Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | MACOVEI Monica ( ECR) | KUDRYCKA Barbara ( PPE), FAJON Tanja ( S&D), IN 'T VELD Sophia ( ALDE), LUNACEK Ulrike ( Verts/ALE), WINBERG Kristina ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | AFET | DE SARNEZ Marielle ( ALDE) | Bodil VALERO ( Verts/ALE), Marie-Christine VERGIAT ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 077-p2
Legal Basis:
TFEU 077-p2Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to introduce a targeted amendment to Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code in order to increase security within the area without internal border control in response to heightened risks of terrorism.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2017/458 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the reinforcement of checks against relevant databases at external borders.
BACKGROUND: checks at the EU’s external borders remain one of the main safeguards of the area without internal border control and significantly contribute to ensuring the long-term security of the Union and its citizens. Such checks shall be carried out in the interests of all Member States. One of the purposes of such checks is to prevent any threat to the internal security and public policy of the Member States.
Minimum checks based on a rapid and straightforward verification of the validity of the travel document for crossing the border are currently the rule for persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law. The phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters , many of whom are Union citizens, demonstrates the need to reinforce checks at external borders with regard to persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law.
CONTENT: the purpose of this regulation is to amend Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) in response to the heightened terrorist threat on the EU’s territory.
Systematic border checks: the regulation amends the Schengen Border Code which obliges the Member States to carry out systematic checks on entry and on exit to the external borders of the Member States using the SIS and Interpol's Stolen and Lost Travel Documents (SLTD) database and other relevant Union databases.
The checks on the relevant persons will be compulsory both when they enter or leave by all air, sea and land borders.
Persons who, in principle, are not subject to targeted checks against the databases, shall, as a minimum, be subject to a check with a view to establishing their identity on the basis of the production or presentation of travel documents. Such a check shall consist of a rapid and straightforward verification of the validity of the travel document for crossing the border, and of the presence of signs of falsification or counterfeiting, where appropriate by using technical devices, and, in cases where there are doubts about the travel document or where there are indications that such a person could represent a threat to the public policy, internal security, public health or international relations of the Member States, the border guard shall consult the databases and at least one of the biomentric identifiers integrated into the travel documents.
In order to facilitate systematic checks against databases, Member States should gradually phase out travel documents without machine-readable zones.
Such systematic checks should be carried out in full compliance with relevant Union law, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union .
Targeted checks: where the checks against the databases would have a disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic , a Member State may decide to carry out those checks on a targeted basis at specified border crossing points, following an assessment of the risks related to the public policy, internal security, public health or international relations of any of the Member States.
The scope and duration of the temporary reduction in targeted checks against the databases shall not exceed what is strictly necessary and shall be defined in accordance with a risk assessment carried out by the Member State concerned.
Persons who, in principle, are not subject to targeted checks against the databases, shall, as a minimum, be subject to a check with a view to establishing their identity on the basis of the production or presentation of travel documents. Such a check shall consist of a rapid and straightforward verification of the validity of the travel document for crossing the border, and of the presence of signs of falsification or counterfeiting.
Risk assessment: Member States shall transmit their risk assessments and their updates to the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (and report every 6 months to the Commission).
Where certain Member States, the Agency or the Commission have concerns about the intention to carry out targeted checks against the databases, they shall notify the Member State in question of those concerns without delay. The Member State in question shall take those concerns into account.
The Commission shall, by 8 April 2019, transmit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of the implementation and consequences of the measures envisages in the regulation.
Air borders: with regard to air borders, the Member States may carry out targeted checks for a maximum transitional period of 6 months from 7.4.2017. This period may be extended by a maximum of 18 months where, at a particular airport, there are specific infrastructural difficulties requiring a longer period of time for the necessary adaptations. This deadline may be extended in certain cases.
Land borders: at the border crossing points where those systematic checks are not carried out, the identity of persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law should be established on the basis of the production or presentation of an authentic travel document which is valid for crossing the border.
The United Kingdom and Ireland are not taking part in the adoption of this regulation and are not bound by it. Denmark shall decide within a period of 6 months after the regulation’s entry into force whether or not it will implement the regulation in its national law.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 7.4.2017 The regulation is directly applicable in all the Member States concerned by the envisaged measures.
