Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | MAUREL Emmanuel ( S&D) | MARTUSCIELLO Fulvio ( PPE), RUOHONEN-LERNER Pirkko ( ECR), WIERINCK Lieve ( ALDE), SCOTT CATO Molly ( Verts/ALE), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | CONT |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113, TFEU 115
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113, TFEU 115Events
PURPOSE: to improve the functioning of the internal market by discouraging the use of aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements.
CONTENT: this Directive amends Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation in order to provide for the mandatory disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements and to extend the scope of the automatic exchange of information between tax authorities to include such arrangements.
Some financial intermediaries and other tax advisory service providers appear to have actively assisted their clients in concealing capital abroad. Reporting on potentially aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements will help to detect the risks of tax evasion at an earlier stage and to take measures to remedy deficiencies to avoid revenue losses.
Communication and automatic exchange of information : the revised Directive obliges intermediaries (e.g. tax advisors, accountants, banks, lawyers) who design or promote tax planning arrangements that have a cross-border element to provide information to tax authorities.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require intermediaries to file information that is within their knowledge, possession or control on reportable cross-border arrangements with the competent authorities within 30 days beginning: (i) on the day after the reportable cross-border arrangement is made available for implementation; or (ii) on the day after the reportable cross-border arrangement is ready for implementation; or (iii) when the first step in the implementation of the reportable cross-border arrangement has been made, whichever occurs first.
To facilitate the work of Member States' administrations, the subsequent automatic exchange of information on such arrangements could take place every quarter .
The information received shall be exchanged automatically through a secure central directory to which all Member States shall have access. The Commission shall also have restricted access to the information exchanged.
Reporting obligation : to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and to prevent loopholes in the proposed framework of rules, the reporting obligation shall be placed upon all actors that are usually involved in designing, marketing, organising or managing the implementation of a reportable cross-border transaction or a series of such transactions, as well as those who provide assistance or advice. It shall not be ignored either that, in certain cases, the reporting obligation would not be enforceable upon an intermediary due to a legal professional privilege or where there is no intermediary because, for instance, the taxpayer designs and implements a scheme in-house.
List of ‘hallmarks’ : aggressive tax planning schemes have evolved over the years to become increasingly complex and are subject to constant modification and adjustment. Rather than defining the concept of aggressive tax planning, the Directive sets out in Annex IV a list of features (called ‘hallmarks’) of transactions that present a strong indication of tax avoidance or abuse.
Penalties : the Directive leaves it to the Member States to determine the penalties applicable in the event of infringement of national rules transposing the Directive into national law. These penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive .
Member States shall communicate to the Commission a yearly assessment of the effectiveness of the automatic exchange of information as well as the practical results achieved.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 25.6.2018.
TRANSPOSITION: no later than 31.12.2019.
APPLICATION: from 1.7.2020.
The European Parliament adopted by 541 votes to 33, with 61 abstentions, following the consultation procedure, a resolution on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements.
Parliament approved the Commission proposal subject to the following amendments:
Objectives of the Directive : Parliament considered that it is key not to compromise the principle of tax equality in a context where the gap between corporate tax rates in the Member States and between Member States is widening. It stated that the Directive shall aim to significantly limit the catastrophic consequences of tax evasion and tax avoidance on the public accounts and to improve the functioning of the internal market through discouraging the use of cross-border aggressive tax planning arrangements.
Members also stressed the urgency of a better exchange of information on tax avoidance arrangements, given the various easy options that the use of intellectual property rights give for the artificial transfer of profits.
Automatic and mandatory exchange of information on cross-border arrangements : the proposal obliges each Member State to take the necessary measures to ensure that intermediaries provide information to the relevant tax authorities on reported cross-border arrangements.
Members have suggested that while conducting statutory audits of statements of their clients, auditors shall be subject to identification and disclosure obligations regarding potential breaches of the audited entity or its intermediaries of the identification and disclosure obligations which the auditor has become aware. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require auditors to file information with the competent authorities on such breaches within 10 working days , beginning on the day after the publication of their audits reports.
Each Member State may, where appropriate, take the necessary measures to give intermediaries the right to a waiver from filing information on a reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements where they are entitled to a legal professional privilege under the national law of that Member State. In such circumstances, the obligation to file information on such an arrangement or series of arrangements shall be the responsibility of the taxpayer and intermediaries shall inform in writing taxpayers of this responsibility due to the privilege, keeping an acknowledgment of receipt signed by the taxpayer. The taxpayer shall report the information on the reportable cross-border arrangement or series of arrangements to the competent authorities within 10 working days.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require intermediaries, auditors and taxpayers to file information on reportable cross-border arrangements that are active on the date of entry into force of this Directive and those that will enter into force thereafter.
