Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | EMPL | DELLI Karima ( Verts/ALE) | BACH Georges ( PPE), RAPTI Sylvana ( S&D), CREUTZMANN Jürgen ( ALDE), CYMAŃSKI Tadeusz ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | KADENBACH Karin ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 371 votes to 47, with 15 abstentions, a resolution on the mid-term review of the European strategy 2007-2012 on health and safety at work.
Parliament recalls that adequate worker prevention in turn promotes wellbeing, quality of work and productivity and that the cost to enterprises and social security systems of occupational accidents and diseases is estimated at 5.9% of GDP. It states that 168 000 European citizens die every year from work-related accidents or diseases and 7 million are injured in accidents. The resolution states that given the labour shortage, it is desirable to prolong older workers' active working lives and measures to promote health and safety at work should take effect in the near future.
In this context, Parliament focuses on the effects of the EU Strategy for health and safety at work and makes the following assessment:
Mid-term review of the strategy : Parliament points out that the European reference framework on occupational health and safety (OHS) does not in itself provide for automatic improvement of working conditions. The major factors for improvement are proper implementation on the ground, notably via employee participation, tripartite dialogue arrangements, gathering and disseminating data, awareness-raising campaigns and networking of training and information services, and supervision of the application of the legislation in Member States. The Commission is asked to take swift action when infringements are detected and to reinforce sanctions when necessary .
The report deplores the fact that in 2009 several Member States did not focus their national strategies on the three priorities of the EU strategy: stress and burn-out at work, RSI, and research into and regular gathering of data on new risks.
It takes the view that OHS policies at European and national level should be made consistent and be reflected in other public policies : health, employment, industry, research, environment, transport, road safety, education, energy, regional development, public procurement and the internal market. It criticises the fact that the Commission has failed to pay sufficient attention to the gender mainstreaming approach when dealing with issues concerning health and safety at work, either in the Community strategy on health and safety at work or in its mid-term assessment. Gender mainstreaming should be implemented across the policies in order to better reflect the specific risks faced by female workers.
Parliament points out that the main aims of the Community strategy for 2007-2012 include both guaranteeing the proper implementation of EU legislation and improving and simplifying existing legislation, inter alia through the implementation of non-binding instruments . It deplores the fact that in 2009 several Member States did not focus their national strategies on the three priorities of the EU strategy : stress and burn-out at work, and research into and regular gathering of data on new risks. Members consider that national strategies should devote greater efforts and resources to prevention. They take the view that OHS policies at European and national level should be made consistent and be reflected in other public policies: health, employment, industry, research, environment, transport, road safety, education, energy, regional development, public procurement and the internal market. Gender-mainstreaming should be implemented across the policies in order to better reflect the specific risks faced by female workers.
The resolution stresses the following:
with respect to the award of public contracts , safety levels and accident prevention practices should be taken more fully into account; the importance of fully implementing REACH and the need for greater synergy between REACH and OHS policies, both at European level and in the Member States; the next European strategy should set more measurable goals, together with binding timetables and a periodic evaluation, and Members hope to see the objective of one labour inspector per 10 000 workers , as recommended by the ILO, become binding; austerity budgets and cuts in social spending should not harm action to improve health and safety at work; Member States should invest more in risk-prevention policies since such investment would be repaid in the form of improved labour productivity, improved business competitiveness and a reduction in social security expenses; work-related stress is recognised as a major obstacle to productivity in Europe and Members deplore the accelerating growth of conditions and accidents caused by psychosocial problems among workers, calling on the Commission to ensure that the EU of the Framework Agreement on Work-related Stress of 8 October 2004 is implemented in every Member State; the need to strengthen cooperation between the EU, the ILO and the WHO with a view to finding solutions to the issue of European workers and those in non-EU countries competing on social terms; ensure the protection of the health of older workers and/or those with disabilities or who have become disabled.
Collection of statistical data: Parliament wants the Commission to develop gender and age-specific statistical means to evaluate prevention not solely in terms of accidents but also in terms of pathologies and the percentage of workers exposed to chemical, physical or biological agents and to dangerous situations from the point of view of the organisation of work. It also calls for the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) to compile national indicators on exposure to cancers and to review the knowledge on exposure of particularly vulnerable workers.
Parliament calls, in addition, for a European programme for the monitoring of occupational hazards (in particular musculoskeletal and psychosocial problems). It criticises the fact that not all Member States set measurable targets related to their national OHS strategies and that the vast majority of them have not set targets on occupational diseases, work-related health problems and illnesses, occupational risk factors or high risk sectors. Neither the mid-term review nor the 2009 scoreboard on the Community Strategy on Health and Safety at Work provide any substantial information on where Member States stand with regard to the EU strategy’s only quantified target of a 25% reduction in occupational accidents by 2012 .
The resolution stresses the problem of implementing occupational health and safety with respect to workers who are engaged in undeclared activities. It takes the view that this injustice can only be prevented by more stringent controls and appropriate sanctions and urges that strong measures be taken against the organisation of such activities. It stresses that OHS is a right irrespective of the worker's status, and that this right must be made effective through better implementation of current legislation.
Parliament calls on EU-OSHA to carry out a research on the effects of ‘double shift’ on the health of female workers, i.e. when women have to continue with unpaid work at home after the regular and recognised paid work.
Fostering a prevention culture : Parliament calls on Member States and Commission to make guidelines on the protection of workers easier to apply in practice, without undermining the rules on health and safety at work. It points out that about 50% of workers in the EU still have no access to preventive services, especially as regards SMEs and subcontracting chains. All workers, those in the public and also in the private sector, should be covered by risk-prevention arrangements as well as effective prevention policies. New forms of employment should be taken into account so as to ensure that prevention and monitoring measures cover all workers, in particular vulnerable workers, regardless of the type of work that they do and their employment arrangements. Parliament hopes that the target will be one safety advisor for every 3 000 employees.
Member States are asked to:
increase the staffing levels of, and the resources available to, their labour inspectorates in order to meet the target of one inspector for every 10 000 workers, as recommended by the ILO; assess the quality of the training of their workplace risk prevention managers and supports their exchanges of best practices. combat the burden of bureaucracy and the labyrinthine structure of state control mechanisms for health and safety at work and work inspections, by strengthening their dynamics and simplifying time-consuming internal procedures with a view to implementing more and more effective controls; bring more searching scrutiny to bear on the failure to report accidents at work.
The resolution also calls for steps to be taken to:
treat, with the same attention, workers in the private and the public sector; strengthen the training of workers but also health and safety public officials; enhance the protection of the workplace itself (primary source of risk) reduce inequalities in working conditions (source of accidents).
Vulnerable workers and specific risks : in addition to workers who do strenuous work, migrants, young people, old people, women of child-bearing age, the disabled, members of ethnic minorities, low-skilled workers, casual workers, those with insecure working conditions and the long-term unemployed returning to the labour market are particularly at-risk categories. Parliament believes that prior to the employment of these workers special preliminary training should be offered where appropriate. The resolution notes that young workers between the ages of 15 and 24 are at particularly high risk of injury, and that the long-term consequences of an illness or injury at an early age can be significant.
