BETA


2016/2012(INI) Application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead FEMM KOZŁOWSKA Agnieszka (icon: PPE PPE) REGNER Evelyn (icon: S&D S&D), GIRLING Julie (icon: ECR ECR), MLINAR Angelika (icon: ALDE ALDE), DELLI Karima (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VON STORCH Beatrix (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion TRAN NILSSON Jens (icon: S&D S&D) Daniela AIUTO (icon: EFDD EFDD), Marie-Christine ARNAUTU (icon: ENF ENF), Georges BACH (icon: PPE PPE), Gesine MEISSNER (icon: ALDE ALDE), Keith TAYLOR (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion LIBE
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion JURI Mary HONEYBALL (icon: S&D S&D), Cecilia WIKSTRÖM (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2017/08/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2017/03/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/03/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 499 votes to 104, with 81 abstentions, a resolution on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services.

As a reminder, Directive 2004/113/EC extends the principle of equal treatment of men and women beyond the realm of employment and the labour market and into the field of access to and supply of goods and services. It prohibits both direct and indirect discrimination based on sex in the access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public, in both the public and private sectors.

Concerned that the application of the Directive is not uniform , Members called for the elimination of any remaining gaps in the implementation of the Directive in some sectors in certain Member States. In this regard, they suggested raising awareness about the provisions of the Directive to enhance the perceived importance of equal treatment in the field of goods and services.

Insurance, banking and financial sectors : in the Test-Achats ruling, the Court of Justice concluded that Article 5(2) of the Directive works against the achievement of the objective of equal treatment between men and women. This provision was considered to be invalid with effect from 21 December 2012 and as a result unisex premiums and benefits are mandatory in all Member States.

Parliament welcomed the implementation of the ruling in national legislation by the Member States and the fact that national legislation has been amended in a legally binding manner. However, it pointed out that there are still challenges related to the conformity of national legislation with the ruling, for example in medical insurance schemes and in relation to the full elimination of discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity .

Members called on the Commission to monitor the proper and full implementation of the ruling in the Member States in order to safeguard women against unqualified pregnancy-related costs, as pregnant women should not experience higher costs on the sole grounds of their pregnancy.

Transport sector and public spaces : Parliament stressed the need to enhance preventive measures against harassment experienced by women in transport. It called on the Commission and the Member States to facilitate the exchange of best practices in this area and called for progress to be made regarding the EU’s accession to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention).

Furthermore, Members regretted the fact that parents and carers of small children still face physical access barriers and other obstacles such as insufficient access to baby changing facilities on the premises of service providers.

The Commission is called upon to consider all obstacles and constraints to accessibility encountered by women as the main users of public transportation services and by carers of small children and carers in general.

The collaborative economy : the Commission is asked to integrate the principles of gender mainstreaming and reflect the regulations of the Directive to safeguard equal treatment of women and men and effectively prevent harassment in the services offered within the collaborative economy. The “zero-tolerance” policy towards harassment should be further strengthened in the sector and there is a need to create clear procedures for users to report cases of abuse.

Differential treatment : the largest share of issues addressed and complaints received by the equality bodies in the Member States concern differential treatment predominantly within the leisure and entertainment sector. They concern justification of unequal treatment based on the derogation provided in Article 4(5) that leads, for example, to differential pricing, refusals to provide services and differing conditions of access for women and men.

Members called for the promotion of forms of positive action in this area.

Enhancing the application of the Directive : the Commission recommended, inter alia :

addressing, as a priority, the transposition issues with the Member States concerned; ensuring sufficient competence and independence as well as sufficient resources for national equality bodies ; improving access to justice for victims of discrimination by giving independent equality bodies the competences to provide assistance, including free legal aid, and the right to represent individuals in cases of alleged discrimination; improving comprehensive, comparable specific data collection on harassment and sexual harassment in the area of equal access to goods and services; examining the possibilities to enhance equal treatment of women and men in advertising and to promote best practices in this field.

Documents
2017/03/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/03/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/02/20
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted an own-initiative report by Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA-RAJEWICZ (EPP, PL) on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services.

As a reminder, Directive 2004/113/EC extends the principle of equal treatment of men and women beyond the realm of employment and the labour market and into the field of access to and supply of goods and services. It prohibits both direct and indirect discrimination based on sex in the access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public, in both the public and private sectors.

Members regretted that the application of the Directive is not uniform and varies across the Member States. They called for the remaining gaps in its implementation to be addressed in some Member States and across certain sectors.

They suggested in particular increasing awareness about the provisions of the Directive to enhance the perceived importance of equal treatment in the field of goods and services.

The insurance sectors : the report welcomed the implementation of the Test-Achats ruling in national legislation by the Member States and the fact that national legislation has been amended in a legally binding manner. However, it pointed out that there are still challenges related to the conformity of national legislation with the ruling, for example in medical insurance schemes and in relation to the full elimination of discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity .

Members considered that ensuring proper and full implementation of the ruling in all Member States and areas is crucial. The conformity with the ruling across Member States should be monitored in periodic reports by the Commission and any gaps should be addressed as a priority.