Reporting formats shall be succinct and easy to use so as not to hinder concrete action against reported practices.
Commission access to information : the Commission shall be able to access relevant information so that it can monitor the proper functioning of this Directive and carry out its responsibilities under competition policies.
In order to enhance legal certainty for intermediaries and taxpayers, the Commission shall publish a list of the reported cross-border arrangements that could potentially be used for tax avoidance purposes, without making any reference to the intermediary or taxpayer.
Each year, Member States shall submit to the Commission a list of the cross-border arrangements that are regarded by the relevant tax authority as being compliant with this Directive.
Penalties : appropriate penalties should be imposed to prevent and suppress potentially aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements. The exchange of information between tax authorities regarding the imposition of penalties and situations where the Member State has refrained from imposing penalties should also be automatic.
Member States shall submit to the Commission and make publicly available a list of intermediaries and taxpayers on whom penalties have been imposed under this Directive, including names, nationalities and residences.
Inclusion of a new measure : every two years, the Commission shall publish a draft update of the list of hallmarks that define aggressive tax planning to include any new or modified tax evasion and tax avoidance arrangements that will have been identified since the previous update was published and should be brought into force within four months of the publication of the draft update.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, following the consultation procedure, a report by Emmanuel MAUREL (S&D, FR) on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament approve the Commission proposal subject to the following amendments:
Objectives of the Directive : Members pointed out that the Directive shall aim to significantly limit the catastrophic consequences of tax evasion and tax avoidance on the public accounts and to improve the functioning of the internal market through discouraging the use of cross-border aggressive tax planning arrangements.
An amendment stressed that the automatic exchange of information between tax administrations, and ensuring coordination with financial intelligence units dealing with money-laundering and terrorist financing , are crucial in order to provide these authorities with the necessary information to enable them to take action where they observe aggressive tax practices.
Automatic and mandatory exchange of information on cross-border arrangements : the proposal obliges each Member State to take the necessary measures to ensure that intermediaries provide information to the relevant tax authorities on reported cross-border arrangements.
Members have suggested that while conducting statutory audits of statements of their clients, auditors shall be subject to identification and disclosure obligations regarding potential breaches of the audited entity or its intermediaries of the identification and disclosure obligations which the auditor has become aware. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require auditors to file information with the competent authorities on such breaches within 10 working days , beginning on the day after the publication of their audits reports.
Each Member State may, where appropriate, take the necessary measures to give intermediaries the right to a waiver from filing information on a reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements where they are entitled to a legal professional privilege under the national law of that Member State. In such circumstances, the obligation to file information on such an arrangement or series of arrangements shall be the responsibility of the taxpayer and intermediaries shall inform in writing taxpayers of this responsibility due to the privilege, keeping an acknowledgment of receipt signed by the taxpayer
The taxpayer shall report the information on the reportable cross-border arrangement or series of arrangements to the competent authorities within 10 working days.
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to assess the tax arrangements disclosed through the exchange of information provided for by this Directive, as well as make available to their tax authorities the resources required.
Reporting formats shall be succinct and easy to use so as not to hinder concrete action against reported practices.
Commission access to information : the Commission shall be able to access relevant information so that it can monitor the proper functioning of this Directive and carry out its responsibilities under competition policies.
Lastly, in order to enhance legal certainty for intermediaries and taxpayers, the Commission shall publish a list of the reported cross-border arrangements that could potentially be used for tax avoidance purposes, without making any reference to the intermediary or taxpayer.
Penalties : appropriate penalties should be imposed to prevent and suppress potentially aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements. The exchange of information between tax authorities regarding the imposition of penalties and situations where the Member State has refrained from imposing penalties should also be automatic.
Member States shall submit to the Commission and make publicly available a list of intermediaries and taxpayers on whom penalties have been imposed under this Directive, including names, nationalities and residences.
Inclusion of a new measure : every two years, the Commission shall publish a draft update of the list of hallmarks that define aggressive tax planning to include any new or modified tax evasion and tax avoidance arrangements that will have been identified since the previous update was published and should be brought into force within four months of the publication of the draft update.
PURPOSE: to strengthen the Union's fiscal transparency framework by introducing new rules for intermediaries in tax planning.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council shall adopt the act after consultation of the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow the opinion of the European Parliament.
BACKGROUND: improving transparency, particularly through the exchange of information between tax administrations, is one of the main pillars of the Commission's strategy to combat tax avoidance and evasion .
Tax planning structures have become ever-more sophisticated. They consist of arrangements which develop across various jurisdictions and shift taxable profits towards beneficial tax regimes or have the effect of reducing the taxpayer´s overall tax bill.
