Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | ROSBACH Anna ( ECR) | MAZEJ KUKOVIČ Zofija ( PPE), KADENBACH Karin ( S&D), SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros ( ALDE), STAES Bart ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | HÄUSLING Martin ( Verts/ALE) | |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
This Commission staff working document concerns the progress made so far against the rising threats from Antimicrobial Resistance.
To recall, in 2011, the Commission launched a 5-year Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance. The progress made under the specific actions may be summarised as follows:
Action n° 1: Strengthen the promotion of the appropriate use of antimicrobials in all Member States : t he European Parliament has allocated funds for a preparatory action to promote the appropriate use of antimicrobials in human medicine. The Antibiotic Resistance and Prescribing in European children (ARPEC) project funded under the Health Programme (2010-2013), aims at improving the quality of antibiotic prescribing for children in Europe and to reduce the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial infections in children. The Commission services will publish later in 2015 data and information provided by the Member States in order to further strengthen the prudent use of antimicrobials in human medicines in the EU.
Action n° 2: Strengthen the regulatory framework on veterinary medicines and on medicated feed : the current veterinary medicines legislation does not provide sufficient tools to ensure that risks to human health arising from the use of antimicrobials in animals are adequately managed. In 2014, the Commission adopted proposals for veterinary medicinal products and medicated feed . They are currently undergoing the ordinary legislative procedure in the European Parliament and the Council.
Action n° 3: Introduce recommendations for prudent use in veterinary medicine, including follow-up reports : regardless of the efforts carried out to improve the prudent use of veterinary antimicrobials it is also necessary to update marketing authorisations to take into account of the latest scientific developments. The Commission services are finalising the drafting of Guidelines for prudent use of antimicrobials in veterinary medicine.
Action n° 4: Strengthen infection prevention and control in healthcare settings : the report showed that in the area of prevention and control of healthcare associated infections (HAI), 26 out of 28 responding countries implemented a combination of actions to prevent and control such infections. More efforts are needed to ensure adequate numbers of specialised infection control staff, receiving regular training, and with dedicated time for this task in hospitals and other healthcare settings. Tailored basic infection prevention and control structures and practices in nursing homes and other long term care facilities should be reinforced. Information on HAI to patients should be improved.
Action n° 5: Introduce of a legal tool to enhance prevention and control of infections in animals in the new Animal Health Law : t he Commission proposal for a Regulation on animal health was adopted in May 2013. It is currently undergoing the ordinary legislative procedure in the European Parliament and in the Council. Its objective is to create an EU animal health legal framework for the control of major transmissible animal diseases.
Action n° 6: Promote, in a staged approach, unprecedented collaborative research and development efforts to bring new antimicrobials to patients : as rapid response, the New Drugs for Bad Bugs (ND4BB) programme was launched in May 2012. A new model for open innovation in the pharmaceutical research area has been created to spur the development of new antibiotics . This model means that research sectors and individual companies now provide unprecedented access to each other’s data and collaborate on solving problems of public health concern.
The Commission and the European Investment Bank are jointly developing a pilot financial facility which aims to target Infectious Diseases (ID). It is expected to be launched in 2015.
Action n° 7: Promote efforts to analyse the need for new antibiotics into veterinary medicine : the report acknowledged that there are certain gaps between the approved indications for veterinary antimicrobials and the needs of veterinarians. This area needs to be improved.
Action n° 8: Develop and/or strengthen multilateral and bilateral commitments for the prevention and control of AMR in all sectors : the Commission services are supporting and actively cooperating with the WHO in this field. Cooperation with China has started and possible cooperation with Russian is imminent. The Commission services are also contributing to the work against antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. They have also begun to develop a strategic approach to the pollution of water by pharmaceuticals . Proposals are awaited in 2017.
Action n° 9: Strengthen surveillance systems on AMR and antimicrobial consumption in human medicine : t ransfer of the European system for surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in human medicine to ECDC was completed in 2012. The system is now integrated as part of ECDC surveillance as the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption Network (ESAC-Net).
Action n° 10: Strengthen surveillance systems on AMR and antimicrobial consumption in animal medicine : t he information collected by the three agencies: the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) on antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial consumption needs to be combined and jointly analysed in order to assess the relationship between use of antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance in animals and in humans at the European level.
Action n° 11: Reinforce and co-ordinate research efforts : af ter the launch of the Action Plan, research on AMR has been further supported by the Commission services with a total budget of approx. €130 million under the EU’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. The new EU framework programme Horizon 2020 continues to give research on infectious diseases including AMR a high priority. In 2014, the European Commission devoted €28 million to the development of new vaccines candidates against tuberculosis, and has earmarked €25 million for HIV vaccine research in 2015.
Action n° 12: Survey and comparative effectiveness research : e ach year, the European Antibiotic Awareness Day (EAAD) attracts strong media interest across Europe. In July 2013, ECDC provided training on the development, implementation and evaluation of prudent antibiotic use campaigns to 29 participants from 20 Member States and Norway.
The European Parliament adopted by 588 votes to 16, with 23 abstentions, a resolution on “the Microbial Challenge – Rising threats from Antimicrobial Resistance”.
Parliament recalls that resistance to antibiotics for certain bacteria is as high as 25 % or more in several Member States and that much of the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) problem stems from the misuse – in particular the excessive use – of antibiotics. It recalls that in the EU, Iceland and Norway alone, antimicrobial resistant bacteria cause some 400 000 infections and 25 000 deaths annually, with at least EUR 1.5 billion spent on extra healthcare costs and productivity losses. It also highlights the fact that many Member States do not have a solid legal and regulatory framework to mandate and support the rational use of medicines. As a result, Parliament calls for the complete and rapid implementation of measures in this area.
Although welcoming the Commission’s five-year strategic Action Plan on tackling AMR and viewing it as generally going in the right direction, Parliament notes that many of the action points reiterate measures prescribed over a decade ago, and that it is not sufficient for tackling the growing risk presented by AMR at international level .
In this context, Members call for an integrated roadmap outlining relevant policy responses, including possible legislative action.
Parliament calls in particular for the Action Plan to:
cover all animals under the EU animal welfare strategy, including, for instance, companion animals and animals used for sports, and emphasise the logical connection between animal health and the use of antimicrobials, as well as the link between animal health and human health.
Prudent use of antimicrobials in human and veterinary medicine: Parliament calls for the prudent use of antimicrobials. The key objective of any AMR strategy is to maintain the efficiency of existing antimicrobials by using them responsibly at the correct therapeutic level only when strictly necessary and prescribed over a specific time at the appropriate dosage (and not for treating viral infections). Similar prudence needs to be exercised in veterinary medicine. Parliament calls on the Member States to use electronic recording systems to ensure that usage patterns on individual farms are appropriate, thus ensuring responsible and minimal use. It also suggests to the Commission that current provisions on maximum animal density in livestock farming be re-evaluated as herd sizes today often present obstacles to the treatment of individual or smaller groups of animals, providing incentives for the prophylactic use of antimicrobials. It calls for a legislative proposal to be presented for the veterinary sector to limit its use of third- and fourth-generation Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) for humans.
Parliament considers that the pending revision of Directive 2001/82/EC offers an important opportunity to take effective measures to reduce AMR through strengthening the provisions for veterinary medicines, such as:
limiting the right to prescribe antimicrobials to professionally qualified veterinarians only; separating the right to prescribe from the right to sell antimicrobials, thereby eradicating economic incentives to prescribe.
Measures are called for to encourage efforts to study hospital outbreaks, to improve diagnostics but also to assess and monitor the Member States' implementation of relevant EU legislation on antimicrobials, in particular with regard to the prescription-only use of antibiotics in the human health and veterinary sectors.
