Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | WESTLUND Åsa ( S&D) | KLASS Christa ( PPE), LEPAGE Corinne ( ALDE), RIVASI Michèle ( Verts/ALE), SCHLYTER Carl ( Verts/ALE), OUZKÝ Miroslav ( ECR) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 489 votes to 102, with 19 abstentions, a resolution on the protection of public health from endocrine disrupters.
Parliament highlights that hormone-related disorders and illnesses in humans have increased over the last 20 years, including impaired sperm quality, early onset of puberty, increased incidence of deformed sexual organs, increased incidence of certain forms of cancer, and metabolic diseases. Certain neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, impacts on neurodevelopmental functions, the immune system or epigenetics, might be linked to exposure to chemical substances with endocrine-disrupting properties. These substances acting as endocrine disrupters can have oestrogenic or antioestrogenic effects which interfere with the function of the female reproductive system, altering hormone concentrations and menstrual cycles of women, as well as their fertility, favouring the development of uterine diseases. Furthermore, an increasing number of scientific studies have suggested that endocrine disrupting chemicals, particularly in combination, play a role in both chronic diseases, including hormone related cancers, obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Application of the precautionary principle : in the abovementioned context, Parliament considers that the precautionary principle should be applied . It requires the Commission and the legislators to take adequate measures to reduce short- and long-term exposure of humans to endocrine disrupters where necessary, while undertaking a much greater research effort to improve the state of the scientific knowledge on the impact of endocrine disrupters on human health. Members take the view that where adverse effects of endocrine disrupting substances can reasonably be presumed, measures to protect human health have to be implemented in line with the precautionary principle.
Protecting pregnant women and babies : Members consider that protecting women from potential risks of endocrine disrupters for their reproductive health is of utmost importance and call on the Commission to support long-term studies monitoring women’s health over large spans of their lives.
Parliament calls on the Commission, as part of its current review of the 1999 Community strategy on endocrine disrupters, to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015 , to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals, including hazard and risk assessments, so as to reduce the exposure of humans – in particular vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, babies, children and teenagers – to hormone disrupters as appropriate.
The resolution stresses that it is essential to base the criteria for determining endocrine disrupting properties on a comprehensive hazard assessment carried out on the basis of state-of-the-art science, taking into account potential combination effects as well as long-term effects and effects during critical windows of development.
The Commission is called upon to take further action in the field of chemicals policy and step up research that provides both for the assessment of the endocrine disrupting potential of individual chemicals as well as the possibility to assess the cumulative impact of identified combinations of substances on the endocrine system.
Defining the main sources of endocrine disrupters : Parliament takes the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disrupters should be based on criteria for defining ‘adverse effect’ and ‘endocrine mode of action’. It stresses that any possible combination effects, such as mixtures or cocktail effects, should be taken into consideration. The criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disrupter must be scientifically based and horizontal. A weight-of-evidence approach should be used and that no single criterion should be seen as cut-off or decisive for the identification of an endocrine disrupter. However, Plenary did not accept the measure proposed by the committee responsible which refused the attempts to introduce the criterion of ‘potency’ as a cut-off for the definition of endocrine disrupters , as this would unduly limit the definition of endocrine disrupters, and make it scientifically flawed and not coherent with the classification of Carcinogenic, Mutagenic and Reprotoxic (CMR) substances which is based on strength of evidence.
Parliament is favourable to establishing testing methods such as those developed by the OECD, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM) covering sex hormones and thyroid hormones as well as steroidogenesis. The development of non-animal test methods should be promoted. Members also propose the development of registers of reproductive health disorders to fill the existing data gap at EU level as well as reliable data on the socioeconomic impacts of hormone-related disorders and illnesses.
Towards a EU strategy on endocrine disrupters : given that there are major difficulties in proving the causal link between exposure to individual chemicals and disruption of the hormonal balance with risk of health impacts, Parliament calls on the Commission to revise its EU strategy on endocrine disrupters so that it delivers effective protection of human health by placing greater emphasis on the precautionary principle, while observing the proportionality principle , to work towards reducing human exposure to endocrine disrupters where necessary.
In the case of chemicals with endocrine-disrupting properties, the difficulties of proving a causal link are exacerbated by a number of factors, such as that: (i) a long time may elapse between exposure and the epigenetic effects, and endocrine disrupters can have a detrimental effect several generations into the future; (ii) the risk of a negative impact varies in magnitude at different stages of development, and critical windows, e.g. during foetal development, may be very short; (iii) endocrine disrupters can act at extremely low concentrations and thus cause adverse effects at a low dosage.
