RM, thus extending the highest quality and life of such materials, and the need for indicators to measure efficient and effective resource use, and points to the
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to draw up rules on the social responsibility of European undertakings involved in the mining of raw materials in source countries; insists that those rules must be binding and legally enforceable and relate to all stages of the exploitation of raw materials, including the corporation's accountability for adverse effects on the environment and livelihoods of indigenous communities;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of the development, promotion and implementation of a life cycle approach for RM, thus internalising the external environmental costs associated with the extraction and the use of raw materials, extending the highest quality and life of such materials, and the need for indicators to measure efficient and effective resource use, and points to the importance of the full implementation of the Ecodesign Directive in this regard;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. points out that competition for access to raw materials has often been a root cause of conflicts and wars, leading to the killing of millions of people for example in Central Africa and other regions of the world;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Encourages the Commission to develop a recycling strategy with retrieval as close to the source of waste as possible, including the purification of waste water, as this would enable the retrieval of higher concentrations of raw material, prevent irretrievability, lower the negative impact on the environment and possibly be more energy efficient,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Reaffirms its support for the Madrid Declaration of the EU - Latin America Summit 2010, which explicitly recognises the principle of the sovereign right of States to manage and regulate their natural resources, while stressing that due attention should be paid to sustainability criteria;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Communication and in particular its broad focus on raw and recovered raw materials from mineral resources and biotic resources, its emphasis on resource efficiency and recycling, and its recognition of the importance of urban mining as a valuable source for retrieving, recycling and upcycling RM; notes that recycling often results in downgrading the value of the material, and that more focus should be given to the upcycling of materials which would render a higher value to the retrieved material; points out the potential of re-use as a separate category, to extend the life of products and urges the Commission (EC) to develop re- use;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Takes note of the fact that the EU is a major consumer of conflict mineral based products; calls for the introduction of global standards that ensure a clean trade system based on the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Points out the importance of the full implementation of the Ecodesign Directive; believes that the role of designers and scientists should be actively taken into account when ensuring the efficient and effective use of raw materials in the whole life cycle of products, as high quality recycling can only take place when the whole supply chain is closed and all stakeholders cooperate to ensure a high recollection rate;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to further
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the EC and Member States to further increase producer responsibility in
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to further develop raw materials traceability systems and to introduce a binding certification scheme for raw materials and trading chains (Certified Trading Chains),
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the EC
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to further develop raw materials traceability systems and to introduce a
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the EC and Member States to further increase producer responsibility in legislation, in particular calls on the Commission to review the Ecodesign, End-of-Life Vehicles, WEEE and Battery Directives to ensure a higher level of RM
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to further develop raw materials traceability systems, from import through to recycling or disposal, and to introduce a binding certification scheme for raw materials and trading chains (Certified Trading Chains), so that trade can be guaranteed to be fair;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the EC and Member States to further increase producer responsibility in legislation to ensure a higher level of RM recovery, reusability, re-manufacturability and re- and upcyclability and to stimulate an efficient use of RM;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to further develop raw materials traceability systems and to introduce a
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the EC and Member States to further increase the use and development of appropriate economic instruments including incentives and taxes to stimulate waste prevention and recycling and producer responsibility schemes in legislation to ensure a higher level of RM rec
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to organise education and awareness-raising campaigns for consumers with a view to using products obtained from recycling;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. This is of particular importance when it comes to the sourcing of so-called conflict minerals - such as cassiserite, coltan and wolfranite, which are mined in the DRC and widely used in mobile phones and laptops; refers to the Dodd Frank Act that was introduced in the US on April 1 as a possible model;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures to ensure there is transparency on commodity markets
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Takes the view that, as well as reducing the negative end-of-life environmental impact (polluting waste) and helping to tackle the problem of the scarcity of many primary raw materials, the recycling of materials (as completely as possible) also creates indigenous industrial development opportunities; urges the Commission to support action to bring about these opportunities, which are particularly important in the current crisis;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Communication and in particular its focus on raw and recovered raw materials from mineral resources and biotic resources, its emphasis on resource efficiency and recycling, and its recognition of the importance of urban mining as a valuable source for retrieving, recycling and upcycling RM; points out the potential of re-use as a separate category, to extend the life of products and urges the Commission (EC) to develop re-use notably through its ecodesign and waste policies;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures to ensure there is transparency on commodity markets, particularly under the aegis of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), and to act against commodities speculation;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures to ensure there is transparency on commodity markets and to act against commodities speculation; notes that this includes appropriate initiatives within the context of the G8 and G20 negotiations;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures to ensure there is transparency on commodity markets
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the EC to
