Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | GOULARD Sylvie ( ALDE) | PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa ( PPE), DELVAUX Mady ( S&D), FOX Ashley ( ECR), GIEGOLD Sven ( Verts/ALE), ZANNI Marco ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | AFCO | RANGEL Paulo ( PPE) | Morten MESSERSCHMIDT ( ECR), Josep-Maria TERRICABRAS ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | EMPL |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 478 votes to 217, with 9 abstentions, a resolution on the EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies.
Parliament stressed that the growing interdependence among economies across the world makes it necessary to move towards increasingly global forms of governance and that the EU should speak with one voice in international institutions/bodies.
Concerned at the lack of coherence caused by the fragmentation and diversity of the various organisations/bodies and at the implementation delays regarding rules and orientations agreed at international level, Parliament stressed the need for enhanced international regulatory cooperation, with strong European Parliament involvement .
Better coordination: Parliament called for clarification as to the remit of each organisation/body and urged for better policy coherence and coordination among the global institutions through the introduction of comprehensive standards of democratic legitimacy, transparency, accountability and integrity . This should, inter alia, concern:
· relations with the public (for example public access to documents, open dialogue with diverse stakeholders, the establishment of mandatory transparency registers and rules on transparency of lobby meeting);
· internal rules (for example human resources based on skills, sound financial management, prevention of conflict of interests).
Parliament considered that the under-representation of least developed countries in most international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies is creating an imbalance.
As well as geographical disparity in representation, there are also certain sectors - notably civil society, SMEs, consumer representatives and employee representatives – whose involvement in the consultation process could be improved in international discussions regarding financial, monetary and regulatory bodies.
Representation of the European Union (EU): Parliament stated that the EU should:
· streamline and codify its representation in multilateral organisations/bodies with a view to increasing the transparency, integrity and accountability of the Union's involvement in these bodies, its influence and the promotion of the legislation it has adopted through a democratic process;
· become a more proactive global actor in ensuring the future G20 commitments , such as transforming shadow banking, implementing over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives reforms, addressing systemic risks and ensuring that emerging risks to the global economy are taken up on the agenda of the relevant global institution;
· seek full membership of international economic and financial institutions where this has not yet been granted and is appropriate (e.g. in the cases of the OECD and the IMF ). Parliament stressed the need for the Commission, representing the whole Union in an international body or organisation or monitoring a private specialist body, to be held more directly accountable to citizens and that the Parliament should be involved in this process.
Parliament also welcomed the work done by the OECD on tax issues, especially the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project. The coordination between the Commission and the Member States which are members of the Financial Action Task Force ( FATF ) should be improved in order for the EU to make its voice heard.
Accordingly, Parliament made the following proposals :
· the Commission is called upon to draw on existing best practices at European and national levels in order to draft a European code of conduct on transparency, integrity and accountability , designed to guide the actions of EU representatives in international organisations/bodies; Parliament should be closely associated in the drafting process;
· the adoption of an interinstitutional agreement with the aim of formalising a 'financial dialogue' , should be organised with the European Parliament for the purpose of establishing guidelines regarding the adoption and the coherence of European positions in the run-up to major international negotiations. Active involvement of national parliaments at their respective levels, by controlling the positions taken by the representatives of the member states concerned, is also necessary;
· enhanced accountability of the Commission to the European Parliament by streamlining the process for the definition of EU positions at the meetings of the G20 in policy fields related to employment, energy, trade, development and anti-corruption;
· Member States to accept the representation of the Banking Union in the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision through the Single Supervisory Mechanism;
· progression towards a single representation of the euro area within the IMF ; this needs to be done without prejudice to a single European Union constituency in the long term;
· include in its work programme the external dimension of economic and financial regulation, that is, the work anticipated to take place in international financial institutions;
· the transparency and accountability of the Euro Group should be improved;
· progressive streamlining of the EU representation should be implemented over the next years, first through enhanced coordination and then, after an assessment, through the unification of seats ; membership of these organisations and bodies should be allocated in accordance with the respective competences of the EU institutions and the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), the Council/Eurogroup, and the national authorities; the EU should work on the functioning of those organisations and bodies with a view to moving away from consensus to a weighted majority voting system;
· it is the duty of the Commission, the Council, or where appropriate the Euro Group, to strengthen coordination through preparatory meetings;
· a thorough assessment of the two separate seats currently allocated to the European Council and Commission presidencies at G20 meetings;
· promote the establishment of a roadmap towards the creation of a global treaty-based financial organisation , with wide-ranging powers of recommendation, negotiation of minimum binding standards, multilateral dispute settlement mechanisms and, where appropriate, sanctions.
