Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | EMPL | ŐRY Csaba ( PPE), JAAKONSAARI Liisa ( S&D), LUDVIGSSON Olle ( S&D), CREUTZMANN Jürgen ( ALDE), HIRSCH Nadja ( ALDE), CORNELISSEN Marije ( Verts/ALE), CABRNOCH Milan ( ECR) | |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | PAPADOPOULOU Antigoni ( S&D) | Norica NICOLAI ( ALDE), Anna ZÁBORSKÁ ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 84, with 19 abstentions, a resolution on cross-border collective bargaining and transnational social dialogue.
Members recall that there were 244 European transnational company agreements (TCAs) in 2012, indicating that labour relations in transnational companies in Europe are becoming increasingly integrated.
Parliament recalls that each EU Member State has its own system of industrial relations, based on different historical developments and traditions. It considers that European dialogue promotes the preservation and growth of employment, improvements in working conditions and thus greater prosperity for employees of transnational undertakings by innovative means while preserving autonomy in collective bargaining.
In this context, Parliament proposes that the Commission should consider whether an optional European legal framework for these European TCAs would be necessary which could abide by the following rules:
voluntary use for the social partners and companies and groups of companies concerned ; that European works councils should be fully involved in the negotiations with European trade union federations where applicable, notably since they are able to detect the need/opportunity for a TCA; the inclusion of the most favourable clause and the non-regression clause is necessary to avert the danger that a European transnational company agreement that might result in evasion of national collective agreements and national company agreements, or impair them; introducing alternative dispute settlement procedures.
The resolution proposes that the Commission might consider whether an optional European legal framework would be necessary and useful in order to provide greater legal security, greater transparency, and foreseeable and enforceable legal effects for agreements.
In parallel, Parliament proposes to the Commission that it recommend the social partners to take account of the following criteria in relation to European TCAs: (i) the mandating procedure, i.e. clarification of the legitimacy and representativeness of the negotiating parties between whom agreements are concluded; (ii) the place and date of conclusion of the agreement; (iii) its substantive and geographical scope; (iv) the most favourable clause and the non-regression clause; (v) the period of validity; (vi) the preconditions for denouncing the agreement and the dispute settlement procedures; (vii) the subjects covered by the agreement; and further formal requirements.
Parliament stresses that the Commission should base its consideration of an optional legal framework on voluntary use.
The resolution recalls in this context the positive experiences of cross-border partnerships between social partners, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure EU support for such partnerships in the future .
Parliament encourages the European social partners to make full use of the possibility of EU agreements as provided by Article 155 TFEU, on a basis of full respect for their autonomy. It also calls for an enhanced role for the European social partners in shaping European policies.
Lastly, Parliament stresses the need to encourage, support and increase the representation and participation of women at the different levels of social dialogue and collective bargaining structures.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Thomas HÄNDEL (GUE/NGL, DE) on cross-border collective bargaining and transnational social dialogue.
Members recall that there were 244 European transnational company agreements (TCAs) in 2012, indicating that labour relations in transnational companies in Europe are becoming increasingly integrated.
They note that TCAs are concluded between European trade union federations, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, individual companies and/or employers’ federations, generally at sectoral level.
In this context, Members propose that the Commission should consider whether an optional European legal framework for these European TCAs would be necessary which could abide by the following rules:
voluntary use for the social partners and companies and groups of companies concerned; that European works councils should be fully involved in the negotiations with European trade union federations where applicable, notably since they are able to detect the need/opportunity for a TCA; the inclusion of the most favourable clause and the non-regression clause is necessary to avert the danger that a European transnational company agreement that might result in evasion of national collective agreements and national company agreements, or impair them; introducing alternative dispute settlement procedures.
Members proposes to the Commission that it recommend the social partners to take account of the following criteria in relation to European TCAs: the mandating procedure, i.e. clarification of the legitimacy and representativeness of the negotiating parties between whom agreements are concluded; the place and date of conclusion of the agreement; its substantive and geographical scope; the most favourable clause and the non-regression clause; the period of validity; the preconditions for denouncing the agreement and the
dispute settlement procedures; the subjects covered by the agreement; and further formal requirements.
The report recalls in this context the positive experiences of cross-border partnerships between social partners, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure EU support for such partnerships in the future .
Members encourage the European social partners to make full use of the possibility of EU agreements as provided by Article 155 TFEU, on a basis of full respect for their autonomy. They also call for an enhanced role for the European social partners in shaping European policies.
