Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | PECH | AFFRONTE Marco ( EFDD) | KUHN Werner ( PPE), SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo ( S&D), VAN DALEN Peter ( ECR), BILBAO BARANDICA Izaskun ( ALDE) |
Committee Recast Technique Opinion | JURI | FERRARA Laura ( EFDD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 043-p2
Legal Basis:
TFEU 043-p2Events
PURPOSE: to improve the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2017/1004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a Union framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the common fisheries policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 199/2008.
CONTENT: the new Regulation simplifies and strengthens the current system for the collection of biological, environmental, technical and socio-economic data in the fisheries sector .
The aim of the new Regulation is to align EU rules with the objectives of the reformed Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), which includes: (i) the protection of the marine environment, (ii) the sustainable management of all commercially exploited species, and in particular (iii) the achievement of good environmental status in the marine environment by 2020.
Multiannual Union programme: in order to coordinate the data collection efforts of all Member States, the Commission shall establish a multiannual Union programme for the collection and management of data. This data shall include:
· biological data on all stocks caught or by-caught in Union commercial and, where appropriate, recreational fisheries in and outside Union waters;
· data to assess the impact of Union fisheries on the marine ecosystem in and outside Union waters;
· socioeconomic data on fisheries, on the sustainability of marine aquaculture and on the fish processing sector.
The data collected should also allow:
· the targets required for the implementation of the multiannual plans referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 , such as fishing mortality rates and spawning stock biomass, to be determined;
· the gaps in the coverage of data relating to the fishing fleet to be closed and the number of data-deficient stocks in certain regions to be reduced.
The Regulation stresses importance of carrying out a sufficient number of mandatory research surveys at sea to be carried out at Union level.
The new rules will ensure that all these relevant data are collected following a cost/benefit approach and without duplication of effort, thus reducing the administrative burden.
National work plans: Member States shall collect data within the framework of an operational programme, and a work plan drawn up in accordance with the multiannual Union programme.
The Commission will assess the work plans after consulting the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) . It may indicate that a Member State should make amendments to a national work plan if a national work plan does not ensure the scientific relevance of the data or sufficient quality of the proposed methods and procedures. The Member State concerned shall submit a revised national work plan.
Cooperation within the Union and regional coordination: Member States shall cooperate and coordinate their actions to further improve the quality of data. They shall coordinate their data collection activities with other Member States in the same marine region and shall make every effort to coordinate their actions with third countries.
In order to facilitate regional coordination, the relevant Member States for each marine region shall establish regional coordination groups .
Access to the sampling sites: data collectors designated by the body in charge of the implementation of the national work plan have access to all catches, vessels and other sampling sites, business registers and any necessary data.
The masters of Union fishing vessels may refuse to accept on board scientific observers only on the basis of an obvious lack of space on the vessel or for safety reasons in accordance with national law. In such cases, data shall be collected through alternative data collection methods that are set out in the national work plan.
Availability of data: data should be put into national computerised databases so that they are accessible to the Commission and can be made available to end-users of scientific data and other interested parties. Data, which do not allow for personal identification should be available without restrictions to any party with an interest in their analysis, including on the environmental aspects of fisheries management.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 10.7.2017.
DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission may adopt delegated acts in respect of establishing a detailed list of data requirements for the purpose of data collection within the framework of the multiannual Union programme. The power to adopt such acts is conferred on the Commission for a period of three years from 10 July 2017 . The European Parliament or the Council have the right to object to a delegated act within two months (which may be extended by two months) from the date of notification of the act.
The European Parliament adopted by 535 votes to 38, with 48 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a Union framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the Common Fisheries Policy (recast).
Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal.
Aims : this Regulation aims to establish rules on the collection, management and use of biological, environmental, technical and socio-economic data concerning the fisheries sector.
The data collection framework should contribute towards reaching the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy , which includes the protection of the marine environment, the sustainable management of all commercially exploited species, and in particular the achievement of good environmental status in the marine environment by 2020.
Multiannual Union programme : the Commission shall establish a multiannual Union programme for the collection and management of data while taking into account:
the need for data to set the targets required for the implementation of the multiannual plans referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 , such as fishing mortality rates and spawning stock biomass; the need for: (i) data that are relevant, comprehensive and reliable for the purpose of decisions on fisheries management and protection of ecosystems including vulnerable species and habitats; (ii) sustainable development of aquaculture at Union level; (iii) support impact assessments of policy measures; the need for simplification and to avoid duplication of data collection and for data to cover data-deficient fisheries.
Parliament stated that it is appropriate for a sufficient number of mandatory research surveys at sea to be carried out at Union level.
National work plans : the Commission shall take into account the evaluation conducted by STECF when approving the national work plans. If such evaluation indicates that a national work plan does not ensure the scientific relevance of the data or sufficient quality of the proposed methods and procedures, the Commission shall immediately inform the Member State concerned and indicate amendments to that work plan.