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that financial markets can play an important role in hedging the risk of both producers and consumers of raw materials and commodities; Calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures to ensure there is transparency on commodity markets and to act against commodities speculation if regarded as necessary on the basis of in-depth empirical analysis;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the EC to look into possibilities of developing a system of chain of custody for all RM where possible, instructing producers to record the origin of RM through a transparent system, following existing examples (FSC and FLEGT for illegal RM), allowing for the future development of sustainability criteria for RM;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures to ensure there is transparency on commodity markets and to act against commodities speculation; considers, in particular, that the possibilities of recycling, substitutability and the efficient use of resources should be explored with that end in view, and that the Commission should promote and initiate R&D projects in those fields;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the EC to develop a system of chain of custody for all RM, instructing producers to record the origin of RM through a transparent system, following existing examples (
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures at EU and G20 level to ensure there is transparency on commodity markets, which is the most efficient way to prevent and sto
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the EC to develop a system of chain of custody for all RM, instructing producers to record the origin of RM through a transparent system, following existing examples
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures to ensure there is transparency on commodity markets and to act decisively against commodities speculation;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for proper and swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive and a landfill ban on recyclable RM and strict and ambitious efficiency criteria for incineration with energy recovery, which should aim at reuse and recycling of RM
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Is concerned about the impact of derivatives markets on price trends for raw materials; considers that there should be more effective controls on speculative action on OTC derivatives markets; against this background, supports measures such as the introduction of a transparency register and the obligation to clear OTC derivatives through central counterparties (CCPs) under the supervision of the ESMA; considers that such measures could lead to greater security for investors and SMEs and enable European producers to plan with greater certainty;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for proper and swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive and
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Regrets that many developing countries and in particular LDCs have been locked into the production and export of raw materials and commodities whose volatile prices constitute a serious impediment to the alleviation of poverty as well as the realisation of the MDGs but recognises that increasing commodity prices have contributed to a significant rise in the external accounts of some developing countries, dependent on primary commodities; notes however that in most cases this has not led to a more equal wealth distribution; underlines the opportunities for the producer countries which lay in the own exploration and management of raw material deposits when fundamental rules of transparency are respected;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for proper and swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive, and
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Supports current efforts in developing countries and in particular in LDCs to diversify their economies and develop economic activities at more advanced stages of the production process, to also include processing and marketing and to enhance the quality, productivity and production of products with a higher degree of value added; urges the Commission to support national commodity development and diversification strategies with support from the European Development Fund when necessary;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for proper and swift
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Stresses that trade based on principles of respecting the rights of workers, indigenous peoples and the environment can play an important role in contributing towards the social and economic development of developing and LDC´s;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Communication and in particular its focus on raw and recovered raw materials from mineral resources and biotic resources, its emphasis on resource efficiency and recycling, and its recognition of the
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Is concerned about the one dimensional character of the trade relations of most resource reach countries; considers the strengthening of regional economic frameworks and increased regional cooperation among developing countries to be of the utmost importance for the sustainable economic development of those countries; underlines in this respect the importance of south-south trade for the economic development of those countries;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for proper and swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive and a landfill ban on recyclable RM and strict and ambitious efficiency criteria for incineration with energy recovery, which should aim at reuse and recycling of RM instead of incineration
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. calls on the Commission to support in the spirit of true partnership fragile states and governments of developing countries in the building up of an efficient management system for their raw materials, including advice on best practice in licensing issues, the negotiation of contracts providing for a just share in the profits for the population and for the society, the establishment of raw material processing industries as well as in the prevention of ecological damages; underlines the need to guarantee the full and equal participation of civil society organisations and the trade union movement in this process;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for proper and swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive and
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6e. Recognises that liberalisation of trade in agricultural food products and agricultural primary commodities has exposed small scale farmers in developing countries and in particular in LDCs to many new challenges. As small scale farmers are largely comprised of women, this can have a disproportionately negative effect on them if they are not able to cope with external competition;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for proper and swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 f (new) 6f. Supports developing countries in their endeavours to secure access to food for the local populations; believes that viable policy space must be further strengthened to enable national rules and measures for the development of this sector, as well as support women who carry the main responsibility for feeding their families and the local communities;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for proper and swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive and a landfill ban on recyclable RM and