Lastly, Members stress the need to encourage, support and increase the representation and participation of women at the different levels of social dialogue and collective bargaining structures.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)816
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0386/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0258/2013
- Committee opinion: PE508.172
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE510.723
- Committee draft report: PE508.017
- Committee draft report: PE508.017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE510.723
- Committee opinion: PE508.172
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)816
Activities
- Alexander Nuno PICKART ALVARO
- Thomas HÄNDEL
- Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olle LUDVIGSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A7-0258/2013 - Thomas Händel - § 2 #
A7-0258/2013 - Thomas Händel - § 6/1 #
A7-0258/2013 - Thomas Händel - § 6/2 #
A7-0258/2013 - Thomas Händel - § 6/3 #
FR | ES | PT | BE | RO | DE | SE | CZ | DK | IT | AT | LU | MT | EE | LT | IE | FI | HR | LV | SI | SK | NL | HU | BG | GB | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
49
|
25
|
19
|
16
|
24
|
72
|
15
|
18
|
10
|
37
|
17
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
7
|
9
|
8
|
7
|
7
|
11
|
21
|
13
|
13
|
46
|
36
|
|
S&D |
128
|
France S&DFor (8) |
Spain S&DFor (16)Alejandro CERCAS, Andrés PERELLÓ RODRÍGUEZ, Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO, Carmen ROMERO LÓPEZ, Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE, Enrique GUERRERO SALOM, Inés AYALA SENDER, Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA, Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR, Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA, Maria BADIA i CUTCHET, María IRIGOYEN PÉREZ, Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ, Ricardo CORTÉS LASTRA, Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO, Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
3
|
Germany S&DFor (18) |
5
|
Czechia S&DFor (7) |
Denmark S&D |
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (11) |
Poland S&DFor (4) |
|||||
Verts/ALE |
43
|
France Verts/ALEFor (10) |
1
|
1
|
Belgium Verts/ALEFor (3)Abstain (1) |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
23
|
3
|
3
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||
NI |
22
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
Netherlands NIAgainst (5) |
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom NIAgainst (4) |
||||||||||||||||
EFD |
19
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDAgainst (5) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Poland EFDAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||||
ECR |
30
|
Czechia ECRAgainst (6) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (15) |
Poland ECRAgainst (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
56
|
France ALDEFor (5)Against (1) |
1
|
Belgium ALDEFor (2)Against (2) |
2
|
Germany ALDEAgainst (6) |
4
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (5) |
Bulgaria ALDEAgainst (5) |
United Kingdom ALDEAgainst (8)Abstain (1) |
||||||||
PPE |
176
|
France PPEFor (14)Against (7) |
Spain PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
Portugal PPEFor (7)Against (2) |
3
|
Romania PPEAgainst (8) |
Germany PPEFor (1)Against (29)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Bernd POSSELT,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Christa KLASS,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Peter JAHR,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Thomas MANN,
Werner LANGEN
|
2
|
2
|
Italy PPEFor (5)Against (11) |
Austria PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
Croatia PPEAgainst (5) |
4
|
4
|
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
2
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (10) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (5) |
Poland PPEFor (2)Against (21)
Arkadiusz Tomasz BRATKOWSKI,
Artur ZASADA,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Filip KACZMAREK,
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI,
Jan KOZŁOWSKI,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Joanna Katarzyna SKRZYDLEWSKA,
Jolanta Emilia HIBNER,
Krzysztof LISEK,
Lena KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA,
Małgorzata HANDZLIK,
Paweł ZALEWSKI,
Piotr BORYS,
Sławomir NITRAS
|
A7-0258/2013 - Thomas Händel - § 8 #
PT | ES | FR | IT | SE | AT | BE | DE | RO | NL | DK | IE | CZ | MT | EE | LT | HR | FI | LU | LV | SK | SI | HU | GB | BG | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
19
|
26
|
50
|
37
|
15
|
17
|
16
|
71
|
26
|
21
|
10
|
7
|
19
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
8
|
10
|
4
|
7
|
11
|
8
|
13
|
47
|
13
|
36
|
|
S&D |
130
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
Spain S&DFor (15)Alejandro CERCAS, Andrés PERELLÓ RODRÍGUEZ, Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO, Carmen ROMERO LÓPEZ, Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE, Enrique GUERRERO SALOM, Inés AYALA SENDER, Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA, Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR, Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA, María IRIGOYEN PÉREZ, Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ, Ricardo CORTÉS LASTRA, Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO, Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
France S&DFor (8) |
5
|
4
|
3
|
Germany S&DFor (19) |
10
|
3
|
Denmark S&D |
2
|
Czechia S&DFor (7) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (12) |
2
|
Poland S&DFor (4) |
||||
Verts/ALE |
44
|
1
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEFor (10) |
3
|
2
|
Belgium Verts/ALEFor (3)Abstain (1) |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
24
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||
EFD |
19
|
Italy EFDFor (5) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
|||||||||||||||||
NI |
22
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands NI |
1
|
United Kingdom NIAgainst (2)Abstain (2) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||
ECR |
30
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Czechia ECRAgainst (7) |
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (14) |
Poland ECRAgainst (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
60
|
2
|
France ALDEFor (5)Against (1) |
4
|
4
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEFor (1)Against (3) |
Germany ALDEAgainst (6) |
2
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (5) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom ALDEAgainst (9) |
Bulgaria ALDEAgainst (5) |
||||||||
PPE |
175
|
Portugal PPEFor (8)Against (1) |
France PPEFor (4)Against (18)
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Constance LE GRIP,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Jean-Paul GAUZÈS,
Jean-Pierre AUDY,
Joseph DAUL,
Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID,
Marielle BOULLIER GALLO,
Maurice PONGA,
Michèle STRIFFLER,
Nora BERRA,
Philippe BOULLAND,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Sophie AUCONIE,
