Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | IVANOVA Iliana ( PPE) | ANDREASEN Marta ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | STAES Bart ( Verts/ALE) | Maurice PONGA ( PPE) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | KAMALL Syed ( ECR) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | RIVELLINI Crescenzio ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the European Investment Bank (EIB) - Annual Report 2010.
Members welcome the 2010 Annual Report and encourage the EIB to continue its activities to support the development of the European economy and foster growth, stimulate employment, and promote social and territorial cohesion with a special focus on projects for less-developed regions. They welcome the approved Corporate operational plan 2011-2013 which gives three main dimensions to the bank's activities in the years ahead: implementing the “Europe 2020” strategy, combating climate change and supporting the EU's external policy.
They support the bank in its commitment to focus on the “ knowledge triangle ” linking education, research and development, innovation.
The resolution notes that the EIB should use its resources and instruments in the best possible way to fight the actual financial and economic crisis .
(1) EIB EU financing activities : the resolution recognizes the increased volume of the structural programmes loans (SPLs) in the light of the economic and financial crisis. It highlights the important role of these loans for the recovery and growth in supporting the public sector investments in some Member states. The EIB is encouraged to continue offering similar instruments not only for countries experiencing financial difficulties, but also to encourage countries with good financial discipline and convergence regions.
Parliament also notes that in terms of lending volume, Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) projects accounted, in 2010, for 32% of EIB financed Trans European Transport lending and welcomes the set up of the European PPP Expertise Centre.
The EIB is urged to:
publish an annual list of all final beneficiaries of loans and other financial instruments in the same way as the Commission is bound to publish such a list of end beneficiaries of EU funds; increase its support to the infrastructure networks in new Member States , which is still relatively low compared to EU-15 Member States.
Members broadly support the cooperation between the EIB and the European Commission in developing innovative financial instruments to promote the objectives of the “Europe 2020” strategy as well as action to kick-start the crisis-hit economy and climate action needs . They especially support the Risk Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF), a joint initiative of the European Commission and the Bank that provides for lending to higher-risk, higher-reward projects.
(2) EIB support to SMEs : the resolution recognizes the fact that 115 000 SMEs received support from the EIB Group and that the EIB contribution amounts to EUR 10.0 billion in credit lines for lending to SMEs, while the European Investment Fund (EIF) provided SME guarantees and risk capital totalling EUR 2.8 billion in 2010. It welcomes the decision by the EIB to join the EBRD and the World Bank Group in the joint action plan by the international institutions to step up support for SMEs in Central and Eastern Europe during the period 2009-2010.
Members encourage the EIB's efforts to ensure greater support for SMEs . They support the new loan product for Mid-Cap enterprises and highlight its importance for boosting the European economic recovery. They call on the EIB to provide advice to SMEs and other beneficiaries, when appropriate, to ensure the quality and effectiveness of the projects. The EIB is called upon to elaborate without delay new, coherent and effective instruments for a better supervision of the financial intermediaries collaborating with the EIB in supporting SMEs in Europe before the end of 2012.
(3) EIB activities outside EU : the resolution notes that, of the total of EUR 72 billion which the EIB lent in 2010, EUR 8.511 billion was lent to developing countries (of which 1.2 billion to Asia and Latin America (ALA), EUR 1 billion to the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP) (973 million) and to South Africa (50 million), EUR 2.55 billion to the Mediterranean countries and EUR 328 million to Central Asian countries), including EUR 657 million for projects in the fields of water and sanitation, health and education.
Members take the view that the European Union guarantee instrument provided by the external mandate has a high added value and leverage. They encourage nonetheless the EIB to pursue own-risk facilities whenever possible while preserving the EIB AAA rating, and while ensuring the effective coordination of assistance activities undertaken by the European Commission, the EIB and other international and local partners.
The resolution calls on the EIB to inform the European parliament about its financing operations in the Mediterranean region , supported by the external lending mandate, to demonstrate the development impacts of its lending and provide a report to the European parliament before the end of 2012. It calls on the EIB, together with the Commission and in close dialogue with the recipient countries, to come up urgently with a proposal for a banking facility that is more effective than the Facility for Euro-Mediterranean Investment and Partnership (FEMIP) in order to underpin the effectiveness of the role performed by the EIB in the Mediterranean countries with regard to SMEs, microcredit, etc.
As regards the EIB’s activity outside the EU, Members call on the Bank to only engage in lending outside the Union after having made sure that the trade rules between the country where the lending occurs and the Union include the principle of reciprocity in the application of social, environmental and health standards .
(4) EIB management and control mechanisms : Members recall the necessity of a European prudential supervisory system under which the EIB should be subjected to the same prudential rules as credit establishments; such prudential control should oversee the quality of the EIB’s financial situation and ensure that its results are accurately measured and the profession’s rules of good conduct are observed. They reiterate the call to subject the EIB to prudential regulatory supervision.
Parliament urges the EIB Group, nevertheless, to continue implementing autonomously best prudential banking practices in order to maintain its strong capital position and to contribute to the growth of the real economy. It calls therefore, for the EIB to undergo a stress test in order to verify the resilience of its portfolio.
