Progress: Awaiting Council's 1st reading position
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | ||
Former Responsible Committee | TRAN | ||
Former Committee Opinion | EMPL |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 0, 9, 1, -, p, 1
Legal Basis:
T, r, e, a, t, y, , o, n, , t, h, e, , F, u, n, c, t, i, o, n, i, n, g, , o, f, , t, h, e, , E, U, , T, F, E, U, , 0, 9, 1, -, p, 1Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 354 votes to 246, with 8 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services.
The position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
National public regulatory body
The competent authorities in each Member State shall designate a national public regulatory body for the road passenger transport sector. That body shall be an impartial authority which is, in organisational, functional, hierarchical and decision-making terms, legally distinct, transparent and independent from any other public or private entity.
Without prejudice to the powers of the national competition authorities, the regulatory body shall have the power to monitor the competitive situation in the domestic market for regular passenger transport services by road, with a view to preventing discrimination or the abuse of a dominant position in the market, including through sub-contracting. Its opinions shall be binding.
The regulatory body should: (i) collect and provide information on access to terminals with an aim of ensuring that access to the terminals for service operators is granted under fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent conditions; (ii) create a publicly accessible electronic register, listing all authorised national and international regular services. Decisions taken by the regulatory body shall be made public within two weeks of their adoption.
Access to terminals
Where terminal operators grant access, bus and coach operators shall comply with the terminal’s existing terms and conditions.
Requests for access to terminals may be refused only on duly justified grounds of lack of capacity considerations, repeated failure to pay fees, duly documented serious and repeated infringements by the road transport operator, or other national provisions, provided they are consistently applied and do not discriminate either against particular carriers seeking access to a terminal, or their associated business models. If a request is refused, the terminal operator shall also communicate its decision to the regulatory authority.
Procedures for authorisation, suspension and withdrawal of authorisation for the international carriage of passengers over a distance of up to 100 kilometres journey distance
The amended text provides that in the event that an international regular bus and coach service has compromised the economic equilibrium of a public service contract, due to exceptional reasons which could not have been foreseen at the time of granting the authorisation and which lay not in the responsibility of the owner of the public service contract, the Member State concerned may, with the agreement of the Commission, suspend or withdraw the authorisation to provide the service, after having given six months’ notice to the carrier. The carrier shall have the possibility to appeal such decision.
For procedures for authorisation, suspension and withdrawal of authorisation for the international carriage of passengers over a distance of up to 100 kilometres, the authorising authority should take a decision on the application without delay and no later than two months of the date of submission of the application by the carrier.
Decisions rejecting an application, granting authorisation with limitations, or suspending or withdrawing authorisation shall state the reasons on which they are based and, where applicable, take into account the analyses of the regulatory body. The applicant or the carrier operating the service concerned shall have the possibility to appeal the decisions of the authorising authority.
Carriers’ obligations
A Member State may decide to require a non-resident carrier to comply with the conditions relating to the requirement of establishment, as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the host Member State after authorisation for a national regular service has been granted to this carrier and before the carrier starts to operate the relevant service. Such decisions shall state the reasons on which they are based.
The decision should take into account the size and duration of the activity of the non-resident carrier in the host Member State. If the host Member State establishes that the non-resident carrier does not satisfy the requirement of establishment, it may withdraw the relevant authorisations granted to it for national regular services or suspend them until the requirement is met.
Authorised cabotage operations
Cabotage operations shall be authorised for the following services:
- occasional services;
- regular services performed by a carrier not resident in the host Member State, in the course of a regular international service, with the exception of transport services meeting the needs of an urban centre or conurbation, or transport needs between it and the surrounding areas. Cabotage operations shall not be carried out independently of that international service.
Control documents for cabotage operations
Parliament called for electronic documents and digital technologies to be used more efficiently to help ease the burden for drivers and reduce road-check times. In this regard, cabotage operations in the form of occasional services shall be carried out under cover of a journey form, on paper or in digital format, which shall be presented at the request of any authorised inspector. Members proposed that during checks, the driver shall be allowed to contact the head office, the transport manager or any other person or entity which may provide the requested documents.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Roberts ZĪLE (ECR, LV) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission's proposal as follows.
Definitions
Members proposed to include the definition of ‘public service contract’ to mean one or more legally binding acts confirming the agreement between a competent authority and a public service operator to entrust to that public service operator the management and operation of public passenger transport services subject to public service obligations; depending on the law of the Member State, the contract may also consist of a decision adopted by the competent authority taking the form of an individual legislative or regulatory act, or containing conditions under which the competent authority itself provides the services or entrusts the provision of such services to an internal operator.
Access to terminals
Where terminal operators grant access, bus and coach operators shall comply with the terminal’s existing terms and conditions.
Requests for access to terminals may be refused only on duly justified grounds of lack of capacity considerations, repeated failure to pay fees, duly documented serious and repeated infringements by the road transport operator, or other national provisions, provided they are consistently applied and do not discriminate either against particular carriers seeking access to a terminal, or their associated business models. If a request is refused, the terminal operator shall also communicate its decision to the regulatory authority.
Procedures for authorisation, suspension and withdrawal of authorisation for the international carriage of passengers over a distance of up to 100 kilometres journey distance
Members introduced a new clause whereby authorisation for a new service can effectively be denied even over the Commission’s proposed 100 km ceiling if the relevant service undermines an existing public service contracts that has been tendered in a transparent way without possibility of extension, bundles together profitable and unprofitable routes and receives no significant public subsidies that risk undermining the level playing field.
Decisions rejecting an application, granting authorisation with limitations, or suspending or withdrawing authorisation shall state the reasons on which they are based and, where applicable, take into account the analyses of the regulatory body. The applicant or the carrier operating the service concerned shall have the possibility to appeal the decisions of the authorising authority.
Freedom to provide services
Without prejudice to the powers of the national competition authorities, the regulatory body shall have the power to monitor the competitive situation in the domestic market for regular passenger transport services by road, with a view to preventing discrimination or the abuse of a dominant position in the market, including through sub-contracting. Its opinions shall be binding.
It shall collect and provide information on access to terminals with an aim of ensuring that access to the terminals for service operators is granted under fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent conditions and shall create a publicly accessible electronic register, listing all authorised national and international regular services.
Authorised cabotage operations
Cabotage operations shall be authorised for the following services:
- regular services performed by a carrier not resident in the host Member State, in the course of a regular international service, with the exception of transport services meeting the needs of an urban centre or conurbation, or transport needs between it and the surrounding areas. Cabotage operations shall not be carried out independently of that international service;
- regular services performed by a carrier not resident in the host Member State, in the course of a regular national service.
Control documents for cabotage operations
Members called for electronic documents and digital technologies to be used more efficiently to help ease the burden for drivers and reduce road-check times. In this regard, c abotage operations in the form of occasional services shall be carried out under cover of a journey form, on paper or in digital format, which shall be presented at the request of any authorised inspector. Members proposed that during checks, the driver shall be allowed to contact the head office, the transport manager or any other person or entity which may provide the requested documents.
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
PURPOSE: to promote access to national markets for regular bus and coach services.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services revealed that operators in national markets are facing obstacles to the development of inter-urban coach services.
An ex-post evaluation of the Regulation was carried out from 2015 to 2017 and concluded that the Regulation is only partly effective in achieving its original objective of promoting coach and bus services as a sustainable alternative to individual car transport.
By pursuing the opening of national markets, the proposal is part of the second mobility package , which aims to combat climate change, make European industry more competitive and improve the quality of life and choice of citizens for their daily mobility.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the combination of measures selected would make it possible to:
generate administrative savings for businesses and administrations in the range of EUR 1.560 million for the EU-28 over the assessment period (2015-2035); increase the activity of coach transport by more than 11 % in 2030 relative to the baseline and increase its modal share by almost one percentage point; improve the connectivity of disadvantaged social groups by 62 billion passenger-kilometres in 2030 while creating 85 000 new jobs and contribute to lower accident costs of EUR 2.8 billion for the EU-28 over the assessment period; have a positive impact on the environment with a EUR 183 million net cumulative savings in CO2 emissions costs and net cumulative savings in air pollution costs of EUR 590 million for the EU-28;
This would not undermine the sustainability of public service contracts serving remote urban areas.