Prevention: Parliament calls for more effective measures to be introduced to prevent both the appearance and the spread of antimicrobial resistance. These measures include better monitoring and better notification of micro-organisms resistant to antimicrobials, as well as a more effective combating of infections, in particular by means of vaccinations. Among other measures that it calls for are limits on uncontrolled access to antimicrobial agents, in particular via the growing number of illegal sales on the internet, and their inappropriate use. It calls on the Member States to improve infection control, and to raise and promote good standards of hygiene – especially hand hygiene, – in order to prevent the spread of infections and reduce the need for antibiotics.
Parliament also invites the Commission to classify, in the forthcoming review of the European veterinary pharmaceuticals legislation, medicated feeding stuffs as ‘pharmaceuticals’ and not as ‘feeding stuffs’, in order to ensure that, in future, the sensitive area of medicated foodstuffs is monitored under pharmaceuticals legislation and that official inspections are carried out accordingly, while ensuring that medicated foodstuffs fall into the ‘prescription only’ category .
Development of new antimicrobials or alternatives for treatment: Parliament considers it vital to limit the emergence of bacteria that are resistant to antimicrobials . In this context, it is necessary to develop new antimicrobial agents. In parallel, it stresses the advantages of public-private partnerships because these can contribute to reaching this objective by dissociating sales transactions from investment in research and development. In this area, Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States to accelerate R&D activities in order to provide new tools to fight tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis.
Parliament also underlines the need to examine new regulatory approaches that would result in stimulating industrial research and the development of new antimicrobials while safeguarding patient safety. It also calls on the Commission to ensure the development and availability of more on-farm tools for early, rapid diagnosis and control of diseases, as well as for a broad and effective diagnostic system at Member State level.
Monitoring and reporting: in this regard, Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States to seek greater cooperation and coordination on early detection, alert and coordinated response procedures regarding pathogenic antimicrobial resistant bacteria in humans, animals, fish and foodstuffs. It calls on Member States to compile clear, comparable, transparent and timely reference data on antimicrobial drug usage so that effective action can be undertaken. It considers, however, that data gathered on the use of antibiotics should be made accessible only to the experts, authorities and decision-makers concerned. It calls on the Member States to ensure separate monitoring and control of resistance among livestock, domestic animals and racing animals.
Communication, education and training: Parliament notes that one of the most common uses for antibiotics is as treatment against the common cold , and that much would be gained if the public could be made aware of the fact that the common cold is a viral infection whereas antibiotics only provide protection against bacterial infections. It calls on the Commission to compile a best practice list with regard to the implementation of effective communication campaigns and professional training courses aimed at raising AMR awareness. It believes that effective information and awareness campaigns must be developed with a view to heightening awareness of the dangers of the unintentional spread of antimicrobial pathogens in hospitals and in the home, and awareness of the means of avoiding this. Campaigns along the lines of "Please take this antibiotic medicine only if it is prescribed by a doctor to you and take it as prescribed” should be promoted and included in the package leaflet.
International cooperation: lastly, Parliament believes that concerted and timely international action that avoids overlap and builds critical mass is the only way forward in minimising the threat to public health that AMR poses globally. It considers that the work undertaken by the Transatlantic Task Force on Antimicrobial Resistance (TATFAR) should be used as a model for international cooperation on antimicrobial resistance. Other similar multilateral and bilateral commitments for the prevention and control of AMR should also be encouraged, in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the WHO (in particular in regard to the control of counterfeit antimicrobials).
The Council adopted conclusions on the impact of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the human health sector and in the veterinary sector , calling upon member states to develop and implement national strategies or action plans for countering AMR.
These national strategies or action plans should, amongst others, include the following elements:
national guidelines on the treatment of humans and animals with antimicrobial agents; communication guidelines and programmes for education and training of professionals; enforcement of national legislation preventing all illegal sales of antimicrobials including illegal sales over the internet; limitation of the use of critically important antibiotics to cases where microbiological diagnosis and susceptibility testing has determined that no other type of antimicrobials will be effective; limitation of prophylactic use of antimicrobials to cases with defined clinical needs; limitation of prescription and use of antimicrobials for herd treatment of animals to cases with a clear clinical or epidemiological justification.
The conclusions also call upon the member states and the Commission to examine the conditions of prescription and sale of antimicrobials in order to ascertain whether practices in human and animals healthcare may lead to over-prescription, overuse or misuse of antimicrobials.
The Commission is invited to expedite the review of legislative acts in order to take antimicrobial resistance better into account. This applies notably to directive 90/167 laying down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the EU and directive 2001/82 on the EU code relating to veterinary medicinal products.
The Commission informed that preparatory work for some of the actions to which it is invited has already been started.
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO) about 440 000 new cases of multidrugresistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) emerge annually, causing at least 150 000 deaths. A high percentage of hospital-acquired infections are caused by highly resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
PURPOSE: to establish an action plan against the rising threats from Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR).
BACKGROUND: since the introduction of penicillin in the 1940s antimicrobial medicines, such as antibiotics, have become essential for the treatment of many microbial infections in humans and animals. In addition to the treatment of infectious diseases (e.g. pneumonia, tuberculosis, malaria, HIV/AIDS) and hospital-acquired infections (e.g. methicilin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), antimicrobials are vital for reducing the risk of complications in relation to complex medical interventions, such as hip replacements, organ transplants, cancer chemotherapy and the care of premature babies. In addition, antimicrobials are used in veterinary medicine and for non-therapeutic purposes (e.g. disinfectants, preservatives, and food and feed additives).
Seventy years later, these applications are now seriously jeopardized by the emergence and spread of microbes that are resistant to affordable and effective firstchoice, or "first-line" medicines, rendering the drugs concerned ineffective for the treatment of the infection. This resistance is a natural biological phenomenon but is amplified by a variety of factors. The inappropriate use of therapeutic antimicrobials in human and veterinary medicine, the use of antimicrobials for non-therapeutic purposes as well as the pollution of the environment by antimicrobials is accelerating the emergence and spread of resistant microorganisms. The consequences are severe.
The Commission recall that a subset of drug-resistant bacteria is responsible for about 25 000 human deaths annually. In addition to avoidable death, this also translates into extra healthcare costs and productivity losses of at least EUR 1.5 billion.
For their part, the Council and the European Parliament have already examined this issue and on 12 May 2011 the European Parliament adopted a non-legislative resolution on antibiotic resistance in which it stresses that AMR has become a huge issue in recent years. To cope with this growing problem and the consequent treatment failures, the EP calls on the Commission to establish an EU-wide plan to combat AMR.
This Communication responds to this request.
CONTENT: in this regard, the Commission has taken a number of important actions:
in the field of human medicine, the 2001 Community Strategy against AMR called for EU actions against AMR in the fields of surveillance, research, prevention and international cooperation. This led to the adoption of EU wide recommendations and guidelines against AMR; in animal husbandry, the ban on the use of antimicrobials for growth promotion was introduced in 2006. The Commission has developed legislation on the control of Salmonella at all relevant stages of production, processing and distribution in order to reduce the exposure of humans to potentially resistant Salmonella; in the field of veterinary medicine, the emphasis has been in monitoring zoonotic AMR (i.e. resistance transmissible between animals and humans) and on the use of antimicrobials in animals; the authorisation requirements of human and veterinary medicines and other products, such as food enzymes, probiotics and decontamination agents, with possible effects on development of AMR have also been the focus areas; AMR is the subject of research funded under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) and the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI). AMR is also the subject of a proposed Joint Programming Initiative (JPI), which aim to coordinate research activities among EU Member States; scientific opinions on AMR by EU Risk Assessment bodies i.e. the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) have formed the basis for policy planning, for example, development of new antimicrobials and monitoring AMR and antimicrobial usage.
Based on such holistic approach, the new actions put forward in this Action Plan aim at:
mitigating the risk of developing AMR in humans from the use of antimicrobials both in humans and animals by effectively ensuring across the EU their appropriate use, and promoting microbiological diagnosis as the means to determine, to the extent possible, the need for antimicrobials; putting in place effective ways to prevent microbial infections and their spread; developing effective antimicrobials or alternatives for treatment of human and animal infections; joining forces with international partners to contain the risks of spreading AMR from international trade and travel and via the environment; reinforcing research to develop the scientific basis and innovative means to combat AMR.
mitigating the risk of developing AMR in humans from the use of antimicrobials both in humans and animals by effectively ensuring across the EU their appropriate use, and promoting microbiological diagnosis as the means to determine, to the extent possible, the need for antimicrobials; putting in place effective ways to prevent microbial infections and their spread; developing effective antimicrobials or alternatives for treatment of human and animal infections; joining forces with international partners to contain the risks of spreading AMR from international trade and travel and via the environment; reinforcing research to develop the scientific basis and innovative means to combat AMR.
The Commission proposes to put in place a 5-year Action Plan to fight against AMR based on 12 key actions:
Action n° 1 : Strengthen the promotion of the appropriate use of antimicrobials in all Member States. Action n° 2 : Strengthen the regulatory framework on veterinary medicines and on medicated feed. Action n° 3 : Introduce recommendations for prudent use in veterinary medicine, including follow-up reports. Action n° 4 : Strengthen infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. Action n° 5 : Introduce of a legal tool to enhance prevention and control of infections in animals in the new Animal Health Law. Action n° 6 : Promote, in a staged approach, unprecedented collaborative research and development efforts to bring new antimicrobials to patients. Action n° 7 : Promote efforts to analyse the need for new antibiotics into veterinary medicine. Action n° 8 : Develop and/or strengthen multilateral and bilateral commitments for the prevention and control of AMR in all sectors. Action n° 9 : Strengthen surveillance systems on AMR and antimicrobial consumption in human medicine. Action n° 10 : Strengthen surveillance systems on AMR and antimicrobial consumption in animal medicine. Action n° 11 : Reinforce and co-ordinate research efforts. Action n° 12 : Survey and comparative effectiveness research.
Several Member States have been pro-active in carrying out actions related to those considered at EU level. These actions at national level and the experience gained from it should be the basis of the practical development and implementation of this Action Plan.
PURPOSE: to establish an action plan against the rising threats from Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR).
BACKGROUND: since the introduction of penicillin in the 1940s antimicrobial medicines, such as antibiotics, have become essential for the treatment of many microbial infections in humans and animals. In addition to the treatment of infectious diseases (e.g. pneumonia, tuberculosis, malaria, HIV/AIDS) and hospital-acquired infections (e.g. methicilin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), antimicrobials are vital for reducing the risk of complications in relation to complex medical interventions, such as hip replacements, organ transplants, cancer chemotherapy and the care of premature babies. In addition, antimicrobials are used in veterinary medicine and for non-therapeutic purposes (e.g. disinfectants, preservatives, and food and feed additives).
Seventy years later, these applications are now seriously jeopardized by the emergence and spread of microbes that are resistant to affordable and effective firstchoice, or "first-line" medicines, rendering the drugs concerned ineffective for the treatment of the infection. This resistance is a natural biological phenomenon but is amplified by a variety of factors. The inappropriate use of therapeutic antimicrobials in human and veterinary medicine, the use of antimicrobials for non-therapeutic purposes as well as the pollution of the environment by antimicrobials is accelerating the emergence and spread of resistant microorganisms. The consequences are severe.
The Commission recall that a subset of drug-resistant bacteria is responsible for about 25 000 human deaths annually. In addition to avoidable death, this also translates into extra healthcare costs and productivity losses of at least EUR 1.5 billion.
For their part, the Council and the European Parliament have already examined this issue and on 12 May 2011 the European Parliament adopted a non-legislative resolution on antibiotic resistance in which it stresses that AMR has become a huge issue in recent years. To cope with this growing problem and the consequent treatment failures, the EP calls on the Commission to establish an EU-wide plan to combat AMR.
This Communication responds to this request.
CONTENT: in this regard, the Commission has taken a number of important actions:
in the field of human medicine, the 2001 Community Strategy against AMR called for EU actions against AMR in the fields of surveillance, research, prevention and international cooperation. This led to the adoption of EU wide recommendations and guidelines against AMR; in animal husbandry, the ban on the use of antimicrobials for growth promotion was introduced in 2006. The Commission has developed legislation on the control of Salmonella at all relevant stages of production, processing and distribution in order to reduce the exposure of humans to potentially resistant Salmonella; in the field of veterinary medicine, the emphasis has been in monitoring zoonotic AMR (i.e. resistance transmissible between animals and humans) and on the use of antimicrobials in animals; the authorisation requirements of human and veterinary medicines and other products, such as food enzymes, probiotics and decontamination agents, with possible effects on development of AMR have also been the focus areas; AMR is the subject of research funded under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) and the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI). AMR is also the subject of a proposed Joint Programming Initiative (JPI), which aim to coordinate research activities among EU Member States; scientific opinions on AMR by EU Risk Assessment bodies i.e. the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) have formed the basis for policy planning, for example, development of new antimicrobials and monitoring AMR and antimicrobial usage.
Based on such holistic approach, the new actions put forward in this Action Plan aim at:
mitigating the risk of developing AMR in humans from the use of antimicrobials both in humans and animals by effectively ensuring across the EU their appropriate use, and promoting microbiological diagnosis as the means to determine, to the extent possible, the need for antimicrobials; putting in place effective ways to prevent microbial infections and their spread; developing effective antimicrobials or alternatives for treatment of human and animal infections; joining forces with international partners to contain the risks of spreading AMR from international trade and travel and via the environment; reinforcing research to develop the scientific basis and innovative means to combat AMR.
mitigating the risk of developing AMR in humans from the use of antimicrobials both in humans and animals by effectively ensuring across the EU their appropriate use, and promoting microbiological diagnosis as the means to determine, to the extent possible, the need for antimicrobials; putting in place effective ways to prevent microbial infections and their spread; developing effective antimicrobials or alternatives for treatment of human and animal infections; joining forces with international partners to contain the risks of spreading AMR from international trade and travel and via the environment; reinforcing research to develop the scientific basis and innovative means to combat AMR.
The Commission proposes to put in place a 5-year Action Plan to fight against AMR based on 12 key actions:
Action n° 1 : Strengthen the promotion of the appropriate use of antimicrobials in all Member States. Action n° 2 : Strengthen the regulatory framework on veterinary medicines and on medicated feed. Action n° 3 : Introduce recommendations for prudent use in veterinary medicine, including follow-up reports. Action n° 4 : Strengthen infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. Action n° 5 : Introduce of a legal tool to enhance prevention and control of infections in animals in the new Animal Health Law. Action n° 6 : Promote, in a staged approach, unprecedented collaborative research and development efforts to bring new antimicrobials to patients. Action n° 7 : Promote efforts to analyse the need for new antibiotics into veterinary medicine. Action n° 8 : Develop and/or strengthen multilateral and bilateral commitments for the prevention and control of AMR in all sectors. Action n° 9 : Strengthen surveillance systems on AMR and antimicrobial consumption in human medicine. Action n° 10 : Strengthen surveillance systems on AMR and antimicrobial consumption in animal medicine. Action n° 11 : Reinforce and co-ordinate research efforts. Action n° 12 : Survey and comparative effectiveness research.