The EIB is called upon to clarify its stance on the so-called EU Project Bonds or other innovative financial instruments based on cofinancing between the EU and EIB budgets. Members believe that the Commission should introduce EU Project Bonds that should become operational as soon as possible, preferably before the 2014-2020 budget period.
Members also consider that requirements regarding environmental, social, civil rights and transparency standards should be respected in all innovative financing instruments. They, however, express concern about the lack of transparency regarding the way ‘global loans’ are allocated and monitored in terms of tax governance. They recall that the EIB should ensure that recipients of its loans do not avail themselves of tax havens or use other harmful tax practices such as abusive transfer pricing which may lead to tax evasion or avoidance.
Members request that compliance with EU standards on environment and social policies should be a systematic condition for accessing EIB financing, while companies or undertakings that violate these principles and are registered in Non-Compliant Jurisdictions should be effectively excluded. Parliament calls on the EIB to establish clear ‘ performance indicators ’ to better track the added value of financing operations, and to strengthen the proper staff expertise in sustainable development, human rights, and social/gender issues.
(5) EIB's responsibilities and future role : noting the alarming divergence among European economies in terms of competitiveness and innovation, Members welcome the fact that in 2010, the EIB increased the funding available for climate related projects in areas such as energy efficiency, renewable-energy, transport, forestation, innovation and adaptation to climate change to EUR 19 billion (30 % of the total loans granted within the EU), up from EUR 16 billion in the previous year.
The EIB is called upon to:
make universal energy access a focus of its engagement in the energy sector, by supporting decentralised small-scale and off-grid projects, particularly in rural areas fund projects that meet stringent environmental requirements ; make a more ambitious contribution to the decarbonisation of the transport sector ; draw up a grey list – for study purposes – of projects involving technologies which, although they may meet European minimum standards, fail to reach average European environmental standards; continue to apply more stringent conditions to projects using fossil fuels ; ensure that the benefits of EIB-funded projects in developing countries also accrue to local communities, which, where appropriate, should be consulted about investment projects likely to have an impact on their area; increase funding for projects related to water resource management , giving particular emphasis to European countries in the southern Mediterranean area and with a particular concern for the sustainability of supply; support projects designed to promote biodiversity and the management of water resources; continue to apply stringent conditions to coal- and lignite-based energy production projects that remain eligible for EIB support in line with EU security-of- supply policy objectives; participate in financing of investment projects which aim to support research, development and innovation in those countries and regions which in case of external asymmetric economic shocks are disproportionately affected; link its financing projects to strive to contribute to poverty reduction and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, human rights, corporate social responsibility, decent work and environmental principles and good governance.
Parliament calls on the EIB governing bodies to consider the possibility of the European Union becoming a shareholder in the Bank, in addition to the Member States, as this would, in its view, reinforce the cooperation between the EIB and the Commission. It calls on the EIB to support the confidence-building efforts in those Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability in the euro area, by participating in investment projects in these countries and by providing guarantees that mitigate the increased country risk.
Lastly, the EIB is called upon to evaluate the implementation and functioning of its “Policy towards weakly regulated, non transparent and uncooperative jurisdictions” (so called NCJ Policy), and to report to the European Parliament before the end of 2012.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Iliana IVANOVA (EPP, BG) on the European Investment Bank (EIB) - Annual Report 2010.
Members welcome the 2010 Annual Report and encourage the EIB to continue its activities to support the development of the European economy and foster growth, stimulate employment, and promote social and territorial cohesion with a special focus on projects for less-developed regions. They support the bank in its commitment to focus on the “ knowledge triangle ” linking education, research and development, innovation.
The report notes that the EIB should use its resources and instruments in the best possible way to fight the actual financial and economic crisis .
EIB EU financing activities : the report recognizes the increased volume of the structural programmes loans (SPLs) in the light of the economic and financial crisis. It highlights the important role of these loans for the recovery and growth in supporting the public sector investments in some Member states. The EIB is encouraged to continue offering similar instruments not only for countries experiencing financial difficulties, but also to encourage countries with good financial discipline and convergence regions.
The report also notes that in terms of lending volume, Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) projects accounted, in 2010, for 32% of EIB financed Trans European Transport lending and welcomes the set up of the European PPP Expertise Centre.
The EIB is urged to:
publish an annual list of all final beneficiaries of loans and other financial instruments in the same way as the Commission is bound to publish such a list of end beneficiaries of EU funds; increase its support to the infrastructure networks in new Member States , which is still relatively low compared to EU-15 Member States.
Members broadly support the cooperation between the EIB and the European Commission in developing innovative financial instruments to promote the objectives of the “Europe 2020” strategy as well as action to kick-start the crisis-hit economy and climate action needs . They especially support the Risk Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF), a joint initiative of the European Commission and the Bank that provides for lending to higher-risk, higher-reward projects.
(1) EIB support to SMEs : the report recognizes the fact that 115 000 SMEs received support from the EIB Group and that the EIB contribution amounts to EUR 10.0 billion in credit lines for lending to SMEs, while the European Investment Fund (EIF) provided SME guarantees and risk capital totalling EUR 2.8 billion in 2010. It welcomes the decision by the EIB to join the EBRD and the World Bank Group in the joint action plan by the international institutions to step up support for SMEs in Central and Eastern Europe during the period 2009-2010.
