Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | INTA | ZALBA BIDEGAIN Pablo ( PPE) | DANTI Nicola ( S&D), MCCLARKIN Emma ( ECR), DE SARNEZ Marielle ( ALDE), BUCHNER Klaus ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 105-p2
Legal Basis:
RoP 105-p2Events
The European Parliament adopted by 569 votes to 99, with 27 abstentions, a resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Rapid implementation of the Bali Package : Parliament welcomed the results of the Ninth WTO Ministerial Conference in Bali (Indonesia) in December 2013, where negotiations were concluded by the 160 WTO members on the trade facilitation agreement (TFA). It acknowledged the benefits that the implementation of this agreement will bring for developing countries given the contribution it will make to a more business-friendly environment, in particular for SMEs.
Parliament emphasised, in particular, that if fully implemented, the agreement ought to:
reduce uncertainty regarding market entry conditions and the costs of trade by between 12.5% and 17.5% (according to estimates – such as those by the OECD); allow consumers to access a larger and cheaper range of products and businesses to access new markets and improve their competitiveness; result in the standardisation and simplification of trade-related procedures; provide new opportunities to expand the use of innovative technologies and electronic systems, including electronic payment systems, national trade portals and one-stop shops.
Members urged all members of the WTO to try to find a solution without delay for implementing the Bali Package in all its aspects, including the reduction of trade-distorting subsidies, so that the DDA can be concluded for the Tenth WTO Ministerial Conference.
Improve the security of trade and customs controls : Parliament stressed that a number of requirements under the agreement, notably on transparency and the automated entry and payment of duties , can be a powerful means of addressing border corruption. It called for better cooperation between custom authorities and stressed that greater transparency will lead to a higher level of security and will be a strong incentive for the intensification of trade, in addition to ensuring more effective customs controls.
In this context, Members fully supported the EU initiative of targeting EUR 400 million in funding over five years for supporting trade facilitation reforms and projects such as improving the customs systems of developing and least developed countries. They highlighted, however, that this funding should be very well coordinated with the funding coming from other international donors such as UNCTAD, the WTO and the World Bank. They also called for close cooperation with specialist organisations such as the World Customs Organization (WCO).
Support for a differential approach : Parliament welcomed the extensive provisions on special and differential treatment for developing and least-developed countries whereby developing and least developed countries can decide when the different provisions will be implemented and for which ones technical assistance will be required. It suggested that the novel approach of making commitments and their scheduling commensurate with countries’ capacities should serve as a benchmark for future agreements.
The resolution underlined the key role that can be played by EU delegations around the world which can work with developing and least developed countries on the ground and asked for the largest possible involvement of these delegations in the disbursement of technical assistance. The Commission is called upon to do its utmost to support developing and least developed countries in the implementation of their commitments.
The Committee on International Trade adopted an own-initiative report by Pablo ZALBA BIDEGAIN (EPP, ES) containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Members welcomed the results of the Ninth WTO Ministerial Conference in Bali (Indonesia) in December 2013, where negotiations were concluded by the 160 WTO members on the trade facilitation agreement (TFA). They acknowledged the benefits that the implementation of this agreement will bring for developing countries given the contribution it will make to a more business-friendly environment, in particular for SMEs.
They emphasised, in particular, that if fully implemented, the agreement ought to:
reduce uncertainty regarding market entry conditions and the costs of trade by between 12.5% and 17.5% (according to estimates – such as those by the OECD); allow consumers to access a larger and cheaper range of products and businesses to access new markets and improve their competitiveness; result in the standardisation and simplification of trade-related procedures; provide new opportunities to expand the use of innovative technologies and electronic systems, including electronic payment systems, national trade portals and one-stop shops.
Members urged all members of the WTO to try to find a solution without delay for implementing the Bali Package in all its aspects, including the reduction of trade-distorting subsidies, so that the DDA can be concluded for the Tenth WTO Ministerial Conference.
The report stressed that a number of requirements under the agreement, notably on transparency and the automated entry and payment of duties , can be a powerful means of addressing border corruption. It called for better cooperation between custom authorities and stressed that greater transparency will lead to a higher level of security and will be a strong incentive for the intensification of trade, in addition to ensuring more effective customs controls.
