Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | ECON | ||
Opinion | EMPL | BASTOS Regina (EPP) | |
Lead | JURI | BERLINGUER Luigi (S&D) | THEIN Alexandra (ALDE) |
Legal Basis RoP 042
Activites
- 2013/03/14 Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
-
2013/01/28
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
A7-0018/2013
summary
The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Luigi BERLINGUER (S&D, IT) and Regina BASTOS (EPP, PT) with recommendations to the Commission on the Statute for a European mutual society. The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs exercised its prerogatives as an associated committee under Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure on this report. Members recall that Parliament has adopted several resolutions calling for the adoption of a regulation on the statute for a European mutual society, and they consider it regrettable that the Commission, having withdrawn its proposal for a statute for a European mutual society in 2006, has not brought forward any new proposals which would give mutual societies a suitable legal instrument to facilitate their cross-border activities. The committee underlined the major role mutual societies play in the Union's economy by providing health care, social services and affordable insurance services to more than 160 million European citizens, representing more than EUR 180 billion in insurance premiums and employing over 350 000 people. It insisted, therefore, that mutual societies cannot continue to be forgotten by the single market and should be given a European statute to place them on an equal footing with other forms of undertaking in the Union, noting also that diversity in forms of entrepreneurship is an asset that should be fully encouraged. The statute proposed would create a voluntary scheme in the form of an optional instrument allowing mutual societies to act in different Member States, to be introduced even in countries where they do not currently exist. The committee put forward four detailed draft Recommendations for a European mutual society on the following: (i) the objectives of the statute; (ii) the elements of a statute; (iii) the scope and coverage of a statute; and (iv) governance of European mutual societies.
-
A7-0018/2013
summary
-
2013/01/22
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- 2012/11/29 Amendments tabled in committee
- 2012/10/04 Committee draft report
-
2012/03/15
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
- Committee draft report: PE496.679
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE500.725
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0018/2013
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0094/2013
Amendments | Dossier |
72 |
2012/2039(INI)
2012/10/16
EMPL
58 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the values of mutual societies correspond to the fundamental principles of the European social model; stresses that, as well as being based on values of solidarity, mutual societies are major operators in the social market economy of the European Union and should be given greater recognition, particularly by establishing a European statute;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that retirement and survivor's pensions make up the largest share of social protection expenditure and that population ageing risks putting public expenditure on social protection under pressure; stresses that mutual societies can play an important role proposing socially responsible pension schemes in the private sector, nevertheless they cannot replace a strong first pillar of the pension system;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that mutuals offer additional and affordable opportunities for EU citizens;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that certain Mutual Societies have a very strong voluntary component and that this volunteer ethos must be preserved and facilitated.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the increase in expenditure on health care and pensions could have significant consequences for the continuity and cover of the current social protection schemes
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the increase in expenditure on health care and pensions could have significant consequences for the continuity and cover of the current social protection schemes, which could lead Member States to lower their level of contribution to statutory social protection and to transfer the costs of social security to the private sector; considers that the enhancement of mutual societies’ contribution to the European social market economy should not take place at the expense of Member States’ action on social protection; stresses that the diversity of social protection systems, some of them borne fully by the state, some by the mutual societies and some on a shared basis between the two, should be respected; considers that the statute for a European mutual society is essential but must not be used to make up for Member States’ deficiencies in terms of social protection;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Hopes that it will be made easier for all workers. and in particular for workers in small businesses, to join a mutual society, and that they will be encouraged to do so;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Hopes, in that case, that a worker’s membership of a system of mutual societies will be encouraged by exemptions from social security contributions or by tax relief;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Points out that mutual societies lack the necessary legal instruments to facilitate their development and their cross-border activities within the internal market
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Points out that mutual societies lack the necessary legal instruments to facilitate their development and their cross-border activities within the internal market; underlines that, in absence of a European statute, mutual societies are often obliged to make use of inadequate legal instruments for their cross-border activities leading to their demutualisation;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the values of mutual societies correspond to the fundamental principles of the European social model; reminds that compared to other social economy enterprise forms, mutual societies operate on the principles of voluntary and open membership, equal voting rights (one member one vote), independence and autonomy with no share capital;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Considers that legislation on mutual societies varies considerably within the EU and that the European statue could