Lastly, the Commission should be provided with an explicit mandate to foster a new impetus for the promotion of multilateralism regarding financial, monetary and regulatory international cooperation.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2016)484
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0108/2016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A8-0027/2016
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0027/2016
- Committee opinion: PE557.271
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE569.719
- Committee draft report: PE567.475
- Committee draft report: PE567.475
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE569.719
- Committee opinion: PE557.271
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A8-0027/2016
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2016)484
Activities
- Ulrike LUNACEK
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 The EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies (short presentation) DE
- 2016/11/22 The EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies (short presentation) DE
- 2016/11/22 The EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies (short presentation) DE
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 The EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies (A8-0027/2016 - Sylvie Goulard) EL
- 2016/11/22 The EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies (short presentation) EL
- 2016/11/22 The EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies (short presentation) EL
- Sylvie GOULARD
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Louis ALIOT
- Max ANDERSSON
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
- Jean ARTHUIS
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
- Jonathan ARNOTT
- Zoltán BALCZÓ
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
- Hugues BAYET
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
- Renata BRIANO
- Steeve BRIOIS
- Gianluca BUONANNO
- Soledad CABEZÓN RUIZ
- Alain CADEC
- Nicola CAPUTO
- Alberto CIRIO
- Jane COLLINS
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
- Andi CRISTEA
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
- Edward CZESAK
- Daniel DALTON
- Michel DANTIN
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
- Philippe DE BACKER
- Rachida DATI
- Mady DELVAUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
- Peter ERIKSSON
- Norbert ERDŐS
- Edouard FERRAND
- Lorenzo FONTANA
- Ashley FOX
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
- Elena GENTILE
- Arne GERICKE
- Sylvie GODDYN
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
- Enrique GUERRERO SALOM
- Antanas GUOGA
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
- Anna HEDH
- Brian HAYES
- Marian HARKIN
- Mike HOOKEM
- Ian HUDGHTON
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
- Diane JAMES
- Ramón JÁUREGUI ATONDO
- Petr JEŽEK
- Marc JOULAUD
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
- Philippe JUVIN
- Béla KOVÁCS
- Olle LUDVIGSSON
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
- Monica MACOVEI
- Louis-Joseph MANSCOUR
- Ivana MALETIĆ
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
- Dominique MARTIN
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
- Louis MICHEL
- Bernard MONOT
- Marlene MIZZI
- Krisztina MORVAI
- Alessia Maria MOSCA
- Renaud MUSELIER
- József NAGY
- Norica NICOLAI
- Jens NILSSON
- Franz OBERMAYR
- Margot PARKER
- Florian PHILIPPOT
- Marijana PETIR
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
- Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE
- Franck PROUST
- Julia REID
- Sofia RIBEIRO
- Robert ROCHEFORT
- Liliana RODRIGUES
- Claude ROLIN
- Fernando RUAS
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
- Jill SEYMOUR
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
- Siôn SIMON
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
- Davor ŠKRLEC
- Igor ŠOLTES
- Renato SORU
- Catherine STIHLER
- Beatrix von STORCH
- Richard SULÍK
- Patricija ŠULIN
- Neoklis SYLIKIOTIS
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
- Pavel TELIČKA
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
- Marita ULVSKOG
- Elena VALENCIANO
- Bodil VALERO
- Marco VALLI
- Paavo VÄYRYNEN
- Daniele VIOTTI
- Udo VOIGT
- Miguel VIEGAS
Votes
A8-0027/2016 - Sylvie Goulard - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
229 |
2015/2060(INI)
2015/09/29
AFCO
52 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for the establishment of better- structured prior coordination mechanisms, so that a common EU position can be forged with a view to promoting EU goals and policies more effectively within existing international economic forums, given the significant degree of interdependence between the world economies dictated by the importance of international trade for the global economic order;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that a concerted EU strategy should be developed within each of these financial, monetary, and regulatory institutions and bodies so as to allow the Union to establish a coordinated position and enhance its influence over the decision-making process;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasizes the importance of a unified European voice in international institutions and bodies and calls on the Commission to propose a European code of conduct on transparency and accountability designed to guide the action of European representatives in international organisations, drawing upon existing best practices; in time this code of conduct could be used as an example by all international institutions and bodies when they create their own codes of conduct;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Advocates that the Union promote a
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Advocates that the Union promote a unified and inclusive European approach in order to ensure that its policies and measures are consistent, effective and sustained and that the interests and inputs of those Member States that are not represented within these institutions or bodies are taken into account when a common stance is defined;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that this unified and inclusive European approach could be better realised through a regular and formal 'financial dialogue' organised in the European Parliament in order to establish guidelines regarding the adoption of European positions in the run-up to major international negotiations, making sure that these positions are known and ensuring follow- up; the European institutions, the Member States and, where appropriate, the heads of the international organisations concerned would be invited to attend; the nature (public or in camera) and frequency of this dialogue would depend on practical requirements;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Considers that this dialogue would serve to define the negotiating remit for areas where the European Parliament is co-legislator with the Council, unifying European positions around the legislation adopted by majority vote or avoiding inconsistencies with legislation pending adoption;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Urges the Union, through its institutions, to comply in full with its Charter of Fundamental Rights and respect the absolute limits laid down by it for action in all areas, including measures of an economic nature likely to have a major impact on the life of its citizens;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Emphasises how vital it is that the national parliaments should exercise democratic scrutiny over the activities of the European Union’s representatives in the international bodies and institutions, and that political accountability should be restored;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the Union should play a more active and prominent role in the process of global economic governance, and stresses the need for coherent EU representation and a strong European voice in international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies, given the current high level of interdependence between countries and the shift in the balance of power;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that the EU should
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that the EU should seek full membership of such international economic and financial institutions, where this has not yet been granted and is appropriate (in the case of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), for instance); calls for the relevant international economic and financial institutions to make all the necessary statutory changes in order to allow for the EUs full participation;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Believes that in the future, with due regard to the distribution of competences between the EU and its Member States and the progress made towards deepening economic and monetary union
