Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó ( PPE) | LUDVIGSSON Olle ( S&D), TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon ( ALDE), LAMBERTS Philippe ( Verts/ALE), STREJČEK Ivo ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | PETI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 527 votes to 121 with 26 abstentions, a resolution on the Annual Tax Report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth.
Members consider that t he need to restore the credibility of budgetary policies, and to reduce the sovereign debt of Member States, makes it necessary to modify budget expenses, swiftly implement growth-friendly structural reforms, improve methods of tax collection and modify some taxes. Priority must be given to those taxes that are levied on capital, environmentally harmful activities and some types of consumption rather than to those levied on labour.
Whilst noting that taxation policy still remains a national competence, Members consider that this does not exclude the effective coordination of tax arrangements at European level .
Despite the improvements made in the field of tax policy coordination, EU citizens and enterprises engaged in cross-border activities still face considerable costs, administrative burdens and legal gaps which need to be eradicated as soon as possible in order to enable them to grasp the full benefits of the single market. Furthermore, harmful tax competition has a detrimental economic impact.
Sustainable fiscal policies and growth : in order to achieve economic balance Members feel it is necessary not only to ensure compliance with sustainable fiscal policies, but also to implement growth-conducive measures such as fighting tax fraud and evasion, shifting taxation towards more growth-friendly tax areas and providing viable tax stimulus for both self-employed persons and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), especially with the aim of promoting innovation. They consider it in the interest of enterprises and citizens to have a clear, predictable, stable and transparent tax environment within the Single Market.
The resolution recommends that Member States proceed carefully when altering existing taxes and introducing new taxes, ensuring that this is done in a growth-friendly way. Concerned about the effects that the shift in many Member States towards a more extensive taxation of consumption could have on social inequalities, Members suggest introducing a certain degree of flexibility in the VAT system, where some product categories such as culture or basic needs could be taxed at rates below the standard rate.
EU-wide tax information system : Parliament recommends as an eventual solution, the establishment of an EU-wide tax information system serving not to harmonise the different national tax structures, but to facilitate their coordination in a continuous and transparent manner, keeping track of the cuts and increases made within each structure. Members consider that the framework of the European Semester would be a good basis for the functioning of such a system.
Members welcome the Commission's initiative regarding the elaboration of a single guide for the calculation of corporate taxes. They call on Member States to agree on and start implementing the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), based on Parliament's position as a key point of reference in this regard.
They also underline that there is a substantial growth potential in reducing and removing tax-related impediments to cross-border activities in the single market.
Fighting tax fraud and evasion and abolishing double taxation : noting that an estimated EUR 1 trillion in public revenue is lost every year in the EU because of tax fraud and tax avoidance, Parliament calls on Member States to take the measures needed to at least halve the tax gap by 2020.
Member States are asked to:
· improve substantially their tax surveillance, control and collection capacity ;
· improve their administrative cooperation in the area of direct taxation;
· implement the Commission proposals for the introduction of a General Anti-Abuse Rule to counteract aggressive tax planning practices and include a clause in their respective double taxation conventions to prevent occurrences of double non-taxation;
· engage in serious negotiations and complete the procedures for all pending legislative proposals regarding issues of tax fraud, tax evasion, tax avoidance, aggressive tax planning and tax havens;
· conclude the process of reviewing and extending the scope of the Savings Taxation Directive and, following the report from Parliament, to adopt and implement without delay the Commission’s proposal for a Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud.
Lastly, in line with solid Commission observations, Parliament underlines that environmental taxes are among the most growth-friendly in relative terms.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ (EPP, HU) on the Annual Tax Report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth.
Whilst noting that taxation policy still remains a national competence, Members consider that this does not exclude the effective coordination of tax arrangements at European level .
Despite the improvements made in the field of tax policy coordination, EU citizens and enterprises engaged in cross-border activities still face considerable costs, administrative burdens and legal gaps which need to be eradicated as soon as possible in order to enable them to grasp the full benefits of the single market.
Sustainable fiscal policies : in order to achieve economic balance Members feel it is necessary not only to ensure compliance with sustainable fiscal policies, but also to implement growth-conducive measures such as fighting tax fraud and evasion, shifting taxation towards more growth-friendly tax areas and providing viable tax stimulus for both self-employed persons and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), especially with the aim of promoting innovation. They consider it in the interest of enterprises and citizens to have a clear, predictable, stable and transparent tax environment within the Single Market.
The report recommends that Member States proceed carefully when altering existing taxes and introducing new taxes, ensuring that this is done in a growth-friendly way. Concerned about the effects that the shift in many Member States towards a more extensive taxation of consumption could have on social inequalities, Members suggest introducing a certain degree of flexibility in the VAT system, where some product categories such as culture or basic needs could be taxed at rates below the standard rate.
EU-wide tax information system : the report recommends as an eventual solution, the establishment of an EU-wide tax information system serving not to harmonise the different national tax structures, but to facilitate their coordination in a continuous and transparent manner, keeping track of the cuts and increases made within each structure. Members consider that the framework of the European Semester would be a good basis for the functioning of such a system.
