BETA


2013/2204(DEC) 2012 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT SONIK Bogusław (icon: PPE PPE) LIBERADZKI Bogusław (icon: S&D S&D), MULDER Jan (icon: ALDE ALDE), STAES Bart (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ANDREASEN Marta (icon: ECR ECR), VANHECKE Frank (icon: EFD EFD), EHRENHAUSER Martin (icon: NA NA)
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion LIBE MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2014/09/05
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor for the financial year 2012.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/558/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union’s General Budget, section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor, for the financial year 2012.

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2012.

The decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 3 April 2014 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 3 April 2014).

Amongst the main observations made, Parliament invited the Supervisor to continue to monitor the allowances management and improve its performance levels .

2014/04/03
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2014/04/03
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a decision concerning the discharge to be granted to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) in respect of the implementation of budget for the financial year 2012.

In its resolution accompanying the decision, adopted by 521 votes to 66, with 8 abstentions, Parliament noted the conclusion of the Court of Auditors that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2012 for administrative and other expenditure were free from material error. It also observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect to the audited topics related to the human resources and procurement for the Supervisor.

Budgetary and financial management : Parliament noted that in 2012, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7.624 million in commitment appropriations, and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.69%, an increase since 2011). It found this a positive development but called for further efforts to improve the implementation rate and for the changes made to be monitored.

EDPS’s framework action : Parliament also made a series of observations on the daily management of the EDPS and called for:

· further improvements regarding the monitoring of allowances and performance levels;

an assessment of the financial impact of structural changes made recently and the implementation of electronic system of case management; continued implementation of the recommendations made by the Internal Audit Service (IAS) of the Commission; the inclusion of an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex and the strengthening of cooperation with other institutions to develop a unified methodology of presenting the translation costs.

Parliament generally considered that the Supervisor should pay particular attention to sound financial management , namely the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which it has used its appropriations in carrying out its responsibilities.

Documents
2014/04/03
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2014/04/02
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2014/03/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Bogusław SONIK (EPP, PL) in which it called on the European Parliament to grant discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) in respect of the implementation of the European Data Protection Supervisor's budget for the financial year 2012.

Members welcomed the fact that on the basis of its audit work, the Court of Auditors concluded that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2012 for administrative and other expenditure of the institutions and bodies were free from material error. They observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect of the audited topics related to human resources and procurement for the EDPS.

Budgetary and financial management : Members noted that in 2012, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7.624 million in commitment appropriations, and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.69%, an increase since 2011). They found this a positive development but called for further efforts to improve the implementation rate and for the changes made to be monitored.

EDPS’s framework action : Members also made a series of observations on the daily management of the EDPS and called for:

further improvements regarding the monitoring of allowances and performance levels;

an assessment of the financial impact of structural changes made ​​recently and the implementation of electronic system of case management; continued implementation of the recommendations made by the Internal Audit Service (IAS) of the Commission; the inclusion of an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex and nationality in the next annual activity report; the strengthening of cooperation with other institutions to develop a unified methodology of presenting the translation costs.

Documents
2014/03/18
   EP - Vote in committee
2014/02/28
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2014/02/24
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2014/02/17
   CSL - Document attached to the procedure
Details

In view of the observations made in the Court of Auditor's report, the Council called on the European Parliament to grant discharge to all of the Union’s institutions in regard to the implementation of their respective budgets for the financial year 2012 .

Overall, the Council’s remarks were positive in regard to the expenditure of the institutions since it noted that, again in 2012, the administrative expenditure of EU institutions and bodies remained free from material error with an estimated error rate of 0%, and that their supervisory and control systems continued to comply with the requirements of the Financial Regulation.

The Council welcomed the fact that, according to the Court's assessment, no serious errors were detected with regard to the effectiveness of the supervisory and control systems, in the individual institutions, except for a limited number of errors in the procurement procedures and the management of social allowances .

It welcomed the measures already taken and encouraged the institutions concerned to address the remaining weaknesses identified by the Court.

Documents
2014/01/27
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/11/04
   EP - MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2013/10/22
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/09/25
   EP - SONIK Bogusław (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2013/09/05
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

PURPOSE: presentation of the Report of the Court of Auditors on the 2012 budget (Analysis of the accounts of the European Data Protection Supervisor - EDPS).

CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 36th Annual Report on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2012 financial year.

In accordance with the tasks and objectives conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it provides under the discharge procedure, for both the European Parliament and Council, a statement of assurance (“DAS”) about the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions of each institution, body or agency of the EU, based on an independent external audit.