Recent revelations, such as the Panama Papers , have highlighted how certain intermediaries actively assist clients to evade tax, usually through complex cross-border arrangements often involving often involving a company located in a jurisdiction which is low tax or non-transparent.
Council Directive 2014/107/EU , amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation between tax authorities within the Union introduced a common reporting standard (CRS) for financial account information within the Union.
The standard that was developed within the OECD Global Forum prescribes for the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts held by non-tax residents and establishes a framework for this exchange worldwide.
The Commission considers it crucial that information which may escape from the scope of this Directive be captured through placing an obligation on intermediaries to report on potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements.
The aim is to increase transparency and access to the right information at an early stage, as this should allow the authorities to improve the speed and accuracy of their risk assessment and make timely and informed decisions on how to protect their tax revenues.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred option is the use of an EU Directive (binding instrument) requiring Member States to introduce a mandatory disclosure regime on potentially aggressive tax planning regime combined with exchange of information.
CONTENT: the proposal amends Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation in order to provide for the mandatory disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements and to extend the scope of the automatic exchange of information between tax authorities to include such arrangements.
Communication and automatic exchange of information : the proposal obliges intermediaries (e.g. tax advisors, accountants, banks, lawyers) who design or promote tax planning arrangements that have a cross-border element to provide information to tax authorities.
The disclosed information shall be exchanged automatically amongst national tax authorities. In practice, the rules propose that the exchange is carried out through submitting the disclosed arrangements to a central directory which all Member States have access to. The Commission will also have limited access to the exchanged information.
Regarding the operational aspects of the mandatory automatic exchange of information, the proposed Directive refers to the mechanism introduced by Council Directive (EU) 2015/2376 , i.e. common communication network (CCN). This will serve as a common framework for the exchanges and for this purpose its scope will be enlarged.
Burden of disclosure : the obligation of disclosure concerns those persons (i.e. natural or legal persons or entities without legal personality) who are identified as intermediaries.
The obligation to report a cross-border scheme shall be borne by the taxpayer (company or individuals) using the scheme: (i) when the intermediary providing the cross-border scheme is not based in the EU, or where the intermediary is bound by professional privilege or secrecy rules; (ii) when it is developed by in-house tax consultants or lawyers.
List of hallmarks : the proposal includes a compilation of the features and elements of transactions that present a strong indication of tax avoidance or abuse. These features and elements are referred to as 'hallmarks' and it suffices that an arrangement fall within the scope of one of those to be treated as reportable to the tax authorities. Intermediaries must make this report to their tax authorities within five days of giving such an arrangement to their client.
The subsequent automatic exchange of information on these arrangements shall happen every quarter of a year.
Penalties : Member States shall lay down penalties against the violation of national rules that implement this Directive and ensure that these penalties actually apply in practice, that they are proportionate and have a dissuasive effect.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: the impact on expenditure is estimated at EUR 0.686 million over five years.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2018/822
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 139 05.06.2018, p. 0001
- Final act published in Official Journal: Corrigendum to final act 32018L0822R(03)
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 031 01.02.2019, p. 0108
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)178
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0050/2018
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A8-0016/2018
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES3232/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE615.388
- Committee draft report: PE613.436
- Contribution: COM(2017)0335
- Contribution: COM(2017)0335
- Contribution: COM(2017)0335
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0236
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0237
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2017)0335
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0236
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0237
- Committee draft report: PE613.436
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE615.388
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES3232/2017
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)178
- Contribution: COM(2017)0335
- Contribution: COM(2017)0335
- Contribution: COM(2017)0335
Activities
- David COBURN
- Pervenche BERÈS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ana GOMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramón JÁUREGUI ATONDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Laurenţiu REBEGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dariusz ROSATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lieve WIERINCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0016/2018 - Emmanuel Maurel - Am 43 01/03/2018 12:17:00.000 #
A8-0016/2018 - Emmanuel Maurel - Proposition de la Commission 01/03/2018 12:17:44.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
105 |
2017/0138(CNS)
2017/12/18
ECON
105 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – Section II – Article 8 a a a a – paragraph 4 4. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require intermediaries and taxpayers to file
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 4 4. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require intermediaries and taxpayers to file information on reportable cross-border arrangements that were implemented
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 4 4. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article a a a – paragraph 4 4. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require intermediaries, auditors and taxpayers to file information on reportable cross-border arrangements that were implemented between [date of political agreement] and 31 December 2018 Intermediaries, auditors and taxpayers, as appropriate, shall file information on those reportable cross-
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 4 4. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require intermediaries and taxpayers to file information on reportable cross-border arrangements that were implemented or through which cross-border transactions were performed, between [date of political agreement] and 31 December 2018. Intermediaries and taxpayers, as appropriate, shall file information on those reportable cross-
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to investigate the tax arrangements disclosed through the exchange of information provided by this Directive, as well as to provide the resources required for this to their tax authorities.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/UEU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 6 – point a (a) the identification of intermediaries, or, where applicable auditors, and taxpayers, including their name, residence for tax purposes, and taxpayer identification number (TIN) and, where appropriate, the persons who are associated enterprises to the intermediary or taxpayer;
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 6 – point a (a) the identification of intermediaries and taxpayers, including their name, nationality, residence for tax purposes, and taxpayer identification number (TIN) and, where appropriate, the persons who are associated
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 6 – point c (c) a summary of the content of the reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements, including a reference to the name by which they are commonly known, if any, and a description in abstract terms of the relevant business activities or arrangements
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 6 – point c (c) a summary of the content of the reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements, including a reference to the name by which they are
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 6 – point d (d) the starting date
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 6 – point e (e) details of the national tax provisions
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 6 – point h (h) the identification of any person in the other Member States, if any, likely to be affected by the reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements indicating to which Member States the affected intermediaries, auditors or taxpayers are linked.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 7 7. To facilitate the exchange of information referred to in paragraph 5 of this Article, the Commission shall adopt the practical arrangements, and provide sufficient resources, necessary for the implementation of this Article, including measures to standardise the communication of the information set out in paragraph 6 of this Article, as part of the procedure for establishing the standard form provided for in Article 20(5).