In this context, Members fully supported the EU initiative of targeting EUR 400 million in funding over five years for supporting trade facilitation reforms and projects such as improving the customs systems of developing and least developed countries. They highlighted, however, that this funding should be very well coordinated with the funding coming from other international donors such as UNCTAD, the WTO and the World Bank. They also called for close cooperation with specialist organisations such as the World Customs Organization (WCO).
The report underlined the key role that can be played by EU delegations around the world which can work with developing and least developed countries on the ground and asked for the largest possible involvement of these delegations in the disbursement of technical assistance. The Commission is called upon to do its utmost to support developing and least developed countries in the implementation of their commitments.
Lastly, Members welcomed the extensive provisions on special and differential treatment for developing and least-developed countries. They suggested that the novel approach of making commitments and their scheduling commensurate with countries’ capacities should serve as a benchmark for future agreements.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2015)748
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0304/2015
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0238/2015
- Committee opinion: PE557.064
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE560.874
- Committee draft report: PE557.158
- Committee draft report: PE557.158
- Committee opinion: PE557.064
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE560.874
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2015)748
Activities
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
- Jonathan ARNOTT
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
- Hugues BAYET
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
- Gianluca BUONANNO
- James CARVER
- Salvatore CICU
- Alberto CIRIO
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
- Michel DANTIN
- Mireille D'ORNANO
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
- Lorenzo FONTANA
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
- Sylvie GODDYN
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
- Antanas GUOGA
- Hans-Olaf HENKEL
- Pablo IGLESIAS
- Marc JOULAUD
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
- Philippe JUVIN
- Barbara KAPPEL
- Afzal KHAN
- Marine LE PEN
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
- Vladimír MAŇKA
- Ivana MALETIĆ
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
- Dominique MARTIN
- Notis MARIAS
- Barbara MATERA
- David MARTIN
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
- Louis MICHEL
- Bernard MONOT
- Marlene MIZZI
- Sophie MONTEL
- Alessia Maria MOSCA
- Florian PHILIPPOT
- Marijana PETIR
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
- Franck PROUST
- Fernando RUAS
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
- Jill SEYMOUR
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
- Siôn SIMON
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
- Davor ŠKRLEC
- Beatrix von STORCH
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
- Pavel TELIČKA
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
- Miguel VIEGAS
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Votes
A8-0238/2015 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
78 |
2015/2067(INI)
2015/06/03
DEVE
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recognises the wide gap that still remains between developed and developing countries' border procedures, and that poor infrastructure, inefficient customs management and excessive red tape
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the numerous commitments, including by the EU, to provide assistance and support for capacity building in order to help developing and least-developed countries to implement the Agreement; stresses that funding for capacity building should be recipient-driven, based on proper needs assessments; considers it indispensable that aid is properly managed and coordinated in line with Articles 210 and 211 TFEU, given the number of donors and pledges; underlines the need for appropriate monitoring of, and reporting on, aid flows.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recognises that private sector expertise can play a central role in promoting trade facilitation measures and in providing assistance and support for TFA implementation in developing countries; takes note of a planned USAID initiative for a public-private alliance towards this end; calls on the Commission to encourage private sector involvement and to explore possibilities for partnerships with European industries in support of implementing the TFA;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Acknowledges that the implementation of trade facilitation reforms has broader development benefits; notes in this context the key role that customs can play in facilitating the expeditious movement of consignments of disaster relief items; stresses that emergency humanitarian assistance should benefit from simplified customs clearance procedures to speed up aid deliveries, and, moreover, be exempt from duties and taxes.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recognises the wide gap that still remains between developed and developing countries’ border procedures, and that poor infrastructure, inefficient customs management, widespread government corruption, distortion of competition and excessive red tape create considerable obstacles to the ability of businesses in developing countries to trade or invest for this purpose; acknowledges that the Trade Facilitation Agreement will give a new impetus to reforms;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that for many developing countries trade facilitation
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges that
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges that expeditious and comprehensive implementation of the Agreement is in the interest of all members of the World Trade Organization, given the tangible gains and, in particular, the estimated reduction in trade costs and protection of the health, safety and economic interests of consumers; underlines that the degree of implementation of the Agreement will be decisive for the benefits derived therefrom;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Is convinced that the Agreement is a development opportunity that by helping to create a more favourable business environment enhances export competitiveness and brings expanded trade opportunities, in particular to small and medium-sized enterprises and land- locked developing countries, and can attract more private sector investment;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Acknowledges that the implementation of the Agreement will improve the conditions for the deepening of regional economic integration, enhance the efficiency of cross-border trade flows and thus increase regional trade exchanges, notably in Africa; notes that regional initiatives should be pursued in line with the WTO Agreement;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
