BETA


2012/2066(INI) Protection of public health from endocrine disrupters

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI WESTLUND Åsa (icon: S&D S&D) KLASS Christa (icon: PPE PPE), LEPAGE Corinne (icon: ALDE ALDE), RIVASI Michèle (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), SCHLYTER Carl (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), OUZKÝ Miroslav (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2013/03/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/03/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 489 votes to 102, with 19 abstentions, a resolution on the protection of public health from endocrine disrupters.

Parliament highlights that hormone-related disorders and illnesses in humans have increased over the last 20 years, including impaired sperm quality, early onset of puberty, increased incidence of deformed sexual organs, increased incidence of certain forms of cancer, and metabolic diseases. Certain neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, impacts on neurodevelopmental functions, the immune system or epigenetics, might be linked to exposure to chemical substances with endocrine-disrupting properties. These substances acting as endocrine disrupters can have oestrogenic or antioestrogenic effects which interfere with the function of the female reproductive system, altering hormone concentrations and menstrual cycles of women, as well as their fertility, favouring the development of uterine diseases. Furthermore, an increasing number of scientific studies have suggested that endocrine disrupting chemicals, particularly in combination, play a role in both chronic diseases, including hormone related cancers, obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Application of the precautionary principle : in the abovementioned context, Parliament considers that the precautionary principle should be applied . It requires the Commission and the legislators to take adequate measures to reduce short- and long-term exposure of humans to endocrine disrupters where necessary, while undertaking a much greater research effort to improve the state of the scientific knowledge on the impact of endocrine disrupters on human health. Members take the view that where adverse effects of endocrine disrupting substances can reasonably be presumed, measures to protect human health have to be implemented in line with the precautionary principle.

Protecting pregnant women and babies : Members consider that protecting women from potential risks of endocrine disrupters for their reproductive health is of utmost importance and call on the Commission to support long-term studies monitoring women’s health over large spans of their lives.

Parliament calls on the Commission, as part of its current review of the 1999 Community strategy on endocrine disrupters, to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015 , to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals, including hazard and risk assessments, so as to reduce the exposure of humans – in particular vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, babies, children and teenagers – to hormone disrupters as appropriate.

The resolution stresses that it is essential to base the criteria for determining endocrine disrupting properties on a comprehensive hazard assessment carried out on the basis of state-of-the-art science, taking into account potential combination effects as well as long-term effects and effects during critical windows of development.

The Commission is called upon to take further action in the field of chemicals policy and step up research that provides both for the assessment of the endocrine disrupting potential of individual chemicals as well as the possibility to assess the cumulative impact of identified combinations of substances on the endocrine system.

Defining the main sources of endocrine disrupters : Parliament takes the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disrupters should be based on criteria for defining ‘adverse effect’ and ‘endocrine mode of action’. It stresses that any possible combination effects, such as mixtures or cocktail effects, should be taken into consideration. The criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disrupter must be scientifically based and horizontal. A weight-of-evidence approach should be used and that no single criterion should be seen as cut-off or decisive for the identification of an endocrine disrupter. However, Plenary did not accept the measure proposed by the committee responsible which refused the attempts to introduce the criterion of ‘potency’ as a cut-off for the definition of endocrine disrupters , as this would unduly limit the definition of endocrine disrupters, and make it scientifically flawed and not coherent with the classification of Carcinogenic, Mutagenic and Reprotoxic (CMR) substances which is based on strength of evidence.

Parliament is favourable to establishing testing methods such as those developed by the OECD, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM) covering sex hormones and thyroid hormones as well as steroidogenesis. The development of non-animal test methods should be promoted. Members also propose the development of registers of reproductive health disorders to fill the existing data gap at EU level as well as reliable data on the socioeconomic impacts of hormone-related disorders and illnesses.

Towards a EU strategy on endocrine disrupters : given that there are major difficulties in proving the causal link between exposure to individual chemicals and disruption of the hormonal balance with risk of health impacts, Parliament calls on the Commission to revise its EU strategy on endocrine disrupters so that it delivers effective protection of human health by placing greater emphasis on the precautionary principle, while observing the proportionality principle , to work towards reducing human exposure to endocrine disrupters where necessary.

In the case of chemicals with endocrine-disrupting properties, the difficulties of proving a causal link are exacerbated by a number of factors, such as that: (i) a long time may elapse between exposure and the epigenetic effects, and endocrine disrupters can have a detrimental effect several generations into the future; (ii) the risk of a negative impact varies in magnitude at different stages of development, and critical windows, e.g. during foetal development, may be very short; (iii) endocrine disrupters can act at extremely low concentrations and thus cause adverse effects at a low dosage.

In this context, the Commission is called upon to:

take greater account of the fact that consumers need to have reliable information – presented in an appropriate form and in a language that they can understand – about the dangers of endocrine disrupters, their effects, and possible ways of protecting themselves; put forward a concrete timetable for applying the future criteria and modified testing requirements for endocrine disrupters in relevant legislation, including reviews of the approval of active substances used in pesticides and biocides ; carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015 , to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals including hazard and risk assessments; lay down an exact timetable, specifying the intermediate stages, for the purposes of: (i) applying the future criteria serving to identify possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals; (ii) reviewing the relevant legislation; (iii) publishing a regularly updated list of priority endocrine disrupters , the first version of which should be published by 20 December 2014; (iv) taking all measures necessary to reduce the exposure of the EU public and the environment to endocrine disrupters .

No limit value setting : plenary stresses that current science does not provide sufficient basis for setting a limit value below which adverse effects do not occur, and endocrine disrupters should therefore be regarded as ‘ non-threshold’ substances , and that any exposure to such substances may entail a risk, unless the manufacturer can show scientific proof that a threshold can be identified, taking into account increased sensitivities during critical windows of development, and the effects of mixtures.

