Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | JURI | BALDASSARRE Raffaele ( PPE) | COFFERATI Sergio Gaetano ( S&D), TAYLOR Rebecca ( ALDE), LICHTENBERGER Eva ( Verts/ALE), KARIM Sajjad ( ECR), SPERONI Francesco Enrico ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | HOWITT Richard ( S&D) | Jean LAMBERT ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | LANGE Bernd ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | FEMM | ||
Committee Opinion | DEVE | GRÈZE Catherine ( Verts/ALE) | Enrique GUERRERO SALOM ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | CULT | LØKKEGAARD Morten ( ALDE) | Heinz K. BECKER ( PPE), Marie-Christine VERGIAT ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | AFET | GRZYB Andrzej ( PPE) | Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK ( ECR) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 553 votes to 41, with 38 abstentions, a resolution on corporate social responsibility (CSR): accountable, transparent and responsible business behaviour and sustainable growth.
Parliament calls for a modern understanding of CSR . It endorses the new definition of CSR put forward by the Commission , which does away with the dichotomy between voluntary and compulsory approaches which has hitherto polarised debate on CSR.
Parliament also believes that in cases where a business is in difficulty, excessive bonuses, compensation and salaries paid to managers are incompatible with socially responsible behaviour . The resolution states that a business’s tax policy should be considered part and parcel of CSR and that socially responsible behaviour consequently leaves no room for strategies aimed at evading tax or exploiting tax havens.
Strengthening the links between CSR, the general public, competitiveness and innovation : Parliament considers that the Commission should take the initiative on this issue. It calls on the Commission to:
promote innovative, along with the national authorities, business models designed to forge closer links between businesses and the social environment in which they operate; consider the current discussions taking place with regard to the review of the Accounting and Transparency Directives so that the new proposed CSR strategy would complement the revised Directive; raise CSR's profile and disseminate best practice; introduce a European award scheme for CSR firms and partnerships and consider, among other actions, whether an European social label could be introduced to this end; support the efforts of the CSR Europe network, seeking first and foremost to strengthen cooperation between business and Member States; carry out periodic surveys of public trust in business and public attitudes towards CSR strategies implemented by businesses and link the content of these surveys with the revision of the sustainable consumption and production action plan, with a view to identifying barriers to more responsible consumption.
Making CSR policies more transparent and more effective : to combat misleading and false information regarding commitments to corporate social responsibility and relating to the environmental and social impact of products and services, the following initiatives are also called for: (i) combating ‘greenwashing’; (ii) account to be taken of social and environmental considerations in public procurement Plenary insisted for the lowest price no longer to be used as an award criterion and for greater accountability throughout the subcontracting chain; (iii) strengthening the potential of CSR in tackling climate change by linking it to resource and energy efficiency, e.g. in the processes companies use to purchase raw materials.
Parliament stresses that Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) is part of the implementation process of CSR in investment decisions. This should combine investors’ financial objectives with their concerns regarding social, environmental and ethical (SEE) and corporate governance issues. Members acknowledge the importance of businesses divulging information on sustainability such as social and environmental factors, with a view to identifying sustainability risks and increasing investor and consumer trust. The resolution also stresses that stringent respect for human rights, due diligence and transparency must be maintained in order to ensure CSR along the whole supply chain.
Members state that corporate responsibility must not be reduced to a marketing tool , and that it should be embedded in a company’s overall business strategy. They call on the Commission and the Member States to introduce corporate stewardship codes that reflect the importance of responsibility for all in the company.
In addition, Parliament advocates the adoption of a legislative proposal allowing for high flexibility of action, in order to take account of CSR's multi-dimensional nature and the diversity of the CSR policies implemented by businesses, matched by a sufficient level of comparability to meet the needs of investors and other stakeholders as well as the need to provide consumers with easy access to information on businesses' impact on society. It considers that information on sustainability should also cover, where appropriate, the subcontracting and supply chains and should be based on globally accepted methodologies such as those of the Global Reporting Initiative or the Integrated Reporting Council which offer a simplified framework to be applied to SMEs.
Other measures are proposed in the resolution such as further consideration to both binding and non-binding measures to facilitate the recognition and promotion of efforts by businesses in connection with transparency and the disclosure of non-financial information.
SMEs and micro-enterprises : Parliament v oices its opposition to all measures that could result in additional administrative or financial constraints for SMEs but calls for support of measures enabling SMEs to take joint action. It calls on the Commission, in collaboration with Member States, to devise strategies and measures to help SMEs pool best CSR practice. Members call for the ‘ think small first ’ principle to be strengthened.
As regards auto-regulation : Parliament welcomes the Commission’s intention to launch a ‘Community of Practice’ on CSR which must be complementary to a code of good practice for co-regulation and self-regulation. In this respect, it calls for the full and active consultation and involvement of representative organisations, including trade unions. Whilst acknowledging the substantial value and potential of self-regulation and co-regulation instruments, Members are opposed, however, to the introduction of a single approach that fails to take account of the specificities of each sector and the specific requirements of businesses.
Members support the Commission’s proposal to require all investment funds and financial institutions to inform every customer about any ethical or responsible investment criteria which they apply or any standards and codes to which they adhere. They call for the CSR policies of companies in the relevant sectors (such as travel, insurance, accommodation and telecommunications) to include positive and practical strategies and structures to support victims of crime and their families during a crisis.
Compliance issues and relations with third countries : Parliament stresses that, following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, it is to be fully informed on how the findings of Sustainability Impact Assessments (SIA) of agreements are incorporated into negotiations. It stresses that future bilateral investment treaties signed by the EU must guarantee that a fair balance is struck between the need to protect investors and the need to allow for state intervention, especially with regard to social, health and environmental standards. Parliament also calls on the Commission to raise awareness at corporate level concerning the importance of CSR and the consequences of non-compliance. The Commission should encourage EU companies to take initiatives aimed at promoting CSR and to exchange good practices with their partners in other countries .
To conclude , Parliament emphasises the need for any regulatory measures to be drawn up within a robust legal framework and in line with international standards, in order to avoid disparate national interpretations. It encourages the Commission to continue its efforts to promote CSR in relations with other countries and regions around the world and call for greater efforts to make reciprocity a central tenet of trade relations. Members reaffirm the belief that the development of CSR should be driven primarily through the multi-stakeholder approach. There is a need for targeted measures and approaches for the development of CSR among SMEs.
Lastly, the report notes that the current Commission strategy for CSR covers the period 2011-2014. It calls on the Commission to ensure that an ambitious strategy is adopted in good time for the period after 2014 . It should be noted that a parallel resolution on promoting society’s interests and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery in the framework of CSR was adopted on the same day [see 2012/2097(INI) ].
The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Raffaele BALDASSARRE (EPP, IT) on corporate social responsibility (CSR): accountable, transparent and responsible business behaviour and sustainable growth.
The Committee on Social Affairs, exercising its prerogatives of an associated committee in accordance with Rule 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure , was also consulted for an opinion on this report.
The two committees have decided to work together closely in order to ensure that a cogent approach is taken in establishing Parliament's position on the renewed EU strategy 2011-2014 for corporate social responsibility. In pursuit of this objective and fully in keeping with their respective responsibilities, the two committees have decided to draw up, under Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure, two own-initiative reports, each covering a separate area : the second report concerns Corporate Social Responsibility: promoting society's interests and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery [see 2012/2097(INI) ].
Members call for a modern understanding of CSR . They strongly advocate corporate social responsibility (CSR), and take the view that CSR – if implemented correctly and practised by all companies, not only larger firms – can make a great contribution towards restoring lost confidence, which is necessary for a sustainable economic recovery, and can mitigate the social consequences of the economic crisis. This is why they believe that making CSR part of a sustainable business strategy is in the interest of businesses and of society as a whole .
Members believe that in cases where a business is in difficulty, excessive bonuses, compensation and salaries paid to managers are incompatible with socially responsible behaviour .
The report states that a business’s tax policy should be considered part and parcel of CSR and that socially responsible behaviour consequently leaves no room for strategies aimed at evading tax or exploiting tax havens.
Overall, Members endorse the new definition of CSR put forward by the Commission , which does away with the dichotomy between voluntary and compulsory approaches which has hitherto polarised debate on CSR.
Strengthening the links between CSR, the general public, competitiveness and innovation : Members consider that the Commission should take the initiative on this issue. They call on the Commission to:
promote innovative, along with the national authorities, business models designed to forge closer links between businesses and the social environment in which they operate; consider the current discussions taking place with regard to the review of the Accounting and Transparency Directives so that the new proposed CSR strategy would complement the revised Directive; raise CSR's profile and disseminate best practice; introduce a European award scheme for CSR firms and partnerships and consider, among other actions, whether an European social label could be introduced to this end; support the efforts of the CSR Europe network, seeking first and foremost to strengthen cooperation between business and Member States; carry out periodic surveys of public trust in business and public attitudes towards CSR strategies implemented by businesses and link the content of these surveys with the revision of the sustainable consumption and production action plan, with a view to identifying barriers to more responsible consumption.
Making CSR policies more transparent and more effective : the report urges the Commission to draw up specific measures to combat misleading and false information regarding commitments to corporate social responsibility and relating to the environmental and social impact of products and services. The issues of filing and considering complaints on the basis of an open and clear procedure and initiating investigations should be examined. The report considers not only that ‘greenwashing’ is a form of deception that misleads consumers, public authorities, and investors, but that it also reduces trust in CSR as an effective means of promoting sustainable and inclusive growth. Members agree that greater account should be taken of social and environmental considerations in public procurement and calls, in this connection, for the lowest price no longer to be used as an award criterion and for greater accountability throughout the subcontracting chain. Further initiatives should be taken to unlock and strengthen the potential of CSR in tackling climate change (by linking it to resource and energy efficiency), e.g. in the processes companies use to purchase raw materials.
Members stress that Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) is part of the implementation process of CSR in investment decisions. This should combine investors’ financial objectives with their concerns regarding social, environmental and ethical (SEE) and corporate governance issues. They acknowledge the importance of businesses divulging information on sustainability such as social and environmental factors, with a view to identifying sustainability risks and increasing investor and consumer trust. The report also stresses that stringent respect for human rights, due diligence and transparency must be maintained in order to ensure CSR along the whole supply chain.
Members state that corporate responsibility must not be reduced to a marketing tool , and that it should be embedded in a company’s overall business strategy. They call on the Commission and the Member States to introduce corporate stewardship codes that reflect the importance of responsibility for all in the company.
In addition, Members advocate the adoption of a legislative proposal on the legislative proposal on the transparency of the social and environmental information, provided by companies allowing for high flexibility of action, matched by a sufficient level of comparability to meet the needs of investors and other stakeholders as well as the need to provide consumers with easy access to information on businesses’ impact on society.
Other proposes measures include: (i) the need for increased, more inclusive and more transparent monitoring of CSR principles in EU trade policy; (ii) the provision of concrete information on and education and training in CSR, so that enterprises can take full advantage of CSR and implement it in their organisational culture; (iii) further consideration to be given to both binding and non-binding measures to facilitate the recognition and promotion of efforts by businesses in connection with transparency and the disclosure of non-financial information.
Members are opposed to the introduction of specific parameters, such as EU-wide performance indicators, which could give rise to unnecessary red tape and inefficient operational structures .
As regards auto-regulation : Members welcome the Commission’s intention to launch a ‘Community of Practice’ on CSR which must be complementary to a code of good practice for co-regulation and self-regulation. In this respect, they call for the full and active consultation and involvement of representative organisations, including trade unions.