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Believes that in the future, with due regard to the distribution of competences between the EU and its Member States
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Believes that in the future, with due regard to the distribution of competences between the EU and its Member States and the progress made towards deepening economic and monetary union, consideration should be given to introducing unified external representation of the EU and the euro area within the IMF and other international economic forums, in order to allow the EU to exploit its potential fully, to facilitate achievement of its objectives, to protect its interests and those of all the Member States and to increase its relevance and influence within the global economic and financial architecture;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Believes that in the future, with due regard to the distribution of competences between the EU and its Member States and the progress made towards deepening economic and monetary union,
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Believes that in the future, with due regard to the distribution of competences between the EU and its Member States and the progress made towards deepening economic and monetary union, consideration should be given to introducing unified external representation of the EU and the euro area within the IMF and other international economic forums, in order to allow the EU to exploit its potential fully and to increase its relevance and influence within the global economic and financial architecture; Stresses the need of a real reform of the EU policies, so as to avoid internal economic and social unbalances between Member States, and to allow processes of debt restructuring;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Regrets the fact that the international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies as well as EU's participation in these are lacking democratic accountability and transparency in their decision-making process
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for the provision of a single seat for the Council and Commission presidencies at G20 meetings, as the two current separate seats detract from Europe's external credibility;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the Union should play a more active and prominent role supporting its Member States in the process of global economic governance, and stresses the need for coherent EU representation and a strong European voice, relaying that of the sovereign nations, in international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that the International Monetary Fund’s expertise can usefully contribute to thinking about the future of the single currency and reforms in that regard, as illustrated by the most recent (April 2015) World Economic Report study – albeit covering only four countries (Germany, France, Italy and Spain) accounting for 80% of euro area GDP – which measured precisely how, since 2000, the euro has undermined macroeconomic policy to the detriment of growth, and charted, too, its negative impact on growth potential;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses the need to ensure the transparency, democratic accountability and legitimacy of the Union’s participation in existing economic and financial institutions via a tight and effective system of scrutiny by the national parliaments, which should be able to ‘show a red cardֹ’, particularly when Commission representatives stray beyond their negotiating briefs in international institutions, as, regrettably, has systematically been the case in the context of GATT and subsequently the WTO;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses the need to ensure the full transparency, democratic accountability
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that representatives of the Union should be able to hold the rotating presidency of the G-20;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Takes the view that the Union’s representatives at the G-20 should be given an explicit democratic mandate by the EU institutions;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Advocates that the Union establish a system of full transparency for lobbyists in the process of negotiation between the European institutions and these international institutions;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that Parliament should be duly informed of the Union’s activities within existing economic and financial institutions; Parliament will play a monitoring role as regards the work of Union representatives in these institutions;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that Parliament should be
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that Parliament and the national parliaments should be duly informed of the Union’s activities within existing economic and financial institutions;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that Parliament should be duly informed of the Union’s activities and positions within existing economic and financial institutions and should have the right to express its opinion;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the Union should play a more active and prominent role in the process of global economic governance,
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that Parliament should be duly informed of the Union’s activities within existing economic and financial institutions with the aim of ensuring accountability and strengthening democratic legitimacy;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for the establishment of inter- institutional working groups that would convene before the official meetings of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies and would grant the European Parliament the opportunity to express its opinion on the issues that would be discussed in the upcoming meetings; a mechanism should be created to take into account such opinion;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that Parliament should be granted access to the relevant documents issued by economic and financial institutions, that an appropriate, open, regular and efficient reporting mechanism should be developed, and that EU participants should systematically provide feedback to Parliament on the decisions taken in these forums;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that Parliament and the national parliaments should be granted access to the relevant documents issued by economic and financial institutions, that an appropriate, open and efficient reporting mechanism should be developed, and that EU participants should systematically provide feedback to Parliament on the decisions taken in these forums;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Takes the view that Parliament should encourage own-initiative reports setting out its findings regarding the participation of EU representatives in these financial and economic institutions, with the aim of promoting their reform on the basis of democratic criteria of general interest;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Affirms that the European Parliament and the national parliaments will exercise democratic scrutiny over the joint programmes of these institutions with the Union;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 c (new) 10c. Urges the Member States to sign an interinstitutional agreement to give the European Parliament powers to supervise the action of the Union in respect of these institutions;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers it necessary to create strong information and transparency mechanisms with the national parliaments in relation to EU activities in existing economic and financial institutions;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Is of the opinion that the EU should, where and when necessary, and once it has set a good example itself in this regard, play a leading and more active role in promoting the reform of international economic and financial institutions with a view to making their functioning more democratic, transparent and accountable, via the close and effective involvement of national parliaments and scrupulous respect for national sovereignty, and thereby bringing them closer to citizens.