National work plans shall contain a detailed description of, inter alia , the following: (i) data to be collected in accordance with the multiannual Union programme; (ii) the temporal and spatial distribution and the frequency by which the data will be collected.
Regional coordination and cooperation : Member States shall cooperate and coordinate their actions to further improve the quality, timeliness and coverage of data enabling the reliability of data collection methods to be further improved, with a view to improving their data collection activities.
Regional coordination groups shall aim at developing and implementing procedures, methods, quality assurance and quality control for collecting and processing data with a view to enabling the reliability of scientific advice to be further improved. For that purpose, regional coordination groups shall aim to develop and implement regional databases.
Access to the sampling sites : the masters of Union fishing vessels may refuse to accept on board the scientific observers operating under the at-sea monitoring scheme only on the basis of an obvious lack of space on the vessel or for safety reasons in accordance with national law. In such cases, data shall be collected through alternative data collection methods which are set out in the national work plan.
Availability of data : Member States shall refrain from any unnecessary restrictions to the dissemination of detailed and aggregated data to end-users of scientific data and other interested parties.
A Member State may refuse to transmit the relevant detailed and aggregated data if there is a risk of natural persons or legal entities being identified, in which case the Member State concerned shall propose alternative means to meet the needs identified by the end-users of scientific data which ensure anonymity.
The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report by Marco AFFRONTE (EFDD, IT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a Union framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the Common Fisheries Policy (recast).
The committee recommended that Parliament’s position adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Objectives: Members specified that the regulation should establish rules on the collection, management, and use of biological, technical, environmental, social and economic data concerning the fisheries sector with a view to contributing to the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy set out in Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Establishment of an EU multiannual programme : only one programme will be in force for the Union. This does not affect the ability of the Commission to amend the programme. When setting out the multiannual programme, the Commission should bear in mind:
the information needs for the management and efficient implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy, including the needs for ecosystem-based fisheries management, the impact of recreational fisheries and the needs of the CFP where those information needs overlap with other legal acts such as the Marine Strategy Framework Directive , the Integrated Maritime Policy and the Birds and Habitats Directives; the need for and relevance of comprehensive and reliable data of good quality for decisions on fisheries management and protection of ecosystems including vulnerable species and habitats; the need for harmonised data that are in line with correct, standardised statistical principles that make it possible to assess the impact on ecosystems and fish stocks and that are taken into account for management at regional level; the need for simplification and to avoid duplication of data collection, the need for data to cover data-deficient fisheries, the need to collect information on fleets that have not yet been covered .
Content of the multi-annual Union programme : multi-annual Union programmes shall establish:
thresholds below which it is not mandatory for Member States to collect data or carry out research surveys, based on their fishing and aquaculture activities; data on fish stocks and their conservation and management; the quantifiable targets required for the implementation of the multiannual plans referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, such as fishing mortality rates and spawning stock biomass; ecosystem data to assess the impact of Union fisheries on the marine ecosystem in Union and external waters, including data on by-catch of non-target species, in particular species protected under international or Union law, data on impacts of fisheries on marine habitats and data on impacts of fisheries on food webs, obtained, inter alia, by analysing catches and vulnerable marine areas such as nursery areas and Posidonia seabeds (marine seagrasses); data on the Union fleet and its activity in Union and external waters; socio-economic data on fisheries, including recreational fisheries; socio-economic data on the fish and aquaculture product processing sector.
The list of mandatory research surveys shall be drawn up taking into account the following requirements:
information needs for the management of the Common Fisheries Policy, including compliance with Union environmental legislation, in particular the objective of achieving good environmental status by 2020; information needs for the evaluation of conservation measures; information which is necessary in order to terminate or adjust emergency measures when they have initially been based on the precautionary principle.
National work plans : Member States' work plans shall contain a detailed description of the following:
the format and time data are to be delivered to end users, taking into consideration deadlines provided for data calls; the type of data collected for control purposes and the type of data collected in the framework of the Regulation.
In preparing their work plan, Member States shall endeavour to cooperate closely with regional authorities and shall coordinate their efforts with other Member States , notably in the same marine region. Data collection activities and methods shall be such as to ensure that it is possible for data to be compared and integrated at least at regional level.
National correspondents : Member States shall ensure that their national correspondent is sufficiently trained and experienced, has a sufficient mandate to represent its Member State in the expert group meetings, and can negotiate on task sharing with regard to sampling, analysis and scientific surveys.
Coordination and cooperation : Member States shall make every effort to coordinate their actions with third countries which have sovereignty or jurisdiction over waters in the same marine region.
Members introduced an amendment defining the tasks of the Regional Co-ordination Groups so that they might plan their activities.
