Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | JÁVOR Benedek ( Verts/ALE) | MARINESCU Marian-Jean ( PPE), IVAN Cătălin Sorin ( S&D), MACOVEI Monica ( ECR), THEURER Michael ( ALDE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | PETI | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | AFCO | ||
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | FEMM |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2015.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision (EU) 2017/1618 of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015, Section V — Court of Auditors.
CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants the Secretary-General of the Court of Auditors discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2015.
This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 27 April 2017 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27 April 2017).
Amongst Parliament’s main observations in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision, the latter called on the Court of Auditors to further work with the other institutions of the Union to develop the performance indicators and priorities for a good financial governance.
Parliament noted the Court's reinforced ethical framework to prevent conflicts of interests, as well as misconduct by members of staff. The Court is called upon to report to Parliament on the revision of its internal anti-harassment rules .
As regards the ongoing gender imbalance issue, Parliament called on the Court to promote gender balance, in particular in management posts.
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the European Court of Auditors in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court for the financial year 2015.
In its resolution accompanying the decision on discharge, adopted by 534 votes to 91 with 7 abstentions, Parliament took note of the auditor’s opinion that the Court’s financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Court.
Budgetary and financial management : in 2015, the Court’s final appropriations amounted to a total of EUR 132 906 000 (compared to EUR 133 498 000 in 2014) and that the overall rate of implementation for the budget was 98.68 %, slightly below that of 2014.
Court’s action : Members appreciated the cooperation between the Court of Auditors and Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control and called for an even more structured annual debate between the Court’s president and Parliament’s Conference of Committee Chairs. They made a series of recommendations to the Court, for example:
implementing the concept of performance-based budgeting (PBB) and good governance of human resources: this concept should also include the setting of specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and time-based (SMART) targets to individual departments, units and the annual plans of members of staff; present proposals to resolve the audit of the agencies issue within the context of the ongoing revision of the Financial Regulation, and the subsequent revision of the Framework Financial Regulation; work with the other institutions of the Union to develop the performance indicators and priorities for a good financial governance; respect the timeframe for the adoption of special reports without compromising the quality of the reports and improve the recommendations in its special reports to be even more targeted; publish a first special report on conflicts of interests by the end of June 2017 and annually thereafter; promote gender balance, in particular in management posts; give greater importance to geographical balance in the area of resources management, particularly with respect to the Member States that have acceded the Union in 2004 or thereafter; revise its calculation system based on working days of absence per individual employee; target its well-being activities better in order to include proactive and positive human resources’ development, with the participation of as many staff members as possible; enact the submission of declarations of interests, instead of declarations of the absence of conflicts of interests; establish clear rules regarding "revolving doors"; include the planning for the upgrade works of three of the Court’s buildings in its annual activity report and to ensure the implementation of the highest possible standards of energy efficiency during the upgrades; clarify how that directorate improved its translation work; consider a more rational use of the Court’s official vehicles; note the progress in negotiations between the Court and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and consider the possibility of an administrative arrangement; envisage the possibility of making recommendations on better communication about the budget of the Union, its functions and its mission, and on how better explain it to European citizens.
Parliament welcomed the creation of a transparency portal on the Court’s website as well as the fact that the Court has already in place rules on whistleblowing.
The Court is called upon to include in its annual activity reports, in compliance with the existing rules on confidentiality and data protection, the results and consequences of closed OLAF cases, where the Court or any member of its staff were the subject of the investigation.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Benedek JÁVOR (Greens/EFA, HU) calling on the European Parliament to give discharge to the Secretary-General of the European Court of Auditors in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court for the financial year 2015.
Members took note of the opinion of the external auditor that the financial statements of the Court give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Court.
Budgetary and financial management : in 2015, the Court’s final appropriations amounted to a total of EUR 132 906 000 (compared to EUR 133 498 000 in 2014) and that the overall rate of implementation for the budget was 98.68 %.
The Court’s reform was implemented in 2015 and was considered to be a success by the Court.