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 8 Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 8 8. The Commission shall
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 The Commission shall by 31 December 2017 develop and provide with technical and logistical support a secure
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall by 31 December 2018 develop and provide with technical and logistical support a secure
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 The competent authorities of all Member States shall have access to the information recorded in that directory. The Commission shall also have access to the information recorded in that directory,
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 The competent authorities of all Member States
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 23 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall communicate to the Commission a yearly assessment of the effectiveness of the automatic exchange of information referred to in Articles 8, 8a, 8aa and 8aaa as well as the practical results achieved. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt the form and the conditions of communication for that yearly assessment. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2). Member States shall communicate to the Commission information about the number of arrangements or series of arrangements disclosed (as classified in Annex IV), the nationality of taxpayers benefiting from these arrangements and the number of sanctions applied to intermediaries or taxpayers disclosing aggressive tax arrangements. The Commission shall produce a yearly public report with this information.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 23 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall communicate to the Commission a yearly assessment of the effectiveness of the automatic exchange of information referred to in Articles 8, 8a, 8aa and 8aaa
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 23 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Member States shall each year submit to the Commission a list of the cross-border arrangements that are regarded by the tax authority as compliant with this Directive.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter V – Article 23 a a The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 26a to amend Annex IV, in order to include in the list of hallmarks potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements or series of arrangements in response to updated information on those arrangements or series of arrangements, which is derived from the mandatory disclosure of such arrangements. It shall do so every two years acting on the basis of the information that will be available regarding new or modified malpractices, publishing its new criteria in draft form four months prior to bringing them into force.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 25 a Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and concerning Articles 8aa and 8aaa, and shall take all measures necessary
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 26 a – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Every three years after entry into force, the Commission shall submit a report on the application of this Directive to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 21 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 6 July 20161a on tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect, _________________ 1a P8_TA(2016)0310
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Most Member States find it increasingly difficult to protect their national tax bases from erosion as
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Member States find it increasingly difficult to protect their national tax bases from erosion as aggressive and complex tax planning structures have evolved to be particularly sophisticated and often take advantage of the increased mobility of both capital and persons within the internal market. These structures commonly consist of arrangements which are developed across various jurisdictions and move taxable corporate and individual's profits towards more beneficial tax regimes or have the effect of reducing the taxpayer´s overall tax bill. As a result, Member States often experience considerable reductions in their tax revenues
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Member States find it increasingly difficult to protect their national tax bases from erosion as tax planning structures have evolved to be particularly sophisticated and often take advantage of the increased mobility of both capital and persons within the internal market. These structures commonly consist of arrangements which are developed across various jurisdictions and move taxable profits towards more beneficial tax regimes or have the effect of reducing the taxpayer´s overall tax bill. As a result, Member States often experience considerable reductions in their tax revenues which hinder them from applying
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Member States find it increasingly difficult to protect their national tax bases from erosion as tax planning structures have evolved to be particularly sophisticated and often take advantage of the increased mobility of both capital and persons within the internal market. These structures commonly consist of arrangements which are developed across various jurisdictions and move taxable profits towards more beneficial tax regimes or have the effect of reducing the taxpayer´s overall tax bill. As a result, Member States often experience considerable reductions in their tax revenues which hinder them from