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Is of the opinion that the EU should
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Believes that the Union, as member of international fora, shall promote the reform of the process of the international and economic governance according to its principles as foreseen, in particular, in Articles 2, 3 and 6 of the Treaty on the European Union;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls for the careful scrutiny by the European Parliament of the procedures and methods deployed by the International Monetary Fund in the context of its participation in the hybrid institutions (formerly known as " troika") and welcomes, in this regard, the recent developments according to which the European Parliament has been asked to get involved in overseeing the Greek bailout programme and any other future bail-out programmes;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Stresses the need for some of these institutions to move beyond their informal nature with a view to being governed by international treaties;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Considers it advisable for the EU to defend, in all international economic fora, the coordination and strengthening of world economic governance, the European Social Model, tax cooperation and a culture of business sustainability;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls for an adhesion of the European Union to international fora regulating and influencing the international economy. However, believes that the EU should clarify the legal nature of the decisions taken by the informal bodies leading the monetary Union;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that the economic and financial crisis which began in 2008 has highlighted the lack of economic governance in the world and the need to establish supranational bodies with the ability to intervene and operating rules for greater coordination of national economic policy decisions;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for the establishment of a coherent and better-
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for the establishment of better- structured prior coordination mechanisms, so that a common EU position can be forged with a view to promoting effectively EU goals and policies
source: 567.822
2015/10/15
ECON
177 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas one of the main roles of the EU should be to act with a single voice in international fora to shape global governance towards the objectives and values of the EU treaties in a democratic framework in order to cope with global challenges;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 -
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 –
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 - Recommends, on the basis of the code, working towards global standards of transparency and accountability, regarding the statute, financing and operation of those organisations
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 - Recommends, on the basis of the code, working towards global standards of transparency and accountability, regarding the statute, financing and operation of those organisations (including their relations with the sector concerned and the public, their communication and access to their documents) as well as their dialogue with the authorities; stresses that new ways of enhancing accountability, transparency and dialogue between the organisations and their member states, national parliaments, and wider civil society should be found, e.g. in the form of formal hearings; is of the opinion that the Commission could play a central role in facilitating these hearings;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 - Recommends, on the basis of the code, working towards global standards of transparency and accountability, regarding the statute, financing and operation of those organisations/bodies (including their relations with the sector concerned and the public, their communication and access to their documents) as well as their dialogue with the authorities;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 a (new) – Calls for the strengthening of transparency and democratic accountability in the areas in which the EU is present, in particular by providing public access to documents, details of the various positions adopted, of relations with lobbies and of any conflicts of interest;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 a (new) - Calls for the adoption of improved provisions on requirements governing transparency and accountability in international finance, monetary and regulatory institutions and facilities;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 a (new) - Calls on the Commission to report yearly on the progress it made towards the establishment of these rules in all concerned organisations and fora;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 a (new) - Requests that the transparency of international organisations is strengthened, notably by setting up mandatory transparency registers to monitor exchanges with stakeholders and civil society;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 a (new) - Calls for the establishment of a common EU policy towards all international financial institutions to ensure policy coherence; is of the opinion that, in order to ensure parliamentary oversight, the European Parliament should give its input to the formulation of this policy in a form of a ‘guidance’ report to the Commission once or twice a parliamentary term, spelling out the Parliament’s view on general policy orientations and goals without going into the details; is of the opinion that the Commission should, based on this guidance, also report back to the Parliament on how this guidance was applied in practice;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the financial system, having been shaped by a lengthy process of privatisation and deregulation, is impinging to an intolerable degree on politics and political institutions and hence on countries’ sovereign development;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 b (new) - Recommends that the dialogue between international organisations and stakeholders needs to be diversified, notably by fostering the dialogue with the civil society and NGOs such as consumer organisations;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 c (new) - Calls on the Commission to set up or support an NGO with adequate technical expertise and financial means to strengthen the voice of civil society in herein mentioned organisations and to counter-balance one-sided influence by the private sector; endorses the creation of ‘Finance Watch’ as best practice;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 d (new) - Calls on the European institutions and agencies as well as Member States to promote accountability of each and every international organisation towards democratically elected bodies;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 e (new) - Calls on the Commission to perform an impact assessment in the next 3 years determining if private organisations act in the public interest;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 3 - Calls for a formalised and regular ‘financial dialogue’ to be organised in the European Parliament for the purpose of
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 3 – Calls for a formalised and regular
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 3 - Calls for
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 3 - Calls, in addition to this general policy guidance, for a formalised and regular ‘financial dialogue’ to be organised in the European Parliament for the purpose of establishing specific guidelines regarding the adoption of European positions in the run-
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 3 – Calls for a formalised and regular ‘financial dialogue’ to be organised in the European Parliament for the purpose of
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 3 - Calls for a formalised and regular ‘financial dialogue’ to be organised in the European Parliament for the purpose of establishing guidelines regarding the adoption of European positions in the run- up to major international negotiations, making sure that these positions are
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas Member States are well represented in international economic fora;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 3 - Calls for a formalised and regular ‘financial dialogue’ to be organised in - and with - the European Parliament for the purpose of establishing guidelines regarding the adoption of European positions in the run-
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 3 a (new) - Proposes in this context the introduction of transparency registers detailing who represents which interests under what name and what financial resources they have, particularly in private specialist and sectoral organisations;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 3 a (new) - Underlines that, given the division of competences between the European Union and its Member States, convergence towards truly European positions in international institutions can only be achieved if ownership is strengthened at both the national and the European level and full involvement is ensured through, amongst others, active involvement of national parliaments besides strong and sustained involvement of the European Parliament.
