BETA


2014/2214(INI) EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI JAKOVČIĆ Ivan (icon: ALDE ALDE) BOGOVIČ Franc (icon: PPE PPE), GIUFFRIDA Michela (icon: S&D S&D), TOMAŠIĆ Ruža (icon: ECR ECR), ŠKRLEC Davor (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), D'AMATO Rosa (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion AFET ŠUICA Dubravka (icon: PPE PPE) Jozo RADOŠ (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ENVI AFFRONTE Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD) Ian DUNCAN (icon: ECR ECR), Eleonora FORENZA (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Gesine MEISSNER (icon: ALDE ALDE), Massimo PAOLUCCI (icon: S&D S&D), Davor ŠKRLEC (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion PECH NICOLAI Norica (icon: ALDE ALDE) Marco AFFRONTE (icon: EFDD EFDD), Renata BRIANO (icon: S&D S&D), Werner KUHN (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/03/15
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2015/10/28
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/10/28
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 560 votes to 60 with 39 abstentions, a resolution on an EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region (EUSAIR).

Members welcomed the Commission communication concerning the European Union Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region and the accompanying action plan. This strategy had been created to add value to interventions, whether by the EU, national or regional authorities or private sectors, in a way that significantly strengthened the functioning of the macro-region.

Parliament highlighted the strategy’s prospects for candidate and potential candidate countries in the region and underlined the importance of the strategy being based on the principles of integration, coordination, cooperation and partnership, whilst reiterating the importance of the “three NOs” principle of no new legislation, no new institutions, no new funding. It welcomed the European Parliament’s representation in the governing bodies of the EUSAIR.

The resolution encouraged all national, regional and local stakeholders to take full ownership of the implementation of the projects covered by this macro-regional strategy. It stressed the need for:

a place-based approach as regards the cooperation activities; the inclusion of the local and regional authorities in the political managing bodies and in the operational, technical and implementing bodies of the strategy; a transparent process for adoption, monitoring and evaluation of the strategy, as well as of openness and inclusiveness towards civil society and all relevant stakeholders.

Pointing out that there were no specific funds assigned just for the implementation of macro-regional strategies, Members called on the countries in the region to bundle funds (ESI Funds, IPA, EFSI) as well as contributions from national sources under the EIB as a financial and investment platform for supporting the financing of projects contributing to the fulfilment of the goals of the strategy.

Parliament made a series of recommendations which focused on the following:

(1) Blue growth : the region’s unique geographical position and specific coastline structure, together with its rich marine biodiversity, hold immense potential for the creation of ‘blue’ jobs , blue technologies, fisheries and aquaculture , and better maritime and marine governance and services.

Members advocated, inter alia :

the creation of new jobs and economic development, and especially jobs for women and young people in coastal and island countries; a policy to coordinate and harmonise the strategy’s goals, as well as common projects, in line with the values, principles and objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy ; promoting the various sectors of blue growth in their training programmes ; clustering and cooperation between public and private enterprises, universities, research institutes and other relevant stakeholders in the marine and maritime sectors; stronger cooperation in marine and maritime research among researchers, and among Member States and regions involved in the EUSAIR strategy, the creation of a joint quality label for high-quality seafood products from the region in order to increase their competitiveness; the protection and preservation of fish stocks and marine ecosystems, to be a paramount objective of the strategy; support for shipbuilding, including the leisure boat sector, focusing on its modernisation and specialisation in order to create jobs strong support for manufacturing areas, twinning and cooperation between areas in different parts of the macro-region; the involvement of fisheries and fishery workers in projects such as those relating to cultural and heritage tourism.

(2) Connecting the region : better transport and energy connections among the participating countries as well as between them and their other neighbours are compelling needs. Parliament also stressed the importance of:

establishing sustainable transport links which reduce journey times, transport and logistic costs and externalities as well as major strategic works related to the interchange between sea and land; underlining the importance of connecting maritime transport routes and ports with other parts of Europe; Parliament called on the participating countries to focus their efforts on implementing projects that are covered by the current TEN-T network and other interventions for its proposed extension to South-Eastern Europe/the Eastern Adriatic coast; optimizing the capacity of the existing infrastructure network, improving their maritime, rail and air transport infrastructure, to develop motorways of the sea in the macro-region, developing a high-speed railway infrastructure that will interconnect the macro-region; implementing major projects to develop intermodal links on the islands; developing capable of reducing the carbon footprint, increasing energy efficiency and guaranteeing the energy security of the macro-region and energy infrastructure beyond. ensure joint planning and investment in energy infrastructure for both the production and transport of electricity and gas in the macro-region.

(3) Environmental quality : recalling that the Adriatic Sea is home to nearly half (49%) of all recorded Mediterranean marine species, Members called for joint efforts in taking all possible measures, such as the use of clean fuels for maritime transport and logistics, in order to preserve the biodiversity of the marine environment.

Parliament pointed out the need to tackle responsibly historical and trans-border pollution and to clean up the sites affected by the industrial contamination of soil, water and air, and, where applicable, by pollution resulting from military conflicts. It called for the establishment of a regional centre for disaster preparedness together with a joint contingency plan for oil spills and large-scale pollution events, in order to create an early warning system to prevent natural disasters and those caused by industrial, transport and other activities.

(4) Sustainable and competitive tourism : Parliament underlined the crucial importance of tourism for the European economy and the need to develop new approaches to help offset seasonality. It urged more support for the financing of tourism projects from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). It recommended:

the urgent improvement of cross-border road connections in order to enhance the competitiveness of tourism; the promotion of sustainable and more balanced tourist flows in various locations; encouraging Member States to promote sustainable mobility solutions in the tourism sector, thus improving the quality of tourist services and enhancing its range;

the development of a diversified tourism offer including thematic tourist parks and routes, and cultural, rural, health, medical, nautical, eno-gastronomic, conference and sport tourism, including cycling, golf, diving, hiking, skiing, mountaineering and outdoor sports, in order to promote tourism throughout the year.

Documents
2015/10/28
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/10/27
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/10/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Regional Development adopted the report by Ivan JAKOVČIĆ (ADLE, HR) on an EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region.

The report welcomed the Commission communication concerning the European Union Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region and the accompanying action plan. It underlined the importance of the strategy being based on the principles of integration, coordination, cooperation and partnership , whilst reiterating the importance of the “three NOs” principle of no new legislation, no new institutions, no new funding.

The EU Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR) is part of the EU regional policy. It is a tool for promoting economic and social cohesion, with the principal objectives of reducing disparities between regions, promoting real convergence and encouraging growth and employment.

