BETA


2016/2075(INI) Evaluation of external aspects of the customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA BEGHIN Tiziana (icon: EFDD EFDD) BENDTSEN Bendt (icon: PPE PPE), RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO Inma (icon: S&D S&D), MCCLARKIN Emma (icon: ECR ECR), DE SARNEZ Marielle (icon: ALDE ALDE), BUCHNER Klaus (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion CONT ALI Nedzhmi (icon: ALDE ALDE) Zigmantas BALČYTIS (icon: S&D S&D), Dennis de JONG (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2017/09/26
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2017/05/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/05/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 468 votes to 89, with 82 abstentions, a resolution on the evaluation of external aspects of the customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade.

Members noted that the Customs Union is a basic pillar of the European Union and of the largest trading blocs in the world and that the implementation of the Union Customs Code is essential for the safeguarding of EU own resources, notably customs duties, and national tax interests.

Cooperation with Member States : Parliament called on the Commission to work closely with the Member States to ensure a coordinated, uniform and efficient implementation of the new system set by the Union Customs Code. It stressed the need to address existing gaps in the control systems, develop further customs simplifications and reduce administrative burdens for legitimate traders, while ensuring at the same time appropriate, effective, efficient and harmonised controls at EU borders.

The resolution emphasised the importance of completing the work of harmonising controls at all points of entry into the Customs Union.

Purpose of the controls : according to Members, effective customs controls must guarantee security, safety, the respect of environmental requirements and health regulations and EU economic interests . Particular effort should be made as regards: (i) intellectual property rights and the fight against illicit trade; (ii) terrorism; (iii) money laundering; (iv) wildlife trafficking; (v) tax evasion; (vi) drug and tobacco trafficking and falsified medicines ,as well as (vii) combating all forms of unfair competition that European firms which comply with EU standards may face. The Commission is called upon to pursue greater collaboration with the private sector in identifying fraudulent operators.

IT systems : insufficient financing to upgrade the existing IT systems and develop the required new systems is a major issue hampering progress, most notably in relation to the new Import Control System.

The resolution stressed the importance of interconnected IT systems and the need to use electronic exchanges to access data on reliable and legal trade and make it available through channels other than customs declarations, for example through international mutual exchange programmes such as the AEO (Authorised Economic Operator) programme or the Smart and Secure Trade Lanes (SSTL) project. Members recalled that the development of the required IT systems needs sufficient financing and insisted on the need to advance from the current “less paper” customs environment to one that is “paper-free”.

The Commission is called on, inter alia, to:

cooperate with customs, border agencies on the ground and stakeholders within the EU, as well as with its trade partners, in the area of data sharing, in particular as regards recognition of custom controls, trusted trade partners and mitigation strategies for dismantling illicit trade networks; analyse the problem of seeking the most favourable customs controls , particularly with regard to customs clearance, inspections, sanctions and controls, and assess their impact on trade, tax revenues and customs duties; work closely with the Member States, the OECD and the World Customs Organisation (WCO) in reducing the existing gaps in the customs control systems by ensuring that illicit trade, counterfeiting and fraud are tackled using more systematically coordinated risk-based controls based on harmonised criteria for inspections; work further with the Member States on sharing best practices on customs procedures and VAT; better develop an accurate cost-benefit analysis of the implications of harmonisation of the enforcement of criminal sanctions in place in the Member States to combat illicit trade activities; identify where the risks lie on specific trade routes and protecting the citizens and legitimate businesses by preventing illegal products from entering the EU; develop and support joint training opportunities for customs agents in the Member States; reinforce its cooperation in customs matters with its main trading partners and their customs authorities, as well as to engage in a dialogue with the main originating countries of counterfeit goods; coordinate in a better way the defence of geographical indication on agri-food products, within the Commission itself and also with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), as a genuine value added on external markets.

Counterfeit : certain trade partners continue to ship the bulk of the illegal or counterfeited products entering the Union. China and Hong Kong are responsible for over EUR 300 million and EUR 100 million respectively. Belarus in 2015 alone caused a fiscal loss to the EU of EUR 1 billion, exporting products that totally circumvented VAT rules and health regulation.

Parliament noted that the efficiency of customs procedures is crucial for the effective and expedient law enforcement with regard to the counterfeiting and smuggling of excisable goods entering the EU. It also insisted that the quality and performance of customs controls on the transit of goods, particularly for shipment and transport operations at ports and borders, is of the first importance and must be improved.

The Commission is called upon to periodically report to the responsible committees of the European Parliament on the monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the EU strategy and action plan for customs risk management.

Documents
2017/05/16
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/05/15
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/04/07
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Tiziana BEGHIN (EFDD, IT) on the evaluation of external aspects of the customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade.

The report noted that the Customs Union is a basic pillar of the European Union and of the largest trading blocs in the world and that the implementation of the Union Customs Code is essential for the safeguarding of EU own resources, notably customs duties, and national tax interests.

Cooperation with Member States : Members called on the Commission to work closely with the Member States to ensure a coordinated, uniform and efficient implementation of the new system set by the Union Customs Code. They stressed the need to address existing gaps in the control systems, develop further customs simplifications and reduce administrative burdens for legitimate traders, while ensuring at the same time appropriate, effective, efficient and harmonised controls at EU borders.

Purpose of the controls : according to the report, effective customs controls must guarantee security, safety, the respect of environmental requirements and health regulations and EU economic interests . Particular effort should be made as regards: (i) intellectual property rights and the fight against illicit trade; (ii) terrorism; (iii) money laundering; (iv) wildlife trafficking; (v) tax evasion; (vi) drug and tobacco trafficking and falsified medicines ,as well as (vii) combating all forms of unfair competition that European firms which comply with EU standards may face.

IT systems : Members stressed the importance of interconnected IT systems and the need to use electronic exchanges to access data on reliable and legal trade and make it available through channels other than customs declarations, for example through international mutual exchange programmes such as the AEO (Authorised Economic Operator) programme or the Smart and Secure Trade Lanes (SSTL) project. They insisted on the need to advance from the current “less paper” customs environment to one that is “paper-free”.

The Commission is called on, inter alia , to:

cooperate with customs, border agencies on the ground and stakeholders within the EU, as well as with its trade partners, in the area of data sharing , in particular as regards recognition of custom controls, trusted trade partners and mitigation strategies for dismantling illicit trade networks; analyse the problem of seeking the most favourable customs controls , particularly with regard to customs clearance, inspections, sanctions and controls, and assess their impact on trade, tax revenues and customs duties; work closely with the Member States, the OECD and the World Customs Organisation (WCO) in reducing the existing gaps in the customs control systems by ensuring that illicit trade, counterfeiting and fraud are tackled using more systematically coordinated risk-based controls based on harmonised criteria for inspections; ensure that the progressive implementation of the Union Customs Code establishes a level playing field throughout the Union; work further with the Member States on sharing best practices on customs procedures and VAT; better develop an accurate cost-benefit analysis of the implications of harmonisation of the enforcement of criminal sanctions in place in the Member States to combat illicit trade activities; develop and support joint training opportunities for customs agents in the Member States; reinforce its cooperation in customs matters with its main trading partners and their customs authorities, as well as to engage in a dialogue with the main originating countries of counterfeit goods; coordinate in a better way the defence of geographical indication on agri-food products, within the Commission itself and also with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), as a genuine value added on external markets.

The report noted that the efficiency of customs procedures is crucial not only for trade facilitation, but also for effective and expedient law enforcement with regard to the counterfeiting and smuggling of excisable goods entering the EU. It also insisted that the quality and performance of customs controls on the transit of goods, particularly for shipment and transport operations at ports and borders, is of the first importance and must be improved.

The Commission is called upon to periodically report to the responsible committees of the European Parliament on the monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the EU strategy and action plan for customs risk management.

Documents
2017/03/21
   EP - Vote in committee
2017/02/03
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/12/09
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/11/10
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/05/24
   EP - ALI Nedzhmi (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2016/05/12
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2016/01/25
   EP - BEGHIN Tiziana (EFDD) appointed as rapporteur in INTA

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0162/2017 - Tiziana Beghin - résolution #

2017/05/16 Outcome: +: 468, -: 89, 0: 82
DE IT ES RO HU CZ PT FR AT BG BE NL SK LT DK LV FI SI EL LU IE HR EE SE PL MT CY GB
Total
85
63
48
26
17
20
18
62
16
14
20
22
12
9
9
8
11
7
19
5
9
8
6
19
48
4
5
48
icon: PPE PPE
190

Belgium PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
158

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
31

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: NI NI
13

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
157 2016/2075(INI)
2016/10/17 CONT 31 amendments...
source: 592.244
2017/02/03 INTA 126 amendments...
source: 599.600

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-05-15-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/4
name
MINEUR Anne-Marie
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.219&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AD-589219_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE595.633
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-PR-595633_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE599.600
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AM-599600_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2017-04-07T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0162_EN.html title: A8-0162/2017
summary
events/2
date
2017-04-07T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0162_EN.html title: A8-0162/2017
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170515&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2017-05-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0208_EN.html title: T8-0208/2017
summary
events/5
date
2017-05-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0208_EN.html title: T8-0208/2017
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana date: 2016-01-25T00:00:00 group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2016-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: ALI Nedzhmi date: 2016-05-24T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ALI Nedzhmi group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0162&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0162_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0208
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0208_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2016-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2016-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
shadows
activities
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2016-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ALDE name: ALI Nedzhmi body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: BENDTSEN Bendt group: S&D name: RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO FERNÁNDEZ Inmaculada group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: DE SARNEZ Marielle group: GUE/NGL name: MINEUR Anne-Marie group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2016-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • date: 2017-03-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CONT date: 2016-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ALDE name: ALI Nedzhmi body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: BENDTSEN Bendt group: S&D name: RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO FERNÁNDEZ Inmaculada group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: DE SARNEZ Marielle group: GUE/NGL name: MINEUR Anne-Marie group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2016-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • date: 2017-04-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0162&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0162/2017 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2017-05-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170515&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0208 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0208/2017 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2016-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BEGHIN Tiziana group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CONT
date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: ALI Nedzhmi
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ALI Nedzhmi group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
INTA
date
2016-01-25T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
docs
  • date: 2016-11-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.219&secondRef=02 title: PE589.219 committee: CONT type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-12-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE595.633 title: PE595.633 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2017-02-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE599.600 title: PE599.600 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-09-26T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=29513&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)511 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-21T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-04-07T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0162&language=EN title: A8-0162/2017 summary: The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Tiziana BEGHIN (EFDD, IT) on the evaluation of external aspects of the customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade. The report noted that the Customs Union is a basic pillar of the European Union and of the largest trading blocs in the world and that the implementation of the Union Customs Code is essential for the safeguarding of EU own resources, notably customs duties, and national tax interests. Cooperation with Member States : Members called on the Commission to work closely with the Member States to ensure a coordinated, uniform and efficient implementation of the new system set by the Union Customs Code. They stressed the need to address existing gaps in the control systems, develop further customs simplifications and reduce administrative burdens for legitimate traders, while ensuring at the same time appropriate, effective, efficient and harmonised controls at EU borders. Purpose of the controls : according to the report, effective customs controls must guarantee security, safety, the respect of environmental requirements and health regulations and EU economic interests . Particular effort should be made as regards: (i) intellectual property rights and the fight against illicit trade; (ii) terrorism; (iii) money laundering; (iv) wildlife trafficking; (v) tax evasion; (vi) drug and tobacco trafficking and falsified medicines ,as well as (vii) combating all forms of unfair competition that European firms which comply with EU standards may face. IT systems : Members stressed the importance of interconnected IT systems and the need to use electronic exchanges to access data on reliable and legal trade and make it available through channels other than customs declarations, for example through international mutual exchange programmes such as the AEO (Authorised Economic Operator) programme or the Smart and Secure Trade Lanes (SSTL) project. They insisted on the need to advance from the current “less paper” customs environment to one that is “paper-free”. The Commission is called on, inter alia , to: cooperate with customs, border agencies on the ground and stakeholders within the EU, as well as with its trade partners, in the area of data sharing , in particular as regards recognition of custom controls, trusted trade partners and mitigation strategies for dismantling illicit trade networks; analyse the problem of seeking the most favourable customs controls , particularly with regard to customs clearance, inspections, sanctions and controls, and assess their impact on trade, tax revenues and customs duties; work closely with the Member States, the OECD and the World Customs Organisation (WCO) in reducing the existing gaps in the customs control systems by ensuring that illicit trade, counterfeiting and fraud are tackled using more systematically coordinated risk-based controls based on harmonised criteria for inspections; ensure that the progressive implementation of the Union Customs Code establishes a level playing field throughout the Union; work further with the Member States on sharing best practices on customs procedures and VAT; better develop an accurate cost-benefit analysis of the implications of harmonisation of the enforcement of criminal sanctions in place in the Member States to combat illicit trade activities; develop and support joint training opportunities for customs agents in the Member States; reinforce its cooperation in customs matters with its main trading partners and their customs authorities, as well as to engage in a dialogue with the main originating countries of counterfeit goods; coordinate in a better way the defence of geographical indication on agri-food products, within the Commission itself and also with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), as a genuine value added on external markets. The report noted that the efficiency of customs procedures is crucial not only for trade facilitation, but also for effective and expedient law enforcement with regard to the counterfeiting and smuggling of excisable goods entering the EU. It also insisted that the quality and performance of customs controls on the transit of goods, particularly for shipment and transport operations at ports and borders, is of the first importance and must be improved. The Commission is called upon to periodically report to the responsible committees of the European Parliament on the monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the EU strategy and action plan for customs risk management.
  • date: 2017-05-15T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170515&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-05-16T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=29513&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2017-05-16T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0208 title: T8-0208/2017 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 468 votes to 89, with 82 abstentions, a resolution on the evaluation of external aspects of the customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade. Members noted that the Customs Union is a basic pillar of the European Union and of the largest trading blocs in the world and that the implementation of the Union Customs Code is essential for the safeguarding of EU own resources, notably customs duties, and national tax interests. Cooperation with Member States : Parliament called on the Commission to work closely with the Member States to ensure a coordinated, uniform and efficient implementation of the new system set by the Union Customs Code. It stressed the need to address existing gaps in the control systems, develop further customs simplifications and reduce administrative burdens for legitimate traders, while ensuring at the same time appropriate, effective, efficient and harmonised controls at EU borders. The resolution emphasised the importance of completing the work of harmonising controls at all points of entry into the Customs Union. Purpose of the controls : according to Members, effective customs controls must guarantee security, safety, the respect of environmental requirements and health regulations and EU economic interests . Particular effort should be made as regards: (i) intellectual property rights and the fight against illicit trade; (ii) terrorism; (iii) money laundering; (iv) wildlife trafficking; (v) tax evasion; (vi) drug and tobacco trafficking and falsified medicines ,as well as (vii) combating all forms of unfair competition that European firms which comply with EU standards may face. The Commission is called upon to pursue greater collaboration with the private sector in identifying fraudulent operators. IT systems : insufficient financing to upgrade the existing IT systems and develop the required new systems is a major issue hampering progress, most notably in relation to the new Import Control System. The resolution stressed the importance of interconnected IT systems and the need to use electronic exchanges to access data on reliable and legal trade and make it available through channels other than customs declarations, for example through international mutual exchange programmes such as the AEO (Authorised Economic Operator) programme or the Smart and Secure Trade Lanes (SSTL) project. Members recalled that the development of the required IT systems needs sufficient financing and insisted on the need to advance from the current “less paper” customs environment to one that is “paper-free”. The Commission is called on, inter alia, to: cooperate with customs, border agencies on the ground and stakeholders within the EU, as well as with its trade partners, in the area of data sharing, in particular as regards recognition of custom controls, trusted trade partners and mitigation strategies for dismantling illicit trade networks; analyse the problem of seeking the most favourable customs controls , particularly with regard to customs clearance, inspections, sanctions and controls, and assess their impact on trade, tax revenues and customs duties; work closely with the Member States, the OECD and the World Customs Organisation (WCO) in reducing the existing gaps in the customs control systems by ensuring that illicit trade, counterfeiting and fraud are tackled using more systematically coordinated risk-based controls based on harmonised criteria for inspections; work further with the Member States on sharing best practices on customs procedures and VAT; better develop an accurate cost-benefit analysis of the implications of harmonisation of the enforcement of criminal sanctions in place in the Member States to combat illicit trade activities; identify where the risks lie on specific trade routes and protecting the citizens and legitimate businesses by preventing illegal products from entering the EU; develop and support joint training opportunities for customs agents in the Member States; reinforce its cooperation in customs matters with its main trading partners and their customs authorities, as well as to engage in a dialogue with the main originating countries of counterfeit goods; coordinate in a better way the defence of geographical indication on agri-food products, within the Commission itself and also with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), as a genuine value added on external markets. Counterfeit : certain trade partners continue to ship the bulk of the illegal or counterfeited products entering the Union. China and Hong Kong are responsible for over EUR 300 million and EUR 100 million respectively. Belarus in 2015 alone caused a fiscal loss to the EU of EUR 1 billion, exporting products that totally circumvented VAT rules and health regulation. Parliament noted that the efficiency of customs procedures is crucial for the effective and expedient law enforcement with regard to the counterfeiting and smuggling of excisable goods entering the EU. It also insisted that the quality and performance of customs controls on the transit of goods, particularly for shipment and transport operations at ports and borders, is of the first importance and must be improved. The Commission is called upon to periodically report to the responsible committees of the European Parliament on the monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the EU strategy and action plan for customs risk management.
  • date: 2017-05-16T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
INTA/8/06471
New
  • INTA/8/06471
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.20.02 Export/import control, trade defence
New
6.20.02
Export/import control, trade defence, trade barriers
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0208 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0208/2017
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170515&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Tiziana BEGHIN (EFDD, IT) on the evaluation of external aspects of the customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade.

    The report noted that the Customs Union is a basic pillar of the European Union and of the largest trading blocs in the world and that the implementation of the Union Customs Code is essential for the safeguarding of EU own resources, notably customs duties, and national tax interests.

    Cooperation with Member States: Members called on the Commission to work closely with the Member States to ensure a coordinated, uniform and efficient implementation of the new system set by the Union Customs Code. They stressed the need to address existing gaps in the control systems, develop further customs simplifications and reduce administrative burdens for legitimate traders, while ensuring at the same time appropriate, effective, efficient and harmonised controls at EU borders.

    Purpose of the controls: according to the report, effective customs controls must guarantee security, safety, the respect of environmental requirements and health regulations and EU economic interests. Particular effort should be made as regards: (i) intellectual property rights and the fight against illicit trade; (ii) terrorism; (iii) money laundering; (iv) wildlife trafficking; (v) tax evasion; (vi) drug and tobacco trafficking and falsified medicines ,as well as (vii) combating all forms of unfair competition that European firms which comply with EU standards may face.

    IT systems: Members stressed the importance of interconnected IT systems and the need to use electronic exchanges to access data on reliable and legal trade and make it available through channels other than customs declarations, for example through international mutual exchange programmes such as the AEO (Authorised Economic Operator) programme or the Smart and Secure Trade Lanes (SSTL) project. They insisted on the need to advance from the current “less paper” customs environment to one that is “paper-free”.

    The Commission is called on, inter alia, to:

    • cooperate with customs, border agencies on the ground and stakeholders within the EU, as well as with its trade partners, in the area of data sharing, in particular as regards recognition of custom controls, trusted trade partners and mitigation strategies for dismantling illicit trade networks;
    • analyse the problem of seeking the most favourable customs controls, particularly with regard to customs clearance, inspections, sanctions and controls, and assess their impact on trade, tax revenues and customs duties;
    • work closely with the Member States, the OECD and the World Customs Organisation (WCO) in reducing the existing gaps in the customs control systems by ensuring that illicit trade, counterfeiting and fraud are tackled using more systematically coordinated risk-based controls based on harmonised criteria for inspections;
    • ensure that the progressive implementation of the Union Customs Code establishes a level playing field throughout the Union;
    • work further with the Member States on sharing best practices on customs procedures and VAT;
    • better develop an accurate cost-benefit analysis of the implications of harmonisation of the enforcement of criminal sanctions in place in the Member States to combat illicit trade activities;
    • develop and support joint training opportunities for customs agents in the Member States;
    • reinforce its cooperation in customs matters with its main trading partners and their customs authorities, as well as to engage in a dialogue with the main originating countries of counterfeit goods;
    • coordinate in a better way the defence of geographical indication on agri-food products, within the Commission itself and also with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), as a genuine value added on external markets.

    The report noted that the efficiency of customs procedures is crucial not only for trade facilitation, but also for effective and expedient law enforcement with regard to the counterfeiting and smuggling of excisable goods entering the EU. It also insisted that the quality and performance of customs controls on the transit of goods, particularly for shipment and transport operations at ports and borders, is of the first importance and must be improved.

    The Commission is called upon to periodically report to the responsible committees of the European Parliament on the monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the EU strategy and action plan for customs risk management.

activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0162&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0162/2017
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4
date
2017-05-16T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2
date
2017-04-07T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/1
date
2017-03-21T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/1
date
2017-03-21T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2/date
Old
2017-04-26T00:00:00
New
2017-05-15T00:00:00
activities/2
date
2017-04-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
other/0/dg/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/trade/
New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/3
group
ALDE
name
DE SARNEZ Marielle
committees/2/shadows/3
group
ALDE
name
DE SARNEZ Marielle
activities/0/committees/2/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
MINEUR Anne-Marie
committees/2/shadows/3
group
GUE/NGL
name
MINEUR Anne-Marie
activities/0/committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: BENDTSEN Bendt
  • group: S&D name: RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO FERNÁNDEZ Inmaculada
  • group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
  • group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus
activities/1
date
2017-03-21T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: BENDTSEN Bendt
  • group: S&D name: RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO FERNÁNDEZ Inmaculada
  • group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
  • group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus
activities/0/committees/0/date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: ALI Nedzhmi
committees/0/date
2016-05-24T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: ALI Nedzhmi
activities
  • date: 2016-05-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2016-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2016-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
INTA/8/06471
reference
2016/2075(INI)
title
Evaluation of external aspects of the customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
6.20.02 Export/import control, trade defence