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 4 – Observes that, in areas where the European Parliament is co-legislator with the Council, the dialogue would serve, in certain cases, to define their negotiating remit,
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 4 - Observes that, in areas where the European Parliament is co-legislator with the Council, the dialogue would serve to define their negotiating remit, unifying European positions around the legislation adopted
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 4 - Observes that, in areas where the European Parliament is co-legislator with the Council, the dialogue would serve to define their negotiating remit, unifying European positions around the legislation adopted by majority vote or avoiding inconsistencies with legislation pending adoption; underlines that European representatives in international negotiations are bound by the adopted EU legislation; calls upon the European representatives to aim for a maximum level of coherence and consistency between international requirements and adopted EU legislation and to prevent conflicts and inconsistencies between the EU legislative requirements and the international standards; calls for particular attention to be paid to compliance by countries with the overall recommendations made by these organisations in order to create a level playing field at international level;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 4 - Observes that, in areas where the European Parliament is co-legislator with the Council, the dialogue would serve to define their negotiating remit, unifying European positions around the legislation adopted by majority vote or avoiding inconsistencies with legislation pending adoption; calls for particular attention to be paid to compliance by countries with the overall recommendations made by these organisations/bodies in order to create a level playing field at international level;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 4 a (new) - Calls for the scrutiny right of the European Parliament on the decisions taken by international regulatory bodies to be made more effective through, for instance, improved access to documents or the establishment of ad hoc working groups;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 4 a (new) - Calls on the Member States to accept the representation of Banking Union at the Basel Committee on banking supervision through the Single Supervisory Mechanism;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 4 a (new) - Believes that, when needed, the European Parliament should adopt resolutions, even with urgent character, to give a democratic mandate to Eurozone representatives in International Financial Institutions, regarding issues of strategic importance for the Euro area and the EU;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas the fiscal costs of financial failures are met nationally;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 5 Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 5 Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 5 – Urges that the Member States
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 5 Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 5 - Urges that the Member States take seriously the coordination and sincere cooperation provisions of the Treaties;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 5 - Urges
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 5 a (new) - Calls on the Commission to include in its work programme the external dimension of economic and financial regulation, that is, the work anticipated to take place in the international financial institutions; is of the opinion that the Commission should, in this respect, also ensure better policy coherence of EU regulation and the EU external commitments;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 5 b (new) - Urges the Commission, in order to enhance internal policy coherence, to set up a working group on global economic governance and financial institutions; is of the opinion that the longer term goal could be to task the Eurozone treasury- as outlined in the ‘five presidents report’ - with this coordination and to bring the relevant Council working group under the same coordination to ensure both institutions work coherently on the international arena;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas global cooperation can lead to a dilution of responsibilities, at the expense of democracy; whereas the role of the national parliaments and the European
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 - Urges the Commission to use its right of initiative to propose, in accordance with Article 138(2) TFEU and the undertakings given by its President to the European
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 - Urges the Commission to use its right of initiative to propose, in accordance with Article 138(2) TFEU and the undertakings given by its President to the European Parliament in 2014, appropriate measures to ensure unified representation of the Union within international financial institutions and conferences; considers it imperative to progress towards single representation of the euro area within the IMF, the first step being to group member countries within a specific constituenc
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 - Urges the Commission to use its right of initiative to propose, in accordance with Article 138(2) TFEU and the undertakings given by its President to the European Parliament in 2014, appropriate measures to ensure unified representation of the Union within international financial
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 - Urges the Commission to use its right of initiative to propose, in accordance with Article 138(2) TFEU and the undertakings given by its President to the European Parliament in 2014, appropriate measures to ensure unified representation of the Union within international financial institutions and conferences; considers it imperative to progress towards single representation of the euro area within the IMF, the first step being to group member countries within specific constituencies and then within a single constituency, without prejudice to the creation of a single European Union constituency in the long term; points out that, under Protocol N° 14
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 a (new) - underlines that it is the duty of the Commission, the Council, or where appropriate the Eurogroup, to strengthen the coordination through preparatory meetings; considers that new ad hoc working groups should be set up, if necessary, like the Economic and Financial Committee (EFC), the Eurogroup Working Group (EWG) and Economic Policy Committee (EPC);
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 b (new) - Considers that beyond the sole case of the IMF progressive streamlining should be implemented over the next years through first enhanced coordination then through unification of the seats; believes that membership to these organisations and bodies should be made according to the respective competencies of the EU institutions and agencies, the Council/Eurogroup, and the national authorities; is of the opinion that in parallel the EU should work on the functioning of those organisations and bodies to move away from the consensus to a weighted majority voting system;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 a (new) - Urges the Commission, likewise, to make use of its right of initiative to propose, in accordance with Article 138(2) TFEU, appropriate measures to ensure unified representation for the European Union in the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Finance Cooperation, the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, first by grouping Member States in a specific constituency no later than 1 January 2020;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas global cooperation can lead to a dilution of responsibilities
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 b (new) - Urges the Commission, finally, to make use of its right of initiative to propose, in accordance with Article 138(2) TFEU, appropriate measures to ensure unified representation for the euro area within the Bank for International Settlements, through the transfer of shares held by national central banks participating in the euro system to the European Central Bank no later than 1 January 2018;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 c (new) - Urges the Commission, likewise, to make use of its right of initiative to propose, in accordance with Article 138(2) TFEU, appropriate measures to ensure unified representation for the European Union in the Inter-American Development Bank no later than 1 January 2020;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 d (new) - Urges the Commission, likewise, to make use of its right of initiative to propose, in accordance with Article 138(2) TFEU, appropriate measures to ensure unified representation for the European Union in the Asian Development Bank no later than 1 January 2020;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 e (new) - Urges the Commission, likewise, to make use of its right of initiative to propose, in accordance with Article 138(2) TFEU, appropriate measures to ensure unified representation for the European Union in the Council of Europe Development Bank no later than 1 January 2020;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 6 f (new) - Urges the Commission, likewise, to make use of its right of initiative to propose, in accordance with Article 138(2) TFEU, appropriate measures to ensure unified representation for the European Union in the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development no later than 1 January 2020;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 7 Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 7 Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 7 –
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 7 Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 7 - Calls for the provision of a single seat for the Council and Commission presidencies at G20 meetings, replacing the two separate seats currently allocated, something which detracts from Europe’s external credibility, particularly in view of the existence of a single market in financial services; considers that, to encourage the convergence of Member States represented individually, various improvements are possible,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas global cooperation can lead to a dilution of responsibilities, at the expense of democracy; whereas the role of the national parliaments can