Members encourage the EIB's efforts to ensure greater support for SMEs . They support the new loan product for Mid-Cap enterprises and highlight its importance for boosting the European economic recovery. They call on the EIB to provide advice to SMEs and other beneficiaries, when appropriate, to ensure the quality and effectiveness of the projects. The EIB is called upon to elaborate without delay new, coherent and effective instruments for a better supervision of the financial intermediaries collaborating with the EIB in supporting SMEs in Europe before the end of 2012.
(2) EIB activities outside EU : the report notes that, of the total of EUR 72 billion which the EIB lent in 2010, EUR 8.511 billion was lent to developing countries (of which 1.2 billion to Asia and Latin America (ALA), EUR 1 billion to the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP) (973 million) and to South Africa (50 million), EUR 2.55 billion to the Mediterranean countries and EUR 328 million to Central Asian countries), including EUR 657 million for projects in the fields of water and sanitation, health and education. It w elcomes the EIB’s focus on climate change .
Members take the view that the European Union guarantee instrument provided by the external mandate has a high added value and leverage. They encourage nonetheless the EIB to pursue own-risk facilities whenever possible while preserving the EIB AAA rating, and while ensuring the effective coordination of assistance activities undertaken by the European Commission, the EIB and other international and local partners.
The report calls on the EIB to inform the European parliament about its financing operations in the Mediterranean region , supported by the external lending mandate, to demonstrate the development impacts of its lending and provide a report to the European parliament before the end of 2012. It calls on the EIB, together with the Commission and in close dialogue with the recipient countries, to come up urgently with a proposal for a banking facility that is more effective than the Facility for Euro-Mediterranean Investment and Partnership (FEMIP) in order to underpin the effectiveness of the role performed by the EIB in the Mediterranean countries with regard to SMEs, microcredit, etc.
The report highlights the role of the EIB's financing for Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects mainly within the EU , and notes EIB's intention to explore the potential for PPPs in the Mediterranean countries. The EIB should adopt clearer definitions, data quality and consistency in the EIB in relation to the PPP projects.
As regards the EIB’s activity outside the EU, Members call on the Bank to only engage in lending outside the Union after having made sure that the trade rules between the country where the lending occurs and the Union include the principle of reciprocity in the application of social, environmental and health standards .
(3) EIB management and control mechanisms : Members recall the necessity of a European prudential supervisory system under which the EIB should be subjected to the same prudential rules as credit establishments; such prudential control should oversee the quality of the EIB’s financial situation and ensure that its results are accurately measured and the profession’s rules of good conduct are observed. They reiterate the call to subject the EIB to prudential regulatory supervision.
The committee urges the EIB Group, nevertheless, to continue implementing autonomously best prudential banking practices in order to maintain its strong capital position and to contribute to the growth of the real economy. It calls therefore, for the EIB to undergo a stress test in order to verify the resilience of its portfolio.
The EIB is called upon to clarify its stance on the so-called EU Project Bonds or other innovative financial instruments based on cofinancing between the EU and EIB budgets. The report believes that the Commission should introduce EU Project Bonds that should become operational as soon as possible, preferably before the 2014-2020 budget period.
Members consider that requirements regarding environmental, social, civil rights and transparency standards should be respected in all innovative financing instruments. They, however, express concern about the lack of transparency regarding the way ‘global loans’ are allocated and monitored in terms of tax governance. They recall that the EIB should ensure that recipients of its loans do not avail themselves of tax havens or use other harmful tax practices such as abusive transfer pricing which may lead to tax evasion or avoidance.
(4) EIB's responsibilities and future role : Members welcome the fact that in 2010, the EIB increased the funding available for climate related projects in areas such as energy efficiency, renewable-energy, transport, forestation, innovation and adaptation to climate change to EUR 19 billion (30 % of the total loans granted within the EU), up from EUR 16 billion in the previous year.
The EIB is called upon to:
fund projects that meet stringent environmental requirements ; make a more ambitious contribution to the decarbonisation of the transport sector ; draw up a grey list – for study purposes – of projects involving technologies which, although they may meet European minimum standards, fail to reach average European environmental standards; continue to apply more stringent conditions to projects using fossil fuels ; ensure that the benefits of EIB-funded projects in developing countries also accrue to local communities, which, where appropriate, should be consulted about investment projects likely to have an impact on their area; increase funding for projects related to water resource management , giving particular emphasis to European countries in the southern Mediterranean area and with a particular concern for the sustainability of supply; support projects designed to promote biodiversity and the management of water resources; continue to apply stringent conditions to coal- and lignite-based energy production projects that remain eligible for EIB support in line with EU security-of- supply policy objectives; participate in financing of investment projects which aim to support research, development and innovation in those countries and regions which in case of external asymmetric economic shocks are disproportionately affected; link its financing projects to strive to contribute to poverty reduction and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, human rights, corporate social responsibility, decent work and environmental principles and good governance.