The resolution stresses that measures of health and safety at work need a gender -based and life-cycle approach. Parliament expresses its concern regarding the assessment of the risk thresholds for pregnant women at work . It calls for detailed research to be carried out into the effects of exposure of pregnant women to certain workplace conditions (e.g. exposure to chemical agents, ionising radiation, electromagnetic waves, stress, excessive heat, lifting heavy weights, etc).
The resolution calls for an impact assessment of the potential risks from new technologies, harmful substances and risk factors including work organisation in the workplace.
Parliament regrets the lack of initiatives to tackle the situation of the self-employed, temporary workers, domestic workers and people working on short-term contracts.
Parliament also regrets the fact that there is no single common definition of moral harassment at the European level. It calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop effective national strategies for combating violence at work which are based on a definition of moral harassment common to the 27 Member States.
The Commission is called upon to:
carry out a conclusive scientific review of the effects of Sunday working on workers' health; submit a proposal to Parliament and the Council in 2012 seeking to ban smoking everywhere at the workplace, including indoor catering establishments, on all public transport and in all enclosed public buildings within the EU; launch a wide consultation on the list of occupational diseases with the European social partners based on a thorough scientific and medical analyses of the main danger areas recognised today (in particular mental disorders and asbestos); accelerate the implementation of REACH, and in particular the substitution of the most worrying chemicals; propose a revision of Directive 2004/37 on carcinogens and mutagens by the end of 2012 in order to enlarge its scope to include substances toxic for reproduction by analogy with the substances of very high concern under REACH, and to strengthen the application of the substitution principle; promote the use of technologies that reduce the risks posed by dangerous substances in the event of occupational accidents; propose measures to adapt working conditions more closely to the needs of those suffering from cancer or other work-related diseases and chronic diseases; avoid compromising the level of protection achieved in the European OHS directives when examining the possibilities for simplifying legislation.
PURPOSE: to propose a m id-term review of the European strategy 2007-2012 on health and safety at work.
CONTENT: the Commission adopted in February 2007 the Communication "Improving quality and productivity at work: Community strategy 2007-2012 on safety and health at work" . The strategy provides a political framework for the improvement of occupational safety and health at both national and European level and a roadmap for stakeholders to play their role in the implementation of the objectives identified by the strategy. In its resolution of 15 January 2008 , the European Parliament called on the Commission to report to the Parliament on progress at the half-way stage of the 2007-2012 strategy. The present Staff Working Paper is based on the results of this consultation process. It provides a summary of the main achievements and of the problems and improvements necessary to enhance the implementation of the Strategy.
It aims at laying the basis for a discussion involving all parties in the preparation of future EU policy initiatives in the area of occupational safety and health (OSH), in particular as regards the preparation of a new strategy for the period post-2012.
Conclusion : t he mid-term review has given a unique opportunity to take stock of the past achievements and to set out priorities for future action within the Strategy. Several stakeholders are already closely involved in the development of the Strategy who will take further initiatives to reinforce its outcome.
From the viewpoint of the Commission services, it is possible to draw from the assessment of the first half of the development of the Strategy the following priorities for action:
simplify and update existing legislation through the finalisation of legislative initiatives, after extensive consultation of social partners and stakeholders, notably in relation to the proposal for a new Directive on ergonomics replacing the existing Manual Handling and Display Screen Equipment Directives; draw conclusions from the discussion on sub-contracting, self-employed, prevention services and integration of occupational health and safety into education, and consider the use of non-binding instruments such as Recommendations; consolidate and further develop the encouraging results of the first phase of implementation as regards the adoption and implementation of national strategies.
Furthermore, it is necessary to start carrying out the final evaluation of the current strategy and preparing the outline of a future EU strategy In order to identify the priorities of the new strategy a large consultation process will be launched in the course of 2011 and continued in 2012, involving all the main actors in the field.
Main recommendation : in the meantime, EU policy on health and safety at work shall maintain its course, underpinned by a three-tiered approach:
a solid legal framework setting binding minimum requirements for all Member States; the involvement of social partners, from the EU level down to company level, through tripartite and autonomous bi-partite social dialogue; a strategic vision promoting a preventive culture which is at the core of the current European Strategy on Health and Safety at Work 2007-2012.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)162
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0589/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0409/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0409/2011
- Committee opinion: PE470.073
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE472.198
- Committee draft report: PE469.808
- Non-legislative basic document published: SEC(2011)0547
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE469.808
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE472.198
- Committee opinion: PE470.073
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0409/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)162
Activities
- Anni PODIMATA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Derek Roland CLARK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvana RAPTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jutta STEINRUCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Diana WALLIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
292 |
2011/2147(INI)
2011/09/20
EMPL
243 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard to the EU 2020 strategy, one main objective of which is to increase employment levels to 75% by the end of the decade in the European Union;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A e (new) Ae. whereas the consolidation of a genuine common market is intrinsically linked to the elimination of all forms of social dumping,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Underlines the importance of cooperation between the European Agency for Health and Safety at Work and the special Committees of the European Commission, such as the the Senior Labour Inpectors Committee and the Advisory Committee for Health and Safety at Work for delivering better results and submitting proposals;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes the reduction in the number of accidents at work in the EU,
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes the reduction in the number of accidents at work in the EU, which is probably due to the fact that greater attention has been devoted to OHS than in the past and it has been improved and because of lower employment levels and a continuing shift to the tertiary sector; hopes that the objectives set at European and national levels and the evaluation of their achievement take better account of this macroeconomic dimension;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes the results of the Commission's
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes the results of the Commission’s ‘Scoreboard 2009’ project illustrating the individual performances of the Member States; regrets that the
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes the results of the Commission’s ‘Scoreboard 2009’ project illustrating the individual performances of the Member States;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes the results of the Commission’s ‘Scoreboard 2009’ project illustrating the individual performances of the Member States; believes that the project needs to cover every area of the 2007-2012 strategy; regrets that the data are not subject to any democratic control and are provided
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Believes there is a need to study in particular the link between suffering at work and the organisation of work,
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Believes there is a need to study the link between suffering at work and the organisation of work and working time, rather than concentrating on statistical factors and detecting individual fragilities;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A f (new) Af. whereas the financial and economic crisis continues to unbalance the labour market by increasing insecure forms of work which are characterised by a low level of worker protection,
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission to compile and supply statistics showing the extent of the reduction in accident rates brought about by research focusing on prevention with its starting point at the planning stage;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Questions whether rights to OHS are respected in the case of undeclared activities; takes the view that this injustice can only be prevented by more stringent controls and appropriate sanctions; stresses that OHS is a right irrespective of the worker’s status, and that this right must be made effective through legislation;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Questions whether rights to OHS are respected in the case of undeclared activities and urges that strong measures be taken against the organisation of such activities; stresses that OHS is a right irrespective of the worker’s status, and that this right must be made effective through legislation;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Notes that the European countries with the lowest occupational accident rates are also the most competitive countries1; believes that data collection needs to be expanded in order to gauge the impact which effective risk prevention has on industrial competitiveness; 1 EU-OSHA and World Economic Forum 2011.