In this context, the Commission is called upon to:
take greater account of the fact that consumers need to have reliable information – presented in an appropriate form and in a language that they can understand – about the dangers of endocrine disrupters, their effects, and possible ways of protecting themselves; put forward a concrete timetable for applying the future criteria and modified testing requirements for endocrine disrupters in relevant legislation, including reviews of the approval of active substances used in pesticides and biocides ; carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015 , to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals including hazard and risk assessments; lay down an exact timetable, specifying the intermediate stages, for the purposes of: (i) applying the future criteria serving to identify possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals; (ii) reviewing the relevant legislation; (iii) publishing a regularly updated list of priority endocrine disrupters , the first version of which should be published by 20 December 2014; (iv) taking all measures necessary to reduce the exposure of the EU public and the environment to endocrine disrupters .
No limit value setting : plenary stresses that current science does not provide sufficient basis for setting a limit value below which adverse effects do not occur, and endocrine disrupters should therefore be regarded as ‘ non-threshold’ substances , and that any exposure to such substances may entail a risk, unless the manufacturer can show scientific proof that a threshold can be identified, taking into account increased sensitivities during critical windows of development, and the effects of mixtures.
Further actions are called for at EU level such as:
supporting targeted research projects on substances likely to affect the endocrine system; requiring all products imported from third countries to comply with all present and future EU legislation on endocrine disrupters; ensuring that all relevant current and future legislation applies horizontally the criteria for identifying known, probable and potential endocrine disrupters, so as to achieve a high level of protection; including all relevant stakeholders in cooperation efforts to introduce the necessary legislative changes, in order to improve protection of human health from hormone-disrupting chemicals, and to devise information campaigns; considering the possibility of establishing a research centre for endocrine disrupters which should research in and coordinate knowledge on endocrine disrupters at EU level; promoting and financing public information programmes on the health risks of endocrine disrupters, so as to allow consumers, in full knowledge of the facts, to adapt their behaviour and lifestyles (in particular pregnant women and children); improving training programmes for health professionals in this field.
Lastly, Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States to support Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) activities and to promote active policies to reduce human and environment exposure to EDCs in all relevant international forums, including the WHO.
It should be noted that an alternative motion for a resolution tabled by the ECR Group was rejected in Plenary.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report drafted by Åsa WESTLUND (S&D, SE) on the protection of public health from endocrine disrupters.
Members highlight that hormone-related disorders and illnesses in humans have increased over the last 20 years, including impaired sperm quality, early onset of puberty, increased incidence of deformed sexual organs, increased incidence of certain forms of cancer, and metabolic diseases. Certain neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, impacts on neurodevelopmental functions, the immune system or epigenetics, might be linked to exposure to chemical substances with endocrine-disrupting properties. These substances acting as endocrine disrupters can have oestrogenic or antioestrogenic effects which interfere with the function of the female reproductive system, altering hormone concentrations and menstrual cycles of women, as well as their fertility, favouring the development of uterine diseases. Furthermore, an increasing number of scientific studies have suggested that endocrine disrupting chemicals, particularly in combination, play a role in both chronic diseases, including hormone related cancers, obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Application of the precautionary principle : in the abovementioned context, Members consider that the precautionary principle should be applied . It requires the Commission and the legislators to take adequate measures to reduce short- and long-term exposure of humans to endocrine disrupters where necessary, while undertaking a much greater research effort to improve the state of the scientific knowledge on the impact of endocrine disrupters on human health. Members take the view that where adverse effects of endocrine disrupting substances can reasonably be presumed, measures to protect human health have to be implemented in line with the precautionary principle.
Protecting women : Members consider that protecting women from potential risks of endocrine disrupters for their reproductive health is of utmost importance and call on the Commission to support long-term studies monitoring women’s health over large spans of their lives. The report stresses that it is essential to base the criteria for determining endocrine disrupting properties on a comprehensive hazard assessment carried out on the basis of state-of-theart science, taking into account potential combination effects as well as long-term effects and effects during critical windows of development.
The Commission is called upon to take further action in the field of chemicals policy and step up research that provides both for the assessment of the endocrine disrupting potential of individual chemicals as well as the possibility to assess the cumulative impact of identified combinations of substances on the endocrine system.
Defining the main sources of endocrine disrupters : Members take the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disrupters should be based on criteria for defining ‘adverse effect’ and ‘endocrine mode of action’. They stress that any possible combination effects, such as mixtures or cocktail effects, should be taken into consideration. The criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disrupter must be scientifically based and horizontal. Members strongly disagree with the attempts to introduce the criterion of ‘potency’ as a cut-off for the definition of endocrine disrupters , as this would unduly limit the definition of endocrine disrupters, and make it scientifically flawed and not coherent with the classification of Carcinogenic, Mutagenic and Reprotoxic (CMR) substances which is based on strength of evidence. The Commission is called upon to introduce in all relevant EU legislation appropriate testing requirements for the identification of substances with endocrine-disrupting properties – such as those developed by the OECD, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM). The development of non-animal test methods should be promoted.