Tokia SAÏFI,
Véronique MATHIEU HOUILLON
|
Italy PPEFor (2)Against (14) |
2
|
Austria PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
3
|
Germany PPEAgainst (27)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Axel VOSS,
Bernd POSSELT,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Christa KLASS,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Joachim ZELLER,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Peter JAHR,
Rainer WIELAND,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
11
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
Croatia PPEAgainst (5) |
2
|
2
|
4
|
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
4
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (10) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (5) |
Poland PPEAgainst (23)
Andrzej GRZYB,
Arkadiusz Tomasz BRATKOWSKI,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Filip KACZMAREK,
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI,
Jan KOZŁOWSKI,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Joanna Katarzyna SKRZYDLEWSKA,
Jolanta Emilia HIBNER,
Krzysztof LISEK,
Lena KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA,
Małgorzata HANDZLIK,
Paweł ZALEWSKI,
Piotr BORYS,
Rafał TRZASKOWSKI,
Sławomir NITRAS,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A7-0258/2013 - Thomas Händel - § 9 #
A7-0258/2013 - Thomas Händel - § 10/1 #
A7-0258/2013 - Thomas Händel - § 10/2 #
ES | PT | FR | DE | BE | DK | IT | AT | IE | SE | CZ | RO | MT | EE | LU | LT | HR | FI | LV | SI | SK | NL | GB | BG | HU | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
27
|
19
|
49
|
71
|
16
|
10
|
36
|
17
|
7
|
13
|
19
|
25
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
5
|
8
|
10
|
7
|
7
|
11
|
20
|
47
|
13
|
13
|
37
|
|
S&D |
128
|
Spain S&DFor (16)Alejandro CERCAS, Andrés PERELLÓ RODRÍGUEZ, Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO, Carmen ROMERO LÓPEZ, Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE, Enrique GUERRERO SALOM, Inés AYALA SENDER, Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA, Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR, Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA, Maria BADIA i CUTCHET, María IRIGOYEN PÉREZ, Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ, Ricardo CORTÉS LASTRA, Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO, Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
France S&DFor (8) |
Germany S&DFor (19) |
3
|
Denmark S&D |
4
|
2
|
3
|
Czechia S&DFor (7) |
10
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (12) |
2
|
2
|
Poland S&DFor (4) |
||||
Verts/ALE |
42
|
1
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEFor (9) |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (10) |
Belgium Verts/ALEFor (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
24
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||
EFD |
19
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDFor (5) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
|||||||||||||||||
NI |
22
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
Netherlands NIAgainst (5) |
United Kingdom NIAgainst (2)Abstain (2) |
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||
ECR |
31
|
1
|
1
|
Czechia ECRAgainst (7) |
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (14)Abstain (1) |
Poland ECRAgainst (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
56
|
2
|
France ALDEFor (5)Against (1) |
Germany ALDEAgainst (6) |
Belgium ALDEFor (1)Against (3) |
2
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (5) |
United Kingdom ALDEAgainst (7)Abstain (1) |
Bulgaria ALDEAgainst (5) |
||||||||
PPE |
176
|
Spain PPEAgainst (4) |
Portugal PPEFor (8)Against (1) |
France PPEAgainst (17)
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Constance LE GRIP,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Jean-Paul GAUZÈS,
Jean-Pierre AUDY,
Joseph DAUL,
Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID,
Maurice PONGA,
Michèle STRIFFLER,
Nora BERRA,
Philippe BOULLAND,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Sophie AUCONIE,
Tokia SAÏFI,
Véronique MATHIEU HOUILLON
|
Germany PPEFor (2)Against (27)
Albert DESS,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Bernd POSSELT,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Christa KLASS,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Joachim ZELLER,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Peter JAHR,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Werner LANGEN
|
3
|
Italy PPEAgainst (15) |
Austria PPEAgainst (6) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
11
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Croatia PPEAgainst (5) |
3
|
4
|
4
|
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
1
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (1)Against (4) |
Hungary PPEAgainst (10) |
Poland PPEFor (2)Against (22)
Andrzej GRZYB,
Arkadiusz Tomasz BRATKOWSKI,
Artur ZASADA,
Bogusław SONIK,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Filip KACZMAREK,
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI,
Jan KOZŁOWSKI,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Joanna Katarzyna SKRZYDLEWSKA,
Jolanta Emilia HIBNER,
Krzysztof LISEK,
Lena KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA,
Małgorzata HANDZLIK,
Paweł ZALEWSKI,
Piotr BORYS,
Rafał TRZASKOWSKI,
Sławomir NITRAS
|
A7-0258/2013 - Thomas Händel - Résolution #
DE | FR | IT | PL | ES | RO | PT | AT | HU | SE | SK | HR | IE | BE | FI | CZ | LV | DK | MT | SI | LT | LU | EE | BG | NL | GB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
72
|
48
|
35
|
36
|
23
|
26
|
19
|
16
|
13
|
15
|
11
|
8
|
7
|
16
|
10
|
19
|
7
|
9
|
4
|
8
|
5
|
4
|
4
|
13
|
21
|
46
|
|
PPE |
174
|
Germany PPEFor (26)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Bernd POSSELT, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Christa KLASS, Daniel CASPARY, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Doris PACK, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hans-Peter MAYER, Herbert REUL, Horst SCHNELLHARDT, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Joachim ZELLER, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Michael GAHLER, Peter JAHR, Rainer WIELAND, Sabine VERHEYEN, Thomas MANN
Against (3)Abstain (1) |
France PPEFor (20)Alain CADEC, Arnaud DANJEAN, Dominique RIQUET, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Jean ROATTA, Jean-Marie CAVADA, Jean-Paul GAUZÈS, Jean-Pierre AUDY, Joseph DAUL, Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID, Marielle BOULLIER GALLO, Maurice PONGA, Michèle STRIFFLER, Nora BERRA, Philippe BOULLAND, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Sophie AUCONIE, Tokia SAÏFI, Véronique MATHIEU HOUILLON
Abstain (1) |
Italy PPEFor (16) |
Poland PPEFor (22)Andrzej GRZYB, Arkadiusz Tomasz BRATKOWSKI, Artur ZASADA, Bogusław SONIK, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Filip KACZMAREK, Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI, Jan KOZŁOWSKI, Jan OLBRYCHT, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Joanna Katarzyna SKRZYDLEWSKA, Jolanta Emilia HIBNER, Krzysztof LISEK, Lena KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA, Paweł ZALEWSKI, Piotr BORYS, Rafał TRZASKOWSKI, Sławomir NITRAS, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Abstain (1) |
