Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | VAUGHAN Derek ( S&D) | DEUTSCH Tamás ( PPE), VISTISEN Anders ( ECR), ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE), JÁVOR Benedek ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | FERBER Markus ( PPE) | Barbara KAPPEL ( ENF), Sander LOONES ( ECR), Olle LUDVIGSSON ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) for the financial year 2014.
NON LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2016/1528 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority for the financial year 2014.
CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Executive Director of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority for the implementation of the latter’s budget for the financial year 2014.
This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 28 April 2016 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 28 April 2016).
Amongst Parliament’s main observations in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision, the latter called on the Authority to pay special attention to the protection of whistleblowers in the context of the soon-to-be-adopted Directive on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure.
The European Parliament decided to grant the Executive Director of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) discharge in respect of the implementation of Authority’s budget for the financial year 2014. The vote on the decision on discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex 5, Article 5 (1) (a) to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure.
Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Authority’s annual accounts for the financial year 2014 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted by 511 votes to 112 with 11 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies:
Agency’s financial statements: Parliament noted that the final budget of the Agency for the financial year 2014 was EUR 21 582 772, representing an increase of 15% compared to 2013, which can be explained by the Agency’s recently established nature. Carryovers: Parliament noted that the rate of carryovers of commitments amounted to 26% overall and 66% for operational expenses, in particular for multi-annual IT investments.
Parliament also made a series of observations regarding transfers, budgetary and financial management, contract award procedures, recruitment, as well as internal audit.
With regard to prevention of conflicts of interest , Parliament called on the Authority to pay special attention to the protection of whistle-blowers in the context of the forthcoming Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure.
Transparency: Parliament stressed that, while making sure that all assignments are carried out in full, the Authority must carefully stick to the tasks assigned to it by the Union legislator and must not seek to de facto broaden its mandate beyond those assignments. It also stressed that when carrying out its work and in particular when drafting technical standards and technical advice, the Authority needs comprehensively to inform the European Parliament about its activities, regretting that this has not always been done in the past. It called on the Authority to supplement communication with the Parliament on draft advice or technical standards relating to the calibration of prudential formulae with a full description of the data and methodology used in such calibrations.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Derek VAUGHAN (S&D, UK) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) for the financial year 2014.
The parliamentary committee calls on the European Parliament to grant the Executive Director of the Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year 2014.
Noting that the Court of Auditors issued a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions for the financial year 2014, Members call on Parliament to approve the closure of the Authority’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
· Agency’s financial statements: Members noted that the final budget of the Agency for the financial year 2014 was EUR 21 582 772, representing an increase of 15% compared to 2013, which can be explained by the Agency’s recently established nature.
· Carryovers: Members noted that the rate of carryovers of commitments amounted to 26% overall and 66% for operational expenses, in particular for multi-annual IT investments.
Members also made a series of observations regarding contract award procedures, recruitment, as well as internal audit.
Lastly, as regards preventing conflicts of interest , Members point out that the Authority needs to pay particular attention to upholding the safety and soundness of the financial sector, ensuring compatibility with Union law, respecting the principle of proportionality and complying with the fundamental principles of the internal market for financial services. They underline, that EIOPA, on that basis, must strive to achieve outcomes that are unambiguous, consistent, coherent and free of superfluous complexity.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2014 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2014 of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Authority for the financial year 2014, accompanied by the Authority's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Authority in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2014.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, the Authority's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Authority's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for 2014 are legal and regular in all material respects.
Nevertheless, the Council has made some observations which may be summarised as follows:
financial programming : while recognising the need to implement the Authority's multiannual IT strategy and its efforts to mitigate the shortfalls of its 2015 budget, the Council reiterated its concern that the level of commitments carried over to the following financial year was high and called on the Authority to pay due attention to proper financial programming and budget implementation in order to reduce the level of carry-overs of committed appropriations to the next financial year, in line with the budgetary principle of annuality.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) for the year 2014, together with the EIOPA’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA).
