Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AGRI | TABAJDI Csaba Sándor ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | GIRLING Julie ( ECR) | Pavel POC ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 534 votes to 16, with 92 abstentions, a resolution on honeybee health and the challenges of the beekeeping sector, in response to a Commission communication on the subject.
It should be noted that an alternative motion for a resolution, tabled by more than 40 Members, was rejected in plenary.
The resolution notes that beekeeping as an economic and social activity plays a crucial role in the sustainable development of rural areas, creates jobs and provides an important ecosystem service via pollination, which contributes to the improvement of biodiversity by maintaining the genetic diversity of plants. However, a decrease in the number of bee colonies has been reported in both the EU and other parts of the world, as well as a declining trend in pollinator species, which contribute to agricultural productivity. In the agricultural sector, the health of individual bees and colonies is affected by numerous lethal and sublethal factors, many of them interconnected.
Given this context, Parliament puts forward the following recommendations:
(1) Research and dissemination of scientific knowledge : Members consider it important to take urgent measures to protect bee health, taking into account the specificities of beekeeping, the diversity of actors involved and the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity.
The Commission is invited to:
increase the level of support for honeybee-health-related research under the next financial framework and to focus the research on (i) technological developments, (ii) disease prevention and control, (iii) defining sustainable agricultural practices, (iv) promoting non-chemical alternatives and (v) generally further encouraging Integrated Pest Management techniques and the development of veterinary medical products for current EU honeybee disease-causing agents, especially the Varroa destructor mite; promote the setting up of appropriate national surveillance systems in close cooperation with beekeepers’ associations and to develop harmonised standards at EU level to allow comparison; support a European Network of ‘reference hives’ to monitor the effect of environmental conditions, beekeeping practices and agricultural practices on bee health; draw up three-year programmes based on a declaration by all Member States of the number of hives actually registered rather than on estimated figures; encourage a greater degree of information-sharing among Member States, laboratories, beekeepers, farmers, industry and scientists, on ecotoxicological studies affecting honeybee health so as to make possible informed, independent scientific scrutiny.
Parliament welcomes the establishment of the EU reference laboratory for bee health and calls on the Commission to set up a steering committee, together with representatives of the beekeeping sector, to assist it in establishing the annual work programme of the EU reference laboratory.
The resolution also calls for support for training programmes for beekeepers on disease prevention and control. The Commission is invited, in cooperation with beekeeping organisations, to submit guidelines for the veterinary treatment of hives.
(2) Veterinary products : the resolution recognises that the development of innovative and effective treatments against Varroa mites , which are implicated in some 10% of annual losses, is of high importance. It calls on the Member States to provide financial support for the research, development and field-testing of new bee-health medicinal products. It highlights, in particular, the need to offer the pharmaceutical industry incentives for the development of new medicinal products designed to combat bee disease.
The Commission is invited to:
draw up common guidelines regarding veterinary treatment in the sector in order to reduce the negative effects of diseases and pests; work out more flexible rules for the authorisation and availability of veterinary products for honeybees, including medicines of natural origin and others that do not have health effects on insects; look into the possibility of extending cover under the European Union Veterinary Fund to bee diseases when the fund is next revised.
Members welcome the Commission intention to propose a comprehensive Animal Health Law . They call on the Commission to adjust the scope and financing of European veterinary policy to take account of the specific characteristics of bees and beekeeping so that bee diseases can be combated more effectively via (i) adequate availability of effective, standardised medicines in all Member States, and (ii) the financing of bee health in the framework of the European veterinary policy.
(3) Effects of modern agriculture on bees : the resolution emphasises that the European Union has only recently, with the committed involvement of the European Parliament, adopted new, stricter rules on the authorisation of plant protection products and their sustainable use, in order to ensure that they are safe for human beings and the environment. Noting that these rules include additional, strict criteria relating to bee safety, Members call on the Commission to keep Parliament informed about the successful implementation of the new rules.
The Commission is invited to improve risk assessment methodology for pesticides in order to protect colony health and population development.
The resolution calls, in a spirit of dialogue between beekeepers, agricultural stakeholders and public authorities, for the setting up of a system to encourage preliminary notification of beekeepers in all Member States in advance of pesticide applications, especially aerial insecticidal treatment operations. It also calls for the setting up of a system to provide on request information about the position of hives when these operations take place.
(4) Production and food safety aspects, protection of origin : Members call on the Commission to:
constantly monitor the animal health situation in source countries , to apply the strictest animal health requirements and to put in place an appropriate monitoring system for the propagation material coming from third countries, in order to avoid introducing exotic bee diseases/parasites such as Aethina tumida beetles and Tropilaelaps mites into the EU; increase transparency regarding the frequency, percentage, characteristics and, above all, the results of the security checks performed at border control posts; include No Action Levels (NALs) or Reference Points for Action (RPAs) or Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) in honey and other apicultural products for substances that cannot be authorised for the European beekeeping sector, as well as to harmonise veterinary border controls and controls on the internal market since, in the case of honey, low-quality imports, adulteration and substitutes distort the market; modify the annexes to Directive 2001/110/EC (Honey Directive) in order to improve the standards of EU production by establishing clear legal definitions for all apicultural products, including honey varieties; harmonise rules on labelling with the provisions of the Regulation on Agricultural Quality Schemes and to introduce obligatory labelling with the country of origin for imported and EU-produced apicultural products.
The resolution calls for a provisional threshold limit (Reference Point for Action) of 10 ppb to be set for veterinary products authorised in the European Union, in view of the different analytical methods that are applied in the various Member States.
Members call for action to boost consumption of European honey and apiculture products , including by promoting honeys with characteristics specific to certain varieties and geographical areas.
(5) Measures in connection with the conservation of biodiversity and the forthcoming reform of the Common Agricultural Policy : Members call on the Commission to provide significantly more financial resources , by stepping up the current support for apiculture in the CAP after 2013 and guaranteeing the continued existence and improvement of the existing support programmes (Regulation (EC) No 1221/97) for the beekeeping sector. They call on the Commission to provide a safety net or a common insurance system for apiculture in order to mitigate the impact of crisis situations on beekeepers.
The Commission is invited to:
provide significantly more financial resources , by stepping up the current support for apiculture in the CAP after 2013 and guaranteeing the continued existence and improvement of the existing support programmes (Regulation (EC) No 1221/97) for the beekeeping sector, and to encourage the development of joint projects, and on the Member States to provide technical assistance for the beekeeping sector; ensure that the system of co-financing is compatible with the establishment of direct aid under the first pillar of the CAP by those states that consider it necessary; provide a safety net or a common insurance system for apiculture in order to mitigate the impact of crisis situations on beekeepers; within the framework of the EU's new biodiversity strategy, make financial resources available for apiculture as a priority and/or at a higher rate in all projects and actions submitted under the CAP dealing exclusively with subspecies and eco-types of Apis mellifera native to each region; clarify, in the forthcoming reform of the CAP, the support measures and aid to be assigned to the European beekeeping sector, taking account of the environmental and social public goods that honeybee colonies provide via pollination and of the environmental service performed by beekeepers in managing their bee colonies; consider the possibility of creating a special scheme for assistance to beekeepers within the framework of the direct aid scheme , for example through bee colony payments, which will help safeguard the beekeeping sector in the EU, keep beekeepers in beekeeping, encourage young people to become beekeepers and ensure bees continue to act as pollinators; promote sustainable agricultural practices in the CAP, to encourage all farmers to employ simple agronomic practices in line with Directive 2009/128/EC and to strengthen agri-environmental measures specific to the beekeeping sector, in the spirit of the new EU Biodiversity Strategy.