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 7 - Calls for the provision of a single seat for the European Council and Commission presidencies at G20 meetings, replacing the two separate seats currently allocated, something which detracts from Europe’s external credibility, particularly in view of the existence of a single market in financial services; considers that, to encourage the convergence of Member States represented individually, various improvements are
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 7 a (new) - Calls for enhancing the accountability of the Commission in front of the European Parliament by streamlining the process for the definition of EU positions in the meetings of the G20 in policy fields related to employment, energy, trade, development and anti-corruption;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 – Calls on the EU institutions and Member States to reflect on the practicalities of creating a global financial organisation
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 - Considers that, to encourage the convergence of Member States represented individually, various improvements are possible, such as the designation of a single spokesperson on a rotating basis or leading spokespersons responsible for given subject areas;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 - Calls on the EU institutions and Member States to reflect on the practicalities of creating a global financial organisation with wide-ranging powers of recommendation, arbitration and, where appropriate, penalisation through independent panels; believes that experiences built notably in the trade sector could be used to set up these arbitration and penalisation panels;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 – Calls on the EU institutions and Member States to
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas global cooperation
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 - Calls on the EU institutions and Member States to
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 - Calls on the EU institutions and Member States to reflect on the practicalities of creating a global financial organisation with wide-ranging powers of coordination, recommendation, arbitration and, where appropriate, penalisation through independent panels; highlights that powers of arbitration should not be delegated to private arbitrage such as ISDS; claims that the aim of this organisation should be to coordinate work and objectives of international organisations mentioned in this report in order to generate global consistency and to create a real level- playing field for all market actors and consumers; stresses that this organisation, as with all such national and international organisations, should be subject to the highest standards of transparency and accountability;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 - Calls on the EU institutions and Member States to reflect on the practicalities of creating
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 (new) Calls on the Commission to ensure that any EU financial legislative proposals must be complimentary to actions at the global level;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 a (new) - Calls the EU Institutions to put in place mechanisms to enhance the cooperation amongst the three EU institutions (ECB, SSM, EBA) participating in the work of the BCBS, bearing in mind their respective functions, competences, and institutional prerogatives;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 a (new) - Highlights the increasing importance of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and welcomes the efforts to unify the representation of the EU mainly through rotation between the Member States;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 8 b (new) - Recalls its position in the Troika report asking the Commission and the Council to bring the IMF to a common position in order to reignite the debate around an international sovereign debt restructuring mechanism (SDRM) with a view to adopting a fair and sustainable multilateral approach in this domain; underlines with that respect the recently adopted U.N principles for sovereign debt restructuring adopted by the General Assembly;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Welcomes the role of international bodies in developing standards for the application of common principles and rules; stresses that, involving the ESAs as the relevant European Supervisory Bodies in the concerned discussions at international level, will have the added benefit of strengthening the contribution of European specific expertise when developing international standards;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the existing international institutions with their own distinct governance structures and remits of action have sprung up throughout the history as a response to each specific situation; whereas this has led to duplication of tasks in some cases, to opaqueness of the current system and lack of overall coordination;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the Treaties provide that any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or incorporated in a Member State, has a right of access to documents of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, whatever their medium (Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights); whereas the same degree of transparency should apply to institutions and agencies of the Union participating in international organisations and fora, especially when setting rules affecting EU citizens;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 24 June 2015 on the review of the economic governance framework,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas the Treaties provide for the obligation that the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union shall have the support of an open, efficient and independent European administration for carrying out their missions (article 298 (1)) requiring highest standards of integrity of those who represent the Union in organisations and fora referred to in this report;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the diversity of the legal structures and financial and operating procedures of international economic organisations make it difficult to undertake an overall monitoring; the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organisation
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the diversity of the legal structures and financial and operating procedures of international economic organisations make it difficult to undertake an overall monitoring; the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) are international organisations with broad remits and composition, while the G20, the Financial Stability Board and the Basel Committee, for example, are among the informal public bodies with limited membership, some of which have enjoyed a new impetus following the crisis, and the International Organisation of Securities Commissions
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas private specialist organisations of a sectoral nature are politically independent, since they are mainly tasked with developing and approving technical standards, but also need to be held accountable to citizens; whereas these two objectives should be balanced against one another;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas recognising the important work being done by all the international bodies, consistency in financial and operating procedures is fundamental in ensuring an international level playing field. The participation of the ESAs on international fora will help to ensure such consistency;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas there exists a perceived lack of transparency in all the major global economic and financial institutions that leads, among others, to opaqueness of policy formulations; whereas it should be a priority for the EU to work towards increasing the transparency of these institutions;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas a number of informal exchanges are already taking place, albeit not on a systematic basis, between the European Parliament and certain of these organisations/bodies;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas a balance needs to be maintained between calling for greater transparency and ensuring the protection of market sensitive information;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the crisis has prompted the
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the crisis has prompted the G20 to focus on effective action, while in the longer term making it more democratic and not undermining the United Nations system is essential for its legitimacy;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the IMF has refused systematically to come to public hearings of the European Parliament while it has accepted to participate to in camera briefings;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the European social model, built on a series of public institutions such as social security, labour law, etc., deserves a higher international profile and concerted support as a system ensuring social protection and decent employment in the world;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas, because it is a project comprising many countries, the EU encompasses economies which are economically variously advanced and culturally dissimilar and consequently do not hold out the same prospects for the development of society; whereas, therefore, neither the Commission President nor any other senior EU leader should ever speak for the Member States in international discussion forums;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the common goal of all stakeholders should be to design a comprehensive framework providing financial stability and to ensure consistency between the global and local levels;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas the economic and financial crisis which began in 2008 has highlighted a striking lack of economic governance in the world, and the absence of supranational bodies with the ability to intervene and sufficient operating rules for greater regulation and better coordination of national economic policy decisions;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas the EU has been showing itself to be not so much a project for cooperation among Member States as one in which the aims being pursued by the most powerful political and economic vested interests are one and the same;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G b (new) Gb. whereas the creation of new EU supervisory bodies should not automatically imply the increase of seats the EU holds in those organisations and bodies; warns that an increase of seats may lead to a situation which has undemocratic effects such as blocking minorities being more likely to occur and could create unease amongst the EU’s partners;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A.