Further actions are called for at EU level such as:

supporting targeted research projects on substances likely to affect the endocrine system; requiring all products imported from third countries to comply with all present and future EU legislation on endocrine disrupters; ensuring that all relevant current and future legislation applies horizontally the criteria for identifying known, probable and potential endocrine disrupters, so as to achieve a high level of protection; including all relevant stakeholders in cooperation efforts to introduce the necessary legislative changes, in order to improve protection of human health from hormone-disrupting chemicals, and to devise information campaigns; considering the possibility of establishing a research centre for endocrine disrupters which should research in and coordinate knowledge on endocrine disrupters at EU level; promoting and financing public information programmes on the health risks of endocrine disrupters, so as to allow consumers, in full knowledge of the facts, to adapt their behaviour and lifestyles (in particular pregnant women and children); improving training programmes for health professionals in this field.

Lastly, Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States to support Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) activities and to promote active policies to reduce human and environment exposure to EDCs in all relevant international forums, including the WHO.

It should be noted that an alternative motion for a resolution tabled by the ECR Group was rejected in Plenary.

Documents
2013/03/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/03/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/01/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report drafted by Åsa WESTLUND (S&D, SE) on the protection of public health from endocrine disrupters.

Members highlight that hormone-related disorders and illnesses in humans have increased over the last 20 years, including impaired sperm quality, early onset of puberty, increased incidence of deformed sexual organs, increased incidence of certain forms of cancer, and metabolic diseases. Certain neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, impacts on neurodevelopmental functions, the immune system or epigenetics, might be linked to exposure to chemical substances with endocrine-disrupting properties. These substances acting as endocrine disrupters can have oestrogenic or antioestrogenic effects which interfere with the function of the female reproductive system, altering hormone concentrations and menstrual cycles of women, as well as their fertility, favouring the development of uterine diseases. Furthermore, an increasing number of scientific studies have suggested that endocrine disrupting chemicals, particularly in combination, play a role in both chronic diseases, including hormone related cancers, obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Application of the precautionary principle : in the abovementioned context, Members consider that the precautionary principle should be applied . It requires the Commission and the legislators to take adequate measures to reduce short- and long-term exposure of humans to endocrine disrupters where necessary, while undertaking a much greater research effort to improve the state of the scientific knowledge on the impact of endocrine disrupters on human health. Members take the view that where adverse effects of endocrine disrupting substances can reasonably be presumed, measures to protect human health have to be implemented in line with the precautionary principle.

Protecting women : Members consider that protecting women from potential risks of endocrine disrupters for their reproductive health is of utmost importance and call on the Commission to support long-term studies monitoring women’s health over large spans of their lives. The report stresses that it is essential to base the criteria for determining endocrine disrupting properties on a comprehensive hazard assessment carried out on the basis of state-of-theart science, taking into account potential combination effects as well as long-term effects and effects during critical windows of development.

The Commission is called upon to take further action in the field of chemicals policy and step up research that provides both for the assessment of the endocrine disrupting potential of individual chemicals as well as the possibility to assess the cumulative impact of identified combinations of substances on the endocrine system.

Defining the main sources of endocrine disrupters : Members take the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disrupters should be based on criteria for defining ‘adverse effect’ and ‘endocrine mode of action’. They stress that any possible combination effects, such as mixtures or cocktail effects, should be taken into consideration. The criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disrupter must be scientifically based and horizontal. Members strongly disagree with the attempts to introduce the criterion of ‘potency’ as a cut-off for the definition of endocrine disrupters , as this would unduly limit the definition of endocrine disrupters, and make it scientifically flawed and not coherent with the classification of Carcinogenic, Mutagenic and Reprotoxic (CMR) substances which is based on strength of evidence. The Commission is called upon to introduce in all relevant EU legislation appropriate testing requirements for the identification of substances with endocrine-disrupting properties – such as those developed by the OECD, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM). The development of non-animal test methods should be promoted.

Members propose the development of registers of reproductive health disorders to fill the existing data gap at EU level as well as reliable data on the socioeconomic impacts of hormone-related disorders and illnesses.

Towards a EU strategy on endocrine disrupters : given that there are major difficulties in proving the causal link between exposure to individual chemicals and disruption of the hormonal balance with risk of health impacts, Members call on the Commission to revise its EU strategy on endocrine disrupters so that it delivers effective protection of human health by placing greater emphasis on the precautionary principle, while observing the proportionality principle , to work towards reducing human exposure to endocrine disrupters where necessary.

In this context, the Commission is called upon to:

take greater account of the fact that consumers need to have reliable information – presented in an appropriate form and in a language that they can understand – about the dangers of endocrine disrupters, their effects, and possible ways of protecting themselves; put forward a concrete timetable for applying the future criteria and modified testing requirements for endocrine disrupters in relevant legislation, including reviews of the approval of active substances used in pesticides and biocides ; carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015 , to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals including hazard and risk assessments; lay down an exact timetable, specifying the intermediate stages, for the purposes of: (i) applying the future criteria serving to identify possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals; (ii) reviewing the relevant legislation; (iii) publishing a regularly updated list of priority endocrine disrupters , the first version of which should be published by 20 December 2014; (iv) taking all measures necessary to reduce the exposure of the EU public and the environment to endocrine disrupters .

No limit value setting : Members stress that current science does not provide sufficient basis for setting a limit value below which adverse effects do not occur. Endocrine disrupters should therefore be regarded as ‘ non-threshold’ substances , and that any exposure to such substances may entail a risk, unless the manufacturer can show scientific proof that a threshold can be identified.