The audit also focused on the budget implementation of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS).

On the basis of its audit work, the Court considers that payments for “Administrative and other expenditure” policy are, overall, significantly error-free .

Although the Court has observed some errors and weaknesses, the examined supervisory and control systems are likely to reduce the rate of error present in initial payment requests to an acceptable level. These systems are therefore assessed as effective.

The main risks regarding administrative and other expenditure are:

the non-compliance with the procedures for procurement; the implementation of contracts; recruitment issues; the calculation of salaries and allowances.

Overall audit evidence indicates that accepted expenditure is not affected by a material level of error.

The Court also made a number of comments specific to each institution or body of the European Union. In the case of the EDPS’s audit, the Court did not identify any significant weakness .

2013/07/26
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
2013/07/25
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published

Documents

Votes

A7-0228/2014 - Bogusław Sonik - Résolution #

2014/04/03 Outcome: +: 521, -: 66, 0: 8
DE FR IT ES RO SE PL PT HU BE NL BG SK AT EL IE HR LT LV FI LU SI EE DK CY MT CZ GB
Total
79
57
54
46
21
18
42
18
17
18
23
15
13
16
10
8
10
9
8
7
6
6
5
9
3
3
18
56
icon: PPE PPE
209

Belgium PPE

3

Ireland PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
153

Netherlands S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Finland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Italy ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
51

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFD EFD
22

Poland EFD

2

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Bulgaria EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
25

France NI

2

Italy NI

2

Spain NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

5
icon: ECR ECR
45

Italy ECR

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
7 2013/2204(DEC)
2014/02/28 CONT 7 amendments...
source: PE-529.745

