Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | VAUGHAN Derek ( S&D) | DEUTSCH Tamás ( PPE), VISTISEN Anders ( ECR), ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE), JÁVOR Benedek ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | MACOVEI Monica ( ECR) | Petr JEŽEK ( ALDE), Josep-Maria TERRICABRAS ( Verts/ALE), Traian UNGUREANU ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) for the financial year 2014.
NON LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2016/1555 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice for the financial year 2014.
CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants discharge to the Executive Director of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice for the implementation of the latter’s budget for the financial year 2014.
This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 28 April 2016 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 28 April 2016).
Amongst Parliament’s main observations in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision, the latter highlighted issues related to the valuation of the SIS II, VIS and EURODAC systems in the Agency’s accounts. It recalled that the systems were transferred from the Commission to the Agency in May 2013 by way of a non-exchange transaction. In the absence of reliable and complete information in respect of the total development cost of those systems, the value of the systems was recorded in the Agency’s accounts at their net book values as per the Commission’s books and updated at year-end. Parliament acknowledged the Agency's comment that as long as the book value of the assets transferred by the Commission to the Agency was established in line with the Commission’s internal accounting rules, there was no action that the Agency had to or could have performed in this respect. It should also be noted that the value of transferred assets is expected to become immaterial in the year 2015 due to the yearly application of depreciation of asset value and that as such, for future discharges.
The European Parliament decided to grant the Executive Director of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2014. The vote on the decision on discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex 5, Article 5 (1) (a) to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure.
Noting that the Court of Auditors has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Agency’s annual accounts for the financial year 2014 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted by 501 votes to 121 with 7 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations, which form an integral part of the decision on discharge and which add to the general recommendations set out in the resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies:
Agency’s financial statements : Parliament noted the Agency’s final budget for the financial year 2014 was EUR 59 380 000, representing a decrease of 3.2% compared to the year 2013. The entire budget of the Agency derives from the Union budget. Emphasis of matter : Parliament noted that the Court's report emphasises the issues related to the valuation of the SIS II, VIS and EURODAC systems in the Agency’s accounts. It stated that the systems were transferred from the Commission to the Agency in May 2013 by way of a non-exchange transaction. It took note that in the absence of reliable and complete information in respect of the total development cost of those systems, the value of the systems was recorded in the Agency’s accounts at their net book values as per the Commission’s books and updated at year-end. It acknowledged the Agency's comment that as long as the book value of the assets transferred by the Commission to the Agency was established in line with the Commission’s internal accounting rules, there was no action that the Agency had to or could have performed in this respect. It also acknowledged that the value of transferred assets is expected to become immaterial in the year 2015 due to the yearly application of depreciation of asset value and that as such, for future discharges, this comment will no longer be relevant. Commitments and carryovers : it noted that the committed appropriations carried over to 2015 were high for administrative expenditure at EUR 15 million (87 %). It acknowledged that these carry-overs mainly resulted from delayed procurements for the extension and refurbishment of the Agency’s site in Strasbourg. The carry-overs for operational expenditure were high at EUR 24.5 million (85 %) and mainly related to multi-annual contracts for the maintenance of the Agency’s IT systems. It therefore called on the Agency to reduce the high level of carry-overs as it is at odds with the principle of annuality . Associated countries : Parliament recalled that according to Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011, countries associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis and EURODAC-related measures must make a contribution to the Agency’s budget .
Parliament also made a series of observations regarding the Agency’s budget and financial management, prevention and management of conflicts of interest, as well as on contract award, recruitment and internal audit and control procedures.
Parliament noted that the negotiations between the Agency and France were successfully concluded and that the seat agreement was signed for the Agency’s operational site in Strasbourg. It is also pleased that the negotiations between the Agency and Estonia were successfully concluded and the seat agreement was signed at the end of 2014.
Lastly, Parliament called for an overall improvement in the prevention of, and the fight against, corruption through a holistic approach, commencing with better public access to documents and more stringent rules on conflicts of interest, the introduction or strengthening of transparency registers and the provision of sufficient resources for law enforcement measures, and also through improved cooperation among Member States and with relevant third countries.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Derek VAUGHAN (S&D, UK) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) for the financial year 2014.
The parliamentary committee calls on the European Parliament to grant the Agency’s Executive Director discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2014.
Noting that the Court of Auditors issued a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions for the financial year 2014, Members call on Parliament to approve the closure of the Agency’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Agency’s financial statements: Members note the Agency’s final budget for the financial year 2014 was EUR 59 380 000, representing a decrease of 3.2% compared to the year 2013. The entire budget of the Agency derives from the Union budget. Emphasis of matter: Members note that the Court's report emphasises the issues related to the valuation of the SIS II, VIS and EURODAC systems in the Agency’s accounts. They note that the systems were transferred from the Commission to the Agency in May 2013 by way of a non-exchange transaction. They take note that in the absence of reliable and complete information in respect of the total development cost of those systems, the value of the systems was recorded in the Agency’s accounts at their net book values as per the Commission’s books and updated at year-end. They acknowledges the Agency's comment that as long as the book value of the assets transferred by the Commission to the Agency was established in line with the Commission’s internal accounting rules, there was no action that the Agency had to or could have performed in this respect. They also acknowledge that the value of transferred assets is expected to become immaterial in the year 2015 due to the yearly application of depreciation of asset value and that as such, for future discharges, this comment will no longer be relevant. Commitments and carryovers: Members note that the committed appropriations carried over to 2015 were high for administrative expenditure at EUR 15 million (87 %). They acknowledge that these carry-overs mainly resulted from delayed procurements for the extension and refurbishment of the Agency’s site in Strasbourg. The carry-overs for operational expenditure were high at EUR 24.5 million (85 %) and mainly related to multi-annual contracts for the maintenance of the Agency’s IT systems. They therefore call on the Agency to reduce the high level of carry-overs as it is at odds with the principle of annuality .
Members also made a series of observations regarding the Agency’s budget and financial management, prevention and management of conflicts of interest, as well as on contract award, recruitment and internal audit and control procedures.
Members note that the negotiations between the Agency and France were successfully concluded and that the seat agreement was signed for the Agency’s operational site in Strasbourg. They are also pleased that the negotiations between the Agency and Estonia were successfully concluded and the seat agreement was signed at the end of 2014.
Lastly, Members call for an overall improvement in the prevention of, and the fight against, corruption through a holistic approach, commencing with better public access to documents and more stringent rules on conflicts of interest, the introduction or strengthening of transparency registers and the provision of sufficient resources for law enforcement measures, and also through improved cooperation among Member States and with relevant third countries.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2014 and the balance sheet as at 31 December 2014 of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA), as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2014, accompanied by the Agency's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommended the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Agency in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2014.
The Council welcomed the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, the Agency's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Agency's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for 2014 are legal and regular in all material respects.
Nevertheless, the Council has made some observations which may be summarised as follows:
software development : the Council, once again, regretted the shortcomings identified by the Court with regard to the Agency's valuation of the different IT systems transferred from the Commission, in particular, as regards software development costs ensued and urged the Agency to take the appropriate corrective measures; financial programming : the Council called on the Agency to improve its financial programming and monitoring of the budget implementation, in order to reduce the level of commitments carried over to the next financial year and the amounts cancelled at the end of the following year to the strict minimum, in line with the budgetary principle of annuality. It invited the Agency to put in place reliable procedures for these purposes and welcomes the steps already taken in this regard.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) for the year 2014, together with the Agency’s reply.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA).
Statement of Assurance : pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
the annual accounts of the Foundation, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2014; the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
Opinion on the reliability of the accounts : in the Court’s opinion, the Office’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2014 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer. Without calling into question this generally favourable opinion, the Court draws attention to the valuation of the Schengen Information System (SIS II), the Visa Information System (VIS) and Eurodac (systems) in the Agency’s accounts. The operational management of these systems is the Agency’s core task. In the absence of reliable and complete information in respect of their total development cost, they are recorded in the Agency’s accounts at their net book values as per the Commission’s books and updated at year end (approximately EUR 6.6 million at date of transfer and EUR 2.1 million euro at 31 December 2014). These values relate mainly to hardware and off-the-shelf software components and do not include software development costs.
Opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts : the Court considers that the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2014 are legal and regular in all material respects.
The report also makes a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Agency, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:
The Court’s observations :
budgetary management : the Court notes that out of the EUR 6.6 million committed appropriations for staff and operational expenditure which were carried over from 2013 to 2014, EUR 1.7 million euro (26 %) were cancelled in 2014, showing that budgetary needs were overestimated at the end of 2013. Furthermore, committed appropriations carried over to 2015 were very high for administrative expenditure at 87 %. These carry-overs mainly resulted from delayed procurements for the extension and refurbishment of the Agency’s site in Strasbourg. Carry-overs of committed appropriations were also high for operational expenditure at EUR 24.5 million (85 %) mainly in relation to multi-annual contracts for the maintenance of the IT systems. The court considers that the high levels of cancelled carry-overs from 2013 and the extent of carry-overs made from 2014 to 2015 is at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality.
The Agency’s replies :
budgetary management : the Agency states it has taken steps to improve its capacity to plan, monitor and implement available appropriations. Specific organisational measures, are regular budget implementation reporting, are being implemented. The Agency closely followed the Financial Regulation as regards carry-forwards, resulting in both automatic and non-automatic carry-overs as allowed by the applicable rules on annuality. As regards non-automatic carry-overs for the Strasbourg site, the Management Board approved these based on a duly justified proposal by the Agency in compliance with applicable rules. The Agency highlights its difficulties regarding the differentiated nature of appropriations regarding commitments carried forward following financial independence, and commitments migrated from DG HOME to the Agency.
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report contains a summary of the Agency’s activities in 2014. This is focused on the following:
Budget : EUR 59.38 million in commitment appropriations.
Activities:
operational management and evolution of SISII, VIS and EURODAC ; helpdesk : provide first level support services to users across all systems under the management of eu-LISA; provision of coordination, security and supervision of relations between Member States and the network provider for the communication infrastructure for SIS II, Eurodac and VIS (sTESTA network); participation in preparatory processes to design, develop and implement new systems; timely and accurate provision of statistics and information on the performance of the systems as provided for in the relevant legal bases; reporting : fulfilment of all reporting obligations laid down in the establishing Regulation and legal bases for the IT systems under the Agency's management monitoring of new technologies and solutions relevant for the operational management and evolution of SIS II, VIS, Eurodac and other large-scale IT systems training : provision of bespoke system training plans for national authorities on IT systems managed by the Agency establishment of an informal network of security experts with the Member States for the exchange of early warnings in cyber areas, best practices and security incident management.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014, as part of the 2014 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (EU-LISA) .
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 148 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the EU-LISA Agency.
The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based.
On this basis, the Financial Controller of the European Commission ensures the certification of the consolidated accounts as declared by the institutions, agencies and bodies of the European Union.
Discharge procedure of the EU agencies : the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised agencies.
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from a budgetary and accrual accounting perspective.
The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of all Institutions. Agencies do not have a separate budget inside the EU budget ; and they are partially financed by a Commission budget subsidy.
This document sets out how the Agency spent and implemented their budget in 2014. Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure.
EASO : in 2014, the tasks and budget of the Office were as follows:
description of the tasks of EU-LISA : the Agency was set up under Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council . Its main aim is to ensure the operational management of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), Eurodac and Visa Information Systems (VIS); EU-LISA’s budget for 2014 : the accounts of the Office for the year 2014 as presented by the Commission in its document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union are as follows:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 59 million;
- paid : EUR 49 million;
- carried-over : EUR 10 million.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 72 million;
- paid : EUR 54 million;
- carried-over : EUR 15 million.
Please refer also to the Final Accounts of the EU-LISA Agency .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014, as part of the 2014 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (EU-LISA) .
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2014 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 148 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the EU-LISA Agency.
The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based.
On this basis, the Financial Controller of the European Commission ensures the certification of the consolidated accounts as declared by the institutions, agencies and bodies of the European Union.
Discharge procedure of the EU agencies : the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised agencies.
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from a budgetary and accrual accounting perspective.
The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of all Institutions. Agencies do not have a separate budget inside the EU budget ; and they are partially financed by a Commission budget subsidy.
This document sets out how the Agency spent and implemented their budget in 2014. Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure.
EASO : in 2014, the tasks and budget of the Office were as follows:
description of the tasks of EU-LISA : the Agency was set up under Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council . Its main aim is to ensure the operational management of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), Eurodac and Visa Information Systems (VIS); EU-LISA’s budget for 2014 : the accounts of the Office for the year 2014 as presented by the Commission in its document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union are as follows:
Commitment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 59 million;
- paid : EUR 49 million;
- carried-over : EUR 10 million.
Payment appropriations :
- committed : EUR 72 million;
- paid : EUR 54 million;
- carried-over : EUR 15 million.
Please refer also to the Final Accounts of the EU-LISA Agency .
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0183/2016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0124/2016
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE576.954
- Committee opinion: PE575.096
- Committee draft report: PE569.761
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05584/2016
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 409 09.12.2015, p. 0275
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0144/2015
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2015)0377
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2015)0377
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2015)0377 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 409 09.12.2015, p. 0275 N8-0144/2015
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05584/2016
- Committee draft report: PE569.761
- Committee opinion: PE575.096
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE576.954
Activities
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
- Jean ARTHUIS
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
- Jonathan ARNOTT
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
- Hugues BAYET
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
- Renata BRIANO
- Steeve BRIOIS
- Gianluca BUONANNO
- James CARVER
- Nicola CAPUTO
- Alberto CIRIO
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
- Andi CRISTEA
- Daniel DALTON
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
- Mireille D'ORNANO
- Norbert ERDŐS
- Edouard FERRAND
- Arne GERICKE
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
- Brian HAYES
- Marian HARKIN
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
- Diane JAMES
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
- Philippe JUVIN
- Barbara KAPPEL
- Afzal KHAN
- Bernd KÖLMEL
- Marine LE PEN
- Bernd LUCKE
- Ivana MALETIĆ
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
- Dominique MARTIN
- Notis MARIAS
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
- Louis MICHEL
- Marlene MIZZI
- Sophie MONTEL
- Renaud MUSELIER
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
- Franz OBERMAYR
- Marijana PETIR
- Julia REID
- Claude ROLIN
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
- Siôn SIMON
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
- Davor ŠKRLEC
- Igor ŠOLTES
- Joachim STARBATTY
- Beatrix von STORCH
- Patricija ŠULIN
- Dubravka ŠUICA
- Pavel TELIČKA
- Traian UNGUREANU
- Miguel VIEGAS
Votes
A8-0124/2016 - Derek Vaughan - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
29 |
2015/2195(DEC)
2016/01/27
LIBE
18 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Welcomes the significant improvement of the budget implementation rates in 2014 and the efforts of the Agency to ensure an efficient and compliant budget implementation.
