Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | BUDG | LEWANDOWSKI Janusz ( PPE), DEPREZ Gérard ( ALDE) | VIOTTI Daniele ( S&D), KÖLMEL Bernd ( ECR), TRÜPEL Helga ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), ZANNI Marco ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | AFCO | BRESSO Mercedes ( S&D) | Morten MESSERSCHMIDT ( ECR), Cristian Dan PREDA ( PPE), Jasenko SELIMOVIC ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | CAPUTO Nicola ( S&D) | Ivan JAKOVČIĆ ( ALDE), Giulia MOI ( EFDD), Miguel VIEGAS ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | BELET Ivo ( PPE) | Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | INTA | VAN DE CAMP Wim ( PPE) | Marietje SCHAAKE ( ALDE), Joachim STARBATTY ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | MORGANO Luigi ( S&D) | Enrique CALVET CHAMBON ( ALDE), Bernd LUCKE ( ECR), Ivana MALETIĆ ( PPE), Miguel VIEGAS ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | CONT | ALI Nedzhmi ( ALDE) | Georgi PIRINSKI ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | EMPL |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 442 votes to 166, with 88 abstentions, a resolution on reform of the European Union’s system of own resources.
Parliament called for the future multi-annual framework policy (MFF) proposed by the Commission to include ambitious proposals to revise the Own Resources Decision . It underlined that both the expenditure and the revenue side of the next MFF will be treated as a single package in the upcoming negotiations between the Council and Parliament. It stated that no agreement will be reached on the MFF without corresponding headway being made on own resources.
Parliament favoured the creation of a new transparent, simpler and fairer system of own resources , based on elements of the current system when they have proved their effectiveness, in order to provide stable finances at Union level. In this context, it stressed the need to link revenues to policy objectives , in particular to the single market, the energy union, and the environment, climate and transport policies, focusing on policies with European added value.
Principles governing the setting-up of a new own resources system : underlining that new own resources cannot all be introduced at the same time, Members proposed to reform of the system of own resources through a two-step approach :
by introducing less technically complex own resources whose collection is easily manageable at a reasonable cost; by gradually introducing each additional new own resource, on the basis of a fixed timetable until all have reached cruising speed.
The introduction of new own resources should have a dual purpose:
1. to bring about a substantial reduction (aiming at 40 %) in the proportion of GNI-based contributions , thus creating savings for Member State budgets; and
2. to enable the financing of a higher level of EU spending under the post-2020 MFF , including covering the gap resulting from the withdrawal of the United Kingdom. The new own resources do not aim to increase the overall fiscal burden for the EU taxpayer, who should not be affected by the introduction of new own resources.
Members recommended:
the abolition of all rebates and corrections , while ensuring fair treatment between Member States; retaining traditional own resources , namely customs duties, agricultural duties and the sugar and isoglucose levies, as a source of revenue for the EU budget; maintaining the contribution based on GNI but only as a residual and balancing resource for the Union budget, which would put an end to the budgetary logic of "fair return".
Basket of possible new own resources : the introduction of new own resources should serve three purposes:
1. consolidate the single market, increase its transparency and improve the level playing field;
2. reduce financial speculation and strengthen tax fairness in sectors that use aggressive tax planning instruments or aggressive tax optimisation;
3. promote the energy transition and the fight against global warming.
Parliament invited the Commission to examine the introduction of new own resources based on:
- A revised value-added tax (VAT) : this resource currently represents around 12 % of EU revenue. However, that the current system has serious shortcomings: the resource is calculated on a statistical basis; it is unnecessarily complex and has no direct link to the citizens.
Members favour setting up a uniform levy rate (1% to 2%) on revenue from the reformed VAT collected entirely by Member State administrations as a Union own resource. The Commission was asked, pending the adoption of the relevant VAT legislation, to present a proposal for a reformed own resource based on VAT as part of its upcoming legislative package on EU own resources. Such a proposal should take account of the main outcomes of the VAT reform currently under discussion.
- A share of corporate tax : Members share the analysis of the High Level Group on Own Resources that a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) can serve as a basis for a new own resource. They asked the Commission to propose the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget, to be calculated on the basis of Member States’ revenue generated from the CCCTB. They were in favour of setting a uniform levy rate on the revenue from the CCCTB, to be collected as an own resource.
- A financial transaction tax (FTT) at European level : Members encouraged the efforts undertaken under enhanced cooperation by a group of 11 Member States with a view to establishing financial transaction tax (FTT), following the 2011 Commission proposal. They called, therefore, for the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget, to be calculated on the basis of a chosen method of taxation of financial activities.
- Taxation of companies in the digital sector : Members called, in principle, for the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget to be levied on transactions in the digital economy, even if it is too early to decide on the exact arrangements for the establishment of such a resource. They believed, nevertheless, that any arrangements made by the EU authorities, such as registration or monitoring systems or regulatory mechanisms, should immediately permit the collection of duties or levies for the benefit of the Union budget on the basis of their European added value.