Members propose the development of registers of reproductive health disorders to fill the existing data gap at EU level as well as reliable data on the socioeconomic impacts of hormone-related disorders and illnesses.
Towards a EU strategy on endocrine disrupters : given that there are major difficulties in proving the causal link between exposure to individual chemicals and disruption of the hormonal balance with risk of health impacts, Members call on the Commission to revise its EU strategy on endocrine disrupters so that it delivers effective protection of human health by placing greater emphasis on the precautionary principle, while observing the proportionality principle , to work towards reducing human exposure to endocrine disrupters where necessary.
In this context, the Commission is called upon to:
take greater account of the fact that consumers need to have reliable information – presented in an appropriate form and in a language that they can understand – about the dangers of endocrine disrupters, their effects, and possible ways of protecting themselves; put forward a concrete timetable for applying the future criteria and modified testing requirements for endocrine disrupters in relevant legislation, including reviews of the approval of active substances used in pesticides and biocides ; carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary no later than 1st of June 2015 , to amend existing legislation or to come forward with new legislative proposals including hazard and risk assessments; lay down an exact timetable, specifying the intermediate stages, for the purposes of: (i) applying the future criteria serving to identify possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals; (ii) reviewing the relevant legislation; (iii) publishing a regularly updated list of priority endocrine disrupters , the first version of which should be published by 20 December 2014; (iv) taking all measures necessary to reduce the exposure of the EU public and the environment to endocrine disrupters .
No limit value setting : Members stress that current science does not provide sufficient basis for setting a limit value below which adverse effects do not occur. Endocrine disrupters should therefore be regarded as ‘ non-threshold’ substances , and that any exposure to such substances may entail a risk, unless the manufacturer can show scientific proof that a threshold can be identified.
Further actions are called for at EU level such as:
supporting targeted research projects on substances likely to affect the endocrine system; requiring all products imported from third countries to comply with all present and future EU legislation on endocrine disrupters; ensuring that all relevant current and future legislation applies horizontally the criteria for identifying known, probable and potential endocrine disrupters, so as to achieve a high level of protection; including all relevant stakeholders in cooperation efforts to introduce the necessary legislative changes, in order to improve protection of human health from hormone-disrupting chemicals, and to devise information campaigns; considering the possibility of establishing a research centre for endocrine disrupters which should research in and coordinate knowledge on endocrine disrupters at EU level; promoting and financing public information programmes on the health risks of endocrine disrupters, so as to allow consumers, in full knowledge of the facts, to adapt their behaviour and lifestyles (in particular pregnant women and children); improving training programmes for health professionals in this field.
Lastly, Members call on the Commission and the Member States to support Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) activities and to promote active policies to reduce human and environment exposure to EDCs in all relevant international forums, including the WHO.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0091/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0027/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE502.204
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE500.605
- Committee draft report: PE496.297
- Committee draft report: PE496.297
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE500.605
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE502.204
Activities
- Åsa WESTLUND
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Pilar AYUSO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christa KLASS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jo LEINEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zofija MAZEJ KUKOVIČ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Radvilė MORKŪNAITĖ-MIKULĖNIENĖ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gilles PARGNEAUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel POC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Richard SEEBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudiu Ciprian TĂNĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Oldřich VLASÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrea ZANONI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
170 |
2012/2066(INI)
2012/11/27
ENVI
157 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Heading 1 on the protection of public health, wildlife and environment from endocrine disrupters
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) - Having regard to the European Environment and Health Strategy and the EU Action Plan on Environment and Health (2004-2010), which inter alia recognise a need to take into account combined exposure of chemicals in risk assessments;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, in its review of EU strategy on endocrine disruptors, to
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, in its review of EU strategy on endocrine disruptors, to place greater emphasis on
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, in its review of EU strategy on endocrine disruptors, to
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, in its review of EU strategy on endocrine disruptors, to place greater emphasis on the precautionary principle and work towards reducing human, wildlife and environmental exposure to endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, in its review of EU strategy on endocrine disruptors, to place greater emphasis on the precautionary principle and work towards reducing human and wildlife exposure to endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, in its review of EU strategy on endocrine disruptors, to place greater emphasis on the precautionary principle and, observing the proportionality principle, to work towards reducing human exposure to endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission, in its review of EU strategy on endocrine disruptors, to place greater emphasis on the precautionary principle and work towards reducing human and environment exposure to endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to take greater account of the fact that consumers need to have reliable information – presented in an appropriate form and in language that they can understand – about the dangers of endocrine disruptors, their effects, and possible ways of protecting themselves;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 a (new) - having regard to Directive (EU) No 2010/63 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls on the Commission to put forward a concrete timetable for applying the future criteria and modified testing requirements for endocrine disrupters in relevant legislation, including reviews of the approval of active substances used in pesticides and biocides, and a roadmap with specific actions and targets to reduce exposure to endocrine disrupters;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Believes that the precautionary and preventive action principle, required under Article 191(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in order to achieve a high level of protection, has to take account of the principle of scientific assessment of the risk and dangers involved.