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on EU-OSHA and Eurofound to analyse causes of early retirement among women and men;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Calls on EU-OSHA to carry out a research on the effects of "double shift" on the health of female workers, i.e. when women have to continue with unpaid work at home after the regular and recognized paid work;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets the lack of information on risks and solutions among employees, employers, social partners and even health services; points out the positive role in this regard of employees’ participation and representation;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets the lack of information on risks among employees, employers, social partners and even health services; points out the positive role in this regard of employees’ participation and representation
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A g (new) Ag. whereas austerity budgets and cuts in social spending risk harming action to improve health and safety at work,
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Points to the importance of transferring scientific data to industry in order to forestall new or emerging risks;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Believes that workers’ representatives help to improve OHS, especially in SMEs and if representation is organised on a formal basis; considers employee participation to be a further key factor in successful OHS-related risk management1; 1 EU-OSHA, ESENER survey.
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Considers a policy on health and safety at work to be essential in order to protect and preserve workers’ health; points, therefore, to the importance of ensuring that the health and safety training given at workplaces is up to date;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Considers that all workers need specific health and safety training, in particular temporary and part-time workers and those contracted out;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Improve the implementation of existing legislation through non-binding instruments such as exchange of good practices, awareness raising campaigns and better information;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Believes that all workers
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19.
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Believes that all workers,
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Believes that all workers, including those in the public sector, should be covered by risk-prevention arrangements including accessibility arrangements;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Believes that all workers, including those in the public sector, should be
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A h (new) Ah. whereas in Europe small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) employ 66% of the economically active population, and whereas the proportion is rising, but account for 82% of occupational injuries and 90% of fatal accidents[1], [1] EU-OSHA
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Believes that all workers, including those in the public sector, should be covered by risk-prevention arrangements; also believes that the new forms of employment should be taken into account so as to ensure that prevention and monitoring measures cover all workers, regardless of the type of work that they do and their employment arrangements;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Believes that all workers, including those in the public sector, should be covered by risk-prevention arrangements; hopes that the target will be one risk prevention inspector for every 3 000 employees;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Stresses the importance of training for workers which encompasses social skills, including interpersonal communication and the ability to cope with conflict situations;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Believes that in order to reduce stress at work, specialised training on working under conditions of stress should be introduced and developed, as well as workshops on teamwork and improving the integration of a given group of workers;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that the independence of
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Believes that health and safety at work is a multidimensional concept and requires synergy between individual policies, such as education, health, research, social security, etc. It is extremely important to focus on occupational risk prevention policies, including through training programmes - with the participation of the social partners - and by informing and training employers and employees;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Takes the view that progress of research in the health sector, the constantly evolving socio-economic conditions, developments in new technologies and changes in the labour market require vigilance at European and national level regarding the emergence of new occupational hazards and the timely updating of the relevant legislation, its implementation framework and the list of arduous and unhealthy occupations;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Considers corporate social responsibility to be an important and effective way of bringing about safer working conditions and a better working environment and therefore believes that it should be encouraged, possibly going beyond voluntary application;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Points out that labour inspectors play a vital role in verifying the implementation
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Points out that labour inspectors play a vital role in verifying the implementation of the legislation in force and, thereby, in prevention; encourages the Member States to strengthen sanctions against enterprises not complying with their obligations concerning fundamental rights (
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. having regard to the ageing of the EU population, the trend towards longer working lives and the need to raise healthy life expectancy; having regard to the inequalities in life expectancy between different socioprofessional categories and to hardship at work; whereas in addition to musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), workers over the age of 55 are particularly prone to cancers, heart disease, respiratory problems and sleep disorders[1], [1] Eurofound: ‘Working conditions of an ageing workforce’
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Points out that labour inspectors play a vital role through education, persuasion and encouragement and in verifying the implementation of the legislation in force and, thereby, in prevention; encourages the Member States to strengthen sanctions against enterprises not complying with their obligations concerning fundamental rights (salaries and OHS, including working hours);
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Points out that labour inspectors play a vital role in verifying the implementation of the legislation in force and, thereby, in prevention, in particular by ascertaining compliance with decent working conditions for vulnerable categories of workers or in occupations in which undeclared work tends to occur; encourages the Member States to strengthen sanctions against enterprises not complying with their obligations concerning fundamental rights (salaries and OHS, including working hours);
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Points out that labour inspectors play a vital role in verifying the implementation of the legislation in force and, thereby, in prevention; stresses that the Member States must guarantee high standards in the training of labour inspectors; encourages the Member States to strengthen sanctions against enterprises not complying with their obligations concerning fundamental rights (salaries and OHS, including working hours);
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Points out that labour inspectors play a vital role in verifying the implementation of the legislation in force and, thereby, in prevention; encourages the Member States to increase the staffing levels of, and the resources available to, their labour inspectorates and to strengthen sanctions against enterprises not complying with their obligations concerning fundamental rights (salaries and OHS, including working hours);
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Points out that EU-OSHA recommends that a standard framework be used for risk assessment and prevention1; 1 EU-OSHA, http://osha.europa.eu/en/topics/riskassess ment/index_html
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Calls for the prevention of problems related to health and safety at work to be treated with the same attention in the private and the public sector; points out that the principle of non-discrimination is binding;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 c (new) 21c. Deplores the failure in a number of Member States to coordinate public and occupational health policies;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 d (new) 21d. Points out that labour inspectorates have a vital role to play in prevention and monitoring and also help to improve information and expertise at company level; urges the Member States to increase the staffing levels of, and the resources available to, their labour inspectorates and meet the target of one inspector for every 10 000 workers, as recommended by the ILO, and to impose more severe penalties on firms that fail to comply with their obligations concerning fundamental rights (salaries, working hours, and OHS); considers that the penalties in such cases must be effective, proportionate, and dissuasive;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 e (new) 21e. Endorses the useful work which the Senior Labour Inspectors’ Committee (SLIC) is doing to bring national cultures closer together; calls for its resources and powers to be strengthened; hopes that it will work together more actively with the Luxembourg Advisory Committee; calls on SLIC to draw up proposals to establish a European labour inspectorate, which would provide invaluable expertise on the posting of workers and cross-border trade in services;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 f (new) 21f. Calls on Member States to bring more searching scrutiny to bear on the failure to report accidents at work;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas protecting young workers can prevent work-related health problems occurring later in life,
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Hopes that employees will be given the option of transferring to another post when they believe their working conditions to constitute a hazard to their health or safety (and considers that, to that end, the degree of harmfulness should be measured according to predetermined indicators or criteria);
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21. Urges Member States to combat the burden of bureaucracy and the labyrinthine structure of state control mechanisms for health and safety at work and work inspections, by strengthening their dynamics and simplifying time- consuming internal procedures with a view to implementing more and more effective controls;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Believes that the Member States, together with private and public organisations, as well as the social partners, should implement effective prevention policies in both the private and the public sector by exchanging information and training employees, managers, social partners, and occupational physicians;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Calls on Member States to monitor periodical medical examinations more effectively and evaluate the results thereof, so as to ensure that the state of health of workers is in accordance with the demands of the workplace;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Notes that risk assessment is carried out in most companies, albeit to a lesser extent in small enterprises and in some Member States1; 1 EU-OSHA, ESENER survey.
