Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | PATRICIELLO Aldo ( PPE) | GLANTE Norbert ( S&D), KRAHMER Holger ( ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard ( Verts/ALE), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | TATARELLA Salvatore ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ZASADA Artur ( PPE) | Jacqueline FOSTER ( ECR), Jaromír KOHLÍČEK ( GUE/NGL), Gesine MEISSNER ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution in response to the Commission’s communication entitled “Towards a space strategy for the European Union that benefits it citizens”.
Recalling that space policy is a key element of the Europe 2020 strategy and an integral part of the flagship initiative on industrial policy , Members welcome the Commission’s Communication as the first step towards a comprehensive EU space policy serving the interests of its citizens, its policies and its diplomacy. Nevertheless, they stress that the priority areas of action should be made clearer and that an assessment of all the technical options and related costs, risks and benefits, and of the social implications, should be undertaken, including all possible impacts on the European Union’s industrial base and European industrial policy.
Addressing societal challenges : the resolution stresses that space solutions (relying on state of the art technologies and a competitive European industrial base) are vital to address today’s important societal challenges, such as natural disasters, resources and climate monitoring, to develop the telecommunications sector and to foster relevant applications in the fields of climate change policies, land-use planning, environment management, agriculture, maritime safety, fisheries and transport.
Members point out that a European space programme should focus on areas of European added value and avoid dispersion of efforts or duplications with activities undertaken by the European Space Agency (ESA).
A coherent approach : Members consider that the European Union is responsible for coordinating and consolidating national space policies and programmes with a view to establishing a coherent European approach in cooperation with all relevant stakeholders. It also stresses the need for clear governance in relation to space policy, making optimal use of the skills available in Europe, with effective supervisory and coordination mechanisms, in order to harmonise priorities and ensure the sound management of resources derived from national funding and from the European Union, the ESA and other European agencies dealing with space and of significance to the EU.
Parliament agrees with the Commission that Europe must maintain independent access to space to be able to achieve its established objectives in carrying out its space policy and continue to benefit from the spin-offs from space application. They therefore, encourage the Commission to put forward specific proposals in the strategic area of launch vehicles , in particular by giving them special attention in the context of industrial policy in the space sector.
Flagship Galileo and GMES projects:
(1) Members consider that Galileo is one of the European Union’s flagship programmes as well as being the first satellite navigation system in the world designed for civilian use, and could enable the Union to remain independent in a strategically important field. They are convinced that the aim of Full Operating Capacity (FOC), based on a constellation of 27 satellites plus a suitable number of spare satellites and adequate ground infrastructure, is a prerequisite in order to attain the added value of Galileo in terms of authentication, high precision and uninterrupted service and therefore to reap the economic and societal benefits
As a result, Parliament formulates the following recommendations:
· the Commission should complete the legislative and financial framework , particularly with regard to the establishment of a financial framework for 2014 - 2020, an approach on effective governance, Galileo services and rules on responsibility; the financing plan to be adopted for Galileo needs to be such as to ensure that long-term needs are able to be met and continuity is provided, including with regard to operating, maintenance and replacement costs;
· the capacity to provide initial services should be completed by 2014 at the latest to ensure that Galileo does indeed become the second GNSS constellation of reference for receiver manufacturers;
· the Commission and the EU GNSS Agency (GSA) should put much more effort into raising awareness of GNSS among potential users and investors, promoting the use of GNSS-based services, as well as identifying and concentrating the demand for these services in Europe.
The resolution stresses that Galileo and EGNOS are instrumental in the creation of a Single European Sky and for the further development of safe and cost-effective air traffic management in Europe. They are also vital for efficient and environmentally sustainable road traffic management, road-use fee collection systems, eCall and real time tracking systems, and future digital tachographs. Members therefore call for the setting of an ambitious and firm timetable, along with stable financing of research and innovation in implementing the two programmes.
They also draw attention to the importance of the EGNOS system covering the whole of the EU and emphasise the need to expand that system in southern, eastern and south-eastern Europe, the Mediterranean region, Africa and the Arctic.
(2) Members consider that GMES is also a European Union flagship programme playing a key role in earth observation. They urge the Commission to complete the legislative framework and put forward a proposal for effective governance of the different levels of development and management of the programme.
The Commission and the other institutions are invited to include financing for GMES in the multiannual financial framework for 2014-2020. Members underline that the costs relating to GMES are already covered until 2013, totalling EUR 3 billion (approximately EUR 2.3 billion for the satellites and EUR 700 million for related services) and that it is estimated that the programme’s operational costs for the period 2014-2020 will average EUR 850 million per year. They call on the Commission to promote public-private partnership and attract more private-sector capital.
Secure Space to Achieve Security and Defence Objectives : Parliament supports the discussions being held by the Commission on strengthening the ‘security’ component of the GMES programme with regard to the monitoring of borders, support for the European Union’s external action, maritime surveillance, complex emergencies, humanitarian aid and civil protection. Space policy should also include policies on the security of critical European space infrastructure and on the safe recovery of disused equipment.
Members consider that maximum use of satellite communication services will directly support the competitiveness of European manufacturing industry, foster the industrial base in Europe and respond to the following key policy objectives:
· achieving total coverage of the EU with broadband Internet , including for next generation services;
· implementing sustainable, safe and intelligent transportation on land, at sea and in the air;
· maximising the EU contribution to cooperation programmes with developing countries and enhancing the EU contribution to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals;
· ensuring an adequate EU role in responding to future disasters within and outside the EU.
Boosting Research and Innovation : Parliament considers that the European Union needs a solid knowledge and technological base if it is to act independently and have a competitive space industry. It stresses the importance of a research and innovation strategy in the area of space policy that ensures technological progress, industrial development and EU competitiveness and creates jobs in the EU.
It calls on the Commission to draw up a strategic agenda in order to ensure consistency between the efforts of the European Union in the field of R&D and those of the ESA and the Member States concerning all necessary technologies, skills and double sources needed to achieve competitiveness, European independence, access to international markets and reduction of risks for European programmes.
Members ask the Commission to examine, in cooperation with the ESA, options for space exploration , indicating the potential costs and benefits; considers in this connection that a joint strategy should be developed with international partners through a cooperation agreement based on the general consensus of all stakeholders and with reasonable contributions from the European Union.
