Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó ( PPE) | KLEVA KEKUŠ Mojca ( S&D), SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros ( ALDE), GIEGOLD Sven ( Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113Events
PURPOSE: to simplify, modernise and harmonise VAT rules applicable to vouchers.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Directive (EU) 2016/1065 of 27 June 2016 amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the treatment of vouchers.
CONTENT: the new directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC (the VAT Directive) lays down specific rules regarding the VAT treatment of vouchers.
In view of the new rules on the place of supply for telecommunications, broadcasting and electronically supplied services which are applicable since 1 January 2015, the directive offers a common solution for vouchers in order to ensure that mismatches do not occur in respect of vouchers supplied between Member States.
Identification of what constitute vouchers: to identify clearly what constitutes a voucher for the purposes of VAT and to distinguish vouchers from payment instruments, the directive harmonises the definition of vouchers . Vouchers may have physical or electronic forms, recognising their essential attributes, in particular the nature of the entitlement attached to them and the obligation to accept them in return for the supply of goods or services.
The directive distinguishes between (i) a single-purpose voucher which is a voucher where the place of supply of the goods or services to which the voucher relates, and the VAT due on those goods or services, are known at the time of issue of the voucher, and (ii) a multi-purpose voucher . It sets out the rules determining the taxable value of transactions in both cases:
· where the VAT treatment attributable to the underlying supply of goods or services can be determined with certainty already upon issue of a single-purpose voucher, VAT should be charged on each transfer, including on the issue of the single-purpose voucher;
· for multi-purpose vouchers, VAT should be charged when the goods or services to which the voucher relates are supplied. Against this background, any prior transfer of multi-purpose vouchers should not be subject to VAT.
Only vouchers which can be used for redemption against goods or services are affected by these rules. The provisions regarding vouchers should not trigger any change in the VAT treatment of transport tickets, admission tickets to cinemas and museums, postage stamps or similar.
Report: no later than 31 December 2022, the Commission shall, on the basis of information obtained from the Member States, present an assessment report on the application of the provisions of this Directive, with particular regard to the definition of vouchers, the VAT rules relating to taxation of vouchers in the distribution chain and to non-redeemed vouchers, accompanied, where necessary, by an appropriate proposal to amend the relevant rules.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 2.7.2016.
TRANPOSITION: by 31.12.2018. The provisions of the directive only apply to vouchers issued after this date.
APPLICATION: from 1.1.2019.
The European Parliament adopted by 602 votes to 24, with 37 abstentions, in the framework of a special legislative procedure (Parliament consultation), a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of vouchers.
Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended:
Scope, transparency and neutrality : a new recital states that in order to eradicate opportunities for tax evasion and tax fraud, to increase VAT collection from vouchers and hence increase public revenue, it is necessary to reinforce the scope, neutrality and transparency with regard to tax treatment of transactions involving vouchers.
Members also propose clarifying the different definitions :
“place of supply” : shall mean the Member State in which the underlying supply of goods or services takes place; “multi-purpose voucher” : shall mean any voucher, other than a discount or rebate voucher, which does not constitute a single-purpose voucher and which entitles the holder to receive goods or services where neither those goods or services nor the place of supply of the Member State where they are to be taxed are sufficiently identified and, as a consequence, the VAT treatment of the voucher cannot be determined with certainty at the date of the sale or issuance; “discount voucher” : means a voucher carrying a right to receive a price discount or rebate with regard to a supply of goods or services which is expressed either as a percentage or as a fixed amount with a nominal value.
Taxable amount : an amendment stipulates that the taxable amount of the supply of goods or services redeemed against a multi-purpose voucher shall be equal to the nominal value of that voucher in fact used to acquire those goods and services.
Review : by 1 January 2017, the Commission shall review the application of Directive 2006/112/EC on its economic and fiscal impact. That report shall include an analysis of the impact of this Directive on the economies of the Member States.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, in the framework of a special legislative procedure (Parliament consultation), the report by Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ (EPP, HU) on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of vouchers.
The committee suggested amending the Commission proposal as follows:
Scope, transparency and neutrality : a new recital states that in order to eradicate opportunities for tax evasion and tax fraud, to increase VAT collection from vouchers and hence increase public revenue, it is necessary to reinforce the scope, neutrality and transparency with regard to tax treatment of transactions involving vouchers.