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Considers that risks arise not so much because SMEs are intrinsically less safe as from the fact that working patterns are flawed and the resources earmarked for OHS are less substantial; believes that SMEs need to be helped to set up their risk prevention policies; points to the usefulness of OiRA and similar initiatives and of economic incentives; calls on the Member States to exchange their best practices;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 c (new) 22c. Points out that information and awareness campaigns are essential in order to alert companies – SMEs included – to risks and ensure that they carry out the necessary prevention measures;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Believes that company-level risk assessment should be carried out at regular intervals and gradually adjusted to take account of new circumstances and emerging risks;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas in the services sector, young workers and women are insufficiently covered by reintegration and job-retention policies[1], [1] EU-OSHA, ‘Young Workers – Facts and Figures’ (http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/rep orts/7606507/view) and the related fact sheet (http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/fac tsheets/70), 2007; ‘Facts and Figures – Musculoskeletal disorders’, 2010 (http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/rep orts/TERO09009ENC/view); and ‘Facts and Figures – The Transport Sector’, 2011
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Is concerned about the impact of subcontracting, for example in civil and military nuclear installations, a
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Is concerned about the impact of subcontracting, for example in civil and military nuclear installations, as
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Is concerned about the impact of subcontracting, for example in civil and military nuclear installations, as each employer tends to limit their preventive actions to their own employees; calls on the Commission to propose legislation on subcontracting; calls for a ban on subcontracting chains in activities that are important in terms of safety;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Believes that more research, exchange of knowledge and practical application of results helps in better identifying and assessing potential new risks;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Considers that risk assessment should be multidisciplinary and based on employee participation;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. calls on the Member States to incorporate OHS from the start of training and subsequently as part of lifelong learning; believes it would be desirable to make risk education compulsory in certain technological, scientific, artistic and sporting fields, as well as in management training courses; would like Member States to incorporate OHS into university teaching, so that it reaches future engineers, architects, business people, managers, etc;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 c (new) 23c. Calls on the Member States to assess the quality of the training of their workplace risk prevention managers and supports their exchanges of best practices;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 d (new) 23d. Encourages the Member States to invest in labour science; wishes to see more research at the EU and national levels in this regard;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 e (new) 23e. Stresses that the main obstacles to concern for psycho-social risks at work are personal receptiveness to the issue, lack of awareness, lack of resources and lack of expertise[1]; 1 EU-OSHA, ESENER survey.
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 f (new) 23f. Notes that enterprises generally deal with psycho-social risks by providing training, but workers suffer first and foremost because the organisation of work and management style are poor;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, when there are no proper checks, the outsourcing of work through subcontracting and temporary agency work
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 g (new) 23g. Stresses that legal complexity does not appear to be a major obstacle to the adoption of policies concerning health and safety at work [1]; 1 EU-OSHA, ESENER survey.
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 – footnote 18 Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the Commission to propose a directive18 protecting
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the Commission to propose a directive protecting the jobs of people who legitimately draw attention to
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Member States to introduce penalties against any refusal by insurance companies to recognise work- related accidents for commercial reasons;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Points out that it is important, first and foremost, for a clear definition to be given to occupational accidents and diseases, including accidents during travel (from home to the workplace), in addition to work-related stress, which should be able to be measured in accordance with specific indicators;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Is of the view that the stress often caused by workplace bullying is a factor which increases musculoskeletal disorders and psycho-social risks and these factors should be the subject of an in-depth study on the part of the Commission;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 c (new) 24c. Takes the view that at each stage of the decision-making process regarding sick leave and accidents at work, close consultations should take place between the human resources department and the occupational medicine department in order to make risk prevention more effective in the long term;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the outsourcing of work through subcontracting and temporary agency work
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 d (new) 24d. Considers that in order to prevent the risk of long-term illness, strict compliance with legislation on sick leave and maternity leave should be ensured, since pressure exerted by employers during this period can lead to an extension of such leave;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Is concened by the rising number of stress related illnesses and notes the lack of education in managing stress at work; calls for preventive actions through stress management training, stress prevention training and awareness raising during education, training and work life;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Commission to continue and enhance the discussions with and the consultation of the social partners with the view to achieving joint and concerted action on particular issues;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Commission to revise the Framework Directive 89/391/EEC in order to ensure that adequate sanctions are applied against employers in the event of blacklisting of workers who endevour to improve the health and safety at their workplace. These sanctions must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive, and in cases aggravated by a serious violation of fundamental rights must include criminal liability for those directly responsible and any legal persons by whom they are engaged;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Encourages the Member States to make more effective use of the European Social Fund, particularly the aid earmarked for setting up health and safety at work training projects for employers and employees;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Encourages the Member States to take into consideration the special risks female workers are facing in preventive policies and risk assessment methods;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Stresses that migrants19 , the young, old, women of child-bearing age, the disabled
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Stresses that migrants
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Stresses that migrants19, the young, old, women of child-bearing age, the disabled
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Criticizes the fact that the Commission has failed to pay sufficient attention to the gender mainstreaming approach, either in the Community strategy on health and safety at work or in its mid-term assessment; calls on the Commission and Member States to take into account gender-specific particularities in national and European strategies for health and safety at work and in the collection of statistical data and in research;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the outsourcing of work through subcontracting and temporary agency work
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Notes that young workers between the ages of 15 and 24 are at particularly high risk of injuryx, and the long-term consequences of an illness or injury at an early age can be significant; calls, therefore, on the Commission to consider also protecting young workers over the age of 18 under Directive 94/33/EC; emphasizes further the need to integrate the issue of health and safety at work in existing EU programmes, such as 'Youth on the Move'; __________________ x Verjans M., de Broeck V., Eckelaert L., OSH in figures: Young workers - Facts and figures, European Agency for Safety and Health at work, European Risk Observatory Report, Luxembourg, 2007, p.133
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 c (new) 25c. Calls on the Commission and Member States to facilitate the process of demographic change by better adapting health and safety measures at the workplace to the needs of older workers; emphasizes the positive effects of lifelong learning in maintaining the motivation to work and of measures that anticipate a decline in physical strength, for example the ergonomic design of workplaces; emphasizes that a framework agreement between the social partners would be a constructive initiative;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Believes that un-skilled and long- term unemployed workers shall not be employed without the necessary preliminary trainings regarding occupational health and safety risks;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Regrets the lack of initiatives to tackle the situation of the self-employed, temporary workers, domestic workers and people working on short-term contracts, as they too have the right to have their OHS respected; points out that these casual workers do not have the same level of social security and their situation in terms of protection at work is exacerbated by a lack of experience and training; moreover, there is some difficulty in ascribing future health consequences to periods of temporary work; calls, in particular, for the revision of Directive 91/383 with regard to subcontracting activities, and of the Posting of Workers Directive;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Reiterates the recommendation of the HIRES European report that temporary workers and company employees should be given the same rights to health promotion where the nature of their work is long-term work directed by the main employer.