- Environmental tax and levies : Members emphasised the importance of green taxation as a particularly suitable mechanism for contributing to the Union's own resources. The Commission was invited to further incorporate the proposals for additional ecological own resources, which are in line with certain Union policies such as those on energy (energy tax), environment and climate (carbon border adjustment mechanism, plastic tax and the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)) and transport (road fuel and air ticket taxes), in order to promote additional future Union own resources.
Parliament called for a significant share of auctioning revenues of the emissions trading scheme (ETS-EU) allowances from Phase 4 (2021) onwards to be considered as a new EU own resource. It invited the Commission to consider the introduction at EU level of a levy on plastic and single-use items, with a view to encouraging the use of more sustainable alternatives.
Other sources of revenue : Parliament reiterated its position that any revenue resulting from fines imposed on companies for breaching EU competition law or linked to late payments of national contributions to the EU budget should constitute extra revenue for the EU budget without entailing a corresponding reduction in GNI contributions.
Members called for the creation of a special reserve in the EU budget which will be progressively filled up by all types of unforeseen other revenue and duly carried over in order to provide additional spending possibilities when needs arise. They considered that this reserve should be earmarked for the MFF special instruments.
The Committee on Budgets adopted an own-initiative report by co-rapporteurs Gérard DEPREZ (ADLE, BE) and Janusz LEWANDOWSKI (EPP, PL) on reform of the European Union’s system of own resources.
Members favoured the creation of a new transparent, simpler and fairer system of own resources, based on elements of the current system when they have proved their effectiveness, in order to provide stable finances at Union level. In this context, they stressed the need to link revenues to policy objectives , in particular to the single market, the energy union, and the environment, climate and transport policies.
Principles governing the setting-up of a new own resources system : Members considered that the reform of the system of own resources could be achieved through a two-step approach: (i) first, by introducing less technically complex own resources whose collection is easily manageable at a reasonable cost, and then (ii), by gradually introducing each additional new own resource, on the basis of a fixed timetable until all have reached cruising speed.
The introduction of new own resources should have a dual purpose:
1. to bring about a substantial reduction (aiming at 40 %) in the proportion of GNI-based contributions, thus creating savings for Member State budgets; and
2. to enable the financing of an higher level of EU spending under the post-2020 MFF , including covering the gap resulting from the withdrawal of the United Kingdom.
Members recommended:
the abolition of all rebates and corrections , while ensuring fair treatment between Member States; retaining traditional own resources , namely customs duties, agricultural duties and the sugar and isoglucose levies, as a source of revenue for the EU budget; maintaining the contribution based on GNI but only as a residual and balancing resource for the Union budget, which would put an end to the budgetary logic of "fair return".
Basket of possible new own resources: the Commission is invited to examine the introduction of new own resources based on:
a revised value-added tax (VAT) : Members favour setting up a uniform levy rate (1% to 2%) on revenue from the reformed VAT collected entirely by Member State administrations as a Union own resource. the Commission was asked, pending the adoption of the relevant VAT legislation, to present a proposal for a reformed own resource based on VAT as part of its upcoming legislative package on EU own resources; a share of corporate tax : Members share the analysis of the High Level Group on Own Resources that a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) can serve as a basis for a new own resource . They asked the Commission to propose the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget, to be calculated on the basis of Member States’ revenue generated from the CCCTB. They were in favour of setting a uniform levy rate on the revenue from the CCCTB, to be collected as an own resource; a financial transaction tax (FTT) at European level : Members encouraged the efforts undertaken under enhanced cooperation by a group of 11 Member States with a view to establishing financial transaction tax (FTT), following the 2011 Commission proposal. They called, therefore, for the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget, to be calculated on the basis of a chosen method of taxation of financial activities; taxation of companies in the digital sector : the committee called, in principle, for the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget to be levied on transactions in the digital economy, even if it is too early to decide on the exact arrangements for the establishment of such a resource. It believed, nevertheless, that any arrangements made by the EU authorities, such as registration or monitoring systems or regulatory mechanisms, should immediately permit the collection of duties or levies for the benefit of the Union budget on the basis of their European added value; environmental tax and levies : stressing the need to encourage energy transition and the fight against global warming, Members emphasised the importance of green taxation as a particularly suitable mechanism for contributing to the Union's own resources. The Commission was invited to further incorporate the proposals for additional ecological own resources, which are in line with certain Union policies such as those on energy (energy tax), environment and climate (carbon border adjustment mechanism, plastic tax and the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)) and transport (road fuel and air ticket taxes), in order to promote additional future Union own resources.