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to c
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary, to propose new legislation so as to reduce the exposure of human beings, particularly foetuses, babies, children and teenagers, to hormone disruptors; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary, to propose new legislation so as to reduce the exposure of human beings, particularly
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to carry out as soon as possible and no later than 2014 a systematic examination of all relevant
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary, to propose new legislation so as to reduce the exposure of human beings, particularly foetuses, babies, children and teenagers, to hormone disruptors, following the example of the ban on the use of bisphenol A in the manufacture of babies’ feeding- bottles; calls on the Commission to submit legislative proposals for chemicals in textiles and building materials, and stresses in particular the importance of reviewing legislation on materials and products intended to come into contact with food, so as to reduce human exposure to endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary, to propose new legislation so as to reduce the exposure of human beings, particularly foetuses, babies, children and teenagers, to hormone disruptors; calls on the Commission to submit legislative proposals for chemicals in textiles
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary, to propose new legislation so as to reduce the exposure of human beings, particularly
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary, to propose new legislation so as to reduce the exposure of human beings, particularly foetuses, babies, children and teenagers, as well as wildlife and environment to hormone disruptors; calls on the Commission to submit legislative proposals for chemicals in textiles and building materials, and stresses in particular the importance of reviewing legislation on materials and products intended to come into contact with food, so as to reduce human exposure to endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 a (new) - having regard to the definition for endocrine disrupting chemicals developed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS)1; __________________ 1 Definition from the WHO/IPCS (2002) report: "An endocrine disruptor is an exogenous substance or mixture that alters function(s) of the endocrine system and consequently causes adverse health effects in an intact organism, or its progeny, or (sub)populations." A potential endocrine disruptor is "an exogenous substance or mixture that possesses properties that might be expected to lead to endocrine disruption in an intact organism, or its progeny, or (sub)populations." (http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/en/c h1.pdf)
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Calls on the Commission to review Directive 2009/48/EC in order to effectively protect children from their exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Stresses in particular the importance of reviewing legislation with regard to daily exposure to multiple potential endocrine disruptors from materials and products intended for everyday use, such as cosmetics, personal care products, household products, air fresheners, cookware, plastic bottles and containers, food packaging, processed foods, pesticides, furniture, building materials, car, truck and machinery components and interiors, electronics, toys, textiles, medical equipment and materials, taking into account the possibility of multiple causality, latency and low-dose effect, so as to reduce human exposure to endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission, when carrying out its future review of EU strategy on endocrine disruptors, to lay down an exact timetable, specifying the intermediate stages, for the purposes of: – applying the future criteria serving to identify possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals; – reviewing the relevant legislation referred to in paragraph 12; – publishing a regularly updated list of priority endocrine disruptors, the first version of which should be published by 20 December 2014; – taking all measures necessary to reduce the exposure of the EU public and the environment to endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Takes the view that endocrine disruptors identified in accordance with Article 57(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 should be regarded as Substances of Very High Concern within the meaning of the Reach Regulation; considers
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Takes the view that
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Takes the view that endocrine disruptors should be regarded as Substances of Very High Concern within the meaning of the Reach Regulation and as Priority Hazardous Substances within the meaning of the Water Framework Directive; considers, therefore, that endocrine disruptors should be subject to authorisation or restriction with a view to substitution;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Takes the view that for substances which, by virtue of their low potency or severity, are not identified as SVHCs or the equivalent, appropriate risk management measures should be considered as a means to mitigate the risk posed to humans and animals;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas hormone-related
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that endocrine disruptors should be regarded as substances for which it is
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that endocrine disruptors should be regarded as substances for which it is not possible to set a limit value
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that endocrine disruptors should be regarded as substances for which it is not possible to set a limit value at which effects may occur (‘non-threshold’ substances) and that any exposure to such
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Calls on the Commission to review relevant legislation to ensure that relevant combination effects of endocrine disruptors are effectively addressed;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to support targeted research projects on e
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to support targeted research projects on endocrine disruptors, including the development of new testing and analysis methods as well as supporting a new paradigm shift based on pathways of toxicity/adverse outcome pathways;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas hormone-related disorders and illnesses in humans have increased over the last 20 years, including impaired sperm quality, early onset of puberty, increased incidence of deformed sexual organs, increased incidence of certain forms of cancer
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to support targeted research projects on endocrine disruptors, including the development of new testing and analysis methods; calls on the Commission to incorporate endocrine disruptors, their combination effects, and related subjects in the priorities for the research and development framework programme;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to support targeted research projects on endocrine disruptors, including the development of new testing and analysis methods as well as supporting a paradigm shift towards testing of pathways of toxicity;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Calls on the Commission to develop in vitro and in silico methodologies in order to minimise animal testing for endocrine disruptors screening;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Calls on the Commission to establish a financial instrument to finance independent research on endocrine disrupters;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Commission to require all products imported from third countries to comply with all present and future EU legislation on endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to include all relevant stakeholders in cooperation seeking to adopt the necessary legislative changes to improve protection of human health from hormone-disrupting
