Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | MAUREL Emmanuel ( S&D) | VANDENKENDELAERE Tom ( PPE), RUOHONEN-LERNER Pirkko ( ECR), TORVALDS Nils ( ALDE), ZANNI Marco ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | CONT |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113, TFEU 115
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113, TFEU 115Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant access for tax authorities to information held by authorities responsible for the prevention of money laundering.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Directive (EU) 2016/2258 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards access to anti-money-laundering information by tax authorities.
CONTENT: the Directive will enable tax authorities to access the mechanisms, procedures, documents and information as regards anti-money-laundering for the performance of their duties in monitoring the proper application of Directive 2011/16/EU and for the functioning of all forms of administrative cooperation provided for in that Directive.
Council Directive 2014/107/EU , amending Directive 2011/16/EU implements the global Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information in Tax Matters within the Union thereby ensuring that information on Account Holders of Financial Accounts is reported to the Member State where the Account Holder is resident.
Directive 2011/16/EU stipulates that, where the Account Holder is an intermediary structure, Financial Institutions are to look through that structure, and identify and report on its beneficial owners. That important element in the application of that Directive relies on anti-money-laundering information obtained pursuant to Directive (EU) 2015/849 for the identification of the beneficial owners.
Access to anti-money-laundering information would ensure that tax authorities are better equipped to fulfil their obligations under Directive 2011/16/EU and to combat tax evasion and fraud more effectively.
TRANSPOSITION: 31.12.2017 at the latest.
APPLICATION: from 1.1.2018.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 6.12.2016.
The European Parliament adopted by 590 votes to 32, with 64 abstentions (following the Parliament’s consultation procedure), a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards access to anti-money-laundering information by tax authorities.
Parliament approved the Commission proposal subject to amendments.
Members stressed that combating tax evasion and tax avoidance, including in connection with money laundering, is an absolute priority for the Union .
The Swissleaks, Luxleaks, Panama Papers and Bahamas Leaks revelations, which are individual manifestations of a global phenomenon, have confirmed the paramount need for greater tax transparency and much closer coordination and cooperation between jurisdictions.
Scope : this Directive shall apply to all taxes of any kind levied by, or on behalf of, a Member State or the Member State’s territorial or administrative subdivisions, including the local authorities, as well as to virtual currency exchange services and custodial wallet providers.
Automatic exchange of information : since anti-money laundering information is in many cases of a cross-border nature, Parliament called for it to be included , where relevant, in the automatic exchange between Member States and should be made available on request to the Commission in the framework of its power to enforce state aid rules.
According to the amended text, the tax authorities of a Member State shall, within three months of their collection, automatically exchange the documents and information referred to in Article 22 of Directive 2011/16/EU with any other Member State if the beneficial owner of a firm , or, in the case of a trust, the settlor, one of the trustees, the protector (where relevant), a beneficiary or any other person exercising genuine control over the trust, or, lastly, the holder of an account referred to in Article 32a of Directive (EU) 2015/849 is a taxpayer in that Member State. Access should be provided to the Commission for the completion of its missions, on a confidential basis.
Access to information : Member States shall provide by law for tax authorities’ access to the central registers, mechanisms, procedures, documents and information referred to in Articles 7, 13, 18, 18a, 19, 27, 30, 31, 32a, 40, 44 and 48 of Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing.
Such access shall be the result of a mandatory automatic exchange of information. Member States shall further guarantee access to that information by including it in a centralised public register of companies, trusts and other structures whose nature or purpose is similar or equivalent.
Efficient use of exchanged data : Member States shall ensure that all information exchanged and obtained shall be investigated in a timely manner, whether that information has been obtained by authorities on request, through spontaneous information exchange by another Member State, or from a public information leak. Should a Member State fail to do this in a timeframe required by national law, it should publicly communicate the reasons for this failure to the Commission.
Transposition : Member States shall adopt and publish, by 31 December 2017 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall apply those provisions from 1 January 2018.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, following the Parliament’s consultation procedure, the report by Emmanuel MAUREL (S&D, FR) on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards access to anti-money-laundering information by tax authorities.