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Considers that the European statute could permit the emergence of trans- national mutual society operators, thus strengthening the European social protection model;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that mutual societies do not exist in all Member States; underlines that this creates market distortions; points out that a European statute could remedy this and that it could inspire the creation of mutuals in these Member States;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the European Commission to reintroduce the proposal for a Statute for the European mutual societies;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Welcomes the study commissioned by the European Commission on the current situation and prospects of mutual societies in the EU, which explores the difficulties mutuals have due to the lack of existing legal frameworks in some Member States, for the creation of new mutuals due to capital requirements and the lack of solutions for grouping; calls on the Commission to propose adequate solutions to resolve these problems in order to better recognize the contributions of mutuals to the social economy, including a Statute;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Points out that mutual societies play or should play an important role in the Member States' economies, given that they contribute to the EU's strategic objectives of ensuring
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Points out that mutual societies play an important role in the Member States' economies, given that they contribute to the EU's strategic objectives of ensuring inclusive growth with access to basic resources, to social rights and services for all and to high-quality health care for all on the basis of solidarity, non-discrimination and non-exclusion;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that mutual societies are voluntary groups of persons (natural or legal) whose purpose is to meet the needs of their members rather than achieve a return on investment, they operate according to the principles of solidarity between members and are managed according to democratic principles;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Underlines that the mutual societies have to play an important role in sustainable health through a pro-active prevention policies;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Stresses that the social economy – and mutual societies in particular – plays an essential role in the EU economy, by combining profitability with solidarity, creating high-quality jobs, strengthening social, economic and regional cohesion, generating social capital and promoting active citizenship, solidarity - based social welfare and a type of economy with democratic values which puts people first and supports sustainable development and social, environmental and technological innovation;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Stresses that the social economy – and mutual societies in particular – plays an essential role in the EU economy, by combining profitability with solidarity, creating high-quality, local jobs, strengthening social, economic and regional cohesion, generating social capital and promoting active citizenship, solidarity and a type of economy with democratic values which puts people first and supports sustainable development and social, environmental and technological innovation;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Points out the benefits of the democratic principles governing mutual societies, such as the one member - one vote principle, contributing to responsible and sustainable management;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Points out that mutual societies have a role to play in meeting these challenges alongside the private sector, and that in order to do so they must be able to compete on equal terms with other forms of undertaking in the EU; underlines that the existing European statutes like the European Cooperative (SCE) or the European Company (SE) are not suitable for mutual societies due to the differences between their business models;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Points out that the EU should take the specific nature of the capital of mutuals into account when devising legislation regarding fund requirements; underlines that a European Statute would make it possible to maintain this specificity while allowing to reach more persons through cross-border activity;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Regards as regrettable the gap in EU legislation, as mutual societies are not specifically mentioned in the treaties and respect for their business models is not covered by any secondary legislation, which refers only to public and private enterprises, which undermines the status of mutual societies, their development and the establishment of a cross-border group and therefore believes that Mutual Societies should be included in Article 54 TFEU in order to ensure that the diversity of enterprises is fully anchored in the Treaties;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Regards as regrettable the gap in EU legislation, as mutual societies are not specifically mentioned in the treaties and respect for their business models is not covered by any secondary legislation, which refers only to public and private enterprises, which undermines the status of mutual societies, their development and the establishment of
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Recognises that a number of mutuals do operate with a cooperative legal form and are included as part of the International Co-operative Alliance through their involvement with the International Cooperative and Mutual Insurance Federation.
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Points out that the European statute for a mutual society is essential for achieving better integration in the single market and thereby helping to achieve the growth and employment objectives of the 2020 strategy; stresses that a European statute would also facilitate the mobility of European citizens by enabling Mutual Societies to provide services in several Member States and thus create more continuity and coherence in the single market;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses that two main types of mutual societies exist in Europe, which are 'mutual benefit' (or 'health providence') societies and 'mutual insurance' societies. "Mutual benefit" societies provide welfare coverage supplementary, complementary or integrated into statutory social protection systems. "Mutual insurance" societies can cover all types of property and life risks. In some Member States mutual societies can even provide services in other fields such as housing or credit;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Points out that the European statute for a mutual society is essential for achieving better integration in the single market
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Points out that the European statute for mutual societies would provide a way of promoting the mutualist model throughout an enlarged Europe, especially in the new Member States, where it is not covered by some legal systems. A European regulation, which would naturally be applicable throughout the whole of the European Union, would have the dual advantage of providing these countries with a European reference statute and of contributing to the status and public profile of this kind of undertaking.
