Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | BRADBOURN Philip ( ECR) | PIRKER Hubert ( PPE), SASSOLI David Maria ( S&D), UGGIAS Giommaria ( ALDE), LICHTENBERGER Eva ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | REGI | UGGIAS Giommaria ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the future of regional airports and air services in the EU.
The resolution notes that regional aviation, like other modes of transport, is a key enabler in citizens’ mobility. Europe’s airports provide a large network of 150 000 city pairs. It also underlines the need for a public service obligation for air services of economic and public interest, especially those connecting remote regions , islands and the outermost regions, in order to ensure their full accessibility and territorial integration.
A considerable number of regional airports are confronted by an airline with a virtual monopoly which can exploit this position to exert pressure by making more and more demands on the airport concerned and on local and/or regional authorities, inter alia with regard to airport charges and aviation safety levies. The resolution notes that the financial and sovereign debt crisis has substantially changed the conditions for airport financing in the EU, especially at ‘non-hub’ airports.
Parliament makes the following recommendations:
Economics of regional air services : the resolution underlines the need for a public service obligation for air services of economic and public interest, especially those connecting remote regions, islands and the outermost regions, in order to ensure their full accessibility and territorial integration. Members believe that such services would not be economically viable without public money.
Strengthening existing links : Members believe that it is desirable to avoid a proliferation of regional airports , and note that the development of regional airports should be targeted in order to avoid the creation of unused or not efficiently used airport infrastructures which would result in an economic burden for the authorities responsible. They maintain, on the contrary, that existing links should be strengthened, especially in areas (islands, for example) suffering from geographical handicaps.
Support on the basis of a cost benefit analysis : Parliament takes the view that national and regional authorities should properly support regional airports, on account of the latter’s environmental and economic impact. Regional airports should also be subject to local and regional consultation, and – on the basis of cost-benefit analyses – be considered eligible to apply for financing under EU funds , as well as other EU-funded financial engineering instruments within the new programming framework. The Commission is asked to:
take a balanced approach in future revisions of aviation guidelines in order to provide for a socially and economically viable development of regional air services, in supporting the development of regional airports and the construction of new regional airports (especially in countries whose national airports are situated in remote areas), to pay particular regard to the balanced territorial development of regions corresponding to levels I and II of the Nomenclature of Territorial Statistical Units (NUTS).
Tourism : the resolution stresses that adequate development of regional airports contributes to parallel development of the tourist system , which is a vitally important area for many European regions. It calls on the Commission to take account of the specific nature and problems of these seasonal regional airports when adopting new legislation for the sector.
Charter airlines and low-cost carriers : regional airports are becoming more and more important for charter airlines as well as for low-cost carriers. Members express concern that certain practices of low-cost airlines, which often operate from regional airports, lead to poorer quality of service for passengers and a deterioration in working conditions. They call on the Commission to guarantee the correct application of European and national legislation on airlines’ social conditions and terms of employment , so that staff employed at a regional airport do not become victims of social dumping and so that fair competition and a level playing field can be ensured in the aviation sector.
‘One bag rule’ : Parliament is also concerned by ‘one-bag’ rule and other restrictions to the cabin baggage allowance imposed by certain airlines. It takes the view that these practices represent a breach of competition law, and believe that these restrictions may constitute an abuse of a carrier’s position. Members call, therefore, on Member States to set common upper limits to be imposed on airlines with regard to such restrictions and consider that any checks relating to luggage weight restrictions and size should be made before arrival at the departure gate.
Goods transport : the resolution also considers that goods transport is a positive factor for regional airports which can further development and jobs, not least through the establishment of related ground services and of businesses linked to regional airports. It calls on the Commission to draw up a strategy that will promote goods transport and facilitate cooperation between neighbouring regional airports. Members urge Member State authorities to propose plans to develop existing regional airports and make them more efficient.
Environment and innovation : Members are of the opinion that there is plenty of spare capacity to be utilised at many regional airports and that, by using that spare capacity, congestion and stacking at major airports can be reduced and the environmental impact limited. They also highlight the role of regional airports in acting as a mainspring for the development of innovation clusters by diminishing location costs for start-ups, especially in geographically remote regions.
The resolution calls on Member States and regional and local authorities to take account of, in addition to economic and financial considerations, environmental, territorial, geological and meteorological factors, and of other rational criteria when deciding where to locate airports and whenever regional airport facilities need to be renovated or expanded. It underlines, at the same time, the importance of using and modernising existing structures before building new ones.
The Commission and Member States are urged to speed up the development of the Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR) , the Clean Sky initiative and the enforcement of Single European Sky legislation as a matter of urgency.
Congestion and multimodality: noting that recent studies state that European regions are losing direct links to some of the most congested airports, the resolution suggests that the scope of any future studies be extended to regional airports. In the interim, it encourages the Member States and the Commission to promote connections between regional airports and main airports in the Member States, helping to boost the economy in the areas around regional airports whiles also offering one solution to the problem of air-traffic congestion in Europe.
Members urge all parties and institutions involved in the revision of Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 (as amended by Regulation (EC) No 793/2004) to focus on delivering new capacity at airports rather than pricing regional air services out of the market. They consider it essential for regional airports to have access to hubs, and take the view that this must be considered during the revision of Regulation (EEC) No 95/93.
Regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport network on the ground. Members call for Member States to develop their intermodal policies and to invest in these strategically important intermodal connections, for example connections with the rail network. They believe that the network development plans of the rail and road sector should take the location of airports into account, with the aim of including airports in the ground transport networks being built. They note the need to develop regional airport networks based on integrated connections with the major airports in order to improve the mobility of people and to streamline goods transport.