The European Parliament adopted by 496 votes to 120, with 42 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards the reinforcement of checks against relevant databases at external borders.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Border checks : the amended text stipulates that the phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters, many of whom are Union citizens, demonstrates the need to reinforce checks at external borders with regard to persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law.
This Regulation amending the Schengen Border Code obliges the Member States to carry out systematic checks on entry and on exit to the external borders of the Member States using the SIS and Interpol's Stolen and Lost Travel Documents (SLTD) database and other relevant Union databases.
Member States are obliged to check systematically third -country nationals against all relevant databases on entry. It should be ensured that such checks are also carried out systematically on exit .
One of the purposes of such checks is to prevent any threat to the internal security and public policy of the Member States, irrespective of the origin of such threat, including where such a threat derives from Union citizens.
Such systematic checks should be carried out in full compliance with relevant Union law, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
In order to facilitate systematic checks against databases, Member States should phase out travel documents without machine -readable zones.
Targeted checks : where the checks against the databases would have a disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic , a Member State may decide to carry out those checks on a targeted basis at specified border crossing points, following an assessment of the risks related to the public policy, internal security, public health or international relations of any of the Member States.
Persons who, in principle, are not subject to targeted checks against the databases, shall, as a minimum, be subject to a check with a view to establishing their identity on the basis of the production or presentation of travel documents. Such a check shall consist of a rapid and straightforward verification of the validity of the travel document for crossing the border, and of the presence of signs of falsification or counterfeiting.
Transitional period : as regards air borders , Member State may decide to carry out those checks on a targeted basis during a maximum transitional period of six months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation. This six-month transitional period may be prolonged for that particular airport by a maximum of 18 months in exceptional cases, where, at a particular airport, there are specific infrastructural difficulties requiring a longer period of time for adaptations.
Where a Member State intends to carry out checks against relevant databases on a targeted basis regarding persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law, it should notify the other Member States, the Agency and the Commission without delay. A procedure for such notification should be developed by the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, in accordance with the Practical Handbook for Border Guards (Schengen Handbook).
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Monica MACOVEI (ECR, RO) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards the reinforcement of checks against relevant databases at external borders.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Respect for Fundamental Rights : it is recalled that the implementation of the Regulation shall take account the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) as well as all Union law relating to data protection. It is also stated that border checks shall be carried out in such a way as to fully respect human dignity and that that should be carried out in a professional and respectful manner and should be proportionate to the objectives pursued.
Access to relevant databases : in order to guarantee security of the Union’s external borders, Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities (including their border guards):
have an electronic connection to Interpol 's Stolen and Lost Travel Documents database (SLTD ) at external border crossing points; have access to the relevant national and European data banks, including the Schengen Information System (SIS) and the Europol Information System (EIS).
In this regard, it is stated that Member States that are not in the Schengen area and whose borders constitute the external borders should be fully integrated into SIS in order to conduct better border management and help preserve the security of the Union.
Targeted checks : as a general rule, systematic checks should be carried out at all external borders. However, if these checks have a disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic, the Member States concerned may carry out those checks on a targeted basis , provided that an assessment of the risks shows that this derogation will not harm the internal security of the Union.
Such risk assessment should be based on a set of common risk indicators developed by the Commission , in close cooperation with Frontex.
It should be possible for border guards to decide not to check relevant databases regarding a person enjoying the right of free movement under Union law if it can be clearly assessed that that person does not jeopardise the internal security of any of the Member States. Such persons could include, inter alia:
children under the age of 12 and minors accompanied by parents; school pupils when travelling on organised excursions; elderly persons when travelling in an organised manner; pilots of aircraft and other crew members; Heads of State or government and the members of their delegations; holders of diplomatic, official or service passports and members of international organisations; rescue services, police and fire brigades and border guards; off-shore workers; holders of permits required by national law in accordance with specific Member States' arrangements in bilateral agreements.
Where a Member State intends to carry out targeted checks, it should notify the other Member States, Frontex and the Commission without delay.
The duration and location of the targeted checks shall not go beyond what is strictly necessary .
