Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | FEMM | MOODY Clare ( S&D) | MATERA Barbara ( PPE), WIŚNIEWSKA Jadwiga ( ECR), MLINAR Angelika ( ALDE), VANA Monika ( Verts/ALE), AIUTO Daniela ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | CONT | Nedzhmi ALI ( ALDE), Inés AYALA SENDER ( S&D), Patricija ŠULIN ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider ( S&D) | Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI ( ALDE), Sophie MONTEL ( ENF), Liadh NÍ RIADA ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | EMPL |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 437 votes to 166, with 80 abstentions, a resolution on the EU funds for gender equality.
Members noted that gender issues are usually more often addressed in “soft” policy areas, such as human resources development, rather than in “hard” ones, such as infrastructure and ICT, which receive higher financial support.
The resolution called for European funding to be used more proactively in order to achieve gender equality goals.
European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) : in order to enhance female participation in the labour market and women's economic independence, Parliament called for the use of appropriate tools and incentives , including the European Funds such as ESF, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), ensuring the necessary social infrastructure funding for the provision of quality, affordable and accessible care services for children and other dependent persons, including elderly dependents and family members with disabilities.
In general, use should be made of the potential of cross‑cutting financing opportunities under ESI funds to support projects aimed at promoting gender equality.
Rights, Equality and Citizenship 2014-2020 programme (REC) : Members regretted that the Daphne programme for combating violence against women has no separate budget line, given that it is currently one of the specific objectives of the REC programme . Deploring the decrease in the funds available for the Daphne specific objective (EUR 20 million in 2011 compared to EUR 14 million foreseen for 2016), Parliament called for Daphne to be provided with sufficient financial support and for its visibility and highly successful profile to be maintained.
The resolution called for priority to be given to organisations dealing with the prevention of violence and supporting victims of all forms of violence. The Commission should increase support for European networks on gender equality themes as well as for gender equality initiatives such as the European Charter for Equality of Women and Men in Local Life.
Horizon 2020 programme (research and innovation) : Parliament recalled the three mainstreaming objectives under the Horizon 2020 programme , namely: (i) to foster equal opportunities and gender balance in project teams; (ii) to ensure gender balance in decision-making; and (iii) to integrate a gender dimension into research content.
They called for:
gender mainstreaming to be further strengthened within this programme, and for the development of gender equality targets in strategies, programmes and projects at all stages of the research cycle; the maintenance of an independent line of funding for gender-specific structural change projects as well as of other gender equality topics in research and innovation.
As regards other instruments , Parliament called:
for the introduction of a requirement for a gender-sensitive analysis into the EU Solidarity Fund when evaluating the impact on populations following natural disasters and in particular on the impact on women: for the allocation of EU development funds for voluntary, modern family planning and reproductive health services; for gender mainstreaming to be included among the founding principles of the recent Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF).
Strategic recommendations : Parliament regretted the Commission’s decision not to address the issue of implementing gender mainstreaming in its mid-term review of the multi-annual financial framework .
It recommended in particular:
integrating and implementing strong and effective gender budgeting and gender mainstreaming in the post-2020 generation of EU funding programmes, with a view to increasing EU funding for measures to combat gender discrimination; for gender-specific indicators to be applied in the project selection, monitoring and evaluation phases of all actions that receive funding from the EU budget; for the close monitoring of the effectiveness of national complaints bodies and procedures in the implementation of gender equality directives.
The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted an own-initiative report by Clare MOODY (S&D, UK) on EU funds for gender equality.
Members noted that gender issues are usually more often addressed in “soft” policy areas, such as human resources development, rather than in “hard” ones, such as infrastructure and ICT, which receive higher financial support.
This report assesses how gender mainstreaming is applied in the EU funds.
European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) : the report pointed out that the ESI Funds constitutes the most important financial support for the implementation of gender equality policy in the EU, especially in the case of the European Social Fund (ESF), which aims to foster the full integration of women in the labour market.
In order to enhance female participation in the labour market and women's economic independence, Members called for the use of appropriate tools and incentives , including the European Funds such as ESF, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), ensuring the necessary social infrastructure funding for the provision of quality, affordable and accessible care services for children and other dependent persons, including elderly dependents and family members with disabilities.
The report invited the Commission to propose new targeted actions aimed at encouraging women's participation in the labour market, such as a specific programme financed by the EAFRD to support female entrepreneurship.
Rights, Equality and Citizenship 2014-2020 programme (REC) : Members regretted that the Daphne programme for combating violence against women has no separate budget line, given that it is currently one of the specific objectives of the REC programme . Members emphasised the need for Daphne to be provided with sufficient financial support and for its visibility and highly successful profile to be maintained.
The Commission is called upon to increase support for European networks on gender equality themes and to bolster the requirement for the collection of gender disaggregated data in the implementation of this programme.
Horizon 2020 programme (research and innovation) : Members recalled the three mainstreaming objectives under the Horizon 2020 programme , namely: (i) to foster equal opportunities and gender balance in project teams; (ii) to ensure gender balance in decision-making; and (iii) to integrate a gender dimension into research content.
They called for:
gender mainstreaming to be further strengthened within this programme, and for the development of gender equality targets in strategies, programmes and projects at all stages of the research cycle; the maintenance of an independent line of funding for gender-specific structural change projects as well as of other gender equality topics in research and innovation.
As regards other instruments, the report called on the Commission to introduce a requirement for a gender-sensitive analysis into the EU Solidarity Fund when evaluating the impact on populations following natural disasters and in particular on the impact on women.
Members also stated that gender mainstreaming should also be included among the founding principles of the recent Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF).
The report called for strategic recommendations on how to better internalise the EU declared principle of gender equality and gender mainstreaming in the budget allocation and spending decisions of the EU policy areas.