Whilst acknowledging the substantial value and potential of self-regulation and co-regulation instruments, Members are opposed, however, to the introduction of a single approach that fails to take account of the specificities of each sector and the specific requirements of businesses.
Members support the Commission’s proposal to require all investment funds and financial institutions to inform every customer (citizens, businesses, public authorities, etc) about any ethical or responsible investment criteria which they apply or any standards and codes to which they adhere. They call for the CSR policies of companies in the relevant sectors (such as travel, insurance, accommodation and telecommunications) to include positive and practical strategies and structures to support victims of crime and their families during a crisis.
CSR and SMEs: putting theory into practice : Members draw attention to the special features of SMEs, which mainly operate at local and regional level inside specific sectors. They call for the ‘ think small first ’ principle to be strengthened. They oppose all measures that could result in additional administrative or financial constraints for SMEs. Members call on the Commission, in collaboration with Member States, SME intermediary organisations and other stakeholders, to devise strategies and measures to help SMEs pool best CSR practice. Development and support strategies aimed at disseminating CSR among SMEs should also be devised and specific measures should be drawn up for small and micro-enterprises.
On an external note , Members stress that, following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament is to be fully informed on how the findings of Sustainability Impact Assessments (SIA) of agreements are incorporated into negotiations. They stress that future bilateral investment treaties signed by the EU must guarantee that a fair balance is struck between the need to protect investors and the need to allow for state intervention, especially with regard to social, health and environmental standards.
The report also calls on the Commission to raise awareness at corporate level concerning the importance of CSR and the consequences of non-compliance The Commission should encourage EU companies to take initiatives aimed at promoting CSR and to exchange good practices with their partners in other countries .
To conclude , Members emphasise the need for any regulatory measures to be drawn up within a robust legal framework and in line with international standards, in order to avoid disparate national interpretations. They encourage the Commission to continue its efforts to promote CSR in relations with other countries and regions around the world and call for greater efforts to make reciprocity a central tenet of trade relations. They reaffirm the belief that the development of CSR should be driven primarily through the multi-stakeholder approach. There is a need for targeted measures and approaches for the development of CSR among SMEs.
Lastly, the report notes that the current Commission strategy for CSR covers the period 2011-2014. It calls on the Commission to ensure that an ambitious strategy is adopted in good time for the period after 2014 .
PURPOSE : to present a renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility
BACKGROUND : the European Commission has previously defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in its 2001 Green Paper as “a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis”.
The Commission details the progress made since its Green Paper and a business-lead initiative called the European Alliance for CSR . Indicators of progress include:
· the number of EU enterprises that have signed up to the ten CSR principles of the United Nations Global Compact has risen from 600 in 2006 to over 1900 in 2011;
· the number of organisations with sites registered under the Environmental Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) has risen from 3 300 in 2006 to over 4 600 in 2011;
· the number of EU companies signing transnational company agreements with global or European workers’ organisations, covering issues such as labour standards, rose from 79 in 2006 to over 140 in 2011.
In spite of this progress, important challenges remain. Many companies in the EU have not yet fully integrated social and environmental concerns into their operations and core strategy . Accusations persist of the involvement of a small minority of European enterprises in human rights harm and failure to respect core labour standards. Only 15 out of 27 EU Member States have national policy frameworks to promote CSR. The Commission has identified a number of factors that will help to further increase the impact of its CSR policy, including the need to better clarify what is expected of enterprises, and the need to promote market reward for responsible business conduct, including through investment policy and public procurement.
The Council and the European Parliament in its resolutions of 2007 , and 2011 have called on the Commission to further develop its CSR policy. Furthermore, in the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission made a commitment to renew the EU strategy to promote Corporate Social Responsibility. In the Single Market Act it stated that it would adopt a new communication on CSR by the end of 2011.
The economic crisis and its social consequences have to some extent damaged consumer confidence and levels of trust in business. They have focused public attention on the social and ethical performance of enterprises. By renewing efforts to promote CSR now, the Commission aims to create conditions favourable to sustainable growth, responsible business behaviour and durable employment generation in the medium and long term.
CONTENT : the Commission presents a modern understanding of CSR , including an updated definition, and a new agenda for action. The main features are as follows:
Definition: the Commission puts forward a new definition of CSR as “ the responsibility of enterprises for their impacts on society ”. Respect for applicable legislation, and for collective agreements between social partners, is a prerequisite for meeting that responsibility. To fully meet their corporate social responsibility, enterprises should have in place a process to integrate social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns into their business operations and core strategy in close collaboration with their stakeholders, with the aim of:
· maximising the creation of shared value for their owners/shareholders and for their other stakeholders and society at large;
· identifying, preventing and mitigating their possible adverse impacts.
The complexity of that process will depend on factors such as the size of the enterprise and the nature of its operations. For most small and medium-sized enterprises, especially microenterprises, the CSR process is likely to remain informal and intuitive.
The new definition is consistent with internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Agenda for action : the new CSR policy puts forward an action agenda for the period 2011-2014 covering 8 areas. This agenda contains commitments from the Commission itself, as well as suggestions for enterprises, Member States, and other stakeholder groups. In implementing this agenda, the Commission will at all times take account the particular characteristics of SMEs, especially their limited resources, and avoid creating unnecessary administrative burdens.
Enhancing the visibility of CSR and disseminating good practices : by giving public recognition to what enterprises do in the field of CSR, the EU can help to disseminate good practice, foster peer learning, and encourage more enterprises to develop their own strategic approaches to CSR.
The Commission intends to:
· create in 2013 multi stakeholder CSR platforms in a number of relevant industrial sectors, for enterprises, their workers and other stakeholders to make public commitments on the CSR issues relevant to each sector and jointly monitor progress;
· launch from 2012 onwards a European award scheme for CSR partnerships between enterprises and other stakeholders.
Improving and tracking levels of trust in business : there is frequently a gap between citizens’ expectations and what they perceive to be the reality of business behaviour. This gap is caused partly by instances of irresponsible behaviour by some enterprises, as well as by cases of some enterprises exaggerating their environmental or social credentials. The Commission intends to:
· address the issue of misleading marketing related to the environmental impacts of products (so-called "green-washing") in the context of the report on the application of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and consider the need for possible specific measures on this issue;
· initiate an open debate with citizens, enterprises and other stakeholders on the role and potential of business in the 21st century, with the aim of encouraging common understanding and expectations, and carry out periodic surveys of citizen trust in business and attitudes towards CSR.
Improving self- and co-regulation processes : the Commission will launch a process in 2012 with enterprises and other stakeholders to develop a code of good practice for self- and co-regulation exercises, which should improve the effectiveness of the CSR process.
Enhancing market reward for CSR : this means leveraging EU policies in the fields of consumption, investment and public procurement in order to promote market reward for responsible business conduct. The Commission will:
· facilitate the better integration of social and environmental considerations into public procurement as part of the 2011 review of the Public Procurement Directives, without introducing additional administrative burdens for contracting authorities or enterprises, and without undermining the principle of awarding contracts to the most economically advantageous tender;
· consider a requirement on all investment funds and financial institutions to inform all their clients (citizens, enterprises, public authorities etc.) about any ethical or responsible investment criteria they apply or any standards and codes to which they adhere.
Improving company disclosure of social and environmental information : one source estimates that about 2,500 European companies publish CSR or sustainability reports, which puts the EU in a position of global leadership. However this is still only a small fraction of the 42,000 large companies operating in the EU. In order to ensure a level playing field, the Commission will present a legislative proposal on the transparency of the social and environmental information provided by companies in all sectors.
Further integrating CSR into education, training and research : the Commission will explore opportunities for financing further research and innovation on CSR , and supporting CSR principles and guidelines in research funded still under the 7th Framework Programme, as well as under its successor, Horizon 2020, and in building the European Research Area. It intends to provide further financial support for education and training projects on CSR under the EU Lifelong Learning and Youth in Action Programmes , and launch an action in 2012 to raise the awareness of education professionals and enterprises on the importance of cooperation on CSR.
Emphasising the importance of national and sub-national CSR policies : the Commission intends to create with Member States in 2012 a peer review mechanism for national CSR policies. It invites Member States to develop by mid 2012 their own plans or national lists of priority actions to promote CSR in support of the Europe 2020 strategy, with reference to internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines and in cooperation with enterprises and other stakeholders, taking account of the issues raised in this communication.
Better aligning European and global approaches to CSR: the EU should promote European interests in international CSR policy developments, while at the same time ensuring the integration of internationally recognised principles and guidelines into its own CSR policies. The Commission intends to monitor the commitments made by European enterprises with more than 1 000 employees to take account of internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, and take account of the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility in its own operations. Furthermore, it invites all large European enterprises to make a commitment by 2014 to take account of at least one of the following sets of principles and guidelines when developing their approach to CSR: the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, or the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility.
The report further notes that improving the coherence of EU policies relevant with business and human rights is a critical challenge. The Commission intends to:
· work with enterprises and stakeholders in 2012 to develop human rights guidance for a limited number of relevant industrial sectors , as well as guidance for small and medium-sized enterprises, based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
· publish by the end of 2012 a report on EU priorities in the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles, and thereafter to issue periodic progress reports.
Lastly, it invites EU Member States to develop by the end of 2012 national plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles.
PURPOSE : to present a renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility
BACKGROUND : the European Commission has previously defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in its 2001 Green Paper as “a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis”.
The Commission details the progress made since its Green Paper and a business-lead initiative called the European Alliance for CSR . Indicators of progress include:
· the number of EU enterprises that have signed up to the ten CSR principles of the United Nations Global Compact has risen from 600 in 2006 to over 1900 in 2011;
· the number of organisations with sites registered under the Environmental Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) has risen from 3 300 in 2006 to over 4 600 in 2011;
· the number of EU companies signing transnational company agreements with global or European workers’ organisations, covering issues such as labour standards, rose from 79 in 2006 to over 140 in 2011.
In spite of this progress, important challenges remain. Many companies in the EU have not yet fully integrated social and environmental concerns into their operations and core strategy . Accusations persist of the involvement of a small minority of European enterprises in human rights harm and failure to respect core labour standards. Only 15 out of 27 EU Member States have national policy frameworks to promote CSR. The Commission has identified a number of factors that will help to further increase the impact of its CSR policy, including the need to better clarify what is expected of enterprises, and the need to promote market reward for responsible business conduct, including through investment policy and public procurement.
The Council and the European Parliament in its resolutions of 2007 , and 2011 have called on the Commission to further develop its CSR policy. Furthermore, in the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission made a commitment to renew the EU strategy to promote Corporate Social Responsibility. In the Single Market Act it stated that it would adopt a new communication on CSR by the end of 2011.
The economic crisis and its social consequences have to some extent damaged consumer confidence and levels of trust in business. They have focused public attention on the social and ethical performance of enterprises. By renewing efforts to promote CSR now, the Commission aims to create conditions favourable to sustainable growth, responsible business behaviour and durable employment generation in the medium and long term.
CONTENT : the Commission presents a modern understanding of CSR , including an updated definition, and a new agenda for action. The main features are as follows:
Definition: the Commission puts forward a new definition of CSR as “ the responsibility of enterprises for their impacts on society ”. Respect for applicable legislation, and for collective agreements between social partners, is a prerequisite for meeting that responsibility. To fully meet their corporate social responsibility, enterprises should have in place a process to integrate social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns into their business operations and core strategy in close collaboration with their stakeholders, with the aim of:
· maximising the creation of shared value for their owners/shareholders and for their other stakeholders and society at large;
· identifying, preventing and mitigating their possible adverse impacts.