Approval of work plans : the Commission shall adopt implementing acts approving the work plans by 31 December of the year preceding the year from which the work plan is to apply.
Access to the sampling sites and data sources : with regard to data collection, the Commission shall, five years from the entry into force of the Regulation, set up a single European database in order to simplify and facilitate data analysis at European level.
Collection of data in the context of scientific advice: when the Commission seeks scientific advice from a competent scientific body, it shall inform in due time the European Parliament and the Council and shall forward to them a copy of the request submitted to the scientific body concerned.
This Commission staff working document accompanies the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a Union framework for the collection, management and the use of data in the fisheries sector and support for the scientific advice regarding the Common Fisheries Policy (recast).
The revision of the Data Collection Framework (DCF) is part of the Commission's Regulatory Fitness Programme ( REFIT ) which seeks to cut red tape and remove regulatory burden. This means simplifying the DCF at different levels.
More specifically, the document:
explains the rationale behind the modifications and simplification and the technical details necessary to understand those modifications; describes the current data collection system and improvements for change; describes the preparatory work consisting of the publication of a roadmap discussing several legislative options, further consultations; explains the options choices for improvement and simplification of the system, including the modification of the legal setup.
Overall, the current DCF has been criticised on a number of levels by a broad range of stakeholders including the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), Member States and end-users, for not reflecting sufficiently the needs of end-users in terms of deciding on what data should be collected or how this should be done, and not being flexible enough to address their evolving needs , e.g. new stocks being exploited, changes to technical measures regulations, development of scientific advice, move to statistically sound sampling schemes etc. Currently, the DCF Regulation contains provisions for the establishment of 3-year multiannual EU programmes but no provisions are included regarding modifications of these three year programmes , or how the needs of end-users should be taken into account to draw them up or modify them.
Proposed solutions : in an attempt to respond to criticisms and improve the DCF, the Commission has examined the current system and has proposed a number of solutions. It is proposed to:
include criteria in the DCF Regulation to determine what data should be included in the multiannual EU programmes , including the end-user need for the data; design the new multiannual EU programmes, and future amendments to it, based on consultation of end-user; include, in the DCF regulation, provisions on the amendment of the multiannual EU programmes; include, in the future data collection system, four key areas in which end-users of DCF data should be better involved: (i) end-user input (advice) in determining what should or should no longer be collected; (ii) end-user involvement in designing the sampling programmes that Member States must carry out to collect those data that end-users will use; (iii) end-user access to DCF data; (iv) end-user feedback on the data they have accessed; provide regions with a greater range of tasks concerning planning and implementing data collection. This would be achieved through the establishment of Regional Coordination Groups (RCGs), to deal with regional issues, as well as an EU Coordination Group (EUCG), to deal with EU-wide issues. The RCGs and EUCG would enable Member States to work on regional or EU cooperation throughout the year, rather than just through an annual meeting as is currently the case; in the context of governance structure, strengthen the current Regional Coordination Meetings (RCM) mechanism , without giving them a legal entity, but broadening the scope of areas they may work on; extend the scope of the DCF to reflect the CFP's new emphasis on ecosystem impacts of fisheries ; include, in the revised DCF Regulation, an obligation for Member States to carry out biological sampling on all stocks targeted or by-caught by EU vessels, including on the discarded fraction of the catches, but without specifying the method for the data collection; streamline the data transmission and storage for fishing activity data; revise the scope of DCF Regulation so that obligations to collect socio-economic data cover also freshwater aquaculture ; develop an improved impact assessment of decisions on fisheries management; establish EU-wide clear and harmonised rules on access to fishing activity data to progress towards exchange of data between Member States and facilitate access to fisheries data; define in DCF Regulation the basic rules and principles for data availability, including rules on personal data protection; develop an IT system for DCF data availability; develop single entry point for accessing DCF data; allow for a gradual shift from "a push" to "a pull system", i.e. to move from a system of data calls initiated by end-users, to a system of data availability ensured by the data providers.
PURPOSE: to establish a Union framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the Common Fisheries Policy.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: a number of amendments are to be made to Council Regulation (EC) No 199/2008 concerning the establishment of a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the Common Fisheries Policy. In the interests of clarity, that Regulation should be recast .
Data collection is essential for the implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), as a basis for founding it on the best possible scientific advice.
Data are needed to evaluate the state of fish stocks, the profitability of the different segments of the sector and the effects of fisheries and aquaculture on the ecosystem. Data are also needed to evaluate EU policies.
For this reason, an EU framework for the collection and management of fisheries data was established in 2000, and then reformed in 2008 resulting in the Data Collection Framework (DCF).