Risk analysis : Frontex shall transmit without delay its evaluations of the Member State’s initial assessment and subsequent reports to all other Member States, indicating whether or not it deems the Member State concerned to have conducted an appropriate security risk and traffic flow assessment, and whether or not the Member State has appropriately decided to apply targeted checks on the basis of that assessment.
The risk assessment shall provide statistics on passengers and incidents related to cross-border crime.
Enhance biometric elements included in Member States’ identity cards : many identity cards produced by the Member States do not have any security features such as facial image or fingerprints. In order to make it possible for systematic verification to be carried out on travel documents other than passports, taking into account internal security issues, the Commission should take swift action to propose the establishment of common standards for the security features and biometrics that are to be included in identity cards issued by the Member States.
Impact of the Regulation : the Commission shall publish a study on the impact of this Regulation on the flow of traffic on the entry and exit at Schengen external borders by one year after the date of entry into force of this Regulation. Then every two years, it shall submit a general evaluation report.
PURPOSE: to introduce a targeted amendment to Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) in order to increase security within the area without internal border control.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: control at external borders remains one of the main safeguards of the area without controls at internal borders. The phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters , many of whom are Union citizens, demonstrates the necessity to strengthen the checks at external borders with regard to Union citizens.
It is estimated that up to 5 000 EU citizens departed to the conflict zones (notably Syria and Iraq) and most probably joined ISIS forces. Many of the perpetrators of recent terrorist attacks, starting from Charlie Hebdo in January 2015, stayed or were trained abroad in the areas controlled by the terrorist organisations.
This proposal replies to the call expressed in the Council conclusions of 19 and 20 November , which invited the Commission to present a proposal for a targeted revision of the Schengen Borders Code to provide for systematic controls of EU nationals, including the verification of biometric information, against relevant databases at external borders of the Schengen area, making full use of technical solutions in order not to hamper the fluidity of movement.
This proposal is a response to the increase of terrorist threats in Europe as manifested by the attacks in Paris, Copenhagen and Brussels, but should address all potential risks to internal security.
CONTENT: this proposal amends Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code).
The amended proposal:
obliges Member States to carry out systematic checks on persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law (i.e. EU citizens and members of their families who are not EU citizens) when they cross the external border against databases on lost and stolen documents as well as in order to verify that those persons do not represent a threat to public order and internal security. This obligation shall apply at all external borders i.e. at air, sea and land borders, both at entry and exit; enables Member States, where a systematic consultation of databases on all the persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law could lead to disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic at the border, to carry out only targeted checks against databases provided that a risk assessment shows this does not lead to risks related to internal security, public policy, international relations of the Member States or a threat to the public health. The risk analysis should be communicated to Frontex and should be the subject of regular reporting to the Commission and to Frontex; reinforces the need to verify biometric identifiers as contained in Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 . This Regulation introduced the facial image and fingerprints as security elements in the passport of EU citizens in order to render them more secure and establish a reliable link between the holder and the passport. Therefore in case of doubts on the authenticity of the passport or on the identity of the holder, border guards should verify those biometric identifiers; removes the margin left to Member States not to check third country nationals on exit : the amendment will align the obligations to check systematically also on exit that a third country national does not present a threat to public policy and internal security.
The United Kingdom and Ireland shall not take part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application. Denmark shall decide within a period of six months after the Council has decided on this Regulation whether it will implement it in its national law.