International cooperation : Members reiterate that international cooperation for peaceful purposes is a basic value of the European Union. They point out that the European Union should be a leader in the space field and maintain a substantial strategic role at world level, particularly in the international negotiations on the Space Situational Awareness System and space exploration. The report stresses that work in the space policy sector may be made more effective through industrial cooperation and sharing of investment in major programmes, such as the International Space Station.
The Commission is invited to draw up an international cooperation strategy , in collaboration with the Member States and the ESA, in order to strengthen dialogue in the space policy field with strategic partners (the United States, the Russian Federation and Japan) and explore the possibility of establishing a similar dialogue with other emerging powers such as China, India and Brazil. International cooperation, particularly with regard to research, must be reciprocal and of mutual benefit.
Relations between the European Union and the ESA : Members consider that the growing involvement of the European Union in the space sector calls for its relations with the ESA and the national agencies to be redefined, taking account of the fact that the technical and planning expertise developed by the ESA and the national agencies are essential to maintaining the technological capacity and the competitiveness of European industry at a high level.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted an own-initiative report by Aldo PATRICIELLO (EPP, IT) in response to the Commission’s communication entitled “ Towards a space strategy for the European Union that benefits it citizens”.
Members welcome the Commission’s Communication as the first step towards a comprehensive EU space policy serving the interests of its citizens, its policies and its diplomacy. Nevertheless, they stress that the priority areas of action should be made clearer and that an assessment of all the technical options and related costs, risks and benefits, and of the social implications, should be undertaken, including all possible impacts on the European Union’s industrial base and European industrial policy.
The report stresses that space solutions (relying on state of the art technologies and a competitive European industrial base) are vital to address today’s important societal challenges , such as natural disasters, resources and climate monitoring, to develop the telecommunications sector and to foster relevant applications in the fields of climate change policies, land-use planning, environment management, agriculture, maritime safety, fisheries and transport.
Members consider that the European Union is responsible for coordinating and consolidating national space policies and programmes with a view to establishing a coherent European approach in cooperation with all relevant stakeholders. It also stresses the need for clear governance in relation to space policy, making optimal use of the skills available in Europe, with effective supervisory and coordination mechanisms, in order to harmonise priorities and ensure the sound management of resources derived from national funding and from the European Union, the ESA and other European agencies dealing with space and of significance to the EU.
Members agree with the Commission that Europe must maintain independent access to space to be able to achieve its established objectives in carrying out its space policy and continue to benefit from the spin-offs from space application. They; therefore, encourage the Commission to put forward specific proposals in the strategic area of launch vehicles , in particular by giving them special attention in the context of industrial policy in the space sector.
Flagship Galileo and GMES projects: Members consider that Galileo is one of the European Union’s flagship programmes as well as being the first satellite navigation system in the world designed for civilian use, and could enable the Union to remain independent in a strategically important field. They are convinced that the aim of Full Operating Capacity (FOC), based on a constellation of 27 satellites plus a suitable number of spare satellites and adequate ground infrastructure, is a prerequisite in order to attain the added value of Galileo in terms of authentication, high precision and uninterrupted service and therefore to reap the economic and societal benefits
As a result, the report formulates the following recommendations:
the Commission should complete the legislative and financial framework , particularly with regard to the establishment of a financial framework for 2014 - 2020, an approach on effective governance, Galileo services and rules on responsibility; the financing plan to be adopted for Galileo needs to be such as to ensure that long-term needs are able to be met and continuity is provided, including with regard to operating, maintenance and replacement costs; the capacity to provide initial services should be completed by 2014 at the latest to ensure that Galileo does indeed become the second GNSS constellation of reference for receiver manufacturers; the Commission and the EU GNSS Agency (GSA) should put much more effort into raising awareness of GNSS among potential users and investors , promoting the use of GNSS-based services, as well as identifying and concentrating the demand for these services in Europe.
The resolution stresses that Galileo and EGNOS are instrumental in the creation of a Single European Sky and for the further development of safe and cost-effective air traffic management in Europe. They are also vital for efficient and environmentally sustainable road traffic management, road-use fee collection systems, eCall and real time tracking systems, and future digital tachographs. Members therefore call for the for the setting of an ambitious and firm timetable, along with stable financing of research and innovation in implementing the two programmes.
Members consider that GMES is also a European Union flagship programme playing a key role in earth observation. They urge the Commission to complete the legislative framework and put forward a proposal for effective governance of the different levels of development and management of the programme.
The Commission and the other institutions are invited to include financing for GMES in the multiannual financial framework for 2014-2020 . Members underline that the costs relating to GMES are already covered until 2013, totalling EUR 3 billion (approximately EUR 2.3 billion for the satellites and EUR 700 million for related services) and that it is estimated that the programme’s operational costs for the period 2014-2020 will average EUR 850 million per year. They call on the Commission to promote public-private partnership and attract more private-sector capital.
Secure Space to Achieve Security and Defence Objectives : the report supports the discussions being held by the Commission on strengthening the ‘security’ component of the GMES programme with regard to the monitoring of borders, support for the European Union’s external action, maritime surveillance, complex emergencies, humanitarian aid and civil protection. Space policy should also include policies on the security of critical European space infrastructure and on the safe recovery of disused equipment.
Members consider that maximum use of satellite communication services will directly support the competitiveness of European manufacturing industry, foster the industrial base in Europe and respond to the following key policy objectives:
achieving total coverage of the EU with broadband Internet, including for next generation services; implementing sustainable, safe and intelligent transportation on land, at sea and in the air; maximising the EU contribution to cooperation programmes with developing countries and enhancing the EU contribution to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals; ensuring an adequate EU role in responding to future disasters within and outside the EU.
Boosting Research and Innovation: Members consider that the European Union needs a solid knowledge and technological base if it is to act independently and have a competitive space industry. They stress the importance of a research and innovation strategy in the area of space policy. They call on the Commission to draw up a strategic agenda in order to ensure consistency between the efforts of the European Union in the field of R&D and those of the ESA and the Member States concerning all necessary technologies, skills and double sources needed to achieve competitiveness, European independence, access to international markets and reduction of risks for European programmes.