CONTENT: the proposal aims to amend the Regulation on passenger coach services with a view to granting access to national markets for regular services.
It provides in particular for the following:
Scope : the proposal extends the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 to all inter-urban carriage of passengers by regular services . Non-resident carriers should be able to operate national regular services under the same conditions as resident carriers.
Regulatory body : each Member State is required to designate an independent and impartial regulatory body. The objective of that requirement is to avoid any conflicts of interest when a regulatory body is conducting an economic analysis to determine if economic equilibrium of a public service contract is compromised. The body should be able to obtain the information requested and enforce its decisions by means of appropriate penalties.
Right of access to terminals : carriers should enjoy a right of access to terminals on fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent terms for the purpose of operating regular services. Applications for access should only be refused if there is a lack of capacity in the terminal. Decisions on applications for access are to be taken within two months and shall contain a proper statement of reasons. Carriers shall have the possibility to appeal decisions to the Regulatory body.
Regular services subject to authorisation : the proposal establishes:
an authorising procedure for the international carriage of passengers over a distance of less than 100 kilometres as the crow flies : authorisations shall be granted unless rejection is justified under the clearly specified; an authorising procedure for the international carriage of passengers over a distance 100 kilometres or more as the crow flies : the refusal of a new service cannot be justified on the grounds that it compromises the economic equilibrium of a public service contract; an authorisation procedure for national regular services : the authorisation for a new service carrying passengers over distance of less than 100 kilometres as the crow flies can be rejected if it compromises the economic equilibrium of a public service contract.
In addition, the proposal:
abolishes the use of the journey form as a control document for occasional services. This should eliminate an unnecessary administrative burden; deletes the obligation according to which regular services are to be performed as part of a regular international service as well as the prohibition of cabotage operations in the form of regular services being carried out independent of a regular service; puts an end to the obligation to establish cabotage journey forms for occasional services; amends rules relating to inspections on the road and in undertakings to include cabotage operations.
Lastly, reporting requirements are foreseen so that the Commission can have consistent information from all Member States to enable it to monitor and evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the legislation.
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to promote access to national markets for regular bus and coach services.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services revealed that operators in national markets are facing obstacles to the development of inter-urban coach services.
An ex-post evaluation of the Regulation was carried out from 2015 to 2017 and concluded that the Regulation is only partly effective in achieving its original objective of promoting coach and bus services as a sustainable alternative to individual car transport.
By pursuing the opening of national markets, the proposal is part of the second mobility package , which aims to combat climate change, make European industry more competitive and improve the quality of life and choice of citizens for their daily mobility.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the combination of measures selected would make it possible to:
generate administrative savings for businesses and administrations in the range of EUR 1.560 million for the EU-28 over the assessment period (2015-2035); increase the activity of coach transport by more than 11 % in 2030 relative to the baseline and increase its modal share by almost one percentage point; improve the connectivity of disadvantaged social groups by 62 billion passenger-kilometres in 2030 while creating 85 000 new jobs and contribute to lower accident costs of EUR 2.8 billion for the EU-28 over the assessment period; have a positive impact on the environment with a EUR 183 million net cumulative savings in CO2 emissions costs and net cumulative savings in air pollution costs of EUR 590 million for the EU-28;
This would not undermine the sustainability of public service contracts serving remote urban areas.
CONTENT: the proposal aims to amend the Regulation on passenger coach services with a view to granting access to national markets for regular services.
It provides in particular for the following:
Scope : the proposal extends the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 to all inter-urban carriage of passengers by regular services . Non-resident carriers should be able to operate national regular services under the same conditions as resident carriers.
Regulatory body : each Member State is required to designate an independent and impartial regulatory body. The objective of that requirement is to avoid any conflicts of interest when a regulatory body is conducting an economic analysis to determine if economic equilibrium of a public service contract is compromised. The body should be able to obtain the information requested and enforce its decisions by means of appropriate penalties.
Right of access to terminals : carriers should enjoy a right of access to terminals on fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent terms for the purpose of operating regular services. Applications for access should only be refused if there is a lack of capacity in the terminal. Decisions on applications for access are to be taken within two months and shall contain a proper statement of reasons. Carriers shall have the possibility to appeal decisions to the Regulatory body.
Regular services subject to authorisation : the proposal establishes:
an authorising procedure for the international carriage of passengers over a distance of less than 100 kilometres as the crow flies : authorisations shall be granted unless rejection is justified under the clearly specified; an authorising procedure for the international carriage of passengers over a distance 100 kilometres or more as the crow flies : the refusal of a new service cannot be justified on the grounds that it compromises the economic equilibrium of a public service contract; an authorisation procedure for national regular services : the authorisation for a new service carrying passengers over distance of less than 100 kilometres as the crow flies can be rejected if it compromises the economic equilibrium of a public service contract.
In addition, the proposal:
abolishes the use of the journey form as a control document for occasional services. This should eliminate an unnecessary administrative burden; deletes the obligation according to which regular services are to be performed as part of a regular international service as well as the prohibition of cabotage operations in the form of regular services being carried out independent of a regular service; puts an end to the obligation to establish cabotage journey forms for occasional services; amends rules relating to inspections on the road and in undertakings to include cabotage operations.
Lastly, reporting requirements are foreseen so that the Commission can have consistent information from all Member States to enable it to monitor and evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the legislation.
Legislative proposal
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)354
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0125/2019
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Go to the page
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0032/2019
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE628.553
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE628.473
- CofR: CDR6151/2017
- Contribution: COM(2017)0647
- Committee draft report: PE623.746
- Contribution: COM(2017)0647
- Contribution: COM(2017)0647
- Contribution: COM(2017)0647
- Reasoned opinion: PE616.552
- Contribution: COM(2017)0647
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0359
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0358
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0361
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0360
- Legislative proposal: COM(2017)0647
- Legislative proposal: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2017)0647
- Legislative proposal published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE623.746
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE628.553
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE628.473
- Legislative proposal: COM(2017)0647 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2017)0359
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2017)0358
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2017)0361
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2017)0360
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2019)354
- Contribution: COM(2017)0647
- Reasoned opinion: PE616.552
- Contribution: COM(2017)0647
- Contribution: COM(2017)0647
- Contribution: COM(2017)0647
- Contribution: COM(2017)0647
- CofR: CDR6151/2017
Activities
- Lucy ANDERSON
- Wim van de CAMP
- Michael CRAMER
- Gesine MEISSNER
- Inés AYALA SENDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabella DE MONTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Peter KOUROUMBASHEV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0032/2019 - Roberts Zīle - Am 79=84= 14/02/2019 12:11:57.000 #
IT | FR | GB | EL | AT | IE | SE | CY | DK | MT | LU | DE | EE | HU | CZ | LT | BE | FI | HR | LV | PT | SI | NL | SK | BG | ES | RO | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
54
|
66
|
53
|
16
|
17
|
7
|
13
|
2
|
11
|
5
|
5
|
80
|
4
|
13
|
18
|
8
|
16
|
11
|
9
|
7
|
17
|
8
|
24
|
12
|
14
|
41
|
24
|
45
|
|
S&D |
142
|
Italy S&DFor (23)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI, Silvia COSTA
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (14)Against (1) |
4
|
Austria S&D |
1
|
5
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Germany S&DFor (19) |
2
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Portugal S&DFor (1)Against (4)Abstain (1) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
Romania S&DFor (2)Against (8) |
Poland S&DFor (1) |
|||
Verts/ALE |
44
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
|||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
40
|
2
|
France GUE/NGL |
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
2
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
7
|
|||||||||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
Italy EFDDFor (12)Abstain (1) |
France EFDDAgainst (1) |
United Kingdom EFDDFor (11) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
32
|
Italy ENF |
3
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
17
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Greece NI |
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
59
|
3
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (1)Against (14) |
1
|
3
|
Germany ECRAgainst (5) |
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (16) |
||||||||||||
ALDE |
59
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
4
|
1
|
||||||||
PPE |
173
|
Italy PPEAgainst (6) |
2
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Germany PPEAgainst (31)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
1
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
2
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (6) |
5
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (7) |
Spain PPEFor (1)Against (12)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
12
|
Poland PPEFor (1)Against (18)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A8-0032/2019 - Roberts Zīle - Am 82 14/02/2019 12:13:46.000 #
IT | FR | AT | DK | EL | LU | SE | CY | IE | MT | LV | HU | BE | DE | PT | HR | SI | EE | FI | LT | NL | GB | CZ | SK | BG | ES | RO | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
54
|
66
|
18
|
11
|
16
|
5
|
13
|
2
|
7
|
5
|
7
|
13
|
16
|
80
|
17
|
10
|
8
|
4
|
12
|
7
|
25
|
55
|
16
|
12
|
14
|
42
|
23
|
45
|
|
S&D |
145
|
Italy S&DFor (21)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI, Silvia COSTA
Against (1)Abstain (1) |
12
|
Austria S&D |
3
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Germany S&DFor (19) |
Portugal S&DFor (1)Against (4)Abstain (1) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (16) |
3
|
3
|
2
|
Romania S&DAgainst (9) |
Poland S&DAgainst (4) |
||
Verts/ALE |
45
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
Spain Verts/ALEAgainst (1) |
|||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
40
|
2
|
France GUE/NGL |
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
2
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
7
|
|||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