The trans-European transport network (TEN-T): Members believe that, as part of the TEN-T, regional airports could play a leading role in the creation of a wider European Common Aviation Area covering 1 billion people in the EU and neighbouring countries, in line with the Commission communication . Stressing that the role played by regional airports is vital for territorial cohesion and social and economic development in the regions, they call for regional airports to be taken into account in the future trans-European transport network policy. The report also emphasises that regional airports in trans-border regions, which are located in close proximity to each other, should demonstrate cooperation and coordination in the use of existing capacities as a precondition for EU co-financing by TEN-T, cohesion and regional funds.
Parliament goes on to make a series of recommendations aiming to improve security, transparency and accessibility with regard to regional airports. With regard to the latter, Members call on the companies responsible for the management of regional airports to make the necessary structural alterations to accommodate disabled people, so as to enable them to access the various airport areas without assistance and to use all services without difficulty.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own-initiative report by Philip BRADBOURN (ECR, UK) on the future of regional airports and air services in the EU.
The report notes that regional aviation, like other modes of transport, is a key enabler in citizens’ mobility. It stresses that improved connectivity and efficient inter-modal mobility can contribute considerably to better access to the regions, to business, tourism and the development of related services, and to the spread of economic prosperity.
The committee makes the following recommendations:
Economics of regional air services : the report underlines the need for a public service obligation for air services of economic and public interest, especially those connecting remote regions, islands and the outermost regions, in order to ensure their full accessibility and territorial integration. Members believe that such services would not be economically viable without public money.
They believe that it is desirable to avoid a proliferation of regional airports , and note that the development of regional airports should be targeted in order to avoid the creation of unused or not efficiently used airport infrastructures which would result in an economic burden for the authorities responsible. They maintain, on the contrary, that existing links should be strengthened, especially in areas (islands, for example) suffering from geographical handicaps.
The Commission is asked to review Decision 2012/21/EU on the application of Article 106(2), by means of which the threshold for which an airport can receive state aid without having to notify the Commission was decreased to 200 000 passengers per year, bearing in mind the Community Guidelines (2005/C312/01) which state that an airport can become cost-efficient with a traffic of over 500 000 passengers per year.
The committee takes the view that national and regional authorities should properly support regional airports, on account of the latter’s environmental and economic impact. Regional airports should also be subject to local and regional consultation, and – on the basis of cost-benefit analyses – be considered eligible to apply for financing under EU funds , as well as other EU-funded financial engineering instruments within the new programming framework. The Commission is asked to:
· take into consideration the opportunities offered by regional airports as part of the European central transport network;
· take a balanced approach in future revisions of aviation guidelines in order to provide for a socially and economically viable development of regional air services,
· in supporting the development of regional airports and the construction of new regional airports (especially in countries whose national airports are situated in remote areas), to pay particular regard to the balanced territorial development of regions corresponding to levels I and II of the Nomenclature of Territorial Statistical Units (NUTS).
The report stresses that adequate development of regional airports contributes to parallel development of the tourist system , which is a vitally important area for many European regions. It calls on the Commission to take account of the specific nature and problems of these seasonal regional airports when adopting new legislation for the sector.
Regional airports are becoming more and more important for charter airlines as well as for low-cost carriers. Members expresses concern that certain practices of low-cost airlines, which often operate from regional airports, lead to poorer quality of service for passengers and a deterioration in working conditions.
They call on the Commission to guarantee the correct application of European and national legislation on airlines’ social conditions and terms of employment , so that staff employed at a regional airport do not become victims of social dumping and so that fair competition and a level playing field can be ensured in the aviation sector.
Members are also concerned by ‘one-bag’ rule and other restrictions to the cabin baggage allowance imposed by certain airlines. They take the view that these practices represent a breach of competition law, and believe that these restrictions may constitute an abuse of a carrier’s position. They call, therefore, on Member States to set common upper limits to be imposed on airlines with regard to such restrictions and consider that any checks relating to luggage weight restrictions and size should be made before arrival at the departure gate.
The report also considers that goods transport is a positive factor for regional airports which can further development and jobs, not least through the establishment of related ground services and of businesses linked to regional airports. It calls on the Commission to draw up a strategy that will promote goods transport and facilitate cooperation between neighbouring regional airports. Members urge Member State authorities to propose plans to develop existing regional airports and make them more efficient.
Environment and innovation : Members are of the opinion that there is plenty of spare capacity to be utilised at many regional airports and that, by using that spare capacity, congestion and stacking at major airports can be reduced and the environmental impact limited. They also highlight the role of regional airports in acting as a mainspring for the development of innovation clusters by diminishing location costs for start-ups, especially in geographically remote regions.
The report calls on Member States and regional and local authorities to take account of, in addition to economic and financial considerations, environmental, territorial, geological and meteorological factors, and of other rational criteria when deciding where to locate airports and whenever regional airport facilities need to be renovated or expanded. It underlines, at the same time, the importance of using and modernising existing structures before building new ones.
The Commission and Member States are urged to speed up the development of the Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR) , the Clean Sky initiative and the enforcement of Single European Sky legislation as a matter of urgency.
Congestion and multimodality: noting that recent studies state that European regions are losing direct links to some of the most congested airports, the report suggests that the scope of any future studies be extended to regional airports. In the interim, it encourages the Member States and the Commission to promote connections between regional airports and main airports in the Member States, helping to boost the economy in the areas around regional airports whiles also offering one solution to the problem of air-traffic congestion in Europe.
Members urge all parties and institutions involved in the revision of Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 (as amended by Regulation (EC) No 793/2004) to focus on delivering new capacity at airports rather than pricing regional air services out of the market. They consider it essential for regional airports to have access to hubs, and take the view that this must be considered during the revision of Regulation (EEC) No 95/93.
Regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport network on the ground. Members call for Member States to develop their intermodal policies and to invest in these strategically important intermodal connections, for example connections with the rail network. They believe that the network development plans of the rail and road sector should take the location of airports into account, with the aim of including airports in the ground transport networks being built. They note the need to develop regional airport networks based on integrated connections with the major airports in order to improve the mobility of people and to streamline goods transport.