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 g (new) 6g. Reiterates the volatility on the commodity markets and of food in particular; underlines that the right to food is recognized in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), therefore insists that efficient mechanisms to introduce fixed price regulations for food and staple goods internationally are a matter of utmost importance;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for proper and swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive and
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 h (new) 6h. Takes note of the increased scepticism regarding the economic and environmental benefits of agro fuel production; is alarmed by the growing conflict between agro fuel production and need to use agricultural land in the interest of food security and food sovereignty ; stresses the need to increase public research into alternative energy sources;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Concurs with the Commission analysis that better implementation and enforcement of existing waste legislation is essential for promoting a more resource-efficient Europe and therefore calls on the Commission to propose the establishment of an EU waste implementation agency combined with a specific European body to carry out direct environmental inspections by the end of 2011, as better implementation of the existing legislation would, in addition to the benefits to the environment and human health, provide important economic benefits and increase access to valuable secondary raw materials;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 i (new) 6i. Notes the increase in leasing and buying off of farmland by emerging and developed economies - commonly referred to as land grabbing- in Africa in particular; notes that these practises largely occur as a result of unsustainable agricultural production internationally ; urges the Commission to not retreat to those new kind of colonialism in its trade and market access negotiations;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Believes that targets that have already been set in several Directives regarding the collection and separation of waste, should be further elaborated and set for the highest and most qualitative recovery of materials in each of the phases of recycling: collection, dismantling, pre- processing and recycling/refinery;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Draws attention, in this connection, to the importance of avoiding wasting raw materials and nutrients from manure, and calls on the Commission and Member States to promote manure processing; notes in this context the importance of defining digestate as a replacement for fertiliser;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Deplores the attitude of third countries, particularly China, which use their position as dominant suppliers to distort the world raw materials market;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Calls on the Commission, in order to ensure proper and swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive, to introduce a landfill ban on recyclable raw materials and strict and ambitious efficiency criteria for incineration with energy recovery, which should aim at reuse and recycling of raw materials; to submit a proposal for amending Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on landfill; and to develop and expand the objectives set out in Article 5(2) thereof; pursuant to the Waste Framework Directive, the reduction target of the ban on sending biodegradable municipal waste to landfill should be extended, starting in 2020, to all biodegradable waste, with the reduction target fixed at 5%;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Deplores the attitude of third countries
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Recognises the right of countries to restrict access to their raw materials for environmental purposes or to address critical shortages of supply when necessary;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Is of the opinion that clarification as regards the exact scope of the raw materials strategy is important; feels that while the Commission should monitor challenges with regard to all resources, a focus on industrial raw materials might indeed be sensible with regard to this initiative in order to allow a more targeted approach;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. believes that countries’ resource sovereignty must be respected and asks the commission in this context to balance its opposition to export taxes in developing countries by employing a differentiated approach taking account of the various national contexts so that development goals and industrialisation of development countries not are put at risk; underlines that free and fair trade is of central importance to the development of the global RM sector and wealth creation in all societies;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the EC to
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the EC to integrate the biodiversity action plan objectives into the
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that substantial quantities of recyclable waste and waste that contains raw materials are still being illegally exported from the EU; calls on the Commission to take all possible steps to put a stop to illegal exports and to incorporate EU-equivalent recycling standards into international agreements; calls on the Member States to significantly reinforce export control regimes, and the Commission close the current loopholes in the Waste Shipment Regulation.
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Stresses the importance of domestic raw materials as the basis of raw- materials supply to European industry; calls, therefore, on the Member States to ensure the long-term security of raw material deposits of regional and trans- regional importance; calls, moreover, on the Commission to improve the framework conditions for the exploitation of domestic raw materials in order to ensure that environmental, social and economic demands are given equal weight in any new directives or regulations, or in the revision of existing ones, with a view to securing access to mineral deposits in a sustainable way;
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that substantial quantities of
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Welcomes the development of instruments and indicators, such as TEEB which reassess the monetary value of biodiversity and ecosystems and give an important indication of the real price of extraction, use and disposal of raw materials, thus internalising external costs; urges the Commission to promote and stimulate the development of these instruments and its use;
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that substantial quantities of recyclable waste and waste that contains raw materials are still being exported from the EU; calls on the Commission to take all possible steps to put a stop to illegal exports and to incorporate EU-equivalent recycling standards into international agreements; calls on the Member States to significantly reinforce export control regimes, especially with respect to customs controls at the external borders of the EU; Calls also, in this context, on all EU's trading partners, especially developing countries, to adopt appropriate laws and enforce adequate control measures to prevent illegal imports of any kind of waste on their territory, and to actively fight against corruption that often enables these illegal imports to happen in the first place.