Members encouraged all national, regional and local stakeholders to take full ownership of the implementation of the projects covered by this macro-regional strategy. They stressed the need for: (i) a place-based approach as regards the cooperation activities; (ii) the inclusion of the local and regional authorities in the political managing bodies and in the operational, technical and implementing bodies of the strategy; (iii) a transparent process for adoption, monitoring and evaluation of the strategy, as well as of openness and inclusiveness towards civil society and all relevant stakeholders.

The report made a series of recommendations which focused on the following:

(1) Blue growth : the report stressed that the region’s unique geographical position and specific coastline structure, together with its rich marine biodiversity, hold immense potential for the creation of ‘blue’ jobs and for innovative and sustainable economic development and growth, including blue technologies, fisheries and aquaculture , and better maritime and marine governance and services.

Members advocated, inter alia :

the creation of new jobs and economic development, and especially jobs for women and young people in coastal and island countries; a policy to coordinate and harmonise the strategy’s goals, as well as common projects, in line with the values, principles and objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy ; promoting the various sectors of blue growth in their training programmes; clustering and cooperation between public and private enterprises, universities, research institutes and other relevant stakeholders in the marine and maritime sectors; the creation of a joint quality label for high-quality seafood products from the region in order to increase their competitiveness; the protection and preservation of fish stocks and marine ecosystems , to be a paramount objective of the strategy; support for shipbuilding , including the leisure boat sector; the involvement of fisheries and fishery workers in projects such as those relating to cultural and heritage tourism.

(2) Connecting the region : the report noted that better transport and energy connections among the participating countries as well as between them and their other neighbours. It also stressed the importance of:

establishing sustainable transport links which reduce journey times, transport and logistic costs and externalities as well as major strategic works related to the interchange between sea and land; underlining the importance of connecting maritime transport routes and ports with other parts of Europe; identifying priority infrastructure projects of regional and European added value; developing a high-speed railway infrastructure that will interconnect the macro-region; implementating major projects to develop intermodal links on the islands; developing energy infrastructure capable of reducing the carbon footprint, increasing energy efficiency and guaranteeing the energy security of the macro-region and beyond.

(3) Environmental quality : recalling that the Adriatic Sea is home to nearly half (49%) of all recorded Mediterranean marine species, Members called for joint efforts in taking all possible measures, such as the use of clean fuels for maritime transport and logistics, in order to preserve the biodiversity of the marine environment.

The report pointed out the need to tackle responsibly historical and trans-border pollution and to clean up the sites affected by the industrial contamination of soil, water and air, and, where applicable, by pollution resulting from military conflicts. It called for the establishment of a regional centre for disaster preparedness together with a joint contingency plan for oil spills and large-scale pollution events, in order to create an early warning system to prevent natural disasters and those caused by industrial, transport and other activities.

(4) Sustainable and competitive tourism : the report underlined the crucial importance of tourism for the European economy and urged more support for the financing of tourism projects from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). It recommended:

the urgent improvement of cross-border road connections in order to enhance the competitiveness of tourism; the promotion of sustainable and more balanced tourist flows in various locations; encouraging Member States to promote sustainable mobility solutions in the tourism sector, thus improving the quality of tourist services and enhancing its range; the development of a diversified tourism offer including thematic tourist parks and routes, and cultural, rural, health, medical, nautical, eno-gastronomic, conference and sport tourism, including cycling, golf, diving, hiking, skiing, mountaineering and outdoor sports, in order to promote tourism throughout the year.

Documents
2015/09/17
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/08/03
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/07/16
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/07/08
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/06/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/05/29
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2014/12/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/12/16
   EP - NICOLAI Norica (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in PECH
2014/11/21
   EP - AFFRONTE Marco (EFDD) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2014/11/04
   EP - ŠUICA Dubravka (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2014/09/22
   EP - JAKOVČIĆ Ivan (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2014/06/17
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to propose a European Strategy for the Adriatic region and Ionian sea.

BACKGROUND: home to more than 70 million people, the Adriatic region plays a key role in strengthening geographical continuity in Europe. It contains a total of 8 countries, these being Italy, Greece, Slovenia, Croatia, Albania, Serbia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Montenegro, but remains open to other regional partners.

The European Council of December 2012 requested the Commission to present an EU

Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR ) by the end of 2014. The general objective of the Strategy is to promote sustainable economic and social prosperity in the Region through growth and jobs creation, and by improving its attractiveness, competitiveness and connectivity, while preserving the environment and ensuring healthy and balanced marine and coastal ecosystems. This will be achieved through cooperation between countries with much shared history and geography. By reinforcing implementation of existing EU policies in the Region, the Strategy brings a clear EU added value, while offering a golden opportunity for all participating countries to align their policies with the EU-2020 overall strategy. It will also contribute to bringing Western Balkan countries closer to the EU by offering them opportunities for working closely with Member States, to address common challenges and opportunities specific to the Region.

CONTENT: this Communication sets outs the needs and potential for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in the Adriatic and Ionian Region. It provides a framework for a coherent macroregional strategy and Action Plan, to address those challenges and opportunities, through cooperation between the participating countries.

Challenges : the Adriatic-Ionian Region is facing a set of common challenges. Historically, a substantial part has been affected by difficult political and economic circumstances as well as conflict. However, Slovenia's and Croatia's accession, and the EU perspective of other countries, provide an opportunity to reinforce links and to overcome the legacy of the past. Major challenges are:

· socio-economic disparities : both in terms of GDP per head and unemployment rates, there are stark contrasts between countries. While some regions enjoy a GDP per head of 20% above the EU average and 4% unemployment rate, others have a GDP per head which is 70% below this average, and unemployment rate of 30%;

· transport: the Region has significant infrastructure deficits, notably between long-established EU Member States and the other countries, resulting in poor accessibility;

· energy : interconnection of electricity grids remains inadequate, preventing the development of an integrated energy market, limiting capacity and hindering profitable exploitation of renewable energy sources;

· environment: increased human use of the marine and coastal space threatens ecosystems. Unsustainable tourism activities put pressure on water, land and biodiversity. Shallowness and its semi-enclosed nature make the Adriatic Sea vulnerable to pollution ;

· natural and man-made hazards and risks entailed by climate change : in addition to major seismic activity, the Region is exposed and vulnerable to the adverse impacts of climate change ;

· administrative and institutional issues : capacities at national, regional or local level must be reinforced to ensure that structures are fit for working with cross-border counterparts, as well as for cross-policy coordination.