The trans-European transport network (TEN-T): Members believe that, as part of the TEN-T, regional airports could play a leading role in the creation of a wider European Common Aviation Area covering 1 billion people in the EU and neighbouring countries, in line with the Commission communication . Stressing that the role played by regional airports is vital for territorial cohesion and social and economic development in the regions, they call for regional airports to be taken into account in the future trans-European transport network policy. The report also emphasises that regional airports in trans-border regions, which are located in close proximity to each other, should demonstrate cooperation and coordination in the use of existing capacities as a precondition for EU co-financing by TEN-T, cohesion and regional funds.
The committee goes on to make a series of recommendations aiming to improve security, transparency and accessibility with regard to regional airports. With regard to the latter, Members call on the companies responsible for the management of regional airports to make the necessary structural alterations to accommodate disabled people, so as to enable them to access the various airport areas without assistance and to use all services without difficulty.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)541/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0152/2012
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0094/2012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE480.772
- Committee opinion: PE478.364
- Committee draft report: PE478.395
- Committee draft report: PE478.395
- Committee opinion: PE478.364
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE480.772
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)541/2
Activities
- Philip BRADBOURN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore IACOLINO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hubert PIRKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Phil PRENDERGAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vilja SAVISAAR-TOOMAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
207 |
2011/2196(INI)
2011/12/21
REGI
53 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of regional airports in the context of air transport and their role in ensuring territorial, economic and social cohesion in the Union by connecting regions; points out that existing public service obligations should be maintained in order to guarantee the accessibility of regions, such as the outermost regions, peripheral and island regions, that face geographical handicaps; notes the importance of airports, especially of regional airports, which are sometimes the only effective link between a region and the rest of Europe;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission, Member States and regional authorities to take greater account of the fact that good air transport connections are often decisive for the development of the local economy and tourism and fundamental to the rapid transportation of passengers and goods;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission, Member States and regional authorities to take greater account of the fact that good air transport connections are
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission, Member States and regional authorities to take
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission, Member States and regional authorities to take
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission, Member States and regional authorities to take greater account of the fact that good air transport connections are often decisive for the development of tourism and fundamental to the rapid transportation of passengers and goods; recognises the importance of regional airports in improving mobility and interregional connectivity and in helping to make regions more attractive;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission, Member States and regional authorities to take greater account of the fact that good air transport connections are often decisive for the development of tourism or in attracting investors and fundamental to the rapid transportation of passengers and goods, bearing in mind that airports are a major driving force behind economic and regional development;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Highlights the role of regional airports in acting as a hub for innovation clusters, by diminishing location costs for start-ups in geographically remote regions;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises the economic importance of regional airports for job creation, particularly in less-developed or disadvantaged regions; stresses, in that connection, the need to exploit the potential for green jobs more effectively; regrets, however, the high amount of precarious jobs and the small impact on local labour markets;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises the economic importance of regional airports for job creation, particularly in less developed or disadvantaged regions; stresses, in that connection, the need to exploit the potential for green jobs more effectively; maintains, however, that the working conditions of airport staff must be respected, providing for minimum standards of protection, which frequently do not exist where the bulk of the traffic is accounted for by low-cost airlines;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of regional airports in the context of air transport and their role in
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises the economic importance of regional airports for job creation, particularly in less-developed
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises the economic importance of regional airports for job creation, particularly in less-developed or disadvantaged regions;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises the economic importance of regional airports in consolidating the position of European regional economic growth poles; draws attention to the opportunities for job creation,
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to take account of environmental, territorial and meteorological factors when deciding where to locate airports; underlines the importance to use and modernise existing structures before building new ones;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to take account of environmental and meteorological factors and rational criteria when deciding where to locate airports;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to take account of environmental and meteorological factors when
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to take account, in addition to economic and financial considerations, of environmental and meteorological factors when deciding where to locate airports;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States and regional
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers it particularly important to employ intermodal solutions where possible; takes the view that
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers it particularly important to employ intermodal solutions where possible; takes the view that r
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of regional airports in the context of air transport and their role in ensuring territorial, economic and social cohesion in the Union by connecting regions; points out that existing public service obligations should be maintained in order to guarantee the accessibility of regions, such as peripheral
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers it particularly important to employ intermodal solutions where possible; takes the view that rail links between airports should be developed, as they offer an ideal way of easing the capacity problems of the airports concerned; believes that better connections between regional airports and local rail or tram services could be environmentally beneficial and help to rationalise regional transport as a whole;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers it particularly important to employ intermodal transport solutions where possible; takes the view th
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers it particularly important to employ intermodal solutions where possible; takes the view that rail links between airports should be developed, as they offer an ideal way of easing the capacity problems of the airports concerned; asks that the particular situation of some regions in which the development of intermodality is affected by their physical and natural characteristics, such as the outermost regions, should not be neglected;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers it particularly important to employ intermodal solutions where possible; takes the view that
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers it particularly important to employ intermodal solutions where possible; takes the view that rail links between airports should be developed, as they offer an ideal way of easing the capacity problems of the airports concerned; recognises the possible contribution of regional airports to easing passenger transport congestion, thereby relieving overcrowded airports, and to the diversification of air transport routes; urges the Member State authorities to propose plans to develop existing regional airports and make them more efficient;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that the modernisation and development of airports is extremely expensive and that the amounts earmarked for this purpose are generally far from sufficient to stimulate the competitiveness of European airports, eliminate capacity bottlenecks and hence increase air transport efficiency and improve the quality-price ratio for passenger and goods transport.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes the view that the building and expansion of regional airports and related infrastructure should be properly supported by national and regional authorities and receive appropriate financing under the TEN-T Networks, the Cohesion Fund and the ERDF, for all categories of regions throughout the 2014-2020 programming period;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes the view that the building and expansion of regional airports and related infrastructure should be properly supported by national and regional authorities and