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that extraction activities must be carried out with due regard for the highest standards of workplace security and environmental protection so as to prevent accidents and rehabilitate the areas affected;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Urges the European Commission to identify key strategic resources for the EU and guarantee access to them;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Notes that, whilst cyanide mining technology, which poses a serious environmental threat, enables just 2 grams of gold to be produced from one tonne of ore, 150 times as much – nearly 300 grams – can be made from one tonne of used mobile phones without the need for cyanide; therefore reminds the Commission of Parliament’s resolution of 5 May 2010 calling for a complete EU ban on cyanide mining technology by the end of 2011;
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Stresses that trade in raw materials cannot be used as a tool for achieving political goals but should have a solely economic dimension. It should not be used to generate political dependency, but should be subject to the usual economic rules;
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Stresses the need to establish clear rules for cooperation in the field of raw materials trade between all participants involved (producers, exporters, transit countries, importers); at the same time, considers that the Commission should take a stand against projects which run counter to this principle, such as the construction of the Southstream gas pipeline, whose main purpose is to avoid using Ukraine as a transit country and block the creation of the Nabucco pipeline. The goal of Southstream should be to transfer gas extracted in Russia, while Nabucco should facilitate the supply of gas to the EU from other sources;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the role of corporate social responsibility and adherence to the highest international environmental and social standards and the application of BAT; calls on the EC to follow the spirit of the US Dodd-Frank Bill on conflict minerals where feasible and urges the EC to present a legislative proposal; supports the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI);
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Welcomes the EU’s efforts to promote sustainable trade in raw materials with third countries (e.g. FLEGT);
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses the role of corporate social responsibility and adherence to the highest international environmental and
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. calls on the Commission to follow the spirit of the US Dodd-Frank bill concerning trade in conflict minerals and urges the commission to present a legislative proposal;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Underlines that development policy is not a raw materials diplomacy tool; agrees that trade agreements should provide the necessary flexibility to support developing countries in creating linkages from the extractive industry towards local industry; believes that countries’ resource sovereignty must be respected and asks the Commission in this context to employ a differentiated approach taking account of the various national contexts so that development goals and industrialisation of development countries are not put at risk;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Recognises the limitations of export taxes for development purposes; insists however that export taxes can be an important policy tool in fostering the social and economic development of developing and least developed countries; therefore calls on the Commission to step back from insisting on the lifting of export taxes in international trade agreements;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Highlights that - especially with regard to the subject of raw materials - a coherent policy, a strategic and long-term vision, as well as a coordinated approach of all involved actors, especially within the Commission, are of utmost importance;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses the need for consistency with proclaimed objectives in the field of cooperation and development aid policy; takes the view that developing countries which are rich in raw materials should not be relegated to the role of net exporters of raw materials but should instead develop their own industrial and development policies, moving further along the value chain; rejects a neo- colonialist vision in the guise of the so- called 'raw-materials diplomacy';
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to adequately fund research in the recycling of waste that contains raw materials; Stresses that recycled industrial waste should not be considered as dross, but rather as a new resource; Suggests therefore to the Commission to boost the EU's internal market in raw materials and legal exports of recycled raw materials and related products from the EU through appropriate incentives that promote the use of recycled raw materials and related products in the EU as well as trade in recycled industrial goods;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Encourages the Commission and EU companies to promote and invest in the transfer of environmentally friendly technologies;
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls for the active introduction and promotion of more sustainable economic models decoupled from material use, to ensure the future availability of RM in the EU; calls for the EC to develop
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls for the active introduction and promotion of more sustainable economic models decoupled from material use, to ensure the future availability of RM in the EU; calls for the EC to develop
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Underlines that a new indicator which goes beyond GDP and which measures resource consumption and resource productivity is essential for the decoupling of economic growth from material use;
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Draws attention to the pernicious effects of speculation on raw materials; takes the view that the physical market should not be obscured by the financial 'derivatives' market, the volume of which has seen a disproportionate increase over the years, making it necessary and urgent to adopt measures in this field; stresses the importance of having reliable official information on flows and physical stocks of raw materials;
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 f (new) 1f. Calls on the Commission to refrain from incorporating any temporary withdrawal provisions for beneficiary countries in its reform of the GSP mechanism that would infringe on a country’s legitimate right to implement certain export restrictions on its raw materials;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Stresses that further data and more studies are needed to ensure a more targeted approach, especially as regards analyses of waste streams, but also the potential of innovative technologies for recycling and substitution;