Lastly, Members call on the EIB governing bodies to consider the possibility of the European Union becoming a shareholder in the Bank, in addition to the Member States, as this would, in its view, reinforce the cooperation between the EIB and the Commission. They call on the EIB to support the confidence-building efforts in those Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability in the euro area, by participating in investment projects in these countries and by providing guarantees that mitigate the increased country risk.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)426
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0119/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0058/2012
- Committee opinion: PE475.798
- Committee opinion: PE476.006
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE480.786
- Committee opinion: PE476.126
- Committee draft report: PE476.140
- Committee draft report: PE476.140
- Committee opinion: PE476.126
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE480.786
- Committee opinion: PE476.006
- Committee opinion: PE475.798
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)426
Activities
- Iliana IVANOVA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Andrew Henry William BRONS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zuzana BRZOBOHATÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jorgo CHATZIMARKAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Emer COSTELLO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabelle DURANT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vicky FORD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert GOEBBELS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ingeborg GRÄSSLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edit HERCZOG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Syed KAMALL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mojca KLEVA KEKUŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudio MORGANTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Crescenzio RIVELLINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bogusław SONIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios STAVRAKAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- László SURJÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michael THEURER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
132 |
2011/2186(INI)
2011/12/21
ENVI
17 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the EIB should undertake to fund projects that meet stringent environmental requirements
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for the EIB to increase its climate action target to reach at least 50% of its lending at the latest by 2015; in addition urges the EIB to develop targeted instruments and policies in order to increase its support for energy efficiency investments;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for the EIB to continue to apply more stringent conditions to
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for the EIB to continue to apply stringent conditions to coal- and lignite- based energy production projects which remain eligible for EIB support in line with EU security-of-supply policy objectives, and stresses how important it is to apply those conditions with a view to phasing out EIB support for high-carbon energy production
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the EIB to ensure that the benefits of EIB funded projects in developing countries also accrue to local communities who, where appropriate, should be consulted on investment projects likely to impact on their area; projects should be checked for environmental integrity and should be consistent with EU carbon cutting targets;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the EIB, with reference to biodiversity, to base its action on the 'no net loss' principle; draws attention, in this connection, to the standards of the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP);
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Urges the EIB to increase funding for projects related to water resource management with particular emphasis given to countries in the Southern Mediterranean area with particular concern for the sustainability of supply;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Draws the EIB’s attention to the growing shortage of raw materials; calls on the EIB to investigate how it can help to make the use of raw materials in the EU more efficient;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for a more ambitious EIB contribution for decarbonisation of the transport sector to meet the objective of decreasing its climate footprint by 35% by 2030; specifically, calls for the introduction of an avoid-shift-improve strategy in the implementation guidelines of the new EIB transport policy as well as strict environmental and climate screening of projects; in this context, considers EIB should give priority to projects that reduce transport demand and develop public and combined transport;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the EIB to undertake not to fund
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the EIB to undertake to support projects to promote biodiversity and management of water resources, not to fund certain types of project and to draw up lists of ‘banned areas’ and ‘banned technologies’ covering, for example, projects that result in significant changes to important natural habitats or in the production of banned substances, large dam projects that fail to comply with the recommendations of the World Commission on Dams, and extraction projects (oil, gas and minerals) which have a devastating environmental and social impact and do not comply with the World Bank Extractive Industries Review recommendations;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the EIB to undertake not to fund certain types of project and to draw up lists of ‘banned areas’ and ‘banned technologies’ covering, for example, projects that result in significant changes to important natural habitats or in the production of banned substances, large dam projects
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the EIB to undertake not to fund certain types of project and to draw up lists of ‘banned areas’ and ‘banned technologies’ covering, for example,
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for EIB to concentrate its additional financing for climate action on direct project funding for mitigation activities, rather than intermediated lending; considers that its involvement in lending to projects that create offset credits should be limited to Least Developed Countries; in particular objects to EIB investment in carbon funds that support forest projects generating offset credits;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the EIB to draw up a grey list of projects involving technologies which although they might be within the European minimum standards, fail to reach the average European environmental standards;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the support given by the EIB to the renewable energy sector (a sector of strategic importance in meeting the EU's climate targets), which has been substantially increased over recent years (EUR
source: PE-478.621
2012/01/12
ECON
39 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the EIB Group1 should continue reporting annually to Parliament on its lending activities within the EU, with regard to the promotion of Union's objectives and the Europe 2020 Strategy, and outside the EU, with regard to its mandate and the overall policy coherence of the EU's external action; takes the view that the EIB and the EBRD should also focus on strengthening their cooperation in third countries, in order to enhance their respective comparative advantages and avoid overlaps in their work2; and recalls that Council and the European Parliament agreed3 that the time was ripe to study the rationalisation of system of European public financial institutions, which should not exclude the option of eventually dissolving the EBRD while boosting the EIB; __________________ 3 Subscription to additional shares in the capital of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ***I.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the EIB Group to continue implementing best prudential banking practices in order to maintain its very strong capital position and contribute to the growth of the real economy;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the EIB Group to continue implementing best prudential banking practices in order to maintain its very strong capital position and contribute to the growth of the real economy; calls, therefore, for the EIB to