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Underlines that the statute could provide opportunities for mutual societies to create economies of scale in order to maintain competitiveness in the future and it would increase recognition of the value of mutual societies within European policy making;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that mutual societies are solid and durable elements which have better withstood the financial crisis in all economies and have contributed to a more resistant, diversified market, particularly in the area of insurance and social protection; points out that mutual societies are particularly active in the area of population ageing and social needs, and that the involvement of mutual societies in the area of pensions offers additional opportunities for EU citizens;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that mutual societies are solid and durable elements which have
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that mutual societies are solid and
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Underlines that mutual societies have no shares but are owned jointly and that surpluses are reinvested rather than distributed to the members, stresses that this has helped mutual societies to resist the crisis better than other private sector entities;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 c (new) 16c. Notes that a European Statute would be a voluntary tool additional to existing national legal provisions applying to mutual societies and would thus not affect the already existing statutes, but would rather be a "28th" system facilitating mutuals to have cross-border activities;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to take into account the specific characteristics of mutual societies so as to ensure a level playing field, with a view to avoiding additional discrimination and ensuring that any new legislation is proportionate as well as guaranteeing
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to take into account the specific characteristics of mutual societies so as to ensure a level playing field, with a view to avoiding additional discrimination and guaranteeing a fair
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that mutual societies play a major role in
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Annexe - Paragraph 17 a (new) - Recommendation 1 (new) 17a. Considers that the diversity of enterprises should be clearly anchored in the EU Treaty and proposes to include mutual societies in the article 54 of the EU Treaty;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Annexe - Paragraph 17 b (new) - Recommendation 2 (new) 17b. Considers that a legal proposal for a Regulation on a European Mutual Society should comprise legal provisions in order: - to allow the existence of European Mutual Societies on the basis of individual or legal persons; - to allow Mutuals to freely operate in the European Single Market thus strengthening the principles of the Single Market itself; - to allow Mutuals to take the advantages stemming from a European Group of Mutuals in particular in the context of Solvency 2 for the mutuals societies providing insurance;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Annexe - Paragraph 17 c (new) - Recommendation 3 (new) 17c. Considers that a combination of strategies and measures is required to establish a level playing field for mutual societies which gives them equal possibilities to add a European dimension to their organisation and activities and to provide mutual societies with adequate legal instruments to facilitate their cross- border and trans-national activities. In this respect, Mutuals societies could operate across EU according to their specific governance;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Annexe - Paragraph 17 d (new) - Recommendation 4 (new) 17d. Calls on the Commission to take into account that making available such an optional Regulation in Member states' legislation which should embody mutuals societies' governance characteristics and principles; define accordingly the conditions of acquisition and loss of membership and the rights and duties of members; and formation by natural or legal persons which could create groups of mutuals, winding up and liquidation of the European Mutual Society and distribution of assets;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Annexe - Paragraph 17 e (new) - Recommendation 5 (new) 17e. Calls on the EU Commission to introduce into the proposed regulation the main characteristics of Mutual societies’ person-based societies, operating essentially according to the principle of self-governance, where the members or their representatives take part directly in defining the mutual society's policy or have the right to influence that policy. Mutual societies do not aim to make profit for distribution to external shareholders and are based on individual affiliation and open enrolment. They are non- discriminatory as far as risk selection is concerned, democratically oriented by their members and financed through solidarity, with a view to improving social conditions of local communities and of wider society in the spirit of mutuality;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Annexe - Paragraph 17 a (new) - Recommendation 6 (new) 17a. Calls on the EU Commission to introduce into the proposed regulation the main characteristics of Mutual societies’ person-based societies, operating essentially according to the principle of self-governance, where the members or their representatives take part directly in defining the mutual society's policy or have the right to influence that policy. Mutual societies do not aim to make profit for distribution to external shareholders and are based on individual affiliation and open enrolment. They are non- discriminatory as far as risk selection is concerned, democratically oriented by their members and financed through solidarity, with a view to improving social conditions of local communities and of wider society in the spirit of mutuality.
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Annexe - Paragraph 17 a (new) - Recommendation 7 (new) 17a. Underlines that a European statute for mutual societies should be supplemented by a Directive with regard to the involvement of employees, not watering down existing workers rights on information, consultation and participation and provide for adequate provisions on employee involvement that have to be negotiated before the establishment of a new European mutual society. Minimum standards should be guaranteed: Employees should be consulted and informed regarding all issues which might significantly affect their interests, such as conditions of employment, structural changes of the society, cross-border issues, vocational training and health and safety of employees. Forms of escape from co- determination, e.g. by moving the headquarters from one Member State to another, should be prevented.