Documents
- For information: COM(2022)0302
- For information: EUR-Lex
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2017/458
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 074 18.03.2017, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00055/2016/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)156
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0047/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0218/2016
- Committee opinion: PE578.843
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE582.195
- Committee draft report: PE578.659
- Contribution: COM(2015)0670
- Contribution: COM(2015)0670
- Contribution: COM(2015)0670
- Debate in Council: 3450
- Contribution: COM(2015)0670
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2015)0670
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE578.659
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE582.195
- Committee opinion: PE578.843
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)156
- Draft final act: 00055/2016/LEX
- For information: COM(2022)0302 EUR-Lex
- Contribution: COM(2015)0670
- Contribution: COM(2015)0670
- Contribution: COM(2015)0670
- Contribution: COM(2015)0670
Activities
- Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daniel DALTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gérard DEPREZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mariya GABRIEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara KUDRYCKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cécile Kashetu KYENGE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ulrike LUNACEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Laurenţiu REBEGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Helga STEVENS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steven WOOLFE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0218/2016 - Monica Macovei - Am 30 accord provisoire #
Amendments | Dossier |
177 |
2015/0307(COD)
2016/04/29
LIBE
99 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Where
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Where, at the external
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new) Where border control at internal borders is reintroduced, and the relevant provisions of Title II are applicable in accordance with Article 28, Member States shall carry out the checks referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph on a non-systematic targeted basis based on an assessment of the risks related to internal security, public policy, international relations of any of the Member States or a threat to public health.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 Each Member State shall transmit its
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 Each Member State shall transmit its risk assessment to the Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union established by Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 and report every three months to the Commission and to that Agency on the application of the checks carried out on a targeted basis. The European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union established by means of Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 shall take account of these reports when it carries out an assessment of the vulnerability of a Member State and may include among the corrective measures the Member State in question is required to take the reintroduction of systematic checks.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 Each Member State shall transmit its risk assessment to the Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union established by Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 and report every three months to the European Parliament, to the Commission and to that Agency on the application of the checks carried out on a targeted basis.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 a (new) Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. With regard to air borders, paragraphs 2b and 2c shall apply for a maximum transitional period of four months from … [the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. With regard to air borders, paragraphs 2a and 2b shall apply for a maximum transitional period of six months from … [the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 a (new) Paragraph 2 shall not apply, on entry and exit, to persons enjoying the right to free movement under Union law when crossing external borders that are borders shared between different parts of the Union to which Union law on free movement applies in accordance, in particular, with Directive 2004/38/EC.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 a (new) Paragraph 2 shall not apply, on entry and exit, to persons enjoying the right to free movement under Union law when crossing external borders that are borders shared between different parts of the Union to which Union law on free movement applies in accordance, in particular, with Directive 2004/38/EC."
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new) Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 a (new) A Member State may decide to carry out those consultations on a targeted basis , at external borders that are borders shared between different parts of the Union to which Union law on free movement, in particular in accordance with Directive 2004/38/EC, applies, where the systematic consultation of the databases referred to in paragraph 2(a) and (b) would have a disproportionate impact on the: (i) flow of traffic; and (ii) rights of persons enjoying the right to free movement under Union law; Consultations on a targeted basis shall be carried out only at specified crossing- points of such external borders on the basis of an assessment of the risks related to internal security, public policy, international relations of any of the Member States or a threat to public health. The risk assessment shall be conducted on a joint basis between the parts of the Union sharing such borders and the decision as to whether to conduct the consultation of the databases referred to in paragraph 2(a) and (b) on a systematic or targeted basis shall be taken on a joint basis together with the neighbouring part of the Union and the Commission
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 a (new) "The competent Member State shall ensure that the border authorities have sufficient technical, financial and human resources to prevent, as a rule, the additional checks causing longer waiting times and hindering the flow of traffic at the external borders."
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii (iii) verification that the third-country national concerned is not considered to be a threat to public policy, internal security or international relations of any of the Member States, including by consulting the relevant Union and national databases, in particular the Schengen Information System
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii (iii) verification that the third-country national concerned is not considered to be a threat to public policy, internal security
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii iii) verification that the third-country national concerned is not considered to be a threat to public policy, internal security or international relations of any of the Member States, including by consulting the relevant Union and national databases, in
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) (1 a) The Commission shall publish an impact study on the impact of this Regulation on the flow of traffic on the entry and exit at Schengen external borders within one year after entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) (1 a) By … [two years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall transmit to the European Parliament and to the Council an evaluation of the implementation and consequences of paragraph 2.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) This amending Regulation shall expire by default five years after entry into force and five years after each prolongation. The Council and European Parliament can decide, following a proposal of the Commission, to prolong the application of this Regulation. In case this amending Regulation lapses without prolongation, Regulation 562/2006 will apply as before the entry into force of this amending Regulation.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) This amending Regulation shall expire five years after entry into force. The Council and European Parliament may decide, following a proposal of the Commission, to prolong the application of this Regulation.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) This Regulation shall expire three years after the date of entry into force. The Council and European Parliament may decide, on a proposal from the Commission, to prolong the application of this Regulation, for which a new proposal shall be submitted.
