Progress: Procedure completed
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: definitive adoption of the European Union’s general budget for 2017.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2017/292 of the European Union’s general budget for the financial year 2017.
CONTENT: the European Parliament voted to adopt the 2017 EU budget, in accordance with the joint text adopted in plenary on 1 December 2016.
The 2017 budget is the 4th annual budget under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for the EU for 2014-2020.
With EUR 157.9 billion and about 1% of the EU's gross national income (GNI), growth, employment and competitiveness will be the main focus of the budgetary priorities for 2017. Other funds will also be allocated to ensure the EU's second highest priority in 2017, namely to respond effectively to the challenges posed by the migratory crisis .
Policy areas of the 2017 budget: the EU budget for 2017 amounts to EUR 157.9 billion in commitment appropriations and EUR 134.5 billion in payment appropriations. On a political level, the main budgetary strands for the financial year 2017 may be summarised as follows:
· nearly half of the funds ( EUR 74.9 billion in commitment appropriations ) are intended to stimulate growth, employment and competitiveness . For example, EUR 21.3 billion will be allocated to programmes such as Horizon 2020, Erasmus +, COSME and the European Interconnection Facility (EIF) and EUR 2.7 billion to the European Strategic Investment Fund (EFSI), a driving force of the investment plan for Europe . In addition, EUR 53.59 billion will be used to promote convergence between Member States and regions through the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) ;
· nearly EUR 6 billion is intended to strengthen the protection of external borders and mitigate the migration and refugee crisis . Half of this amount will be used to finance actions within the EU and the other half, actions outside the EU to combat the root causes of migration .
Budget year 2017 in figures:
· commitment appropriations: EUR 157.858 billion, up by 1.7% compared to 2016;
· payment appropriations: EUR 134.49 billion, down 1.6% from the 2016 budget.
Budget 2017 - amounts by headings:
· Heading 1: Smart and inclusive growth: this heading is allocated EUR 74.9 billion in commitments and EUR 56.52 in payments. It comprises two specific sub-headings:
- 1a: Competitiveness for growth and jobs: this sub-heading sees an increase of 12.1% compared to 2016 commitments. The commitments are set at EUR 21.3 billion. Specific programmes under this heading include: (i) the ‘Horizon 2020’ framework and research programme; (ii) Erasmus + and (iii) COSME, Competitiveness of Enterprises and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs);
- 1b: Economic, social and territorial cohesion: commitments increased by 5.4% compared to 2016: commitments under this heading have been set at EUR 53.6 billion.
· Heading 2: Sustainable Growth: natural resources: this heading is characterised by commitments of EUR 58.6 billion, of which EUR 46.6 billion are available for market expenditure and direct aids to farmers. The payments were set at EUR 42.6 billion. Overall commitments and payments decreased by less than 1% compared to 2016.
· Heading 3: Security and citizens: this heading saw the amount of its commitments decrease slightly following a significant increase in 2016. Commitments are set at EUR 4.29 billion and payments are raised by 25% to EUR 3.8 billion.
· Heading 4: Global Europe: this heading amounted to EUR 10.16 billion in commitments and includes programmes such as Pre-Accession Instrument, the European Neighbourhood Instrument, the Instrument for Development Cooperation, the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the Stability Instrument. The heading showed an increase of 11% compared to 2016 in terms of commitments. Payments amounted to EUR 9.5 billion, a decrease of 6.6%.
· Heading 5 and 6: Administration: the level of commitments and payment is set at EUR 9.4 billion (+ 5% for commitments and payments).
The publication of a corrigendum to the definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2017/292 of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017 on 14.3.2017 should be noted. It includes a series of corrections to the amounts of certain budget headiing in various policy areas. These amounts are presented with a comparison of expenditures for 2016 for these same policies as well as the corresponding appropriations as executed in 2015 (commitments and payments).
The European Parliament adopted by 438 votes to 194, with 7 abstentions, the joint text on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017 approved by the Conciliation Committee under the budgetary procedure.
Parliament approved the joint text agreed by the Conciliation Committee, which consists of the following documents taken together:
list of budget lines not modified, compared to the draft budget or the Council's position; summary figures by financial framework headings; line by line figures on all budget items; a consolidated document showing the figures and final text of all lines modified during the conciliation.
Parliament noted that its level of staffing was one of the major issues of this conciliation. It recalled that based on the Gentlemen’s Agreement, each branch of the budgetary authority has sole competence for its own section of the budget. It also recalled its political decision to exempt the political groups from the 5 % staff reduction target.
Parliament will evaluate the consequences of budgetary decisions on the functioning of the institution.
Parliament confirmed the joint statements made by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission annexed to the resolution. They concern:
the overall level of commitment appropriations in the 2017 budget is set at EUR 157 857.8 million. Overall, this leaves a margin below the MFF ceilings for 2017 of EUR 1 100.1 million in commitment appropriations; the overall level of payment appropriations in the 2017 budget is set at EUR 134 490.4 million; the Flexibility Instrument for 2017 is mobilised in commitment appropriations for an amount of EUR 530 million for heading 3 Security and Citizenship; the Global margin for commitments is mobilised at a level of EUR 1 439.1 million for heading 1a Competitiveness for Growth and Jobs; the Contingency margin is mobilised at a level of EUR 1 906.2 million for heading 3 and heading 4. It is offset for EUR 575 million against the unallocated margin under heading 2 Sustainable Growth: Natural Resources in 2017 and for EUR 507.3 million in 2017, EUR 570 million in 2018 and EUR 253.9 million in 2019 against the unallocated margins under heading 5 Administration; the 2017 payment appropriations related to the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument in 2014, 2015 and 2016 are estimated by the Commission at EUR 981.1 million.
The joint conclusions adopted in the framework of the joint text confirm the adoption of:
Draft Amending Budget 4/2016 and the accompanying mobilisation of the Contingency margin are accepted, as proposed by the Commission. Draft Amending Budget 5/2016 is accepted as proposed by the Commission. Draft Amending Budget 6/2016 and the related mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund are accepted as proposed by the Commission. Amending letter No 1 to the draft budget 2017.
The joint text also confirms certain horizontal issues relating to decentralised agencies and more specifically on the granting of posts to Europol, Eurojust, the European Banking Authority, the European Asylum Support Office and the European Medicines Agency. In addition, a number of actions and pilot projects were confirmed.
Further joint statements by Parliament, the Council and the Commission were adopted as regards:
Youth Employment Initiative : the Council and the European Parliament invited the Commission to propose an amending budget in 2017 in order to provide EUR 500 million for the YEI in 2017 financed by the Global margin for commitments, as soon as the technical adjustment foreseen by article 6 of the MFF Regulation is adopted. Payment appropriations : Parliament and the Council called on the Commission to continue monitoring closely and actively the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes and to present in a timely manner, updated figures concerning the state of implementation and estimates regarding payment appropriations requirements in 2017. 5 % staff reduction . European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) : the Commission proposed to endow the EFSD Guarantee Fund with EUR 750 million over the period 2017–2020, of which EUR 400 million from the European Development Fund (EDF) over the four years, EUR 100 million from the ENI over 2017–2020 (of which EUR 25 million in 2017), and EUR 250 million of commitment (and payment) appropriations in 2017. The Commission is called upon to request the necessary appropriations in an amending budget in 2017 in order to provide the financing of the EFSD from the EU budget as soon as the legal base is adopted. EU Trust Funds and the Facility for Refugees in Turkey : Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed that the establishment of Trust Funds and of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey should be transparent and clear. The Commission is urged to present, as of 2017, a Working Document accompanying the Draft Budget for the following financial year. Agriculture : the budget 2017 includes a series of emergency measures to assist farmers in facing the market difficulties experienced recently. The Commission confirmed that the margin under heading 2 is sufficient to address possible unforeseen needs and it undertakes to monitor the market situation regularly.
The European Parliament delegation to the Conciliation Committee adopted a report by Jens GEIER (S&D, DE) (Section III – Commission) and Indrek TARAND (Greens/EFA, EE) (other sections) on the joint text on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017 approved by the Conciliation Committee under the budgetary procedure.
The EP delegation called on the Parliament to approve the joint text agreed by the Conciliation Committee. The main elements are as follows:
the overall level of commitment appropriations in the 2017 budget is set at EUR 157 857.8 million. Overall, this leaves a margin below the MFF ceilings for 2017 of EUR 1 100.1 million in commitment appropriations; the overall level of payment appropriations in the 2017 budget is set at EUR 134 490.4 million; the Flexibility Instrument for 2017 is mobilised in commitment appropriations for an amount of EUR 530 million for heading 3 Security and Citizenship; the Global margin for commitments is mobilised at a level of EUR 1 439.1 million for heading 1a Competitiveness for Growth and Jobs; the Contingency margin is mobilised at a level of EUR 1 906.2 million for heading 3 and heading 4. It is offset for EUR 575 million against the unallocated margin under heading 2 Sustainable Growth: Natural Resources in 2017 and for EUR 507.3 million in 2017, EUR 570 million in 2018 and EUR 253.9 million in 2019 against the unallocated margins under heading 5 Administration; the 2017 payment appropriations related to the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument in 2014, 2015 and 2016 are estimated by the Commission at EUR 981.1 million.
Members confirmed the joint statements by Parliament, the Council and the Commission annexed to this resolution which concern in particular:
the youth employment initiative; the 5 % staff reduction; European Fund for Sustainable Development; EU Trust Funds and the Facility for Refugees in Turkey; agriculture.
The European Parliament adopted by 446 to 184 with 60 abstentions, a resolution on the Council position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017.
According to Parliament, the 2017 budget has to be considered in the wider context of the mid-term revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF). Therefore, budget 2017 has to be in line with the EU2020 targets, which represent its main orientation and overarching priority.
It reiterated its firm conviction that initiatives such as the suspension of the ESI funds by the Commission are not only unfair and disproportionate, but also politically unsustainable .
Stressing that Parliament's reading of the 2017 budget fully reflects the political priorities adopted by an overwhelming majority in its resolution of 9 March 2016 on general guidelines, Parliament emphasised that peace and stability are core values that need to be maintained by the Union. It considered that the Good Friday Agreement, which has proven vital to peace and reconciliation in Northern Ireland, must be protected. It underlined the need for specific measures to ensure support for the regions which will be particularly affected in the case of Brexit .
Responding to major EU challenges : Parliament highlighted that the Union is currently facing a number of serious emergencies and new challenges, which could not be foreseen at the time that the MFF 2014-2020 was set-up. Increased financial resources are therefore needed to be deployed from the Union budget, in order to meet the political challenges and allow the Union to deliver answers and effectively respond to those crises as a matter of utmost urgency and priority.
The first of these needs are the migration challenge and slow economic growth following the economic crisis. Funding should be boosted for research and infrastructure projects as well as for fighting youth unemployment.
These challenges should not take precedence over other important Union policies, in particular:
the creation of decent and quality employment; the development of enterprises and entrepreneurship for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
Parliament noted that the Heading 3 ceiling is vastly insufficient to provide for appropriate funding for the internal dimension of the current refugee and migratory challenges. It stressed that, in order to ensure the necessary additional funding in this field, an unprecedented resource to the MFF special instruments, including the full use of the Flexibility Instrument, as well as the substantial mobilisation of the "last resort" Contingency Margin , was proposed by the Commission in the 2017 Draft Budget (DB), and accepted by the Council.
Parliament reiterated its position that requests for additional funding should not be deployed to the detriment of the Union’s existing external action, including its development policy . The setting-up of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey (FRT), Trust Funds, and any other ad-hoc instruments cannot be financed by cuts to other existing instruments.
Parliament strongly questions whether the Heading 4 ceiling (Global Europe) is sufficient to provide a sustainable and effective response to the current external challenges, including the current refugee and migratory challenges.
New money to finance new initiatives in relation to defence : Members reiterated their conviction that the Union budget should find ways of financing new initiatives which are not to the detriment of existing Union programmes. It is concerned that the Preparatory Action for defence research, which will amount to EUR 80 million over the next three years will be squeezed under the current budget of the MFF. However, for Parliament additional efforts for operations, administrative costs, preparatory actions and pilot projects in relation to the common security and defence policy also need additional financial input from Member States . In this regard, the current MFF mid-term review/revision should be used by Member States to clarify the long-term funding of common defence research.
International commitments : Parliament recalled that the Union ratified the COP 21 agreement and needs to dedicate part of its financial resources to respecting its international commitments. It strongly encouraged the Commission to pursue that track.
Youth travel : Parliament called on the Commission to present an initiative aimed at providing public transport vouchers to young Europeans selected on the basis of a competition.
Reverse Council’s budget cuts : Parliament reversed all cuts proposed by the Council to the DB . It failed to understand the reasoning behind the proposed cuts and contests Council’s declared intention of recreating artificial margins in some headings such as subheading 1a (Competitiveness for Growth and Jobs) and Heading 4 (Global Europe), particularly considering that margins would in any way be too small to react to unforeseen circumstances or crises.
Parliament compensated in full all cuts related to the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and Horizon 2020 for a total of EUR 1 240 million in commitments for 2017 via new appropriations to be obtained through the mid-term revision of the MFF.
It insisted on the need to provide an effective response to youth unemployment across the Union; therefore increases the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) by an additional EUR 1 500 million in commitment appropriations to enable its continuation.
Towards an overall budget agreement : Parliament expected that the Council will share this approach and that an agreement will easily be reached in conciliation, allowing the Union to rise to the occasion and effectively respond to the challenges ahead. In parallel, it set the overall level of appropriations for 2017 at EUR 160.7 billion and EUR 136.8 billion in commitment and payment appropriations respectively.
Specific recommendations : in the second part of the resolution, Parliament made a series of recommendations heading by heading which may be summarised as follows:
Subheading 1a – Competitiveness for growth and jobs : Parliament strongly disagreed with these cuts in a heading that symbolises the European added value and delivers more growth and jobs for citizens. It decided to reverse all cuts made by the Council. In line with its continued priorities for Jobs and Growth and after careful assessment of their absorption capacity so far, Parliament decided to propose some selective increases above the level of the DB for the COSME, Progress, Marie Curie, European Research Council, Eures and Erasmus+ programmes and increased the level of commitment appropriations for subheading 1a above the DB by EUR 45 million (excluding EFSI, pilot projects and preparatory actions).
Subheading 1b – Economic, social and territorial cohesion : Parliament disapproved of Council's proposed cuts of EUR 3 million in commitments and, more importantly, EUR 199 million in payments under subheading 1b, including on support lines and reiterated its strong support for the continuation of the YEI. It decided, as a first step and in line with the Regulation on the European Social Fund which foresees the possibility of such a continuation, to increase the YEI by EUR 1 500 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 500 million in payment appropriations to provide an effective response to youth unemployment.
Heading 2 – Sustainable growth: natural resources : Parliament stated that the Union budget must prioritise initiatives that will facilitate a real greening of the economy. It anticipated the presentation of the Amending Letter for the emergency support package in particular for the dairy sector and decided to express its strong support for the agricultural sector in the Union. It increased therefore the appropriations by EUR 600 million above the DB, in order to tackle the effects of the dairy sector crisis and the effects of the Russian embargo on the milk sector.
Heading 3 – Security and Citizenship : Parliament underlined that Parliament continues to put the current migration challenge at the top of its agenda. It noted that the big deviation of the original programming advocates in favour of an upwards adjustment of the Heading 3 ceilings. It stressed that the Commission proposes to finance those reinforcements largely through the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument (for EUR 530 million, thereby fully exhausting the funding available for this year) and the Contingency Margin (for EUR 1 160 million).
Given the unprecedented level of funding for migration-related expenditure (totalling EUR 5.2 billion in 2017 in Headings 3 and 4 and the mobilisation of the European Development Fund) and the proposals for applying flexibility on the table, Parliament does not request further reinforcements for migration-related policies. It will resist any attempts to reduce funding for Union actions in this field.
According to Parliament, budgetary flexibility has its limits and can only be a short-term solution. A forward-looking and brave answer in the face of these long-term refugee and migratory challenges is needed. This would involve an upwards adjustment of the ceiling of Heading 3.
Heading 4 – Global Europe : Parliament strongly questions whether Heading 4 ceilings are sufficient to provide for appropriate funding for the external dimension of the refugee and migratory challenges. It decided, therefore, to reverse all Council’s cuts in Heading 4. It deemed it necessary to increase appropriations for the Turkish Cypriot Community budget line (+EUR 3 million) to promote trust and reconciliation between the two communities.
Heading 5 – Administration : Parliament considered that Council’s cuts are unjustified and harmful and restores the DB for all Commission administrative expenditure, including administrative and research support expenditure in Headings 1 to 4. It decided, in the light of recent revelations and in order to regain the confidence of Union citizens and the credibility of the Union institutions, to hold 20 % of appropriations of the Temporary Allowances for former Members in reserve until the Commission enforces a stricter Code of conduct for Commissioners to prevent conflict of interests and the revolving doors.
The Parliament also made a series of specific recommendations on other institutions by restoring most of the amounts and posts which were cut by the Council.
Other recommendations : Parliament stressed that, at its request, a payment plan has been agreed with the aim of reducing the backlog of outstanding cohesion policy-related payment claims for 2007-2013 to a 'normal' level of EUR 2 billion by the end of 2016. However, it pointed out that at least EUR 8.2 billion of unpaid bills were identified at the end of 2015 for 2007-2013 in the field of cohesion policy, a figure which is expected to fall below EUR 2 billion by the end of 2016. It insisted a new payment plan should be based on sound financial management.
Lastly, Parliament is convinced that a Union-wide dimension should be tackled by pooling efforts and putting additional means at Union level rather than by calling past commitments into question or reverting to the illusion of purely national solutions .
This Amending Letter No 1 to the draft budget for the year 2017 (AL 1/2017) proposes four main areas of amendment to the draft budget (DB) 2017. Three are policy-related:
agriculture and fisheries; competitiveness for growth and jobs; the new Partnership Framework under the Migration Agenda, the External Investment Plan, and security.
The fourth group of amendments proposed relates to a number of administrative and technical adjustments. In more detail, AL 1/2017 covers the following:
- the updating of the estimated needs, assigned revenue and appropriations for agricultural expenditure : in addition to changing market factors, the Amending Letter also incorporates the impact of decisions in the agricultural sector since the draft budget 2017 was presented in June 2016, as well as other proposals expected to have a significant effect during the budget year. taking into account various technical amendments, the level of commitment appropriations remains unchanged, with a slight reduction (-EUR 1 million) in payment appropriations ;
- the phasing in of reinforcements announced in the mid-term review of the multiannual financial framework 2014-2020 for sustainable growth, with EUR 200 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 7 million in payment appropriations in heading 1a,’Competitiveness for growth and jobs’. The Commission proposes to finance the commitments through the global margin for commitments (GMC) and the unallocated margin. The breakdown is as follows:
Horizon 2020: +EUR 50 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 7 million in payment appropriations; Competitiveness of enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises (COSME): +EUR 50 million in commitment appropriations; Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – transport: +EUR 50 million in commitment appropriations; Erasmus+: + EUR 50 million in commitment appropriations; WiFi4EU, an initiative aiming to help European communities offer free Wi-Fi access points to any citizen: +EUR 20 million in commitment appropriations redeployed from the 'Information and Communication Technology' strand of the CEF.
- reinforcing by EUR 1 billion the budgetary resources under heading 4, ‘Global Europe’ , to address the root causes of migration and promote the swift implementation of agreements with third countries under the new Partnership Framework process and to create a European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) with a new EFSD Guarantee Fund. The Commission proposes to increase commitment appropriations by EUR 1 billion and payment appropriations by EUR 210 million. Given the very low margin in heading 4 (created by the transfer of the EU Special Representatives from heading 4 to heading 5, Administration), most of this increase in commitment appropriations is financed through a corresponding mobilisation of the Contingency Margin to be offset in 2017 against the unallocated margins of heading 2 ‘Sustainable Growth: Natural Resources’ and in 2018-2019 against the unallocated margins of heading 5;
- an increase in the number of posts at Europol to strengthen operational support, notably to provide a 24/7 service and on-the-spot deployment capabilities as announced in the Commission's communication on enhancing security in a world of mobility ;
- an increase of posts requested for Frontex (European Border and Coast Guard agency) and the European Asylum Support office (EASO) in light of a more detailed assessment of the job profiles required;
- minor adjustments to the establishment plans of the European agency for safety and health at work (EU-OSHA) and the European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions (EUROFOUND);
- the transfer of expenditure related to the three EU Special Representatives (EUSRs) from heading 4 to heading 5;
- an update of the likely needs for additional appropriations related to 2017 for the salaries and pensions of all institutions;
- the alignment of the establishment plans of the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, to reflect the agreement reached between them regarding economies of scale.
The Commission also stressed that it intends to fund the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) in 2017 up to a level of EUR 500 million in commitment appropriations . However, at this stage, the Commission does not propose the budgetary allocations in this Amending Letter. Consequently, the Commission will propose to add these allocations through a draft amending budget to be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council immediately after the technical adjustment in early 2017.
Overall, the net impact of Amending Letter 1/2017 on expenditure in the 2017 draft budget is an increase of EUR 1 257.2 million in commitment appropriations and an increase of EUR 523.1 million in payment appropriations. On the revenue side of the budget, some fines will be paid to the Commission and all legal remedies will be exhausted at the end of 2016 for an estimated amount of EUR 1 billion. The Commission proposes to increase the relevant budget items in the revenue part of the budget by this amount. This will reduce the GNI contribution requested from the national budgets by the same amount.
The Committee on Budgets adopted the joint report by Jens GEIER (S&D, DE) (Section III – Commission) and Indrek TARAND (Greens/EFA, EE) (other sections) on the Council position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017.
Members stressed that Parliament's reading of the 2017 budget fully reflects the political priorities adopted by an overwhelming majority in its resolution of 9 March 2016 on general guidelines and its resolution of 6 July 2016 and the Europe 2020 objectives. They reiterated that, in the current context, initiatives such as the suspension of the ESI funds by the European Commission, are not only unfair and disproportionate, but also politically unsustainable.
They emphasised that peace and stability are core values that need to be maintained by the Union. The Good Friday Agreement, which has proven vital to peace and reconciliation in Northern Ireland, must be protected. They also underlined the need for specific measures to ensure support for the regions which will be particularly affected by ‘Brexit.’
New challenges for the EU : Members stressed that the Union is currently facing a number of serious emergencies and new challenges, and were convinced that increased financial resources need to be deployed from the Union budget, in order to meet the political challenges and allow the Union to deliver answers and effectively respond to those crises as a matter of utmost urgency. Accordingly, they considered that a strong political commitment is needed to secure fresh appropriations in 2017 and until the end of the programming period.
Members recalled the need to meet the needs of the migration and refugee challenge and slow economic growth as well as investment in research and fighting youth unemployment.
On the issue of migration, the committee noted that the Heading 3 ceiling is vastly insufficient to provide for appropriate funding. It underlined the need for adopting a human rights-based approach linking migration with development and guaranteeing the integration of migrant workers and asylum seekers and refugees, as well as priority programmes, such as culture programmes. This requires the full use of the Flexibility Instrument, as well as the substantial mobilisation of the Contingency Margin, which was accepted by the Council.
No detriment to other Union action : Members reiterated that requests for additional funding needed for addressing the current refugee and migratory challenge should not be deployed to the detriment of the Union’s existing external action, including its development policy. They stressed that the setting-up of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey (FRT), Trust Funds, and any other ad-hoc instruments cannot be financed by cuts to other existing instruments. Members strongly questioned whether the Heading 4 ceiling (Global Europe) is sufficient to provide an effective response to the current external challenges, including the current refugee and migratory challenges.
Members reiterated their conviction that the Union budget should find ways of financing new initiatives that are not to the detriment of existing Union programmes and policies. They were concerned that the preparatory action for defence research, which will amount to EUR 80 million in the next three years will be squeezed under the current budget of the MFF. They were also convinced that with an already underfinanced Union budget, additional efforts for operations, administrative costs, preparatory actions and pilot projects in relation to the common security and defence policy also need additional financing by Member States, who should consider this in the current MFF mid-term review.
Restoration of sums in the draft budget : under these circumstances, the committee restored all cuts proposed by the Council to the draft budget. It stated that it failed to understand the reasoning behind the proposed cuts and contested Council’s declared intention to recreate artificial margins in some headings such as subheading 1a (Competitiveness for Growth and Jobs) and Heading 4 (Global Europe), particularly considering that margins would in any way be too small to react to unforeseen circumstances or crises. Members recalled that the Union’s ratification of the COP 21 agreement required financial resources to respect the international commitments. They encouraged the Commission to pursue this track in line with the commitment to mainstream climate action in the budget.
Members went on to note that the Council's reading failed to predict the actual execution of the Union budget for the last five years and that considerably more funds were needed in each of the final budgets. They therefore called on the Council to adjust its position in the conciliation committee in order to provide adequate funding for the 2017 budget.
Mobilise all available margins : Members announced that, for the purpose of adequately financing those pressing needs, and considering the very tight MFF margins in 2017, they would call on Parliament to finance the reinforcements above the draft budget by the exhaustion of all margins available and an increased recourse to the Contingency Margin.
They also decided to compensate in full all cuts related to the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and Horizon 2020 for a total of EUR 1 240 million in commitments for 2017 via new appropriations to be obtained through the mid-term revision of the MFF. They increased the Youth Employment Initiative by an additional EUR 1 500 million in commitment appropriations. Appropriate additional financing for these important Union programmes should be decided in the framework of the mid-term revision of the MFF.
The committee expected that the Council would share this approach and that an agreement would easily be reached in conciliation, allowing the Union to rise to the occasion and effectively respond to the challenges ahead;
It set the overall level of appropriations for 2017 at EUR 161.8 billion and EUR 136.8 billion in commitment and payment appropriations respectively.
Members went on to make a series of observations and recommendations under each sub-heading of the budget and each Union institution, in line with their general budgetary views.
On 12 September 2016, the Council adopted its position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017.
Following the discussions in Council, the main features of this position may be summarised as follows:
EUR 156 377.15 million in commitment appropriations; EUR 133 790.01 million in payment appropriations.
Under the Council's position on the DB for 2017, commitment appropriations increase by 0.89 % compared to the 2016 budget and payment appropriations decrease by 7.02%.