The report called for a significant share of auctioning revenues of the emissions trading scheme (ETS-EU) allowances from Phase 4 (2021) onwards to be considered as a new EU own resource. It invites the Commission to consider the introduction at EU level of a levy on plastic and single-use items, with a view to encouraging the use of more sustainable alternatives.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)366
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0076/2018
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0041/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.885
- Committee opinion: PE612.384
- Committee opinion: PE612.244
- Committee opinion: PE612.212
- Committee draft report: PE616.543
- Committee opinion: PE604.865
- Committee opinion: PE606.164
- Committee opinion: PE609.360
- Committee opinion: PE609.360
- Committee opinion: PE606.164
- Committee opinion: PE604.865
- Committee draft report: PE616.543
- Committee opinion: PE612.212
- Committee opinion: PE612.244
- Committee opinion: PE612.384
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.885
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)366
Activities
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 - Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (debate)
- 2016/11/22 The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 - Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (debate)
- 2016/11/22 The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 - Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (debate)
- 2016/11/22 The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 - Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (debate)
- Gérard DEPREZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 - Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (debate) FR
- 2016/11/22 The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 - Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (debate) FR
- Bill ETHERIDGE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Monica MACOVEI
- Isabelle THOMAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 - Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (debate) FR
- 2016/11/22 The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 - Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (debate) FR
- Nedzhmi ALI
- Jean ARTHUIS
- Ivo BELET
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
- Steeve BRIOIS
- Wim van de CAMP
- Nicola CAPUTO
- Silvia COSTA
- Michel DANTIN
- André ELISSEN
- Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI
- Benedek JÁVOR
- Barbara KAPPEL
- Bernd KÖLMEL
- Alain LAMASSOURE
- Ivana MALETIĆ
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luigi MORGANO
- Sophie MONTEL
- Momchil NEKOV
- Georgi PIRINSKI
- Pavel POC
- Soraya POST
- Sofia RIBEIRO
- Paul RÜBIG
- Elly SCHLEIN
- Jasenko SELIMOVIC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
- Patricija ŠULIN
- Tibor SZANYI
- Helga TRÜPEL
- Marco VALLI
- Daniele VIOTTI
- Miguel VIEGAS
- Maria Gabriela ZOANĂ
Votes
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 16 14/03/2018 13:04:27.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 18 14/03/2018 13:04:43.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 51 14/03/2018 13:04:56.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 53 14/03/2018 13:05:26.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 43 14/03/2018 13:05:39.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 20 14/03/2018 13:05:55.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 41 14/03/2018 13:06:08.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 21 14/03/2018 13:06:21.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 45 14/03/2018 13:06:37.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 22 14/03/2018 13:06:49.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 23 14/03/2018 13:07:02.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - § 22/2 14/03/2018 13:07:27.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 42 14/03/2018 13:07:40.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - § 23 14/03/2018 13:07:55.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 3 14/03/2018 13:08:55.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 46 14/03/2018 13:09:11.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 47 14/03/2018 13:09:24.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 31 14/03/2018 13:09:42.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 5 14/03/2018 13:09:55.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - § 37 14/03/2018 13:10:09.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 6 14/03/2018 13:10:22.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 7S 14/03/2018 13:10:44.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - § 42/1 14/03/2018 13:10:59.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - § 42/2 14/03/2018 13:11:12.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 8S 14/03/2018 13:11:26.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 9 14/03/2018 13:11:43.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 10S 14/03/2018 13:12:33.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 36 14/03/2018 13:12:44.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 11S 14/03/2018 13:12:57.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 12S 14/03/2018 13:13:31.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 13S 14/03/2018 13:13:48.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 14S 14/03/2018 13:14:05.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - § 55/1 14/03/2018 13:14:26.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - § 55/3 14/03/2018 13:14:40.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 15S 14/03/2018 13:14:54.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - § 60/2 14/03/2018 13:15:21.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - § 60/3 14/03/2018 13:15:33.000 #
A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Résolution 14/03/2018 13:15:50.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
502 |
2017/2053(INI)
2017/09/15
AFCO
30 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates its strong support for a comprehensive reform of the European Union's system of own resources; recalls that the current system of own resources contradicts the
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Takes note of the opportunity presented by Brexit to
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Takes note of the opportunity presented by Brexit to reconsider the current system of rebates and corrections, which are not only contrary to the
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that the EU’s powers are founded on the principle of representation of interests of Member States and according to the Art. 311 TFEU the adoption of provisions relating to the system of own EU resources requires a unanimous decision by the Council and approval by every Member States, thus retaining their fiscal sovereignty.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the EU budget should be endowed with a system of genuine own resources, following the recommendations of the High Level Group on Own Resources;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Underlines that in times of scarce public resources but growing financial needs, the EU budget needs to focus on areas bringing the highest ‘European added value’, or on European public goods for which action at EU level is not only relevant, but indispensable;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Calls on the Commission to start a reflection on how funds directly generated by EU policies could become revenues for the EU budget, such as revenues from auctions under the Emissions Trading System, emissions premiums for cars as well as revenues from the future European Travel Information and Authorisation System;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Believes that any reform of the system of own resources should be based on the principles of subsidiarity and comprehensibility for European citizens
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Believes that any reform of the system of own resources should be based on the principles of subsidiarity and comprehensibility for European citizens; recalls the principles listed in the Monti report and used by the High Level Group on Own Resources to assess possible new own resources and takes the view that they constitute useful guidance for the reflection on the reforms;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the current system of own resources contradicts the
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Believes that any reform of the system of own resources should be based on the principles of fairness, stability and unity, subsidiary
