Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | BUDG | MATERA Barbara ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | EMPL |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the automotive sector in France.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2012/16/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France).
CONTENT: the European Parliament and the Council have decided to mobilise an amount of EUR 24 493 525 in commitment and payment appropriations in respect of redundancies in the automotive sector in France.
More specifically, this amount shall assist France who submitted an application on 9 October 2009 to mobilise the EGF in respect of redundancies in the enterprise Renault s.a.s. and seven of its suppliers.
Given that this application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 , the European Parliament and the Council have decided to grant the above-mentioned amount.
To recall, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide additional support for workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market. The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the EGF within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million.
The scope of the EGF was broadened for applications submitted from 1 May 2009 to include support for workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis.
The European Parliament adopted by 448 votes to 87, with 90 abstentions, a resolution approving the annexed proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment.
An amount of EUR 24 493 525 in commitment and payment appropriations shall be mobilised in respect of redundancies in the automotive sector in France.
Parliament recalls that the European Union has set up the appropriate legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market.
Given that France has requested assistance in respect of a case concerning 4 445 redundancies, of which 3 582 targeted for assistance, in the enterprise Renault s.a.s. and seven of its suppliers from the automotive industry, Parliament requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF for the requested amount.
The EGF application submitted by France does not cover the Renault workers who opted for the early retirement scheme and to which the EGF aid could not be allocated under Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 , but saw their pension rights altered by the pension reform which came into force in the meantime. In this regard, Members consider that the efforts made by all parties involved to find a viable solution so that these former Renault workers can complement their pension rights should be noted. Plenary notes that the efforts made by the French government, as well as the written engagement made by Renault should be underlined. The constructive dialogue between all parties concerned should be continued until a satisfactory solution is found.
Whilst Members appreciate the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following the Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, they note the lengthy assessment period in respect of this particular application. They hope that further improvements in the procedure will be reached in the framework of the upcoming reviews of the EGF.
The resolution notes that that the first results on the efficiency of the measures targeting the dismissed workers should soon be available and note that the success rates are a key indicator of the efficiency of the fund. Parliament calls on the Commission for a strong and close monitoring and guidance in ensuring that the training on offer matches the local economic trends.
Parliament recalls the institutions’ commitment to ensuring a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF, providing one-off, time-limited individual support geared to helping workers who have suffered redundancies as a result of globalisation and the financial and economic crisis.
It recalls that:
the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements, nor measures restructuring companies or sectors; the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF includes information on the complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds.
In parallel, Parliament notes the fact that, following repeated requests from the Parliament, for the first time the 2011 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 47 608 950 on the EGF budget line 04 05 01. It recalls that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines.
The Committee on Budgets adopted the report drafted by Barbara MATERA (EPP, IT) on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for an amount of EUR 24 493 525 in commitment and payment appropriations in respect of redundancies in the automotive sector in France.
Members recall that the European Union has set up the appropriate legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market.
Given that France has requested assistance in respect of a case concerning 4 445 redundancies, of which 3 582 targeted for assistance, in the enterprise Renault s.a.s. and seven of its suppliers from the automotive industry, Members request the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF for the requested amount.
The EGF application submitted by France does not cover the Renault workers who opted for the early retirement scheme and to which the EGF aid could not be allocated under Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 , but saw their pension rights altered by the pension reform which came into force in the meantime. In this regard, Members consider that the efforts made by all parties involved to find a viable solution so that these former Renault workers can complement their pension rights should be noted.
Whilst Members appreciate the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following the Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, they note the lengthy assessment period in respect of this particular application. They hope that further improvements in the procedure will be reached in the framework of the upcoming reviews of the EGF.
The report notes that that the first results on the efficiency of the measures targeting the dismissed workers should soon be available and note that the success rates are a key indicator of the efficiency of the fund. They call on the Commission for a strong and close monitoring and guidance in ensuring that the training on offer matches the local economic trends.
Members recall the institutions’ commitment to ensuring a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF, providing one-off, time-limited individual support geared to helping workers who have suffered redundancies as a result of globalisation and the financial and economic crisis.
Members recall that:
the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements, nor measures restructuring companies or sectors; the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF includes information on the complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds.