The committee responsible stressed that combating tax evasion and tax avoidance, including in connection with money laundering, is an absolute priority for the Union . It also stressed the need to:
benefit synergies stemming from domestic, Union and international cooperation between the different authorities involved in fighting these crimes and abuses; take account of issues, such as beneficial ownership transparency or the extent to which entities, such as legal professions, are subject to the Anti-money laundering (AML) framework in third countries, are crucial to enhancing the ability of Union authorities to address tax dodging and money laundering.
This Directive shall apply to all taxes of any kind levied by, or on behalf of, a Member State or the Member State’s territorial or administrative subdivisions, including the local authorities, as well as to virtual currency exchange services and custodial wallet providers.
Members stressed the need to: (i) ensure direct and facilitated access by the tax authorities to the AML information, procedures, documents and mechanisms for the performance of their duties in monitoring the proper application of Directive 2011/16/EU; (ii) include that information, where relevant, in the automatic exchanges between Member States, and to provide access to the Commission, on a confidential basis.
Since AML information is in many cases of a cross-border nature, it should be included, where relevant, in the automatic exchange between Member States and should be made available on request to the Commission in the framework of its power to enforce state aid rules.
Member States shall ensure that all information exchanged and obtained shall be investigated in a timely manner , whether that information has been obtained by authorities on request, through spontaneous information exchange by another Member State, or from a public information leak. Should a Member State fail to do this in a timeframe required by national law, it should publicly communicate the reasons for this failure to the Commission.
Member States shall adopt and publish, by 31 December 2017 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall apply those provisions from 1 January 2018 .
PURPOSE: to enable tax authorities to consistently access anti-money-laundering information for the performance of their duties in monitoring the proper application of the Directive 2011/16/EU on Administrative Cooperation by Financial Institutions.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
BACKGROUND: Directive 2014/107/EU amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation applies as of 1 January 2016 to 27 Member States and as of 1 January 2017 to Austria. It implements the Global Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information in Tax Matters within the EU. As such, it ensures that information on Account Holders of Financial Accounts is reported to the Member State where the Account Holder is resident.
In addition, Directive 2011/16/EU stipulates that, where the Account Holder is an intermediary structure, Financial Institutions are to look through that structure, and identify and report its beneficial owners . That important element in the application of the Directive relies on anti-money-laundering ('AML') information obtained pursuant to Directive 2015/849/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing.
Recent media leaks exposed the large scale concealment of offshore funds. Further measures still need to be taken to reinforce the EU and international transparency framework . In particular, it has become apparent that tax authorities need greater access to information on the beneficial owners of intermediary entities and other relevant customer due diligence information, if they are to effectively identify and address tax evasion.
Tax administrations' access to anti-money-laundering information differs considerably throughout the EU . Even when this access is granted, authorities often still encounter significant barriers that hinder the effectiveness of their work against tax avoidance and evasion.
To ensure effective monitoring of the application by Financial Institutions of the due diligence procedures set forth in Directive 2011/16/EU, the tax authorities need access to AML information.
This proposal is part of the Commission’s ambitious agenda against tax evasion and avoidance, with a view to delivering fairer and more effective taxation in the EU.
CONTENT: this proposal seeks to amend Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation by introducing a measure to enable tax authorities to consistently access anti-money-laundering information for the performance of their duties .
The amendment would enable tax authorities to have access to the mechanism, procedures, documents and information on beneficial ownership information and the underlying customer due diligence procedures as part of the Fourth Anti-Money-Laundering Directive.