The total amount of payment appropriations provided for in the Council's position on the DB for 2017 corresponds to 0.89% of the EU gross national income (GNI) .
A. Principles : when adopting its position, the Council took into account the following principles:
to work within the framework of the budget guidelines established for the 2017 budget in the Council conclusions adopted in February 2016; to follow an approach leading to a budget complying with budgetary discipline and sound financial management, as well as taking duly into account the ongoing economic and budgetary constraints in Member States; to provide adequate funding for the European Union's various priorities, determining appropriations on the basis of past and current budget implementation and realistic absorption capacities ; to foresee the necessary appropriations enabling the smooth implementation of the new programmes in the third year of the MFF 2014-2020; to leave adequate margins under the ceilings of the headings and subheadings of the MFF, with the exception of sub-heading 1b and heading 3, in order to be able to cope with unforeseen situations; to keep payment appropriations firmly under control in all headings and sub-headings of the MFF and to create a sufficient margin to cover unforeseen events, resulting in a reduction in payment appropriations in particular under (sub-)headings 1a, 1b, 2 and 4 .
Administrative expenditure : the Council recalls the importance of limiting the increase in 2017 and of reducing staff in line with the -5 % target over the period 2013-2017 set in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 on budgetary discipline.
In this context, the administrative budgets of the institutions were examined on the following basis:
to keep under strict control the volume of administrative expenditure of the institutions, in line with the approach followed by the Member States for their national civil services; to set the administrative budget of each institution at the appropriate level, taking into account their specificities and real and justified needs; to carry out targeted reductions and increase the flat rate abatement on salaries for some institutions and offices, taking into account their past and current budget implementation and vacancy rates; to apply the Commission's proposal to reduce staff by 1% per year as from 2013.
Decentralised agencies : as regards decentralised agencies, the Council reduced the overall level of contributions from the Union budget by -EUR 5 million in commitment and payment appropriations. Agencies which did not fully implement the contributions received from the Union budget in the past and/or for which the absorption capacities could be lower than the forecasts made by the Commission are affected by those reductions.
Statement on payment appropriations: the Council will carefully examine the letter of amendment for agriculture (including information on assigned revenue) in order to appropriately assess the level of resources under heading 2 (Sustainable growth: natural resources) in the 2017 budget.
It called on the Commission to continue closely scrutinizing the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes and invited the Commission to present in a timely manner updated figures concerning the state of affairs and estimates regarding 2017 payment appropriations.
Statement on the presentation of the Commission's statement of estimates for 2017: lastly, the Council recalled the pragmatic calendar agreed between the Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission during their trilogue on 14 March 2016 setting the dates for the budgetary procedure for 2017. This pragmatic calendar is an essential element for the improvement of the functioning of the budgetary procedure and contributes to ensuring a timely adoption of the budget.
B. Expenditure by main budget headings :
Heading 1: Smart and inclusive growth: EUR 74 283 million in commitments:
1a) Competitiveness for growth and jobs: the amount is set at EUR 20 712 million in commitments, an increase of 9% compared to 2016.
The sub-heading is characterised by the following elements:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction of -EUR 397 million in the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 on a number of specific budget lines including administrative support expenditure, namely -EUR 116.5 million in Large Infrastructure Projects, -EUR 125.3 million in the Common Strategic Framework for Research and Innovation, -EUR 18.6 million in Employment and Social Innovation, -EUR 12.1 million in Customs, Fiscalis and Anti-Fraud, -EUR 111.5 million in the Connecting Europe Facility, -EUR 6.6 million in actions financed under the prerogatives of the Commission and specific competences conferred to the Commission and -EUR 4 million in other programmes; this includes the use of the global margin for commitments for an amount of EUR 1 265 million for this sub-heading; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 by a total amount of -EUR 331.5 million , of which -EUR 219.7 million in Large Infrastructure Projects, -EUR 74.3 million in the Common Strategic Framework for Research and Innovation, -EUR 1.2 million in Employment and Social Innovation, -EUR 7.1 million in Customs, Fiscalis and Anti-Fraud, -EUR 15.4 million in the Connecting Europe Facility, -EUR 5 million in Energy projects to aid economic recovery, -EUR 3.7 million in actions financed under the prerogatives of the Commission and specific competences conferred to the Commission and -EUR 2.9 million in other programmes; the amounts mentioned above also take into account reductions in contributions to decentralised agencies for a total amount of -EUR 2.3 million in commitment and payment appropriations under this sub-heading.
The margin available under sub-heading 1a is EUR 478 million.
1b) Economic, social and territorial cohesion: the Council provided EUR 53 571 million in commitments (an increase of 5.4 % compared to 2016). Other main features of this sub-heading include:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction by -EUR 3 million in the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 on a number of specific budget lines related to administrative support expenditure under this subheading; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 by a total amount of -EUR 199 million, in particular for 2014-2020 programmes, notably: Transition regions (-EUR 10 million), Competitiveness (More developed regions) (-EUR 43 million), the Cohesion Fund (-EUR 20 million), European territorial cooperation (-EUR 81 million), Technical assistance and innovative actions (-EUR 25 million), and European Aid to the Most Deprived (-EUR 20 million); place into the reserve EUR 18.6 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 9.8 million in payment appropriations for the Structural Reform Support Programme, due to the lack of an adopted legal basis.
The margin available under sub-heading 1b is EUR 16.2 million.
Heading 2: Sustainable growth: natural resources: the amount for this heading is set at EUR 58 722 million in commitments. This is a reduction of 6% compared to 2016. Market-related expenditure and direct payments shall represent EUR 42.7 billion.
The heading is characterised by the following elements:
reduce the level of commitment appropriations requested in the DB 2017 by -EUR 179.5 million on administrative support lines, on operational technical assistance lines, and on operational lines under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 by a total amount of -EUR 198 million , of which -EUR 177.1 million in the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund, -EUR 20.2 million in the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, -EUR 0.2 million in the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, and -EUR 0.2 million in the LIFE programme; the amounts mentioned above also take into account reductions in contributions to decentralised agencies for an amount of -EUR 0.3 million in commitment and payment appropriations under this heading; place into the reserve EUR 5.1 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 2.5 million in payment appropriations for the Structural Reform Support Programme, due to the lack of an adopted legal basis.
The margin available under heading 2 is EUR 938.8 million.
Heading 3: Security and citizenship : the amount of this heading is set at EUR 4 248 million in appropriations and sees an increase of 4.84% compared to the 2016 budget. This heading is characterised by the following:
establish the level of commitment appropriations with a total reduction of -EUR 24.3 million of the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 on a number of budget lines concerning administrative support expenditure (-EUR 0.5 million) and operational expenditure for new programmes (-EUR 21.5 million); set the level of payment appropriations, including a total reduction of -EUR 21.6 million of the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 on a number of budget lines concerning administrative support expenditure (-EUR 0.5 million) and operational expenditure for new programmes (-EUR 18.8 million).
The margin available under heading 3 is equal to zero . The Flexibility Instrument is mobilised for an amount of EUR 530 million in commitment appropriations and the Contingency Margin is mobilised for an amount of EUR 1 140 million in commitment appropriations for this heading. This amount is offset by a reduction of the margin in Heading 2 (Sustainable growth: natural resources) by EUR 530 million and in Heading 5 (Administration) by EUR 610 million.
Heading 4: Global Europe : the Council lays down an amount of EUR 9 327 million in commitments, an increase of 1.74% compared to 2016. It also decided to:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction by -EUR 105.2 million in the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 on a number of specific budget lines;
set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 by a total amount of -EUR 70.2 million, of which:
-EUR 2.8 million in the Instrument for Pre-accession assistance, -EUR 2.4 million in the European Neighbourhood Instrument, -EUR 47.1 million in the Development Cooperation Instrument, -EUR 7.3 million in the Partnership instrument for cooperation with third countries, -EUR 0.2 million in the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, -EUR 0.4 million in the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace, -EUR 4.6 million in the EU Aid Volunteers initiative, -EUR 1.1 million in other actions and programmes and -EUR 4.3 million in actions financed under the prerogatives of the Commission and specific competences conferred to the Commission.
The margin available under heading 4 is EUR 105.2 million
Heading 5: Administrative expenditure : the administrative expenditure amounts to EUR 9 263 million , an increase of 3.67%. Each institution’s budget is set out in the Council position with the budget variations from year to year.
As regards staff levels, the Council accepted the establishment plans as proposed by the Commission in the DB for 2017.
The margin available under heading 5 is EUR 44.5 million.
Special instruments : lastly, the Council did not include any amount in payment appropriations in the reserve for the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (-EUR 30 million). Moreover, it did not include any amount in the reserve for the European Union Solidarity Fund (-EUR 513 million in commitment appropriations, -EUR 200 million in payment appropriations).
On 12 September 2016, the Council adopted its position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017.
Following the discussions in Council, the main features of this position may be summarised as follows:
EUR 156 377.15 million in commitment appropriations; EUR 133 790.01 million in payment appropriations.
Under the Council's position on the DB for 2017, commitment appropriations increase by 0.89 % compared to the 2016 budget and payment appropriations decrease by 7.02%.
The total amount of payment appropriations provided for in the Council's position on the DB for 2017 corresponds to 0.89% of the EU gross national income (GNI) .
A. Principles : when adopting its position, the Council took into account the following principles:
to work within the framework of the budget guidelines established for the 2017 budget in the Council conclusions adopted in February 2016; to follow an approach leading to a budget complying with budgetary discipline and sound financial management, as well as taking duly into account the ongoing economic and budgetary constraints in Member States; to provide adequate funding for the European Union's various priorities, determining appropriations on the basis of past and current budget implementation and realistic absorption capacities ; to foresee the necessary appropriations enabling the smooth implementation of the new programmes in the third year of the MFF 2014-2020; to leave adequate margins under the ceilings of the headings and subheadings of the MFF, with the exception of sub-heading 1b and heading 3, in order to be able to cope with unforeseen situations; to keep payment appropriations firmly under control in all headings and sub-headings of the MFF and to create a sufficient margin to cover unforeseen events, resulting in a reduction in payment appropriations in particular under (sub-)headings 1a, 1b, 2 and 4 .
Administrative expenditure : the Council recalls the importance of limiting the increase in 2017 and of reducing staff in line with the -5 % target over the period 2013-2017 set in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 on budgetary discipline.
In this context, the administrative budgets of the institutions were examined on the following basis:
to keep under strict control the volume of administrative expenditure of the institutions, in line with the approach followed by the Member States for their national civil services; to set the administrative budget of each institution at the appropriate level, taking into account their specificities and real and justified needs; to carry out targeted reductions and increase the flat rate abatement on salaries for some institutions and offices, taking into account their past and current budget implementation and vacancy rates; to apply the Commission's proposal to reduce staff by 1% per year as from 2013.
Decentralised agencies : as regards decentralised agencies, the Council reduced the overall level of contributions from the Union budget by -EUR 5 million in commitment and payment appropriations. Agencies which did not fully implement the contributions received from the Union budget in the past and/or for which the absorption capacities could be lower than the forecasts made by the Commission are affected by those reductions.
Statement on payment appropriations: the Council will carefully examine the letter of amendment for agriculture (including information on assigned revenue) in order to appropriately assess the level of resources under heading 2 (Sustainable growth: natural resources) in the 2017 budget.
It called on the Commission to continue closely scrutinizing the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes and invited the Commission to present in a timely manner updated figures concerning the state of affairs and estimates regarding 2017 payment appropriations.
Statement on the presentation of the Commission's statement of estimates for 2017: lastly, the Council recalled the pragmatic calendar agreed between the Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission during their trilogue on 14 March 2016 setting the dates for the budgetary procedure for 2017. This pragmatic calendar is an essential element for the improvement of the functioning of the budgetary procedure and contributes to ensuring a timely adoption of the budget.
B. Expenditure by main budget headings :
Heading 1: Smart and inclusive growth: EUR 74 283 million in commitments:
1a) Competitiveness for growth and jobs: the amount is set at EUR 20 712 million in commitments, an increase of 9% compared to 2016.
The sub-heading is characterised by the following elements:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction of -EUR 397 million in the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 on a number of specific budget lines including administrative support expenditure, namely -EUR 116.5 million in Large Infrastructure Projects, -EUR 125.3 million in the Common Strategic Framework for Research and Innovation, -EUR 18.6 million in Employment and Social Innovation, -EUR 12.1 million in Customs, Fiscalis and Anti-Fraud, -EUR 111.5 million in the Connecting Europe Facility, -EUR 6.6 million in actions financed under the prerogatives of the Commission and specific competences conferred to the Commission and -EUR 4 million in other programmes; this includes the use of the global margin for commitments for an amount of EUR 1 265 million for this sub-heading; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 by a total amount of -EUR 331.5 million , of which -EUR 219.7 million in Large Infrastructure Projects, -EUR 74.3 million in the Common Strategic Framework for Research and Innovation, -EUR 1.2 million in Employment and Social Innovation, -EUR 7.1 million in Customs, Fiscalis and Anti-Fraud, -EUR 15.4 million in the Connecting Europe Facility, -EUR 5 million in Energy projects to aid economic recovery, -EUR 3.7 million in actions financed under the prerogatives of the Commission and specific competences conferred to the Commission and -EUR 2.9 million in other programmes; the amounts mentioned above also take into account reductions in contributions to decentralised agencies for a total amount of -EUR 2.3 million in commitment and payment appropriations under this sub-heading.
The margin available under sub-heading 1a is EUR 478 million.
1b) Economic, social and territorial cohesion: the Council provided EUR 53 571 million in commitments (an increase of 5.4 % compared to 2016). Other main features of this sub-heading include:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction by -EUR 3 million in the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 on a number of specific budget lines related to administrative support expenditure under this subheading; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 by a total amount of -EUR 199 million, in particular for 2014-2020 programmes, notably: Transition regions (-EUR 10 million), Competitiveness (More developed regions) (-EUR 43 million), the Cohesion Fund (-EUR 20 million), European territorial cooperation (-EUR 81 million), Technical assistance and innovative actions (-EUR 25 million), and European Aid to the Most Deprived (-EUR 20 million); place into the reserve EUR 18.6 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 9.8 million in payment appropriations for the Structural Reform Support Programme, due to the lack of an adopted legal basis.
The margin available under sub-heading 1b is EUR 16.2 million.
Heading 2: Sustainable growth: natural resources: the amount for this heading is set at EUR 58 722 million in commitments. This is a reduction of 6% compared to 2016. Market-related expenditure and direct payments shall represent EUR 42.7 billion.
The heading is characterised by the following elements:
reduce the level of commitment appropriations requested in the DB 2017 by -EUR 179.5 million on administrative support lines, on operational technical assistance lines, and on operational lines under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 by a total amount of -EUR 198 million , of which -EUR 177.1 million in the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund, -EUR 20.2 million in the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, -EUR 0.2 million in the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, and -EUR 0.2 million in the LIFE programme; the amounts mentioned above also take into account reductions in contributions to decentralised agencies for an amount of -EUR 0.3 million in commitment and payment appropriations under this heading; place into the reserve EUR 5.1 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 2.5 million in payment appropriations for the Structural Reform Support Programme, due to the lack of an adopted legal basis.
The margin available under heading 2 is EUR 938.8 million.
Heading 3: Security and citizenship : the amount of this heading is set at EUR 4 248 million in appropriations and sees an increase of 4.84% compared to the 2016 budget. This heading is characterised by the following:
establish the level of commitment appropriations with a total reduction of -EUR 24.3 million of the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 on a number of budget lines concerning administrative support expenditure (-EUR 0.5 million) and operational expenditure for new programmes (-EUR 21.5 million); set the level of payment appropriations, including a total reduction of -EUR 21.6 million of the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 on a number of budget lines concerning administrative support expenditure (-EUR 0.5 million) and operational expenditure for new programmes (-EUR 18.8 million).
The margin available under heading 3 is equal to zero . The Flexibility Instrument is mobilised for an amount of EUR 530 million in commitment appropriations and the Contingency Margin is mobilised for an amount of EUR 1 140 million in commitment appropriations for this heading. This amount is offset by a reduction of the margin in Heading 2 (Sustainable growth: natural resources) by EUR 530 million and in Heading 5 (Administration) by EUR 610 million.
Heading 4: Global Europe : the Council lays down an amount of EUR 9 327 million in commitments, an increase of 1.74% compared to 2016. It also decided to:
establish the level of commitment appropriations, targeting a total reduction by -EUR 105.2 million in the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 on a number of specific budget lines;
set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB 2017 by a total amount of -EUR 70.2 million, of which:
-EUR 2.8 million in the Instrument for Pre-accession assistance, -EUR 2.4 million in the European Neighbourhood Instrument, -EUR 47.1 million in the Development Cooperation Instrument, -EUR 7.3 million in the Partnership instrument for cooperation with third countries, -EUR 0.2 million in the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, -EUR 0.4 million in the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace, -EUR 4.6 million in the EU Aid Volunteers initiative, -EUR 1.1 million in other actions and programmes and -EUR 4.3 million in actions financed under the prerogatives of the Commission and specific competences conferred to the Commission.
The margin available under heading 4 is EUR 105.2 million
Heading 5: Administrative expenditure : the administrative expenditure amounts to EUR 9 263 million , an increase of 3.67%. Each institution’s budget is set out in the Council position with the budget variations from year to year.
As regards staff levels, the Council accepted the establishment plans as proposed by the Commission in the DB for 2017.
The margin available under heading 5 is EUR 44.5 million.
Special instruments : lastly, the Council did not include any amount in payment appropriations in the reserve for the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (-EUR 30 million). Moreover, it did not include any amount in the reserve for the European Union Solidarity Fund (-EUR 513 million in commitment appropriations, -EUR 200 million in payment appropriations).
PURPOSE: presentation of the Commission Draft Budget (DB) for 2017 (all sections).
BACKGROUND: the draft budget (DB) 2017 notes, first of all, that the British people expressed their wish to leave the European Union. However, EU law continues to apply in full until the United Kingdom is no longer a member.
It is recalled that the EU budget represents around 1 % of EU gross national income (GNI), and just above 2 % of all public spending in the EU.
2017 will be the fourth year of the current multiannual financial framework and the third of the mandate of the current Commission. The latter proposes a draft budget reflecting and supporting the political priorities set by President Jean-Claude Juncker, in particular contributing to the greatest extent possible to jobs, growth and investment, and providing a European response to the challenges of:
· migration management
· the fight against terrorism and organised crime.
· protecting EU external borders,
· fostering a coordinated partnership with neighbouring regions and other third countries.
Besides these two clear priorities, the Commission will continue to progress towards a connected digital single market, a resilient energy union, a deeper and fairer internal market and economic and monetary union, and a free trade agreement with the United States.
The budget in figures: the 2017 DB is presented as follows:
· in terms of commitment appropriations , the total expenditure in the draft budget (DB) 2017 (including the special instruments) is EUR 157.7 million , corresponding to 1.05% of GNI, this being an increase of 1.7% above the total expenditure in 2016. The resulting total margin under the MFF ceilings for commitments stands at EUR 815.4 million.
· the payment appropriations amount to EUR 134.9 million , corresponding to 0.9% of GNI. This represents a decrease of 6.2% over the level of payment appropriations in the 2016 budget.
The significant reduction of total payments essentially reflects the finalisation of the implementation of programmes from the 2007-2013 MFF and the slow implementation of the new generation of programmes in some policy areas. The margin left under the payment ceiling of the MFF for 2017 amounts to EUR 9 608.5 million.
The main budgetary priorities of 2017
- Boosting jobs, growth and investments remains the main priority : whilst the European economy continues to recover, growth forecasts are still modest. This moderate and fragile growth rate makes it imperative to maintain the rhythm of implementation of the political priorities of the Commission to create the conditions for sustainable and inclusively economic growth, with the aid of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the structural and investment funds and programmes under the expenditure heading 'Competitiveness for growth and jobs' (heading 1a) with Horizon 2020, and COSME.
-An effective European response to the migration challenge: building on the actions already undertaken in 2015 and 2016 which reached a combined total of over EUR 10.5 billion, the 2017 draft budget includes EUR 5.2 billion of specific migration-related expenditure for both internal and external actions.
Accordingly, the amount proposed for 2017 for 'Security and citizenship' (heading 3) is EUR 1.8 billion above the initially programmed amount for the year, and represents a slight increase over the reinforced funding level in the 2016 budget. Given the unprecedented scale of the needs, the Commission proposes to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument, and the Contingency Margin for commitments, to finance a wide range of actions including emergency assistance, relocation, resettlement, return and integration of refugees and asylum-seekers. The budget also includes EUR 200 million for the new instrument allowing the provision of emergency humanitarian support within the Union in response to the current influx of refugees and migrants into Europe.
The EU budget will also continue to fund a variety of actions to address the root causes of migration. Through the recently created Trust Fund for Africa, the budget will provide significant assistance to host countries dealing with large migration flows outside the Union. In particular, the draft budget includes EUR 750 million to reach the EUR 1 billion contribution from the EU budget towards the EUR 3 billion agreed for the Facility for Refugees in Turkey in 2016-2017. It also includes the budgetary implications of the pledge for Lebanon and Jordan.
-Other sectoral priorities: the budget will also fiancé other measures such as security of energy supply, research and innovation, and climate action. Following the COP 21 conference in Paris, the Commission continues to push towards its commitment for 20 % of the budget to address climate change. Lastly, the budget envisages amounts for: (i) combat cyber-crime; (ii) ensure effective border management; (iii) defeat terrorism.
KEY BUDGETARY ASPECTS OF THE HEADINGS : the analysis is structured under the 2014-2020 financial framework headings:
Heading 1: Smart and inclusive growth : this heading is broken down into 2 sub-headings:
· Heading 1a: Competitiveness for growth and jobs : commitment appropriations for ‘Competitiveness for growth and jobs’ (heading 1a) are set at EUR 21 109 million. This is an increase of 11 % compared to the 2016 budget, mostly relating to the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and Erasmus+. This leaves a margin of EUR 81 million, after making use of the Global Margin for Commitments for an amount of EUR 1 265 million. Payment appropriations increase by 10.9 % to EUR 19 298 million.
· Heading 1b: Economic, social and territorial cohesion : commitment appropriations increase by 5.4 % to EUR 53 573.8 million, leaving a margin of EUR 13.2 million. Because of the frontloading of the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) in 2014 and 2015, no commitments are proposed at this stage for 2017 pending the results of the evaluation of the programme. Payment appropriations for the heading as a whole decrease by -23.5 % compared to the 2016 budget, to EUR 37 348.7 million. This is the combined result of the progressive completion of the 2007-2013 programmes, which is only partially offset by the increase in payment appropriations under the new programmes. The new programmes have been slower to get off the ground than expected.
Heading 2: Sustainable growth: natural resources : commitment appropriations are set at EUR 58 901.7 million. The level of expenditure leaves a margin of EUR 1.3 billion under the ceiling, EUR 650 million of which is proposed to offset the use of the Contingency Margin for migration and refugee-related expenditure in heading 3. Payment appropriations amount to EUR 55 236.2 million, with an increase of 0.2 % compared to 2016. The funding for market related expenditure and direct payments is EUR 42 937.6 million in commitment appropriations, and EUR 42 889 million in payment appropriations.
Heading 3: Security and citizenship : this heading sees an increase in commitment appropriations of 5.4% in comparison with the 2016 budget to EUR 4 272.4 million. The budget for this heading was already well above the financial programming in 2016 through the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument (EUR 1.5 billion). Given the scale of the challenge of the refugee and migration crises, it is proposed to sustain the level of effort for migration and security funding in this heading in 2017, including the new Instrument for emergency support within the Union. This leaves no margin under the heading and will require the mobilisation of both the Flexibility Instrument to its maximum possible extent in 2017 (EUR 530million) and the Contingency Margin (EUR 1 164.4 million). Payment appropriations increase by 25.1 % to EUR 3 781.9 million, resulting from the increase of commitment appropriations in 2015, 2016 and 2017 to address the refugee and migration crisis.
Heading 4: Global Europe: this heading sees an increase in commitment appropriations of 2.9 % to EUR 9 432 million, leaving no margin under the expenditure ceiling . This is to tackle the external dimension of the refugee crisis, in particular honouring pledges made towards neighbouring countries bearing a large burden such as Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon. Payment appropriations decrease by -8.5 % to EUR 9 289.7 million, now that the backlog of outstanding commitments under this heading has been brought under control.