Members ask the Commission to examine, in cooperation with the ESA, options for space exploration , indicating the potential costs and benefits; considers in this connection that a joint strategy should be developed with international partners through a cooperation agreement based on the general consensus of all stakeholders and with reasonable contributions from the European Union.
International coopération : Members reiterate that international cooperation for peaceful purposes is a basic value of the European Union. They point out that the European Union should be a leader in the space field and maintain a substantial strategic role at world level, particularly in the international negotiations on the Space Situational Awareness System and space exploration. The report stresses that work in the space policy sector may be made more effective through industrial cooperation and sharing of investment in major programmes, such as the International Space Station.
The Commission is invited to draw up an international cooperation strategy, in collaboration with the Member States and the ESA, in order to strengthen dialogue in the space policy field with strategic partners (the United States, the Russian Federation and Japan) and explore the possibility of establishing a similar dialogue with other emerging powers such as China, India and Brazil. International cooperation, particularly with regard to research, must be reciprocal and of mutual benefit.
Relations between the European Union and the ESA : Members c onsiders that the growing involvement of the European Union in the space sector calls for its relations with the ESA and the national agencies to be redefined, taking account of the fact that the technical and planning expertise developed by the ESA and the national agencies are essential to maintaining the technological capacity and the competitiveness of European industry at a high level.
PURPOSE: Communication setting out practical options for developing an EU space strategy.
CONTENT: Article 189 of the TFEU conferring on the Union a shared competence on space which it pursues alongside that of the Member States, opened up new perspectives for developing an EU space strategy. In this new framework, Europe's space policy is aimed at achieving the following objectives: (i)promoting technological and scientific progress; (ii) stimulating industrial innovation and competitiveness; (iii) enabling European citizens to reap the benefits of space applications and (iv) raising Europe's profile on the international stage in the area of space. In order to achieve those goals, Europe needs to keep independent access to space. This Communication sets out the priority actions designed to put those objectives into practice.
Priority actions for EU space policy : the Communication notes that the European Parliament in its Resolution of November 2008 approved the European Space Policy and urges that definite action be taken on the four proposed priorities – climate change, security, innovation and exploration. The fifth Space Council reaffirmed these as priority areas where specific action continues to be required.
Satellite navigation: the Galileo and EGNOS programmes : these two programmes form an integral part of the Europe 2020 strategy, as they are intended to push the EU to the forefront by developing innovative ways of exploiting satellite navigation, boosting economic activity in the market further downstream, creating new business opportunities, facilitating the provision of humanitarian aid and enhancing the wellbeing of Europe's citizens (by making transport safer, increasing civil protection and developing social services for the elderly and the disabled, to give but a few examples). The benefits of these programmes for the EU cut across all sectors of the economy, such as transport, telecommunications, the environment and security. The GNSS applications markets are growing rapidly, and their annual turnover worldwide is expected to reach around EUR 240 billion by 2020. Moreover, as a result of the advantages of Galileo and EGNOS compared with the other competing systems, they are expected to generate economic and social benefits worth around EUR 60-90 billion over the next 20 years. Later in the year, the Commission will draft a proposal for legislation aimed at adapting the institutional framework that covers the Galileo and EGNOS programmes to take account of the guidelines put forward by the European Parliament and the Council.
The GMES Programme : the GMES programme plays a vital role in monitoring the sea, land and atmospheric environment, aiming to facilitate better understanding of the European and global environments as a basis for policy. It will help underpin a sustainable use of resources as well as providing better information on climate change. Regulation (EEC) No 911/2010 governing the initial operations of the GMES programme 2011-2013 was adopted in 2010 by the European Parliament and the Council. The current priority is to ensure that the programme is implemented quickly and effectively, in partnership with the Member States, and that it is fully operational by 2014.
Secure space to achieve security and defence objectives : the seventh meeting of the Space Council in November 2010 recommended that within the GMES programme, additional consideration should be given on how to meet the specific needs of security policies and the services dedicated notably to maritime surveillance, border control and support for EU external actions.
The S (Security) component of the GMES programme must therefore be enhanced. Discussions are taking place to analyse how new developments affecting space technologies can contribute to effective solutions for areas such as monitoring borders, support for the EU's external action, maritime surveillance, complex emergencies, humanitarian aid and civil protection.
Furthermore, in 2008, the fifth Space Council meeting confirmed that the Union needs to play an active role in the implementation of the Space Situational Awareness (SSA) system and its governance mechanisms. Implementing this system involves gathering existing resources, making good any shortfalls and maintaining and operating the system. The SSA system should be organised according to a structure, yet to be defined, that would take account of the level and extent of participation of each Member State and of the other bodies involved, depending on the missions to be accomplished and constraints to be respected.
Space Exploration : active involvement by the EU in this area would enable it to establish a closer link between space exploration and social and economic challenges by merging the interests of the different Member States and ensuring that internal resources are used effectively. There is a political dimension to space exploration that goes beyond the issues inherent in research and development. The Union could also explore options to work with the ISS, ensuring that all Member States participate in it. The EU's independent access to space also means increased European capability to pursue independent missions from Europe's spaceport in Kourou.
Furthermore, a high-level international platform should be set up in order to identify the areas of space exploration open to international cooperation, to strengthen the political dimension of international discussions on space exploration and to enhance cooperation synergies with non-Member States; in short, a platform enabling the EU to coordinate the European space effort.
Space industry policy : the space industry is a key sector given society's increasing dependence on space infrastructure and applications for both civilian and military use. In the space industry, there is a high degree of concentration but few SMEs. In Europe, in common with other space powers, the space sector is highly reliant on public procurement, and has to contend with increased competition on the world market. The Commission believes that it is vital to draw up quickly a space industry policy that fully reflects the specific needs of each sub-sector. The main objectives of such a policy would be the steady, balanced development of the industrial base as a whole, including SMEs, greater competitiveness on the world stage, non-dependence for strategic sub-sectors such as launching, which require special attention, and the development of the market for space products and services.
Research and innovation : space policy can make a decisive contribution to making the Innovation Union a reality. Mobilising innovation support mechanisms will make it possible to improve developing infrastructure by boosting the market for applications and services derived from the Galileo/EGNOS and GMES programmes, as well as for the telecommunications sector. In turn, the setting of ambitious space objectives will stimulate innovation.
Telecommunications satellites : in order to maintain Europe's lead in satellite communication technologies, research must be carried out at European level, given the spin-offs it can create for other application sectors. The availability of the appropriate radio spectrum will be necessary to ensure that satellite communications and space infrastructure help achieve the European Digital Agenda and EU space policy objectives
International dimension : the EU, in close collaboration with the ESA, will continue to strengthen its "space dialogues" with its strategic partners – i.e. the United States and Russia – with a view to increasing cooperation. It will also propose that space dialogues, the scope and objectives of which will be set out in appropriate bilateral arrangements, be established with other existing and emerging space powers, in particular China. The EU will seek constructive solutions to issues of cooperation and sharing open frequencies in the field of satellite navigation
Governance: the communication discusses the importance of strengthening cooperation with Member States as well as developing relations with ESA. The Commission is looking into the possibility of presenting a proposal for a space programme in 2011 .
PURPOSE: Communication setting out practical options for developing an EU space strategy.
CONTENT: Article 189 of the TFEU conferring on the Union a shared competence on space which it pursues alongside that of the Member States, opened up new perspectives for developing an EU space strategy. In this new framework, Europe's space policy is aimed at achieving the following objectives: (i)promoting technological and scientific progress; (ii) stimulating industrial innovation and competitiveness; (iii) enabling European citizens to reap the benefits of space applications and (iv) raising Europe's profile on the international stage in the area of space. In order to achieve those goals, Europe needs to keep independent access to space. This Communication sets out the priority actions designed to put those objectives into practice.
Priority actions for EU space policy : the Communication notes that the European Parliament in its Resolution of November 2008 approved the European Space Policy and urges that definite action be taken on the four proposed priorities – climate change, security, innovation and exploration. The fifth Space Council reaffirmed these as priority areas where specific action continues to be required.
Satellite navigation: the Galileo and EGNOS programmes : these two programmes form an integral part of the Europe 2020 strategy, as they are intended to push the EU to the forefront by developing innovative ways of exploiting satellite navigation, boosting economic activity in the market further downstream, creating new business opportunities, facilitating the provision of humanitarian aid and enhancing the wellbeing of Europe's citizens (by making transport safer, increasing civil protection and developing social services for the elderly and the disabled, to give but a few examples). The benefits of these programmes for the EU cut across all sectors of the economy, such as transport, telecommunications, the environment and security. The GNSS applications markets are growing rapidly, and their annual turnover worldwide is expected to reach around EUR 240 billion by 2020. Moreover, as a result of the advantages of Galileo and EGNOS compared with the other competing systems, they are expected to generate economic and social benefits worth around EUR 60-90 billion over the next 20 years. Later in the year, the Commission will draft a proposal for legislation aimed at adapting the institutional framework that covers the Galileo and EGNOS programmes to take account of the guidelines put forward by the European Parliament and the Council.
The GMES Programme : the GMES programme plays a vital role in monitoring the sea, land and atmospheric environment, aiming to facilitate better understanding of the European and global environments as a basis for policy. It will help underpin a sustainable use of resources as well as providing better information on climate change. Regulation (EEC) No 911/2010 governing the initial operations of the GMES programme 2011-2013 was adopted in 2010 by the European Parliament and the Council. The current priority is to ensure that the programme is implemented quickly and effectively, in partnership with the Member States, and that it is fully operational by 2014.
Secure space to achieve security and defence objectives : the seventh meeting of the Space Council in November 2010 recommended that within the GMES programme, additional consideration should be given on how to meet the specific needs of security policies and the services dedicated notably to maritime surveillance, border control and support for EU external actions.
The S (Security) component of the GMES programme must therefore be enhanced. Discussions are taking place to analyse how new developments affecting space technologies can contribute to effective solutions for areas such as monitoring borders, support for the EU's external action, maritime surveillance, complex emergencies, humanitarian aid and civil protection.
Furthermore, in 2008, the fifth Space Council meeting confirmed that the Union needs to play an active role in the implementation of the Space Situational Awareness (SSA) system and its governance mechanisms. Implementing this system involves gathering existing resources, making good any shortfalls and maintaining and operating the system. The SSA system should be organised according to a structure, yet to be defined, that would take account of the level and extent of participation of each Member State and of the other bodies involved, depending on the missions to be accomplished and constraints to be respected.
Space Exploration : active involvement by the EU in this area would enable it to establish a closer link between space exploration and social and economic challenges by merging the interests of the different Member States and ensuring that internal resources are used effectively. There is a political dimension to space exploration that goes beyond the issues inherent in research and development. The Union could also explore options to work with the ISS, ensuring that all Member States participate in it. The EU's independent access to space also means increased European capability to pursue independent missions from Europe's spaceport in Kourou.
Furthermore, a high-level international platform should be set up in order to identify the areas of space exploration open to international cooperation, to strengthen the political dimension of international discussions on space exploration and to enhance cooperation synergies with non-Member States; in short, a platform enabling the EU to coordinate the European space effort.
Space industry policy : the space industry is a key sector given society's increasing dependence on space infrastructure and applications for both civilian and military use. In the space industry, there is a high degree of concentration but few SMEs. In Europe, in common with other space powers, the space sector is highly reliant on public procurement, and has to contend with increased competition on the world market. The Commission believes that it is vital to draw up quickly a space industry policy that fully reflects the specific needs of each sub-sector. The main objectives of such a policy would be the steady, balanced development of the industrial base as a whole, including SMEs, greater competitiveness on the world stage, non-dependence for strategic sub-sectors such as launching, which require special attention, and the development of the market for space products and services.
Research and innovation : space policy can make a decisive contribution to making the Innovation Union a reality. Mobilising innovation support mechanisms will make it possible to improve developing infrastructure by boosting the market for applications and services derived from the Galileo/EGNOS and GMES programmes, as well as for the telecommunications sector. In turn, the setting of ambitious space objectives will stimulate innovation.
Telecommunications satellites : in order to maintain Europe's lead in satellite communication technologies, research must be carried out at European level, given the spin-offs it can create for other application sectors. The availability of the appropriate radio spectrum will be necessary to ensure that satellite communications and space infrastructure help achieve the European Digital Agenda and EU space policy objectives
International dimension : the EU, in close collaboration with the ESA, will continue to strengthen its "space dialogues" with its strategic partners – i.e. the United States and Russia – with a view to increasing cooperation. It will also propose that space dialogues, the scope and objectives of which will be set out in appropriate bilateral arrangements, be established with other existing and emerging space powers, in particular China. The EU will seek constructive solutions to issues of cooperation and sharing open frequencies in the field of satellite navigation
Governance: the communication discusses the importance of strengthening cooperation with Member States as well as developing relations with ESA. The Commission is looking into the possibility of presenting a proposal for a space programme in 2011 .
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)212
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0013/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0431/2011
- Committee opinion: PE472.221
- Contribution: COM(2011)0152
- Committee opinion: PE469.889
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE473.828
- Committee draft report: PE467.225
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0152
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0152
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0152 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE467.225
- Committee opinion: PE469.889
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE473.828
- Committee opinion: PE472.221
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)212
- Contribution: COM(2011)0152
Activities
- Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrew Henry William BRONS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jiří HAVEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eija-Riitta KORHOLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vittorio PRODI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Artur ZASADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
168 |
2011/2148(INI)
2011/09/14
TRAN
23 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that a space strategy for the European Union is necessary to ensure that space technology contributes fully to safer and more efficient traffic management and traffic control across all transport modes; points out that Europe’s international status in the space sector is declining, that the potential of space exploration in terms of innovation is not being tapped and that competitiveness is being eroded;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that promoting the use of EGNOS and Galileo in civil aviation is a strategic requirement for the implementation of SESAR, especially as regards its use for landing procedures and at small airports;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls the relevance of the GMES programme for the sustainable development of transport and transport safety, especially in the context of maritime transport and maritime surveillance
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls the relevance of the GMES programme for the sustainable development of transport and transport safety, especially in the context of maritime transport and maritime surveillance and believes that the European Union must continue to play an active role in the financing and development of that programme, while also pinpointing innovative means of financing and making use of project bonds;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls the relevance of the GMES programme for the sustainable development of transport and transport safety, especially in the context of maritime transport and maritime surveillance; and stresses the need to maintain the programme’s funding in the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls the relevance of the GMES programme for the sustainable development of transport and transport safety, especially in the context of maritime transport and maritime surveillance; deplores the fact that GMES no longer forms part of the Multiannual Financial Framework, and calls on the Commission and Member States to identify continuing means of financing for GMES systems post-2013;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls the relevance of the GMES programme for the sustainable development of transport and transport safety, especially in the context of maritime transport and maritime surveillance; considers that partners in neighbouring regions should be encouraged to participate in the GMES programme by being involved in European terrestrial and maritime protection and security strategy;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises that surveying dangerous and polluting goods transport should be a priority within satellite based observation and navigation systems;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for the funding, development, implementation and viability of innovative space-technology-based transport applications and services to be guaranteed, with a view to deriving maximum benefit from European investment in the technological potential of space and meeting the needs of users and the general public;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Agrees with the Commission that Europe needs to maintain independent access to space in order to be able to achieve its space policy aims and to derive lasting benefit from space applications in fields such as transport policy; therefore encourages the Commission to make concrete proposals for the strategic launch vehicles sub-sector, paying particular attention to it in the proposed space industrial policy;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses the importance of European involvement
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Demands the Commission and the Member States to guarantee transparency in financing and cooperation between military and civil space use strategies;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that, within space policies, the question of launch vehicles has a specifically transport-relevant dimension and stresses the need for fresh European policy impetus here, given the currently critical economic situation of the launch vehicles sector worldwide.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on Member States to reconfirm their commitment to EU space projects, such as SESAR, which will prove vitally important for future growth and jobs across various sectors.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that the EU should be in the vanguard of the space sector, continuing to play a significant strategic role on the international scene, and therefore calls for the development of its coordinating capability in the field of space exploration, and for additional support for research and the development of technology, with a view to making Europe more independent technologically and ensuring that members of the public and sectors of the economy other than the space industry share the benefits of innovation in this field.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Emphasises the importance of stepping up industrial cooperation with third countries in the field of space policy, and especially with the USA, Japan, Russia, China, India, Brazil, Argentina and Chile, and with the countries of Africa and the Middle East.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the need for a greater understanding of the dependencies on space of essential sectors, and encourages Member States and the Commission to promote the importance of space;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the transport sector has a key role to play in achieving the EU 20-20- 20 targets in CO2-emissions and energy consumption as well as the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy and that sustainable growth cannot be achieved without an efficient transport sector;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the seven Space Councils to date have made only one passing reference to transport in Europe and that the significance of space policy for transport has not been given detailed consideration in the deliberations of the Space Council as reflected in its outcome of proceedings; draws attention to the almost infinite prospects for developing space activities and the fact that they are a significant driver for a growth economy;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that Galileo and EGNOS are instrumental in the creation of a Single European Sky and for the further development of safe and cost effective air traffic management in Europe and therefore calls for
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that Galileo and EGNOS are instrumental in the creation of a Single European Sky and for the further development of safe and cost
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Draws attention to the importance of EGNOS covering the whole of the EU, in order to strengthen the single aviation market, and stresses the need to expand that system in the south, east and south-east of Europe;
source: PE-472.108
2011/10/06
ENVI
33 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that EU space policy must not promote militarisation of space; in this context finds that any military use of GALILEO or GMES must be financed from Member States military budgets and in any case not from EU budget;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Reaffirms the importance of GMES, the Earth observation system which can provide easily accessible information at the national, regional and global level, acquiring and analysing information and extracting precise and useful data for those involved in civil protection for risk prevention, early warning systems, emergency management and recovery operations following earthquakes, tsunamis or environmental disasters; observes that, in light of the ‘Europe 2020’ objectives, GMES is an essential resource in combating climate change at the global level, as well as for maritime and coastal surveillance, water and soil management and regional planning, making use of innovative environmental assessment and reporting technology capable of combining spatial and in-situ data;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the importance of the GMES programme and its potential contribution to achievement of the 'Europe 2020' objectives by indicating how to combat climate change and providing background information on the green economy and investment in technology and infrastructures;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Acknowledges the current utilisation of the GMES emergency management programme in practice, particularly in response to floods or humanitarian disasters;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Stresses that the GMES programme is not only infrastructural in nature but also targeted at environmental protection and safety systems; these are the priorities of the European Union and all Member States strongly committed to environmental policy;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines the importance of the GMES contribution to achieving Europe 2020 objectives by providing information to combat climate change and to support growth and the green economy, as well as long-term investments in technology and infrastructure;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the Commission's proposed Financial Framework for the period 2014 - 2020 excludes financing for the GMES programme completely, and asks the Member States to continue to cover the costs of the launch and annual maintenance of the programme; considers that this w