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Believes that greater attention should be brought to bear specifically with a view to making jobs accessible to, and safe for, workers with disabilities;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Is concerned about working conditions at some sites in the nuclear sector
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 14 Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the outsourcing of work through subcontracting and temporary agency work often involves less skilled labour and looser employment relationships, which makes it more difficult to identify responsibility for health and safety at work (OHS),
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Calls for an impact assessment of the potential risks from new technologies, especially in nanotechnologies in the workplace;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Calls for an impact assessment of the potential risks from nanotechnologies in the workplace and calls for legislative actions to ensure that nano-materials are fully covered by the Europaen OHS regulation;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Calls for particular attention to be focused on workers who do strenuous work;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that excessive working hours and insufficient rest periods are major factors in the increased level of occupational accidents and diseases;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that excessive working hours and insufficient rest periods
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that excessive working hours and insufficient rest periods are major factors in the increased level of occupational accidents and diseases;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that excessive working hours and insufficient rest periods are major factors in the increased level of occupational accidents and diseases;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that excessive working hours and insufficient rest periods, a
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that excessive working hours and insufficient rest periods are major factors in the increased level of occupational accidents and diseases and calls for a satisfactory balance between work and family life; hopes that the opt- out provisions applicable to Directive 2003/88/EC will be removed; stresses that these provisions violate the fundamental principles of OSH;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that excessive working hours and insufficient rest periods are major factors in the increased level of occupational accidents and diseases;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas Framework Directive 89/391/EEC places the responsibility on employers to establish a systematic prevention policy covering all risks, irrespective of a worker’s status, and to ensure that employees are not damaged by occupational factors, including the effects of mobbing,
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Is alarmed at the increase in enforced part-time work, disjointed hours and night work;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30.
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Is alarmed at the increase in enforced part-time work, enforced teleworking, enforced disjointed hours and night work; calls for the risks to the balance between work and private life posed by
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Is alarmed at the increase in enforced part-time work, disjointed hours and night and Sunday work; calls for the risks to the balance between work and private life posed by teleworking, Sunday work and multiple jobs to be scientifically assessed;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Is alarmed at the increase in enforced part-time work, disjointed hours and night work; calls for the risks to the balance between work and private life, especially for women, posed by teleworking and multiple jobs to be assessed;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Is alarmed at the increase in enforced part-time work, disjointed hours and night work; calls for the risks to the balance between work and private life posed by teleworking and multiple jobs
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Is most concerned about the results of a recent study by the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) and the European Brain Council (EBC) according to which more than one in three Europeans (164.8 million) suffers from a mental disorder which has thus become the leading cause of illness; calls on the Commission, through more in- depth studies, to examine more closely links with the workload, working schedules and working arrangements and, where appropriate, propose a list of measures to be taken;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 – footnote 22 Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Hopes that the future legislative proposal on musculoskeletal disorders will cover all workers; criticises, however, that the Commission proposes a narrow approach of a 'recast procedure' merging the provisions of Directives 90/269/EEC and 90/270/EEC into a single legislative instrument; calls on the Commission to propose a new Directive, based on the principles of prevention as described in Framework Directive 89/391/EEC on health and safety at work and designed to cover all work situations in a holistic approach to rule out MSD risk factors right from the outset; points out that not only biomechanical constraints, but also work content, work organisation, the physical and psychosocial environment, sensory and emotional constraints must be addressed, including the 'gender dimension', as women and men are differently affected by MSD risks;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas accidents, MSDs and work- related stress are the main areas of concern for European enterprises in relation to OHS[1], [1] EU-OSHA, Esener Survey 2009, http://osha.europa.eu/sub/esener/en/front- page/document_view?set_language=en
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Considers that measures to encourage part-time work for older workers could provide a progressive transition to retirement and enhance the well-being and capacities of older workers;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 b (new) 31b. Reiterates its request to the Commission contained in the resolution of 23 February 2005 on the European Environmental and Health Action Plan 2004-2010 to designate environmental tobacco as a class A1 carcinogen under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, so that tobacco smoke falls within the scope of Directive 2004/37/EC on carcinogens and mutagens;
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 c (new) 31c. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal to Parliament and Council in 2012 seeking to ban smoking everywhere at the workplace, including indoor catering establishments, on all public transport and in all enclosed public buildings within the EU;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Calls on the Commission to use all scientific elements and propose legislation on new potentially harmful substances and risk factors, including work organisation;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 b (new) 31b. Believes that Member States can be supported in research on new risks and introducing new practices contributing in more effectively applying security rules, through the 7h Framework Programme on Research and Innovation;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32.
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Reiterates its call for recommendation 2003/670 concerning the European schedule of occupational diseases to be transformed into a directive, and calls on the inclusion of asbestos related diseases into such a directive;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Believes that research into the health and safety of the following occupations needs to be carried out immediately: - hairdressers and how the chemicals they work with effect the health of the hairdressers and of their unborn children; - working time for pilots - workers in and around airports in regards to particle pollution and how this exposure make them more at risk of getting certain diseases such as cancer - baggage handlers in airports in regards to how heavy lifting effects their health - bus drivers performing mobile road transport activities on routes shorter than 50 km since these bus drivers are exempt from the rules in Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 and to what extent this effects the road safety and the health and safety of the bus drivers;
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 b (new) 32b. Calls on the Commission, if new studies or science prove that certain occupations have high health and safety risks, to immediately take the appropriate measures to protect the safety and health of the workers;
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Considers that rehabilitation and reinstatement after illness or an accident are essential and should therefore be encouraged;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas no link has been shown to exist between the number of accidents and company size; whereas, however, the accident rate does depend on the type of production that a firm carries out and the sector in which it operates, the degree of dependence being highest in sectors involving mostly manual labour and a close man-machine relationship,
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Is alarmed at the persistent number of cancers associated with the exercise of an occupation
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Is alarmed at the persistent number of
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33a. Stresses that risks from carcinogens principally affect workers in the industrial, crafts and agricultural sectors, together with women in the services sector who are repeatedly exposed to them1; calls for an impact assessment regarding the exposure of agricultural workers to chemicals; 1 ETUI, 2010, http://hesa.etui- rehs.org/uk/publications/pub54.htm
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to accelerate the implementation of REACH, and in particular the substitution of the most worrying chemicals; considers that work- related diseases should be taken into account in the prioritisation of these substances;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Calls on the Commission to propose a revision of Directive 2004/37 on carcinogens and mutagens by the end of 2012
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35a. Stresses that the scope of Directive 2004/37 needs to be extended to take into account new risk factors and reprotoxins, that the level of protection and prevention needs to be thoroughly improved by making exposure limit values (OELVs) for benzene, vinyl chloride monomer and hard wood dust more restrictive and by defining (OELVs) for a much bigger number of carcinogens than stipulated by the current Directive, in particular for cristalline silica;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Believes that maximum exposure limits based on health effects and not on an evaluation of technical feasibility, as is currently the case, should be established at European level for the majority of carcinogenic substances; stresses that harmonisation must always be upwards, that is to say based on the most stringent limits;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to propose measures to adapt working conditions more closely to the needs of those suffering from cancer or other work-related diseases and chronic diseases;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 b (new) 36b. Takes the view that the emerging ecological employment sector requires specific attention; calls for environmental impact evaluations and surveys regarding the toxicity of ecological materials and the working conditions of those putting into service the appliances used for the production of renewable energy (manufacture, use, maintenance and recycling);
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the EU 2020 strategy aims for an overall employment rate of 75% of the population aged between 20 and 64; whereas workers with chronic or long- term illnesses often do not return to work, even though their health would permit it;