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Believes that any reform of the system of own resources should be based on the principles of subsidiary, solidarity, sustainability and comprehensibility for European citizens;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Believes that a reform of the EU own resources system should center on more efficient use of EU financial means, improved democratic control over the EU budget, and respect of the subsidiarity principle, which provides Member States with a right to decide about sources of financing for their contributions they pay to EU budget.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that reform on the revenue side should go hand in hand with reform on the expenditure side
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that reform on the revenue side should go hand in hand with reform on the expenditure side to ensure a visible link with EU policies and priorities and to support EU policies in key areas of EU competence, such as the single market, environmental protection and climate action, energy union, and reducing fiscal heterogeneity in the single market, as recommended in the Monti report1
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that reform on the revenue side should go hand in hand with reform on the expenditure side to ensure a visible link with EU policies and priorities and to support EU policies in key areas of EU competence, such as the single market, environmental protection and climate action, energy union, and reducing fiscal heterogeneity in the single market, as recommended in the Monti report1 ; by such a reform national Court of auditors and Parliaments should be entrusted to investigate and deliver an opinion on the execution of the budget and EU expenditure in their territory ; _________________ 1 Final report and recommendations of the High Level Group on Own Resources on the future financing of the EU, adopted in December 2016
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that reform on the revenue side should go hand in hand with reform on the expenditure side to ensure a visible link with EU policies and priorities and to support EU policies in key areas of EU competence, such as the single market, environmental protection and climate action, energy union, common defence policy, and reducing fiscal heterogeneity in the single market, as recommended in the Monti report1; _________________ 1 Final report and recommendations of the High Level Group on Own Resources on the future financing of the EU, adopted in December 2016
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls, when conducting the future reforms, the importance of preserving the unity of the European budget and limiting the use of programmes and vehicles that run parallel to the European budget, confining those to strictly justified cases and subjecting them to proper scrutiny, as recommended by the High Level Group on Own Resources;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes the view that all five scenarios for the future of the EU presented by the Commission in March 2017 would necessitate additional financing
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that the current system of own resources is characterised by a considerable degree of complexity and lack of transparency; calls therefore on the EU institutions and the Member States to tackle these shortcomings efficiently and constructively;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Highlights the need for restoring legitimacy to EU and public spending in general; suggests therefore that greater attention should be given to synergies between the EU budget and national funding for areas with a high European added value or where national financial possibilities are insufficient for achieving a European public good;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists on the use of the passerelle clause enshrined in Article 48(7) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) to switch from voting by unanimity to qualified majority voting (QMV) and the ordinary legislative procedure for the adoption of own resources, th
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that the EU budget and its financing should be more transparent and readable for citizens, so that the benefits of the EU, and not only its costs, are made visible; takes the view that this would improve the overall accountability of the EU budget;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Takes note of the opportunity presented by Brexit to deeply reform the structural fund system, entrust the national Courts and Parliament to examine and evaluate the execution of the budget and expenses in their country, reconsider the current system of rebates and corrections, which are not only contrary to the letter and spirit of the Treaties, but which have also proven to shift the focus of discussions from the European added value of the EU budget to the ‘net balance’ effect on the contributions of Member States;
source: 610.688
2017/10/31
CONT
105 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas, in a situation of scarce resources,
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that in order to boost the transition towards a sustainable, circular and low-carbon economy and deliver on the commonly agreed Energy Union targets, significant additional investments are required in the period 2020-2030; notes that the transition to a sustainable, circular and low-carbon economy may be speeded up by taxing fossil fuels;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that tangible progress on these key EU policies requires a thorough reform, based on the principles of subsidiarity, solidarity, transparency, sustainability and comprehensibility, with a view to a more effective EU budget based on genuine own resources, with a direct and transparent link to investments in projects with clear European added value for citizens and companies;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Supports the introduction of new own resources, which will reduce the EU budget dependence on GNI-based contributions from the Member States and will permit better dedication of EU financing to EU policies and priorities; is of the opinion that the share of new genuine own resources should increase to at least 50% of the revenue side of the EU budget;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that tangible progress on these key EU policies requires a thorough reform with a view to a more effective EU budget that is less dependent on resources transferred from Member States and is based on genuine own resources, with a direct and transparent link to investments in projects with clear European added value for citizens and companies;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises the need of creating new genuine own resources system that will contribute to revenue sufficiency and stability, simplicity, transparency, fairness between Member States, equality among citizens, cost-effectiveness and EU financial autonomy;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that a tangible
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Considers that the forthcoming negotiations of the next MFF, as well as Brexit, give an opportunity for the EU to reform its system of own resources; calls, therefore, on the Member States to undertake a real and in-depth reform of the system of own resources, and to make future EU financing more stable, sustainable and predictable, as well as more transparent and accountable to EU citizens;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that tangible progress on these key EU policies requires a thorough reform with a view to a more effective EU budget based on genuine own resources, with a direct and transparent link to investments in projects with clear European added value for citizens
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Calls for using the reform for introducing incentives and for encouraging the Member States to invest in the European project; considers, in this regard, that national contributions to the EU Budget should be excluded from the deficit calculations under the Stability and Growth Pact;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that tangible progress on these key EU policies requires a thorough reform with a view to a more effective EU budget based on