In parallel, Members note the fact that, following repeated requests from the Parliament, for the first time the 2011 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 47 608 950 on the EGF budget line 04 05 01. They recall that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines.
PURPOSE: to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) in respect of redundancies in the automotive sector in France.
PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council.
CONTENT: the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established by Council Regulation No 1927/2006 to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.
The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) through a flexibility mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million over and above the relevant headings of the financial framework.
The Commission services have carried out a thorough examination of the application submitted by France to mobilise the EGF. The main elements of the assessment are as follows:
France: EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault : o n 9 October 2009, France submitted application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault for a financial contribution from the EGF, following redundancies in Renault s.a.s. and seven of its subsidiaries in France. The application was supplemented by additional information up to 10 February 2011.
In order to establish the link between the redundancies and the global financial and economic crisis, France argues that Renault suffered from the increasing cost of credit and the hardening of credit conditions from 2008 onwards, which seriously affected the ability of the enterprise to fund its own activities in the short term as well as its investment plans or the future. At the same time, consumers also felt the tightening of credit and the effects of the global financial and economic crisis, leading to anxiety about job security and the postponement of vehicle purchases. Despite the temporary measures introduced by some Member States (e.g. scrappage schemes), registrations of new Renault cars in Europe dropped by 6.5% between 2007 and 2008. This downward tendancy accelerated during the fourth quarter of 2008, when new registrations dropped from -15.2% in October 2008 to - 27.5% in December 2008 compared with the same period of 2007.
France submitted this application under the intervention criteria of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a four-month period in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its suppliers and downstream producers. The application cites 1 384 redundancies in Renault s.a.s. and six suppliers during the four-month reference period from 1 April 2009 to 31 July 2009 and a further 3 061 redundancies in Renault s.a.s. and seven suppliers outside the reference period, but included in the same voluntary redundancy plan.
All of these redundancies were calculated in accordance with the first indent of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. After a thorough examination of this application, the Commission has concluded in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 that the conditions for a financial contribution under this Regulation are met.
On the basis of the application from France, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the coordinated package of personalised services is EUR 24 493 525 , representing 65% of the total cost.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: considering the maximum possible amount of a financial contribution from the EGF under Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, as well as the scope for reallocating appropriations, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the total amount referred to above, to be allocated under heading 1a of the financial framework.
The proposed amount of financial contribution will leave more than 25% of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the EGF available for allocations during the last four months of the year, as required by Article 12(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
By presenting this proposal to mobilise the EGF, the Commission initiates the simplified trialogue procedure, as required by Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006, with a view to securing the agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the need to use the EGF and the amount required. The Commission invites the first of the two arms of the budgetary authority that reaches agreement on the draft mobilisation proposal, at appropriate political level, to inform the other arm and the Commission of its intentions. In case of disagreement by either of the two arms of the budgetary authority, a formal trialogue meeting will be convened.
The remaining amount of payment appropriations initially entered on the budget line 04.0501 after adoption by both arms of the budgetary authority of the proposals submitted to date for mobilising the EGF is EUR 808 079 and is therefore not sufficient to cover the amount of EUR 24 493 525 needed for the present application. As a reinforcement of the EGF budget line 04.0501 by EUR 50 000 000 is foreseen through AB2/2011, this budget line will be used to cover the amount of EUR 24 493 525 needed for the present application.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2012/16
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 006 10.01.2012, p. 0005
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0579/2011
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary: A7-0396/2011
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE475.905
- Committee draft report: PE469.852
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE472.113
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0420
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE472.113
- Committee draft report: PE469.852
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE475.905
Activities
- Alexander Nuno PICKART ALVARO
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- Jean-Paul GAUZÈS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- Estelle GRELIER
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (A7-0396/2011 - Barbara Matera) (vote)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- Pervenche BERÈS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- Barbara MATERA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Recent Council decisions and Commission revision of the EGF regulation - Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France) (debate)
- Damien ABAD
- Marije CORNELISSEN
- Frédéric DAERDEN
- Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO
- Marian HARKIN
- Paul MURPHY
- Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU
- Phil PRENDERGAST
- Paul RÜBIG
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Amendments | Dossier |
21 |
2011/2158(BUD)
2011/09/08
BUDG
10 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Union has set up
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that the Member States must see to it that the necessary mechanisms are in place to avoid duplicate financing under EU financial instruments, pursuant to Article 6(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates in this sense the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following the Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the Fund; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be reached in the framework of the upcoming reviews of the EGF and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the Fund will be achieved; takes note, however, of the lengthy assessment period in respect of this particular application for the mobilisation of the EGF for Renault s.a.s and seven of its suppliers; notes that this particular request has so far had the longest period of assessment of any EGF application since the EGF's creation in 2007.