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36a. Considers that the new Community strategy for occupational health and safety at work 2013 - 2020 should focus on using the potentials of REACH for improving workers’ protection from chemical hazards, a renewed effort for preventing work-related illnesses and improving workers’ quality of life at work, strengthening the monitoring and enforcement responsibilities of labour inspectorates and workers' participation in designing, monitoring and implementing prevention policies, improving the recognition of occupational diseases and addressing flexibility, insecurity, sub-contracting etc. as obstacles to proper risk prevention;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 b (new) Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36a. Calls for administrative and legal redress proceedings relating to the recognition of work-related accidents and diseases to be facilitated and speeded up, provision being made for amicable settlement;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 a (new) 37a. Reiterates its call upon the Commission to avoid compromising the level of protection achieved in the European OHS directives when examining the possibilities to simplify the legislation;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. having regard to the growing impact of chronic work-related health problems such as musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) and
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas psycho-social risks are risks related to stress, symbolic violence and harassment at work; whereas stress is linked to job insecurity, ethical conflicts, poor work organisation (for example, deadline pressure or excessive workload), conflict with clients, a lack of support at work, unstable labour relations or an inappropriate work-life balance;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas technological development brings new health and safety risks for workers which should be evaluated;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the lack of a regular timetable for workers in occupations involving night work often causes difficulties which can lead to occupational diseases;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas reproductive capacity can be endangered by the health problems which can arise when parents-to-be or their unborn children are exposed to the effects of environmental pollution and risk factors present in the working environment,
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 a (new) - having regard to its position of 7 July 2011 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Year for Active Ageing (2012)1, 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0332
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the Europe 2020 Strategy aims, by 2020, to attain an employment rate of 75% for the section of the population aged between 20 and 64, with priority for the employment of women, young people, older workers, the low- skilled and legal immigrants, and to improve social cohesion;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas 168 000 European citizens die every year from work-related accidents or diseases, and whereas it is not yet possible to put an accurate figure on the accidents linked to the use of new technologies and new forms of work,
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas 168 000 European citizens die every year from work-related accidents or diseases and the EU continues to face a number of challenges in occupational health and safety,
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas 168 000 European citizens die every year from work-related accidents or diseases and 7 million are injured in accidents,
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas equal working conditions may have different effects on men and women and whereas these differences should be taken into account in strategies and measures to improve health and safety at work;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas, given the labour shortage, it is desirable to prolong older workers' active working lives and whereas measures to promote health and safety at work should take effect in the near future;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas safety training and a culture of prevention are vital but can at times be wanting, whether in small or in large enterprises,
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) G a. whereas women report a higher level of work-related health problems than men irrespective of the type of work2, therefore measures of health and safety at work need a gender-based and life-cycle approach, __________________ 2 Occupational health and safety risks for the most vulnerable workers, EP Policy Department A, Economic and Scientific Policy, 2011, p. 40
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas women are equally, if not more, affected by musculoskeletal disorders, even when they are working in the service sector,
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G c (new) Gc. whereas ageing women are particularly vulnerable to age-related diseases which should be adequately addressed in OHS policies,
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 22 a (new) – having regard to its resolution on harassment at the workplace2,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the European reference framework on occupational health and safety (OHS) does not
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the European reference framework on occupational health and safety (OHS) does not automatically provide for improvement in working conditions, and that proper implementation in practice, notably via employee participation, and supervision of the application of the legislation are crucial; calls on the Commission to take swift
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the European reference framework on occupational health and safety (OHS) does not automatically provide for improvement in working conditions, and that proper implementation, notably via employee participation, and supervision of the application of the legislation are crucial, as are tripartite dialogue arrangements, gathering and disseminating data, awareness-raising campaigns and networking of training and information services; calls on the Commission to take swift action when infringements are detected;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the European reference framework on occupational health and safety (OHS) does not automatically provide for improvement in working conditions, and that proper implementation, notably via employee participation, and supervision of the
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes the view, since the employment rate needs to grow by an annual average of some 1% in the EU, that it is particularly important to ensure the protection of the health of older workers and/or those with disabilities or who have become disabled, and the development of working conditions adapted to their changed situation;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls that occupational accidents form only a limited part of the health problems caused by work, and that narrowing down the former much broader preventive focus of the Community Strategy to this single target breaks with the holistic spirit of the framework directive; criticises that the strategy for the current period (2007 – 2012) views occupational health primarily as a variable of the productivity and competitiveness of businesses;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that – apart from the business’s image and economic factors – legal requirements and employee claims are the two main factors motivating employers to take action;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the right to health is a fundamental right and whereas all workers enjoy a legal guarantee of working conditions which respect their health, safety and dignity,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that legal requirements and employee claims are the two main factors motivating employers to take action, but that sensible employers are interested in OHS even without them, because it improves employees’ welfare and their business’s productivity and reputation;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Takes the view that OHS policies, at European and national level, should be made consistent
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Takes the view that OHS policies, at European and national level, should be made consistent with other public policies: health, employment, industry, environment, transport, education
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Takes the view that OHS policies, at
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Takes the view that OHS policies, at European and national level, should be made consistent with other public policies: health, employment, industry, public procurement, environment, transport, education and energy;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Takes the view that OHS policies, at European and national level, should be made consistent with other public policies: health, employment, industry, environment, transport, education and energy and should implement gender- mainstreaming in its policies in order to better reflect the specific risks faced by female workers;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises the need to mainstream gender when dealing with issues concerning health and safety at work and welcomes the initiative of the Commission calling for the preparation of unique methods of impact assessment in OSH with regard to gender specificity; calls on the Commission to assess the availability of gender-disaggregated statistics at Community level on work-related fatal and non-fatal diseases;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls, when public contracts are awarded, for safety levels and accident prevention practices to be taken more fully into account;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of fully implementing REACH and the need for greater synergy between REACH and OHS policies, both at European level and in the Member States; calls for transparency regarding the activities of the Substance Information Exchange Forum;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Maintains that training programmes need to be supported through better coordination of Community policies and that existing programmes should be intensified, the object being to pursue a risk prevention policy drawing on local, regional, and national experience;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas occupational risk prevention has similar objectives to sustainable development: anticipating the potentially negative impact of action taken by companies, groups or society,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Takes the view that Sunday should be enshrined in EU labour legislation as a regular weekly rest day, as it was in the 1993 Working Time Directive, if it can be scientifically proven that Sunday is preferable to any other day of the week in the interest of protecting workers' health;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Takes the view that there is an urgent need for a conclusive scientific review of the effects of Sunday working on workers’ health; notes that two Eurofound studies from 2007 and 2003, and studies by British and German researchers from 2009, showed that Sunday is preferable as a regular weekly rest day to any other day of the week in the interest of protecting workers' health; considers that the Commission should order a neutral study in the near future to review all the existing results and come to a conclusive scientific finding;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for the next European strategy to set more measurable goals, together with binding timetables and a periodic evaluation;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for the next European strategy to set more measurable goals, together with binding timetables and a periodic evaluation; hopes to see the
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls for the next European strategy to set more measurable goals, together with binding timetables and a periodic evaluation; hopes to see the objective of one labour inspector per 10 000 workers, as recommended by the ILO, become binding as a minimum obligation of the Member State;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Believes that the economic effects of the crisis and the severe economic downturn in some Member States should not serve as a pretext for the defective application of legislation on health and safety at work, or undermine occupational risk prevention policies;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Member States to encourage the social dialogue, at EU level and at national, local and workplace levels, as it is a vital instrument for ensuring the health and safety of all workers;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that the Member States and enterprises should invest more in risk- prevention policies and ensure worker participation therein; considers that such
