BETA


2016/2311(INI) 2016 Commission report on Serbia

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET MCALLISTER David (icon: PPE PPE) FAJON Tanja (icon: S&D S&D), TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton (icon: ECR ECR), VAJGL Ivo (icon: ALDE ALDE), ŠOLTES Igor (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), CASTALDO Fabio Massimo (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2017/11/20
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2017/06/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/06/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 524 votes to 70, with 79 abstentions, a resolution on the 2016 Commission Report on Serbia.

Parliament recalled that Serbia, like any country aspiring to join the Union, must be judged on its own merits in terms of fulfilling, implementing and complying with the same set of criteria.

Accession negotiations : Parliament welcomed the opening of negotiations with this country and the continued engagement of Serbia on the path of integration into the EU and its constructive and well-prepared approach to the negotiations.

It underlined that the thorough implementation of reforms and policies remains a key indicator of a successful integration process. However, it noted delays in the absorption of pre-accession aid and called on Serbia to make progress in this area.

Economic reforms : Parliament welcomed the progress made by Serbia in developing a functioning market economy and the improvement of the overall economic situation in the country. It underlined the paramount role of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) for Serbia’s economy and encouraged Serbia to promote entrepreneurship, particularly among young people.

Political reforms : although Parliament welcomed the conduct of the parliamentary elections on 24 April 2016 which were assessed positively, it called on the authorities to fully address the recommendations of the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission, in particular with regard to the lack of transparency of the financing of political parties and of the election campaign. Parliament stressed that the funding of political parties must be in accordance with the highest international standards. It called on the authorities to properly investigate claims of irregularities, violence and intimidation that arose during the electoral process.

Taking note of the results of the presidential elections held on 2 April 2017, Parliament strongly condemned the rhetoric used during the presidential campaign by government officials and pro-government media against other presidential candidates. It regretted the uneven access of candidates to the media during the election campaign as well as the parliament recess during the campaign , denying opposition politicians a public forum. It called on the authorities to properly investigate claims of various types of irregularities.

Plenary noted that Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić received 55.08 % of the vote in the presidential election of 2 April 2017 and that esses that a multiparty delegation from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) observed the election, and that the OSCE/ODIHR deployed an election assessment mission (EAM).

Relations with Russia : Parliament reiterated its call on Serbia, in line with the requirements of its candidate status, to progressively align its foreign and security policy with that of the EU , including its policy on Russia. It considered the conduct of joint Serbia-Russia military exercises regrettable. It welcomed, however, Serbia’s important contribution to several EU CSDP missions and operations (EUTM Mali, EUTM Somalia, EUNAVFOR Atalanta, EUTM RCA) and its continued participation in international peacekeeping operations.

Parliament also commended Serbia’s constructive and humanitarian approach in dealing with the migration crisis . It called on Serbia to fully respect the rights of asylum applicants in Serbia and to ensure that unaccompanied and separated minors are protected.

It called on the Commission to continue the work on migration with all the countries of the Western Balkans in order to ensure that European and international norms and standards are followed.

Rule of law : Parliament called for effective reforms in the judiciary field, in particular by taking steps to promote judicial independence which is not assured in practice. It expressed concern at the lack of progress in the fight against corruption and urged Serbia to show clear political will and commitment in tackling this issue. Parliament also reiterated its call for proper reform of the offence of abuse of office and abuse of responsible position so as to prevent possible misuse or arbitrary interpretation.

Efforts are also called for in the following areas:

the fight against organised crime and criminal networks; the prosecution of war crimes; the fight against terrorism and money laundering.

Democracy and human rights : Parliament considered that the constitution needs to be revised so as to fully reflect the recommendations of the Venice Commission, notably with regard to the independence of key institutions. It stated that further effort is needed to depoliticise the public administration.

It noted that further sustained efforts are needed to improve the situation of persons belonging to vulnerable groups, including Roma, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS, LGBTI persons, migrants and asylum seekers, and ethnic minorities.

Furthermore, measures are called for as regards the freedom of expression and the media . Parliament stressed that political interference, threats, violence and intimidation against journalists, including physical assaults, verbal and written threats and attacks on property, remain an issue of concern. It called on the authorities to publicly and unequivocally condemn all attacks, to provide adequate resources to investigate more proactively all cases of attacks against journalists and media outlets and to swiftly bring the perpetrators to justice.