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Re
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the Commission’s proposed Financial Framework for the period 2014 - 2020 excludes the GMES programme
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the Commission’s proposed Financial Framework for the period 2014 - 2020 excludes the GMES programme completely, and asks the Member States to continue to cover the costs of the launch and annual maintenance of the programme; considers that this would lead to a potential temporary suspension of the programme itself, sacrificing the considerable experience acquired with operational systems already launched for the purpose of assessing spatial data, an interruption in data provision as a result, and a dependence on non-European space infrastructure;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the importance of the space programmes Galileo and EGNOS, which are key to optimising the application of the space policy to
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that the costs relating to GMES are already covered until 2013, totalling EUR 3 billion (approximately EUR 2.3 billion for the satellites and EUR 700 million for related services) and that it is estimated that the programme’s operational maintenance costs for the period 2014 - 2020 will average EUR 850 million per year;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that the costs relating to GMES are already covered until 2013, totalling EUR 3 billion (approximately EUR 2.3 billion for the satellites and EUR 700 million for related services) and that it is estimated that the programme's
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that the costs relating to
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that the costs relating to GMES are already covered until 2013, totalling EUR 3 billion (approximately EUR 2.3 billion for the satellites and EUR 700 million for related services) and that it is estimated that the programme’s maintenance costs for the period 2014 - 2020 will average EUR 850 million per year; calls on the Commission to promote public-private partnership and attract more private-sector capital;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. calls on the Commission to increase funding for European space programmes, promote public-private partnership and attract more private-sector capital;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the adequate use of space programmes would lead to significant savings for the sectors involved, especially EU environment policy;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the adequate use of space programmes would lead to significant savings for the sectors involved, and downstream benefits to regions and local communities;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the adequate use of space programmes would lead to significant savings for the sectors involved; urges the Commission to allocate additional funding for the development of science and technology and for establishing infrastructure in connection with those programmes;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Acknowledges the social benefits to users of GMES services, for whom continuity and sustainability are of the essence if they are to derive maximum advantage from the observation infrastructures offered by the programme;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the importance of the space programmes Galileo and EGNOS, which are key to optimising the application of the space policy to transport so as to benefit European citizens; calls for a speedy development of these programmes
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that Parliament's aim is to include the GMES programme in the
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that Parliament’s aim is, following a cost-benefit analysis, to include the GMES programme in the European budget, enabling Europe to commit to achieving the space programme objectives while respecting all the ‘2020’ objectives, among them combating climate change.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Reiterates that inclusion of GMES funding in the 2014 - 2020 multiannual financial framework would save wasting investment to date in the seventh framework programme of research in the field of services and information.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Reaffirms the importance of GMES, the Earth observation system which can provide easily accessible information at the global level, acquiring and analysing information and extracting precise and useful data for observing the environment and assisting in environmental policy design, as well as those involved in civil protection following earthquakes, tsunamis or environmental disasters; observes that, in light of the ‘Europe 2020’ objectives, GMES is an essential resource in combating climate change at the global level;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Reaffirms the importance of GMES, the Earth observation system which can provide easily accessible information at the global level
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Reaffirms the importance of GMES, the Earth observation system, which can provide easily accessible information at the global level
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Reaffirms the importance of GMES, the Earth observation system which can provide easily accessible information at the global level, acquiring and analysing information and extracting precise and useful data for those involved in civil protection following earthquakes, tsunamis or environmental disasters; observes that, in light of the ‘Europe 2020’ objectives, GMES is an essential resource in combating climate change at the global level, also meets the more general needs of society and resolves the problems relating to development of agriculture, fisheries, transport and regional development;
source: PE-473.827
2011/10/13
ITRE
112 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas, before a decision is made on a further financial commitment from the EU budget in the next multiannual financial
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Considers that international cooperation should promote European technology, infrastructure and services in the space field
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Considers that international cooperation should promote European technology and space services and so help strengthen this strategic industrial sector; stresses that the effectiveness of space policy sector can be enhanced by means of industrial cooperation and joint investment in major programmes;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Stresses the importance of ensuring an adequate EU role in responding to future disasters within and outside the EU;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Calls on the Commission to draw up an international cooperation strategy, in collaboration with the Member States
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Points out that international cooperation, although desirable, particularly with regard to research, must be reciprocal and of mutual benefit; regrets that our main space competitors’ institutional markets are closed to foreign industries, including European industries;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Reminds the European Union’s policy makers that the greater part of the world’s institutional markets are unfortunately not open to international competition and that the international competition envisaged must be based on conditions that make fair trade possible;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Emphasises the importance of stepping up industrial cooperation with third countries in the field of space policy, and especially with the USA, Japan, Russia, China, India, Brazil, Argentina and Chile, and with the countries of Africa and the Middle East;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Points out that, pursuant to Article 189 TFEU, the European Union should
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Argues in favour of developing the European Union’s space exploration activities and coordinating these activities at European level, in cooperation with the Member States and the ESA; points out that the creation of an EU corps of astronauts based on the present ESA corps would offer increased possibilities for gradually placing missions under the direct control of the European Union and would lead to the creation of a European crew transportation system; considers that the European Union should make a more active contribution to adapting the launch infrastructure in accordance with the pace of development of the Ariane 5 launch system and to adapting and maintaining the European Space Port (Guiana Space Centre);
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas GMES is also an European-led flagship programme at the service of European citizens, supplying geo- information to assist the public institutions for implementation of policies including environmental management, risk management and citizens protection; whereas the GMES programme must guarantee continuous access to information on the environment and security issues based on permanent space-based observation and in-situ infrastructures;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that the growing involvement of the European Union in the space sector calls for its relations with the ESA and the national agencies to be redefined, taking account of the fact that the technical and planning expertise developed by the ESA and the national agencies are essential to maintaining technological capacity and the competitiveness of European industry and that the European Union could concentrate on the operations, the developments and the continuity of the space systems that it needs, as well as on the international expansion of markets and on users’ requests, with the aim of strengthening the European industry’s capacity and competitiveness;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that the growing involvement of the European Union in the space sector calls for its relations with the ESA to be redefined, taking account of the fact that the technical and planning expertise developed by the ESA are essential to maintaining the technological capacity and