Heading 5: Administration (expenditure for all institutions and staff): commitment and payment appropriations for 'Administration' (heading 5) for all institutions combined including pensions and European schools increase by 4.1 %, with commitments set at EUR 9 321.7 million. Irish has now become a new official language and institutions have to comply with the new linguistic requirements. Moreover, institutions are stepping up their security systems. Expenditure for the European schools takes into account a continuing increase in the number of pupils in the schools, especially those in Frankfurt and Luxembourg. The margin under the ceiling of heading 5 amounts to EUR 596.3 million, EUR 514.4 million of which is proposed to offset the use of the Contingency Margin for migration-related expenditure in heading 3.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 051 28.02.2017, p. 0001
- Final act published in Official Journal: Corrigendum to final act 32017B0292R(01)
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 068 14.03.2017, p. 0001
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0475/2016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Budgetary conciliation report tabled for plenary: A8-0353/2016
- Budgetary joint text: 14635/2016
- Budgetary joint text published: 14635/2016
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0411/2016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2016)0679
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary: A8-0287/2016
- Committee draft report: PE589.175
- Committee opinion: PE584.134
- Council position on draft budget: 11900/2016
- Council position on draft budget published: 11900/2016
- Committee opinion: PE585.593
- Committee opinion: PE585.738
- Committee opinion: PE584.233
- Committee opinion: PE585.566
- Committee opinion: PE585.713
- Committee opinion: PE585.727
- Committee opinion: PE585.734
- Committee opinion: PE587.630
- Committee opinion: PE585.749
- Committee opinion: PE585.789
- Committee opinion: PE582.079
- Committee opinion: PE582.234
- Committee opinion: PE584.223
- Committee opinion: PE585.709
- Commission draft budget published: COM(2016)0300
- Commission draft budget published: EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE582.079
- Committee opinion: PE582.234
- Committee opinion: PE584.223
- Committee opinion: PE585.709
- Committee opinion: PE585.749
- Committee opinion: PE585.789
- Committee opinion: PE584.233
- Committee opinion: PE585.566
- Committee opinion: PE585.713
- Committee opinion: PE585.727
- Committee opinion: PE585.734
- Committee opinion: PE587.630
- Committee opinion: PE585.593
- Committee opinion: PE585.738
- Council position on draft budget: 11900/2016
- Committee opinion: PE584.134
- Committee draft report: PE589.175
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2016)0679 EUR-Lex
- Budgetary joint text: 14635/2016
Activities
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate)
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand)
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate)
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand)
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate)
- Indrek TARAND
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) (vote)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate)
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate)
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate)
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate)
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) FR
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate) FR
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) ES
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) ES
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) ES
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate) ES
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) IT
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) IT
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) IT
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate) IT
- Bernd KÖLMEL
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) DE
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) DE
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) DE
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate) DE
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) SK
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) SK
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) SK
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate) SK
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) EL
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) EL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) EL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate) EL
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate) FR
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate) FR
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (4)
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) SL
- 2016/11/22 2017 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate) SL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier, Indrek Tarand) SL
- 2016/11/22 General budget of the European Union for 2017 - all sections (debate) SL
- Gérard DEPREZ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Sander LOONES
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Lars ADAKTUSSON
- Richard ASHWORTH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
- Zoltán BALCZÓ
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
- Hugues BAYET
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
- Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
- Renata BRIANO
- Steeve BRIOIS
- Alain CADEC
- James CARVER
- Alberto CIRIO
- Edward CZESAK
- Michel DANTIN
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
- Rachida DATI
- Mireille D'ORNANO
- Norbert ERDŐS
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
- Lorenzo FONTANA
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Ingeborg GRÄSSLE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO
- Brian HAYES
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
- Philippe JUVIN
- Barbara KAPPEL
- Giovanni LA VIA
- Monica MACOVEI
- Ernest MARAGALL
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Dominique MARTIN
- Louis MICHEL
- Marlene MIZZI
- Norica NICOLAI
- Franz OBERMAYR
- Florian PHILIPPOT
- Marijana PETIR
- Julia REID
- Fernando RUAS
- Tokia SAÏFI
- Martin SCHULZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Ricardo SERRÃO SANTOS
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
- Siôn SIMON
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
- Beatrix von STORCH
- Tibor SZANYI
- Dubravka ŠUICA
- Isabelle THOMAS
- Ángela VALLINA
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Daniele VIOTTI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Jana ŽITŇANSKÁ
- Tim AKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bas BELDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Soledad CABEZÓN RUIZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daniel DALTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Angélique DELAHAYE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabella DE MONTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nirj DEVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edouard FERRAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ashley FOX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Enrico GASBARRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena GENTILE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michela GIUFFRIDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Enrique GUERRERO SALOM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hans-Olaf HENKEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liisa JAAKONSAARI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Petr JEŽEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marc JOULAUD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Afzal KHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jeppe KOFOD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Béla KOVÁCS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Constance LE GRIP
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne LIETZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd LUCKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Svetoslav Hristov MALINOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Valentinas MAZURONIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luigi MORGANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- József NAGY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lambert van NISTELROOIJ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stanisław OŻÓG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rolandas PAKSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gilles PARGNEAUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Margot PARKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sofia RIBEIRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- György SCHÖPFLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joachim STARBATTY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaromír ŠTĚTINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivica TOLIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ulrike TREBESIUS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marco VALLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jarosław WAŁĘSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lieve WIERINCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sotirios ZARIANOPOULOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stanisław ŻÓŁTEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 22/2 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 1 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 2 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 28/1 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 28/2 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 29 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 30 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 31 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 34/2 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 3 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 42/1 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - § 44 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - § 83 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 5 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 6 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 8 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 9S #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - § 99 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Am 10 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - § 117 #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Considérant A #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Considérant B #
A8-0287/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Résolution #
A8-0353/2016 - Jens Geier et Indrek Tarand - Projet commun #
Amendments | Dossier |
744 |
2016/2047(BUD)
2016/07/15
ENVI
17 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Observes that Member States should view environment and climate- friendly policies, measures and projects as an opportunity to improve public health and promote growth;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Highlights the previous problems entailed by the lack of payment appropriations for the LIFE programme, which
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Highlights that the Union has the highest standards for food safety in the
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Recalls the paramount role of decentralised agencies in carrying out technical, scientific or managerial tasks that substantially help the Union’s institutions to make and implement policies; recalls, moreover, the very important tasks of the agencies which are under the remit of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (EEA, ECHA, ECDC, EFSA, EMA) and the paramount importance of their enhanced cooperation to perform these tasks, both for the Union institutions and citizens; highlights in this respect, that it is of
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Recalls the paramount role of decentralised agencies in carrying out technical, scientific or managerial tasks that substantially help the Union’s institutions to make and implement policies; recalls, moreover, the very important tasks of the agencies which are under the remit of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (EEA, ECHA, ECDC, EFSA, EMA) and the paramount importance of their enhanced cooperation to perform these tasks, both for the Union institutions and citizens; highlights in this respect, that it is of
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Recalls that in view of the publication, on 15 June 2016, of two draft legal acts, which set the criteria to identify endocrine disruptors, the Commission has asked the relevant agencies to immediately start preparatory work to accelerate the process once the criteria are in force; highlights, therefore, that it is crucial that adequate financial and human resources are at the disposal of EFSA and ECHA;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Recognises, moreover, that unforeseen costs for EMA may arise in 2017 or beyond as a consequence of the
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Stresses the need that EMA upholds its normal quality and quantity of work during the possible move to another Member State and tackles the growing number of incidents of temporary shortages of medicines in the Member States;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Stresses that there is no margin left for pilot projects and preparatory actions
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Points out the crucial importance of investments in research and innovation in several areas which are under the remit of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, and stresses that it is essential for the draft budget for 2017 to appropriately reflect the fact that such investments are a priority; points out that the sustainable growth and innovation capacity of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the Union is one of the main competitive advantages that the Union has in globalised markets;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that a substantial part of the draft budget for 2017 (especially of heading 3) has to be dedicated to the challenges that the Union is currently facing, especially to addressing the migration and security crises; points out, however, that the substantial European added value of the policies and financing instruments in the remit of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety has to be borne in mind by the budgetary authorities when deciding on the draft budget for 2017 and urges the Council in particular to refrain from making any cuts in respect of policies and financing instruments within the remit of that committee which have clearly demonstrable Union added value;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines the importance of mainstreaming biodiversity protection in the development, implementation and funding of all Union policies and considers transparency of Member States´ spending on nature protection and biodiversity conservation to be equally important for the consistency and coherence of Union expenditure; calls on the Commission to develop a tracking methodology for biodiversity related spending across the Union budget;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls the added value that ecosystems and biodiversity bring to the European environment, and calls therefore for sufficient resources to be allocated in the draft budget for 2017 to ensure the long-term protection of the biodiversity; reminds the Commission and the Member States, therefore, of their obligation under Article 8 of the Habitats Directive to ensure an adequate level of financing for the conservation measures needed to restore the species and habitats in Natura 2000 sites to a favourable conservation status;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Union financial resources do not contain subsidies that are harmful for the climate, lock in fossil fuel infrastructure, such as fossil fuel subsidies, support activities which are harmful to biodiversity, damage ecosystems, or require increased use of resources and energy; calls on the Commission furthermore to introduce an effective method of tracking biodiversity spending in the Union budget;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the revi
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the revision of the MFF creates an excellent opportunity to
source: 587.439
2016/07/18
IMCO
24 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that a strengthened and well-functioning single market is fundamental for the Union’s capacity to absorb shocks; stresses that the Union’s budget must support the transition to a circular economy and an inclusive and an accessible Digital Single Market; calls therefore for more efficient spending of the budget by establishing a clear set of financing priorities for the advancement of the Single Market and consequently the development of the economy;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes appropriations for the COSME programme, a key instrument to support entrepreneurship and investments in growth and jobs, as a priority; underlines the need for efficient financing for innovation, scale-up, internationalisation and access to third markets, digitalisation and adoption of circular economy business models for SMEs and microentreprises, so as to increase their international competitiveness;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines the importance of an efficient financial framework for innovation, digitalization, research and business models based on circular economy;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Is concerned, however, at the reduction in the COSME budget line 02 02 02 ‘Improving access to finance for SMEs - equity and debt’, as SMEs and microenterprises still face difficulties in finding appropriate funding; believes that developing a right business environment by improving private venture capital frameworks for SMEs and microenterprises, facilitating access to finance, producing sound legislation and fully applying the ‘Think Small First’ principle across the single market is crucial and could support growth and job creation;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Underlines the importance of a supplementary budget line allocation for the support of EU SMEs internationalisation. This framework should be efficient and should have the aim of increasing lifetime duration of EU SMEs;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. In the new financial framework should be underlined the importance of financing market studies on non-EU markets which would offer information to EU SMEs and would support internationalisation;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the allocation of funds for the modernisation of the customs union, which supports the timely implementation of the Union Customs Code and the development of the electronic customs systems;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes the allocation of funds for the modernisation of the customs union, which supports the implementation of the Union Customs Code and the development of the electronic customs systems, leading to effective tools in combating fraud and guaranteeing both consumer protection and fair competition;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Underlines the need to confirm the required budget for the Preparatory Action for Common Security and Defense Policy (CSDP) - related Research;
Amendment 18 #
11. Stresses the important role of standardisation for the single market which ensures the interoperability of products and services and enhances the competitiveness of companies; underlines th
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Stresses the important role of standardisation for the single market which ensures the interoperability of products and services and enhances the competitiveness of companies;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that a strengthened and well-functioning single market is fundamental for the Union’s capacity to absorb shocks; stresses that the Union’s budget must support the transition to a circular economy and an inclusive and accessible Digital Single Market;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls therefore on the Commission and all stakeholders to guarantee the financial sustainability of the European standardisation system, including through adequate financial planning in 2017, since this is essential to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Acknowledges the allocation of financing for internal market governance tools, including SOLVIT; recalls the importance of strengthening and streamlining existing tools for SMEs in order to simplify their cross-border expansion; urges the Commission and the Member States to place greater emphasis on streamlining and improving Product Contact Points and Points of Single Contact; believes that further efforts are also needed to ensure that
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Asks for the financing of
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Asks for the financing of the pilot projects proposed by IMCO on key issues such as the development of the Digital Single Market, cross-border cooperation in the interest of consumers or awareness- raising in respect of consumer rights, as well as of auditing human medical implants;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Asks for the financing of the pilot projects proposed by IMCO on key issues such as the development of the Digital Single Market, cross-border cooperation in the interest of consumers or awareness- raising in respect of consumer rights; whilst recognising that such financing should not entail an increase in the overall budget allocated under the MFF, but should be made through reallocation and rationalisation of existing budget lines, across the Budget 2017;
Amendment 3 #
2. Recalls that a strengthened and well-functioning single market is fundamental for the Union’s capacity to absorb shocks; stresses that the Union’s budget must support the transition to a circular economy and an inclusive and competitive Digital Single Market;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that a strengthened and well-functioning single market is fundamental for the Union’s capacity to absorb shocks; stresses that the Union’s budget must support the transition to a circular economy and an inclusive and diverse Digital Single Market;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the importance of a strong consumer policy that reinforces consumer safety and awareness and adjusts consumer rights in line with societal,
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the importance of a strong consumer policy that reinforces consumer safety and awareness and adjusts consumer rights
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the importance of a strong consumer policy that reinforces consumer safety and awareness and adjusts consumer rights in line with societal,
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recognises the importance of the role of the Commission and its associated programmes in discharging duties relating to the single market, and therefore considers sufficient budgetary allocation should be made to execute these tasks; stresses that such allocations should not entail an increase in the overall budget allocated under the MFF, but should be made through reallocation and rationalisation of existing budget lines, across the Budget 2017; further considers that some areas of Single Market spending may benefit from consolidation, including the single market tools;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that, in the 2017 budgetary procedure, most of IMCO's main priorities in the areas of the single market, the customs union and consumer protection have been properly taken into account with adequate levels of appropriations allocated; whilst stressing that such allocations should not entail an increase in the overall budget allocated under the MFF, but should be made through reallocation and rationalisation of existing budget lines, across the Budget 2017; further considers that some areas of Single Market spending may benefit from consolidation, including the single market tools;
source: 585.816
2016/07/19
INTA
29 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Stresses the need to allocate specific resources for the comprehensive ex-ante and ex-post assessment of the possible gender-equality impact of trade agreements signed by the Union;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that international trade is an important
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that trade is an important foreign policy tool of the Union which can help to tackle migration causes if it is underpinned with the necessary financial means and implemented with respect for the principle of policy coherence for development; underlines that the funding of trade-related aid and programs for the mitigation of the refugee crisis should not be deduced from Official Development Assistance (ODA) spending;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that trade is an important foreign policy tool of the Union which can help to tackle migration causes if it is underpinned with the necessary financial means; with regard to Greece, increased EU funding is essential, given the need to address the current refugee crisis;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that trade is an important foreign policy tool of the Union which can also help to tackle migration causes if it is underpinned with the necessary financial means and conducted in coherence with other policy areas such as development policy;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) should be allocated sufficient budgetary resources, including in the field of economic and trade policy cooperation, so that adequate trade-related technical support and assistance can be made available to our close partners, especially those in the Eastern Partnership as well as the post- Arab-Spring countries, without condemning them to a fresh dependency mode which would result from debts and the corresponding repayment conditions arising from the MFA;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) should be allocated sufficient budgetary resources so that adequate trade-related technical support and assistance can be made available to our close partners, especially those in the Eastern Partnership as well as the post-Arab-Spring countries; reiterates that in partner countries undergoing an economic crisis, the objective must be, above all, tangible and sustainable improvements to the living conditions of ordinary people;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that the
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) should be allocated sufficient budgetary resources so that adequate trade-related technical support and assistance can be made available to our close partners,
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that adequate appropriations should be allocated to the trade-related budget lines to enable the Commission to pursue its
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Deplores the proposed significant cuts to macro-financial assistance compared to the exceptionally high level in 2016, given that many partner countries continue to face severe economic difficulties; believes that a higher funding level than proposed will be required to ensure that all future requests for loans can be accommodated;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is concerned about the increasing recourse to guarantees and financial instruments outside the Union budget to respond to multiple crises, financed in part from the Union budget through cuts of programmes under Heading IV; points to the failure of Member States to match the Union contributions to the two Trust Funds which limits their potential impact; insists that such funding instruments must remain an exception and should eventually be included in the Union budget to allow for proper democratic control;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is concerned about the increasing recourse to guarantees and financial instruments outside the Union budget to respond to multiple crises, financed in part from the Union budget through cuts of programmes under Heading IV; insists that such funding instruments must adhere to the established criteria of aid effectiveness, such as ownership and alignments and must remain an exception and should eventually be included in the Union budget to allow for proper democratic control;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is concerned about the increasing recourse to guarantees and financial instruments outside the Union budget to respond to multiple crises, financed in part from the Union budget through cuts of programmes under Heading IV; insists that such funding instruments must remain an exception and must be confirmed in advance by the European Parliament, and should eventually be included in the Union budget to allow for proper democratic control;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes the announcement by the Commission that it will present a proposal for an External Investment Plan as part of the New Migration Partnership Framework in autumn 2016; believes that the External Investment Plan will offer new investment opportunities for European business in developing third countries and contribute to the sustainable political and economic stabilisation of the European Neighbourhood; deplores that the forthcoming proposals are not reflected in the draft general budget 2017; stresses that the creation of the new fund should not go to the detriment of the already under-funded programmes in Heading IV but make use of the funds as well as the expertise and the management capacities of the European Investment Bank;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to assess and improve the existing tools aimed at promoting SME internationalisation regarding coherence with other SME support instruments such as COSME as well as subsidiarity, non-duplication and complementarity in relation to respective Member State programmes; underlines that SME funding programs need to be assessed against compliance with ILO and Human Rights standards;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to assess and improve the existing tools aimed at promoting SME internationalisation regarding coherence with other SME support instruments such as COSME as well as subsidiarity, non-duplication and complementarity in relation to respective Member State programmes;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Deplores the fact that, instead of promoting fair trade for all and increasing funding for the business sector, the EU is encouraging partnership agreements such as the TTIP which strengthen multinational companies, while forcing SMEs out of business.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Commission to allocate resources to elaborate specific and clear guidebooks about the opportunities and benefits offered by each past or future trade agreement concluded by the EU;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that adequate appropriations should be allocated to the trade-related budget lines to enable the Commission to pursue its
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that adequate appropriations should be allocated to the trade-related budget lines to enable the Commission to pursue its ambitious trade agenda as outlined in the "Trade for all" strategy, which implies also a re-allocation of adequate resources in order to enable
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that adequate appropriations should be allocated to the trade-related budget lines to enable the Commission to pursue its ambitious trade agenda as outlined in the "Trade for all" strategy, which implies also a re-allocation of adequate resources in order to
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Stresses the need for additional efforts to boost the active monitoring of the application and repercussions of trade agreements signed by the Union, guaranteeing that trade-related budget lines earmark sufficient resources for exante, ex-post and interim assessment of trade agreements in relation to the Union economy and the economy of its partner countries;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Underlines the urgent need for a thorough reorganisation of the EU budget and its structure in the context of the review of the MFF and with regard to the trade policy agenda, and calls on the Commission to take the initiative on this vis à vis the Council and Parliament;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Notes that the Union has an increasingly ambitious trade agenda, leading to an increased burden on DG Trade; stresses therefore that sufficient resources must be allocated to ensure that DG Trade is adequately staffed to carry out the increasing number of simultaneous negotiations and monitoring activities;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Notes that citizens of the Union are increasingly asking for more involvement and engagement in Union trade policy and that the Commission has made this a priority; stresses in this regard that it is crucial that enough resources are allocated in order to actively involve citizens in Union trade policy making, through active engagement, stakeholder meetings, communication initiatives both online and offline and translations of fact sheets, negotiation texts and position papers; calls on the Member States to take a more active role in explaining the added value of trade policy, since they formulate the negotiating mandates, and to allocate sufficient resources in their own national budgets;
source: 585.480
2016/07/20
AFET
18 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes the increase in Heading 4 commitment appropriations, but considers it far from sufficient in view of the current political and security situation in our neighbourhood and beyond; urges an increase above the Heading 4 ceiling as set out in the MFF, using the existing flexibility mechanisms, which is necessary in order to provide a sustainable and effective response to the many challenges of external origin that the EU is facing, including
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that, in view of the dynamic developments taking place in the global security and humanitarian situation,
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that, in view of the dynamic developments taking place in the global security and humanitarian situation, EU crisis response mechanisms need to be reinforced; strongly rejects the proposed
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Welcomes the proposal for a preparatory action on defence research following a pilot project initiated by the European Parliament, which could positively contribute to increased cooperation between the Member States in the field of security and defence;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Rejects the Commission proposal on a new preparatory action on defence research with a budget of EUR 25 million in 2017; recalls the decision of 19 November 2007 taken by the EU defence ministers on a framework for a joint Strategy on Defence Research and Technology which contained four benchmarks on collaborative spending, and in particular a benchmark on research and development aiming at increasing the percentage of collaborative research and development from 10 to 20 percent; notes that the Member States have been, on a national level, unable to implement their own decisions in this respect for the last 9 years and that according to the latest publications of the European Defence Agency the level of collaborative research is even decreasing; is convinced that any EU budget contribution in this field would not be justifiable under these circumstances;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Notes the proposal of the Commission of 5 July 2016 on Capacity Building in Support of Security and development (CBSD) amending the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace; rejects the attempt to use a development policy-based instrument for security and military objectives at the expense of its conflict prevention function; believes that the provision of military training, mentoring, advice, equipment, infrastructure and services to military actors cannot be funded by a regulation based on Articles 209 and 212 TFEU also for legal reasons, as a number of European Court of Justice rulings have already confirmed; urges the Commission to clarify the precise source of the additional EUR 100 Million funding for CBSD under the IcSP;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for increasing investment in the visibility of EU external action in order to strengthen the impact of funding in this field;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines that youth exchange programs are one of the most successful measures to increase intercultural skills and to foster understanding and connectivity between people and countries; draws therefore particular attention to the funds which are annually transferred to the Erasmus+ Programme from ENI, IPA2 and the PI; believes that the potential of Erasmus+ as a foreign policy instrument is much underrated and urgently calls for an increase of the Youth programme, in particular, in the field of non-formal and informal learning (starting from the age of 13), which so far only receives 10% of the overall funds, but is in high demand.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned about the significant impact that the pledges made by the EU at the London conference on supporting Syria and in the context of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey will have on the external financing instruments and the humanitarian aid budget; while supporting those pledges, stresses that their fulfilment must not be to the detriment of other priority areas and long-term policies; calls in particular for an increase in the funding of the European Neighbourhood Instrument, which plays a vital role in supporting stability among Europe's
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned about the significant impact that the pledges made by the EU at the London conference on supporting Syria and in the context of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey will have on the external financing instruments and the humanitarian aid budget; while supporting those pledges, stresses that their fulfilment must not be to the detriment of other priority areas and long-term policies; calls in particular for an increase in the funding of the European Neighbourhood Instrument, which plays a vital role in supporting stability among Europe's Eastern and Southern neighbours; draws attention notably to Tunisia, which is the success story of democratic transition in the region, but which remains potentially fragile; considers it essential to maintain the EU’s pivotal role in supporting the Middle East Peace Process, the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned about the significant impact that the pledges made by the EU at the London conference on supporting Syria and in the context of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey will have on the external financing instruments and the humanitarian aid budget;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses the importance of ensuring further support for candidate and potential candidate countries in adopting and implementing political, economic and social reforms; notes that the performance-based approach was used for the budgeting of the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA);
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that, in view of the dynamic developments taking place in the global security and humanitarian situation, EU
source: 585.725
2016/07/25
ECON
62 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers it regrettable that during its first year in operation the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) did not guarantee any additionality in the criteria for the selection of projects, with these mainly having involved the refinancing of existing projects of dubious environmental, social and economic worth;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls the key role played by the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in mobilising private sector financing and new sources of finance in investments crucial for Europe's competitiveness and economic recovery; insists on the need to finance new investments in line with the criteria set out in Regulation (EU) 2015/1017 of the European Parliament and of the Council , in particular additionality, sustainability and territorial and social cohesion; ____________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2015/1017 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2015 on the European Fund for Strategic Investments, the European Investment Advisory Hub and the European Investment Project Portal and amending Regulations (EU) No 1291/2013 and (EU) No 1316/2013--- the European Fund for Strategic Investments (OJ L 169, 1.7.2015, p. 1).
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Also calls for this draft budget to be focused on real convergence policies, based on social progress and safeguarding and fostering each country’s potential, net job creation (translating into secure employment of high quality), sustainable use of natural resources, and protection of the environment;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes the view that it is essential to boost public investment in order to preserve and enhance the quality of health and education systems and the quality of services provided for the public, as well as to create favourable conditions for economic development;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. In that regard, notes with particular concern continuing high levels of youth unemployment, even after the Union has returned to modest economic growth;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls that the Union Budget is mainly an investment budget;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls for neutralisation in the calculation of debt and deficit in public investment carried out by Member States’ public operators, particularly with regard to the impact of the new ESA 2010 system of accounts, which prevents Member States from paying their co-financing share to the Structural Funds (in particular the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Youth Employment Initiative) and thus using these funds to escape from the economic crisis and re- launch growth and employment;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls for support programmes to be set up for Member States should they wish – having realised that their participation in EMU has become unsustainable and intolerable – to negotiate their exit from the euro, and considers that programmes of this kind should provide for the compensation necessary to make good such social and economic damage as the countries in question might have suffered because they adopted the single currency;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Considers that in order to solidify the economic recovery in the Union and address the refugee flows, the 2017 Budget should be higher in real terms vis- à-vis the 2016 Budget;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Calls for emergency plans to be drawn up to support the economies of countries under the Troika regime in order to provide for financial resources and for the necessary exceptions to the operation of the single market and common policies;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the 2017 draft budget to
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Maintains that no institutional status should be conferred on the principles of macroeconomic conditionality and the performance reserve or on the link between cohesion policy and the Structural Funds or, moreover, on the Stability and Growth Pact, the economic governance package, or any economic agreement entered into by Member States; considers that in each case the underlying assumptions are undeniably different and the objectives are diametrically opposed;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Maintains that the aim of cohesion policy should not be impeded by macroeconomic conditionality or the stipulations of the Fiscal Compact; stresses that cohesion policy is designed to ensure balanced growth and eliminate inequalities with a view to achieving genuine convergence; points out that funding for European regions should not be suspended because Member States have failed to comply with macroeconomic conditions and that suspending funding for Member States in difficulties will make the situation worse;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 f (new) 1f. Takes the view that – no matter how many programmes might be set up to stimulate economic growth, investment, and job creation and no matter how much additional funding might be channelled into the existing programmes – the Member States’ economies will not revive, and there will be no resurgence in social development and progress, until the constraints imposed by the economic governance structure are abandoned for good, that is to say, until the treaties underlying it are revoked;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that after five years, entities benefitting from funding of the civil- society capacity building in the area of financial services are still d
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that after five years, entities benefitting from funding of the civil- society capacity building in the area of financial services
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that after five years, entities benefitting from funding of the civil- society capacity building in the area of financial services are still
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that after five years, entities benefit
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that after five years, entities benefitting from funding of the civil- society capacity building in the area of financial services are still disproportionately depending on EU funding with EU grants consistently representing more than 50 % of their respective budgets; emphasises that such entities should
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the Commission proposal which continues the existing funding arrangements with a maximum envelope of EUR 1,5 million per year for civil-society capacity building in the area of financial services;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the 2017 draft budget to reflect and support the
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for continued investment in Structural Funds across all regions including transition areas in order not to interrupt the effects of measures and efforts already implemented;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out the present and future role of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) in
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out the present and future role of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) in relation to Union- level financial supervision and the banking union; emphasises that the 2017 draft budget must provide sufficient resources for the ESAs to fulfil their mandate;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out the present and future role of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) in relation to Union- level financial supervision and the banking union; emphasises that the 2017 draft budget must provide sufficient resources for the ESAs to fulfil their mandate;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out the present and future role of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) in relation to Union- level financial
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out the present and future role of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) in relation to Union- level financial supervision, the capital market union1a and the banking union; emphasises that the 2017 draft budget must provide sufficient resources for the ESAs to fulfil their mandate; points out that the budget foreseen in the multi-
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that in order to relaunch the European integration process a structured dialogue with civil society needs to be held, starting on 1 January 2017 in order to coincide with the 70th anniversary of the Treaty of Rome in March 2017 and ending in May 2018 with the holding of a Second European Congress in the Hague on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the first one, and that to this end the 2017 budget should include the means to fund the activities forming part of this process;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out, however, that in the case of EBA, sufficient resources should be provided for in
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the 2017 draft budget to reflect and support
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out, however, that in the case of EBA, sufficient resources should be provided for in the 2017 draft budget to prepare a relocation away from London
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out, however, that in the case of EBA, sufficient resources should be provided for in the 2017 draft budget to prepare a relocation away from London when the United Kingdom notifies its intention to withdraw
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the ESAs
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the ESAs must
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that in the field of digitalisation of financial services, particularly with regards to Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a build-up of technical expertise and regulatory capacity is urgently needed in order to be better able to react rapidly to potential challenges; therefore specifically supports the funding of a horizontal Task Force on DLT;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the 2017 draft budget to reflect and support the priorities outlined in the European Semester, specifically relaunching investment
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that the 2017 budget should contain a suitably prominent budgetary item, under the ‘Europe for Citizens’ programme, on funding for activities and studies linked to European history and culture, and on the history of European integration and the study thereof;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that the structural reform support programme is a useful tool to provide assistance to administrative capacity-building and structural reforms; takes the view that this function is key to reducing economic disparities and fostering good and sustainable economic policies; calls, therefore, on adequate funding to be allocated to this instrument and for reflection to be started on its expansion and its integration within a euro area fiscal capacity as a tool to provide conditional incentives to convergence and reform;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Considers that the 2017 budget should contain a budgetary item concerning support for regional integration in the rest of the world, even if said funding comes from development cooperation programmes;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Considers that in order to relaunch the European integration process a structured dialogue with civil society needs to be held, starting on 1 January 2017 in order to coincide with the 70th anniversary of the Treaty of Rome in March 2017 and ending in May 2018 with the holding of a Second European Congress in the Hague on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the first one, and that to this end the 2017 budget should include the means to fund the activities forming part of this process;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that in light of the legislative revisions with regard to the exchange of information in the field of taxation between national tax authorities, the legal basis for the Fiscalis 2020
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for a fundamental rethink of taxation at EU level and for the introduction of one or more new own resources to finance the Union's priority projects (investment projects, Horizon 2020, etc.).