Protection of minorities : Parliament underlined that Vojvodina (Northern Serbia) has maintained a high degree of protection for minorities and that the inter-ethnic situation has remained good. It stressed that the autonomy of Vojvodina should not be weakened and that the law on Vojvodina’s resources should be adopted without further delay, as prescribed by the constitution.

Parliament also noted the adoption of the new Roma social inclusion strategy 2016-2025 and called for its swift adoption. There is a large number of Roma people from Serbia seeking asylum in the EU due to their lack of protection.

Good neighbourly relations : Members encouraged Serbia to strengthen its proactive and positive engagement with its neighbours and the wider region. It called on Serbia to fully implement bilateral agreements with neighbouring countries and to enhance cooperation with the neighbouring EU Member States, in particular on border areas, in order to facilitate economic development.

It noted that Serbia has shown an increasingly constructive engagement in regional cooperation initiatives such as the Danube Strategy, the South-East Europe Cooperation Process, the Regional Cooperation Council, etc and called on it to implement the connectivity reform measures associated with the connectivity agenda and the conclusions of the 2016 Paris conference on the Western Balkans and TEN-T regulation.

International Criminal Tribunal : Parliament welcomed the adoption of a national strategy for the investigation and prosecution of war crimes. It called for enhanced regional cooperation in handling war crimes and solving all outstanding issues in this respect. It called for full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and urged the authorities to continue working on the issue of the fate of missing persons, locating mass graves and guaranteeing the rights of victims and their families. Members reiterated their support for the initiative to establish the regional Commission for the establishment of facts about war crimes and other serious violations of human rights committed in the former Yugoslavia.

Regional cooperation : Parliament commended the opening of three new border-crossing points between Serbia and Romania, as well as reconciliation with Albania. It welcomed Serbia’s continued engagement in the normalisation process with Kosovo . It regretted, however, the decision taken by the Serbian authorities not to allow former President of Kosovo Atifete Jahjaga to attend the ‘Mirëdita, Dobar Dan’ festival in Belgrade, at which she had been invited to deliver a speech on victims of sexual violence during the war in Kosovo. It also regretted the subsequent reciprocity measure adopted by the Kosovan authorities to ban Serbia’s Minister of Labour Aleksandar Vulin from entering Kosovo. Plenary stressed that such decisions are in breach of the Brussels Agreement on freedom of movement concluded by Serbia and Kosovo .

Members called on both parties to identify new areas of discussion for the dialogue, with the aim of improving the lives of people and comprehensively normalising relations. They expressed concern at the recent tensions between Serbia and Kosovo regarding the first train journey from Belgrade to Mitrovica North, including warmongering statements and anti-EU rhetoric.

They called on the Commission to make further efforts to support a true reconciliation process in the region, notably through support for cultural projects dealing with the recent past and promoting a common and shared understanding of history and a public and political culture of tolerance, inclusion and reconciliation;

Energy : lastly, Parliament called on Serbia to fully implement the connectivity reform measures in the energy sector and to ratify the Paris climate agreement.

Documents
2017/06/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/06/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/03/22
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2017/03/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2017/02/28
   EP - Vote in committee
2017/01/19
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2017/01/19
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2016/12/19
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/10/27
   EP - MCALLISTER David (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0063/2017 - David McAllister - Résolution 14/06/2017 13:13:51.000 #

2017/06/14 Outcome: +: 524, 0: 79, -: 70
DE PL IT ES RO GB FR CZ HU SE PT BG AT NL BE SK FI LT HR SI DK LU EE IE MT CY LV EL
Total
90
50
66
51
26
55
63
20
18
19
21
15
17
23
20
12
11
8
11
8
10
6
6
10
5
6
6
19
icon: PPE PPE
200

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Latvia PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
174

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Italy ECR

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

3

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
3
2

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

France NI

Against (1)

2
3
icon: EFDD EFDD
34

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
47

Italy GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
29

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
325 2016/2311(INI)
2017/01/19 AFET 325 amendments...
source: 597.481