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Member States find it increasingly difficult to protect their national tax bases from erosion as tax planning structures have evolved to be particularly sophisticated and often take advantage of the increased mobility of both capital and persons within the internal market. These structures commonly consist of arrangements which are developed across various jurisdictions and move taxable profits towards more beneficial tax regimes or have the effect of reducing the taxpayer´s overall tax bill. As a result, Member States often experience considerable reductions in their tax revenues which hinder them from applying growth-friendly tax policies, as well as making it harder to finance social and other public services and hence to ensure fair treatment. It is therefore critical that Member States' tax authorities obtain comprehensive and relevant information about potentially aggressive
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Member States find it increasingly difficult to protect their national tax bases from erosion as tax planning structures have evolved to be particularly sophisticated and often take advantage of the increased mobility of both capital and persons within the internal market. These structures commonly consist of arrangements which are developed across various jurisdictions and move taxable profits towards more beneficial tax regimes or have the effect of reducing the taxpayer
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Member States find it increasingly difficult to protect their national tax bases from erosion as tax planning structures have evolved to be particularly sophisticated and often take advantage of the increased mobility of both capital and persons within the internal market following a long process of deregulation of the European and international financial system. These structures commonly consist of arrangements which are developed across various jurisdictions and move taxable profits towards more beneficial tax regimes or have the effect of reducing the taxpayer´s overall tax bill. As a result, Member States often experience considerable reductions in their tax revenues which hinder them from applying growth-friendly tax policies. It is therefore critical that Member States' tax authorities obtain comprehensive and relevant information about potentially aggressive tax arrangements. This information would enable those authorities to be able to promptly react against harmful tax practices and to close loopholes through enacting legislation or by undertaking adequate risk assessments and carrying out tax audits.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Member States
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Considering that most of the potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements span across more than one jurisdiction, the disclosure of information about those arrangements would bring additional positive results where that information was also exchanged amongst Member States.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Considering that most of the potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements span across more than one jurisdiction, the disclosure of information about those arrangements would bring additional positive results where that information was also exchanged amongst Member States. In particular, the automatic exchange of information between tax administrations is crucial in order to provide these authorities with the necessary
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Considering that most of the potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements span across more than one jurisdiction, the disclosure of information about those arrangements would bring additional positive results where that information was also exchanged amongst Member States. In particular, the automatic exchange of relevant information between tax administrations is crucial in order to provide these authorities with the necessary information to enable them to take action where they
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Recognising how a transparent
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) The European Parliament should also encourage individuals who have access to information related to sensitive tax information of multinational corporations regarding tax evasion and tax avoidance practices, to come forward and cooperate with the authorities with discretion and respect to the public interest.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) It is necessary to recall how certain financial intermediaries and other providers of tax advice, and auditors, seem to have actively assisted their clients to conceal money offshore. Furthermore, although the CRS introduced by Council Directive (EU) 2014/10727 is a significant step forward in establishing a tax transparent framework within the Union, at least in terms of financial account information, it can still be improved. _________________ 27 Council Directive (EU) 2014/107 of 9 December 2014 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (OJ L 359, 16.2.2014, p. 1).
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) It is necessary to recall how certain financial intermediaries and other providers of tax advice seem to have actively assisted their clients to conceal money offshore. It is also necessary to identify the legal status of those financial intermediaries and the licence under which they operate. Furthermore, although the CRS introduced by Council Directive (EU) 2014/10727 is a significant step forward in establishing a tax transparent framework within the Union, at least in terms of financial account information, it can still be improved.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) It is necessary to recall how certain financial intermediaries and other providers of tax advice seem to have actively assisted their clients to conceal money offshore. Furthermore, although the CRS introduced by Council Directive (EU) 2014/10727 is a significant step forward in establishing a tax transparent framework within the Union, at least in terms of financial account information, it can still be improved. In addition, Member States' capacity to process the amount of financial information received should be enhanced accordingly and tax administrations' financial, human and IT resources should be increased. _________________ 27 Council Directive (EU) 2014/107 of 9 December 2014 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (OJ L 359, 16.2.2014, p. 1).