The 2013 reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) by Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 needs to be matched by adaptations in the supporting scientific advice and therefore the data needed for it. This is particularly relevant in order to achieve maximum sustainable yield (MSY) at the latest by 2020, to manage fisheries taking account of their impacts on the ecosystem, and to gradually introduce a landing obligation. The reform of the CFP also requires changes in the way data are obtained, e.g. regionalisation and devolution of tasks from the European Union to Member States in the context of regional cooperation.
The revision of the DCF is part of the Commission's Regulatory Fitness Programme (REFIT) which seeks to cut red tape and remove regulatory burden.
CONTENT: the changes to be made to the rules laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 199/2008 are essential because of the new needs arising from the CFP reform. The proposal retains the key provisions of the current system : the establishment of an EU Multi-annual Programme, to be implemented by national Data Collection plans; key obligations in the form of commitments by Member States in relation to collection, storage, protection and provision of data; provisions on rights and obligations of end-users of data; and provisions on cooperation within and between Member States, as well as with and between scientific and management bodies.
The proposed modifications compared to the current DCF Regulation are presented as follows:
remove overlaps and seeking synergies between EU legislations and reducing costs of the entire system of marine data. The DCF will only create data collection obligations insofar as they are not already covered by other EU legislation; maximise synergies with environmental law : the current DCF does not provide sufficient data on some ecosystem impacts of fisheries which are however required for implementing efficiently the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) . This is the case of incidental catches of protected species (birds, marine mammals, turtles etc.), effects on food webs (predator-prey relations), and the impact of fishing on habitats; reduce the level of prescriptions set at EU level without compromising data quality : the legislation should be more result-oriented and leave more flexibility to Member States regarding implementation. By ensuring more and earlier involvement of the Member States, in the context of regional cooperation, on decision making about methodologies to be followed or quality targets to be met, the DCF can be greatly simplified and the data collection system made more flexible; reduce the details decided by or reported to the Commission : currently, national programmes describe in great detail what will be done, how and by whom in each Member State. The objective is to reduce this significantly. With the move away from triennial to multi-annual EU and national programmes, Member States will be in a position to plan their work over a longer period; collect once, use several times : the Commission proposes, as a first proposal, to make the DCF the main legal instrument by which Member States are to provide any data necessary to data users (end-users and other interested parties), whatever the source of the legal obligation under which data are collected (DCF or any other EU legislation). The second proposal should enhance cooperation between Member States to develop compatible data storage and exchange systems and formats in line with those agreed under Directive 2007/2/EC and promote compatibility between data formats used under other Union legislation.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: none which are not already foreseen in the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund ( EMFF ).
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0574
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0664
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2020)0229
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0131
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2017/1004
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 157 20.06.2017, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00006/2017/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)309
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0091/2017
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0150/2016
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR5241/2015
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE575.270
- Opinion on the recast technique: PE575.119
- Committee draft report: PE569.773
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES3926/2015
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2015)0118
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2015)0294
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2015)0118
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES3926/2015
- Committee draft report: PE569.773
- Opinion on the recast technique: PE575.119
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE575.270
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR5241/2015
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)309
- Draft final act: 00006/2017/LEX
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0131 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0664 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2020)0229
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0574 EUR-Lex
Activities
- Marco AFFRONTE
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renata BRIANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- David COBURN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Czesław HOC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mike HOOKEM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Diane JAMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Werner KUHN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- António MARINHO E PINTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ricardo SERRÃO SANTOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Remo SERNAGIOTTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jarosław WAŁĘSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0150/2016 - Marco Affronte - Am 118 #
Amendments | Dossier |
119 |
2015/0133(COD)
2016/01/26
PECH
119 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. For data which are to be collected under other legal acts
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) ‘end-users’ means bodies with a research or management interest in the scientific analysis of data in the fisheries sector; three categories of end-users are defined: (1) national, regional and European administrations, ICES, STECF, RFMOs, regional coordination groups (2) Advisory Councils (3) universities, national and international scientific and technical institutes, NGOs and fishermen's organisations;
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – title Establishment of a multi-annual Union programme
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt, in accordance with Article 23, delegated acts establishing a multi-annual Union programme
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) the information needs for the management of the Common Fisheries Policy, including compliance with Union environmental legislation, in particular the objective of achieving good environmental status by 2020, as set out in Article 1(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC, and consistency with other Union policies, as referred to in Article 2(5)(j) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013; an exception may be made for data collected under Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 if they do not comply with the technical standards required for scientific and statistical purposes. Member States may decide upon this and shall clearly indicate it in their national work plans;
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) the information needs for the management and efficient implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy or for the ecosystem based fisheries management needs overlapping with other legal acts such as the Marine Strategy Framework Directive;