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/2
date
2017-03-22T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0063_EN.html title: A8-0063/2017
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2
date
2017-03-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0063_EN.html title: A8-0063/2017
events/2
date
2017-03-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0063_EN.html title: A8-0063/2017
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-06-13-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: MCALLISTER David date: 2016-10-27T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: MCALLISTER David date: 2016-10-27T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE594.161
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-594161_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE597.481
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-597481_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2017-03-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0063_EN.html title: A8-0063/2017
summary
events/2
date
2017-03-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0063_EN.html title: A8-0063/2017
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170613&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2017-06-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0261_EN.html title: T8-0261/2017
summary
events/5
date
2017-06-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0261_EN.html title: T8-0261/2017
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
docs/2/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0063&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0063_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0261
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0261_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: MCALLISTER David date: 2016-10-27T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2016-10-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MCALLISTER David group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2016-10-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MCALLISTER David group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2016-10-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MCALLISTER David group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
activities
  • date: 2017-01-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: ALDE name: VAJGL Ivo group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2016-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
  • date: 2017-02-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: ALDE name: VAJGL Ivo group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2016-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
  • date: 2017-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0063&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0063/2017 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2017-06-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170613&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-06-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0261 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0261/2017 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2016-10-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MCALLISTER David group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2016-10-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
docs
  • date: 2016-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE594.161 title: PE594.161 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2017-01-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE597.481 title: PE597.481 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-11-20T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=29282&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)574 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2017-01-19T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-02-28T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-22T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0063&language=EN title: A8-0063/2017 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by David McALLISTER (EPP, DE) on the 2016 Commission Report on Serbia. Members recalled that Serbia, like any country aspiring to join the Union, must be judged on its own merits in terms of fulfilling, implementing and complying with the same set of criteria. Accession negotiations : Members welcomed the opening of negotiations with this country and the continued engagement of Serbia on the path of integration into the EU and its constructive and well-prepared approach to the negotiations. They underlined that the thorough implementation of reforms and policies remains a key indicator of a successful integration process. However, they noted delays in the absorption of pre-accession aid and called on Serbia to make progress in this area. Economic reforms : Members welcomed the progress made by Serbia in developing a functioning market economy and the improvement of the overall economic situation in the country. They underlined the paramount role of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) for Serbia’s economy and encouraged Serbia to promote entrepreneurship, particularly among young people. Political reforms : although Members welcomed the conduct of the parliamentary elections on 24 April 2016 which were assessed positively, Members reiterated their call on Serbia, in line with the requirements of its candidate status, to progressively align its foreign and security policy with that of the EU, including its policy on Russia . They considered the conduct of joint Serbia-Russia military exercises regrettable. The report commended Serbia’s constructive and humanitarian approach in dealing with the migration crisis . They called on Serbia to fully respect the rights of asylum applicants in Serbia and to ensure that unaccompanied and separated minors are protected. Rule of law : Members called for effective reforms in the judiciary field, in particular by taking steps to promote judicial independence which is not assured in practice. They expressed concern at the lack of progress in the fight against corruption and urged Serbia to show clear political will and commitment in tackling this issue. Members also reiterated their call for proper reform of the offence of abuse of office and abuse of responsible position so as to prevent possible misuse or arbitrary interpretation. Efforts are also called for in the following areas: the fight against organised crime and criminal networks; the prosecution of war crimes; the fight against terrorism and money laundering. Democracy and human rights : Members considered that the constitution needs to be revised so as to fully reflect the recommendations of the Venice Commission, notably with regard to the independence of key institutions. They stated that further effort is needed to depoliticise the public administration. They noted that further