The proposed Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)8
- Contribution: COM(2016)0452
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2016/2258
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 342 16.12.2016, p. 0001
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0432/2016
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A8-0326/2016
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE592.157
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4584/2016
- Contribution: COM(2016)0452
- Committee draft report: PE589.168
- Debate in Council: 3480
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2016)0452
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE589.168
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE592.157
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4584/2016
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)8
- Contribution: COM(2016)0452
- Contribution: COM(2016)0452
Activities
- Enrique CALVET CHAMBON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Norbert ERDŐS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Bernd LUCKE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zoltán BALCZÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Beatriz BECERRA BASTERRECHEA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renata BRIANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steeve BRIOIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Soledad CABEZÓN RUIZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- James CARVER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andi CRISTEA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pál CSÁKY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edward CZESAK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michel DANTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Enrico GASBARRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena GENTILE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michela GIUFFRIDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ana GOMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Brian HAYES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hans-Olaf HENKEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramón JÁUREGUI ATONDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Petr JEŽEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marc JOULAUD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rina Ronja KARI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Krišjānis KARIŅŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Afzal KHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jeppe KOFOD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd KÖLMEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Béla KOVÁCS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Werner LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Constance LE GRIP
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sander LOONES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Louis-Joseph MANSCOUR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michał MARUSIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dominique MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luigi MORGANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Momchil NEKOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Norica NICOLAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cora van NIEUWENHUIZEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stanisław OŻÓG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rolandas PAKSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Florian PHILIPPOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav POCHE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Julia REID
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liliana RODRIGUES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dariusz ROSATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Virginie ROZIÈRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fernando RUAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jill SEYMOUR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Peter SIMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joachim STARBATTY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Beatrix von STORCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Neoklis SYLIKIOTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adam SZEJNFELD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabelle THOMAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivica TOLIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ulrike TREBESIUS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marco VALLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ángela VALLINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daniele VIOTTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lieve WIERINCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steven WOOLFE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0326/2016 - Emmanuel Maurel - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
45 |
2016/0209(CNS)
2016/10/19
ECON
45 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Recital -1 (new) (-1) The various recent tax scandals (‘EuroLeaks’, ‘Panama Papers’ and ‘Bahamas Leaks’) have revealed a list of companies and individuals who used and continue to use tax havens, non- cooperative jurisdictions and jurisdictions with tax regimes that are highly favourable to multinational companies and very wealthy individuals in order to gain financial advantages, have access to dubious and in many cases criminal sources of or destinations for funds, and avoid paying the taxes due. This situation demands resolute action that is not merely superficial but seeks to combat all schemes that enable those with the most wealth and resources to evade both the law and their tax obligations to their countries and communities.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Recital -1 a (new) (-1a) The role of vehicles, accounts and companies based in tax havens and non- cooperative jurisdictions has emerged as the common denominator in a vast range of operations, generally detected a posteriori, which conceal tax fraud, tax evasion and money laundering practices. This fact in itself should call for political and diplomatic action aimed at eliminating offshore centres at global level.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Recital -1 b (new) (-1b) Until this goal has been achieved, it is necessary to take legislative action to strengthen the control and prevention measures available to the tax, judicial, economic and financial authorities and designed to prevent, detect and combat all criminal practices such as money laundering.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Council Directive 2011/16/EU11 as amended by Directive 2014/107/EU12 applies as of 1 January 2016 to 27 Member States and as of 1 January 2017 to Austria. That Directive implements the Global Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information in Tax Matters (“Global Standard”) within the Union. As such, it ensures that information on Account Holders of Financial Accounts is reported to the Member State where the Account Holder is resident with the aim of combating tax evasion, tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning. __________________ 11 Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC (OJ L 64, 11.3.2011, p. 1). 12 Council Directive 2014/107/EU of 9 December 2014 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Council Directive 2011/16/EU11
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Council Directive 2011/16/EU is still characterised by several loopholes used by tax-dodging experts to circumvent the automatic exchange of information therefore, undermining its effectiveness. In order to prevent their use to avoid reporting, as a result of a situation where asset management and beneficial ownership are located in the same jurisdiction, entities which are effectively untaxed and unsupervised should not be considered to be investment entities. In addition, a Union financial institution should be considered as the reporting entity for a Custodial Institution with a foreign account to prevent the circumvention of reporting by placing clients’ assets in a foreign custodial institution. To avoid the exploitation of "synthetic" tax residents’ certificates easily available in countries such as Panama, Gibraltar, the Bahamas and thereby circumventing reporting to the Union authority, any previous residence in the Union within the last ten years should be deemed as an indication of current residence. A tax clearance certificate should be used to establish actual residence. In order to avoid selling newly created investment-linked insurances which are non-cash value and thereby allow the circumvention of reporting, Union law should provide that such instruments are treated as cash value policies. The exception allowing non-reporting of insurance policies sold by foreign agents to Union residents should be abolished. Whereas they currently fall into the category of an Holding active non-financial entity which is exempt from reporting, trusts owing companies should be considered to be a reporting entity. In order to prevent the use of loans which are not repaid as a way of redistributing profits and investment returns, credit interest should, like equity and debt interest, be reportable. The possibility of exploiting current provisions which exempt newly created entities which merely state the intention of being an operational company from reporting should be removed. Gold should be included among financial assets since it produces a financial income in the form of gold leasing, which is currently excluded from reporting.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) The fight against tax evasion and tax avoidance, including in connection with money laundering, is an absolute priority for the Union;
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) To ensure effective monitoring of the application by Financial Institutions of the due diligence procedures set forth in Directive 2011/16/EU, the tax authorities need full and rapid access to AML information and to have at their disposal sufficient numbers of suitably skilled staff to perform that task. In the absence of such access and the appropriate staff, those authorities
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) To ensure effective monitoring of the application by Financial Institutions of the due diligence procedures set forth in Directive 2011/16/EU, the tax authorities need access to AML information. This access should be the result of a mandatory automatic exchange of information. In the absence of such access, those authorities would not be able to monitor, confirm and audit that the Financial Institutions apply properly Directive 2011/16/EU by identifying correctly and reporting the beneficial owners of intermediary structures.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) To ensure effective monitoring of the application by Financial Institutions of the due diligence procedures set forth in Directive 2011/16/EU, the tax authorities need access to AML information and the ability to exchange such information. In the absence of such access, those authorities would not be able to monitor, confirm and audit that the Financial Institutions apply properly Directive 2011/16/EU by identifying correctly and reporting the beneficial owners of intermediary structures.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) At international level, the mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation has been identified as a key instrument in the fight against tax evasion, tax avoidance and profit shifting. The recent report ‘Promotion of a democratic and equitable international order’ - drawn up at the request of the UN Secretary-General by the independent expert Alfred-Maurice de Zayas and published on 4 August 2016 - proposed an action plan to combat these phenomena and recommended, among other measures, that legislation be approved providing for the multilateral automatic exchange of financial information.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The observed link between tax evasion, tax avoidance and money laundering calls for exploiting, to the maximum extent, synergies stemming from domestic, Union and international cooperation between the different authorities involved in fighting these crimes and abuses. Issues, such as beneficial ownership transparency or the extent to which entities, such as legal professions, are subject to the AML framework in third countries, are crucial to enhancing the ability of Union authorities to address tax dodging and money laundering.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The recent LuxLeaks, Panama Papers and Bahamas Leaks scandals, which are individual manifestations of a global phenomenon, have shown that a lack of transparency, poor coordination between states and a lack of cooperation among tax authorities result in misalignments between tax systems and between the various jurisdictions involved, thereby creating potentials for fraud that can be exploited.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The Panama Papers and Bahamas Leaks revelations have once again confirmed the paramount need for greater tax transparency as well as closer coordination and cooperation between jurisdictions.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) 3a. The Panama Papers and the Bahamas Leaks scandals have confirmed the paramount need for greater tax transparency and much closer coordination between jurisdictions.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) EU rules on the prevention and combatting of money laundering have over time incorporated changes in international standards, with the aim of strengthening Member State coordination and responding – precisely because of the links between money laundering, the funding of terrorism, organised crime and tax evasion and avoidance – to the challenges faced at global level. It is therefore necessary to ensure
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) It is therefore necessary to ensure the access by the tax authorities to the AML information, procedures, documents and mechanisms for the performance of their duties in monitoring the proper application of Directive 2011/16/EU and to include this information, when relevant, in the automatic exchanges between Member States, and with the Commission, on a confidential basis.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) It is therefore necessary to ensure the
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) It is therefore necessary to ensure the access by the tax authorities to the AML information, procedures, documents and mechanisms for the performance of their duties in monitoring the proper application of Directive 2011/16/EU and for the functioning of all forms of administrative cooperation by that Directive.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) It is therefore necessary to ensure the access by the tax authorities to the AML and anti-tax fraud information, procedures, documents and mechanisms for the performance of their duties in monitoring the proper application of Directive 2011/16/EU.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Enhanced customer due diligence measures should also be made available to tax authorities. However, enhanced measures currently have little scope to fight tax evasion since they are largely applied to countries included in the list of high-risk countries as defined by the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 of 14 July 20161a. Currently, the list mirrors the existing Financial Action Task Force (FATF) list and does not include a number of countries where recent scandals and observed scant adherence to a number of FATF recommendations still point to widespread tax evasion and money laundering activities occurring in such jurisdictions. Therefore, it is vital to adopt an extended updated list of high-risk countries on the basis of additional and more stringent criteria. Moreover, in order to exploit synergies in the Union legislative framework, specific enhanced customer due diligence measures shall also be applied to those countries which will be included in the forthcoming Union common list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions to be published by the Commission. _________________ 1aCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 of 14 July 2016 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council by identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (OJ L 254, 20.9.2016, p.1)
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In order to achieve the objectives of this Directive, the Commission should assess the role which the banking system and financial operators may be playing in promoting money laundering. By virtue of its enhanced powers in the field of financial and banking regulation, the European Union could therefore take action through an ad hoc proposal on increased control and transparency for banking and financial transactions, and potential penalties such as licence withdrawal in the event of repeated non- compliance or fraud.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In addition, it is important that tax authorities have adequate information and communications technology (ICT) systems in place that can trace money- laundering activities at an early stage. In that respect, tax authorities should have adequate ICT and staff resources that can cope with the large amount of AML information to be exchanged between Member States.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) It is important to enable tax administrations to access information handled by the remaining bodies bound by anti-money-laundering due diligence measures, in addition to financial institutions, where that information is significant for tax purposes;
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Moreover, given that the upgraded information exchange and the information leaks have increased the spontaneous exchange and availability of information, it is very important that Member States investigate and act upon all potential wrongdoings.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4b) Since AML information is in many cases of a cross-border nature, it should be included, when relevant, in the automatic exchange between Member States and should be made available on request to the Commission in the framework of its power to enforce state aid rules. Moreover, given the complexity and the need to verify the reliability of this information, such as in the case of data on beneficial ownership, tax authorities should cooperate on cross-border enquiries.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4b) It is essential for there to be an automatic, mandatory and continuous exchange of information in the tax field among the various competent authorities in order to ensure maximum transparency and to have a basic instrument for preventing and combating fraudulent behaviour of all kinds.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4b) Given the global character of anti- money laundering activities, international cooperation is key to an effective and efficient fight against such activities.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 c (new) (4c) The mandatory automatic exchange of AML information between the tax authorities of Member States should be based on the principle of reciprocity.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Where this Directive requires that access to personal data by tax authorities be provided by law, this does not necessarily require an act adopted by the parliament, without prejudice of the constitutional order of the Member State concerned. However, such a law should be clear and precise and in line with the principles of personal data protection and its application should be clear and foreseeable to persons subject to it, in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Since the objective of this Directive, namely the efficient administrative cooperation between Member States and its effective monitoring under conditions compatible with the proper functioning of the internal market in order to combat tax fraud, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the uniformity and effectiveness required, be better achieved at Union level,
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive shall apply to all taxes of any kind levied by, or on behalf of, a Member State or the Member State’s territorial or administrative subdivisions, including the local authorities, as well as to virtual currency exchange services and custodial wallet providers.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 5 – paragraph 1 b (new) In Article 5, the following paragraph is added: “The Commission, in the framework of its power to enforce state aid rules, shall have access on request to the information referred to Article 22 of this Directive.”
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) The following article is inserted: “Article 8a The tax authorities of a Member State shall, within six months of their collection, automatically exchange the documents and information referred to in Article 22 of this Directive with any other Member State, and with the Commission on a confidential basis, if the beneficial owner of a firm, or, in the case of a trust, the settler, one of the trustees, the protector (where applicable), a beneficiary or any other person exercising genuine control over the trust, or, lastly, the holder of an account referred to in Article 32a of Directive (EU) 2015/849 is a taxpayer in that Member State.”