Response to challenges through the Strateg y: in the face of these common problems, the Commission sets out a rolling Action Plan, accompanying the Strategy and expanding the maritime dimension to include the hinterland, structured around four interdependent pillars of strategic relevance :

· Blue Growth ;

· connecting the Region (transport and energy networks) ;

· environmental quality ;

· sustainable tourism .

The Plan also has two cross-cutting aspects:

· capacity-building , including communication, for efficient implementation and for raising public awareness and support;

· research and innovation to boost high-skilled employment, growth and competitiveness. Cooperation within transnational networks can bring ideas to markets, and help develop new products and services.

Furthermore, climate change mitigation and adaptation as well as disaster risk management are horizontal principles for all four pillars.

-Blue Growth : the objective of this pillar, coordinated by Greece and Montenegro, is to drive innovative maritime and marine growth in the Region by promoting sustainable economic development and jobs and business opportunities in the Blue economy, including fisheries and aquaculture.

-Connecting the region : coordinated by Italy and Serbia, the objective of this pillar is to improve transport and energy connectivity in the Region and with the rest of Europe and develop infrastructure networks and regulatory frameworks. Coordinated monitoring of maritime traffic and multi-modal transport will increase competitiveness.

-Environmental quality : coordinated by Slovenia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, this pillar entails addressing environmental quality, contributing to good environmental status for marine and coastal ecosystems, reducing pollution of the sea, limiting, mitigating and compensating soil sealing, reducing air pollution and halting loss of biodiversity and degradation of ecosystems.

-Sustainable tourism : the objective of this pillar, coordinated by Croatia and Albania, is to develop the full potential of the Region in terms of innovative, sustainable, responsible quality tourism. Diversification of tourism products and services, along with tackling seasonality, will boost business and create jobs. World-wide marketing of an Adriatic-Ionian "brand" of tourism products and services will increase demand.

A series of initiatives are set out in the Communication for each of these areas in the Strategy.

Governance : in order to ensure the success of the Strategy, it is proposed to strengthen coordination between participating countries, as well as between different ministries and decision-making levels within each country, and ensuring as high-level political dialogue.

Funding : the Strategy is implemented by mobilising and aligning existing EU and national funding of relevance to the four pillars and topics. In particular, the European Structural and Investment Fund and the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance for 2014-2020 provide significant resources and a wide range of tools and technical options.

Other funds and instruments relevant to the pillars are available, notably Horizon 2020 for all pillars, the Connecting Europe Facility for Pillar 2, the LIFE programme for Pillar 3, as well as for mitigation and adaptation to climate change, and, for Pillar 4, the COSME programme for SMEs. Other means are available, notably from the Western Balkan Investment Framework, the European Investment Bank and other International Financial Institutions.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 5 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 588, -: 67, 0: 14
DE IT PL ES GB RO FR BE HU PT CZ SE FI EL BG SK NL IE HR AT LT DK SI LV MT LU EE CY
Total
83
71
46
47
65
27
66
21
19
21
15
19
13
18
11
11
24
10
10
18
8
10
8
6
6
5
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
192

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
174

Czechia S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 8 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 587, -: 60, 0: 9
DE IT ES PL GB RO BE HU FR PT CZ SE FI EL NL SK IE BG HR AT DK LT SI LV MT LU EE CY
Total
80
69
45
46
64
27
20
19
64
21
15
18
13
17
24
11
10
10
10
17
11
8
8
7
6
5
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
189

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
166

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 10 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 543, -: 83, 0: 21
DE ES PL IT RO GB BE HU AT FR CZ PT SE FI NL BG SK HR DK SI LT IE LV EE EL MT LU CY
Total
76
47
44
70
27
62
19
18
17
65
15
20
19
13
24
10
10
9
11
8
7
10
6
6
18
6
5
4
icon: PPE PPE
187

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
166

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
56

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

France Verts/ALE

4

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 17 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 586, -: 37, 0: 35
DE IT PL ES FR GB RO BE PT HU CZ SE FI BG SK NL IE HR AT LT DK SI EL LV MT EE LU CY
Total
81
71
46
46
64
64
25
21
20
19
15
17
12
11
11
24
10
10
18
9
11
8
18
7
6
5
4
4
icon: PPE PPE
190

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
167

Czechia S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

France Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 23/1 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 593, -: 62, 0: 3
DE IT ES PL GB RO PT HU SE AT BE FR NL CZ FI BG SK IE HR EL DK LT SI LV MT LU EE CY
Total
82
70
46
45
64
27
20
19
18
18
19
62
24
15
13
11
11
10
10
18
11
9
8
6
6
5
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
192

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
166

Netherlands S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

1
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

1

France Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 23/2 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 535, -: 111, 0: 8
IT DE ES RO BE PT FR SE AT HU CZ NL BG IE HR FI EL SI DK LT MT LV EE CY LU PL SK GB
Total
68
80
45
27
20
20
65
18
17
19
14
24
11
10
10
13
17
8
11
9
6
7
5
5
4
46
10
64
icon: PPE PPE
186

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
164

Czechia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 32 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 592, -: 37, 0: 21
DE IT ES PL FR GB RO PT BE HU EL CZ AT FI BG SK SE IE HR LT DK NL SI LV EE MT LU CY
Total
81
68
45
45
53
66
27
21
20
19
18
15
17
13
11
11
19
10
10
9
11
24
8
7
6
6
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
190

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
169

Czechia S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Sweden S&D

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

5

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

France Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
26

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 42 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 504, -: 141, 0: 6
DE ES IT RO FR PT EL CZ BG BE IE HR AT FI HU LT SE SI DK SK LU LV EE NL CY PL MT GB
Total
78
47
71
27
61
19
18
14
11
20
10
10
18
13
19
8
18
8
11
11
5
7
5
22
5
44
6
64
icon: PPE PPE
190

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Lithuania PPE

1

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
168

Czechia S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2
5

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

France Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44
3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
34

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Denmark ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - §64/1 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 611, 0: 31, -: 28
DE IT FR ES PL GB RO BE PT SE HU AT CZ NL FI BG SK IE HR DK LT SI EL LV EE MT CY LU
Total
84
70
68
47
45
66
24
21
21
19
19
18
15
24
13
11
11
10
10
11
8
8
18
7
6
6
5
4
icon: PPE PPE
193

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
171

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - §64/2 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 535, -: 56, 0: 37
DE PL FR ES IT GB RO HU BE AT PT SE CZ FI BG LT HR SK DK SI LV IE NL EL MT LU EE CY
Total
78
41
62
43
69
64
23
19
18
18
20
18
14
12
11
9
9
9
10
8
7
10
19
16
6
5
5
4
icon: PPE PPE
179

Finland PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
162
5

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - §64/3 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 580, 0: 34, -: 32
DE IT ES FR PL GB RO PT BE AT HU CZ SE NL BG FI SK HR DK EL LT SI LV IE EE MT LU CY
Total
81
68
44
64
45
63
22
21
20
17
17
14
19
24
11
11
11
10
11
18
8
8
7
10
6
6
4
5
icon: PPE PPE
183

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
164

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3
3

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 68/1 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 570, -: 80, 0: 8
DE IT ES FR RO BE PT AT HU NL EL CZ SE FI BG SK IE HR LT DK SI PL LV MT EE CY LU GB
Total
81
70
46
65
24
21
19
18
17
24
18
15
19
13
11
11
10
10
9
10
8
46
7
6
5
5
4
65
icon: PPE PPE
187

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
169
3

Netherlands S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (2)

6
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 68/2 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 588, -: 45, 0: 22
DE IT ES PL FR RO PT BE SE HU AT NL CZ EL GB FI BG HR DK SK IE LT SI LV EE MT LU CY
Total
80
70
45
45
64
24
21
21
19
19
18
23
15
17
64
13
11
10
11
11
9
8
8
7
6
6
5
4
icon: PPE PPE
190

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
167

Netherlands S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
2

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
34

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 84/1 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 628, -: 25, 0: 10
DE IT FR ES PL GB NL RO PT BE AT EL CZ SE HU FI BG SK IE HR LT DK SI LV EE LU CY MT
Total
83
71
66
46
45
65
24
23
20
21
18
18
15
19
18
13
11
11
10
10
9
10
8
7
6
5
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
190

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
171

Netherlands S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
37

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
10

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 84/2 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 530, -: 109, 0: 13
DE IT ES FR PT RO SE HU EL CZ BG NL BE IE HR LT FI AT SI PL DK MT LV EE CY SK LU GB
Total
81
69
43
65
21
22
19
18
18
15
11
23
19
10
10
9
13
17
8
46
10
6
7
5
5
11
4
66
icon: PPE PPE
180

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
171

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
11

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Finland ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - § 85 #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 555, -: 68, 0: 48
DE IT ES PL GB RO FR BE HU PT CZ SE FI BG SK NL HR AT DK LT SI LV EE MT LU IE CY EL
Total
84
71
47
45
66
24
68
21
19
21
15
19
13
11
11
24
10
18
11
8
8
7
6
6
5
10
5
17
icon: PPE PPE
193

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
172

Czechia S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3
icon: ENF ENF
37

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - Considérant G #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 594, -: 67, 0: 8
DE IT ES PL GB RO PT FR BE HU CZ SE FI BG SK IE HR AT LT DK NL SI EL LV MT LU EE CY
Total
84
70
47
46
65
24
21
67
21
19
15
19
13
11
11
10
10
18
9
11
24
8
18
7
6
5
5
4
icon: PPE PPE
193

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
172

Czechia S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Italy ENF

For (1)

Against (1)

5

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić - Résolution #

2015/10/28 Outcome: +: 560, -: 60, 0: 39
DE IT ES PL GB RO BE FR PT HU AT SE CZ BG FI HR NL SK LT DK SI LV IE EL MT EE CY LU
Total
82
71
46
45
66
24
21
66
20
19
18
19
15
11
11
10
23
9
8
11
8
7
10
18
6
5
5
4
icon: PPE PPE
190

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
168

Czechia S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1

Finland ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
12

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
441 2014/2214(INI)
2015/06/04 PECH 59 amendments...
source: 557.168
2015/06/10 AFET 47 amendments...
source: 560.572
2015/06/19 ENVI 67 amendments...
source: 560.791
2015/07/08 REGI 268 amendments...
source: 560.789

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.188
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-557188_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE552.090&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-552090_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.789
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-560789_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.114&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-557114_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.240&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-557240_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2015-10-01T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0279_EN.html title: A8-0279/2015
summary
events/3
date
2015-10-01T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0279_EN.html title: A8-0279/2015
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151027&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2015-10-28T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0383_EN.html title: T8-0383/2015
summary
events/6
date
2015-10-28T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0383_EN.html title: T8-0383/2015
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan date: 2014-09-22T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2014-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: ŠUICA Dubravka date: 2014-11-04T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2014-11-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ŠUICA Professor Dubravka group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: AFFRONTE Marco date: 2014-11-21T00:00:00 group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2014-11-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AFFRONTE Marco group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
rapporteur
name: NICOLAI Norica date: 2014-12-16T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2014-12-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NICOLAI Norica group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/5/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0279&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0279_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0383
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0383_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2014-06-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0357 title: COM(2014)0357 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52014DC0357:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy Commissioner: CREȚU Corina type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2014-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2014-11-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: ŠUICA Dubravka body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2014-11-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: EFD name: AFFRONTE Marco body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: PECH date: 2014-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: BOGOVIČ Franc group: S&D name: GIUFFRIDA Michela group: ECR name: TOMAŠIĆ Ruža group: GUE/NGL name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios group: Verts/ALE name: ŠKRLEC Davor group: EFD name: D'AMATO Rosa responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2014-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2015-09-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2014-11-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: ŠUICA Dubravka body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2014-11-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: EFD name: AFFRONTE Marco body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: PECH date: 2014-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: BOGOVIČ Franc group: S&D name: GIUFFRIDA Michela group: ECR name: TOMAŠIĆ Ruža group: GUE/NGL name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios group: Verts/ALE name: ŠKRLEC Davor group: EFD name: D'AMATO Rosa responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2014-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2015-10-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0279&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0279/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-10-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151027&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-10-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0383 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0383/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2014-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2014-11-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: ŠUICA Dubravka
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2014-11-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ŠUICA Professor Dubravka group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENVI
date
2014-11-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: EFD name: AFFRONTE Marco
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2014-11-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AFFRONTE Marco group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
PECH
date
2014-12-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Fisheries
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
REGI
date
2014-09-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2014-12-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NICOLAI Norica group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2015-05-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.188 title: PE557.188 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-06-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE552.090&secondRef=03 title: PE552.090 committee: PECH type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-07-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.789 title: PE560.789 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-07-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.114&secondRef=02 title: PE557.114 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-08-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.240&secondRef=03 title: PE557.240 committee: ENVI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-15T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=26195&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)67 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2014-06-17T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0357 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2014)0357 summary: PURPOSE: to propose a European Strategy for the Adriatic region and Ionian sea. BACKGROUND: home to more than 70 million people, the Adriatic region plays a key role in strengthening geographical continuity in Europe. It contains a total of 8 countries, these being Italy, Greece, Slovenia, Croatia, Albania, Serbia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Montenegro, but remains open to other regional partners. The European Council of December 2012 requested the Commission to present an EU Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR ) by the end of 2014. The general objective of the Strategy is to promote sustainable economic and social prosperity in the Region through growth and jobs creation, and by improving its attractiveness, competitiveness and connectivity, while preserving the environment and ensuring healthy and balanced marine and coastal ecosystems. This will be achieved through cooperation between countries with much shared history and geography. By reinforcing implementation of existing EU policies in the Region, the Strategy brings a clear EU added value, while offering a golden opportunity for all participating countries to align their policies with the EU-2020 overall strategy. It will also contribute to bringing Western Balkan countries closer to the EU by offering them opportunities for working closely with Member States, to address common challenges and opportunities specific to the Region. CONTENT: this Communication sets outs the needs and potential for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in the Adriatic and Ionian Region. It provides a framework for a coherent macroregional strategy and Action Plan, to address those challenges and opportunities, through cooperation between the participating countries. Challenges : the Adriatic-Ionian Region is facing a set of common challenges. Historically, a substantial part has been affected by difficult political and economic circumstances as well as conflict. However, Slovenia's and Croatia's accession, and the EU perspective of other countries, provide an opportunity to reinforce links and to overcome the legacy of the past. Major challenges are: · socio-economic disparities : both in terms of GDP per head and unemployment rates, there are stark contrasts between countries. While some regions enjoy a GDP per head of 20% above the EU average and 4% unemployment rate, others have a GDP per head which is 70% below this average, and unemployment rate of 30%; · transport: the Region has significant infrastructure deficits, notably between long-established EU Member States and the other countries, resulting in poor accessibility; · energy : interconnection of electricity grids remains inadequate, preventing the development of an integrated energy market, limiting capacity and hindering profitable exploitation of renewable energy sources; · environment: increased human use of the marine and coastal space threatens ecosystems. Unsustainable tourism activities put pressure on water, land and biodiversity. Shallowness and its semi-enclosed nature make the Adriatic Sea vulnerable to pollution ; · natural and man-made hazards and risks entailed by climate change : in addition to major seismic activity, the Region is exposed and vulnerable to the adverse impacts of climate change ; · administrative and institutional issues : capacities at national, regional or local level must be reinforced to ensure that structures are fit for working with cross-border counterparts, as well as for cross-policy coordination. Response to challenges through the Strateg y: in the face of these common problems, the Commission sets out a rolling Action Plan, accompanying the Strategy and expanding the maritime dimension to include the hinterland, structured around four interdependent pillars of strategic relevance : · Blue Growth ; · connecting the Region (transport and energy networks) ; · environmental quality ; · sustainable tourism . The Plan also has two cross-cutting aspects: · capacity-building , including communication, for efficient implementation and for raising public awareness and support; · research and innovation to boost high-skilled employment, growth and competitiveness. Cooperation within transnational networks can bring ideas to markets, and help develop new products and services. Furthermore, climate change mitigation and adaptation as well as disaster risk management are horizontal principles for all four pillars. -Blue Growth : the objective of this pillar, coordinated by Greece and Montenegro, is to drive innovative maritime and marine growth in the Region by promoting sustainable economic development and jobs and business opportunities in the Blue economy, including fisheries and aquaculture. -Connecting the region : coordinated by Italy and Serbia, the objective of this pillar is to improve transport and energy connectivity in the Region and with the rest of Europe and develop infrastructure networks and regulatory frameworks. Coordinated monitoring of maritime traffic and multi-modal transport will increase competitiveness. -Environmental quality : coordinated by Slovenia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, this pillar entails addressing environmental quality, contributing to good environmental status for marine and coastal ecosystems, reducing pollution of the sea, limiting, mitigating and compensating soil sealing, reducing air pollution and halting loss of biodiversity and degradation of ecosystems. -Sustainable tourism : the objective of this pillar, coordinated by Croatia and Albania, is to develop the full potential of the Region in terms of innovative, sustainable, responsible quality tourism. Diversification of tourism products and services, along with tackling seasonality, will boost business and create jobs. World-wide marketing of an Adriatic-Ionian "brand" of tourism products and services will increase demand. A series of initiatives are set out in the Communication for each of these areas in the Strategy. Governance : in order to ensure the success of the Strategy, it is proposed to strengthen coordination between participating countries, as well as between different ministries and decision-making levels within each country, and ensuring as high-level political dialogue. Funding : the Strategy is implemented by mobilising and aligning existing EU and national funding of relevance to the four pillars and topics. In particular, the European Structural and Investment Fund and the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance for 2014-2020 provide significant resources and a wide range of tools and technical options. Other funds and instruments relevant to the pillars are available, notably Horizon 2020 for all pillars, the Connecting Europe Facility for Pillar 2, the LIFE programme for Pillar 3, as well as for mitigation and adaptation to climate change, and, for Pillar 4, the COSME programme for SMEs. Other means are available, notably from the Western Balkan Investment Framework, the European Investment Bank and other International Financial Institutions.
  • date: 2014-12-17T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-09-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-10-01T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0279&language=EN title: A8-0279/2015 summary: The Committee on Regional Development adopted the report by Ivan JAKOVČIĆ (ADLE, HR) on an EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region. The report welcomed the Commission communication concerning the European Union Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region and the accompanying action plan. It underlined the importance of the strategy being based on the principles of integration, coordination, cooperation and partnership , whilst reiterating the importance of the “three NOs” principle of no new legislation, no new institutions, no new funding. The EU Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR) is part of the EU regional policy. It is a tool for promoting economic and social cohesion, with the principal objectives of reducing disparities between regions, promoting real convergence and encouraging growth and employment. Members encouraged all national, regional and local stakeholders to take full ownership of the implementation of the projects covered by this macro-regional strategy. They stressed the need for: (i) a place-based approach as regards the cooperation activities; (ii) the inclusion of the local and regional authorities in the political managing bodies and in the operational, technical and implementing bodies of the strategy; (iii) a transparent process for adoption, monitoring and evaluation of the strategy, as well as of openness and inclusiveness towards civil society and all relevant stakeholders. The report made a series of recommendations which focused on the following: (1) Blue growth : the report stressed that the region’s unique geographical position and specific coastline structure, together with its rich marine biodiversity, hold immense potential for the creation of ‘blue’ jobs and for innovative and sustainable economic development and growth, including blue technologies, fisheries and aquaculture , and better maritime and marine governance and services. Members advocated, inter alia : the creation of new jobs and economic development, and especially jobs for women and young people in coastal and island countries; a policy to coordinate and harmonise the strategy’s goals, as well as common projects, in line with the values, principles and objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy ; promoting the various sectors of blue growth in their training programmes; clustering and cooperation between public and private enterprises, universities, research institutes and other relevant stakeholders in the marine and maritime sectors; the creation of a joint quality label for high-quality seafood products from the region in order to increase their competitiveness; the protection and preservation of fish stocks and marine ecosystems , to be a paramount objective of the strategy; support for shipbuilding , including the leisure boat sector; the involvement of fisheries and fishery workers in projects such as those relating to cultural and heritage tourism. (2) Connecting the region : the report noted that better transport and energy connections among the participating countries as well as between them and their other neighbours. It also stressed the importance of: establishing sustainable transport links which reduce journey times, transport and logistic costs and externalities as well as major strategic works related to the interchange between sea and land; underlining the importance of connecting maritime transport routes and ports with other parts of Europe; identifying priority infrastructure projects of regional and European added value; developing a high-speed railway infrastructure that will interconnect the macro-region; implementating major projects to develop intermodal links on the islands; developing energy infrastructure capable of reducing the carbon footprint, increasing energy efficiency and guaranteeing the energy security of the macro-region and beyond. (3) Environmental quality : recalling that the Adriatic Sea is home to nearly half (49%) of all recorded Mediterranean marine species, Members called for joint efforts in taking all possible measures, such as the use of clean fuels for maritime transport and logistics, in order to preserve the biodiversity of the marine environment. The report pointed out the need to tackle responsibly historical and trans-border pollution and to clean up the sites affected by the industrial contamination of soil, water and air, and, where applicable, by pollution resulting from military conflicts. It called for the establishment of a regional centre for disaster preparedness together with a joint contingency plan for oil spills and large-scale pollution events, in order to create an early warning system to prevent natural disasters and those caused by industrial, transport and other activities. (4) Sustainable and competitive tourism : the report underlined the crucial importance of tourism for the European economy and urged more support for the financing of tourism projects from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). It recommended: the urgent improvement of cross-border road connections in order to enhance the competitiveness of tourism; the promotion of sustainable and more balanced tourist flows in various locations; encouraging Member States to promote sustainable mobility solutions in the tourism sector, thus improving the quality of tourist services and enhancing its range; the development of a diversified tourism offer including thematic tourist parks and routes, and cultural, rural, health, medical, nautical, eno-gastronomic, conference and sport tourism, including cycling, golf, diving, hiking, skiing, mountaineering and outdoor sports, in order to promote tourism throughout the year.
  • date: 2015-10-27T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151027&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-10-28T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26195&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-10-28T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0383 title: T8-0383/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 560 votes to 60 with 39 abstentions, a resolution on an EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region (EUSAIR). Members welcomed the Commission communication concerning the European Union Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region and the accompanying action plan. This strategy had been created to add value to interventions, whether by the EU, national or regional authorities or private sectors, in a way that significantly strengthened the functioning of the macro-region. Parliament highlighted the strategy’s prospects for candidate and potential candidate countries in the region and underlined the importance of the strategy being based on the principles of integration, coordination, cooperation and partnership, whilst reiterating the importance of the “three NOs” principle of no new legislation, no new institutions, no new funding. It welcomed the European Parliament’s representation in the governing bodies of the EUSAIR. The resolution encouraged all national, regional and local stakeholders to take full ownership of the implementation of the projects covered by this macro-regional strategy. It stressed the need for: a place-based approach as regards the cooperation activities; the inclusion of the local and regional authorities in the political managing bodies and in the operational, technical and implementing bodies of the strategy; a transparent process for adoption, monitoring and evaluation of the strategy, as well as of openness and inclusiveness towards civil society and all relevant stakeholders. Pointing out that there were no specific funds assigned just for the implementation of macro-regional strategies, Members called on the countries in the region to bundle funds (ESI Funds, IPA, EFSI) as well as contributions from national sources under the EIB as a financial and investment platform for supporting the financing of projects contributing to the fulfilment of the goals of the strategy. Parliament made a series of recommendations which focused on the following: (1) Blue growth : the region’s unique geographical position and specific coastline structure, together with its rich marine biodiversity, hold immense potential for the creation of ‘blue’ jobs , blue technologies, fisheries and aquaculture , and better maritime and marine governance and services. Members advocated, inter alia : the creation of new jobs and economic development, and especially jobs for women and young people in coastal and island countries; a policy to coordinate and harmonise the strategy’s goals, as well as common projects, in line with the values, principles and objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy ; promoting the various sectors of blue growth in their training programmes ; clustering and cooperation between public and private enterprises, universities, research institutes and other relevant stakeholders in the marine and maritime sectors; stronger cooperation in marine and maritime research among researchers, and among Member States and regions involved in the EUSAIR strategy, the creation of a joint quality label for high-quality seafood products from the region in order to increase their competitiveness; the protection and preservation of fish stocks and marine ecosystems, to be a paramount objective of the strategy; support for shipbuilding, including the leisure boat sector, focusing on its modernisation and specialisation in order to create jobs strong support for manufacturing areas, twinning and cooperation between areas in different parts of the macro-region; the involvement of fisheries and fishery workers in projects such as those relating to cultural and heritage tourism. (2) Connecting the region : better transport and energy connections among the participating countries as well as between them and their other neighbours are compelling needs. Parliament also stressed the importance of: establishing sustainable transport links which reduce journey times, transport and logistic costs and externalities as well as major strategic works related to the interchange between sea and land; underlining the importance of connecting maritime transport routes and ports with other parts of Europe; Parliament called on the participating countries to focus their efforts on implementing projects that are covered by the current TEN-T network and other interventions for its proposed extension to South-Eastern Europe/the Eastern Adriatic coast; optimizing the capacity of the existing infrastructure network, improving their maritime, rail and air transport infrastructure, to develop motorways of the sea in the macro-region, developing a high-speed railway infrastructure that will interconnect the macro-region; implementing major projects to develop intermodal links on the islands; developing capable of reducing the carbon footprint, increasing energy efficiency and guaranteeing the energy security of the macro-region and energy infrastructure beyond. ensure joint planning and investment in energy infrastructure for both the production and transport of electricity and gas in the macro-region. (3) Environmental quality : recalling that the Adriatic Sea is home to nearly half (49%) of all recorded Mediterranean marine species, Members called for joint efforts in taking all possible measures, such as the use of clean fuels for maritime transport and logistics, in order to preserve the biodiversity of the marine environment. Parliament pointed out the need to tackle responsibly historical and trans-border pollution and to clean up the sites affected by the industrial contamination of soil, water and air, and, where applicable, by pollution resulting from military conflicts. It called for the establishment of a regional centre for disaster preparedness together with a joint contingency plan for oil spills and large-scale pollution events, in order to create an early warning system to prevent natural disasters and those caused by industrial, transport and other activities. (4) Sustainable and competitive tourism : Parliament underlined the crucial importance of tourism for the European economy and the need to develop new approaches to help offset seasonality. It urged more support for the financing of tourism projects from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). It recommended: the urgent improvement of cross-border road connections in order to enhance the competitiveness of tourism; the promotion of sustainable and more balanced tourist flows in various locations; encouraging Member States to promote sustainable mobility solutions in the tourism sector, thus improving the quality of tourist services and enhancing its range; the development of a diversified tourism offer including thematic tourist parks and routes, and cultural, rural, health, medical, nautical, eno-gastronomic, conference and sport tourism, including cycling, golf, diving, hiking, skiing, mountaineering and outdoor sports, in order to promote tourism throughout the year.
  • date: 2015-10-28T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
REGI/8/02161
New
  • REGI/8/02161
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.70.05 Regional cooperation, transfrontier cooperation
New
4.70.05
Regional cooperation, cross-border cooperation
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0357:EN
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151027&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0383 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0383/2015
activities/5/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Regional Development adopted the report by Ivan JAKOVČIĆ (ADLE, HR) on an EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region.