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Calls on the Member States to take into consideration the risks which the increase of own resources may entail to the system of collecting revenues, and thus requiring the necessary safeguards to be introduced in it;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the view presented in the final report of the High Level Group on Own Resources that the reform of the own resources system should be budget neutral; therefore the introduction of new own resources or other types of EU revenue should result in reductions in GNI-based contributions;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Draws attention to the need of strengthening the existing systems of control and of introducing new mechanisms for prevention of fraud and irregularities which may threaten the EU financial interests in the process of collecting new own resources; calls, in this regard, on the Commission to be prepared to propose relevant measures for protection of the EU financial interests when and if new own resources for the Union budget are introduced by Member States;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the use of own resources should be oriented to European public
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the use of own resources should be oriented to public EU goods that can benefit all Member States equally;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that own resources based on an electricity tax or motor fuel levy continue to encounter strong political opposition and, in the case of an electricity tax, would overlap with the scope of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS); stresses that the EU Emissions Trading System and this electricity tax cannot exist at the same time; considers, therefore, that these options are not the most suitable instruments of reform
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that own resources based on an electricity tax or motor fuel levy continue to encounter strong political opposition and, in the case of an electricity tax, would overlap with the scope of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS); considers, therefore, that t
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the EU budget is primarily an investment budget
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that in order to boost the urgently needed transition towards a sustainable, circular and low-carbon economy
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the use of own resources should be oriented to public EU goods that can benefit all Member States equally; notes t
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that own resources based on an electricity tax
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that the EU should consider doing less in domains where the Union is perceived as having limited added value, or as being unable to deliver on promises; stresses, however, that where ambitious European aims are set, sufficient funds should also be allocated, and that where new goals are set, new resources should be presented;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that own resources based on an electricity tax or motor fuel levy continue to encounter strong political opposition and, in the case of an electricity tax, would overlap with the scope of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS); considers, therefore, that these options are not the most suitable instruments of reform for the current system of own resources; considers it important that the electricity tax does not cause an excessive financial burden on individual households;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that own resources based on an electricity tax
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that own resources based on an electricity tax or motor fuel levy continue to encounter strong political opposition and, in the case of an electricity tax, would overlap with the scope of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS); considers, therefore, that these options are not
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Welcomes the conclusion of the High Level Group on Own Resources (HLGOR) on a motor fuel levy, which finds that it is a strong contender for an own resource given the significant volume of taxation it represents in all Member States, its relatively harmonised base that would facilitate its implementation and the stability of its revenues, as well as the fact that it would contribute to environmental protection and thus to a genuine European common good;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Believes that a reform of the EU own resources system should be based on a combination of new resources stemming from production, consumption and environmental policies, as recommended by the High-Level Group on Own Resources;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Notes that, according to the HLGOR, a partial transfer of revenue collected by or from Member States from the motor fuel levy to the EU level could provide approximately 30-40 billion euros, whilst it is estimated by another study that a full transfer of this levy to the EU level could yield more than 160 billion euros, enough to finance the entire EU budget;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Expresses its concern about the low share of the Union budget devoted to climate-related spending; maintains that the revenues obtained from own resources should be spent
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Believes that an EU harmonised levy on motor fuel based on the polluter pays principle would help internalise external costs, provide public health and environmental benefits by incentivising the switch to less polluting transport modes thereby reducing government spending on health and environmental interventions, correct the existing distortions in the single market due to ´tank tourism´ and, if ring fenced, support investment flows towards sustainable mobility;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for an own resources system with no financial impact on national budgets, citizens, or SMEs; points out that the introduction of a tax – on as international a basis as possible – on financial transactions by the most aggressive and expert investors could be a way not just to finance the EU budget, but also to combat financial speculation; calls also for a tax on CO2 emissions to be levied on multinationals;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that DG Environment accounts for the second largest volume of fines imposed for non-compliance with EU legislation, amounting to EUR 284 million for the period 2014-2017; calls for revenue stemming directly from EU legislation and its enforcement to be invested in common EU projects with tangible added value; recalls, however, that the revenue from fines does not constitute stable means of income to the Union budget;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on open debate for maintaining the level of payments for Cohesion policy and CAP in the next programming period taking into account the additionally and high value-added from those policies for the European stability, competitiveness and economic growth.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that DG Environment accounts for the second largest volume of fines imposed for non-compliance with EU legislation, amounting to EUR 284 million for the period 2014-2017; calls for revenue stemming directly from EU legislation and its enforcement to be invested in common EU projects with tangible added value, without prejudice to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the EU budget is primarily an investment budget with some redistributive functions between the Member States, and serves mainly to support common EU policies and objectives,
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that in order to boost the transition towards a sustainable, circular and low-carbon economy and to deliver on the commonly agreed Energy Union targets
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Deplores the disparities in the customs checks carried out within the EU and the large amounts involved in fraud affecting the own resource collection system; calls on the Commission to strengthen the common policy on customs checks by providing for genuine harmonisation with a view to improving the collection of traditional own resources;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that DG Environment accounts for the second largest volume of fines imposed for non-compliance with EU legislation, amounting to EUR 284 million for the period 2014-2017; calls for revenue stemming directly from EU legislation and its enforcement to be invested in
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on targeted capacity building in those Member States experiencing difficulties with centrally managed programs like CEF, Horizon 2020, EFSI.