Further actions are called for at EU level such as:

supporting targeted research projects on substances likely to affect the endocrine system; requiring all products imported from third countries to comply with all present and future EU legislation on endocrine disrupters; ensuring that all relevant current and future legislation applies horizontally the criteria for identifying known, probable and potential endocrine disrupters, so as to achieve a high level of protection; including all relevant stakeholders in cooperation efforts to introduce the necessary legislative changes, in order to improve protection of human health from hormone-disrupting chemicals, and to devise information campaigns; considering the possibility of establishing a research centre for endocrine disrupters which should research in and coordinate knowledge on endocrine disrupters at EU level; promoting and financing public information programmes on the health risks of endocrine disrupters, so as to allow consumers, in full knowledge of the facts, to adapt their behaviour and lifestyles (in particular pregnant women and children); improving training programmes for health professionals in this field.

Lastly, Members call on the Commission and the Member States to support Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) activities and to promote active policies to reduce human and environment exposure to EDCs in all relevant international forums, including the WHO.

Documents
2013/01/23
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/01/22
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2012/11/27
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2012/11/15
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2012/04/20
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2012/04/12
   EP - WESTLUND Åsa (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI

Documents

Activities

AmendmentsDossier
170 2012/2066(INI)
2012/11/27 ENVI 157 amendments...
source: PE-500.605
2013/01/22 ENVI 13 amendments...
source: PE-502.204