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the EIB Group to make available on its website, where appropriate, relevant information on the beneficiaries of
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the EIB Group to make available on its website
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the EIB Group to make available on its website, where appropriate and prior to project approval, relevant information on the beneficiaries of long- term loans and guarantees, social and environmental evaluations of projects, project
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. takes the view that, in order to reach small and medium-sized enterprises, the EIB should especially form partnerships at a higher level with transparent and accountable financial intermediaries linked to the local economy;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the EIB to keep up the efforts to ensure that loans are effectively transmitted to SMEs by financial intermediaries;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the EIB to clarify its stance on the so-called Project Bonds, Eurobonds or other innovative financial instruments based on co-financing between the EU and EIB budgets; considers that the same strict requirements regarding environmental, social, civil rights and transparency standards need to be respected in all innovative financing instruments;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the EIB Group1 should continue reporting
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the EIB to
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the EIB to support the confidence building efforts in the Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability in the euro area, by participating in investment projects in these countries and providing guarantees that mitigate the increased country risk;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls that the EIB in common agreement with the European Commission should put up a comprehensive plan on the functioning of project bonds as soon as possible;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the EIB to participate in financing of investment projects which aim to support research, development and innovation in those countries and regions which in case of external asymmetric economic shocks are disproportionately affected;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Believes that the EIB should take into account the financial situation of Member States in order to set in which infrastructures the pilot phase of project bonds should be implemented; this pilot phase should give priority to those projects placed in Member States suffering low growth and liquidity problems in the financial markets;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the EIB to
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the EIB to step up its activities in its southern Mediterranean countries of operation to promote investment in
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the EIB to assess and make public the development impact of current operations and correspondingly step up its activities in its southern Mediterranean countries of operation to promote investment in economic development and support the democratic process in those countries;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Any support for financial intermediaries should be restricted only to local institutions not operating in secrecy jurisdictions and which have a substantial local ownership and are equipped to implement a pro-development approach supporting the specificity of local SMEs in each country;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Welcomes the increased role of the EIB's structural programme loans (SPLs) in helping Member States to finance their contributions to programmes supported by EU Structural Funds; calls on the Commission to work with the EIB to ensure that investment in infrastructure projects is not postponed as a result of the economic difficulties faced by Member States;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the EIB Group1 should continue reporting annually to Parliament on its lending activities within the EU, with regard to the promotion of Union’s objectives and the Europe 2020 Strategy, and outside the EU, with regard to its mandate and the overall policy coherence of the EU’s external action; takes the view that the EIB and the EBRD should also focus on strengthening their cooperation in third countries, in order to enhance their respective comparative advantages and avoid overlaps in their work2, while ensuring more effective use of resources;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Believes that the EIB should undertake its own independent evaluation of the jurisdictions in which it is activating, in order to fight illicit capital flows and ensure that it is not participating in offshore financial centres;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the EIB to enhance its activities in EU countries with large and persisting current account deficits with a view to fostering social and economic convergence and increase financial and political sustainability of the monetary union;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Asks the EIB to clarify and justify its position regarding the transformation of the FEMIP into a Euro-Mediterranean bank;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Requests the revision of the EIB energy policy document from 2007 to render it consistent with the EU 2050 objectives and roadmaps;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Notes that in 2010 the Bank provided EUR 25.9 billion to regions in the EU worst hit by the economic crisis;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses the importance of the JASPERS, JESSICA, JEREMIE and JASMINE programmes for both regional convergence and cohesion in Europe and support for small and medium-sized businesses and stresses the need for adequate funding during the new programming period (2014-2020) also; welcomes participation by the EIB in the European Progress Microfinance Facility; stresses the importance for regional convergence of EIB loans in the form of funding for structural projects;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Notes the reduction in loans to the EIB to EUR 60 billion in 2012 from EUR 75 billion in 2011 under the new Operational Programme for 2012-2014, as indicated in the annual programme adopted by the Board of Directors;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6e. Welcomes the assistance provided by the EIB, in cooperation with the EU structural funds for countries facing financial difficulties, including loans to cover part of the national contribution to projects supported by these funds; welcomes the creation of a Guarantee Fund in Greece funded by the NSRF with EIB support and assistance, which is expected to help facilitate the realisation of public investments.