Italy ENF |
4
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
Italy EFDDFor (12)Abstain (1) |
France EFDDFor (3)Abstain (3) |
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (11) |
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
17
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Greece NIAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
59
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Germany ECRAgainst (5) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (15) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (16) |
||||||||||||
ALDE |
57
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
||||||||
PPE |
173
|
Italy PPEAgainst (6) |
5
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
1
|
Germany PPEAgainst (30)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Markus FERBER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
Portugal PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
4
|
5
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
2
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (7) |
Spain PPEAgainst (13)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
Romania PPEFor (1)Against (11) |
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A8-0032/2019 - Roberts Zīle - Am 81 14/02/2019 12:14:03.000 #
IT | FR | EL | GB | IE | DK | AT | LU | CY | SE | HU | EE | MT | LV | HR | BE | PT | SI | LT | DE | FI | NL | CZ | SK | BG | ES | RO | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
54
|
65
|
15
|
55
|
7
|
11
|
17
|
5
|
2
|
12
|
13
|
4
|
5
|
7
|
10
|
16
|
17
|
8
|
7
|
80
|
11
|
24
|
18
|
12
|
14
|
41
|
24
|
45
|
|
S&D |
143
|
Italy S&DFor (22)Brando BENIFEI, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI, Silvia COSTA
Against (1) |
12
|
4
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (16) |
1
|
3
|
Austria S&D |
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (1)Against (4)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
Germany S&DFor (18) |
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
10
|
Romania S&DFor (1)Against (9) |
Poland S&DAgainst (4) |
|
Verts/ALE |
43
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
2
|
Spain Verts/ALEAgainst (1) |
||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
40
|
2
|
France GUE/NGL |
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
1
|
3
|
2
|
7
|
|||||||||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
Italy EFDDFor (12)Abstain (1) |
France EFDDAbstain (1) |
United Kingdom EFDDFor (11) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
32
|
Italy ENF |
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
17
|
1
|
2
|
Greece NIAbstain (1) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
59
|
3
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (15) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Germany ECRAgainst (5) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (16) |
||||||||||||
ALDE |
59
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
4
|
4
|
1
|
||||||||
PPE |
172
|
Italy PPEAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
Portugal PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
5
|
2
|
Germany PPEAgainst (31)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
3
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (7) |
Spain PPEAgainst (12)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
12
|
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A8-0032/2019 - Roberts Zīle - Am 78 14/02/2019 12:14:14.000 #
IT | AT | BE | EL | SE | DK | LU | CY | IE | MT | HU | LV | LT | EE | FI | PT | SI | DE | HR | NL | SK | CZ | BG | GB | ES | FR | RO | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
55
|
18
|
16
|
16
|
13
|
11
|
5
|
2
|
7
|
5
|
12
|
7
|
8
|
4
|
11
|
18
|
8
|
80
|
10
|
25
|
11
|
18
|
13
|
55
|
41
|
65
|
24
|
45
|
|
Verts/ALE |
45
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
1
|
2
|
4
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
5
|
|||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
39
|
2
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
3
|
2
|
1
|
7
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||
S&D |
147
|
Italy S&DFor (18)Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Renata BRIANO, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
Against (6) |
Austria S&D |
3
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Portugal S&DFor (1)Against (6) |
1
|
Germany S&DFor (16)Against (2) |
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (15)Against (1) |
12
|
Romania S&DAgainst (10) |
Poland S&DAgainst (5) |
||
NI |
16
|
1
|
Greece NIAbstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
Italy ENF |
4
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
Italy EFDDFor (12)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (11) |
France EFDDAgainst (3)Abstain (3) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
58
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEFor (4)Against (2) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
4
|
3
|
1
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
1
|
||||||||
ECR |
59
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Germany ECRAgainst (5) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (15) |
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (16) |
||||||||||||
PPE |
172
|
Italy PPEAgainst (6) |
5
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Portugal PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
5
|
Germany PPEAgainst (31)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
4
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
5
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (7) |
2
|
Spain PPEAgainst (12)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
12
|
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A8-0032/2019 - Roberts Zīle - Am 86 14/02/2019 12:14:34.000 #
FR | AT | DK | EL | SE | CY | IE | HU | EE | MT | LU | IT | LT | FI | LV | BE | DE | SI | PT | HR | NL | CZ | SK | BG | GB | ES | RO | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
66
|
18
|
11
|
16
|
13
|
2
|
7
|
13
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
54
|
8
|
12
|
7
|
16
|
81
|
8
|
18
|
10
|
25
|
18
|
12
|
14
|
55
|
42
|
24
|
45
|
|
Verts/ALE |
45
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
|||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
40
|
France GUE/NGL |
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
7
|
|||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
4
|
Italy ENFAbstain (5) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
S&D |
147
|
12
|
Austria S&D |
3
|
Greece S&DAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
5
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Italy S&DFor (6)Against (17) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Germany S&DFor (18)Against (1) |
1
|
Portugal S&DFor (1)Against (6) |
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (15)Against (1) |
Romania S&DAgainst (10) |
Poland S&DAgainst (5) |
||
NI |
17
|
2
|
1
|
Greece NI |
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
France EFDDAgainst (1) |
Italy EFDDFor (12)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (11) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
60
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Germany ECRAgainst (5) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (15) |
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (16) |
||||||||||||
ALDE |
59
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
4
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||
PPE |
174
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
1
|
3
|
2
|
Italy PPEAgainst (6) |
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
Germany PPEAgainst (31)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
5
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (6) |
4
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (7) |
2
|
Spain PPEAgainst (13)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
12
|
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A8-0032/2019 - Roberts Zīle - Am 77 14/02/2019 12:14:54.000 #
FR | AT | SE | DK | LU | CY | BE | IE | HU | EE | EL | LV | FI | MT | DE | PT | HR | LT | SI | IT | NL | CZ | SK | BG | GB | ES | RO | PL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
66
|
18
|
13
|
11
|
5
|
2
|
16
|
7
|
13
|
4
|
16
|
6
|
11
|
5
|
81
|
18
|
10
|
8
|
8
|
55
|
25
|
18
|
12
|
14
|
55
|
42
|
24
|
45
|
|
Verts/ALE |
45
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
Spain Verts/ALE |
|||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
40
|
France GUE/NGL |
1
|
1
|
2
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (5) |
1
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
4
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
7
|
|||||||||||||||
S&D |
148
|
12
|
Austria S&D |
5
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Germany S&DFor (18)Against (1) |
Portugal S&DFor (1)Against (6) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
Italy S&DFor (7)Against (17) |
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (15)Against (1) |
Romania S&DAgainst (10) |
Poland S&DAgainst (5) |
||
ENF |
33
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
Italy ENFAgainst (5) |
4
|
3
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
17
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
Greece NIAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
France EFDDFor (3)Against (3) |
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDDFor (12)Abstain (1) |
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (11) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
59
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Germany ECRAgainst (5) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (15) |
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (16) |
||||||||||||
ALDE |
59
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
4
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||
PPE |
173
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
Germany PPEAgainst (31)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Christian EHLER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hermann WINKLER,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan GEHROLD,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner KUHN,
Werner LANGEN
|
Portugal PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
4
|
2
|
5
|
Italy PPEAgainst (6) |
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
Slovakia PPEAgainst (6) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (7) |
2
|
Spain PPEAgainst (13)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET,
Gabriel MATO,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO,
Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT,
Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO,
Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
12
|
Poland PPEAgainst (19)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Barbara KUDRYCKA,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogusław SONIK,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
A8-0032/2019 - Roberts Zīle - Vote: proposition de la Commission 14/02/2019 12:15:15.000 #
PL | RO | ES | BG | SK | CZ | PT | LT | HR | SI | LV | BE | DE | FI | EE | HU | LU | MT | FR | CY | NL | SE | EL | IE | AT | DK | GB | IT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
45
|
24
|
41
|
13
|
12
|
18
|
18
|
8
|
10
|
8
|
7
|
16
|
81
|
12
|
4
|
13
|
5
|
5
|
66
|
2
|
25
|
13
|
16
|
7
|
18
|
11
|
55
|
53
|
|
PPE |
173
|
Poland PPEFor (19)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Barbara KUDRYCKA, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogusław SONIK, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Krzysztof HETMAN, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
Spain PPEFor (13)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carlos ITURGAIZ, Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET, Gabriel MATO, José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA, Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO, Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Verónica LOPE FONTAGNÉ
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (6) |
Slovakia PPE |
Czechia PPEFor (6) |
Portugal PPEFor (6) |
2
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
Germany PPEFor (30)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Christian EHLER, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hermann WINKLER, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Stefan GEHROLD, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner KUHN, Werner LANGEN
Against (1) |
3
|
1
|
Hungary PPEFor (7) |
2
|
3
|
Netherlands PPEFor (5) |
3
|
2
|
3
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
Italy PPEFor (6) |
|||
ALDE |
59
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
4
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
Netherlands ALDEFor (6) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||
ECR |
60
|
Poland ECRFor (15)Against (1) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
15
|
3
|
||||||||||||
NI |
17
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Greece NI |
1
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
S&D |
145
|
Poland S&DFor (5) |
10