Fighting tax fraud and evasion and abolishing double taxation : noting that an estimated EUR 1 trillion in public revenue is lost every year in the EU because of tax fraud and tax avoidance, the report calls on Member States to take the measures needed to at least halve the tax gap by 2020.
Member States are asked to:
improve substantially their tax surveillance, control and collection capacity ; improve their administrative cooperation in the area of direct taxation; implement the Commission proposals for the introduction of a General Anti-Abuse Rule to counteract aggressive tax planning practices and include a clause in their respective double taxation conventions to prevent occurrences of double non-taxation; engage in serious negotiations and complete the procedures for all pending legislative proposals regarding issues of tax fraud, tax evasion, tax avoidance, aggressive tax planning and tax havens; conclude the process of reviewing and extending the scope of the Savings Taxation Directive and, following the report from Parliament, to adopt and implement without delay the Commission’s proposal for a Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud.
Lastly, in line with solid Commission observations, the report underlines that environmental taxes are among the most growth-friendly in relative terms.
PURPOSE: to strengthen the Single Market by removing cross-border tax obstacles for passenger cars.
BACKGROUND: each year, about 3 million used cars are transferred between Member States , of which up to 1 million are linked to people migrating from one Member State to another. The issues of double or multiple taxation and of potential tax discrimination in case of crossborder transfers of passenger cars are of concern to EU citizens and service providers. This can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU.
In its 2010 EU Citizenship Report , the Commission announced that it would work on solutions to double registration taxes on cars as this can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU and in its Communication 'Removing cross-border tax obstacles for EU citizens' the Commission pointed out that, when buying a car in a Member State other than that of their normal residence or when transferring a car to a Member State other than that in which it is registered, EU citizens frequently face excessively complex re-registration procedures and may have to pay registration and/or circulation taxes twice.
It should be noted that, currently, there is no harmonisation at EU level of car registration and circulation taxes . The Commission has taken initiatives and put forward legislative proposals to solve these problems on three occasions, in 1975, in 1998 and in 2005 . The 1975 proposal resulted in the adoption of Directive 83/182/EEC , providing tax exemptions for the temporary introduction of a motor-driven road vehicle into a Member State from another Member State.
Despite the jurisprudence of the Court and legislative actions, it has not been possible to overcome the fragmentation of national tax schemes or to fully and systematically remove double taxation and the potential tax discrimination of cars transferred by citizens from one Member State to another.
CONTENT: this Communication aims at clarifying the EU rules on vehicle taxation , explaining rights and obligations of Member States, citizens and businesses.
The Commission considers the abolition of registration taxes and integrating them (in a revenue neutral way) into the circulation taxes as well as the harmonisation and 'greening' of car taxation as the best solution to the remaining problems identified above. However, as the 2005 proposal has so far not been adopted, it is appropriate to explore immediate solutions to the problems identified in this Communication.
Hence, the Commission has identified and proposes to the Member States to apply the following best practices in the short term:
(1) Lack of information : to ensure that taxpayers know their rights and obligations when moving to another Member State, Member States should provide adequate information on their application of registration and circulation taxes on vehicles in cross-border situations, including information on how they have implemented the EU legal framework. To this end, a central contact point for taxpayers should be designated, to which a link can be provided on the website of the Commission.
(2) Double taxation : to avoid double taxation and 'over-taxation' where citizens move a car permanently from one Member State to another, Member States that initially applied a registration tax should as a minimum grant a partial refund of the tax taking into account the depreciation of the car independently from whether or not the Member State of destination provides an exemption from registration tax, if any.
(3) Temporary transfer of a passenger car and rental cars : Member States should make full use of the flexibility offered by Directive 83/182/EEC to apply more liberal arrangements allowing for the temporary use of vehicles in Member States without application of registration and circulation tax. This relates, in particular, to rental cars registered in another Member State, but also to other situations of temporary or occasional use by a resident of a car registered in another Member State.
(4) Fragmentation of the EU car market : Member States should take action to reduce the fragmentation of the EU car market caused by the divergent application by Member States of car registration and circulation taxes. The upcoming Guidelines on financial incentives for clean and energy-efficient vehicles also need to be taken into account.