Members called for, inter alia :
the EU-level funding of EUR 6.17 billion allocated in the current multiannual framework (MFF) for achieving the objectives of gender-strategic engagement as a first step to be increased in the next MFF; gender-specific indicators to be applied in the project selection, monitoring and evaluation phases of all actions that receive funding from the EU budget; the Commission to monitor closely the effectiveness of national complaints bodies and procedures in the implementation of gender equality directives.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)390
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0075/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0033/2017
- Committee opinion: PE593.962
- Committee opinion: PE592.269
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE595.648
- Committee draft report: PE594.036
- Committee draft report: PE594.036
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE595.648
- Committee opinion: PE592.269
- Committee opinion: PE593.962
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2017)390
Activities
- Beatriz BECERRA BASTERRECHEA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate) ES
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate) ES
- Diane JAMES
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate)
- Marek JUREK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate) PL
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate) PL
- Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate) PL
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate) PL
- Urszula KRUPA
- Clare MOODY
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate) HR
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate) HR
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate) HR
- 2016/11/22 Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 - Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services - Report on EU funds for gender equality (debate) HR
- Daniela AIUTO
- Stefan ECK
- María Teresa GIMÉNEZ BARBAT
- Julie GIRLING
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
- Filiz HYUSMENOVA
- Jérôme LAVRILLEUX
- Constance LE GRIP
- Florent MARCELLESI
- Jiří MAŠTÁLKA
- Notis MARIAS
- Angelika MLINAR
- Margot PARKER
- Emilian PAVEL
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
- Csaba SÓGOR
- Jutta STEINRUCK
- Helga STEVENS
- Beatrix von STORCH
- Tibor SZANYI
- Pavel TELIČKA
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
- Ángela VALLINA
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
- Jana ŽITŇANSKÁ
Votes
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 35/2 #
ES | GB | DE | IT | FR | BE | PT | RO | SE | EL | FI | BG | CZ | LV | DK | CY | NL | LU | AT | LT | EE | IE | SI | SK | HR | HU | MT | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
49
|
63
|
88
|
62
|
63
|
20
|
21
|
30
|
18
|
19
|
13
|
13
|
19
|
8
|
12
|
6
|
23
|
5
|
18
|
11
|
5
|
8
|
8
|
13
|
11
|
18
|
6
|
50
|
|
S&D |
175
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (19) |
Germany S&DFor (26)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Jo LEINEN, Joachim SCHUSTER, Jutta STEINRUCK, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
Italy S&DFor (23)Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Flavio ZANONATO, Gianni PITTELLA, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
|
4
|
Portugal S&DFor (8) |
Sweden S&D |
4
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
Austria S&D |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
Poland S&DFor (5) |
|||
ALDE |
57
|
1
|
3
|
France ALDEFor (6) |
Belgium ALDE |
1
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||
Verts/ALE |
48
|
4
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (6) |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (12) |
1
|
5
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
45
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
3
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||
EFDD |
38
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (1) |
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (12)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
PPE |
200
|
Spain PPEFor (12)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET, Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO, Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT, Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
Abstain (1) |
Germany PPEAgainst (22)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Burkhard BALZ,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Herbert REUL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Jens GIESEKE,
Joachim ZELLER,
Markus PIEPER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Sven SCHULZE,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (3) |
Italy PPEFor (2)Against (9)Abstain (1) |
France PPEFor (17)Against (1) |
4
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
Romania PPEFor (5)Against (7) |
3
|
Greece PPE |
3
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (6)Abstain (1) |
Czechia PPEFor (2)Against (4) |
4
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands PPEFor (1) |
3
|
Austria PPEAgainst (5) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
Slovenia PPEFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (2) |
Slovakia PPEFor (2)Against (4) |
Croatia PPEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
Hungary PPEFor (2)Against (6)Abstain (2) |
3
|
Poland PPEFor (5)Against (10) |
|
ECR |
66
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (7)Against (3)Abstain (6) |
Germany ECRFor (2)Against (4) |
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Poland ECRFor (2)Against (17)
Anna FOTYGA,
Beata GOSIEWSKA,
Bolesław G. PIECHA,
Czesław HOC,
Edward CZESAK,
Karol KARSKI,
Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI,
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI,
Mirosław PIOTROWSKI,
Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO,
Ryszard CZARNECKI,
Stanisław OŻÓG,
Sławomir KŁOSOWSKI,
Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA,
Urszula KRUPA,
Zbigniew KUŹMIUK,
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
|
|||||||||||
NI |
15
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
Greece NIFor (2)Against (3) |
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
36
|
1
|
1
|
Italy ENFAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
France ENFAgainst (15)Abstain (2) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 52 #
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 55/2 #
DE | ES | IT | GB | FR | RO | BE | SE | AT | PT | NL | EL | FI | BG | CZ | DK | LV | LU | CY | LT | EE | HU | IE | SI | HR | SK | MT | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
89
|
49
|
60
|
62
|
63
|
30
|
21
|
18
|
18
|
21
|
22
|
19
|
13
|
13
|
20
|
12
|
8
|
6
|
6
|
11
|
6
|
18
|
8
|
8
|
11
|
13
|
6
|
51
|
|
S&D |
175
|
Germany S&DFor (27)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Jo LEINEN, Joachim SCHUSTER, Jutta STEINRUCK, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
Italy S&DFor (21)Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elly SCHLEIN, Flavio ZANONATO, Gianni PITTELLA, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Simona BONAFÈ
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (19) |
4
|
Sweden S&D |
Austria S&D |
Portugal S&DFor (8) |
3
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
Poland S&DFor (5) |
|||
ALDE |
58
|
2
|
1
|
France ALDEFor (6) |
2
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
4
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||
PPE |
201
|
Germany PPEFor (11)Against (12) |
Spain PPEFor (13)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET, Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Pilar AYUSO, Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO, Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT, Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
Italy PPEAgainst (7)Abstain (1) |
France PPEFor (17) |
Romania PPEFor (9)Against (3) |
4
|
3
|
5
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (2)Abstain (3) |
Netherlands PPEAgainst (1) |
Greece PPE |
3
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (6)Against (1) |
Czechia PPEFor (2)Against (4) |
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Hungary PPEAbstain (10) |
3
|
Slovenia PPEFor (1)Against (1)Abstain (3) |
Croatia PPEFor (1)Against (4) |
Slovakia PPEFor (2)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
3
|
Poland PPEFor (7)Against (9) |
|
Verts/ALE |
49
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11)Against (1) |
4
|
1
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (6) |
5
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
45
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||
EFDD |
38
|
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (14)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (1) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
66
|
Germany ECRAbstain (3) |
2
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (7)Against (2)Abstain (6) |
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Poland ECRAgainst (19)
Anna FOTYGA,
Beata GOSIEWSKA,
Bolesław G. PIECHA,
Czesław HOC,
Edward CZESAK,
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA,
Karol KARSKI,
Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI,
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI,
Marek JUREK,
Mirosław PIOTROWSKI,
Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO,
Ryszard CZARNECKI,
Stanisław OŻÓG,
Sławomir KŁOSOWSKI,
Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA,
Urszula KRUPA,
Zbigniew KUŹMIUK,
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
|
|||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
Greece NIFor (2)Against (3) |
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
35
|
1
|
Italy ENFFor (1)Against (1)Abstain (4) |
1
|
France ENFAgainst (17)
Bernard MONOT,
Dominique BILDE,
Dominique MARTIN,
Edouard FERRAND,
Florian PHILIPPOT,
Gilles LEBRETON,
Jean-François JALKH,
Jean-Luc SCHAFFHAUSER,
Joëlle MÉLIN,
Marie-Christine ARNAUTU,
Marie-Christine BOUTONNET,
Mireille D'ORNANO,
Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI,
Philippe LOISEAU,
Sophie MONTEL,
Steeve BRIOIS,
Sylvie GODDYN
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - Am 2 #
ES | DE | FR | IT | BE | PT | GB | RO | SE | NL | CZ | FI | EL | DK | LU | CY | IE | BG | EE | LT | HR | SK | AT | SI | LV | MT | HU | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
49
|
88
|
63
|
61
|
21
|
20
|
63
|
30
|
18
|
22
|
20
|
13
|
19
|
12
|
6
|
5
|
8
|
10
|
5
|
10
|
11
|
13
|
18
|
8
|
8
|
5
|
18
|
51
|
|
S&D |
174
|
Germany S&DFor (26)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Jo LEINEN, Joachim SCHUSTER, Jutta STEINRUCK, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
Italy S&DFor (22)Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Flavio ZANONATO, Gianni PITTELLA, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
Against (2) |
4
|
Portugal S&DFor (8) |
United Kingdom S&DFor (19) |
Sweden S&D |
2
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
Austria S&D |
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
Poland S&DFor (5) |
||||
ALDE |
58
|
3
|
France ALDEFor (6) |
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
4
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||
Verts/ALE |
49
|
4
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (12) |
5
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (6) |
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
44
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
3
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||
PPE |
196
|