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) the information needs for the management and implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, the Integrated Maritime Policy and the Birds and Habitats Directives;
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new) (aa) the information needs on the impact of decisions on recreational fisheries;
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the need and relevance of comprehensive, reliable and clear data for decisions on fisheries management and protection of the ecosystem including vulnerable species and habitats,
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the need and relevance of data for decisions on fisheries management and protection of the ecosystem including vulnerable species, birds and habitats,
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) the need for harmonised data that are in line with correct, standardised statistical principles that make it possible to assess the impact on ecosystems and fish stocks and that are taken into account for management at regional level;
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) existing time-series and the need to avoid any interruption in the chronology of data,
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) the need for simplification and to avoid duplication of data collection,
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) (fa) the need to collect information on fleets that have not yet been covered;
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) data requirements to achieve the objectives of Articles 6, 9 and 25 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013;
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) thresholds for aquaculture below which Member States do not need to collect data or carry out research surveys, based on their aquaculture activities.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) criteria for the collection of information, taking into account its usefulness, demand, and the economic importance and social impact that analysing the information can have;
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) biological data on all stocks caught or by-caught by Union commercial
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) biological data on all stocks caught or by-caught by Union commercial and, where appropriate, recreational fisheries in Union and external waters and by commercial and recreational eel and salmon fisheries in inland waters to enable ecosystem based management and conservation as necessary for the operation
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) biological data on all stocks caught or by-caught, including discards, by Union commercial and, where appropriate, recreational fisheries in Union and external waters to enable ecosystem based management and conservation as necessary for the operation of the Common Fisheries Policy;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) the quantifiable targets required for the implementation of the multiannual plans referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, such as such as fishing mortality rates and spawning stock biomass;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) data on fish stocks and their conservation and management;
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) subject to the limits of the spatial resolution applied to fisheries observation, ecosystem data to assess the impact of Union fisheries on the marine ecosystem in Union and external waters, including data on by-catch of non-target species, in particular species protected under international or Union law, data on impacts of fisheries on marine habitats and data on impacts of fisheries on food webs, obtained by analysing catches;
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) data on Union fleets and their activity
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) including socio-economic data on recreational fisheries to enable the socio- economic performance of the Union recreational fisheries sector to be assessed;
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) socio-economic data and sustainability data on aquaculture of marine and diadromous species to enable the assessment of the socio-economic performance
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point f Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new) (fa) socio-economic data for use in assessing employment trends in the fisheries and aquaculture sectors and the fish and aquaculture product processing sectors.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The data referred to in paragraph 1(a) may include: (a) socio-economic data on the fish processing sector to enable the socio- economic performance of that sector to be assessed; (b) socio-economic data on aquaculture of freshwater species to enable the socio- economic performance of the Union freshwater aquaculture sector to be assessed; (c) sustainability and environmental data on aquaculture to enable the sustainability of the Union aquaculture sector, including its environmental impact to be assessed; The data needs and a mapping of existing relevant data may be evaluated within pilot studies referred to in point (f) of Article 77(2) of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The data referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall only be collected under this Regulation if they are not collected within other Union legal frameworks, with the possible exception of data collected under Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009. Member States may decide upon this and shall clearly indicate it in their national work plans.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The data referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall only be collected under this Regulation if they are not collected within other Union legal frameworks. However, the collection of data under this Regulation may include data requirements covered by Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, in the event that the data currently collected in accordance with that Regulation do not comply with the technical standards required for scientific and statistical purposes. If Member States decide that the data to be collected under this Regulation are to include data requirements covered by Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, they shall clearly indicate this in their national work plans.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) information needs for the management of
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) information needs for management of the Common Fisheries Policy or for the ecosystem based fisheries management needs overlapping with other legal acts such as the Marine Strategy Framework Directive;
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new) (da) the information needed in order to terminate or adjust emergency measures when they have initially been based on the precautionary principle;
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point f (f) avoidance of disrupting the history of survey data, and the need to maintain reliable time series.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Where specific targets for maximum sustainable yield cannot be determined owing to insufficient data, Union multiannual plans shall provide for measures based on the precautionary approach that ensure at least a comparable degree of conservation of the relevant stocks.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Member States shall work closely with regional authorities that have powers as regards drawing up the national plan.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. With a view to ensuring that similar data collection policies are properly coordinated, in particular as regards the methodologies to be used and the quality and reliability targets to be met, Member States shall apply the European Statistics Code of Practice and the Quality Assurance Framework of the European Statistical System.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall designate a sufficiently trained national correspondent and shall inform the Commission thereof