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Believes that a genuinely effective accident prevention policy has to start at the planning stage so as to ensure that the greater safety resulting from innovation will extend to both the product and the entire production process; calls on the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to support and encourage research in this field;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Believes that further research is needed in order to determine the health effects of given occupations, including in the long term, in order – wherever possible – to avert cases in which the onset of disease occurs after the end of working life;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas technological development and changes in economic and social conditions are constantly changing work places and practices, rapid political, administrative and technical responses are therefore essential in order to guarantee a high level of health and safety at work,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Takes the view that the adoption, planning and implementation of national strategies should take into consideration the specific situation of each Member state, targeting the sectors and companies most affected by occupational accidents;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the unequal application across the EU of the Framework Agreement on Work-related Stress
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the unequal application across the EU of the Framework Agreement on Work-related Stress
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the unequal application across the EU of the Framework Agreement on Work-related Stress and and calls on the
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the unequal application across the EU of the Framework Agreement of 8 October 2004 on Work-related Stress and calls on the
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the unequal application across the EU of the Framework Agreement on Work-related Stress and calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal on work-related stress, bearing in mind that job insecurity has a real impact on the stress factor;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the unequal application across the EU of the Framework Agreement on Work-related Stress and calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal on work-related stress, especially since the new phenomenon of suicide cases caused by the over demanding targets of enterprises that can not be reached by employees, mainly in high ranking or managerial posts;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets the unequal application across the EU of the Framework Agreement on Work-related Stress and calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal on work-related stress; calls on the Commission to support, facilitate and monitor the transposition of the agreements concluded and resolutions agreed by the social partners in the field of OHS;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A c (new) Ac. whereas work is a source of income but also of individual and social identification and thus a factor in individual and collective fulfilment,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that EU policy on chemical risks and prevention of work-related cancers should be more ambitious and
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that EU policy on chemical risks
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Notes that neither the public nor the private sector is really prepared to face up to the demographic situation and regard the employment of more people with disabilities or with changed working capacities as a possibility;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Draws attention to the proliferation of non-standard forms of employment (temporary work, seasonal work, part-time work, teleworking), which require a specific approach to worker protection;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Draws attention to the proliferation of non-standard forms of employment (temporary work, seasonal work, part-time work, teleworking), which require a specific approach to worker protection; calls for the Commission to
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Draws attention to the proliferation of
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recalls that OHS is necessarily multidisciplinary, as it draws on – in particular – occupational medicine, safety, ergonomics, epidemiology, toxicology, industrial hygiene and psychology;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Considers that, if European citizens are to be asked to remain at work until a greater age, their working conditions must be improved;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Deplores the lack of synergy between the directive on collective redundancies and the directives on OHS, at a time when processes of reorganisation and restructuring of businesses and public administrations will create greater threats to OHS;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A d (new) Ad. whereas risk prevention is essential to reducing the rate of work-related accidents and sickness; having regard to the positive impact of good health and safety at work management at both national and European levels and for companies,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 d (new) 9d. Stresses the added value of Union policy on chemicals and the potential for improvement which should be exploited to prevent work-related cancers;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 e (new) 9e. Calls on the Commission to share the results of the analysis of the social, environmental and economic impact of carcinogens or mutagens and to propose an amendment to Directive 2004/37/EC on carcinogens or mutagens in order to impose new binding limits on products which are not yet covered by it; recalls that the present trend is towards greater concern about risks posed by chemicals in cases where the use of chemicals is not intentional but they are secondary effects (for example in waste treatment) and about combined exposure to multiple hazardous substances;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 f (new) 9f. Deplores the fact that in 2009 several Member States did not focus their national strategies on the three priorities of the EU strategy: stress and burn-out at work, RSI and research into and regular gathering of data on new risks; considers that national strategies should devote greater efforts and resources to prevention;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 g (new) 9g. Stresses that the emergence of new types of jobs (for example green jobs) is a source of new opportunities to protect workers1 and adapt vocational training; [1] EU-OSHA, Foresight of new and emerging risks to occupational safety and health associated with new technologies in green jobs by 2020, Phase 1 : (http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/rep orts/foresight-green-jobs-drivers- change_TERO11001ENN/view) and Phase 2 (http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/rep orts/foresight-green-jobs-key- technologies/view; and NIOSH http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/PtD/gree njobs.html
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 h (new) 9h. Considers that corporate social responsibility has a part to play in promoting OHS;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Underlines that there should be incentives for a more affective application of the rules on Health and Safety at work, especially with regard more vulnerable grous (women, disabled, temporary workers etc.);
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that the Commission should develop gender and age-specific statistical means to evaluate prevention not solely in terms of accidents but also in terms of pathologies and the percentage of workers exposed to chemical, physical or biological agents and to dangerous situations from the point of view of the organisation of work;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Stresses the importance of gender- based measures and life-cycle approach to eliminate the risk of early retirement due to health problems;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls for the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) to compile national indicators on exposure to
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls for the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) to compile national indicators on exposure to cancers and to review the knowledge on exposure of particularly vulnerable workers (women, the personal services sector, etc.);
source: PE-472.198
2011/10/06
ENVI
49 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that work-related accidents are more frequent amongst certain categories of workers than others – e.g. young, older and migrant workers, and those with precarious jobs; calls therefore on the Commission and Member States to adopt specific measures for these target groups; believes particular attention needs to be paid to women and to maternity issues, recalling that secure jobs with rights are an important factor for workplace health and safety;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that work-related accidents are more frequent amongst certain categories of workers than others – e.g. young, older and migrant workers, and those with precarious jobs; calls therefore on the Commission and Member States to adopt specific measures for these target groups, and to use the workplace to promote adult health; calls for more funding for the activities carried out as part of different projects, and for better- developed health services in the workplace;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses the crucial importance of training programmes relating to the safety and supervision of young people in their first months at work; in this respect, believes that a significant role can be played by training programmes offering sector-specific information, as also by high-quality supervision, in view of its direct impact on workers' safety;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission to propose binding legislation before the end of 2012 to ensure that health and safety legislation fully applies to sub-contractors at all levels so as to put an end to the practice of limiting preventive measures to one's own workers.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Points out that the main aims of the Community strategy for 2007-2012 include both guaranteeing the proper implementation of EU legislation and improving and simplifying existing legislation, inter alia through the implementation of non-binding instruments; also notes that, under Article 4 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the EU enjoys only shared competence with the Member States in the fields of employment and public health, and that in its 2007 communication the Commission emphasises the development and implementation of national strategies; stresses, therefore, the need to adapt EU legislation to social changes in a coherent manner and to avoid legislating unnecessarily at EU level;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Stresses that success for the 2007- 2012 Strategy for Health and Safety at Work means an "ongoing, sustainable and uniform reduction in accidents at work and occupational illnesses," including fulfilment of the explicit target of a 25% reduction in the incidence of accidents at work, and notes that these will need to be demonstrated by adequate quantitative data on EU-level trends in occupational accidents and illnesses;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. Urges the Commission to facilitate the development of European health and safety standards at the workplace; in this connection, stresses the importance of cooperation by the Member States in identifying the causes of workplace accidents and in the exchange of best practice;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 f (new) 2f. Stresses the need to draw up programmes for the active population concerning health and safety standards in the workplace;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the framework directive on health and safety at work ( 89/391/EEC) is already