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) It is necessary to recall how certain financial intermediaries and other providers of tax advice
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements of a cross-border dimension can contribute effectively to the efforts for creating an environment of fair and efficient taxation in the internal
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements of a cross-border dimension can contribute effectively to the efforts for creating an environment of fair taxation in the internal market and strengthen the collective pressure on those Member States that abuse freedom of movement of capital and EU company law provisions in a bid to attract the tax base of other Member States. In this light, an obligation on intermediaries to inform tax authorities on certain cross-border arrangements that could potentially be used for tax avoidance purposes would constitute a step in the right direction. In order to develop a more comprehensive policy, it would also be significant that as a second step, following disclosure, the tax authorities share information with their peers in other
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements of a cross-border dimension can contribute effectively to the efforts for creating an environment of fair taxation in the internal market. In this light, an obligation on intermediaries to inform tax authorities on certain cross-border arrangements that could potentially be used for tax avoidance purposes would constitute a step in the right direction. In order to develop a more comprehensive policy, it would also be significant that as a second step, following disclosure, the tax authorities share information with their peers in other Member States. Such arrangements should also enhance the effectiveness of the CRS. In addition, it would be crucial to grant the Commission access to a sufficient amount of information so that it can monitor the
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements of a cross-border dimension can contribute effectively to the efforts for creating an environment of fair taxation in the internal market. In this light, an obligation on intermediaries to inform tax authorities on certain cross-border arrangements that could potentially be used for tax avoidance purposes would constitute a step in the right direction. In order to develop a more comprehensive policy, it would also be significant that as a second step, following disclosure, the tax authorities automatically share information with their peers in other Member States. Such arrangements should also enhance the effectiveness of the CRS. In addition, it would be crucial to grant the Commission access to
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements of a cross-border dimension can contribute effectively to the efforts for creating an environment of fair taxation in the internal market. In this light, an obligation on intermediaries to inform tax authorities on certain cross-border arrangements that could potentially be used for tax avoidance purposes would constitute a step in the right direction. In order to develop a more comprehensive policy, it would also be significant that as a second step, following disclosure, the tax authorities share information with their peers in other Member States. Such arrangements should also enhance the effectiveness of the CRS. In addition, it would be crucial to grant the Commission access to a sufficient amount of information so that it can monitor the proper functioning of this Directive, including state-aid monitoring. Such access to information by the Commission does not discharge a Member State from its obligations to notify any state aid to the Commission.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements of a cross-border dimension can contribute effectively to the efforts for creating an environment of fair taxation in the internal market. In this light, an obligation on intermediaries and auditors to inform tax authorities on certain cross-border arrangements that could potentially be used for tax avoidance purposes would constitute a step in the right direction. In order to develop a more comprehensive policy, it would also be significant that as a second step, following disclosure, the tax authorities share information with their peers in other Member States. Such arrangements should also enhance the effectiveness of the CRS. In addition, it would be crucial to grant the Commission access to a sufficient amount of information so that it can monitor the proper functioning of this Directive. Such access to information by the Commission does not discharge a Member State from its obligations to notify any state aid to the Commission.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) The disclosure of potentially
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In order to make the tax administrations meet the enhanced duties of mapping the procedures through which amounts of money can secretly surpass national authorities' radars, special funding is needed for equipping them with the necessary legal, administrative and IT tools. This funding has to be channelled to all Member States with special provision to those who face tax collection challenges with a larger fiscal imprint.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Recent tax-related leaks have also underlined the need for better information exchange on aggressive tax planning arrangements. To highlight one example, it is scandalous that despite of various inquiries on Apple’s tax practices, its recent Jersey-based tax avoidance structure was only revealed with the Paradise Papers leak.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) It is acknowledged that the disclosure of potentially aggressive cross- border tax planning arrangements would stand a better chance of achieving its envisaged deterrent effect where the relevant information reached the tax authorities at an early stage, in other words before the disclosed arrangements are actually implemented. Where the disclosure obligation is shifted to taxpayers, it would be practical to place the obligation to disclose those potentially
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) It is acknowledged that the disclosure of potentially aggressive cross- border tax planning arrangements would stand a better chance of achieving its envisaged deterrent effect where the relevant information reached the tax authorities at an early stage, in other words before the disclosed arrangements are actually implemented creating that way an early warning mechanism with necessary sanctioning powers. Where the disclosure obligation is shifted to taxpayers, it would be practical to place the obligation to disclose those potentially aggressive cross- border tax planning arrangements at a slightly later stage, as taxpayers may not be aware of the nature of the arrangements at the time of the inception. To facilitate Member States' administrations, the subsequent automatic exchange of information on these arrangements could take place every quarter.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) It is acknowledged that the disclosure of potentially aggressive cross- border tax planning arrangements would stand a better chance of achieving its envisaged deterrent effect where the relevant information reached the tax authorities at an early stage
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) It is acknowledged that the disclosure of potentially aggressive cross- border tax planning arrangements would stand a better chance of achieving its envisaged deterrent effect where the relevant information reached the tax
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) To ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and to prevent loopholes in the proposed framework of rules, the obligation for disclosure should be placed upon all actors that are usually involved in designing, marketing, organising or managing the implementation of a reportable cross- border transaction or a series thereof as well as those who provide assistance or advice. It should not be ignored either that in certain cases, the obligation to disclose would not be enforceable upon an intermediary due to a legal professional privilege or where there is no intermediary because, for instance, the taxpayer designs and implements a scheme in-house. It would thus be crucial that, in such circumstances, tax authorities do not lose the opportunity to receive information about tax-related arrangements that are potentially linked to aggressive tax planning