    The report welcomed the Commission communication concerning the European Union Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region and the accompanying action plan. It underlined the importance of the strategy being based on the principles of integration, coordination, cooperation and partnership, whilst reiterating the importance of the “three NOs” principle of no new legislation, no new institutions, no new funding.

    The EU Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR) is part of the EU regional policy. It is a tool for promoting economic and social cohesion, with the principal objectives of reducing disparities between regions, promoting real convergence and encouraging growth and employment.

    Members encouraged all national, regional and local stakeholders to take full ownership of the implementation of the projects covered by this macro-regional strategy. They stressed the need for: (i) a place-based approach as regards the cooperation activities; (ii) the inclusion of the local and regional authorities in the political managing bodies and in the operational, technical and implementing bodies of the strategy; (iii) a transparent process for adoption, monitoring and evaluation of the strategy, as well as of openness and inclusiveness towards civil society and all relevant stakeholders.

    The report made a series of recommendations which focused on the following:

    (1) Blue growth: the report stressed that the region’s unique geographical position and specific coastline structure, together with its rich marine biodiversity, hold immense potential for the creation of  ‘blue’ jobs and for innovative and sustainable economic development and growth, including blue technologies, fisheries and aquaculture, and better maritime and marine governance and services.

    Members advocated, inter alia:

    • the creation of new jobs and economic development, and especially jobs for women and young people in coastal and island countries;
    • a policy to coordinate and harmonise the strategy’s goals, as well as common projects, in line with the values, principles and objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy;
    • promoting the various sectors of blue growth in their training programmes;
    • clustering and cooperation between public and private enterprises, universities, research institutes and other relevant stakeholders in the marine and maritime sectors;
    • the creation of a joint quality label for high-quality seafood products from the region in order to increase their competitiveness;
    • the protection and preservation of fish stocks and marine ecosystems, to be a paramount objective of the strategy;
    • support for shipbuilding, including the leisure boat sector;
    • the involvement of fisheries and fishery workers in projects such as those relating to cultural and heritage tourism.

    (2) Connecting the region: the report noted that better transport and energy connections among the participating countries as well as between them and their other neighbours. It also stressed the importance of:

    • establishing sustainable transport links which reduce journey times, transport and logistic costs and externalities as well as major strategic works related to the interchange between sea and land;
    • underlining the importance of connecting maritime transport routes and ports with other parts of Europe;
    • identifying priority infrastructure projects of regional and European added value;
    • developing a high-speed railway infrastructure that will interconnect the macro-region;
    • implementating major projects to develop intermodal links on the islands;
    • developing energy infrastructure capable of reducing the carbon footprint, increasing energy efficiency and guaranteeing the energy security of the macro-region and beyond.

    (3) Environmental quality: recalling that the Adriatic Sea is home to nearly half (49%) of all recorded Mediterranean marine species, Members called for joint efforts in taking all possible measures, such as the use of clean fuels for maritime transport and logistics, in order to preserve the biodiversity of the marine environment.

    The report pointed out the need to tackle responsibly historical and trans-border pollution and to clean up the sites affected by the industrial contamination of soil, water and air, and, where applicable, by pollution resulting from military conflicts. It called for the establishment of a regional centre for disaster preparedness together with a joint contingency plan for oil spills and large-scale pollution events, in order to create an early warning system to prevent natural disasters and those caused by industrial, transport and other activities.

    (4) Sustainable and competitive tourism: the report underlined the crucial importance of tourism for the European economy and urged more support for the financing of tourism projects from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). It recommended:

    • the urgent improvement of cross-border road connections in order to enhance the competitiveness of tourism;
    • the promotion of sustainable and more balanced tourist flows in various locations;
    • encouraging Member States to promote sustainable mobility solutions in the tourism sector, thus improving the quality of tourist services and enhancing its range;
    • the development of a diversified tourism offer including thematic tourist parks and routes, and cultural, rural, health, medical, nautical, eno-gastronomic, conference and sport tourism, including cycling, golf, diving, hiking, skiing, mountaineering and outdoor sports, in order to promote tourism throughout the year.
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/5/date
Old
2015-10-26T00:00:00
New
2015-10-28T00:00:00
activities/5/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2
date
2015-09-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/3
date
2015-10-01T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0279&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0279/2015
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/5/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0357:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0357:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0357:EN
activities/1/committees/0/date
2014-11-04T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: ŠUICA Dubravka
committees/0/date
2014-11-04T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: ŠUICA Dubravka
activities/3
date
2015-10-27T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0357:EN
activities/2
date
2015-10-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0357:EN
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title
Old
Regional Policy
New
Regional and Urban Policy
other/0/dg/title
Old
Regional Policy
New
Regional and Urban Policy
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to propose a European Strategy for the Adriatic region and Ionian sea.