source: 560.531
2015/06/25
INTA
66 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas much work
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the EU is working actively to ensure coherence between its various policies (in the areas of trade, cooperation, humanitarian aid, etc.), and whereas these policies should be cross- sectoral and be assessed on the basis of impact studies;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the EU is committed to promoting free, fair and open trade which is balanced and of mutual benefit for all; whereas the WTO is the natural framework for the continuation and reaffirmation of these principles;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the EU is committed to promoting free, fair and open trade which is balanced and of mutual benefit for all; whereas the WTO is the
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the precautionary principle set out in Article 191 TFEU requires, moreover, that a risk be prevented or counteracted before conclusive proof exists of that risk actually materialising, and whereas that principle also applies to goods imported into the European Union;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the EU
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the EU is one of the largest aid donors in the world; whereas financial assistance for the implementation of the TFA is a measure under the category of "Aid for Trade" and should be treated independently from Official Development Aid (ODA);
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the EU is
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the results of the ninth WTO Ministerial Conference in December 2013, where negotiations were concluded by the 160 WTO members on the Trade Facilitation Agreement; considers the Trade Facilitation Agreement an important milestone, as it is the first multilateral agreement since the establishment of the WTO in 1995 and will create a blueprint for customs modernisation amongst the 161 WTO members; is of the opinion that bilateral free trade agreements between the EU and third countries are no substitute to multilateral agreements established in the forum of the WTO and that they hinder the creation of predictable global trade rules;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Deplores that the TFA does not include any provisions to promote fair trade; Calls on the Commission to put fair trade high on the agenda of the Nairobi Ministerial Conference, in accordance with its TEU obligations;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that the EU remains in favour of the Bali Package decisions being fully and faithfully implemented by all WTO Members which would enable attention to be turned towards the successful conclusion of the negotiations under the Doha Development Agenda (DDA);
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Is aware of the temporary nature of the Bali decision regarding Public Stockholding for Food Security Purposes; calls on the EU to support a permanent solution which adequately takes into account the motivation of developing countries to ask for the exclusion of food security measures from WTO disciplines;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Commends the openness of developing countries to advance parts of the DDA agenda such as TFA whose "demandeurs" were rather developed countries; calls on the EU to more decisively support topics in the implementation of the DDA agenda which are high in the interest of developing countries in order to facilitate a balanced conclusion of the Round;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the benefits that the implementation of this agreement will bring, in particular for SMEs; emphasises that the agreement will reduce uncertainty
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the benefits that the implementation of this agreement will bring, in particular for SMEs; emphasises that the agreement will reduce uncertainty regarding market entry conditions and the costs of trade by between 12.5 % and 17.5 % (according to estimates such as those by the OECD) thus allowing businesses to access new markets and improve their competitiveness by reducing red tape and associated costs; nevertheless believes that the Trade Facilitation Agreement is very likely to lead to the release of additional budgetary resources, particularly for the management of advance rulings and stemming from a fresh incentive to create separate transit infrastructure;
Amendment 26 #
3. Acknowledges the benefits that the implementation of this agreement will bring, in particular for SMEs; emphasises that the agreement will reduce uncertainty regarding market entry conditions and the costs of trade by between 12.5 % and 17.5 % (according to estimates such as those by the OECD) thus allowing businesses to access new markets and improve their competitiveness by reducing red tape and associated costs; also highlights the risk of opening the way to a dispute settlement mechanism in the customs area through a strengthening of the right of appeal and review to which the applicant is entitled before an administrative or judicial authority and a lack of clarity as regards the independence of that authority;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the benefits that the implementation of this agreement will bring for exporters from the EU and other developed countries, in particular for SMEs; emphasises that the agreement will reduce uncertainty regarding market entry conditions