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the EIB Group1 should continue reporting annually to Parliament on its lending activities within the EU, with regard to the promotion of Union's objectives and the Europe 2020 Strategy, and outside the EU, with regard to its mandate and the overall policy coherence of the EU's external action; takes the view that the EIB and the EBRD should also focus on strengthening their coordination and cooperation in third countries, in order to enhance their respective comparative advantages and avoid overlaps in their work2;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Given the investment needs of the EU and its member states and the insufficient capital provided by the markets, calls upon the Governors of the EIB to agree to a significant raise in capital for the EIB primarily aimed at collecting the double dividend of economic recovery and the ecological conversion of our economies;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that the European Union needs economic growth which can be effectively boosted by investing in research and development and fostering the construction of trans-European networks and that in this context the activity of the EIB can contribute to improving the current economic outlook;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that the EIB should implement mechanisms to guarantee that in all its financial operations the EU's environmental, social, human rights, transparency and procurement standards are strictly respected; calls on EIB to further enhance transparency in its lending through financial intermediaries and to prevent the use of tax havens, transfer pricing and tax avoidance;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Recommends the EIB to adopt a moratorium on mining projects it finances as long as strong binding standards are not in place in order to guarantee the application of regulations that will prevent cases like Mopani to happen again;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes the alarming divergence among European economies in terms of competitiveness and innovation;
source: PE-478.676
2012/01/20
DEVE
8 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Whereas EIB's activity outside the EU has developed primarily in middle income countries, with limited staff resources particularly for upstream work and for project monitoring, as well as limited local presence compared to the level and complexity of financing activities outside the EU;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Notes that in 2010, the EIB lent EUR 5 bn of the total 72 bn EIB lending to developing countries (1.2 bn to Asia and Latin America (ALA), EUR1 bn to ACP (973m) and South Africa (50m), EUR 2.55 bn to the Mediterranean countries and EUR 328 mn to Central Asian countries) of which only EUR 467 mn for projects directly aiming at achieving the MDGs;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the EIB’s focus on climate change, particularly on renewable energy and on the two projects in France’s Pacific OCTs funded to the tune of EUR 15 million in particular; calls on the EIB to make universal energy access a focus of its engagement in the energy sector, by supporting decentralised small- scale and off-grid projects, particularly in rural areas; calls on the EIB to phase out projects which are likely to have a significant impact on the environment, such as large dams, CCS and fossil fuel technologies, to avoid locking developing countries into these energies;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the EIB to actively support projects aimed at financial inclusion, i.e. facilitating equal access to financial services such as loans and savings and insurance schemes, for instance through supporting microfinance institutions;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes EIB's commitments and policy developed regarding non- cooperative jurisdictions; however, expresses its concern about the lack of transparency regarding the way "global loans" are allocated and monitored in terms of tax governance; recalls that the EIB should ensure that recipients of its loans do not avail themselves of tax havens or use other harmful tax practises such as abusive transfer pricing which may lead to tax evasion or avoidance; in this context, calls on the EIB to request that financial intermediaries make public any use of the global loans they receive, including a report of their activities in any individual country in which they operate;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets that the EIB is not prioritising investment in local companies in ACP countries; Deems that monitoring of global loans or loans for SMEs should be improved, to ensure that financial intermediaries properly implement
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the initiative of concluding a Memorandum of Understanding on cooperation between the European Parliament and the EIB; in this context, stresses upon the need to involve closely the EP in the process of discussion on the setting-up of an "EU Platform for External Cooperation and Development" and to guarantee transparency in the process;
source: PE-480.600
2012/02/03
CONT
68 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the EIB's financing operations inside the European Union focus on six policy priorities: ensuring economic and social cohesion
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the EIB to
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Urges EIB to increase its support to the public sector
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Urges EIB to increase the public sector support for infrastructure networks in new Member states which is still relatively low compared to EU-15 Member States;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the achievement one full year ahead of schedule of the EUR 30bn target in lending to SMEs set by the December 2008 ECOFIN Council; supports the
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas the Audit Committee was established under the EIB Statute as an independent committee responsible for the auditing of the EIB’s accounts and verifying that the activities of the Bank conform to best banking practice; whereas the Audit Committee stated in its report of 6 April 2011 that: ‘in 2010 the Audit Committee received the expected support from the Bank’s services, thus being able properly to discharge its responsibilities’;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the achievement full year ahead of schedule of the EUR 30bn target in lending to SMEs set by the December 2008 ECOFIN Council; supports the New loan
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Reiterates continuous previous recommendations of the EP to enhance transparency in EIB's selection of financial intermediaries and the way ‘global loans’ are allocated; stresses the need for clearer conditions and stricter lending effectiveness criteria;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Reiterates its call
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Reiterates its call to report on the results achieved, including
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Welcomes the decision by the EIB to join the EBRD and the World Bank Group in the joint action plan by the international institutions to step up support for SMEs in Central and Eastern Europe during the period 2009-2010; notes that by fulfilling its commitments under this plan (doubling the resources normally made available to SMEs in the region), the EIB met its target well ahead of schedule and a 25% – or EUR 14bn – increase was recorded in EIB lending activity at the end of 2010; calls on the EIB to continue its close cooperation with banks in this region in supporting SMEs;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Welcomes the European Progress Microfinance Facility established in March 2010 by the EC and by the EIB; emphasizes the need for a public disclosure of the results of this facility up to date; points out that the complete set of selecting criteria for
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Welcomes the European Progress Microfinance Facility established in March 2010 by the EC and by the EIB; emphasizes the need for a public disclosure of the results of this facility up to date;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the special report of the European Court of Auditors number 4/2011 on the Audit of the SME Guarantee Facility and recognizes the important role of the SMEG facility; is concerned about the findings of the Court which relate to: insufficient records justifying the agreement parameters between the EIB and the financial intermediaries, unclear performance indicators, absence of target values of the indicators calls on the EIB to remedy these shortcomings without delay in cooperation with the Court;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the special report of the European Court of Auditors number 4/2011 on the Audit of the SME Guarantee Facility and recognizes the important role of the SMEG facility; is concerned about the findings of the Court which relate to: insufficient records justifying the agreement parameters between the EI