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets the absence of reliable and complete information about the total implementation cost of the IT systems SIS II, VIS and EURODAC; notes that the cost of SIS II was 8 times the estimated one, and its delivery was delayed 6 years, while acknowledging the limited responsibility of the Agency on this matter due to its entering into operation end of 2012; requests a full report from EU-LISA with the assistance of the Commission on total implementation costs, development of software applications
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Observing the lack of transparency, urges the Agency to publish a comprehensive organigram and the names and functions of its entire staff; asks for adoption of a clear strategy on whistle-
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets the high cancellation (22 %) of committed appropriations carried over in 2014 due to delays in IT projects provided by external suppliers;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its deep concern about the high cancellation ratio (26 %) of committed appropriations carried over in 2014; urges the Agency to improve its budgetary planning and human resources management; welcomes, therefore, the Agency's acknowledgement of the need to improve its budgetary management; emphasizes the need to reduce budgetary carry-over of commitments in the future;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets the high cancellation (22 %) of committed appropriations carried over in 2014 due to delays in IT projects provided by external suppliers; acknowledges the Court of Auditor's comment that carry- overs often result from events beyond the agencies' control or are justified by the multi-annual nature of operations, procurement procedures or projects; puts into question the utility of these IT projects, as their delays had no operational impacts according to the Agency; requests a full report on their scope and added value for Union citizens;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets the high cancellation (22 %) of committed appropriations carried over in 2014 due to delays in IT projects provided by external suppliers;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Takes note of the Court of Auditors comments regarding the improvements that need to be made in respect of the internal controls and of the budgetary management.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the Agency published in 2014 a new Code of Conduct, with guidelines on management and prevention of conflict of interest and "revolving doors"; asks the Management Board to publish declarations of interest instead of declarations of absence of conflict of interest, leaving the assessment to a third party and to detail policies and rules
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Takes note of the extensive reply provided by the Agency in response to the comments made by the Court of Auditors and of the commitments made which will contribute to an improved control of the budget implementation cycle.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the provisions established by the Europol Management Board on internal investigations and
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the Agency did not comply with Parliament's recommendation last year to put in place policies for preventing and managing conflicts of interest
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the Agency did not comply with Parliament's recommendation last year to put in place policies for preventing and managing conflicts of interest; urges the Agency to remedy this, to adopt such a policy, to inform the discharge authority on its adoption and to make it publicly available; to publish the CVs and declarations of interest of its executive director, management board and national experts and to provide a track record of conflicts of interest it has identified, by the end of March 2016;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Re
source: 575.359
2016/03/04
CONT
11 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Calls for an overall improvement in the prevention of, and the fight against, corruption in the public sector, and especially within the EU institutions and agencies, through a holistic approach, commencing with better public access to documents and more stringent rules on conflicts of interest, the introduction or strengthening of transparency registers and the provision of sufficient resources for law enforcement measures, and also through improved cooperation among Member States and with relevant third countries;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Calls on all the EU institutions and agencies to enhance their procedures and practices aimed at safeguarding the financial interests of the Union and to actively contribute to a results-oriented discharge process;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes from the Court’s report that out of EUR 6 600 000 of committed appropriations carried forward to 2014 for Title I (staff expenditure) and Title II (administrative expenditure), EUR 1 700 000 (26 %) were cancelled, showing that the budgetary needs were overestimated at the end of 2013; acknowledges however, the Agency's observation that upon becoming financially independent in 2013, a number of commitments for
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Encourages the EU institutions and agencies to better raise awareness of the conflict-of-interest policy among their officials, alongside ongoing awareness- raising activities and the inclusion of integrity and transparency as an obligatory item to be discussed during recruitment procedures and performance reviews; considers that a distinction should be made between elected representatives and public officials in the legislation on conflicts of interest; believes that there should also be such regulations in the Member States for public officials and civil servants involved in the administration and monitoring of EU subsidies; calls on the Commission to submit a draft legal basis on this matter;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. States that the annual reports of the EU institutions and agencies could play an important role in compliance regarding transparency, accountability and integrity; calls for the EU institutions and agencies to include a standard chapter on these components in their annual reports;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Requests that all EU institutions and agencies implement Article 16 of the Staff Regulations by publishing, on an annual basis, information about senior officials who have left the EU administration, as well as a list of conflicts of interest; requests that the aforementioned independent structure assess the compatibility of post-EU employment or the situation whereby civil servants and former Members of the European Parliament move from the public to the private sector (the 'revolving door' issue) and the possibility of a conflict of interest, and define clear cooling-off periods, which should cover at least the period for which transitional allowances are granted,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Asks the EU institutions and bodies to apply strictly the measures pertaining to discretion and exclusion in respect of public procurement, with proper background checks being carried out in every instance, and to apply the exclusion criteria in order to debar companies in the event of any conflict of interest, this being essential to protect the EU's financial interests;
source: 576.954
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/1/name |
Old
VISTISEN Anders PrimdahlNew
VISTISEN Anders |
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2015-07-23T00:00:00New
2015-07-22T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE569.761New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-569761_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.096&secondRef=04New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-575096_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE576.954New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-576954_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160427&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-04-27-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0124&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0124_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0183New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0183_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
commission |
|
committees |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
procedure |
|