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to include all relevant stakeholders in cooperation seeking to adopt the necessary legislative changes to improve protection of human health from the adverse effects of hormone-disrupting chemicals;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to include all relevant stakeholders in cooperation seeking to adopt the necessary legislative changes to improve protection of human health, wildlife and environment from hormone-disrupting chemicals;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to include all relevant stakeholders in cooperation seeking to adopt the necessary legislative changes to improve protection of human health and the environment from hormone-disrupting chemicals;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to include all relevant stakeholders in cooperation seeking to adopt the necessary legislative changes to improve protection of human health and environment from hormone- disrupting chemicals;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas hormone-related disorders and illnesses in humans have increased over the last 20 years, including impaired sperm quality, early onset of puberty, increased incidence of deformed sexual organs, increased incidence of certain forms of cancer and many cases of metabolic illnesses as well as neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to include all relevant stakeholders in cooperation seeking to adopt the necessary legislative changes to improve protection of human health from hormone-disrupting chemicals and to devise information campaigns;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Calls on the Commission to consider the possibility of establishing a research centre for endocrine disrupters which should research in and coordinate knowledge on endocrine disrupters at EU level;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to ensure that in developing the criteria for identifying endocrine disruptors
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the criteria for identifying known, probable and potential endocrine disruptors are applied horizontally to all relevant current and future legislation so as to achieve a high level of protection, respectively;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Urges the Commission to promote and finance public information programmes on the health risks of endocrine disruptors, so as to allow consumers, in full knowledge of the facts, to adapt their behaviour and lifestyles; these information programmes should focus in particular on the most vulnerable groups (pregnant women and children) so that precautionary measures can be taken in good time;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Welcomes the inclusion of EDCs as an emerging policy issue under the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM); calls on the Commission and the Member States to support these SAICM activities, and to promote active policies to reduce human and environment exposure to EDCs in all relevant international forums as World Health Organization (WHO) or the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17 b. Calls on the Commission and member states to launch public information campaigns to improve the level of information of the general public, especially vulnerable populations, on endocrine disrupters used in consumer products ; calls on member states to improve the training programs of health professionals in this field.
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Stresses that while this resolution is limited to addressing the protection of human health from endocrine disrupters, it is equally important to take decisive action on endocrine disrupters to protect wildlife and the environment;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. (new) whereas chemical substances acting as endocrine disrupters have oestrogenic or anti-oestrogenic effects which interferes with the function of the female reproductive system, altering hormone concentrations and menstrual cycle of women, as well as their fertility; favouring the development of uterine diseases such as fibroids and endometriosis; affecting the breast growth and lactation; and whereas such substances have been identified as risk factors responsible for girls' premature puberty, breast cancer, miscarriage and impaired fertility or infertility;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. Whereas an increasing number of scientific studies have suggested that endocrine disrupting chemicals, particularly in combination, play a role in both chronic diseases, including hormone related cancers, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and also in reproductive problems;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas there is now significant scientific evidence that hormone-related disorders in wildlife including reproductive abnormalities, masculinisation of gastropods, feminisation of fish or decline of many mollusc populations in various parts of the world, are linked to the impact of chemicals with endocrine-disrupting properties;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas there are many possible causes for a growing frequency of hormone- related disorders in humans; whereas there is now significant scientific evidence that this is partly due to the impact of
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Heading 1 on the protection of public health and environment from endocrine disrupters
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D – introductory part D. whereas,
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D – introductory part D. whereas, in the case of
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D – indent 1 – a long time may elapse between exposure and
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D – indent 3 Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D – indent 3 – during their lives, people are exposed to a
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D – indent 4 – endocrine disrupters can interact with each other and with the body's own
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D – indent 5 –
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D – indent 5 a (new) - many elements and substances can affect the endocrine system and studies and scientific tests on the interaction of some chemicals which might be endocrine disruptors need therefore to be carried out in sufficient number;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D – indent 5 a (new) – lifestyle and personal habits, as reflected in, for example, stress, exercise, and diet, also affect the endocrine system;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D – indent 6 a (new) - whereas many chemical or synthesised substances trigger a reaction in the endocrine system, but this does not mean these are adverse effects or that all substances need be classified as endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) - having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1272/20081 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 199/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, __________________ 1 OJ L 353, 31.12.08, p.1.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas EU legislation contains
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas EU legislation contains no criteria for determining whether a substance should be regarded as having endocrine-disrupting properties; whereas a timetable should be set up to ensure the swift application of the future criteria.