Amendment 25 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to
Amendment 26 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Deplores the lack of proper impact assessment during the preparation of the Commission proposal;
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Control at external borders remains one of the main safeguards of the Schengen area without controls at internal borders. It is carried out in the interest of all the Member States
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Control at external borders remains one of the main safeguards of the area without controls at internal borders. It is carried out in the interest of all Member States. One of the purposes of such controls is to prevent any threat to the Member States' internal security and public
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1)
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Control a
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) It is essential to take into account the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 b (new) (1b) It is essential to take into account the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 16 December 1966 and the protocols thereto.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 c (new) (1c) It is essential to take into account the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) of 18 December 1979 and the protocol thereto.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 d (new) (1d) It is essential to take into account Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 20001a. ____________ 1aRegulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data, OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 e (new) (1e) It is essential to take into account Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 f (new) (1f) It is essential to take into account the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2)
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters, many of whom are Union citizens, demonstrates the necessity to strengthen the checks at external borders with regard to Union citizens by checking biometric identifiers and consulting the available databases.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The need to fight terrorism should not undermine the rights and freedoms of EU citizens or third-country nationals. Border checks should only be carried out in strict compliance with the principles of proportionality and necessity. They should be carried out on the basis of a rigorous risk analysis and with respect for fundamental rights, in particular the right to privacy.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The documents of persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law should therefore be checked systematically against relevant databases related to stolen, misappropriated, lost and invalidated travel documents in order to avoid that persons hide their real identity. To that end, the Member States must ensure that there is an electronic connection to Interpol's Stolen and Lost Travel Documents (SLTD) database at external border crossing points.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The documents of persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law, including third-country nationals, should therefore be checked systematically, on entry into and on exit from the territory of the Union, against relevant databases related to stolen, misappropriated, lost and invalidated travel documents in order to avoid that persons hide their real identity.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The documents of persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The documents of persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law should therefore, as a general rule, be checked systematically against relevant databases related to stolen, misappropriated, lost and invalidated travel documents in order to avoid that persons hide their real identity.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The documents of persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law should therefore be checked systematically against relevant databases related to stolen, misappropriated, fraudulent, lost and invalidated travel documents in order to avoid that persons hide their real identity.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Border guards should for the same reason also systematically check persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law against relevant national and European databases in order to ensure that they do not represent a threat to internal security or public policy. To that end, the Member States should ensure that their border guards have access to the relevant national and European data banks, including the Schengen Information System (SIS) and the Europol Information System (EIS).
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Border guards
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Border guards should for the same reason also, as a general rule, systematically check persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law against relevant national and European databases in order to ensure that they do not represent a threat to internal security or public policy.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) Technological developments allow in principle to consult relevant databases without delaying the process of crossing the border, as the controls on documents and persons can be carried out in parallel. Automatic border control gates should be installed. The use of passenger information received in accordance with Council Directive 2004/82/EC7a, or with other Union or national law, may also contribute to speeding up the process of required controls during the border- crossing process. It is therefore possible without disproportionate negative effect on persons travelling in good faith to strengthen checks at external borders to better identify those persons who intend to hide their real identity or who are subject to relevant alerts for security reasons or for arrest. Systematic checks should be carried out at all external borders. However, if
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) T
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) Technological developments allow in principle to consult relevant databases with
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) Technological developments allow in principle to consult relevant databases without delaying the process of crossing the border, as the controls on documents and persons can be carried out in parallel.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) Technological developments allow in principle to consult relevant databases without delaying the process of crossing the border, as the controls on documents and persons can be carried out in parallel. It is therefore possible without negative effect on persons travelling in good faith to strengthen checks at external borders to
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) Technological developments allow in principle to consult relevant databases without delaying the process of crossing the border, as the controls on documents and persons can be carried out in parallel. It is therefore possible without negative effect on persons travelling in good faith to strengthen checks at external borders to better identify those persons who intend to hide their real identity or who are subject to relevant alerts for security reasons or for arrest.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) Technological developments allow in principle to consult relevant databases with
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) It should be possible for border guards to decide not to check relevant databases regarding a person enjoying the right of free movement under Union law if it can be clearly assessed that that person does not jeopardise the internal security of any of the Member States. Such persons could include, inter alia, children under the age of 12 and minors accompanied by parents; school pupils when travelling on organised excursions; elderly persons when travelling in an organised manner; pilots of aircraft and other crew members; Heads of State or government and the members of their delegation(s); holders of diplomatic, official or service passports and members of international organisations; rescue services, police and fire brigades and border guards; offshore workers; holders of permits required by national law in accordance with specific Member States' arrangements in bilateral agreements as referred to in point (a) of Article 4(2) of the Regulation (EU) 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a ; _________________ 1aRegulation (EU) 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 1).