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the framework directive on health and safety at work (89/391/EEC) is already over 20 years old but has yet to see any substantial amendments, so it needs to be adapted to
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that top priority must be given to a preventive approach when promoting health and safety at work and that this approach must be firmly rooted both in the EU strategy and in the national strategies, and taken account of in the national prevention programmes of public services in the field of health, hygiene and safety in the workplace in the interests of the protection of workers' health and working conditions;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the framework directive on health and safety at work (89/391/EEC) is already over 20 years old but has yet to see any substantial amendments, so it needs to be adapted to the new challenges posed by changes in the working environment, such as the increase in mental health problems and developments in the field of workplace ergonomics, taking account of musculoskeletal disorders, which in the EU affect more than half of workers suffering from work-related physical problems;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the European Commission to consider mental illness, such as depression, as a priority when reviewing the strategy and European Health and Safety legislation given the growing problem of workplace-related depression and cognition disorders.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Notes that the health and safety of employees is improved when they have health and safety representatives in their workplace; considers that for employees to participate effectively in a workplace health and safety strategy, both employees and their health and safety representatives must be adequately protected from any resulting discrimination on the part of employers; calls on the Commission to amend Directive 89/391/EEC to strengthen the protections against this type of discrimination, and in particular to prevent the victimisation, dismissal or the refusal of employment or 'blacklisting' of workers or their representatives;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to review the Directive on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (2004/37/EC) to enlarge its scope to include substances that are toxic for reproduction; notes that limit values on substances that endanger human health have only been set in a very few cases; calls, in the interests of workers, for the rapid implementation of REACH, and in particular for the
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to review the Directive on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (2004/37/EC); notes that limit values on substances that endanger human health have only been set in a very few cases; calls, in the interests of workers, for the rapid implementation of REACH and CLP, and in particular for the substitution of chemicals that are classified as especially harmful to human health;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. ; Calls on the Commission to review, as a matter of urgency, the Directive on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (2004/37/EC); notes that limit values on substances that endanger human health have
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to review the Directive on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (2004/37/EC); notes that limit values on substances that endanger human health have only been set in a very few cases; calls, in the interests of workers, for the rapid implementation of REACH, and in particular for the substitution of chemicals that are especially harmful to human health, taking account of the need for Community funding with a view to dealing with the problems of adaptation to REACH encountered by microbusinesses and SMEs in certain sectors, such as textiles and clothing;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Expresses its concern regarding the assessment of the risk thresholds for pregnant women at work; calls for detailed research to be carried out into the effects of exposure of pregnant women to certain workplace conditions (e.g. exposure to chemical agents, ionising radiation, electromagnetic waves, stress, excessive heat, lifting heavy weights, etc); in this connection, also calls for research into the connections between stillbirths, perinatal complications and health problems of newborn infants and workplace conditions liable to pose risks to pregnant women;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Notes that the Parliament considered in 2007 that the current legislation on musculoskeletal disorders was inadequate, and therefore asked the Commission to consider coming forward with proposals for a Directive; notes that, four years on, the legislation on musculoskeletal disorders is still inadequate, as the Commission has delayed its proposal for a new Directive;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets th
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that top priority must be given to a preventive approach when promoting health and safety at work and that this approach must be firmly rooted both in the EU strategy and in the national strategies, and that access to high-quality basic health services in the workplace must also be improved in order to ensure health and safety in the workplace and create the right conditions for good productivity;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Regrets the delayed action of the Commission with regard to the presentation of a new legislative proposal on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from electromagnetic fields after the postponement of the implementation of Directive 2004/40/EC and calls for the rapid implementation of the relevant legislation when adopted;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Points out that chemicals are not evaluated under REACH for endocrine disruption; Therefore, calls on the Commission to propose provisions in order to take hormone disruption into account;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises that
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls for
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the fact that the available data confirm the declining trend in occupational accidents; points out, however, that the number of occupational accidents is still too high;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Points out that in its 2007 communication the Commission stated that one of its aims was to support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the implementation of EU legislation and of their risk prevention policies; stresses, therefore, the need to support European SMEs and protect them from any unwarranted or inappropriate penalties, especially during the current recession;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Points out that appropriate training for workers makes a significant contribution to their health and safety, and that this aspect should therefore receive greater attention in future;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 d (new) 7d. Calls on the Commission, in future legislation on health and safety at work and where applicable, to promote the use of technologies that reduce the risks posed by dangerous substances in the event of occupational accidents and, where possible, for these technologies to replace the use of chemical and radioactive substances;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the EU and the Member States to develop a European programme for the monitoring of occupational hazards (in particular musculoskeletal and psychosocial problems), based on health indicators, definitions and epidemiological tools common to the 27 Member States; stresses the need for an integrated approach to monitoring, taking into account both the career paths of current employees and the state of health of those who have retired;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 e (new) 7e. Calls for a binding EU list of occupational illness, as a minimum requirement for Member States, which also recognises as occupational illnesses new pathogenic occupational stresses such as work-induced mental illness affecting the musculoskeletal system;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 f (new) 7f. Calls on the Member States to implement as quickly as possible the Directive 2010/32/EU on the protection of healthcare workers from sharps injuries and to ensure highest level of protection from patients and healthcare workers being exposed to healthcare associated infections;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 g (new) 7g. Stresses the need for the continual improvement of data collection in order to guarantee the EU-wide comparability of data;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 h (new) 7h. Calls on the Member States and Commission to make guidelines on the protection of workers easier to apply in practice, without undermining the rules on health and safety at work;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 i (new) Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 j (new) 7j. Calls for binding limit values for manual lifting, since this is the most effective way of ensuring that employers provide more protection for their employees;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 k (new) 7k. Points out that savings in the economic crisis must not mean losing sight of health and safety at work;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 l (new) 7l. Underlines the responsibility of employers to foster the physical and mental health of workers; calls on undertakings to adopt company agreements that make company-level health promotion mandatory, in the form of a certified company health and safety management scheme in line with the quality criteria set by the European Network for Workplace Health Promotion;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 m (new) 7m. Calls for the EU-level social dialogue on health and safety at work and employee participation to be stepped up;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 n (new) 7n. Calls for an improved cross-border exchange of information between the various national authorities with a view to more efficient checks when workers are transferred to other EU Member States;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Reminds that the workplace is to be considered as a privileged platform to support the EU and Member States' prevention strategies, addressing both communicable or non-communicable diseases, and that employers, workers organisation and other social partners have a great role to play in promoting healthy lifestyles and health literacy among the working population
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up the fight against health-related inequalities, and to reduce disparities in terms of working conditions and access to services aimed at improving workers’ health, prevention and occupational health;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that work-related accidents are more frequent amongst certain categories of workers than others – e.g. young, older
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that work-related accidents are more frequent amongst certain categories of workers than others – e.g. young
source: PE-473.822
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.808New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-PR-469808_EN.html |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.198New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-472198_EN.html |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE470.073&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-470073_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111214&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-12-14-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0547/COM_SEC(2011)0547_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0547/COM_SEC(2011)0547_EN.pdf |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0547/COM_SEC(2011)0547_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0547/COM_SEC(2011)0547_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-409&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0409_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-589New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0589_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
EMPL/7/06320New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
InitiativeNew
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|