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas sustainable growth must be guaranteed in the Union also through redeployment of unused EU Budget payment appropriations to joint programmes targeting growth, competitiveness and employment, and through leveraging EIB loans and setting up an efficient project bond market;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Takes the view that the European Union guarantee instrument provided by the external mandate has a high added value and leverage; encourages nonetheless the EIB to pursue own-risk facilities whenever possible while, preserving the EIB AAA rating, ensuring the effective coordination of assistance activities undertaken by the European Commission, the EIB and other international and local partners in order to increase the consistency and complementarity of the actions;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the EIB to inform the European parliament about its financing operations in the Mediterranean region, supported by the external lending mandate, to demonstrate the development impacts of its lending and provide a report to the European parliament before the end of 2012 suggests that due attention will be paid to the recently published report from Bankwatch criticising some of these financial operations;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Highlights the role of the EIB's financing for Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects mainly within the EU, and notes EIB's intention to
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls on the EIB, together with the Commission and in close dialogue with the recipient countries, to come up urgently with a proposal for a banking facility that is more effective than FEMIP in order to underpin the effectiveness of the role performed by the EIB in the Mediterranean countries with regard to SMEs, microcredit, etc;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Is concerned about the lack of sufficient information about the results of the external policy actions; highlights the absence of requirements for financial intermediaries to send ex-post results on individual operations calls therefore on the bank to make such ex- post reporting compulsory;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Is concerned about the lack of sufficient information about the results of the external policy actions; highlights the absence of requirements for financial intermediaries to send ex-post results on individual operations; welcomes, however, the new reporting provisions under Decision 1080/2011/EU;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33a. Reiterates its call on the European Commission to provide Parliament with a legal analysis of the possible options for prudential supervision of the EIB; recognizes the existence of institutional difficulties in relation to possible role of the European Central Bank in EIB's prudential supervision; calls on the Commission to explore, in close cooperation with the eurozone Member States, all possibilities of EIB's prudential supervision;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33a. Questions whether the Audit Committee has all the skills and independence required to carry out its remit and would like to know what independent means are available to this body to carry out its work;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 b (new) 33b. Proposes that this regulatory supervision be: i) exercised by the European Central Bank on the basis of Article 127(6) of the TFEU, ii) or, failing that and on the basis of a voluntary approach by the EIB, carried out by the European Banking Authority with or without the participation of one or more national regulators, or by an independent auditor;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the 2010 Annual Report and encourages the EIB to continue its activities to support the development of the European economy and foster growth, stimulate employment, and promote interregional and social cohesion with a special focus on projects for less-developed regions; supports the bank in its intention to target operations where its financing is likely to have the greatest impact on economic growth, points out that the EIB should use its resources and instruments in the best possible way to fight the actual financial and economic crisis;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Expresses its grave concern about the latest developments related to the EIB's credit rating; urges the EIB to elaborate and implement a strategy in order to keep its AAA rating which is the cornerstone of the bank's activity and is essential for the bank's operations; notes that the bank would be excluded for certain categories of investors if the AAA rating would not be maintained;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Points out that the overall level of credit risk in the Bank's loan portfolio has risen as a result of both growing pressures on the creditworthiness of existing counterparts, driven by the continuing effects of the economic crisis and the higher credit risk embedded in new operations; recommends that the EIB take appropriate measures to avoid
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Welcomes the new EIB's complaints mechanism; notes however that this mechanism is not completely operational in 2010; takes note of the substantial growth of numbers of complaints mainly in the area of procurement, environmental, social and developmental aspects of financed projects; asks the EIB to provide the EP with relevant information about the follow- up on the submitted complaints;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Welcomes the new EIB's complaints mechanism; notes and regrets however that this mechanism is not completely operational in 2010; takes note of the substantial growth of numbers of complaints mainly in the area of procurement, environmental, social and developmental aspects of financed projects; asks the EIB to provide the EP with relevant information about the follow- up on the submitted complaints by then end of September 2012;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Requests that compliance with EU standards on environment and social policies should be a systematic condition for accessing EIB financing, while companies or undertakings that violate
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 a (new) 41a. Requests that the financial guarantees given by the EU to the EIB be repaid at the average rate for repayment of comparable guarantees observed on the financial market. The repayment as thus calculated may be subject to a subsidy decision by the EU for the EIB in accordance with the normal procedures if the absence of repayment of this guarantee forms part of an economic model in accordance with the Union’s objectives, particularly for activities outside the Union, and with the rules on the functioning of the internal market to avoid distortions of competition with the private sector;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 a (new) Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 b (new) 41b. Regrets the mention in the EIB’s 2010 report that the EIB’s capital adequacy ratio – the ratio of the Bank’s capital to its assets – stands at 27.2%, whilst stating that the Bank for International Settlements’ Basel Committee sets the minimum capital adequacy ratio for banks at 8%, since the operating rules for the EIB’s capital are not the same as for banks to which the aforementioned Basel Committee’s ratio applies;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 c (new) Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 d (new) 41d. Proposes that the Member States involved in the EIB adopt a plan, e.g. over the EU 2020 period, to release the share of unpaid subscribed capital which on 31 December 2010 amounted to around EUR 190bn;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the 2010 Annual Report and encourages the EIB to continue its activities to support the development of the European economy and foster growth, stimulate employment, and promote