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) Where a Member State intends to carry out targeted checks and consultations regarding persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law, it should notify the other Member States, the Agency and the Commission without delay. The Commission should develop, no later than one month from the date of entry into force of this Regulation, a procedure for this notification, in cooperation with the Member States, in the context of the Schengen Borders Code Handbook.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Where a Member State conducts targeted rather than systematic checks, it should make use of the common risk indicators for foreign terrorist fighters established by the Commission and the guidelines drawn up by Frontex.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 b (new) (5b) However, should systematic checks at external borders have a disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic at the border, Member States should be allowed not to carry out systematic checks against relevant databases if, on the basis of a risk assessment, it is found that such a relaxation of checks would not lead to a security risk. Such risk assessments should be transmitted to the Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (the Agency) established by Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/20041a and be the subject of regular reporting both to the Commission and to the Agency. _________________ 1a Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 of 26 October 2004 establishing a European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 1).
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) With Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/20049, the Union introduced the facial image and fingerprints as security elements in the passport of Union citizens. These security features have been introduced in order to render the passports more secure and establish a reliable link between the holder and the passport. Member States should therefore systematically verify these biometric identifiers
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) With Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/20049, the Union introduced the facial image and fingerprints as security elements in the passport of Union citizens.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Border checks should be carried out in such a way as to fully respect human dignity. Border control should be carried out in a professional and respectful manner and be proportionate to the objectives pursued.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 b (new) (6b) Many identity cards produced by the Member States do not, however, have any security features such as the facial image or fingerprints. In order to make it possible for this systematic verification to be carried out on travel documents other than passports, but also with internal security issues in mind, the Commission should take swift action to propose the establishment of common standards for the security features and biometrics that are to be included in identity cards issued by the Member States.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Member States should exchange data, regularly update their existing relevant databases, make full use of existing information systems and establish the necessary technical connections to all information systems and databases, in accordance with their legal bases and obligations. Member States should, in this regard, exchange best practices with each other.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Member States
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Member States
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Since the objective of this Regulation
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely reinforcing the checks against databases at external borders of the European Union in reply in particular to the increase of the terrorist threat concerns one of the safeguards of the area without internal border control and as such concerns the proper functioning of the Schengen area, it cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can rather be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) For the purpose of maximising the benefits of existing information systems and, if necessary, develop new and complementary actions to address gaps and improve the interoperability of information systems and to ensure effective border controls at the external borders, Member States according to their needs should receive financial support from the Commission.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) For the purpose of maximising the benefits of existing information systems and, if necessary, develop new and complementary actions to address gaps and improve the interoperability of information systems and to ensure effective border controls at the external borders, Member States according to their needs should receive financial support from the budget of the Union.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) The application of this Regulation should take into account the existing arrangements for Gibraltar with regard to border crossings with Spain, whilst fully respecting the non-participation of the United Kingdom in the Schengen area. There should not be a disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic at the border or freedom of movement as a consequence of this Regulation.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Member States that are not in the Schengen area and whose borders constitute the external borders should be fully integrated into the Schengen Information System in order to conduct better border management and help preserve the security of the Union.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory wording (2) On entry and on exit, persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law shall at least be subject to
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory wording 2. On entry