Member States are called upon to make a greater effort and enhance clarity in protecting the rights and welfare of pregnant women. They should not experience higher costs on the sole grounds of their pregnancy. Awareness should be raised among service providers as to the special protection afforded to pregnant women.

Transport sector and public spaces : Members stressed the need to enhance preventive measures against harassment experienced by women in transport. They called on the Commission and the Member States to facilitate the exchange of best practices in this area and called for progress to be made regarding the EU’s accession to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention).

Furthermore, Members regretted the fact that parents and carers of small children still face physical access barriers and other obstacles such as insufficient access to baby changing facilities on the premises of service providers. Members emphasised the need to safeguard the rights of both mothers and fathers to enjoy equal opportunities in the company of their children on the premises of service providers.

The Commission therefore to consider all obstacles and constraints to accessibility encountered by women as the main users of public transportation services and by carers of small children and carers in general.

The collaborative economy : Members highlighted the new possible areas of application of the Directive, in particular as a result of digitalisation of certain services and sectors as well as the proliferation of collaborative forms of service provision. They pointed out that the recently published Commission communication entitled “ European agenda for the collaborative economy ” should serve as a first step for promoting and regulating this sector effectively.

The Commission should integrate the principles of gender mainstreaming and reflect the regulations of the Directive to safeguard equal treatment of women and men and effectively prevent harassment in the services offered within the collaborative economy and ensure adequate safety.

Differential treatment : the largest share of issues addressed and complaints received by the equality bodies in the Member States concern differential treatment predominantly within the leisure and entertainment sector . They concern justification of unequal treatment based on the derogation provided in Article 4(5) that leads, for example, to differential pricing, refusals to provide services and differing conditions of access for women and men.

Members considered that the relative lack of positive action based on Article 4(5) across Member States constitutes a gap in the implementation of the Directive. They called for the promotion of forms of positive action.

Enhancing the application of the Directive : the Commission is urged to prioritise addressing the transposition issues with the Member States concerned by means of concrete measures, and to support them in implementing the Directive in a more consistent manner;.

Given the varying degree of effectiveness with which national equality bodies carry out their tasks, Member States are called on to guarantee sufficient competence and independence in accordance with the provisions of the Directive and national law as well as sufficient resources for national equality bodies.

The Commission, the Member States and equality bodies are called on to raise awareness about the provisions of the Directive among both service providers and users in order to implement the principle of equal treatment in this field and reduce the number of breaches of the Directive left unreported.

Documents
2017/02/06
   EP - Vote in committee
2016/11/29
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/11/15
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/11/14
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/10/20
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/01/25
   EP - NILSSON Jens (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2016/01/21
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2015/11/16
   EP - KOZŁOWSKA Agnieszka (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2015/05/05
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to present a report on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services.

BACKGROUND: Council Directive 2004/113/EC extends the protection against sex discrimination beyond the traditional realm of the labour market to the areas of access to and supply of goods and services. This implements the obligation to apply the principle of equal treatment in most economic day-to-day transactions affecting the lives of citizens in the EU.

In its first report, the Commission aims to provide information on the state of play of implementation on the ground.

The report concerns in particular the consequences of the Test Achats ruling .

CONTENT: the Court of Justice of the European Union annulled Article 5(2) of the Directive in its 2011 Test Achats ruling. The provision had permitted the use of sex-based actuarial factors in insurance contracts. The ruling obliged Member States to make unisex premiums and benefits mandatory by 21 December 2012. The Commission adopted guidelines concerning the consequences of the ruling in 2011. This report covers the implementation of the ruling in Member States . It is, however, not limited to the area of financial services but comprehensively reviews the implementation of the Directive as a whole.

Transposition of the directive in Member States and infringements : Directive 2004/113/EC has been transposed into national law in all 28 Member States.

The Commission has checked the conformity of the national implementing laws with the Directive. The review of the national legislation and experiences with its application on the ground shows that there are still challenges relating to the implementation of the Directive concerning, in particular, the derogation provided in Article 4(5) which permits the provision of goods and services exclusively or primarily to members of one sex under certain conditions.

As a result of these assessments, questions were raised with 17 Member States. The information provided revealed that the transposition was sufficiently clear and compliant or was amended in compliance with the Directive in 11 of those Member States. With 6 Member States, the intensive dialogue on sufficient implementation of the Directive continues.

The main concerns regard the restricted scope of application of the national legislation , for example, through an overly restrictive understanding of the notion of goods and services that are available to the public and offered outside the area of private and family life or through protection covering only consumers as recipients of services. Another recurrent issue is an overly broad scope of the possibility to justify unequal treatment on the basis of Article 4(5) of the Directive, which may lead to unjustified unequal treatment in the pricing of the same service (e.g. entry fees to discotheques or sports events or car rental fees). Some questions are related to insufficient protection on grounds of maternity and pregnancy in the provision of services or an insufficient scope of the right to compensation, for example due to the lack of an entitlement to compensation for immaterial damages.