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall designate a national correspondent whom it deems to be best suited to the task and shall inform the Commission thereof
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall designate an expert from the fisheries sector to be its national correspondent and shall inform the
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) with a view to improving transparency, coordinate the preparation of the annual report referred to in Article 10, working closely with the relevant regional authorities;
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) coordinate the preparation of the national work plan referred to in Article 6 and of the annual report referred to in Article 10;
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) ensure the transmission of information within the Member State to the relevant authorities; and
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) consult and inform coastal local authorities which have legal or economic powers in relation to fisheries.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. In accordance with Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, Member States shall coordinate their actions with other Member States and make every effort to coordinate their actions with third countries having sovereignty or jurisdiction over waters in the same marine region as referred to in Article 3(d) of this Regulation. For this purpose, a Regional Co-ordination Group shall be established by the relevant Member States in each Marine Region.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The role, objectives and mandates of regional coordination groups will need to be clearly defined, without bypassing the role of the relevant administrations and authorities within the Member States.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Regional Co-ordination Groups shall consist of experts from Member States, the Commission, and relevant end-users of data, as well as representatives of the local authorities which have legal or economic powers in relation to fisheries.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. Regional Co-ordination Groups shall coordinate with each other and with the Commission where issues affect several
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. Regional Co-ordination Groups
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall approve the work
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall approve the work plans and the amendments thereto made in accordance with Article 8(2) on the basis of the evaluation by the STECF no later than two months after receiving the work plans, and in any event no later than the end of the year.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall approve the work plans and the amendments thereto made in accordance with Article 8(2) on the basis of the evaluation by the STECF
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall on an annual basis submit to the Commission a report on the carrying out of their work plans. The report shall be submitted at the latest by 31 May in the year following the reference year. The Commission may adopt implementing acts laying down rules on procedures, format and various timetables for the submission and approval of annual reports. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 24(2).
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall on an annual basis submit to the Commission a report on the carrying out of their work plans
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – title Access to the sampling sites and data sources
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. With regard to data collection, the Commission shall set up a single European register in order to simplify and facilitate data analysis at European level within a period of no more than five years.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the conditions under which masters of Union fishing vessels are obliged to accept on board scientific observers
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 2. For the purpose of the verification of the socio-economic data collected in accordance with Article 6(1), Member States shall take all the requisite steps to ensure that the Commission has access to the national computerised databases referred to in Article 12(b).
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The Member States and the Commission shall guarantee the confidentiality of information whilst adhering to data protection rules.
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall set up adequate processes and electronic technologies to ensure an effective application of Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, and shall
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall set up adequate processes and publicly accessible electronic technologies to ensure an effective application of Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, and shall refrain from any unnecessary restrictions to the widest possible dissemination of detailed and aggregated data.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall set up adequate processes and electronic technologies to ensure an effective application of Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, and
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that relevant detailed and aggregated data are updated and made available
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that relevant detailed and aggregated data are updated and made available to end-users
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 4. Where detailed data are
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – title Compatible systems for harmonising data storage and exchange
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. In view of reducing costs and facilitating access to data for end-users and other interested parties, Member States, the Commission, scientific advisory bodies and any relevant end-users shall cooperate to develop compatible systems to harmonise data storage and exchange
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 If a Member State refuses to provide data under Article 16(4) within six months of a request being made, the end-user may request the Commission to review the refusal within one month. If the Commission, within one month, finds that the refusal is not duly justified, it may require the Member State to supply the data to the end-user within one month.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 1. Member States, alongside regions with relevant powers and the Commission shall coordinate their efforts and cooperate in order to further improve the quality, timeliness and coverage of data enabling further improvement of the reliability of scientific advice, the quality of the work programmes and the working methods of the regional fisheries management organisations to which the Union is contracting party or observer and international scientific bodies.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The Common Fisheries Policy has been reformed by Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council21. The objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy and the requirements for data collection in the fisheries sector are set out in Articles 2 and 25 of that Regulation. Furthermore, Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council22 has reformed the structure of financial support to Member States' fisheries data collection activities. __________________ 21 Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 and (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC (OJ L354, 28.12.2013, p.22). 22 Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2328/2003, (EC) No 861/2006, (EC) No 1198/2006 and (EC) No 791/2007 and Regulation (EU) No 1255/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 149, 20.5.2014, p. 1).