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. Whereas, at EU level, there are no coordinated or combined monitoring programmes specifically dedicated to endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. whereas any invocation of the precautionary principle should be in accordance with criteria outlined in the Commission's communication (COM(2000)0001)
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) E b. Whereas there is little if any co- ordination regarding the way that data are collected, managed, assessed and reported across the different monitoring programmes;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, as things stand at present, it is
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the standard data requirements in EU chemicals legislation do not contain
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the standard data requirements in EU chemicals legislation
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the standard data requirements in certain EU chemicals legislation do not contain any information on endocrine- disrupting properties;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) G a. Whereas a number of EU laws are aimed at protecting citizens from exposure to harmful chemicals; however, current EU legislation assess each exposure individually and does not provide for a comprehensive, integrated assessment of cumulative effects taking into account different routes of exposure and different product types;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 ter (new) - having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/20091 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC, __________________ 1 OJ L 309, 24.11.09, p.1.
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers it necessary, on the basis of an overall assessment of the state of knowledge,
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers, on the basis of an overall assessment of the state of knowledge, that
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers, on the basis of an overall assessment of the state of knowledge
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers, on the basis of an overall assessment of the state of knowledge, that the precautionary principle requires us as legislators to take measures to reduce human short and long term exposure to endocrine disruptors to a minimum;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers, on the basis of an overall assessment of the state of knowledge, that the precautionary principle requires us as
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers, on the basis of an overall assessment of the state of knowledge, that the precautionary principle requires us as legislators to take measures to reduce human, wildlife and environmental exposure to endocrine disruptors to a minimum;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The development of non-animal test methods should be promoted in order to produce safety data relevant to humans and to replace animal studies currently in use;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Invites the Commission to pay appropriate attention to the precautionary principle and the potential risks of chemical combination effects when drawing up future proposals;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that the precautionary principle applies in a world of scientific uncertainty, in which a risk can be characterised only on the basis of imperfect knowledge – neither set in stone nor beyond challenge – but in which it is necessary to act in order to avert or reduce potentially serious or irreversible consequences for human health and/or the environment; considers that the Commission, as a risk manager, is duty- bound to observe that principle, in accordance with Article 191(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU); maintains, as far as endocrine disruptors are concerned, that the precautionary principle should lead the Commission to bring a much greater research effort to bear to improve the state of scientific knowledge, as well as to propose a range of measures, including some to be implemented immediately, with a view to protecting the public and the environment and informing groups most at risk;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. The use of non-animal test methods and other risk assessment strategies should be promoted. Animal testing should be minimised and tests on vertebrates should be undertaken as a last resort. In accordance with Directive 2010/63/EU, tests on vertebrate animals must be replaced, restricted or refined. Therefore, we call on the Commission to lay down rules to avoid duplicative testing and duplication of tests and studies on vertebrates should be prohibited;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 b (new) – having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that the
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that the
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that the feared effects of endocrine disruptors are so serious that the absence of precise knowledge, including exact knowledge of causal links, should not
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that the feared effects of endocrine disruptors are so serious that the absence of precise knowledge, including exact knowledge of causal links, should not prevent us – without overstepping the proportionality principle – from taking measures to protect humans and animals;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. (new) Considers that protecting women from potential risks of endocrine disrupters for their reproductive health is of utmost importance; calls therefore on the Commission to prioritise research funding to study the effects of hormone disruptors on women's health, and to support long-term studies monitoring women's health over large spans of their lives thus allowing an evidence-based assessment of the long-term and multi- generational effects of exposure to endocrine disruptors;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Considers that calls for full scientific proof of causality before taking any action in the name of "sound science" are in fact motivated by vested interests to delay any action against endocrine disrupters and have nothing to do with good science as they ignore the complexities and irreducible uncertainties referred to in paragraph D;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls, therefore, on the Commission to submit as soon as possible proposals for overarching criteria
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) – having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls, therefore, on the Commission to submit as soon as possible proposals for overarching criteria together with testing and information requirements for chemicals on the commercial market, and for EU legislation to make clear what is regarded as a substance with endocrine-
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls, therefore, on the Commission to submit as soon as possible proposals for
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls, therefore, on the Commission to submit as soon as possible proposals for overarching criteria together with testing and information requirements for chemicals on the commercial market, and for EU legislation to make clear what is regarded as a substance with endocrine- disrupting properties; advocates
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls, therefore, on the Commission to submit as soon as possible proposals for overarching criteria together with testing and information requirements for chemicals on the commercial market, and for EU legislation to make clear what is regarded as a substance with endocrine- disrupting properties;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that it is
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that it is important for the criteria for endocrine-disrupting chemicals to be based on a comprehensive
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that it is important for the criteria for endocrine-disrupting
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that it is important for the criteria for endocrine-disrupting chemicals to be based on a
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that it is important for the criteria for endocrine-disrupting chemicals to be based on a comprehensive hazard assessment, taking into account potential combination effect, as well long term exposure effects;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new) - having regard to the OECD conceptual framework for testing and assessment of endocrine disruptors.