After having received the opinion of the institutions to which this Communication is addressed, the Commission intends to set up a technical Working Group to discuss the issues above with Member States. As a result of this process, the discussions in the Council on the 2005 proposal could gain a new momentum . Revision of Directive 83/182/EEC could also be envisaged in order to take account of the extensive jurisprudence of the Court and to enhance transparency and legal certainty.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0206/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0154/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE505.997
- Committee draft report: PE504.212
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2012)0756
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE504.212
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE505.997
Activities
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- Gunnar HÖKMARK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- Liisa JAAKONSAARI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- Mojca KLEVA KEKUŠ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- Anni PODIMATA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
- Sonia ALFANO
- Jean-Pierre AUDY
- Erik BÁNKI
- Pervenche BERÈS
- Victor BOŞTINARU
- Andrew Henry William BRONS
- Martin CALLANAN
- Minodora CLIVETI
- Daniel COHN-BENDIT
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
- Joseph DAUL
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
- Richard FALBR
- Elisa FERREIRA
- Lorenzo FONTANA
- Giuseppe GARGANI
- Jean-Paul GAUZÈS
- Marietta GIANNAKOU
- Sylvie GOULARD
- Ana GOMES
- Enrique GUERRERO SALOM
- Zita GURMAI
- Satu HASSI
- Edit HERCZOG
- Salvatore IACOLINO
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
- Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA
- Eva JOLY
- Dennis de JONG
- Ivailo KALFIN
- Krišjānis KARIŅŠ
- Jürgen KLUTE
- Wolf KLINZ
- Werner LANGEN
- Olle LUDVIGSSON
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
- Ulrike LUNACEK
- Vladimír MAŇKA
- Judith A. MERKIES
- Paul MURPHY
- Jan MULDER
- Rolandas PAKSAS
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
- Franck PROUST
- Herbert REUL
- Niccolò RINALDI
- Oreste ROSSI
- Olle SCHMIDT
- Martin SCHULZ
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
- Sophocles SOPHOCLEOUS
- Francisco SOSA WAGNER
- Laurence J.A.J. STASSEN
- Bart STAES
- Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN
- Ivo STREJČEK
- Hannes SWOBODA
- Kay SWINBURNE
- Csaba Sándor TABAJDI
- Rui TAVARES
- Sampo TERHO
- Nuno TEIXEIRA
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
- Emilie TURUNEN
- Frank VANHECKE
- Angelika WERTHMANN
- Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA
- Zbigniew ZIOBRO
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Votes
A7-0154/2013 - Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz - § 20 #
Amendments | Dossier |
149 |
2013/2025(INI)
2013/03/06
ECON
149 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) - having regard to the Commission communication of 6 December 2012 on An Action Plan to strengthen the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion (COM(2012)0722),
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the EU economies have a rather modest outlook for economic growth in the near future;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that for the functioning of such a system, the framework of the European Semester would be adequate, since – in tandem with other specific macroeconomic measures – it could
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that for the functioning of such a system, the framework of the European Semester would be adequate, since – in tandem with other specific macroeconomic measures – it could keep good record of the various tax policies of the different Member States, taking fully into account the
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that for the functioning of such a system,
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes that for the functioning of such a system, the framework of the European Semester would be a
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Stresses that environmental taxes, in addition to generating revenues, should be consistently and dynamically used for internalising environmentally harmful externalities and for keeping economic developments on a sustainable path;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Underlines, in line with solid Commission observations, that environmental taxes are among the most growth-friendly in relative terms and that shifts towards this field of taxation would therefore be beneficial to growth;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 c (new) 16c. Calls on Member States to pay close attention to the Commission's recommendations about raising environmental taxes and about strengthening the specific tax arrangements in this field;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the Euro area as a whole is experiencing a double-dip recession caused by excessive debt and the financial crisis;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 d (new) 16d. Emphasizes that an update of the 2003 Energy Taxation Directive is long overdue; calls, therefore, on Member States to reach agreement on a solid revision of this Directive before the end of this year;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 e (new) 16e. Notes that the enhanced cooperation on the Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), to be implemented in 11 Member States together representing 2/3 of EU GDP, is a major step forward in the coordination of taxation policy in Europe;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 f (new) 16f. Notes that if revenues are smartly recycled back into the economy, the FTT could, according to the Commission's calculations, have a positive impact on GDP of 0,2%;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -17 (new) -17. Underlines that stepping up the fight against tax fraud and evasion is a vital key to promoting sustainable growth in the EU; stresses that reduced levels of fraud and evasion would strengthen the growth potential in the economy by making public finances healthier and by making enterprises compete on an honest and level playing field;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -17 a (new) -17a. Calls on Member States to commit to a bold but realistic target of halving the tax gap in the EU by 2020; notes that such a target could be integrated into the European Semester;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -17 b (new) -17b. Welcomes the Commission's Action Plan against tax fraud and evasion and its complementary recommendations urging Member States to take determined and coordinated action against aggressive tax planning and tax havens; calls on Member States to strongly endorse the Action Plan, to fully implement the two recommendations and to quickly finalise the procedures on all pending legislative proposals in these areas;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -17 c (new) -17c. Urges Member States, following the positive report from the European Parliament, to without delay adopt and implement the Commission's proposal for a Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -17 d (new) -17d. Calls on Member States to conclude the process of upgrading