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Urges the EC to examine the effects of a tax on mineral resources, non-energy RM, water and land use, and in particular on any side effects, such as non sustainable substitution, tax evasion or a shift of economic activities to third countries
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Urges the EC to examine the effects of a tax on mineral resources, non-energy RM, water and land use, and in particular on any side effects, such as non sustainable substitution, tax evasion or a shift of economic activities to third countries;
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Urges the EC to examine the effects of a tax on mineral resources, unused extracted raw materials, non-energy RM, water and land use, and in particular on any side effects, such as non sustainable substitution, tax evasion or a shift of economic activities to third countries; points out that a tax on resources would render resources more valuable, resulting in better use, re-use and recycling of RM and lower export of resources
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Encourages the Commission to continue preparations for an Innovation Partnership on raw materials in line with the 'Innovation Union' flagship initiative and stresses the importance of close cooperation already at an early stage between all institutions concerned in this regard;
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Believes that the extension of the lifetime of products and therefore also raw materials and biotic materials, should be promoted as their extraction, use and disposal have a major impact on land use, water, energy and transport; points out that the raw materials strategy must be incorporated into the wider EU 2020 strategy as an essential part of its overall aims, calls for more targeted resource efficiency innovation and points out that a higher efficiency rate in material use has a major impact on the industry and transport sector;
Amendment 98 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Calls on the EC to collect data on the potential in the EU of recovering raw materials through landfill mining and to develop standards for the conditions under which landfills could be excavated, including possible recovery of other resources, energy efficiency compared to the extraction of primary raw materials, possible side effects on the environment and human health (such as release of greenhouse gasses and toxic substances) and the potential for energy production and landscape restoration;
source: PE-466.972
2011/05/31
AGRI
46 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's Communication and the approach adopted in it, which defines raw materials and agricultural commodities as a matter of prime concern for the EU; notes that raw materials form the majority of the overall Communication and regrets, however, that agriculture is addressed as only a limited part;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Demands that careful attention be given to the fundamental uncertainty surrounding the increasing interaction between the price movements of energy and non-energy commodities, especially food;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Draws attention to the precarious state of supply in the case of imported agricultural products, given the restrictions on exports recently imposed by certain countries; believes the EU needs to protect its citizens from the consequences of such phenomena by reducing levels of dependency;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Believes that Member States need to move towards an optimum level of exploitation of available agricultural land, by rehabilitating deteriorated land and returning abandoned or uncultivated land to the agricultural circuit;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. With regard to food security,
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. With regard to food security, supports the finding of the Communication that
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. With regard to food security, supports the finding of the Communication that without a Common Agricultural Policy and a direct support mechanism,
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. With regard to food security, supports the finding of the Communication that without a Common Agricultural Policy and a direct support mechanism, European agriculture is unlikely to survive, and therefore stresses the need to preserve the existing level of financing of the CAP; agrees, furthermore, that the EU does and should continue to play a very important role in ensuring sufficient food for a growing world population; is therefore supportive of a strategy on raw materials and commodities that is based on an integrated approach which encompasses agricultural, financial, environmental and development policy concerns;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. With regard to food security, supports the finding of the Communication that without a sound, coherent and adequately financed Common Agricultural Policy and a direct support mechanism, European agriculture is unlikely to survive; agrees, furthermore, that the EU does and should continue to play a role in ensuring sufficient food for a growing world population; is therefore supportive of a strategy on raw materials and commodities that is based on an integrated approach which encompasses agricultural, financial, energy, environmental and development policy concerns
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasize the importance of phosphorus to the agricultural sector; calls on the Commission to put forward a Strategy on Phosphorus, which should include initiatives on resource-efficiency, recycling and a life cycle approach to the sustainability of fertilizers;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that successful EU policies on raw materials must be tied into Europe’s policies on industry, research, energy, biodiversity, trade, development, agriculture, innovation, transport and the Europe 2020 strategy; sound and strategic management of raw materials, coupled with real reform of the internal market, would put Europe well on its way to becoming a competitive player in tomorrow's global economy;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) Draws attention, in this connection, to the importance of avoiding wasting raw materials and nutrients from manure, and calls on the Commission and Member States to promote manure processing; notes in this context the importance of defining digestate as a replacement for fertiliser;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Reaffirms its commitment to free and fair trade, which is a prerequisite for European farmers to get access to raw materials and energy;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Insists, in line with the Commission, that the international community