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8 a (new) The following article is inserted: “Article 8a The tax authorities of a Member State shall, within two months of their collection, automatically exchange the documents and information referred to in Article 22 of this Directive with any other Member State and the European Commission if the beneficial owner of a firm, or, in the case of a trust, the settler, one of the trustees, the protector (where applicable), a beneficiary or any other person exercising genuine control over the trust, or, lastly, the holder of an account referred to in Article 32a of Directive (EU) 2015/849 is a taxpayer in that Member State.”
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1b (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8 a (new) The following article is inserted: “Article 8a The tax authorities of a Member State shall automatically exchange the documents and information referred to in Article 22 of this Directive with any other Member State if the beneficial owner of a firm, or, in the case of a trust, the settler, one of the trustees, the protector (where applicable), a beneficiary or any other natural person exercising effective control over the trust, or, lastly, the holder of an account referred to in Article 32a of Directive (EU) 2015/849 is a taxpayer in that Member State.”
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 (1a) For the purpose of the implementation and enforcement of the laws of the Member States giving effect to this directive, and to ensure the functioning of the administrative cooperation it establishes, Member States shall provide by law for access by tax authorities to the mechanisms, procedures, documents and information referred to in articles 13, 30, 31, 32a and 40 of Directive 2015/849/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council*. Member States shall further guarantee access to that information by including it in a centralised public register of companies, trusts and other structures whose nature or purpose is similar or equivalent.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 22 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) For the purpose of the implementation and enforcement of the laws of the Member States giving effect to this directive, and to ensure the functioning of the administrative cooperation it establishes, Member States shall provide by law for
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 22 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) For the purpose of the implementation and enforcement of the laws of the Member States giving effect to this directive, and to ensure the functioning of the administrative cooperation it establishes, Member States shall provide by law for access by tax authorities to the mechanisms, procedures, documents and information referred to in articles 7, 13,
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 22 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) For the purpose of the implementation and enforcement of the laws of the Member States giving effect to this directive, and to ensure the functioning of the administrative cooperation it establishes, Member States shall provide by law for access by tax authorities to the central registers, mechanisms, procedures, documents and information referred to in articles 13, 30, 31, 32a and 40 of Directive 2015/849/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council*.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 22– paragraph 1 b (new) (1a) In Article 22, the following paragraph 1b is inserted: “(1b) The obligation regarding access by tax authorities to documents and information on beneficial ownership and due diligence procedures shall refer to the following obliged entities pursuant to Article 2 of Directive 2015/849/EU: (1) credit institutions; (2) financial institutions; (3) the following natural or legal persons acting in the exercise of their professional activities: (a) auditors, external accountants and tax advisers; (b) notaries and other independent legal professionals, where they participate, whether by acting on behalf of and for their client in any financial or real estate transaction, or by assisting in the planning or carrying out of transactions for their client concerning the: (i) buying and selling of real property or business entities, (ii) managing of client money, securities or other assets, (iii) opening or management of bank, savings or securities accounts, (iv) organisation of contributions necessary for the creation, operation or management of companies, (v) creation, operation or management of trusts, companies, foundations, or similar structures; (c) trust or company service providers not already covered under point (a) or (b); (d) estate agents; (e) other persons trading in goods to the extent that payments are made or received in cash in an amount of EUR 10 000 or more, whether the transaction is carried out in a single operation or in several operations which appear to be linked;”
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 22– paragraph 1 b (new) Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 1 a (new) having regard to Protocol (No 1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union,
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 1 b (new) having regard to Protocol (No 2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
source: 592.157
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/3/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=27813&j=0&l=en
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.168New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-589168_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE592.157New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-592157_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:4584)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:4584)(documentyear:2016)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=27813&j=0&l=en
|
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0326_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0326_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161122&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-11-22-TOC_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0326&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0326_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0432New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0432_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/8/07145New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32016L2258New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32016L2258 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/5/docs/0 |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/9 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/6 |
|
activities/7 |
|
activities/8 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting final decisionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/docs/1/text |
|
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting final decision |
activities/5/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2016-11-30T00:00:00New
2016-11-22T00:00:00 |
activities/5/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2016-11-10T00:00:00New
2016-07-05T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Legislative proposal published |
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
ECON/8/07145
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3 |
|
committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
committees/1/date |
2016-07-12T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|