Spain PPEFor (13)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET, Gabriel MATO, Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Pilar AYUSO, Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO, Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
Germany PPEFor (7)Against (21)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Burkhard BALZ,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Herbert REUL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Jens GIESEKE,
Joachim ZELLER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Sven SCHULZE,
Werner KUHN
Abstain (2) |
France PPEFor (17) |
Italy PPEFor (2)Against (10) |
4
|
Portugal PPEAbstain (3) |
Romania PPEAgainst (6)Abstain (1) |
3
|
Netherlands PPEFor (5) |
Czechia PPEFor (2)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
3
|
Greece PPEFor (1)Abstain (3) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
Croatia PPEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
Slovakia PPEFor (2)Against (4) |
Austria PPEAgainst (5) |
Slovenia PPEAgainst (3)Abstain (2) |
Latvia PPEFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
3
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (9)Abstain (1) |
Poland PPEFor (2)Against (8) |
|
EFDD |
37
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (11)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (15)Abstain (1) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
Greece NIFor (2)Against (3) |
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
66
|
Germany ECRFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (3) |
1
|
4
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (7)Against (2)Abstain (7) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (19)
Anna FOTYGA,
Beata GOSIEWSKA,
Bolesław G. PIECHA,
Czesław HOC,
Edward CZESAK,
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA,
Karol KARSKI,
Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI,
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI,
Marek JUREK,
Mirosław PIOTROWSKI,
Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO,
Ryszard CZARNECKI,
Stanisław OŻÓG,
Sławomir KŁOSOWSKI,
Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA,
Urszula KRUPA,
Zbigniew KUŹMIUK,
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
|
|||||||||||
ENF |
36
|
1
|
France ENFAgainst (17)
Bernard MONOT,
Dominique BILDE,
Dominique MARTIN,
Edouard FERRAND,
Florian PHILIPPOT,
Gilles LEBRETON,
Jean-François JALKH,
Jean-Luc SCHAFFHAUSER,
Joëlle MÉLIN,
Marie-Christine ARNAUTU,
Marie-Christine BOUTONNET,
Mireille D'ORNANO,
Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI,
Philippe LOISEAU,
Sophie MONTEL,
Steeve BRIOIS,
Sylvie GODDYN
|
Italy ENFAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 56/2 #
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 56/3 #
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 62/2 #
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 62/3 #
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 67 #
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 78/1 #
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 78/2 #
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 79 #
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - Am 1 #
A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - Résolution #
ES | DE | IT | RO | FR | PT | SE | BG | BE | EL | FI | LV | IE | SI | LU | HR | EE | AT | DK | CY | LT | NL | CZ | HU | SK | MT | GB | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
49
|
90
|
61
|
29
|
64
|
21
|
18
|
13
|
21
|
20
|
13
|
8
|
8
|
8
|
5
|
11
|
6
|
18
|
12
|
6
|
11
|
23
|
20
|
16
|
13
|
6
|
62
|
50
|
|
S&D |
175
|
Germany S&DFor (27)Arndt KOHN, Arne LIETZ, Bernd LANGE, Birgit SIPPEL, Constanze KREHL, Dietmar KÖSTER, Evelyne GEBHARDT, Gabriele PREUSS, Iris HOFFMANN, Ismail ERTUG, Jakob von WEIZSÄCKER, Jens GEIER, Jo LEINEN, Joachim SCHUSTER, Jutta STEINRUCK, Kerstin WESTPHAL, Knut FLECKENSTEIN, Maria NOICHL, Martina WERNER, Norbert NEUSER, Peter SIMON, Petra KAMMEREVERT, Susanne MELIOR, Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN, Tiemo WÖLKEN, Udo BULLMANN, Ulrike RODUST
|
Italy S&DFor (22)Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Gianni PITTELLA, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
|
Portugal S&DFor (8) |
Sweden S&D |
4
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Austria S&D |
3
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (19) |
Poland S&DFor (5) |
|||
PPE |
203
|
Spain PPEFor (14)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET, Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO, Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT, Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
Against (1)Abstain (1) |
Germany PPEFor (10)Against (7) |
Italy PPEFor (6)Against (6) |
Romania PPEFor (8)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
France PPEFor (18)Alain CADEC, Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Constance LE GRIP, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Maurice PONGA, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Nadine MORANO, Philippe JUVIN, Renaud MUSELIER, Tokia SAÏFI
|
Portugal PPEFor (7)Abstain (1) |
3
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (7) |
4
|
Greece PPEFor (5) |
3
|
4
|
3
|
Slovenia PPEFor (3)Abstain (2) |
3
|
Croatia PPEFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
1
|
Austria PPEAgainst (5) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
Netherlands PPEFor (1) |
Czechia PPEFor (3)Against (3) |
Hungary PPEAgainst (1)Abstain (8) |
Slovakia PPEFor (2)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
3
|
Poland PPEFor (12)Against (5) |
|
Verts/ALE |
47
|
4
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (12) |
1
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (6) |
|||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
45
|
10
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
3
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
||||||||||||||
ALDE |
58
|
2
|
2
|
France ALDEFor (2)Against (2)Abstain (2) |
1
|
2
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (1) |
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
Netherlands ALDEAbstain (3) |
4
|
1
|
|||||||||
EFDD |
38
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (16) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
2
|
Greece NIAgainst (5) |
2
|
3
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
35
|
1
|
Italy ENFAbstain (6) |
1
|
France ENFAgainst (15)Abstain (2) |
1
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
66
|
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
Belgium ECRAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (16) |
Poland ECRAgainst (18)
Anna FOTYGA,
Beata GOSIEWSKA,
Bolesław G. PIECHA,
Czesław HOC,
Edward CZESAK,
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA,
Karol KARSKI,
Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI,
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI,
Marek JUREK,
Mirosław PIOTROWSKI,
Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO,
Ryszard CZARNECKI,
Stanisław OŻÓG,
Sławomir KŁOSOWSKI,
Urszula KRUPA,
Zbigniew KUŹMIUK,
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
|
Amendments | Dossier |
331 |
2016/2144(INI)
2016/11/14
BUDG
37 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016-2019 published, in December 2015, highlights the key role of EU funding in support of gender equality, one of the European Union's founding values;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas the lack of specific gender indicators and of collection of gender- disaggregated data as well as insufficient implementation strategies makes it impossible to achieve correct financial and budgetary accountability with a view to evaluating the gender equality impact of EU policies;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas the lack of specific gender indicators and of collection of
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas the lack of specific gender indicators and of collection of
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas the lack of specific gender indicators and of collection of gender- disaggregated data regrettably makes it impossible to achieve correct financial and budgetary
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. whereas the Gender Equality Index 2015 - Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005-2012, published by the European Institute for Gender Equality in 2015, provides a detailed assessment of where the European Union and its Member States stand with respect to gender equality in six core domains (work, money, knowledge, time, power and health) and two satellite domains (violence and intersecting inequalities);
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. Recalls the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016, especially articles 20 to 24 on ex-post evaluation of existing legislation as a basis for further action
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) D b. whereas the Gender Equality Index 2015 - Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005-2012, published by the European Institute for Gender Equality in 2015, provides a sound methodology of measuring gender inequality fully aligned with the principle of gender mainstreaming;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) D b. Welcomes efforts done in introducing gender specific indicators and collection of gender-disaggregated data in some EU legislative and policies, like e.g. in the ESF
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Regrets that the implementation of the EU budget does not currently match with the EU's high-level commitment to gender equality;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for all budget titles to pursue
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. having regard to Article 8 TFEU, which states the following: ‘In all its activities, the Union shall aim to eliminate inequalities, and to promote equality, between men and women’;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for gender-specific indicators to be applied in the project selection, monitoring and evaluation phases of all actions that receive funding from the EU budget, and for the systematic collection of gender-disaggregated data on beneficiaries and participants, also with regard to funds from outside the EU budget, such as the EFSI and the future EFSD;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for gender-specific indicators to be applied in the project selection, monitoring and evaluation phases of all actions that receive funding from the EU budget, and for the systematic collection of gender-disaggregated data on beneficiaries and participants but avoiding overregulation and administrative burdens;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for gender-specific indicators, and criteria when applicable, to be applied in the project selection, monitoring and evaluation phases of all actions that receive funding from the EU budget, and for the systematic collection of gender- disaggregated data on beneficiaries and participants;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Looks upon the EU-level funding of EUR 6.17 billion allocated in the current MFF to achieving the objectives of this gender-strategic engagement as
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Looks upon the EU-level funding of EUR 6.17 billion allocated in the current MFF to achieving the objectives of this gender-strategic engagement as a first step,
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Looks upon the EU-level funding of EUR 6.17 billion allocated in the current MFF to achieving the objectives of this gender-strategic engagement as a first step, and asks for an immediate increase in this amount