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9)
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Aggressive tax planning arrangements have evolved over the years to become increasingly more complex and are always subject to constant modifications and adjustments as a reaction to defensive counter-measures by the tax authorities. Taking this into consideration, it would be more effective to endeavour to capture potentially aggressive tax
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) The constantly growing role and importance of intellectual property rights in the business models and tax structures of large corporations further underline the urgency of better information exchange on tax avoidance arrangements, given the various easy options that the use of immaterial rights give for artificial transfer of profits.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 b (new) (9b) The lack of comprehensive, public country-by-country reporting on relevant financial figures of major multinational enterprises has contributed into the poor reliability of aggregated data on offshore structures, highlighted by the fact that many of the recent high-profile tax avoidance structures are not visible in the current commercial corporate financial account databases. These gaps in statistics hinder the attempts of tax authorities to conduct risk assessments on risk jurisdictions and underlines the need for greater information exchange on tax planning structures.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Given that the primary objective of such legislation should focus on ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market, it would be critical not to regulate at the level of the Union beyond what is necessary to achieve the envisaged aims. This is why it would be necessary to limit any common rules on disclosure to cross- border situations, namely situations in either more than one Member State or a Member State and a third country. In such circumstances, due to the potential impact on the functioning of the internal market, one can justify the need for enacting a common set of rules, rather than leaving the matter to be dealt with at the national level. If a Member State implements further national reporting measures of a similar nature, the additional information collected should be shared with other Member States if relevant.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Given that the primary objective of such legislation should focus on significantly limiting the catastrophic consequences of tax evasion and tax avoidance on the public accounts while ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market, it would be critical not to regulate at the level of the Union beyond what is necessary to achieve the envisaged aims. This is why it would be necessary to limit any common rules on disclosure to cross-
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Given that the primary objective of such legislation should focus on ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market, it would be critical not to regulate at the level of the Union beyond what is necessary to achieve the envisaged aims. This is why it would be necessary to limit any common rules on disclosure to cross- border situations, namely situations in either more than one Member State or a Member State and a third country. In such circumstances, due to the potential impact on the functioning of the internal market,
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Considering that the disclosed arrangements should have a cross-border dimension, it would be important to share the relevant information with the tax authorities in other Member States in order to ensure the maximum effectiveness of this Directive in deterring aggressive tax planning practices. The mechanism for the exchange of information in the context of advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements, should be available to the public and should also be used to accommodate the mandatory and automatic exchange of disclosed information on potentially aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements amongst tax authorities in the Union.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Considering that the disclosed arrangements should have a cross-border dimension, it would be important to share the relevant information with the tax authorities in other Member States in order to ensure the maximum effectiveness of this Directive in deterring aggressive tax planning practices. The mechanism for the exchange of relevant information in the context of advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) (11a) Penalties are to be effective, proportionate and dissuasive, but their design is left for Member States’ legislation. Since all Member States might not have the incentives to design and implement effective sanctions, in order to ensure consistent implementation across Member States, the exchange of information between tax authorities has to be automatic also in regard to penalties imposed, as well as to situations where the Member State has refrained from imposing any.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to facilitate the automatic exchange of information and enhance the efficient use of resources, exchanges should be carried out through the common communication network (CCN) developed by the Union. In this context, information would be recorded on a secure central directory on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation, which should then be publicly accessible and searchable. Member States should have to implement a series of practical arrangements, including measures to standardise the communication of all requisite information through creating a standard form. This should also involve specifying the linguistic requirements for the envisaged exchange of information and accordingly upgrading the CCN.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to facilitate the automatic exchange of relevant information and enhance the efficient use of resources, exchanges should be carried out through the common communication network (CCN)
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) In order to improve the prospects for effectiveness of this Directive, Member States should lay down strict penalties against the violation of national rules that implement this Directive and ensure that these penalties actually apply promptly in practice, that they are proportionate and have a dissuasive effect. The Member States should submit to the Commission a public list of intermediaries and taxpayers who have had penalties imposed under this Directive, including name, nationality and place of residence.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) In order to improve the prospects for effectiveness of this Directive, Member States
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) In order to improve the
Amendment 69 #
(13a) Since the knowledge source of new procedures are Member States, which might have a tradition of enticing foreign direct investment with tax advantages, sufficient incentives to expose tax avoidance arrangements in good time must be in place. In particular, sanctions should be increasing with elapsed time on non-reporting to national tax authorities and on sharing the new procedures that meet the specified hallmarks with other Member States’ tax authorities.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of this Directive, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in connection with updating the hallmarks