As regards the conservation of bee biodiversity , the resolution urges the Commission:
within the framework of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 (Habitats Directive), to define the conservation status of the species Apis mellifera and, where appropriate, to include it in the Annexes to the Directive; within the framework of Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992, to ban, at least temporarily, the import from third countries of live bees and species of the genus Bombus sp. in order to prevent the introduction of exotic diseases.
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development adopted an own-initiative report by Csaba Sándor TABADJI (S&D, HU) on honeybee health and the challenges of the beekeeping sector, in response to a Commission communication on the subject.
The report notes that beekeeping as an economic and social activity plays a crucial role in the sustainable development of rural areas, creates jobs and provides an important ecosystem service via pollination, which contributes to the improvement of biodiversity by maintaining the genetic diversity of plants. However, a decrease in the number of bee colonies has been reported in both the EU and other parts of the world, as well as a declining trend in pollinator species, which contribute to agricultural productivity. In the agricultural sector, the health of individual bees and colonies is affected by numerous lethal and sublethal factors, many of them interconnected.
Given this context, the report puts forward the following recommendations:
(1) Research and dissemination of scientific knowledge : Members consider it important to take urgent measures to protect bee health, taking into account the specificities of beekeeping, the diversity of actors involved and the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity.
The Commission is invited to:
increase the level of support for honeybee-health-related research under the next financial framework and to focus the research on (i) technological developments, (ii) disease prevention and control, (iii) defining sustainable agricultural practices, (iv) promoting non-chemical alternatives and (v) generally further encouraging Integrated Pest Management techniques and the development of veterinary medical products for current EU honeybee disease-causing agents, especially the Varroa destructor mite; promote the setting up of appropriate national surveillance systems in close cooperation with beekeepers’ associations and to develop harmonised standards at EU level to allow comparison; support a European Network of ‘reference hives’ to monitor the effect of environmental conditions, beekeeping practices and agricultural practices on bee health; draw up three-year programmes based on a declaration by all Member States of the number of hives actually registered rather than on estimated figures; encourage a greater degree of information-sharing among Member States, laboratories, beekeepers, farmers, industry and scientists, on ecotoxicological studies affecting honeybee health so as to make possible informed, independent scientific scrutiny.
Members welcome the establishment of the EU reference laboratory for bee health and call on the Commission to set up a steering committee, together with representatives of the beekeeping sector, to assist it in establishing the annual work programme of the EU reference laboratory.
The report also calls for support for training programmes for beekeepers on disease prevention and control. The Commission is invited, in cooperation with beekeeping organisations, to submit guidelines for the veterinary treatment of hives.
(2) Veterinary products : the report recognises that the development of innovative and effective treatments against Varroa mites , which are implicated in some 10 % of annual losses, is of high importance. It calls on the Member States to provide financial support for the research, development and field-testing of new bee-health medicinal products. It highlights, in particular, the need to offer the pharmaceutical industry incentives for the development of new medicinal products designed to combat bee disease.
The Commission is invited to:
draw up common guidelines regarding veterinary treatment in the sector in order to reduce the negative effects of diseases and pests; work out more flexible rules for the authorisation and availability of veterinary products for honeybees, including medicines of natural origin and others that do not have health effects on insects; look into the possibility of extending cover under the European Union Veterinary Fund to bee diseases when the fund is next revised.
Members welcome the Commission intention to propose a comprehensive Animal Health Law . They call on the Commission to adjust the scope and financing of European veterinary policy to take account of the specific characteristics of bees and beekeeping so that bee diseases can be combated more effectively via i) adequate availability of effective, standardised medicines in all Member States, and ii) the financing of bee health in the framework of the European veterinary policy.
(3) Effects of modern agriculture on bees : the report emphasises that the European Union has only recently, with the committed involvement of the European Parliament, adopted new, stricter rules on the authorisation of plant protection products and their sustainable use, in order to ensure that they are safe for human beings and the environment. Noting that these rules include additional, strict criteria relating to bee safety, Members call on the Commission to keep Parliament informed about the successful implementation of the new rules.
The Commission is invited to improve risk assessment methodology for pesticides in order to protect colony health and population development.
The report calls, in a spirit of dialogue between beekeepers, agricultural stakeholders and public authorities, for the setting up of a system to encourage preliminary notification of beekeepers in all Member States in advance of pesticide applications, especially aerial insecticidal treatment operations. It also calls for the setting up of a system to provide on request information about the position of hives when these operations take place.
(4) Production and food safety aspects, protection of origin : Members call on the Commission to:
constantly monitor the animal health situation in source countries , to apply the strictest animal health requirements and to put in place an appropriate monitoring system for the propagation material coming from third countries, in order to avoid introducing exotic bee diseases/parasites such as Aethina tumida beetles and Tropilaelaps mites into the EU; increase transparency regarding the frequency, percentage, characteristics and, above all, the results of the security checks performed at border control posts; include No Action Levels (NALs) or Reference Points for Action (RPAs) or Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) in honey and other apicultural products for substances that cannot be authorised for the European beekeeping sector, as well as to harmonise veterinary border controls and controls on the internal market; modify the annexes to Directive 2001/110/EC (Honey Directive) in order to improve the standards of EU production by establishing clear legal definitions for all apicultural products, including honey varieties; harmonise rules on labelling with the provisions of the Regulation on Agricultural Quality Schemes and to introduce obligatory labelling with the country of origin for imported and EU-produced apicultural products.
The report calls for action to boost consumption of European honey and apiculture products , including by promoting honeys with characteristics specific to certain varieties and geographical areas.
(5) Measures in connection with the conservation of biodiversity and the forthcoming reform of the Common Agricultural Policy : Members call on the Commission to provide significantly more financial resources , by stepping up the current support for apiculture in the CAP after 2013 and guaranteeing the continued existence and improvement of the existing support programmes (Regulation (EC) No 1221/97) for the beekeeping sector. They call on the Commission to provide a safety net or a common insurance system for apiculture in order to mitigate the impact of crisis situations on beekeepers.
The Commission is invited to:
consider the possibility of creating a special scheme for assistance to beekeepers within the framework of the direct aid scheme, for example through bee colony payments, which will help safeguard the beekeeping sector in the EU, keep beekeepers in beekeeping, encourage young people to become beekeepers and ensure bees continue to act as pollinators; promote sustainable agricultural practices in the CAP, to encourage all farmers to employ simple agronomic practices in line with Directive 2009/128/EC and to strengthen agri-environmental measures specific to the beekeeping sector, in the spirit of the new EU Biodiversity Strategy.