sustained efforts are needed to improve the situation of persons belonging to vulnerable groups, including Roma, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS, LGBTI persons, migrants and asylum seekers, and ethnic minorities. Furthermore, measures are called for as regards the freedom of expression and the media. Protection of minorities : Members underlined that Vojvodina (Northern Serbia) has maintained a high degree of protection for minorities and that the inter-ethnic situation has remained good. They stressed that the autonomy of Vojvodina should not be weakened and that the law on Vojvodina’s resources should be adopted without further delay, as prescribed by the constitution. Members also noted the adoption of the new Roma social inclusion strategy 2016-2025 and called for its swift adoption. There is a large number of Roma people from Serbia seeking asylum in the EU due to their lack of protection. Good neighbourly relations : Members encouraged Serbia to strengthen its proactive and positive engagement with its neighbours and the wider region. They called on Serbia to fully implement bilateral agreements with neighbouring countries and to enhance cooperation with the neighbouring EU Member States, in particular on border areas, in order to facilitate economic development. They noted that Serbia has shown an increasingly constructive engagement in regional cooperation initiatives such as the Danube Strategy, the SouthEast Europe Cooperation Process, the Regional Cooperation Council, etc and called on it to implement the connectivity reform measures associated with the connectivity agenda and the conclusions of the 2016 Paris conference on the Western Balkans and TEN-T regulation. International Criminal Tribunal : Members welcomed the adoption of a national strategy for the investigation and prosecution of war crimes. They called for enhanced regional cooperation in handling war crimes and solving all outstanding issues in this respect. They called for full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and urged the authorities to continue working on the issue of the fate of missing persons, locating mass graves and guaranteeing the rights of victims and their families. They reiterated their support for the initiative to establish the regional Commission for the establishment of facts about war crimes and other serious violations of human rights committed in the former Yugoslavia. Regional cooperation : Members commended the opening of three new border-crossing points between Serbia and Romania, as well as reconciliation with Albania. It welcomed Serbia’s continued engagement in the normalisation process with Kosovo. They called on both parties to identify new areas of discussion for the dialogue, with the aim of improving the lives of people and comprehensively normalising relations. Members expressed concern at the recent tensions between Serbia and Kosovo regarding the first train journey from Belgrade to Mitrovica North, including warmongering statements and anti-EU rhetoric. Energy : lastly, Members called on Serbia to fully implement the connectivity reform measures in the energy sector and to ratify the Paris climate agreement.
  • date: 2017-06-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170613&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-06-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=29282&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2017-06-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0261 title: T8-0261/2017 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 524 votes to 70, with 79 abstentions, a resolution on the 2016 Commission Report on Serbia. Parliament recalled that Serbia, like any country aspiring to join the Union, must be judged on its own merits in terms of fulfilling, implementing and complying with the same set of criteria. Accession negotiations : Parliament welcomed the opening of negotiations with this country and the continued engagement of Serbia on the path of integration into the EU and its constructive and well-prepared approach to the negotiations. It underlined that the thorough implementation of reforms and policies remains a key indicator of a successful integration process. However, it noted delays in the absorption of pre-accession aid and called on Serbia to make progress in this area. Economic reforms : Parliament welcomed the progress made by Serbia in developing a functioning market economy and the improvement of the overall economic situation in the country. It underlined the paramount role of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) for Serbia’s economy and encouraged Serbia to promote entrepreneurship, particularly among young people. Political reforms : although Parliament welcomed the conduct of the parliamentary elections on 24 April 2016 which were assessed positively, it called on the authorities to fully address the recommendations of the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission, in particular with regard to the lack of transparency of the financing of political parties and of the election campaign. Parliament stressed that the funding of political parties must be in accordance with the highest international standards. It called on the authorities to properly investigate claims of irregularities, violence and intimidation that arose during the electoral process. Taking note of the results of the presidential elections held on 2 April 2017, Parliament strongly condemned the rhetoric used during the presidential campaign by government officials and pro-government media against other presidential candidates. It regretted the uneven access of candidates to the media during the election campaign as well as the parliament recess during the campaign , denying opposition politicians a public forum. It called on the authorities to properly investigate claims of various types of irregularities. Plenary noted that Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić received 55.08 % of the vote in the presidential election of 2 April 2017 and that esses that a multiparty delegation from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) observed the election, and that the OSCE/ODIHR deployed an election assessment mission (EAM). Relations with Russia : Parliament reiterated its call on Serbia, in line with the requirements of its candidate status, to progressively align its foreign and security policy with that of the EU , including its policy on Russia. It considered the conduct of joint Serbia-Russia military exercises regrettable. It welcomed, however, Serbia’s important contribution to several EU CSDP missions and operations (EUTM Mali, EUTM Somalia, EUNAVFOR Atalanta, EUTM RCA) and its continued participation in international peacekeeping operations. Parliament also commended Serbia’s constructive and humanitarian approach in dealing with the migration crisis . It called on Serbia to fully respect the rights of asylum applicants in Serbia and to ensure