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory wording (2) On entry and on exit, persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law shall, as a general rule, be subject to the following checks:
Amendment 79 #
(a) verification of the identity and the nationality of the person and the validity and authenticity of the travel document, by consulting the relevant databases,
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory wording (a) verification of the identity and the nationality of the person and the validity and authenticity of the travel document, by consulting
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory wording (a) verification of the identity and the nationality of the person and the validity
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a – point 2 Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c (3) national databases containing information on stolen, misappropriated, fraudulent, lost and invalidated travel documents
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 1–paragraph 2 – point a – point 3 a (new) (3a) the European Criminal Records Information System.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) verification that a person enjoying the right of free movement under Union law is not considered to be a threat to the internal security, public policy, international relations of any of the Member States or to public health,
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) verification that a person enjoying the right of free movement under Union law is not considered to be a threat to the internal security, public policy, international relations of any of the Member States or to public health, including by consulting the relevant Union
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) verification that a person enjoying the right of free movement under Union law is not considered to be a threat to the internal security, public policy, international relations of any of the Member States or to public health, including by consulting the relevant Union and national databases,
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where there is doubt on the authenticity of the travel document or on the identity of its holder, the checks shall include the verification of the biometric identifiers integrated in the passports and travel documents issued in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004*. If possible, this verification of biometric identifiers shall also be carried out for other travel documents which are not covered by this Regulation, including identity cards.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where there is doubt on the authenticity of the travel document or on the identity of its holder, the checks
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where there is doubt on the authenticity of the travel document or on the identity of its holder, the checks shall include the verification of one of the biometric identifiers integrated in the passports and travel documents issued in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004*.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 On entry or exit, when crossing an external border of the Schengen area which is shared between several Member States or Member State territories persons enjoying freedom of movement under EU law, in particular Directive 2004/38/EC, shall undergo a minimum check intended to establish their identity on the basis of the production or presentation of their travel documents.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) On entry and exit, only minimum checks to establish their identities on the basis of the production or presentation of travel documents shall be applied to persons enjoying the right to free movement under Union law, in particular under Directive 2004/38/EC, when crossing an external Schengen border that is shared between Member States or different parts of the Union. Those minimum checks shall consist of a rapid and straightforward verification.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) The consequences of the checks referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph shall not jeopardise the right of entry of persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law into the territory of the Member State concerned as laid down in Directive 2004/38/EC.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Border guards may decide not to check the relevant databases regarding a person enjoying the right of free movement under Union law if it can be clearly assessed that that person does not jeopardise the internal security of any of the Member States.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (new) Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where a Member State temporarily reintroduces internal border controls, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter II of Title III, it should, where appropriate, consider applying systematic checks in the same way as for external border controls.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Where
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Where, at external land and sea borders, the checks referred to in points a) and b) of the first subparagraph would have a disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic, Member States may carry out those checks on a targeted basis based on an assessment of the risks related to internal security, public policy, international relations of any of the Member States or a threat to public health. The duration and location of these checks must not go beyond what is strictly necessary for the purposes of risk assessment.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Where, at external land and sea borders, the checks referred to in points a) and b) of the first subparagraph would have a disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic, Member States may carry out those checks on a targeted basis based on an assessment of the risks related to internal security, public policy, international relations of any of the Member States or a threat to public health. The minimum check intended to establish identity on the basis of production or presentation of travel documents shall still apply, however.