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G c (new) Gc. whereas many macroeconomic and monetary matters require greater supranational coordination, particularly in relation to fiscal matters, where tasks such as combating tax havens, tax fraud and tax evasion to the detriment of national treasuries can be tackled only from an international angle, including coordination to introduce supranational forms of taxation;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need for
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need for enhanced international regulatory cooperation;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need for international regulatory cooperation based on solidarity among peoples and not on defence of major economic and financial interests;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need for international regulatory cooperation, with full parliamentary involvement;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls upon the European actors to have a stronger focus on the global competitiveness of the EU financial sectors, when making policy on the European and international level;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Expresses concern
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Expresses concern at the lack of
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls for clarification as to the remit of each organisation, the ways in which they operate, and the legal nature of their decisions;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the stability of the financial system
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls for clarification as to the remit of each organisation
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls for clarification as to the remit of each organisation, their financing and the legal nature of their decisions;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls for clarification as to the remit of each organisation/body and the legal nature of their decisions;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Expresses concerns on the fact that the functioning and the working methods of most International Organisations appear to show scarce adherence to the above mentioned principles; underlines in particular that: - According to a study commissioned by the EU Parliament the G20 as an informal international body suffers from a serious gap in transparency, integrity and accountability; - According to a study commissioned by the European Parliaments it appears that the IASB enjoys substantial autonomy in developing standards applied worldwide– with the exception of the USA, and that its strong reliance on private donors has the potential to call into question the organisation’s independence.
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for better policy coherence and coordination amongst the global institutions and for a renewal of the established working culture and methods in order to increase the transparency and accountability; considers that this must include public access to key documents such as minutes and preparatory papers, open dialogue with all the stakeholders as well as the civil society and the establishment of transparency registers similar to the one used in the European Parliament and the Commission;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the under-representation of one part of the world i
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point a (new) (a) Considers that, as well as geographical disparity in representation, there are also certain sectors - notably civil society, consumer representatives and employee representatives - who are underrepresented in international discussions regarding financial, monetary and regulatory bodies; calls on the Commission to act to redress this balance as well;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the EU
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the EU could streamline and codify its representation
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the stability of the financial system, which is essential for the eff
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the EU could streamline its representation, with a view to increasing its influence
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the EU
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the EU could streamline its representation in multilateral organisations and fora, with a view to
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Is convinced that the EU should become a more proactive global actor in ensuring implementation of globally agreed regulation, especially the G20 commitments that are yet to be addressed, such as transforming shadow banking, and to ensure emerging risks to global economy are taken up on the agenda of the relevant global institution;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Re
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Regards as
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Regards as sometimes detrimental to the Union situations in which representatives of a Member State or national organisation assume positions in international bodies that are contrary to European legislative or regulatory decisions adopted by majority vote;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Regards as detrimental to the Union
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the stability of the financial system, which is essential for the effective allocation of resources for growth and jobs, is
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Regards as detrimental to the Union situations in which representatives of a Member State or national organisation assume positions in international bodies that are contrary to European legislative or regulatory decisions adopted by majority vote; calls accordingly for the coordination between these representatives to be enhanced and made more effective, for instance through more binding mechanisms;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Regards as detrimental to the Union
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Regards as detrimental to the Union situations in which representatives of a Member State or national
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Regards as highly detrimental to the Union situations in which representatives of a Member State or national organisation assume positions in international bodies that are contrary to European legislative or regulatory decisions adopted by majority vote;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point a (new) (a) Considers that if the Union is not able to speak through ‘one mouth’, it should at least speak with ‘one voice’ in international organisations;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – subparagraph a (new) Proposes, therefore, that the Member State which intends to express its views in international organisations does so after consulting the opinion of the majority of the other Member States; in this regard, a special Council meeting should take place with a view to such an event;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the need for the Commission, where it is representing the Union in an international body or organisation or monitoring a private specialist body, to be held more directly accountable to citizens; stresses the importance of the role of the European Parliament in this process;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that the internal division of competences between the EU and its Member States, provided for in the Treaty of Lisbon, does not limit the sovereign power of Member States internationally, even though the principle of sincere cooperation should be complied with, as provided for in Article 4 TEU;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that unified representation of the Member States within international financial institutions, including the proposal for single representation of the euro area countries within the IMF, poses serious problems in terms of financial sovereignty;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that the EU should ensure the fair representation of large and small Member States in international institutions and bodies;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the growing interdependence of the economies across the world makes it necessary to move towards increasingly global forms of governance;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Considers that Member States, given that they remain sovereign states, have the right to defend, at first hand, the interests of their people and their national interests in international forums; therefore vehemently rejects any code of conduct intended to inhibit individual action by Member States;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the priorities of organisations and related working groups should be clarified and formally set out; takes the view