that unaccompanied and separated minors are protected. It called on the Commission to continue the work on migration with all the countries of the Western Balkans in order to ensure that European and international norms and standards are followed. Rule of law : Parliament called for effective reforms in the judiciary field, in particular by taking steps to promote judicial independence which is not assured in practice. It expressed concern at the lack of progress in the fight against corruption and urged Serbia to show clear political will and commitment in tackling this issue. Parliament also reiterated its call for proper reform of the offence of abuse of office and abuse of responsible position so as to prevent possible misuse or arbitrary interpretation. Efforts are also called for in the following areas: the fight against organised crime and criminal networks; the prosecution of war crimes; the fight against terrorism and money laundering. Democracy and human rights : Parliament considered that the constitution needs to be revised so as to fully reflect the recommendations of the Venice Commission, notably with regard to the independence of key institutions. It stated that further effort is needed to depoliticise the public administration. It noted that further sustained efforts are needed to improve the situation of persons belonging to vulnerable groups, including Roma, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS, LGBTI persons, migrants and asylum seekers, and ethnic minorities. Furthermore, measures are called for as regards the freedom of expression and the media . Parliament stressed that political interference, threats, violence and intimidation against journalists, including physical assaults, verbal and written threats and attacks on property, remain an issue of concern. It called on the authorities to publicly and unequivocally condemn all attacks, to provide adequate resources to investigate more proactively all cases of attacks against journalists and media outlets and to swiftly bring the perpetrators to justice. Protection of minorities : Parliament underlined that Vojvodina (Northern Serbia) has maintained a high degree of protection for minorities and that the inter-ethnic situation has remained good. It stressed that the autonomy of Vojvodina should not be weakened and that the law on Vojvodina’s resources should be adopted without further delay, as prescribed by the constitution. Parliament also noted the adoption of the new Roma social inclusion strategy 2016-2025 and called for its swift adoption. There is a large number of Roma people from Serbia seeking asylum in the EU due to their lack of protection. Good neighbourly relations : Members encouraged Serbia to strengthen its proactive and positive engagement with its neighbours and the wider region. It called on Serbia to fully implement bilateral agreements with neighbouring countries and to enhance cooperation with the neighbouring EU Member States, in particular on border areas, in order to facilitate economic development. It noted that Serbia has shown an increasingly constructive engagement in regional cooperation initiatives such as the Danube Strategy, the South-East Europe Cooperation Process, the Regional Cooperation Council, etc and called on it to implement the connectivity reform measures associated with the connectivity agenda and the conclusions of the 2016 Paris conference on the Western Balkans and TEN-T regulation. International Criminal Tribunal : Parliament welcomed the adoption of a national strategy for the investigation and prosecution of war crimes. It called for enhanced regional cooperation in handling war crimes and solving all outstanding issues in this respect. It called for full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and urged the authorities to continue working on the issue of the fate of missing persons, locating mass graves and guaranteeing the rights of victims and their families. Members reiterated their support for the initiative to establish the regional Commission for the establishment of facts about war crimes and other serious violations of human rights committed in the former Yugoslavia. Regional cooperation : Parliament commended the opening of three new border-crossing points between Serbia and Romania, as well as reconciliation with Albania. It welcomed Serbia’s continued engagement in the normalisation process with Kosovo . It regretted, however, the decision taken by the Serbian authorities not to allow former President of Kosovo Atifete Jahjaga to attend the ‘Mirëdita, Dobar Dan’ festival in Belgrade, at which she had been invited to deliver a speech on victims of sexual violence during the war in Kosovo. It also regretted the subsequent reciprocity measure adopted by the Kosovan authorities to ban Serbia’s Minister of Labour Aleksandar Vulin from entering Kosovo. Plenary stressed that such decisions are in breach of the Brussels Agreement on freedom of movement concluded by Serbia and Kosovo . Members called on both parties to identify new areas of discussion for the dialogue, with the aim of improving the lives of people and comprehensively normalising relations. They expressed concern at the recent tensions between Serbia and Kosovo regarding the first train journey from Belgrade to Mitrovica North, including warmongering statements and anti-EU rhetoric. They called on the Commission to make further efforts to support a true reconciliation process in the region, notably through support for cultural projects dealing with the recent past and promoting a common and shared understanding of history and a public and political culture of tolerance, inclusion and reconciliation; Energy : lastly, Parliament called on Serbia to fully implement the connectivity reform measures in the energy sector and to ratify the Paris climate agreement.
  • date: 2017-06-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Old
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    New
    Rules of Procedure EP 159
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/08485
    New
    • AFET/8/08485
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 54
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 8.20.01 Candidate countries
    New
    8.20.01
    Candidate countries
    activities/3/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170613&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/4/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0261 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0261/2017
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/4
    date
    2017-06-14T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    activities/3
    date
    2017-06-13T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/3
    date
    2017-05-16T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/2/docs/0/text
    • The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by David McALLISTER (EPP, DE) on the 2016 Commission Report on Serbia.