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) For practical reasons, a single European register should be set up for the gathering, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and for information exchange.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 b (new) (7b) Priorities should be identified and data gathering activities should be carried out in such a way as to guarantee the quality of the information obtained. The data collection framework should be extended to cover all fleets, or serious consideration should be given to carrying out the work needed to assess the state of important stocks, in all cases on the basis of a cost-benefit analysis and for the sake of simplification.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The definition of ‘recreational fisheries’
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The definition of "recreational fisheries" should include all non- commercial fisheries, irrespective of their specific purpose, in order to cover all forms of fisheries that may affect fish stocks and ecosystems, to ensure the impact and socio-economic value of such fishing is fully taken into consideration when managing fisheries.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The definition of ‘recreational fisheries’ should include all non-commercial fisheries, irrespective of their specific purpose, in order to cover all forms of
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) The data should be used only for the purpose of scientific research into fish and better fisheries management, and in keeping with the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) It is necessary to have accurate, reliable data on the state of fish stocks, especially in the Adriatic region, in order to gauge how stocks are affected by coastal fishing, bearing in mind that the species fished in coastal fisheries are for the most part of little economic significance and account for a small proportion of commercial fishing.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The definition of "end-users" should be aligned with the definition of "end-users of scientific data" appearing in Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 and cover also scientific bodies and not-for-profit organisations with an interest in the environmental aspects of fisheries management.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The definition of ‘marine regions’ should be based on scientific considerations and environmental and socioeconomic criteria.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Data needs by end-users should be identified and it should be specified which data have to be collected under this Regulation. Those data should include ecosystem data related to the impact of
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Data needs by end-users should be identified and it should be specified which data have to be collected under this Regulation. Those data should include ecosystem data related to the impact of fisheries and data on the sustainability of aquaculture. To simplify and minimise the administrative burden, it is also necessary to ensure that data collected under this Regulation are not also collected under other EU legislation.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Supports the objective of tailoring the availability of data more closely to management needs, but nevertheless cautions against the consequences of the cost-benefit or cost-use analysis suggested by the Commission. For certain data, research at sea cannot be replaced by less costly methods.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21)
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21a) The data collection framework should be extended to cover all fleets;
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21a) It is essential for data collectors to plan their work in discussion with regional data end-users, in order to ensure that the data collected is as relevant as possible.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21a) Fish stock assessments that are fundamental for scientific advice on sustainable catch levels depend on quality data. However, data are often the product of incomplete and inaccurate reporting, due inter alia to IUU fishing and some catches from recreational fisheries not being included in the assessments.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21a) There is a need for quality data collection, management and use regarding the landing obligation in order to control and assess the effective implementation of the landing obligation and to bring data collection into line with the requirements resulting from the revised Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). Data needs in support of the landing obligation should be fully assessed. A specific short to medium-term strategy is needed to allow the full use of control and monitoring tools applicable to the implementation of the landing obligation; The strategy should take into account the need for data for its implementation, for capacity building for the industry and the administrations in the use of new technologies and the development of technical infrastructures;
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 b (new) (21b) there is a need for data collection on by-catch of protected species, including sea birds, marine mammals and turtles, and on the impact of fisheries on habitats, vulnerable marine areas and the ecosystem in order to ensure the proper implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 b (new) (21b) Fish stock assessments that are fundamental for strong scientific advice on sustainable catch levels depend on quality commercial data that are often incomplete and inaccurate, inter alia due to IUU fishing and catches from recreational fisheries.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Member States should determine the way they collect data, but in order to be able to combine data on a regional level, minimum requirements for data quality, coverage and compatibility should be agreed by Member States at regional level. When there is general agreement on the methods at regional level, Regional Co- ordination Groups should submit a regional work plan for adoption by Commission. With that aim in view, the objectives, role and powers of the proposed regional coordination bodies and the role of the authorities with responsibility for taking the necessary measures must be clearly defined.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Member States should determine the way they collect data, but in order to be able to combine data on a regional level in a meaningful way, minimum requirements for data quality, coverage and compatibility should be agreed by Member States at
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Member States should determine the way they collect data, but in order to be able to combine data on a regional level, minimum requirements for data quality, coverage and compatibility should be agreed by Member States at regional level, taking into account that in some regions basins are managed jointly with third countries which have sovereignty or jurisdiction over waters in those regions. When there is general agreement on the methods at regional level, Regional Co- ordination Groups should submit a regional work plan for adoption by the Commission.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) (22a) As regards the activities of Regional Co-ordination Groups, cooperation should be intensified between Member States and third countries which have sovereignty or jurisdiction over waters in the same region with a view, as far as possible, to harmonising data collection, processing, exchange, and accessibility procedures.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) Union legislation should no longer determine the precise details of methodologies to be applied in collecting data. Provisions on particular methods of data collection should therefore be replaced by the description of the process by which they will be determined. That process should be in accordance to Union minimum requirements for data quality, coverage and compatibility and essentially include cooperation between Member States and data users in regional co- ordination groups, and validation by the Commission through work plans submitted