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes the view that
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes the view that the building and expansion of regional airports and related infrastructure should be properly supported by national and regional authorities and receive appropriate financing under the TEN-T Networks, the Cohesion Fund and the ERDF, in the new programming framework currently being assessed;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of regional
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes the view that the preservation, building and expansion of regional airports and related infrastructure
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes the view that the building and expansion of regional airports and related infrastructure should be properly supported by national and regional authorities and receive appropriate financing under the TEN-T Networks, the Cohesion Fund and the ERDF; recommends that the Commission bear in mind the opportunities offered by regional airports as part of the European central transport network encompassed by the Connecting Europe Facility;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes the view that the building and expansion of regional airports and related infrastructure should be properly supported by national and regional authorities and receive appropriate financing under the TEN-T Networks, the Cohesion Fund and the ERDF, as well as other EU-funded financial engineering instruments;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Asks the Commission to ensure that regional cargo airports, as well as passenger airports, are included in EU programmes; stresses that cargo airports might still be vital to regional development even if a regional passenger airport is seen as unviable;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that the development of regional airports should be taken into account in the context of actions under the territorial cooperation objective in order to promote balance among the regions in terms of access to airports and the coordinated development of a network of transport links, with a view to territorial cohesion;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to ensure that, in accordance with a specific territorial assessment, airports are included in regional spatial development plans or taken into account in regional development strategies
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to ensure that, in accordance with a specific territorial assessment, airports are included in regional spatial development plans
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to ensure that, in accordance with a specific territorial assessment taking account of cross-border cooperation, airports are included in regional spatial development plans or taken into account in regional development strategies.
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to ensure that, in accordance with a specific territorial assessment, airports are included in regional spatial development plans
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to ensure that, in accordance with a specific territorial assessment, airports are
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of regional airports in the context of air transport and their role in ensuring territorial, economic and social cohesion in the Union by connecting regions; points out that existing public service obligations should be maintained in order to guarantee the accessibility and territorial continuity of regions, such as peripheral, outermost and island regions, that face geographical handicaps particularly as a result of their remoteness; notes the importance of airports, especially of regional airports,
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to ensure that, in accordance with a specific territorial assessment, airports are included in regional spatial development plans or taken into account in regional development strategies
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out the importance of drawing up, planning and implementing joint cross-border strategies relating to development and access to airport infrastructure; highlights the importance of European territorial cooperation in achieving these coordinated strategies, and the urgency of certain cross-border investments; calls for all macro-regional coordination to include an in-depth study of transport integration – in particular as regards air transport – as part of its strategy, in order to achieve genuine social and territorial cohesion.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Urges the Commission, therefore, to pave the way for the establishment of a system of airport charges that goes beyond the simple desire to raise funds and has the requisite effect to ensure the competitiveness of the European air transport system as a whole, paying particular attention to peripheral and island regions;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the importance of increasing the competiveness of the outermost regions and promoting their integration with other regions so as to close the economic gap separating them from the rest of Europe.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of regional airports in the context of air transport and their role in ensuring territorial, economic and social cohesion in the Union by connecting regions; points out that existing public service obligations should be maintained in order to guarantee the accessibility of regions, such as peripheral and island regions, that face geographical handicaps; notes the importance of airports,
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of regional airports in the context of air transport and their role in ensuring territorial, economic
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that regional airports are also needed in the least developed regions of Europe, which lack strong road or rail networks; believes that a minimum air service to national capitals should be provided;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that irrational proliferation of further regional airports would run counter to efficiency and sustainability criteria; maintains on the contrary that existing links should be strengthened, especially in areas (islands, for example) suffering from geographical handicaps; accordingly welcomes any initiative aimed at developing the role of public transport, including transport by road, in promoting links;
source: PE-478.609
2012/02/07
TRAN
154 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas there is currently no adequate definition for the term ‘regional airport’; whereas
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas 90% of Europe’s citizens live in the regions and regional aviation is a key enabler in providing them with mobility and accessibility, particularly in the island and outermost regions, so as to safeguard territorial, economic and social cohesion; whereas it also enables business to move into the regions and to spread economic prosperity;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the need for better integration between modes of transport
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the need for better integration between modes of transport, as well as the fact that traffic share must be determined by the market; urges the Commission to come forward with a communication encouraging industry to develop multi- modal through ticketing between the rail and air sector; points to the fact that schemes of this kind are already in operation, such as the ‘rail and fly’ tickets being offered by certain carriers in Germany; draws attention to the fact that Regulation (EC) No 80/2009 has already established common rules for the use of computerised reservation systems;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the need for better integration between modes of transport, as well as the fact that traffic share must be determined by the market; urges the Commission to come forward with a communication
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses that alternative train/bus travel should at least be able to operate within a fair pricing framework, based on actual costs, compared with short flight connections by low-cost carriers often operating at regional airports;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Believes that the network development plans of the rail and road sector should take into account the location of airports, with the aim of including airports in the ground transport networks being built;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Notes the urgent need to guarantee airport capacity in the European Union so as not to lose competitiveness by comparison with other regions experiencing growth, and thus prevent traffic from shifting to neighbouring regions; takes the view that regional airports can help reduce congestion at Europe's main airports and maintain a leading position;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Notes the need to develop regional airport networks based on integrated connections with the major airports in order to improve the mobility of people and streamline goods transport;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Notes that regional and local authorities, together with the private sector, are best prepared to successfully manage regional airports;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Believes that the European Commission should put in place the necessary legislation in order to liberalise regional airport management and ensure that such airports are not managed in a centralised way in order to increase economic efficiency;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas 90% of Europe’s citizens live in the regions and regional aviation is a key enabler in providing them with mobility; whereas it fosters tourism and the development of related services and also enables business to move into the regions and to spread economic prosperity;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that the cost of implementing security measures at smaller regional airports is proportionally higher than at major airports, which benefit from economies of scale; believes, in this connection, that costs should be more evenly shared between passengers