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Looks upon the EU-level funding of EUR 6.17 billion allocated in the current MFF to achieving the objectives of this
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital Β Β. whereas the European Parliament,
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises that the allocation of EU funding to promote gender equality must, on the basis of Article 8 TFEU, seek to promote equal rights for the biological genders and ‘equality between men and women’;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for strong gender budgeting and gender mainstreaming to be taken into account in preparing the post-2020 generation of EU funding programmes, with the aim of determining the following elements: i) identifying the implicit and explicit gender issues; ii) identifying – where possible – the allied resource allocations; and iii) assessing whether the EU funding programmes will continue or change existing inequalities between women and men (and groups of women and men), girls and boys and patterns of gender relations.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for strong gender budgeting and gender mainstreaming to be taken into account in preparing the post-2020 generation of EU funding programmes with a view to increasing EU funding for measures to combat gender discrimination.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for strong gender budgeting and gender mainstreaming to be
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for strong gender equality budgeting and
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the European Parliament, in its report on the revision of the MFF 2014-20201 ,
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the goal of gender equality in Europe still remains far from being achieved, according to the 2015 Gender Equality Index published by the EIGE;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. having regard to the clarification of the term ‘gender mainstreaming’ provided by the Commission in its answer to Parliamentary Question E-102868/2015 of 3 December 2015;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas gender budgeting implies the introduction of the gender perspective at all levels of the budgetary process and the need to increase EU funding to promote gender equality;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas gender budgeting implies
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas gender equality budgeting implies the introduction of the gender equality perspective at all levels of the budgetary process;
source: 594.006
2016/12/12
FEMM
245 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Β B. whereas the Commission’s Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016-2019, published in December 2015, highlights the key role of EU funding in support for
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalls the importance of close monitoring and evaluation of the Operational Programmes of the ESI Funds, in order to avoid the downgrading of
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Deplores that despite efforts to create a
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Deplores that despite efforts to create a ‘standard’ in this field, a systematic method for the implementation of gender mainstreaming within the ESF has not yet been established; calls on the Commission and the Member States to evaluate the possibility to increase resources for gender equality assessment and to follow consistently the implementation of gender mainstreaming;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Deplores that despite efforts to create a ‘standard’ in this field, a systematic method for the implementation of gender mainstreaming within the ESF has not yet been established; calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase resources for
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States not to increase resources for gender equality assessment and constantly monitor the implementation of gender mainstreaming until the sustained added value of that policy has been established;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Commission’s Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016-2019, published in December 2015, highlights the key role of EU funding in support for gender equality; whereas no EU institution has consistently implemented gender budgeting;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for the
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for the creation of permanent
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Highlights the
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Highlights the importance of giving special attention and priority to ESIF measures supporting investments in educational, social and healthcare services
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Highlights the importance of giving special attention and priority to ESIF measures supporting investments in educational, social and healthcare services, in addition to childcare facilities, given that these services are facing reductions in public funding at national and local level and that it would increase the number of jobs;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Highlights the importance of giving special attention and priority to ESIF measures supporting investments in educational, social and healthcare services, given that these services are facing reductions in public funding at national, regional and local level;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Suggests
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Suggests that the Member States increase
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 EU funding for
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. whereas spending and revenue decisions impact women and men differently;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Regrets that the budget lines under REC do not specify the resources allocated to each of the objectives of the programme, making it very difficult to analyse the spending dedicated to gender equality and combating violence against women;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that, according to the European Commission Staff Working Document for the Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016-2019, the two objectives related to gender equality and to the Daphne programme for combating violence against women
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that the two objectives related to
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that the two objectives related to
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that the two objectives related to gender equality and to the Daphne programme for combating violence against women currently account for around 35 % of the REC funds; points out that a majority of funds have been allocated under the Daphne objective compared to the gender equality objective; nonetheless finds it regrettable that Daphne has no separate budget line, given that it is currently one of the specific objectives of the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme; emphasises the need for Daphne to be provided with sufficient financial support and for its visibility and highly successful profile to be maintained;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Takes the position that sexual abuse, commercial sexual exploitation of women, the use of women for surrogacy, and sex selected abortion must be considered as unjustifiable under any political, social, religious or cultural grounds;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18 b. Condemns all forms of discrimination and violence against men and women;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes that under the
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes that under the
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Stresses that citizenship-building should be associated not only with the defence and extension of rights, but also with welfare and well-being, with education and training free from gender stereotypes and with access to social and health services, including sexual and reproductive health;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) B b. whereas the EP in its report on the Revision of the MFF 2014-2020, supports effective integration of gender mainstreaming;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22 a. Calls on the Commission to increase support for European networks on gender equality themes; thereby reinforcing opportunities for greater peer- to-peer learning, notably amongst subnational authorities; in particular, specific support is needed to increase women's participation in decision- making;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for more clarity on how the objective on combating violence is pursued under the REC programme; highlights the importance of funds reaching grassroots organisations and local and regional governments in order to ensure effective implementation;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for more clarity on how the objective on combating violence is pursued under the REC programme; highlights the importance of funds reaching grassroots organisations in order to ensure effective implementation; priority should be given to those organizations dealing with prevention of violence and supporting victims of all forms of violence;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. Recognises the need to ensure support for implementation of existing local and regional gender equality initiatives such as the European Charter for Equality of Women and Men in Local Life;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the Commission to st
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the Commission to strengthen the requirement regarding the collection
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Urges the Member States to take measures to guarantee women in disadvantaged circumstances equal access to public health systems, in particular basic health services as defined by the World Health Organisation, encompassing the protection of mother and child and gynaecological and obstetric care;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 4 EU funding for
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new) B c. whereas gender issues are usually more addressed in "soft" policy areas, such as human resources development, than in "hard" ones, like infrastructures, ICT, which receive the higher financial support;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 4 EU funding for
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 4 EU funding for
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Highlights the fact that the Horizon 2020 programme (hereinafter ‘this programme’), in line with the requirements of Article 16 of its Regulation, mainstreams
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Highlights the fact that the Horizon 2020 programme (hereinafter ‘this programme’), in line with the requirements of Article 16 of its Regulation, mainstreams
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Highlights the fact that the Horizon 2020 programme (hereinafter ‘this programme’), in line with the requirements of Article 16 of its Regulation, mainstreams
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Strongly reiterates that combating inequality between women and men in the area of research and innovation cannot be carried out using measures such as gender quotas, which lead to a questioning of the scientific competence of women and as a result are counterproductive;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26.