As regards the conservation of bee biodiversity , the report urges the Commission:
within the framework of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 (Habitats Directive), to define the conservation status of the species Apis mellifera and, where appropriate, to include it in the Annexes to the Directive; within the framework of Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992, to ban, at least temporarily, the import from third countries of live bees and species of the genus Bombus sp. in order to prevent the introduction of exotic diseases.
PURPOSE: to clarify the key issues related to honeybee health and key actions that the Commission intends to take to address them.
BACKGROUND: in the past decade several health problems have affected the beekeeping sector in different countries worldwide. In particular, in recent years, there have been several reports of increased mortality in bees both in the EU and elsewhere. This has caused serious concern all over the world, but scientific studies have not been able to determine the exact cause or the extent of these increased mortalities.
Nevertheless, the health of bees is linked with many factors of a different nature (bacterial, viral, parasitic, etc); availability of appropriate treatments; invasive species; and environmental changes. Other factors to be considered include the use of pesticides in agriculture.
It is important to protect bee health proactively, taking into account the particularities of beekeeping, the different actors involved.
Beekeeping is a widely-developed activity in the EU, both at professional (keepers with over 150 hives) and hobby level. There are around 700,000 beekeepers in the EU out of which around 97% are non-professional. That is why the EU has established certain harmonised rules to protect and maintain the health of bees, while Member States may regulate other aspects of bee keeping and related activities.
In the spirit of the Animal Health Strategy for the European Union (2007-2013 – "Prevention is better than cure") adopted in 2007, beekeeping organisations concerned about bee health in the EU recently called for more focus on to the issue.
In November 2008, the European Parliament also passed a resolution on the situation in the beekeeping sector . This called on the Commission to carry out specific actions and to ensure that those actions were coordinated.
The Commission has already launched a number of initiatives to address the concerns of the beekeeping sector and others are planned.
CONTENT: the objective of this Communication is to clarify the key issues related to bee health and key actions that the Commission intends to take to address them:
financial support to Member States in order, inter alia , to fight Varroa (an important bee parasite that is present and well established in the EU); checks on the animal health requirements for imports from third countries of live bees and bumble bees to avoid introduction into the EU of exotic bee diseases; assess the possible implications for the bee sector in the framework of the preparatory process for the creation of the new Animal Health Law; a more frequent use of guidance documents at EU and/or national level, or at the level of the sector concerned, could also be envisaged to address issues for which legislation at EU level would not be appropriate; start a pilot surveillance programme by the end of 2011 as regards bee mortalities; designate an EU Reference Laboratories (EURL) for bee health which should become operational by April 2011; improve knowledge and training on bee health – the contribution of the Better Training for Safer Food programme; improve the availability of veterinary medicines for bees; authorisation of pesticides at EU level only if their use has no unacceptable effect on bee health or bees or its use leads to negligible exposure of honeybees; preparation of a Communication on the EU Biodiversity Strategy to achieve the EU 2020 biodiversity target, which will look at ways of preventing or mitigating the loss of biodiversity by addressing its cause. The implementation of this strategy is expected to have a beneficial effect on bee health; approval of the national programmes of the 27 Member States to improve the production and marketing of apiculture products for the period 2011-2013. The EU contribution to the financing of the programmes has increased by almost 25 percent compared to the previous period (2008-2010), from 26 M€ to 32 M€ per year; support research projects in bee health and the decline of both wild and domesticated pollinators, including honeybee colonies, in Europe; improve communication between relevant players , at EU or national, regional or local level and also across policy areas; strengthen the global link to international activities (for instance the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE)).
This Communication should serve as a basis for further discussion with the European Parliament, the Council as well as Member State authorities and stakeholders. This should contribute to identifying possible further actions needed at EU level.
It is important to understand that such actions can only be successful if all interested stakeholders take part in a constructive and transparent manner. This is why the Commission will initiate discussions in the appropriate fora to obtain extensive feed back on its intentions, and to improve its assessment and management of the bee health situation. Non-governmental organisations and beekeeping industry platforms in particular can play a dual role both to initiate and implement many new actions.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)55
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0493/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0359/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0359/2011
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE469.980
- Committee opinion: PE464.754
- Committee draft report: PE467.076
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2010)0714
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE467.076
- Committee opinion: PE464.754
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE469.980
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0359/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)55
Activities
- Libor ROUČEK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Csaba Sándor TABAJDI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrew Henry William BRONS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert DUŠEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kartika Tamara LIOTARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Judith A. MERKIES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria do Céu PATRÃO NEVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Struan STEVENSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
220 |
2011/2108(INI)
2011/08/31
AGRI
220 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) - having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC1, ________ 1 OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas beekeeping and biodiversity are mutually dependent; whereas bees give early warning of the damaging impact of biodiversity loss and pollution; whereas, via pollination, bee colonies provide important environmental and social public goods, thus ensuring food security and maintaining biodiversity; whereas ‘bee pastures’ and diverse foraging grounds provide bees with the rich nutrition necessary to stay healthy,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the need to support training programmes for beekeepers, farmers and f
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the need to support training programmes for beekeepers and farmers on disease prevention and control, botanical knowledge and the impact of pesticides, with the purpose of encouraging the acquisition of qualifications, and to make beekeeping-related project grants available for young researchers;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the need to support training programmes for beekeepers and farmers on disease prevention and control, botanical knowledge and the impact of pesticides, with the purpose of encouraging the acquisition of qualifications, and production programmes which devote particular attention to disease and pest resistance;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the need to support training programmes organised by universities, particularly those given by vets specialised and trained in these problems, for beekeepers and farmers on disease prevention and control, botanical
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls on the authorities and representative organisations in the Member States to support the dissemination of appropriate scientific and technical knowledge about bee health among beekeepers; underlines that a permanent dialogue is needed between beekeepers, farmers and the relevant authorities;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. recommends that a greater linkage be made to the Apimondia Secretariat in Rome which can supply relevant stakeholders, particularly scientists, with expertise and experience in putting forward possible solutions to the decreasing numbers of honeybees throughout the EU.
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses the need to ensure adequate training for veterinarians, as well as regular opportunities for veterinary consultation for beekeepers and the involvement of apiculture specialists in national veterinary authorities; stresses, furthermore, that in order to maintain direct contact with beekeepers a beekeeper should be appointed as full-time veterinary assistant in each area covered by a veterinary service, with inspections being carried out at least once a year at the premises of all beekeepers in that area and it being made compulsory for details of the state of the apiaries to be entered into a database every autumn;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses the need to ensure adequate training for veterinarians, as well as
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Stresses the need to promote and provide appropriate training, and financial support, for young farmers wishing to invest in apiculture;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital В В. whereas increased bee mortality has been reported in both the EU and other parts of the world; whereas pollinator species, which contribute to agricultural productivity, are in decline; whereas, in the event of a marked intensification of this trend, farmers in the EU, as well as those in other parts of the world, may have to resort to human-assisted pollination, which would entail a twofold increase in expenditure on pollination; whereas science and veterinary practice cannot currently provide effective prevention or disease control against certain pests and diseases owing to insufficient research and development of new bee-health medicines in the past decades, which is the result of the limited size of the market and the consequent low interest of big pharmaceutical companies,
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide financial support for the research, development and field- testing of new bee-health medicinal products, especially for SMEs, in light of the beekeeping sector’s contribution to biodiversity and the public good in the form of pollination, taking into consideration the high cost of veterinary treatment currently borne by beekeepers by comparison with health costs in other livestock sectors;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide financial support for the pharmaceutical industry and for the research, development and field-
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Notes that public awareness and education of bees is vitally important as bees are often mistaken for wasps and many people remain scared of bees as a result, in addition, poor knowledge of the work that bees do in gardens often means that hobby gardeners do not plant the right types of plants and flowers; stresses that more public awareness in this area may help provide more varied food sources for bees and help their survival as a result.