The complexity of that process will depend on factors such as the size of the enterprise and the nature of its operations. For most small and medium-sized enterprises, especially microenterprises, the CSR process is likely to remain informal and intuitive.
The new definition is consistent with internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Agenda for action : the new CSR policy puts forward an action agenda for the period 2011-2014 covering 8 areas. This agenda contains commitments from the Commission itself, as well as suggestions for enterprises, Member States, and other stakeholder groups. In implementing this agenda, the Commission will at all times take account the particular characteristics of SMEs, especially their limited resources, and avoid creating unnecessary administrative burdens.
Enhancing the visibility of CSR and disseminating good practices : by giving public recognition to what enterprises do in the field of CSR, the EU can help to disseminate good practice, foster peer learning, and encourage more enterprises to develop their own strategic approaches to CSR.
The Commission intends to:
· create in 2013 multi stakeholder CSR platforms in a number of relevant industrial sectors, for enterprises, their workers and other stakeholders to make public commitments on the CSR issues relevant to each sector and jointly monitor progress;
· launch from 2012 onwards a European award scheme for CSR partnerships between enterprises and other stakeholders.
Improving and tracking levels of trust in business : there is frequently a gap between citizens’ expectations and what they perceive to be the reality of business behaviour. This gap is caused partly by instances of irresponsible behaviour by some enterprises, as well as by cases of some enterprises exaggerating their environmental or social credentials. The Commission intends to:
· address the issue of misleading marketing related to the environmental impacts of products (so-called "green-washing") in the context of the report on the application of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and consider the need for possible specific measures on this issue;
· initiate an open debate with citizens, enterprises and other stakeholders on the role and potential of business in the 21st century, with the aim of encouraging common understanding and expectations, and carry out periodic surveys of citizen trust in business and attitudes towards CSR.
Improving self- and co-regulation processes : the Commission will launch a process in 2012 with enterprises and other stakeholders to develop a code of good practice for self- and co-regulation exercises, which should improve the effectiveness of the CSR process.
Enhancing market reward for CSR : this means leveraging EU policies in the fields of consumption, investment and public procurement in order to promote market reward for responsible business conduct. The Commission will:
· facilitate the better integration of social and environmental considerations into public procurement as part of the 2011 review of the Public Procurement Directives, without introducing additional administrative burdens for contracting authorities or enterprises, and without undermining the principle of awarding contracts to the most economically advantageous tender;
· consider a requirement on all investment funds and financial institutions to inform all their clients (citizens, enterprises, public authorities etc.) about any ethical or responsible investment criteria they apply or any standards and codes to which they adhere.
Improving company disclosure of social and environmental information : one source estimates that about 2,500 European companies publish CSR or sustainability reports, which puts the EU in a position of global leadership. However this is still only a small fraction of the 42,000 large companies operating in the EU. In order to ensure a level playing field, the Commission will present a legislative proposal on the transparency of the social and environmental information provided by companies in all sectors.
Further integrating CSR into education, training and research : the Commission will explore opportunities for financing further research and innovation on CSR , and supporting CSR principles and guidelines in research funded still under the 7th Framework Programme, as well as under its successor, Horizon 2020, and in building the European Research Area. It intends to provide further financial support for education and training projects on CSR under the EU Lifelong Learning and Youth in Action Programmes , and launch an action in 2012 to raise the awareness of education professionals and enterprises on the importance of cooperation on CSR.
Emphasising the importance of national and sub-national CSR policies : the Commission intends to create with Member States in 2012 a peer review mechanism for national CSR policies. It invites Member States to develop by mid 2012 their own plans or national lists of priority actions to promote CSR in support of the Europe 2020 strategy, with reference to internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines and in cooperation with enterprises and other stakeholders, taking account of the issues raised in this communication.
Better aligning European and global approaches to CSR: the EU should promote European interests in international CSR policy developments, while at the same time ensuring the integration of internationally recognised principles and guidelines into its own CSR policies. The Commission intends to monitor the commitments made by European enterprises with more than 1 000 employees to take account of internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, and take account of the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility in its own operations. Furthermore, it invites all large European enterprises to make a commitment by 2014 to take account of at least one of the following sets of principles and guidelines when developing their approach to CSR: the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, or the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility.
The report further notes that improving the coherence of EU policies relevant with business and human rights is a critical challenge. The Commission intends to:
· work with enterprises and stakeholders in 2012 to develop human rights guidance for a limited number of relevant industrial sectors , as well as guidance for small and medium-sized enterprises, based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
· publish by the end of 2012 a report on EU priorities in the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles, and thereafter to issue periodic progress reports.
Lastly, it invites EU Member States to develop by the end of 2012 national plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)304
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0049/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0017/2013
- Committee opinion: PE497.944
- Committee opinion: PE498.079
- Committee opinion: PE497.789
- Committee opinion: PE498.153
- Committee opinion: PE496.505
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE500.760
- Committee draft report: PE500.415
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0681
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0681
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0681 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE500.415
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE500.760
- Committee opinion: PE496.505
- Committee opinion: PE498.153
- Committee opinion: PE497.789
- Committee opinion: PE497.944
- Committee opinion: PE498.079
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)304
Activities
- Raffaele BALDASSARRE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Corporate social responsibility: accountable, transparent and responsible business behaviour and sustainable growth (A7-0017/2013 - Raffaele Baldassarre) (vote)
- 2016/11/22 Corporate social responsibility: accountable, transparent and responsible business behaviour and sustainable growth - Corporate social responsibility: promoting society's interests and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Corporate social responsibility: accountable, transparent and responsible business behaviour and sustainable growth - Corporate social responsibility: promoting society's interests and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery (debate)
- Richard HOWITT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Corporate social responsibility: accountable, transparent and responsible business behaviour and sustainable growth - Corporate social responsibility: promoting society's interests and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Corporate social responsibility: accountable, transparent and responsible business behaviour and sustainable growth - Corporate social responsibility: promoting society's interests and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery (debate)
- Charalampos ANGOURAKIS
- Regina BASTOS
- Elena BĂSESCU
- Heinz K. BECKER
- Malika BENARAB-ATTOU
- Jean-Jacob BICEP
- Philippe BOULLAND
- Alejandro CERCAS
- Derek Roland CLARK
- Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
- Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT
- Emer COSTELLO
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
- Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
- Kinga GÖNCZ
- Catherine GRÈZE
- Andrzej GRZYB
- Nadja HIRSCH
- Martin KASTLER
- Jaromír KOHLÍČEK
- Eva LICHTENBERGER
- Thomas MANN
- Jiří MAŠTÁLKA
- Iosif MATULA
- Paul MURPHY
- Cristiana MUSCARDINI
- Csaba ŐRY
- Franz OBERMAYR
- Siiri OVIIR
- Antigoni PAPADOPOULOU
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
- Jacek PROTASIEWICZ
- Nicole SINCLAIRE
- Jutta STEINRUCK
- Dimitar STOYANOV
- Csaba Sándor TABAJDI
- Rebecca TAYLOR
- Oldřich VLASÁK
- Zbigniew ZIOBRO
- Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Votes
A7-0017/2013 - Raffaele Baldassarre - § 17/1 #
A7-0017/2013 - Raffaele Baldassarre - § 17/2 #
A7-0017/2013 - Raffaele Baldassarre - § 26/1 #
A7-0017/2013 - Raffaele Baldassarre - § 26/2 #
A7-0017/2013 - Raffaele Baldassarre - § 42 #
A7-0017/2013 - Raffaele Baldassarre - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
268 |
2012/2098(INI)
2012/11/07
AFET
46 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) - 1a. Welcomes the fact that the new definition established in the Commission's CSR Communication of 25.10.2011 emphasises that respect for applicable legislation and collective agreements is a prerequisite for responsible action and specifies the framework required for corporate responsibility by demanding that ‘social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns’ are integrated into the operations and core strategy of businesses in close collaboration with their stakeholders; reiterates that corporate social responsibility must also extend to enterprises’ behaviour towards and in third countries;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new) (1) While recognizing the importance of UN human rights framework for CSR, recalls that Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union guarantees the fundamental right to conduct a business which should be duly taken into account and serve as reference supporting CSR policies in the EU;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 (new) (2) Underlines the importance of balancing freedom to conduct business with other rights guaranteed by this Charter as well as internationally recognized principles and guidelines for CSR; welcomes, in this context, the efforts of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) to collect evidence and expertise concerning existence and interpretation of the freedom to conduct business;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Commits itself to continue to raise consistently its expectation that EU institutions and officials, including the EU Special Representative on Human Rights,
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Commits itself to continue to raise consistently its expectation that EU institutions and officials, including the EU Special Representative on Human Rights
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new) (1) Calls on the Commission and Member States to conduct fundamental rights impact assessments prior to conclusion of and when evaluating multilateral and bilateral trade and investment agreements and the attribution of development aid and to guarantee that these rights are respected; in this context, special emphasis should be put on the basic principle of equality between men and women;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises that Paris Principles-aligned NHRIs are uniquely positioned to provide support for the implementation of the U
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises that Paris Principles-aligned NHRIs are
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Undertakes to place the
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – point 1 (1) ensure that
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the efforts of the European Union and the Member States to align their policies with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises updated in 2011 and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights1,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – point 2 (2) develop specific support under the EIDHR for training and overall capacity- building in the area of
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists, in order to ensure that the implementation of the new EU CSR strategy promotes society’s interests, the respect for human rights, and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery and development, that the legislative proposal on the mandatory disclosure of non- financial information (including environmental, social, and governance information) of companies ensures transparency by providing a clear, unambiguous, common and predetermined framework, with specific reference to human rights, that is fully aligned with the UN Guiding Principles and based on objective indicators, such as the gender pay gap,
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists, in order to ensure that the implementation of the new EU CSR strategy promotes the interests of society
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists, in order to ensure that the implementation of the new EU CSR strategy promotes society’s interests, the respect for human rights, and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery and development, that the legislative proposal on the mandatory disclosure of non- financial information (including environmental, social, and governance information) of companies ensures transparency by providing a clear, unambiguous, common and predetermined framework. with specific reference to human rights, that is fully aligned with the OECD and UN
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists, in order to ensure that the implementation of the new EU CSR strategy promotes society's interests, the respect for human rights, and a route to sustainable and inclusive
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates its calls on the EU and the Member States to improve the enforcement of existing laws integrating
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates its calls on the EU and the Member States to improve the enforcement of existing laws integrating ‘business and human rights’ concerns, and to develop further solutions aiming at a ‘level playing field’ for domestic and third countries’ business enterprises in order to combat social dumping;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for human rights due diligence standards, including the obligation to carry out social and environmental impact assessments and effective redress mechanisms, at EU level, addressing, among other issues, potentially high human rights impact and risk areas such as global and local supply chains, conflict minerals,
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for human rights and supply chain due diligence standards at EU level that meet requirements laid out by the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains from Conflict- Affected and High-Risk Areas, addressing, among other issues, potentially high human rights impact and risk areas such as global and local supply chains, conflict minerals, and outsourcing;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers corporate social responsibility to be a relevant concept for enabling control to be exercised over enterprises’ actions and their impacts; points out that such control is essential for achieving the objectives of the Treaty on European Union and the objectives referred to in the Communication of building a more cohesive society and bringing about a transition towards a sustainable economy; believes, however, that being of a voluntary nature it is insufficient to ensure that enterprises comply fully with social and environmental standards in line with the objectives laid down; calls on the Commission to establish a binding framework for corporate social responsibility for all enterprises in the areas in which they operate;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for human rights due diligence standards at EU level, addressing, among other issues, potentially high human rights impact and risk areas such as global and local supply chains, conflict minerals, and outsourcing; welcomes the programmes already set up by the EU, in particular the FLEGT programme in forestry, and supports private initiatives such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI);
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls for human rights due diligence standards at EU level, addressing, among other issues, potentially high human rights impact and risk areas such as global and local supply chains, conflict minerals, land-grabbing and outsourcing;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the EU and the Member States, with respect to CSR infringements, to adopt specific binding rules on granting fundamental rights to effective remedy and access to an impartial and independent tribunal, referring in particular to the fact that these are secured in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; reaffirms the need to encourage transnational judicial cooperation with the aim of establishing judicial procedures and non- judicial redress mechanisms;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Requests that where the EU or Member States are partners of business (e.g. in public procurement, state-owned enterprises, joint ventures, ‘blending’, export credit guarantees, large scale projects in third countries), consistency with the OECD and UN
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Requests that where the EU or Member States are partners of business (e.g. in public procurement, state-owned enterprises, joint ventures, ‘blending’, export credit guarantees, large scale projects in third countries), consistency with the UN Guiding Principles should be a priority, reflected in specific contractual clauses, and with consequences for companies blatantly violating human rights; recommends that the envisaged