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Draws attention to the
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Draws attention to the three mainstreaming objectives under this programme, namely: to foster equal opportunities and
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas in order to balance professional and private life not only must affordable and accessible public care facilities
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Welcomes the fact that this programme provides support for research bodies in implementing
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Welcomes the fact that this programme provides support for research bodies in implementing
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27 a. Welcomes the fact that applicants have the possibility to include training and specific studies on gender as eligible costs in their proposals;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27 b. Welcomes that gender balance in staff is one of the ranking factors in the evaluation criteria in Horizon 2020 and that the way sex and/or gender analysis is taken into account in a proposal is assessed by the evaluators alongside the other relevant aspects of the proposal;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 c (new) 27 c. Deplores, however, that the criteria to evaluate the grants is oriented in promoting gender equality and not in ensuring gender equality; calls on this regard for a gender equality ex-ante conditionality to apply to all grants under Horizon 2020;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Welcomes the specific indicators used to monitor the implementation of a
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Welcomes the specific indicators used to monitor the implementation of a
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Welcomes the specific indicators used to monitor the implementation of a gender equality perspective in Horizon 2020, as well as the fact that, regarding gender balance in Horizon 2020 advisory groups in 2014, women’s participation was 52 %4
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that a
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas in order to balance professional and private life, a well thought-out system of care-related leave together with high-quality, easily affordable and accessible
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that a further review is needed in order to assess the results, based also on indicators such as the percentage of women participants and women project coordinators in Horizon 2020, and to propose
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Considers that a further review is needed in order to assess the results, based also on indicators such as the percentage of women participants and women project coordinators in Horizon 2020, as is consideration of how gender parity affects perception of the prestige connected with being a professional scientist, and to propose adjustments to the specific actions if required;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls for gender mainstreaming to be further strengthened under all pillars of Horizon 2020, and for the development of
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls for gender mainstreaming to be further strengthened
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls for gender mainstreaming to be further strengthened under all pillars of Horizon 2020, and for the development of
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls for
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls for the maintenance of an independent line of funding for gender- specific structural change projects (such as GERI for 2014-2016), as well as of other
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls for the maintenance of an independent line of funding for gender- specific structural change projects (such as GERI for 2014-2016), as well as of other
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls for the maintenance of an independent line of funding for gender- specific structural change projects (such as GERI for 2014-2016), as well as of other
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Γ C. whereas in order to balance professional and private life affordable and accessible public care facilities have to be provided and expenditures for these facilities are to be considered as part of infrastructure investments; whereas these services are a precondition for women’s participation in the labour market, in leading positions, in science and research and thus for
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31 a. Welcomes that one of the objectives in 'Science with and for Society' is to ensure gender equality, in both the research process and research content; further welcomes the grants 'Support to research organisations to implement gender equality plans' and 'Promoting Gender equality in H2020 and the European Research Area'; deplores, however, that there are no specific lines in the budget for the specific objectives of this programme;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32.
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Opposes the changes envisaged in the ‘New Science with and for Society Scoping Paper 2018-2020’ subsuming
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32.
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32.
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 5 Other programmes and funds including specific objectives on
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 5 Other programmes and funds including specific objectives on
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 5 Other programmes and funds including specific objectives on
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the European Commission and the European Council calls for the annual budgetary procedures applied for the MFF 2014-2020 to integrate, as appropriate, gender-responsive elements, taking into account the ways in which the overall financial framework of the Union contributes to increased gender equality
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32 a. Deplores that the European Fund for Strategic Investments does not include a gender perspective and stresses that a successful process of recovery is not possible without addressing the impact of the crises on women;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 b (new) 32 b. Stresses that natural disasters have a big impact on infrastructures linked to public services and, therefore, women are particularly affected; calls on the Commission to introduce in the EU Solidarity Fund a requirement for a gender sensitive analysis while evaluating the impact on population;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Notes that in the field of external actions and development cooperation, the Gender Action Plan (GAP) established for the period 2016-2020 covers the EU’s activities in third countries, and that there are several external assistance instruments that support
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Notes that in the field of external actions and development cooperation, the Gender Action Plan (GAP) established for the period 2016-2020 covers the EU’s activities in third countries, and that there are several external assistance instruments that support
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Notes that in the field of external actions and development cooperation, the Gender Action Plan (GAP) established for the period 2016-2020 covers the EU’s activities in third countries, and that there are several external assistance instruments that support
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33 a. Stresses that girls and women victims of armed conflict have the right to necessary medical care, including access to contraception, emergency contraception and abortion services; recalls that EU humanitarian aid must uphold the rights of girls and women under international humanitarian law and should not be subject to restrictions imposed by other partner donors as noted in EU's 2016 budget; welcomes EU's approach on this regard and encourages the Commission to maintain its position;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33 a. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to improve the documentation of discrimination against and violent attacks on female Christian refugees;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Highlights that gender mainstreaming is also among the founding principles of the recent Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF)
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the European Commission and the European Council calls for the annual budgetary procedures applied for the MFF 2014-2020 to integrate, as appropriate, gender-responsive elements, taking into account the ways in which the overall financial framework of the Union contributes to increased gender equality
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Highlights that gender mainstreaming is also among the founding principles of the recent Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF), and that eligible actions under this funding should ensure that special attention is paid to the specific needs of vulnerable persons, in particular women, unaccompanied minors, LGBTQI people and other groups at risk;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34 a. Calls for a comprehensive set of EU-wide gender guidelines to be adopted to migration and asylum policy with adequate funding for comprehensive training programmes for professionals who may come into contact with refugees and asylum seekers; emphasises that these are sensitive to the gender specific needs of refugee women and concomitant gendered harms such as the trafficking of women and girls;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34 a. Notes that female and male asylum seekers and economic refugees have particular requirements, so that the Member States are invited as far as possible to satisfy the specific requirements of women, men, children and families seeking asylum;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 b (new) 34 b. Highlights the ongoing issues of overcrowding in refugee reception centres and the impact this has on women's safety; calls for greater use of AMIF to improve reception centres with separate sleeping and sanitation facilities for women and men, and access to gender- sensitive health services including prenatal and postnatal care;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 b (new) 34 b. Notes that Christian refugees in Member State asylum-seeker hostels face attacks by fanatical Muslims living according to Sharia Law, who even subject them to death threats;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 c (new) 34 c. Member states should be encouraged to make greater use of cohesion funds and Structural Investment Funds alongside the AMIF in order to promote the integration of refugees in the labour market, with a specific focus on how accessible childcare enables women refugees;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 d (new) 34 d. Calls for a review on the increased funding for and wider scope of the Daphne and Odysseus programmes with an assessment on expanding these programmes to address the severe vulnerabilities experienced by women refugees and provide greater support in addressing these gendered harms;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Emphasises that there are other funds, such as the Internal Security Fund, special financial instruments like the Emergency Support Instrument. and other ad hoc instruments and grants, that have been mobilised to address needs in the context of the present
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Emphasises that there are other funds, such as the Internal Security Fund, special financial instruments like the Emergency Support Instrument. and other ad hoc instruments and grants, that have been mobilised to address needs in the context of the present refugee crisis; points out the difficulty in monitoring the use of these funds
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Emphasises that there are other funds, such as the Internal Security Fund, special financial instruments like the Emergency Support Instrument. and other ad hoc instruments and grants, that have been mobilised to address needs in the context of the present refugee crisis; points out the difficulty in monitoring the use of these funds, in particular from a gender perspective, and calls for the use of EU funding in this area to be coordinated, effective
Amendment 2 #
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the European Commission and the European Council calls for the annual budgetary procedures applied for the MFF 2014-2020 to integrate, as appropriate, gender-responsive elements, taking into account the ways in which the overall financial framework of the Union contributes to increased
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Calls for specific funding to support targeted measures involving grassroots organisations for ensuring that the
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Calls for specific funding to support targeted measures involving grassroots organisations, local and regional governments for ensuring that
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Calls for specific funding to support targeted measures involving grassroots organisations for ensuring that the basic
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Calls for specific funding to support targeted measures involving grassroots organisations for ensuring that the basic rights, safety and security of refugee and migrant women
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37.
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37.