Portugal PPEFor (9) |
Austria PPE |
Hungary PPEFor (10) |
2
|
Slovakia PPEFor (4)Abstain (2) |
5
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (5) |
2
|
||||
S&D |
125
|
Germany S&DFor (19) |
France S&DFor (8) |
Poland S&DFor (4) |
Spain S&DFor (13)Alejandro CERCAS, Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO, Carmen ROMERO LÓPEZ, Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE, Enrique GUERRERO SALOM, Inés AYALA SENDER, Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA, Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR, Maria BADIA i CUTCHET, Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ, Ricardo CORTÉS LASTRA, Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO, Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
10
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
4
|
2
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
Czechia S&DFor (7) |
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (11) |
||||
Verts/ALE |
43
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (10) |
France Verts/ALEFor (10) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
24
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||
EFD |
19
|
Italy EFD |
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||||
NI |
21
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands NIAgainst (5) |
United Kingdom NIAgainst (4) |
|||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
59
|
Germany ALDEAgainst (6) |
France ALDEFor (6) |
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Sweden ALDEFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
2
|
Belgium ALDEFor (1)Against (3) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Bulgaria ALDEAgainst (5) |
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom ALDEFor (1)Against (7) |
||||||||
ECR |
30
|
Poland ECRAgainst (5) |
Czechia ECRAgainst (7) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (15) |
Amendments | Dossier |
182 |
2012/2292(INI)
2013/04/30
FEMM
38 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the importance of collective bargaining between management and labour in order to improve the work-life balance and gender equality, particularly with respect to the pay gap and the glass ceiling;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that trade union federations have the task of exercising the right to collective bargaining and Member States have the task of guaranteeing that this right and collective labour agreements are not violated;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that patterns of representation at different levels (local, sectoral, cross-industry, national, cross national and international) are not well documented, stresses that data on women's representation in relation to age, sexuality, ability, class, ethnicity, citizenship status, and race are virtually non-existent; underlines the importance of disaggregating data,
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses the right of all citizens, particularly women, to take part in political life and policy-making in their countries, specifically by holding public office and being elected to trade union and worker representation bodies, without either privileges or discrimination;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that women's specific needs are overlooked in the various stages of collective bargaining; underlines that without a shift in the culture of bargaining itself (who is negotiating and how - which highlights leadership style), there may be little change in what is negotiated, stresses that struggles around diversity, equality, inclusive representation, and democratizing leadership inside institutions need to be linked to the collective bargaining and social dialogue agenda.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that collective bargaining represents a valuable complement to legislation and decision making process in promoting gender equality and is a key mechanism for gender mainstreaming in employment;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that collective bargaining represents a valuable complement to legislation in promoting gender equality and is a key mechanism for gender mainstreaming in employment, in particular as a mechanism for combating wage discrimination;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need to solicit the views of women, which generally relate also to the interests of children or elderly persons in their care, and to ensure that they are represented in negotiating teams and also calls for gender impact assessments of collective agreements;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the EU is currently facing the worst economic and financial crisis since the great depression of the 1930s, a crisis aggravated by the so-called austerity measures that have been imposed on Member States by the EU institutions in the context of economic governance policies and 'financial assistance' programmes;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Highlights women's right to take part in shaping and implementing major policy issues in the sectors concerned;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises that unions should raise awareness of the benefits of unionization and carry out special campaigns to encourage women to participate;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on unions to ensure that the organization of trade union life (meetings, travels, activities) responds to work-life balance needs of both men and women;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on unions to promote and enhance gender sensitivity among their members and among employers;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Member States to en
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the effects of the economic
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that gender equality issues, like the gender pay gap, gender segregation in the labour market, reconciliation of work and family responsibilities, promoting career development and combating violence and sexual harassment at work must be
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Urges the Member States to guarantee that women can exercise their rights in all areas of society, prohibiting and penalising all forms of discrimination;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Member States to focus in particular on small and medium-sized undertakings, which invariably encounter greater difficulties in promoting equal opportunities and absorbing the cost of absences for maternity or parental leave;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Urges the Member States to guarantee the right to equal employment opportunities as regards access, vocational training and promotion and the principle of 'equal pay for equal work';
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Calls on the Member States to bestow an annual Gender Equality Prize on enterprises promoting gender equality at the workplace through their methods of staff organisation and administration;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 c (new) 13c. Urges the Member States effectively to recognise maternity and paternity as an outstanding social function, guaranteeing the rights to leave that are enshrined in the legislation;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 d (new) 13d. Urges the Member States to take into account that the right to work is an essential precondition if women are to enjoy effective equal rights, economic independence and professional fulfilment, and therefore insists that precarious employment should be eradicated through the mandatory application of the principle that for every actual job there should be a permanent post, and by recognising and enhancing the right to work with rights;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the continued decentralization and de-collectivization of the industrial relations system will increase both vertical and horizontal work-force inequality and will leave many women workers in an increasingly vulnerable position;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas women's right to equality is a condition for a democratic and human society and the free development of women's creative and productive capacities;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph B a (new) Ba. Emphasizes the fact that gender equality issues such as the gender pay gap and the reconciliation of professional and family life, are best addressed and resolved through the fora of collective bargaining.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas research shows that women are undeniably and persistently under- represented at all levels and in all arenas of social dialogue, whereas in contrast to governments/public authorities and trade unions, employers' organizations are consistently the least likely to have women's representation in social dialogue arenas and to take initiatives around gender equality;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-510.621
2013/05/08
EMPL
144 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) – having regard to Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reco
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends introducing
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recommends introducing extrajudicial dispute settlement procedures; considers that, in European transnational company
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 a (new) Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recommends furthermore
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recommends furthermore, at the same time as a second stage, introducing a European
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recommends furthermore, as a second stage, introducing a European extrajudicial dispute resolution agency, to devise and then implement a tenable solution with the participation of the contracting parties, in which context the dispute resolution agency should be convened at the request of the European social partners voluntarily and from case to case in order to settle conflicts extrajudicially; considers that particular attention should be awarded to the establishing of the head office (jurisdiction criterion), which should preferably be neutral, rather than the company’s registered office, in order to avoid the agreement being judicially subject to the rules of a single Member State;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recommends
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 b (new) – having regard to the ILO Tripartite declaration of principles concerning multinational enterprises and social policy (MNE Declaration) (1977),
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recommends, in the medium term, in view of the increasing transnationalisation of industrial relations, to task the Social Partners with assessing the long-term need of establishing over the next few years an independent three-tier system of European labour courts;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recommends, in the medium term, in view of the increasing transnationalisation of industrial relations, establishing over the next few years an independent three-tier system of European labour courts, including through the creation of a labour division of the European Court of Justice;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses that there is no need at all to lay down basic principles concerning European TCAs;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Requests the Commission to prepare a proposal to be discussed with EU social partners in order to set up an EU alternative dispute resolution mechanism to handle transnational labour conflicts respecting the national industrial relations traditions and their specificities in the out-of-court settlement of collective labour disputes;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls on the Commission to create the framework conditions that allow for the establishment of transnational industrial relations in border regions;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recommends the establishment of fundamental criteria for European transnational company agreements which the negotiating parties should discuss and whose outcome they should record in writing in order to prevent problems of subsequent interpretation and application; notes that the following points, in particular, should be covered: - the mandating procedure, i.e. clarification of the
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A (new) -A. whereas the equal prominence of social rights and economic freedoms should be enshrined in the EU treaties;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recommends the establishment of fundamental criteria for European transnational company agreements which the negotiating parties should discuss and whose outcome they should record in writing in order to prevent problems of subsequent interpretation and application; notes that the following points, in particular, should be covered: the mandating procedure, i.e. clarification of the legitimacy and representativeness of the negotiating parties between which agreements are concluded, the place and date of conclusion of an agreement, substantive and geographical scope, the most favourable clause and the non- regression clause, the period of validity, the preconditions for denouncing the agreement and the dispute settlement procedures; stresses that workers representatives entering into such negotiations should at least be given comparable rights given to European Works Councils under the European Works Councils Directive;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Draws attention to Complaint No 85/2012, which is pending before the European Committee of Social Rights, in the Laval case, and calls for the right to implementation of cross-border collective measures to be granted; stresses that the ILO Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (CEACR) has found the legislation that Sweden adopted as a result of the EU Court of Justice's ruling in the Laval case to be in violation of fundamental trade union rights;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Draws attention to Complaint No 85/2012, which is pending before the European Committee of Social Rights, in the Laval case, and calls for the right to implementation of cross-border collective measures to be granted. A legitimate right to collective self-protection should therefore be enshrined and applied in the event of violations of European cross-border agreements, as requested in the Andersson report (2008/2085(INI) of 30 September 2008 (A6-0370/2008)];
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Recalls in this context the good experiences made with cross-border partnerships between social partners and calls upon the European Commission and Member States to secure EU support for such cross-border partnerships in the future;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Encourages European social partners to make full use of the possibility of EU agreements as provided by article 155 TFEU, while fully respecting their autonomy;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the number of European
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13 b. Calls for a stronger role of the European Social Partners in shaping European policies; in particular calls for the social partners to participate in drawing up the Annual Growth Survey and to play a stronger role in monitoring progress achieved by Member States;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 c (new) 13 c. Calls for tripartite social summits to be reformed and strengthened; considered that their recommendations shall be duly taking into account by the European Council and respected during the European semester process;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 d (new) 13 d. Deplores the Commission's advise for Member states to decentralise wage negotiations; considers that central and coordinated wage agreements should be promoted, guaranteeing a decent wage, decent working conditions and an equal treatment of both employees and employers;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 e (new) 13 e. Encourages monitoring and exchange views on wage developments in relation to productivity, inflation and internal demand, unemployment and income inequalities, with the involvement in of the social partners, the European Parliament, Member states' governments and national parliaments, while respecting Article 153(5) of the TFEU and the autonomy of social partners;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the European Economic and Social Committee, the EU social partners and the national parliaments.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the number of European transnational company agreements
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas, according to the Commission’s TCA database, the number of European transnational company agreements
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the number of European transnational company agreements has increased significantly and whereas this indicates that labour relations in large transnational companies in Europe are becoming increasingly integrated;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 b (new) – having regard to Council Directive 2001/86/CE of 8.10.2001 supplementing the Statute for a European company with regard to the involvement of employees and Council Directive 2003/72/EC of 22 July 2003 supplementing the Statute for a European Cooperative Society with regard to the involvement of employees,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the legal status of these agreements
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the legal status of these agreements at European level and in relation to national legal orders is unclear and this leads to legal uncertainty for both sides of industry;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas there is no legal framework for these agreements either at international or at European level; whereas consideration should be given to whether this is a reason for fewer of these agreements being concluded;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) D a. whereas the asymmetry between global companies and local workforces and workers' representatives gives multinational companies management a considerable comparative advantage over labour when setting working conditions at international level;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) D b. whereas those transnational company agreements should not undermine rights and obligations conferred to employees and employers by law and international conventions; whereas those transnational company agreements could positively complement existing labour law and international conventions; whereas systematic references to existing legal standards, in particular ILO conventions, can reinforce the legitimacy of transnational company agreements;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas each EU Member State has its own system of
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 c (new) – having regard to Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas each EU Member State has its own system of relations between social partners, based on different historical developments and traditions, which has to be respected and does not require harmonisation but does need stronger coordination in the interest of workers across the EU;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. whereas cross-border partnerships between social partners have proven to be good practices to promote free movement of workers and promote their respective rights across borders; whereas EU support for such cross-border partnerships is vital;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) E b. whereas all actors - the EU, the Member States and the Social Partners - need to adapt their practices to ensure adequate representation of Social Partners at the European level especially in relation to economic governance, to ensure the autonomy of the Social Partners and to avoid counter effects that might appear where Social Partners and Labour Markets are organized at sectoral, regional or national level while measures impacting on these are taken at European level;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas it is a particular feature of the European Social Dialogue that it promotes the preservation and growth of employment, improvements in working conditions and thus greater prosperity for employees of transnational undertakings by innovative means while preserving
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) G a. whereas there are borders in the EU where wages differ highly between one Member State and the other, even though the two bordering regions form a common economic region;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) G b. whereas a stable economic and monetary union requires addressing large macro-economic imbalances among Member States as a result of differences in business cycles, price and wage dynamics; whereas wages are not merely macro-economic adjustment variables but also the main source of income that people need for a decent living;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G c (new) G c. whereas despite efforts social partners have taken to coordinate their actions across borders, these initiatives have not been sufficient to prevent the emergence of serious imbalances and have now led to the undesirable situation where economic adjustment including on wages is enforced by public authorities in the context of the European Semester and Troika-programmes without proper social partner involvement, in a asymmetric non-transparent manner and at high social costs;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G d (new) G d. whereas a stronger European social dialogue and transnational collective bargaining could contribute to pro- actively avoiding the emergence of large macro-economic and social imbalances, including wage competition, in particular among EMU Member States;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G e (new) G e. whereas the Macroeconomic Dialogue currently consists of a confidential exchange of policy information which lacks ownership, transparency and is not effectively taken into account in collective bargaining processes at national or other relevant levels thereby failing to bring about timely adjustment in case of large wage divergences, in a socially responsible manner;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 d (new) – having regard to Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community- scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G f (new) G f. whereas businesses increasingly operate on a European level while the representation of workers is predominantly organised along national lines; whereas this asymmetry is negatively impacting the representation of workers interests and puts workers at risk of being played out against each other and being forced to agree to lower wages, worse working conditions or other downward adjustments;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Highlights the need to strengthen transnational social dialogue and cross border collective bargaining particularly at company level where it is currently under developed, establishing new channels for its development and, with it, balanced cross-border industrial relations; further stresses that transnational social dialogue can provide a setting for more efficient cross border collective bargaining;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 a (new) -1 a. Is concerned about the imbalance between social rights and economic freedoms and an unclear situation regarding the possibility of cross border collective actions including sympathy actions; considers that remedying to this imbalance is necessary to provide solid foundations to cross border collective bargaining and transnational social dialogue; calls therefore for using secondary legislation and the next treaty revision process to introduce a clear clause on social rights, including the right to strike, being treated equally to economic freedoms
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that this resolution is concerned with European transnational company agreements
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that this resolution is concerned with European transnational company agreements
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that this resolution is concerned with European transnational company agreements
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that this resolution
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) – having regard to the Council Conclusions (EPSCO) 17423/11 adopted on 1 December 2011,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Proposes that in the medium term
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Proposes that
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Proposes that in the medium term an optional European legal framework should be adopted for
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Requests the Commission to prepare and start consultations with EU social partners following the procedure established in the Lisbon Treaty concerning a legislative proposal to set up a voluntary legal framework for transnational company agreements;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that social convergence must be made a policy priority and that European transnational company agreements can be powerful tools for moving towards that social convergence;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Calls on Social Partners, Commission, Council, and ECB as a matter of urgency to reform the Macroeconomic Dialogue with the aim of effectively preventing wage competition and excessive wage divergence in particular among EMU Member States and enabling social partners to play their full role in a reinforced economic governance structure;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Is of the opinion that a reformed macro-economic dialogue needs to be transparent and public, and that a broad general debate about appropriate wage policies should be launched that sets clear signals to the public and feeds into the European Semester process; suggests that the Macro-Economic Dialogue takes place in the European Parliament in the presence of relevant committees;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new) 2 c. Calls on the Commission and Council to ensure that agreement on coordination achieved in the reformed Macro- Economic Dialogue is properly taken into account before the presentation of the Annual Growth Survey as well as before country specific recommendations are addressed to the Member States;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 d (new) 2 d. Stresses that the current over-focus on unit labour cost as a key indicator of the scoreboard for macro-economic imbalances has proven to be too one-sided and that governance based on it risks negatively impacting domestic demand, income security, and increasing poverty and inequality; highlights that when addressing diverging competitiveness in a reformed macro-economic dialogue and in the European Semester, account needs to be taken of capital and resource efficiency developments besides productivity and unit labour costs developments;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 e (new) 2 e. Calls on the Commission, in close cooperation with the social partners, to develop a comprehensive vision on the strengthening of the coordination of transnational sectorial dialogue, including between sectors and addressing the crucial differences between the tradable and non-tradable sectors;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 f (new) 2 f. Calls on the Commission to support Social Partners to take up a more important role at the European level amongst others through coordination, technical and financial support including translation, implementation guides, awareness-raising, continuous learning processes, monitoring and reporting;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 g (new) 2 g. Calls on the European social partners to work with their national affiliates to achieve better gender balance in both participation rates and representation on the boards of committees;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 Optional legal framework for European transnational co
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the autonomy of the social partners, as a result of which they enter into negotiations and
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that TCAs differ from one another, for example as regards extent of applicability, scope and signatories, in accordance with the purposes, points of departure, needs and objectives of those parties, that businesses and corporate cultures differ substantially from one another and that contracting parties’ autonomy to create different kinds of TCA must be respected;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Proposes that the social partners
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Proposes that the social partners
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Proposes that
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Proposes that the social partners take as their basis an optional European legal framework in order, even before negotiations at European level, to eliminate certain potential problems at source and
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that the
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that the
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that the application of such an optional legal framework should be optional for the social partners and companies and group of companies involved as well as based on flexibility and referral at national level in order to give the transnational company agreement legal effect;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls for the representative European trade union federations and European employer federations to negotiate and conclude only European transnational company agreements; observes that, if a European trade union federation has not agreed any internal procedure for issuing a negotiating mandate, agreements may only be concluded by representative national trade unions; considers that European works councils should be fully involved in the negotiations;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls for the representative European trade union federations to negotiate and conclude only European transnational company agreements; observes that, if a European trade union federation has not agreed any internal procedure for issuing a negotiating mandate, agreements may only be concluded by representative national trade unions; considers that European works councils should be fully involved in the negotiations; recommends that the Commission review the criteria on trade union representation (COM/2002/0704);
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Underlines that collective bargaining is a trade union prerogative whether at enterprise, national or European level and for that reason the legitimacy of actors is a key issue in any European initiative and implementation of agreements has to be done in accordance with existing national practices;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Underlines the usefulness of national social partners signing adhesion agreements through which they could take over the content of Transnational Company Agreements in order to ensure national ownership and enforceability;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Notes that national unions must be part of the negotiations but they have to mediate their specific national interests within the procedures adopted at European level;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. considers that European works councils should be fully involved in the negotiations with European trade union Federations where applicable; notably as they are able to detect the need/opportunity for a TCA, initiate the process and pave the way for negotiations, help in ensuring the transparency and dissemination of information concerning the agreements toward the workers involved; welcome that some European trade union Federations have designed procedural rules to involve European works council;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 source: PE-510.723
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.017New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-PR-508017_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.723New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-510723_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.172&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-508172_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130912&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2012-09-12-TOC_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-258&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0258_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-386New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0386_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
EMPL/7/11229New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/committees |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-03-27T00:00:00New
2012-11-22T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-05-13T00:00:00New
2013-06-20T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-06-20T00:00:00New
2013-09-12T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/5 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1856f0fb8127435bdbefcNew
4f1ac8e0b819f25efd0000fa |
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de187a90fb8127435bdc222New
4f1ada41b819f207b300005f |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/5/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-258&language=EN
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-09-09T00:00:00New
2013-03-27T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee draft report |
activities/5 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/committee_full |
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityNew
Women's Rights and Gender Equality |
activities/3/committees/1/committee_full |
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityNew
Women's Rights and Gender Equality |
committees/1/committee_full |
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityNew
Women's Rights and Gender Equality |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-06-19T00:00:00New
2013-06-20T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.723
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-05-08T00:00:00New
2013-05-13T00:00:00 |
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.017
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-07-01T00:00:00New
2013-09-09T00:00:00 |
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-05-30T00:00:00New
2013-06-19T00:00:00 |
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/date |
2012-11-06T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2012-11-06T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
EMPL/7/11229
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|