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The data referred to in this Regulation should be put into publicly available national computerised databases so that they are accessible to the Commission and can be made available to data users. It is in the interest of all data user that data which does not allow for personal identification should be available without restrictions to any party who has an interest in its analysis.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) (24a) It is necessary to bear in mind that a species to which no protection plan currently applies could become a priority in future. It is therefore necessary to ensure the availability of the time series necessary for effective scientific monitoring of the status of fisheries resources.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 b (new) (24b) Expresses doubts about the reduction in the frequency of data gathering, which could affect monitoring and the establishment of series, particularly for data which can change rapidly and have a major impact on management measures.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) (25a) Further scientific studies should be carried out to assess the state of fish stocks, in particular in the Mediterranean, where there is a need to boost stocks and where it is difficult to carry out scientific studies based on the monitoring of commercial fisheries because almost all the fisheries there are mixed.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 b (new) (25b) It is important to guarantee, as far as possible, that enough scientific studies are carried out and that they are carried out in accordance with the needs identified in each of the fishing areas so that better knowledge can be gained about their fishing resources and the best possible scientific research can be used to assess what forms of management are most suitable in each of those areas.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 a (new) (27a) Stresses the importance of socioeconomic data for fisheries and aquaculture, and suggests that, in the medium term, the harmonisation of these data could contribute to greater harmonisation and enhancement of social rules in these sectors.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) There is a need to ensure that end- users are provided with data
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 a (new) (28a) The confidentiality of information obtained in the course of compiling primary data should be guaranteed, and data protection laws should be complied with.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 a (new) (30a) For the sake of simplification and rationalisation, the information to be collected should be selected on the basis of its value, demand and the impact analysing it could have.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 b (new) (30b) To raise the profile of women in the fisheries sector, the gender variable should be taken into account in the collection of data on natural persons, in particular the data listed under Article 5(2) (d), (e) and (f) of this Regulation on the socio-economic aspects of fisheries, aquaculture and the processing of fisheries products.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) In accordance with the principle of proportionality, it is necessary and appropriate, for the achievement of the basic objective of improving data quality, access and availability in the fisheries sector, to establish a framework and general guidelines for data
source: 575.270
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=27131&j=0&l=en
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/11 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/date |
Old
2017-01-26T00:00:00New
2017-01-25T00:00:00 |
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3926)(documentyear:2015)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3926)(documentyear:2015)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.773New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-PR-569773_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.119New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-CM-575119_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.270New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AM-575270_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5241)(documentyear:2015)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5241)(documentyear:2015)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=27131&j=0&l=en
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/docs |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0150&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0150_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0091New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0091_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
PECH/8/03721New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R1004New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R1004 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/11 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/6/docs/0 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/10 |
|
activities/9 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/7 |
|
activities/8 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final actNew
Awaiting signature of act |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final act |
activities/6/docs/1/text |
|
activities/6/docs/0 |
|
activities/6/docs |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
activities/6/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Old
Economic and Social CommitteeNew
European Economic and Social Committee |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0294:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0294:EN
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/1/body |
Old
EPNew
unknown |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2016-04-25T00:00:00New
2016-04-19T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee |
activities/2 |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2017-03-13T00:00:00New
2017-03-16T00:00:00 |
activities/5/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en |
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/maritime-affairs-and-fisheries_en |
activities/5/date |
Old
2017-03-01T00:00:00New
2017-03-13T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0294:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0294:EN
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2017-02-01T00:00:00New
2017-03-01T00:00:00 |
activities/5/date |
Old
2017-01-18T00:00:00New
2017-02-01T00:00:00 |
activities/5/date |
Old
2016-12-12T00:00:00New
2017-01-18T00:00:00 |
activities/5/date |
Old
2017-01-17T00:00:00New
2016-12-12T00:00:00 |
activities/5/date |
Old
2016-10-25T00:00:00New
2017-01-17T00:00:00 |
activities/5/date |
Old
2016-10-03T00:00:00New
2016-10-25T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2 |
|
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/4/date |
Old
2016-09-12T00:00:00New
2016-10-03T00:00:00 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2016-07-05T00:00:00New
2016-09-12T00:00:00 |
activities/2/date |
Old
2016-04-18T00:00:00New
2016-04-19T00:00:00 |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
51ec5983b819f2575200010cNew
53b2dfd5b819f205b0000122 |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1/name |
Old
CORBETT RichardNew
SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo |
committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
51ec5983b819f2575200010cNew
53b2dfd5b819f205b0000122 |
committees/1/shadows/1/name |
Old
CORBETT RichardNew
SERRÃO SANTOS Ricardo |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2016-06-06T00:00:00New
2016-07-05T00:00:00 |
committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2016-03-21T00:00:00New
2016-04-18T00:00:00 |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2016-01-06T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2016-01-06T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
procedure/title |
Old
Collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the Common Fisheries Policy. RecastNew
Collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the common fisheries policy. Recast |
activities/3/date |
Old
2016-05-09T00:00:00New
2016-06-06T00:00:00 |
activities/3/date |
Old
2016-03-07T00:00:00New
2016-05-09T00:00:00 |
activities/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/4 |
|
committees/1/shadows/4 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0294:EN
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2015-07-06T00:00:00New
2016-03-07T00:00:00 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
committees/1/date |
2015-08-26T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|