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Reiterates its request for gender budgeting to be
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the European Commission and the European Council calls for the annual budgetary procedures applied for the MFF 2014-2020 to integrate, as appropriate, gender-responsive elements, taking into account the ways in which the overall financial framework of the Union contributes to increased
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Reiterates its request for gender budgeting to be used at all levels of the EU budgetary procedure; calls for consistent use of gender budgeting throughout the budgetary process so that budgetary expenditure can be used as a means of promoting gender equality;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 – point i (new) (i) identifying the implicit and explicit gender issues;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 – point ii (new) (ii) identifying – where possible – the allied resource allocations; and
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 – point iii (new) (iii) assessing whether the EU funding programmes will continue or change existing inequalities between women and men (and groups of women and men), girls and boys and patterns of gender relations;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Calls for
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Calls for the amount to be allocated to individual policy objectives and actions dedicated to
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Calls for the amount to be allocated to individual policy objectives and actions dedicated to
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Δ D. whereas the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the European Commission and the European Council calls for the annual budgetary procedures applied for the MFF 2014-2020 to integrate, as appropriate, gender-responsive elements, taking into account the ways in which the overall financial framework of the Union contributes to increased
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39 a. Recalls that gender budgeting is a methodology that needs to be applied in all EU budget lines, and not only for the programmes where the implications for a gender impact seem most relevant;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 b (new) 39 b. Notes that gender mainstreaming is not a once-off exercise and that gender budgeting requires an ongoing commitment to understanding gender, which includes analysis and consultation, and ongoing budget readjustments to take account of the changing needs of women and men, boys and girls;
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Looks upon the EU-level funding of EUR 6.17 billion allocated in the current MFF to achieving the objectives of gender- strategic engagement as a first step
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Looks upon the EU-level funding of EUR 6.17 billion allocated in the current MFF to achieving the objectives of
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Looks upon the EU-level funding of EUR 6.17 billion allocated in the current MFF to achieving the objectives of gender- strategic engagement as a
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Looks upon the EU-level funding of EUR 6.17 billion allocated in the current MFF to achieving the objectives of gender- strategic engagement as a
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Looks upon the EU-level funding of EUR 6.17 billion allocated in the current MFF to achieving the objectives of
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41. Believes that the mid-term review of the MFF could have been an opportunity to improve the results achieved by the EU budget in the pursuit of
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the European Commission and the European Council calls for the annual budgetary procedures applied for the MFF 2014-2020 to integrate, as appropriate, gender-responsive elements, taking into account the ways in which the overall financial framework of the Union contributes to increased gender equality and ensures gender mainstreaming; whereas, despite this fact, there is a need to step up the firm commitment to gender mainstreaming, since there has been minimal implementation of existing policies and insufficient budgetary resources have been earmarked for gender issues;
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42. Regrets, therefore, the Commission’s decision to not address the issue of implementation of gender mainstreaming in its mid-term review of the MFF, and calls for more specific action to address this
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Calls for gender-specific indicators to be applied in the project selection, monitoring and evaluation phases of all actions that receive funding from the EU budget, for mandatory gender impact assessment
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Calls for gender-specific indicators to be applied in the project selection, monitoring and evaluation phases of all actions that receive funding from the EU budget, for mandatory gender impact assessment as a general ex-ante conditionality, and for the collection of gender-disaggregated data with regard to beneficiaries and participants;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Strongly recommends that
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Strongly recommends that
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 a (new) 44 a. Recalls, however, that engendering data is more than collecting sex- dissagregated data and calls for the improvement of data collection in order to be able to make a qualitative analysis of women's situation, for example, regarding working conditions;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Calls for the EU institutions and Member States to organise regular training and technical support programmes on gender mainstreaming tools for all staff involved in policymaking and budgetary procedures; calls for the mainstreaming of gender budgeting into both EU and national strategies to be encouraged, so as to promote gender equality more effectively;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 a (new) 45 a. Calls on the Commission to monitor closely the effectiveness of national complaint bodies and procedures in the implementation of gender equality directives;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 b (new) 45 b. Asks the Court of Auditors also to incorporate the gender perspective when assessing the execution of the Union budget; asks Member States similarly to introduce the gender dimension in their budgets in order to analyse government programmes and policies, their impact on the allocation of resources and their contribution to equality between men and women;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 c (new) 45 c. Calls for the monitoring and evaluation of the National Action Plan (NAP) for Equal Treatment 2013-2016 in Poland ; expresses its concern that no separate funds were earmarked for gender equality from the central budget for the implementation of the NAP from the side of the public administration; calls for a balance in the setting up of the monitoring body including experts and representatives of women's rights and gender equality NGOs;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 d (new) 45 d. Praises the work of the Commissioner for Human Rights in Poland, which according to the Law on Equal Treatment, is the responsible equality body for the enactment of equal treatment; expresses its deep concern about the recent budget cuts affecting the Commissioner for Human Rights ; recalls that the national equality body should be adequately staffed, funded, and its independence respected and maintained;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas since the 2008 crisis a downgrading of
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Ε E. whereas since the 2008 crisis a downgrading of
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the external assessment of the effectiveness of gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament's activities commissioned in 2014 by the EP's Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs policy department, which was entitled 'Gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament's committees and delegations' and which covered the period from June 2011 to February 2013, produced the following findings: the Committee on Women's Rights drew up 33 opinions for only 11 of the 23 committees; of a total of 718 individual proposals and amendments on various topics, only 210, or one-third, were adopted in full or in part; the largest number of FEMM committee proposals were made to the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, which took over only 39.5%, or not even half, of them; in the other committees the proportion of proposals/amendments accepted was even lower: Foreign Affairs 28%, Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 11%, and Budgets only 5.5%; whereas in the light of these disappointing findings no recommendations should be made to the Member States;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas, at a time when there is a crisis of confidence in the EU, ensuring that its finances are fully transparent should be a priority for all the European institutions, and is something they must not ignore;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 13 September 2016 on creating labour market conditions favourable for work- life balance (2016/2017(INI))1a, _________________ 1a P8_TA-PROV(2016)0338.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas budgetary expenditure is not gender-neutral and can have a different impact on women and men;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas, in the light of the findings of the external assessment of the effectiveness of gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament's activities published by one of Parliamemnt's own policy departments under the title 'Gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament's committees and delegations', the European Court of Auditors should carry out a cost-benefit analysis of all the gender mainstreaming policies of the EU institutions and bodies in general and of the European Parliament in particular and publish details of the budget resources made available for this purpose, with a view to ensuring that the taxes paid by women are being used properly;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Recalls that public policies aiming at social engineering (such as gender mainstreaming) promoted by the EU institutions must respect the cultural diversity and national traditions of the Member States according to Art. 4(2) TEU;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the intended
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the intended mainstreaming of gender equality as a cross-cutting policy objective of the EU budget in EU funds and programmes as established in Article 8 TFEU;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises that the objective of equal opportunities between men and women must find expression in a practical approach which does not lead to women and men being set up in opposition to one another and or to being played off against one another;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new) - having regard to the adoption, on 8 March 2016, of the report on 'Gender Mainstreaming in the work of the European Parliament' (P8_TA(2016)0072),
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Deplores, however, the fact that the EU
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes that gender budgeting is part of an overall strategy on gender equality and stresses, therefore, that the commitment of EU institutions on that area is fundamental; regrets in this context that no EU gender equality strategy 2016-2020 was adopted and, echoing the Council Conclusions on Gender Equality of the 16th of June 2016, calls on the Commission to enhance the status of its Strategic engagement for gender equality 2016-2019 by adopting it as a Communication;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Acknowledges that not all EU policy areas can be gender mainstreamed, as for example the EU policy on honey bees, because there is only one female bee queen per colony and not two;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Stresses the importance of the structures and processes involved in budget-making and the need to change the ones which have been shown to underpin, or unintentionally promote gender inequality;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new) 2 c. Notes that awareness raising and training on gender mainstreaming and gender budgeting is necessary to develop gender sensitive structures and procedures;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that some EU programmes (e.g. ESF, REC, Horizon 2020, IPA II, Humanitarian aid, DCI and EIDHR) include specific actions related to
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that some EU programmes (e.g. ESF, REC, Horizon 2020, IPA II, Humanitarian aid, DCI and EIDHR) include specific actions related to
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas equality between men and women is a fundamental value of the European Union enshrined in the Treaties; whereas Article 8 TFEU lays down