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Highlights the need to offer the pharmaceutical industry incentives for the development of new medicinal products designed to combat bee diseases;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the Commission’s intention
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to propose a comprehensive Animal Health Law but considers that account must be taken of the unique and specific nature of beekeeping; calls on the Commission to ensure greater harmonisation among the Member States, focusing its efforts on combating and controlling varroasis in the EU;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to propose a comprehensive Animal Health Law with a special focus on bees;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Stresses that in urban environments, including heavily densely populated cities, roof gardens can encourage diversity in the environment and food sources available for bees and that greater public awareness can help people managing roof gardens to find the right mix of flowers and plants to aid the survival of bees in these environments.
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to work out more flexible rules for the authorisation and availability of veterinary products for
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to work out more flexible rules for the authorisation and availability of veterinary products for honeybees, especially natural medicines
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas beekeeping and biodiversity are mutually dependent; whereas, via pollination, bee colonies provide important environmental and social public goods, thus ensuring food security and maintaining biodiversity; whereas ‘bee pastures’ and diverse foraging grounds provide bees with the rich nutrition necessary to stay healthy, bearing in mind that this food needs to be available all the year round and during the most critical periods, i.e. before winter and in spring,
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to work out more flexible rules for the authorisation and availability of veterinary products for honeybees, especially medicines of plant origin and others that do not harm insects in the long term; welcomes the Commission's proposal on the revision of the veterinary medicinal product directive; emphasises however, that special attention be paid to antibiotics, which should not be authorised for opportunistic diseases in colonies, given the impacts on the quality of bee products and resistance;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Stresses that Colony collapse disorder is not a modern phenomena and has been recorded before the advent of modern farming practices; considers that the health of honeybees should be seen as an important bio-indicator for the state of our environment and the sustainability of agricultural practices;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Welcomes the Commission's intention to introduce maximum residue levels for the use of medicinal products through the 'cascade' procedure in order to eliminate the current legal uncertainty which hinders the treatment of sick bees;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Commission to look into the possibility of extending cover under the European Union Veterinary Fund to bee diseases when the fund is next revised;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to improve
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to improve risk assessment methodology for pesticides
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to improve risk assessment methodology for pesticides, which is independently evaluated by the European Food Safety Authority and should focus on both the individual insect and the entire colony, and to ensure
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to improve risk assessment methodology for pesticides, which should focus on both the individual insect and the entire colony, and to ensure
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to improve risk assessment methodology for pesticides, which should focus on both the individual insect and the entire colony, and to ensure
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. Emphasizes concerns that due to the high cost of establishing a beekeeping enterprise, there are fewer people entering the sector, resulting in a shortfall in hives needed to pollinate vital agricultural crops.
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to improve risk assessment methodology for pesticides, which should focus on
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to improve risk assessment methodology for pesticides, which should focus on both lethal and sub- lethal effects, direct or indirect contamination via water, droplet guttation, nectar and pollen, the individual insect and the entire colony, and to ensure free access to the ecotoxicological studies
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Emphasises that the European Union has only recently, with the committed involvement of the European Parliament, adopted new, stricter rules on the authorisation of plant protection products and their sustainable use, in order to ensure that they are safe for human beings and the environment; notes that these rules include additional, strict criteria relating to bee safety; calls on the Commission to keep Parliament informed about the successful implementation of the new rules;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Member States to transpose and fully implement, as soon as possible, Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides and, in particular,
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Member States to transpose and fully implement, as soon as possible, Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of p
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Member States to transpose and fully implement, as soon as possible, Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides and, in particular, to promote
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Member States to transpose and fully implement, as soon as possible, Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides and, in particular, to pay particular attention to the use of pesticides that may have an adverse effect on bees and on colony health, and to promote low-pesticide-input pest management and integrated pest management;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. recognises that the development of innovative and effective treatments against Varroa mites, implicated in annual losses of about 10%, is of high importance; considers that there is a need to increase support on veterinary treatments, obtained solely from licensed commercial formulae, in order to reduce negative effects of diseases and pests; asks the Commission to introduce common guidelines regarding the veterinary treatment in the sector, stressing the need for it to be properly used; calls for guidelines to be introduced for the use of molecules and/or formulations with a base of organic acids and essential oils and other substances authorised for biological pest control;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. Whereas the health and sustainability of the 69 species of bumblebees should also be taken into account, bumblebee colonies are uniquely at risk, because only the queen survives the winter and is often at risk of being eaten by predators.
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to consider chronic, larval and sub-lethal toxicity
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to consider chronic, larval and sub-lethal toxicity, and substance-pathogen and substance- substance synergies in the risk assessment of pesticides; calls
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to consider chronic, larval and sub-lethal toxicity
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to consider chronic, larval and sub-lethal toxicity, and
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to consider chronic, larval and sub-lethal toxicity
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to consider
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to consider chronic, larval and sub-lethal toxicity, and substance-pathogen and substance- substance synergies in the risk assessment of pesticides; calls on the Commission to pay special attention to specific pesticides, such as those of the family of the neonicotinoide family (Clothianidin, Thiacloprid, Imidacloprid, Thiamethoxam), phenyl-pyrazoles (Fipronil) and pyrethroids, or active substances such as Chlorpyrifos or Dimethoat, as these active substances in pesticides have a proven adverse effect on bee and colony health; application
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission, on the basis of reliable and effective tests, to consider chronic, larval and sub-lethal toxicity, and substance-pathogen and substance- substance synergies in the risk assessment of pesticides; calls on the Commission to pay special attention to specific pesticides, such as those of the family of the neonicotinoide family (clothianidin, thiacloprid, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam), phenyl-pyrazoles (fipronil) and pyrethroids, or active substances such as chlorpyrifos or Dimethoat, as these active substances in pesticides have a proven adverse effect on bee and colony health; application methods such as seed coating should also be considered;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas increased bee mortality has been reported in both the EU and other parts of the world; whereas science and veterinary practice cannot currently provide effective prevention or disease control against certain pests and diseases owing to insufficient research and development of new bee-health medicines in the past decades
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to consider chronic, larval and sub-lethal toxicity, and substance-pathogen and substance- substance synergies in the risk assessment
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Calls on the Commission to pay special attention to the use of specific pesticides, which could have an adverse effect on bee and colony health,
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Welcomes the fact that experts from the European Food Safety Authority are carrying out an independent assessment of the requirements placed on the industry as regards supplying data on the various pesticides;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls for comprehensive scientific research, based on appropriate risk assessment
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls for comprehensive scientific research, based on appropriate risk assessment, on the possible replacement of
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls for comprehensive scientific research, based on appropriate risk assessment, on the possible replacement of active substances in pesticides that are harmful to
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls for comprehensive scientific research, based on appropriate risk assessment, on the possible replacement of active substances in pesticides that are harmful to the
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls for comprehensive scientific research, based on appropriate risk assessment, on the possible replacement of active substances in pesticides that are harmful to the pollinator or to aquatic animal stocks, starting with the application of sustainable agricultural practices including crop rotation;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls for comprehensive and exhaustive scientific research, based on appropriate risk assessment, on the possible replacement of active substances in pesticides that are harmful to the pollinator or to aquatic animal stocks;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls, in a spirit of dialogue between beekeepers and agricultural stakeholders, for
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls, in a spirit of dialogue between beekeepers and agricultural stakeholders, for the setting up of a system of obligatory preliminary notification of beekeepers in all Member States in advance of pesticide applications, especially aerial
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls, in a spirit of dialogue between beekeepers and agricultural stakeholders and in order to remedy the existing communication deficit, for the setting up of a system of obligatory preliminary notification of beekeepers in all Member States in advance of pesticide applications, especially aerial chemical mosquito controls;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls, in a spirit of dialogue between beekeepers and agricultural stakeholders, for the setting up of a system of obligatory preliminary notification of beekeepers in all Member States in advance of pesticide applications, applying only to those pesticides that have a major environmental impact, especially aerial chemical mosquito controls;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls, in a spirit of dialogue between beekeepers and agricultural stakeholders, for the setting up of a system of obligatory preliminary notification of beekeepers in all Member States in advance of pesticide applications, especially aerial chemical mosquito controls; takes the view that the cost of evacuating apiaries in the spraying area should be factored into the pest control costs;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Member States to make it possible to acquire higher-education qualifications in plant protection knowledge especially non-chemical alternatives for use in agriculture;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas increased bee mortality has been reported in both the EU and other parts of the world; whereas there is a link between bee mortality and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs); whereas science and veterinary practice cannot currently provide effective prevention or disease control against certain pests and diseases owing to insufficient research and development of new bee-health medicines in the past decades, which is the result of the limited size of the market and the consequent low interest of big pharmaceutical companies,
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Member States to make it possible to acquire higher-education qualifications in plant protection knowledge for use in agriculture, as is already the case in Belgium, for example;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Member States to make it possible to acquire higher-education qualifications in plant protection knowledge for use in agriculture for all students pursuing specialisms in agriculture and science;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Calls on the Member States to consider the advisability of making beekeeping and bee health part of agricultural training;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Highlights the importance of the relationship between beekeeping and agriculture and the need for a sustainable and productive agriculture, which is able to preserve natural resources and enhance biodiversity, guaranteeing a high level of bee health;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. With special regard to the 2009
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. With special regard to the 2009 EFSA project entitled ‘Bee mortality and Bee Surveillance in Europe’, calls on the Commission to conduct objective research on the
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission constantly to monitor the animal health situation in source countries, to apply the strictest animal health requirements and to put in place an appropriate monitoring system for the propagation material coming from third countries, in order to avoid introducing exotic bee diseases/parasites such as Aethina tumida beetles and Tropilaelaps
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission constantly to monitor the animal health situation in source countries, to apply the strictest animal health requirements and to put in place an appropriate monitoring system for the propagation material coming from third countries, in order to avoid introducing exotic bee diseases/parasites such as Aethina tumida beetles and Tropilaelaps mites into the EU; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with beekeeping organisations, to submit guidelines for the veterinary treatment of hives; calls on the Commission and Member States to increase transparency regarding the frequency, percentage, characteristics and above all the results of the security checks performed at border control posts;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission constantly to monitor the animal health situation in source countries, to apply the strictest animal health requirements and to put in place an appropriate monitoring system for the propagation material coming from third countries, in order to avoid introducing exotic bee diseases/parasites such as Aethina tumida beetles and Tropilaelaps mites into the EU; also calls on the Commission to introduce additional measures to ensure bee health, including better bio-security and production practices for beekeepers;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. calls on the Commission to lay down guidelines to restrict the transfer of species to non-native environments so as to prevent unrestricted cross breeding which would jeopardise the survival of such species, and to take note of the problems relating to queen bee imports from third countries and lay down common Community guidelines to curb this phenomenon;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas increased bee mortality has been reported in both the EU and other parts of the world; whereas science and veterinary practice cannot currently provide effective prevention or disease control against certain pests and diseases owing to insufficient research and development of new bee-health medicines in the past decades, which is the result of the limited size of the market and the consequent low interest of big pharmaceutical companies; whereas the limited number of medicines available to fight the Varroa destructor mite are in many cases no longer effective,
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for the establishment of No Action Levels (NALs) or Reference Points for Action (RPAs) on antibiotics in honey and for the drafting of guidelines concerning the general principles governing the control of certain bee diseases and bee treatment practices;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24 a. Calls on the Commission to establish in all Member States, with regard to the active ingredients of antibiotics with proven effectiveness in fighting bee diseases or which have recently been developed, uniformly-applicable measurement methods and maximum residue levels (MRL) for apiculture products, which must not proportionately exceed, given average consumption, the levels permitted for other animal products (milk, meat, eggs, etc.), and correspondingly-applied reference points for action (RPA), until new, effective veterinary medicines start to appear;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission to include
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls on the Commission to put in place or modify the annexes to Directive 2001/110/EC (Honey Directive) in order to improve the standards of EU production by establishing clear legal definitions for all apicultural products, including honey
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls on the Commission to put in place or modify the annexes to Directive 2001/110/EC (Honey Directive) in order to improve the standards of EU production by establishing clear legal definitions for all apicultural products, including honey varieties, and defining the important parameters of honey quality, such as proline and saccharase content,
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls on the Commission to put in
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls on the Commission to put in place or modify the annexes to Directive 2001/110/EC (Honey Directive) in order to improve the standards of EU production by establishing clear legal definitions for all apicultural products, including honey varieties, and defining the important parameters of honey quality, such as proline and saccarase content, low level of HMF or humidity, and adulteration (such as the glycerine content, sugar isotope ratio (C13/C14), pollen spectrum and aroma and sugar content of honey), and to apply these strictly and thoroughly to imported apiary products;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas increased bee mortality has been reported in both the EU and other parts of the world; whereas science and veterinary practice cannot currently provide effective prevention or disease control against certain pests and diseases owing to insufficient research and development of new bee-health medicines in the past decades, which is the result of the limited size of the market and the consequent low interest of big pharmaceutical companies; deploring also a certain tendency among beekeepers to regard certain diseases as routine, although they are dangerous, and a lack of communication between the beekeeping world and – in particular – the public authorities,
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Calls on the Commission to harmonise rules on labelling with the provisions of the Regulation on Agricultural Quality Schemes
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. In the spirit of the EU’s new quality policy, calls on beekeepers, their representative organisations and commercial companies to make better use of the EU origin labelling schemes (PDO and PGI) for hive products, which could contribute to the affordability of apicultural activity, and calls on the Commission, in close cooperation with beekeeping associations, to propose quality denominations and promote the direct sale of beekeeping products on local markets;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. In the spirit of the EU's new quality policy, calls on beekeepers, their representative organisations and commercial companies to make better use of the EU origin labelling schemes (PDO and PGI) for hive products, which could contribute to the affordability of apicultural activity; calls upon the Commission to put in place quality terms for honey (e.g. traditional honey) and to promote the direct sale of apiculture products on local markets;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Calls for action to boost consumption of European honey and apiculture products, including by promoting honeys with characteristics specific to certain varieties and geographical areas;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28 a. Calls for sustainable practices in all parts of the CAP, recalling that extended crop rotation systems, on-farm mixed cropping and grass-clover mixtures have major environmental and agronomic benefits, as leguminous crops in arable rotations prevent diseases, regenerate the soil, have a beneficial effect on pollinators and help climate change resilience and mitigation;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 5 Measures in connection with the conservation of biodiversity and the forthcoming reform of the Common Agricultural Policy
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls on the Commission to p
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls on the Commission to provide significantly more financial resources
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls on the Commission to provide significantly more financial resources for the beekeeping sector, to provide financial support for national beekeeping programmes for the period after 2013 and to encourage the development of joint projects, and on the Member States to provide technical assistance for the beekeeping sector; calls on the Commission to provide a safety net or a common insurance system for apiculture in order to mitigate the impact of crisis situations on beekeepers;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 b (new) - having regard to Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides1, ________ 1 OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 71,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the health of individual bees and colonies is affected by numerous lethal and sub-lethal factors, many of them interconnected; whereas the limited number of marketed medicines to fight the Varroa destructor mite are in many cases no longer efficient; whereas the
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls on the Commission to provide significantly more financial resources for the beekeeping sector, particularly measures to support beekeepers, and to encourage the development of joint projects, and on the Member States to provide technical assistance for the beekeeping sector; calls on the Commission to provide a safety net or a common insurance system for apiculture in order to mitigate the impact of crisis situations on beekeepers;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Urges the Commission, within the framework of the EU's new biodiversity strategy, to make financial resources available for apiculture as a priority and/or at a higher rate in all projects and actions submitted under the CAP dealing exclusively with subspecies and eco-types of Apis mellifera native to each region;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Calls on the Commission to clarify, in the forthcoming reform of the CAP, the support measures and aid to be assigned to the European beekeeping sector, taking account of the environmental and social public goods that honeybee colonies provide via pollination and the environmental service performed by beekeepers in managing their bee colonies;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 а (new) 29а. Notes that, according to the Commission report of 28 May 2010, the overall number of beekeepers in the EU has risen slightly in comparison to 2004; points out that, according to the report, that increase is solely attributable to the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU, and that, not counting the beekeepers from those countries, there would have been have been a significant decrease in the number of beekeepers in the EU; views this as indicative of the gravity of the situation in the beekeeping sector in the EU and of the need to grant it assistance and to implement concrete measures to keep beekeepers in beekeeping;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Calls on the Commission to enable the services provided by farmers who provide forage for bees to be rewarded financially, since although pollination by bees has a major economic impact, no market value is currently attached to the pollination services from which many branches of agriculture benefit and on which they depend;
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29b. Calls on the Commission to consider the possibility of creating a special scheme for assistance to beekeepers within the framework of the direct aid scheme, such as through bee colony payments, which will help safeguard the beekeeping sector in the EU, keep beekeepers in beekeeping, encourage young people to become beekeepers and ensure bees continue to act as pollinators;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to strengthen and develop the agri-environmental measures specific to the beekeeping sector, in the spirit of the new EU Biodiversity Strategy, and to encourage
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to strengthen and develop the agri-environmental measures specific to the beekeeping sector, in the spirit of the new EU Biodiversity Strategy, and on Member States to lay down agri-environmental measures geared to apiculture in their rural development programmes and to encourage farmers to engage in agri- environmental measures in order to support ‘honeybee-friendly’ grasslands on field margins, and to employ special crop rotation and variation;
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to strengthen and develop the agri-environmental measures specific to the beekeeping sector, in the spirit of the new EU Biodiversity Strategy
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to put sustainable agricultural practices at the heart of the CAP, by asking all EU farmers as from 2014 to apply a simple package of agronomic practices (including crop rotation, permanent pasture, cover crops, green infrastructure areas) and to encourage Member States to include, strengthen and develop
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the health of individual bees and colonies is affected by numerous lethal
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to strengthen and develop the agri-environmental measures specific to the beekeeping sector, in the spirit of the new EU Biodiversity Strategy, and to encourage farmers to
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to strengthen and develop the agri-environmental measures specific to the beekeeping sector, in the spirit of the new EU Biodiversity Strategy, and to encourage farmers to engage in agri-environmental measures in order to support ‘bee-friendly’ grasslands on field margins, and to employ special crop rotation and
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Calls on the Commission to propose measures under the second pillar of the CAP to promote beekeeping training for farmers and foresters and make closer networking between beekeepers, farmers and foresters possible;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30 a. Calls on the Commission to encourage agri-environment schemes which incentivise farmers to grow legumes as fodder for bees and to ensure that food is available for bees all year round;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Recalls that measures to promote biodiversity are also vital in the non-farm sector; notes that green spaces along roads, verges of railway lines, forest cuttings for energy transmission networks and public and private gardens cover substantial areas where rational management methods can considerably increase pollen and nectar resources for bees and pollinating insects; considers that this development should be pursued in the context of harmonious land management which in particular maintains road safety;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls on the Commission to rank the sugar used for bee foraging purposes as inexpensive industrial sugar, given the high sugar prices on the EU market, and calls for better traceability of sugars in terms of production and composition, particularly as regards HMF;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls on the Commission to rank the sugar used for bee foraging purposes as
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Calls on all stakeholders in the beekeeping sector to take advantage of the opportunities offered by the current common agricultural policy and the upcoming reform thereof, which
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Calls on all stakeholders in the beekeeping sector to take advantage of the opportunities offered by the current common agricultural policy
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the health of individual bees and colonies is affected by numerous lethal and sub-lethal factors, many of them interconnected
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32 a. Emphasises that the number of pollinator species is declining at an alarming rate worldwide and that one of the reasons for this is the agricultural model that relies on the use of pesticides and genetically modified organisms (i.e. monoculture), which adversely affect bee populations;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the health of individual bees and colonies is affected by numerous lethal and sub-lethal factors, many of them interconnected; whereas the limited number of marketed medicines to fight the Varroa destructor mite are in many cases no longer efficient; whereas
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the health of individual bees and colonies is affected by numerous lethal and sub-lethal factors, many of them interconnected; whereas the limited number of marketed medicines to fight the
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the health of individual bees and colonies is affected by numerous lethal and sub-lethal factors, many of them interconnected; whereas the limited number of marketed medicines to fight the Varroa destructor mite are in many cases no longer
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the health of individual bees and colonies is affected by numerous lethal
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the health of individual bees and colonies is affected by numerous lethal and sub-lethal factors, many of them interconnected; whereas the limited number of marketed medicines to fight the Varroa destructor mite are in many cases no longer efficient; whereas the toxic agents especially neurotoxic products and their synergists in certain pesticides, changing climatic and environmental conditions, loss of plant biodiversity, the increase of monocultures, land use change, mismanaged beekeeping practices and the presence of invasive species weaken colonies' immune systems and favour opportunistic pathologies,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the health of individual bees and colonies is also affected by numerous lethal and sub-lethal factors such as beekeeping practices that use subspecies outside their natural environment and/or colonies, and harmful selection methods that reduce swarming ability and aggressivity and significantly increase the vulnerability of the species, which is at the same time faced with the presence of invasive species,
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas beekeepers
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) - having regard to the "Federation Strategy" for the future of the beekeeping sector drawn up by Apimondia, the International Federation of Beekeepers’ Associations 1, __________________ 1 http://www.apimondia.com/en/the- federation/strategy
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas beekeepers
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas beekeepers
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas beekeepers are primarily responsible for the health
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas beekeepers are primarily responsible for the health and well-being of their bees, though farming methods have a role to play too, and whereas beekeepers do not receive any financial reward for the role they play in ensuring the pollination of plants in the natural environment,
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas beekeepers are primarily responsible for the health and well-being of their bees, though farming methods have a role to play too, and although this is only possible with the effective cooperation of society – in particular the agricultural community which practises chemical plant protection – and the recognition of common interests;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas beekeepers and the environment around beehives are primarily responsible for the health and well-being of their bees, though farming methods have a role to play too,
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E.
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Е а (new) Еа. whereas the action programme in support of apiculture will expire at the end of 2013, and whereas, according to the European Commission report of 28 May 2010, national apiculture programmes are helping to improve the situation in that sector;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Е a (new) Еb. whereas the EU is dependent on honey imports, with over 40% of the honey consumed in the EU being imported from third countries;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas beekeeping as an economic and social activity plays a crucial role in the sustainable development of rural areas and creates
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, because active substances
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, because active substances and medicines are not metabolised by bees and can end up in honey, because European producers rely on clean, residue-free, high- quality honey, and also because of the problem of resistance, minimal use of veterinary products and active substances is advocated, as is maintaining a healthy colony immune system,
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, because active substances and
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, because active substances and medicines are not metabolised by bees and end up in honey, because European producers rely on clean, residue-free, high- quality honey, and also because of the problem of resistance, appropriate minimal use of veterinary products and active substances is advocated, as is maintaining a healthy colony immune system,
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) F a. Whereas a large number of European beekeepers are amateur and not professional apiarists,
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the import of queen bees and artificial swarms may pose a threat to bee health, since bee diseases may be introduced into the EU with them,
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas the import of queen bees and artificial swarms from third countries and the resulting import of various strains of Varroa increases the virulence and damaging effects of the Varroa strains already present in the EU,
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) F a. whereas, in spite of the most rigorous precautions, bees and bee colonies can still be affected by various diseases which can often only be treated with antibiotics, as is the case with other animals kept for farming purposes;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 a (new) Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to increase the level of support for honeybee-health- related research under the next financial framework (FP8) and to focus the research on technological developments, disease prevention and control, particularly the impact of environmental factors on bee colony immune systems, defining sustainable agricultural practices and increasing non-chemical alternatives, and the development of veterinary medical products for current EU honeybee-disease- causing agents, especially Varroa destructor mites,
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas beekeeping as an economic and social activity plays a crucial role in the sustainable development of rural areas and creates
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to increase the level of support for honeybee-health- related research under the next financial framework (FP8) and to focus the research on technological developments, disease prevention and control, particularly the impact of environmental factors on bee colony immune systems, defining sustainable agricultural practices and increasing
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to increase the level of support for honeybee-health- related research under the next financial framework (FP8) and to focus the research on technological developments, disease
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to increase the level of support for honeybee-health- related research under the next financial framework (FP8) and to focus the research on technological developments, disease prevention and control, particularly the impact of environmental factors on the bee colony immune system and interactions with pathologies, defining sustainable agricultural practices and increasing non- chemical alternatives, and the development of veterinary medical products for current EU honeybee-disease-
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to increase the level of support for honeybee-health- related research under the next financial framework (FP8) and to focus the research on technological developments, disease prevention and control, particularly the impact of beekeeping and farming practices and environmental factors on bee colony immune systems,
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to increase the level of support for honeybee-health- related research under the next financial framework (FP8) and to focus the research
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to increase the level of support for honeybee-health- related research under the next financial framework (FP8) and to focus the research on technological developments, disease prevention and control, particularly the impact of environmental factors on bee colony immune systems, defining sustainable agricultural practices and increasing non-chemical alternatives, and the development of veterinary medical products for current EU honeybee-disease- causing agents, especially the Varroa destructor mite
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to increase the level of support for honeybee-health- related research under the next financial framework (FP8) and to focus the research on technological developments, disease prevention and control, particularly the impact of environmental factors on bee colony immune systems, defining sustainable agricultural practices and increasing
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to increase the level of support for honeybee-health- related research under the next financial framework (FP8) and to focus the research on technological developments, disease prevention and control, particularly the impact of environmental factors on bee colony immune systems, defining sustainable agricultural practices and increasing non-chemical alternatives, and the development of veterinary medical products for current EU honeybee-disease- causing agents, especially Varroa destructor mites, Nosema ceranae endoparasites and other opportunistic diseases; calls on the Commission to rule out overlaps in the use of funds and to create new financial opportunities where needed, in view of beekeeping’s importance in the European Union;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to increase the level of support for honeybee-health- related research under the next financial framework (FP8) and to focus the research on technological developments, disease prevention and control, particularly the impact of environmental factors on bee colony immune systems, defining sustainable agricultural practices and increasing non-chemical alternatives, and the development of veterinary medical products for current EU honeybee-disease-
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Calls on the Commission to examine organic apiculture practices conducted in accordance with EU regulations, in order to reduce the problem of antibiotics and other residues, and to promote, by means of further research, information and funding, the promulgation of those elements shown to be effective;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas beekeeping as an economic and social activity plays a crucial role in the sustainable development of rural areas and the balance of natural ecosystems and may create
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Considers that it is important to take urgent measures to protect bee health, taking into account the specificities of beekeeping, the diversity of actors involved and the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Reiterates concerns that increased mortality among honeybees and wild pollinators in Europe would, if left unchecked, have a profound negative impact on agriculture, food production and security, biodiversity, environmental sustainability and ecosystems;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to promote the setting up of appropriate national surveillance systems and to develop harmonised standards at EU level to allow comparison;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to promote the setting up of appropriate national surveillance systems in close cooperation with beekeepers’ associations and to develop harmonised standards which are easy to introduce at EU level to allow comparison
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to promote the setting up of appropriate national surveillance systems and to develop
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to promote the setting up of appropriate national
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to promote the setting up of appropriate national surveillance systems based on well established ones, like APENET in Italy, and to develop harmonised standards at EU level to allow comparison; stresses the need for uniform identification and registration of bee hives;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to promote and coordinate the setting up of appropriate national surveillance systems and to develop harmonised standards at EU level to allow comparison; stresses the need for uniform identification and registration of bee hives;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission not only to promote the setting up of appropriate national surveillance systems but also to place existing initiatives such as the COST campaign – COLOSS project, which are recognised as effective, on a more permanent footing and to develop harmonised standards at EU level to allow comparison; stresses the need for uniform identification and registration of bee hives;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to promote the setting up of appropriate national surveillance systems and to develop harmonised standards at EU level to allow comparison; stresses the need for uniform identification and registration of bee hives; points also to the need to quantify bee colony losses and to implement an appropriate monitoring system common to all the Member States, since no representative or comparable European-scale information exists on bee colony losses;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas beekeeping as an economic and social activity plays a crucial role in the sustainable development of rural areas
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to promote the setting up of appropriate national surveillance systems and to develop harmonised standards at EU level to allow comparison; stresses the need for uniform identification and registration of bee hives, whose operation should be funded by means of support payments to beekeepers for bee colonies who have submitted a statistical overview of the number of bee colonies, quantitative and qualitative indicators and bees’ health;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point 1 (new) (1) Regards the introduction of a notification requirement, in particular for people who keep bees as a hobby, as a disproportionately bureaucratic arrangement; given the small-scale nature of the beekeeping sector and the constantly changing number of swarms, mandatory registration and identification is unworkable and should therefore be rejected;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point 1 (new) (1) Calls on the European Commission to support a European Network of "reference hives" to monitor bee health in relation with environmental conditions and beekeeping and agricultural practices;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines the importance of current EU funding for the promotion of production and marketing of apiculture products yet stresses the need to ensure that each Member States applies this funding as it is intended.
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. calls on the Commission to draw up three-year programmes based on a declaration by all Member States of the number of hives actually registered rather than on estimated figures;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the establishment of the EU reference laboratory for bee health, which should focus on activities not covered by existing expert networks or national laboratories
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need to support diagnostic laboratories and field tests at a national level and points out that overlaps in funding should be avoided; highlights the importance of monitoring carried out in Italy that resulted in the temporary ban on insecticides on maize seeds treated with clothianidin, thiamethoxam, imidacloprid and fipronil; overlapping should be avoided between the monitoring developed by COLOSS, that requested by Directive 2010/21 (monitoring the exposure of bees to the mentioned active substances) and that studying the factors of bee losses (EURL);
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need to support diagnostic
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need to support diagnostic laboratories and field tests at a national level and points out that overlaps in funding should be avoided and that beekeepers and their organisations should be involved in carrying out field tests;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas beekeeping and biodiversity are mutually dependent; whereas, via pollination, bee colonies provide important environmental, economic and social public goods, thus ensuring food security and maintaining biodiversity; whereas ‘bee pastures’
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to set up a steering committee, together with representatives of the beekeeping sector, which will assist the Commission in establishing the
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to set up a steering committee, together with representatives of the beekeeping sector, which will assist the Commission in establishing the annual work programme of the EU reference laboratory; deplores the fact that the first annual work programme of the EU’s reference laboratory was presented without prior consultation of stakeholders;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to set up a steering committee, together with politicians drawn primarily from major producing countries, and representatives of the beekeeping sector, which will assist the Commission in establishing the annual work programme of the EU reference laboratory;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to set up a steering committee, together with representatives of organisations in the beekeeping sector, which will assist the Commission in establishing the annual work programme of the EU reference laboratory;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to continue supporting scientific research on honeybee health, building on the good examples of the COST Action COLOSS and the BeeDoc and STEP initiatives and to encourage member states to support scientific research in this area; stresses nevertheless that relations with beekeepers and beekeeper organisations should be enhanced;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to continue supporting scientific research on honeybee health, building on the good examples of the COST Action COLOSS and the BeeDoc and STEP initiatives; stresses nevertheless that relations with beekeepers and beekeeper organisations should be enhanced by means of projects involving academics working in the sector;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to continue supporting scientific research on honeybee health, building on the good examples of the COST Action COLOSS, APENET and the BeeDoc and STEP initiatives; stresses nevertheless that relations with beekeepers and beekeeper organisations should be enhanced;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States to encourage and oversee the setting up of national
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States to encourage and oversee the setting up of national melliferous and polliniferous plant phenology monitoring networks;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission actively to encourage a greater degree of information- sharing, including ecotoxicological studies, among Member States, laboratories
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas beekeeping and biodiversity are mutually dependent; whereas, via pollination, bee colonies provide important environmental and social public goods, thus ensuring food security and maintaining biodiversity, and, by managing their bee colonies, beekeepers perform an environmental service of paramount importance as well as safeguarding a sustainable production model in rural areas; whereas ‘bee pastures’ and diverse foraging grounds provide bees with the rich nutrition necessary to stay healthy,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission actively to encourage a greater degree of information- sharing among Member States, laboratories, industry, farmers and beekeepers on ecotoxicological studies and other factors affecting honeybee health so as to make possible informed, independent scientific scrutiny;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission actively to encourage a greater degree of information- sharing among Member States, laboratories, the plant protection industry and beekeepers on ecotoxicological studies and other factors affecting honeybee health so as to make possible informed, independent scientific scrutiny;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission actively to encourage a greater degree of information- sharing among Member States, laboratories and beekeepers on ecotoxicological studies and other factors affecting honeybee health so as to make possible informed, independent scientific scrutiny; calls on the Commission to help this process by making available its relevant webpage on all official languages of the concerned Member States;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission actively to encourage a greater degree of information- sharing among Member States, laboratories and beekeepers on ecotoxicological studies and other factors affecting honeybee health so as to make possible informed, independent scientific scrutiny and create a single database;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls for coordination and collaboration between beekeepers, growers, industries, public authorities and researchers in order to determine the causes of the problem and bring effective solutions to it.
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Asks the Commission to consider the scope for stepping up research into bee health, with a focus on the prevention of bee diseases and the strengthening of bees’ immune systems;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the need to encourage young beekeepers to enter the sector and to support training programmes for beekeepers
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the need to encourage young beekeepers to enter the sector and to support training programmes for beekeepers and farmers on disease prevention and control, botanical knowledge and the impact of pesticides
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the need to s
source: PE-469.980
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/3/date |
Old
2011-10-25T00:00:00New
2011-10-24T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.076New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-PR-467076_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE464.754&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-464754_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.980New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AM-469980_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0359_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0359_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111114&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-11-14-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-359&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0359_EN.html |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0714/COM_COM(2010)0714_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0714/COM_COM(2010)0714_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-359&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0359_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-493New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0493_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AGRI/7/05284New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52010DC0714:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52010DC0714:EN
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|