Statement of assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the Agency, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2014, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Authority’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2014 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The report also makes a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Authority, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:
The Court’s observations :
budgetary management : the level of committed appropriations carried over also remained high (26 %) particularly for the operational budget related to specific contracts with a cumulative value of EUR 2.4 million signed late in the year, particularly for the on-going development and maintenance of a database and other IT services to be provided in 2015. The transfers were intended to compensate for shortfalls in the Authority’s 2015 budget following substantial budget cuts decided by the discharge authorities. The transfers were intended to compensate for shortfalls in the Authority’s 2015 budget following substantial budget cuts decided by the discharge authorities. These shortfalls would not have allowed the Authority to continue implementing its multiannual IT strategy, which was one of its core operational activities. Although budget transfers, carry-overs and related commitments are in line with the specific provisions of the EU Financial Regulation and were executed following Management Board decisions, the extent to which 2015 activities will be covered by 2014 appropriations is at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality. There is a need to better align the funds made available in the agency’s annual budgets with the financial needs for the implementation of its multiannual IT strategy.
The Authority’s reply :
budgetary management : EIOPA acknowledged that the percentage of carried-over appropriations from 2013 to 2014 and from 2014 to 2015 for operational expenditure was high due to the multiannual nature of the work, the challenging time frame (mainly driven by the Solvency II calendar with the preparatory phase starting in 2015 and full implementation in 2016). EIOPA is also aware that part of the 2015 activities are covered by a relatively high proportion of carried-over appropriations from 2014. This is explained by the need to finance its complex and multiannual IT plan, ensuring a proper implementation of Solvency II. In addition, in order to better align the budgetary funds available for the given year, EIOPA’s budget and procurement processes have already been revised to guarantee a full integration into the overall planning and coordination processes of EIOPA.
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report contains a summary of the Authority’s activities in 2014 . This is focused on the following:
Budget : EUR 21 595 704.
Activities :
regulatory tasks : amongst others, 18 drafts implementing technical standards prepared on Solvency II and the finalisation of around 500 guidelines relating to Solvency II, report on an EU single market in personal pensions; supervisory tasks : excellent examples of an approach to forming a shared view have been observed in 6 different National Competent Authorities; consumer protection and financial innovation: consultation papers on cross selling, product oversight and governance arrangements by insurance undertakings; Key Information Documents (KIDs) and insurance-based investment products; common supervisory culture ; financial stability : two bi-annual Financial Stability Reports, completion of quantitative tools for modelling reserves and premiums; crisis management: implementation of process for regular consideration of the need for EIOPA preventive action in response to adverse developments and risks; external relations : number of dialogues with important third countries including US and China and professional secrecy & gap analysis reports for Isle of Man, Canada, Albania, FYR Macedonia, Montenegro and Turkey; conferences and other public events .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014, as part of the 2014 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) .
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA).
The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based.
On this basis, the Financial Controller of the European Commission ensures the certification of the consolidated accounts as declared by the institutions, agencies and bodies of the European Union.
Discharge procedure of the EU agencies : the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised agencies.
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from a budgetary and accrual accounting perspective.
The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of all Institutions. Agencies do not have a separate budget inside the EU budget ; and they are partially financed by a Commission budget subsidy.
This document sets out how the Agencies spent and implemented their budget in 2014. Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure.
EIOPA : in 2014, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
description of EIOPA's tasks : EIOPA, which is located in Frankfurt (DE), was set up by Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council with a view to protecting the public interest by contributing to the short, medium and long-term stability and efficiency of the financial system for the economy of the European Union; EIOPA's budget for the 2014 financial year : EIOPA’s budget for 2014, as presented in the Commission document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union, gives the following figures:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 22 million;
- paid : EUR 22 million;
- carried-over : 0.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 22 million;
- paid : EUR 21 million;
- carried-over : EUR 6 million.
Please refer also to the final accounts of the Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014, as part of the 2014 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) .
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA).
The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based.