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Supports the continuation of the pilot project on capacity building, programmatic development and communication in the context of the fight against tax avoidance, tax evasion and tax fraud, launched in 2016.
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Subheading 3 a (new) EU bond issuance 6a. Calls for the inclusion of a spending line in the 2017 Budget that could be used to back up the capital and interest payments of a pilot EU bond issuance.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the 2017 draft budget to reflect and support the priorities outlined in the European Semester, specifically relaunching investment, pursuing structural reforms to modernise European economies, conducting
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Subheading 3 b (new) Reception of refugees 6b. Considers that the 2017 budget should earmark more resources for reception of refugees.
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Subheading 3 a (new) Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Subheading 3 a (new) EFRAG 6a. Calls on the Commission to continue the reform of the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) in particular with regard to its task and responsibilities, thereby also strengthening the Union's influence in international accounting standard-setting.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the 2017 draft budget to reflect and support the priorities outlined in the European Semester
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the 2017 draft budget to reflect and support the priorities outlined in the European Semester, specifically relaunching investment, pursuing socially balanced and sustainable structural reforms to modernise European economies, conducting responsible fiscal policies;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for the 2017 draft budget to reflect and support the priorities outlined in the European Semester, specifically relaunching investment, pursuing structural reforms to modernise European economies and increase competitiveness, conducting responsible fiscal policies;
source: 587.443
2016/07/26
AGRI
62 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Takes note of the proposed EUR 58.9 billion in commitments
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes with regret that DB 2017 leaves a massively reduced unallocated margin of 0.64 billion under Heading 2; insists and notwithstanding any urgencies in other budgetary Headings that the allocated contingency margin of 0.65 billion must remain in Heading 2 to address the continuing crisis in agricultural markets and any possible forthcoming crises and frequently occurring price volatility; highlights that a foreign policy decision has led to the Russian embargo, which subsequently placed farmers to bear the brunt of that decision and trigged the crisis; insists therefore that the entire margin remains within Heading 2;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes with regret that DB 2017 leaves a massively reduced unallocated margin of 0.64 billion under Heading 2; insists and notwithstanding any urgencies in other budgetary Headings that the allocated contingency margin of 0.65 billion must remain in Heading 2 to address the continuing crisis in agricultural markets
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that Union agriculture has increasingly been exposed to crises in recent years; calls therefore on the Commission to reconsider the system of contingency funding and to create a new instrument that allows rapid political intervention in the event of a crisis, without impacting on the annual direct payments;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor, in a timely way, the price volatility of agricultural products, with a particular focus on the dairy sector, which has adverse effects on farmers' incomes, and to react promptly and effectively when needed, giving farmers directly the option of combating such price volatility;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Stresses that it is essential that funds earmarked for research in the agri- food sector, in particular from the Horizon 2020 budget, remain fully available as such in order to stimulate innovation in the agricultural sector;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets the proposed cuts for intervention in the agricultural markets, especially for milk and milk products compared to 2016; sees a continued financial effort being necessary to combat
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets the proposed cuts for intervention in the agricultural markets, especially for milk and milk products compared to 2016; sees a continued financial effort being necessary to combat the crisis in the milk market; asks the Commission to extend emergency measures related to sales difficulties; is concerned that further markets intervention will be necessary; calls for a review of the CAP and the creation of a new instrument that will ensure production in order to normalise prices;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets the proposed cuts for intervention in the agricultural markets, especially for milk and milk products compared to 2016; sees a continued financial effort being necessary to combat the crisis in the milk market; asks the Commission to extend emergency measures related to sales difficulties and especially for the protection of the traditional character of certain milk products such as Greek feta and Greek yogurt; is concerned that further markets intervention will be necessary;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets the proposed cuts for intervention in the agricultural markets, especially for milk and milk products compared to 2016; sees a continued financial effort being necessary to combat the crisis in the milk market, in particular Union funding for mandatory supply management to reduce milk volume during periods of critically low milk prices; asks the Commission to extend emergency measures related to sales difficulties; is concerned that further markets intervention will be necessary;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that the measures proposed have not fully reached their objectives; regrets the proposed cuts for intervention in the agricultural markets, especially for milk and milk products compared to 2016; sees a continued financial effort being necessary to combat the crisis in the milk market; asks the Commission to extend emergency measures related to sales difficulties; is concerned that further markets intervention will be necessary;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that, given the ceiling imposed by the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for Heading 2, major categories of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) spending are likely, to be cut in 2017, including rural development, direct payments and market measures, notwithstanding the ongoing crisis as a result of successive revisions of the CAP that geared for the liberalisation of markets;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets the proposed cuts for intervention in the agricultural markets, especially for milk and milk products compared to 2016; sees a continued financial effort being necessary to combat the crisis in the milk market; asks the Commission to extend emergency measures related to both sales difficulties and consequences of the Russian embargo; is concerned that further markets intervention will be necessary;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets the proposed cuts for intervention in the agricultural markets
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Re
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Requests that the appropriations intended for the fight against the medical crises in the plant and animal fields, currently EUR 20 million, are very strongly increased because they are insufficient to cope with the reappearance of diseases such as Xylella Fastidiosa and Bird Influenza, and with the appearance of contagious nodular dermatosis, a new infectious disease affecting cattle, already present in Greece and Bulgaria and threatening several other countries.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Insists that Member States implement without delay a support programme with the objective of reducing milk production; believes that Member States should coordinate their actions in order to reduce the competition between milk producers from different Member States; considers that the best way to have an effective production management would be at Union level, thus ensuring a level playing field;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes the effects of the abolition of milk quotas and takes the view that preparatory measures are necessary to avoid market imbalances following the abolition of sugar quotas in September 2017;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the continued support for the school milk scheme of EUR 75 million in the DB for 2017; regrets the cuts of EUR 20 million to the school fruit and vegetables scheme; reiterates the vital importance of both schemes to farmers and Members States and underlines their importance given the current crisis and levels of child malnutrition in the Union; reiterates the vital importance of schemes for the free distribution of fruits and vegetables withdrawn from sale for larger families calls on the Commission to reduce bureaucracy in both schemes;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the continued support for the school milk scheme of EUR 75 million in the DB for 2017; re
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for the need to strengthen the school scheme taking into account the oversupply, the need to promote healthy habits in children, and the need to promote the consumption;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Regrets in particular the proposed cuts in rural development in commitments and payments;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out the need to allocate a budget line to promote in all areas, including schools, the consumption of organic and local products;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that the reduction of staffing levels by 5 % over five years to which the Commission is committed should lead to improved efficiency without disproportionally reducing staffing levels in the agricultural and rural development policy area in which the Union carries out a comprehensive policy which meets an increasing number of societal challenges;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for better synergies between the CAP and other Union policies, in particular regarding energy, water supply, land use, biodiversity and ecosystems, the development of remote islands and mountainous areas and the reorganisation of primary production;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Urges the Commission and the Member States to take measures in response to the significant price volatility of agricultural products;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Member States, in particular Greece, pay farmers and stockbreeders on time and in full the subsidies and aid to which they are entitled under the CAP, paying special attention to compensatory allowances;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the increase in operational funds for producer organisations; regrets the massive cuts in aid to producer groups for preliminary recognition; welcomes the prolongation of exceptional measures for the fruit & vegetable sector especially in light of the crisis and the Russian embargo that severely hit producers; calls for those measures to remain in force for as long as the Russian embargo lasts and for them to be widened to cover all crop and livestock sectors affected; points out that the milk sector requires particular attention because the Russian embargo is adding to the uncertainty for producers by exacerbating the price fall seen since the quota scheme was abolished;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the increase in operational funds for producer organisations, nonetheless notes that it is not enough to support the needs and demands of this organisations ; regrets the massive cuts in aid to producer groups for preliminary recognition; welcomes the prolongation of exceptional measures for the fruit & vegetable sector especially in light of the crisis and the Russian embargo that severely hit producers; regrets that the funds intended to withstand the effects of the Russian embargo have been withdrawn from the CAP budget insofar that the situation was created by a political measure of Union external policy;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the increase in operational funds for producer organisations; regrets the massive cuts in aid to producer groups for preliminary recognition; welcomes the prolongation of exceptional measures for the fruit & vegetable sector especially in light of the crisis and the Russian embargo that severely hit producers; calls on the Commission to increase the funds intended to compensate losses caused by the Russian embargo, so long as Union sanctions against Russia as a result of the Ukrainian crisis remain in place;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the increase in operational funds for producer organisations;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Underscores the importance of developing new markets for maintaining competitiveness and increasing the resistance of Union agriculture to market crises such as in the case of Russian embargo; calls for the financial support of market development, inter alia through the use of funds from the superlevy;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Regrets in particular the proposed cuts in rural development in commitments and payments; rejects therefore the 23.1% reduction in commitments and 4.6% reduction in payments; stresses that funding for rural development under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) has a high value added to the economics of rural areas across the Union including a real potential for maintaining jobs and creating new ones;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Welcomes the allocations for research and innovation related to agriculture under Horizon 2020, to secure sufficient supplies of safe and high quality food and other bio-based products; underlines the need to prioritize projects that involve primary producers;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for the allocation of a sufficient budget line for farmers' organisations at Union level to strengthen their role of dialogue and negotiation with Union institutions;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that funds allocated to the reserve for crises in the agricultural sector in the 2017 budget, which are subsequently left unspent remain in full in Heading 2 for the following
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that funds allocated to the reserve for crises in the agricultural sector in the 2017 budget, which are subsequently left unspent remain in full in Heading 2 for the following budget year for
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Welcomes the trend of shifting the priorities of the CAP with less spending in areas of direct payments and market measures; calls in this respect for a shift of allocation of CAP funding from direct payments and market measures, towards measures guiding improvements in the agricultural sector in the fields of social- economic and environmental sustainability, animal welfare and biodiversity; calls for the creation of measurable milestones on these improvements, with regular monitoring by the Commission and reporting to the Parliament;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Insists on the need to provide funds to compensate for the economic losses suffered by farmers due to market crises or other effects especially by farmers from Member States such as Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal; reiterates the need to use the available margins under Heading 2 to this effect;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Insists on the need to provide funds to compensate for the economic losses suffered by farmers due to market crises or other effects; reiterates the need to use the available margins under Heading 2 to this effect in particular a supply management fund;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Insists on the need to provide funds to compensate for the economic losses suffered by farmers due to market crises and sanitary or phytosanitary crises such as Xylella fastidiosa, and reiterates the need to use the available margins under Heading 2 to this effect; insists that compensation for eradication should also cover rehabilitation of agroecosystems including the soil, as well as establishing robust biological diversity, especially ensuring genetic diversity of the planting stock that ideally includes resistance to or tolerance of the disease or pest; indeed, considers that one of the aims of any aid granted should be to ensure balanced, biologically diverse agroecosystems and landscapes that are less susceptible to future attacks; calls on the Commission and the Council to take all the necessary measures to combat the deterioration of those markets;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls for a budget line to be set, or retrieved , where appropriate, which will enable public services to support the agriculture and farms as regards animal and plant health, by grants, licenses and other means as well as by legal and technical advice;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Disagrees with the Commission’s decision to increase the funds for voluntary coupled support, as this leads to market distortions amongst Member States in certain agricultural markets; disagrees also with the reduction in support for young farmers;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Regrets in particular the proposed cuts in rural development in commitments and payments; rejects therefore the 23.1% reduction in commitments and 4.6% reduction in payments; stresses that funding for rural development under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) has a high
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses the need to provide financial and technical support for reconversion to farmers most affected by the current agricultural crisis; insists that Members States implement such support measures.
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Asks the Commission to create market observatories for meat and other products affected by the volatility of prices in order to establish prognosis and to avoid overproduction;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses the need to strengthen the budget in lines aimed at combating animal diseases and plant pests whose prevalence has been increasing every year;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Calls for additional funding to be earmarked for the olive-growing and olive oil sector to offset losses to farmers caused by the Xylella fastidiosa outbreak, to step up prevention measures in the Union, to combat the spread of this devastating disease and to restructure the sector and consolidate scientific research into the pathogen and its carrier;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Stresses the need to provide funds which would enable the implementation of a production model based on agroecology and prioritisation of local markets and markets in proximity, strengthening the Union internal market as a key factor in overcoming the current crisis and contributing to the fight against climate change;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 c (new) 10c. Notes generally that investment is needed to make our agroecosystems resilient to climate change and to the establishment and spread of invasive species, notably through biologically diverse farmed landscapes and living, healthy soils that contain predators and beneficial species, allowing for natural regulation of pest populations;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the slight increase in funds allocated to support beekeeping, as Parliament has consistently viewed beekeeping as a priority for the future of agriculture and for the conservation of biodiversity
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the slight increase in funds allocated to support beekeeping and seeks more funding, as Parliament has consistently viewed beekeeping as a priority for the future of agriculture and for the conservation of biodiversity.
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the slight increase in funds allocated to support beekeeping, as Parliament has
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Demands that the Commission monitors the significant price volatility of agricultural products, which has adverse effects on farmers' incomes, and acts swiftly and effectively when needed;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Welcomes the farmers’ support package announced in July 2016 and considers it a step toward better management of production; regrets, nevertheless, that the portion allocated to Union-level measures, compared with the amount allocated to national envelopes, is too small when production management must be Union-wide in order to avoid the risk of re-nationalisation and maintain a level playing field; considers that structural measures should be anticipated and integrated into the budgets of future years;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Suggests that the Commission explores the possibility to replace certain financial aid to developing countries with food products affected by overproduction
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Advocates that the objectives of increasing the competitiveness and sustainability of European agriculture are upheld, and asks for resources to be provided in order to fulfil these objectives;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 c (new) 11c. Disagrees with the Commission's decision to delay the presentation of its draft budget for 2017 by more than a month, due to the UK referendum, as it severely disrupts the budgetary procedure;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Highlights the objectives of increasing the competitiveness and sustainability of Union agriculture, and asks for resources to be provided in order to fulfil these objectives; recalls the potential of agriculture policy in terms of job creation, technical and social innovation and sustainable development, particularly in the rural areas where they promote regional development;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Condemns year-on-year decreases in rural development commitment and spending.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Urges Member States to consider, in the opportunity afforded by the CAP's mid-term review, reversing decisions made at the beginning of the programing period that transferred allocations from pillar two to pillar one, so as to strengthen their rural development; highlights the new opportunities available for rapid approval of changed rural development measures.
source: 587.423
2016/07/27
PECH
32 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the objectives of the CFP can only be reached if there is a sufficient budget; points out that the budget is concentrated in Section III and Title 11, ‘Maritime Affairs and Fisheries’; notes that the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), which has limited resources at its disposal compared with other EU funds, and the compulsory contributions to regional fisheries management organisations and sustainable fisheries agreements make up most of the budget.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the CFP also contributes to social cohesion in outermost regions and offshore islands; points out that in some cases those regions and islands are dependent on fishing and should therefore be especially recognised and supported in accordance with Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as are regions that suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, in accordance with Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the CFP should also contribute
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the CFP also contributes to social cohesion in outermost regions and offshore islands; points out that th
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that the implementation of the new CFP entails a
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out the need to guarantee sufficient financial support
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out the need to guarantee sufficient financial support
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) must help the small-scale fishing industry renew its fishing gear in order to meet the severe constraints connected with the landing obligation. Since that obligation arises from a regulation, all the expenses incurred by fishermen in this regard should be covered by the EMFF.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that the modernisation of fisheries control policy can only be implemented by modernising its tools, which cannot be done without increasing its budget.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the importance of ensuring a proper funding and maintaining, at the very least, the level of appropriations earmarked in the current financial year for the collection of data, which is a key task to enabling rational and scientific based decisions to be taken on fisheries policy issues.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the importance of ensuring a proper funding for the collection of data, while at the same time respecting the personal data protection provisions in force, which is a key task to enabling rational and scientific based decisions to be taken on fisheries policy issues.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises the need to invest in analysis and dissemination, throughout the supply chain, of knowledge and understanding of economic aspects of the fisheries and aquaculture market, for which reason funding has to be guaranteed, under the market intelligence budget line, for commitment appropriations needed to cover the envisaged payment estimates.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Emphasises the need to give priority to projects focused on job creation (specially through the Youth Employment Initiative),
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Emphasises the need to give priority to projects focused on job creation (specially through the Youth Employment Initiative), on diversifying local economies in order to add more value to their fishing activities – by, for example, promoting product labelling or fisheries tourism – and on the protection and recovery of fish stocks and maritime ecosystems.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Emphasises the need to give priority to projects focused on job creation (specially through the Youth Employment Initiative), on innovative projects and on diversifying local economies in order to add more value to their fishing activities and on the protection and recover of fish stocks and maritime ecosystems.
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Designates youth employment in this sector a political priority; stresses that it is the responsibility of Member States to do their utmost to make it easier for young people to take up the various occupations within fishing by making use of all tools made available to them, including the Structural Funds.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Reiterates that a large number of mixed fisheries will be affected by the landing obligation for discards as of 1 January 2017, and calls in this connection for a specific budget line to be dedicated to assistance in meeting this obligation in order to ring-fence and promote research and development into the selectivity of fishing gear.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Points out that all the operational programmes on fisheries have recently been adopted by the Members States, so in the financial year 2017 the Commission and the national administrations should speed up actions to ensure a timely implementation of the projects concerned; considers that the Union budget
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on DG MARE, under the sustainable fisheries partnership agreements (SFPAs), to monitor sectoral aid closely, using detailed charts, based on the information contained in the project files.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Points out that the European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) can only perform its role if provided with sufficient technical, economic and financial resources
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the objectives of the CFP can only be effectively reached if there is a sufficient budget; points out that the budget is concentrated in Section III and Title 11, ‘Maritime Affairs and Fisheries’; notes that the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) and the compulsory contributions to regional fisheries management organisations and sustainable fisheries agreements make up most of the budget.
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Points out that the European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) can only perform its role if provided with sufficient technical, economic and financial resources; calls on the Commission to ensure sufficient funding for the appropriations devoted to the EFCA in order to enable it to fulfil its new tasks attributed to it
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Points out that the European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) can only perform its role if provided with sufficient technical, economic and financial resources;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Points out that the European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) can only perform its role if provided with sufficient technical, economic, human and financial resources; calls on the Commission to ensure sufficient funding for the appropriations devoted to the EFCA in order to enable it to fulfil its new tasks attributed to it in the proposal on a European Border and Coast Guard package; recalls the need to exempt all posts of agencies dealing with the migration crisis from the 5 % staff reduction target.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Recommends an increase in the EFCA budget to enable it to carry out the new tasks required under the European Border and Coastguard project.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the need for the EU budget to reflect the stated policy objectives for employment, businesses and entrepreneurship; stresses that fisheries and maritime affairs are also areas where jobs are created and growth is generated and that they contribute actively to regional development and natural- resource management.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of the social
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of the social and economic dimension of fishing for local communities and some maritime and coastal regions that are particularly dependent on fishing; recognises the need to maintain enough financial previsions for enabling coastal, artisanal and small scale fleet sectors to obtain funding.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of the social and economic dimension of fishing for local communities and some maritime
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that there is a major economic, social and environmental dimension to fisheries and maritime affairs and that they play a vital role in the blue economy.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that the efforts sought from fishermen have already enabled many stocks to attain the maximum sustainable yield.