and extending the scope of the Savings Taxation Directive in order to ensure fair and proper taxation in this field and to end banking secrecy;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -17 e (new) -17e. Welcomes, in the field of corporate taxation, the intensified international work aimed at addressing base erosion and profit shifting; finds the OECD report on this theme to be a crucial contribution and looks forward to the follow-up action plan to be presented this summer; expects the G 20 finance ministers, after having endorsed the report at their recent meeting in Moscow, to take bold and collective action on the basis of that action plan;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the European Union working method is based on subsidiarity and multilevel governance between the EU, the Member States and its regions and local authorities;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -17 f (new) -17f. Calls for a common EU approach towards tax havens;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Emphasises that in countries where labour costs are high relative to productivity, and where the creation of jobs
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Emphasises that in countries where labour costs are high relative to productivity, and where the creation of jobs is therefore hindered, possible measures to reduce these costs or increase productivity could be examined; invites in this regard both Member States and the Commission to cooperate on selected pilot projects to reduce the costs of vital economic inputs such as energy;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Emphasises that in countries where labour costs are high relative to productivity, and where the creation of jobs is therefore hindered, possible measures to reduce these costs or increase productivity could be examined; tax reforms have to promote labour market participation in order to increase labour supply and promote inclusiveness, and thus contribute to increased productivity;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Stresses, in this context, that the roles of social partners, as well as national practices and institutions for wage formation, should always be fully respected;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the Commission's initiative regarding the elaboration of a single guide for the calculation of corporate taxes; calls on Member States to agree on and start implementing the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base as a matter of priority;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on Member States to agree and implement a compulsory Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Underlines that there is a substantial growth potential in reducing and removing tax-related impediments to cross-border activities in the single market; stresses that the revision of the VAT Directive, the work on the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base and the development of administrative cooperation in the area of taxation are crucial factors in making full use of that potential;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Urges the Commission to introduce country-by-country reporting for cross border companies in all sectors, requiring disclosure of information on the trading of a group as a whole in order to monitor respect for proper transfer pricing rules;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new) 18c. Calls on the Commission to take immediate action with regard to strengthening transparency and regulation in respect of company registries and registers of trusts and foundations;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Member States to give their full support to the Commission initiatives, in collaboration with national tax authorities, aimed at suppressing taxation and other fiscal obstacles related to cross-border activities in order to improve further coordination and cooperation in this field; encourages the Member States to continue and upgrade, under Fiscalis programme, the simultaneous controls to find and fight cross-border tax fraud as well as facilitate presence of foreign officials in the offices of tax administrations and during administrative enquiries; highlights the importance of regular knowledge- exchange between tax administrations when dealing with aggressive tax planning schemes used by multinational companies;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Member States to give their full support to the Commission initiatives, in collaboration with national tax authorities, aimed at suppressing taxation and other fiscal obstacles related to cross-border activities in order to improve further coordination and cooperation in this field; in order to improve economic efficiency and incentives a well-designed tax has to take account of possible arising externalities;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Urges Member States to swiftly implement the Commission's proposal for the introduction of a General Anti-Abuse Rule to counteract aggressive tax planning practices, and include a clause in their Double Taxation Conventions to prevent occurrences of double non- taxation; encourages Member States to ignore any tax benefits arising from artificial arrangements or those lacking commercial substance;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Is concerned by the tendency in a number of Member States to cut staff and other resources at tax authorities and similar bodies; stresses that this could weaken the ability to provide fair and efficient service to enterprises and individuals and to counter tax fraud and evasion;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls Member States to be very careful on obliging enterprises to pay corporate taxes and VAT in an anticipated way, late devolution of part of these taxes creates distortions in theirs accounts and can create liquidity problems and even closure.
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Calls on Member States to remove all obstacles in national law that hinder cooperation and exchanges of tax information with the EU institutions, while also ensuring effective protection of taxpayers' data;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas since the outbreak of the recent
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Member States to improve substantially their tax collection capacity, thereby generating additional resources to promote growth and jobs as laid down in EU 2020; in light of this, urges Member States to allocate adequate financial and human resources to their national tax administrations and tax audit staff;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Member States to improve substantially their tax collection capacity, thereby generating additional resources to promote growth and jobs as laid down in EU 2020; moreover Member States would in this way contribute to the future elaboration of a European taxpayer's code based on good national practices;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Member States to improve substantially their tax collection capacity, thereby generating additional resources to promote growth and jobs as laid down in EU 2020; it is important to consider that efficiency in tax administration can reduce the amount of an economy's resources that have to be devoted to revenue collection.