The Commission has received a number of complaints from citizens , the majority of which concern individual cases of alleged discriminations in transactions between private parties without any involvement of Member States. These cases are not about incorrect transposition or application of the Directive by a Member State. In such cases, remedies are only available under national law and through national courts in those situations. There are no infringement proceedings pending following a complaint revealing incorrect transposition or implementation of the Directive by Member States.

Main conclusions of the report :

In the specific area of financial services, the implementation of the Test-Achats ruling in the insurance sector has been the most important challenge . All Member States have implemented the ruling or are implementing it. Some Member States have chosen to go beyond the ruling by applying the unisex rule to all types of insurance and pension , including occupational social security funds, which fall within the scope of Directive 2006/54/EC. In September 2014, the CJEU further held that differentiated benefits on the basis of gender-specific actuarial data are inadmissible in statutory social security pensions under Directive 79/7/EEC5. In the light of these developments, the Commission will assess the application of gender-differentiated conditions to occupational pensions under Directive 2006/54/EC and whether action should be taken to ensure the comprehensive application of the unisex rule in all pillars of the pension system, whether voluntary, occupational or statutory.

As regards impacts of the Test-Achats judgment on price levels of insurances, it seems too early to come to final conclusions. However, evaluated on the basis of the little evidence available, the impact seems very limited.

Concerning implementation of the Directive, all Member States have taken measures to transpose the Directive into their domestic legal orders and to set up the procedures and bodies for its implementation. The Commission does not consider it necessary to propose amendments to the Directive at this stage but will prioritise addressing the remaining transposition issues with the Member States concerned, mainly in relation to the scope of the exception provided for in Article 4(5) of the Directive.

Further enforcement work as well as case law at national and EU level should lead to clarifications on some of the questions raised in the report. Thereafter, the main challenge will be for Member States to ensure that their administrative and judicial authorities and their equality bodies systematically provide full protection to victims on the ground . The Commission will continue its monitoring activities and support Member States in order to realise the full potential of the Directive.

Documents

Votes

A8-0043/2017 - Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz - § 10 #

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 470, -: 147, 0: 69
ES GB DE IT FR BE RO PT SE NL FI DK IE CZ BG MT LU LV EE AT CY LT HR EL SI SK HU PL
Total
49
63
90
61
64
21
30
21
18
23
13
12
8
20
13
6
5
8
6
18
6
11
11
19
8
13
17
51
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: PPE PPE
201

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

For (1)

3

Croatia PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Slovenia PPE

5
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
67

Italy ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark ECR

3

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3
icon: NI NI
15

United Kingdom NI

3

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

A8-0043/2017 - Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz - § 34 #

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 381, -: 258, 0: 46
IT FR ES BE SE GB PT DE FI RO LU DK MT EE AT CY EL LT LV IE BG HR SI NL CZ SK HU PL
Total
62
64
49
21
18
64
21
89
13
30
6
12
6
6
18
6
19
11
8
7
12
11
8
23
20
13
17
50
icon: S&D S&D
175

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Sweden ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Germany NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

3

Cyprus ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
201

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland PPE

3

A8-0043/2017 - Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz - Visa 8/1 #

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 573, -: 73, 0: 42
DE IT ES GB RO FR BE PT AT HU SE CZ NL EL FI BG DK IE LT LU LV EE SI CY MT PL HR SK
Total
91
62
49
63
30
63
21
21
18
17
18
20
23
20
13
12
12
8
11
6
8
6
8
6
6
51
11
13
icon: S&D S&D
175

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2
icon: PPE PPE
204

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
5

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
67

Italy ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

A8-0043/2017 - Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz - Visa 8/2 #

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 392, -: 223, 0: 68
GB IT FR DE BE ES SE DK PT CZ AT FI RO EE CY MT NL LT LU IE EL HR BG LV SI SK HU PL
Total
62
62
62
90
21
49
17
12
21
20
18
13
29
6
6
6
23
11
6
8
20
11
13
8
8
13
17
50
icon: S&D S&D
173

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Denmark ECR

3

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

France NI

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2
icon: PPE PPE
203

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

4

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Ireland PPE

3

A8-0043/2017 - Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz - Visa 15 #

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 401, -: 252, 0: 32
IT FR ES DE BE SE GB FI PT CZ AT LU DK MT EE CY LT NL RO IE EL BG HR LV SI SK HU PL
Total
63
64
48
89
21
18
62
12
20
20
18
6
12
6
6
6
11
23
30
8
20
12
11
8
8
13
18
51
icon: S&D S&D
176

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Sweden ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

France NI

2

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Denmark ECR

3

Cyprus ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
203

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

A8-0043/2017 - Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz - Considérant L #

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 390, -: 259, 0: 43
IT FR ES SE DE PT GB BE FI LU DK MT RO CZ EE AT CY LT NL IE EL HR LV BG SI SK HU PL
Total
63
64
49
18
90
21
64
21
13
6
12
6
30
20
6
18
6
11
23
8
20
11
8
13
8
13
18
51
icon: S&D S&D
178

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Sweden ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

France NI

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Italy ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Denmark ECR

3

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
204

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3
5

A8-0043/2017 - Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz - Résolution #