Members also propose clarifying the different definitions :
“place of supply” : shall mean the Member State in which the underlying supply of goods or services takes place; “multi-purpose voucher” : shall mean any voucher, other than a discount or rebate voucher, which does not constitute a single-purpose voucher and which entitles the holder to receive goods or services where neither those goods or services nor the place of supply of the Member State where they are to be taxed are sufficiently identified and, as a consequence, the VAT treatment of the voucher cannot be determined with certainty at the date of the sale or issuance; “discount voucher” : means a voucher carrying a right to receive a price discount or rebate with regard to a supply of goods or services which is expressed either as a percentage or as a fixed amount with a nominal value.
Review : by 1 January 2017, the Commission shall review the application of Directive 2006/112/EC on its economic and fiscal impact. That report shall include an analysis of the impact of this Directive on the economies of the Member States.
PURPOSE: to clarify and harmonise the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
BACKGROUND: the world has moved on since common VAT rules were adopted in 1977 and the increased use of vouchers is just one of many changes which have transformed the way in which business is done, introducing complexities which were not envisaged at the time.
Neither the Sixth VAT Directive (Council Directive 77/388/EEC) nor the VAT Directive (Council Directive 2006/112/EC) provide for rules on the treatment of transactions involving vouchers.
For the purposes of the VAT rules, a voucher is an instrument which gives the holder a right to goods or services, or to receive a discount or rebate in relation to a supply of goods or services. The issuer assumes an obligation to supply goods or services, to give a discount or pay a rebate.
A voucher may be in electronic or physical form and generally has an underlying commercial or promotional objective, which may be to promote the supply of particular goods or services or to expedite the payment for particular goods or services. Vouchers come in different types. Some are issued against consideration and today can be taxed either at sale or at redemption, depending on the approach of individual Member States. A voucher may also be issued for free and entitle the holder to the supply of goods or services without further charge.
The absence of common rules has obliged Member States to develop their own solutions, inevitably uncoordinated. The resultant mismatches in taxation cause problems such as double or non-taxation but also contribute to tax avoidance and form barriers to business innovation.
The Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) has on several occasions been asked to explain how the VA Directives should apply in such circumstances. For vouchers, this process has given some guidance but has left other problems unresolved. The objective of this proposal is to deal with these issues by clarifying and harmonising the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the proposal is accompanied by an Impact Assessment. It concludes that the only realistic way to deal with the identified shortcomings is a modernisation of the VAT Directive by inserting new provisions which deal with vouchers . A study undertaken made by Deloitte is included as an annex to the Impact Assessment. It sustains the economic justification for making this legislative proposal, in particular the actual and potential consequences from mismatches between Member States.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: the proposal consists of several amendments to the VAT Directive aimed to define clearly the different types of vouchers and to harmonise their VAT treatment . In making this legislative proposal, the search is for clarity. This should extend to the tax consequences of the different types of vouchers when issued, distributed or redeemed, either within a single Member State or in operations which extend to more than one Member State.
To solve these problems, changes to the VAT Directive are envisaged. They fall under five headings :
1. Defining vouchers for VAT purposes : the VAT Directive needs to be clear about which vouchers are to be taxed when issued and which are to be taxed only when redeemed. The former are described as ‘single-purpose vouchers’ and the latter as ‘multi-purpose vouchers’. This distinction hinges on whether the information is available to tax on issue or whether, because their end-use is subject to choice, taxation has to await redemption.
2. Time of taxation : the current rules on the time of chargeability of the tax (in Article 65) should be adjusted to ensure that single-purpose vouchers (SPVs) are subject to VAT at the time they are issued and paid for.
To avoid confusion, the supply of the right which is inherent in a voucher and the underlying supply of goods or services cannot be regarded as separate transactions. SPVs are taxed from the outset so this potential problem will not arise. For vouchers which are not taxed when issued because the place and level of taxation cannot yet be established, tax should only be charged when the underlying goods or services are supplied. To make sure this happens, and that only this happens, a new Article 30b is proposed. This makes it clear that the issue of a voucher and the subsequent supply of goods or services constitute a single transaction for VAT.
3. Rules for distribution : once the VAT Directive has established that multi-purpose vouchers (MPVs) are to be taxed on redemption, some issues which relate to their distribution need to be addressed.
Since distribution chains for MPVs can extend across several Member States, common rules are necessary for identifying and measuring this distribution service. An additional point makes clear that the distribution is a supply of a service for the purposes of the VAT Directive. The computation of the taxable amount for this service is dealt with in a new Article.
The proposal aims to ensure that the totality of the taxable operations associated with an MPV – the supply of a distribution service and the supply of the underlying goods or services – are described and taxed in a manner which is comprehensive, neutral and transparent.