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (7) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Germany S&DFor (1)Against (18) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
12
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
1
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
3
|
United Kingdom S&DAgainst (16) |
Italy S&DAgainst (17)Abstain (1) |
||
EFDD |
34
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
France EFDDFor (1)Against (5) |
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (11) |
Italy EFDDAgainst (12)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
Italy ENFAgainst (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
40
|
Spain GUE/NGLAgainst (7) |
2
|
4
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (1)Against (6) |
1
|
France GUE/NGLAgainst (4) |
1
|
3
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
45
|
Spain Verts/ALEAgainst (5) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (11) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
Amendments | Dossier |
370 |
2017/0288(COD)
2018/10/04
TRAN
370 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 7 7. ‘cabotage operation’ means a national road
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 7 7. ‘cabotage operation’ means a national road passenger transport service temporarily operated for hire or reward in a host Member State or the carriage of passengers in the same Member State on international regular services in accordance with the provisions of the Regulation, except where this is the primary purpose of the service;”;
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 7 7. ‘cabotage operation’ means a national road passenger transport service
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 7 7. ‘cabotage operation’ means a national road passenger transport service operated for hire or reward commencing in the country of establishment and carried out by a non-resident carrier in a host Member State;”;
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 7 7. ‘cabotage operation’ means a national road passenger transport service
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 7 7. ‘cabotage operation’ means a temporary national road passenger transport service operated for hire or reward in a host Member State;
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 7 7. ‘cabotage operation’ means a national road passenger transport service operated for hire or reward by a non- resident in a host Member State;
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c – introductory part (c) the following points 9 to 11 a are added:
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 9 9. ‘terminal’ means any
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 9 9. ‘terminal’ means a
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 9 9. ‘terminal’ means an
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 9 9. ‘terminal’ means an
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 9 9. ‘terminal’ means a
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 9 9. ‘terminal’ means any staffed facility with a minimum area of 600m2, wh
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 9 9. ‘terminal’ means a
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c 10. ‘terminal operator’ means any entity responsible for
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 10 10. ‘terminal operator’ means any entity responsible for
Amendment 118 #
10. ‘terminal operator’ means any entity responsible for
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 10 10. ‘terminal operator’ means any entity
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 11. ‘viable alternative’ means another terminal with facilities enabling it to provide a comparable service, which is easy for users to access via public transport, and which is economically acceptable
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 11. ‘viable alternative’ means another terminal which is economically acceptable to the carrier, and allows it to operate the passenger service concerned in terms of transport links and infrastructure in exactly the same way as or in a similar manner to the terminal originally applied for.”;
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 11. ‘viable alternative’ means another terminal which is economically acceptable to the carrier
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 11. ‘viable alternative’ means another terminal which is economically acceptable to the carrier,
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 11. ‘viable alternative’ means another terminal which is economically acceptable to the carrier
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 11. ‘viable alternative’ means another terminal which is economically acceptable to the carrier, has a similar infrastructure and connectivity and allows it to operate the passenger service concerned.”;
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. ‘public service contract’ means one or more legally binding acts confirming the agreement between a competent authority and a public service operator to entrust to that public service operator the management and operation of public passenger transport services subject to public service obligations; depending on the law of the Member State, the contract may also consist of a decision adopted by the competent authority: – taking the form of an individual legislative or regulatory act, or – containing conditions under which the competent authority itself provides the services or entrusts the provision of such services to an internal operator;
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. ‘alternative route’ means a route between the same starting point and destination taken by another existing regular service that can be used instead.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 12 (new) 11a. ‘alternative route’ means a route between the same starting point and destination taken by another existing regular service that can be used instead.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. ‘traffic route’ means a connection between two stopping points, where passengers could be picked up and set down at predetermined stopping points.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 (2a) In Article 3, paragraph 3 is amended as follows: 3. ‘The freedom to provide services shall be without prejudice to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road, in particular the exclusive rights granted to a public service operator in return for the discharge of public service obligations.’
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 2a. Article 3 is amended as follows: ‘Article 3 Freedom to provide services 1. Any carrier for hire or reward referred to in Article 1 shall be permitted in accordance with this Regulation to carry out regular services, including special regular services and occasional services by coach and bus, without discrimination on grounds of nationality or place of establishment if he: (a) is authorised in the Member State of establishment to undertake carriage by means of regular services, including special regular services, or occasional services by coach and bus, in accordance with the market access conditions laid down by national legislation; (b) satisfies the conditions laid down in accordance with Community rules on admission to the occupation of road passenger transport operator in national and international transport operations; (ba) has a legal person with a name, address and telephone number in the host Member State as a contact person for the authorities; and (c) meets legal requirements regarding the standards for drivers and vehicles as laid down, in particular, in Council Directive 92/6/EEC of 10 February 1992 on the installation and use of speed limitation devices for certain categories of motor vehicles in the Community, Council Directive 96/53/EC of 25 July 1996 laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic and Directive 2003/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on the initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles for the carriage of goods or passengers. 2. Any own-account carrier referred to in Article 1 shall be permitted to carry out
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 1 Each Member State shall designate a single national regulatory body for the road passenger transport sector. That body shall be an impartial authority which is, in organisational, functional, hierarchical and decision making terms, legally distinct and independent from any other public or private entity. It shall be independent from any competent authority involved in the award of a public service contract. The remit of the single national regulatory body shall cover any carrier operating on the territory of the Member State, including carriers from other Member States at the time of inspection, whether they are operating in the area of cabotage providing regular services or providing services on a temporary basis.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 1 Each Member State shall designate a
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 1 Each Member State shall designate a
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 1 Each Member State shall designate a
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 1 Each Member State shall designate a single national regulatory body for the road passenger transport sector. That body shall be an impartial authority which is, in organisational, functional, hierarchical and decision making terms, legally distinct and independent from any other public or private entity. It shall be independent from any competent authority involved in the award of a public service contract. Its opinions shall be binding.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 1 Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Each Member State shall designate a single national regulatory body for the road passenger transport sector. That body shall be an impartial authority which is, in organisational, functional, hierarchical and decision making terms, legally distinct, transparent and independent from any other public or private entity. It shall be independent from any competent authority involved in the award of a public service contract.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The regulatory body may
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 2 Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 2 2. The regulatory body for the road passenger transport sector shall have the necessary organisational capacity in terms of human and other resources
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 2 2. The regulatory body for the road passenger transport sector shall have the
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 2 2. The regulatory body for the road passenger transport sector shall have the necessary organisational capacity
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. without prejudice to the powers of the national competition authorities, the regulatory body shall have the power to monitor the competitive situation in the domestic market for regular passenger transport services by road, by noting the costs and taxation of the applicant in order to check that they are comparable to those in the host state, with a view to preventing discrimination or the abuse of a dominant position in the market, including through sub-contracting;
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 3 Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 3 3. The
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 3 – point a (a) carry out
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) collect and provide information on access to terminals for both operators and all passengers; and
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 2 – point (b a) new (ba) Without prejudice to the powers of the national competition authorities, the regulatory body shall have the power to monitor the competitive situation in the domestic market for regular passenger transport services by road, by recognising the costs and the taxation elements of the applicant with respect to those in the host Member State, in order to prevent discrimination, social dumping or the abuse of a dominant position in the market, including through sub- contracting;
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (ca) a publicly accessible electronic register shall be set up, listing all authorised national and international services.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (ca) create a record in electronic format for public access in which all the authorized national and international regular services will appear
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Coaches and buses engaged in national road passenger transport service shall have an effective and stable establishment in the Member State.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 4 Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 4 The
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 4 Information requested shall be supplied within a reasonable period set by the
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 5 Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall ensure that decisions taken by the regulatory body are subject to judicial review.
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall ensure that decisions taken by the
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 6 Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 6 6. Decisions taken by the regulatory body shall be made public within two weeks.;
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 a – paragraph 6 6. Decisions taken by the
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 b (new) (3a) The following Article 3b is inserted before Chapter II: "Article 3b Levy on carriers providing regular coach or bus services 1. Member States which apply the provisions of Chapter III of this Regulation for national regular services may, under the conditions laid down in this Article, authorise the national competent authority to impose a levy on carrier providing passenger services for the operation of routes which fall within the jurisdiction of that authority and which are operated between two terminals in that Member State. 2. The levy is intended to compensate the authority for public service obligations laid down in public service contracts awarded in accordance with Union law. The revenue raised from such a levy and paid as compensation shall not exceed what is necessary to cover all or part of the cost incurred in the relevant public service obligations taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit for discharging those obligations. 3. The levy shall be imposed in accordance with Union law, and shall respect in particular the principles of fairness, transparency, non- discrimination and proportionality, in particular between the average price of the service to the passenger and the level of the levy. The total levies imposed pursuant to this paragraph shall not endanger the economic viability of the bus and coach passenger transport service on which they are imposed. 4. The relevant authorities shall keep the information necessary to ensure that the origin of the levies and their use can be traced. Member States shall provide the Commission with this information. 5. Based on the experience of regulatory bodies, competent authorities and carriers providing regular coach or bus services the Commission shall adopt measures setting out the details of the procedure and criteria to be followed for the application of this Article."
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 3 c (new) (3b) 3c. Member States shall not apply Article 3b when they apply subsidies for the transportation of passengers on unprofitable lines and routes at the expense of a national and/or local budget.
Amendment 173 #
1. International carriage of passengers
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. International carriage of passengers
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. International carriage of passengers
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 1 1. Terminal operators shall grant carriers
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 1 1. Terminal operators shall grant carriers the right to access publicly owned terminals for the purpose of operating regular services including any facilities or services provided in that terminal under fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent conditions.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a 1. Terminal operators shall
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Where terminal operators grant access, bus and coach operators must comply with the terminal's existing terms and conditions.
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Terminal operators shall endeavour to accommodate all requests for access in order to ensure optimum use of terminals, with preference being given to public service operators where territorial balance and social cohesion are compromised.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Terminal operators shall
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Terminal operators shall endeavour to accommodate all requests for access in order to ensure optimum use of publicly owned terminals.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Requests for access may be refused
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Requests for access to terminals may be refused only on the grounds of lack of capacity, or for security and service reasons. If a request is refused, the terminal operator shall inform the regulatory authority of its decision.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Requests for access may be refused only on the grounds of lack of capacity, security concerns, repeated failure to pay fees or violations of the house rules.
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Requests for access may be refused
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Requests for access may be refused
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Requests for access may be refused
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Requests for access may be refused only on
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Where a terminal operator refuses a request for access, it shall indicate any viable alternatives of which it is aware.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Where a terminal operator refuses a request for access, it shall indicate any
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Where a terminal operator refuses a request for access, it shall indicate
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 3 Terminal operators shall publish at least the following information in t
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 3 Terminal operators shall publish
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 3 Terminal operators shall publish
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 3 Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 3 – point a a (new) (aa) a list of all infrastructure and technical specifications of the terminal;
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 3 – point b Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the rules for scheduling the allocation of capacity, including the conditions for managing the access to terminals in the event of demand that exceeds capacity;
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 3 – point c Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (ca) a list of the existing infrastructure and technical specifications of the terminal;
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 That information shall be made available free of charge in electronic format by the terminal operator
Amendment 214 #
3a. Regulatory bodies may exclude terminals that are owned and used solely by the terminal operator for its own road passenger transport services from the application of this Article. When considering an application for exclusion, regulatory bodies shall take into account the availability of viable alternatives.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 2 Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 2 Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 2 2. If access cannot be granted as requested in the application, the terminal operator shall initiate consultations with all
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 3 3. The terminal operator shall take a decision on any application for access to a terminal within
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 3 3. The terminal operator shall take a decision on any application for access to a terminal within
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 3 3. The terminal operator shall take a decision on any application for access to a terminal within
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 4 4. Applicants may appeal against decisions by terminal operators. Appeals shall be lodged with the
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 4 4. Applicants may appeal against decisions by terminal operators. Appeals shall be lodged with the
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 Where the
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 Where the
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 The decision of the regulatory body on the appeal shall be binding, subject to national law provisions regarding judicial review. The regulatory body shall be able to enforce it by means of penalties which are effective, proportionate and dissuasive
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 The decision of the
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 The decision of the
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 5 b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 6 – paragraph 4 Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 6 – paragraph 4 Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Applications for authorisation of regular services shall be submitted to the authorising authority in one Member State in paper or electronic format.
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 7 – paragraph 2 Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 7 – paragraph 2 Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. In the event that an international regular bus and coach service has compromised the economic equilibrium of a public service contract, due to exceptional reasons which could not have been foreseen at the time of granting the authorisation, the Member State concerned may, with the agreement of the Commission, suspend or withdraw the authorisation to provide the service, after having given three months’ notice to the carrier. The carrier shall have the possibility to appeal such decision.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – title Authorisation procedure
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – title Authorisation procedure for the international carriage of passengers
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – title Authorisation procedure for the international carriage of passengers over a distance of
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – title Authorisation procedure for the international carriage of passengers over a distance of less than 100 kilometres
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – title Authorisation procedure for the international carriage of passengers over a distance of less than 100 kilometres
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Authorisations shall be issued in agreement with the competent authorities
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Authorisations shall be issued in agreement with the competent authorities of all the Member States in whose territories passengers are picked up or set down and are carried over distances of
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Authorisations shall be issued in agreement with the competent authorities of all the Member States in whose territories passengers are picked up or set down
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 2 The competent authorities of the Member States whose agreement has been requested shall notify the authorising authority of their decision within t
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. The authorising authority shall take a decision on the application within
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 4. Authorisation shall be granted unless refusal can be justified on o
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. Authorisation shall be granted unless the competent authorities of the Member States whose agreement has been requested decide to limit market access in accordance with Article 8d(1) and/or refusal can be justified on one or more of the grounds listed in points (a) to (d) of Article 8c(2).
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. Authorisation shall be granted unless refusal can be justified on one or more of the grounds listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. In the event that an international regular bus and coach service has compromised the economic equilibrium of a public service contract, due to exceptional reasons which could not have been foreseen at the time of granting the authorisation and which lay not in the responsibility of the owner of the public service contract, the Member State concerned may, with the agreement of the Commission, suspend or withdraw the authorisation to provide the service, after having given six months’ notice to the carrier. The carrier shall have the possibility to appeal such decision.