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 499, -: 104, 0: 81
DE ES IT RO FR PT BE SE HU NL AT CZ BG GB FI IE DK SI EL LT LU HR EE MT CY SK LV PL
Total
90
49
61
30
64
21
21
18
16
23
18
20
13
63
12
8
12
8
19
11
6
11
6
6
5
13
8
51
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1
icon: PPE PPE
202

Ireland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
6
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
65

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
221 2016/2012(INI)
2016/09/12 TRAN 71 amendments...
source: 589.139
2016/11/15 FEMM 126 amendments...
source: 593.809
2016/11/18 JURI 24 amendments...
source: 594.045

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-03-13-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: KOZŁOWSKA Agnieszka date: 2015-11-16T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: KOZŁOWSKA-RAJEWICZ Agnieszka date: 2015-11-16T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/6/rapporteur
  • name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří date: 2016-03-15T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE592.221
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-PR-592221_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.500&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-585500_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.809
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AM-593809_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.255&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-589255_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2017-02-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0043_EN.html title: A8-0043/2017
summary
events/3
date
2017-02-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0043_EN.html title: A8-0043/2017
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170313&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2017-03-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0074_EN.html title: T8-0074/2017
summary
events/6
date
2017-03-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0074_EN.html title: T8-0074/2017
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: KOZŁOWSKA-RAJEWICZ Agnieszka date: 2015-11-16T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2015-11-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KOZŁOWSKA-RAJEWICZ Agnieszka group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: NILSSON Jens date: 2016-01-25T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2016-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NILSSON Jens group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří date: 2016-03-15T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/4/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0043&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0043_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0074
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0074_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-05-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0190/COM_COM(2015)0190_EN.pdf title: COM(2015)0190 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52015DC0190:EN body: EC commission: DG: Justice Commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2016-01-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn group: ECR name: GIRLING Julie group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: PIMENTA LOPES João group: Verts/ALE name: DELLI Karima group: EFD name: VON STORCH Beatrix responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2015-11-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: EPP name: KOZŁOWSKA-RAJEWICZ Agnieszka body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2016-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2016-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: S&D name: NILSSON Jens
  • date: 2017-02-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn group: ECR name: GIRLING Julie group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: PIMENTA LOPES João group: Verts/ALE name: DELLI Karima group: EFD name: VON STORCH Beatrix responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2015-11-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: EPP name: KOZŁOWSKA-RAJEWICZ Agnieszka body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2016-03-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2016-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: S&D name: NILSSON Jens
  • date: 2017-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0043&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0043/2017 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2017-03-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170313&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0074 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0074/2017 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2015-11-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KOZŁOWSKA-RAJEWICZ Agnieszka group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
FEMM
date
2015-11-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: EPP name: KOZŁOWSKA-RAJEWICZ Agnieszka
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2016-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NILSSON Jens group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
TRAN
date
2016-01-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: S&D name: NILSSON Jens
docs
  • date: 2016-10-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE592.221 title: PE592.221 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.500&secondRef=02 title: PE585.500 committee: TRAN type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.809 title: PE593.809 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.255&secondRef=02 title: PE589.255 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2017-08-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=28218&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)390 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-05-05T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0190/COM_COM(2015)0190_EN.pdf title: COM(2015)0190 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2015&nu_doc=0190 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present a report on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services. BACKGROUND: Council Directive 2004/113/EC extends the protection against sex discrimination beyond the traditional realm of the labour market to the areas of access to and supply of goods and services. This implements the obligation to apply the principle of equal treatment in most economic day-to-day transactions affecting the lives of citizens in the EU. In its first report, the Commission aims to provide information on the state of play of implementation on the ground. The report concerns in particular the consequences of the Test Achats ruling . CONTENT: the Court of Justice of the European Union annulled Article 5(2) of the Directive in its 2011 Test Achats ruling. The provision had permitted the use of sex-based actuarial factors in insurance contracts. The ruling obliged Member States to make unisex premiums and benefits mandatory by 21 December 2012. The Commission adopted guidelines concerning the consequences of the ruling in 2011. This report covers the implementation of the ruling in Member States . It is, however, not limited to the area of financial services but comprehensively reviews the implementation of the Directive as a whole. Transposition of the directive in Member States and infringements : Directive 2004/113/EC has been transposed into national law in all 28 Member States. The Commission has checked the conformity of the national implementing laws with the Directive. The review of the national legislation and experiences with its application on the ground shows that there are still challenges relating to the implementation of the Directive concerning, in particular, the