Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | PECH | FRAGA ESTÉVEZ Carmen ( PPE) | RODUST Ulrike ( S&D), MEISSNER Gesine ( ALDE), LÖVIN Isabella ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | PONGA Maurice ( PPE) | Gesine MEISSNER ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted a comprehensive EU fishery strategy in the Pacific Region.
It recalled that around half the tuna caught in the world are taken in the waters of the Western and Central Pacific, of which 80 % are in the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of island states and only 20 % in international waters.
The resolution stated that despite slightly improved fisheries supervision, vigilance and monitoring in the Pacific, the sustainability of the region’s resources is being threatened by a major rise in the number of purse-seiners (mainly from Asia and the island states), the increase in the fishing effort, and illegal fishing. Parliament considered the EU’s approach in the field of fisheries in the Pacific should be to actively support the current regional efforts to address overcapacity and improve fisheries management .
It proposed, to this effect, a targeted strategy which should:
ensure coherence among all the Community policies affecting the Pacific region; within the framework of future, post-Cotonou relations with the Pacific ACP countries, have a regional focus that bolsters the position and role of the EU in the Western and Central Pacific region; ensure that the 11th EDF takes this strategy into account and also reflects the possibility of increasing the percentage of sector-specific assistance for addressing fishing communities’ needs (including enhancing their contribution to local food security) and developing fishery infrastructure; call for greater coordination and complementarity with other actors in the region in relation to development assistance.
Parliament stressed the need for distant water fleetsto contribute, in cooperation with Pacific countries, to reducing fishing pressure on tropical tuna stocks , including by substantially reducing mortality levels for juvenile big-eye tuna , a stock of great economic importance to the region and one which is currently overfished.
In the short term, the fisheries strategy should:
take account of the importance of this region from a fisheries standpoint and its value to the Union’s fleet and the EU market and fish processing industry; provide legal certainty for the vessels operating there.
Parliament noted that the EU’s strategy for accessing resources in the EEZs of the countries in the region by way of fisheries cooperation agreements has not worked properly except in the case of Kiribati, and considered that a new framework for close and advantageous relations between the various parties involved is needed in order to revitalise and consolidate those agreements. For Members, they considered that part of the problem is that the EU has held unsuccessful negotiations on agreements with the countries of the Western Pacific, which is where the EEZs of the Solomon Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia are located, rather than directing its efforts towards the Central Pacific, where the Community’s purse-seiner fleet has traditionally centred its operations.
Parliament welcomed the fact that the Commission has completed prior assessments with the Cook Islands and Tuvalu with a view to launching negotiations on fisheries partnership agreements. It considered this new negotiating approach to be more in line with the regional focus repeatedly called for by Parliament.
Overall, Parliament noted that the EU's approach to the Pacific should assist developing states , and small island developing states in particular, in their efforts to secure a greater share of the benefits from the sustainable exploitation of straddling and highly migratory fish stocks and should also help strengthen regional efforts to sustainably conserve and manage fisheries for such stocks.
Combat against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU fishing) : Parliament called for measures to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU fishing) and for the Commission to include an explicit reference to the IUU Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 in the provisions of the EPA negotiated with the Pacific countries.
EPAs should include a specific reference to the implementation of the IUU regulation, rather than simply general wording on the need to combat IUU fishing, and should not be concluded with third countries identified as ‘non-cooperating’.
In the medium to long term , Parliament called on the Commission to provide for the establishing of a longer-term strategy for access for the EU fleet to the EEZs of the countries of the region, based on a regional framework agreement between the EU and the countries of the Western and Central Pacific , negotiated with the Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA) and centring on the following aspects:
outline the arrangements for access for the EU fleet; establish a system of transparent governance which would in particular ensure the combating of IUU fishing; based on the vessel day scheme (VDS), provided that measures are adopted to ensure its transparency, improve its effectiveness; explore ways of channelling EDF development assistance for the region through the FFA, since the Pacific ACP countries do not have the human and technical resources to adequately utilise that funding.
At the same time, Parliament stressed that the final stage in this process should be exclusively regional in its focus, i.e. it should take the form of a multilateral fisheries cooperation agreement with the EPA signatory countries that grants the Community fleet access to the EEZs of those countries.
Lastly, the resolution underlined the need for Parliament to be adequately involved in the preparation and negotiating process and the long-term monitoring and assessment of the functioning of bilateral agreements according to the provisions of the TFEU and be immediately and fully informed, on an equal footing with the Council, at all stages of the procedure related to FPAs. It recalled its conviction that it should be represented by observers at the Joint Committee meetings envisaged in the fisheries agreements.
The Committee on Fisheries adopted an own-initiative report by Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ (EPP, ES) on a comprehensive EU fishery strategy in the Pacific Region.
Members recalled that around half the tuna caught in the world are taken in the waters of the Western and Central Pacific, of which 80 % are in the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of island states and only 20 % in international waters.
The report stated that despite slightly improved fisheries supervision, vigilance and monitoring in the Pacific, the sustainability of the region’s resources is being threatened by a major rise in the number of purse-seiners (mainly from Asia and the island states), the increase in the fishing effort, and illegal fishing. The committee considered the EU’s approach in the field of fisheries in the Pacific should be to actively support the current regional efforts to address overcapacity and improve fisheries management .
They proposed, to this effect, a targeted strategy which should:
ensure coherence among all the Community policies affecting the Pacific region; within the framework of future, post-Cotonou relations with the Pacific ACP countries, have a regional focus that bolsters the position and role of the EU in the Western and Central Pacific region; ensure that the 11th EDF takes this strategy into account and also reflects the possibility of increasing the percentage of sector-specific assistance for addressing fishing communities’ needs (including enhancing their contribution to local food security) and developing fishery infrastructure; call for greater coordination and complementarity with other actors in the region in relation to development assistance.
Members stressed the need for distant water fleetsto contribute, in cooperation with Pacific countries, to reducing fishing pressure on tropical tuna stocks , including by substantially reducing mortality levels for juvenile big-eye tuna , a stock of great economic importance to the region and one which is currently overfished.
In the short term, the fisheries strategy should:
take account of the importance of this region from a fisheries standpoint and its value to the Union’s fleet and the EU market and fish processing industry; provide legal certainty for the vessels operating there.
Members noted that the EU’s strategy for accessing resources in the EEZs of the countries in the region by way of fisheries cooperation agreements has not worked properly except in the case of Kiribati, and considered that a new framework for close and advantageous relations between the various parties involved is needed in order to revitalise and consolidate those agreements. For Members, they considered that part of the problem is that the EU has held unsuccessful negotiations on agreements with the countries of the Western Pacific, which is where the EEZs of the Solomon Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia are located, rather than directing its efforts towards the Central Pacific, where the Community’s purse-seiner fleet has traditionally centred its operations.
They welcomed the fact that the Commission has completed prior assessments with the Cook Islands and Tuvalu with a view to launching negotiations on fisheries partnership agreements. They considered this new negotiating approach to be more in line with the regional focus repeatedly called for by Parliament.
Overall, Members noted that the EU's approach to the Pacific should assist developing states , and small island developing states in particular, in their efforts to secure a greater share of the benefits from the sustainable exploitation of straddling and highly migratory fish stocks and should also help strengthen regional efforts to sustainably conserve and manage fisheries for such stocks. They called for measures to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU fishing) and for the Commission to include an explicit reference to the IUU Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 in the provisions of the EPA negotiated with the Pacific countries.
In the medium to long term , Members called on the Commission to provide for the establishing of a longer-term strategy for access for the EU fleet to the EEZs of the countries of the region, based on a regional framework agreement between the EU and the countries of the Western and Central Pacific , negotiated with the Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA) and centring on the following aspects:
outline the arrangements for access for the EU fleet; establish a system of transparent governance which would in particular ensure the combating of IUU fishing; based on the vessel day scheme (VDS), provided that measures are adopted to ensure its transparency, improve its effectiveness; explore ways of channelling EDF development assistance for the region through the FFA, since the Pacific ACP countries do not have the human and technical resources to adequately utilise that funding.
At the same time, Members stressed that the final stage in this process should be exclusively regional in its focus, i.e. it should take the form of a multilateral fisheries cooperation agreement with the EPA signatory countries that grants the Community fleet access to the EEZs of those countries.
Lastly, they underlined the need for Parliament to be adequately involved in the preparation and negotiating process and the long-term monitoring and assessment of the functioning of bilateral agreements according to the provisions of the TFEU and be immediately and fully informed, on an equal footing with the Council, at all stages of the procedure related to FPAs.
Members recalled their conviction that Parliament should be represented by observers at the Joint Committee meetings envisaged in the fisheries agreements.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0402/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0297/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE514.795
- Committee draft report: PE504.069
- Committee opinion: PE500.519
- Committee opinion: PE500.519
- Committee draft report: PE504.069
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE514.795
Activities
- John ATTARD-MONTALTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabelle DURANT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gianni PITTELLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
55 |
2012/2235(INI)
2012/12/13
DEVE
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that in the Pacific region, 15 ACP States have special relations with the EU under the Cotonou Agreement and that, in those countries, the fisheries sector, including inshore
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Also calls for greater coordination and complementarity with other actors in the region in relation to development assistance, in keeping with the Cairns Compact of August 2009; welcomes the holding on 12 June 2012 of the second EU-PIF ministerial meeting, which has strengthened the EU-Pacific political dialogue, in particular in the fields of fisheries and development, thereby ensuring that actions taken in these areas by the EU and countries in the region will be more effective;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to use its influence with the RFMOs concerned, in particular the WCPFC and SPRFMO, together with the SPC and the Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), in order to promote sustainable fisheries by intensifying action to eliminate IUU fishing, and to support the scientific committees with a view to providing them with relevant information about available fish stock levels;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the ACP States to continue to take a
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points to the need for EU policies to be consistent with development objectives along the lines called for in Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; calls on the Commission to ensure that measures relating to Pacific fisheries are in keeping with an external dimension of the common fisheries policy, make for sustainable exploitation of fishery resources – allowing as required for the effects of climate change – and help to achieve the Millennium Development Goals in the Pacific region;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points to the need for EU policies to be consistent with development objectives along the lines called for in Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; calls on the Commission to ensure that measures relating to Pacific fisheries
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points to the need for EU policies to be consistent with development objectives along the lines called for in Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; calls on the Commission to ensure that measures relating to Pacific fisheries are in keeping with the joint communication from the Commission and the High Representative 'Towards a renewed EU-Pacific development Partnership'1, that they make for sustainable exploitation of fishery resources – allowing as required for the effects of climate change – and that they help to achieve the Millennium Development Goals in the Pacific region; strongly supports the proposal put forward by the Commission and High Representative aimed at making the Pacific OCTs catalysts for inclusive and sustainable growth for human development in the region, including in the fisheries sector; __________________ 1 JOIN (2012) 6 final, 21 March 2012
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to promote cooperation at regional and sub-regional level and to ensure that EU fisheries policies are compatible with existing regional Treaties and agreements, including the Parties to the Nauru Agreement (PNA) and its implementing protocols;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Stresses the need for the EU to contribute to a decrease in fishing pressure on tropical tuna stocks, including by substantially decreasing mortality levels of juvenile big-eye tuna, a stock of great economic importance to the region and which is currently overfished;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Regrets that there is no regional fisheries a
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Regrets that there is no regional fisheries agreement for the Pacific, bearing in mind
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points to the need to coordinate EU activities in the Pacific region, not least the support for the fisheries sector under the EDF, the DCI, and the Investment Facility for the Pacific, and the funding allocations for sectoral support under the present SFAs with
source: PE-502.023
2013/07/19
PECH
43 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new) - having regard to the Fisheries Resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly, such as paragraph 157 of UNGA resolution 66/68 in relation to the obligations of developed States towards least developed States and small island developing States,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the European Union's approach in the field of fisheries in the Pacific should actively support current regional efforts to address overcapacity and improve fisheries management;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas the vessel day scheme (VDS) was introduced by the Parties to the Nauru Agreement in 2008 in an attempt to manage access to PNA waters, limit fishing effort in those waters and maximise benefits derived from the fishery to Pacific small island developing States;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H b (new) Hb. whereas the WCPFC has mandated since 2008 the use of the VDS as the mechanism to regulate fishing effort by third countries' fleets in the EEZs of PNA members;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H c (new) Hc. whereas WCPFC conservation and management measure 2008-01 limited the effort exerted by the EU fleet on the high Seas to one hundred days, with reference to 2004 levels; whereas this figure was consistently exceeded with 258 days exerted in 2009, 379 in 2010, and 671 in 2011; whereas the EU fleet did therefore not comply with relevant WCPFC conservation and management measure;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas until its recent renewal in 2013, fishing activities under the United States
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the vessel day scheme (VDS)
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the fisheries partnership agreements signed by the EU, including those with the countries of the Pacific Region, have traditionally been based on
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas access based on either tonnage or vessel numbers does not adequately reflect total fishing effort, particularly of the EU fleet which is made up of very large vessels; whereas a well designed and enforced vessel day scheme has the potential to provide the means to prevent further increases in effort in the region;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L b (new) Lb. whereas bilateral fisheries agreements between PNA countries and other States such as Japan, Taiwan, China, Korea and New Zealand are based on the VDS; whereas the new multilateral agreement with the US is also based on the VDS;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard to the FAO International Plan of Action for the Management of Fishing Capacity, endorsed by the FAO Council in November 2000 (IPOA- Capacity),
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M a (new) Ma. whereas EPAs should include a specific reference to the implementation of the IUU regulation, rather than simply general wording on the need to combat IUU fishing, and should not be concluded with third countries identified as "non- cooperating";
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas the Commission, in its Decision of 15 November 2012, issued
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. whereas, however, besides the Fisheries Partnership Agreement with Kiribati, the EU has also negotiated such agreements with two other countries of the Western Pacific
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Urges the Commission to ensure
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Urges the Commission to ensure the coordination and coherence of all the Community policies affecting the Pacific region, and specifically those on fisheries, trade and development, and to enhance potential synergies with a view to achieving a multiplier effect that maximises the benefits both for the states of the Pacific region and for the EU countries, while also raising the profile of the EU in the Western and Central Pacific;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Urges the Commission to ensure the
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to seek that the 11th EDF takes this strategy into account and also reflects the possibility of increasing the percentage of sector-specific assistance for
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Highlights the importance of establishing a fisheries strategy for the Western and Central Pacific given the relevance of this region from a fisheries standpoint and its value to the
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the EU strategy for accessing resources in the EEZs of the countries in the region by way of fisheries cooperation agreements has not
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the EU strategy for accessing resources in the EEZs of the countries in the region by way of fisheries cooperation
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to the Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing approved by the FAO Conference at its Thirty-sixth Session on 22 November 2009,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers th
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Notes that the EU's approach to the Pacific should assist developing States, small island development States in particular, in realizing a greater share of the benefits from the sustainable exploitation of straddling and highly migratory fish stocks and in strengthening regional efforts to sustainably conserve and manage fisheries for such stocks as called for by the UNFSA Review Conference;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to include an explicit reference to the IUU Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 in the provisions of the EPA negotiated with the Pacific countries;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 – introductory part 12. Calls on the Commission to provide for the establishing of a longer-term strategy on access for the EU fleet to the EEZs of the countries of the region,
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 – introductory part 12. Calls on the Commission to work with the Pacific region in order to provide for the establishing of a longer-term
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 – point a a)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 b (new) - having regard to its report on the external dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy1, __________________ 1 2011/2318(INI)
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 – point b b)
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 – point c c)
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 – point d d)
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Underlines the need for Parliament to be adequately involved in the preparation and negotiating process and the long-term monitoring and assessment of the functioning of bilateral agreements according to the provisions of the TFEU; insists that Parliament be immediately and fully informed on an equal footing with the Council at all stages of the procedure related to FPAs, pursuant to Articles 13(2) and 218(10) TFEU; recalls its conviction that Parliament should be represented by observers at the Joint Committee meetings envisaged in fisheries agreements and insists that civil society, including both EU and third country fisheries representatives, also attend as observers in those meetings;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A) whereas
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the EU has to seek policy coherence for development on the basis of Article 208(1) of the TFEU, according to which 'The Union shall take account of the objectives of development cooperation in the policies that it implements which are likely to affect developing countries';
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas bilateral and multilateral trade agreements being negotiated by the EU should be preceded by impact assessments, in particular with respect to the conservation of marine living resources and the consequences of such agreements on local populations; whereas such bilateral and multilateral agreements should be guided by the conclusions of such impact assessments;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, in the current negotiations on the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between the EU and the ACP aimed at adapting the generalised system of preferences arising from the Cotonou Agreement to WTO rules, fisheries products have a crucial role both in terms of access to European markets and
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. mindful of the danger posed by the derogation on rules of origin provided for in Article 6(6) of Protocol II on rules of origin annexed to the interim partnership agreement between the European Community and the Pacific States, resulting in unfair competition in the European market for fishery products;
source: PE-514.795
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/3/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.519&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-500519_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.069New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-PR-504069_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.795New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AM-514795_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-297&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0297_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-402New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0402_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
PECH/7/09919New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de187b10fb8127435bdc22cNew
4f1ada7eb819f207b3000074 |
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184a30fb8127435bdbdd4New
4f1ac817b819f25efd0000c8 |
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de187f50fb8127435bdc28aNew
4f1adaccb819f207b300008f |
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de186f90fb8127435bdc126New
4f1ad99db819f207b3000027 |
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de186680fb8127435bdc05aNew
4f1ad930b819f207b3000000 |
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de184c20fb8127435bdbe03New
4f1ac7f7b819f25efd0000bc |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-07-19T00:00:00New
2013-09-18T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=[%EY][%m][%d]&type=CRENew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131007&type=CRE |
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-09-18T00:00:00New
2013-10-08T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/6 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de187b10fb8127435bdc22cNew
4f1ada7eb819f207b3000074 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184a30fb8127435bdbdd4New
4f1ac817b819f25efd0000c8 |
committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de187f50fb8127435bdc28aNew
4f1adaccb819f207b300008f |
committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de186f90fb8127435bdc126New
4f1ad99db819f207b3000027 |
committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de186680fb8127435bdc05aNew
4f1ad930b819f207b3000000 |
committees/1/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de184c20fb8127435bdbe03New
4f1ac7f7b819f25efd0000bc |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-297&language=EN
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.795
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.069
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-10-21T00:00:00New
2013-10-07T00:00:00 |
activities/1 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
PECH/7/09919
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|