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Calls on the Commission to take further action in the field of chemicals policy and step up research that provides both for the assessment of the endocrine disrupting potential of individual chemicals as well as the possibility to assess the cumulative impact of identified combinations of substances on the endocrine system;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disruptors should be based on criteria for defining ‘adverse effect’ and ‘endocrine mode of action’, the WHO definition being an appropriate basis for that purpose; considers that both these criteria must be weighed up in parallel in order to carry out a comprehensive assessment; considers that proven effects should be assumed to be harmful as long as there
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disruptors should be based on criteria for defining
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that that the criteria for defining endocrine disruptors should be based on criteria for defining
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disruptors should be based on criteria for defining ‘adverse effect’ and ‘endocrine mode of action’; considers that both these criteria must be weighed up in parallel in order to carry out a comprehensive assessment; considers that proven effects should be assumed to be harmful
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disruptors should be based on criteria for defining ‘adverse effect’ and ‘endocrine mode of action’; considers that both these criteria must be weighed up in parallel in order to carry out a comprehensive assessment; considers that proven effects should be assumed to be
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that the criteria ought to help classify the substances in a hierarchy based on their potential for producing adverse effects;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disruptor should be based on scientific
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disruptor should be scientifically based
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 b (new) - having regard to the draft guidance document on standardised test guidelines for evaluating chemicals for endocrine disruptions (2011).
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disruptor
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disruptor should be scientifically based and that the precautionary principle should be applied;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Strongly disagrees with the attempts to introduce the criterion of 'potency' as a cut-off for the definition of endocrine disrupters, as this would unduly limit the definition of endocrine disrupters, would be scientifically flawed and not coherent with the classification of CMR substances which is based on strength of evidence;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that the definition of the criteria must be harmonised at UN level, and conceivably implemented under the GHS (Globally Harmonised System) and consequently in the European System of Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP);
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that, in assessing whether a substance does or does not have endocrine-disrupting properties, all peer- reviewed scientific studies should be taken into account
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that all peer-reviewed scientific data and information, including a review of the scientific literature and non-GLP studies, should be taken into account, subject to their strengths and weaknesses, in assessing whether a substance does or does not have endocrine- disrupting properties; further considers it important to take account of modern methods and up-to-date research;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that all peer-reviewed scientific studies, including non-GLP studies, should be taken into account, subject to their strengths and weaknesses, in assessing whether a substance does or does not have endocrine-
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to introduce in all relevant EU legislation appropriate testing requirements for the identification of substances with endocrine-disrupting properties; considers that the validated and internationally recognised testing methods that have been developed in (for example) the OECD, in EURL ECVAM or under the US EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program must be implemented; notes that the OECD programme of testing methods covers sex hormones and thyroid hormones as well as steroidogenesis; points out, on the other hand, that there are no tests for many other areas of the endocrine system, e.g. insulin and growth hormones; considers that testing methods and guidance documents should be developed so as to take better account of endocrine disruptors, possible low-dose effects and non-
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to introduce in all relevant EU legislation appropriate testing requirements for the identification of substances with endocrine-disrupting properties; considers that the validated and internationally recognised testing methods based on WHO definitions of ‘endocrine disruptor’ and ‘adverse effect’ that have been developed in (for example) the OECD must be implemented; notes that the OECD programme of testing methods covers sex hormones and thyroid hormones as well as steroidogenesis; points out, on the other hand, that there are no tests for other areas of the endocrine system, e.g. insulin and growth hormones; considers that testing methods and guidance documents should be developed so as to take better account of endocrine disruptors, possible low-dose effects and non-
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 c (new) - having regard to the draft detailed review paper: state of the sciences on novel in vitro and in vivo screening and testing methods and endpoints for evaluating endocrine disruptors.