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Requests that where the EU or Member States are partners of business (e.g. in public procurement, state-owned enterprises, joint ventures, ‘blending’, export credit guarantees, large scale projects in third countries), consistency with the UN Guiding Principles should be a priority, reflected in specific contractual clauses, and with consequences for companies blatantly violating human rights;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Requests that where the EU or Member States are partners of business (e.g. in public procurement, state-owned enterprises, joint ventures, ‘blending’, export credit guarantees, large scale projects in third countries), consistency with the UN Guiding Principles should be a priority, reflected in specific contractual clauses, and with legal consequences for companies blatantly violating human rights; recommends that the envisaged ‘EU Platform for External Cooperation and Development’ establish such modalities;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses the importance of the UN ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ framework and considers that its three pillars – the state’s responsibility to protect against human rights violations, the responsibility of businesses to respect human rights and the need for more effective access to remedies – should be supported by appropriate measures to enable their implementation;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Acknowledges that grievances against EU companies operating abroad are often more usefully solved in situ; commends the OECD National Contact Points as state- based non-legal mechanisms that can mediate over a broad range of business and human rights disputes; calls, however, for a greater effort by companies in developing grievance mechanisms aligned with the effectiveness criteria stated in the Guiding Principles and to seek further authoritative guidance provided by internationally recognised principles and guidelines, in particular the recently updated OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ten principles of the United Nations Global Compact, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility, the ILO Tri-partite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses the importance of assessing an enterprise's compliance with social responsibility in terms of the entire supply chain; considers it vital to put in place effective and transparent indicators with which to assess precisely the impact of an enterprise’s activities from a systemic point of view;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls for the development of more effective transparency and accountability standards for EU technology companies in relation to export of technologies that can be used to violate human rights or to act against the EU´s security interest;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Welcomes the Commission’s wish to address the issue of corporate social responsibility in the context of enlargements; is disappointed, nevertheless, that this issue is not specifically addressed in the accession negotiations with candidate countries and that this concept is not mentioned in the Communication from the Commission on the Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2012-20131 __________________ 1 COM(2012) 600 final
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Calls for human rights impact assessments as early as in the research and development phase of new technologies;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to work towards establishing global advocacy, international guidelines and complementary legislation to ensure that EU businesses have a positive impact in foreign societies; notes that businesses’ positive impact in foreign societies can be assessed in terms of, among other things, local people’s access to resources and their food sovereignty and the endogenous development of societies;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 c (new) 14c. Calls for the implementation of ´know your end user´ to ensure the prevention of human rights violations up or down stream in a production or market flow;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 d (new) 14d. Calls for the monitoring of restrictive measures (sanctions, boycotts, embargos) at the EU level;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists that each of the 27 Member States must accelerate the revision of their national action plans on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists that each of the 27 Member States must accelerate the revision of their national action plans on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and the development of national plans implementing UN Guiding Principles, which should be finalised at the latest by December 2013; Member States should ensure these plans are drafted with participation of all relevant stakeholders including NGOs, civil society; calls on the EU to facilitate learning from the experience of those EU States which are currently undergoing this process; encourages the Member States to draw inspiration from guidance developed by the European Group of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs);
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists that each of the 27 Member States must accelerate the revision of their national action plans on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and the development of national plans implementing UN Guiding Principles, which should be finalised at the latest by December 2013; calls on the EU to facilitate learning from the experience of those EU States which are currently undergoing this process; encourages the Member States to draw inspiration from the guidelines contained in the ISO 26000 standard, the OECD Guidelines, the most recent version of the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines and guidance developed by the European Group of National Human Rights
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises that the CSR of enterprises both within the EU and in third countries should also be extended to areas such as the organisation of work, the quality of employment, equal opportunities, social inclusion, combating discrimination and continuing training;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for greater policy coherence at EU level by bringing public procurement as well as export credit, good governance, competition, development, trade, investment and other policies and agreements into conformity with the international
source: PE-500.385
2012/11/16
CULT
40 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Encourages the EU to play an active role in raising awareness of the contribution enterprises can give to society through Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the field of culture
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Member States to introduce tax exemptions for firms that fund voluntary work and non-profit initiatives;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Draws attention to the need for CSR to be incorporated into the curricula of educational establishments at all levels, including business schools, and into training programmes for managers and employees of small and medium-sized enterprises;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Encourages Member States to integrate CSR into relevant education curricula both in schools providing upper secondary education and at higher education level;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Encourages Member States to integrate CSR into relevant education curricula, and in particular into language learning and the appreciation of multilingualism;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the importance of the link between universities and enterprises and points to the role CSR
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the importance of the link
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. encourages enterprises to provide quality internships with a strong learning component that ease the transition between education and employment, facilitate the development of labour market relevant skills and support the autonomy of young people;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. E
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Encourages enterprises to promote creativity and cultural projects within their CSR policies,
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Encourages the EU to play an active role in raising awareness of the contribution enterprises can give to
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Encourages enterprises to promote creativity and cultural projects, and particularly projects linked to problems within Europe, within their CSR policies, in the context of civic commitment, and to stimulate growth and job creation;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Encourages enterprises to promote creativity and cultural projects within their CSR policies, in the context of civic commitment, and to stimulate sustainable growth and job creation;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points to the importance of involving small and medium-sized enterprises in CSR and recognising their achievements in this area;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Encourages enterprises, in conjunction with management and labour, to train, inform and involve their employees in the major social challenges affecting Europe, particularly as regards the economy, society, the environment and internationally;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for the idea of sponsorship to be promoted among employers;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points to the important contribution CSR can make in creating opportunities for learning and growth, civic commitment and social integration by way of high-level of interaction with society; stresses in particular the contribution of CSR in creating opportunities for young people and developing their talents;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points to the important contribution CSR can make in creating opportunities for learning and growth, civic commitment, professional ethics and social integration by way of high-level interaction with society
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points to the important contribution CSR can make in creating opportunities for learning and growth, shaping and promoting social attitudes, civic commitment and social integration by way of high-level of interaction with society;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points to the important contribution CSR can make in creating opportunities for learning and growth, civic commitment and social integration by way of high-level interaction with society, as well as intergenerational activities such as mutual mentoring and know-how transfer between old and young;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the importance of upholding human rights in relations with non-EU countries;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the European award scheme for CSR partnerships between enterprises and others stakeholders, including educational institutions and sports organisations as an important step in raising the visibility of CSR;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that Socially Responsible Investment (SRI), as part of the implementation process of CRS in investment decisions, shall combine investors' financial and economic objectives with their social, environmental, ethical, cultural and educational issues;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Encourages the Member States and the Union to take into consideration for their CSR agenda that the cultural and creative SMEs can have a significant impact on social and environmental change, inducing long term solutions to combat poverty in giving new impulses to the labour market and integrating social consideration;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for research to be conducted into the reasons for the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the various CSR strategies implemented;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Member States to support and enhance the status of employee volunteering and employer-
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for more clear-cut action, be it of a voluntary nature or stemming from accountability and/or an obligation, to foster social responsibility as regards Member States’ public sectors;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Believes cultural content and media companies have a corporate social responsibility in ensuring the fundamental rights of users are protected, and considers that self-regulation and deep packet inspections risks outsourcing police and law enforcement into the hands of private sector (actors);
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the fact that a growing number of firms in EU Member States are implementing CSR measures, but points out that decisions on implementing such measures are the exclusive preserve of the individual Member States;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Encourages media companies to include transparent journalism standards in their CSR policies, including guarantees of source protection and the rights of whistle blowers.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the EU, pursuant to Article 152 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), to include Corporate Social Responsibility (CRS) in its promotion of the role of, and dialogue between, management and labour; proposes in this regard that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) should be a regular item on the agenda of the Tripartite Social Summit referred to in Article 152(2) TFEU;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Encourages the EU as well as Member States to provide concrete information on, and education and training in CSR, in order for enterprises to
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Encourages the EU as well as Member States, within the framework of existing programmes, to provide concrete information on, and education and training in CSR, in order for enterprises to take full advantage of CSR and be able to implement it in their organisational culture;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Encourages the EU as well as Member States to provide concrete information on, and education and training in CSR, in order for enterprises to take full advantage of CSR and be able to implement it in their organisational culture; points out and regrets however that the language of CSR is still mostly voluntary;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises that, as a purely voluntary commitment, CSR is insufficient to deal with externalities resulting from the operations of multinationals, including environmental, social and human rights violations; reiterates its call for the establishment of legally binding obligations for investors, especially those operating in developing countries, to respect cultural diversity, human rights, environmental and social standards;
source: PE-500.409
2012/11/20
DEVE
40 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that owing to the heterogeneity of the concept of CSR, with different companies having developed different standards on accounting, auditing and reporting, levels of CSR are hard to compare; emphasises that
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Deplores the lack of information for SMEs on the global compact under which businesses can commit themselves to aligning their operations and strategies with 10 universally accepted principles in the areas of human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Stresses that the UN Global Compact and the ISO 26000 standards are not properly suited to the needs of SMEs, which makes the whole idea of CSR less effective within the EU;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Draws attention to the need for thought to be given at both EU and national levels to how tax incentives might be used to promote CSR more widely among firms;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that,
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that, as a purely voluntary commitment, CSR
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that, as a purely voluntary commitment, CSR is insufficient to deal with externalities resulting from the operations of multinationals, including environmental degradation and human and labour rights violations; reiterates its call for the establishment of legally binding obligations for foreign investors operating in developing countries to respect human rights
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Highlights that companies should be encouraged to implement CSR practices, moreover those which have already implemented these practices shall be encouraged to pursuit its goals; asks the Commission to consider incentives, such as priority in EU public procurement contracts, in order to make CSR seen by companies as an opportunity and not as a threat;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that CSR should result in clear commitments
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that CSR should result in clear commitments with performance indicators, and that provision should be made for objective monitoring and effective accountability mechanisms
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points out it, if uptake of CSR is to increase within the EU, it is essential for appropriate oversight bodies to be set up at both EU and national levels;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that owing to the heterogeneity of the concept of CSR, with different companies having developed different standards on accounting, auditing and reporting, levels of CSR are hard to compare; emphasises that
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that the way in which
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that the way in which extractive industries operate in developing countries requires
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that investment by the petroleum industry in Nigeria is a good example of the limitations of CSR as currently implemented, where companies have failed to take CSR initiatives to create sustainable business practices, or contribute to the development of their host states;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to take further initiatives that aim to unlock and strengthen the potential of CSR in tackling climate change (by linking it to resource and energy efficiency), e.g. in companies' raw materials purchasing process;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that CSR should apply to the entire global supply chain, including all levels of sub-contracting and whether in the supply of goods, workers or services, that it should include provisions to extend protection to migrant, agency and posted workers and that it should be based on fair pay and decent working conditions and guarantee trade union rights and freedoms; takes the view that the concept of Responsible Supply Chain Management needs to be further elaborated as a mechanism for delivering CSR;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Takes the view that, in order to have a real impact on poverty reduction, the CSR agenda shall also put focus on SMEs as their cumulative social and environmental impacts are significant;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that EU companies should be legally liable
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that EU companies should be legally liable in their home countries for violations committed abroad by their subsidiaries and entities they control; points out that the US Alien Tort Claims Act provides the option of suing a corporation or natural person for violating the law of nations or a Treaty of the US irrespective of the nationality of the accused or place in which the crime was committed; calls on the Commission to consider initiatives along this line;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Agrees with the Commission that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) must cover human rights, labour and employment practices, environmental issues (such as biodiversity, climate change, resource efficiency) and combating bribery and corruption, i.e. through good tax governance (namely transparency, exchange of information and fair tax competition);
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that EU companies should be legally liable in their home countries for human rights violations committed abroad