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Stresses that the transparency of taxation and the improvement of the situation in the field of tax evasion are inevitable, as the several billion EUR deficits deriving from them still threaten government incomes, and the non appropriate action in this field only further strengthens black economy and further weakens Europe's competitiveness;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Calls on the Member States to adopt the Savings directive, which would make it possible to eliminate tax loopholes as such;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c (new) 20c. Calls on the Member States to improve their administrative cooperation in the area of direct taxation;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 d (new) 20d. Calls on the Commission to identify the areas where the EU regulation and the member state administrative cooperation could be improved in order to reduce tax fraud, including the appropriate use of the FISCALIS and CUSTOMS programs;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 e (new) 20e. Calls on the Member States - according to the Commission Action Plan to strengthen the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion-, to take part in the widest possible circle in the EU VAT forum;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 f (new) 20f. Calls on the Commission to put in place on short notice an appropriate monitoring and scoreboard system, which could control the accomplishment of the actions detailed in the 2012 Commission Action Plan to strengthen the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 g (new) 20g. Recalls on the Commission to provide more budgetary resources and staff to DG TAXUD to help it develop EU policies and proposals concerning double non-taxation, tax evasion and fraud;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas some countries like Ireland and Spain have seen their revenue coming from the housing industry greatly falling as a result of the end of its bubble, and they need a change in their taxing distribution or its public expenditure;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, because of the debt crisis, the Member States are facing the difficult challenge of having to balance their budgets and promote economic growth and job creation at the same time;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, because of the
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, because of the
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 b (new) - having regard to the Commission recommendation of 6 December 2012 on aggressive tax planning (C(2012)8806),
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas tax systems in the EU shall be oriented to be business friendly in order to enhance their capacity to create growth and jobs;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas in an environment of slow growth and recession, late devolution of anticipated tax payments create additional liquidity problems for corporations;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the impact of the crisis can be
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the impact of the crisis can be diminished with a tax policy that is compatible with the aims of the EU 2020 strategy and this should be a priority;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas a smart taxation policy is key to internalising environmental externalities;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas tax evasion and avoidance deprive Member States of 1 trillion Euros of taxes;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas some academic studies show that precisely those Member States more affected by the debt crisis and with more difficulties to have a balanced budget inside the eurozone are those that have a bigger share of grey economy;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the need to restore the credibility of budgetary polic
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 c (new) - having regard to the Commission recommendation of 6 December 2012 regarding measures intended to encourage third countries to apply minimum standards of good governance in tax matters (C(2012)8805),
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the need to restore the credibility of budgetary policy, and reduce the sovereign debt, makes it necessary to
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the need to restore the credibility of budgetary policy, and reduce the sovereign debt, makes it necessary to reduce budget expenses, introduce structural reforms and, at the same time,
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the need to restore the credibility of budgetary policy, and reduce the sovereign debt, makes it necessary to reduce budget expenses, introduce structural reforms and, at the same time,
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the contributing capacity of taxpayers is almost exhausted in several Member States; whereas the European shadow economy represents an estimated 22.1 % of total economic activity and a scandalous estimated EUR one trillion is lost to tax fraud and tax avoidance every year in the EU;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas active and well-calibrated policy development in the field of environmental taxation is a vital key to enhancing growth and to making growth prospects sustainable;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas fiscal federalism may be a good tool in order to achieve self- responsibility in the tax management at regional level and so entails higher economic efficiency;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas the loss of tax revenue due to tax fraud and tax avoidance raises the deficit and debt levels of Member States, thereby reducing the funds available for fostering public investment, growth and employment, representing a danger for the safeguarding of the EU social model based on quality public services, threatening the proper functioning of the Single Market and acting as a dent to the efficiency and fairness of tax systems within the EU;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas there is a very substantial tax gap in Europe: an estimated EUR 1 trillion in public revenue is lost every year in the EU because of tax fraud and tax avoidance, representing a yearly cost of around EUR 2000 to every EU citizen;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that taxation policy still remains a national competence and that the different tax systems of the Member States have therefore to be respected; notes that
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) - having regard to its report on public finances in EMU - 2011 and 2012 (A7- 0425/2012),
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that taxation policy still remains a national competence and that the different tax systems of the Member States have therefore to be respected; notes that any change with regard to taxation policy, especially the transfer of competences from the national to the Union level, requires a change in the Treaty, which requires the unanimous agreement of all Member States; notes, however, that this does not exclude the effective coordination of tax arrangements and growth targets at European level;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that all EU legislation shall take duly into account when being drafted the existence not only of national tax regimes but regional too in some parts of Europe;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out, however, that a coordinated European floor rate for the taxation of profits, income and assets constitutes no impediment in this regard;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the optimal design of tax systems depend on numerous factors and differs therefore from country to country; therefore proper adjustment of tax policies in the short-, medium-, and long term is indispensable;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the optimal design of tax systems may depend on numerous factors and may differ