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2013-07-26T00:00:00
docs
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
events/0
date
2013-07-25T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
events/0
date
2013-07-26T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2014-04-02-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.734
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-521734_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE524.745&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-524745_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE529.745
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-529745_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2014-03-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0228_EN.html title: A7-0228/2014
summary
events/3
date
2014-03-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0228_EN.html title: A7-0228/2014
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0298_EN.html title: T7-0298/2014
summary
events/6
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0298_EN.html title: T7-0298/2014
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: SONIK Bogusław date: 2013-09-25T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SONIK Bogusław group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique date: 2013-11-04T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2013-11-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/2/type
Old
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
New
Document attached to the procedure
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0228&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0228_EN.html
events/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0298 title: T7-0298/2014
summary
events/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24464&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/6
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0298 title: T7-0298/2014
summary
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0298
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0298_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-07-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570 title: COM(2013)0570 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52013DC0570:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2013-10-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: LIBERADZKI Bogusław group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: SONIK Bogusław body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2013-11-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique
  • date: 2014-03-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: LIBERADZKI Bogusław group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: SONIK Bogusław body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2013-11-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique
  • date: 2014-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0228&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0228/2014 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2014-04-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-04-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0298 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0298/2014 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2014-09-05T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SONIK Bogusław group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: PPE name: SONIK Bogusław
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2013-11-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2013-11-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique
docs
  • date: 2013-09-05T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2013:331:TOC title: OJ C 331 14.11.2013, p. 0001 title: N7-0049/2014 summary: PURPOSE: presentation of the Report of the Court of Auditors on the 2012 budget (Analysis of the accounts of the European Data Protection Supervisor - EDPS). CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 36th Annual Report on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2012 financial year. In accordance with the tasks and objectives conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it provides under the discharge procedure, for both the European Parliament and Council, a statement of assurance (“DAS”) about the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions of each institution, body or agency of the EU, based on an independent external audit. The audit also focused on the budget implementation of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS). On the basis of its audit work, the Court considers that payments for “Administrative and other expenditure” policy are, overall, significantly error-free . Although the Court has observed some errors and weaknesses, the examined supervisory and control systems are likely to reduce the rate of error present in initial payment requests to an acceptable level. These systems are therefore assessed as effective. The main risks regarding administrative and other expenditure are: the non-compliance with the procedures for procurement; the implementation of contracts; recruitment issues; the calculation of salaries and allowances. Overall audit evidence indicates that accepted expenditure is not affected by a material level of error. The Court also made a number of comments specific to each institution or body of the European Union. In the case of the EDPS’s audit, the Court did not identify any significant weakness . type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report body: CofA
  • date: 2014-01-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.734 title: PE521.734 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2014-02-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=5848%2F14&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 05848/2014 summary: In view of the observations made in the Court of Auditor's report, the Council called on the European Parliament to grant discharge to all of the Union’s institutions in regard to the implementation of their respective budgets for the financial year 2012 . Overall, the Council’s remarks were positive in regard to the expenditure of the institutions since it noted that, again in 2012, the administrative expenditure of EU institutions and bodies remained free from material error with an estimated error rate of 0%, and that their supervisory and control systems continued to comply with the requirements of the Financial Regulation. The Council welcomed the fact that, according to the Court's assessment, no serious errors were detected with regard to the effectiveness of the supervisory and control systems, in the individual institutions, except for a limited number of errors in the procurement procedures and the management of social allowances . It welcomed the measures already taken and encouraged the institutions concerned to address the remaining weaknesses identified by the Court. type: Supplementary non-legislative basic document body: CSL
  • date: 2014-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE524.745&secondRef=02 title: PE524.745 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2014-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE529.745 title: PE529.745 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2013-07-26T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2013)0570 summary: PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012, as part of the 2012 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor . Legal reminder : the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129(2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of the Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements. The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflow of a body that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information that is useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it. 1) Purpose : the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2012 . It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions. The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management. Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues: accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...); consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies); the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments); the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ); the means of recovery following irregularities detected; the modus operandi of the accounting system; the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge. To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year . The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings. Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements. 2) Implementation of appropriations under Section IX of the budget for the financial year 2012 : the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the EDPS’s expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Budget and Financial Management Report for the 2012 financial year ): available appropriations: EUR 7.624 million; commitments: EUR 7.258 million (rate of implementation: 95.21%); payments: EUR 6.959 million (rate of implementation 81.28%). 3) Budgetary implementation – conclusions : in more general and political terms, the EDPS’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2012 was chiefly marked by the following activities: consolidation of administrative cooperation (follow-up of the technical set-up of the EDPS, cooperation with various European Commission and Parliament DGs, extended cooperation agreement for the third time for a period of two years from January 2012); conclusion of new cooperation agreements with the Commission’s Human Resources and Informatics DGs, as well as with the European Institute of Administration; continuation of other international agreements with the European Parliament and other institutions for the everyday management of the EDPS, with a view to reducing costs; impact of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty: expanded tasks in relation to the Stockholm programme and a resulting increase in staff (2 AD in 2012).
  • date: 2013-10-22T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2014-03-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2014-03-21T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0228&language=EN title: A7-0228/2014 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Bogusław SONIK (EPP, PL) in which it called on the European Parliament to grant discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) in respect of the implementation of the European Data Protection Supervisor's budget for the financial year 2012. Members welcomed the fact that on the basis of its audit work, the Court of Auditors concluded that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2012 for administrative and other expenditure of the institutions and bodies were free from material error. They observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect of the audited topics related to human resources and procurement for the EDPS. Budgetary and financial management : Members noted that in 2012, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7.624 million in commitment appropriations, and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.69%, an increase since 2011). They found this a positive development but called for further efforts to improve the implementation rate and for the changes made to be monitored. EDPS’s framework action : Members also made a series of observations on the daily management of the EDPS and called for: further improvements regarding the monitoring of allowances and performance levels; an assessment of the financial impact of structural changes made ​​recently and the implementation of electronic system of case management; continued implementation of the recommendations made by the Internal Audit Service (IAS) of the Commission; the inclusion of an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex and nationality in the next annual activity report; the strengthening of cooperation with other institutions to develop a unified methodology of presenting the translation costs.
  • date: 2014-04-02T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-04-03T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0298 title: T7-0298/2014 summary: The European Parliament adopted a decision concerning the discharge to be granted to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) in respect of the implementation of budget for the financial year 2012. In its resolution accompanying the decision, adopted by 521 votes to 66, with 8 abstentions, Parliament noted the conclusion of the Court of Auditors that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2012 for administrative and other expenditure were free from material error. It also observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect to the audited topics related to the human resources and procurement for the Supervisor. Budgetary and financial management : Parliament noted that in 2012, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7.624 million in commitment appropriations, and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.69%, an increase since 2011). It found this a positive development but called for further efforts to improve the implementation rate and for the changes made to be monitored. EDPS’s framework action : Parliament also made a series of observations on the daily management of the EDPS and called for: · further improvements regarding the monitoring of allowances and performance levels; an assessment of the financial impact of structural changes made recently and the implementation of electronic system of case management; continued implementation of the recommendations made by the Internal Audit Service (IAS) of the Commission; the inclusion of an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex and the strengthening of cooperation with other institutions to develop a unified methodology of presenting the translation costs. Parliament generally considered that the Supervisor should pay particular attention to sound financial management , namely the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which it has used its appropriations in carrying out its responsibilities.
  • date: 2014-04-03T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2014-09-05T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor for the financial year 2012. NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/558/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union’s General Budget, section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor, for the financial year 2012. CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2012. The decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 3 April 2014 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 3 April 2014). Amongst the main observations made, Parliament invited the Supervisor to continue to monitor the allowances management and improve its performance levels .
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/7/14036
New
  • CONT/7/14036
procedure/final/title
Old
OJ L 266 05.09.2014, p. 0142
New
OJ L 266 05.09.2014, p. 0142
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:266:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:266:TOC
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.02 2012 discharge
New
8.70.03.07
Previous discharges
procedure/title
Old
2012 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor
New
2012 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/6
date
2014-09-05T00:00:00
text