4. Discount vouchers : difficulties arise with discount vouchers when the discount is ultimately met by the issuer rather than the redeemer. To avoid a complex series of adjustments, it is proposed to treat this discount as a separate supply of a service by the redeemer to the issuer.
5. Other technical or consequential changes : some further technical changes to the VAT Directive will be required to ensure the proper functioning of these solutions, notably as regards the right of deduction (Article 169), the person liable for payment of the tax (Article 193) and other obligations (Article 272). Technical changes are needed to deal correctly with MPVs and SPVs respectively.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implication for the European Union budget.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2016/1065
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 177 01.07.2016, p. 0009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)338
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0175/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0058/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE502.194
- Committee draft report: PE501.925
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1401/2012
- Contribution: COM(2012)0206
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2012)0126
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2012)0127
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2012)0206
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2012)0126
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2012)0127
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1401/2012
- Committee draft report: PE501.925
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE502.194
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)338
- Contribution: COM(2012)0206
Votes
A7-0058/2013 - Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
15 |
2012/0102(CNS)
2013/01/24
ECON
15 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) To ensure certain and uniform treatment and to avoid inconsistencies, distortion of competition, double or non-
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) To
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The VAT treatment of the transactions associated with vouchers is dependent upon the specific characteristics of the voucher. It is therefore necessary to distinguish between various types of vouchers and the distinct definitions need to be
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) A voucher gives the right to receive goods or services or to receive a discount
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Vouchers are frequently distributed through an agent or pass through a distribution chain based on the purchase and the subsequent resale. In order to preserve neutrality, it is essential that the amount of VAT to be paid on the goods or services supplied in return for a voucher, remains intact. To assure this, the nominal value of multi-purpose vouchers should be fixed upon issue.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Vouchers may involve the supply of goods or services across borders. Should the chargeability differ between Member States, this could result in double taxation or non taxation. To prevent such situation and make it clear in which Member State tax must be paid, no derogation from the rule by which VAT is chargeable when the goods or the services are supplied should be allowed.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In so far as the goods or services supplied upon redemption of a voucher are taxed, the taxable person is entitled to deduct the VAT incurred on expenditure in relation to the issue of the voucher, in accordance with the Union legislation in force. It should be clarified that this cost of VAT is deductible even if those goods or services are supplied by someone other than the issuer of the voucher.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive 2006/112/EC Chapter 5 – Article 30a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 “Voucher” shall mean any instrument carrying a right to receive a supply of goods or services, or to receive a price discount or rebate with regard to a supply of goods or services and where there is a corresponding obligation to fulfil this right.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 2006/112/EC Chapter 5 – Article 30a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 “Multi-purpose voucher” shall mean any voucher, other than a discount or rebate voucher, which does not constitute a single-purpose voucher and for which, because the VAT treatment cannot be determined with certainty at the date of the sale or issuance and the end-use is subject to choice, taxation has to await redemption.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 2006/112/EC Chapter 5 – Article 74a – paragraphs 1 1. The taxable amount of the supply of goods or services redeemed against a multi-purpose voucher shall be equal to the nominal value of that voucher effectively used to acquire those goods and services, or in the case of partial redemption, to that part of the nominal value which corresponds to the partial redemption of that voucher, less the amount of VAT related to the goods or services redeemed.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 2006/112/EC Chapter 5 – Article 74a – paragraph 2 2. The nominal value
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 January 2014
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 a (new) Article 2a By 1 January 2017, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the economic and fiscal impact of this Directive, including the fiscal impact in each Member State.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax lays down rules on the time and place of supply of goods and services, the taxable amount, the chargeability of value added tax (VAT) and the entitlement to deduction. Those rules are, however, not sufficiently clear or comprehensive to ensure consistency in the tax treatment of transactions involving vouchers to an extent which has undesirable consequences for the proper functioning of the internal market. In order to eradicate opportunities for tax evasion and tax fraud, to increase VAT collection from vouchers and hence increase public revenue, it is necessary to reinforce the scope, neutrality and transparency with regards to tax treatment of transactions involving vouchers.