      Members recalled that Serbia, like any country aspiring to join the Union, must be judged on its own merits in terms of fulfilling, implementing and complying with the same set of criteria.

      Accession negotiations: Members welcomed the opening of negotiations with this country and the continued engagement of Serbia on the path of integration into the EU and its constructive and well-prepared approach to the negotiations.

      They underlined that the thorough implementation of reforms and policies remains a key indicator of a successful integration process. However, they noted delays in the absorption of pre-accession aid and called on Serbia to make progress in this area.

      Economic reforms: Members welcomed the progress made by Serbia in developing a functioning market economy and the improvement of the overall economic situation in the country. They underlined the paramount role of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) for Serbia’s economy and encouraged Serbia to promote entrepreneurship, particularly among young people.

      Political reforms: although Members welcomed the conduct of the parliamentary elections on 24 April 2016 which were assessed positively, Members reiterated their call on Serbia, in line with the requirements of its candidate status, to progressively align its foreign and security policy with that of the EU, including its policy on Russia. They considered the conduct of joint Serbia-Russia military exercises regrettable.

      The report commended Serbia’s constructive and humanitarian approach in dealing with the migration crisis. They called on Serbia to fully respect the rights of asylum applicants in Serbia and to ensure that unaccompanied and separated minors are protected.

      Rule of law: Members called for effective reforms in the judiciary field, in particular by taking steps to promote judicial independence which is not assured in practice. They expressed concern at the lack of progress in the fight against corruption and urged Serbia to show clear political will and commitment in tackling this issue. Members also reiterated their call for proper reform of the offence of abuse of office and abuse of responsible position so as to prevent possible misuse or arbitrary interpretation.

      Efforts are also called for in the following areas:

      • the fight against organised crime and criminal networks;
      • the prosecution of war crimes;
      • the fight against terrorism and money laundering.

      Democracy and human rights: Members considered that the constitution needs to be revised so as to fully reflect the recommendations of the Venice Commission, notably with regard to the independence of key institutions. They stated that further effort is needed to depoliticise the public administration.

      They noted that further sustained efforts are needed to improve the situation of persons belonging to vulnerable groups, including Roma, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS, LGBTI persons, migrants and asylum seekers, and ethnic minorities.

      Furthermore, measures are called for as regards the freedom of expression and the media.

      Protection of minorities: Members underlined that Vojvodina (Northern Serbia) has maintained a high degree of protection for minorities and that the inter-ethnic situation has remained good. They stressed that the autonomy of Vojvodina should not be weakened and that the law on Vojvodina’s resources should be adopted without further delay, as prescribed by the constitution. Members also noted the adoption of the new Roma social inclusion strategy 2016-2025 and called for its swift adoption. There is a large number of Roma people from Serbia seeking asylum in the EU due to their lack of protection.

      Good neighbourly relations: Members encouraged Serbia to strengthen its proactive and positive engagement with its neighbours and the wider region. They called on Serbia to fully implement bilateral agreements with neighbouring countries and to enhance cooperation with the neighbouring EU Member States, in particular on border areas, in order to facilitate economic development.

      They noted that Serbia has shown an increasingly constructive engagement in regional cooperation initiatives such as the Danube Strategy, the SouthEast Europe Cooperation Process, the Regional Cooperation Council, etc and called on it to implement the connectivity reform measures associated with the connectivity agenda and the conclusions of the 2016 Paris conference on the Western Balkans and TEN-T regulation.