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that DG Environment accounts for the second largest volume of fines imposed for non-compliance with EU legislation, amounting to EUR 284 million for the period 2014-2017; calls for revenue stemming directly from EU legislation and its enforcement to be invested in common, socially and environmentally sustainable, EU projects with tangible added value;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to submit
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that DG Environment accounts for the second largest volume of fines imposed for non-compliance with EU legislation, amounting to EUR 284 million for the period 2014-2017; calls for revenue stemming directly from EU legislation and its enforcement to be invested in common EU projects with tangible added value to the environment;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to submit a communication to Parliament explaining how it intends to reconcile long-term political objectives, such as the Europe 2020 Strategy, with the situation that will ensue after the 2020 multiannual financial framework (MFF), within the course of the next year; strongly believes that an EU agenda for the next decade should play a decisive role in the process of
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Takes the view that the conditions are present making it possible to boost ‘other revenue’ by increasing the contributions third countries need to pay to participate in EU programmes, and the taxes on the salaries of EU staff;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for a proportion of the ETS auctioning revenue, from Phase 4 (2021) onwards, to be directed towards concrete common EU projects, such as
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that long-term projects, such as Horizon 2020
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for a proportion of the ETS auctioning revenue, from Phase 4 (2021) onwards, to be directed towards a Just Transition Fund as it has been proposed by the European Parliament and concrete
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Believes that simpler and clearer rules will contribute to a swift allocation of resources and will increase efficiency and transparency, with fewer errors occurring as a result; asks the Commission to draw up an action plan along these lines; stresses that simpler and cleared rules should not lead to increased discretion and curbed scrutiny in the allocation of means;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for a proportion of the ETS auctioning revenue, from Phase 4 (2021) onwards, to be directed towards concrete common EU projects, such as cross-border energy infrastructure (to facilitate the integration of renewables, for example), energy storage and investments in breakthrough innovation in industry, with due regard for technology neutrality;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Draws attention to the increasing instances of transnational VAT fraud, also known as ‘carousel fraud’, and calls on the Commission to further strengthen measures to prevent and avert fraud of this kind; considers it essential for the VAT resource to be optimised at the practical level without imposing an additional burden on EU citizens and Member States;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for a proportion of the ETS auctioning revenue, from Phase 4 (2021) onwards, to be directed towards co
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Believes that simpler and clearer budgetary rules will make the need for more own resources obsolete;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Believes that an EU air ticket tax or flight levy based on the carbon intensity of the respective flight is a strong candidate for an own resource, as it would provide market signals indicating the most carbon-efficient competitor among airlines and aircraft manufacturers thereby incentivising the use of sustainable fuels and helping to reduce aviation´s environmental footprint; believes that given that neither fuel tax nor VAT are currently levied on air transport, a total potential tax revenue of approximately 40 billion euros in 2016, this would help restore fair competition in the transport sector and go some way towards curbing aviation´s growing emissions;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Points out that the policies which would benefit all EU citizens and provide more EAV are not attractive in terms of net balances; believes, therefore, that a new method of measuring the value of projects should be developed, including the social impact - positive and negative- of such projects, and streamlined reporting should be introduced;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that in order to boost the transition towards a sustainable, circular and low-carbon economy and meet the commonly agreed Energy Union targets, Member States’ revenues from the auctioning of emission allowances should in no way be reduced in the future;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the main goal of the EU budget should be to support accelerated growth and jobs in less developed regions to achieve an equivalent level of social and economic development within all Member States to which an increased use of own resources should significantly contribute;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that in order to boost the transition towards a sustainable, circular and low-carbon economy
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Points out that the
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses that some existing cross-border capacities are currently not being used to their full capacity, or indeed at all, because the energy markets in some Member States are shut off completely; suggests, therefore, that efforts should first go into making sure that full use is made of these existing capacities before new ones are created;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates that it is crucial to allocate own resources to projects that can generate the highest EAV rather than
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for an analysis of whether revenue from commonly agreed national road charging schemes, based on distance, journey time and transport emissions, can be used to fund EU projects promoting the development of low-emission mobility, including incentives for zero- and low- emission vehicles, low-emission alternative energy sources for transport, and sustainable multimodal transport, in particular high-speed railways and inland waterways; recognizes, however, the possible problems of such approach in remote and rural areas where distances are long and railways and public transport are not available;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for an analysis of whether revenue from commonly agreed national road charging schemes, based on distance, journey time and transport emissions, can be used to fund EU projects promoting the development of walking, cycling, low- emission mobility, including incentives for zero- and low-
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Considers that the possibility to collect a CO2 levy through carbon pricing using either taxation or market-based instruments should be examined by the Commission as a way to strengthen the EU budget; believes that such an instrument could provide high EAV, as the levy could function as an incentive to change consumer and producer behaviour in favour of a less carbon- intensive future; considers, however, that any tax-based EU solution should be as neutral as possible for the total tax ratio of a given Member State; points out that such a levy would also have to take into account the current emission trading schemes to avoid overlapping and conflicting means and objectives;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for an analysis of whether