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the benefits that the implementation of this agreement will bring, in particular for SMEs; emphasises that the agreement will reduce uncertainty regarding market entry conditions and the costs of trade by between 12.5 % and 17.5 % (according to estimates such as those by the OECD) thus allowing businesses to access new markets and improve their competitiveness by reducing red tape and associated costs; recognises, however, that in view of the precautionary principle, a change in the circumstances giving rise to notifications for controls and inspections is insufficient reason for lowering the level of control on goods imported into the European Union; therefore considers the system of notifications for controls and inspections laid down in the Trade Facilitation Agreement to conflict with the precautionary principle;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the benefits that the implementation of this agreement will bring, in particular for SMEs; emphasises that the agreement will reduce uncertainty regarding market entry conditions and the costs of trade by between 12.5 % and 17.5 % (according to estimates such as those by the OECD) thus allowing businesses and consumers to access new markets and improve their competitiveness by
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the benefits that the implementation of this agreement will bring, in particular for SMEs; emphasises that the agreement will reduce uncertainty regarding market entry conditions and the costs of trade by 10% in the developed countries and between 12.5 % and 1
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the benefits that the implementation of th
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the benefits that the implementation of this agreement
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the benefits that the implementation of this agreement will bring for development, by helping to create a more favourable business environment, in particular for SMEs; emphasises that the agreement will reduce uncertainty regarding market entry conditions and the costs of trade by between 12.5 % and 17.5 % (according to estimates such as those by the OECD) thus allowing businesses to access new markets and improve their competitiveness by reducing red tape and associated costs;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Also invites the EU Member States to conduct a prior evaluation of the costs arising from the training and recruitment of special units attached to the advance rulings infrastructure;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that most WTO Members have yet to establish functioning local and regional markets, in order to provide their population with access to goods and services most needed;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that implementation of the agreement, in particular by developing countries, will result in the standardisation and simplification of trade-related procedures; points out that the agreement can provide new opportunities to expand the use of innovative technologies and electronic systems, including electronic payment systems, national trade portals and one- stop shops;
Amendment 37 #
3b. Calls on the Commission to collect and submit statistical data on the costs incurred through the creation of advance rulings infrastructure and special facilities for goods in transit;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Urges the Commission fine tune Article 3.7 and Article 4 of the Trade Facilitation Agreement so that only one national administrative or judicial authority exercising official authority in the State to which an application has been submitted can hear the appeal and review the procedures or rulings disputed by the applicant;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Invites the EU Member States to interpret broadly the change in circumstances giving rise to notifications for controls and inspections so that it is not possible for the risks associated with the import of goods solely to be linked to a potential risk event;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas two thirds of the WTO membership need to ratify the agreement before it can enter into force;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges all members of the WTO to try to find a solution without delay for implementing the Bali Package so that the DDA can be concluded for the 10th WTO Ministerial Conference; calls on the Commission to defend the WTO Member States' right to regulate to provide food security for their population;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges all members of the WTO to try to find a solution without delay for implementing the Bali Package in all its aspects so that the DDA can be concluded for the 10th WTO Ministerial Conference;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges all members of the WTO to try to find a solution without delay for implementing the Bali Package, with particular reference to cutting agricultural subsidies, so that the DDA can be concluded for the 10th WTO Ministerial Conference;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Is aware of the fact that the USA, as well as the European Community had for many years programmes in place, which purchased products from their farmers at fixed prices, and that these programmes proved to be essential tools for providing food security, and to strengthen the agricultural sector;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the importance of th
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Nevertheless recognises that the estimated reduction in the costs of trade for these countries does not take into account their degree of resilience to the implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement or the calculations of opportunities in the national strategy choices relating to the creation of transit and customs infrastructure in particular, as recommended by the WTO;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises that the degree of implementation of the agreement will
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises that the degree of implementation of the agreement will determine the benefits that will be derived therefrom; believes that full and faithful implementation will be of greatest benefit to all signatories;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises that the degree and timing of implementation of the agreement will determine the benefits that will be derived therefrom;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas two thirds of the WTO membership need to ratify the
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Draws attention to the fact that the agreement contains binding provisions and non-binding guidelines; urges all WTO members to do their utmost to implement both the binding provisions and the guidelines, with a view to bringing trade costs down as far as is possible;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Emphasises that, while a number of requirements under the agreement, notably on transparency and the automated entry and payment of duties, can be a powerful means of addressing border corruption, intervention by customs units on the ground remains essential to better manage risk;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Emphasises that a number of requirements under the agreement, notably on transparency and the automated entry and payment of duties, can be a powerful means of addressing border corruption; stresses that greater transparency will enhance trade certainty and should act as a strong incentive to step up trade, in addition to allowing more effective monitoring;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports fully the EU initiative of providing EUR 400 million in funding for