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to introduce in all relevant EU legislation appropriate testing requirements for the identification of substances with endocrine-disrupting
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to introduce in all relevant EU legislation appropriate testing requirements for the identification of substances with endocrine-disrupting properties; considers that the validated and internationally recognised testing methods that have been developed in (for example) the OECD must be implemented; notes that the OECD programme of testing methods covers sex hormones and thyroid hormones as well as steroidogenesis; points out, on the other hand, that there are no tests for other areas of the endocrine system, e.g. insulin and growth hormones; considers that testing methods and guidance documents should be developed so as to take better account of endocrine disruptors, possible combination and low-dose effects and non-
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to introduce in all relevant EU legislation appropriate testing requirements for the identification of substances with endocrine-disrupting properties; considers that the most recent validated and internationally recognised testing methods that have been developed in (for example) the OECD must be implemented; notes that the OECD programme of testing methods covers sex hormones and thyroid hormones as well as steroidogenesis; points out, on the other hand, that there are no tests for other areas of the endocrine system, e.g. insulin and growth hormones; considers that testing methods and guidance documents should be developed so as to take better account of endocrine disruptors, possible low-dose effects and non-
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Invites the Commission and Member States to develop registers of reproductive health disorders to fill the existing data gap at EU level ;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Invites the Commission and Member States to develop reliable data on the socio-economic impacts of hormone- related disorders and illnesses
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that it should be possible for decision-making bodies to
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that it should be possible for decision-making bodies to deal with substances having
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that it should be possible for decision-making bodies to
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that it should be possible for decision-making bodies to deal with substances having similar chemical structures on a group basis if the manufacturer or importer cannot demonstrate that the chemical is safe in spite of its structural similarity,
source: PE-500.605
2013/01/22
ENVI
13 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas hormone-related disorders and illnesses in humans have increased over the last 20 years, including impaired sperm quality, early onset of puberty, increased incidence of deformed sexual organs, increased incidence of certain forms of cancer, and m
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission, as part of its current review of the 1999 Community strategy on endocrine disruptors to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Takes the view that endocrine disruptors should be regarded as Substances of Very High Concern within the meaning of the Reach Regulation
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that
Amendment 13 #
17 a. Stresses that while this resolution is limited to addressing the protection of human health from endocrine disrupters, it is equally important to take decisive action on endocrine disrupters to protect wildlife and the environment;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers, on the basis of an overall assessment of the state of knowledge, that the precautionary principle
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls, therefore, on the Commission to submit as soon as possible proposals for
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that it is
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disruptors should be based on criteria for defining
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disruptor
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that it should be possible for decision-making bodies to deal with substances having
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission
source: PE-502.204
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.297New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-PR-496297_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.605New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-500605_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.204New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-502204_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130312&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2012-03-12-TOC_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-27&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0027_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-91New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0091_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/7/08967New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/committees |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-01-22T00:00:00New
2012-04-20T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2012-11-15T00:00:00New
2013-01-23T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2 |
|
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-04-20T00:00:00New
2013-03-12T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/docs/0 |
|
activities/4/docs/1/text |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/6 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de189640fb8127435bdc491New
4f1adc92b819f207b3000125 |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de185c40fb8127435bdbf69New
4f1ac99bb819f25efd000145 |
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de186630fb8127435bdc053New
4f1ad252b819f2759500001a |
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de188030fb8127435bdc29dNew
4f1adac2b819f207b300008c |
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de1887b0fb8127435bdc353New
4f1adb22b819f207b30000ab |
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de187360fb8127435bdc179New
4f1ada22b819f207b3000055 |
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
4.20.01 Medicine, diseases, AIDSNew
4.20.01 Medicine, diseases |
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/7/date |
Old
2013-03-13T00:00:00New
2013-03-14T00:00:00 |
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/6 |
|
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-27&language=EN
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-01-22T00:00:00New
2012-11-15T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs/0/title |
Old
PE502.204New
PE496.297 |
activities/1/docs/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee draft report |
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.204New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.297 |
activities/1/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee draft report |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-03-13T00:00:00New
2012-11-27T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-03-05T00:00:00New
2013-01-22T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/6/body |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
activities/8/body |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
EPP |
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4faf9bc0b819f22421000000New
4de185c40fb8127435bdbf69 |
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/0/name |
Old
SOUSA AldaNew
KLASS Christa |
activities/4/committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
EPP |
activities/4/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4faf9bc0b819f22421000000New
4de185c40fb8127435bdbf69 |
activities/4/committees/0/shadows/0/name |
Old
SOUSA AldaNew
KLASS Christa |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
EPP |
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4faf9bc0b819f22421000000New
4de185c40fb8127435bdbf69 |
committees/0/shadows/0/name |
Old
SOUSA AldaNew
KLASS Christa |
activities/6 |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/9 |
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/7/date |
Old
2013-03-11T00:00:00New
2013-03-13T00:00:00 |
activities/7/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-01-23T00:00:00New
2012-11-27T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.204
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de186f60fb8127435bdc122New
4faf9bc0b819f22421000000 |
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/4/name |
Old
MATIAS MarisaNew
SOUSA Alda |
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de186f60fb8127435bdc122New
4faf9bc0b819f22421000000 |
committees/0/shadows/4/name |
Old
MATIAS MarisaNew
SOUSA Alda |
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-02-04T00:00:00New
2013-03-11T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.605
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-12-18T00:00:00New
2013-01-23T00:00:00 |
activities/0 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
other/0/commissioner |
Old
DALLI JohnNew
BORG Tonio |
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-10-02T00:00:00New
2012-11-15T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.297
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|