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that EU companies should be legally liable in their home countries for violations of fundamental human, employment and trade union rights committed abroad by their subsidiaries and entities they control; insists that any enterprise that is found to be blacklisting workers or breaching human rights and labour standards should be excluded from receiving EU grants and funding and from taking part in calls for tender or other public procurement contracts at EU, national or public authority level;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists that it is the duty of the state to protect against violations of human and labour rights, including by businesses, to hold companies accountable, to uphold freedom of association and collective bargaining rights, and to provide access to justice for victims; calls on the Commission to provide effective measures to operationalise the UN Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework put forward by John Ruggie, the UN Special Representative on Business and Human Rights;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that better implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights will contribute to EU objectives regarding specific human rights issues and core labour standards; hence, calls on the EU to strive for a clear international legal framework over the responsibilities and obligations of business with regard to human rights;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Welcomes the fact that the number of companies disclosing information on their environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance has grown significantly in recent years; points out, however, that reporting companies still constitute only a small share of global business; notes that, while the EU Accounts Modernisation Directive 2003/51 ensures a minimum level of disclosure of both financial and non- financial key performance indicators, it does not stipulate any requirements in relation to the type of indicators to be included in annual reports; calls on the Commission to investigate further possible measures to strengthen disclosure of ESG information at the European level, e.g. by complementing the Modernisation Directive through a comply or explain mechanism, instead of permitting companies the option of not reporting;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Reiterates its call for the inclusion of CSR clause in EU trade and investment agreements; in particular recommends the implementation of the CSR principle inter alia by export credit and development finance agencies and other institutions involved in foreign direct investment;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Stresses that EU assistance to governments of third countries in implementing social and environmental regulation together with effective inspection regimes, is a necessary complement to advancing the CSR of European business worldwide;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 e (new) 8e. Stresses that Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) is part of the implementation process of CRS in investment decisions; notes that there is currently no universal definition of SRI but it usually combines investors' financial objectives with their concerns about social, environmental, ethical (SEE) and corporate governance issues;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 f (new) 8f. Urges the EU and its Member States to take further policy initiatives that aim to raise awareness and strengthen the development of SRI, inter alia by considering legal formulation of an SRI minimum standards setting, especially within the scope of its investment and trade agreements with developing countries;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Notes that CSR is a mechanism with which employers can support their workers and local communities in developing countries and that it can ensure gains are equitably shared to develop sustainable economic and social prosperity and lift more people out of poverty, especially in times of financial crisis; regrets that protocols for social intervention are currently only voluntary and urges the Commission to make these binding;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Points out that CSR covers a wide range of social standards on which very little focus is placed owing to a failure to establish indicators with which to measure progress on social issues;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls for full and active consultation and involvement of representative organisations, including trade unions, in the development, operation and monitoring of companies’ CSR processes and structures, including through the on- going development of workers’ skills and qualifications through training and lifelong learning, working with employers in a genuine partnership approach;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Stresses that its should be easy for investors and consumers to identify firms which have made a commitment to CSR, as this would encourage those firms in their efforts;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Highlights the need for the EU to look at the possibility of introducing appropriate marks or labels to be used alongside the names, or on the products, of firms that have made a commitment to CSR, so as to make them easy to identify;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that CSR is the best tool for companies to show their commitment, solidarity and responsibility towards society, and its also essential to achieving the objective of policy coherence for development (PCD); welcomes the Commission’s commitment to promote CSR in full consistency with current international guidelines; regrets, however, that the language of CSR is mostly
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that CSR is essential to achieving the objective of policy coherence for development (PCD); welcomes the Commission’s commitment to promote CSR in full consistency with current international guidelines;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that CSR is essential to achieving the objective of policy coherence for development (PCD); welcomes the Commission’s commitment to promote CSR in full consistency with current international guidelines, inter alia the recently updated OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ten principles of the United Nations Global Compact, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility, the ILO Tri-partite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights; regrets, however, that the language of CSR is mostly voluntary;
source: PE-500.609
2012/11/26
INTA
61 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Undertakes to place the corporate social responsibility issue on the agendas of all future EU meetings with third countries, especially with privileged relations partners, and calls for corporate social and environmental responsibility to be integrated into contractual relations between the EU and third countries;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls for all European companies operating in third countries with more than 1000 employees to be required by 1 January 2014 to apply the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a CSR
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a binding CSR clause in all bilateral trade and investment agreements signed by the EU, on the basis of principles of CSR as defined and acknowledged at the international level; suggests that this clause
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a CSR clause in all bilateral trade and investment agreements signed by the EU, on the basis of principles of CSR as defined and acknowledged at the international level in the OECD, the ILO, the UN and the European Union; suggests that this clause contain measures for the implementation of these principles, such as a requirement to carry out reporting and to publish regular assessments of the social and environmental impact of the activities of companies and of their sphere of influence (subsidiaries, supply chains, etc.) and a requirement to apply due diligence, i.e. to take the necessary measures to prevent breaches of social and environmental rights wherever the company operates;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a CSR clause in all bilateral trade and investment agreements signed by the EU, on the basis of principles of CSR as defined and acknowledged at the international level
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a CSR clause in all bilateral trade and investment agreements signed by the EU, on the basis of principles of CSR as defined and acknowledged at the international level; suggests that this clause contain measures
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Asks the Commission to include a CSR clause in all bilateral trade and investment agreements signed by the EU, on the basis of principles of CSR as defined and acknowledged at the international level; suggests that this clause contain measures for the implementation of these principles and that National Contact Points be set up as fora for questions concerning the OECD Guidelines;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Highlights the key role played by corporations, their subsidiaries and their supply chains in international trade and calls to make that corporate social and environmental responsibility an integral part of the European Union's trade agreements;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all companies operating in the Single market, including transnational corporations whose subsidiaries or supply chains are located in the EU, comply with all their legal obligations at both the national and EU level in order to ensure fair competition and maximise the benefits for EU consumers; calls also on the Commission to actively promote responsible business conduct amongst EU companies operating abroad with a special focus on ensuring strict compliance with all their legal obligations stemming from either domestic laws or any bilateral or international legal obligations their business operations are subject to therein, none the least compliance with international standards and rules in the areas of human rights, labour and the environment; to this aim, suggests to the Commission to actively engage with its partners in developing and emerging countries to exchange best practices and know-how on ways and means to improve the business environment and awareness about responsible business conduct;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Suggests to the Member State governments that they request the European Investment Bank to include a CSR clause in its operations;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers the "Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations 'Protect, Respect and Remedy' Framework", or so called Ruggie Framework, endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council on 16 June 2011, as the most comprehensive and innovative framework, to be enshrined in EU trade agreements with third countries;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Asks the Commission to introduce a more open and clear procedure for filing and considering complaints of non- compliance to CSR principles, including enforcement mechanisms and initiating investigations where necessary
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls for the Commission to urge companies to apply CSR; emphasises the need to support and encourage the spread of such practices among SMEs, limiting the costs and red tape entailed;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission to include a CSR clause in agreements with non- governmental organisations (NGOs), particularly where these relate to development activities;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that the principles underpinning CSR have not been sufficiently well incorporated into the revised GSP and GSP+ Regulation; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that the principles underpinning CSR have not been sufficiently well incorporated into the revised GSP and GSP+ Regulation; calls on the Commission to ensure that transnational corporations – whether or not they have their registered office in the European Union – whose subsidiaries or supply chains are located in countries participating in the GSP and GSP+ comply with their national and
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regrets that the Commission has not yet drawn up concrete proposals on the implementation of CSR principles in EU trade policy
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission to promote corporate social responsibility in multilateral forums by supporting an enhanced cooperation between the WTO and other multilateral forums dealing with CSR, such as the ILO and the OECD;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Reminds that for settling commercial disputes and/or seeking compensation for negative externalities of irresponsible or illegal business activity both court litigations and alternatives to court litigations already exist; calls, in this regard, on the Commission to further enhance awareness of both amongst the businesses community and the public at large; recalls that the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) provides dispute resolution services for individuals, businesses, states, state entities, and international organizations seeking alternatives to court litigation that can contribute to improve effective access to justice for victims in the event of breaches of responsible business practices causing economic, social and environmental damages in the EU and/or abroad;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the monitoring of restrictive measures (sanctions, boycotts, embargos), as well as of licensing schemes for dual use items, on the EU level;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for mechanisms to be put in place whereby CSR principles must be respected not only by the main company or contractor benefitting from a trade agreement, but also by any sub- contractors or supply chains which it may use, whether in the supply of goods, workers or services, thereby ensuring a level playing field based on fair pay and decent working conditions, and guaranteeing trade union rights and freedoms;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on the Commission to improve its sustainability impact assessment model, in order to properly reflect the economic, social, human rights and environmental implications, including climate change mitigation goals, of trade negotiations; calls on the Commission to follow up on the trade agreements with the EU's partner countries, by carrying out, prior to and after the signing of a trade agreement, sustainability impact assessment studies, taking into account in particular vulnerable sectors;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Underlines that, following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament is to be fully informed on how the findings of Sustainability Impact Assessments (SIA) of agreements are incorporated into negotiations prior to their conclusion, and which chapters of those agreements have been changed to avoid any negative impacts identified in the SIA;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a system of legal cooperation to be set up between the EU and third countries signatories to bilateral trade agreements
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a system of transnational legal cooperation to be set up between the EU and third countries signatories to bilateral trade agreements; hopes that the parties to such agreements will undertake to ensure effective access to justice for victims
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a system of legal cooperation to be set up between the EU and third
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regrets that the Commission has not yet drawn up concrete proposals on the implementation of CSR principles in EU trade policy; takes the view, in the light of the key role played by corporations, their subsidiaries and their supply chains in international trade, that corporate social and environmental responsibility must become an integral part of the ‘sustainable development’ chapters of the European Union’s trade agreements;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for the development of more effective transparency and accountability standards for EU technology companies in relation to export of technologies that can be used to violate human rights or against the EU's security interest;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the EEAS to ensure that EU trade officers, if based in EU embassies, enjoy a regular training on CSR issues, in particular with respect to the implementation of UN "Protect, Respect and Remedy" principles; that EU embassies function as EU Contact Points for complaints concerning EU companies and their subsidiaries, since OECD National Contact Points only exist in OECD adhering countries and therefore are not accessible in practice for concerned workers affected in countries outside the OECD;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls for human rights impact assessments as early as in the research and development phase of new technologies, including scenario studies and considerations of identifying Human Rights by Design standards;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Stresses that awareness rising for the importance of CSR and the consequences of non compliance at corporate level, as a task for the EU Commission, must be accompanied by adequate awareness and capacity building at the level of host country governments, to effectively ensure the implementation of CSR rights and access to justice;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Calls for the implementation of the 'know your end user' principle to ensure increased scrutiny and prevention of human rights violations up or down stream in supply chains and production or market flows;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that future bilateral investment treaties signed by the EU must guarantee a fair balance between investors' protection and the po
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that future bilateral investment treaties signed by the EU must guarantee a fair balance between investors’ protection and the potential for State intervention, especially as regards social, health and environmental standards;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Commits itself to step up its efforts continually so that EU institutions and officials, including the EU Special Representative for Human Rights, are required to enforce social, environmental and human rights standards in all EU external relations and actions;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets that the current reform of the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EG) and of the Accounting Directive (2003/51/EG) does not address the issue of corporate social responsibility sufficiently; calls on the Commission to ensure that companies falling under these directives are obliged to
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets that the current reform of the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EG) and of the Accounting Directive (2003/51/EG) does not address the issue of corporate social responsibility sufficiently; calls on the Commission to ensure that companies falling under these directives are obliged to publicly report regularly on their CSR activities, particularly in non-EU states.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets that the current reform of the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EG) and of the Accounting Directive (2003/51/EG) does not address the issue of corporate
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that CSR dimension should be incorporated into multilateral trade agreements and therefore calls on the Commission to support it both in the international forums in particular the OECD and the ILO, and in the WTO in the post-Doha context;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for future CSR measures to include the whole value chain, from raw materials extraction via trade to recycling.