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/5
name
SOUSA Alda
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.297
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-PR-496297_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.605
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-500605_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.204
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-502204_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2013-01-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0027_EN.html title: A7-0027/2013
summary
events/2
date
2013-01-30T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0027_EN.html title: A7-0027/2013
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130312&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2012-03-12-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2013-03-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0091_EN.html title: T7-0091/2013
summary
events/5
date
2013-03-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0091_EN.html title: T7-0091/2013
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: WESTLUND Åsa date: 2012-04-12T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2012-04-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WESTLUND Åsa group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-27&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0027_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-91
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0091_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2012-04-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: KLASS Christa group: ALDE name: LEPAGE Corinne group: Verts/ALE name: RIVASI Michèle group: Verts/ALE name: SCHLYTER Carl group: ECR name: OUZKÝ Miroslav group: GUE/NGL name: SOUSA Alda responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2012-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: WESTLUND Åsa
  • date: 2013-01-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: KLASS Christa group: ALDE name: LEPAGE Corinne group: Verts/ALE name: RIVASI Michèle group: Verts/ALE name: SCHLYTER Carl group: ECR name: OUZKÝ Miroslav group: GUE/NGL name: SOUSA Alda responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2012-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: WESTLUND Åsa
  • date: 2013-01-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-27&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0027/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130312&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22553&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-91 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0091/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Health and Food Safety commissioner: BORG Tonio
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2012-04-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WESTLUND Åsa group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ENVI
date
2012-04-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: S&D name: WESTLUND Åsa
docs
  • date: 2012-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.297 title: PE496.297 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2012-11-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.605 title: PE500.605 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-01-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.204 title: PE502.204 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2012-04-20T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-01-23T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-01-30T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-27&language=EN title: A7-0027/2013 summary: The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report drafted by Åsa WESTLUND (S&D, SE) on the protection of public health from endocrine disrupters. Members highlight that hormone-related disorders and illnesses in humans have increased over the last 20 years, including impaired sperm quality, early onset of puberty, increased incidence of deformed sexual organs, increased incidence of certain forms of cancer, and metabolic diseases. Certain neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, impacts on neurodevelopmental functions, the immune system or epigenetics, might be linked to exposure to chemical substances with endocrine-disrupting properties. These substances acting as endocrine disrupters can have oestrogenic or antioestrogenic effects which interfere with the function of the female reproductive system, altering hormone concentrations and menstrual cycles of women, as well as their fertility, favouring the development of uterine diseases. Furthermore, an increasing number of scientific studies have suggested that endocrine disrupting chemicals, particularly in combination, play a role in both chronic diseases, including hormone related cancers, obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Application of the precautionary principle : in the abovementioned context, Members consider that the precautionary principle should be applied . It requires the Commission and the legislators to take adequate measures to reduce short- and long-term exposure of humans to endocrine disrupters where necessary, while undertaking a much greater research effort to improve the state of the scientific knowledge on the impact of endocrine disrupters on human health. Members take the view that where adverse effects of endocrine disrupting substances can reasonably be presumed, measures to protect human health have to be implemented in line with the precautionary principle. Protecting women : Members consider that protecting women from potential risks of endocrine disrupters for their reproductive health is of utmost importance and call on the Commission to support long-term studies monitoring women’s health over large spans of their lives. The report stresses that it is essential to base the criteria for determining endocrine disrupting properties on a comprehensive hazard assessment carried out on the basis of state-of-theart science, taking into account potential combination effects as well as long-term effects and effects during critical windows of development. The Commission is called upon to take further action in the field of chemicals policy and step up research that provides both for the assessment of the endocrine disrupting potential of individual chemicals as well as the possibility to assess the cumulative impact of identified combinations of substances on the endocrine system. Defining the main sources of endocrine disrupters : Members take the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disrupters should be based on criteria for defining ‘adverse effect’ and ‘endocrine mode of action’. They stress that any possible combination effects, such as mixtures or cocktail effects, should be taken into consideration. The criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disrupter must be scientifically based and horizontal. Members strongly disagree with the attempts to introduce the criterion of ‘potency’ as a cut-off for the definition of endocrine disrupters , as this would unduly limit the definition of endocrine disrupters, and make it scientifically flawed and not coherent with the classification of Carcinogenic, Mutagenic and Reprotoxic (CMR) substances which is based on strength of evidence. The Commission is called upon to introduce in all relevant EU legislation appropriate testing requirements for the identification of substances with endocrine-disrupting properties – such as those developed by the OECD, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM). The development of non-animal test methods should be promoted. Members propose the development of registers of reproductive health disorders to fill the existing data gap at EU level as well as reliable data on the socioeconomic impacts of hormone-related disorders and illnesses. Towards a EU strategy on endocrine disrupters : given that there are major difficulties in proving the causal link between exposure to individual chemicals and disruption of the hormonal balance with risk of health impacts, Members call on the Commission to revise its EU strategy on endocrine disrupters so that it delivers effective protection of human health by placing greater emphasis on the precautionary principle, while observing the proportionality principle , to work towards reducing human exposure to endocrine disrupters where necessary. In this context, the Commission is called upon to: take greater account of the fact that consumers need to have reliable information – presented in an appropriate form and in a language that they can understand – about the dangers of endocrine disrupters, their effects, and possible ways of protecting themselves; put forward a concrete timetable for applying the future criteria and modified testing requirements for endocrine disrupters in relevant legislation, including reviews of the approval of active substances used in pesticides and biocides ; carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015 , to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals including hazard and risk assessments; lay down an exact timetable, specifying the intermediate stages, for the purposes of: (i) applying the future criteria serving to identify possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals; (ii) reviewing the relevant legislation; (iii) publishing a regularly updated list of priority endocrine disrupters , the first version of which should be published by 20 December 2014; (iv) taking all measures necessary to reduce the exposure of the EU public and the environment to endocrine disrupters . No limit value setting : Members stress that current science does not provide sufficient basis for setting a limit value below which adverse effects do not occur. Endocrine disrupters should therefore be regarded as ‘ non-threshold’ substances , and that any exposure to such substances may entail a risk, unless the manufacturer can show scientific proof that a threshold can be identified. Further actions are called for at EU level such as: supporting targeted research projects on substances likely to affect the endocrine system; requiring all products imported from third countries to comply with all present and future EU legislation on endocrine disrupters; ensuring that all relevant current and future legislation applies horizontally the criteria for identifying known, probable and potential endocrine disrupters, so as to achieve a high level of protection; including all relevant stakeholders in cooperation efforts to introduce the necessary legislative changes, in order to improve protection of human health from hormone-disrupting chemicals, and to devise information campaigns; considering the possibility of establishing a research centre for endocrine disrupters which should research in and coordinate knowledge on endocrine disrupters at EU level; promoting and financing public information programmes on the health risks of endocrine disrupters, so as to allow consumers, in full knowledge of the facts, to adapt their behaviour and lifestyles (in particular pregnant women and children); improving training programmes for health professionals in this field. Lastly, Members call on the Commission and the Member States to support Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) activities and to promote active policies to reduce human and environment exposure to EDCs in all relevant international forums, including the WHO.