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the priorities of organisations and related working groups should be clarified and formally set out; takes the view
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the priorities of organisations and related working groups should be clarified and formally set out; takes the view, that the principle of consensus risks not only slowing down deliberations but also diluting the substance of the recommendations and that the composition of the organisations must reflect their diversity in financial, economic and supervisory terms; stresses the need to carry out ex ante
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the priorities of organisations and related working groups should be clarified in particular as regards their relationship with the U.N. system and formally set out; takes the view, that the systematic recourse to the principle of consensus risks not only slowing down deliberations but also diluting the substance of the recommendations and that the composition of the organisations must reflect their diversity in financial, economic and supervisory terms; stresses the need to carry out ex ante impact assessments;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Is of the opinion that the Commission should be provided with an explicit mandate to foster a new impetus for the promotion of multilateralism regarding financial, monetary and regulatory international cooperation;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the work done by the OECD on tax issues, especially the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project; considers that the monitoring of the implementation is the new challenge ahead; underlines that the coordination between the Commission and the Member States that are members of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) should be improved in order for the EU to make its voice heard;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Takes the view that
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Takes the view that action taken to monitor compliance with recommendations on the part of the various countries involved is still insufficient to ensure the creation of a level playing field at international level respecting the subsidiarity principle;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Considers it dangerous and anti- democratic to believe that peer review makes for greater accountability to the people than the traditional formal democratic accountability model based on the ‘agent and principal’ concept (in which elections are the means whereby ‘agents’ – elected representatives – are made accountable by the ‘principal’, in other words electors);
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas, with the crisis, the paradigms of economic and financial governance have collapsed;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Takes note that the FSB is now engaging to develop standards in the insurance sector; recognizes that the IAIS is playing an important role in global insurance policy, but stresses that involving EIOPA would have the benefit of strengthening the contribution of European insurance specific expertise and ensure that the standards developed at global level do not go against the logic the EU has been the first to develop;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 1 Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 1 – Calls on the Commission to draw on existing best practices to draft a European code of conduct on transparency and democratic accountability designed to guide – indicatively – the action of European representatives in international organisations;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 1 - Calls on the Commission to draw on existing best practices at European and national levels to draft a European code of conduct on transparency and accountability designed to guide the action of European representatives in international organisations; requests that the European Parliament should be closely associated in the drafting process;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 1 - Calls on the Commission to draw on existing best practices to draft a European code of conduct on transparency, integrity and accountability
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 1 - Calls on the Commission to draw on existing best practices to draft a European code of conduct on transparency and accountability designed to guide the action of European Union representatives in international organisations;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 1 - Calls on the Commission to draw on existing best practices to draft a European code of conduct on transparency and accountability designed to guide the action of European representatives in
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 1 a (new) - Calls on the Commission to define its positions in international financial and macroeconomic fora in line with the following principles: 1. The need to step up fiscal collaboration among countries across the world in order to reduce and ultimately eliminate tax havens, and to coordinate and harmonise national tax policies so as to avoid tax evasion based on opaque systems and unfair tax competition; 2. The need to support the spread of the culture of corporate social responsibility (CSR), since sustainable undertakings are and will be the basis for cohesive and sustainable human development. To this end, the EU must support the development of the UN guiding principles and the spread of the culture of business responsibility for human rights. 3. The need to uphold the European social model and its expansion in the context of globalisation of the economy and production, not only as an ideal with regard to decent employment and social protection but as the sole means of preventing social dumping, which ultimately leads to the deterioration and devaluation of that model.
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 1 a (new) - Urges the Commission, likewise, to make use of its right of initiative to propose, in accordance with Article 138(2) TFEU, appropriate measures to ensure unified representation for the European Union in the African Development Bank no later than 1 January 2020;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 source: 569.719
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/3 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.475New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-567475_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.719New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-569719_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.271&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AD-557271_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0027&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0027_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0108New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0108_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/8/02961New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/4 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2016-02-18T00:00:00New
2016-03-17T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2016-02-24T00:00:00New
2016-04-11T00:00:00 |
activities/1/date |
Old
2016-01-18T00:00:00New
2016-02-24T00:00:00 |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2015-11-30T00:00:00New
2015-12-01T00:00:00 |
activities/2/date |
Old
2015-12-14T00:00:00New
2016-01-18T00:00:00 |
activities/2/date |
Old
2015-11-23T00:00:00New
2015-12-14T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/5 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2015-10-19T00:00:00New
2015-11-30T00:00:00 |
committees/1/shadows/5 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
activities/1 |
|
committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
activities/0/committees/0/date |
2015-04-16T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2015-04-16T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|