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Deplores that several programs include gender equality only as a transversal objective which not only leads to lower support for gender-specific actions but also makes it almost impossible to estimate the amounts that are allocated to gender issues 1a _________________ 1aCommission working document on Programme Statements of operational expenditure for draft budget 2017, p.15
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that gender equality
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that tools for
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that tools for gender mainstreaming such as gender indicators, gender impact assessment (GIA) and gender budgeting (GB) are very rarely used in policy design and implementation, whether at EU level or by national institutions; highlights the fact that
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that tools for gender mainstreaming such as gender indicators, gender impact assessment (GIA) and gender budgeting (GB) are very rarely used in policy design and implementation, whether at EU level or by national institutions; highlights the fact that the lack of specific gender indicators and of collection of gender-disaggregated data makes it impossible to estimate the gender equality impact of EU policies; therefore repeats its call for indicators and statistics on gender issues to be further developed in order to permit assessment of the EU budget from a gender perspective and the monitoring of gender budgeting;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Notes that collaboration is needed between statisticians and policy makers to understand the type of data policy makers need and for policy makers to be aware of the challenges in collecting sensitive data; stresses the fundamental role of EIGE in closing this gap;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas equality between women and
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Regrets that despite the joint declaration attached to the MFF on gender mainstreaming there has been
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Regrets that despite the joint declaration attached to the MFF on gender mainstreaming there has been no significant progress in this field; calls, in keeping with the principle of the responsible use of EU budget resources, for a detailed cost-benefit analysis with the aim of doing away with appropriations for gender mainstreaming in those policy areas in which it has been shown to be ineffective;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights the fact that no clear
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that the Commission’s communication on the MFF midterm review published in September 2016 makes no reference to the implementation of
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls for gender equality strategy and its mainstreaming to become part of the EU semester;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Underlines that transparency and access to information on real achievements in gender equality not just implementation should be real priority for the European Union;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new) 8 c. Calls for gender mainstreaming provisions to be adopted as well in policy fields that are not considered as immediately related to gender equality, such as ICT, transport, business and investment support or climate change;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas equal
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 d (new) 8 d. Considers that a network of external experts and organisations should be involved in all stages of the budgetary process to increase the transparency and democratic quality, in particular when it regards applying a gender budgeting approach;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 EU funding for
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 EU funding for
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 EU funding for
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Points out that the ESI Funds constitute the most important financial support for the implementation of gender equality policy in the EU, especially in the case of the ESF (European Social Fund), which aims to foster the full integration of women in the labour market; underlines that Regulation 1304/2013 makes gender mainstreaming a compulsory part of all phases of programmes and projects financed by the ESF, including preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; emphasises that this Regulation does not guarantee mothers and fathers the freedom to choose without suffering discrimination as a result;
Amendment 75 #
9. Points out that the ESI Funds constitute the most important financial support for the implementation of
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Points out that the ESI Funds constitute the most important financial support for the implementation of
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Points out that the ESI Funds constitute the most important financial support for the implementation of gender equality policy in the EU, especially in the case of the ESF (European Social Fund), which aims to foster the full integration of women in the labour market; underlines that Regulation 1304/2013 makes gender mainstreaming
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses th
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas among the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations, to be achieved by 2030, No 5 is gender equality, which applies to all 17 goals;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that ensuring the necessary infrastructure funding for quality, affordable and accessible care services for children and the elderly will support female participation in the labour market and women’s economic independence, and thus foster
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that ensuring the necessary infrastructure funding for quality, affordable and accessible care services for children and the elderly will support female participation in the labour market and women’s economic independence, and thus foster
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that ensuring the necessary infrastructure funding for quality, affordable and accessible care services for children and the elderly will support female participation in the labour market and women’s economic independence, and thus foster gender equality; emphasises that by taking this approach the EU will actively discriminate against some mothers and fathers if they are not at the same time offered freedom to choose which does not lay them open to discrimination;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Deplores that women still suffer from inequalities at work such as lower participation rates in employment, pay gap, greater incidence of atypical or part- time employment, poorer pension entitlements, career segregation and poorer levels of progression; stresses the importance of ESF in providing funding opportunities to combat discrimination and promoting gender equality at work;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Notes that unpaid work is an important element of economic efficiency, and that the traditional approach fails to take into account unpaid work such as childcare and caring for the elderly in the payment of social benefits;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Takes the position that home caregivers (both men and women) remain discriminated against in terms of the failure to count their years of work towards pensions and entitlements;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that it is difficult to have a figure on the spending dedicated to promote gender equality and that, according to the European Commission Staff Working Document for the Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016- 2019, EUR 5.85 billion
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that EUR 5.85 billion EUR will be spent in 2014-2020 on measures promoting
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that EUR 5.85 billion EUR will be spent in 2014-2020 on measures promoting
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that ERDF funding should also support investment in childcare, caring for the elderly and other social infrastructure to promote a better work-life balance in the Member States;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Commission’s Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016-2019, published in December 2015, highlights the key role of EU funding in support
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that ERDF funding should
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that ERDF funding should also support investment in childcare and other social infrastructure and in child benefits for fathers and mothers who choose to keep their children at home;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that ERDF funding should also support investment in childcare and other social infrastructure supporting public services;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Stresses the important role of EAFRD in ensuring the necessary funding to support public services and social infrastructure in rural areas and promoting access to land and investment for women;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12 b. Calls on the Commission to propose new targeted actions addressed to encourage women's participation in the labour market such as a specific programme financed by the EAFRD in order to support female entrepreneurship;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12 c. Calls on the Commission, the Member States, regional and local governments to make use of the potential of cross cutting financing opportunities under ESI funds to support projects aimed at promoting gender equality; highlights the importance of the partnership principle applied within the ESI funds, which contributes positively to gender mainstreaming at the local level;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalls the importance of close monitoring and evaluation of the Operational Programmes of the ESI Funds
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalls the importance of
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalls the importance of close monitoring and evaluation of the Operational Programmes of the ESI Funds, in order to
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalls the importance of close monitoring and evaluation of the Operational Programmes of the ESI Funds, in order to avoid the downgrading of
source: 595.648
2016/12/15
CONT
49 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas equality between men and women is a fundamental value of the EU enshrined in the Treaties, whereas the Commission's Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016-2020 highlights the importance of EU funding in support for gender equality; whereas the EUs strategy for equality between women and men 2010-
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. having regard also the fact that within the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), approximately €5.85bn will be spent in the period 2014- 20 on measures promoting gender equality, of which 1.6% falls under the European Social Funds (ESF) for specific investment priority "Equality between men and women in all areas including access to employment, career progression, reconciliation of work and private life and promotion of equal pay for equal work";
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. recalls the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016 that supports establishing monitoring requirements including measurable indicators as a basis on which to collect evidence of the effects of legislation on the ground and to support further action while avoiding administrative burdens;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) D b. whereas EU funding for gender equality in the area of fundamental rights, equality and citizenship via the Rights, Equality and Citizenship (REC) 2014- 2020 programme has an overall budget of €439.5m, out of which 35% is earmarked for the two gender equality objectives related to gender equality and to the Daphne programme for combatting violence against women;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that gender budgeting should be an instrument of democratic governance that will help to ensure that gender equality becomes a reality; considers, likewise, that budgetary control tasks should indicate to what extent the EU budget and its implementation favour or hinder equality policies; is of the opinion that the current gulf between male and female pay for the same work is totally unacceptable;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that gender budgeting should be an instrument of democratic governance that will help to ensure that gender equality becomes a reality; is of the opinion that the current gulf between male and female pay for the same work is totally unacceptable; and must be eliminated immediately;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that gender budgeting should be a