must adopt a long-term coordinated approach for global food security, including increased research efforts and investment in the agricultural sector in developing countries, notably through development policy priorities in order to increase resilience and adaptability to food shocks;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Is aware of the impact on agricultural production of the large-scale use of farmland for the production of renewable energies; considers, nonetheless, that the agri-food sector also has an important role to play in terms of bioenergy production, and therefore calls for the identification of possible synergies between the two fields;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates calls for increased transparency, better and more timely information on food commodity reserves and stocks; reaffirms its support for a system of global food reserves, under the aegis of the UN system of institutions, and believes the EU should play a leading role in promoting this initiative; is supportive of the recent efforts undertaken by the G20 towards more information exchange in food production forecasts;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Reaffirms its support for a system of global emergency food reserves, under the aegis of the UN system of institutions, believes national emergency reserves should be available locally to alleviate the effects of extreme price surges and improve the supply situation and believes the EU should play a leading role in promoting this initiative; is supportive of the recent efforts undertaken by the G20 towards more information exchange in food production forecasts;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Reaffirms its support for a system of global food reserves, under the aegis of the UN system of institutions, and believes the EU should play a leading role in promoting this initiative; is supportive of the recent efforts undertaken by the G20 towards more information exchange in food production forecasts; stresses the value of measures to develop the availability, quality and transparency of the information on stocks at Union and international level;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to include incentive based initiatives in the CAP and the raw materials strategy aimed at unlocking the full potential of farmers to increase their production of sustainable energy, which is currently underexploited; thereby creating new rural jobs and adding an additional revenue stream to the income of farmers;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Supports the analysis provided by the Commission with regard to agricultural products in the context of global food security, with diminishing global food reserves and increasing
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes the joint communiqué of the 3rd Berlin agriculture ministers' Summit of 22 January 2011 signed by 48 countries which called for an improved ability of agricultural markets to function properly and recognised the importance of trade to create a balance between the different actors in agricultural markets and to improve farmers' access to raw materials and energy;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Expects the raw materials strategy to align with the Europe 2020 strategy priorities of smart, inclusive and sustainable growth; believes that the proposals should include the agriculture sector's use of raw materials, soil and water resources;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Reiterates its commitment to tackling extreme price volatility
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Reiterates its commitment to tackling extreme price volatility, given market behaviour in the case of agricultural commodities; recalls the fact that the market for agricultural products is structurally volatile, with seasonality of production, climatic events and other factors that prevent producers from adapting to demand fluctuations in a short time; recalls that agriculture is a sector of strategic interest and that
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Reiterates its commitment to tackling extreme price volatility, given market behaviour in the case of agricultural commodities; recalls the fact that the market for agricultural products is structurally volatile, with seasonality of production, climatic events and other factors that prevent producers from adapting to demand fluctuations in a short time; highlights that in the medium term we can expect higher agricultural commodity prices, but that farmers are still likely to be faced with increased price volatility and increased input production costs; recalls that agriculture is a sector of strategic interest and that its functioning may not be left only to market forces; stresses that higher prices for agricultural commodities rarely result in higher
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Reiterates its commitment to tackling extreme price volatility, given market behaviour in the case of agricultural commodities, for example by increasing agricultural productivity and adaptability to the effects of climate change; recalls the fact that the market for agricultural products is structurally volatile, with seasonality of production, climatic events and other factors that prevent producers from adapting to demand fluctuations in a short time; recalls that agriculture is a sector of strategic interest and that its functioning may not be left only to market forces; stresses that higher prices for agricultural commodities rarely result in higher incomes for farmers;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. With regard to financial instruments,
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. With regard to financial instruments, supports the recent Commission proposals on regulating OTC derivatives and on public consultation on the MiFID Directive; believes that
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. With regard to financial instruments, supports the recent Commission proposals on regulating OTC derivatives and on public consultation on the MiFID Directive; believes that speculative behaviour, malpractice and abuse on derivatives markets for commodities should be
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. With regard to financial instruments, supports the recent Commission proposals on regulating OTC derivatives and on public consultation on the MiFID Directive; believes that speculative behaviour on derivatives markets for commodities should be
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Supports the analysis provided by the Commission with regard to agricultural products in the context of global food security, with diminishing global food reserves and increasing hunger, and
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that commodity derivatives markets initially fulfilled the purpose of hedging against risk, as well as providing the possibility of raising funding from the market, both of which serve the interests of farmers; notes with concern,