  • date: 2013-03-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130312&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-03-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22553&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-03-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-91 title: T7-0091/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 489 votes to 102, with 19 abstentions, a resolution on the protection of public health from endocrine disrupters. Parliament highlights that hormone-related disorders and illnesses in humans have increased over the last 20 years, including impaired sperm quality, early onset of puberty, increased incidence of deformed sexual organs, increased incidence of certain forms of cancer, and metabolic diseases. Certain neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, impacts on neurodevelopmental functions, the immune system or epigenetics, might be linked to exposure to chemical substances with endocrine-disrupting properties. These substances acting as endocrine disrupters can have oestrogenic or antioestrogenic effects which interfere with the function of the female reproductive system, altering hormone concentrations and menstrual cycles of women, as well as their fertility, favouring the development of uterine diseases. Furthermore, an increasing number of scientific studies have suggested that endocrine disrupting chemicals, particularly in combination, play a role in both chronic diseases, including hormone related cancers, obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Application of the precautionary principle : in the abovementioned context, Parliament considers that the precautionary principle should be applied . It requires the Commission and the legislators to take adequate measures to reduce short- and long-term exposure of humans to endocrine disrupters where necessary, while undertaking a much greater research effort to improve the state of the scientific knowledge on the impact of endocrine disrupters on human health. Members take the view that where adverse effects of endocrine disrupting substances can reasonably be presumed, measures to protect human health have to be implemented in line with the precautionary principle. Protecting pregnant women and babies : Members consider that protecting women from potential risks of endocrine disrupters for their reproductive health is of utmost importance and call on the Commission to support long-term studies monitoring women’s health over large spans of their lives. Parliament calls on the Commission, as part of its current review of the 1999 Community strategy on endocrine disrupters, to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015 , to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals, including hazard and risk assessments, so as to reduce the exposure of humans – in particular vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, babies, children and teenagers – to hormone disrupters as appropriate. The resolution stresses that it is essential to base the criteria for determining endocrine disrupting properties on a comprehensive hazard assessment carried out on the basis of state-of-the-art science, taking into account potential combination effects as well as long-term effects and effects during critical windows of development. The Commission is called upon to take further action in the field of chemicals policy and step up research that provides both for the assessment of the endocrine disrupting potential of individual chemicals as well as the possibility to assess the cumulative impact of identified combinations of substances on the endocrine system. Defining the main sources of endocrine disrupters : Parliament takes the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disrupters should be based on criteria for defining ‘adverse effect’ and ‘endocrine mode of action’. It stresses that any possible combination effects, such as mixtures or cocktail effects, should be taken into consideration. The criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disrupter must be scientifically based and horizontal. A weight-of-evidence approach should be used and that no single criterion should be seen as cut-off or decisive for the identification of an endocrine disrupter. However, Plenary did not accept the measure proposed by the committee responsible which refused the attempts to introduce the criterion of ‘potency’ as a cut-off for the definition of endocrine disrupters , as this would unduly limit the definition of endocrine disrupters, and make it scientifically flawed and not coherent with the classification of Carcinogenic, Mutagenic and Reprotoxic (CMR) substances which is based on strength of evidence. Parliament is favourable to establishing testing methods such as those developed by the OECD, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM) covering sex hormones and thyroid hormones as well as steroidogenesis. The development of non-animal test methods should be promoted. Members also propose the development of registers of reproductive health disorders to fill the existing data gap at EU level as well as reliable data on the socioeconomic impacts of hormone-related disorders and illnesses. Towards a EU strategy on endocrine disrupters : given that there are major difficulties in proving the causal link between exposure to individual chemicals and disruption of the hormonal balance with risk of health impacts, Parliament calls on the Commission to revise its EU strategy on endocrine disrupters so that it delivers effective protection of human health by placing greater emphasis on the precautionary principle, while observing the proportionality principle , to work towards reducing human exposure to endocrine disrupters where necessary. In the case of chemicals with endocrine-disrupting properties, the difficulties of proving a causal link are exacerbated by a number of factors, such as that: (i) a long time may elapse between exposure and the epigenetic effects, and endocrine disrupters can have a detrimental effect several generations into the future; (ii) the risk of a negative impact varies in magnitude at different stages of development, and critical windows, e.g. during foetal development, may be very short; (iii) endocrine disrupters can act at extremely low concentrations and thus cause adverse effects at a low dosage. In this context, the Commission is called upon to: take greater account of the fact that consumers need to have reliable information – presented in an appropriate form and in a language that they can understand – about the dangers of endocrine disrupters, their effects, and possible ways of protecting themselves; put forward a concrete timetable for applying the future criteria and modified testing requirements for endocrine disrupters in relevant legislation, including reviews of the approval of active substances used in pesticides and biocides ; carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015 , to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals including hazard and risk assessments; lay down an exact timetable, specifying the intermediate stages, for the purposes of: (i) applying the future criteria serving to identify possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals; (ii) reviewing the relevant legislation; (iii) publishing a regularly updated list of priority endocrine disrupters , the first version of which should be published by 20 December 2014; (iv) taking all measures necessary to reduce the exposure of the EU public and the environment to endocrine disrupters . No limit value setting : plenary stresses that current science does not provide sufficient basis for setting a limit value below which adverse effects do not occur, and endocrine disrupters should therefore be regarded as ‘ non-threshold’ substances , and that any exposure to such substances may entail a risk, unless the manufacturer can show scientific proof that a threshold can be identified, taking into account increased sensitivities during critical windows of development, and the effects of mixtures. Further actions are called for at EU level such as: supporting targeted research projects on substances likely to affect the endocrine system; requiring all products imported from third countries to comply with all present and future EU legislation on endocrine disrupters; ensuring that all relevant current and future legislation applies horizontally the criteria for identifying known, probable and potential endocrine disrupters, so as to achieve a high level of protection; including all relevant stakeholders in cooperation efforts to introduce the necessary legislative changes, in order to improve protection of human health from hormone-disrupting chemicals, and to devise information campaigns; considering the possibility of establishing a research centre for endocrine disrupters which should research in and coordinate knowledge on endocrine disrupters at EU level; promoting and financing public information programmes on the health risks of endocrine disrupters, so as to allow consumers, in full knowledge of the facts, to adapt their behaviour and lifestyles (in particular pregnant women and children); improving training programmes for health professionals in this field. Lastly, Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States to support Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) activities and to promote active policies to reduce human and environment exposure to EDCs in all relevant international forums, including the WHO. It should be noted that an alternative motion for a resolution tabled by the ECR Group was rejected in Plenary.
  • date: 2013-03-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/index_en.htm title: Health and Consumers commissioner: BORG Tonio
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ENVI/7/08967
New
  • ENVI/7/08967
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.20 Public health
  • 4.20.01 Medicine, diseases
New
3.70.13
Dangerous substances, toxic and radioactive wastes (storage, transport)
4.20
Public health
4.20.01
Medicine, diseases
activities/0/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: KLASS Christa group: ALDE name: LEPAGE Corinne group: Verts/ALE name: RIVASI Michèle group: Verts/ALE name: SCHLYTER Carl group: ECR name: OUZKÝ Miroslav group: GUE/NGL name: SOUSA Alda responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2012-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: WESTLUND Åsa
activities/0/date
Old
2013-01-22T00:00:00
New
2012-04-20T00:00:00
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.204 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE502.204
activities/0/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: KLASS Christa group: ALDE name: LEPAGE Corinne group: Verts/ALE name: RIVASI Michèle group: Verts/ALE name: SCHLYTER Carl group: ECR name: OUZKÝ Miroslav group: GUE/NGL name: SOUSA Alda responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2012-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: WESTLUND Åsa
activities/1/date
Old
2012-11-15T00:00:00
New
2013-01-23T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.297 type: Committee draft report title: PE496.297
activities/1/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2
date
2012-11-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.605 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE500.605
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/3/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: KLASS Christa group: ALDE name: LEPAGE Corinne group: Verts/ALE name: RIVASI Michèle group: Verts/ALE name: SCHLYTER Carl group: ECR name: OUZKÝ Miroslav responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2012-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: WESTLUND Åsa
activities/3/date
Old
2012-04-20T00:00:00
New
2013-03-12T00:00:00
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130312&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4
date
2013-01-23T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: KLASS Christa group: ALDE name: LEPAGE Corinne group: Verts/ALE name: RIVASI Michèle group: Verts/ALE name: SCHLYTER Carl group: ECR name: OUZKÝ Miroslav responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2012-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: WESTLUND Åsa
activities/4/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22553&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/4/docs/1/text
  • The European Parliament adopted by 489 votes to 102, with 19 abstentions, a resolution on the protection of public health from endocrine disrupters.