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the optimal design of tax systems depend on numerous factors and differs therefore from country to country, necessitating planning and policy coordination;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the improvements acquired in the field of the coordination of tax policies, but points out that EU many citizens and enterprises engaged in cross- border activities still face considerable costs and administrative burdens, while others exploit the differences of national tax systems to significantly reduce effective tax rates;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the improvements acquired in the field of the coordination of tax policies, but points out that EU citizens and enterprises engaged in cross-border activities still face considerable costs
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the improvements
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) - having regard to the OECD report on "Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting"1,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the improvements acquired in the field of the coordination of tax policies, but points out that EU citizens and enterprises engaged in cross-border activities still face considerable costs and
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the healthy competition between different tax systems that exists in the Single Market, as this competition boosts, accelerates and stimulates the European economies; functional institutions represented by a sound and fair legal and administrative framework are crucial in this respect;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the healthy competition between different tax systems that exists in the Single Market, its Member States and, in some particular cases, its regions, as this competition boosts, accelerates and stimulates the European economies;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Member States to improve substantially their tax collection capacity, thereby generating additional resources to promote growth and jobs as laid down in EU 2020;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that besides ensuring compliance with the sustainable fiscal policies, in order to achieve economic balance it is necessary to implement growth-conducive measures such as
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes th
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that besides ensuring compliance with the sustainable fiscal policies, in order to achieve economic balance it is necessary to implement growth-conducive measures such as viable tax reductions for both self- employed persons and small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs);
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 16 a (new) - having regard to the conclusions of the Council of 12 February 2013 on the Alert Mechanism Report 20131,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the Commission's "Action Plan to strengthen the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion", the recommendations on "measures intended to encourage third countries to apply minimum standards of good governance in tax matters" and the recommendations on "aggressive tax planning" adopted by the Commission on 6 December 2012; calls on the Member States to follow up on Commission's recommendations, take immediate and coordinated action against tax havens and aggressive tax planning and thus guarantee a fairer distribution of the fiscal effort and increased Member States' revenue;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Believes that excessive deficits at the regional level are sometimes related to the lack of relation in their budgets between tax revenue and tax expenditure. At the same time this hinders the creation of the necessary environment to build a self- sustaining growth model;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Commission and the Member States to cooperate further
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Commission and the Member States to cooperate further in order to ensure
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Whereas it is highly commendable for the EU and its Member States to actively fight tax fraud, tax evasion and aggressive tax planning to ensure due collection of tax from both companies and citizens;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Acknowledges that fiscal federalism gives incentives to those regions with legislative and budgetary powers to be responsible for part of their own resources and so can be a useful tool in order to fight against tax fraud;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Whereas Member States should share best practices and coordinate on anti- carousel fraud measures, for example in the mobile-phone and computer-hardware sectors;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Welcomes the Commission Action Plan to strengthen the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion and calls the Commission to put forward the proposals announced as soon as possible;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Emphasises that it is in the interest of enterprises and citizens to have a clear, predictable, stable and transparent tax environment within the Single Market, as a lack of transparency on tax rules is an obstacle to cross-border activities and investments in the EU; suggests that there should be more information for individuals and enterprises with respect to the taxation rules, requirements and regulations in every Member State;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Emphasises that it is in the interest of enterprises and citizens to have a clear, predictable, stable and transparent tax environment within the Single Market, as a lack of transparency on tax rules is an obstacle to cross-border activities and investments in the EU; the tax regime should lead to less distortion of the market signals to businesses and households;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 a (new) - having regard to the final Statement of the G20 Meeting of Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in Moscow, 15-16 February 20132,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Emphasises that it is in the interest of enterprises and citizens to have a clear, predictable, stable and transparent tax environment within the Single Market, as a lack of transparency on tax rules is an obstacle to cross-border activities and domestic and foreign investments in the EU;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Emphasises that a
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Emphasises that a reliable tax environment is an important prerequisite for investment, growth and job creation; recommends, therefore, that Member States proceed carefully when altering existing taxes and introducing new taxes, ensuring that th
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Emphasises that a reliable tax environment is an important prerequisite for investment, growth and job creation; recommends, therefore, that Member States proceed carefully when introducing new taxes, ensuring that they are growth- friendly and that the business sector has sufficient time and means to prepare itself before the new fiscal measures enter into force;·
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Underlines the importance of not creating tax structures that exacerbate social inequalities; stresses that large inequalities are not only unacceptable per se, but could also have detrimental consequences for economic growth;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Understands that in order to make the EU budget a useful instrument to enhance growth, own resources are necessary in order to have more autonomy for the Commission in its proposals. In this sense, the revenues coming from an FTT may be a good option;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Is concerned about the effects that the general shift in many Member States towards more extensively taxing consumption could have on social inequalities; stresses that since such taxes often have the strongest impact on low- income households, the troublesome result could be that these households are forced to take a larger share of the overall tax burden; calls on Member States to be attentive to this potential problem, to consider appropriate compensatory measures and to carefully study the negative implications of eroding the progressivity of the tax system as a whole;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Believes that VAT should not have a flat tax rate for all products. Those products that are considered of first need, and those related to culture, should be treated in a differentiated form;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 Identifying