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Stresses that the current system of own resources suffers from its excessive complexity; notes that current system places unequal emphasis on the net balances between Member States; believes that a reform based on clear and commonly agreed principles should be prepared by the Commission and the Member States to resolve this problem effectively;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for an analysis to be made of the possibility of using direct taxation of imported goods produced in third countries with high emissions to finance EU environmental protection projects that create the highest European added value;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Is also concerned about the zero sum game policy that some EU countries are currently applying and that budgetary negotiations are not driven by the European added value principle, but by the national “fair return” logic and budgetary balances; insist, therefore, on abolition of all correction mechanisms and rebates;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Believes that possible additional revenue generated from enhanced emission-based contributions by intra-EU aviation should be used to step up research and investment in EU low-carbon aircraft and for further improvements to the efficient use of airspace, in partnership with the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO);
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Encourages the Commission and the Member States to consider also other tax-based resources available to the EU that could provide for more EAV in certain risk-related policy fields, while at the same time strengthening the EU budget;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Calls on the Commission to consider recommendations on new resources as presented by the High Level Group on Own Resources in its report on the future financing of the EU;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Believes that revenue from the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) for third- country nationals should be used to invest in research and development in the field of clean and low-emission air transport and in further improvements to the efficient use of airspace
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 c (new) 11c. Encourages the Commission to examine and introduce concrete proposals for new resources in order to reduce GNI- based and VAT-based resources to the EU budget; considers that the current VAT- based of own resources should be replaced by a proper transfer of a share of VAT levied at national level; believes that new resources could come also from European policies such as environment, energy, climate or transport policies;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Believes that revenue from the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) for third- country nationals should be used to invest in research and development
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 d (new) 11d. Considers that if any new resource will be adopted, it should follow three basic criteria: simplicity equity and democratic control; recalls that the principles mentioned by High-Level group on Own Resources should to be taken into account when considering new sources; points out that new system should be understandable and transparent for European tax-payers;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Believes that possible future emission-based shipping contributions should be used to be re-invested in the European shipping sector through research and development funding for cleaner technology and sustainable ships;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the main goal of the EU budget should be to support sustainable growth, employment, economic recovery, migration, and security, as well as accelerated growth in less developed regions to achieve an equivalent level of development within all Member States;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 e (new) 11e. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to omit all rebate mechanisms and corrections, which would provide more simple, democratic and transparent structure;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 f (new) 11f. Stresses the importance of customs inspections and the related collection of customs duties; draws attention to the revenue losses due to the VAT gap and cross border VAT frauds; underlines that smuggling of heavily taxed goods means serious losses of revenue to the budget of the EU and the Member States;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls for an exploration of the possible introduction of an own resource reflecting the carbon content of consumer goods sold in the single market, such as a carbon-added tax (CAT), that would gradually replace a proportion of the current VAT-based own resource and of a carbon adjustment mechanism imposed at the EU’s borders on all goods entering the Single Market to compensate for the estimated carbon cost of their production compared to EU production.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 g (new) 11g. Recalls the importance of facilitating and accelerating information exchange with authorities such OLAF and Europol in order to combat customs frauds and fight cross-border tax crime;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls for an exploration of the possible introduction of an own resource reflecting the carbon content of consumer goods sold in the single market,
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls for
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas one of the main goals of the EU budget should be to support accelerated growth in less developed regions to achieve an equivalent level of development within all Member States;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the main goal of the EU budget should be to support
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that own resources based on GNI, while designed to be raised only when other own resources are insufficient to cover costs, have, over time, grown out of all proportion and now constitute some 70% of the EU’s revenue; therefore considers it necessary and urgent to remedy this anomaly by reducing EU expenditure appropriately;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that own resources should focus on projects that can generate the highest European added value (EAV); emphasises that expenditure should be focused on areas for which funding at European level is indispensable, or where funding at national level would be insufficient to achieve the European goal, and that if programmes have to date not been shown to provide any added value, they should be thoroughly reviewed in order to be discontinued;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that Article 2 of the Paris Agreement underlines the need to make ´finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development´ and that appropriate reforms to the EU budget are essential in order to reach net-zero emissions by mid-century;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that own resources should focus on projects that can generate the highest European added value (EAV), while recognizing that some such areas, as for example the social impact, do not lend themselves to easily defined measurement; emphasises that expenditure should be focused on areas for which funding at European level is indispensable, or where funding at national level would be insufficient to achieve the European goal;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Notes that, while the EU is required to balance its budget, expenditure commitments routinely exceed payments, thus creating a de facto EU public debt; calls for priority to be given to eliminating arrears and for any new expenditure commitment to be limited to the EU’s exclusive competences and, in the case of concurrent competences, to policies with an irrefutable European added value, without prejudice to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality;