    Parliament highlights that hormone-related disorders and illnesses in humans have increased over the last 20 years, including impaired sperm quality, early onset of puberty, increased incidence of deformed sexual organs, increased incidence of certain forms of cancer, and metabolic diseases. Certain neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, impacts on neurodevelopmental functions, the immune system or epigenetics, might be linked to exposure to chemical substances with endocrine-disrupting properties. These substances acting as endocrine disrupters can have oestrogenic or antioestrogenic effects which interfere with the function of the female reproductive system, altering hormone concentrations and menstrual cycles of women, as well as their fertility, favouring the development of uterine diseases. Furthermore, an increasing number of scientific studies have suggested that endocrine disrupting chemicals, particularly in combination, play a role in both chronic diseases, including hormone related cancers, obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

    Application of the precautionary principle: in the abovementioned context, Parliament considers that the precautionary principle should be applied. It requires the Commission and the legislators to take adequate measures to reduce short- and long-term exposure of humans to endocrine disrupters where necessary, while undertaking a much greater research effort to improve the state of the scientific knowledge on the impact of endocrine disrupters on human health. Members take the view that where adverse effects of endocrine disrupting substances can reasonably be presumed, measures to protect human health have to be implemented in line with the precautionary principle.

    Protecting pregnant women and babies: Members consider that protecting women from potential risks of endocrine disrupters for their reproductive health is of utmost importance and call on the Commission to support long-term studies monitoring women’s health over large spans of their lives.

    Parliament calls on the Commission, as part of its current review of the 1999 Community strategy on endocrine disrupters, to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015, to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals, including hazard and risk assessments, so as to reduce the exposure of humans – in particular vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, babies, children and teenagers – to hormone disrupters as appropriate.

    The resolution stresses that it is essential to base the criteria for determining endocrine disrupting properties on a comprehensive hazard assessment carried out on the basis of state-of-the-art science, taking into account potential combination effects as well as long-term effects and effects during critical windows of development.

    The Commission is called upon to take further action in the field of chemicals policy and step up research that provides both for the assessment of the endocrine disrupting potential of individual chemicals as well as the possibility to assess the cumulative impact of identified combinations of substances on the endocrine system.

    Defining the main sources of endocrine disrupters: Parliament takes the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disrupters should be based on criteria for defining ‘adverse effect’ and ‘endocrine mode of action’. It stresses that any possible combination effects, such as mixtures or cocktail effects, should be taken into consideration. The criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disrupter must be scientifically based and horizontal. A weight-of-evidence approach should be used and that no single criterion should be seen as cut-off or decisive for the identification of an endocrine disrupter. However, Plenary did not accept the measure proposed by the committee responsible which refused the attempts to introduce the criterion of ‘potency’ as a cut-off for the definition of endocrine disrupters, as this would unduly limit the definition of endocrine disrupters, and make it scientifically flawed and not coherent with the classification of Carcinogenic, Mutagenic and Reprotoxic (CMR) substances which is based on strength of evidence.

    Parliament is favourable to establishing testing methods such as those developed by the OECD, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM) covering sex hormones and thyroid hormones as well as steroidogenesis. The development of non-animal test methods should be promoted. Members also propose the development of registers of reproductive health disorders to fill the existing data gap at EU level as well as reliable data on the socioeconomic impacts of hormone-related disorders and illnesses.

    Towards a EU strategy on endocrine disrupters: given that there are major difficulties in proving the causal link between exposure to individual chemicals and disruption of the hormonal balance with risk of health impacts, Parliament calls on the Commission to revise its EU strategy on endocrine disrupters so that it delivers effective protection of human health by placing greater emphasis on the precautionary principle, while observing the proportionality principle, to work towards reducing human exposure to endocrine disrupters where necessary.

    In the case of chemicals with endocrine-disrupting properties, the difficulties of proving a causal link are exacerbated by a number of factors, such as that: (i) a long time may elapse between exposure and the epigenetic effects, and endocrine disrupters can have a detrimental effect several generations into the future; (ii) the risk of a negative impact varies in magnitude at different stages of development, and critical windows, e.g. during foetal development, may be very short; (iii) endocrine disrupters can act at extremely low concentrations and thus cause adverse effects at a low dosage.

    In this context, the Commission is called upon to:

    • take greater account of the fact that consumers need to have reliable information – presented in an appropriate form and in a language that they can understand – about the dangers of endocrine disrupters, their effects, and possible ways of protecting themselves;
    • put forward a concrete timetable for applying the future criteria and modified testing requirements for endocrine disrupters in relevant legislation, including reviews of the approval of active substances used in pesticides and biocides;
    • carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015, to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals including hazard and risk assessments;
    • lay down an exact timetable, specifying the intermediate stages, for the purposes of: (i) applying the future criteria serving to identify possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals; (ii) reviewing the relevant legislation; (iii) publishing a regularly updated list of priority endocrine disrupters, the first version of which should be published by 20 December 2014; (iv) taking all measures necessary to reduce the exposure of the EU public and the environment to endocrine disrupters.

    No limit value setting: plenary stresses that current science does not provide sufficient basis for setting a limit value below which adverse effects do not occur, and endocrine disrupters should therefore be regarded as ‘non-threshold’ substances, and that any exposure to such substances may entail a risk, unless the manufacturer can show scientific proof that a threshold can be identified, taking into account increased sensitivities during critical windows of development, and the effects of mixtures.

    Further actions are called for at EU level such as:

    • supporting targeted research projects on substances likely to affect the endocrine system;
    • requiring all products imported from third countries to comply with all present and future EU legislation on endocrine disrupters;
    • ensuring that all relevant current and future legislation applies horizontally the criteria for identifying known, probable and potential endocrine disrupters, so as to achieve a high level of protection;
    • including all relevant stakeholders in cooperation efforts to introduce the necessary legislative changes, in order to improve protection of human health from hormone-disrupting chemicals, and to devise information campaigns;
    • considering the possibility of establishing a research centre for endocrine disrupters which should research in and coordinate knowledge on endocrine disrupters at EU level;
    • promoting and financing public information programmes on the health risks of endocrine disrupters, so as to allow consumers, in full knowledge of the facts, to adapt their behaviour and lifestyles (in particular pregnant women and children);
    • improving training programmes for health professionals in this field.