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that commodity derivatives markets initially fulfilled the purpose of hedging against risk, as well as providing the possibility of raising funding from the market, both of which serve the interests of
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that commodity derivatives markets initially fulfilled the purpose of hedging against risk, as well as providing the possibility of raising funding from the market, both of which serve the interests of farmers; notes
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Deplores the fact that too much agricultural waste is currently not used to its full potential; considers that agricultural waste should be seen as an asset and therefore asks the Commission to investigate new means of using it as raw materials for other sectors;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes that the efficient monitoring of policy on agricultural raw materials is essential for an effective strategy; stresses the need for closer coordination within the Commission and between Member States, and insists on the need to keep Parliament regularly informed on the evolution of the initiative for agricultural raw materials, by means of an annual activity report;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Asks the Commission to include these concerns in its strategy and to propose concrete measures to ensure food security
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Asks the Commission to include these concerns in its strategy and to propose concrete measures to ensure food security
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Supports the analysis provided by the Commission with regard to agricultural products in the context of global food security, with diminishing global food reserves and increasing hunger, and from a market perspective, underlining the extreme price volatility in food and feed, the imperfections of the food and feed chains and the role of financial instruments and speculative behaviour as
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Supports the analysis provided by the Commission with regard to agricultural products in the context of global food security, with diminishing global food reserves and increasing hunger, and from a market perspective, underlining the extreme price volatility in food and feed, the imperfections of the food and feed chains and the role of financial instruments and speculative behaviour as a possible cause of instability, one which must be taken seriously;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Supports the analysis provided by the Commission with regard to agricultural products in the context of global food security, with diminishing global food reserves and increasing hunger
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes the lack of evidence there is to establish a systematic link between financial speculation and long-term price trends of food commodities and agricultural raw materials; considers, therefore, that a thorough analysis aiming at gaining a better understanding of the multiple factors that affect short and long-term food commodities and agricultural raw materials price trends could provide a useful basis for adopting adequate measures to mitigate the effects of extreme price volatility;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Asks the Commission, together with other international bodies, to refine their analysis on the causes explaining market fluctuations and seek greater clarity on the interactions between speculation and agricultural markets, as well as energy markets and food commodities prices; Stresses that those steps should be taken as part of the efforts to regulate the financial markets at global and EU level;
source: PE-464.932
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-460898_EN.html
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-464763_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-462634_EN.html
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-464768_EN.html
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0442/COM_COM(2013)0442_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0442/COM_COM(2013)0442_EN.pdf |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0025/COM_COM(2011)0025_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0025/COM_COM(2011)0025_EN.pdf |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE458.600New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-458600_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE462.749New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-462749_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE462.883New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-462883_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE462.807&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-462807_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE460.898&secondRef=02
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE464.763&secondRef=02
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE462.634&secondRef=02
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE464.768&secondRef=03
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0288_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0288_EN.html |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0442/COM_COM(2013)0442_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0442/COM_COM(2013)0442_EN.pdf |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0025/COM_COM(2011)0025_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0025/COM_COM(2011)0025_EN.pdf |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/5/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110912&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-09-12-TOC_EN.html |
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-288&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0288_EN.html |
docs/9/body |
EC
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0442/COM_COM(2013)0442_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0442/COM_COM(2013)0442_EN.pdf |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-288&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0288_EN.html |
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-364New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0364_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/05029New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Effective Raw Materials Strategy for EuropeNew
Effective raw materials strategy for Europe |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0025:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0025:EN
|
activities/2/committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
545fe675d1d1c56de6000000
|
activities/4/committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
545fe675d1d1c56de6000000
|
committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
545fe675d1d1c56de6000000
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|