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Believes that this delay harmed some of the workers who did not take part in the measures financed by the EGF and opted for early-retirement schemes instead, and whose pension benefits were altered by the pension reform that came into force in the meantime; is of the opinion that following this evolution of the legal environment, the Commission should have requested that these workers be offered the possibility of taking part in EGF measures;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Notes that, given the delay between the implementation of the measures targeting the dismissed workers and the validation of the EGF request by the Commission, the first results on the efficiency of those measures are already available; deplores the low success rates and calls for a stronger assessment and more Commission guidance in ensuring that the training on offer matches the local economic trends;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Recalls the institutions’ commitment to ensuring a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF, providing one- off, time-limited individual support geared to helping workers who have suffered redundancies as a result of globalisation and the financial and economic crisis; emphasises the role that the EGF can play in the reintegration of workers made redundant, in particular the most vulnerable and least skilled workers, into the labour market;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that, in accordance with Article
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF includes information on the coordination and complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds; reiterates its call to the Commission to present a comparative evaluation of these data in its annual reports as well;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
source: PE-472.113
2011/11/09
BUDG
11 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Approve
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the EGF application submitted by France does not cover the Renault workers who opted for the early retirement scheme
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates in this sense the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following the Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the Fund; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be reached in the framework of the upcoming reviews of the EGF and that greater efficiency, transparency and visibility of the Fund will be achieved; takes note, however, of the lengthy assessment period in respect of this particular application for the mobilisation of the EGF for Renault s.a.s and seven of its suppliers; notes that this particular request has so far had the longest period of assessment of any EGF application since the EGF's creation in 2007;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Believes that this delay harmed some of the workers who opted for early- retirement schemes instead, and whose pension benefits were altered by the pension reforms that came into force in the meantime; is of the opinion that following this evolution of the legal environment, the Commission should have requested that these workers be offered the possibility of taking part in EGF measures; requests Renault and France to formally commit to take legal and financial measures so that the full pension rights and benefits of those workers can be restored while granting them an exemption from work at the equivalent conditions;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Notes that, given the delay between the implementation of the measures targeting the dismissed workers and the validation of the EGF request by the Commission, the first results on the efficiency of those measures are already available; deplores the low success rates and calls for a stronger assessment and more Commission guidance in ensuring that the training on offer matches the local economic trends;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Requests the Commission to mention the urgent need for additional measures to solve the issue of former workers who saw their pension benefits severely altered by the French pension reforms which came into force in its final recommendation report regarding the assessment progress made by France in the implementation of a sustainable and fair pension system;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Requests the Commission to closely survey and update, notably in the country specific recommendation, its evaluation of the sustainability and adequacy of the French pension reforms and their potential loopholes regarding all workers' situation to deliver on the additional measures needed;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Observes that Renault is currently resorting to temporary workers and deplores that the EGF might provide an incentive for multinational companies to replace their contractual workforce with a more flexible and precarious one; believes that this issue needs to be addressed in the forthcoming revision of the EGF regulation;
source: PE-475.905
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.113New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AM-472113_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.852New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-PR-469852_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE475.905New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AM-475905_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111215&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-12-15-TOC_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-396&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0396_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-579New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0579_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDG/7/06525New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012D0016New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012D0016 |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0420:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0420:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0420/COM_COM(2011)0420_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0420/COM_COM(2011)0420_EN.pdf |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
8.70.51 2011 budgetNew
4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocations, Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) |
procedure/subject/2 |
Old
4.15.05 Industrial restructuring, job losses, redundancies, relocationsNew
8.70.60 Previous annual budgets |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|