Court’s action : Members made a series of recommendations to the Court:
implementing the concept of performance-based budgeting (PBB) and good governance of human resources: this concept should also include the setting of specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and time-based (SMART) targets to individual departments, units and the annual plans of members of staff; resolve the audit of the agencies issue within the context of the ongoing revision of the Financial Regulation, and the subsequent revision of the Framework Financial Regulation; work with the other institutions of the Union to develop the performance indicators and priorities for a good financial governance; give more prominence to special report by the recipient institutions; that the effectiveness of separate special reports could be enlarged if they were grouped together in time in relation to specific policy areas; publish a first special report on conflicts of interests by the end of June 2017 and annually thereafter; promote gender balance, in particular in management posts; give greater importance to geographical balance in the area of resources management, particularly with respect to the Member States that have acceded the Union in 2004 or thereafter; revise its calculation system based on working days of absence per individual employee; target its well-being activities better in order to include proactive and positive human resources’ development, with the participation of as many staff members as possible; enact the submission of declarations of interests, instead of declarations of the absence of conflicts of interests; include the planning for the upgrade works of three of the Court’s buildings in its annual activity report and to ensure the implementation of the highest possible standards of energy efficiency during the upgrades; clarify how that directorate improved its translation work; consider a more rational use of the Court’s official vehicles; note the progress in negotiations between the Court and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and consider the possibility of an administrative arrangement; envisage the possibility of making recommendations on better communication about the budget of the Union, its functions and its mission, and on how better explain it to European citizens.
The Court is called upon to include in its annual activity reports, in compliance with the existing rules on confidentiality and data protection, the results and consequences of closed OLAF cases, where the Court or any member of its staff were the subject of the investigation.
Based on the observations contained in the report by the Court of Auditors, the Council called on the European Parliament to grant discharge to all of the EU institutions in respect of the implementation of their respective budgets for the financial year 2015 .
The Council welcomed that the administrative and related expenditure of the EU institutions remained free from material error with an estimated level of error of 0.6 %, which is well below the materiality threshold. It noted with satisfaction that no serious weaknesses were identified by the Court in the supervisory and control systems and in the examined annual activity reports.
The Council took note of a limited number of errors detected by the Court, notably in the recruitment and procurement procedures and in the management of staff allowances .
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Court of Auditors .
Legal reminder : the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2015 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 148(2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union.
(1) Governance and budgetary principles : the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies. The main institutions in the sense of being responsible for drafting policies and taking decisions are the EP, the European Council, the Council and the Commission.
The EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), the Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field.
The budget is prepared by the Commission and usually agreed in mid-December by the Parliament and the Council, based on the procedure of Art. 314 TFEU.
According to the principle of budget equilibrium, the total revenue must equal total expenditure (payment appropriations) for a given financial year.
EU revenues : the EU has two main categories of funding: own resources revenues and sundry revenues. Own resources can be divided into traditional own resources (such as custom levies), the own resource based on value added tax (VAT) and the resource based on gross national income (GNI). Sundry revenues arising from the activities of the EU (e.g. competition fines) normally represent less than 10 % of total revenue. Own resources revenue make up the vast majority of EU funding.
Expenditure of the EU institutions : the EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.
From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:
Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies. Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.
Consolidated annual accounts of the EU : this Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It also presents the accounting principles applicable to the European budget (in particular, consolidation).
The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.
Audit and discharge : the EU’s annual accounts and resource management are audited by the European Court of Auditors, its external auditor, which as part of its activities draws up for the European Parliament and the Council:
an annual report on the activities financed from the general budget, detailing its observations on the annual accounts and underlying transactions; an opinion, based on its audits and given in the annual report in the form of a statement of assurance, on (i) the reliability of the accounts and (ii) the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions involving both revenue collected from taxable persons and payments to final beneficiaries.
The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. This discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement; (iii) or the refusal of the discharge.
The document also presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.
( 2) Implementation of Court of Auditors’ appropriations for the financial year 2015 : the document comprises a series of detailed annexes, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. The document noted that in 2015 the Court’s budget was EUR 141 million (total payments in 2015 with an implementation rate of 91.7%).
As regards the Court of Auditor’s expenditure, the information is drawn from the Court of Auditors 2015 Annual Activity Report and highlighted that 2015 was marked by:
the production of annual reports on the EU budget and the European Development Funds (EDFs), as well as specific annual reports on the accounts of over 50 EU agencies and other bodies. It produced 52 specific annual reports for the 2014 financial year and 25 special reports on a range of topics and eight opinions were issued during the year on new or revised EU legislation with significant financial impact; audit visits to Member State authorities, other recipients of EU funds in the EU and beyond its borders; the Court currently owns three buildings (K1, K2 and K3) and rents small spaces for its IT disaster recovery centre, along with a meeting room.
External audit of the ECA : the ECA’s annual accounts are audited by an independent external auditor (PricewaterhouseCoopers Sàrl).
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2015, as part of the 2015 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Court of Auditors .
Legal reminder : the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2015 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 148(2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union.
(1) Governance and budgetary principles : the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies. The main institutions in the sense of being responsible for drafting policies and taking decisions are the EP, the European Council, the Council and the Commission.
The EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), the Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field.
The budget is prepared by the Commission and usually agreed in mid-December by the Parliament and the Council, based on the procedure of Art. 314 TFEU.
According to the principle of budget equilibrium, the total revenue must equal total expenditure (payment appropriations) for a given financial year.
EU revenues : the EU has two main categories of funding: own resources revenues and sundry revenues. Own resources can be divided into traditional own resources (such as custom levies), the own resource based on value added tax (VAT) and the resource based on gross national income (GNI). Sundry revenues arising from the activities of the EU (e.g. competition fines) normally represent less than 10 % of total revenue. Own resources revenue make up the vast majority of EU funding.
Expenditure of the EU institutions : the EU's operational expenditure of these institutions takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed.
From 2014 onwards, the Commission classifies its expenditure as follows:
Direct management : the budget is implemented directly by the Commission services. Indirect management : the Commission confers tasks of implementation of the budget to bodies of EU law or national law, such as the EU agencies. Shared management : under this method of budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States. About 80 % of the expenditure falls under this management mode covering such areas as agricultural spending and structural actions.
Consolidated annual accounts of the EU : this Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2015 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It also presents the accounting principles applicable to the European budget (in particular, consolidation).
The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.
Audit and discharge : the EU’s annual accounts and resource management are audited by the European Court of Auditors, its external auditor, which as part of its activities draws up for the European Parliament and the Council:
an annual report on the activities financed from the general budget, detailing its observations on the annual accounts and underlying transactions; an opinion, based on its audits and given in the annual report in the form of a statement of assurance, on (i) the reliability of the accounts and (ii) the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions involving both revenue collected from taxable persons and payments to final beneficiaries.
The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission (and other EU bodies) from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. This discharge procedure may produce three outcomes: (i) the granting; (ii) postponement; (iii) or the refusal of the discharge.
The document also presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.
( 2) Implementation of Court of Auditors’ appropriations for the financial year 2015 : the document comprises a series of detailed annexes, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. The document noted that in 2015 the Court’s budget was EUR 141 million (total payments in 2015 with an implementation rate of 91.7%).
As regards the Court of Auditor’s expenditure, the information is drawn from the Court of Auditors 2015 Annual Activity Report and highlighted that 2015 was marked by:
the production of annual reports on the EU budget and the European Development Funds (EDFs), as well as specific annual reports on the accounts of over 50 EU agencies and other bodies. It produced 52 specific annual reports for the 2014 financial year and 25 special reports on a range of topics and eight opinions were issued during the year on new or revised EU legislation with significant financial impact; audit visits to Member State authorities, other recipients of EU funds in the EU and beyond its borders; the Court currently owns three buildings (K1, K2 and K3) and rents small spaces for its IT disaster recovery centre, along with a meeting room.
External audit of the ECA : the ECA’s annual accounts are audited by an independent external auditor (PricewaterhouseCoopers Sàrl).
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0149/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0151/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE600.913
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05876/2017
- Committee draft report: PE593.841
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2016)0475
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2016)0475
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex COM(2016)0475
- Committee draft report: PE593.841
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05876/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE600.913
Activities
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0151/2017 - Benedek Jávor - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
31 |
2016/2155(DEC)
2017/03/07
CONT
31 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Secretary-General of the Court of Auditors discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Auditors for the financial year
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Takes note that the Court’s reform was implemented in 2015
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Welcomes the new money for EU added value approach of the Court in its Reports; calls for further work with the other EU institutions to develop the performance indicators and priorities for the good financial governance;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the revision of article 163 of the Financial Regulation foresees that “special reports are drawn up and adopted within [...] 13 months”;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Takes the view that the special reports of the Court should be given more prominence by the recipient institutions and should have yearly dedicated reports; emphasizes that the effectiveness of the separate special reports could be enlarged if they were grouped together in time in relation to specific policy areas, thus making it possible for Parliament to devote ad hoc reports to these special reports of the Court outside the discharge cycle;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Deplores that the Court failed to present since 2012 a special report on the conflict of interest in all Agencies, in particular in those related to industries contrary to the requests made in the previous discharge reports adopted by the Parliament; urges the Court to produce and publish such special reports on conflict of interests by the end of June 2017 and to publish such reports annually; annual reports on conflicts of interest are vital for the integrity of the EU institutions as the relationships between the European Agencies in the industry field, industries and lobbying companies are of outmost importance;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Observes that the Court complies with the inter-institutional agreement to reduce staff by 5 % over a period of five years; asks to be informed