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Asks that CSR policies are included in all levels of trade agreements with the EU, and include provisions to extend protection to migrant, agency and posted workers
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that the Commission and the Member States should encourage European companies to take initiatives aimed at promoting corporate social responsibility and to exchange good practices with their partners in other countries;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls for CSR policies and fundamental employment and trade union rights, such as the right to privacy and freedom of association, to be respected by EU companies in all their operations, whether based in the EU or internationally
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission to look at the possibility of partial tax relief for businesses in line with their achievements and efforts in terms of corporate social responsibility;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls for full and active consultation and involvement of representative organisations, including trade unions, in the development, operation and monitoring of companies' CSR processes and structures, working with employers in a genuine partnership approach
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that promoting CSR is an objective supported by the European Union, therefore the Union must ensure that the external policies it implements make contribution to the sustainable development and to the social development of the countries concerned;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Calls for an increased and more inclusive and transparent monitoring of CSR principles in EU trade policy, with clear benchmarks to measure improvements so as to encourage confidence in the system;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6e. Notes that CSR is a mechanism with which employers can support their workers and local communities in developing countries, that respect for CSR and labour standards can enable such countries to benefit from further international trade and that CSR can ensure gains are equitably shared to develop sustainable economic and social prosperity and lift more people out of poverty, especially in times of financial crisis; regrets that protocols for social intervention are currently only voluntary and urges the Commission to make these binding.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Urges the Commission, in devising concrete proposals for the application of CSR principles, to base itself on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, including the OECD complaints procedure;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Commands all members of the OECD for their comprehensive work on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises as published as of 25 May 2011 that are far reaching recommendations for responsible business conduct that 44 adhering governments – representing all regions of the world and accounting for 85% of foreign direct investment – encourage their enterprises to observe wherever they operate;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Agrees that current environmental and climate change imperatives and the development of global production chains demand a broader CSR concept coverage than envisaged when the concept was first conceived; hence considers necessary to spell out an updated CSR concept, relating to labour and human rights and employment issues, as well as to environmental protection, climate change concerns, and avoidance of corruption and tax evasion;
source: PE-500.554
2012/11/30
EMPL
81 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Maintains that the voluntary nature of CSR should again become a key defining characteristic and that the Commission should distinguish more clearly between (1) the original CSR concept, meaning philanthropic action whereby business fulfils its responsibility to society, (2) social action by business, based on laws, rules, and international standards, and (3) antisocial action by business, which violates laws, rules, and international standards and is exploitative by nature, one example being the employment of child or forced labour; regrets that these three aspects are repeatedly lumped together in the CSR debate; roundly condemns antisocial action by business and considers that greater pressure needs to be exerted in order to make countries translate international standards into national law and enforce them; expressly commends business – especially small and medium-sized firms – for their voluntary philanthropic work in which CSR finds expression, and will protect and foster this; is of the opinion that in a free society, business should not be forced to do good works;
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Endorses the new definition of CSR put forward by the Commission, which does away with the dichotomy between voluntary and compulsory approaches and recognises the need for a clear structural framework;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to draw up specific measures to combat misleading marketing relating to the environmental impact of products, over and above those provided for in the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive; considers that greenwashing is not only a deception that misleads consumers, public authorities, and investors, but also decreases trust in corporate social responsibility as an effective way to promote sustainable inclusive growth;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Insists that any enterprise that is found to be blacklisting workers or breaching human rights and labour standards should be excluded from receiving EU grants and funding and from taking part in calls for tender for other public procurement contracts at EU, national or public authority level;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that co- and self-regulation cannot be a substitute for appropriate regulation
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Calls for CSR policies to include specific measures to tackle the unlawful practice of blacklisting workers and denying them access to employment, often due to their trade union membership and activities or role as health and safety representative;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that co- and self-regulation can
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Calls for mechanisms to be put in place whereby CSR principles must be respected not only by the main company but also by the supply chain and any subcontractors which it may use, whether in the supply of goods, workers or services;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that co- and self-regulation cannot be a substitute for appropriate regulation in any of the areas covered by CSR such as labour and employment practices, human rights, environmental practices, but believes that it
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 d (new) 12d. Asks that CSR policies include provisions relating to migrant, agency and posted workers;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that co- and self-regulation cannot be a substitute for appropriate regulation in any of the areas covered by CSR, but believes that it could underpin existing private and voluntary CSR initiatives by establishing minimum principles to ensure consistency, materiality, multi-stakeholder input and transparency; believes self-regulation must include provision for "access to remedy" in line with "pillar three" of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Acknowledges the importance of businesses divulging information on sustainability such as social and environmental
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers it vital to ensure the appropriate procurement of services and compliance with fair competition principles in the single market by including social criteria in the award of contracts with the utmost transparency, together with ILO clauses, as an essential condition, in order to ensure beneficial social value for CSR activity. This may also encourage the pursuit of more appropriate and effective CSR activity within industrial sectors;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Acknowledges the importance of businesses divulging social and environmental information, with a view to identifying sustainability risks and increasing investor and consumer trust; points to the substantial progress being made in this respect
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Rejects the notion that small businesses are less responsible than large simply because they do not have separate CSR infrastructure; believes that sensible thresholds must be established to take account of small business needs in any new CSR-related legislative proposals that come forward; nevertheless calls for European action to build on the experience of Italy through regional Chambers of Commerce and of France through its savings banks (Cordé Initiative) to build awareness and visibility for the small business contribution through clustering of small businesses by locality or sector;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Is closely monitoring the current discussions on the legislative proposal on the transparency of the social and environmental information provided by companies;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission’s intention
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Is closely monitoring the current discussions on the legislative proposal on the transparency of information on sustainability such as the social and environmental
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission's intention to launch a
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Is closely monitoring the current discussions on the legislative proposal on
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Commends the Commission’s intention to conduct Eurobarometer surveys on trust in business; strongly advocates
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers proper corporate governance to be a key element of corporate social responsibility, especially as regards relations with public authorities and workers and their representative organisations and as regards policy on bonuses, compensation, and salaries; believes that when the bonuses, compensation, and salaries paid to managers are out of all proportion to what is paid to workers, especially in cases where a business is in difficulty, they are incompatible with socially responsible behaviour;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to launch a ‘Community of Practice’ on CSR; considers that this must be complementary to a code of good practice for co- and self-regulation, allowing all
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to give further consideration
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Maintains that the transparency and credibility of CSR actions could be ensured if minimum standards were established; notes that minimum standards in this area should, in any event, cover the involvement of employee representatives and trade unions, along with other stakeholders, as regards content, enforcement, and monitoring, the involvement of the value chain, and independent review of compliance with self-imposed obligations;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Is firmly opposed to the introduction of specific parameters, such as EU-wide performance indicators, which could give rise to unnecessary red tape and inefficient
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Is firmly opposed to the introduction of specific parameters, such as EU-wide performance indicators, which could give rise to unnecessary red tape and inefficient operational strictures; believes that the best safeguard against this is to promote globally accepted methodologies such as those of the Global Reporting Initiative and the Integrated Reporting Council;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Considers it essential, however, that the Commission should, as quickly as possible, develop the projected common life cycle-based methodology for measuring environmental performance; believes that the above methodology would be useful both from the point of view of transparency of business information and for the purposes of the assessment which public authorities bring to bear on companies’ environmental performance;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls for full and active consultation and involvement of representative organisations, including trade unions, in the development, operation and monitoring of companies’ CSR processes and structures, working with employers in a genuine partnership approach;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Fully supports the Commission's intention to bring forward a
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that an obligation for systematic reporting on essential information on sustainability does not overburden companies as any new CSR strategy needs to be welcomed by companies; calls on the Commission to allow for a transition period before non- financial reporting on a regular basis comes into force for companies as this transition period would provide companies with the opportunity to first properly implement CSR internally, putting in place an accurate and detailed CSR policy as part of their internal management systems;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Fully supports the Commission's intention to bring forward a legislative proposal on ‘non-financial disclosure’ by business; commends that this proposal is based on a wide-ranging public consultation as well as a series of workshops with relevant stakeholders warns that use of the term ‘non-
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Supports the Commission proposal to require all investment funds and financial institutions to inform every customer (citizens, businesses, public authorities, etc.) about any ethical or responsible investment criteria which they apply or any standards and codes to which they adhere;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to address the issue of misleading marketing related to the environmental and social impacts of the companies' operations in the context of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Endorses the Commission’s Directive on minimum standards for victims; calls for the CSR policies of companies in the relevant sectors (such as travel, insurance, accommodation and telecommunications) to include positive and practical strategies and structures to support victims of crime and their families during a crisis, and to set up specific policies for any employee who becomes a victim of crime, whether in the workplace or outside;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a Calls on the Commission accordingly to propose a clear legislative framework making compulsory non-financial disclosure by major European companies and specifying the minimum amount of information which must be provided (including environmental data, taking account of life-cycle costs, social aspects, in particular respect for human rights, and governance) and the methodology; notes that information should also be given regarding subcontracting and supply chains; calls for the drafting of simplified framework provisions which may be adopted by SMEs;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 c (new) 17c. Asks the Commission to introduce a more open and clear procedure for filing and considering complaints of non- compliance with CSR principles, including enforcement mechanisms and the initiation of investigations where necessary;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls for immediate measures at European level to combat the inadmissible practice of ‘greenwashing’, which not only deceives and misleads consumers, the authorities and investors, but also undermines confidence in corporate responsibility as an effective instrument for inclusive and sustainable growth;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Draws attention to the special features of SMEs, which mainly operate at local and regional level inside specific sectors; considers it essential, therefore, for Union CSR policies, including national CSR action plans, to take proper account of the specific requirements of SMEs
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Commends the Commission’s intention to conduct Eurobarometer surveys on trust in business; advocates
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Believes that a business’s tax policy should be considered part and parcel of CSR and that socially responsible behaviour consequently leaves no room for strategies aimed at evading tax or exploiting tax havens;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Condemns corporate corruption and tax evasion
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Acknowledges that many SMEs in Europe already undertake CSR policies, such as local employment, community engagement, applying good governance policies with their supply chain etc.; however, most of these SMEs do not know that they are actually putting in practice sustainability, CSR and good corporate governance practices; therefore calls on the Commission to first consider SMEs’ current practices before considering CSR strategies specifically for SMEs;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Condemns corporate corruption and tax evasion; believes that corporate transparency must extend to open and accountable relations for companies inside and outside Europe; that responsible companies must take a vigorous and public stand against corruption at all levels and at all times; condemns any attempts to evade fair taxation in all countries where companies operate; and although companies have a duty to speak out on public issues of concern including human rights, their lobbying activities must themselves be fully transparent and give absolute respect to democratic principles; calls on the Commission to place new emphasis on these issues in the CSR debate under the heading ‘good governance’;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Condemns corporate corruption and tax
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on public authorities to provide support for CSR promotional activities carried out by SME intermediary organisations, inter alia through smart, targeted use of structural funding, for instance, for promoting the labour integration of disfavoured groups, such as people with disabilities;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the discussion in the Commission of the dangers of "Greenwash" and the Commission's intention to consider the possibility of some CSR as leading to misleading advertising; urges the Commission to ensure that necessary grievance mechanisms are in place to ensure that external stakeholders can challenge, including legally where necessary, misleading or false advertising and seek effective sanctions including corrections and penalties; believes such an inclusive and balanced approach will inspire confidence from all stakeholders and citizens that EU initiatives in the field of CSR are objective, fair and credible;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Supports the Commission proposal to make it compulsory for investment funds and financial institutions to inform all their clients about any ethical or responsible investment criteria applied by them or any standards or codes with which they comply;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stringent human rights due diligence and transparency is particularly needed in ensuring supply chain responsibility, measuring sustainability footprint of European business, and combating tax avoidance and illicit money flows. The ongoing parliamentary debates over the draft EU Extractive Transparency Law for the extractive and logging industry (2011/0307(COD)), the review of the Anti- money laundering directive and the announced draft of legislation on non- financial reporting provide opportunities to improve companies' transparency towards these ends;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to set up a database for
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Recommends that CSR guides and handbooks should be drawn up for SMEs, in electronic form in each instance;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the link between good
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Reaffirms the belief that the development of CSR should be driven primarily
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the link between good corporate responsibility and good corporate governance can only be achieved if CSR is mandatory for companies and is a mainstream part of the company affecting its day-to-day financial strategy; believes that the Commission should explore opportunities to ensure that CSR strategy is agreed at board level.
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Reaffirms the belief that the development of CSR should be
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Agrees with the view expressed in the Commission communication that compliance with applicable law and collective labour agreements is a sine qua non of corporate social responsibility; also believes that socially responsible behaviour must of necessity translate into proper relations with trade unions, in particular respect for trade union rights, a continuous flow of information to workers and their representative organisations, and their involvement in company decision-taking;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the link between good corporate responsibility and good corporate governance can only be achieved if CSR is a mainstream part of the company affecting its day-to-day financial strategy; believes that the Commission should e
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Notes that the current Commission strategy for CSR covers the period 2011- 2014; calls on the Commission to ensure that an ambitious strategy is adopted in good time for the period after 2014;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that the link between good corporate responsibility and good corporate governance can only be achieved if CSR is a mainstream part of the company affecting its day-to-day financial strategy; believes that the Commission should explore opportunities to ensure that CSR strategy is agreed at board level
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Commends the Commission's intention to conduct Eurobarometer surveys on trust in business; advocates that binding and accordingly implemented corporate social responsibility (CSR) can fully contribute to restoring lost confidence, as this is absolutely necessary for a sustainable economic recovery;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Believes that when assessing the social responsibility of a company, it is necessary to take into account the behaviour of companies operating within its supply chain and, where applicable, of its subcontractors;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Commends the Commission’s
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to consider the current discussions taking place with regard to the review of the Accounting and Transparency Directives so that the new proposed CSR strategy would complement the revised Directive;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Commends the Commission's intention to conduct Eurobarometer surveys on trust in business; advocates that corporate social responsibility (CSR) can fully contribute to restoring lost confidence, as this is absolutely necessary for economic recovery, and it can successfully mitigate the social consequences of the economic crisis;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the importance of support for innovative solutions enabling businesses to address social and environmental challenges such as the introduction of
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Commends the Commission’s intention to conduct Eurobarometer surveys on trust in business; advocates that corporate societal responsibility (CSR) can fully contribute to restoring lost confidence, as this is absolutely necessary for economic recovery;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to consider whether it could establish a European corporate social responsibility certificate; believes that such a certificate should be recognised throughout the European Union and constitute proof of compliance with a body of requirements related to the different aspects of CSR, based on the principles and guidelines recognised at international level;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Acknowledges the importance and the potential of CSR Europe’s Enterprise 2020 initiative, which can play a substantial role in strengthening the link between CSR and competitiveness by fostering the dissemination of best practice; calls on the Commission and the Member States to foster greater synergies as regards the aim of pursuing policies and initiatives to promote social innovation and job creation; urges the Commission to support the efforts of the CSR Europe network seeking first and foremost to strengthen cooperation between business and Member States so as to lay the foundations for national action plans and the dissemination of best practice;
source: PE-501.898
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-498153_EN.html
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-497789_EN.html
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-497944_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-498079_EN.html
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdf |
events/5/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.415New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PR-500415_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.760New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-500760_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.505&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-496505_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.153&secondRef=03
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.789&secondRef=02
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.944&secondRef=03
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.079&secondRef=02
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-17&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0017_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-49New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0049_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
JURI/7/09590New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0681:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0681:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdf |
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE : to present a renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility BACKGROUND : the European Commission has previously defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in its 2001 Green Paper as a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis. The Commission details the progress made since its Green Paper and a business-lead initiative called the European Alliance for CSR. Indicators of progress include: · the number of EU enterprises that have signed up to the ten CSR principles of the United Nations Global Compact has risen from 600 in 2006 to over 1900 in 2011; · the number of organisations with sites registered under the Environmental Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) has risen from 3 300 in 2006 to over 4 600 in 2011; · the number of EU companies signing transnational company agreements with global or European workers organisations, covering issues such as labour standards, rose from 79 in 2006 to over 140 in 2011. In spite of this progress, important challenges remain. Many companies in the EU have not yet fully integrated social and environmental concerns into their operations and core strategy. Accusations persist of the involvement of a small minority of European enterprises in human rights harm and failure to respect core labour standards. Only 15 out of 27 EU Member States have national policy frameworks to promote CSR. The Commission has identified a number of factors that will help to further increase the impact of its CSR policy, including the need to better clarify what is expected of enterprises, and the need to promote market reward for responsible business conduct, including through investment policy and public procurement. The Council and the European Parliament in its resolutions of 2007, and 2011 have called on the Commission to further develop its CSR policy. Furthermore, in the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission made a commitment to renew the EU strategy to promote Corporate Social Responsibility. In the Single Market Act it stated that it would adopt a new communication on CSR by the end of 2011. The economic crisis and its social consequences have to some extent damaged consumer confidence and levels of trust in business. They have focused public attention on the social and ethical performance of enterprises. By renewing efforts to promote CSR now, the Commission aims to create conditions favourable to sustainable growth, responsible business behaviour and durable employment generation in the medium and long term. CONTENT : the Commission presents a modern understanding of CSR, including an updated definition, and a new agenda for action. The main features are as follows: Definition: the Commission puts forward a new definition of CSR as the responsibility of enterprises for their impacts on society. Respect for applicable legislation, and for collective agreements between social partners, is a prerequisite for meeting that responsibility. To fully meet their corporate social responsibility, enterprises should have in place a process to integrate social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns into their business operations and core strategy in close collaboration with their stakeholders, with the aim of: · maximising the creation of shared value for their owners/shareholders and for their other stakeholders and society at large; · identifying, preventing and mitigating their possible adverse impacts. The complexity of that process will depend on factors such as the size of the enterprise and the nature of its operations. For most small and medium-sized enterprises, especially microenterprises, the CSR process is likely to remain informal and intuitive. The new definition is consistent with internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Agenda for action: the new CSR policy puts forward an action agenda for the period 2011-2014 covering 8 areas. This agenda contains commitments from the Commission itself, as well as suggestions for enterprises, Member States, and other stakeholder groups. In implementing this agenda, the Commission will at all times take account the particular characteristics of SMEs, especially their limited resources, and avoid creating unnecessary administrative burdens. Enhancing the visibility of CSR and disseminating good practices: by giving public recognition to what enterprises do in the field of CSR, the EU can help to disseminate good practice, foster peer learning, and encourage more enterprises to develop their own strategic approaches to CSR. The Commission intends to: · create in 2013 multi stakeholder CSR platforms in a number of relevant industrial sectors, for enterprises, their workers and other stakeholders to make public commitments on the CSR issues relevant to each sector and jointly monitor progress; · launch from 2012 onwards a European award scheme for CSR partnerships between enterprises and other stakeholders. Improving and tracking levels of trust in business: there is frequently a gap between citizens expectations and what they perceive to be the reality of business behaviour. This gap is caused partly by instances of irresponsible behaviour by some enterprises, as well as by cases of some enterprises exaggerating their environmental or social credentials. The Commission intends to: · address the issue of misleading marketing related to the environmental impacts of products (so-called "green-washing") in the context of the report on the application of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and consider the need for possible specific measures on this issue; · initiate an open debate with citizens, enterprises and other stakeholders on the role and potential of business in the 21st century, with the aim of encouraging common understanding and expectations, and carry out periodic surveys of citizen trust in business and attitudes towards CSR. Improving self- and co-regulation processes: the Commission will launch a process in 2012 with enterprises and other stakeholders to develop a code of good practice for self- and co-regulation exercises, which should improve the effectiveness of the CSR process. Enhancing market reward for CSR: this means leveraging EU policies in the fields of consumption, investment and public procurement in order to promote market reward for responsible business conduct. The Commission will: · facilitate the better integration of social and environmental considerations into public procurement as part of the 2011 review of the Public Procurement Directives, without introducing additional administrative burdens for contracting authorities or enterprises, and without undermining the principle of awarding contracts to the most economically advantageous tender; · consider a requirement on all investment funds and financial institutions to inform all their clients (citizens, enterprises, public authorities etc.) about any ethical or responsible investment criteria they apply or any standards and codes to which they adhere. Improving company disclosure of social and environmental information: one source estimates that about 2,500 European companies publish CSR or sustainability reports, which puts the EU in a position of global leadership. However this is still only a small fraction of the 42,000 large companies operating in the EU. In order to ensure a level playing field, the Commission will present a legislative proposal on the transparency of the social and environmental information provided by companies in all sectors. Further integrating CSR into education, training and research: the Commission will explore opportunities for financing further research and innovation on CSR, and supporting CSR principles and guidelines in research funded still under the 7th Framework Programme, as well as under its successor, Horizon 2020, and in building the European Research Area. It intends to provide further financial support for education and training projects on CSR under the EU Lifelong Learning and Youth in Action Programmes, and launch an action in 2012 to raise the awareness of education professionals and enterprises on the importance of cooperation on CSR. Emphasising the importance of national and sub-national CSR policies: the Commission intends to create with Member States in 2012 a peer review mechanism for national CSR policies. It invites Member States to develop by mid 2012 their own plans or national lists of priority actions to promote CSR in support of the Europe 2020 strategy, with reference to internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines and in cooperation with enterprises and other stakeholders, taking account of the issues raised in this communication. Better aligning European and global approaches to CSR: the EU should promote European interests in international CSR policy developments, while at the same time ensuring the integration of internationally recognised principles and guidelines into its own CSR policies. The Commission intends to monitor the commitments made by European enterprises with more than 1 000 employees to take account of internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, and take account of the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility in its own operations. Furthermore, it invites all large European enterprises to make a commitment by 2014 to take account of at least one of the following sets of principles and guidelines when developing their approach to CSR: the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, or the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility. The report further notes that improving the coherence of EU policies relevant with business and human rights is a critical challenge. The Commission intends to: · work with enterprises and stakeholders in 2012 to develop human rights guidance for a limited number of relevant industrial sectors, as well as guidance for small and medium-sized enterprises, based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. · publish by the end of 2012 a report on EU priorities in the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles, and thereafter to issue periodic progress reports. Lastly, it invites EU Member States to develop by the end of 2012 national plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles. New
