Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | MACOVEI Monica ( ECR) | KUDRYCKA Barbara ( PPE), CHINNICI Caterina ( S&D), WIKSTRÖM Cecilia ( ALDE), ALBRECHT Jan Philipp ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | GEIER Jens ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | CONT |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 074, TFEU 077-p2, TFEU 078-p2, TFEU 079-p2, TFEU 082-p1, TFEU 085-p1-a2, TFEU 087-p2, TFEU 88-p2
Legal Basis:
TFEU 074, TFEU 077-p2, TFEU 078-p2, TFEU 079-p2, TFEU 082-p1, TFEU 085-p1-a2, TFEU 087-p2, TFEU 88-p2Events
PURPOSE: to create an agency at European Union level responsible for the operational management and, where appropriate, the development of large-scale IT systems within the area of freedom, security and justice (extending the mandate of eu-LISA).
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2018/1726 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA), and amending Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011.
CONTENT: this Regulation strengthens the mandate of the ‘eu-LISA’ Agency by giving the Agency an important role in the implementation of the new IT architecture in the field of justice and home affairs (JHA).
Missions
TheAgency established by this Regulation replaces and succeeds the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice as established by Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011.
It shall be responsible for:
- the operational management of the Schengen Information System (SIS), the Visa Information System (VIS) and Eurodac, as well as the preparation, development and/or operational management of the Entry/Exit System ( EES ), DubliNet and the European Travel Information and Authorisation System ( ETIAS );
- implementing technical solutions to achieve interoperability, defined as the ability of information systems to exchange data and share information;
- providing assistance to Member States, at their request, for example support when extraordinary security or migration challenges or needs require it;
- playing a greater role in research relevant to the operational management of systems and in pilot projects of an experimental nature designed to test the feasibility of an action and its usefulness;
- providing support to the Commission services on technical issues relating to existing or new systems, where requested, in particular for the preparation of new proposals for large-scale IT systems to be managed by the Agency.
The Agency shall ensure a high level of data protection, in accordance with EU data protection law, including specific provisions for each large-scale IT system.
Legal status and location
The Agency shall be a body of the Union and shall have legal personality. It is based in Tallinn (Estonia). Development and operational management tasks shall be carried out at the technical site in Strasbourg (France). A backup site capable of operating a large-scale IT system in the event of a failure of such a system shall be installed in Sankt Johann im Pongau, Austria.
If there is a need to establish a second separate technical site, either in Strasbourg or Sankt Johann im Pongau or, where appropriate, in both locations, to host the systems, this request shall be justified on the basis of an impact assessment and an independent cost-benefit analysis.
Structure
The administrative and management structure of the Agency shall comprise: a Management Board; an Executive Director; Advisory Groups.
The Management Board shall appoint the Executive Director from a list of at least three candidates proposed by the Commission following an open and transparent selection procedure.
Before appointment, the candidates proposed by the Commission shall be invited to make a statement before the competent committee or committees of the European Parliament and answer questions from the committee members.
If the Management Board decides to appoint a candidate other than the one for which Parliament has expressed its preference, it shall inform Parliament and the Council in writing of the manner in which Parliament's opinion has been taken into account.
The Executive Director shall be assisted by a Deputy Executive Director appointed by the Management Board on a proposal from the Executive Director.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: as from 11.12.2018.
The European Parliament adopted by 541 votes to 71, with 20 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice, and amending Regulation (EC) 1987/2006 and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and repealing Regulation (EU) 1077/2011.
The European Parliament’s position, adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure, amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Tasks : the Agency established by this Regulation replaces and succeeds the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice as established by Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011. It shall be responsible for the operational management of the Schengen Information System ( SIS ), the Visa Information System ( VIS ) and Eurodac , as well as the preparation, development and/or operational management of the Entry/Exit System ( EES ), DubliNet and the European Travel Information and Authorisation System ( ETIAS ).
Technical solutions : the amended text specifies that the Agency shall be able to implement technical solutions in order to comply with the availability requirements laid down in the legislative instruments governing the systems under the responsibility of the Agency while fully respecting the specific provisions of those instruments with regard to the technical architecture of the respective system.
Where those technical solutions require a duplication of a system or a duplication of components of a system an independent impact assessment and cost-benefit analysis shall be carried out and a decision shall be taken by the Management Board following the consultation of the Commission. The assessment shall also include an examination of the needs in terms of hosting capacity of the existing technical sites related to the development of such solutions and the possible risks of the current operational set up.
Tasks related to the communication infrastructure : when carrying out those tasks all external private-sector entities or bodies, including the network provider, shall be bound by the security measures and shall have no access to any operational data stored in the large scale IT systems operated by the Agency or transferred through the communication infrastructure or to the SIS II SIRENE-related exchange by any means.
Interoperability : where interoperability of large-scale information systems has been stipulated in a relevant legislative instrument, the Agency shall develop the necessary actions to enable that interoperability.
Support to Member States and the Commission: any Member State may request the Agency to provide advice with regard to its national systems' connection to the central systems . Any Member State may submit a request for ad-hoc support to the Commission which, subject to its positive assessment that such support is required by security or migratory extraordinary needs, shall transmit it, without delay, to the Agency, which shall inform the Management Board. The Member State shall be informed in case the Commission's assessment is negative.
The requesting Member States may task the Agency to establish a common component or router for advance passenger information and passenger name record data as a technical support tool to facilitate connectivity with air carriers. In such case eu-LISA is to collect centrally the data from air carriers and transmit those data to the Member States via the common component or router. The requesting Member States are to adopt the necessary measures to ensure air carriers transfer the data via eu-LISA.
Location : the Agency shall have its seat in Tallinn (Estonia). The tasks relating to development and operational management shall be carried out in the technical site in Strasbourg , France. A backup site capable of ensuring the operation of a large-scale IT system in the event of failure of such a system shall be installed in Sankt Johann im Pongau , Austria.
Due to the specific nature of the large-scale IT systems, should it become necessary for the Agency to establish a second separate technical site either in Strasbourg or in Sankt Johann im Pongau or in both locations, as required, in order to host the systems, such need shall be justified on the basis of an independent impact assessment and cost-benefit analysis.
Executive Director : the Management Board shall appoint the Executive Director from a list of at least three candidates proposed by the Commission following an open and transparent selection procedure.
Before appointment, the candidates proposed by the Commission shall be invited to make a statement before the competent committee or committees of the Parliament and answer questions from the committee members. If the Management Board takes a decision to appoint a candidate other than the candidate whom the Parliament indicated as its preferred candidate , the Management Board shall inform the Parliament and the Council in writing of the manner in which the opinion of the Parliament was taken into account.
The Executive Director shall be assisted by a Deputy Executive Director appointed by the Management Board on the proposal of the Executive Director.
Cooperation with international organisations and other relevant entities : where so provided by a Union act, in so far as it is necessary for the performance of its tasks, the Agency may, by means of the conclusion of working arrangements , establish and maintain relations with international organisations and their subordinate bodies governed by public international law or other relevant entities or bodies, which are set up by, or on the basis of, an agreement between two or more countries.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Monica MACOVEI (ECR, RO) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice, and amending Regulation (EC) 1987/2006 and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and repealing Regulation (EU) 1077/2011.
As a reminder, the aim of the proposal is to review eu-LISA establishing Regulation in order to adapt it to the recommendations for legislative amendments stemming from the evaluation, as well as to improve the functioning of eu-LISA and enhance and strengthen its role to ensure that its mandate meets current challenges at EU level in the area of freedom, security and justice.
Aims : Members pointed out that the Agency shall, inter alia , ensure:
effective, secure and continuous operation of large-scale IT systems in order to ensure continuous improvement of data quality; a high level of data protection , in line with relevant Union legislation; an appropriate level of security , including the implementation of a proper information security risk management process; the provision of adequate statistics to the Commission and to the relevant Union decentralised agencies.
Interoperability : the proposal provides for the Agency to develop the necessary measures to enable interoperability of systems, subject, where appropriate, to the adoption of the relevant legislative instruments.
Considering the risks posed to the right to privacy and the right to data protection, Members stated that interoperability cannot be implemented without a specific legal basis, comprising an impact assessment and a feasibility study . This is why they removed that provision.
Assistance to the Member States and the Commission : any Member State may request the Agency to provide advice as regards its national systems' connection to the central systems. Any Member State may also submit a request directly to the Agency for ad-hoc support. Prior to providing such ad-hoc support, the Agency shall consult the Commission .
Legal status and location : where a backup site is required to ensure the full functionality of the systems in the event of failure of one or more of those systems, this site shall be installed in Sankt Johann im Pongau, Austria. Members envisaged the possibility of creating new technical sites . No later than 15 months after the entry into force of the Regulation, the Commission shall assess the existing and future needs of the Agency in terms of the hosting capacity of existing sites.
Transparency : Members proposed that the rules adopted by the Management Board on the prevention and management of conflicts of interest of its members and the annual, written statement of commitment of the Members of the Management Boards, the executive Director and the members of the Advisory Groups shall be published on the website of the Agency . Moreover, the Agency is called on to adopt internal rules on the protection of whistle-blowers .
Management Board, the Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director : following the organisation of an appropriate selection procedure by the Commission, and following a hearing of the proposed candidates in the competent committee of the European Parliament, the Management Board should also appoint an Executive Director. The Executive Director should be assisted by a Deputy Executive Director.
The Executive Director and the Deputy Executive Director shall be independent in the performance of their respective duties.
The Management Board shall evaluate the performance of the Agency. It shall also adopt internal rules to control the use and access of large-scale IT systems by Agency staff.
The Agency shall have sufficient budgetary and staff resources at its disposal so that it does not need to outsource its tasks and duties to private companies.
Cooperation with the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies : the Agency shall cooperate with the Commission, with other Union institutions and with other Union bodies, offices and agencies in particular those established in the area of freedom, security and justice, and in particular the European Agency for Fundamental Rights, in matters covered by this Regulation, in order to achieve coordination and financial savings, to avoid duplication and to promote synergy and complementarity as regards their activities. This cooperation shall take place within the framework of practical working arrangements setting out cost recovery mechanisms .
Third countries : the Agency shall be open to the participation of third countries that have entered into any type of association agreement with the Union concerning the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, as well as of Dublin-related measures and Eurodac-related measures.
Members want to provide a sufficient legal basis for the Agency to establish and maintain relations with international organisations and other relevant entities of bodies (such as Interpol and IATA) for the implementation of proposals on the Entry-Exit System and ETIAS .
Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the proposal for a Regulation on the eu-LISA.
As a reminder, the eu-LISA proposal is part of a wider process aimed at improving the management of external borders and strengthening internal security in the European Union to meet specific security challenges.
This Proposal aims mainly to entrust eu-LISA with:
the operational management of the existing and future large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice; developing some aspects of the interoperability of these systems; carrying out research activities and pilot projects; developing, managing and hosting a common IT system for a group of Member States opting on a voluntary basis for a centralised solution in implementing technical aspects of the EU legislation on decentralised systems in the area of freedom, security and justice.
The EDPS was consulted informally before the publication of the eu-LISA Proposal and he provided informal comments to the Commission, which were taken into account only partially.
In its capacity as eu-LISA's supervisory authority, the EDPS:
recommends that the eu-LISA Proposal is accompanied by a detailed impact assessment of the right to privacy and the right to data protection which are enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU ; recalled that there is currently no legal framework for the interoperability of EU large scale IT systems. Therefore eu-LISA could develop the implementing actions only if such legal framework is adopted. The EDPS proposes to delete current references related to interoperability in the eu-LISA Proposal; has concerns regarding the possibility that eu-LISA could develop and host a common centralised solution for large scale IT systems which are in principle decentralised. The EDPS proposes to delete the provision allowing the change of the architecture of the system on a basis of the delegation agreement between eu-LISA and group of Member States.
In addition to the main concerns identified above, the recommendations of the EDPS relate to the following aspects of the eu-LISA Proposal: (i) statistics generated by the system; (ii) internal monitoring; (iii) Information Security Risk Management; (iv) roles of the EDPS and the Data Protection Officer.
PURPOSE: to create an agency at European Union level responsible for the operational management and, where appropriate, the development of large-scale information systems within the area of freedom, security and justice (extending the mandate of eu-LISA).
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the eu-LISA Agency - established by Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 , amended in 2015 by Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 - currently manages the Visa Information System (VIS), second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) and Eurodac (for the comparison of fingerprints).
The first evaluation of the Agency's work, carried out in 2015-2016 on the basis of an independent external evaluation , concluded that the eu-LISA agency effectively carried out the operational management of large-scale IT systems as well as the other tasks entrusted to it, but also that a number of amendments to its establishing Regulation were necessary.
In the light of this assessment, the Commission proposes to extend the mandate of the eu-LISA agency by entrusting it to:
provide technical solutions needed to ensure interoperability between large-scale IT systems; develop and manage the future large-scale IT systems of the EU.
The proposal follows on from the Commission Communication of 6 April 2016 entitled 'Stronger and smarter information systems for borders and security', the High Level Expert Group's final report of 11 May 2017 and in the Commission's Seventh progress report towards an effective and genuine Security Union of 16 May 2017.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the proposal is based to a large extent on the results and recommendations of the independent external evaluation report of the Agency’s work. No impact assessment was carried out since the evaluation concluded that the amendments are essentially technical in nature.
CONTENT: the aim of this proposal is to review the Regulation establishing the eu-LISA Agency in order to adapt it to the recommendations for legislative amendments stemming from the evaluation, as well as to improve the functioning of the Agency and enhance and strengthen its role to ensure that its mandate meets current challenges at EU level in the area of freedom, security and justice.
The tasks of the new eu-LISA agency would be as follows:
Ensuring the centralised operational management of EU information systems : subject to the adoption of legislative instruments proposed by the Commission, eu-LISA would also be responsible for the preparation, development and operational management of the Entry/Exit System ( EES ), DubliNet, the European Travel Authorisation System ( ETIAS ), the automated system for registration, monitoring and the allocation mechanism for applications for international protection and the ECRIS-TCN system. Developing the necessary actions to enable interoperability : the Agency shall be tasked with the development of a European Search Portal , a shared biometric matching service and a Common Identity Repository , subject to the adoption of the relevant legislative instrument on interoperability. Where relevant, any actions carried out on interoperability should have to be guided by the Commission Communication on the European interoperability framework – implementation strategy. Ensuring data quality : subject to the adoption of specific legislative amendments/proposals, the proposal entrusts the Agency with the task of setting up automated data quality control mechanisms and common data quality indicators, as well as developing a central repository for reporting and statistics. The purpose of such mechanisms would be to enable central systems to automatically identify apparently incorrect or inconsistent data submissions so that the originating Member State is able to verify the data and carry out any necessary remedial actions. Providing assistance to Member States and the Commission : the Agency may provide advice and/or assistance to the Commission on technical matters relating to existing or new systems, including through studies and testing. It could be responsible for developing, managing or hosting a common IT system by a group of at least six Member States voluntarily opting for a centralised solution.
The proposal also specifies the tasks to be entrusted to the Management Board and to the Executive Director , whose mandate may be extended for a period not exceeding five years, in accordance with the Common Approach on decentralised agencies.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: for the Agency to adequately address its new tasks, from 2018 to 2020 an amount of EUR 78.354 million will need to be added to the Agency's Union subsidy. This amount does not include the budget required for the new systems which is foreseen under the relevant legislative proposals nor that required for the proposals amending existing systems.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2018/1726
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 295 21.11.2018, p. 0099
- Draft final act: 00029/2018/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)547
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0310/2018
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0404/2017
- Committee opinion: PE612.072
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE613.328
- Contribution: COM(2017)0352
- Contribution: COM(2017)0352
- Contribution: COM(2017)0352
- Document attached to the procedure: N8-0087/2017
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 386 16.11.2017, p. 0006
- Contribution: COM(2017)0352
- Committee draft report: PE610.908
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2017)0352
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE610.908
- Document attached to the procedure: N8-0087/2017 OJ C 386 16.11.2017, p. 0006
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE613.328
- Committee opinion: PE612.072
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)547
- Draft final act: 00029/2018/LEX
- Contribution: COM(2017)0352
- Contribution: COM(2017)0352
- Contribution: COM(2017)0352
- Contribution: COM(2017)0352
Activities
Votes
A8-0404/2017 - Monica Macovei - Am 108 05/07/2018 12:21:13.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
137 |
2017/0145(COD)
2017/10/24
BUDG
12 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) the provision of adequate statistics for the Commission and for the relevant Union decentralised agencies.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5a – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) tasks relating to interoperability with ETIAS.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5b – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) tasks relating to interoperability with EES.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. The Agency may plan and implement testing activities on matters
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency may also be tasked to develop, manage and/or host a common IT system by a group of at least six Member States opting on a voluntary basis for a centralised solution assisting them in implementing technical aspects of obligations deriving from Union legislation on decentralised systems in the area of freedom, security and justice, subject to prior approval by the Commission and after a decision of the Management Board. In such case the Member States concerned shall entrust the Agency with those tasks by way of a delegation agreement including the conditions for the delegation and setting out the calculation of all relevant costs and the invoicing method. All costs incurred shall be borne by the Member States concerned. The budget of the Agency should include a specific budget line that is exclusively dedicated to this purpose and additional to the financial resources allocated for the daily work
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 a (new) Article 12 a Statistical support The Agency shall provide adequate and detailed statistical information to: (a) the Commission for the purposes of evaluations and monitoring as provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 1053/20131a; and (b) the European Border and Coast Guard Agency for the purposes of monitoring the carrying out of vulnerability assessments in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council1b. The Agency may provide adequate and detailed statistical information to other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies for justified purposes. _________________ 1aCouncil Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 of 7 October 2013 establishing an evaluation and monitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis and repealing the Decision of the Executive Committee of 16 September 1998 setting up a Standing Committee on the evaluation and implementation of Schengen (OJ L 295, 6.11.2013, p. 27). 1bRegulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2016 on the European Border and Coast Guard and amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 and Council Decision 2005/267/EC (OJ L 251, 16.9.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 1. The Management Board shall appoint the Executive Director from a list of at least three candidates proposed by the Commission following an open and transparent selection procedure. The selection procedure shall provide for publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and elsewhere of a call for expressions of interest. The Management Board shall appoint the Executive Director on the basis of personal merit, experience in the field of large-scale IT systems and administrative, financial and management skills as well as knowledge in data protection. The Management Board shall take its decision to appoint the Executive Director by a two-
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 1. The Agency shall cooperate with the Commission, with other Union institutions and with other Union bodies, offices and agencies in particular those established in the area of freedom, security and justice, and in particular the European Agency for Fundamental Rights, in matters covered by this Regulation, in order to achieve coordination and financial savings, to avoid duplication and to promote synergy and complementarity as regards their activities.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 4 4. Cooperation with Union bodies, offices and agencies shall take place within the framework of working arrangements. Such arrangements shall have received the Commission's prior approval. Such arrangements may provide for the sharing of services between agencies where appropriate either by proximity of locations or by policy area within the limits of the respective mandates and without prejudice to their core tasks. The working arrangements shall establish the mechanisms for cost recovery.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 1. Each year the Executive Director shall draw up, in accordance with the principle of performance-based budgeting and taking into account the activities carried out by the Agency as well as its objectives and expected results, a draft statement of estimates of the Agency’s revenue and expenditure for the following financial year, including an establishment plan, and shall send it to the Management Board.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new) (d a) cost recovery paid by Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies for services provided to them in accordance with working arrangements referred to in Article 37;
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) For the purpose of fulfilling its mission, achieving coordination and financial savings, avoiding duplication and promoting synergy and complementarity, and to the extent required for the accomplishment of its tasks, the Agency should be allowed to cooperate with Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, in particular those established in the area of freedom, security and justice, in matters covered by this Regulation and the legislative instruments governing the development, establishment, operation and use large-scale IT systems managed by the Agency in the framework of working arrangements concluded in accordance with Union law and policy and within the framework of their respective competences. Those working arrangements should receive the Commission's prior approval. The Agency should also consult and follow up the recommendations of the European Network and Information Security Agency regarding network security, where appropriate.
source: 612.147
2017/11/07
LIBE
125 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 The Agency, together with the Commission, shall work towards establishing for all systems under the Agency's operational responsibility, automated data quality control mechanisms and common data quality indicators
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 The Agency, together with the Commission, shall work towards establishing for all systems under the Agency's operational responsibility, automated data quality control mechanisms and common data quality indicators and towards developing a central repository containing only anonymised data for reporting and statistics, subject to specific legislative amendments to the existing systems' instruments and/or to specific provisions in new instruments.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall on a regular basis keep the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission, and, where
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall on a regular basis keep the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission, and, where
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency shall on a regular basis keep the European Parliament, the Council and, where
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency shall on a regular basis keep the European Parliament, the Council and, where
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Agency shall on a regular basis keep the European Parliament, the Council and, where
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. At the request of the Commission or the Council, with the approval of the European Parliament, and after a decision of the Management Board the Agency may be entrusted with budget implementation tasks
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. At the request of the Commission or the Council, with the consent of the Parliament, and after a decision of the Management Board the Agency may be entrusted with budget implementation tasks for proofs of concept funded under the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa provided for in Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 in accordance with Article 58(1)(c) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012, by way of a delegation agreement.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 4 4. The Agency may plan and implement testing activities on
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. The Agency may be requested to provide advice to Member States with regard to the national systems' connection to the central systems and ad-hoc support to Member States. The requests for ad-hoc support shall be submitted to the Commission which shall transmit them to the Agency. It may also be requested to provide advice or support to the Commission on technical issues related to existing or new systems including by way of suitable studies and appropriate testing.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency may also be tasked to develop, manage and/or host a common IT system by a group of at least six Member States opting on a voluntary basis for a centralised solution assisting them in implementing technical aspects of obligations deriving from Union legislation on decentralised systems in the area of freedom, security and justice, subject to
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 Where a backup site
Amendment 123 #
Other technical sites may be established by decision of the Management Board, following consultation of the European Parliament and the Commission.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 5 5. Both technical sites may be used simultaneously for active operation of the large- scale IT systems provided that the second site remains capable of ensuring their operation in case of failure of one or more of the systems.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. If, following a proper assessment of technical capacity by the Commission, it is concluded that the existing technical sites are not able to support new tasks and they cannot be expanded, further technical sites may be established.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) appoint, the Executive Director, check and assess his/her work, and where relevant extend his/her term of office or remove him or her from office, in accordance with Article 22;
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) appoint, the Executive Director and Deputy Executive Director, and where relevant extend his/her term of office or remove him or her from office, in accordance with Article 22;
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) exercise disciplinary authority over the Executive Director and oversee his performance including the implementation
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (ia) adopt detailed internal procedures to protect whistle blowers, including appropriate channels of communication for reporting misconduct,
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point r (r) adopt an interim report by the end of August of each year on progress on the implementation of planned activities of the current year and submit it to the European Parliament and the Commission;
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point s (s) assess and adopt the consolidated annual activity report of the Agency's activities for the previous year comparing, in particular, the results achieved with the objectives of the annual work programme and send both the report and its assessment, by 1 July of each year to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission, the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Court of Auditors; the annual activity report shall be published;
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point y (y) adopt the necessary security measures, including a
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point y (y) adopt the necessary security measures, including a
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point y a (new) (ya) adopt internal rules for monitoring any use of and access to large-scale IT systems by the staff of the Agency.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point z (z) adopt the security rules on the protection of classified information and non-classified sensitive information following
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point n n (nn) ensure
Amendment 137 #
3. The term of office of the members and their alternates shall be four years,
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 3. The term of office of the members and their alternates shall be four years,
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 4. Countries associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, as well as of Dublin and Eurodac-related measures, shall participate in the activities of the Agency. They shall each appoint one representative and an alternate to the Management Board.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Regarding countries associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, as well as of Dublin and Eurodac-related measures, Article 38 shall apply.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 1. The Executive Director shall manage the Agency. The Executive Director shall assist and be accountable to the Management Board. The Executive Director shall, at least once a year, report to the European Parliament on the performance of his
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 1. The Executive Director shall manage the Agency and shall be completely independent in the performance of his or her duties. The Executive Director shall assist and be accountable to the Management Board. The Executive Director shall report to the European Parliament on the performance of his or her duties when invited to do so. The Council may invite the Executive Director to report on the performance of his/her duties.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Executive Director shall be independent in the performance of his duties. Without prejudice to the respective competences of the Commission and the Management Board, the Executive Director shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government or other body.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 – point h (h) protecting the financial interests of the Union by applying preventing measures against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, without prejudicing the investigative competence of OLAF and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, by effective checks and, if irregularities are detected, by recovering amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by imposing effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative including financial penalties;
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 – point r (r) preparing the necessary security measures including a
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 – point r (r) preparing the necessary security
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Before appointment, the candidate
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Before appointment, the candidate selected by the Management Board shall be invited to make a statement before the competent committee(s) of the European Parliament and answer questions from the committee members. After the statement, the European Parliament shall adopt an opinion setting out its view of the selected candidate and send it to the Management Board. The Management Board shall inform the European Parliament of the manner in which that opinion has been taken into account. The opinion shall be treated as personal and confidential until the appointment of the candidate. Following the appointment of the candidate, the European Parliament shall be invited to submit a second opinion stating whether or not the Management Board has taken its initial opinion into account.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Management Board shall appoint the Executive Directive taking these views into account. The Management Board shall take its decision by a two-thirds majority of all its members with a right to vote.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. If the Management Board takes a decision to appoint a candidate other than the candidate whom the European Parliament indicated as its preferred candidate, the management board shall inform the European Parliament and the Council in writing of the manner in which the opinion of the European Parliament was taken into account.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 5 5. The Management Board shall inform the European Parliament if it intends to extend the Executive Director’s term of office. Within one month before any such extension, the Executive Director shall be invited to make a statement before the competent committee(s) of the European Parliament and answer questions from the committee members. Should any competent committee of the European Parliament oppose the extension, the Management Board must review its decision, taking that committee’s comments into account.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 7 7. The Executive Director may be removed from office only upon a decision of the Management Board
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Article 22a Deputy Executive Director 1. A Deputy Executive Director shall assist the Executive Director. The Executive Director shall define the tasks of the Deputy Executive Director. 2. All provisions of Article 22 shall apply to the Deputy Executive Director.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Each Member State which is bound under Union law by any legislative instrument governing the development, establishment, operation and use of a particular large- scale IT system, as well as the Commission and countries associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, as well as of Dublin and Eurodac-related measures, shall appoint one member to the Advisory Group relating to that large-
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 6 6. When preparing an opinion, the members of each Advisory Group shall do their best to reach a consensus. If such a
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 7 7. Each Member State and each country associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, as well as of Dublin and Eurodac-related measures, shall facilitate the activities of the Advisory Groups.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission and the Member States, upon request of the Agency, may second officials or national
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 The members of the Management Board, the Executive Director and the members of the Advisory Groups shall undertake to act in the public interest. For that purpose they shall issue an annual, written, public statement of commitment, which shall be published on the Agency's website.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 The list of members of the Management Board and of Members of the Advisory Groups shall be published on the Agency’s Internet site.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 4 4. The Agency shall communicate in accordance with the legislative instruments governing the development, establishment, operation and/or use of large-scale IT- systems and may engage in communication activities on its own initiative within its field of competence. It shall ensure in particular that in addition to the publications specified in Article 15(1)(r), (s), (ii), (jj), [(kk)], [(ll)], [(mm)] and Article 42(9), the public and any interested party are rapidly given objective, accurate, reliable comprehensive and easily understandable information with regard to its work. The allocation of resources to communication activities shall not be detrimental to the effective exercise of the Agency's tasks as referred to in Articles 3 to 12. Communication activities shall be carried out in accordance with relevant communication and dissemination plans adopted by the Management Board.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 2 2. Where the Agency processes personal data for the purpose referred to paragraph
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 2. The security rules shall be adopted by the Management Board following
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 1. No later than five years from the entry into force of this Regulation, and every five years thereafter, the Commission, after consulting the Management Board, shall assess the Agency's performance in relation to its objectives, mandate, tasks and locations
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 1. No later than
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 1. No later than f
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 3 3. The Agency shall consult and follow the recommendations of the European Network and Information Security Agency regarding network
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 4 4. Cooperation with Union bodies, offices and agencies shall take place within the framework of working arrangements. Such arrangements shall
Amendment 171 #
5. The Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies referred to in paragraph 1, shall use information received from the Agency only within the limits of their competences and insofar as they respect fundamental rights, including data protection requirements. Onward transmission of other communication of personal data processed by the Agency to Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies shall be subject to specific working arrangements regarding the exchange of personal data and subject to the prior
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – title 38 Participation by countries associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, as well as of Dublin and Eurodac-related measures
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 1. The Agency shall be open to the participation of
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 The Agency shall adopt internal rules requiring the members of its bodies and its staff members to avoid any situation liable to give rise to a conflict of interest during their employment or term of office and to report such situations. Any serious breach of those internal rules shall be notified to the European Parliament and the Commission in a manner reflecting the rules on confidentiality applicable to the alleged breach.
Amendment 175 #
The Agency shall adopt internal rules requiring the members of its bodies and its staff members to avoid any situation liable to give rise to a conflict of interest during and after their employment or term of office and to report such situations.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 a (new) Maintenance in force of the internal rules adopted by the Management Board Internal rules and measures adopted by the Management Board on the basis of Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 shall remain in force after the entry into force of this Regulation, without prejudice to any amendments thereto required by this Regulation.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation – The European Parliament rejects [the Commission proposal].
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 – introductory part (5) Since the Management Authority required legal, administrative and financial autonomy, it was established in the form of a regulatory agency (Agency) having legal personality. As was agreed, the seat of the Agency was established in Tallinn (Estonia). However, since the tasks relating to technical development and the preparation for the operational management of SIS and VIS were already being carried out in Strasbourg (France) and a backup site for those IT systems had been installed in Sankt Johann im Pongau (Austria) in line also with the locations of the SIS and VIS systems decided under the relevant legislative instruments, this should
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 – point 1 Since taking up its responsibilities on 1 December 2012, the Agency took over the tasks conferred on the Management Authority in relation to VIS by Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 and Council Decision 2008/633/JHA55 . It took over the tasks conferred to the Management Authority in relation to SIS II by Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA in April 2013 following the
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 – point 1 Since taking up its responsibilities on 1 December 2012, the Agency took over the tasks conferred on the Management Authority in relation to VIS by Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 and Council Decision 2008/633/JHA55. It took over the tasks conferred to the Management Authority in relation to SIS II by Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA in April 2013 following the system's go-live and it took up the tasks conferred on the Commission in relation to
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 – point 1 Since taking up its responsibilities on 1 December 2012, the Agency took over the tasks conferred on the Management Authority in relation to VIS by Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 and Council Decision 2008/633/JHA55 . It took over the tasks conferred to the Management Authority in
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Furthermore, the Agency could also be made responsible for the preparation, development and operational management of additional large-scale IT systems in application of Articles 67 to 89 of the
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The Agency should be responsible for carrying out pilot projects, in accordance with Article 54(2)(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council60 . The Agency may in addition be entrusted by the Commission, following the approval of the budgetary authority, with budget implementation tasks for proofs of concept funded under the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa provided for in Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council61 in accordance with Article 58(1)(c) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012. The Agency may also plan and implement testing activities on matters strictly covered by this Regulation and the legislative instruments governing the development, establishment, operation and use of the large-scale IT systems managed by the Agency. When tasked with carrying out a pilot project, the Agency should pay particular attention to the European Union Information Management Strategy.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) The Agency should provide advice to Member States with regard to the national systems' connection to the central systems at their request.
Amendment 60 #
(19) The Agency should also provide ad-hoc support to Member States where required by security
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) The Agency should also provide ad-hoc support to Member States where required by security or migratory extraordinary needs. In particular, where a Member State faces specific and disproportionate migratory challenges at particular areas of its external borders characterised by large inward migratory flows, the Member States should be able to rely on technical and operational reinforcements. This should be provided in hotspot areas by migration management
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) The Agency should also, whenever it identifies more effective innovative technical solutions, notify and support the Commission services on technical issues related to existing or new systems, when required, in particular for the preparation of new proposals on large-scale IT systems to be entrusted to the Agency.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) It should also be possible that the Agency is tasked with developing, managing and/or hosting a common IT system for a group of Member States opting on a voluntary basis for a centralised solution assisting them to implement technical aspects of obligations deriving from Union legislation on decentralised large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice. This should require prior
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The Member States and the Commission should be represented on a Management Board, in order to control the functions of the Agency effectively. The Management Board should be entrusted with the necessary functions, in particular to adopt the annual work programme, carry out its functions relating to the Agency’s budget, adopt the financial rules applicable to the Agency
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The Member States and the Commission should be represented on a Management Board, in order to control the functions of the Agency effectively. The Management Board should be entrusted with the necessary functions, in particular to adopt the annual work programme, carry out its functions relating to establishing the strategy for managing the Agency’s budget, adopt the financial rules applicable to the Agency, appoint an Executive Director and establish procedures for taking decisions relating to the operational tasks of the Agency by the Executive Director and check and assess the work of the Executive Director. The Agency should be governed and operated taking into account the principles of the Common approach on
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23)
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The Member States and the Commission should be represented on a Management Board, in order to control the functions of the Agency effectively. The Management Board should be entrusted with the necessary functions, in particular to adopt the annual work programme, carry out its functions relating to the Agency’s budget, adopt the financial rules applicable to the Agency, appoint an Executive Director and establish procedures for taking decisions relating to the operational tasks of the Agency by the Executive Director. The Management Board should carry out these tasks in an efficient and transparent way. The Agency should be governed and operated taking into account the principles of the Common approach on Union decentralised agencies adopted on 19 July 2012 by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The Member States and the Commission should be represented on a Management Board, in order to control the functions of the Agency effectively. The Management Board should be entrusted with the necessary functions, in particular to adopt the annual work programme, carry out its functions relating to the Agency’s budget, adopt the financial rules applicable
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) As regards SIS II, the European Police Office (Europol) and the European Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust), both having the right to access and search directly data entered into SIS II in application of Decision 2007/533/JHA [or Regulation XX of XX on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU,], should have observer status at the meetings of the Management Board when a question in relation to the application of Decision 2007/533/JHA is on the agenda.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) Member States should appoint a Member to the Advisory Group concerning a large-scale IT system, if they are bound under Union law by any legislative instrument governing the development,
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 a (new) (34a) The Agency should be open to the participation of countries that have entered into any agreements with the EU on their association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, as well as Dublin and Eurodac-related measures, since certain large-scale IT systems, such as ETIAS, require cooperation with such other countries.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) In order to ensure the transparent operation of the Agency, Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council66 should apply to the Agency. The Agency should be as transparent as possible about its activities, without jeopardising the attainment of the objective of its operations. It should make public information on all of its activities, in line with the principle of transparency and in order to ensure the attainment of its objectives. It should likewise ensure that the public and any interested party are rapidly given information with regard to its work. _________________ 66 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43).
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) In order to ensure open and transparent employment conditions and equal treatment of staff, the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union ('Staff Regulations') and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union ('Conditions of Employment of other Servants'), laid down in Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/6869 (together
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely the establishment of an Agency at Union level responsible for the operational management and where appropriate the development of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice cannot be sufficiently and effectively achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. The Agency shall be responsible for the operational management of the Schengen Information System (SIS) the Visa Information System (VIS) and Eurodac, in line with the principle of subsidiarity as laid down in Article 5 TEU.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 5 5. Operational management shall consist of all the tasks necessary to keep large-scale IT systems functioning in accordance with the specific provisions applicable to each of them, including responsibility for the communication infrastructure used by them. Those large- scale systems shall not exchange data or enable sharing of information or knowledge
Amendment 83 #
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 6 – indent 2 Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 6 – indent 2 Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the development of large-scale scale IT systems using an adequate project management structure for efficiently and securely developing large-scale IT systems;
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the development of large-scale
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) effective, secure and continuous
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) a high level of data protection, in accordance with the
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) a high level of data protection, in accordance with the applicable
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) an appropriate level of data and physical security, through the implementation of a proper Information Security Risk Management Process (ISRM) and in accordance with the applicable rules, including specific provisions for each large-scale IT system.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) an appropriate level of
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) The Agency shall also be responsible for the tasks relating to the SIRENE Bureaux and for the communication between the SIRENE Bureaux foreseen in the SIS Regulation.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. Appropriate measures in
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. Appropriate measures including
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. Appropriate measures including security plans shall be adopted by the Agency, inter alia, to prevent the unauthorised reading, copying, transfer, modification or deletion of personal data during transfers of personal data or transport of data media, in particular by means of appropriate encryption techniques. All system-related operational information circulating in the communication infrastructure shall be encrypted.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. Tasks relating to the operational management of the communication infrastructure may, at the Agency’s own responsibility, be entrusted to external private-sector entities or bodies in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012. In such a case, the network provider shall be bound by the security measures referred to in paragraph 3 and shall have no access to
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 The Agency, together with the Commission, shall work towards establishing for all systems under the Agency's operational responsibility, automated data quality control mechanisms
source: 613.328
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30592&j=0&l=en
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
events/0 |
|
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)614678New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2018)614678 |
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Decision 2007/533/JHA 2005/0103(CNS) Amending Regulation (EC) 1987/2006 2005/0106(COD) Repealing Regulation (EU) 1077/2011 2009/0089(COD) Amended by 2021/0391(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Decision 2007/533/JHA 2005/0103(CNS) Amending Regulation (EC) 1987/2006 2005/0106(COD) Repealing Regulation (EU) 1077/2011 2009/0089(COD)
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE610.908New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-610908_EN.html |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.328New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-613328_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE612.072&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-612072_EN.html |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/title |
Old
Joint Declaration 2018New
Joint Declaration 2018-19 |
procedure/Notes |
|
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0404&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0404_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0310New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0310_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
LIBE/8/10385New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final actNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/6 |
|
links/Research document |
|
procedure/legal_basis/7 |
Old
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 088-p2New
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 88-p2 |
procedure/legislative_priorities |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final act |
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
LIBE/8/10385
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/2/shadows/3 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|