derogation provided in Article 4(5) which permits the provision of goods and services exclusively or primarily to members of one sex under certain conditions. As a result of these assessments, questions were raised with 17 Member States. The information provided revealed that the transposition was sufficiently clear and compliant or was amended in compliance with the Directive in 11 of those Member States. With 6 Member States, the intensive dialogue on sufficient implementation of the Directive continues. The main concerns regard the restricted scope of application of the national legislation , for example, through an overly restrictive understanding of the notion of goods and services that are available to the public and offered outside the area of private and family life or through protection covering only consumers as recipients of services. Another recurrent issue is an overly broad scope of the possibility to justify unequal treatment on the basis of Article 4(5) of the Directive, which may lead to unjustified unequal treatment in the pricing of the same service (e.g. entry fees to discotheques or sports events or car rental fees). Some questions are related to insufficient protection on grounds of maternity and pregnancy in the provision of services or an insufficient scope of the right to compensation, for example due to the lack of an entitlement to compensation for immaterial damages. The Commission has received a number of complaints from citizens , the majority of which concern individual cases of alleged discriminations in transactions between private parties without any involvement of Member States. These cases are not about incorrect transposition or application of the Directive by a Member State. In such cases, remedies are only available under national law and through national courts in those situations. There are no infringement proceedings pending following a complaint revealing incorrect transposition or implementation of the Directive by Member States. Main conclusions of the report : In the specific area of financial services, the implementation of the Test-Achats ruling in the insurance sector has been the most important challenge . All Member States have implemented the ruling or are implementing it. Some Member States have chosen to go beyond the ruling by applying the unisex rule to all types of insurance and pension , including occupational social security funds, which fall within the scope of Directive 2006/54/EC. In September 2014, the CJEU further held that differentiated benefits on the basis of gender-specific actuarial data are inadmissible in statutory social security pensions under Directive 79/7/EEC5. In the light of these developments, the Commission will assess the application of gender-differentiated conditions to occupational pensions under Directive 2006/54/EC and whether action should be taken to ensure the comprehensive application of the unisex rule in all pillars of the pension system, whether voluntary, occupational or statutory. As regards impacts of the Test-Achats judgment on price levels of insurances, it seems too early to come to final conclusions. However, evaluated on the basis of the little evidence available, the impact seems very limited. Concerning implementation of the Directive, all Member States have taken measures to transpose the Directive into their domestic legal orders and to set up the procedures and bodies for its implementation. The Commission does not consider it necessary to propose amendments to the Directive at this stage but will prioritise addressing the remaining transposition issues with the Member States concerned, mainly in relation to the scope of the exception provided for in Article 4(5) of the Directive. Further enforcement work as well as case law at national and EU level should lead to clarifications on some of the questions raised in the report. Thereafter, the main challenge will be for Member States to ensure that their administrative and judicial authorities and their equality bodies systematically provide full protection to victims on the ground . The Commission will continue its monitoring activities and support Member States in order to realise the full potential of the Directive.
  • date: 2016-01-21T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-02-06T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-02-20T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0043&language=EN title: A8-0043/2017 summary: The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted an own-initiative report by Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA-RAJEWICZ (EPP, PL) on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services. As a reminder, Directive 2004/113/EC extends the principle of equal treatment of men and women beyond the realm of employment and the labour market and into the field of access to and supply of goods and services. It prohibits both direct and indirect discrimination based on sex in the access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public, in both the public and private sectors. Members regretted that the application of the Directive is not uniform and varies across the Member States. They called for the remaining gaps in its implementation to be addressed in some Member States and across certain sectors. They suggested in particular increasing awareness about the provisions of the Directive to enhance the perceived importance of equal treatment in the field of goods and services. The insurance sectors : the report welcomed the implementation of the Test-Achats ruling in national legislation by the Member States and the fact that national legislation has been amended in a legally binding manner. However, it pointed out that there are still challenges related to the conformity of national legislation with the ruling, for example in medical insurance schemes and in relation to the full elimination of discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity . Members considered that ensuring proper and full implementation of the ruling in all Member States and areas is crucial. The conformity with the ruling across Member States should be monitored in periodic reports by the Commission and any gaps should be addressed as a priority. Member States are called upon to make a greater effort and enhance clarity in protecting the rights and welfare of pregnant women. They should not experience higher costs on the sole grounds of their pregnancy. Awareness should be raised among service providers as to the special protection afforded to pregnant women. Transport sector and public spaces : Members stressed the need to enhance preventive measures against harassment experienced by women in transport. They called on the Commission and the Member States to facilitate the exchange of best practices in this area and called for progress to be made regarding the EU’s accession to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention). Furthermore, Members regretted the fact that parents and carers of small children still face physical access barriers and other obstacles such as insufficient access to baby changing facilities on the premises of service providers. Members emphasised the need to safeguard the rights of both mothers and fathers to enjoy equal opportunities in the company of their children on the premises of service providers. The Commission therefore to consider all obstacles and constraints to accessibility encountered by women as the main users of public transportation services and by carers of small children and carers in general. The collaborative economy : Members highlighted the new possible areas of application of the Directive, in particular as a result of digitalisation of certain services and sectors as well as the proliferation of collaborative forms of service provision. They pointed out that the recently published Commission communication entitled “ European agenda for the collaborative