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 a (new) (14a) In order to ensure an effective implementation of the measures foreseen by this Directive, it is important that tax authorities have adequate information and communication technology (ICT) systems in place and adequate staff resources.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 b (new) (14b) In order not to strain the capacity of the national tax authorities to comply with the legislative measures foreseen by this Directive, the hallmarks should be implemented incrementally; the order of the implementation should be based on a prior assessment carried out by the Commission, with the aim of identifying the hallmarks that ought to be given priority.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) In order to ensure a uniform use and interpretation of hallmarks, the Commission should regularly monitor the activities of the tax authorities, within the powers conferred upon it by this Directive.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Since the objective of this Directive, namely to significantly limit the catastrophic consequences of tax evasion and tax avoidance on the public accounts and to improve the functioning of the internal market through discouraging the use of cross-border aggressive tax planning arrangements,
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 18 – point c (c) one or more of the parties to the arrangement or series of arrangements carries on a
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 18 – point c (c) one or more of the parties to the arrangement or series of arrangements carries on a business in another jurisdiction through a permanent establishment
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 18 – point d (d) one or more of the parties to the arrangement or series of arrangements carries on a
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 18 – point e (e) such arrangement or series of arrangements
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2016/11/EU Article 3 – point 19 19. "reportable cross-border arrangement" means any cross-border arrangement or series of arrangements that satisfy at least one of the hallmarks set out in Annex IV. The Commission shall identify which hallmarks ought to be prioritized and consequently allow an incremental implementation.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 20 20. "hallmark" means
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 21 – paragraph 1 "intermediaries" means any person that carries the responsibility vis-à-vis the taxpayer for designing, marketing, organising or managing the implementation of the tax aspects of a reportable cross-border arrangement, or series of such arrangements, in the course of providing financial, accounting or fiscal services relating to tax
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 21 – point d a (new) (da) provide the service to a taxpayer resident for tax purposes in a Member State in the case of is a legal person established in a third country and belonging to a group of companies established in the Member State of the recipient;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 21 – paragraph 2 a (new) While conducting tax and financial statements audits of intermediaries, as defined in this Article, auditors shall be subject to the same identification and disclosure obligations regarding potential aggressive tax schemes covered by article 8aaa of this Directive.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 23 – point b (b) a taxpayer participates in the control of another taxpayer through a holding that exceeds
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 23 – point c (c) a taxpayer participates in the capital of another taxpayer through a right of ownership that, directly or indirectly, exceeds
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b (new) Directive 2011/16/EU Article 3 – point 23 – point c a (new) (ca) A taxpayer is the beneficial owner of another taxpayer within the meaning of Directive (EU) 2015/849.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require intermediaries and auditors to file information with the competent tax authorities on a reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements within five working days, beginning on the day after the reportable cross-border arrangement or series of arrangements is made available for implementation by the intermediary to one or more taxpayers following contact with that taxpayer or those taxpayers, or where the first step in a series of arrangements has already been implemented.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Each Member State
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to give intermediaries and auditors the right to a waiver from filing information on a reportable cross- border
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – Section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to give intermediaries the right to a waiver from filing information on a reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements where they are entitled to a legal professional privilege under the national law of that Member State. In such circumstances, the obligation to file information on such an arrangement or series of arrangements shall be the responsibility of the taxpayer and intermediaries shall inform taxpayers of this responsibility due to the privilege. The taxpayer shall report the information to the competent tax authorities on the reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements within ten working days. Without prejudice to the obligations of the intermediaries, this time period shall apply whenever the tax reporting obligations are to be fulfilled by the tax payer.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – Section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to give intermediaries the right to a waiver from filing information on a reportable cross-border arrangement or series of such arrangements where they are entitled to a legal professional privilege under the national law of that Member State. In such circumstances, the obligation to file information on such an arrangement or series of arrangements shall be the responsibility of the taxpayer and intermediaries shall inform taxpayers in writing of this responsibility due to the privilege and shall keep an acknowledgement of receipt signed by the taxpayer.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Intermediaries and auditors may only be entitled to a waiver under the first subparagraph to the extent that they operate within the limits of the relevant national laws that define their professions.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Chapter II – section II – Article 8 a a a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 source: 615.388
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30677&j=0&l=en
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.436New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-613436_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.388New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-615388_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3232)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:3232)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30677&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0016_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0016_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180301&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-03-01-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0016&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0016_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0050New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0050_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/8/10283New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2017-07-12T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/7 |
|
committees/2/date |
2017-07-12T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2017-07-06T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
committees/1/date |
2017-07-06T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/4 |
|
committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
committees/1/shadows/4 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2017-07-12T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2017-07-12T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
ECON/8/10283
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|