PURPOSE : to present a renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility BACKGROUND : the European Commission has previously defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in its 2001 Green Paper as a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis. The Commission details the progress made since its Green Paper and a business-lead initiative called the European Alliance for CSR. Indicators of progress include: · the number of EU enterprises that have signed up to the ten CSR principles of the United Nations Global Compact has risen from 600 in 2006 to over 1900 in 2011; · the number of organisations with sites registered under the Environmental Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) has risen from 3 300 in 2006 to over 4 600 in 2011; · the number of EU companies signing transnational company agreements with global or European workers organisations, covering issues such as labour standards, rose from 79 in 2006 to over 140 in 2011. In spite of this progress, important challenges remain. Many companies in the EU have not yet fully integrated social and environmental concerns into their operations and core strategy. Accusations persist of the involvement of a small minority of European enterprises in human rights harm and failure to respect core labour standards. Only 15 out of 27 EU Member States have national policy frameworks to promote CSR. The Commission has identified a number of factors that will help to further increase the impact of its CSR policy, including the need to better clarify what is expected of enterprises, and the need to promote market reward for responsible business conduct, including through investment policy and public procurement. The Council and the European Parliament in its resolutions of 2007, and 2011 have called on the Commission to further develop its CSR policy. Furthermore, in the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission made a commitment to renew the EU strategy to promote Corporate Social Responsibility. In the Single Market Act it stated that it would adopt a new communication on CSR by the end of 2011. The economic crisis and its social consequences have to some extent damaged consumer confidence and levels of trust in business. They have focused public attention on the social and ethical performance of enterprises. By renewing efforts to promote CSR now, the Commission aims to create conditions favourable to sustainable growth, responsible business behaviour and durable employment generation in the medium and long term. CONTENT : the Commission presents a modern understanding of CSR, including an updated definition, and a new agenda for action. The main features are as follows: Definition: the Commission puts forward a new definition of CSR as the responsibility of enterprises for their impacts on society. Respect for applicable legislation, and for collective agreements between social partners, is a prerequisite for meeting that responsibility. To fully meet their corporate social responsibility, enterprises should have in place a process to integrate social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns into their business operations and core strategy in close collaboration with their stakeholders, with the aim of: · maximising the creation of shared value for their owners/shareholders and for their other stakeholders and society at large; · identifying, preventing and mitigating their possible adverse impacts. The complexity of that process will depend on factors such as the size of the enterprise and the nature of its operations. For most small and medium-sized enterprises, especially microenterprises, the CSR process is likely to remain informal and intuitive. The new definition is consistent with internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Agenda for action: the new CSR policy puts forward an action agenda for the period 2011-2014 covering 8 areas. This agenda contains commitments from the Commission itself, as well as suggestions for enterprises, Member States, and other stakeholder groups. In implementing this agenda, the Commission will at all times take account the particular characteristics of SMEs, especially their limited resources, and avoid creating unnecessary administrative burdens. Enhancing the visibility of CSR and disseminating good practices: by giving public recognition to what enterprises do in the field of CSR, the EU can help to disseminate good practice, foster peer learning, and encourage more enterprises to develop their own strategic approaches to CSR. The Commission intends to: · create in 2013 multi stakeholder CSR platforms in a number of relevant industrial sectors, for enterprises, their workers and other stakeholders to make public commitments on the CSR issues relevant to each sector and jointly monitor progress; · launch from 2012 onwards a European award scheme for CSR partnerships between enterprises and other stakeholders. Improving and tracking levels of trust in business: there is frequently a gap between citizens expectations and what they perceive to be the reality of business behaviour. This gap is caused partly by instances of irresponsible behaviour by some enterprises, as well as by cases of some enterprises exaggerating their environmental or social credentials. The Commission intends to: · address the issue of misleading marketing related to the environmental impacts of products (so-called "green-washing") in the context of the report on the application of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and consider the need for possible specific measures on this issue; · initiate an open debate with citizens, enterprises and other stakeholders on the role and potential of business in the 21st century, with the aim of encouraging common understanding and expectations, and carry out periodic surveys of citizen trust in business and attitudes towards CSR. Improving self- and co-regulation processes: the Commission will launch a process in 2012 with enterprises and other stakeholders to develop a code of good practice for self- and co-regulation exercises, which should improve the effectiveness of the CSR process. Enhancing market reward for CSR: this means leveraging EU policies in the fields of consumption, investment and public procurement in order to promote market reward for responsible business conduct. The Commission will: · facilitate the better integration of social and environmental considerations into public procurement as part of the 2011 review of the Public Procurement Directives, without introducing additional administrative burdens for contracting authorities or enterprises, and without undermining the principle of awarding contracts to the most economically advantageous tender; · consider a requirement on all investment funds and financial institutions to inform all their clients (citizens, enterprises, public authorities etc.) about any ethical or responsible investment criteria they apply or any standards and codes to which they adhere. Improving company disclosure of social and environmental information: one source estimates that about 2,500 European companies publish CSR or sustainability reports, which puts the EU in a position of global leadership. However this is still only a small fraction of the 42,000 large companies operating in the EU. In order to ensure a level playing field, the Commission will present a legislative proposal on the transparency of the social and environmental information provided by companies in all sectors. Further integrating CSR into education, training and research: the Commission will explore opportunities for financing further research and innovation on CSR, and supporting CSR principles and guidelines in research funded still under the 7th Framework Programme, as well as under its successor, Horizon 2020, and in building the European Research Area. It intends to provide further financial support for education and training projects on CSR under the EU Lifelong Learning and Youth in Action Programmes, and launch an action in 2012 to raise the awareness of education professionals and enterprises on the importance of cooperation on CSR. Emphasising the importance of national and sub-national CSR policies: the Commission intends to create with Member States in 2012 a peer review mechanism for national CSR policies. It invites Member States to develop by mid 2012 their own plans or national lists of priority actions to promote CSR in support of the Europe 2020 strategy, with reference to internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines and in cooperation with enterprises and other stakeholders, taking account of the issues raised in this communication. Better aligning European and global approaches to CSR: the EU should promote European interests in international CSR policy developments, while at the same time ensuring the integration of internationally recognised principles and guidelines into its own CSR policies. The Commission intends to monitor the commitments made by European enterprises with more than 1 000 employees to take account of internationally recognised CSR principles and guidelines, and take account of the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility in its own operations. Furthermore, it invites all large European enterprises to make a commitment by 2014 to take account of at least one of the following sets of principles and guidelines when developing their approach to CSR: the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, or the ISO 26000 Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility. The report further notes that improving the coherence of EU policies relevant with business and human rights is a critical challenge. The Commission intends to: · work with enterprises and stakeholders in 2012 to develop human rights guidance for a limited number of relevant industrial sectors, as well as guidance for small and medium-sized enterprises, based on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. · publish by the end of 2012 a report on EU priorities in the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles, and thereafter to issue periodic progress reports. Lastly, it invites EU Member States to develop by the end of 2012 national plans for the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles. |
activities/0/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2012-11-30T00:00:00New
2012-05-24T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-01-28T00:00:00New
2013-01-22T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-05-24T00:00:00New
2013-01-28T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/5/docs/0 |
|
activities/5/docs/1/text |
|
activities/5/docs/1/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-49
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185030fb8127435bdbe65New
4f1ac8c1b819f25efd0000ef |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186650fb8127435bdc056New
4f1ad26cb819f27595000023 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1852a0fb8127435bdbe99New
4f1ac8adb819f25efd0000e8 |
committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1854a0fb8127435bdbec6New
4f1ac923b819f25efd000111 |
committees/5/committee_full |
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityNew
Women's Rights and Gender Equality |
committees/7/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1862c0fb8127435bdc001New
4f1ad233b819f2759500000f |
committees/9/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/9/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183710fb8127435bdbc17New
4f1ac62ab819f25efd000022 |
committees/9/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de183fa0fb8127435bdbce6New
4f1ac731b819f25efd000071 |
committees/9/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de186570fb8127435bdc043New
4f1ad25eb819f2759500001e |
committees/9/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de185eb0fb8127435bdbfa6New
4f1ac978b819f25efd00013a |
committees/9/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de186c20fb8127435bdc0dbNew
4f1ad979b819f207b300001b |
committees/9/shadows/5/mepref |
Old
4de188260fb8127435bdc2d0New
4f1adb8db819f207b30000ce |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
procedure/subject/9 |
Old
6.40.13 Relations with international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRDNew
5.05 Economic growth |
procedure/subject/11 |
Old
5.05 Sustainable development and growthNew
6.40.13 Relations with/in the context of international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRD |
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-02-05T00:00:00New
2012-11-08T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Committee draft report |
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-02-06T00:00:00New
2013-02-05T00:00:00 |
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/7/date |
Old
2012-11-08T00:00:00New
2013-02-06T00:00:00 |
activities/7/docs/0/title |
Old
PE500.415New
T7-0049/2013 |
activities/7/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.415
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-17&language=EN
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-02-04T00:00:00New
2013-02-05T00:00:00 |
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.760
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-11-29T00:00:00New
2012-11-30T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Deadline AmendmentsNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=681New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0681/COM_COM(2011)0681_EN.pdf |
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.415
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/committees/2/date |
2012-01-25T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2012-01-25T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/7/date |
Old
2012-05-29T00:00:00New
2012-10-10T00:00:00 |
activities/3/committees/7/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184310fb8127435bdbd38New
4de1862c0fb8127435bdc001 |
activities/3/committees/7/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
DÉSIR HarlemNew
LANGE Bernd |
committees/7/date |
Old
2012-05-29T00:00:00New
2012-10-10T00:00:00 |
committees/7/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184310fb8127435bdbd38New
4de1862c0fb8127435bdc001 |
committees/7/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
DÉSIR HarlemNew
LANGE Bernd |
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/committees/1/date |
2011-11-10T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2011-11-10T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/9/shadows |
|
committees/9/shadows |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/committees/0/date |
2012-04-26T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2012-04-26T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/7/date |
2012-05-29T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/7/rapporteur |
|
committees/7/date |
2012-05-29T00:00:00
|
committees/7/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/commission/0 |
|
activities/3 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
JURI/7/09590
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|