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes that economic growth is basically generated by three factors: labour, capital and technological progress, and that taxation policy should be adjusted to these factors in the short, medium and long term; in light of the financial crisis adequate financial market development is vital; in this respect tax should not distort decisions on how to finance investment, including the choice between debt and equity;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the EU economies
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes that economic
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes that economic growth is basically generated by three factors: labour, capital and technological progress, and that taxation policy should be adjusted to these factors in the short, medium and long term; stresses therefore the importance of concerted decision-making to this aim;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes that economic growth is basically generated by three factors: labour, capital and technological progress, and that taxation policy should
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Underlines the importance of internalising environmental externalities for long term economic development. To this end, Council is asked to speed up the work on the revision of the energy taxation directive, and the Commission should come forward with a comprehensive assessment of existing internalisation gaps, followed by appropriate legislative proposals;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that taxation policy
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that taxation policy could operate in a new way based on a two-step model, designed with the aim of boosting the economy and creating new demands in the long term, whereby the first step would consist of
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Assumes that tax increases in certain domains such as tobacco products could have some positive effects by channelling additional resources to the public health sector, and thus be beneficial to the citizens and the real economy;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that reducing taxes on research and development
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that reducing taxes on research and development has benefits in the long term and this must be taken into account at European and national level;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Acknowledges that broadening already existing tax bases,
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Acknowledges that broadening already existing tax bases,
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recalls that tax cuts should be based on a solid and carefully planned fiscal policy, where the sustainability of public finances is in no way put in danger, and accompanied by measures aimed at increasing growth and employment;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recalls that tax
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recalls that tax cuts should be based on a solid and carefully planned fiscal policy, accompanied by measures aimed at increasing competitiveness, growth and employment;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that i
source: PE-505.997
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.212New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-504212_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE505.997New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-505997_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130521&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-05-21-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-154&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0154_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-206New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0206_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/7/11579New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0756:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0756:EN
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-03-06T00:00:00New
2013-03-11T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-05-21T00:00:00New
2013-04-24T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-03-11T00:00:00New
2013-04-30T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-04-24T00:00:00New
2013-05-21T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/5 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185210fb8127435bdbe8fNew
4f1ac4b7b819f2589600002d |
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de186690fb8127435bdc05bNew
4f1ad936b819f207b3000002 |
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de188f00fb8127435bdc3f6New
4f1adc0db819f207b30000fb |
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de1865d0fb8127435bdc04dNew
4f1ad22ab819f2759500000c |
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de188910fb8127435bdc375New
4f1adbacb819f207b30000d9 |
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de1856f0fb8127435bdbefcNew
4f1ac8e0b819f25efd0000fa |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
5.05 Sustainable economic growthNew
5.05 Economic growth |
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-05-22T00:00:00New
2013-02-05T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Committee draft report |
activities/6 |
|
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-02-05T00:00:00New
2013-05-21T00:00:00 |
activities/6/docs/0/title |
Old
PE504.212New
T7-0206/2013 |
activities/6/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.212New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-206 |
activities/6/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-154&language=EN
|
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
5.05 Sustainable development and growthNew
5.05 Sustainable economic growth |
activities/5 |
|
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/5/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/6 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to strengthen the Single Market by removing cross-border tax obstacles for passenger cars. BACKGROUND: each year, about 3 million used cars are transferred between Member States, of which up to 1 million are linked to people migrating from one Member State to another. The issues of double or multiple taxation and of potential tax discrimination in case of crossborder transfers of passenger cars are of concern to EU citizens and service providers. This can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU. In its 2010 EU Citizenship Report, the Commission announced that it would work on solutions to double registration taxes on cars as this can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU and in its Communication 'Removing cross-border tax obstacles for EU citizens' the Commission pointed out that, when buying a car in a Member State other than that of their normal residence or when transferring a car to a Member State other than that in which it is registered, EU citizens frequently face excessively complex re-registration procedures and may have to pay registration and/or circulation taxes twice. It should be noted that, currently, there is no harmonisation at EU level of car registration and circulation taxes. The Commission has taken initiatives and put forward legislative proposals to solve these problems on three occasions, in 1975, in 1998 and in 2005. The 1975 proposal resulted in the adoption of Directive 83/182/EEC, providing tax exemptions for the temporary introduction of a motor-driven road vehicle into a Member State from another Member State. Despite the jurisprudence of the Court and legislative actions, it has not been possible to overcome the fragmentation of national tax schemes or to fully and systematically remove double taxation and the potential tax discrimination of cars transferred by citizens from one Member State to another. CONTENT: this Communication aims at clarifying the EU rules on vehicle taxation, explaining rights and obligations