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports fully the EU initiative of providing EUR 400 million in funding for the provision of technical assistance to developing and least developed countries which will be spent on projects such as improving the customs systems of developing and least developed countries; considers it important that the relevant EU supervisory authorities ensure that all funds are spent in accordance with the principles of sound financial management and requests regular information be provided to the European Parliament and the Member States in this regard;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports fully the EU initiative of providing EUR 400 million in funding for the provision of technical assistance to developing and least developed countries which will be spent on projects such as improving the customs systems of developing and least developed countries; insists that this funding should be raised under "Aid for Trade" budget lines and not be subtracted from ODA budgets;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Nevertheless enjoins the Commission to conduct in-depth monitoring of the allocation of that funding and of the effectiveness of its use;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Recalls that in order to mitigate negative effects of globalisation on workers, the EU has created the Globalisation Adjustment Fund, while the US President has proposed to create a similar instrument for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) to deal with the effects of globalised trade on US workers; points out that workers in the vast majority of signatory states to the TFA will not be able to resort to a comparable fund;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls also for close cooperation with specialist organisations such as the World Customs Organization which can provide valuable practical and technical expertise on a case-by-case basis in order that the least developed countries in particular can take full advantage of the trading opportunities created by the Agreement;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls also for close cooperation with specialist organisations such as the World Customs Organization which can provide valuable expertise on a case-by-case basis, thus fostering development and capacity- building in this area;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas two thirds of the WTO membership need to ratify the agreement before it can
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Underlines the key role that can be played by EU delegations around the world which can work with developing and least developed countries ‘on the ground' and asks for the largest possible
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to do its utmost to support developing and least developed countries in the implementation of their commitments, while ensuring that those commitments do not impact adversely on national and local policies in the area of territorial security and risk monitoring;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to do its
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to do its utmost to support developing and least developed countries in the implementation of their commitments; stresses that funding for capacity building should be recipient-driven and based on proper needs assessments;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to do its utmost to support developing and least developed countries in the implementation of their commitments, taking into account the degree of flexibility they need in order to implement trade facilitation obligations;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends that international organisations and the partners of developing and least developed countries collaborate closely in the implementation of category C provisions in order to implement them within the shortest possible time; points out that the financial means needed for implementation would exceed by far what has been pledged until today;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends that international organisations
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas two thirds of the WTO membership need to ratify the agreement before it can enter into force; in that regard, it calls for WTO members to do their utmost to enable the agreement to enter into force as soon as possible and at all events before the 10th WTO Ministerial Conference (MC10) in Nairobi in December;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas some of the large emerging economies such as China, Brazil and India will not ask for technical assistance; this is to be welcomed as it
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas some of the large emerging economies such as China, Brazil and India will not ask for technical assistance; this is to be welcomed as it ensures that the assistance available
source: 560.874
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.158New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-PR-557158_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.064&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-557064_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE560.874New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-560874_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0238&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0238_EN.html |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0304New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0304_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
INTA/8/03073New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 105-p2
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 099-p1
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
procedure/type |
Old
INI - Own-initiative procedureNew
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2015-09-10T00:00:00New
2015-07-22T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/3 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/0 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
other/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|