Several Member States have been pro-active in carrying out actions related to those considered at EU level. These actions at national level and the experience gained from it should be the basis of the practical development and implementation of this Action Plan.
Documents
- Follow-up document: SWD(2016)0347
- Follow-up document: SWD(2016)0348
- Follow-up document: SWD(2015)0059
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)175
- Contribution: COM(2011)0748
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0483/2012
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0373/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0373/2012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.577
- Committee opinion: PE494.678
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.371
- Committee draft report: PE486.077
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0748
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0748
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0748 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE486.077
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.371
- Committee opinion: PE494.678
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.577
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0373/2012
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)175
- Follow-up document: SWD(2015)0059
- Follow-up document: SWD(2016)0347
- Follow-up document: SWD(2016)0348
- Contribution: COM(2011)0748
Activities
- Isabelle DURANT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Erik BÁNKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert DUŠEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sari ESSAYAH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zofija MAZEJ KUKOVIČ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ROSBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudiu Ciprian TĂNĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
187 |
2012/2041(INI)
2012/09/19
ENVI
125 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 – having regard to the
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex issue driven by a variety of interconnected factors; whereas it has cross-border nature; whereas individual intervention measures will have minimal effect;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses the importance of establishing an effective European network of national surveillance systems in the human health and veterinary sectors in order to facilitate the compilation of clear, comparable, transparent and timely reference data on antimicrobial drug usage; calls for the transmission to surveillance systems of data on the prescription and sales of all antimicrobial agents for use in humans and animals; believes this should be based on the existing monitoring networks operated by EFSA, the ECDC European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption Network (ESAC-net), the ECDC European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-net), and the EMA European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC);
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses the importance of establishing an effective European network of national surveillance systems in the human health and veterinary sectors in order to facilitate
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses the importance of establishing an effective European network of national surveillance systems in the human health and veterinary sectors in order to
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses the importance of establishing an effective European network of national surveillance systems in the human health and veterinary sectors, based on uniform standards for all Member States, in order to facilitate the compilation of clear, comparable, transparent and timely reference data on antimicrobial drug usage; believes this should be based on the existing monitoring networks operated by EFSA, the ECDC European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption Network (ESAC-net), the ECDC European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-net), and the EMA European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC);
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on Member States to establish infection control programmes, based on current best practice, with the responsibility for effective management on antimicrobial resistance in hospitals, long-term care institutions and herds of food production animals;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on Member States to promote closer inter-sectoral collaboration between relevant authorities and sectors to encourage a more integrated veterinary-human health approach and monitor the implementation of national antimicrobial resistance strategies;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Emphasises the need to support sustainable food production systems which in contrast to ''factory farming'' are potentially less exposed to AMR;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission in the context of the upcoming review of the legislation on veterinary medicines to propose clear reporting obligations on all pharmaceutical companies, veterinarians and farmers, respectively, about the amount of antimicrobials that they sell, prescribe and use, respectively;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that future measuring and reporting on the use of antimicrobials in both the human and veterinary sectors will be broadened out, showing not only the total amount of antimicrobials used but also types of antimicrobials, treatment times, etc.;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that the encouragement of appropriate antimicrobial use, for the purpose of raising medical awareness, depends on a change of attitude and practice among patients, farmers and practitioners in the spheres of veterinary and human medicine; considers that more effective and continuous educational and training measures should be taken at both national and European level
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex issue driven by a variety of interconnected factors; whereas
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that the encouragement of appropriate antimicrobial use depends on a change of attitude and practice among patients, farmers
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that the encouragement of appropriate antimicrobial use depends on
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that the encouragement of appropriate antimicrobial use depends on a change of attitude and practice among patients, farmers and practitioners in the spheres of veterinary and human medicine; acknowledges the existence of misconceptions regarding the effects of antibiotics; considers that more effective and continuous awareness, information, educational and training measures should be taken to alert the public and in particular those suffering from illnesses and those working in health care at both national and European level;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that the encouragement of appropriate antimicrobial use depends on a
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Notes that one of the most common reasons for using antibiotics is for the treatment of common cold and that much could be gained from the public's being aware of the fact that common cold is a viral infection but that antibiotics are used against bacterial infections;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Welcomes the annual European Antibiotic Awareness Day (18 November) instituted to promote the responsible use of antimicrobials; considers, however, that its visibility and potential could be more effectively maximised through coordinated, innovative and high-impact campaigns based on the experience derived
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Welcomes the annual European Antibiotic Awareness Day (18 November) instituted to promote the responsible use of antimicrobials; considers, however, that its visibility and potential could be more effectively maximised through strengthened political support at national and European levels, a broader approach which covers also animals, and coordinated, innovative and high-impact campaigns based on the experience derived from successful European and international initiatives;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to compile a best practice list with regard to the implementation of effective communication campaigns and
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to compile a best practice list with regard to the implementation of effective communication campaigns and professional training courses aimed at raising AMR awareness whereas information amongst citizens as well as health and veterinarian professionals is key to a better awareness and hence prevention;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Takes the view that effective information and awareness campaigns must be developed with a view to heightening awareness of the dangers of the unintentional spread of antimicrobial pathogens in hospitals and in the home and means of avoiding this;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas effective surveillance in both the human health and the veterinary sector is the cornerstone of national and international efforts to control antimicrobial resistance;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Member States to raise awareness on over-the-counter sales of antibiotics and to prevent all illegal sales of antimicrobials including illegal sales over the Internet in both the human health sector and the veterinary sector;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission to examine in the study on the improvement of the package leaflet and the drug fact box the idea of better communication to the patient on antibiotics, for example: "Please take this antibiotic medicine only if it is prescribed by a doctor to you and take it as prescribed. Improper use of antibiotics can create resistance which harms yourself and other people.";
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls on the Commission to build on the work of the TATFAR and promote similar multilateral and bilateral commitments for the prevention and control of AMR with other global partners;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point 1 · comparable data collection and data sharing for human and veterinary antimicrobials;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Urges Member States and the Commission to encourage and promote global risk management initiatives, such as the WHO list of CIAs for human medicine and the OIE List of Antimicrobials of Veterinary Importance;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Supports an international approach to the control of counterfeit antimicrobials in line with the WHO guidelines;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas resistance in animal bacteria is significant both for animal health and welfare and for human health;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, given the lack of new antibacterial drug development, it is of paramount importance that the effective exploitation of existing antimicrobials is maintained for as long as possible via preventive measures to contain infection spread prevention, vaccinations, alternative treatments, prudent use and controlled antimicrobial dosage;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, given the lack of new antibacterial drug development, it is of paramount importance that the effective exploitation of existing antimicrobials is maintained for as long as possible via prudent use, infection spread prevention, vaccinations, alternative treatments,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas, the only tuberculosis (TB) vaccine currently available (BCG), was developed over 90 years ago and it does not offer protection against the most common form of TB – pulmonary TB;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas, treatment of tuberculosis relies on antibiotics developed decades ago, many of which have serious toxic side effects;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas there is a clear link between antimicrobials use in animals and the spread of resistance in humans
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 – having regard to the second revision of the WHO list of critically important antimicrobials for human medicine (report of the first meeting of the WHO Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance [AGISAR], Copenhagen, 2009), and to the OIE List of Antimicrobial Agents of Veterinary Importance (OIE List, May 2007) and subsequent refinements,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas there
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the widespread use of powerful and persistent chemical agents in livestock and poultry production operations, aquaculture and agriculture, is associated with the emergence of drug- resistant infections in these settings and has been linked to the establishment and spread of drug-resistant infections in humans;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas, despite farmers' primary objective to keep their livestock healthy and productive through good agricultural practices (hygiene, proper feed, appropriate husbandry and good animal management), animals can still become ill, and appropriate therapy and veterinary medicines should be available;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas to date no standard definition of ‘preventive treatment’ has been adopted and disagreements are constantly arising from different interpretations thereof;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas bacterial resistance ignores national borders and the problem cannot be solved overnight; whereas it is of uttermost importance to elaborate on a strong collaboration between countries and sectors;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas there is a need to educate and raise awareness among those involved in antimicrobial use, including policy-makers, health professionals and the general public, to bring about the necessary changes in prescribers', dispensers' and citizens' behaviour;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas antibiotics are still available over-the-counter and without prescription in certain Member States, and that this practice aggravates the problem with antimicrobial resistance;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H b (new) Hb. whereas failure to respect basic rules of hygiene in a human environment, not only in hospitals but also in the home for example, is causing a further spread of antimicrobial pathogens;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H b (new) Hb. whereas the use of diagnostics have a vital role to play in combating AMR by encouraging more targeted approaches to treatment;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 a (new) - having regard to the Codex Code of practice to minimise and contain antimicrobial resistance (CAC/RCP 61- 2005),
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Notes that, although the Commission's action plan goes in the right direction, it does not go far enough to contain the rising threat from antimicrobial resistance;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that, while almost all Member States have developed national AMR strategies in accordance with the Council Recommendation on prudent use of antimicrobial agents in human medicine, progress with regard to meeting set objectives has been slow and uneven; calls for firm governmental commitment to full and timely implementation at national level;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the Commission's five-year strategic Action Plan on tackling AMR, but expresses concern that many of the action points reiterate measures prescribed over a decade earlier in the Council Recommendation of 15 November 2001 on the prudent use of antimicrobial agents in human medicine;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that the key objective of any
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that the key objective of any AMR strategy is to maintain the efficiency of existing antimicrobials by using them responsibly at the correct therapeutic level only when strictly necessary and prescribed over a limited time at the appropriate dosage, and reducing the use of antimicrobials in general and especially of Critically-
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that the key objective of any AMR strategy is to maintain the efficiency of existing antimicrobials by using them responsibly at the correct therapeutic level only when strictly prescribed over a
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that the key objective of any AMR strategy is to maintain the efficiency of existing antimicrobials by using them responsibly at the correct therapeutic level only when strictly prescribed over a limited time at the appropriate dosage, and reducing the use of antimicrobials in general and especially of Critically- Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) in human and veterinary medicine; we need to enhance surveillance of the use of antimicrobials in babies and young children, as well as in clinical treatment, where there is a need to control and measure antimicrobial use;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – footnote 14 14. Report of the
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to propose clear obligations on Member States to effectively control the prudent use of antimicrobials in human and veterinary medicine, and to report about these controls;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that more efforts are needed to control the use of antimicrobials in the veterinary sector; strongly disapproves of
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 21 a (new) - having regard to the Preparatory Action voted by the European Parliament "Antimicrobial resistance (AMR): Research on the causes of high and improper antibiotic usage" in the framework of the Budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012, which aims at studying the issue of inappropriate use and sales of antimicrobial agents with or without prescription throughout the chain - from the doctor and the pharmacist to the patient, in terms of behaviour of all actors involved,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that more efforts are needed to control the use of antimicrobials in the human health and in the veterinary sector; strongly disapproves of the uncontrolled prophylactic use of antimicrobials
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that more efforts are needed to control the use of antimicrobials in the veterinary sector; strongly disapproves of the uncontrolled prophylactic use of antimicrobials in animal husbandry; controls on, and the criteria for, imports of food from non-Member States should be enhanced, particularly owing to the potential that such imports may contain traces of antimicrobials;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that more efforts are needed to control the use of antimicrobials in the veterinary sector; strongly disapproves of the uncontrolled prophylactic use of antimicrobials in animal husbandry; stresses that sound information on the use of antimicrobials in some Member States is lacking and that transparent, coherent and consistent data are needed;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that more efforts are needed to control the use of antimicrobials in the veterinary sector; strongly disapproves of the
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that more efforts are needed to control the use of antimicrobials in the veterinary sector; strongly disapproves of the uncontrolled prophylactic use of antimicrobials in animal husbandry; endorses the Council conclusions of 22 June 2012 which call on the Member States to limit the prophylactic use of antimicrobials to cases with defined clinical needs and to limit the prescription and use of antimicrobials for herd treatment of animals to cases where a veterinarian has assessed that there is a clear clinical and where appropriate epidemiological justification to treat all animals;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that more efforts are needed to control the use of antimicrobials in the human and veterinary
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the European Medicines Agency to establish scientific criteria for the reliability and medical necessity of preventive antimicrobial treatment;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the development of models of livestock production in which animals remain healthy for as long as possible and therefore do not need to be treated with antibiotics is an important element in a strategy geared to the long term;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to draw up legislative proposals to reduce the maximum animal density in livestock farming to a level that respects animal welfare and is sustainable, not least to reduce the risk of infections and disease transmission;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the need to review provisions relating to farm animal welfare with a view to improving animal health. Farm animal health protection helps reduce the use of veterinary pharmaceuticals; furthermore, in treating individual animals priority should be given to minimising the use of veterinary pharmaceuticals over maintaining herd sizes; by modern standards, units or herds on livestock farms are often too large to provide treatment for individual animals or smaller groups of animals;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the development of drug resistance is a natural and unavoidable consequence of antimicrobial treatment; whereas this process
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on the Commission to strengthen the provisions for the authorization of veterinary medicines in the upcoming revision with a view to reducing AMR;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Considers that greater attention should be given to animal health in the field of livestock breeding; strains which are resistant to disease could help ensure that fewer veterinary pharmaceuticals will be needed for rearing or fattening purposes;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Calls on the Member States to phase out the prophylactic, metaphylactic and sub-therapeutic use of antimicrobials in livestock farming in national legislation and instead establish in a legally binding manner good practices for animal husbandry that prevent infections and thus reduce the risk of AMR, limiting antimicrobial use to effective treatment of infected animals only, as guidelines on prudent use have been unable to resolve the problem;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to come up with a legislative proposal for the veterinary sector to limit the use of
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls further on the Commission to come up with a legislative proposal for the veterinary sector to limit the use of
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to give serious consideration to reviewing Directive 2001/82/EC, including altering the definition of the prescription of antimicrobial veterinary medical products so that antibiotics can only be prescribed by professionally qualified veterinarians;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to maintain its renewed momentum and publish its progress report on implementation of the AMR Action Plan by the end of 2013, which report should include an overview of the reductions in the use of veterinary antimicrobials achieved in each Member State;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to assess and monitor Member States' implementation of the relevant European legislation on antimicrobials, especially with regard to the prescription-only use of antibiotics in human health and veterinary sector and the ban on antimicrobials as growth promoters in animal feed;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to examine the condition for prescription and sale of antimicrobials in order to ascertain whether practices in human and animal healthcare may lead to over-prescription, overuse or misuse of antimicrobials;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage efforts to ensure that the practice of hospital epidemiologist becomes part of the everyday practice in hospitals;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to monitor the use of nanosilver in consumer products as it might cause an increasing resistance of micro-organisms against silver, including nanosilver and silver based compounds, which may limit the usefulness of nanosilver in medical devices and other medical applications;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines that the increased use of diagnostics is necessary to improve the accuracy of diagnoses, leading to a reduction in the use of antimicrobials;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission to consider legislation which separates veterinarians' right to both prescribe and sell antimicrobials. thereby eradicating economic incentives to prescribe;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage efforts to study hospital outbreaks on a routine basis, as well as the possible role of the spread of drug-resistant clones in these outbreaks;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls on the Commission to examine the feasibility of drawing up European clinical guidelines for treatment of specific diseases with antimicrobials based on fundamental principles, such as only allowing a doctor to prescribe antimicrobials if he or she has seen the patient and a diagnosis has been given, and choosing narrow-spectrum antimicrobials wherever possible;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. With a view to limiting the use and easy availability of antimicrobial agents, welcomes Member States' initiatives to review the legal status of all oral, inhaled and parenteral anti