    BACKGROUND: home to more than 70 million people, the Adriatic region plays a key role in strengthening geographical continuity in Europe. It contains a total of 8 countries, these being Italy, Greece, Slovenia, Croatia, Albania, Serbia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Montenegro, but remains open to other regional partners.

    The European Council of December 2012 requested the Commission to present an EU

    Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR) by the end of 2014. The general objective of the Strategy is to promote sustainable economic and social prosperity in the Region through growth and jobs creation, and by improving its attractiveness, competitiveness and connectivity, while preserving the environment and ensuring healthy and balanced marine and coastal ecosystems. This will be achieved through cooperation between countries with much shared history and geography. By reinforcing implementation of existing EU policies in the Region, the Strategy brings a clear EU added value, while offering a golden opportunity for all participating countries to align their policies with the EU-2020 overall strategy. It will also contribute to bringing Western Balkan countries closer to the EU by offering them opportunities for working closely with Member States, to address common challenges and opportunities specific to the Region.

    CONTENT: this Communication sets outs the needs and potential for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in the Adriatic and Ionian Region. It provides a framework for a coherent macroregional strategy and Action Plan, to address those challenges and opportunities, through cooperation between the participating countries.

    Challenges: the Adriatic-Ionian Region is facing a set of common challenges. Historically, a substantial part has been affected by difficult political and economic circumstances as well as conflict. However, Slovenia's and Croatia's accession, and the EU perspective of other countries, provide an opportunity to reinforce links and to overcome the legacy of the past. Major challenges are:

    ·        socio-economic disparities: both in terms of GDP per head and unemployment rates, there are stark contrasts between countries. While some regions enjoy a GDP per head of 20% above the EU average and 4% unemployment rate, others have a GDP per head which is 70% below this average, and unemployment rate of 30%;

    ·        transport: the Region has significant infrastructure deficits, notably between long-established EU Member States and the other countries, resulting in poor accessibility;

    ·        energy: interconnection of electricity grids remains inadequate, preventing the development of an integrated energy market, limiting capacity and hindering profitable exploitation of renewable energy sources;

    ·        environment: increased human use of the marine and coastal space threatens ecosystems. Unsustainable tourism activities put pressure on water, land and biodiversity. Shallowness and its semi-enclosed nature make the Adriatic Sea vulnerable to pollution ;

    ·        natural and man-made hazards and risks entailed by climate change: in addition to major seismic activity, the Region is exposed and vulnerable to the adverse impacts of climate change ;

    ·        administrative and institutional issues: capacities at national, regional or local level must be reinforced to ensure that structures are fit for working with cross-border counterparts, as well as for cross-policy coordination.

    Response to challenges through the Strategy: in the face of these common problems, the Commission sets out a rolling Action Plan, accompanying the Strategy and expanding the maritime dimension to include the hinterland, structured around four interdependent pillars of strategic relevance :

    ·        Blue Growth ;

    ·        connecting the Region (transport and energy networks) ;

    ·        environmental quality ;

    ·        sustainable tourism.

    The Plan also has two cross-cutting aspects:

    ·        capacity-building, including communication, for efficient implementation and for raising public awareness and support;

    ·        research and innovation to boost high-skilled employment, growth and competitiveness. Cooperation within transnational networks can bring ideas to markets, and help develop new products and services.

    Furthermore, climate change mitigation and adaptation as well as disaster risk management are horizontal principles for all four pillars.

    -Blue Growth: the objective of this pillar, coordinated by Greece and Montenegro, is to drive innovative maritime and marine growth in the Region by promoting sustainable economic development and jobs and business opportunities in the Blue economy, including fisheries and aquaculture.

    -Connecting the region: coordinated by Italy and Serbia, the objective of this pillar is to improve transport and energy connectivity in the Region and with the rest of Europe and develop infrastructure networks and regulatory frameworks. Coordinated monitoring of maritime traffic and multi-modal transport will increase competitiveness.

    -Environmental quality: coordinated by Slovenia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, this pillar entails addressing environmental quality, contributing to good environmental status for marine and coastal ecosystems, reducing pollution of the sea, limiting, mitigating and compensating soil sealing, reducing air pollution and halting loss of biodiversity and degradation of ecosystems.

    -Sustainable tourism: the objective of this pillar, coordinated by Croatia and Albania, is to develop the full potential of the Region in terms of innovative, sustainable, responsible quality tourism. Diversification of tourism products and services, along with tackling seasonality, will boost business and create jobs. World-wide marketing of an Adriatic-Ionian "brand" of tourism products and services will increase demand.

    A series of initiatives are set out in the Communication for each of these areas in the Strategy.

    Governance: in order to ensure the success of the Strategy, it is proposed to strengthen coordination between participating countries, as well as between different ministries and decision-making levels within each country, and ensuring as high-level political dialogue.

    Funding: the Strategy is implemented by mobilising and aligning existing EU and national funding of relevance to the four pillars and topics.  In particular, the European Structural and Investment Fund and the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance for 2014-2020 provide significant resources and a wide range of tools and technical options.

    Other funds and instruments relevant to the pillars are available, notably Horizon 2020 for all pillars, the Connecting Europe Facility for Pillar 2, the LIFE programme for Pillar 3, as well as for mitigation and adaptation to climate change, and, for Pillar 4, the COSME programme for SMEs. Other means are available, notably from the Western Balkan Investment Framework, the European Investment Bank and other International Financial Institutions.

activities/1
date
2014-12-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
REGI/8/02161
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities
  • date: 2014-06-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0357 celexid: CELEX:52014DC0357:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2014)0357 body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document published commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional Policy Commissioner: CREȚU Corina
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2014-11-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: EFD name: AFFRONTE Marco
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: PECH date: 2014-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: BOGOVIČ Franc group: S&D name: GIUFFRIDA Michela group: ECR name: TOMAŠIĆ Ruža group: GUE/NGL name: PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios group: Verts/ALE name: ŠKRLEC Davor group: EFD name: D'AMATO Rosa responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2014-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JAKOVČIĆ Ivan
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
procedure
reference
2014/2214(INI)
title
EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
4.70.05 Regional cooperation, transfrontier cooperation