economy ” should serve as a first step for promoting and regulating this sector effectively. The Commission should integrate the principles of gender mainstreaming and reflect the regulations of the Directive to safeguard equal treatment of women and men and effectively prevent harassment in the services offered within the collaborative economy and ensure adequate safety. Differential treatment : the largest share of issues addressed and complaints received by the equality bodies in the Member States concern differential treatment predominantly within the leisure and entertainment sector . They concern justification of unequal treatment based on the derogation provided in Article 4(5) that leads, for example, to differential pricing, refusals to provide services and differing conditions of access for women and men. Members considered that the relative lack of positive action based on Article 4(5) across Member States constitutes a gap in the implementation of the Directive. They called for the promotion of forms of positive action. Enhancing the application of the Directive : the Commission is urged to prioritise addressing the transposition issues with the Member States concerned by means of concrete measures, and to support them in implementing the Directive in a more consistent manner;. Given the varying degree of effectiveness with which national equality bodies carry out their tasks, Member States are called on to guarantee sufficient competence and independence in accordance with the provisions of the Directive and national law as well as sufficient resources for national equality bodies. The Commission, the Member States and equality bodies are called on to raise awareness about the provisions of the Directive among both service providers and users in order to implement the principle of equal treatment in this field and reduce the number of breaches of the Directive left unreported.
  • date: 2017-03-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170313&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-03-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=28218&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2017-03-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0074 title: T8-0074/2017 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 499 votes to 104, with 81 abstentions, a resolution on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services. As a reminder, Directive 2004/113/EC extends the principle of equal treatment of men and women beyond the realm of employment and the labour market and into the field of access to and supply of goods and services. It prohibits both direct and indirect discrimination based on sex in the access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public, in both the public and private sectors. Concerned that the application of the Directive is not uniform , Members called for the elimination of any remaining gaps in the implementation of the Directive in some sectors in certain Member States. In this regard, they suggested raising awareness about the provisions of the Directive to enhance the perceived importance of equal treatment in the field of goods and services. Insurance, banking and financial sectors : in the Test-Achats ruling, the Court of Justice concluded that Article 5(2) of the Directive works against the achievement of the objective of equal treatment between men and women. This provision was considered to be invalid with effect from 21 December 2012 and as a result unisex premiums and benefits are mandatory in all Member States. Parliament welcomed the implementation of the ruling in national legislation by the Member States and the fact that national legislation has been amended in a legally binding manner. However, it pointed out that there are still challenges related to the conformity of national legislation with the ruling, for example in medical insurance schemes and in relation to the full elimination of discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity . Members called on the Commission to monitor the proper and full implementation of the ruling in the Member States in order to safeguard women against unqualified pregnancy-related costs, as pregnant women should not experience higher costs on the sole grounds of their pregnancy. Transport sector and public spaces : Parliament stressed the need to enhance preventive measures against harassment experienced by women in transport. It called on the Commission and the Member States to facilitate the exchange of best practices in this area and called for progress to be made regarding the EU’s accession to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention). Furthermore, Members regretted the fact that parents and carers of small children still face physical access barriers and other obstacles such as insufficient access to baby changing facilities on the premises of service providers. The Commission is called upon to consider all obstacles and constraints to accessibility encountered by women as the main users of public transportation services and by carers of small children and carers in general. The collaborative economy : the Commission is asked to integrate the principles of gender mainstreaming and reflect the regulations of the Directive to safeguard equal treatment of women and men and effectively prevent harassment in the services offered within the collaborative economy. The “zero-tolerance” policy towards harassment should be further strengthened in the sector and there is a need to create clear procedures for users to report cases of abuse. Differential treatment : the largest share of issues addressed and complaints received by the equality bodies in the Member States concern differential treatment predominantly within the leisure and entertainment sector. They concern justification of unequal treatment based on the derogation provided in Article 4(5) that leads, for example, to differential pricing, refusals to provide services and differing conditions of access for women and men. Members called for the promotion of forms of positive action in this area. Enhancing the application of the Directive : the Commission recommended, inter alia : addressing, as a priority, the transposition issues with the Member States concerned; ensuring sufficient competence and independence as well as sufficient resources for national equality bodies ; improving access to justice for victims of discrimination by giving independent equality bodies the competences to provide assistance, including free legal aid, and the right to represent individuals in cases of alleged discrimination; improving comprehensive, comparable specific data collection on harassment and sexual harassment in the area of equal access to goods and services; examining the possibilities to enhance equal treatment of women and men in advertising and to promote best practices in this field.
  • date: 2017-03-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Justice commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
FEMM/8/05519
New
  • FEMM/8/05519
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.10.04 Gender equality
New
4.10.04
Gender equality
procedure/subtype
Old
Implementation
New
  • Implementation
  • See also Directive 2004/113/EC 2003/0265(CNS)
procedure/summary
  • See also Directive 2004/113/EC
activities/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0074 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0074/2017
activities/5/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170313&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/4/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52015DC0190:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52015DC0190:EN
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted an own-initiative report by Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA-RAJEWICZ (EPP, PL) on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services.