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. With a view to limiting the use and easy availability of antimicrobial agents, welcomes Member States’ initiatives to review the legal status of all oral, inhaled and parenteral antibiotics (namely antimalarial, antiviral and antifungal drugs) that remain available to patients without a prescription; antibiotics should not be available in EU Member States without a prescription, i.e. sold freely, as this encourages people to self-treat, often on the basis of inaccurate assumptions;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. With a view to limiting
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas much of the antimicrobial resistance problem stems from the misuse of antibiotics, particularly of excessive use;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Emphasises the need to combat the increasing problem of illegal internet sales of antimicrobials;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes the important role of vaccines in limiting the development of AMR by reducing the amounts of antimicrobial agents required to treat infections but considers that this must not be a substitute for good animal husbandry;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes the important role of vaccines in limiting the development of AMR by reducing the amounts of antimicrobial agents required to treat infections; since vaccinated, healthy individuals do not need antibiotics for the treatment of diseases which can be fended off by the immune system following vaccination;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to assist individual Member States to devise and promote prudent use guidelines aimed at reducing non-essential and inappropriate exposure to antimicrobials in human and veterinary medicine, livestock farming, agriculture, aquaculture and horticulture;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to devise and promote prudent use guidelines aimed at reducing non-essential and inappropriate exposure to antimicrobials
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States, in accordance with the competent EU Agencies, to devise and promote prudent use guidelines aimed at reducing non-essential and inappropriate
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Welcomes moves by public authorities in the Member States to use vaccination as a key intervention in their AMR strategies but believes this should not replace good farm management and animal husbandry systems;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for a legally binding obligation to reduce the antimicrobial use in animal husbandry in the EU by at least 50% by 2018, compared to 2012 figures, for each class of antimicrobials;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission to work actively to create a legal framework to increase the application of measures to prevent infection in livestock farming, so as to reduce the spread of infections and diseases;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas many Member States do not have a solid legal and regulatory framework to mandate and support the rational use of medicines;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that the livestock and intensive fish-farming sectors should focus on preventing disease through good hygiene, housing and animal husbandry, as well as strict bio-security measures, rather than the prophylactic use of antibiotics;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Underlines that non-compliance with the physician's instructions, especially patients not completing the required treatment period, is a major factor contributing to antimicrobial resistance and calls on the Commission to consider mandatory labelling of medicines about the importance of medical adherence in this regard;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission with regard to the forthcoming review of European veterinary pharmaceuticals legislation to classify medicated feeding stuffs as ‘pharmaceuticals’ and not as ‘feeding stuffs’, in order to ensure that, in future, the sensitive area of medicated foodstuffs will be monitored under pharmaceuticals legislation and official inspections carried out accordingly, and ensuring that medicated foodstuffs fall into the ‘prescription only’ category;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Underlines that infection prevention and control is a vital cornerstone in the fight against AMR in human medicine; believes that research into the epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) due to MRSA and C. difficile and other emerging multidrug resistant organisms needs to be broadened out;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to promote good hand washing and hand drying - especially in sensitive environments, such as healthcare institutions - in order to prevent the spread of infections and reduce the need for antibiotics;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Calls on the Commission and Member States to increase the exchange of best practice on preventing and reducing healthcare associated infections (HAIs);
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, after having taken decisive action to minimize the unnecessary use of antimicrobials, to encourage efforts to develop new and innovative public-private partnership (PPP) business models that delink investment in R&D for new antibiotics and diagnostic tools from sales transactions
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to accelerate research and development activities in order to provide new tools to fight tuberculosis and drug- resistant tuberculosis;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to invest in R&D aimed at alternatives for AMR use in livestock production and to support innovation in agriculture practices, in line with the goals of the future European Innovation Partnership on Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Highlights the need to
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex issue driven by a variety of interconnected factors;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to examine new regulatory approaches, including transferable intellectual property rights and p
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to examine new regulatory approaches,
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Notes the importance of access to rapid, reliable and affordable diagnostic tools in the development of new treatment strategies;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Member States to improve infection control in health care and raise standards of hygiene in hospitals and other health care facilities in order to avoid illnesses which would require the prescription of antibiotics;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to examine new regulatory approaches oriented towards subsidising research for the development of new antimicrobials which can have a fiscally beneficial result both for the public and the private sector;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen incentives for public and private sector cooperation to reinvigorate antimicrobial research and development (R&D); believes that sharing knowledge and pooling resources through innovative public-private partnerships (PPPs) will be critical to ensuring the clinical efficacy and availability of existing antimicrobials;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Calls on the Commission to ensure that, as part of the EU 2020 strategy, farmers across all EU Member States can have access to smart, effective and alternative tools to cure their animals, including for minor uses and minor species (MUMS), which currently face a substantial lack of veterinary medicines;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 d (new) 12d. Calls on the Commission to ensure the development and availability of more on farm tools for early, rapid diagnosis and control of diseases, as well as a broad and effective diagnostic system at Member State level which can ensure the timely delivery of results in case bacteriological examinations are performed;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission and Member States to seek greater cooperation and coordination on
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission and Member States to seek greater cooperation and coordination on the early detection of pathogenic antimicrobial resistant bacteria in humans, animals, fish and foodstuffs in order to continuously monitor the extent and growth of AMR; urges the Member States in addition to set up national databanks in accordance with uniform standards in which dealers, veterinary surgeons and farmers are required to document the administration and use of antibiotics;
source: PE-496.371
2012/09/20
AGRI
52 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 1 1. Notes that, although the Commission's action plan goes in the right direction,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that sound information on the use of antimicrobials in some Member States is lacking and that transparent, coherent and consistent data are needed;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 3 Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 3 3. Proposes to promote sustainable livestock systems
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 3 3. Proposes to promote sustainable livestock systems which reduce farmers' dependency on costly and unsustainable inputs which pose a high
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 5 Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 5 5. Proposes
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 5 5. Proposes
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 5 5. Proposes
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that the use of antimicrobials in sub-therapeutic levels is prohibited in the EU;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to ensure implementation of the ban, adopted in 2006, on antimicrobials being used as growth promoters in the Member States;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 1 1. Notes that, although the Commission’s action plan goes in the right direction, it does not go far enough to contain the rising global threat from antimicrobial resistance;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Is of the view that the main objective of farmers should be to implement suitable rearing methods in order to keep their cattle healthy and productive and to safeguard their wellbeing; stresses, however, that the proper use of antibiotics in animal husbandry is necessary in order to ensure animal wellbeing;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 5 d (new) 5d. Points out that antimicrobial resistance in animals differs between different species and different forms of animal husbandry;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 6 6. Proposes
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 6 6. Proposes
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 7 7. Notes the importance of vaccines in limiting
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 7 7. Notes the importance of vaccines in limiting antimicrobial resistance, but believes this should not be a substitute for good husbandry and that veterinary surgeons should only administer antibiotics where there is good reason to do so;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 7 7. Notes the importance of vaccines in limiting antimicrobial resistance, but believes this should not be a substitute for good husbandry or appropriate biosecurity measures;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recommends that the Commission investigate the prophylactic and therapeutic use of homeopathy and phytotherapy in animal husbandry as a way of reducing or replacing antibiotics;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 8 Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 1 1. Notes that, although the Commission's action plan goes in the right direction, it does not go far enough to contain the rising threat from antimicrobial resistance; calls therefore on the Commission for an integrated roadmap outlining relevant policy responses including possible legislative action.