source: PE-502.194
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=CNS&year=2012&number=0102&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=CNS&year=2012&number=0102&appLng=EN |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1401)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1401)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE501.925New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-501925_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.194New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-502194_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0058_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0058_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-58&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0058_EN.html |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-175New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0175_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/7/09537New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32016L1065New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32016L1065 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0206/COM_COM(2012)0206_FR.pdfNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=206 |
activities/5 |
|
activities/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting final decisionNew
Procedure completed |
activities/5 |
|
procedure/final |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=206New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0206/COM_COM(2012)0206_FR.pdf |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012PC0206:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0206/COM_COM(2012)0206_FR.pdfNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=206 |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=206New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0206/COM_COM(2012)0206_FR.pdf |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0206/COM_COM(2012)0206_FR.pdfNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=206 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012PC0206:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012PC0206:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012PC0206:EN
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185210fb8127435bdbe8fNew
4f1ac4b7b819f2589600002d |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4dee5a2d0fb8127435be059fNew
4f1adb75b819f207b30000c6 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de185240fb8127435bdbe93New
4f1ac841b819f25efd0000d8 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09New
4f1ac814b819f25efd0000c7 |
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185210fb8127435bdbe8fNew
4f1ac4b7b819f2589600002d |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4dee5a2d0fb8127435be059fNew
4f1adb75b819f207b30000c6 |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de185240fb8127435bdbe93New
4f1ac841b819f25efd0000d8 |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09New
4f1ac814b819f25efd0000c7 |
activities/3/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185210fb8127435bdbe8fNew
4f1ac4b7b819f2589600002d |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4dee5a2d0fb8127435be059fNew
4f1adb75b819f207b30000c6 |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de185240fb8127435bdbe93New
4f1ac841b819f25efd0000d8 |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09New
4f1ac814b819f25efd0000c7 |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185210fb8127435bdbe8fNew
4f1ac4b7b819f2589600002d |
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4dee5a2d0fb8127435be059fNew
4f1adb75b819f207b30000c6 |
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de185240fb8127435bdbe93New
4f1ac841b819f25efd0000d8 |
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09New
4f1ac814b819f25efd0000c7 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
activities/3/committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/1/group |
Old
ALDENew
ALDE |
committees/0/shadows/2/group |
Old
Verts/ALENew
Verts/ALE |
committees/0/shadows/3/group |
Old
ECRNew
ECR |
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2012-09-11T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/2/committees/0/date |
2012-09-11T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/3/committees/0/date |
2012-09-11T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/date |
2012-09-11T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2012-09-11T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/2/committees/0/date |
2012-09-11T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/3/committees/0/date |
2012-09-11T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/date |
2012-09-11T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
ESOCNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2012-11-14T00:00:00New
2012-05-10T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52012AE1401:ENNew
CELEX:52012PC0206:EN |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/title |
Old
CES1401/2012New
COM(2012)0206 |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, reportNew
Legislative proposal published |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eescopinions.eesc.europa.eu/eescopiniondocument.aspx?language=EN&docnr=1401&year=2012New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0206/COM_COM(2012)0206_FR.pdf |
activities/0/type |
Old
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, reportNew
Legislative proposal published |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/8 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012PC0206:EN
|
activities/2/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012AE1401:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012PC0206:EN
|
activities/2/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012AE1401:EN
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/7/docs/0/text |
|
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting final decision |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
8.50.01 Implementation of Community lawNew
8.50.01 Implementation of EU law |
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-58&language=EN
|
activities/7/date |
Old
2013-04-16T00:00:00New
2013-04-17T00:00:00 |
activities/6 |
|