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor for the financial year 2012.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2014/558/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union’s General Budget, section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor, for the financial year 2012.

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2012.

The decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 3 April 2014 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 3 April 2014).

Amongst the main observations made, Parliament invited the Supervisor to continue to monitor the allowances management and improve its performance levels.

type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/final
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:266:TOC
title
OJ L 266 05.09.2014, p. 0142
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de1888b0fb8127435bdc36b
New
4f1adb88b819f207b30000cc
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de186430fb8127435bdc023
New
4f1ad25ab819f2759500001d
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de186b20fb8127435bdc0c1
New
4f1ac452b819f25896000005
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de188650fb8127435bdc331
New
4f1adb8fb819f207b30000cf
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/mepref
Old
4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4b
New
4f1ac5e7b819f25efd00000a
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
4de189170fb8127435bdc41f
New
4f1adc48b819f207b300010e
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/5/mepref
Old
4de1847f0fb8127435bdbd9f
New
4f1ac7b8b819f25efd0000a5
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de1888b0fb8127435bdc36b
New
4f1adb88b819f207b30000cc
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de186430fb8127435bdc023
New
4f1ad25ab819f2759500001d
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de186b20fb8127435bdc0c1
New
4f1ac452b819f25896000005
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de188650fb8127435bdc331
New
4f1adb8fb819f207b30000cf
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/mepref
Old
4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4b
New
4f1ac5e7b819f25efd00000a
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
4de189170fb8127435bdc41f
New
4f1adc48b819f207b300010e
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/5/mepref
Old
4de1847f0fb8127435bdbd9f
New
4f1ac7b8b819f25efd0000a5
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de1888b0fb8127435bdc36b
New
4f1adb88b819f207b30000cc
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de186430fb8127435bdc023
New
4f1ad25ab819f2759500001d
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de186b20fb8127435bdc0c1
New
4f1ac452b819f25896000005
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de188650fb8127435bdc331
New
4f1adb8fb819f207b30000cf
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref
Old
4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4b
New
4f1ac5e7b819f25efd00000a
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
4de189170fb8127435bdc41f
New
4f1adc48b819f207b300010e
committees/0/shadows/5/mepref
Old
4de1847f0fb8127435bdbd9f
New
4f1ac7b8b819f25efd0000a5
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
S&D
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
ALDE
New
ALDE
committees/0/shadows/2/group
Old
Verts/ALE
New
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/4/group
Old
EFD
New
EFD
activities/1/committees/0/date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: SONIK Bogusław
activities/1/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: LIBERADZKI Bogusław
  • group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/1/committees/2/date
2013-11-04T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique
activities/2/committees/0/date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: SONIK Bogusław
activities/2/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: LIBERADZKI Bogusław
  • group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/2/committees/2/date
2013-11-04T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique
committees/0/date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: SONIK Bogusław
committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: LIBERADZKI Bogusław
  • group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
committees/2/date
2013-11-04T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: PPE name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/1/committees/0/date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: SONIK Bogusław
activities/1/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: LIBERADZKI Bogusław
  • group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/1/committees/2/date
2013-11-04T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique
activities/2/committees/0/date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: SONIK Bogusław
activities/2/committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: LIBERADZKI Bogusław
  • group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/2/committees/2/date
2013-11-04T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique
committees/0/date
2013-09-25T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: SONIK Bogusław
committees/0/shadows
  • group: S&D name: LIBERADZKI Bogusław
  • group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: ECR name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
  • group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
committees/2/date
2013-11-04T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament adopted a decision concerning the discharge to be granted to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) in respect of the implementation of budget for the financial year 2012.

    In its resolution accompanying the decision, adopted by 521 votes to 66, with 8 abstentions, Parliament noted the conclusion of the Court of Auditors that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2012 for administrative and other expenditure were free from material error. It also observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect to the audited topics related to the human resources and procurement for the Supervisor.