source: 587.446
2016/07/28
FEMM
29 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas according to a joint declaration by the Parliament, the Council and the Commission from November 2013, the annual budgetary procedures should integrate
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Reminds the Commission that according to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, protection of human life and its dignity is a shared European value; therefore insists that the EU budget should not be used to fund programs and activities that result in the destruction of human embryos;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls for the 'Budget for Results' agenda to be used as an opportunity for budget spending to deliver integrated benefits of gender equality with every euro spent;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that jobs, growth and investments remain the overarching priority of the 2017 EU budget; draws attention to the existing
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that jobs, growth and investments remain the overarching priority of the 2017 EU budget; draws attention to the existing gender-related targets in the Europe 2020 strategy, namely increasing female employment from only 63,5 % currently to 75 % and achieving equal pay between women and men, gender equality in the membership of national parliaments and an equal number of women on large company boards, all of which we are a long way from reaching;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that jobs, growth and investments remain the overarching priority of the 2017 EU budget; draws attention to the existing gender-related targets in the Europe 2020 strategy, namely increasing female employment to 75 % and achieving equal pay between women and men, gender equality in the membership of national parliaments and an equal number of women on large company boards, all of which we are a long way from reaching; therefore considers it important to sufficiently finance measures promoting and supporting good-quality education, entrepreneurship, employability and job creation for women and girls under the European Structural and Investment Funds;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that jobs, growth and investments remain the overarching priority of the 2017 EU budget; draws attention to the existing gender-related targets in the Europe 2020 strategy, namely increasing female employment to 75 % and achieving equal pay between women and men, gender equality in the membership of national parliaments and an equal number of women on large company boards, all of
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for resources to be allocated from Union funds to promote women´s rights and gender equality through education, health services, notably sexual and reproductive health and rights services, girls empowerment, and women's political representation;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for the 2017 budget to use EFSI and the ESF to finance good- quality, accessible and affordable care facilities in areas where there is a shortage to help reach the Barcelona targets and also contribute to the reconciliation of the work-life balance;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Highlights that gender segregation is a large contributor to the EU gender pay gap (16 %) and consequently the pension gap (40 %); therefore calls for more investment to be delivered for promoting girls and women in sectors where they are currently underrepresented such as science, technology, engineering, maths and entrepreneurship as a tool to close the pay gap, increase the economic independence of women and elevate their position in the labour market;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Notes that the rise in austerity following the financial crisis has led to cutbacks in public services and benefits in Member States; notes that those cuts fall heaviest on women as benefits often constitute an important source of their income and because they use public services more than men; highlights the increased insecurity due to more part-time and temporary contracts, more old women and single mothers in poverty and the fact that a lack of sufficient Union legislation in relation to maternity leave further compromised women's socio- economic situation; therefore calls for the 2017 budget to mobilise the ESF to protect women across all Member States by investing in work-life balance reconciliation in order to help more women into work and improve their socio- economic situation;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the Daphne programme played a fundamental role in combating violence against children, young people and women in the EU by funding awareness-raising campaigns and projects that reach out to those most at risk, and Parliament repeatedly asked to ensure that the Daphne programmes’ profile is kept as high as possible;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the 2017 budget tries to provide an effective European response to the migration challenge; stresses the need to assign funds for providing specific assistance to, and promoting in
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the 2017 budget tries to provide an effective European response to the migration challenge; stresses the need to assign funds for providing specific assistance to, and promoting inclusion and monitoring the situation of, female
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the 2017 budget tries to provide an effective European response to the migration challenge; stresses the need to assign funds for providing specific assistance to, and promoting inclusion and monitoring the situation of, female refugees and asylum seekers in the EU including skills training, flexible language training, education, health and good-quality childcare facilities to help women refugees intergrate into their host countries;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the 2017 budget tries to provide an effective European response to the migration challenge; stresses the need to assign funds for providing specific assistance to, and promoting inclusion and monitoring the situation of, female refugees and asylum seekers in the EU; believes that, in particular, tailored facilities should be put in place in order to create suitable areas for mothers and children, and special attention should be given to women and girls victims of violence, including FGM;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Deplores the failure of the austerity policies imposed on several Member States, and in particular its negative impact on women and gender equality; calls for EU investments and budgetary priorities to focus on counteracting these impacts, through investments in public care services, investments in education and health, as well as through a coherent use of gender budgeting;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Deplores the fact that the Daphne programme is no longer considered to be an expenditure area in its own right; welcomes the small increase in the planned allocations of the Daphne specific objective within the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme; recalls that the
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for increased measures aimed directly at disadvantaged groups of women, investing in high-quality public services and, specifically, guaranteeing adequate provision of high-quality services for childcare, elderly care and care of other dependent persons, and calls for genuine budgetary transparency in respect of the funds (ESF, PROGRESS, DAPHNE) allocated to gender equality policies;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for the adoption of strategies for more effective promotion of equality between men and women; highlights the need to earmark increased funding for the fight against all forms of violence and discrimination against women and girls;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Regrets the proposed cuts in humanitarian aid (HUMA) and development cooperation (DCI), as these are especially important for women and gender equality.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the 2008 economic recession saw a rise in austerity measures being applied across Member States in an attempt to stabilise the economy;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the mainstreaming of
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the mainstreaming of gender-equality as a cross-cutting policy objective of the EU budget in EU funds and programmes;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the mainstreaming of gender-equality as a cross-cutting policy objective of the EU budget in EU funds and programmes; urges, however, the consistent use of gender budgeting, including quantifiable budget allocations
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the mainstreaming of gender-equality as a cross-cutting policy objective of the EU budget in EU funds and programmes; urges, however, the
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the mainstreaming of gender-equality as a cross-cutting policy objective of the EU budget in EU funds and programmes; urges, however, the consistent use of gender budgeting, including quantifiable budget allocations and results indicators in order to rectify the imbalances between men and women; stresses the need to support young women who can face gender-specific obstacles to get good quality offers of employment, continued education, apprenticeships or traineeships; notes that more funds should be allocated for women and girls who would like to start up their own business and for entrepreneurship;
source: 587.425
2016/07/29
TRAN
76 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that transport infrastructures are fundamental to the freedom of movement of persons, goods and services on which the single market is based, and that this freedom of movement is both a powerful catalyst for EU integration, jobs and tourism and is a key factor in the performance of European trade and industry; takes the view that transport infrastructures should meet certain quality criteria, in order to ensure increased consumer safety and protection;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that Union transport policy, in particular with regard to the Tran-European transport Network, is one of the most
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that, in previous calls for proposals concerning the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), grants have been awarded primarily to projects in the central part of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T), thereby relegating outlying and isolated areas to the back of the queue; recalls, in this context, that trans-European network corridors should extend to all areas of the Union and calls on the Commission, in future CEF calls for proposals, to focus on projects that provide links with the core network corridors and thereby enhance connectivity throughout the network;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, given that the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI)
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) did not produce the expected results as regards transport infrastructures
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) did not produce the expected results as regards transport infrastructures; stresses therefore that cuts in the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) should not be further used to finance EFSI; strongly requests that the cuts in CEF to finance the EFSI programme are restored within the framework of the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework or are at least earmarked for transport infrastructure projects with European added value; takes the view that the allocation criteria for the EFSI should be redesigned so that countries with less developed administrative capacity can take advantage of this financing programme;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI)
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) did not produce
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the implementation of the European Fund for
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) did not produce the expected results as regards transport infrastructures; stresses therefore that cuts in the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) should not be further used to finance EFSI; strongly requests that the cuts in CEF to finance the EFSI programme are restored within the framework of the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework or are at least earmarked for transport infrastructure projects with European added value that will lead to an increase in connectivity;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that a number of projects that are genuinely European in scope and in line with EU transport policy, such as installing the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) in EU transport corridors and the Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) project, are unable to properly benefit from the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) owing to their complex legal structures, which often involve several Member States and various different organisations; considers that these are clear examples of projects on which the EFSI could be focusing, given their significant European added value and the greater risks and difficulties that they face when it comes to securing funding; calls on the Commission and the EFSI Advisory Hub to propose innovative ways to mobilise EFSI funding for such projects;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that cross-border transport infrastructures are fundamental to the freedom of movement of persons, goods and services on which the single market is based, and that this freedom of movement
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Stresses that partial recovery of funds redeployed from the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) to the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) should be one of the key priorities for the 2017 Budget; given the fact that almost no funds remain available for new projects in the remaining MFF years, draws attention to the importance of ensuring as soon as possible sufficient budget in order to immediately launch a call for proposals as CEF projects are long-term projects that run over several years;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Welcomes, in this context, the Commission’s proposal to include missing rail links in the 2016 calls for proposals; calls on the Commission to provide advisory support to the project promoters and competent authorities to ensure that they put forward high-quality proposals; considers that cross-border missing links with significant European added value in terms of jobs, tourism and sustainability which connect areas that were historically linked by rail should be funded through the Connecting Europe Facility and other ad hoc funding sources;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Regrets the significant decrease in budget for removing bottlenecks, rail interoperability and bridging missing links, sustainable and efficient transport systems, and integration and interconnection of transport modes and emphasises, in this context, the vital importance of a complete restoration of the budget for these areas;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Welcomes the overall success of CEF and asks the Commission to launch, as a matter of priority, a third call for proposals with the remaining budget for CEF in order to further plan the remaining commitments;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Points at the massive oversubscription of projects and at the high number of high-quality projects, which were rejected in 2014-2015 due to insufficient Union budget and notes that additional resources beyond the recovery of redeployed funds could be absorbed;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 e (new) 3e. Recalls that point 17 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline1a provides for 10% flexibility to increase CEF budget in annual budgetary procedures; calls on the Commission to increase, in line with the Interinstitutional Agreement, the total envelope of the CEF, including an increase in the cohesion envelope of the CEF; ________________ 1a Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management (OJ L 8, 14.1.2015, p. 18).
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points at t
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points at two key transport policy areas closely related to infrastructure development, i.e. the establishment of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and the promotion of Motorways of the Sea which aim at relieving land transport corridors and may constitute their "maritime leg"; stresses that it is of upmost importance for the sustainability of transport in the Union that goods and passenger traffics are shifted from road transport, which is severely affected by social dumping due to European directives, to rail and maritime means of transport; therefore underlines the vital importance of adequately funding the development of ERTMS and promoting Motorways of the Seas; underlines also the need to revitalise inland waterway transport in Europe;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points at two key transport policy areas closely related to infrastructure development, i.e. the establishment of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS), the reduction of noise for rail freight and the promotion of Motorways of the Sea which aim at relieving land transport corridors and may constitute their "maritime leg"; stresses that it is of upmost importance for the sustainability of transport in the Union that goods and passenger traffics are shifted from road to rail and maritime means of transport; therefore underlines the vital importance of adequately funding the development of ERTMS and promoting Motorways of the Seas; underlines also the need to revitalise sustainable inland waterway transport in Europe;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points at two key transport policy areas closely related to infrastructure development, i.e. the establishment of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and the promotion of Motorways
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that transport infrastructures are fundamental to the freedom of movement of persons, goods and services on which the single market is based, and that this freedom of movement is both a powerful catalyst for EU integration, jobs and tourism and is a key factor in the performance of European trade
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the conclusion of the technical pillar of the fourth railway package; underlines the greater role of the European Railway Agency in terms of certification and technical infrastructure development, which must therefore be adequately financed; believes that continuous efforts should also be put on research and innovation in the rail sector and calls on adequate funding for the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking, the re- establishing of regional cross-border links and maintenance of rail infrastructure;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the conclusion of the fourth railway package; underlines the greater role of the European Railway Agency in terms of certification and technical infrastructure development
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the first calls for proposals for the Shift2Rail joint initiative; calls on the governing body, and on the Commission in particular, to speed up the implementation of its work programme to make up for the time lost while setting up the initiative and, furthermore, to place particular emphasis on resolving core interoperability issues in the European rail network;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines that the revision of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 envisages broadening the scope of competence of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); stresses the importance of allocating adequate funding to the EASA to ensure the successful uptake of these new responsibilities;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that the optimisation of transport modes integration and interconnection and intermodal connections, along with the development of freight corridors, represent essential elements for shifting freight from road to rail and for improving the sustainability of rail;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the importance of the goals set by COP 21 with regard to transport in
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the importance of the goals set by COP 21 with regard to transport in order to combat climate change; underlines that financial means should be available to ensure a modal shift from road to rail and waterborne transport and encouraging Member States to invest in smart, sustainable, integrated public transport; recommends also paying attention to noise reduction in transport to provide citizens with an environment of high quality; furthermore insists to reduce external costs caused by transport and thereby decrease the burden on future public budgets;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses th
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the importance of the goals set by COP 21 with regard to transport in order to combat climate change; underlines that financial means should be available to ensure a modal shift from road to rail and waterborne transport and encouraging Member States to invest in smart, sustainable, accessible integrated public transport; recommends also paying attention to noise reduction in transport to provide citizens with an environment of high quality;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines that efficient logistics management in the Union c
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines that efficient green logistics management in the Union can greatly contribute to decongesting of traffic and a reducing CO2 emissions; encourages the Commission to promote digitalisation in logistics, such as cargo-pooling initiatives; draws attention to the fact that Motorways of the Seas are cornerstones in logistics and that ports and hinterland interconnections are main nodes for multi- modal transport schemes;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines that efficient logistics management across all transport modes in the Union can greatly contribute to decongesting of traffic and a reducing CO2 emissions; draws attention to the fact that Motorways of the Seas are cornerstones in logistics and that ports are main nodes for multi-modal transport schemes;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines that efficient logistics management in the Union can greatly contribute to decongesting of traffic and a reducing CO2 emissions; draws attention to the fact that Motorways of the Seas are cornerstones in logistics and that ports are
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the key role of digital technology in the development of efficient and sustainable transport; encourages the Commission to support innovation and the development of innovative solutions for all transport sectors to the benefit of all Union citizens and tourists; underlines that there is a need to balance the needs and expectations of consumers and the functioning of tourist and transport service providers based on new business models in a way which is favourable for both parties;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the key role of digital technology in the development of efficient and sustainable transport and mobility management; encourages the Commission to support innovation and the development of innovative solutions for all transport sectors, such as shared mobility in cities and rural areas interconnected with public transport, to the benefit of all Union citizens and tourists;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that Union transport policy, in particular with regard to the Tran-European transport Network, is one of the most successful Union policies; points out that the TEN-T network plays a fundamental role in commercial exchanges within the Union, contributing to the wealth of its citizens; recalls therefore the importance of financing missing and cross- border links of the TEN-T network and importance of linking the transport networks of all EU regions and solve such problems as the lack of appropriate infrastructure, accessibility and a low interoperability between the Central and Eastern, and Western parts of the EU;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the key role of digital technology in the development of efficient and sustainable transport; encourages the Commission to support innovation and the development of innovative solutions for all transport sectors to the benefit of all Union citizens and tourists and to enable SME access to all transport sectors ;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the key role of digital technology in the development of efficient
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the key role of digital technolog
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to support various possibilities of financing measures to achieve the accessibility of the transport services, vehicles, infrastructure and intermodal connecting hubs and other measures to improve accessibility for persons with disabilities;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Emphasises the importance of investing in regional airports as this will have a positive impact on a wide range of activities such as exports, business efficiency and productivity, inward investment, and therefore will boost EU market;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Encourages the Commission to support initiatives aiming at improving road safety and that can help to achieve the goal to reduce road deaths by half until 2020 and significantly reduce serious injuries;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Underlines once more that EASA has already cut 5 % of posts over five years as agreed in the Interinstitutional Agreement; considers, therefore, that any further cuts proposed by the Council could endanger the proper functioning of EASA and could prevent the Agency to fulfil the tasks already assigned and those that will be assigned by the legislative authority; underlines further that the new EASA posts that are needed to fulfil additional tasks due to new policy developments and new legislation need to be counted outside any reduction target;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Underlines that the EASA posts (including the related pensions) which are fully financed from industry and therefore have no impact on the Union budget should not be subject to any staff reduction including the lnterinstitutional Agreement;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Emphasises that it should be left to the discretion of EASA to increase the number of posts fully financed by industry during the financial year according to the fluctuating workload i.e. industry demands; underlines that, for this purpose, the budgetary authority should, in addition to the number of posts financed by fees and charges already authorised through the adoption of the EASA budget, indicate the additional percentage (within an upward ceiling of 10%) of posts that could be allowed by the Agency’s Management Board on a proposal of the Agency to respond to an unforeseen evolution of the market demand ; further underlines that the decision of the Management Board should be based on a documented evaluation of unforeseen workload and efficiency criteria;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that Union transport policy, in particular with regard to the Tran-European transport Network, is one of the most successful Union policies; points out that the TEN-T network must play
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 e (new) 8e. Underlines the importance to allocate sufficient funding for Galileo and EGNOS in 2017 in order to ensure the Commission's commitments regarding safety and efficiency in aviation, road, rail and maritime transport; reiterates the importance of providing swiftly uninterrupted GNSS services for smart roads and connected vehicles, smart fleet and cargo and traffic management such us ATM, ERTMS, eCall;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 f (new) 8f. Stresses the need for accurate funding for the implementation of the components of SESAR in order to ensure the deployment of ATM functionalities that are considered essential for the improvement of the Union's ATM system performance;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Recalls the political importance of addressing the refugee and migrant issue and the contribution the European Maritime Safety Agency can make; emphasises the importance of adequate funding to ensure optimal use of state-of- the-art technology, such as transport safety for refugees, migrants and rescuers, information sharing and staff training;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Recalls the
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Recalls the political importance of addressing the refugee and migrant issue
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Recalls the
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls for the introduction of a direct budgetary line for tourism in the Union budget for 2017, as it existed in the past, given the importance of this economic activity for SMEs and green jobs in Europe and the need to further improve its attractiveness and competitiveness in a worldwide competitive environment; calls on the Commission to ensure the availability in all EU languages of the Guide on EU funding 2014-2020 for the tourism sector; asks the Commission to present a yearly overview of the Tourism projects co-financed through the different EU funds;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that Union transport policy, in particular with regard to the Tran-European transport Network, is one of the most successful Union policies; points out that the TEN-T network plays a fundamental role in
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls for the introduction of a direct budgetary line for tourism in the Union budget for 2017, given the importance of this economic activity in Europe and the need to further improve its attractiveness and
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Requests that a comprehensive strategy for the tourism industry be drawn up which contains all the necessary aspects of an innovative and competitive tourist sector, such as: sector financing, professional development, accessibility, infrastructure, a visa regime, digitisation and promotion;
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Underlines the importance of rural, mountainous, island, coastal and remote areas in further development of sustainable tourism in Europe; believes that means should be put in the promotion of local cultures, biodiversity in those regions as well as in tourist locations not addressed by mass tourism; believes that specific schemes aimed at
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Underlines the importance of rural, mountainous costal and remote areas in further development of
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Requests that the neZEH pilot project be continued by setting up a budget line to provide further technical assistance and subsidies for renovation projects for hotels that are aiming to become Nearly Zero Energy Hotels; takes the view that this approach could help Europe remain a world leader in the tourism sector and could also contribute to transforming it into the most ecological destination in the world;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Considers that ensuring security of the transport means and infrastructures is of high priority and that adequate funding must be safeguarded to this purpose.
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Stresses the importance of promoting Europe as a tourist destination and of cross-border routes; takes the view that adequate financing for promoting tourist destinations will increase the number of visitors and, accordingly, tourism’s contribution to the Union’s GDP.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that Union transport policy, in particular with regard to the Tran-European transport Network, is one of the most successful Union policies; points out that the TEN-T network plays a fundamental role in commercial exchanges within the Union, contributing to the wealth of its citizens; recalls therefore the importance of
source: 587.501
2016/08/01
REGI
27 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges the Commission’s efforts in developing the strategy ‘EU budget focused on results’; calls on the Commission to further simplify EU funding, especially with regard to the implementation and management of EU- funded projects, always considering the need for a proper balance between simplification and control;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2a (new) 2a. Underlines the need to step up efforts to fulfil the target of spending at least 20 % of the EU budget on climate action; stresses the important contribution of cohesion policy spending to this end; emphasises, however, that the 20% target is not sufficient to accommodate the requirements to achieve the objectives deriving from the COP21 agreement;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern that heading 1b (economic, social and territorial cohesion) of the 2017 draft budget foresees a huge drop in payment appropriations (EUR 37.3 billion representing a 23,5 % reduction compared to 2016); at the same time commitments amount to EUR 53,6 billion, (a 5,4 % increase compared to 2016); is of the opinion that the payments proposed are not sufficient to cope with the level of payments needed under this heading; , therefore, this endangers the full implementation of the programmes and might undermine the citizens' trust in Union policies;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern that heading 1b (economic, social and territorial cohesion) of the 2017 draft budget foresees a huge drop in payment appropriations (EUR 37.3 billion representing a 23,5 % reduction compared to 2016); at the same time commitments amount to EUR 53,6 billion, (a 5,4 % increase compared to 2016); is of the opinion that the payments proposed are not sufficient to cope with the level of payments needed under this heading; recalls in this context that 456 national and regional programs and 79 Interregional cooperation programs under the ESI Funds are expected to deliver a critical mass of investments in key growth areas, which will positively impact the EU’s economy;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Takes note of the Commission Press Release on the 2017 draft EU budget, issued on 30 June and stating that, based on the relatively slow take-up of certain spending programmes, especially in the area of cohesion policy, the Commission expects to receive fewer invoices in 2017 than in 2016; asks the Commission to provide the Parliament with more details on this issue and to consider the risk that this decrease in payments would create again a n important backlog of payments from 2017 onwards;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Underlines that the funds under heading 1b represent the main resource available to local authorities in order to deal with the management of the migratory crisis; therefore reiterates the need to provide a sufficient level of payment appropriations;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Draws attention to this increasing gap under heading 1b of the 2017 draft budget between commitments and payments appropriations: from EUR 2 billion in 2016 to EUR 16,3 billion in 2017; highlights that, as the implementation rate of the European Structural and Investment Funds is expected to increase in 2017, sufficient budgetary resources are needed to match that increase; raises awareness that the late start of the implementation of cohesion policy programmes in the current MFF and the lack of administrative capacity of beneficiaries to accelerate the implementation of programmes could delay the payments in 2017; is seriously concerned that this situation will negatively influence the backlog of payments, notably through the possible accumulation of unpaid invoices over the second half of the multiannual financial framework;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4a (new) 4a. Is convinced that decommitments across all headings, in particular heading 1b, resulting from total or partial non- implementation of the actions for which they were earmarked, should be made available again in the EU budget and be mobilised by the budgetary framework of the annual budgetary procedures; calls on the Commission to make proposals to that in the framework of the 2017 budget;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to update and adapt its payment plan, which has been established to reduce and prevent the reoccurrence of the payment backlog, taking also into account the increased payment needs deriving from the technical adjustment according to Article 7 of Council Regulation No 1311/2013, and to present it to the Parliament;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4a (new) 4a. Stresses that, in the context of new increasing challenges, the Commission should work with Member States in a more effective way at their request for programmes’ modifications in order to ensure better coordination among the ESI Funds to address the unexpected challenges;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4b (new) 4b. Urges the Commission and Member States to carry out on-going evaluations of the operational programmes in implementation and in case of non-efficiency, the latter to be modified as to be directed to more effective and efficient management of the ESI Funds with view to achieve the envisaged objectives;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges the Commission’s efforts in developing the strategy ‘EU budget focused on results’; calls on the Commission to further simplify EU funding, especially with regard to the implementation and management of EU- funded projects particularly at regional and local level;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that according to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that according to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014- 2020, the Commission has reviewed, in 2016, together with the annual technical adjustment for 2017, all Member States’ total allocations under the “Investment for growth and jobs” goal of cohesion policy for the years 2017 to 2020; notes the effect of the adjustment is a EUR 4,6 billion increase in the 2017-2020 ceilings for
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Is of the opinion that decommitments - in particular underheading 1b - but also across all headings, resulting from justified total or partial non-implementation, should be re- injected into the annual budgetary procedure; calls on the Commission to make proposals to this regard already concerning the 2017 budget;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Recalls the key role played by the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in mobilising private sector financing and new sources of finance in investments with strengthened additionality crucial for Europe’s competitiveness and economic recovery; welcomes the Commission allocation for EFSI for 2017 which should not jeopardise other funding programmes, inter alia Horizon2020 and Connecting Europe Facilities;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Suggests that the additional resources following the technical adjustment should in particular be allocated to areas with high European added-value, such as youth employment, integration of refugees and migrants and sustainable investment;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Underlines that the decommitted amounts to heading 1b title being reintegrated into EU budget but bound to the same heading;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5b (new) 5b. Takes note of the Commission’s proposal on the establishment of the Structural Reform Support Programme with a financial envelope of EUR 142 800 000 and underlines that this funding should be allocated with a view to strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5b (new) 5b. Stresses the important contribution of cohesion policy with regard to the effective implementation of gender budgeting; calls on the Commission to support measures to establish appropriate tools in order to achieve gender equality, such as incentive structures using the Structural Funds to encourage gender budgeting at the national level;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges the Commission’s efforts in developing the strategy ‘EU budget focused on results’; calls on the Commission to further simplify EU funding, especially with regard to the implementation and management of EU- funded projects, taking into account the principle of proportionality;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges the Commission’s efforts in developing the strategy ‘EU budget focused on results’; calls on the Commission to further simplify EU funding, especially with regard to the implementation and management of EU- funded projects; in that respect stresses the need for the Commission to implement a streamlined approach to the entire life- cycle of EU-funded projects with a strong focus on timely payments, measurable results and updated indicators;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Calls for the 2017 draft budget to reflect and support the priorities outlined in the European Semester, specifically relaunching investments for innovation, growth and job creation, fostering convergence, pursuing sustainable and socially balanced structural reforms to modernise European economies making them more competitive, conducting fiscal policies which would ensure investments and sustainable growth;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that around one third of the annual EU budget is targeted at economic, social and territorial cohesion; underlines that cohesion policy is the Union’s main investment policy and a tool for reducing disparities between all EU regions, and that it plays an important role in
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that around one third of the annual EU budget is targeted at economic, social and territorial cohesion; underlines that cohesion policy is the Union’s main investment policy and a tool for reducing disparities between all EU regions, and that it plays an important role in the delivery of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; points out that better consistency, synergy and complementarities must be ensured between ESI Funds, the EFSI and the other Union-funded and national programmes in order to attain the Europe 2020 strategy goals and boost investments;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that around one third of the annual EU budget is targeted at economic, social and territorial cohesion; underlines that cohesion policy is the Union’s main investment policy and a tool for reducing disparities between all EU regions, and that it plays an important role in the delivery of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; in this framework calls on the Commission to take into consideration the uneven impact that the refugee crisis has had at local and regional level and asks for flexibility in order to limit its effect on disparities within the Union;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that around one third of the annual EU budget is targeted at economic, social and territorial cohesion; underlines that cohesion policy is the Union’s main investment policy and a tool for reducing disparities between all EU regions, and that it plays an important role in the delivery of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; notes with concern the poor visibility of ESI Funds and stresses on the Commission to draft a framework to increase the attractiveness of cohesion policy investments;
source: 587.420
2016/08/04
CULT
22 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the delay in the presentation of the draft budget for 2017 by the Commission significantly disrupts the work of the Parliament; is of the opinion that such delays should be avoided in the future; asks the Commission to respect a specific work schedule each year in order to enable a framework of clear and ambitious work for the Parliament; recalls the importance of good communication and timeliness between institutions to promote optimal governance of our actions and our debates;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 f (new) 2f. Highlights that 2017 will mark the th 30 anniversary of the Erasmus programme; calls, therefore, for the allocation of adequate resources to use this moment of celebration to further promote the benefits of the programme for Europe and its citizens; calls, furthermore, for a large involvement of stakeholders, including youth organisations and other education providers, to reach out to a broad European audience;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that the Commission has made no provision for a margin for further reinforcements under which pilot projects and preparatory actions could be financed under heading 3; notes that there is a margin under heading 1a which is an improvement compared to last year´s proposal; stresses the importance of pilot projects and preparatory actions as tools for the formulation of political priorities and the introduction of new innovative initiatives that might turn into standing Union activities, though taking into account the principle of subsidiarity and in particular making sure that pilot projects are not going in contradiction with national policies of the Member States;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls therefore the importance for the EU to give priority to supporting these programs for small and medium enterprises, especially in the sectors of media, art and film which have priority financial needs, particularly through a reduction of payment times for these companies;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights that an effective EU
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Expresses its concern regarding the accumulation of payment arrears by the Commission including approximately 200 million euros only for the Erasmus Program;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines, in the context of the evolving migration and refugee crisis, as well as terrorist threats, the role of cultural diplomacy; welcomes the Comm
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines, in the context of the evolving migration and refugee crisis, as well as terrorist threats, the role of cultural diplomacy
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the necessary budgetary guarantees for the preparatory activities of the implementation of the 2018 European Year of Cultural Heritage must be foreseen
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Highlights the importance of statistical research and access to comparable data resources allowing for the effective monitoring and analysis of the cultural, economic and societal impact of policies in the field of culture and education; in this respect, recalls the necessity of allocating sufficient resources for that purpose;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Underlines that culture and the promotion of Cultural Heritage should not be considered a tool of economic adjustment but as the heart of European peoples´ identities ; encourages therefore the Commission to work closely with the Member States to promote every aspect of our historical wealth such as monuments, museums and cultural building, so all Member States citizens can have access to their roots;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Insists on the importance of cultural and linguistic diversity among the European Union through the different Member States and asks therefore the Commission to ensure, also financially, its preservation and promotion;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the proposed increases in the draft budget for 2017 for the Erasmus+, Creative Europe and Europe for Citizens programmes; highlights that investment in those policy areas contributes to the Europe 2020 strategy's aim of promoting smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth, and
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the signing of the agreement setting off the Financial Guarantee Facility of Creative Europe, one of the key means to improve access to loan financing for SMEs and organisations working in the cultural and creative sector, and one of the key means for guaranteeing the necessary fair remuneration of creators; welcomes the initiative of the integrated training scheme of the Guarantee Facility proposed to bankers and financial intermediaries; strongly recommends all necessary measures to be put in place in the course of 2016, so that the Guarantee Facility may reach cruising speed as soon as possible;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Highlights that the EU programmes in the field of culture, education, youth and citizenship present additionalities and synergies with integration policies for migrants and refugees; invites, therefore, EU the institutions to respond with appropriate increases in the funding of directly managed programmes - such as Creative Europe - as well as for the Structural and Investment Funds, and dedicated budget lines;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Reiterates its belief that the Youth chapter of Erasmus+ is an emblematic learning mobility programme, equipping young people with the skills and competences needed to face new challenges; stresses that this chapter must receive 10% of the overall programme budget as indicated in the basic act;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Notes, in the context of new societal challenges for Europe, the need to strengthen a European approach to face common European challenges by supporting large scale innovation projects in the field of education, training and youth carried out by the European Civil Society networks; points out that this could be best done by allocating 5% of overall KA2 “Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of good practices” of Erasmus+ funding to centralised actions;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. Regrets that no additional commitment appropriations for the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) are included in the 2017 draft budget; calls upon the Member States and the Commission to ensure the continuation of the scheme in 2017;
source: 587.507
2016/08/12
AFCO
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes the Commission’s proposed increase in appropriations for Heading 3 of 5,4 % in commitment appropriations and 25,1 % in payment appropriations as compared to the 2016 budget;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes in particular the proposed increase of 4,3 % in commitment appropriations and 10,7 % in payment appropriations for the ‘Europe for Citizens’ programme, as compared to the 2016 budget, as this programme helps to foster civic and democratic participation a
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the importance of further developing tools to enhance e- government, e-governance, e-voting and e-participation and promote digital citizenship a
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines the urgent need to provide the Joint Transparency Register Secretariat with sufficient and adequate administrative and financial means in order to fulfil its tasks, as it plays a key role in ensuring fair and transparent activities of interest representatives; expects therefore an increase of its resources in the coming years, notably following the adoption of the new Inter- institutional agreement on the Transparency register;
source: 587.465
2016/08/16
DEVE
34 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the ambitious Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, to which the Union and Member States signed up in September 2015, requires development assistance from the EU budget to be kept at least at the level foreseen in the MFF, while maintaining its focus on long-term efforts to eradicate poverty, a
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Insists that priorities and funding must reflect the transcontinental nature of gender-based violence and development issues; funding for projects must therefore invest in the coherent engagement of the EU to work across continents, for the commitment in the SWD on Gender Equality to be turned into actions;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the alarming gravity of the humanitarian needs triggered by the Syrian crisis and other unprecedented
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the alarming gravity of the humanitarian needs triggered by the Syrian crisis and other unprecedented conflicts necessitates using the Emergency Aid Reserve (over and above the MFF ceilings) and the Flexibility Instrument to the fullest extent possible, while also using the margin under heading IV to address the humanitarian crisis; is concerned that the new funding mechanisms affecting development funds have an uncertain goal and regrets the lack of involvement by the European Parliament; recalls that it is strongly against the use of development funds for non-development objectives;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the alarming gravity of the humanitarian needs triggered by the Syrian crisis and other unprecedented conflicts necessitates using the Emergency Aid Reserve (over and above the MFF ceilings) and the Flexibility Instrument to the fullest extent possible, while also using the margin under heading IV to address the humanitarian crisis; calls on the EU to strengthen its capacity to link security and development in the implementation of the EU´s development policy;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the alarming gravity of the humanitarian needs triggered by the Syrian crisis and other unprecedented conflicts necessitates using the Emergency Aid Reserve (over and above the MFF ceilings) and the Flexibility Instrument to the fullest extent possible, while also using the margin under heading IV to address the humanitarian crisis; insists, furthermore, on the need to ensure proper funding for humanitarian aid budget lines;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Takes the view that action to establish special funds must provide a flexible response to emergencies plus genuine added value, supplementing existing sources of funding, and that those funds must accordingly be endowed with new money; urges the Member States to honour their pledges and pay over the amounts announced;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses the need to address the security-development nexus and deliver on Goal 16 of the 2030 Development Agenda; recalls, nevertheless, that funding which is not DAC-able must stem from other instruments than the Development Cooperation Instrument or the European Development Fund;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Regrets the cuts to the DCI human development line in comparison to the 2016 budget in order to finance EU policy priorities; considers this as contrary to fundamental development effectiveness principles and therefore requests the restoration of budget 2016 levels;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers it of paramount importance to address protracted humanitarian crises, and to focus on prevention and cooperation with the
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers it of paramount importance to address protracted humanitarian crises, and to focus on prevention and cooperation with
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the ambitious Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals,, in particular Goal 3 on health, Goal 4 on education and Goal 5 on gender equality, to which the Union and Member States signed up in September 2015, requires development assistance from the EU budget to be kept at least at the level foreseen in the MFF, while maintaining its focus on long-term efforts to eradicate poverty, as stipulated by Article 208 TFEU;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers it of paramount importance to address protracted humanitarian crises, including those in EU Member States such as Greece, and to focus on prevention and cooperation with the private sector, in order to help bridge the global funding gap in humanitarian action;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers it of paramount importance to address protracted humanitarian crises, and to focus on prevention, building resilience, and cooperation with the private sector, in order to help bridge the global funding gap in humanitarian action;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Commission
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to increase support for local private sector development in partner countries and calls for the respective budgetary allocations to be introduced as early as possible in next year’s budget, although not at the expense of support to other development actors, such as civil society organisations; highlights the importance of encouraging a climate where private initiative can flourish in line with the UN guiding principles on business and human rights, through legislative capacity building and a strong rule of law, sound banking systems and regulations, functioning tax systems, increased transparency and accountability;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to increase support for local public and private sector development in partner countries and calls for the respective budgetary allocations to be introduced as early as possible in next year’s budget; highlights the importance of encouraging a climate where public and private initiative can flourish, through
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Insists that the development budget for 2017 must reflect more consistently the Union
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Insists that the development budget for 2017 must reflect more consistently the Union’s focus on fragile states, Least Developed Countries,
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Insists that the development budget for 2017 must reflect more consistently the Union’s focus on fragile states, Least Developed Countries, youth unemployment and women facing gender- based violence, harmful practices and those in conflict situations;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Insists that the development budget for 2017 must reflect more consistently the Union’s focus on fragile states, Least Developed Countries, security- development nexus, youth unemployment and women in conflict situations;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Insists that the development budget for 2017 must reflect more consistently the
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Urges the Commission and Member States to ensure that funding mechanisms and budgetary lines reflect all Agenda 2030 commitments agreed to; calls on the EU and its Member States to re-commit without delay to the 0.7% of GNI target for ODA and to submit a timeline on how to gradually increase ODA in order to reach the 0.7% target by 2030;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is deeply concerned about the insufficient level of appropriations for the development cooperation instrument lines for Asia and the Middle East, in particular taking into account the external and internal stress and instability that countries such as Bangladesh, Pakistan, Ira
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Urges the Commission and Member States to support developing countries in setting up robust and resilient quality public social security and public health systems; calls on the Commission to continue promoting better access to medicines in poor countries; reiterates the need to invest in neglected diseases; calls, in this context, on the Commission for a follow-up of the Ebola virus disease;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls for the Commission to ensure that the financing of adaptation to impacts of climate change and of other climate actions in vulnerable third countries are additional to financing of actions through development cooperation instruments; this climate financing shall count towards the fulfilment of the Union's climate financing commitments, but be additional to, and not count as, financing for development;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Stresses that the EU financial rules only allow faith-based organizations (FBO) to apply for funding if they register as an NGO; underlines that although funding should not be given for religious activities, the role of churches and FBOs in mitigating poverty and promoting development is undeniable among the most vulnerable sectors including the displaced, the poor, the sick, the handicapped, children, women and the elderly; stresses in this context that churches and FBOs are often the only reliable institutions that people trust as they have necessary infrastructure to provide aid and support for the people; calls for inclusion of the churches and FBOs in the EU financial regulations allowing them to apply for funding within the EU development policy and humanitarian aid.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for the Commission to fully reflect in its Budget proposals the Union
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for the Commission to fully reflect in its Budget proposals the Union’s commitment to working with the private sector and financial institutions in development cooperation; highlights therefore the possible potential to leverage new resources for development through public-
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for the Commission to fully reflect in its Budget proposals the Union’s commitment to working with the private sector and financial institutions in development cooperation; highlights therefore the potential to leverage new resources for development through public- private partnerships, blending and other innovative ways; looks forward to the detailed proposals on the setting up of an
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for the Commission to fully reflect in its Budget proposals the Union’s commitment to working with the private sector and financial institutions in development cooperation; highlights therefore the potential to leverage new resources for development through public- private partnerships, blending and other innovative ways; looks forward to the detailed proposals on the setting up of an investment plan for Africa, which should focus on capacity building
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for investments in projects that enhance tailored training for professionals on issues of gender-based violence and harmful practices, as well as projects promoting community engagement, in light of the fact that 2017 will be the European Year of Combating Violence Against Women;
source: 587.625
2016/08/25
LIBE
66 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the commitments of the EC to
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Reiterates its belief that EU funding for reception and integration of migrants and asylum seekers should be substantially increased, as opposed to the priority which is given today to border control and other costly security measures, such as administrative detention, which have not shown their effectiveness and often contravene the rights of migrants; calls on the Commission to primarily allocate additional resources for earmarked specific actions to Member States that volunteer for actions geared towards reception and integration of migrants and asylum seekers, as proposed in the LIBE opinion for the 2016 Budget1a; _________________ 1a §1 of EP budget opinion 2016
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for an upward revision of the
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for a revision of the MFF to deliver
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for a revision of the MFF to deliver a more powerful and sustainable response to the current crisis
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Believes the positive impact of the EU migration funds relies on processes at national and EU level to ensure transparency, effective monitoring and accountability. It is hence imperative to introduce monitoring and evaluation mechanisms in itinere and not only ex post which secure effective expenditure and assess whether the EU is attaining its policy objectives. Calls therefore on the Commission to ensure that result indicators and measurable targets based on the activities undertaken are defined at policy and project levels. Qualitative and quantitative indicators shall be established, be stable overtime and be comparable in order to measure the EU funds' impact and the achievement of their objectives. Quantified data should be systematically collected. Believes the European Court of Auditors should be monitoring throughout the project cycle and not only at the very end
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines that the existing efforts of the EU to deal with the refugee and migration flows should adapt adequately to the specific needs and vulnerabilities faced by the increased number of displaced women and girls, calls for earmarked humanitarian funds to assure a multisectoral approach, including adequate implementation of the minimum standards for life-saving sexual and reproductive health services, the prevention and response to sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) and training of social workers and medical staff across the European refugee route in both Headings III and IV;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Expects migratory flows to continue, due to political instability and conflicts in many regions; welcomes the Commission's Communication on establishing a New Partnership Framework with third countries under the European Agenda on Migration; calls for a rapid implementation of the proposals, in order to tackle the root causes of migration in full respect of the values on which the Union is based;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Recalls that the fair and transparent distribution of funding between the different objectives of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund was a priority for Parliament during negotiations leading to the adoption of that fund; calls on the Commission accordingly to increase the number of budget lines under the Asylum Migration and Integration Fund to facilitate a better readability and transparency of how the financial resources allocated to the different objectives and thus to those budgetary lines will be spent; calls, in particular, on the Commission to separate expenditure on enhancing fair return strategies from expenditure on legal migration and promoting the effective integration of third-country nationals in all future draft budgets as proposed in the LIBE opinion for the 2015 Budget 1a _________________ 1a §12 of EP budget opinion 2015
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2 c. Believes responsible authorities should ensure more transparency throughout the application process. The calls for proposals should be widely disseminated and easily accessible. At Member State level, local and regional technical bodies could play an active role in this dissemination as well as provide support in the application process. Each year, the following information should be publicized by the Commission as regards the selected projects and programmes: names and nature of all projects supported (avoiding generic titles that do not reflect the actual content like "capacity-building"), the year of funding, the duration of the project, the amount of EU contribution, the policy priority it addresses, the overall number of applicants for the call, the evaluation criteria and the remaining amount of the EU contribution that has not been allocated.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the use of the flexibility instrument and the contingency margin under Heading 3 for an amount of EUR 1.7 billion but notes that further flexibility is no longer possible in 2017;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the use of the flexibility instrument and the contingency margin under Heading 3 for an amount of EUR 1.7 billion but
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new) Welcomes the establishment of a Victims of Terrorism Response Co-ordination Centre (EURO 2 million) which should overcome barriers such as poor knowledge and weak skills development by bringing together key operational experts, victim advocates and organisation from around Europe to identify key priorities and issues for victims of terrorism and deliver a coordinated support for victims of terrorism across borders in order to have a proper victim oriented approach in emergency responses infrastructures;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Is concerned that the establishment of financial instruments outside the EU budget could threaten its unicity and circumvent the budgetary procedure, that requires the involvement and scrutiny of the European Parliament;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes funding of AMIF (EUR 1.6 billion) and ISF (EUR 0.7 billion); considers that, as regards AMIF, priority should be given to projects supporting asylum seekers and integration of refugees; acknowledges the positive contribution of regional and local authorities as well as civil society organizations in that regard, and asks for the EU and the Member states to support their actions; supports the total funding (EUR 3 billion) for setting up the European Border and Coast Guard agency, the new Entry-Exit System, the new Common European Asylum System, the establishment of an EU Agency for Asylum and for creating the instrument providing fast and efficient emergency humanitarian assistance within the EU;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes funding of AMIF (EUR 1.6 billion) and ISF (EUR 0.7 billion); supports the total funding (EUR 3 billion) for setting up the European Border and Coast Guard agency, the new Entry-Exit System, the new Common European Asylum System and for creating the instrument providing fast and efficient emergency humanitarian assistance within the EU; underlines the difficult condition of the unaccompanied minors in refugee camps, subject to potential abuse and trafficking, and calls for the creation of proper tools, using these emergency funds, in order to rapidly improve the current situation;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes funding of AMIF (EUR 1.6 billion) and ISF (EUR 0.7 billion)
Amendment 28 #
4. Welcomes funding of AMIF (EUR 1.6 billion) and ISF (EUR 0.7 billion); considers that this increase adds to the need to ensure a fair and transparent distribution of annual funding between the different programs and objectives of the funds; supports the total funding (EUR 3 billion) for setting up the European Border and Coast Guard agency, the new Entry-Exit System, the new Common European Asylum System and for creating the instrument providing fast and efficient emergency humanitarian assistance within the EU;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the commitments of the EC to provide the necessary resources to protect the external borders of the EU, to reinforce security inside and outside the Union, to provide MS support for the reception of people in need for international protection and to address the root causes of migration flows in the countries of origin and transit; points out however that the EUR 5.2 billion programmed in 2017 for Heading III and IV to address challenges posed by the refugee and migration crisis and unprecedented threat levels posed to the security of European citizens by terrorism, cybercrime and other serious organized crime of increasingly complex and cross-border nature represent less than 3,5% of the total Union budget, which is little considering existential stakes involved for the EU; considers that the Union should show solidarity with those in
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes funding of AMIF (EUR 1.6 billion) and ISF (EUR 0.7 billion); supports the total funding
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 32 #
Frontex should provide its Fundamental Rights Officer with adequate resources and staff for setting up the complaint mechanism and for further developing and implementing the Agency' strategy to monitor and ensure the protection of fundamental rights.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses that while the budgetary resources and the number of posts for the European Border and Coast Guard seem adequate for now, the future needs of the agency in terms of operational resources and staff will have to be closely monitored so that the agency does not lack behind reality; suggests, that the grades of temporary posts shall be increased to meet the complex nature of the new tasks assigned to the agency by the revised regulation;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Believes that further resources should be allocated to training at EU level in the framework of police and judicial cooperation, in particular as regards the activities of the European Border and Coast Guard agency, as well as the procedures to identify and deal with victims, notably of human trafficking and gender-based violence;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Acknowledges that the budgetary resources and staff of EASO proposed by the Commission are meeting the Agency's needs. Stresses the importance, that these figures must not be decreased and that there should be a revision of these figures if a situation of an increased inflow of migrants emerges again;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Supports the budget increase of the efficient JHA agencies, particularly those involved with migration and security; welcomes the Europol European Cybercrime Centre (EC3) fight against online child sexual exploitation and points out the need for more human resources in this field; underlines the need for proper funding adjustments in order to support Eurojust facing the massively increasing workload in areas such as fight against terrorism, cybercrime, illegal immigrant smuggling and other forms of serious cross-border crime; requests to further justify the dramatic 92%, EUR 73 million increase of the budget of EU-LISA for the
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Supports the budget increase of the
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Supports the budget increase of the efficient JHA agencies involved with migration and security; highlights that the relevant agencies must be sufficiently resourced and staffed when their mandates are increased; requests to further justify the dramatic 92%, EUR 73 million increase of the budget of EU-LISA for the Entry Exit System and the revision of Dublin legislation as well as to explain break-down of appropriations between EU- LISA budget and the ISF;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the commitments of the EC to provide the necessary resources to protect the external borders of the EU, to reinforce security inside and outside the Union, to provide MS support for the reception of people in need for international protection and to address the root causes of migration flows in the countries of origin and transit; points out however that the EUR 5.2 billion programmed in 2017 for Heading III and IV to address challenges posed by the refugee and migration crisis represent less than 3,5% of the total Union budget, which is little considering existential stakes involved for the EU; considers that the Union
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Supports the budget increase of the efficient JHA agencies involved with migration and security; requests to further justify the dramatic 92%, EUR 73 million increase of the budget of EU-LISA for the Entry Exit System, the revision of Eurodac regulation, the interoperability of Information Systems and the revision of Dublin legislation as well as to explain break-down of appropriations between EU- LISA budget and the ISF;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Supports the budget increase of the efficient JHA agencies involved with migration and security;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Supports the budget increase of the efficient JHA agencies involved with migration and security especially EUROPOL, EUROJUST; requests to further justify the dramatic 92%, EUR 73 million increase of the budget of EU-LISA for the Entry Exit System and the revision of Dublin legislation as well as to explain break-down of appropriations between EU- LISA budget and the ISF;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Stresses that a coordinated approach between the Member States to fight organised crime, cybercrime, terrorism and other serious crime with cross-border dimension is more important than ever and urges for an increase of Europol and Eurojust operational resources and staff; underlines especially Europol's need for sufficient human and operational resources; In this context is very concerned about the vulnerability of unaccompanied minors and young women during the migration crisis who can easily become victims of criminals; additional posts are needed to improve among others the identification of victims, to intensify the persecution of criminals, to destroy the organized networks of sexual abusers and to accelerate the detection, analysis and removal of child abuse material on- and offline; also stresses the urgency to combat terrorists misusing the migration flow for terrorist purposes and to combat organised crime networks misusing the hardship of migrants for their criminal intents;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Questions the existence of the budget line "establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register data on the entry, exit and refusal of entry of third country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States of the European Union" even though the "Smart Borders" package has yet to be adopted by the co-legislators; underlines that no specific funding has been allocated to that budget line since its creation; calls on the Commission to establish budget lines for such actions only after the co-legislators have approved those actions through the appropriate legislative act, as proposed in the LIBE opinion for the 2015 Budget 1a; _________________ 1a §10 of EP budget opinion 2015
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Welcomes the additional resources dedicated for the development of the European database on New Drugs of European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Calls on the Commission to ensure in the budgetary planning that EMCDDA is provided with sufficient resources required for the implementation of the envisaged legislative amendment of the EMCDDA founding regulation concerning the Early Warning System and the Risk Assessment of New Psychoactive Substances.
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. stresses that Europol must be given appropriate resources, including for investment in new technologies, taking into account its new center of counterterrorism and the Internet referral unit to effectively combat serious cross border crimes, such as terrorism and child sexual abuse online;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the EU Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) is provided with sufficient resources to be able to execute the additional tasks delegated to it by the EU legislation, particularly by the Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive and for the tasks related to preventing and fighting cybercrime;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. believes that priority should be given to address the specific needs of unaccompanied minors, as they are particularly vulnerable and require special care;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the commitments of the EC to provide the necessary resources to protect the external borders of the EU, to reinforce security inside and outside the Union, to provide MS support for the reception and integration of people in need for international protection and to address the root causes of migration flows in the countries of origin and transit; points out however that the EUR 5.2 billion programmed in 2017 for Heading III and IV to address
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the increase of the budget lines "Ensuring the protection of rights and empowering citizens" and "Promoting non-discrimination and equality", as part of the 'Rights, Equality and Citizenship' programme; believes the Agency for fundamental rights can play a key role in achieving these objectives and calls for the strengthening of this agency; expects the Commission to issue new calls for proposals, in particular to ensure the highest level of protection of fundamental rights in the digital environment
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the increase of the budget line "Ensuring the protection of rights and empowering citizens" and
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the increase of the budget line "Ensuring the protection of rights and empowering citizens" and the "Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme" and expects the Commission to issue new calls for proposals, in particular to ensure the highest level of protection of fundamental rights, including in the digital environment.
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the increase of the budget line "Ensuring the protection of rights and empowering citizens" and "Promoting non-discrimination and equality"; expects the Commission to issue new calls
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Believes that there is no direct link between migration and terrorism in Europe; asks for new funding to fight against the radicalisation of young people within the EU; considers that this can be achieved by promoting integration and fighting against discrimination, racism and xenophobia; calls for specific funding to be allocated to tackle growing homo- transphobia in Member States; calls to support projects aiming at the empowerment of women and girls in the most concerned communities.
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Reiterates its call for specific funding to be allocated to tackle growing antisemitism, islamophobia, afrophobia and antiromism in Member States; calls in particular for the Union to support projects aiming at the empowerment of women and girls from the communities concerned, as proposed in the LIBE opinion for the 2016 Budget 1a. _________________ 1a §12 of EP budget opinion 2016
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Emphasises the need to increase the EU budget for gender equality policies and the fight against gender-based violence; requests the Commission clarification on the decrease of appropriations allocated to the European Institute for Gender Equality;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls for strengthening EMCDDA in the connection with the planned adoption of the regulation on new psychoactive substances with additional tasks for the agency.
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. considers important to strengthen the funds for child helplines in order to prevent and protect missing children
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the commitments of the EC to provide the necessary resources to protect the external borders of the EU, to reinforce security inside and outside the Union, to provide MS support for the reception of people in need for international protection and to address the root causes of migration flows in the countries of origin and transit; points out however that the EUR 5.2 billion programmed in 2017 for Heading III and IV to address challenges posed by the refugee and migration crisis represent less than 3,5% of the total Union budget, which is little considering existential stakes involved for the EU; considers that the Union should show solidarity with those in real need and the preservation of the European democratic values
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Believes that a coherent European response to search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean must be independent from border management and control missions, and designed as a stand-alone mission; Reiterates its call for a more long-term approach to search and rescue operations, necessary also through a new budget line for an EU Search and Rescue Fund as proposed in the LIBE opinion for the 2016 Budget 1a _________________ 1a §4 and §8 of EP budget opinion 2016
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Stresses the importance of the 'Justice programme' in order to further develop the European area of justice and to improve the application of mutual recognition; calls on the Union to support training and awareness rising activities aiming at facilitating access to justice for all Europeans, as well as promoting and supporting the rights of victims, in particular victims of human trafficking and gender-based violence;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6 c. Calls for EU development funds and humanitarian aid not be linked to partner countries' capacity and/or willingness to collaborate in migration control e.g. through readmission clauses
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6 d. Insists that projects that run against fundamental rights of migrants and give legitimacy to dictatorial regimes should not be supported.
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 f (new) 6 f. Believes that civil society, including Non-Governmental Organisations, plays a significant role in safeguarding, promoting and implementing migrants' rights. Hence, such NGOs should be supported in playing their role as watchdogs and promoters of fundamental rights as direct service providers and innovators in developing new tools and building capacities of various stakeholders. Therefore, effective partnership principles for civil society organisations should be established, securing their involvement in preparation, planning, monitoring, implementation and evaluation of funding at both national and EU levels. Such principles should be mandatory.
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 g (new) 6 g. Believes funds used for the reception and integration of migrants and asylum seekers should be exempt from EU deficit rules as provided for in the EU Stability and Growth Pact
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the commitments of the EC to provide the necessary resources to
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the commitments of the EC to provide the necessary resources to
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
source: 587.660
2016/09/06
CONT
28 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the main objective of the 2017 draft budget will be to ensure that the Union budget is provided with the means it requires to fully deliver its reinforced contribution to jobs, growth, investment and solidarity, and to respond to new developments, and their impact on immigration, humanitarian aid and security; whereas there needs to be a fundamental rethink of taxation at EU level and whereas one or more new own resources in the true sense should be established in order to finance Union priorities (investment projects, Horizon 2020, etc.);
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Is of the opinion that the sectorial policy adjustment within the mid-term review is to be considered as a preliminary step for the real MFF reform after 2020 under new rules and principles reflecting the expected Union needs and priorities for the third decade of 21st century; asks the Commission to adjust the Union budget in terms of a sharper focus on
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Recalls that “societal challenge 6” of the Horizon 2020 programme (Europe in a changing world - Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies) and in particular, the contribution of the social sciences and
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Underlines that the success rate after the first 100 calls of Horizon 2020 reaches 14 % (comparing to 20 % of the overall FP7). Only 20 % of the budget targeted for SMEs was allocated (5 % contribution from the SME instrument), 38 % of the successful candidates were newcomers and very few move from the 1st to the 2nd phase. This leads to the conclusion that the second and third phase, which support a feasibility study to become real innovation and its further commercialisation, loose from their potential. In addition, the role of SMEs must be strengthened.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Moreover, East and Central European countries are lagging far behind from the Western and Northern counterparts in their success rate and funding share. Urges for more technical assistance where needed and sharing of good practices. Simplified and understandable synergy between Horizon 2020 and ESIF/ EFSI is also recommended.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Recalls that the Union budget
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Recalls that the Union budget could serve as an important trigger in accelerating medium- and long-term investment activities, also in reaction on completely new social problems; notes that Union budget could more strongly support the investments into areas making and contributing the Union more cohesive and less vulnerable to external shocks, like the key projects in energy, mobility, IT as well as the research and development, which have also their social aspects and implications that have to be efficiently accented;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the budgetary authority to
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that current and recent practice reveals a strong need to continue to simplify the process by which Union funds are utilised and accessed by users; is of the opinion that the more simple rules are, the more uniform they are and the less potential for unintended errors and omissions exist
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the main objective of the 2017 draft budget will be to ensure that the Union budget is provided with the means it requires to fully deliver its reinforced contribution to economic, social and territorial cohesion, jobs, growth, investment and solidarity, and to respond to continuing challenges and new developments, and their impact
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Simplifying the process of accessing EU funding and making this more transparent would result in take-up with visible and positive effects in the EU Member States;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Notes that overregulation and gold- plating are key obstacles for the beneficiaries of the European Structural and Investments Funds (ESIFs) and for the relevant auditing bodies; urges the Commission and the Member States to reduce the administrative burden for the beneficiaries, e.g. through single audit strategy; is concerned, however, at the slow uptake of the simplifications by the Member States and calls on the Commission to assist national authorities in this regard;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Notes that overregulation and gold- plating are key obstacles for the beneficiaries of the European Structural and Investments Funds (ESIFs) and for the relevant auditing bodies; urges the Commission and the Member States to reduce the administrative burden and pressure for the beneficiaries, e.g. through single audit strategy;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Points out that complete transparency ensures that funds are used entirely in accordance with the rules; expresses disquiet about transparency as regards major EU-funded works, especially where data on subcontractors are concerned; calls on the Commission to set up systems affording greater transparency, extending also to funds widened to encompass countries outside the EU;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Stresses that it is crucial to bring a results-oriented culture to the heart of
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Stresses that it is crucial to bring a
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Notes that the financial engineering instruments (FEI), if implemented in a targeted manner, for appropriate project typology and reasonable purpose
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Expresses doubts about the effectiveness of the new financial instruments, a point that has also been made by the European Court of Auditors, and calls on the Commission to consider whether the resources earmarked for financing of this type might be scaled down in order to allow scope for more substantial public investment in support of Member States.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Notes with concern that the EFSI implementation figures show that the majority of the investments are concentrated in the EU top five economies, thus undermining the achievement of the Union's strategic objective for greater cohesion.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the dialogue between Parliament and the Commission provided for in Article 318 TFEU should stimulate a performance-oriented culture inside the Commission, including increased transparency and enhanced accountability;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Programme statements of operational expenditures attached to the draft budget 2017 as
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Insists that as part of the budgetary authority the Parliament is entitled to express views on
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Expresses concern at the payments situation, given that RAL levels remain extremely high and are at odds with the spirit of the Treaties, which calls for a balanced budget; calls on the Commission and the Member States to bring rigour to bear on the selection of priorities to finance and to abandon those projects which have no obvious added value;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Is of the opinion that the MFF mid-
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Is of the opinion that the MFF mid- term review, to be presented by the Commission by the end of 2016, is the first and best opportunity to tackle structurally a number of serious crises and the high level of RAL, as well as to take account of new political initiatives not anticipated at the time of the MFF’s adoption
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the total financial corrections and recoveries confirmed and imposed by the Commission on Member States that fail to implement sound systems amounted to EUR 3 499 million in 2015 which is less than in 2014 (when it was EUR 4 728 million); asks the Commission to indicate clearly what amounts recovered in 2015 have been registered as revenue in the accounts of the Union or have been offset, along with the budget line from which they come, and the extent to which financial corrections and recoveries decided in 2016 may impact on payment requirements for the 2017 budget;
source: 589.100
2016/10/04
BUDG
214 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 — having regard to Articles 174 to 178 and 314 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that Parliament's reading of the 2017 budget
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Reiterates, that budgetary flexibility has its limits and can only be a short-term solution; is strongly convinced that a forward-looking and brave answer in the face of
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Reiterates, that budgetary flexibility has its limits and can only be a short-term solution; is strongly convinced that a forward-looking and brave answer in the face of a crisis that involves the entire continent and shows no signs of abating, is an upwards adjustment of the ceiling of Heading 3, provided there is an equivalent downwards adjustment across other headings, as well as a clear implementation strategy of how such additional funding would be used most effectively; insists that such an adjustment is indispensable and urgent and is disappointed that the Commission forewent the opportunity to propose it at the occasion of the MFF mid-term revision;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Reiterates, that budgetary flexibility has its limits and can only be a short-term solution on an ad hoc basis as need arises; is strongly convinced that a forward- looking and brave answer in the face of an unprecedented crisis that involves the entire continent and disproportionally affects some Member States and shows no signs of abating, is an upwards adjustment of the ceiling of Heading 3; insists that such an adjustment is indispensable and urgent and is disappointed that the Commission forewent the opportunity to propose it at the occasion of the MFF mid- term revision;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Reiterates, that budgetary flexibility has its limits and can only be a short-term solution; is strongly convinced that a forward-looking and brave answer in the face of a crisis that involves the entire
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26 a. In the context of the current security and migration challenges, welcomes the increase of the funding of AMIF (EUR 1,6 billion) and ISF (EUR 0,7 billion); considers that the increase of AMIF adds to the need to ensure a fair and transparent distribution of annual funding between the different programs and objectives of the fund and a better readability on how these financial resources will be spent;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Notes that a new Instrument for emergency support within the Union was adopted on 15 March 2016, with an indicative envelope of EUR 700 million
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal, as part of the MFF mid-term revision, to establish a new European Union Crisis Reserve, to be financed from de-committed appropriations, as an additional instrument to react rapidly to crises, such as the
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal, as part of the MFF mid-term revision, to establish a new European Union Crisis Reserve, to be financed from de-committed appropriations, as an additional instrument to react rapidly to external border threats and crises, such as the current migra
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that Parliament's reading of the 2017 budget
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal, as part of the MFF mid-term revision, to establish a new European Union Crisis Reserve, to be financed from de-committed appropriations, as an additional instrument to react rapidly to crises
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal, as part of the MFF mid-term revision, to establish a new European Union Crisis Reserve, to be financed from de-committed appropriations, as an additional instrument to react rapidly to crises, such as the current
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. In the face of increased threat levels in several Member States
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. In the face of increased threat levels in several Member States and the concurrent challenges of migration management and the fight against terrorism and organised crime, requests funding for additional staff for Europol; recalls that Europol currently has only 3 staff members at their disposition to be deployed to 8 permanent and additional non-permanent Hot-Spots in Italy alone; considers this number to be too low for Europol to be able to fulfil their tasks in terms of fight against human trafficking, terrorism and other serious cross-border crime;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. In the face of increased threat levels in several Member States and the concurrent challenges of migration management and the fight against homegrown and imported terrorism and organised crime, requests funding for additional staff for Europol;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30.
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Condemns the Council’s cuts to numerous programmes in the areas of culture, the media, citizenship, fundamental rights and public health by a total of EUR 24,3 million in commitment appropriations; considers it a detrimental sign by the Council to cut culture programmes in order to free funds for the
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Condemns the Council’s cuts to numerous programmes in the areas of culture, the media, citizenship, fundamental rights and public health by a total of EUR 24,3 million in commitment appropriations; considers it a detrimental sign by the Council to cut culture programmes
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Emphasis that peace and stability are core values that need to be maintained by the Union; considers that the Good Friday agreement which has proven vital to peace and reconciliation must be protected; underlines the need for specific measures and programs to ensure support for any region which might be affected in case of a negotiated exit from the Union upon the invocation of Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon, in accordance with the expressed will of its citizens;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32.
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32.
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the creation of a budget line for an EU Search and Rescue Fund, which is to cover search and rescue activities carried out by the Member States and
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32 a. Welcomes the establishment of a Victims of Terrorism Response Co- ordination Centre (EUR 2 million) which should overcome barriers such as poor knowledge and weak skills development by bringing together key operational experts, victim advocates and organisation from around Europe to identify key priorities and issues for victims of terrorism and deliver a coordinated support for victims of terrorism across borders in order to have a proper victim- oriented approach in emergency response infrastructures;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 b (new) 32 b. Welcomes the creation of a new budget line to provide funding for the victims of terrorism; supports resources being made available to tackle the broad areas of need of victims, including physical treatments, psycho-social services and financial support; believes that too often the needs of innocent victims of terrorism are either forgotten, or considered secondary, when measures to tackle the terrorist threat are proposed;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 c (new) 32 c. Rejects any use of the Union budget to finance a militarist Union program; defends the need for an alternative set of programmes that support a more social Europe reinforcing sustainable development, strengthened, environment-friendly internal demand based on progressive wages, full employment with rights, social welfare, eradicating poverty and social exclusion and improved social and economic cohesion;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 d (new) 32 d. Welcomes the creation of a budget line for supporting the European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) which is a newly created instrument aiming at involving the citizens' role in the Union decision- making process and deepening our European democracy; is of the opinion that the level of commitment appropriations as proposed in the DB is too low; decides to increase the budget line;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 e (new) 32 e. Expresses its deep concern at the high number of allegations of inhumane treatment and reception conditions of refugees and asylum-seekers within the refugee and asylum reception centres, in particular those receiving Union financial support and the lack of adequate protection of unaccompanied minors all along the route to a safe place and calls for a thorough investigation of the 10 000 missing children as reported by EUROPOL; calls for a thorough investigation of all measures and projects in particular those which have been benefiting from Union financial support, and which are being implemented with the support of the Member States in the field of migration, asylum and border management, to check their compliance with European and international law, in particular the UN Human Rights Charter, the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the Convention on the Rights of the Child , the European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33 a. recalls that Directive (EU) 2016/681 (PNR Directive) has to be implemented in the Member States until May 2018; invites the Commission and Member States to provide sufficient financial resources within the budget line on 'Prevention and fight against cross- border organised crime and better management of security related risks and crisis' so that a swift implementation at a technical high level with full interoperability can be guaranteed and Member States, which face economic problems, are able to be part of the PNR system in the foreseen time delay; __________________ 1aDirective (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 132).
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Notes that, in the light of the ongoing refugee crisis, the Union’s external action is faced with ever growing funding needs which largely exceed the current size of Heading 4; therefore, underlines that the Heading 4 ceilings are vastly insufficient to provide for appropriate funding for the external dimension of the migration and refugee crisis;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Stresses the need for the 2017 budget to meet the needs of the migration crisis and slow economic growth following the economic crisis; notes that funding should be boosted for research and infrastructure projects as well as for fighting youth unemployment;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Notes that, in the light of the ongoing migration and refugee crisis, the Union’s external action is faced with ever growing funding needs which largely exceed the current size of Heading 4; therefore,
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Notes that, in the light of the ongoing refugee crisis, the Union
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Notes that, in the light of the ongoing
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Notes that, in the light of the
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Decides, therefore, to reverse all Council’s cuts in Heading 4; decides also to reinstate the 2016 levels for the ENI Mediterranean lines and for humanitarian aid; furthermore decides to mitigate the cuts made by the Commission in the DCI
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35 a. Welcomes the proposed increase of macro-financial assistance which has been significantly cut compared to 2016; believes that a higher funding level than proposed will be required to ensure that all future requests for loans can be accommodated;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36.
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36 a. Highlights the need to ensure and guarantee that human, civil rights and liberties, social protection, including protection for the most vulnerable, healthcare, social and financial benefits are implemented in full compliance with international law, in particular in particular the UN Human Rights Charter, the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the Convention on the Rights of the Child , the European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU; stresses the importance of enhanced financing for resettlement schemes and relocation procedures, notably under the Asylum, Migration and Immigration Fund (AMIF), in order to achieve a solidarity based approach to European asylum and migration policy as safe and legal ways are the only way to prevent and reduce irregular migration; underlines the need to create possibilities within the Union budget, eventually through the creation of new financial instruments, to develop resettlement areas and safe zones on the African continent and in the Middle East, in cooperation with the African Union, the Arab League and UNHCR; points out that this should not preclude the Union of assuming its fair share of responsibility towards hosting refugees in Europe;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Notes with concern that, despite their topical nature and significant size, EU Trust Funds as well as the FRT are virtually invisible in the Union budget; calls for them to be
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Notes with concern that, despite their topical nature and significant size, EU Trust Funds as well as the FRT are virtually invisible in the Union budget; calls for them to be incorporated in a way that is more transparent and more respectful of the unity of the Union budget and of the prerogatives of the budgetary authority, and creates new budget lines to that end; also calls on the Commission to provide evidence that the use of financial instruments under the Trusts Funds does not result in diverting appropriations from the objectives under their initial legal bases; notes that the objective of leveraging national contributions on top of the Union budget has so far notoriously failed; highlights in that respect that, in future calls for an EU budget contribution to the Trust Funds, the Parliament will only agree to them once a comparable amount of Member States’ contributions has been delivered; invites, therefore, Member States to live up as soon as possible to their commitments;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the Union is currently facing a number of serious emergencies and is convinced that the necessary financial resources need to be deployed from the Union budget, in order to meet the political challenges and allow the Union to deliver answers and effectively respond to those crises as a matter of utmost urgency and priority; stresses that the Union ratified the COP 21 agreement and needs to dedicate part of its financial resources to respect its international commitments; considers therefore that climate-related spending must be significantly increased in order to reach, at least, 20% of the Union budget for the period 2014-2020; considers that a strong political commitment is needed to secure fresh appropriations in 2017 and until the end of the programming period for this purpose;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 a (new) 37 a. Notes that the guarantee fund for external actions, which covers defaults on loans and loan guarantees granted to non-Member States or for projects in non- Member States, has, according to the Commission report on guarantees covered by the general budget (COM(2016) 576 final) additional financial needs in order to reach the target amount, which consequently led to a provisioning of EUR 228,04 million being inserted in the DB 2017; is concerned that this requirements put additional pressure on the already very tight ceilings in Heading 4;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Looks forward to the Commission’s budgetary proposals to finance the new Migration Partnership Framework and the External Investment Plan;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38.
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38.
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39 a. Deems it necessary to increase appropriations for the Turkish Cypriot Community budget line (+EUR 3 million) for the purpose of contributing decisively to the continuation and intensification of the mission of the Committee on Missing Persons in Cyprus and of supporting the bicommunal Technical Committee on Cultural Heritage, thus promoting trust and reconciliation between the two communities;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Considers that Council’s cuts are unjustified and harmful for the Member States and restores the DB for all Commission administrative
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41. Decides, in the light of recent revelations and in order to regain the confidence of EU citizens and the credibility of the EU institutions, to hold 20% of appropriations of the Temporary Allowances for former Members in reserve until the Commission enforces a pragmatic, effective, enforceable and stricter Code of conduct for Commissioners to prevent conflict of interests and the revolving doors in the hope to regain some of the respect to the role after recent failures;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 a (new) 41 a. Considers that interinstitutional administrative cooperation is a source of efficiency as know-how, capacities and resources developed for an institution can be made available to others; therefore asks to establish a system which limits administrative burdens to the necessary minimum, ensures the appropriate quality of services, provides the main responsible institution with the necessary budgetary means and incentivises the cooperation of the other institutions by limiting their share to the marginal costs caused by the cooperation and as such aligning sound financial management decisions on level of the institutions with the overall sound financial management of the budget;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 a (new) 42 a. Welcomes the budget increase of the efficient JHA agencies, especially those involved with migration and security; stresses that these agencies must be sufficiently resourced (including for investing in new technologies) and staffed when their mandates are increased;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the Union is currently facing a number of serious emergencies, including migration and homegrown and external terrorism, as well as the ongoing economic crisis disproportionately affecting some Member States, and is convinced that the necessary financial resources need to be deployed from the Union budget, in order to meet the political challenges and allow the Union to deliver answers and, with the Member States, effectively respond to those crises as a matter of utmost urgency and priority; considers that a strong political commitment is needed to secure fresh appropriations in 2017 and until the end of the programming period for this purpose;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. In the context of the current security challenges, and, bearing in mind the necessity for a coordinated European response,
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. In the context of the current security challenges
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 a (new) 43 a. In detail, stresses the need for sufficient human and material resources for Europol's newly established European Counter Terrorism Center, EC3 and IRU, including with regards to joint operational planning and threat assessment in order to strengthen a coordinated approach between the Member States to fight organised crime, cybercrime and internet related crime, terrorism and other serious crime; asks for additional funding for joint investigation teams;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 b (new) 43 b. Recalls the planned improvement and interoperability of the different JHA information systems announced by the Commission in its communication "the future framework for stronger and smarter information systems for border management and internal security" dated 6 April 2016; urges to foresee the need for appropriate resources for those technical solutions to be implemented swiftly and efficiently;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 c (new) 43 c. Welcomes the inclusion in the 2017 budget of the adequate resources to support the long term transformation of Frontex into a European Border and Coast Guard agency and the transformation of EASO into a fully- fledged asylum agency; stresses that, while the resources for the European Border and Coast Guard seem adequate for now, the future needs of the agency in terms of operational resources and staff will have to be closely monitored to that the agency does not lag behind reality;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. In view of the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Europe’s southern neighbourhood
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. In view of the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Europe’s southern neighbourhood,
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45.
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Reiterates its
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Stresses that substantial operational and personnel savings could be achieved if agencies operating from more than one place (ENISA, eu-LISA, ERA) were limited to one seat only; is of the opinion that current operational needs of those agencies make such change feasible;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the Union is currently facing a number of serious emergencies and new challenges, which could not be foreseen at the time when the MFF 2014-2020 was set-up; is convinced that the
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Stresses that substantial operational and personnel savings could be achieved if agencies operating from more than one place (ENISA, eu-LISA, ERA) were limited to one seat only; is of the opinion that current operational needs of those agencies make such change feasible; underlines that moving the European Banking Authority (EBA) away from London and merging it with at least one of the two other Supervisory Authorities could lead to considerable synergistic savings in the costs of the two agencies; invites the Commission to put forward a proposal in this respect;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 a (new) 46 a. Considers that the grades of temporary posts for the European Border and Coast Guard Agency have to be increased to meet the complex nature of the new tasks assigned to the agency by the revised regulation;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Having carried out a careful analysis of the pilot projects and preparatory actions submitted as regards the rate of success of the on-going ones, excluding initiatives already covered by existing legal bases and taking fully into account the Commission's assessment of the projects' implementability, decides to adopt a compromise package made up of a limited number of PP-PAs, also in view of the limited margins available and the ceilings for PP-PAs;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Having carried out a careful analysis of the pilot projects and preparatory actions submitted as regards the rate of success of the on-going ones, excluding initiatives already covered by existing legal bases and taking fully into account the Commission's assessment of the projects' implementability, decides to adopt a compromise package made up of a limited number of PP-PAs
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Having carried out a careful analysis of the pilot projects and preparatory actions submitted as regards the rate of success of the on-going ones, excluding initiatives already covered by existing legal bases and taking fully into account the Commission's assessment of the projects' implementability, decides to adopt a compromise package made up of a limited number of PP-PAs,
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 a (new) 47 a. Calls for the increase of commitment appropriations for pilot projects and preparatory actions, taking into consideration it is the only initiative of Members of the European Parliament to intervene on the Union budget, designed to test its feasibility and usefulness;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Recalls the importance of the Emergency Aid Reserve in providing a rapid response
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Recalls the importance of the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR) in providing a rapid response to specific aid requirements for third countries for unforeseen events and its earlier call for a substantial increase in its financial envelope, as part of the revision of the MFF; notes that its very quick consumption in 2016, likely to use up all possibilities of carry-over, is an indication that this special instrument will
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Recalls the importance of the Emergency Aid Reserve in providing a rapid response to specific aid requirements for third countries for unforeseen events and its earlier call for a substantial increase in its financial envelope, as part of the revision of the MFF; notes that its very quick consumption in 2016, likely to use up all possibilities of carry-over, is a
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49.
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Voices concern over the severe decrease in payments appropriations in the 2017 Draft Budget as compared with the 2016 budget; notes that this reveals implementation delays which are not only worrying for the delivery of Union policies but also entail the risk of rebuilding a backlog of unpaid bills at the end of the current programming period, unless a satisfactory agreement is found as part of the MFF revision;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Voices concern over the
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 a (new) 50 a. Stresses that, at the request of Parliament, a payment plan has been agreed with the aim of reducing the backlog of outstanding cohesion policy- related payment claims for 2007-2013 to a 'normal' level of EUR 2 billion by the end of 2016; points out that at least EUR 8,2 billion of unpaid bills were identified at the end of 2015 for 2007-2013 in the field of cohesion policy, a figure which is expected to fall below EUR 2 billion by the end of 2016; believes that a joint payment plan for 2016-2020 should be binding, developed and agreed between the three institutions; insists that such a new payment plan should be based on sound financial management and provide for a clear strategy to meet all payment needs in all headings until the end of the current MFF, and to avoid a 'hidden backlog' caused by an artificial slowdown in the implementation of certain multiannual programmes and other mitigating measures, such as the reduction of pre-financing rates;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52.
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Maintains unchanged the overall level of its budget for 2017, as adopted by the plenary on 14 April 2016 at EUR 1 900 873 000; incorporates the budgetary neutral technical adjustments to reflect into the budget its recent decisions
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Regrets the proposal of internalisation of chauffeur service which will correspond to other additional expenses; believes that, in order to reduce the expenditures, the transport service should eventually only be provided to/from the airport/railway station and the places of work and the preference should be given to the use of minivans and buses, at scheduled times; underlines the great advantage in economic, social and environmental terms offered by the new train connection from Brussels Airport to Brussels-Gare du Luxembourg; considers that any other travel should be privately arranged by MEPs;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 53.
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 53.
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 54.
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the Union is currently facing a number of serious emergencies and is convinced that the necessary financial resources need to be deployed from the Union budget, in order to meet the political challenges and allow the Union to deliver answers and effectively respond to those crises as a matter of utmost urgency and priority; considers that
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 54. Recalls its political decision to exempt the political groups and the non- attached from the 5% staff reduction target, as underlined it its resolutions on the budgets 20148 , 20159 and 201610 ; __________________ 8
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Deplores the increase of public funding for European political parties (from EUR 10 339 866 in 2008 to EUR 31 905 000 in 2017) and for European political foundations (from EUR 4 268 630 in 2008 to EUR 19 000 000 in 2017);
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 56 Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 57. Encourages the Secretary-General to propose detailed arrangements for the full sharing of back office functions and services between Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee; calls on the Secretary- General to also undertake a study on whether synergies in back office functions and services can also be made between the Parliament, the Commission and the Council;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 57. Encourages the Secretar
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 57. Encourages the Secretary-General to propose detailed arrangements for
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 59. Reiterates that the implementation of the staff reduction target should not jeopardize the proper functioning of the Institution and the exercise by the Parliament of its core powers as exercised by the Treaties, nor alter its
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 a (new) 59 a. In the light of the multiple problems encountered in this year's internal budgetary procedure, concludes that it is inevitable to overhaul Chapter 9 and relevant parts of other chapters of its Rules of Procedure to achieve what the European Parliament called for in its abovementioned resolution of 14 April 2016 on Parliament's estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2017, i.e. that "any relevant information should be presented to Members of the Bureau and the Committee on Budgets at every stage of the procedure in a timely and intelligible manner and with the necessary level of detail and breakdowns in order to enable the Bureau, the Committee on Budgets and the political groups to conduct proper deliberations and base decisions on a comprehensive picture of the state and needs of Parliament's budget;"
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 b (new) 59 b. Pursuant to point 15 of its abovementioned resolution of 14 April 2016 on Parliament's estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2017, requires that the method of establishment of the budget of the Parliament on the basis of the current needs and not on the basis of a system of coefficients is used for the first time during the budgetary procedure for the financial year 2018;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 60. Recalls that the administration is committed to submit a medium and long term practicable budgetary planning, including a clear distinction between investments and operational expenditure relating to the functioning of the institution, including the compulsory statutory obligations; expects therefore that 2018 preliminary draft estimates would be presented in the same format;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Insists on the need to provide the Union with new own resources, among others, with new own resources based upon taxation of financial transactions and the appropriate taxation of all multinationals which are involved in tax evasion; considers this to be is an adequate answer to the large majority of the Union citizens requests;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 a (new) 60 a. Recalls the 2013 Fox-Häfner report1a , which estimated the costs of the geographic dispersion of the Parliament to be between EUR 156 million and EUR 204 million and equivalent to 10% of the Parliament's budget; notes the finding that 78% of all missions by Parliament statutory staff arise as a direct result of the Parliament's geographic dispersion; emphasises that the report also estimates the environmental impact of the geographic dispersion to be between 11,000 to 19,000 tonnes of CO2 emissions; reiterates the negative public perception caused by this dispersion and calls therefore for a roadmap to a single seat and a reduction in the relevant budget lines; __________________ 1a Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0498.
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 b (new) 60 b. stresses that the Parliament and the Council, in order to create long term savings in the Union budget, must address the need for a roadmap to a single seat, as requested by the large majority of this Parliament in several resolutions;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 c (new) 60 c. Regrets that despite numerous calls by the Committee on Budgets, mid- term and long-term strategy for Parliament buildings is not available for informed committee deliberations;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 d (new) 60 d. Notes that the Discharge 2014: EU general budget - European Parliament report1a called for a clearer segregation between the roles of President and 'Spitzenkandidat' during the 2014 European Election campaign; believes that questions remain regarding the role of Parliament staff and international missions taken by the President during this campaign; calls for a portion of the relevant budget lines to be placed in reserve until these issues have been addressed satisfactorily; __________________ 1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0150.
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 61 Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 61 Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 61 Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 61 Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 61 61. Given the substantial benefits that Google and similar companies are deriving from the Parliament's own and unique proprietary translation service to boost Google Translate and similar translation services, calls on the Secretary General to negotiate with Google and similar companies an appropriate contribution to the EP Budget;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 64 64. Expresses its dissatisfaction with the unilateral statement of the Council and the related appendix on the 5 % staff reduction in the Council’s position on the 2017 DB according to which the Court still needs to reduce its establishment plan by 19 posts; underlines that those 19 posts correspond to the 12 and 7 posts duly granted by Parliament and the Council in the 2015 and 2016 budgetary procedures respectively to address additional needs and insists therefore that those 19 posts should not be given back, the Court having already duly achieved its 5 % staff reduction requirement by successfully and commendably suppressing 98 posts during the period 2013-2017;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2016 on ''Preparation of the post- electoral revision of the MFF 2014-2020: Parliament's input ahead of the Commission's proposal''1a, __________________ 1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0309.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that whilst Parliament has supported the Commission’s actions in the tackling of the migration and refugees crisis, it has always insisted that this challenge not take precedence over other important Union policies,
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 65 65. Restores the standard abatement rate to its initial level of 2,6 % in order to allow the Court of Auditors to honour its mandate and meet its needs in respect of the establishment plan;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 66 66. Restores an additional five budget items cut by Council for the Court of Auditors to implement its work programme and promptly deliver the planned and future Audit Reports;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 69.
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 71.
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 75 75. Notes with regret that the Council has decreased the DB of the Ombudsman by -EUR 195 000; underlines that this reduction would impose a disproportionate burden on the very limited budget of the Ombudsman and would have major impact on the institution's capacity to serve the European citizens effectively; restores therefore all the budget lines cut by Council in order to enable the Ombudsman to fulfil her mandate and commitments which have already been put at risk;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 75 75.
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 75 75. Notes
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 76 76.
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that whilst Parliament has supported the Commission’s actions in the tackling of the migration and refugees crisis, it has always insisted that this challenge not take precedence over other important Union policies, for example in the field of jobs and growth; notes that the
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 78. Decides furthermore to create a Strategic Communication Capacity budget item in line with the European Council conclusions of March 2015 and equip the EEAS with adequate staff and tools to face the
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 80 80. Is convinced that the Union budget can contribute to addressing effectively not only the consequences but also the root causes of the
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 80 80. Is convinced that the Union budget, with a clear implementation strategy, can contribute to addressing effectively not only the consequences but also the root causes of the crises that the Union is currently facing; takes the view, however, that unforeseen events with a Union-wide dimension should be tackled by pooling efforts
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 80 80. Is convinced that the Union budget
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 81 81. Instructs its President to forward this conciliatory resolution, together with the amendments to the draft general budget, to
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that whilst Parliament has
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that whilst Parliament has supported the Commission’s actions in the tackling of the
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that whilst Parliament has supported the Commission’s actions in the tackling of the migration and refugees crisis, it has always insisted that this challenge not take precedence over other important Union policies, for example in the field of jobs and growth, agriculture and rural development; notes that the Heading 3 ceiling is vastly insufficient to provide for appropriate funding for the internal dimension of the migration and refugee crisis as well as priority programmes, such as culture programmes;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that whilst Parliament has supported the Commission’s actions yet to be delivered in the tackling of the migration and refugees crisis, it has always insisted that this challenge not take precedence over other important Union policies, for example in the field of jobs and growth; notes that the Heading 3 ceiling is vastly insufficient to provide for appropriate funding for the internal dimension of the migration and refugee crisis as well as priority programmes, such as culture programmes;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Notes that the Heading 3 ceiling (Security and Citizenship) has proven to be insufficient to provide for adequate funding, in order to tackle the migration and refugee crisis; stresses that, in order to ensure the necessary additional funding in this field, an unprecedented resource to the MFF special instruments, including the full use of the Flexibility Instrument, as well as the substantial mobilisation of the "last resort" Contingency Margin, was proposed by the Commission in the Draft Budget 2017, and accepted by the Council;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Reiterates its position that requests for additional funding needed for addressing the
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Reiterates its position that requests for additional funding needed for
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Reiterates its position that requests for additional funding needed for addressing the migration and refugee crisis must have a clear implementation strategy and should not be deployed to the detriment of the Union’s existing external action, including its development policy; repeats that the setting-up of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey (FRT), Trust Funds, and any other ad-hoc instruments
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that budget 2017 has to be considered in the wider context of the mid- term revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF); stresses therefore that budget 2017 has to be in line with the EU2020 targets, especially the social and environmental ones;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Reiterates its position that requests for additional funding needed for addressing the migration and refugee crisis should not be deployed to the detriment of the Union’s existing external action, including its development policy; repeats that the setting-up of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey (FRT), Trust Funds, and any other ad-hoc instruments cannot be financed by cuts to other existing instruments;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Reiterates its conviction that the Union budget should find ways of financing new initiatives which are not to the detriment of existing Union programmes and policies
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Reiterates its conviction that the Union budget should find ways of financing new initiatives which are not to the detriment of existing Union programmes and policies
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Reiterates its conviction that the Union budget should find ways of financing new initiatives which are not to the detriment of existing Union programmes and policies and is disappointed that the Preparatory Action for defence research, which will amount to EUR 80 million in the next three years will be squeezed under the current budget of the MFF and should be fully safeguarded; is convinced that with an already underfinanced Union budget, additional efforts for operations, administrative costs, preparatory actions and pilot projects in relation to the common security and defence policy also need additional financial means by the Member States while respecting any objective limitations to fully finance those actions; considers that the current MFF mid-term review/revision should be used by the Member States in that respect;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Reiterates its conviction that the Union budget should find ways of financing new initiatives which are not to the detriment of existing Union programmes and policies and
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Reiterates its conviction that the Union budget should find ways of financing new initiatives which are not to the detriment of existing Union programmes and policies
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Reiterates its conviction that the Union budget should find ways of financing new initiatives which are not to the detriment of existing Union programmes and policies and
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Recalls that, in compliance with the goals of the Europe 2020 Strategy, and in order to respond to the challenges and investment needs related to climate action, the Commission took the commitment to mainstream climate action in the 2014-2020 MFF and aims at reaching the target of at least 20% of Union spending dedicated to climate- related actions; notes that, according to the Statement of Estimates for the financial year 2017, the draft budget is expected to allocate 19,2% of expenditure to this aim; strongly encourages the Commission to pursue on this track so to apply the 20% target for the second half of this MFF;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that budget 2017 has to be considered in the wider context of the mid- term revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF), even if it failed to address the structural problems overall;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Takes note that the Council's reading failed to predict the actual execution of the Union budget for the last five consecutive years and that, taking all amending budgets into account, considerably more funds were needed in each of the final budgets; therefore calls on the Council to adjust its position in the conciliation committee in order to provide adequate funding for the Union budget 2017 immediately from the beginning;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. recalls the European Court of Auditor's Special Report 19/2016 "Implementing the EU budget through financial instruments - lessons to be learnt from the 2007-2013 programme period", which concludes that financial instruments had high administrative costs and fees in comparison to private funds and often had an insufficient leverage effect in mobilising private investment; therefore warns Commission and Council to overestimate the effects of financial instruments and to further move the Union budget in this direction, particularly because this would change the fundamental set up of the Union budget and its financing structure;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Announces that, for the purpose of adequately financing those pressing needs, and considering the very tight MFF margins in 2017, Parliament will finance the reinforcements above the DB by the exhaustion of all margins available and an increased recourse to the Contingency Margin
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Announces that, for the purpose of adequately financing those pressing needs,
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Restores all cuts related to the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and Horizon 2020 for a total of EUR 1 240 million in commitments via new appropriations to be obtained through the mid-term revision of the MFF; insists on the need to provide an effective response to youth unemployment accross the Union; therefore increases the Youth Employment Initiative with additional EUR 1 500 million in commitment appropriations to
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Restores all cuts related to the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and Horizon 2020 for a total of EUR 1 240 million in commitments via new appropriations to be obtained through the mid-term revision of the MFF; increases the Youth Employment Initiative with additional EUR 1 500 million in commitment appropriations to provide an effective response to youth unemployment, especially to the Member States in southern Europe, such as Greece, which should also be financed by additional funds provided in the mid-term revision of the MFF;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Restores all cuts related to the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and Horizon 2020 for a total of EUR 1 240 million in commitments via new appropriations to be obtained through the mid-term revision of the MFF; increases the Youth Employment Initiative with additional EUR 1 500 million in commitment appropriations to provide an effective response to youth unemployment
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Expects that the Council will share this approach and that an agreement will easily be reached in conciliation, allowing the Union to rise to the occasion and effectively respond to both the pressing current emergencies and the challenges ahead;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, again this year, subheading 1a is severely affected by the Council's reading with 52 % of the overall Council cuts in commitments falling within this heading; questions therefore how the Council can claim that jobs and growth is one of their two priorities and stresses that the Union should immediately combat the high unemployment rates of its Member States;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Strongly disagrees with these cuts in a heading that symbolises the European added value and delivers more growth and jobs for citizens; consequently decides to restore all cuts made by the Council, restoring two of the main Union priorities of jobs and growth;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Strongly disagrees with these cuts in a heading that symbolises the European added value and could deliver
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Strongly disagrees with these cuts in a heading that symbolises mainly the European added value and delivers more growth and jobs for citizens; consequently decides to restore all cuts made by the Council;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Delivering on the commitment taken in June 2015 to minimise to the maximum the budgetary impact of the creation of the EFSI on Horizon 2020 and CEF in the framework of the annual budgetary procedure, decides to fully restore the original pre-EFSI profile of the Horizon 2020 and CEF lines that were cut for the provisioning of the EFSI Guarantee Fund; demands the corresponding additional commitments appropriations of EUR 1,24 billion above DB to be made available in the framework of the MFF revision; points out that EFSI should be improved in order to be fully efficient and effective by ensuring that the additionality principle is respected, by improving the geographical and sectorial balances and by improving the transparency in the decision-making process;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Delivering on the commitment taken in June 2015 to minimise to the maximum the budgetary impact of the creation of the EFSI on Horizon 2020 and CEF in the framework of the annual budgetary procedure, decides to fully restore the original pre-EFSI profile of the Horizon 2020 and CEF lines that were cut for the provisioning of the EFSI Guarantee Fund; demands the corresponding additional commitments appropriations of EUR 1,24 billion above DB to be made available in the framework of the MFF revision and fully respect prior political commitments towards Horizon 2020 and CEF;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Delivering on the commitment taken in June 2015 to minimise to the maximum the budgetary impact of the creation of the EFSI on Horizon 2020 and
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Notes that the projects selected for the EFSI do not represent new investment in the real economy but the refinancing of existing projects of questionable sustainability in economic, social and environmental terms; reiterates its conviction that the EFSI is not the right instrument to guarantee growth and development; believes therefore that the appropriations for the provisioning of the EFSI guarantee fund could be better used to respond to other urgencies and priorities;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Reiterates its firm conviction that, in this particular current context, initiatives such as the suspension of the ESI funds by the European Commission, as foreseen by Article 23(15) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 (Common Provisions Regulation - CPR), are not only unfair and disproportionate, but also legally unsustainable;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Calls on the Commission to provide appropriate support from the budget line "Removing bottlenecks, enhancing rail interoperability, bridging missing links and improving cross-border sections" for the construction, signposting, maintenance, and management of the routes of the Trans- European EuroVelo Cycling Network;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14 b. Stresses that Union's biggest research and innovation programme, Horizon 2020, is the only financial instrument to implement an innovation- friendly environment that can transform great ideas into products and services, thus stimulating growth and jobs;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. In line with its continued priorities for Jobs and Growth and after careful assessment of their absorption capacity so far, decides to propose some selective
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Is concerned about possible further delays and additional costs of the ITER programme as well as the related potential repercussions on the Union budget, especially for other R&D programme funded by the Union; proposes to put appropriations into reserve, to be released only if the updated project plan provides sufficient evidence that Parliament's recommendations have been properly taken into account;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15 b. Underlines the huge discrepancy between funding for nuclear activities in the Union budget and support for future- oriented renewable energy; believes therefore that abandoning the ITER project would free up much needed resources, which could be used for investing into already working renewable energy technologies;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 c (new) 15 c. Believes that the Euratom budget line on Nuclear fission and radiation protection should be reoriented towards the decommissioning of nuclear power plants; in the same vein, considers that the appropriations for nuclear activities of the Joint Research Centre should be used only for activities necessary for implementing safeguards;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Disapproves of Council's proposed cuts of EUR 3 million in commitments and, more importantly, EUR 199 million in payments under subheading 1b, including on support lines; calls on the Council to explain how these cuts are compatible with its objective of providing “necessary
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Disapproves of Council's proposed cuts of EUR 3 million in commitments and, more importantly, EUR 199 million in payments under subheading 1b, including on support lines; calls on the Council to explain how these cuts are compatible with its objective of providing “necessary appropriations enabling the smooth implementation of the new programmes in the fourth year of the multiannual financial framework 2014-2020”;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Disapproves of Council's proposed cuts of EUR 3 million in commitments and, more importantly, EUR 199 million in payments under subheading 1b, including on support lines; calls on the Council to explain and fully substantiate how these cuts are compatible with its objective of providing “necessary appropriations enabling the smooth implementation of the new programmes in the fourth year of the multiannual financial framework 2014- 2020”; notes that the cuts in payments go further than the already significant cuts proposed by the Commission, who suggested a significant decrease by -23,5 % compared to the 2016 EU budget;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Calls instead for the establishment of emergency plans to support the economies of countries in which the troika has intervened, which shall provide added financial resources to implement investment policies in order to reach social and economical convergence, while establishing the necessary exceptions to the functioning of the single market and common policies;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Calls for an impact evaluation of Union policies based on impact assessment reports in order to determine to what extent they managed, amongst others, to reduce economic disparities, develop competitive and diversified regional economies and boost sustainable growth and jobs;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17 b. Recalls that cohesion policy represents the main Union investment policy and its legal objective of reducing disparities between European regions by strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Is alarmed by the significant delays in the implementation of the European Structural and Investment Fund cycle, which is likely to have a serious detrimental effect on the timely achievement of results on the ground but risks also to lead to the reconstitution of a new backlog of unpaid bills in the second half the current MFF; urges the Member States concerned to promptly designate the remaining managing authorities and tackle all other causes of delay in the implementation of the programmes; notes the Commission’s proposals for more simplification for recipients of Union funds but sticks to the position that most remains to be done at the Member States’ level supported by the Commission to ensure that the programmes reach full swing;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Is alarmed by the significant delays in the implementation of the European Structural and Investment Fund cycle, w
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Is alarmed by the significant delays in the implementation of the European Structural and Investment Fund cycle, which is likely to have a serious detrimental effect on the timely achievement of results on the ground but risks also to lead to the reconstitution of a new backlog of unpaid bills in the second half the current MFF; urges the Member
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Stresses that further efforts to increase investment should be made, in particular by developing new financial instruments based upon a new European public investment plan financed by new own resources on the basis of a more progressive tax regime; insists that the contributions to the Union budget from the Member States should not be accounted when calculating Member States' structural deficits; believes that those elements should be taken into consideration in the preparation of the draft budget for 2017 insofar as this should help identify priorities within an economic context; calls, consequently, for more synergies and complementarity between in particular public investment policies by the Member States budgets and the Union budget, in particular those aimed at promoting the growth and sustainable employment creation which is the cornerstone for the Union;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that the Commission has not proposed any commitment appropriations for the Youth Employment Initiative in 2017 as a result of its frontloading in the years 2014-2015;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that the Commission has not proposed any commitment appropriations for the Youth Employment Initiative in 2017 as a result of its frontloading in the years 2014-2015;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that the Commission has not proposed any commitment appropriations for the Youth Employment Initiative in 2017 as a result of its frontloading in the years 2014-2015; decides, in line with the Regulation on the European Social Fund7 which foresees the possibility of such a continuation, to increase the Youth Employment Initiative with additional EUR 1 500 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 500 million in payment appropriations to provide an effective response to youth unemployment; notes that, in line with Parliament’s requests, these new appropriations should be financed by the use of all financial means available under the current MFF Regulation and through the MFF mid-term revision; recalls that the Youth Guarantee scheme, part of the Youth Employment initiative is the only Union funding mechanism that aims at ensuring that all young Union citizens younger than 25 years receive a good- quality job within the first 4 months after leaving formal education; urges the Member States to do their utmost to speed up the implementation of the Initiative on the ground, for the direct benefit of young Europeans; __________________ 7 Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Social Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 470).
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Re
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Stresses that the Union budget should be used in such a way to give priority to policies of real convergence, integration and cohesion, based on social progress and solidarity, safeguarding and promoting decent, quality and stable job creation, sustainable use of natural resources and protection of the environment; underlines that the Union budget has proven to be scarce despite its potential to become an important resource in tackling recent crises and responding to needs which were not anticipated during the negotiation of the MFF 2014- 2020, such as the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the migration and refugee crisis or geopolitical tensions in Europe's neighbourhood causing a number of serious challenges and emergencies, while within the Union the pace of economic recovery and a continuous lowering of both public and private investment levels below its potential led to an investment gap and the aggravation of inequalities between Member States, its regions and its citizens;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that the Commission has not proposed any commitment appropriations for the Youth Employment Initiative in 2017 as a result of its frontloading in the years 2014-2015; decides, in line with the Regulation on the European Social Fund7 which foresees the possibility of such a continuation, to increase the Youth Employment Initiative with additional EUR 1 500 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 500 million in payment appropriations to provide an effective response to youth unemployment, drawing lessons from the results of the coming Commission's evaluation of the YEI implementation; notes that, in line with Parliament’s requests, these new appropriations should be financed by the use of all financial means available under the current MFF Regulation and through the MFF mid-term revision; urges the Member States to do their utmost to speed up the implementation of the Initiative on the ground, for the direct benefit of young Europeans; __________________ 7 Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Social Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 470).
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that the Commission has not proposed any commitment appropriations for the Youth Employment Initiative in 2017 as a result of its frontloading in the years 2014-2015; decides, in line with the Regulation on the European Social Fund7 which foresees the possibility of such a continuation, to increase the Youth Employment Initiative with additional EUR 1 500 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 500 million in payment appropriations to provide an effective response to
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recalls that the Commission has not proposed any commitment appropriations for the Youth Employment Initiative in 2017 as a result of its frontloading in the years 2014-2015; decides, in line with the Regulation on the European Social Fund7
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Decides to restore the DB in both commitments and payments for the lines cut by the Council; increases commitment appropriations for subheading 1b by EUR 1 500 million and payment appropriations by EUR 500 million above DB for the Youth Employment Initiative, and by EUR 4 million for commitments and 2 EUR million for payments for the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Underlines that subheading 1b bears the biggest part of the current outstanding commitments
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Underlines that subheading 1b bears the biggest part of the current outstanding commitments which is impeding the reimbursement for resources already spent by the beneficiaries of the funds; warns that the high level of RAL under subheading 1b, which stood at EUR 151 119 million at the beginning of September 2016 risks jeopardizing the implementation of new and potentially much needed programmes;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Recalls the need for further funding designed for the Union's peripheral regions aimed at slowing down the growing socioeconomic cleavage between the European centre and it's peripheral regions;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21 b. Notes that the EIB's Evaluation of the functioning of the EFSI from September 2016 shows that as for the period ending 30 June 2016, only two peripheral Member States, Cyprus and Malta, had no signed operations under either window of that Fund;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Notes that the Council reduced appropriations in Heading 2 by EUR - 179,5 million in commitments and EUR - 198 million in payments, on administrative support lines, on operational technical assistance lines (such as the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and the LIFE programme), on operational lines under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), which is an essential to maintain agriculture in living territories, and on decentralised agencies; notes that the biggest cuts in payments are borne by rural development; considers that the Amending Letter should remain the basis for any reliable revision of EAGF appropriations; restores the DB levels accordingly;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 d (new) 1 d. Reiterates its conviction whereas in order to offset the weak economic recovery, the new latent crisis trends and the increased divergence in the Union it is necessary to provide an adequate increase to the Union's budget to ensure the adequate level of resources in next year's budget with particular emphasis on the programs and projects aimed at boosting growth and decent employment, eradicating poverty, investing in smart, sustainable, green growth, development and humanitarian aid; underlines that contributions to this increase should result from an increase in the payments made by Member States with the highest GNI and the highest per capita income, correcting the current biased and unfair system of contribution keys; reiterates that it is imperative to increase support to Member States, especially those facing economic recession, for investment in infrastructure, social facilities, research, innovation and development;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Awaits the presentation of the Amending Letter for the emergency support package in particular for the dairy sector; considers that this measure will contribute significantly to improving market disposition and will be reflected in improved prices for European dairy producers that in cases has been unjustifiably low, in particular after the end of the quota system, and the substantial financial impact of the Russian ban which has proved largely inefficient and ineffective;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. A
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Awaits the presentation of the Amending Letter for the emergency support package in particular for the dairy sector; considers that this measure will contribute significantly to improving market disposition and will be reflected in improved prices for European dairy producers, in particular after the end of the quota system, and the financial impact of the Russian ban, even if it is still insufficient;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. Requests that more attention should be given to small-scale farming and small-scale fishing, which are very often not in a position to properly benefit from the current system of Union funding;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23 b. In line with its EU2020 targets and with its international commitments to tackle the climate change, decides to propose an increase above the level of the DB for LIFE + programme;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Underlines that Parliament continues to put the current migration challenge at the top of its agenda; welcomes the Commission’s proposal for an additional EUR 1,8 billion to tackle the migration crisis in the Union, above what had initially been programmed for 2017;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Underlines that Parliament continues to put the current migration challenge at the top of its agenda; welcomes the Commission’s proposal for an additional EUR 1,8 billion to tackle the migration c
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Underlines that Parliament continues to put the current migration challenge at the top of its agenda; welcomes the Commission
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Underlines that Parliament continues to put the current migration challenge and the overarching effects of illegal migration at the top of its agenda; welcomes the Commission’s proposal for an additional EUR 1,8 billion to tackle the migration crisis in the Union, above what had initially been programmed for 2017; notes that the big deviation of the original programming shows the need of a full revision of the current MFF; is disappointed that the Commission did not use the opportunity to adjust the ceilings accordingly, particularly of Heading 3; stresses that the Commission proposes to finance this reinforcement through the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument (for EUR 530 million, thereby fully exhausting the funding available for this year) and the Contingency Margin (for EUR 1 160 million); given the unprecedented level of funding for migration-related expenditure (totalling EUR 5,2 billion in 2017) and the proposals for applying flexibility on the table, does not request further though required reinforcements for migration-related policies; at the same time, will resist any attempts to reduce funding for Union actions in this field;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Underlines that Parliament
source: 592.062
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/19 |
Old
New
|
committees/20 |
Old
New
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-582079_EN.html
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-582234_EN.html
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-584223_EN.html
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-585709_EN.html
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-585713_EN.html
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-585738_EN.html
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AD-584134_EN.html
|
events/1/date |
Old
2016-09-12T00:00:00New
2016-09-11T00:00:00 |
events/10/date |
Old
2016-11-24T00:00:00New
2016-11-23T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.079&secondRef=02
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE582.234&secondRef=02
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.223&secondRef=02
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.709&secondRef=02
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.749&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-585749_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.789&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-585789_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.233&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-584233_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.566&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-585566_EN.html |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.713&secondRef=02
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.727&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-585727_EN.html |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.734&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-585734_EN.html |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE587.630&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AD-587630_EN.html |
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.593&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-585593_EN.html |
docs/13/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE585.738&secondRef=02
|
docs/14/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE584.134&secondRef=02
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.175New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-PR-589175_EN.html |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161025&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-10-25-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/10 |
|
events/11 |
|
events/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0353_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0353_EN.html |
events/12 |
|
events/13 |
|
events/13 |
|
events/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20161130&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-11-30-TOC_EN.html |
events/14 |
|
events/14 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0287&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0287_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0411New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0411_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/10 |
|
events/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0353&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0353_EN.html |
events/11 |
|
events/13 |
|
events/14/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0475New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0475_EN.html |
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDE/8/08281;BUDG/8/06195New
|
procedure/final/title |
Old
OJ L 051 28.02.2017, p. 0001New
OJ L 051 28.02.2017, p. 0001 |
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:051:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:051:TOC |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed |
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
51ec5c64b819f2575200024c
|
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
GILL NeenaNew
GILL CBE Neena |
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
51ec5c64b819f2575200024c
|
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
GILL NeenaNew
GILL CBE Neena |
activities/9/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
51ec5c64b819f2575200024c
|
activities/9/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
GILL NeenaNew
GILL CBE Neena |
activities/12 |
|
activities/15 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
51ec5c64b819f2575200024c
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
GILL NeenaNew
GILL CBE Neena |
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council decision on budgetary joint textNew
Awaiting signature of act |
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
51ec5c64b819f2575200024c
|
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
51ec5c64b819f2575200024c
|
activities/9/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
51ec5c64b819f2575200024c
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
51ec5c64b819f2575200024c
|
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
activities/10/docs/0/url |
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=14635%2F16&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC
|
activities/2/committees/15/date |
2016-05-23T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/15/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/15/date |
2016-05-23T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/15/rapporteur |
|
activities/9/committees/15/date |
2016-05-23T00:00:00
|
activities/9/committees/15/rapporteur |
|
committees/15/date |
2016-05-23T00:00:00
|
committees/15/rapporteur |
|
activities/2/committees/15/date |
2016-05-23T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/15/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/committees/15/date |
2016-05-23T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/15/rapporteur |
|
activities/9/committees/15/date |
2016-05-23T00:00:00
|
activities/9/committees/15/rapporteur |
|
committees/15/date |
2016-05-23T00:00:00
|
committees/15/rapporteur |
|
activities/6/docs/0 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/13/docs/0/text |
|
activities/12/docs |
|
activities/13/docs |
|
activities/13/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting announcement of budgetary joint textNew
Awaiting Council decision on budgetary joint text |
activities/12/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/10/date |
Old
2016-11-17T00:00:00New
2016-11-24T00:00:00 |
activities/11/docs/0/text |
|
activities/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Budgetary conciliation committee convenedNew
Awaiting announcement of budgetary joint text |
activities/11 |
|
activities/12 |
|
activities/10 |
|
activities/2/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/7 |
|
activities/8 |
|
activities/9 |
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDG/8/06195New
BUDE/8/08281;BUDG/8/06195 |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Budgetary conciliation committee convened |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
BUDG/8/06195
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
committees/13/date |
2016-02-23T00:00:00
|
committees/13/rapporteur |
|
activities/0 |
|
committees/9/date |
2016-03-16T00:00:00
|
committees/9/rapporteur |
|
committees/8/date |
2016-04-14T00:00:00
|
committees/8/rapporteur |
|
committees/18/date |
Old
2016-02-15T00:00:00New
2016-02-16T00:00:00 |
committees/2/date |
2016-02-23T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/18/date |
2016-02-15T00:00:00
|
committees/18/rapporteur |
|
committees/15/date |
2016-05-23T00:00:00
|
committees/15/rapporteur |
|
committees/13/date |
2016-02-23T00:00:00
|
committees/13/rapporteur |
|
committees/10/date |
2016-03-04T00:00:00
|
committees/10/rapporteur |
|
committees/7/date |
Old
2016-01-14T00:00:00New
2016-01-21T00:00:00 |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|