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 8 8. Calls for
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 8 8. Calls for a statutory management requirement on prudent use of antimicrobials to be developed and included in cross-compliance, while minimising administrative requirements for farmers;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on EFSA to pay a special attention to monitoring and analysing the situation on antimicrobial resistance in livestock across the EU.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Emphasises the importance of sharing best practice between member state and regional authorities.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls for a prudent and responsible use of antimicrobials in animals and for more information to veterinarians and farmers to minimise the development of AMR; calls for the exchange of best practices such as the acceptance of guidelines on the prudent use of antimicrobials as important tools to combat the development of AMR;"
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 9 Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 9 Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 9 Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 9 9. Proposes a target of halving antimicrobial use in animal treatment in the EU as a whole by 2018, compared to 2012 figures, while taking due consideration of the kind of substances used;;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 1 – point a (new) (a) Underlines that the action plan should cover all animals under the EU animal welfare strategy, including for instance companion animals and animals used for sports, and emphasise the logical connection between animal health and the use of antimicrobials, as well as the link between animal health and human health;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for continued efforts to ensure that antimicrobials are only used in both veterinary and human medicine where such use can be justified;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recalls that the Parliament, in its resolution of 12 May 2011 on antibiotic resistance, stressed the need to get a full picture of when, where, how and on which animals antimicrobials are used, and believes that such data should be collected, analysed and made public by the Commission without delay; data collected should be harmonised and comparable to enable proper analysis and effective, co-ordinated, species-specific action tailored to different types of animal husbandry, in order to combat AMR on both EU and Member State level.
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission to include in its progress report on the implementation of the AMR Action Plan an overview of the reductions in the use of veterinary antimicrobials achieved per Member State;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 10 Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 10 10. Proposes that the action point on monitoring should be strengthened by establishing a database on antimicrobial use, to be run by the appropriate competent authorities; notes that farmers are already obliged, under
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 10 10. Proposes that the action point on monitoring should be strengthened by establishing a database on antimicrobial use, to be run by the appropriate competent authorities; notes that farmers are already obliged, under
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 10 10. Proposes that the action point on monitoring should be strengthened by establishing a database on antimicrobial use, to be run by the appropriate competent authorities; suggests that research, innovation, better communication and better education and professional training in respect of the use of antimicrobials be promoted; notes that farmers are already obliged, under phytosanitary rules, to record antimicrobial applications in on- farm registers; that data can be entered electronically by farmers or by veterinarians; the raw data would be used by the competent authorities and would not be available to third parties, and collated data would be available at Member State and EU levels for monitoring purposes.
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to oblige the Member States to monitor the use of antibiotics in animal husbandry more efficiently and in an integrated way through the use of databases; points out that registering the use of antibiotics on farms is obligatory;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to take all the actions to ensure a broad and effective diagnostic system at Member State level which can ensure the timely delivery of results in case bacteriological examinations are performed;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes the benefit of antimicrobials in protecting the health and welfare of animals
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Calls for separate monitoring and control by the Member States of resistance in the case of livestock, domestic animals, racing animals, etc., without giving rise to additional financial or administrative burdens for farmers, breeders or vets;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 10 c (new) 10c. Calls on the Commission to ensure that individual Member States have a fast, efficient diagnostic system; the correct use of antibiotics must be guaranteed by the opportunity to obtain precise bacteriological results quickly;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 10 d (new) 10d. Is of the view that data gathered on the use of antibiotics should be made accessible only to experts, the relevant authorities and the decision-makers concerned;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 2 2. Agrees that a holistic approach is needed, based on prudent
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 2 2. Agrees that a holistic approach is needed, based on prudent, appropriate use of antimicrobials and
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for the introduction of reliable approaches in order to effect a significant decrease in resistance when rearing animals; particular attention should be paid to the rearing of young animals, which often come from different breeders and are exposed to a risk of infection when brought together;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for more and better coordinated research to be performed on new antimicrobials as well as other alternatives (vaccination, bio security, breeding for resistance) and evidence based strategies to avoid and control infectious diseases in animals;
source: PE-496.440
2012/10/26
ENVI
10 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex issue of cross-border nature driven by a variety of interconnected factors; whereas
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that the encouragement of appropriate antimicrobial use depends on a change of attitude
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas antimicrobial resistance affects both humans and animals and has dangerous implications for human and animal health; whereas there is a link between the use of antimicrobials
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that more efforts are needed to control the use of antimicrobials in the human and veterinary
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Stresses the need to review provisions related to farm animal welfare which improve animal health thereby reducing the use of veterinary pharmaceuticals; calls on the Commission to re-evaluate provisions on maximum animal density in livestock farming as current herd sizes often prevent individual or smaller animal group treatment thus incentivising prophylactic use of antimicrobials; considers that focusing on livestock strains which are resistant to disease could help ensure that fewer veterinary pharmaceuticals will be needed for rearing purposes but considers this should not replace sound farm management and animal husbandry;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4a (new) 4a. Considers that the pending revision of Directive 2001/82/EC offers an important opportunity to take effective measures to reduce AMR through strengthening the provisions for veterinary medicines, such as: - limiting the right to prescribe antimicrobials to professionally qualified veterinarians only; - separating the right to prescribe from the right to sell antimicrobials thus eradicating economic incentives to prescribe;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. With a view to limiting
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes the important role of vaccines in limiting the development of AMR by reducing the amounts of antimicrobial agents required to treat infections
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9a (new) 9a. Underlines that infection prevention and control is a vital cornerstone in the fight against AMR; calls on the Member States to improve infection control, raise and promote good standards of hygiene, especially hand hygiene, particularly in sensitive environments, such as healthcare institutions, in order to prevent the spread of infections and reduce the need for antibiotics; further calls on the Commission and Member States to increase the exchange of best practice on preventing and reducing healthcare associated infections (HAIs) and to broaden research into the epidemiology of HAIs due to MRSA and C. difficile and other emerging multidrug resistant organisms;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that sound information on the use of antimicrobials in some Member States is still lacking; emphasizes the importance of establishing an effective European network of national surveillance systems in the human health and veterinary sectors
source: PE-496.577
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/10 |
|
events/0/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=748New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=0748 |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE486.077New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-PR-486077_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.371New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-496371_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE494.678&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-494678_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.577New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-496577_EN.html |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121210&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2012-12-10-TOC_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=748New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=0748 |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-373&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0373_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-483New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0483_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/7/08364New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0748:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0748/COM_COM(2011)0748_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0748/COM_COM(2011)0748_EN.pdf |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0748:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to establish an action plan against the rising threats from Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). BACKGROUND: since the introduction of penicillin in the 1940s antimicrobial medicines, such as antibiotics, have become essential for the treatment of many microbial infections in humans and animals. In addition to the treatment of infectious diseases (e.g. pneumonia, tuberculosis, malaria, HIV/AIDS) and hospital-acquired