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Calls on the Commission to fulfil its political leadership and supervisory role vis-à-vis organisations which act on its behalf;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the GMES programme must guarantee continuous access to information on the environment and security issues, based on permanent space-based
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas industry competitiveness supported by an ambitious R&D programme and additional activities such space exploration, the security of space infrastructure and international cooperation are key aspects of a successful space policy;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas, as pointed out by the Commission, independent access to space must be ensured so the European space policy objectives can be achieved,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. having regard to European industrial know-how and the important role played by major European programmes in European integration and competitiveness,
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's European space strategy as the first step towards a comprehensive and user-driven European Union space policy serving the interests of its citizens, its policies and its diplomacy;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas satellite communication services are already at the service of EU governments and citizens;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes the important role of satellite networks in achieving total coverage of the EU with broadband internet by 2013, thus aiding to meet the EU Digital Agenda targets;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers it important that space policy is a realistic policy aimed at improving the everyday lives of European citizens
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers it important that space policy is a realistic policy aimed at improving the everyday lives of European citizens; stresses that space technologies are vital in terms of identifying
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the Commission's intention of drawing up a space policy specifically tailored to the sub-sectors of the industry; emphasises, in that connection, that this policy should be coordinated not only with the ESA and the Member States, but also with the European Parliament;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes the importance of the implementation of sustainable, safe and intelligent transportation on land, at sea and in the air;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the European Union is responsible for coordinating and consolidating national space policies, agencies and programmes with a view to establishing a coherent European approach, in
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the European Union is responsible for coordinating and consolidating national space policies and program
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the European Union is responsible for coordinating and consolidating national space policies and programmes with a view to establishing a coherent European approach in cooperation with
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the objectives of the strategy in terms of strengthening Europe
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas space is of strategic importance for Europe and a key element for its independent decision-making and action;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the objectives of the strategy in terms of strengthening Europe's space infrastructure and providing more support for research in order to increase
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Believes that space infrastructure and services developed and financed by the European Union should remain civilian systems under civilian control, and that any military application using the same infrastructure should be fully funded by the defence budgets of the Member States; demands that Commission and the Member States to guarantee transparency in financing and any cooperation between military and civil space use strategies;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes, however, that, whilst the Commission strategy identifies priority areas of action, they remain in part somewhat vague; stresses that they should be made clearer and that an assessment of all the technical options and related costs and benefits should be given; in particular a European space programme should focus on areas of European added value and avoid dispersion of efforts or duplications with activities undertaken by the ESA;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes, however, that, whilst the Commission strategy identifies priority areas of action, they remain in part somewhat vague; stresses that they should be made clearer and that an assessment of all the technical options and related costs and benefits should be given, including all possible impacts on the European Union’s industrial base and European industrial policy;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes, however, that, whilst the Commission strategy identifies priority areas of action, they remain in part somewhat vague; stresses that they should be made clearer and that an assessment of all the technical options and related costs, risks and benefits, and of the social implications, should be given;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes, however, that, whilst the Commission
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need for clear governance in relation to space policy, making optimal use of the skills available in Europe, with effective supervisory and coordination mechanisms, in order to harmonise priorities and resources derived from national funding and from the European Union, the ESA and other European agencies dealing with space and of significance to the EU, such as the EDA;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need for clear governance in relation to space policy, with effective
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Agrees with the Commission that Europe must maintain independent access to space to be able to achieve its established objectives in carrying out its space policy and continue to benefit from the spin-offs from space applications; therefore encourages the Commission to put forward specific proposals in the strategic area of launch vehicles, in particular by giving them special attention in the context of industrial policy in the space sector;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the European satellite communications sector is a fundamental element for sustaining a healthy European space industry as more than half of the European industry turnover is derived from producing or launching telecommunications satellites;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that Galileo is one of the European Union
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recalls that Galileo's main objective is its civilian use in order to increase European competitiveness, and so this objective should have priority over security and defence goals;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that IOC, able to provide initial services, should be completed by 2014 at the latest to ensure that Galileo does indeed become the second GNSS constellation of reference for receiver manufacturers; welcomes the launch o
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is convinced that the aim of Full Operating Capacity (FOC), based on a constellation of 27 satellites plus a suitable number of spare satellites and adequate ground infrastructure, is a prerequisite to attain the added value of Galileo in terms of authentication, high precision and uninterrupted service and therefore to reap the economic and societal benefits, and that this aim should be achieved by 2018 at the latest; fears that Galileo could lose its lead if the system is not completed in time and if the marketing and internationalisation of services are not carried out in an appropriate manner; believes that clear and unambiguous support from all European institutions for achieving FOC is needed to convince users and investors of the EU’s
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that the financing plan to be adopted for Galileo needs to be such as to ensure that long-term needs are able to be met and continuity is provided, including with regard to operating
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the EU is currently dependent on the American Global Positioning System (GPS), with activities accounting for roughly 7% of GDP relying on this system, and given that Galileo is expected to offer clear advantages compared to
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 – point a (new) (a) Urges the Commission and the EU GNSS Agency (GSA) to put much more effort into raising awareness of GNSS among potential users and investors, promoting the use of GNSS-based services, as well as identifying and concentrating the demand for these services in Europe;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Is strongly convinced that additional funding for GNSS can only be secured if
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Is strongly convinced that additional funding for GNSS can only be secured if awareness of the costs and benefits for the EU economy and society brought by GNSS different possible options is raised considerably among decision-
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Points out that EGNOS is a real,
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Points out that EGNOS is a real, operational programme; is convinced of the necessity to fully exploit this programme and make use of its applications in practice
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Points out that EGNOS is a real, operational programme; is convinced of the necessity to fully exploit this programme and make use of its applications in practice, ensuring coverage
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to complete the legislative framework and
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas Galileo is expected to offer clear advantages compared to GPS, such as improved accuracy, global integrity, authentication and guarantee of service, as well as to give the Union strategic autonomy; takes note of the importance that the Galileo can have in order to improve competitiveness and quality of many services in Europe;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to complete the legislative framework and