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that the cost of implementing security measures at smaller regional airports
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that the cost of implementing security measures at smaller regional airports is proportionally higher than at major airports, which benefit from economies of scale; believes, in this connection, that costs should be more evenly shared between passengers, airports and general taxation, and that this should be one of the criteria for determining the level of airport charges;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that the cost of implementing security measures at smaller regional airports is proportionally higher than at major airports, which benefit from economies of scale; believes, in this connection, that costs should be more evenly shared between
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that the cost of implementing security measures at smaller regional
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that the cost of implementing security measures at smaller regional airports is proportionally higher than at major airports, which benefit from economies of scale; believes,
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recalls that the EU directive on airport charges4 only covers airports with more than 5 million passengers and/or the biggest airport in each EU Member State;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recalls that the EU directive on airport charges4 only covers airports with more than 5 million passengers and/or the biggest airport in each EU Member State;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Council to adopt a position on aviation security charges
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Council to adopt a position on aviation security charges and believes that more stringent security measures should be paid for
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the unequal material status of citizens and the different levels of infrastructure development result in disparities in the opportunity to use regional flight connections in the Member States;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Council to adopt a position on aviation security charges and believes that more stringent security measures should be paid
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Acknowledges the need for reliable
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Acknowledges the need for reliable LAG (liquids, aerosols and gels) screening equipment
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Urges the Commission and Member States to ensure that the development of regional airports is limited to the absolute minimum, i.e. that it is neither hampered nor promoted at the expense of the development of more sustainable modes of transport such as rail and water transport;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Points out that a well-developed network of regional airports will also improve passenger safety, by ensuring, among other things, that a network of emergency or alternative airports is available in the event of a deterioration in the weather or other circumstances;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Considers it vital to incorporate freight transport specialisation as an essential element that will contribute to the planning of the airport map and optimise the use of available infrastructure; points out that appropriate use of this principle, together with the appropriate handling of slots to segment passenger and freight transport, should help to avoid saturation at main airports; highlights the important role played by regional airports in this strategy;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Strongly believes that major regional airports with consistent year-round traffic should be included in the planning deliberations for the TEN-T Core Network, especially those with high- volume connectivity with third countries and intra-European traffic and those regional airports which can serve to relieve bottlenecks;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Strongly believes that major regional airports with consistent year-round traffic should be included in the extended TEN-T
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Strongly believes that major regional airports with consistent year-round traffic, which make a demonstrable contribution to economic development, revitalisation of industry and employment in their region, should be included in the TEN-T Core Network, especially those with high-
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Firmly believes that the development of regional airports should be encouraged primarily in regions lacking in other forms of transport connections;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Considers the development of regional airports to be a priority in regions where connections using other modes of transport are lacking;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Emphasises that regional airports in trans-border regions which are located in close proximity to each other should demonstrate cooperation and coordination in the use of existing capacities as a precondition for EU co- financing by TEN-T, cohesion and regional funds;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets that the Commission has not paid attention to the request from Parliament and the Council in Article 10(4) of Decision 884/2004/EC for regional airports to be connected to the network, especially in view of the need for air transport services to Europe's regions to be ensured alongside the development of high-speed rail services, as air transport can in certain circumstances reach further and serve thinner markets more efficiently in terms of time
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the connectivity offered by aviation to
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets that the Commission has not paid attention to the request from Parliament and the Council in Article 10(4) of Decision 884/2004/EC for regional airports to be connected to the network, especially in view of the need for air transport services to Europe's regions to be ensured alongside the development of
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets that the Commission has not paid attention to the request from Parliament and the Council in Article 10(4) of Decision 884/2004/EC for regional airports to be connected to the network, especially in view of the need for air transport services to Europe’s regions to be ensured alongside the development of high-speed rail services
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Regrets that the Commission has not paid attention to the request from Parliament and the Council in Article 10(4) of Decision 884/2004/EC for regional airports to be connected to the network, especially in view of the need for air transport services to Europe's regions to be ensured alongside the development of high-speed rail services, as air transport can in certain circumstances reach further and serve thinner markets more efficiently in terms of time, cost and environmental impact; therefore highlights the great importance of connecting high-speed and long-distance rail services to airports;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Believes that a broader inclusion of main and regional airports in the new TEN-T guidelines and action to promote their intermodality both with priority high-speed rail networks and adequate links with regular road transport services to and from the main population centres in their hinterland will facilitate access to private financing for airport infrastructure projects and send a positive signal to capital markets; calls on the Commission, during its review of the TEN-T, to recognise the vital link between regional air services and economic regeneration;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Considers it crucial to include regional authorities in the debates and procedures that are to lead to the planning and improved utilisation of European airport infrastructure in order to improve the information available, encourage participation and transparency in decision-making and replace bad competition practices between regional airports with a search for synergies between complementary infrastructures;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes the tendency of certain air carriers, especially low cost carriers (LCCs), to add
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes the tendency of certain air carriers, especially low cost carriers (LCCs), to add unavoidable charges on to the headline price of air tickets, such as charges for the use of debit or credit cards, and considers that this makes it more difficult to compare fares between airlines; is concerned that, as a result, some passengers may be deterred from using regional air services;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes the tendency of certain air carriers, especially low cost carriers (LCCs), to add unavoidable charges on to the headline price of air tickets, such as charges for the use of debit or credit cards, which are charges deriving from the application of Community legislation that airlines pass on to passengers; is concerned that, as a result, some passengers may be deterred from using regional air services; wishes to see special attention paid to the impact of this practice on regional air services during the revision of air passenger rights;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the connectivity offered by aviation to EU regions, citizens and businesses is