activities/5/committees |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to clarify and harmonise the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers. PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive. BACKGROUND: the world has moved on since common VAT rules were adopted in 1977 and the increased use of vouchers is just one of many changes which have transformed the way in which business is done, introducing complexities which were not envisaged at the time. Neither the Sixth VAT Directive (Council Directive 77/388/EEC) nor the VAT Directive (Council Directive 2006/112/EC) provide for rules on the treatment of transactions involving vouchers. For the purposes of the VAT rules, a voucher is an instrument which gives the holder a right to goods or services, or to receive a discount or rebate in relation to a supply of goods or services. The issuer assumes an obligation to supply goods or services, to give a discount or pay a rebate. A voucher may be in electronic or physical form and generally has an underlying commercial or promotional objective, which may be to promote the supply of particular goods or services or to expedite the payment for particular goods or services. Vouchers come in different types. Some are issued against consideration and today can be taxed either at sale or at redemption, depending on the approach of individual Member States. A voucher may also be issued for free and entitle the holder to the supply of goods or services without further charge. The absence of common rules has obliged Member States to develop their own solutions, inevitably uncoordinated. The resultant mismatches in taxation cause problems such as double or non-taxation but also contribute to tax avoidance and form barriers to business innovation. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has on several occasions been asked to explain how the VA Directives should apply in such circumstances. For vouchers, this process has given some guidance but has left other problems unresolved. The objective of this proposal is to deal with these issues by clarifying and harmonising the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the proposal is accompanied by an Impact Assessment. It concludes that the only realistic way to deal with the identified shortcomings is a modernisation of the VAT Directive by inserting new provisions which deal with vouchers. A study undertaken made by Deloitte is included as an annex to the Impact Assessment. It sustains the economic justification for making this legislative proposal, in particular the actual and potential consequences from mismatches between Member States. LEGAL BASIS: Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the proposal consists of several amendments to the VAT Directive aimed to define clearly the different types of vouchers and to harmonise their VAT treatment. In making this legislative proposal, the search is for clarity. This should extend to the tax consequences of the different types of vouchers when issued, distributed or redeemed, either within a single Member State or in operations which extend to more than one Member State. To solve these problems, changes to the VAT Directive are envisaged. They fall under five headings: 1. Defining vouchers for VAT purposes: the VAT Directive needs to be clear about which vouchers are to be taxed when issued and which are to be taxed only when redeemed. The former are described as single-purpose vouchers and the latter as multi-purpose vouchers. This distinction hinges on whether the information is available to tax on issue or whether, because their end-use is subject to choice, taxation has to await redemption. 2. Time of taxation: the current rules on the time of chargeability of the tax (in Article 65) should be adjusted to ensure that single-purpose vouchers (SPVs) are subject to VAT at the time they are issued and paid for. To avoid confusion, the supply of the right which is inherent in a voucher and the underlying supply of goods or services cannot be regarded as separate transactions. SPVs are taxed from the outset so this potential problem will not arise. For vouchers which are not taxed when issued because the place and level of taxation cannot yet be established, tax should only be charged when the underlying goods or services are supplied. To make sure this happens, and that only this happens, a new Article 30b is proposed. This makes it clear that the issue of a voucher and the subsequent supply of goods or services constitute a single transaction for VAT. 3. Rules for distribution: once the VAT Directive has established that multi-purpose vouchers (MPVs) are to be taxed on redemption, some issues which relate to their distribution need to be addressed. Since distribution chains for MPVs can extend across several Member States, common rules are necessary for identifying and measuring this distribution service. An additional point makes clear that the distribution is a supply of a service for the purposes of the VAT Directive. The computation of the taxable amount for this service is dealt with in a new Article. The proposal aims to ensure that the totality of the taxable operations associated with an MPV the supply of a distribution service and the supply of the underlying goods or services are described and taxed in a manner which is comprehensive, neutral and transparent. 4. Discount vouchers: difficulties arise with discount vouchers when the discount is ultimately met by the issuer rather than the redeemer. To avoid a complex series of adjustments, it is proposed to treat this discount as a separate supply of a service by the redeemer to the issuer. 5. Other technical or consequential changes: some further technical changes to the VAT Directive will be required to ensure the proper functioning of these solutions, notably as regards the right of deduction (Article 169), the person liable for payment of the tax (Article 193) and other obligations (Article 272). Technical changes are needed to deal correctly with MPVs and SPVs respectively. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implication for the European Union budget. New
PURPOSE: to clarify and harmonise the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers. PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive. BACKGROUND: the world has moved on since common VAT rules were adopted in 1977 and the increased use of vouchers is just one of many changes which have transformed the way in which business is done, introducing complexities which were not envisaged at the time. Neither the Sixth VAT Directive (Council Directive 77/388/EEC) nor the VAT Directive (Council Directive 2006/112/EC) provide for rules on the treatment of transactions involving vouchers. For the purposes of the VAT rules, a voucher is an instrument which gives the holder a right to goods or services, or to receive a discount or rebate in relation to a supply of goods or services. The issuer assumes an obligation to supply goods or services, to give a discount or pay a rebate. A voucher may be in electronic or physical form and generally has an underlying commercial or promotional objective, which may be to promote the supply of particular goods or services or to expedite the payment for particular goods or services. Vouchers come in different types. Some are issued against consideration and today can be taxed either at sale or at redemption, depending on the approach of individual Member States. A voucher may also be issued for free and entitle the holder to the supply of goods or services without further charge. The absence of common rules has obliged Member States to develop their own solutions, inevitably uncoordinated. The resultant mismatches in taxation cause problems such as double or non-taxation but also contribute to tax avoidance and form barriers to business innovation. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has on several occasions been asked to explain how the VA Directives should apply in such circumstances. For vouchers, this process has given some guidance but has left other problems unresolved. The objective of this proposal is to deal with these issues by clarifying and harmonising the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the proposal is accompanied by an Impact Assessment. It concludes that the only realistic way to deal with the identified shortcomings is a modernisation of the VAT Directive by inserting new provisions which deal with vouchers. A study undertaken made by Deloitte is included as an annex to the Impact Assessment. It sustains the economic justification for making this legislative proposal, in particular the actual and potential consequences from mismatches between Member States. LEGAL BASIS: Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the proposal consists of several amendments to the VAT Directive aimed to define clearly the different types of vouchers and to harmonise their VAT treatment. In making this legislative proposal, the search is for clarity. This should extend to the tax consequences of the different types of vouchers when issued, distributed or redeemed, either within a single Member State or in operations which extend to more than one Member State. To solve these problems, changes to the VAT Directive are envisaged. They fall under five headings: 1. Defining vouchers for VAT purposes: the VAT Directive needs to be clear about which vouchers are to be taxed when issued and which are to be taxed only when redeemed. The former are described as single-purpose vouchers and the latter as multi-purpose vouchers. This distinction hinges on whether the information is available to tax on issue or whether, because their end-use is subject to choice, taxation has to await redemption. 2. Time of taxation: the current rules on the time of chargeability of the tax (in Article 65) should be adjusted to ensure that single-purpose vouchers (SPVs) are subject to VAT at the time they are issued and paid for. To avoid confusion, the supply of the right which is inherent in a voucher and the underlying supply of goods or services cannot be regarded as separate transactions. SPVs are taxed from the outset so this potential problem will not arise. For vouchers which are not taxed when issued because the place and level of taxation cannot yet be established, tax should only be charged when the underlying goods or services are supplied. To make sure this happens, and that only this happens, a new Article 30b is proposed. This makes it clear that the issue of a voucher and the subsequent supply of goods or services constitute a single transaction for VAT. 3. Rules for distribution: once the VAT Directive has established that multi-purpose vouchers (MPVs) are to be taxed on redemption, some issues which relate to their distribution need to be addressed. Since distribution chains for MPVs can extend across several Member States, common rules are necessary for identifying and measuring this distribution service. An additional point makes clear that the distribution is a supply of a service for the purposes of the VAT Directive. The computation of the taxable amount for this service is dealt with in a new Article. The proposal aims to ensure that the totality of the taxable operations associated with an MPV the supply of a distribution service and the supply of the underlying goods or services are described and taxed in a manner which is comprehensive, neutral and transparent. 4. Discount vouchers: difficulties arise with discount vouchers when the discount is ultimately met by the issuer rather than the redeemer. To avoid a complex series of adjustments, it is proposed to treat this discount as a separate supply of a service by the redeemer to the issuer. 5. Other technical or consequential changes: some further technical changes to the VAT Directive will be required to ensure the proper functioning of these solutions, notably as regards the right of deduction (Article 169), the person liable for payment of the tax (Article 193) and other obligations (Article 272). Technical changes are needed to deal correctly with MPVs and SPVs respectively. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implication for the European Union budget. |
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-02-25T00:00:00New
2013-02-26T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.194
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012AE1401:EN
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE501.925
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de186040fb8127435bdbfc9New
4f1ac4c4b819f25896000033 |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/name |
Old
KLEVA MojcaNew
KLEVA KEKUŠ Mojca |
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de186040fb8127435bdbfc9New
4f1ac4c4b819f25896000033 |
committees/0/shadows/0/name |
Old
KLEVA MojcaNew
KLEVA KEKUŠ Mojca |
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-05-24T00:00:00New
2013-04-16T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
EP officialisationNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=206New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0206/COM_COM(2012)0206_FR.pdf |
activities/2 |
|
activities/3/body |
Old
EPNew
ESOC |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-06-12T00:00:00New
2012-11-14T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
S&D |
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de183db0fb8127435bdbcb9New
4de186040fb8127435bdbfc9 |
committees/0/shadows/0/name |
Old
CASA DavidNew
KLEVA Mojca |
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/2/committees/0/date |
2012-09-11T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/date |
2012-09-11T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/0/docs/1 |
|
activities/0/docs/2/url |
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0127:FIN:EN:PDF
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
ECON/7/09537
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/1/title |
Old
COM(2012)0206New
SWD(2012)0127 |
activities/0/docs/1/type |
Old
Legislative proposal publishedNew
Document attached to the procedure |
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|