On this basis, the Financial Controller of the European Commission ensures the certification of the consolidated accounts as declared by the institutions, agencies and bodies of the European Union.
Discharge procedure of the EU agencies : the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised agencies.
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from a budgetary and accrual accounting perspective.
The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of all Institutions. Agencies do not have a separate budget inside the EU budget ; and they are partially financed by a Commission budget subsidy.
This document sets out how the Agencies spent and implemented their budget in 2014. Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure.
EIOPA : in 2014, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
description of EIOPA's tasks : EIOPA, which is located in Frankfurt (DE), was set up by Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council with a view to protecting the public interest by contributing to the short, medium and long-term stability and efficiency of the financial system for the economy of the European Union; EIOPA's budget for the 2014 financial year : EIOPA’s budget for 2014, as presented in the Commission document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union, gives the following figures:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 22 million;
- paid : EUR 22 million;
- carried-over : 0.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 22 million;
- paid : EUR 21 million;
- carried-over : EUR 6 million.
Please refer also to the final accounts of the Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority .
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0174/2016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0091/2016
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE576.945
- Committee opinion: PE572.995
- Committee draft report: PE569.752
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05584/2016
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 409 09.12.2015, p. 0175
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0135/2015
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2015)0377
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2015)0377
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2015)0377 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 409 09.12.2015, p. 0175 N8-0135/2015
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05584/2016
- Committee draft report: PE569.752
- Committee opinion: PE572.995
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE576.945
Activities
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renata BRIANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steeve BRIOIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gianluca BUONANNO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- James CARVER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daniel DALTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Norbert ERDŐS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edouard FERRAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Brian HAYES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Diane JAMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Afzal KHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd KÖLMEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd LUCKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dominique MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renaud MUSELIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Florian PHILIPPOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Julia REID
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Siôn SIMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joachim STARBATTY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Beatrix von STORCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0091/2016 - Derek Vaughan - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
39 |
2015/2189(DEC)
2016/01/19
ECON
30 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that EIOPA’s role in promoting a common supervisory regime across the internal market is essential in order to ensure better integrated, more transparent and safer financial markets as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Emphasizes that, on all issues linked to EIOPA's resources, it has to be ensured that the mandate can consistently be fulfilled and that the practical limits of independent, reliable and effective supervision are not set by budgetary constraints;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Acknowledges that the setting-up phase of ESFS has still not been completed and therefore notes that the tasks already entrusted to EIOPA as well as additional tasks envisaged in on-going legislative work, require an adequate level of staff
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Acknowledges that the setting-up phase of ESFS has still not been completed and therefore notes that the tasks already entrusted to EIOPA, as well as additional tasks envisaged in on-going legislative work, require an adequate level of staff and budget to allow for satisfactory
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that given its limited resources, EIOPA must stick strictly to the tasks
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that given its limited resources, EIOPA must
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that given its limited resources, EIOPA must stick strictly to the tasks assigned to it by the Union legislator and must not seek to broaden its mandate beyond those assignments; suggests that using national secondees on short-term contracts could assist permanent staff with legislative workload in times of high demand; stresses that while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, EIOPA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities; regrets that EIOPA has in the past not always met that standard;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that when drafting implementing legislation, guidelines, questions and answers or similar measures EIOPA must always respect the mandate attributed by the Union legislator and must not seek to set standards in areas where legislative processes are still pending;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that EIOPA
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Regrets the lack of transparency that has hitherto characterised EIOPA in the performance of its duties, in particular as regards the drafting of secondary legislation, despite the continuous reminders and numerous requests from the European Parliament;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Regrets to acknowledge that EIOPA has not managed to keep the Union legislator informed in a sufficient and comprehensive manner about all details of its on-going work;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Regrets to acknowledge that in some occasions documents have only been transmitted to the Union legislator after they have been leaked to the wider public and deems this to be unacceptable;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Concludes that EIOPA