    Lastly, Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States to support Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) activities and to promote active policies to reduce human and environment exposure to EDCs in all relevant international forums, including the WHO.

    It should be noted that an alternative motion for a resolution tabled by the ECR Group was rejected in Plenary.

activities/4/type
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/6
date
2013-03-12T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in Parliament
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de189640fb8127435bdc491
New
4f1adc92b819f207b3000125
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de185c40fb8127435bdbf69
New
4f1ac99bb819f25efd000145
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de186630fb8127435bdc053
New
4f1ad252b819f2759500001a
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de188030fb8127435bdc29d
New
4f1adac2b819f207b300008c
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref
Old
4de1887b0fb8127435bdc353
New
4f1adb22b819f207b30000ab
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
4de187360fb8127435bdc179
New
4f1ada22b819f207b3000055
committees/0/shadows/5
group
GUE/NGL
name
SOUSA Alda
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject/1
Old
4.20.01 Medicine, diseases, AIDS
New
4.20.01 Medicine, diseases
activities/6/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/7/date
Old
2013-03-13T00:00:00
New
2013-03-14T00:00:00
activities/7/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-91 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0091/2013
activities/7/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/6
date
2013-03-05T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report drafted by Åsa WESTLUND (S&D, SE) on the protection of public health from endocrine disrupters.

    Members highlight that hormone-related disorders and illnesses in humans have increased over the last 20 years, including impaired sperm quality, early onset of puberty, increased incidence of deformed sexual organs, increased incidence of certain forms of cancer, and metabolic diseases. Certain neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, impacts on neurodevelopmental functions, the immune system or epigenetics, might be linked to exposure to chemical substances with endocrine-disrupting properties. These substances acting as endocrine disrupters can have oestrogenic or antioestrogenic effects which interfere with the function of the female reproductive system, altering hormone concentrations and menstrual cycles of women, as well as their fertility, favouring the development of uterine diseases. Furthermore, an increasing number of scientific studies have suggested that endocrine disrupting chemicals, particularly in combination, play a role in both chronic diseases, including hormone related cancers, obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

    Application of the precautionary principle: in the abovementioned context, Members consider that the precautionary principle should be applied. It requires the Commission and the legislators to take adequate measures to reduce short- and long-term exposure of humans to endocrine disrupters where necessary, while undertaking a much greater research effort to improve the state of the scientific knowledge on the impact of endocrine disrupters on human health. Members take the view that where adverse effects of endocrine disrupting substances can reasonably be presumed, measures to protect human health have to be implemented in line with the precautionary principle.

    Protecting women: Members consider that protecting women from potential risks of endocrine disrupters for their reproductive health is of utmost importance and call on the Commission to support long-term studies monitoring women’s health over large spans of their lives. The report stresses that it is essential to base the criteria for determining endocrine disrupting properties on a comprehensive hazard assessment carried out on the basis of state-of-theart science, taking into account potential combination effects as well as long-term effects and effects during critical windows of development.

    The Commission is called upon to take further action in the field of chemicals policy and step up research that provides both for the assessment of the endocrine disrupting potential of individual chemicals as well as the possibility to assess the cumulative impact of identified combinations of substances on the endocrine system.

    Defining the main sources of endocrine disrupters: Members take the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disrupters should be based on criteria for defining ‘adverse effect’ and ‘endocrine mode of action’. They stress that any possible combination effects, such as mixtures or cocktail effects, should be taken into consideration. The criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disrupter must be scientifically based and horizontal. Members strongly disagree with the attempts to introduce the criterion of ‘potency’ as a cut-off for the definition of endocrine disrupters, as this would unduly limit the definition of endocrine disrupters, and make it scientifically flawed and not coherent with the classification of Carcinogenic, Mutagenic and Reprotoxic (CMR) substances which is based on strength of evidence. The Commission is called upon to introduce in all relevant EU legislation appropriate testing requirements for the identification of substances with endocrine-disrupting properties – such as those developed by the OECD, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM). The development of non-animal test methods should be promoted.

    Members propose the development of registers of reproductive health disorders to fill the existing data gap at EU level as well as reliable data on the socioeconomic impacts of hormone-related disorders and illnesses.

    Towards a EU strategy on endocrine disrupters: given that there are major difficulties in proving the causal link between exposure to individual chemicals and disruption of the hormonal balance with risk of health impacts, Members call on the Commission to revise its EU strategy on endocrine disrupters so that it delivers effective protection of human health by placing greater emphasis on the precautionary principle, while observing the proportionality principle, to work towards reducing human exposure to endocrine disrupters where necessary.

    In this context, the Commission is called upon to:

    • take greater account of the fact that consumers need to have reliable information – presented in an appropriate form and in a language that they can understand – about the dangers of endocrine disrupters, their effects, and possible ways of protecting themselves;
    • put forward a concrete timetable for applying the future criteria and modified testing requirements for endocrine disrupters in relevant legislation, including reviews of the approval of active substances used in pesticides and biocides;
    • carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015, to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals including hazard and risk assessments;
    • lay down an exact timetable, specifying the intermediate stages, for the purposes of: (i) applying the future criteria serving to identify possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals; (ii) reviewing the relevant legislation; (iii) publishing a regularly updated list of priority endocrine disrupters, the first version of which should be published by 20 December 2014; (iv) taking all measures necessary to reduce the exposure of the EU public and the environment to endocrine disrupters.

    No limit value setting: Members stress that current science does not provide sufficient basis for setting a limit value below which adverse effects do not occur. Endocrine disrupters should therefore be regarded as ‘non-threshold’ substances, and that any exposure to such substances may entail a risk, unless the manufacturer can show scientific proof that a threshold can be identified.