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 5 Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 6 Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 6 6. After having consulted the Member States of the competent authorities which disagreed, the Commission shall, within four months from receipt of the communication from the authorising authority, take a decision. The decision shall take effect 30 days after its notification to the competent authorities in the Member States concerned.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 6 6. After having consulted the Member States of the competent authorities which disagreed, the Commission shall, within
Amendment 257 #
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Articles 8 a to 8 d Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Articles 8 a to 8 d Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – title Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – title Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – title Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – title Authorisation procedure for the international carriage of passengers over a distance of
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – title Authorisation procedure for the international carriage of passengers over a distance of 100 kilometres or more
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – title Authorisation procedure for the international carriage of passengers over a distance of 100 kilometres or more
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 1 Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 1 Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 1 Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This article is without prejudice to the powers of the Member States and the competent authorities to limit the right of access if the service is likely to disturb the economic balance of a public service contract or to prejudice the exclusive rights granted to the operator of a public service.
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 2 Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 2 Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 2 2. Authorisation shall be granted unless refusal can be justified on one or
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 2 2. Authorisation shall be granted unless refusal can be justified on one or more of the grounds listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 – paragraph 4 2. Authorisation shall be granted unless refusal can be justified on one or more of the grounds listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 279 #
2a. In the event that an international regular bus and coach service has compromised the economic equilibrium of a public service contract as defined in point (ca) of Article 8c(2), due to exceptional circumstances which could not have been foreseen at the time of granting the authorisation and which lay not in the responsibility of the owner of the public service contract, the Member State concerned may, with the agreement of the Commission, suspend or withdraw the authorisation to provide the service after having given six months’ notice to the carrier. The service provider shall have the possibility to appeal the decision.
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 3 Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 3 Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 3 Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 3 3. The authorising authority shall forward to the competent authorities of all Member States in whose territories passengers are picked up or set down, as well as to the competent authorities of Member States whose territories are crossed without passengers being picked up or set down, a copy of the application, together with copies of any other relevant documentation, and its assessment,
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 3. The authorising authority shall forward to the competent authorities of all Member States in whose territories passengers are picked up or set down, as well as to the competent authorities of Member States whose territories are crossed without passengers being picked up or set down, a copy of the application, together with copies of any other relevant documentation, and its assessment,
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. If one of the competent authorities does not agree to the authorisation for one of the reasons set out in paragraph 2, authorisation may not be granted, but the matter may be referred to the Commission within one month of receipt of its reply.
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. If one of the competent authorities does not agree to the authorisation for one of the reasons set out in paragraph 2, authorisation may not be granted, but the matter may be referred to the Commission within one month of receipt of its reply.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. After having consulted the Member States of the competent authorities which disagreed, the Commission shall, within four months of receipt of the communication from the authorising authority, take a decision. The decision shall take effect 30 days after its notification to the Member States concerned.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. After having consulted the Member States of the competent authorities which disagreed, the Commission shall, within four months of receipt of the communication from the authorising authority, take a decision. The decision shall take effect 30 days after its notification to the Member States concerned.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. The Commission decision shall apply until such time as the Member States reach an agreement and the authorising authority adopts a decision on the application.
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 a – paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. The Commission decision shall apply until such time as the Member States reach an agreement and the authorising authority adopts a decision on the application.
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – title Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – title Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – title Authorisation procedure for international
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 1 Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 1 Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 1 1. The authorising authority shall take a decision on the application within
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This article is without prejudice to the powers of the Member States and the competent authorities to limit the right of access if the service is likely to disturb the economic equilibrium of a public service contract or to prejudice the exclusive rights granted to the operator of a public service.
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 2 Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 2 Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 2 2. Authorisations for national regular services shall be granted unless refusal can be justified on one or more of the grounds listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 2 2. Authorisation
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 2 2. Authorisations for national regular services shall be granted unless refusal can be justified on one or more of the grounds listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 2 2. Authorisations for national regular services shall be granted unless refusal can be justified on one or more of the grounds listed in points (a) to (c a) of Article 8c(2)
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 2 2. Authorisations for national regular services shall be granted unless refusal can be justified on one or more of the grounds listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 2 2. Authorisations for national regular services shall be granted unless refusal can be justified on one or more of the grounds listed in points (a) to (
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 2 2. Authorisations for national regular services shall be granted unless refusal can be justified on one or more of the grounds listed in points (a) to (c) of Article 8c(2) and, if the
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 3 Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 3 Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 3 Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 3 3. The distance referred to in paragraph 2 may be increased to 120 kilometres if the
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 b – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Before starting to operate the service, the authorised carrier shall prove it has an effective and stable establishment in the state in which the service is to be provided, in accordance with Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 3a. Before starting to operate the service, the authorised carrier shall prove it has an effective and stable establishment in the state in which the service is to be provided, in accordance with Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – title Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 1 Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Decisions rejecting an application or granting authorisation with limitations shall state the reasons on which they are based and shall be informed by the analyses of the regulatory body.
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) the applicant has not complied with national or international legislation on road transport, and in particular the conditions and requirements relating to authorisations for international road passenger services, or has committed serious infringements of Union or national or, where appropriate, regional road transport legislation in particular with regard to the rules applicable to vehicles and driving and rest periods for drivers;
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) A regulatory body has established on the basis of an objective economic analysis that the new service proposed by the applicant will compromise the economic equilibrium of at least one existing or planned public service contract provided that: – that contract bundles profitable and unprofitable routes, – the contract operator has not been receiving any significant competition distorting direct public funds, including in the form of regional or municipal subsidies, and – the contract was awarded via a transparent competitive tendering procedure for a period not exceeding 10 years without a possibility of extension.
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) On the basis of an objective analysis, a regulatory body establishes that the service would compromise the economic equilibrium of a public service contract, provided that: – that contract bundles profitable and unprofitable routes; – that contract operator has not been receiving public funds, also in the form of regional or municipal subsidies; – the contract was awarded through a transparent competitive tendering procedure less than five years before the entry into force of this Regulation and does not exceed a duration of 10 years.
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) the applicant has requested authorisation for a regular service to run on the same route, or via a different route, where a competent authority has granted a public service operator an exclusive right to provide certain public passenger transport services in return for the discharge of public service obligations within the framework of a public service contract;
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) the applicant has requested authorisation for a regular service to run on the same route, or via a different route, where a competent authority has granted a public service operator an exclusive right to provide certain public passenger transport services in return for the discharge of public service obligations within the framework of a public service contract;
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point d (d) a regulatory body establishes on the basis of an objective
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point d (d) a regulatory body establishes on the basis of an objective economic analysis that the service would compromise the economic equilibrium of a public service contract. That analysis shall assess the relevant structural and geographical characteristics of the market and the network concerned (size, demand characteristics, network complexity, technical and geographical isolation, and the services covered by the contract), and account shall also be taken of whether the new service brings better quality services or more value for money.
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point d (d) a regulatory body establishes on the basis of an objective economic analysis that the service would compromise the economic equilibrium of a public service contract under Regulation 1370/2007 or of a traffic service which has been authorised following the implementation of another competitive procedure.
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point d (d) a regulatory body establishes on the basis of an objective economic analysis that the service would compromise the economic equilibrium of a public service contract, or a competent authority establishes that the proposed service is prejudicial to the exclusive rights granted to the operator of a public service.
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point d (d) a regulatory body establishes
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) the applicant has applied for authorisation for a regular service on a particular route or network or in a particular area where a competent authority has granted or planned to grant to an undertaking – or public service operator - an exclusive right to perform the same, similar or equivalent public transport services in return for the discharge of public service obligations within the framework of a public service contract, or if the proposed regular service occurs in an urban or suburban centre or conurbation, or it meets the transport needs between it and the surrounding areas.
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Authorising authorities shall not reject an application solely on the grounds that the carrier requesting authorisation offers lower prices than those offered by other road carriers or the fact
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 3 Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 c – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that decisions taken by the authorising authority are subject to judicial review.