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Points out that, while in some aircraft the stowage can be limited, there are no common guidelines for hand or hold baggage size or weight on EU flights;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Points out that, while in some aircraft the stowage can be limited, there are no common guidelines for hand or hold baggage size or weight on EU flights; suggests that the Commission encourage industry to set common upper limits for restrictions, as this would give passengers greater certainty when travelling; suggests also that a standardised system of charges should be established per kg in excess of the authorised weight for baggage, which should in any case be lower than the charges currently applied; believes that, for such an arrangement to work in a global market, the ICAO must be involved in this process;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Suggests that the amount chargeable by airlines for excess and overweight baggage should be capped;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Stresses that, thanks to the small size of their terminals, compactness and organisation, regional airports represent added value for passengers with reduced mobility, passengers travelling with their families, etc.; calls on the Commission, airports and other stakeholders to take the design and construction of terminals that are more accessible and welcoming for passengers as their example;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. All statistical data on regional airports shall be released in order to improve their management;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the connectivity offered by aviation to EU regions, citizens and businesses is unique and cannot be replaced; whereas Europe's airports provide a network of 150 000 city
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the connectivity offered by aviation to EU regions, citizens and businesses is
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas an expansion of Europe's high-speed rail network can be economically and environmentally more viable than creating new regional airports;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas travelling by train contributes on average to a near threefold reduction in energy consumption and CO2 emissions, compared with travelling by plane;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas there is currently no
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas national airports situated in remote areas are often unable fully to function as the national airport of a given country, particularly as the national transport systems and intermodality of systems in such countries are frequently not sufficiently developed and access to national airports can be difficult due to their geographical locations;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. Observes that a considerable number of regional airports are confronted by an airline with a virtual monopoly which can exploit this position to exert pressure by making more and more demands of the airport concerned and of local and/or regional authorities, inter alia with regard to airport charges and aviation safety levies;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas airport retail sales have decreased by 40% due to the introduction of restrictive policies for hand-luggage by some airlines; whereas the impact of the ‘one bag’ rule has been to bring about a decline in ground-based retail sales of almost 70% for some regional airports; whereas 32% of retail profit in airports goes towards subsidising airlines via landing charges;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas airport retail sales have decreased
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas airport retail sales have decreased by 40% due to the introduction of restrictive policies for hand-luggage by some airlines; whereas the impact of the ‘one bag’ rule
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. acknowledges that
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. acknowledges that Europe is
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. notes that the financial and sovereign debt crisis has substantially changed the conditions for airport financing in the EU, especially at non-hub airports, and stresses therefore the need for a rational approach to the introduction of new legal solutions safeguarding regional airports against economically irrational burdens;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas in order to enhance economic efficiency, regional airports should not be managed by a centralised entity;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas regional airports should be mainly managed by regional and local authorities and the private sector;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas there is currently no adequate definition for the term ‘regional airport’; whereas, therefore, for the purposes of this report, regional airports shall be defined as ‘non-hub’ airports, using their own city code, regardless of passenger throughput, and ‘regional air service’ shall be defined as a flight departing from and/or landing at a regional airport;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G c (new) Gc. whereas the construction of new regional airports should be based on a cost-benefit analysis;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G d (new) Gd. whereas transparency in statistical passenger data is key for the development of regional airports;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G e (new) Ge. whereas investment from the public sector in the reforming of airports shall display a certain relationship between the amount of money spent and the number of passengers using the infrastructure;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Understands the need for a public service obligation for air services of economic interest, especially those connecting remote regions and islands;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Understands the need for a public service obligation for air services of economic interest, especially those connecting re
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Understands the need for a public service obligation for air services of economic and public interest, especially those connecting remote regions and islands; believes that such services would not be economically viable without public money;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Understands the need for a public service obligation for air services of economic interest, especially those connecting remote, peripheral and underdeveloped regions and islands; believes that such services would not be economically viable without public money;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Understands the need for a public service
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that public funding for regional airports should be compatible with Articles 106 and 107 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, relating to state aid; considers also that airlines which receive public funding for regional airports directly or indirectly should be required to remain in the airport for a length of time directly proportional to the ratio between the amount of funding provided and the airport’s passenger volume; Provision should be made for a system of penalties to be applied to airlines which move out of regional airports in receipt of funding before the appointed date;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas it will be essential in the ongoing debate on regional airports to determine their various roles and in particular to distinguish between island airports, airports in cities, seasonal airports and airports serving inaccessible or economically weak regions;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Believes that it is desirable to avoid a proliferation of regional airports, and notes that the development of regional airports should be targeted to a specific and well-defined scope, in order to avoid the creation of unused or not efficiently used airport infrastructures which would result in an economic burden for the responsible authorities and could alter competition with the main hubs;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls for the criteria on obtaining subsidies and public funding to be strictly defined and transparent;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to take a balanced approach in future revisions of aviation guidelines in order to provide for a socially, environmentally and economically
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to take a balanced approach in future revisions of aviation guidelines in order to provide for a socially and economically viable development of regional air services, taking into account the environmental impact of air transport;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to take a balanced approach in future revisions of aviation guidelines in order to provide for a socially
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to take a balanced approach in future revisions of aviation guidelines in order to provide for a socially and economically viable development of regional air services and ensure equal access to those services for EU citizens;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to take a balanced approach in future revisions of