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to complete the legislative framework and clarify the approach on effective governance
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to complete the legislative framework and clarify the approach on effective governance; is disappointed that the Commission has not proposed including financing for GMES in the multiannual financial framework for 2014-2020
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to complete the legislative framework and clarify the approach on effective governance; is d
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to propose a long-term financing and governance plan and to establish an operational organisation responsible for the management and provision of data in order to enable the actual success of the programme; believes it is important to establish the agreements to be put in place with national agencies in order to maximise the interoperability, continuity and governance of the system; considers it necessary to ensure that
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to propose a long-term financing plan, based on the examination of all possible options, and to establish an operational organisation responsible for the management and provision of data in order to enable the actual success of the programme; this needs to be coupled with a common European data policy to ensure real open access and availability of existing data; believes it is important to establish the agreements to be put in place with national agencies in order to maximise the interoperability and governance of the system; considers it necessary to ensure that a distinction is made between scientific use and commercial use, which requires specific structures and competences; hopes that the programme achieves its objective of being fully operational from 2014;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to propose a long-term financing plan and to establish an operational organisation
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to propose a
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to propose a long-term financing plan that provides for the utilisation of innovative financial instruments and using project bonds and public-private partnerships and to establish an operational organisation responsible for the management and provision of data in order to enable the actual success of the programme; believes it is important to establish the agreements to be put in place with national agencies in order to maximise the interoperability and governance of the system; considers it necessary to ensure that a distinction is made between scientific use and commercial use, which requires specific structures and competences; hopes that the programme achieves its objective of being fully operational from 2014;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas Galileo is expected to offer
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Supports the discussions being held by the Commission on strengthening the ‘security’ component of the GMES programme with regard to the monitoring
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Supports the discussions being held by the Commission on strengthening the ‘security’ component of the GMES programme with regard to the monitoring of borders, support for the European Union
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19.
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Considers that the creation of a European Space Situational Awareness system
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Considers that the creation of a European Space Situational Awareness System could help protect space infrastructure against space debris, solar radiation and asteroids; believes that the creation of all new European programmes should be based on existing capacity, skills and infrastructure, which have required investment on the part of each of the Member States, and should develop current capacity where there are gaps;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Believes that space policy should also include policies on the security of critical European space infrastructure and on the safe recovery of disused equipment;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 – point a (new) Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers that the European Union needs a solid knowledge and technological base
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers that the European Union needs a solid technological base if it is to act independently and have a competitive space industry capable of competing in fair conditions with non European ones; stresses that a legislative, administrative and financial framework is essential if industry is to invest in research and innovation;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Believes that the EU needs to invest to ensure guaranteed European access to space and orbital infrastructure;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses the importance of a future strategy in the area of research and
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses the importance of a future strategy in the area of research and innovation; considers that a European R&D policy for space must ensure the availability of needed technologies – with the appropriate maturity, the required level of non dependence, and at competitive conditions; calls on the Commission to draw up a strategic agenda in order to ensure consistency between the efforts of the European Union in the field of R&D and those of
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses the importance of a
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Considers it necessary to establish mechanisms and programmes to
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls on the Commission to promote the use of satellite communication services, since telecommunications satellites are vital to the success of the space industry and the related services are fundamental to the achievement of European objectives, such as provision of access to broadband services, the introduction of smart transport systems or cooperation with developing countries;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Also considers it necessary, in order to strengthen European competitiveness, to retain autonomy in terms of access to space, favouring the use of European
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Also considers it necessary, in order to ensure that Europe is not dependent and to strengthen European competitiveness, to retain Europe’s autonomy in terms of access to space, favouring the use of European
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Also considers it necessary, in order to strengthen European independence and competitiveness, to retain autonomy in terms of access to space, favouring the use of European
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the Commission has submitted a proposal for the financing of Galileo under the 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework, but the framework does not include financing for the GMES programme, which thus puts the future of this programme seriously at risk;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Also considers it necessary at affordable conditions, in order to strengthen European competitiveness, to retain autonomy in terms of access to space, favouring the use of European transporters and verifying the suitability of operational and industrial organisation in relation to joint requirements;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Also considers it necessary, in order to strengthen European competitiveness, to retain autonomy in terms of access to space, favouring the use of European launchers and transporters and verifying the suitability of operational and industrial organisation in relation to joint requirements;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Also considers it necessary, in order to strengthen European competitiveness, to
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the Commission to appropriately address financial and practical requirements in future research framework programmes; in particular, research and development of space- related applications should be integrated as key enabling technologies for the different sectoral research areas such as climate change, environment, transport, agriculture, etc., rather than in a separate space theme;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Asks the Commission to examine, in cooperation with the ESA, options for space exploration, indicating the potential costs and benefits;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Asks the Commission to examine, in cooperation with the ESA, options for space exploration, indicating the potential costs and benefits; considers, in this connection, that a joint strategy should be developed with
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26.
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Considers that international cooperation
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Considers that international cooperation should promote
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Considers that international cooperation should promote European technology and services in the space field and so help strengthen this strategic industrial sector; points out that the European Union should be a leader in the space field and maintain a substantial strategic role at world level, particularly in the international negotiations on the Space Situational Awareness System and space exploration; stresses that work in the space policy sector may be made more effective through industrial cooperation and sharing of investment in major programmes;
source: PE-473.828
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0152/COM_COM(2011)0152_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0152/COM_COM(2011)0152_EN.pdf |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.225New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-467225_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.889&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-469889_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE473.828New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-473828_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.221&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-472221_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120119&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-01-19-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-431&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0431_EN.html |
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-13New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0013_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/06161New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0152:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0152:EN
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|