    As a reminder, Directive 2004/113/EC extends the principle of equal treatment of men and women beyond the realm of employment and the labour market and into the field of access to and supply of goods and services. It prohibits both direct and indirect discrimination based on sex in the access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public, in both the public and private sectors.

    Members regretted that the application of the Directive is not uniform and varies across the Member States. They called for the remaining gaps in its implementation to be addressed in some Member States and across certain sectors.

    They suggested in particular increasing awareness about the provisions of the Directive to enhance the perceived importance of equal treatment in the field of goods and services.

    The insurance sectors: the report welcomed the implementation of the Test-Achats ruling in national legislation by the Member States and the fact that national legislation has been amended in a legally binding manner. However, it pointed out that there are still challenges related to the conformity of national legislation with the ruling, for example in medical insurance schemes and in relation to the full elimination of discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity.

    Members considered that ensuring proper and full implementation of the ruling in all Member States and areas is crucial. The conformity with the ruling across Member States should be monitored in periodic reports by the Commission and any gaps should be addressed as a priority.

    Member States are called upon to make a greater effort and enhance clarity in protecting the rights and welfare of pregnant women. They should not experience higher costs on the sole grounds of their pregnancy. Awareness should be raised among service providers as to the special protection afforded to pregnant women.

    Transport sector and public spaces: Members stressed the need to enhance preventive measures against harassment experienced by women in transport. They called on the Commission and the Member States to facilitate the exchange of best practices in this area and called for progress to be made regarding the EU’s accession to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention).

    Furthermore, Members regretted the fact that parents and carers of small children still face physical access barriers and other obstacles such as insufficient access to baby changing facilities on the premises of service providers. Members emphasised the need to safeguard the rights of both mothers and fathers to enjoy equal opportunities in the company of their children on the premises of service providers.

    The Commission therefore to consider all obstacles and constraints to accessibility encountered by women as the main users of public transportation services and by carers of small children and carers in general.

    The collaborative economy: Members highlighted the new possible areas of application of the Directive, in particular as a result of digitalisation of certain services and sectors as well as the proliferation of collaborative forms of service provision. They pointed out that the recently published Commission communication entitled “European agenda for the collaborative economy” should serve as a first step for promoting and regulating this sector effectively.

    The Commission should integrate the principles of gender mainstreaming and reflect the regulations of the Directive to safeguard equal treatment of women and men and effectively prevent harassment in the services offered within the collaborative economy and ensure adequate safety.

    Differential treatment: the largest share of issues addressed and complaints received by the equality bodies in the Member States concern differential treatment predominantly within the leisure and entertainment sector. They concern justification of unequal treatment based on the derogation provided in Article 4(5) that leads, for example, to differential pricing, refusals to provide services and differing conditions of access for women and men.

    Members considered that the relative lack of positive action based on Article 4(5) across Member States constitutes a gap in the implementation of the Directive. They called for the promotion of forms of positive action.

    Enhancing the application of the Directive: the Commission is urged to prioritise addressing the transposition issues with the Member States concerned by means of concrete measures, and to support them in implementing the Directive in a more consistent manner;.

    Given the varying degree of effectiveness with which national equality bodies carry out their tasks, Member States are called on to guarantee sufficient competence and independence in accordance with the provisions of the Directive and national law as well as sufficient resources for national equality bodies.

    The Commission, the Member States and equality bodies are called on to raise awareness about the provisions of the Directive among both service providers and users in order to implement the principle of equal treatment in this field and reduce the number of breaches of the Directive left unreported.

activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/5
date
2017-03-14T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/title
Old
Report on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services
New
Application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0043&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0043/2017
activities/3
date
2017-02-20T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/0/commission/0/DG
Old
url
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/
title
Justice
New
Justice
activities/2
date
2017-02-06T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
other/0/dg
Old
url
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/
title
Justice
New
Justice
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/0
date
2015-05-05T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0190/COM_COM(2015)0190_EN.pdf title: COM(2015)0190 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52015DC0190:EN
body
EC
type
Non-legislative basic document published
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/1/mepref
Old
53ba83fab819f24b330001d8
New
4f1ac846b819f25efd0000da
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/1/name
Old
ŽITŇANSKÁ Jana
New
GIRLING Julie
activities/1/body
Old
EC
New
EP
activities/1/commission
  • DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra
activities/1/date
Old
2015-05-05T00:00:00
New
2017-03-13T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0190/COM_COM(2015)0190_EN.pdf title: COM(2015)0190 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52015DC0190:EN
activities/1/type
Old
Non-legislative basic document published
New
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/2/shadows/1/mepref
Old
53ba83fab819f24b330001d8
New
4f1ac846b819f25efd0000da
committees/2/shadows/1/name
Old
ŽITŇANSKÁ Jana
New
GIRLING Julie
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4f1ac846b819f25efd0000da
New
53ba83fab819f24b330001d8
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/1/name
Old
GIRLING Julie
New
ŽITŇANSKÁ Jana
committees/2/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4f1ac846b819f25efd0000da
New
53ba83fab819f24b330001d8
committees/2/shadows/1/name
Old
GIRLING Julie
New
ŽITŇANSKÁ Jana
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
VON STORCH Beatrix
committees/2/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
VON STORCH Beatrix
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
MLINAR Angelika
committees/2/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
MLINAR Angelika
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/2
group
GUE/NGL
name
PIMENTA LOPES João
committees/2/shadows/2
group
GUE/NGL
name
PIMENTA LOPES João
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
GIRLING Julie
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/2
group
Verts/ALE
name
DELLI Karima
committees/2/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
GIRLING Julie
committees/2/shadows/2
group
Verts/ALE
name
DELLI Karima
activities/1/committees/5/date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/5/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří
committees/5/date
2016-03-15T00:00:00
committees/5/rapporteur
  • group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to present a report on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services.