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Annexe - Paragraph 17 a (new) - Recommendation 8 (new) 17a. Underlines the importance of the solidarity principle in mutual societies where clients are also members and thus share the same interests; recalls the principle of common ownership of the capital and its indivisibility; stresses the importance of the principle of disinterested distribution in case of liquidation, that is to say that assets should be distributed to other mutual societies or to a body having as object the support and promotion of mutual societies;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Annexe - Paragraph 17 a (new) - Recommendation 9 (new) 17a. Stresses that a European Statute for mutual societies should not affect national systems for statutory social security managed by mutual societies;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that mutual societies play a major role in the EU economy by providing health care and social services to more than 160 million European citizens, that they represent more than EUR 180 billion in insurance premiums and that they employ over 350.000 people in the EU; stresses that mutual societies facilitate access to care and social inclusion and participate fully in the provision of services of general interest within the European Union;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that with a 25% share of the insurance market and 70% of the total number of undertakings in the industry, mutual societies cannot continue to be forgotten by the single market
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that retirement and survivor’s pensions make up the largest share of Member States’ social protection expenditure
source: PE-497.912
2012/11/28
JURI
14 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 19 February 2009 on Social Economy1,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Annex – Recommendation 2 – indent 1 – mutual societies organise
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Annex - Recommendation 3 - point 4 (new) – since the framework within which mutual societies operate differs from one Member State to another, the regulation should ensure that European mutual societies are able to freely define their own objects and to provide a broad spectrum of services, including social insurance and health insurance and the granting of loans, to their members.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Annex – Recommendation 4 – indent 1 – The European mutual society should be managed democratically and financed collectively for the benefit of its members. The Statute should stipulate that the members are the collective owners of the mutual organisation.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Annex – Recommendation 4 – indent 2 – The statutes of a European mutual society should lay down governance and management rules providing for the following: a general meeting (which can be composed as a meeting of all members or a meeting of delegates of the members), a supervisory organ and a management or administrative organ, depending on the form adopted in the statutes.
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Annex – Recommendation 4 – indent 3 –Each member (natural or legal person) or delegate of the general meeting should
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas, due to their diversity, mutual societies in Europe exist within a very
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas mutual societies play a major role in the Union's economy by providing health care
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas in some Member States statutory health insurance funds are prohibited from operating as private- sector companies;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas in some Member States, alongside insurance services, mutual societies provide low- or zero-interest loan services to their members;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. whereas in at least six Member States of the Union and the EEA, it is legally impossible to create a mutual-
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S a (new) Sa. whereas the lack of a statute still impedes cross-border cooperation and merger of mutuals;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Annex – Recommendation 1 – indent 1 – to remove all barriers to cross-border cooperation between mutual societies while taking account of their
source: PE-500.725
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-18&language=EN
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2012-11-29T00:00:00New
2012-10-04T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs/0/title |
Old
PE500.725New
PE496.679 |
activities/1/docs/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee draft report |
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.725New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.679 |
activities/1/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee draft report |
activities/2/body |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-03-14T00:00:00New
2012-11-29T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/5 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/5/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/4 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2012-11-29T00:00:00New
2012-10-04T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs/0/title |
Old
PE500.725New
PE496.679 |
activities/1/docs/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee draft report |
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.725New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.679 |
activities/1/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee draft report |
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-01-22T00:00:00New
2012-11-29T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-02-07T00:00:00New
2013-03-14T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.725
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-02-04T00:00:00New
2013-02-07T00:00:00 |
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2012-03-08T00:00:00New
2012-10-04T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
EP officialisationNew
Committee draft report |
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/7/date |
Old
2012-12-18T00:00:00New
2013-01-22T00:00:00 |
activities/5 |
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/7/date |
Old
2013-01-14T00:00:00New
2013-02-04T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.679
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
ALDE |
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de186300fb8127435bdc007New
4de188ea0fb8127435bdc3ee |
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/0/name |
Old
LEHNE Klaus-HeinerNew
THEIN Alexandra |
committees/2/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
ALDE |
committees/2/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de186300fb8127435bdc007New
4de188ea0fb8127435bdc3ee |
committees/2/shadows/0/name |
Old
LEHNE Klaus-HeinerNew
THEIN Alexandra |
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-09-19T00:00:00New
2012-11-20T00:00:00 |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-11-27T00:00:00New
2012-12-18T00:00:00 |
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-09-11T00:00:00New
2012-09-19T00:00:00 |
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-09-10T00:00:00New
2013-01-14T00:00:00 |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|