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 6 EIB's responsibilities and future role 41 a. Notes the alarming divergence among European economies in terms of competitiveness and innovation;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Welcomes the EIB's focus on climate change, particularly on renewable energy; calls on the EIB to make universal energy access a focus of its engagement in the energy sector, by supporting decentralised small-scale and off-grid projects, particularly in rural areas;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Is of the opinion that the EIB should fund projects that meet stringent environmental requirements, thereby promoting sustainable growth and the phasing out of environmental harmful subsidies;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 a (new) 44a. Calls on the Commission and the EIB Group to design innovative, joint budget-EIB financing instruments for investments supporting biodiversity, and the related provision by the EIB Group of technical and financial advisory services, consistent with the Bank's environmental performance standards;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Further reiterates its call that the EIB should bring its operations fully into line with an EU objective of a swift transition to a low-carbon economy
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 a (new) 48a. Proposes that the Commission, in conjunction with the EIB (in view of the quality of the latter’s human resources and its experience in financing major infrastructure), engage in a process of strategic analysis of investment funding, without ruling out any possible scenario, including subsidies, the release of sums subscribed to the EIB’s capital by the Member States, EU subscriptions to the EIB’s capital, loans, innovative instruments, financial engineering tailored to long-term projects which are not immediately profitable, the development of guarantee systems, the creation of an investment section within the EU budget, financial consortia of European, national and local authorities, public-private partnerships, etc.;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Recalls, moreover, that the Europe 2020 strategy will only be credible and effective if it is backed up by adequate financial resources, and therefore supports a more prominent role for the EIB in enhancing the catalytic role and leverage function of structural funds and the further development and optimum use of innovative financing instruments in all Member States, involving notably the EIB and the EIF, as well as the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and other international financial institutions (e.g. blending grants and loans, venture capital instruments, new forms of risk- sharing and
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Recalls, moreover, that the Europe 2020 strategy will only be credible if it is backed up by adequate financial resources, and therefore supports a more prominent role for the EIB in enhancing the catalytic role and leverage function of structural funds and the further development and optimum use of innovative financing instruments, involving notably the EIB and the EIF
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 a (new) 50a. Calls on the EIB to support the confidence building efforts in the Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability in the euro area, by participating in investment projects in these countries and providing guarantees that mitigate the increased country risk;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the EIB Group6 should continue reporting annually to the European parliament on its lending activities related to the EU budget and focused on: EU financing and External financing calls on the bank that its annual report should be easily accessible and understandable for the wider public;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Takes the view that, after the Lisbon treaty changes and the increased role of the EIB for the balanced and steady development of the Internal market, the EIB should become more accountable to the EU citizens namely being subject to a discharge procedure by the European Parliament on the deployment of public funds from the EU budget or the European Development Fund, managed by the EIB
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Welcomes the commitment of the EIB to develop a new framework for measuring the development impacts (REM framework) for evaluating projects both ex-ante and ex-post as of January 2011, and encourages the EIB to enhance transparency in applying this framework by disclosing the full list of indicators, and publishing monitoring reports and measures taken; requests to be informed about the improvements in result monitoring achieved by the new Result Measurement framework (REM);
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Welcomes the commitment of the EIB to develop a new framework for measuring the development impacts (REM framework) for evaluating projects both ex-ante and ex-post as of January 201
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 a (new) 52a. Welcomes the fact that the financial and contractual monitoring of projects has been reinforced by the creation of a new monitoring task force; requests to be informed about the results and improvements achieved by the new monitoring task force;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 a (new) 52a. Calls on the EIB to participate in financing of investment projects which aim to support research, development and innovation in those countries and regions which in case of external asymmetric economic shocks are disproportionately affected;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 53. Calls on the EIB to link its financing projects
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 55 55. Recognizes the progress made by the EIB in establishing clear procedures vis-à- vis the Offshore financial centres; supports the Bank in its policy not to participate in any operation, implemented through a non- cooperative jurisdiction. Calls on the EIB to evaluate the implementation and functioning of its "Policy towards weakly regulated, non transparent and uncooperative jurisdictions" (so called NCJ Policy) and to report to the European Parliament before the end of 2012; encourages the EIB to regularly review and update its NCJ Policy to ensure that EIB's financing operations do not contribute to any form of tax evasion, money laundering or financing of terrorism;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 55 55. Recognizes the progress made by the EIB in establishing clear procedures vis-à- vis the
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 55 a (new) 55a. Expects that 2012 is the last year in which the Bank will paid out bonuses over and above the normal salaries to its staff;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the EIB Group6 should continue reporting annually to the European parliament on its
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recommends that the EIB
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognizes the increased volume of the structural programmes loans (SPLs) in the light of the economic and financial crisis; highlights the important role of these loans
source: PE-480.786
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/4/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE476.140New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-476140_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE476.126&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-476126_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.786New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-480786_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE476.006&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-476006_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE475.798&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-475798_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-58&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0058_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-119New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0119_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/7/06847New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|