source: 582.195
2016/05/02
AFET
78 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 Having regard to the pr
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 Having regard to the pr
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 Having regard to
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 Having regard to
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 Having regard to the
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 Having regard to
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 Having regard to
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 3 Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 4 Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1)
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Control at external borders remains one of the main safeguards of the area without controls at internal borders. It is carried out in the interest of all Member States and with full respect for fundamental rights. One of the purposes of such controls is to prevent any threat to the Member States' internal security and public policy, irrespectively of the origin of such threat, including where such threats derive from Union citizens.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966 and to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 1966 and their additional protocols,
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 b (new) (1b) Having regard to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) of 1979 and the additional protocol thereto,
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 c (new) (1c) Having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 d (new) (1d) Having regard to the protection of the personal data of European citizens
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 e (new) (1e) Having regard to Article 2 TEU, which states that the EU is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 f (new) (1f) Having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters, many of whom are Union citizens, demonstrates the necessity
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2)
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters, many of whom are Union citizens, demonstrates the urgentnecessity to strengthen the checks at external borders with regard to Union citizens.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The need to fight terrorism must not jeopardise the rights and freedoms of either European citizens or third-country nationals. Border checks must be carried out in strict compliance with the principles of proportionality and necessity. They must be carried out on the basis of a stringent risk analysis and with respect for fundamental rights, in particular the right to privacy.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3)
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The documents of persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4)
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Border guards
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Border guards should for the same reason also
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5)
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) T
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) Technological developments allow in principle to consult relevant databases without delaying the process of crossing the border, as the controls on documents and persons can be carried out in parallel. It is therefore possible without negative effect on persons travelling in good faith to strengthen checks at external borders to better identify those persons who intend to hide their real identity or who are subject to relevant alerts for security reasons or for arrest. Systematic checks should be carried out at all external borders. However, if systematic checks at land and sea borders with existing capacities and technologies were to have a disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic at the border, Member States should be allowed not to carry out systematic checks against databases but only if based on a risk analysis assessing
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) Technological developments allow in principle to consult relevant databases without delaying the process of crossing the border, as the controls on documents and persons can be carried out in parallel. It is therefore possible without negative effect on persons travelling in good faith to strengthen checks at external borders to better identify those persons who intend to hide their real identity or who are subject to relevant alerts for security reasons or for arrest. Systematic checks should be carried out at all external borders. However, if systematic checks at land and sea borders were to have a disproportionate impact on the flow of traffic at the border, Member States should be allowed not to carry out
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) W
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) With Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/20049, the Union introduced the facial image and fingerprints as security elements in the passport of Union citizens. These security features have been introduced in order to render the passports more secure and establish a reliable link between the holder and the passport. Member States should therefore verify these biometric identifiers, in case of doubts on the authenticity of the passport or on the identity of its holder. The same approach should apply to checks on third- country nationals, where possible. __________________ 9 Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 of 13 December 2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States (OJ L 385, 29.12.2004, p.1).
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) With Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/20049, the Union introduced the facial image and fingerprints as security elements in the passport of Union citizens. These security features have been introduced in order to render the passports more secure and establish a reliable link between the holder and the passport
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7)
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Member States
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8)
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9)
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Since the objective of this Regulation
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely reinforcing the checks against databases at external borders in reply in particular to the increase of the terrorist threat concerns one of the safeguards of the area without internal border control and as such concerns the proper functioning of the Schengen area, it
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10)
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13)
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14)
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – title The Schengen area shall be abolished, in keeping with the desire of all European peoples for security
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory sentence 2. On entry
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory sentence a) verification of the identity and the nationality of the person and the validity and authenticity of the travel document, by consulting
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where there is doubt on the authenticity of the travel document or on the identity of its holder, the checks
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 Having regard to
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii iii) verification that the third-country national concerned is not considered to be a threat to public policy
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 This Regulation
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 source: 582.169
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/3/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=27428&j=0&l=en
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
events/7/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.659New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-578659_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.195New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-582195_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE578.843&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-578843_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=27428&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/7/docs |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0218&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0218_EN.html |
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0047New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0047_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
LIBE/8/05343New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R0458New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32017R0458 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/12 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/summary/0 |
Old
Amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006New
Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 |
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/migration-and-home-affairs_en |
activities/11 |
|
other/1/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/migration-and-home-affairs_en |
activities/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0670:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0670:EN
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/9 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final actNew
Awaiting signature of act |
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final act |
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/5/date |
Old
2017-02-14T00:00:00New
2017-02-15T00:00:00 |
activities/5/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/6 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2016-02-15T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/3/date |
2016-02-15T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/4/committees/3/date |
2016-02-15T00:00:00
|
activities/4/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/date |
2016-02-15T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2016-02-15T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/3/date |
2016-02-15T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/4/committees/3/date |
2016-02-15T00:00:00
|
activities/4/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/date |
2016-02-15T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2016-11-22T00:00:00New
2015-12-15T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Legislative proposal published |
activities/5/date |
Old
2016-10-04T00:00:00New
2016-11-22T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2016-09-13T00:00:00New
2016-10-04T00:00:00 |
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/4 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/5 |
|
committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
committees/3/shadows/4 |
|
committees/3/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
committees/3/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2016-02-16T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2016-02-16T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/3/date |
2016-02-15T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/3/shadows |
|
committees/3/date |
2016-02-15T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
LIBE/8/05343
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52015PC0670:EN
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|