of Member States, citizens and businesses. The Commission considers the abolition of registration taxes and integrating them (in a revenue neutral way) into the circulation taxes as well as the harmonisation and 'greening' of car taxation as the best solution to the remaining problems identified above. However, as the 2005 proposal has so far not been adopted, it is appropriate to explore immediate solutions to the problems identified in this Communication. Hence, the Commission has identified and proposes to the Member States to apply the following best practices in the short term: (1) Lack of information: to ensure that taxpayers know their rights and obligations when moving to another Member State, Member States should provide adequate information on their application of registration and circulation taxes on vehicles in cross-border situations, including information on how they have implemented the EU legal framework. To this end, a central contact point for taxpayers should be designated, to which a link can be provided on the website of the Commission. (2) Double taxation: to avoid double taxation and 'over-taxation' where citizens move a car permanently from one Member State to another, Member States that initially applied a registration tax should as a minimum grant a partial refund of the tax taking into account the depreciation of the car independently from whether or not the Member State of destination provides an exemption from registration tax, if any. (3) Temporary transfer of a passenger car and rental cars: Member States should make full use of the flexibility offered by Directive 83/182/EEC to apply more liberal arrangements allowing for the temporary use of vehicles in Member States without application of registration and circulation tax. This relates, in particular, to rental cars registered in another Member State, but also to other situations of temporary or occasional use by a resident of a car registered in another Member State. (4) Fragmentation of the EU car market: Member States should take action to reduce the fragmentation of the EU car market caused by the divergent application by Member States of car registration and circulation taxes. The upcoming Guidelines on financial incentives for clean and energy-efficient vehicles also need to be taken into account. After having received the opinion of the institutions to which this Communication is addressed, the Commission intends to set up a technical Working Group to discuss the issues above with Member States. As a result of this process, the discussions in the Council on the 2005 proposal could gain a new momentum. Revision of Directive 83/182/EEC could also be envisaged in order to take account of the extensive jurisprudence of the Court and to enhance transparency and legal certainty. New
PURPOSE: to strengthen the Single Market by removing cross-border tax obstacles for passenger cars. BACKGROUND: each year, about 3 million used cars are transferred between Member States, of which up to 1 million are linked to people migrating from one Member State to another. The issues of double or multiple taxation and of potential tax discrimination in case of crossborder transfers of passenger cars are of concern to EU citizens and service providers. This can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU. In its 2010 EU Citizenship Report, the Commission announced that it would work on solutions to double registration taxes on cars as this can be an obstacle to EU citizens' right to move freely in the EU and in its Communication 'Removing cross-border tax obstacles for EU citizens' the Commission pointed out that, when buying a car in a Member State other than that of their normal residence or when transferring a car to a Member State other than that in which it is registered, EU citizens frequently face excessively complex re-registration procedures and may have to pay registration and/or circulation taxes twice. It should be noted that, currently, there is no harmonisation at EU level of car registration and circulation taxes. The Commission has taken initiatives and put forward legislative proposals to solve these problems on three occasions, in 1975, in 1998 and in 2005. The 1975 proposal resulted in the adoption of Directive 83/182/EEC, providing tax exemptions for the temporary introduction of a motor-driven road vehicle into a Member State from another Member State. Despite the jurisprudence of the Court and legislative actions, it has not been possible to overcome the fragmentation of national tax schemes or to fully and systematically remove double taxation and the potential tax discrimination of cars transferred by citizens from one Member State to another. CONTENT: this Communication aims at clarifying the EU rules on vehicle taxation, explaining rights and obligations of Member States, citizens and businesses. The Commission considers the abolition of registration taxes and integrating them (in a revenue neutral way) into the circulation taxes as well as the harmonisation and 'greening' of car taxation as the best solution to the remaining problems identified above. However, as the 2005 proposal has so far not been adopted, it is appropriate to explore immediate solutions to the problems identified in this Communication. Hence, the Commission has identified and proposes to the Member States to apply the following best practices in the short term: (1) Lack of information: to ensure that taxpayers know their rights and obligations when moving to another Member State, Member States should provide adequate information on their application of registration and circulation taxes on vehicles in cross-border situations, including information on how they have implemented the EU legal framework. To this end, a central contact point for taxpayers should be designated, to which a link can be provided on the website of the Commission. (2) Double taxation: to avoid double taxation and 'over-taxation' where citizens move a car permanently from one Member State to another, Member States that initially applied a registration tax should as a minimum grant a partial refund of the tax taking into account the depreciation of the car independently from whether or not the Member State of destination provides an exemption from registration tax, if any. (3) Temporary transfer of a passenger car and rental cars: Member States should make full use of the flexibility offered by Directive 83/182/EEC to apply more liberal arrangements allowing for the temporary use of vehicles in Member States without application of registration and circulation tax. This relates, in particular, to rental cars registered in another Member State, but also to other situations of temporary or occasional use by a resident of a car registered in another Member State. (4) Fragmentation of the EU car market: Member States should take action to reduce the fragmentation of the EU car market caused by the divergent application by Member States of car registration and circulation taxes. The upcoming Guidelines on financial incentives for clean and energy-efficient vehicles also need to be taken into account. After having received the opinion of the institutions to which this Communication is addressed, the Commission intends to set up a technical Working Group to discuss the issues above with Member States. As a result of this process, the discussions in the Council on the 2005 proposal could gain a new momentum. Revision of Directive 83/182/EEC could also be envisaged in order to take account of the extensive jurisprudence of the Court and to enhance transparency and legal certainty. |
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-05-20T00:00:00New
2013-05-21T00:00:00 |
activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner |
Old
REHN OlliNew
ŠEMETA Algirdas |
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title |
Old
Economic and Financial AffairsNew
Taxation and Customs Union |
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htmNew
http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
other/0/commissioner |
Old
REHN OlliNew
ŠEMETA Algirdas |
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Economic and Financial AffairsNew
Taxation and Customs Union |
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htmNew
http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|