    Budgetary and financial management: Parliament noted that in 2012, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7.624 million in commitment appropriations, and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.69%, an increase since 2011). It found this a positive development but called for further efforts to improve the implementation rate and for the changes made to be monitored.

    EDPS’s framework action: Parliament also made a series of observations on the daily management of the EDPS and called for:

    ·        further improvements regarding the monitoring of allowances and performance levels;

    • an assessment of the financial impact of structural changes made recently and the implementation of electronic system of case management;
    • continued implementation of the recommendations made by the Internal Audit Service (IAS) of the Commission;
    • the inclusion of an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex and
    • the strengthening of cooperation with other institutions to develop a unified methodology of presenting the translation costs.

    Parliament generally considered that the Supervisor should pay particular attention to sound financial management, namely the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which it has used its appropriations in carrying out its responsibilities.

activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0298
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140402&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
docs
type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0298/2014
body
EP
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
activities/5
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
activities/4/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/5/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Vote scheduled
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Bogusław SONIK (EPP, PL) in which it called on the European Parliament to grant discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) in respect of the implementation of the European Data Protection Supervisor's budget for the financial year 2012.

    Members welcomed the fact that on the basis of its audit work, the Court of Auditors concluded that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2012 for administrative and other expenditure of the institutions and bodies were free from material error. They observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect of the audited topics related to human resources and procurement for the EDPS.

    Budgetary and financial management: Members noted that in 2012, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7.624 million in commitment appropriations, and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.69%, an increase since 2011). They found this a positive development but called for further efforts to improve the implementation rate and for the changes made to be monitored.

    EDPS’s framework action: Members also made a series of observations on the daily management of the EDPS and called for:

    further improvements regarding the monitoring of allowances and performance levels;

    • an assessment of the financial impact of structural changes made ​​recently and the implementation of electronic system of case management;
    • continued implementation of the recommendations made by the Internal Audit Service (IAS) of the Commission;
    • the inclusion of an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex and nationality in the next annual activity report;
    • the strengthening of cooperation with other institutions to develop a unified methodology of presenting the translation costs.
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
New
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0228&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0228/2014
activities/3
date
2014-03-21T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2014-03-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/2/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/3
date
2014-04-03T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
MULDER Jan
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3
group
ECR
name
ANDREASEN Marta
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
MULDER Jan
committees/0/shadows/3
group
ECR
name
ANDREASEN Marta
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0570:EN
activities/0/type
Old
Non-legislative basic document
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/1
date
2013-10-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/7/14036
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2012, as part of the 2012 discharge procedure.

    Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor.

    Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129(2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of the Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements.

    The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflow of a body that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information that is useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it.

    1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2012. It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions.

    The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

    Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

    • accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...);
    • consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies);
    • the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments);
    • the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ);
    • the means of recovery following irregularities detected;
    • the modus operandi of the accounting system;
    • the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

    To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence.

    The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings.

    Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

    2) Implementation of appropriations under Section IX of the budget for the financial year 2012: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the EDPS’s expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Budget and Financial Management Report for the 2012 financial year):

    • available appropriations: EUR 7.624 million;
    • commitments: EUR 7.258 million (rate of implementation: 95.21%);
    • payments: EUR 6.959 million (rate of implementation 81.28%).

    3) Budgetary implementation – conclusions: in more general and political terms, the EDPS’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2012 was chiefly marked by the following activities:

    • consolidation of administrative cooperation (follow-up of the technical set-up of the EDPS, cooperation with various European Commission and Parliament DGs, extended cooperation agreement for the third time for a period of two years from January 2012);
    • conclusion of new cooperation agreements with the Commission’s Human Resources and Informatics DGs, as well as with the European Institute of Administration; continuation of other international agreements with the European Parliament and other institutions for the everyday management of the EDPS, with a view to reducing costs;
    • impact of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty: expanded tasks in relation to the Stockholm programme and a resulting increase in staff (2 AD in 2012).
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013DC0570:EN
activities/0/docs/0/url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=570
activities
  • date: 2013-07-26T00:00:00 docs: celexid: CELEX:52013DC0570:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2013)0570 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Non-legislative basic document
  • date: 2014-04-02T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: LIBERADZKI Bogusław group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: VANHECKE Frank group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: EPP name: SONIK Bogusław
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2013-11-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: MATHIEU HOUILLON Véronique
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
subject
8.70.03.02 2012 discharge
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
reference
2013/2204(DEC)
title
2012 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor