Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AGRI | POLČÁK Stanislav ( PPE), KADENBACH Karin ( S&D), KUŹMIUK Zbigniew ( ECR), ROHDE Jens ( ALDE), HÄUSLING Martin ( Verts/ALE), ZULLO Marco ( EFDD), LOISEAU Philippe ( ENF) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 410 votes to 205, with 59 abstentions, a resolution on minimum standards for the protection of farm rabbits.
An alternative motion for a resolution, tabled by the EPP group, was rejected in plenary by 235 votes to 388, with 62 abstentions.
Parliament recalled that the majority of rabbits are farmed for meat production, with over 340 million rabbits slaughtered for meat ever year . There are grave concerns regarding the poor welfare, high stress levels and high mortality and morbidity rates of farm rabbits in Europe.
The resolution suggested:
phasing out battery and barren wire cages in rabbit farming , and make the conversion to alternative methods of rabbit farming such as park farming or hutch systems, with grass as the main feed, which improve the comfort and welfare of farmed rabbits; undertaking further research for the purpose of finding the best possible housing systems to improve animal welfare; preserving the quality and safety of rabbit meat imports by undertaking thorough controls and inspections when these imports enter the Union.
Rabbit rearing : given that rabbits are extremely sensitive animals and can suffer from a wide range of welfare problems and diseases caused by inappropriate breeding conditions, it is necessary to increase efforts tackle the lack of research and investment in medicines.
Members pointed out that rabbits weaned for fattening and does kept in alternative collective park systems, which typically provide 750 cm²/rabbit for growers and 800 cm²/rabbit for does, benefit from more space for movement. However, such systems will cause farms to incur costs, which needs to be taken into account by providing financial assistance to farmers who opt for this system for raising rabbits.
The resolution stated that any compulsory measure initiated will have to be backed up by the budget necessary to support rabbit breeders . A specific heading should be included for the purpose of promoting the consumption of rabbit meat.
Moreover, the Commission is invited to use scientific evidence and findings as the basis when proposing measures for housing requirements for breeding does and for rabbits reared for meat production.
Transport and slaughtering : Parliament stressed that rabbits should be fed and watered before long-distance transport and be provided with adequate food, water and space in transit, and that transport times should be as limited as possible. Moreover, rabbits should be fully stunned before slaughter.
Antimicrobial resistance : due to species-specific diseases and the high mortality rate inherent to rabbit farming, widespread routine administration of antibiotics has become a necessity, which can lead to an increase in antimicrobial resistance.
Parliament stressed that antibiotics must be used only for treatment purposes and should be followed by the appropriate withdrawal period before slaughter. It emphasised that reducing the use of antibiotics, can only be achieved if stronger emphasis is placed on the management and monitoring of rabbit farms.
In the light of the high number of rabbits being farmed and slaughtered in the EU and the severe animal welfare implications of the systems currently used for keeping rabbits, Parliament suggested drawing up a roadmap towards financially sustainable minimum standards for the protection of farm rabbits. This roadmap should consist, as a minimum, of:
the drafting of guidelines containing good practices and establishing animal welfare rules for rabbits; a Commission recommendation, taking into consideration existing national measures, containing, where appropriate, proposals for a common EU approach, in particular with regard to rabbit health, welfare and housing.
Lastly, the resolution encouraged Member States and the Commission to give dedicated budgetary support in order to undertake scientific research into health of farm rabbits, taking into account the request for a move towards other systems of production.
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development adopted the own-initiative report by Stefan ECK (GUE/NGL, DE) on minimum standards for the protection of farm rabbits.
Members recalled that the majority of rabbits are farmed for meat production, with over 340 million rabbits slaughtered for meat ever year .
There are grave concerns regarding the poor welfare, high stress levels and high mortality and morbidity rates of farm rabbits in Europe.
The report suggested phasing out battery and barren wire cages in rabbit farming , and make the conversion to alternative methods of rabbit farming such as park farming or hutch systems, with grass as the main feed, which improve the comfort and welfare of farmed rabbits.
Member States and the Commission are called upon to undertake further research for the purpose of finding the best possible housing systems to improve animal welfare in different types of farming and to preserve the quality and safety of rabbit meat imports by undertaking thorough controls and inspections when these imports enter the Union.
Rabbit rearing : Members expressed concern that rabbits reared and fattened for meat production in the EU are kept in old-fashioned cages which do not conform to modern farming requirements. Rabbits are extremely sensitive animals and can suffer from a wide range of welfare problems and diseases caused by inappropriate breeding conditions. Few therapeutic tools are available to rabbit farmers and veterinarians to tackle the health problems that arise.
The report pointed out that rabbits weaned for fattening and does kept in alternative collective park systems, which typically provide 750 cm²/rabbit for growers and 800 cm²/rabbit for does, benefit from more space for movement. However, such systems will cause farms to incur costs, which needs to be taken into account by providing financial assistance to farmers who opt for this system for raising rabbits.
Transport and slaughtering : given that transport is a stressful experience for rabbits, Members stressed that rabbits should be fed and watered before long-distance transport and be provided with adequate food, water and space in transit, and that transport times should be as limited as possible . Moreover, rabbits should be fully stunned before slaughter.
Antimicrobial resistance : due to species-specific diseases and the high mortality rate inherent to rabbit farming, widespread routine administration of antibiotics has become a necessity, which can lead to an increase in antimicrobial resistance.
Members stressed that antibiotics must be used only for treatment purposes and should be followed by the appropriate withdrawal period before slaughter. Member States should be encouraged to gradually phase out the use of conventional battery cages across the EU.
In conclusion, the report encouraged the Commission, in the light of the high number of rabbits being farmed and slaughtered in the EU and the severe animal welfare implications of the systems currently used for keeping rabbits, to draw up a roadmap towards financially sustainable minimum standards for the protection of farm rabbits. This roadmap should consist, as a minimum, of:
the drafting of guidelines containing good practices and establishing animal welfare rules for rabbits; a Commission recommendation, taking into consideration existing national measures, containing, where appropriate, proposals for a common EU approach, in particular with regard to rabbit health, welfare and housing.
Lastly, the report encouraged Member States and the Commission to give dedicated budgetary support in order to undertake scientific research into health of farm rabbits, taking into account the request for a move towards other systems of production.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)390
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0077/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0011/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE589.149
- Committee draft report: PE587.419
- Committee draft report: PE587.419
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE589.149
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)390
Activities
- Paul BRANNEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michel DANTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stefan ECK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Florent MARCELLESI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alex MAYER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0011/2017 - Stefan Eck - Am 1 #
A8-0011/2017 - Stefan Eck - Am 3 #
A8-0011/2017 - Stefan Eck - AGRI committee resoluti #
GB | DE | IT | SE | BE | FI | DK | EL | NL | AT | PL | CZ | LT | RO | LU | EE | IE | PT | CY | LV | HR | BG | SI | SK | MT | HU | ES | FR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
60
|
88
|
58
|
18
|
21
|
13
|
12
|
20
|
23
|
18
|
48
|
20
|
11
|
30
|
6
|
6
|
8
|
21
|
5
|
8
|
11
|
13
|
8
|
13
|
6
|
17
|
48
|
63
|
|
S&D |
172
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (19) |
Germany S&DFor (27)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Jo LEINEN, Joachim SCHUSTER, Jutta STEINRUCK, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
Italy S&DFor (18)Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elly SCHLEIN, Flavio ZANONATO, Gianni PITTELLA, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
Against (1)Abstain (1) |
Sweden S&D |
4
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
Austria S&D |
Poland S&DFor (5) |
4
|
2
|
Romania S&DFor (13)Against (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Portugal S&DFor (6)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
France S&D |
|
ALDE |
56
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
4
|
3
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
1
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Spain ALDEAbstain (2) |
France ALDEAgainst (2) |
||||||||
ECR |
64
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (13)Abstain (1) |
Germany ECRFor (4)Abstain (2) |
2
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Poland ECRFor (17)Anna FOTYGA, Beata GOSIEWSKA, Bolesław G. PIECHA, Czesław HOC, Edward CZESAK, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Karol KARSKI, Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI, Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI, Marek JUREK, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Stanisław OŻÓG, Sławomir KŁOSOWSKI, Urszula KRUPA, Zbigniew KUŹMIUK, Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
Abstain (1) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
49
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (6) |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (12) |
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
45
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||
EFDD |
37
|
United Kingdom EFDD |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
15
|
3
|
2
|
Greece NIFor (5) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
36
|
1
|
1
|
Italy ENFAbstain (6) |
1
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
France ENFFor (3)Against (13)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||||||
PPE |
199
|
Germany PPEFor (2)Against (25)
Albert DESS,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Herbert REUL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (3) |
Italy PPEFor (1)Against (8)Abstain (2) |
3
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
Greece PPEAgainst (5) |
Netherlands PPEFor (1) |
Austria PPEAgainst (5) |
Poland PPEFor (2)Against (15)Abstain (4) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
3
|
Romania PPEFor (2)Against (10) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
Portugal PPEFor (1)Against (7) |
1
|
4
|
5
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (1)Against (5)Abstain (1) |
Slovenia PPEFor (1)Against (4) |
Slovakia PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
3
|
Hungary PPEFor (1)Against (9) |
Spain PPEAgainst (16)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Pilar AYUSO,
Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
France PPEAgainst (18)
Alain CADEC,
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Angélique DELAHAYE,
Anne SANDER,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Brice HORTEFEUX,
Constance LE GRIP,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Franck PROUST,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Jérôme LAVRILLEUX,
Marc JOULAUD,
Maurice PONGA,
Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE,
Nadine MORANO,
Philippe JUVIN,
Renaud MUSELIER,
Tokia SAÏFI
|
Amendments | Dossier |
256 |
2016/2077(INI)
2016/09/20
AGRI
256 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) - having regard to the European Food Safety Authority's Scientific Opinion Concerning the Welfare of Animals during Transport of 12 January 2011,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the majority of rabbits are farmed for meat production, with over 340 million rabbits slaughtered for meat ever year; whereas more than three quarters of all rabbit farming in the EU takes place in Italy, Spain and France, although it represents less than 1% of the EU's final livestock production;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes with concern that Directive 98/58/EC concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes, which requires freedom of movement in accordance with the ethological or biological needs of animals, is not complied with where rabbits are raised in cages;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3 c. Underlines that there is a downward trend in rabbit meat consumption; notes that consumers increasingly demand rabbit meat farmed to high animal welfare standards, as well as origin labelling on rabbit meat products; encourages the Member States and the sector to make use of voluntary labelling schemes as laid down in Chapter V of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for the mandatory origin labelling of rabbit meat, thereby allowing consumers to make informed and transparent purchasing choices, while highlighting the provenance of the product and protecting it from unfair competition;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Encourages the use of EU support under the rural development programmes for a transition in the rabbit farming sector's production systems towards higher animal welfare standards; invites the Commission to consider drafting support programmes to this end;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 d (new) 3 d. Stresses that all rabbit meat on the EU market must adhere to high food safety and quality standards, and animal welfare criteria, including imports from third countries; highlights the dangers of unfair competition from third countries if equivalent standards and criteria are not applied to imports;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 e (new) 3 e. Calls on the Commission and Member States to safeguard the quality and safety of rabbit meat imports by undertaking thorough controls and inspections when these imports enter the Union;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Encourages the use of alternative flooring to slats, in order to provide greater comfort than plastic gratings or solid floors with litter;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Welcomes the establishment of the European platform on animal welfare, and calls on the Commission and Member States to exchange and highlight codes of practice on rabbit farming;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Points out that there is a need for further scientific research on the welfare of farm rabbits; invites the Member States and Commission to encourage and undertake scientific research on the welfare of farm rabbits and rabbit farming production systems;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas it is both important and necessary to achieve and maintain profitable rabbit production so that it can continue to help preserve the rural fabric and employment, particularly for women, in areas where other types of production are not possible, as well as continuing to offer varied, high-quality food to consumers;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Asks that, as is the case for other species, research be carried out to define alternative production systems, including organic production systems, so that rabbit farmers can opt for them on a voluntary basis and the diverse range of European consumers can be offered a wider range of products tailored to their needs;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that, owing to the absence of species-specific animal husbandry legislation for rabbits in the EU, the breeding of rabbits is highly intensified and its architecture resembles a high-output industrial production system that frequently displays total disregard for these sentient creatures;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that, owing to the absence of species-specific animal husbandry legislation for rabbits in the EU, the breeding of rabbits is highly intensified and its architecture resembles a
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. whereas the rabbit farming sector in the EU faces a steady decline and the projections for 2016 point to a decrease in the market of 3.9% whilst the rabbit farming sector operates in the global market conditions and does not benefit from direct aid or market interventions under Pillar I of the Common Agricultural Policy;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points out that
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points out that, t
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points out th
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points out that in some EU Member States, to cut costs and save space, a
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points out that, to cut costs and save space, a typical barren wire cage for an adult doe in
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points out that, to cut costs and save space, a typical barren wire cage for an adult doe in the EU is 60 to 65 cm long, 40 to 48 cm wide and 30 to 35 cm high; concludes that this means that rabbits cannot
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the European Union is the prime producer of rabbits in the world, ahead of Asia and particularly China, which, producing 417 000 tonnes of carcases, is the biggest exporter;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes with concern that
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes with concern that there is a high rate of disease and mortality amongst caged farm rabbits, compared with other farmed species; points out that EFSA already concluded in 2005 that the mortality and morbidity of farmed rabbits seem considerably higher than in other farmed animal species due to enteric and respiratory infections, and reproductive problems;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes with concern that there is a high rate of disease and mortality amongst caged farm rabbits, compared with other farmed species, because of the specific sensitivity of these animals, which is also one of their features in the natural environment;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes with concern that there is a high rate of disease and mortality amongst caged farm rabbits, compared with other farmed species; considers that this high mortality rate is, to a large extent, due to the systems of management and monitoring presently in place within certain countries and the lack of interest in promoting genetic strains with a calmer temperament during breeding activities;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes with concern that there is a high rate of disease and mortality amongst
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes with concern that there
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that, even in a natural environment, rabbits suffer from diseases and viruses which are sometimes fatal (HDV, myxomatosis, intestinal coccidiosis, etc.), which sometimes require treatment with antibiotics or remedies against parasites in order to prevent their dying out in the areas affected;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas rabbit farmers and the sector as a whole have an interest in ensuring that rabbit breeding in line with the European production model continues to uphold the highest standards in the world with regard to food safety, animal health and welfare and respect for the environment;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Expresses its concern that rabbits reared and fattened for meat production
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Expresses its concern that rabbits reared and fattened for meat production in the EU are typically caged in groups, and are provided with a space per rabbit that is less than the area of two ordinary A4 sheets of paper, which is far too little;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Expresses its concern that rabbits reared
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Expresses its concern that rabbits reared and fattened for meat production in the EU are typically
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Expresses its concern that rabbits reared and fattened for meat production in the EU are typically caged in small groups, and are provided with a space per rabbit that is less than the area of two ordinary A4 sheets of paper;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that rabbits are extremely sensitive animals and can suffer from a wide range of welfare problems and infectious diseases, including fatal viruses, snuffles and sore hocks
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas European rabbit farming is based on the coexistence of different production systems, and whereas rabbit farming is an important way of diversifying the income of many small farms throughout the territory, at the same time as providing a source of employment, in most cases for women;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that rabbits can suffer from a wide range of
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that rabbits can suffer from a wide range of welfare problems and diseases, including fatal viruses
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that rabbits can suffer from a wide range of welfare problems and diseases, including fatal viruses, snuffles and sore hocks
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that rabbits can suffer from a wide range of
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that rabbits can suffer from a wide range of welfare problems and diseases, including fatal viruses, snuffles and sore hocks from sitting on wire-mesh cage floors;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that, in those outdated cages, rabbits can suffer from a wide range of
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that rabbits can suffer from a wide range of welfare problems and diseases, including fatal viruses, snuffles and sore hocks from sitting on wire-mesh cage floors; is aware that investigations6 have shown that on some farms sick and injured rabbits are not treated and many fall victim to eye and fungal infections and respiratory conditions; notes with concern that the vast majority of these animals end up in the food chain, either as pet food or as meat sold to consumers in supermarkets; stresses the need for immediate action and the isolation of rabbits where there are indications of a disease; calls for increased investment to improve rabbit welfare, as well as for medicines and vaccines for domestic rabbits; _________________ 6 http://www.ciwf.org.uk/our- campaigns/investigations/rabbit- investigations/2014-the-biggest-secret-of- the-cage-age/
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that rabbits can suffer from a wide range of welfare problems and diseases, including fatal viruses,
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Points out that nutrition has a high impact on animal welfare and animal health, therefore rabbits should have permanent access to fibrous food;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises the importance of providing training courses for people involved in all aspects of animal handling in rabbit farming in order to
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas, with a mean consumption of 1.70 kg per inhabitant, rabbit meat is one of the least consumed meats in the Union (between 1 and 2% of all meat consumed);
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises the importance of providing training courses for people involved in all aspects of animal handling in rabbit farming and good practice guides based on reliable technical and scientific analyses in order to improve their performance and understanding of the relevant animal welfare requirements in order to avoid unnecessary suffering for animals;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that, g
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that growing rabbits and does kept in pen systems, typically 750 cm²/rabbit for growers and 800 cm²/rabbit for does, benefit from more space for movement
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that growing rabbits and does kept in pen systems, typically 750 cm²/rabbit for growers and 800 cm²/rabbit for does, benefit from more space for movement,
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that growing rabbits and does kept in pen systems, typically 750 cm²/rabbit for growers and 800 cm²/rabbit for does, benefit from more space for movement
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that growing rabbits and does kept in pen systems, typically 750 cm²/rabbit for growers and 800 cm²/rabbit for does, benefit from more space for movement,
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that growing rabbits and does kept in pen systems, typically 750 cm²/rabbit for growers and 800 cm²/rabbit for does, benefit from more space for movement
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that growing rabbits and does kept in pen systems, typically 750 cm²/rabbit for growers and 800 cm²/rabbit for does, benefit from more space for movement, social interaction and play, and that platforms in pen systems allow rabbits to avoid aggressors by getting out of the way, with separate housing for does when they are nursing a litter; encourages therefore also further research into the benefits of alternative housing systems, such as for example pen systems;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas rabbit production accounts for only a small share of final livestock production, at less than 1%, and the sector is currently facing economic difficulties owing to the steady decline in consumption in the EU;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that growing rabbits and does kept in
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Underlines that more research into the group housing of does would benefit their welfare, in particular with regard to the time during which does have to be kept in separate housing and when to subsequently re-introduce them into the group;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Advises that male rabbits over 12 weeks of age which are kept for breeding should always be housed separately in any system, owing to problems of aggression, so as to protect other specimens also;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Points out that transport is an extremely stressful experience for rabbits; underlines that rabbits should be fed and watered before transport and be provided with adequate food, water and space in transit, and that transport times should be as limited as possible, owing to the sensitivity of the species; emphasises that there are a huge variety of stress factors that affect animal welfare and that these differ between regions or even farms, such as heat, inanition, dehydration, pain and trauma, cold, motion sickness and fear;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Points out that transport is an extremely stressful experience for rabbits; underlines that rabbits should be fed before long-distance transport and be provided with adequate food, water and space in transit, and that transport times should be as limited as possible, owing to the sensitivity of the species; emphasises that there are a huge variety of stress factors that affect animal welfare and that these differ between regions or even farms;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Points out that transport is an extremely stressful experience for rabbits; underlines that rabbits should be fed before long-distance transport and be provided with adequate food, water and space in transit, and that transport times should be as limited as possible, owing to the sensitivity of the species; emphasises that there are a huge variety of stress factors that affect animal welfare and that these differ between regions or even farms;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Points out that transport is an extremely stressful experience for rabbits; underlines that rabbits should be fed before long-distance transport and be provided with adequate food, water and space in transit, and that transport times should be as limited as possible, owing to the sensitivity of the species; emphasises that there are a huge variety of stress factors that affect animal welfare and that these differ between regions or even farms;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Points out that transport is an extremely stressful experience for rabbits; underlines that rabbits should be fed before long-distance transport and be provided with adequate food, water and space in transit, and that transport times should be as limited as possible, owing to the sensitivity of the species; emphasises that there are a huge variety of stress factors that affect animal welfare and that these differ between regions or even farms;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Points out that transport is a
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Points out that transport is
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) B b. Whereas there is a clear consumer trend against the consumption of rabbit meat;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Stresses that the welfare of farm rabbits during transport and slaughtering depends on the attitudes and handling procedures used by farmers, hauliers and abattoir personnel, as well as the transport logistics;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that rabbits should be fully stunned before slaughter, ensuring that they undergo no suffering, pain or stress; recalls that slaughter
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that rabbits should be fully stunned before slaughter, ensuring that they undergo no suffering, pain or stress; recalls that slaughter should be carried out without risk of the stunned animal regaining consciousness; draws attention to the need to improve alternative systems to electronarcosis, such as stunning with CO2 and a mixture of gases, which are used on other species;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that rabbits should be fully stunned before slaughter, ensuring that they undergo no suffering, pain or stress; recalls that slaughter should be carried out without risk of the stunned animal regaining consciousness; calls for progress to be made in the search for alternative systems to electronarcosis, such as stunning with CO2 and a mixture of gases, which are used on other species;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Encourages research and development of more humane gas killing methods, preferably using inert gases; considers that parameters should be identified for effective electrical stunning;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that the
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses th
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses th
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that the
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that the
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that the widespread use of antibiotics in rabbit farming, especially in the intensive type of farming that uses cage systems, can, in certain cases, lead to an increase in antimicrobial resistance;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Points out that rabbits are frequently kept in battery cages, with no concessions being made to their natural environment, and kept alive through heavy recourse to products based on antibiotics; stresses the need to ban systematic recourse to pharmaceuticals to offset the shortcomings of intensive battery farming in terms of environment and health; calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage other types of rabbit farming such as the 'park' (indoor open pen) system, ‘improved’ barn rearing and organic rearing; stresses that these alternatives to intensive battery farming would make it possible to have less recourse to antibiotics, thereby curbing the spread of antimicrobial resistance;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises that
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises th
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 b (new) - having regard to the European Food Safety Authority's Scientific Opinion related to "The Impact of the current housing and husbandry systems on the health and welfare of farmed domestic rabbits" of 11 October 2005,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the housing of rabbits kept for farming purposes is one of the central questions discussed among stakeholders involved in their breeding
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises that
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises that abolishing the use of battery cages across the EU would have a positive impact on the protection of public health and would reduce the use of antibiotics in rabbit farming, which would also have benefits for the health of consumers;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Emphasises that reducing the use of antibiotics, and the positive impact that this will have on public health, can only be achieved if stronger emphasis is placed on the management and monitoring of rabbit farms;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission, in the light of the high number of rabbits being farmed and slaughtered in the EU
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission, in the light of the high number of rabbits being farmed and slaughtered in the EU
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission, in the light of
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission, in the light of the high number of rabbits being farmed and slaughtered in the EU
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the housing of rabbits kept for farming purposes is one of the
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission, in the light of the high number of rabbits being farmed and slaughtered in the EU and the severe animal welfare implications of the systems currently used for keeping rabbits, to
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission, in the light of the high number of rabbits being farmed and slaughtered in the EU and the severe animal welfare implications of the systems currently used for keeping rabbits, to put forward soon legislative proposals on setting minimum standards for the protection of farm rabbits, including a limit on the use of antibiotics;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Maintains that welfare measures should be implemented in such a way as to allow for the viability of farms; considers that further work on good practice guides and voluntary systems would be the most appropriate way to cover all of the welfare, environmental, and production characteristics existing within the sector in the EU;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Calls on the Member States to pursue research and continue work with a view to devising welfare strategies suited to the production and climate characteristics of the individual regions;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Invites the Commission to
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Invites the Commission to
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Invites the Commission to consider
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the housing of rabbits kept for farming purposes is one of the central questions discussed among stakeholders involved in their breeding, both with regard to animal welfare and from an economic point of view, but especially with regard to animal welfare;
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Invites the Commission to
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Invites the Commission to consider
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Invites the Commission to consider
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Invites the Commission to consider pen systems as
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Invites the Commission to set within future EU-level legislation, in cooperation with stakeholders, an appropriate transitional period to phase out battery cage systems in rabbit farming alongside a reasonable timetable with measurable milestones and regular reporting to, and monitoring by, the Commission;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Stresses that housing systems like park systems have already been developed to provide better welfare for rabbits, even though there is still a need for further development, therefore calls on the Commission to support research on animal friendly housing systems;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Calls for the immediate implementation and enforcement in relevant EU legislation, such as Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport, of all scientific recommendations on rabbit welfare from EFSA and the OIE;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17 b. Believes that the requirements in Articles 3 and 4 of Directive/98/58/EC for "all reasonable steps" to be taken for animal welfare, and defining standards in accordance with "established experience and scientific knowledge", should be used to enforce the scientific recommendations on rabbit welfare laid down by EFSA and the OIE;
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Points out that a balance must be kept between the various aspects to be taken into consideration, as regards
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Points out that a balance must be kept between the various aspects to be taken into consideration, as regards welfare and health, economic and social considerations and environmental impact; points out also that account must be taken of consumer needs for affordable, high- quality rabbit meat;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the housing of rabbits kept for farming purposes is
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Points out that a balance must be kept between the various aspects to be taken into consideration, as regards
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Points out that discussions about welfare will need to allow for the sustainability of farms with a view to preserving their competitiveness; maintains in addition that bilateral agreements must insist on reciprocity where animal welfare is concerned;
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Invites the Commission to encourage research in the breeding of rabbits from genetic strains with calmer temperaments and on the group keeping of mother does;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. S
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses that
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses that
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses that all measures should be harmonised at EU level by
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses that all future measures
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the housing of rabbits kept for farming purposes is one of the central questions discussed among stakeholders involved in their breeding, especially with regard to maintaining health and animal welfare;
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses that all measures should be harmonised at EU level by introducing specific EU legislation for the minimum protection of farm rabbits, including a clear system of production labelling
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses that all measures should be harmonised at EU level by introducing
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Points out that a European transparent labelling has not yet been introduced for rabbit meat, thus leaving national distribution channels open to non-identified external elements that do not always comply with animal health and animal welfare legislation; urges therefore the inclusion in European legislation of mandatory origin labelling for rabbit meat, in addition to provisions governing rabbit breeding and slaughter, so as to ensure greater market transparency, uphold quality standards and protect consumer health;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Encourages all Member States to come into line with the existing rabbit welfare provisions laid down by Austria, Belgium, Germany and the United Kingdom, in the interests of a level playing field;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Points out that the EU farm rabbit production is different amongst Member States; stresses that some Member States have already implemented national guidelines setting up minimum standards for farm rabbits (such as Germany); considers it important to ensure a level playing field for producers in the EU and towards third countries; calls on individual Member States to develop guidelines in order to both ensure animal welfare and to consider economic and social aspects of the sector;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Notes that the enforcement of compulsory measures to protect farm rabbits will entail substantial investment by farms and, bearing in mind the price crisis in the sector, calls on the Commission to implement economic aid enabling rabbit breeders to tackle that investment without jeopardising the continued survival of their farms;
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Points out that any compulsory measure initiated will have to be backed up by the budget necessary to support rabbit breeders; also maintains that a specific heading should be included for the purpose of promoting the consumption of rabbit meat;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Encourages the Commission and Member States to support farmers who develop systems that improve the welfare of rabbits as part of the CAP's rural development programmes;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Encourage the EC and the Member States to support farmers developing higher welfare systems for rabbits under rural development payments;
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls on the Commission to provide accurate and regularly updated EU rabbit farming statistics and to include rabbit meat in the European Meat Market Observatory;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the housing of rabbits kept for farming purposes is one of the central questions discussed among stakeholders involved in their breeding, especially with regard to animal health and welfare;
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Calls upon the Commission, in particular Eurostat, and the Member States to collect and produce regularly updated and accurate statistics on rabbit meat production and rabbit meat trade;
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20 a. Points out that the promotion of animal welfare can only succeed in the framework of economically viable production systems and the EU rabbit sector is undergoing a deep crisis situation; considers that establishing additional welfare measures for farms at this moment would be unaffordable and would accentuate the recession in the sector, possibly leading to its closure in the EU;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20 b. Believes that European farmers and their agri-cooperatives aim to address consumer's needs and wishes, supplying sufficiently healthy and high-quality agricultural and food products at affordable prices; points out that, in order to do so, they need to remain economically viable whilst responding effectively to new challenges such as the growing demand for food, limited natural resources, the effects of climate change or the emergence and spread of new diseases.
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c (new) 20 c. Strongly believes that individual Member States should be working with their farmers to develop workable and more effective solutions that would fit the specific production and climatic conditions of each European region, on a voluntary basis;
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 d (new) 20 d. Considers that discussions on animal welfare should take into account the associated costs of complying with legislation and the competitiveness of the sector; points out that EU producers have to compete with third countries that have different standards on animal welfare; asks the Commission to reflect on the possibility of re-launching discussions on animal welfare in the WTO;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 f (new) 20 f. Calls on the Commission to provide accurate and regularly updated EU statistics on rabbit production, market prospects & trade; calls on the Member States and Eurostat to provide for mandatory data collection of data for rabbit meat;
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 e (new) 20 e. Considers that financial support should be made available to support farmers to implement existing provisions on animal welfare and for those farmers willing to experiment animal welfare measures that go beyond current mandatory requirements; requests, in addition, that the sector be included as a priority for European programs to promote the consumption of EU rabbit meat;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) C a. Whereas there are grave concerns regarding the poor welfare, high stress levels, high mortality and morbidity of farm rabbits in Europe, as already concluded by EFSA in 2005; whereas some, but not all, detrimental effects on the welfare of farm rabbits are the result of poor housing systems and cages;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the majority of rabbits in the EU are
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the majority of rabbits in the EU are kept in barren environments, often in battery cages;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the majority of rabbits in the EU are kept in
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 c (new) - having regard to chapter 7.5 of the World Organisation for Animal Health's (OIE) Terrestrial Animal Health Code on "Slaughter of Animals",
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas, since their domestication, the majority of rabbits in the EU are kept in barren environments, often in battery cages; whereas rabbits are often housed in sheds containing 500 to 1 000 breeding females and 10 000 to 20 000 growing rabbits;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the domesticated rabbit has kept most of the wild rabbit’s natural behaviour
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the domesticated rabbit has kept most of the wild rabbit’s natural behaviour, and intensive farming systems can have severe negative implications for its welfare;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 d (new) - having regard to the UK Government's Code of Recommendations for the Welfare of Rabbits,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas there is a lack of research, development and innovation in relation to rabbit breeding (health, animal welfare, medication, etc.), which is a consequence of its slight economic interest for businesses given its low economic value and low level of significance in European animal production as a whole;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas, up to now, there is a lack of sufficient research and information that would make it possible to resolve the challenges in relation to health and behaviour that arise as a consequence of rearing rabbits in groups and on the ground, and that compromise rabbit health and welfare;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas in organic production systems rabbits are kept in group pens with access to a small area of pasture at the base of the pen, which allows the rabbits more space, increased social interaction and more opportunities for natural behaviour such as gnawing on wooden blocks, eating hay, hiding in tubes and under platforms, standing on their hind legs, lying stretched out, hopping and jumping; whereas, however, these group housing systems pose problems in relation to aggressiveness among the animals, as a consequence of bringing together batches of animals or keeping females with different litters in the same pen, causing lesions that affect their health and welfare; whereas rearing animals on the ground increases the problems encountered in controlling infections and parasites, leading to increased disease and mortality among the rabbits;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas in organic production systems rabbits are kept in group pens with access to a small area of pasture at the base of the pen, which allows the rabbits more space, increased social interaction and more opportunities for natural behaviour such as gnawing on wooden blocks, eating hay, hiding in tubes and under platforms, standing on their hind legs, lying stretched out, hopping and jumping; notes that health problems may also occur in group pens, such as increase of diseases, mainly transmitted by oro-fecal route and higher mortality rates, while negative social interactions (aggressiveness, fighting, cannibalism) are also possible;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas in organic production systems rabbits are kept in group pens with access to a small area of pasture at the base of the pen, which allows the rabbits more space, increased social interaction and more opportunities for natural behaviour such as gnawing on wooden blocks, eating hay, hiding in tubes and under platforms, standing on their hind legs, lying stretched out, hopping and jumping; notes that group pens suffer from greater incidence of health problems (increase of diseases, mainly transmitted by oro-fecal route and higher mortality rates) due to poor hygiene and as consequence of negative social interactions (e.g. aggressiveness, fighting, cannibalism....).
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas in organic production systems fattening rabbits are kept in group pens with access to a small area of pasture at the base of the pen, which allows the rabbits more space, increased social interaction and more opportunities for natural behaviour such as gnawing on wooden blocks, eating hay, hiding in tubes and under platforms, standing on their hind legs, lying stretched out, hopping and jumping;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas European producers are required to meet high standards of animal health and welfare that are not always compulsory in third countries exporting animals for slaughter to the EU; whereas consumers are becoming increasingly attentive to the conditions under which animals are being reared;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas, however, research needs to be carried out on the social problems posed by group housing systems, such as increased aggression as a consequence of bringing together batches of animals or rearing females with different litters, which may cause lesions that affect their health and welfare, and whereas it is also more difficult to control infections and parasites;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas the European Animal Welfare Strategy argued that existing legislation should be fully implemented before introducing more legislation, and the development of guides to best practice should be encouraged;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas research needs to be undertaken to develop alternative production systems such as organic production, that would exist alongside traditional production systems;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas, as in the case of other species such as poultry, research might be undertaken into alternative production systems, including organic production systems, that can offer consumers a wider range of food products and have hitherto been developed only to a limited extent;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F c (new) Fc. whereas, at present, insufficient research and information is available to resolve the health challenges and behavioural problems that can arise as a result of the different types of rabbit farming, including systems where rabbits are reared in groups and on the ground;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F d (new) Fd. whereas the sector’s low level of economic significance in the EU represents a strong disincentive for research and innovation aimed at improving rabbit health and welfare;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas there are minimum EU standards for the protection of pigs1 , calves2 , laying hens3 and broiler chickens4 , as well as the general Council Directive for the protection of animals kept for farming purposes5 , but there is not as yet any specific EU legislation on minimum standards for the protection of rabbits; whereas Member States, notably those where the majority of rabbit meat is produced, apply their own legislation to cover rabbit farming; _________________ 1 Council Directive 2008/120/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs, Official Journal L 47, 18.02.2009 p. 5-13. 2 Council Directive 2008/119/EEC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of calves. Official Journal L 10, 11.1.2009 p. 7-13. 3 Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal L203, 3.8.1999 p. 53-57. 4 Council Directive 2007/43/EC of 28 June 2007 laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production, Official Journal L 182, 12.7.2007, p. 19-28. 5 Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. Official Journal L221, 8.8.1998 p. 23-27.
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas there are minimum EU standards for the protection of pigs1 , calves2
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas there are minimum EU standards for the protection of pigs1
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas there are minimum EU standards for the protection of pigs1
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas rabbit farming has been very hard hit by the decline in meat consumption in the European Union and the economic crisis in farming, and whereas sales prices have fallen by some 20% in three years, while production costs have remained constant;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas there are minimum EU standards for the protection of pigs1 , calves2 , laying hens3 and broiler chickens4 , as well as the general Council Directive for the protection of animals kept for farming purposes5 , but there is not as yet any specific EU legislation on minimum standards for the protection of farmed rabbits; _________________ 1 Council Directive 2008/120/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs, Official Journal L 47, 18.02.2009 p. 5-13. 2 Council Directive 2008/119/EEC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of calves. Official Journal L 10, 11.1.2009 p. 7-13. 3 Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal L203, 3.8.1999 p. 53-57. 4 Council Directive 2007/43/EC of 28 June 2007 laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production, Official Journal L 182, 12.7.2007, p. 19-28. 5 Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. Official Journal L221, 8.8.1998 p. 23-27.
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) G a. Whereas more and more consumers and citizens across the EU are asking for regulation and better welfare for farm rabbits; whereas some Member States have national legislation for the protection of farm rabbits in force;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the ban on the conventional caging of laying hens under Directive 1999/74/EC is now in force and has for the most part been successfully transposed in the Member States;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas only a few Member States have legal requirements for rabbit farming; whereas in 2012 Austria has banned the keeping of rabbits in cages for meat production; whereas Belgium has legislation in force that aims to phase out battery cages and replace them with park systems by 2025;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) H a. whereas EFSA's Scientific Opinion on Animal Transport of 2011 made a number of recommendations concerning rabbit welfare during transport: these proposals included ensuring adequate ventilations so that the temperature inside the crate is maintained within a range of 5-20 degrees Celsius; whereas the same opinion pointed out that time spent inside the containers during storage before slaughter should not be considered as a resting period but as journey time and that the need for better minimum space allowance should be studied;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) H a. Whereas the EU has a negative trade balance with China with regard to rabbit meat; whereas 99% of rabbit meat imports into the EU originate from China; whereas Chinese producers will outcompete EU farmers, with adverse animal welfare implications, if no actions are taken;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas rabbit breeding is already subject to national legislation in those Member States where rabbit meat production is principally concentrated;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H b (new) H b. whereas EFSA's Scientific Opinion on Housing and Husbandry Systems of Farmed Rabbits of 2005 recommended increases in cage size, lower maximum stocking densities for growing animals and therapeutic interventions including the use of additives to reduce disease;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas, likewise, account should be taken of the nutritional contribution made by rabbit meat and the role its production plays in family-run businesses, accounting for a significant share of jobs for women in many rural areas where there are few possibilities for livestock diversification;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H c (new) H c. whereas the recommendations of the World Organization for Animal Health's (OIE) Terrestrial Animal Health Code on animal slaughter, including methods of stunning and knowledge requirements for operators, apply to rabbits;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H d (new) H d. whereas Article 3 of Council Directive 98/58/EC on animal welfare requires "all reasonable steps" to be taken to ensure the welfare of animals, and Article 4 defines standards for keeping animals in terms of "established experience and scientific knowledge", which includes standards laid down by EFSA and the OIE;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Expresses its concern
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Expresses its concern
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Expresses its concerns that rabbits in the EU are usually reared in unenriched cages, a barren environment that only has a drinker and feeder; also notes with concern that rabbits are fed on pellets and the close confines of the battery cages do not allow rabbits to express their natural behaviour, leading to abnormal behaviour, such as over grooming and repetitive gnawing or nibbling of the cage;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Expresses its concerns that rabbits in the EU are usually reared in unenriched cages, a barren environment that only has a drinker and feeder
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas just as much account should be taken of the welfare of farmers as of animal welfare;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Expresses its concerns that the majority of rabbits in the EU are
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Emphasises that rabbits, due to their complex intrinsic physiological and behavioural needs are not suited to a life in production systems; calls upon the Commission and Member States, in close cooperation with all relevant stakeholders, to come forward with a roadmap which aims to phase out the keeping of rabbits for production purposes;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Supports giving a boost to research and innovation to improve rabbit farming in the European Union, whereby the EU would grant incentives aimed at resolving the health and animal welfare problems that may arise in the various production systems while at the same time promoting the profitability of European farms;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that in some Member States alternatives to barren-cage farming of rabbits exist which
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges th
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that in some Member States alternatives to
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that in some Member States alternatives to barren-cage farming of rabbits exist
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that in some Member States alternatives to barren-cage farming of rabbits exist, such as open-air park farming or hutch systems, with grass as the main feed, which reduce the incidence of disease and mortality rates and improve the comfort and welfare of farmed rabbits;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that in some Member States alternatives to barren-cage farming of rabbits
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas in Europe the majority of rabbits are farmed for meat production, w
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that in some Member States alternatives to barren-cage farming of rabbits exist which, in certain cases, reduce the incidence of disease and mortality rates and improve the welfare of farmed rabbits;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Encourages the
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Encourages the use of
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Encourages
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Encourages
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Encourages
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Encourages
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Encourages the research on the use of pen systems for groups, which
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Encourages the use of
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Encourages the use of pen systems for groups, which are the most suitable system for rabbits because of their highly social behaviour; points out that the use of pen systems improves the welfare of farm rabbits and reduces the incidence of abnormal behaviour amongst them, allowing them an existence more closely resembling their natural state;
source: 589.149
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/3/docs |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE587.419New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-PR-587419_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE589.149New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AM-589149_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0011&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0011_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0077New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0077_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AGRI/8/06481New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/4 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2017-03-02T00:00:00New
2017-01-30T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
activities/3/date |
Old
2017-01-25T00:00:00New
2017-03-13T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
other/0/commissioner |
Old
HOGAN PhilNew
ANDRIUKAITIS Vytenis Povilas |
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/agriculture-and-rural-development_en |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2/date |
Old
2017-02-13T00:00:00New
2017-03-02T00:00:00 |
activities/1/date |
Old
2017-01-26T00:00:00New
2017-01-25T00:00:00 |
activities/1/date |
Old
2016-11-29T00:00:00New
2017-01-26T00:00:00 |
activities/2/date |
Old
2017-01-16T00:00:00New
2017-02-13T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
committees/0/shadows/6 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|