    BACKGROUND: Council Directive 2004/113/EC extends the protection against sex discrimination beyond the traditional realm of the labour market to the areas of access to and supply of goods and services. This implements the obligation to apply the principle of equal treatment in most economic day-to-day transactions affecting the lives of citizens in the EU.

    In its first report, the Commission aims to provide information on the state of play of implementation on the ground.

    The report concerns in particular the consequences of the Test Achats ruling.

    CONTENT: the Court of Justice of the European Union annulled Article 5(2) of the Directive in its 2011 Test Achats ruling. The provision had permitted the use of sex-based actuarial factors in insurance contracts. The ruling obliged Member States to make unisex premiums and benefits mandatory by 21 December 2012. The Commission adopted guidelines concerning the consequences of the ruling in 2011. This report covers the implementation of the ruling in Member States. It is, however, not limited to the area of financial services but comprehensively reviews the implementation of the Directive as a whole.

    Transposition of the directive in Member States and infringements: Directive 2004/113/EC has been transposed into national law in all 28 Member States.

    The Commission has checked the conformity of the national implementing laws with the Directive. The review of the national legislation and experiences with its application on the ground shows that there are still challenges relating to the implementation of the Directive concerning, in particular, the derogation provided in Article 4(5) which permits the provision of goods and services exclusively or primarily to members of one sex under certain conditions.

    As a result of these assessments, questions were raised with 17 Member States. The information provided revealed that the transposition was sufficiently clear and compliant or was amended in compliance with the Directive in 11 of those Member States. With 6 Member States, the intensive dialogue on sufficient implementation of the Directive continues.

    The main concerns regard the restricted scope of application of the national legislation, for example, through an overly restrictive understanding of the notion of goods and services that are available to the public and offered outside the area of private and family life or through protection covering only consumers as recipients of services. Another recurrent issue is an overly broad scope of the possibility to justify unequal treatment on the basis of Article 4(5) of the Directive, which may lead to unjustified unequal treatment in the pricing of the same service (e.g. entry fees to discotheques or sports events or car rental fees). Some questions are related to insufficient protection on grounds of maternity and pregnancy in the provision of services or an insufficient scope of the right to compensation, for example due to the lack of an entitlement to compensation for immaterial damages.

    The Commission has received a number of complaints from citizens, the majority of which concern individual cases of alleged discriminations in transactions between private parties without any involvement of Member States. These cases are not about incorrect transposition or application of the Directive by a Member State. In such cases, remedies are only available under national law and through national courts in those situations. There are no infringement proceedings pending following a complaint revealing incorrect transposition or implementation of the Directive by Member States.

    Main conclusions of the report:

    In the specific area of financial services, the implementation of the Test-Achats ruling in the insurance sector has been the most important challenge. All Member States have implemented the ruling or are implementing it. Some Member States have chosen to go beyond the ruling by applying the unisex rule to all types of insurance and pension, including occupational social security funds, which fall within the scope of Directive 2006/54/EC. In September 2014, the CJEU further held that differentiated benefits on the basis of gender-specific actuarial data are inadmissible in statutory social security pensions under Directive 79/7/EEC5. In the light of these developments, the Commission will assess the application of gender-differentiated conditions to occupational pensions under Directive 2006/54/EC and whether action should be taken to ensure the comprehensive application of the unisex rule in all pillars of the pension system, whether voluntary, occupational or statutory.

    As regards impacts of the Test-Achats judgment on price levels of insurances, it seems too early to come to final conclusions. However, evaluated on the basis of the little evidence available, the impact seems very limited.

    Concerning implementation of the Directive, all Member States have taken measures to transpose the Directive into their domestic legal orders and to set up the procedures and bodies for its implementation. The Commission does not consider it necessary to propose amendments to the Directive at this stage but will prioritise addressing the remaining transposition issues with the Member States concerned, mainly in relation to the scope of the exception provided for in Article 4(5) of the Directive.

    Further enforcement work as well as case law at national and EU level should lead to clarifications on some of the questions raised in the report. Thereafter, the main challenge will be for Member States to ensure that their administrative and judicial authorities and their equality bodies systematically provide full protection to victims on the ground. The Commission will continue its monitoring activities and support Member States in order to realise the full potential of the Directive.

activities/1/committees/7/date
2016-01-25T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/7/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: NILSSON Jens
committees/7/date
2016-01-25T00:00:00
committees/7/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: NILSSON Jens
activities/1
date
2016-01-21T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
FEMM/8/05519
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities
  • date: 2015-05-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0190/COM_COM(2015)0190_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52015DC0190:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2015)0190 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra type: Non-legislative basic document published
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn responsible: True committee: FEMM date: 2015-11-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: EPP name: KOZŁOWSKA-RAJEWICZ Agnieszka
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: JOUROVÁ Věra
procedure
reference
2016/2012(INI)
title
Report on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
summary
See also Directive 2004/113/EC
subtype
Implementation
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
4.10.04 Gender equality