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Concludes that EIOPA’s mixed financing arrangement
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Concludes that EIOPA’s mixed financing arrangement is inflexible, burdensome and a potential threat to its independence, especially when 60% of its budget is financed by the competent national supervisory authorities; therefore calls on the Commission to reconsider the financing arrangement in favour of an independent budget line from the budget of the Union and the introduction of fees by market participants.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Concludes that EIOPA’s mixed financing arrangement is inflexible, burdensome and a potential threat to its independence; therefore calls on the Commission to reconsider the financing arrangement in favour of an independent budget line from the budget of the Union and the introduction of appropriately and proportionately calibrated levies or fees by market participants.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on EIOPA to follow EBA in greater transparency by disclosing all its meetings with third party stakeholders;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for any EU funds from the Union budget earmarked for EIOPA to be subject to the prior approval of the European Parliament and to be accounted for by EIOPA every six months;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that EIOPA’s role in
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on EIOPA to supplement communication with the EP on draft advice or technical standards relating to the calibration of prudential formulae with a full description of the data and methodology used in such calibrations;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that EIOPA's work is of a purely technical nature and that key political decisions are the prerogative of the Union legislator;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that EIOPA when carrying out its activities needs to pay particular attention to the
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that EIOPA when carrying out its activities needs to pay
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that EIOPA when carrying out its activities needs to pay particular attention to the issue of proportionality and must strive to achieve outcomes that are unambiguous, coherent and free of superfluous complexity; recalls that the ESAs are responsible for micro- prudential supervision, whereas day-to- day supervision is conducted at national level;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that it is of particular importance that provisions drafted by EIOPA are designed in a way that allow them to be equally applied by smaller entities;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that EIOPA must be independent of any interest group and must ensure its total independence by pursuing consumer protection as its sole objective;
source: 575.251
2016/03/04
CONT
9 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Acknowledges from the Authority that the majority of issues related to carryovers will diminish during 2016 when an advanced level of maturity of the Authority’s IT capability is expected; notes in particular that the majority of carryovers are related to contractual obligations which the Authority entered into in 2014, but for which services delivery partially took place in 2015; further notes that, in addition to the IT projects, the carryovers covered expert reimbursements under the “Common Supervisory Culture” project, as well as meetings, missions and translations with an operational purpose; calls on the Authority to improve the management of external contracts in future and bring it into line with the principles of sustainable and stable budgetary management;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Urges the Authority to keep carryovers to the next financial year to a minimum in future;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Demands that all those EU institutions and agencies that have not yet done so urgently adopt internal rules on whistleblowing and take a common approach to their obligations, focusing on the protection of whistleblowers; requests special attention for the protection of whistleblowers in the context of the Directive on the Protection of Trade Secrets; calls on the Commission to promote legislation on a minimum level of protection for whistleblowers in the EU; calls on the institutions and agencies to amend the Staff Regulations to ensure that they not only formally oblige officials to report irregularities of all kinds but also lay down adequate protection for whistleblowers; calls on the institutions and agencies to implement Article 22(c) of the Staff Regulations without delay;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Calls on all the EU institutions and agencies to enhance their procedures and practices aimed at safeguarding the financial interests of the Union and to actively contribute to a results-oriented discharge process;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new) 11c. Encourages the EU institutions and agencies to better raise awareness of the conflict-of-interest policy among their officials, alongside ongoing awareness- raising activities and the inclusion of integrity and transparency as an obligatory item to be discussed during recruitment procedures and performance reviews; considers that a distinction should be made between elected representatives and public officials in the legislation on conflicts of interest; believes that there should also be such regulations in the Member States for public officials and civil servants involved in the administration and monitoring of EU subsidies; calls on the Commission to submit a draft legal basis on this matter;
source: 576.945
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/1/name |
Old
VISTISEN Anders PrimdahlNew
VISTISEN Anders |
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2015-07-23T00:00:00New
2015-07-22T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.752New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-569752_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE572.995&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-572995_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.945New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-576945_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160427&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-04-27-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0091&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0091_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0174New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0174_EN.html |
commission |
|
committees |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
procedure |
|