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Emphasises that geographical balance, namely the relationship between staff nationality and the size of Member States, should still remain an important element of resources management particularly with respect to the Member States that have acceded to the Union since 2004, welcomes the fact that the European Court of Auditors has reached an overall balanced composition of officials from the Member States which joined the European Union before and since 2004; but points out that these Member States are still underrepresented at the higher level of administration and in managerial posts for which progress is still awaited;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Is concerned with the high number of days of sick leave among the staff; calls on the Court to target its well-being activities to ensure the well-being of its staff in order to better perform its core mission; calls on the Court to investigate the possibility of abuse of sick leave by staff, and to report its findings to the discharging authority;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Takes note that the Court organised five away days, mainly in preparation of the reform of the Court, with a low proportion of staff members participating (
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Is concerned that the assigned revenue consists of missions, energy consumption and VAT recoveries on private telephone calls; asks the court to provide details regarding the VAT recoveries in private telephone calls and the usefulness of these private telephone calls to the Court’s activity; also asks the Court to provide a list with the missions and the dates when they were undertaken and details on the cost-efficiency of each mission.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Asks the Court whether it has checked the use of EU funds by MEPs; asks the Court to provide to the discharge authority the list of the checked MEPs and the result of this investigation;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Reminds the Court that the Union Agencies have to adopt Codes of Cood Administrative Behaviour and are encouraged to use the Transparency Register as a reference instrument for their interaction with the interested representatives;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Notes that the Court stated that in 2015 it had no meetings with lobbyist but with professional associations and civil society; draw however attention to the Court that the professional associations could represent the interests of industries and could act as lobbyists; asks the Court to present the minutes of these meetings by June 2017;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Stresses the interest and importance of widening cooperation to other European universities for the creation of specialist courses in European auditing; calls on the Court to keep Parliament informed of the development and results of this cooperation;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls the Court to envisage recommendations on how to better communicate about the EU budget and how to explain better to citizens what the EU budget achieves
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard the ECA special Report No 15/2012 "Management of conflict of interest in selected EU Agencies";
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 b (new) - having regard that the Court failed to thoroughly asses the accounts of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) where the discharge authority found a number of conflicts of interests and mismanagement of human resources;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Reminds the Court that the audit of the decentralised agencies remains “under the full responsibility of the Court, which manages all administrative and procurement procedures required”6 ; encourages the Court to put forward proposals to resolve the audit of the agencies issue within the context of the ongoing revision of the Financial Regulation, and the subsequent revision of the Framework Financial Regulation; is of the opinion that this matter should be clarified so as to
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes note of Court’s failure to identify the conflict of interest situations in the Board of Regulators of Agency for cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) and the failure to criticise in the Court’s report the lack of CVs and declarations of interest in a number of Agencies and Joint Undertakings ( Bio- based industries (BBI) Joint Undertaking, Office of the Body of the European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC), Safety of air navigation Joint Undertaking (SESAR), European Railway Agency (ERA) etc);
source: 600.913
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2016-07-11T00:00:00New
2016-07-10T00:00:00 |
events/4/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE593.841New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-593841_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE600.913New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-600913_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0151&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0151_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0149New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0149_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/07347New
|
procedure/final/title |
Old
OJ L 252 29.09.2017, p. 0120New
OJ L 252 29.09.2017, p. 0120 |
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:252:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2017:252:TOC |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
2015 discharge: EU general budget, Court of AuditorsNew
2015 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Auditors |
activities/6 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/5/docs/0 |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):ENNew
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52016DC0475:ENNew
CELEX:52016PC0475(01):EN |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/4 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2017-03-23T00:00:00New
2017-03-22T00:00:00 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2017-03-22T00:00:00New
2017-03-23T00:00:00 |
activities/2/date |
Old
2017-03-23T00:00:00New
2017-03-22T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016DC0475:EN
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/6/mepref |
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096 |
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/6/name |
Old
ALIOT LouisNew
KAPPEL Barbara |
committees/4/shadows/6/mepref |
Old
53b2d70eb819f205b0000008New
53b2dbc9b819f205b0000096 |
committees/4/shadows/6/name |
Old
ALIOT LouisNew
KAPPEL Barbara |
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en |
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2016-10-04T00:00:00New
2017-03-23T00:00:00 |
activities/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
53b2dffbb819f205b0000129New
53b2db7cb819f205b000008d |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
ŠOLTES IgorNew
JÁVOR Benedek |
committees/4/shadows/0 |
|
committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
committees/4/shadows/3 |
|
committees/4/shadows/5 |
|
committees/4/shadows/6 |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/07347
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/7 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|