      International Criminal Tribunal: Members welcomed the adoption of a national strategy for the investigation and prosecution of war crimes. They called for enhanced regional cooperation in handling war crimes and solving all outstanding issues in this respect. They called for full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and urged the authorities to continue working on the issue of the fate of missing persons, locating mass graves and guaranteeing the rights of victims and their families. They reiterated their support for the initiative to establish the regional Commission for the establishment of facts about war crimes and other serious violations of human rights committed in the former Yugoslavia.

      Regional cooperation: Members commended the opening of three new border-crossing points between Serbia and Romania, as well as reconciliation with Albania. It welcomed Serbia’s continued engagement in the normalisation process with Kosovo. They called on both parties to identify new areas of discussion for the dialogue, with the aim of improving the lives of people and comprehensively normalising relations. Members expressed concern at the recent tensions between Serbia and Kosovo regarding the first train journey from Belgrade to Mitrovica North, including warmongering statements and anti-EU rhetoric.

      Energy: lastly, Members called on Serbia to fully implement the connectivity reform measures in the energy sector and to ratify the Paris climate agreement.

    activities/3
    date
    2017-05-16T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/3/date
    Old
    2017-05-17T00:00:00
    New
    2017-05-16T00:00:00
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/2/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0063&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0063/2017
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/4
    date
    2017-05-17T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    activities/2
    date
    2017-03-22T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    activities/2/date
    Old
    2017-03-09T00:00:00
    New
    2017-05-16T00:00:00
    activities/2/type
    Old
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    New
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/3
    date
    2017-04-26T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Awaiting committee decision
    activities/2
    date
    2017-03-09T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    activities/0/committees/0/date
    2016-10-27T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows
    • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
    • group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles
    • group: ALDE name: VAJGL Ivo
    • group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír
    • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
    • group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    activities/1/committees/0/date
    2016-10-27T00:00:00
    activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
    activities/1/committees/0/shadows
    • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
    • group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles
    • group: ALDE name: VAJGL Ivo
    • group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír
    • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
    • group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    activities/2/date
    Old
    2017-04-05T00:00:00
    New
    2017-04-26T00:00:00
    committees/0/date
    2016-10-27T00:00:00
    committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
    committees/0/shadows
    • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
    • group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles
    • group: ALDE name: VAJGL Ivo
    • group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír
    • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
    • group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    activities/0/committees/0/date
    2016-10-27T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows
    • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
    • group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles
    • group: ALDE name: VAJGL Ivo
    • group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír
    • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
    • group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    activities/1/committees/0/date
    2016-10-27T00:00:00
    activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
    activities/1/committees/0/shadows
    • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
    • group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles
    • group: ALDE name: VAJGL Ivo
    • group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír
    • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
    • group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    committees/0/date
    2016-10-27T00:00:00
    committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
    committees/0/shadows
    • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
    • group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles
    • group: ALDE name: VAJGL Ivo
    • group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír
    • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
    • group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    activities/1
    date
    2017-02-28T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: ALDE name: VAJGL Ivo group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2016-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows
    • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
    • group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles
    • group: ALDE name: VAJGL Ivo
    • group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír
    • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
    • group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    committees/0/shadows
    • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
    • group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles
    • group: ALDE name: VAJGL Ivo
    • group: GUE/NGL name: KOHLÍČEK Jaromír
    • group: Verts/ALE name: ŠOLTES Igor
    • group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2017-04-26T00:00:00
    New
    2017-04-05T00:00:00
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2017-03-13T00:00:00
    New
    2017-04-26T00:00:00
    activities/0
    date
    2017-01-19T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2016-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    AFET/8/08485
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    New
    Awaiting committee decision
    activities
    • date: 2017-03-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2016-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: MCALLISTER David
    links
    other
      procedure
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      reference
      2016/2311(INI)
      title
      2016 Commission report on Serbia
      geographical_area
      Serbia, from 06/2006
      stage_reached
      Preparatory phase in Parliament
      subtype
      Annual report
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      8.20.01 Candidate countries