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – title Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 1 Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 1 1. Member States may limit the right of access to the international and national market for regular services if the
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 1 1. Member States and the competent authorities may limit the right of access to the international and national market for regular services if the proposed regular service carries passengers over distances of less than 100 kilometres as the crow flies and if the service would compromise the economic equilibrium of a public service contract
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 1 1. Member States may limit the right of access to the international and national market for regular services
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 1 1. Member States may limit the right of access to the international and national
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 1 1. Member States may limit the right of access to the international and national market for regular bus and coach services if the proposed regular service
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 1 1. Member States may limit the right of access to the international and national market for regular services if the proposed regular service
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 1 1. Member States may limit the right of access to the international and national market for regular services if the proposed regular service carries passengers over distances of less than 100 kilometres
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 1 1. Member States may limit the right of access to the international and national market for regular services if the proposed regular service
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 2 Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The competent authorities that awarded a public service contract or the public service operators performing the public service contract may request the regulatory body to
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The regulatory body shall examine the request and
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The regulatory body shall examine the request and may decide
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 3 Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Where the regulatory body carries out an economic analysis, it shall inform all interested parties of the results of that analysis and its conclusions
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Where the regulatory body carries out an
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 4 Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States may further liberalise the authorisation system for national scheduled services and open their market to those which also further liberalise their market.
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 5 Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 5 Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 5 Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 5 Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 5 5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 26 establishing the procedure and criteria to be followed for the application of this Article, in particular in carrying out the economic analysis.";
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Where a competent authority has granted exclusive rights to an undertaking performing a public service in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council, protection of those exclusive rights shall apply only to the operation of public passenger transport services providing services on the same routes or on alternative routes. This shall not prevent the authorisation of new regular services operating on other routes.
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Where a competent authority has granted exclusive rights to an undertaking performing a public service in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council, protection of those exclusive rights shall apply only to the operation of public passenger transport services providing services on the same routes or on alternative routes. This shall not prevent the authorisation of new regular services operating on other routes.
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Member States may further liberalise their national long-distance bus markets with regard to authorisation procedures or kilometre thresholds.
Amendment 366 #
5b. Member States may limit the right of access to the international and national market for regular services if the proposed regular service meets the needs of an urban or suburban centre or conurbation, or the needs for transport between it and the surrounding areas.
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d – paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Member States may limit the right of access to the international and national market for regular services if the proposed regular service meets the needs of an urban or suburban centre or conurbation, or the needs for transport between it and the surrounding areas.
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 8 d a (new) (11a) Article 8da Member States may introduce further liberalisation of the services covered by this Regulation, in particular as regards the simplification of procedures and kilometre - road distance - thresholds.
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 9 Articles 8
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 4 Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 15 a (new) Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 15 a (new) Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 15 – introductory part Cabotage operations shall be authorised for the following services, provided they do not concern urban or suburban areas or agglomerations:
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 15 – point c (c) regular services performed in accordance with this Regulation
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 15 – point c (c) regular services, performed
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 15 – point c (c) regular services p
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 15 – point c (c) regular services performed
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 15 – point c (c) regular services, performed
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The application of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council17 has revealed that some operators in national markets
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 15 – point c (c)
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 15 – point c (c) regular services, performed
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 15 – point c (c) regular services performed in accordance with this Regulation, if this is not the main objective of the service in the host Member State.”;
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 16 – paragraph 1 (16a) Article 16(1) is replaced by the following: "(1) The performance of the cabotage operations shall be subject, save as otherwise provided in Community legislation, to Directive 96/71/EC, as amended by Directive 2016/0070 (COD), on the posting of workers and the laws, regulations and administrative provisions in force in the host Member State with regard to the following:
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 (17) Article 17 is
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 17 (17) Article 17 is
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 17 (17)
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 20 Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The application of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council17 has revealed that operators in national markets are facing obstacles to the development of inter-urban coach services. Moreover, road passenger transport services have not kept pace with the evolving needs of citizens in terms of availability and quality and sustainable transport modes continue to have a low modal share. As a consequence, certain groups of citizens are placed at a disadvantage in terms of availability of passenger transport services, and there are more road accidents, emissions and congestion, space use and infrastructure costs due to greater use of cars. _________________ 17 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services, and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 88).
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 20 – paragraph 1 Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 25 – paragraph 1 a (new) (19a) In Article 25, the following paragraph 1 a is inserted: "Member States shall not apply the provisions of Chapter III of this Regulation for national regular services on territories covered by services of general economic interest, on the condition that public service contracts are awarded following a competitive tendering procedure, in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007."
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 26 Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 26 Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 4(2), 5(5), 6(4), 7(2), 8d(5) and 28(3) shall be conferred on the Commission for a
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 4(2), 5(5), 6(4), 7(2),
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 26 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 4(2), 5(5), 6(4), 7(2),
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 26 – paragraph 6 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 4(2), 5(5), 6(4), 7(2),
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 28 Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 1. E
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. Each year, by 31 January at the latest, and for the first time by 31 January […the first January following the entry into force of this Regulation] the competent authorities of the Member States shall communicate to the Commission the number of authorisations for regular services issued the previous year and the total number of authorisations for regular services valid on 31 December
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. E
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 28 – paragraph 2 2. E
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 28 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 28 – paragraph 5 5. By [please insert the date calculated 5 years after date of application of this Regulation], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Regulation. The report shall include information on the extent to which this Regulation has contributed to a better functioning road passenger transport
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Annex II – part (b) – Article 1 – paragraph 2 – (c a) new 21a. In Annex II, part (b) is amended as follows: ‘2. This licence is issued by the competent authorities of the Member State of establishment of the carrier for hire or reward who: (a) is authorised in the Member State of establishment to undertake carriage by means of regular services, including
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 b (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 29 Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) To ensure a coherent framework for the inter-urban carriage of passengers by regular coach and bus services throughout the Union, Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 should apply to all inter-urban carriage by regular services. The scope of that Regulation should therefore be extended, but, by virtue of the principle of subsidiarity, not applied to urban and suburban areas and agglomerations.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) To ensure a coherent framework for the inter-urban carriage of passengers by regular coach and bus services throughout the Union, Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 should apply to all inter-urban carriage by regular services. The scope of that Regulation should therefore be extended, although urban and suburban transport should continue to be excluded.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) To ensure a coherent legislation framework of
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) To ensure a coherent framework for the inter-urban carriage of passengers by regular coach and bus services throughout the Union, Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 should apply to all inter-urban carriage by regular services
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The transport sector, which must be considered to be of strategic importance regarding the development options of any Member State, encompasses the carriage of passengers by road. Each Member State must accordingly define its strategic vision for the development of the transport sector, which may include regulation and public control with appropriate measures to meet the needs of the public and the country, ensuring territorial and social cohesion, offsetting the adverse effects of deregulation in terms of transport cuts and lower quality and more expensive public transport services and infrastructures.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3)
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) An independent and impartial regulatory body, issuing binding opinions, should be designated in each Member State to ensure the proper functioning of the road passenger transport market. That body may also be responsible
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3)
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Commercial regular service operations should not compromise the
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Commercial regular service operations should not compromise the economic equilibrium of existing public service contracts, nor should they conflict with the exclusive rights granted in exchange for compliance with public service obligations in the context of a public service contract. For this reason, the regulatory body should be able to carry out an objective economic analysis to ensure that this is the case.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Commercial regular service operations should not compromise the
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Commercial regular service operations
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Commercial regular service operations should not compromise the economic equilibrium of existing public service contracts. For this reason, the regulatory body should be able to carry out an objective economic analysis and should have the authority, where appropriate, to propose the measures necessary to ensure that this is the case.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Commercial regular service operations should not compromise the economic equilibrium of existing public service contracts according to Regulation 1370/2007 and Regulation 2016/2338. For this reason, the regulatory body should be able to carry out an objective economic analysis to ensure that this is the case.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Commercial regular service operations should not co
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Commercial regular service operations should not compromise the economic equilibrium of existing public service contracts. For this reason, the
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5)
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) Regular services in the form of cabotage operations should be conditional on the possession of a Community licence, be of a temporary nature and be provided only in connection with international transport. In order to facilitate effective controls of those services by enforcement authorities, the rules regarding the issuing of Community licences should be clarified.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to ensure fair competition in the market, operators of regular services should be provided with access rights to terminals in the Union on fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent terms. The operation of a terminal requires the approval of a national authority, which has to verify which requirements are necessary and which must be fulfilled. Appeals against decisions rejecting or limiting access should be lodged with the
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to ensure fair competition in the market, operators of regular services should be provided with access rights to terminals in the Union on fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent terms. Appeals against decisions rejecting or limiting access should be lodged with the regulatory body. Passengers with disabilities and with reduced mobility (PRMs) should also have barrier-free fair access to terminals and busses and coaches.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to ensure fair competition in the market, operators of regular services should be provided with access rights to terminals in the Union on fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent terms. Appeals against decisions rejecting or limiting access should be lodged with the regulatory body. Member States may exempt terminals solely or partly serving public transport from the scope of this Regulation.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to ensure fair competition in the market, operators of regular services should be provided with access rights to terminals in the Union on fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent terms. Where territorial balance and social cohesion are compromised, public service operators should have priority access. Appeals against decisions rejecting or limiting access should be lodged with the regulatory body.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to ensure fair competition in the market, operators of regular services should be provided with access rights to publicly owned terminals in the Union on fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent terms.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to ensure fair competition in the market, operators of regular services should be provided with access rights to terminals in the Union on fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent terms. Appeals against decisions rejecting or limiting access should be lodged with the
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to ensure fair competition in the market when necessary, operators of regular services should be provided with access rights to terminals in the Union on fair, equitable, non-discriminatory and transparent terms
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The Commission should soon propose a review of Regulation 181/2011/EC on bus and coach passenger rights, in order to improve quality of services and not further lead to intermodal distortion of competition.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 b (new) (6b) The Commission should propose measures to include bus and coach prices into fair and efficient pricing criteria, on the basis of the internalisation of external costs, in order to achieve more sustainability and fair competition between the different transport modes.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Authorisation for both national and international regular services should be subject to an authorisation procedure.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Authorisation for both national and international regular services should be
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Authorisation for both national and international regular services should be subject to an authorisation procedure. Authorisation should be granted, unless there are specific grounds for refusal attributable to the applicant, or the service would compromise the economic equilibrium of a public service contract.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Authorisation for both national and international regular services should be subject to an authorisation procedure. Authorisation should be granted, unless there are specific grounds for refusal attributable to the applicant, or the service would co
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Authorisation for both national and international regular services should be subject to an authorisation procedure. Authorisation should be granted, unless there are specific grounds for refusal attributable to the applicant, or the service
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Non-resident carriers should be able to operate national regular services under the same conditions as resident carriers. This should also include social standards for the drivers, such as equal treatment in salaries and professional qualification. Working, driving and rest times rules should be in coherence of road safety and fair intermodal competition and the enforcement of the according legislation should be guaranteed by the Commission and the Member States.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Non-resident carriers should be able to operate national regular services under the same conditions as resident carriers by attending a competitive tendering procedure, in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Non-resident carriers should be able to operate national regular services under the same conditions as resident carriers. Directive 96/71/EC as amended by Directive (EU) 2018/957 on the posting of workers applies to the drivers of non- resident carriers.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Non-resident carriers should be able to operate national regular services under the same conditions as resident carriers, as long as they can demonstrate compliance with all relevant provisions of national, Union and international law.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Administrative formalities should be reduced as much as possible without abandoning the controls and penalties that guarantee the correct application and effective enforcement of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Administrative formalities should be reduced as much as possible without abandoning the controls and penalties that guarantee the correct application and effective enforcement of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Administrative formalities should be reduced as much as possible without abandoning the controls and penalties that guarantee the correct application and effective enforcement of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009. The journey form constitutes an
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Administrative formalities should be reduced
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Calls on Member States to consider creating a system similar to PNR for coach and bus services;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Insofar as this Regulation harmonises the rules in national markets for regular coach and bus services and access to terminals, its objectives, namely the promotion of inter-urban mobility and the increase of the modal share of sustainable passenger transport modes, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States. Therefore, the Union may adopt measures,
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In order to take into account market developments and technical progress the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) (-1) in Article 1, the following paragraph 1a is inserted: ‘This Regulation shall be without prejudice to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road.’;
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new) Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) -1 The following paragraph 1 a is inserted in Article 1: "This Regulation shall also apply to national interurban services without prejudices to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007."
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 1 – paragraph 4 Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. This Regulation shall apply to national road passenger services for hire or reward operated by a non-resident carrier as provided for in Chapter V, while commercial road passenger services in urban or suburban areas or agglomerations shall be excluded from the scope thereof.”;
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. This Regulation shall apply to national road passenger services for hire or reward operated by a non-resident carrier, on a temporary basis, as provided for in Chapter V.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. This Regulation shall apply to national road passenger services for hire or reward operated on a temporary basis by a non-resident carrier as provided for in Chapter V.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. This Regulation shall apply to national road passenger services for hire or reward temporarily operated by a non- resident carrier as provided for in Chapter V.”;
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. This Regulation shall apply to temporary national road passenger services for hire or reward operated by a non- resident carrier as provided for in Chapter V.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. This Regulation shall apply to national road passenger services for hire or reward
Amendment 99 #
7. ‘cabotage operation’ means: – either a national road passenger transport service operated on a temporary basis for hire or reward in a host Member State; – or the picking up and setting down of passengers within the same Member State, in the course of a regular international service, in compliance with the provisions of this Regulation, provided that it is not the principal purpose of the service;
source: 628.473
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
TRANNew
EMPL |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Transport and TourismNew
Employment and Social Affairs |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Responsible CommitteeNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/3 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/10 |
|
docs/12 |
Old
New
|
docs/13 |
Old
New
|
docs/15 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/summary/19 |
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/4/docs/0/title |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Go to the page |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/summary/22 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32102&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=32102 |
events/8 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
TRAN/8/11610 |
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 2007/0097(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/2 |
2007/0097(COD)
|
procedure/legal_basis |
Old
New
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 091-p1 |
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
Old
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the RegionsNew
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2019-354-TA-8-2019-0125_en.docx |
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
TRAN |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Transport and Tourism |
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Former Committee OpinionNew
Former Responsible Committee |
committees/3 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
docs/9/date |
Old
2017-12-18T00:00:00New
2017-12-19T00:00:00 |
docs/10/date |
Old
2018-02-14T00:00:00New
2018-02-15T00:00:00 |
docs/11/date |
Old
2018-05-01T00:00:00New
2018-05-02T00:00:00 |
docs/12/date |
Old
2018-02-26T00:00:00New
2018-02-27T00:00:00 |
docs/13/date |
Old
2018-06-27T00:00:00New
2018-06-28T00:00:00 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=en
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=32102&j=0&l=en
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2017-12-19T00:00:00New
2017-12-18T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2018-02-15T00:00:00New
2018-02-14T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2018-05-02T00:00:00New
2018-05-01T00:00:00 |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/date |
Old
2018-02-27T00:00:00New
2018-02-26T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14/date |
Old
2018-06-28T00:00:00New
2018-06-27T00:00:00 |
docs/15 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
events/0 |
|
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)621907New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2018)621907 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2017-12-19T00:00:00New
2017-12-18T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2018-02-15T00:00:00New
2018-02-14T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2018-05-02T00:00:00New
2018-05-01T00:00:00 |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/date |
Old
2018-02-27T00:00:00New
2018-02-26T00:00:00 |
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14/date |
Old
2018-06-28T00:00:00New
2018-06-27T00:00:00 |
docs/15 |
|
events/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-623746_EN.html
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-628473_EN.html
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-628553_EN.html
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/1/body |
EP
|
events/2/body |
EP
|
events/3/body |
EP
|
events/6/body |
EP
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE623.746
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.473
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.553
|
docs/9 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
28615
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocationNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:6151)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:6151)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE623.746New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE623.746 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.473New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.473 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.553New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.553 |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0032_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0032_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190213&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190213&type=CRE |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0125_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0125_EN.html |
events/8/body |
EP
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/8 |
|
docs/9/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0032&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0032_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0125New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0125_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links/Research document |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/8/11610New
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Council 1st reading position / budgetary conciliation convocation |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner |
Old
ŠEFČOVIČ MarošNew
BULC Violeta |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2018-01-16T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows |
|
activities/2 |
|
committees/1/date |
2018-01-16T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
other/0/commissioner |
Old
ŠEFČOVIČ MarošNew
BULC Violeta |
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
TRAN/8/11610
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|