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises that the objective of equal opportunities for men and women must find expression in a practical approach which does not lead to women and men being set up in opposition to one another and or to being played off against one another;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Acknowledges that not all EU policy areas can be gender mainstreamed, as for example the EU policy on honey bees, because there is only one female bee queen per colony and not two;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that gender budgeting is considered in certain policy areas (employment, social affairs and inclusion, home affairs, justice, development and cooperation, research and innovation, education and culture), but believes it should be included in all policy areas and that it should help to guarantee access to both the labour market and positions of responsibility and decision-making positions on the same terms as men, as well as helping to eliminate the gap in pay for the same work;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. It is regrettable that the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014- 2020, the European Commission's communication published in September 2016, makes no reference to the implementation of the gender mainstreaming, so that we don't have a clear gender equality strategy with specific objectives, concrete targets and allocations;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that gender budgeting is considered in
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that gender budgeting is considered in certain policy areas, such as
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that gender budgeting is considered in certain policy areas (employment, social affairs and inclusion, home affairs, justice, development and cooperation, research and innovation, education and culture), but believes it
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Stresses the importance of including mainstreaming gender as a category of analysis in the budgetary process by ensuring qualitative analysis available to monitor and ultimately close the gender pay gap, moving towards complete gender equality;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Takes the position that home caregivers (both men and women) remain discriminated against in terms of the failure to count their years of work towards pensions and entitlements;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Takes the position that sexual abuse, commercial sexual exploitation of women, the use of women for surrogacy, and sex selected abortion must be considered as unjustifiable under any political, social, religious or cultural grounds;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2 c. Condemns all forms of discrimination and violence against men and women;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that properly implemented gender budgeting has a positive effect, improving employment prospects and remuneration for women generally, while
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. whereas the Joint Declaration calls for the annual budgetary procedure applied for the MFF 2014-2020 to integrate, as appropriate, gender- responsive elements, taking into account the ways in which the overall financial framework of the Union contributes to increased gender equality and ensures gender mainstreaming;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Suggests that particular attention should be paid to ESIF measures supporting investments in educational, social and healthcare services, having in mind that these services are facing reductions in public funding at national and local level;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that gender equality goals are
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets the lack of gender- aggregated data and gender-specific indicators required to monitor and evaluate the action receiving funding from the EU budget to tackle gender equality; welcomes efforts done in introducing gender specific indicators and collection of gender-dissaggreated data in some EU legislative and policies, like e.g. in the ESF; believes it is important to intensify efforts to develop those indicators to monitor all key areas of EU of gender- equality policy; welcomes and supports committment in the Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016-2019 2016 to improve data collection with the support of Eurostat, the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), Eurofound, the Council of Europe (CoE) and the Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA);
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets the lack of gender- disaggregated data and gender-specific indicators required to monitor and evaluate the action receiving funding from the EU budget to tackle gender equality; calls on the Commission to introduce these indicators in all sectors where they are relevant for these purposes;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets the lack of
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Reiterates its concern at the huge lack of gender balance – with the widest gap of all the EU institutions – among Members of the European Court of Auditors, which currently comprises 28 men and only three women (two fewer than at the start of this year); calls on the Council, from now on and until an acceptable balance has been reached, to propose two candidates to Parliament, a woman and a man, for each future appointment;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. whereas the Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016-2019 published in December 2015 reaffirmed commitment to continue work to promote equality between men and women;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Strongly recommends that data which has been disaggregated according to gender, race, skin colour, ethnic, geographic and social origin, genetic features, language, religion, belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, wealth, birth, disability, age and sexual orientation should be made available to the public in order to ensure financial accountability and transparency;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the European Court of Auditors, with a view to the EU's new budgeting for results procedure, to provide data on the impact of the budget and European programmes in relation to both the specific objectives of the EU’s equality policies and horizontal aspects of those policies, in both its recommendations and its special reports;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Commission and the Member States to promote a holistic debate on policies and budgetary choices with a view to strengthening the policies contributing to
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that the external assessment of the effectiveness of gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament's activities commissioned in 2014 by the EP's Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs policy department, which was entitled 'Gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament's committees and delegations' and which covered the period from June 2011 to February 2013, produced the following findings: the Committee on Women's Rights drew up 33 opinions for only 11 of the 23 committees; of a total of 718 individual proposals and amendments on various topics, only 210, or one-third, were adopted in full or in part; the largest number of FEMM committee proposals were made to the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, which took over only 39.5%, or not even half, of them; in the other committees the proportion of proposals/amendments accepted was even lower: Foreign Affairs 28%, Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 11%, and Budgets only 5.5%; considers, in the light of these disappointing findings, that the Committee on Women's Rights should not make recommendations to the Member States, because it has no legitimacy to do so;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Recalls that public policies aiming at social engineering (such as "gender mainstreaming") promoted by the EU institutions must respect the cultural diversity and national traditions of the Member States according to Art. 4(2) TEU;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Takes the view, in the light of the findings of the external assessment of the effectiveness of gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament's activities published by one of Parliament's own policy departments under the title 'Gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament's committees and delegations', the European Court of Auditors should carry out a cost-benefit analysis of all the gender mainstreaming policies implemented by the EU institutions and bodies in general and by the European Parliament in particular and publish details of the budget resources made available for physical resources and staff, with a view to ensuring that the taxes paid by women are being used properly;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls, in keeping with the principle of the responsible use of EU budget resources, for a detailed cost-benefit analysis with the aim of doing away with appropriations for gender mainstreaming which have been shown to be ineffective;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Calls on the Commission and the Member States not to increase budget resources for 'gender equality' and to constantly monitor the implementation of gender mainstreaming until the sustained added value of that policy has been established;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6e. Highlights the fact that responsibility for those policy approaches lies with the Member States and that the EU should not influence national governments' priorities through its fiscal policy;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas within the EU's own budgetary oversight institution, the European Court of Auditors, there is a major gender imbalance, an imbalance perpetuated with every new nominee this calendar year;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas one of the most telling measures of gender equality is equal pay; but equally important are EU efforts and their results in increasing female labour- market participation and the equal economic independence of women and men; in promoting equality between women and men in decision-making; combating gender-based violence and protecting and supporting victims; and promoting gender equality and women's rights across the world;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital Γ C. whereas one of the most telling measures of gender equality is equal pay, which should be implemented directly in all Member States of the Union;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital Γ C. whereas one of the most telling measures of
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas if professional and private life are to be reconciled not only must affordable and accessible public care facilities be provided, but mothers and fathers must also be free to choose to educate their children fully or partly at home without suffering discrimination as a result, and expenditures for these facilities are to be considered as part of investment in the future; whereas both care facilities and the freedom to choose parental care at home without suffering discrimination are prerequisites for men's and women's participation in the labour market;
source: 595.695
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/3/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE594.036New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-PR-594036_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE595.648New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AM-595648_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE592.269&secondRef=04New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-592269_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.962&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AD-593962_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0033&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0033_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0075New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0075_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
FEMM/8/07098New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/4 |
|
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
other/0/dg |
Old
New
Justice |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/0/committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
committees/3/shadows/1 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/date |
2016-10-19T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1 |
|
committees/1/date |
2016-10-19T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/committees/3/shadows/3 |
|
committees/3/shadows/3 |
|
activities/0/committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
activities/0/committees/3/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
53b2e03cb819f205b0000133New
53b2d705b819f205b0000005 |
activities/0/committees/3/shadows/3/name |
Old
VON STORCH BeatrixNew
AIUTO Daniela |
committees/3/shadows/0 |
|
committees/3/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
53b2e03cb819f205b0000133New
53b2d705b819f205b0000005 |
committees/3/shadows/3/name |
Old
VON STORCH BeatrixNew
AIUTO Daniela |
activities/0/committees/0/date |
2016-06-15T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2016-06-15T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
FEMM/8/07098
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|