infections (e.g. methicilin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), antimicrobials are vital for reducing the risk of complications in relation to complex medical interventions, such as hip replacements, organ transplants, cancer chemotherapy and the care of premature babies. In addition, antimicrobials are used in veterinary medicine and for non-therapeutic purposes (e.g. disinfectants, preservatives, and food and feed additives). Seventy years later, these applications are now seriously jeopardized by the emergence and spread of microbes that are resistant to affordable and effective firstchoice, or "first-line" medicines, rendering the drugs concerned ineffective for the treatment of the infection. This resistance is a natural biological phenomenon but is amplified by a variety of factors. The inappropriate use of therapeutic antimicrobials in human and veterinary medicine, the use of antimicrobials for non-therapeutic purposes as well as the pollution of the environment by antimicrobials is accelerating the emergence and spread of resistant microorganisms. The consequences are severe. The Commission recall that a subset of drug-resistant bacteria is responsible for about 25 000 human deaths annually. In addition to avoidable death, this also translates into extra healthcare costs and productivity losses of at least EUR 1.5 billion. For their part, the Council and the European Parliament have already examined this issue and on 12May 2011 the European Parliament adopted a non-legislative resolution on antibiotic resistance in which it stresses that AMR has become a huge issue in recent years. To cope with this growing problem and the consequent treatment failures, the EP calls on the Commission to establish an EU-wide plan to combat AMR. This Communication responds to this request. CONTENT: in this regard, the Commission has taken a number of important actions:
Based on such holistic approach, the new actions put forward in this Action Plan aim at:
The Commission proposes to put in place a 5-year Action Plan to fight against AMR based on 12 key actions:
Several Member States have been pro-active in carrying out actions related to those considered at EU level. These actions at national level and the experience gained from it should be the basis of the practical development and implementation of this Action Plan. New
PURPOSE: to establish an action plan against the rising threats from Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). BACKGROUND: since the introduction of penicillin in the 1940s antimicrobial medicines, such as antibiotics, have become essential for the treatment of many microbial infections in humans and animals. In addition to the treatment of infectious diseases (e.g. pneumonia, tuberculosis, malaria, HIV/AIDS) and hospital-acquired infections (e.g. methicilin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), antimicrobials are vital for reducing the risk of complications in relation to complex medical interventions, such as hip replacements, organ transplants, cancer chemotherapy and the care of premature babies. In addition, antimicrobials are used in veterinary medicine and for non-therapeutic purposes (e.g. disinfectants, preservatives, and food and feed additives). Seventy years later, these applications are now seriously jeopardized by the emergence and spread of microbes that are resistant to affordable and effective firstchoice, or "first-line" medicines, rendering the drugs concerned ineffective for the treatment of the infection. This resistance is a natural biological phenomenon but is amplified by a variety of factors. The inappropriate use of therapeutic antimicrobials in human and veterinary medicine, the use of antimicrobials for non-therapeutic purposes as well as the pollution of the environment by antimicrobials is accelerating the emergence and spread of resistant microorganisms. The consequences are severe. The Commission recall that a subset of drug-resistant bacteria is responsible for about 25 000 human deaths annually. In addition to avoidable death, this also translates into extra healthcare costs and productivity losses of at least EUR 1.5 billion. For their part, the Council and the European Parliament have already examined this issue and on 12May 2011 the European Parliament adopted a non-legislative resolution on antibiotic resistance in which it stresses that AMR has become a huge issue in recent years. To cope with this growing problem and the consequent treatment failures, the EP calls on the Commission to establish an EU-wide plan to combat AMR. This Communication responds to this request. CONTENT: in this regard, the Commission has taken a number of important actions:
Based on such holistic approach, the new actions put forward in this Action Plan aim at:
The Commission proposes to put in place a 5-year Action Plan to fight against AMR based on 12 key actions:
Several Member States have been pro-active in carrying out actions related to those considered at EU level. These actions at national level and the experience gained from it should be the basis of the practical development and implementation of this Action Plan. |
activities/0/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2012-12-11T00:00:00New
2012-03-15T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2/text/0 |
Old
The Council adopted conclusions on the impact of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the human health sector and in the veterinary sector, calling upon member states to develop and implement national strategies or action plans for countering AMR. These national strategies or action plans should, amongst others, include the following elements:
The conclusions also call upon the member states and the Commission to examine the conditions of prescription and sale of antimicrobials in order to ascertain whether practices in human and animals healthcare may lead to over-prescription, overuse or misuse of antimicrobials. The Commission is invited to expedite the review of legislative acts in order to take antimicrobial resistance better into account. This applies notably to directive 90/167 laying down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the EU and directive 2001/82 on the EU code relating to veterinary medicinal products. The Commission informed that preparatory work for some of the actions to which it is invited has already been started. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO) about 440 000 new cases of multidrugresistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) emerge annually, causing at least 150 000 deaths. A high percentage of hospital-acquired infections are caused by highly resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). New
The Council adopted conclusions on the impact of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the human health sector and in the veterinary sector, calling upon member states to develop and implement national strategies or action plans for countering AMR. These national strategies or action plans should, amongst others, include the following elements:
The conclusions also call upon the member states and the Commission to examine the conditions of prescription and sale of antimicrobials in order to ascertain whether practices in human and animals healthcare may lead to over-prescription, overuse or misuse of antimicrobials. The Commission is invited to expedite the review of legislative acts in order to take antimicrobial resistance better into account. This applies notably to directive 90/167 laying down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the EU and directive 2001/82 on the EU code relating to veterinary medicinal products. The Commission informed that preparatory work for some of the actions to which it is invited has already been started. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO) about 440 000 new cases of multidrugresistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) emerge annually, causing at least 150 000 deaths. A high percentage of hospital-acquired infections are caused by highly resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-09-19T00:00:00New
2012-11-06T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-03-15T00:00:00New
2012-11-15T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
activities/5 |
|
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/6/committees |
|
activities/6/date |
Old
2012-11-06T00:00:00New
2012-12-11T00:00:00 |
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185720fb8127435bdbeffNew
4f1ac8f9b819f25efd000103 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EFDNew
ECR |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de188070fb8127435bdc2a3New
4f1adadcb819f207b3000095 |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de185fc0fb8127435bdbfbfNew
4f1ac963b819f25efd000132 |
committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4dee5a2d0fb8127435be059fNew
4f1adb75b819f207b30000c6 |
committees/1/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de188650fb8127435bdc331New
4f1adb8fb819f207b30000cf |
committees/1/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de186f60fb8127435bdc122New
4f1ad983b819f207b300001f |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
procedure/subject/2 |
Old
4.20.01 Medicine, diseases, AIDSNew
4.20.01 Medicine, diseases |
activities/8/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/9/docs |
|
activities/9/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/7/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2011-11-15T00:00:00New
2012-07-12T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
DateNew
Committee draft report |
activities/5 |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2012-03-08T00:00:00New
2012-10-16T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
EP officialisationNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/7/date |
Old
2012-09-14T00:00:00New
2012-11-15T00:00:00 |
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Deadline AmendmentsNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
activities/8 |
|
activities/10 |
|
activities/12 |
|
activities/1/commission/0/Commissioner |
Old
DALLI JohnNew
BORG Tonio |
activities/12/commission/0/Commissioner |
Old
DALLI JohnNew
BORG Tonio |
other/0/commissioner |
Old
DALLI JohnNew
BORG Tonio |
activities/11/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/12 |
|
activities/13 |
|
activities/10/date |
Old
2012-11-14T00:00:00New
2012-11-15T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=748New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0748/COM_COM(2011)0748_EN.pdf |
activities/10 |
|
activities/9/committees |
|
activities/9/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/8/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.577
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.371
|
activities/7 |
|
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
ECRNew
EFD |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/4 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
ECRNew
EFD |
committees/1/shadows/4 |
|
activities/4/text |
|
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE486.077
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-09-11T00:00:00New
2012-09-14T00:00:00 |
committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=748
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=748
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=748
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=748
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/committees/1/date |
2012-03-23T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/4 |
|
committees/1/date |
2012-03-23T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=748
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|