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that adequate development of regional airports contributes to parallel development of the tourist system, which is a vitally important area for many European regions; calls for airport staff to benefit from decent contractual terms, with particular reference to airports in which most of the traffic is accounted for by low-cost airlines;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission, in supporting the development of regional airports and the construction of new regional airports – especially in countries whose national airports are situated in remote areas – to pay particular regard to the balanced territorial development of NUTS 1 and NUTS 2 regions in order to ensure innovation and competitiveness in regions which are a long way from the capital city and do not enjoy good transport access, and to facilitate the development of real economic and transport hubs;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to guarantee the correct application of European and national legislation on airlines’ social conditions and terms of employment, so that staff employed at a regional airport do not become victims of social dumping and so that fair competition and a level playing field can be ensured in the aviation sector;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. Recalls the goals of the Transport White Paper, particularly that by 2050 the majority of medium-distance passenger transport should go by rail;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that some regional airports are operational only during mass tourism seasons, which often poses an added problem of organisation, involves higher unit costs, etc.; calls on the Commission to take account of the specific nature and problems of these seasonal regional airports when adopting new legislation for the sector;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines that regional airports are becoming more and more important for charter airlines as well as for low cost carriers; stresses that the main rationale today for charter airlines is as long-haul operators to holiday destinations, with an inferior seat pitch and in-flight service compared with scheduled legacy airlines, often from regional airports that cannot support a scheduled service and flying beyond the competitive reach of low-cost airlines with their short-haul aircraft;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the companies responsible for the management of regional airports to make the necessary structural alterations to accommodate disabled people so as to enable them to access the various airport areas without assistance and to use all services without difficulty;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Highlights the fact that the imposition of a tax on a per-aircraft basis could result in airlines focusing on routes with a high load factor, to the detriment of thinner routes serving regional airports;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Recalls that narrow-body aircraft are favoured on short-haul routes, especially where network carriers are feeding hubs from regional airports and by low-cost carriers (LCCs);
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Understands that commercial activities are a major source of income for regional airports and is concerned by ‘one-bag’ and
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Understands that commercial activities are a major source of income for regional airports and is concerned by ‘one-bag’ and other restrictions to the cabin baggage allowance imposed by certain airlines; deplores the fact that it threatens the viability of retail sales as a source of airport revenue for regional airports that have negotiated competitive landing charges to attract airlines; believes that these restrictions may constitute an abuse of a carrier’s position; calls, therefore, on the Member States to set common upper limits to be imposed on airlines with regard to such restrictions;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Understands that commercial activities are a major source of income for regional airports and is concerned by ‘one-bag’ and other restrictions to the cabin baggage allowance imposed by certain airlines; takes the view that these practices represent a breach of competition law and deplores the fact that it threatens the viability of retail sales as a source of airport revenue for regional airports that have negotiated competitive landing charges to attract airlines; believes that these restrictions may constitute an abuse of a carrier’s position;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Understands that commercial activities are a major source of income for regional airports and is concerned by ‘one-bag’ and other restrictions to the cabin baggage allowance imposed by certain airlines, and by bad practices under which unavoidable charges are added to ticket prices; takes the view that these practices are incompatible with the financial efforts being made to encourage these airlines to operate from certain airports and believes that such practices should be penalised; deplores the fact that it threatens the viability of retail sales as a source of airport revenue for regional airports that have negotiated competitive landing charges to attract airlines; believes that these restrictions may constitute an abuse of a carrier’s position;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Expresses concern at the current practice of low-cost airlines, which often operate from regional airports, of taking advantage of their dominant position to pursue aggressive business practices which are increasingly resulting in a poorer quality of service for passengers and a deterioration in working conditions for staff;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas regional airports play a vital role of furthering EU cohesion policy, as an important means of ensuring the accessibility and territorial integration of geographically disadvantaged areas, such as outlying and island regions;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that checks relating to restrictions on luggage weight and size should only be made at check-in or during security checks and not on arrival at the gate
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Asks the Commission to review decision 2012/21/EU on the application of Article 106(2), by means of which the threshold for which an airport can receive State Aid without having to notify the Commission was decreased to 200 000 passengers per year, bearing in mind the Community Guidelines (2005/C312/01) which state that an airport can become cost-efficient with a traffic of over 500 000 passengers per year;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Considers that goods transport is a positive factor for regional airports which can further development and jobs, not least through the establishment of related ground services and of businesses linked to regional airports; calls on the Commission to draw up a strategy that will promote goods transport and facilitate cooperation between neighbouring regional airports;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Believes that regional airports should not be enhancing tools for public deficits and should generally be economically sustainable in the mid term;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that some airlines charge fees for check-in baggage which often seem disproportionately high and calls on the Commission, with regard to the practices set out in point 3 and to fair and transparent pricing policy, to investigate this practice;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that some air operators operate almost exclusively from regional airports, imposing abusive conditions on airport operators and hampering access by other airlines; calls on the Commission to look into this situation and propose corresponding measures;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission and Member States to speed up the development of the SESAR
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission and Member States to speed up the development of the SESAR and
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission and Member States to speed up the development of SESAR and the Single European Sky as a matter of urgency; stresses that the sweeping cuts to public investment must not affect the development of this project nor the deployment made necessary by the launching of the European geostationary navigation overlay service (EGNOS); notes that, with the work of SESAR and the important role of EGNOS, regional airports will profit from projects such as remote towers, enhanced capacity, more rational flight routes and improved operational procedures;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges that capacity management is not the same at ‘slot
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas certain terms, notably ‘extraordinary circumstances’ and ‘delay’, should have a standard interpretation, and whereas the Commission should carry out an immediate review of Regulation No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges that capacity management is not the same at ‘slot coordinated’ airports as at ‘slot non- coordinated’ airports; is of the opinion that there is plenty of spare capacity to be utilised at many regional airports and that, by using that spare capacity, congestion and stacking at major airports can be reduced and the environmental impact
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges that airport capacity, flexibility and airspace capacity management is not the same at ‘slot coordinated’ airports as at ‘slot non- coordinated’ airports; is of the opinion that there is plenty of spare airport capacity, flexibility and airspace capacity to be