    Further actions are called for at EU level such as:

    • supporting targeted research projects on substances likely to affect the endocrine system;
    • requiring all products imported from third countries to comply with all present and future EU legislation on endocrine disrupters;
    • ensuring that all relevant current and future legislation applies horizontally the criteria for identifying known, probable and potential endocrine disrupters, so as to achieve a high level of protection;
    • including all relevant stakeholders in cooperation efforts to introduce the necessary legislative changes, in order to improve protection of human health from hormone-disrupting chemicals, and to devise information campaigns;
    • considering the possibility of establishing a research centre for endocrine disrupters which should research in and coordinate knowledge on endocrine disrupters at EU level;
    • promoting and financing public information programmes on the health risks of endocrine disrupters, so as to allow consumers, in full knowledge of the facts, to adapt their behaviour and lifestyles (in particular pregnant women and children);
    • improving training programmes for health professionals in this field.

    Lastly, Members call on the Commission and the Member States to support Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) activities and to promote active policies to reduce human and environment exposure to EDCs in all relevant international forums, including the WHO.

activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-27&language=EN
activities/1
date
2012-11-15T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.297 type: Committee draft report title: PE496.297
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/1/date
Old
2013-01-22T00:00:00
New
2012-11-15T00:00:00
activities/1/docs/0/title
Old
PE502.204
New
PE496.297
activities/1/docs/0/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Committee draft report
activities/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.204
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.297
activities/1/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Committee draft report
activities/2
date
2012-11-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.605 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE500.605
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/2/date
Old
2013-03-13T00:00:00
New
2012-11-27T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.605 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE500.605
activities/2/type
Old
Vote scheduled
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/3/date
Old
2013-03-05T00:00:00
New
2013-01-22T00:00:00
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.204 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE502.204
activities/3/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/6/body
Old
unknown
New
EP
activities/8/body
Old
unknown
New
EP
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
GUE/NGL
New
EPP
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4faf9bc0b819f22421000000
New
4de185c40fb8127435bdbf69
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0/name
Old
SOUSA Alda
New
KLASS Christa
activities/4/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
GUE/NGL
New
EPP
activities/4/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4faf9bc0b819f22421000000
New
4de185c40fb8127435bdbf69
activities/4/committees/0/shadows/0/name
Old
SOUSA Alda
New
KLASS Christa
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
GUE/NGL
New
EPP
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4faf9bc0b819f22421000000
New
4de185c40fb8127435bdbf69
committees/0/shadows/0/name
Old
SOUSA Alda
New
KLASS Christa
activities/6
date
2013-03-05T00:00:00
body
unknown
type
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/8
date
2013-03-12T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/9
date
2013-03-13T00:00:00
body
unknown
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/6
date
2013-03-05T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate scheduled
activities/7/date
Old
2013-03-11T00:00:00
New
2013-03-13T00:00:00
activities/7/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote scheduled
activities/5
date
2013-01-30T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0027/2013
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/4
date
2013-01-23T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: ALDE name: LEPAGE Corinne group: Verts/ALE name: RIVASI Michèle group: Verts/ALE name: SCHLYTER Carl group: ECR name: OUZKÝ Miroslav group: GUE/NGL name: SOUSA Alda responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2012-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: WESTLUND Åsa
activities/2
date
2012-11-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.605 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE500.605
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/2/date
Old
2013-01-23T00:00:00
New
2012-11-27T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.605 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE500.605
activities/2/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.204
activities/3
date
2013-01-22T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE502.204
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
4de186f60fb8127435bdc122
New
4faf9bc0b819f22421000000
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/4/name
Old
MATIAS Marisa
New
SOUSA Alda
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
4de186f60fb8127435bdc122
New
4faf9bc0b819f22421000000
committees/0/shadows/4/name
Old
MATIAS Marisa
New
SOUSA Alda
activities/4/date
Old
2013-02-04T00:00:00
New
2013-03-11T00:00:00
activities/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.605
activities/3/date
Old
2012-12-18T00:00:00
New
2013-01-23T00:00:00
activities/0
body
EP
date
2012-04-12T00:00:00
type
EP officialisation
activities/3
body
EP
date
2012-11-16T00:00:00
type
Deadline Amendments
activities/4
date
2012-11-27T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE500.605
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
other/0/commissioner
Old
DALLI John
New
BORG Tonio
activities/2/date
Old
2012-10-02T00:00:00
New
2012-11-15T00:00:00
activities/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.297
activities/2
date
2012-10-02T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee draft report title: PE496.297
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0
group
EPP
name
KLASS Christa
committees/0/shadows/0
group
EPP
name
KLASS Christa
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2
group
Verts/ALE
name
RIVASI Michèle
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3
group
Verts/ALE
name
SCHLYTER Carl
committees/0/shadows/2
group
Verts/ALE
name
RIVASI Michèle
committees/0/shadows/3
group
Verts/ALE
name
SCHLYTER Carl
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
LEPAGE Corinne
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2
group
ECR
name
OUZKÝ Miroslav
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
MATIAS Marisa
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
LEPAGE Corinne
committees/0/shadows/2
group
ECR
name
OUZKÝ Miroslav
committees/0/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
MATIAS Marisa
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
activities
  • body: EP date: 2012-04-12T00:00:00 type: EP officialisation
  • date: 2012-04-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: KLASS Christa responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2012-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: WESTLUND Åsa
  • body: EP date: 2012-11-16T00:00:00 type: Deadline Amendments
  • date: 2012-12-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2013-02-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: KLASS Christa responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2012-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: WESTLUND Åsa
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/index_en.htm title: Health and Consumers commissioner: DALLI John
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ENVI/7/08967
reference
2012/2066(INI)
title
Protection of public health from endocrine disrupters
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject