Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | COLLIN-LANGEN Birgit ( PPE) | TARABELLA Marc ( S&D), CREUTZMANN Jürgen ( ALDE), RÜHLE Heide ( Verts/ALE), HARBOUR Malcolm ( ECR), SALVINI Matteo ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114-p1Subjects
Events
The Commission presented a report on the assessment of the European standard on electronic invoicing, in accordance with Directive 2014/55/EU.
As a reminder, Directive 2014/55/EU has the objective of promoting the uptake of electronic invoicing in public procurement, by ensuring interoperability and improving legal certainty.
It requires contracting authorities to receive and process electronic invoices which comply with a European Standard (EN) for electronic invoicing.
Further to the Directive, the Commission gave on 10 December 2014 a mandate to the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) to develop the EN on electronic invoicing and its related deliverables.
The European standard has recently been adopted by CEN and this report assesses the standard with regard to: (i) its practicality; (ii) its user-friendliness; (iii) its implementation costs for the end user.
The report presents the results of this assessment based on two main sources: (i) the CEN technical report and (ii) a complementary study carried out by an external contractor (PWC) on behalf of the Commission between the end of March 2017 and July 2017.
According to the two main sources, the European standard is considered suitable for the intended use .
1) Practicality : this criterion refers to elements such as being effective, useful and suitable for a particular purpose or situation. The practicality of the European standard for eInvoicing, in terms of its fitness for purpose has been confirmed by the Member State authorities and stakeholders interviewed .
The decision to limit the number of formats for implementing the semantic data model of the core invoice to UBL 2.1 3 and UNCEFACT/CII will result in further simplification, since these are two very common syntaxes already in use in the market. Most of the contracting authorities interviewed for this study will prioritise the support for only one syntax, UBL 2.1 .
2) User-friendliness : this criterion involves an assessment of the easiness to use and to implement the standard, in particular taking into account existing systems, such as Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP).
The EN is considered to be flexible due to the possible use of optional elements, free text fields and code lists included. However, this advantage may result in excessive proliferation of Core Invoice Usage Specifications (CIUS) and extensions. The CIUS are specifications, which are aimed to help implementers of solving the practical aspects of defining the IT systems based on the EN.
The use of CIUS and extensions should be monitored and limited , possibly through a coordinated European initiative, in order to safeguard interoperability across borders.
3) Implementation costs : this criterion refers to the implementation costs to be borne by end-users (contracting authorities and their suppliers) for supporting the standard, covering the full set of identified scenarios. The costs of implementing eInvoicing are largely dependent on the two key variables in each country: the level of maturity and the architecture chosen by the public sector for eInvoicing.
The report noted that:
in Member States where a mature and centralised eInvoicing architecture is in place, the impact of the EN on end-users will be generally low; Member States with low eInvoicing maturity adopting a decentralised architecture will face challenges to ensure the take up and implementation of the European standard. Nevertheless, these difficulties may be mitigated if the government provides clear guidance and rules, such as the use of standards; in Member States with low eInvoicing maturity which chose to implement a centralised eInvoicing system , the impact of the standards will depend on the national requirements and the level of readiness in the public and the private sector.
Small contracting authorities : interviews with local and regional authorities show that the use of the standard is essential for local authorities to reduce costs and lead to the conclusion that the benefits in terms of simplification of payment procedures are considered as outweighing limited costs for implementation.
Challenges : the contacted stakeholders put forward a number of measures to support the roll-out of the European Standard and maximise the benefits:
the existing test environment , freely accessible (no authentication required) to be further enhanced (e.g. more meaningful explanations for errors, updated as validation artefacts evolve) and provide examples of complex and simple invoices; a central European registry listing all service and solution providers which are supporting the European Standard (EN) or the Core Invoice Usage Specification (CIUS), as key element of a governance system; clear documentation about the EN and its implementation; a technical Service Desk to provide support through the implementation of the EN; financial support for the implementers.
The roll-out of the EN will require maintenance and governance.
In parallel to the transmission of this Report to European Parliament and Council, the reference to the EN will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
PURPOSE: the removal of market barriers and obstacles to trade deriving from the existence of differing national rules and standards and ensuring interoperability
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive 2014/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on electronic invoicing in public procurement.
CONTENT: the Directive aims at spreading the use of new technologies in public tenders . It will contribute to improving the functioning of the internal market by reducing the obstacles to entering the market, especially for SMEs, and by solving the problem of the compatibility of different e-invoicing systems in various Member States. The European Parliament, in its resolution of 20 April 2012, pointed at market fragmentation and underlined the substantial benefits offered by electronic invoicing.
The Directive is part of the on-going modernisation of the public administration sector in Member States, and particularly of the major overhaul of the EU public procurement directives.
Establishment of a European standard on electronic invoicing : the directive provides that the Commission shall request that the relevant European standardisation organisation draft a European standard for the semantic data model of the core elements of an electronic invoice , complying at least with the following criteria: (i) it is technologically neutral, (ii) it is compatible with relevant international standards on electronic invoicing, (iii) it takes into account the special needs of small and medium-sized enterprises as well as of sub-central contracting authorities and contracting entities; (iv) it is suitable for use in commercial transactions between enterprises.
Prior to the introduction of the European standard, the practical application of the standard should be sufficiently tested. The Commission shall retain overall responsibility for the testing with special account be taken of the respect for the criteria of practicality, user-friendliness and possible implementation costs. Where a test phase has been completed, the Commission shall publish the reference to the standard in the Official Journal of the European Union by 27 May 2017.
Core elements of an electronic invoice : the Directive sets these out as follows: (i) process and invoice identifiers; (ii) the invoice period; (iii) information on seller, buyer, payer and seller's tax representative; (iv) contract reference; (v) delivery details; (vi) payment instructions; (vii) allowance or charge information; (viii) invoice line item information; (ix) invoice totals; (x) VAT breakdown.
Data protection: the Directive is without prejudice to applicable Union and national law on data protection. Personal data obtained for the purpose of electronic invoicing may be used only for that purpose or for purposes compatible with it.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 26.05.2014.
TRANSPOSITION: by 27.11.2018.
By way of derogation, Member States shall, not later than 18 months after the publication of the reference of the European standard on electronic invoicing in the Official Journal of the European Union, adopt, publish and apply the provisions necessary to comply with the obligation to receive and process electronic invoices.
Member States may postpone the application of the Directive for sub-central contracting authorities and contracting entities until 30 months following the publication of the reference of the European standard on electronic invoicing and the list of syntaxes in the Official Journal of the European Union.
The European Parliament adopted by 646 votes to 25, with 5 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on electronic invoicing in public procurement.
Parliament adopted its position at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise between Parliament and Council.
Scope : the amended text stipulated that obstacles to cross-border trade deriving from the co-existence of several legal requirements and technical standards on electronic invoicing and from the lack of interoperability should be removed or reduced.
However, this Directive should not apply to electronic invoices issued as a result of the performance of contracts falling within the scope of Directive 2009/81/EC on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain works contracts, supply contracts and service contracts by contracting authorities or entities in the fields of defence and security , where the procurement and performance of the contract are declared to be secret or must be accompanied by special security measures, and provided that the Member State has determined that the essential interests concerned cannot be guaranteed by less intrusive measures.
Establishment of a European standard : the Commission should request that the relevant European standardisation organisation draft a European standard for the semantic data model of the core elements of an electronic invoice.
The European standard on should be technologically neutral and should comply with at least the following criteria :
it is compatible with relevant international standards on electronic invoicing; it has regard to the need for personal data protection; it allows for the establishment of practical, user-friendly, flexible and cost-efficient electronic invoicing systems; it takes into account the special needs of small and medium-sized enterprises as well as of sub-central contracting authorities and contracting entities; it is suitable for use in commercial transactions between enterprises.
Test phase : under the responsibility of the Commission, the standard should be tested as to its practical application for an end user . The Commission shall submit a report on the outcome of the test to the European Parliament and the Council. Where a test phase has been completed, the Commission shall publish the reference to the standard in the Official Journal of the European Union , together with the list of a limited number of syntaxes That publication shall be completed by three years following the entry into force of the Directive.
Formal objections to the European standard : the amended text introduced the possibility for a Member State or the European Parliament to raise such objections and inform the Commission thereof, with a detailed explanation, and the Commission shall decide:
to publish, not to publish, or to publish with restriction the references to the European standard on electronic invoicing and the list of syntaxes concerned in the Official Journal of the European Union; to maintain, to maintain with restriction or to withdraw the references to the European standard on electronic invoicing and to the list of syntaxes concerned in, or from, the Official Journal of the European Union.
Maintenance and development of the European standard : in order to take into account technological developments and to ensure full and on-going interoperability in electronic invoicing in public procurement, the Commission may: (a) update or revise the European standard on electronic invoicing; (b) update or revise the list of syntaxes published by the Commission in the Official Journal of the European Union. To do so, it should make a request to the relevant European standardisation organisation.
Core elements of an electronic invoice : Parliament stipulated in the body of the text of the Directive the core elements of the electronic invoice. These are:
process and invoice identifiers; the invoice period; seller, buyer, payee and seller’s tax representative information; contract reference; delivery details; payment instructions; allowance or charge information; invoice line item information; invoice totals; VAT breakdown.
Data protection : it is stated that this Directive should be without prejudice to applicable Union and national law on data protection. Personal data obtained for the purpose of electronic invoicing may be used only for that purpose or for purposes compatible with it.
Transposition : Member States should adopt, publish and apply the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive at the latest 54 months after its entry into force. They may postpone the application with regard to their sub-central contracting authorities and contracting entities until 30 months after publication of the reference of the European standard on electronic invoicing in the Official Journal of the European Union at the latest.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the report by Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN (EPP, DE) on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on electronic invoicing in public procurement.
The committee recommended that Parliament’s position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Scope : the directive will not apply to certain contracts awarded under Directive 2009/81/EC on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain works contracts, supply contracts and service contracts by contracting authorities or entities in the fields of defense and security.
The directive will not apply where contracting authorities and contracting entities receive electronic invoices where they consider it necessary, in the interests of security, to use invoice formats or impose other invoicing requirements that are incompatible with this Directive.
Requirements relating to the content of the standard : the proposal does not contain any requirements for the content of the standard that would form the basis for applying standardisation procedures.
Accordingly, Members set out the core elements of electronic invoices in a new annex, along the lines of the provisions of Directive 2006/112/EC on VAT.
Drawing up a European standard : the Commission shall request the relevant European standardisation organisation to draft a European standard for the semantic data model of the key components of an electronic invoice. It shall set the European standardisation organisation a deadline of 24 months for the elaboration and adoption of the European standard.
The European standard should conform at least to the following:
· be technologically neutral;
· be interoperable;
· meet the requirements of Council Directive 2006/112/EC;
· have regard to the need for personal data protection in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC, to a 'data protection by design' approach and to the principles of proportionality, data minimisation and purpose limitation;
· allow for the establishment of practical, user-friendly and flexible e-invoicing systems;
· take into account the special needs of small and medium-sized enterprises as well as the sub-central contracting authorities and contracting entities.
Lastly, the European standard should be compatible with relevant international standards on electronic invoicing in order to prevent suppliers from third countries encountering technical market access barriers.
Test phase : once the European standard is adopted, the Commission shall test, within a period of six months, the practical application of the standard, as it shall exist for use by an end user. Within one month of completion of the testing procedure, it shall submit a report on the outcome to the European Parliament and the Council.
Where the test has been satisfactorily completed, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act , in which it shall state that the standard satisfies the requirements of the request and that it decides to publish the reference to such standard in the Official Journal of the European Union. The implementing act will be adopted at the latest 9 months after the adoption of the standard by the relevant standardisation organisation.
The Commission may dispense with the test procedure if it, or the competent standardisation organisation, has already verified, during the process of drawing up the standard, that the practical application of the standard meets the relevant requirements. In this case, it must adopt an implementing act at the latest 3 months after the adoption of the standard by the relevant standardisation organisation.
Formal objections to the European standard : Members inserted the option for a Member State or the European Parliament to state objections and inform the Commission giving detailed reasons. The Commission shall decide:
· to publish, not to publish, or to publish with restriction the references to the European standard concerned in the Official Journal of the European Union;
· to maintain, to maintain with restriction or to withdraw the references to the European standard concerned in, or from, the Official Journal of the European Union.
Maintenance and further development of the European standard: the Commission may request the relevant European standardisation organisation to revise the European standard.
Amendment of the requirements for the European standard : the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in order to amend the requirements for the European standard for the semantic data model for the key components of an electronic invoice.
Committee procedures: the Commission shall be assisted by the committee established under Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
Transposition : in order to allow sufficient time for the necessary technical, organisational and financial adjustments, Members considered it advisable to provide for a phased implementation period of 51 months for central government authorities and 67 months for sub-central contracting authorities.
The Council agreed on a general approach to develop e-invoicing in the field of public procurement. It invited the Presidency to start negotiations with the European Parliament on the basis of the general approach with a view to reaching an agreement at first reading.
The general approach provides that the Commission shall request the relevant European standardisation organisation to draft a European standard for the semantic data model for the core section of an electronic invoice.
The Commission shall require that the European standard should comply at least with the following criteria :
be technologically neutral; be compatible with relevant international standards on electronic invoicing; have regard to the need for personal data protection in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC; does not affect the provisions of Directive 2006/112/EC.
Member States shall ensure that contracting authorities and contracting entities do not refuse to receive electronic invoices which comply with the European standard for the semantic data model for the core section of an electronic invoice whose reference has been published and with any of the syntaxes approved by the Commission.
The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts , approve the list of syntaxes that comply with the European standard for the semantic data model for the core section of an electronic invoice.
In order to allow contracting authorities and contracting entities to properly prepare and take the necessary technical measures, the text foresees a transposition deadline of 30 months following the publication of the reference of the European standard on electronic invoicing and the list of syntaxes in the Official Journal of the European Union.
To facilitate the take up of electronic invoicing for certain contracting authorities, such as local and regional contracting authorities and public undertakings, Member States may postpone the application of the requirements of this Directive for sub-central contracting authorities, public undertakings and contracting entities until 36 months following the publication of the reference of the European standard on electronic invoicing and the list of syntaxes in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This possibility to postpone the application of the requirements of this Directive should not apply to central purchasing bodies.
Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) on the Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on electronic invoicing in public procurement.
The EDPS appreciates that certain data protection issues have been taken into account in the proposal. He gives recommendations on how the proposal could be further improved:
include a substantive provision to clarify that the Proposal is not meant to provide for general derogations from data protection principles and that relevant personal data protection legislation (i.e. national rules implementing Directive 95/46/EC) remain fully applicable in the context of e-invoicing; amend the proposal to ensure that: (i) the European standards to be adopted will follow a ‘privacy by design’ approach; (ii) ensure that data protection requirements are taken into account, and that; (iii) the standards will respect, in particular, the principles of proportionality, data minimisation and purpose limitation; include a reference to EU or national law, which should, in turn, provide appropriate safeguards should it be the intention of the legislator to provide for the publication of personal data for purposes of transparency and accountability.
PURPOSE: to facilitate the adoption of electronic invoicing in public procurement.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the widely-acknowledged benefits of e-invoicing have led several EU Member States (Denmark, Austria, Sweden and Finland) to require the submission of e-invoices in public procurement in all or part of the public sector. However, these bottom-up initiatives are for the most part based on national standards, most of which are not interoperable. As such, they lead to an increase in complexity and costs for firms wishing to participate in cross-border procurement, and thereby generate market access barriers. The overall result is that the adoption of e-invoicing in Europe is still very limited , accounting for 4 to 15% of all invoices exchanged.
In the Communication " Reaping the benefits of einvoicing for Europe ", the Commission has called for e-invoicing to become the predominant invoicing mode in the EU by 2020. In a resolution in April 2012, the European Parliament called for making e-invoicing compulsory in public procurement by 2016, while Member States have called for measures to promote e-invoicing at the Informal Competitiveness Council of February 2012 and in the European Council Conclusions of June 2012.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: after having analysed five different options, the Impact Assessment concluded that the most appropriate solution is to impose on contracting authorities and contracting entities an obligation to accept the reception of electronic invoices complying with a new common European invoicing standard as of a particular date.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: the proposal foresees that a new European e-invoicing standard will be drawn by the relevant European standard-setting body, in this case the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN). This will be done on the basis of a mandate by the European Commission which will be prepared at a later stage. The mandate will include a list of minimum requirements which the standard will have to incorporate. The work will then be carried out in line with the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 .
In its request to the relevant European standardisation organisation, the Commission should require that such European standard is technologically neutral , in order to avoid any distortion of competition. Since electronic invoices may contain personal data, the Commission should also require that such European standard guarantees personal data protection in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC.
With a view to guaranteeing interoperability , a European standard should define semantic data elements referring to, in particular, complementary seller and buyer data, process identifiers, invoice attributes, invoice item details, delivery information, payment details and terms. It should also be compatible with the existing standards for payments in order to allow for automatic processing of payments.
Where the European standard drawn up by the relevant European standardisation organisation satisfies the requirements contained in the Commission’s request, the references of such European standard should be published in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Member States shall ensure that contracting authorities and contracting entities do not refuse to receive electronic invoices which comply with the European standard.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no additional financial impact over and beyond the resources already allocated to the standardisation actions in the current and the future Multiannual Financial Framework.
PURPOSE: to facilitate the adoption of electronic invoicing in public procurement.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the widely-acknowledged benefits of e-invoicing have led several EU Member States (Denmark, Austria, Sweden and Finland) to require the submission of e-invoices in public procurement in all or part of the public sector. However, these bottom-up initiatives are for the most part based on national standards, most of which are not interoperable. As such, they lead to an increase in complexity and costs for firms wishing to participate in cross-border procurement, and thereby generate market access barriers. The overall result is that the adoption of e-invoicing in Europe is still very limited , accounting for 4 to 15% of all invoices exchanged.
In the Communication " Reaping the benefits of einvoicing for Europe ", the Commission has called for e-invoicing to become the predominant invoicing mode in the EU by 2020. In a resolution in April 2012, the European Parliament called for making e-invoicing compulsory in public procurement by 2016, while Member States have called for measures to promote e-invoicing at the Informal Competitiveness Council of February 2012 and in the European Council Conclusions of June 2012.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: after having analysed five different options, the Impact Assessment concluded that the most appropriate solution is to impose on contracting authorities and contracting entities an obligation to accept the reception of electronic invoices complying with a new common European invoicing standard as of a particular date.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: the proposal foresees that a new European e-invoicing standard will be drawn by the relevant European standard-setting body, in this case the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN). This will be done on the basis of a mandate by the European Commission which will be prepared at a later stage. The mandate will include a list of minimum requirements which the standard will have to incorporate. The work will then be carried out in line with the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 .
In its request to the relevant European standardisation organisation, the Commission should require that such European standard is technologically neutral , in order to avoid any distortion of competition. Since electronic invoices may contain personal data, the Commission should also require that such European standard guarantees personal data protection in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC.
With a view to guaranteeing interoperability , a European standard should define semantic data elements referring to, in particular, complementary seller and buyer data, process identifiers, invoice attributes, invoice item details, delivery information, payment details and terms. It should also be compatible with the existing standards for payments in order to allow for automatic processing of payments.
Where the European standard drawn up by the relevant European standardisation organisation satisfies the requirements contained in the Commission’s request, the references of such European standard should be published in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Member States shall ensure that contracting authorities and contracting entities do not refuse to receive electronic invoices which comply with the European standard.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no additional financial impact over and beyond the resources already allocated to the standardisation actions in the current and the future Multiannual Financial Framework.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0590
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)455
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2014/55
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 133 06.05.2014, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00021/2014/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0198/2014
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0004/2014
- Debate in Council: 3276
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR5277/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE523.101
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 038 08.02.2014, p. 0011
- Document attached to the procedure: N7-0065/2014
- Contribution: COM(2013)0449
- Committee draft report: PE521.724
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4392/2013
- Contribution: COM(2013)0449
- Contribution: COM(2013)0449
- Contribution: COM(2013)0449
- Legislative proposal: COM(2013)0449
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2013)0222
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2013)0223
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2013)0225
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2013)0449
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2013)0449 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2013)0222
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2013)0223
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2013)0225
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4392/2013
- Committee draft report: PE521.724
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 038 08.02.2014, p. 0011 N7-0065/2014
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE523.101
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR5277/2013
- Draft final act: 00021/2014/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)455
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0590 EUR-Lex
- Contribution: COM(2013)0449
- Contribution: COM(2013)0449
- Contribution: COM(2013)0449
- Contribution: COM(2013)0449
Votes
A7-0004/2014 - Birgit Collin-Langen - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
53 |
2013/0213(COD)
2013/11/15
IMCO
53 amendments...
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5a) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Rates2a. ____________ 2a Regulation (EU) N. 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The Commission should apply the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European standardisation3 to request the relevant European standardisation organisation to draft a European standard for the semantic data model of the core electronic invoice. In its request to the relevant European standardisation
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The Commission should apply the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European standardisation3 to request the relevant European standardisation organisation to draft a European standard for the semantic data model of the core electronic invoice. In its request to the relevant European standardisation organisation, the Commission should require that such European standard is technologically neutral, in order to avoid any distortion of competition. Since electronic invoices may contain personal data, the Commission should also require that such European standard
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In order to keep abreast of technological progress and developments in legislation, the Commission should be empowered to adopt, in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, legal acts concerning the adjustment of the requirements for the European standard listed in this Directive for the semantic data model for the core components of the electronic invoice. It is particularly important that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations as part of its preparatory work, including at experts level. When preparing and drawing up delegated acts, the Commission should ensure that the relevant documents are sent to the European Parliament and the Council simultaneously, in good time and in an appropriate manner.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The European standard for the semantic data model of the core electronic invoice should build on existing specifications, including in particular those developed by European or international organisations such as CEN (CWA 16356 and CWA 16562), ISO (Financial Invoice based on the ISO 20022 methodology), and UN/CEFACT (CII v. 2.0). It should not require electronic signatures. In carrying out the mandate, the relevant European standardisation organisation should also take into account the results of Large- Scale Pilot Projects implemented within the framework of the Policy Support Programme of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) and e-invoicing specifications of any other relevant bodies and organisations that are widely used by the business community. Such European standard should define semantic data elements referring to, in particular, complementary seller and buyer data, process identifiers, invoice attributes, invoice item details, delivery information, payment details and terms. It should also be compatible with the existing standards for payments in order to allow for automatic processing of payments.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Following the adoption of the new European standard by the Commission in accordance with the European standardisation procedure, the Commission should test the standard in practice. In this test phase the Commission should describe and check the application of the standard as it exists for use by an end user. The Commission should pay particular attention to user- friendliness and practicality, and calculate potential implementing costs.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 b (new) (7b) In order to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises can also benefit from electronic invoicing in public procurement, the European standard should be easy to understand, user- friendly and easy to use.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 c (new) (7c) In the context of implementation, Member States should take into account the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises and small contracting entities and offer both contracting authorities and contracting entities and suppliers the necessary support so that the new European standard can be used. Moreover, training measures should be provided, in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8a) European standardisation organisations regularly review and update the European standard as necessary in order to respond to technological developments. In light of the rapid nature of such developments in the ICT sector, the Commission may request the relevant European standardisation organisation to regularly review and update the standard to into account these developments and ensure continuing interoperability.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Contracting authorities and contracting entities should not refuse the reception of electronic invoices which comply with such common European standard on the grounds of non-compliance with other technical requirements (for example national or sector specific requirements). However contracting authorities and contracting entities should remain free to verify, before paying the invoice, whether the content of the electronic invoice correctly reflects all the details of the business transaction. The obligation to not refuse electronic invoices in accordance with this Directive is without prejudice to Article 4 of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating late payment in commercial transactions.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) This Directive should apply to electronic invoices received by contracting authorities and contracting entities and issued and transmitted as a result of the performance of contracts awarded in accordance with Directive [replacing Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts5 ], Directive [replacing Directive 2004/17/EC
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 a (new) (10a) This Directive does not affect the application of Article 346 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Moreover, where the performance of the contract is declared to be secret or must be accompanied by special security measures in accordance with the laws, regulations or administrative provisions in force in a Member State and provided that the Member State has determined that the essential interests concerned cannot be guaranteed by less intrusive measures, contracting authorities and contracting entities may decide to impose for a particular contract special invoicing requirements other than those provided in this Directive. In such cases, contracting authorities and contracting entities should set out these requirements in the procurement documents.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) The Directive should require only recipients, i.e. contracting authorities, central purchasing bodies and contracting entities, to accept and process electronic invoices. In contrast, the invoicing entity should be able to choose between submitting the invoice in accordance with the European standard, in accordance with national or other technical standards or in paper format.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) In order to allow contracting authorities and contracting entities to take the technical measures that, following the establishment of the European standard, are necessary to comply with the provisions of this Directive, a transposition
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) In order to allow contracting authorities and contracting entities to take the technical measures that, following the establishment of the European standard, are necessary to comply with the provisions of this Directive, a transposition deadline of
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 b (new) (18b) A standardisation of electronic invoicing is in line with the expansion of European Union law and national and international law for electronic procurement in the Union.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 b (new) (19b) The intended use of Structural Fund resources to support the establishment of e-procurement in Europe should also promote the use of electronic invoicing for public contracts.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 a (new) (20a) The European Data Protection Supervisor has been consulted in accordance with Article 28, paragraph 2, of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council11a and issued an opinion on 11 November 2013. _____________ 11a Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8 , 12.1.2001, p. 1).
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 This Directive shall apply to electronic invoices issued as a result of the performance of contracts awarded in accordance with Directive [replacing Directive 2004/18/EC], Directive [replacing Directive 2004/17/EC],
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 This Directive shall apply to electronic invoices issued as a result of the performance of contracts
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 1 (1)
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 4 a (new) (4a) 'central government authorities’ means contracting authorities as defined in Article 2(2) of the Directive [replacing Directive 2004/18/EC];
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 4 b (new) (4b) 'sub-central contracting authorities’ means sub-central contracting authorities as defined in Article 2(3) of the Directive [replacing Directive 2004/18/EC];
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 4 c (new) (4c) 'central purchasing bodies' means central purchasing bodies as defined in Article 2(10) of the Directive [replacing Directive 2004/18/EC];
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall require that the European standard for the semantic data model of the core electronic invoice
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall require that the European standard for the semantic data model of the core electronic invoice
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall require that the European standard for the semantic data model of the core electronic invoice
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall require that the European standard for the semantic data model of the core electronic invoice be technologically neutral, and guarantee personal data protection in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC. This standard should be reviewed no less often than once every three years.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) – subparagraph 2 (new) The Commission may dispense with the test procedure if it, or the competent standardisation organisation has already checked, during the process of drawing up the standard, as referred to in this article, that the practical application of the standard meets the relevant requirements.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. Where the European standard drawn up following the request referred to in paragraph 1 satisfies the requirements contained therein, the Commission shall publish the reference to such European standard together with the approved list of syntaxes in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. If the Commission establishes by means of an implementing act that the European standard drawn up in response to its request, as referred to in paragraph 1, meets the requirements set out in the Annex to this Directive it shall publish the references of the standard in the Official Journal of the European Union. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 5a(3).
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. The European standard for the semantic data model for the key components of an electronic invoice shall meet the stipulations of Council Directive 2006/112/EC.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 a (new) Article 3a 1. The Commission shall request the relevant European standardisation organisation to provide a list with a restricted number of syntaxes which comply with the European standard for the semantic data model and recommendations on transmission interoperability to facilitate use of the semantic data standard. 2. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts [adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 5a(2)], approve the restricted list of syntaxes that comply with the European standard. In order to restrict the number of syntaxes identified in the list and with a view to ensuring the full and on-going interoperability the Commission shall have the right, in accordance with the [advisory procedure referred to in Article 5a(2)], to review the approved list of syntaxes.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 a (new) Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 b (new) Article 3b Delegated acts The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 5b in relation to changes in the requirements set out in Articles 3(2b) and 3a(1), and in the Annex to this Directive, for the European standard for the semantic data model for the key components of an electronic invoice.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that contracting authorities and contracting
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 a (new) Article 4a Data protection 1. Applicable European and national rules on data protection shall be unaffected by this Directive and their field of application shall extend to electronic invoicing. 2. Insofar as there is no provision to the contrary in European or national law and without prejudice to appropriate protective measures in accordance with Article 13 of Directive 95/46/EC, personal data may be used exclusively for the purpose of electronic invoicing or purposes compatible with it. 3. Member States shall ensure, without prejudice to appropriate protective measures in accordance with Article 13 of Directive 95/46/EC, that arrangements for the publication, for transparency and accounting purposes, of personal data gathered in connection with electronic invoicing are in line with the purpose of such publication and with the principle of the protection of privacy.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 a (new) Article 4a Formal objections to the European standard (1) If a Member State or the European Parliament considers that the European standard does not fully meet the requirements set out in Articles 3(2b) and 3a(1) and in the Annex to this Directive, it shall be incumbent on it to advise the Commission of its objections, submitting a detailed explanation thereof, and the Commission, after consultation with the committee referred to in Article 5a (new) or other consultation with experts in the relevant sector, shall decide: (a) to publish, not to publish, or to publish with restriction, the references of the European standard concerned in the Official Journal of the European Union, or (b) to maintain, to maintain with restriction, or to withdraw, the references of the European standard concerned in, or from, the Official Journal of the European Union. (2) The Commission shall publish information on its website on the European standard once it has been subject to the decision referred to in paragraph 1. (3) The Commission shall inform the European standardisation organisation concerned of the decision referred to in paragraph 1 and, if necessary, request the revision of the European standard concerned. (4) The decision referred to in paragraph 1(a) of this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 5a(2). (5) The decision referred to in paragraph 1(b) of this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 5a(3).
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new) Article 5a Formal objections 1. When a Member State or the European Parliament considers that the European standard for the semantic data model of the core electronic invoice does not entirely satisfy the requirements which it aims to cover and which are set out in Article 3(1) second paragraph and in the Annex, it shall inform the Commission thereof with a detailed explanation and the Commission shall, after consulting the committee referred to in Article 5b, decide: (a) to publish, not to publish or to publish with restriction the references to the European standard for the semantic data model of the core electronic invoice in the Official Journal of the European Union; (b) to maintain, to maintain with restriction or to withdraw the references to the European standard for the semantic data model of the core electronic invoice in or from the Official Journal of the European Union. 2. The Commission shall inform the European standardisation organisation concerned of the decision referred to in paragraph 1 and, if necessary, request the revision of the European standard for the semantic data model of the core electronic invoice. 3. The decision referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 5b(2). 4. The decision referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 5b(3).
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new) Article 5a Committee procedure The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. 2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.]
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 a (new) Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 b (new) Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 b (new) Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall bring into force the
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Following publication of the European standard in accordance with Article 3(2), central government authorities shall have 36 months and sub- central contracting authorities and contracting entities 48 months in which to comply with this requirement.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall review the effects of this Directive on the internal market and on the uptake of electronic invoicing in public procurement and report thereon to the European Parliament and the Council by 30 June 2023. Where appropriate, the report shall be accompanied by
source: PE-523.101
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0449/COM_COM(2013)0449_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0449/COM_COM(2013)0449_EN.pdf |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2013&number=0213&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2013&number=0213&appLng=EN |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:4392)(documentyear:2013)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:4392)(documentyear:2013)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.724New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-521724_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE523.101New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-523101_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5277)(documentyear:2013)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5277)(documentyear:2013)(documentlanguage:EN) |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0449/COM_COM(2013)0449_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0449/COM_COM(2013)0449_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/10/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0449/COM_COM(2013)0449_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0449/COM_COM(2013)0449_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0004&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0004_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0198New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0198_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
IMCO/7/13244New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014L0055New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014L0055 |
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/selected_topics |
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0449:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0449:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0449/COM_COM(2013)0449_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0449/COM_COM(2013)0449_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2013-09-25T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/3/committees/3/date |
2013-09-25T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/4/committees/3/date |
2013-09-25T00:00:00
|
activities/4/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/4/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/6/docs/0 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/11/docs/1/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0055&from=ENNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:133:TOC |
activities/11/text |
|
committees/3/date |
2013-09-25T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
2.10.03 Standardisation, EC standards and trade mark, certification, complianceNew
2.10.03 Standardisation, EC standards and trademark, certification, compliance |
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2013-09-25T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/3/committees/3/date |
2013-09-25T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/4/committees/3/date |
2013-09-25T00:00:00
|
activities/4/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/4/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/11 |
|
committees/3/date |
2013-09-25T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/selected_topics |
|
activities/9 |
|
activities/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/text |
|
activities/7 |
|
activities/8 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final actNew
Awaiting signature of act |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/text |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&typ=Simple&cmsid=638&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=&ff_TITRE=&ff_SOUS_COTE_MATIERE=&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=400&ssf=DATE_DOCUMENT+DESC&single_comparator=%3D&from_date=&to_date=&lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3276&dd_DATE_REUNION=03/12/2013&single_date=03/12/2013New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&ff_FT_TEXT=3276&dd_DATE_REUNION=03/12/2013&single_date=03/12/2013 |
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final act |
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2014-04-02T00:00:00New
2014-03-11T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-11-14T00:00:00New
2013-06-26T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0449:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/title |
Old
PE523.101New
COM(2013)0449 |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Legislative proposal published |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE523.101New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0449/COM_COM(2013)0449_EN.pdf |
activities/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Legislative proposal published |
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0004&language=EN
|
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/2/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013AE4392:EN
|
activities/2/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013AE4392:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0449:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0449:EN
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://eescopinions.eesc.europa.eu/eescopiniondocument.aspx?language=EN&docnr=4392&year=2013
|
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE523.101
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.724
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2013-09-25T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows |
|
committees/3/date |
2013-09-25T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0449:EN
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
IMCO/7/13244
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|