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges that capacity management is not the same at ‘slot coordinated’ airports as at ‘slot non- coordinated’ airports; is of the opinion that there is plenty of spare capacity to be utilised at many regional airports and that, by using that spare capacity, congestion and stacking at major airports can be reduced and the environmental impact minimised; considers it vital, therefore, to move towards a European airport map that will integrate regional infrastructure; believes that its development should take account of available airport capacity, including the capacity of regional airports, and incorporate it into the planning of the European transport system taking into consideration the quality of infrastructure, possibilities for specialisation and opportunities for intermodality;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges that capacity management is not the same at ‘slot coordinated’ airports as at ‘slot non- coordinated’ airports; is of the opinion that there is plenty of spare capacity to be utilised at many regional airports and that, by using that spare capacity, congestion and stacking at major airports can be reduced and the environmental impact minimised; recognises that good connections between main airports and nearby regional airports can help to reduce congestion;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Urges the Commission and Member States to invest more in Research and Development and pilot projects together with the industry, particularly concerning alternative fuels;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Member States and local and regional authorities to use and modernise existing facilities before building new ones; calls for due account to be taken of the environmental, meteorological, territorial and geological features of the area concerned in any decision to construct or extend airport facilities;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to take a rational approach to the administrative and legal regulation of slot management at regional airports, the lack of which could restrict the network;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission, given that major hub airports are close to maximum capacity, to draw up a strategy for the allocation of regional airport slots in order to attract new airlines, and promote competition, decongestion of major airports and the development of regional airports;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses that short-haul flights are the most damaging and CO2-emitting modes of transport; believes that alternatives to drive down CO2 emissions such as high- speed rail links should be encouraged for regions to develop;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the Commission study on the allocation of slots states that the ‘European regions are losing direct links to some of the most congested airports’, and is disappointed that this study deals only with major airports; therefore suggests that the scope of the study be extended to regional airports;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the Commission study on the allocation of slots states that the ‘European regions are losing direct links to some of the most congested airports’3, and is disappointed that this study deals only with major airports; calls on the Commission to promote connections between regional airports and main airports in the Member States, which constitutes one solution to the problem of air traffic congestion in Europe;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the Commission study on the allocation of slots states that the ‘European regions are losing direct links to some of the most congested airports’3, and is disappointed that this study deals only with major airports; calls on the Member States and the Commission to improve, as far as possible, the connectivity of regional airports to the hub airports, thereby helping to boost the economy in the areas around regional airports;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Urges all parties and institutions involved in the revision of Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 (as amended by Regulation (EC) No 793/2004) to focus on
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport network on the ground; believes that improved interlinking of regional airports with other parts of the transport network will lead to greater use of regional airports when hub airports are suffering capacity bottlenecks, as efficient comodality will ensure prompt onward travel;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport network on the ground; calls for more investment in these strategically important connections, particularly with regard to the improved multimodal mobility highlighted in the Commission’s White Paper on Transport;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the rail transport network
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport network on the ground; supports, therefore, the development of measures under the territorial cooperation objective to promote airport links to the transport network;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport network on the ground; encourages the Member States to develop their intermodal policies in this regard, in order to establish quick, sustainable and affordable connections between urban centres and their nearest regional airport;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport network on the ground; calls for the development of rail links between airports in order to lessen the capacity problems of airports and ease user mobility;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas 90% of Europe's citizens live in the regions and
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport network on the ground, particularly to rail transport;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport network on the ground and encourages local and regional authorities to come forward with plans for sustainable mobility that establish an efficient logistics chain; proposes that an exchange of good practice be organised in the field of links between regional airports and urban centres;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets that regional airports situated away from urban centres are often not adequately connected to the transport network on the ground; considers that an adequate network of links between regional airports, rail transport and road transport is essential to the development of the airports themselves and the surrounding region; calls on the Commission to draw up a strategy to promote intermodal transport and the linking up of regional airports with the TEN-T networks;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that the lack of decisive action to increase the accessibility of regional airports by means of appropriate communication with urban centres, including through transport infrastructure investments, is restricting the economic and social development of the regions;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Considers that priority must be given to creating effective links between regional airports and major airports by facilitating passenger throughput with a view to promoting the development of regional airports and helping to decongest major airports;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the need for better integration between modes of transport, as well as the fact that traffic share must be determined by the market, provided that it operates under uniform conditions with regard to combined transport and the environment, including complete internalisation of external costs; urges the Commission to come forward with a communication encouraging industry to develop multi- modal through ticketing between the rail and air sector; points to the fact that schemes of this kind are already in operation, such as the ‘rail and fly’ tickets being offered
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the need for better integration between modes of transport
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the need for better integration between modes of transport, as well as the fact that traffic share must be determined by the market; urges the Commission to come forward with a communication encouraging industry to develop multi- modal through ticketing between the rail and air sector; points to the fact that schemes of this kind are already in operation, such as the ‘rail and fly’ tickets being offered by certain carriers in
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the need for better integration between modes of transport, as well as the fact that traffic share must be determined by the market; urges the Commission to come forward with a communication encouraging industry to develop multi- modal through ticketing between the rail and air sector; points to the fact that schemes of this kind are already in operation, such as the ‘rail and fly’ tickets being offered by certain carriers in
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the need for better integration between modes of transport, as well as the fact that traffic share must be determined by the market, provided that the market functions equitably from the standpoint of the environment and intermodality, including through the full externalisation of all internal costs; urges the Commission to come forward with a communication encouraging industry to develop multi- modal through ticketing between the rail, road and air sectors; points to the fact that schemes of this kind are already in operation, such as the ‘rail, coach and fly’ tickets being offered by certain carriers
source: PE-480.772
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/3/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=21422&j=0&l=en
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.395New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-478395_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.364&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-478364_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.772New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-480772_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120509&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-05-09-TOC_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-94&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0094_EN.html |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-152New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0152_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/7/06914New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|