source: 613.261
2017/11/29
INTA
101 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the EU
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the report of the High Level Group on Own Resources (HLGOR) put forward new proposals, including reforming the VAT own resource and the EU emissions trading system, a CO2 levy, transport taxation, electricity taxation and revenues deriving from the digital single market;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the Customs Union is a basic pillar of the EU and essential in negotiating trade agreements as one of the largest trading blocs in the world; Points out that the EU’s international trade is directly related to the traditional own resources of the EU, which consist mainly of customs duties on imports from outside the EU and sugar levies and in 2015 represented 12.8 % of the total revenue of the EU;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the report of the High Level Group on Own Resources (HLGOR) put forward new proposals, including reforming the VAT own resource and the EU emissions trading system, a CO2 levy, transport taxation, electricity taxation and revenues deriving from the digital single market; emphasises that the introduction of new ORs could lead to greater
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the EU’s international trade is directly related to the traditional own resources of the EU, which also consist
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the report of the High Level Group on Own Resources (HLGOR) put forward new proposals, including reforming the VAT
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Suggests to fix the percentage of customs revenues retained by Member States for collection costs again at the original ten percent, in order to compensate for the diminishment of this traditional own resource after significant tariff reductions agreed at the WTO and in major bilateral EU trade agreements.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the report of the High Level Group on Own Resources (HLGOR) put forward new proposals, including reforming the VAT own resource and the EU emissions trading system, a CO2 levy, transport taxation, electricity taxation and revenues deriving from the digital single market; emphasises that the introduction of new ORs could lead to greater policy coherence between the revenue and expenditure sides of the budget as well as a reduction in the financial contribution by Member States;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the pressing need to analyse the impact on the traditional own resources of the conclusion of (free) trade agreements and to allocate alternative sources of income in order to compensate for a possible decrease in those resources; points out that steps must be taken to stop powers being transferred, even temporarily, to the Commission, given that those powers are often exercised without proper and continuous scrutiny by Parliament and generate expenditure against the budget;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the report of the
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the need to analyse the impact on the traditional own resources as a result of the conclusion of (free) trade agreements
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that at present, the majority of the EU’s revenue still comes from national contributions – GNI (69.1 %) and VAT (12.4 %) – which are not perceived as genuine own resources;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the need to analyse the impact on the traditional own resources of the conclusion of (free) trade agreements and to allocate alternative sources of income in order to compensate for a possible decrease in those resources and their probable instability;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that funding for the CAP, an historic policy of the European Union, must first and foremost be secured from existing resources, at least at its current level;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the need to analyse the impact on the traditional own resources of the conclusion of (free) trade agreements and to allocate
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that the EU needs a stable form of own resources and notes that punitive duties, for example, cannot therefore be foreseen as income and are not, for the same reason, suitable as predictable sources of income;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Takes note of the announcement of Commissioner Malmstrom that the Commission aims to conclude before the end of 2017 negotiations for free trade agreements of the European Union and its Member States with Japan, with MERCOSUR, with Mexico, and with Chile, and that the Commission wants to propose in 2018 ratification of the FTAs with Singapore, and with Vietnam; Points out that this would mean a dramatic reduction of own resources income for the Union’s budget in 2018 and the coming years;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that the reform of budgetary revenue is neither an end in itself nor a panacea to cure all budgetary ills; it should be seen as a building block in the ongoing effort to restore trust and legitimacy to EU action by making the EU’s own resources system simpler, more transparent and equitable, and democratically accountable;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Points out that revenue other than own resources can also finance the budget and should be explored; stresses that this may entail auctioning proceeds or other revenue stemming from EU policies such as border control, the digital single market, the protection of the environment or energy efficiency;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. C
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for an exploration of the possibilities of creating sustainability- and emission- based customs duties and levies on trade in goods and services, and for the incorporation of such measures into the EU’s international trade policies and agreements
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Invites all parties to draw the
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for an exploration of the possibilities of creating sustainability- and emission- based customs duties and levies on trade in goods and services, and for the incorporation of such measures into the EU’s international trade policies and
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Invites all parties to draw the
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for an exploration of the possibilities of creating sustainability- and emission- based customs duties and levies on trade in goods and services, and for the incorporation of such measures into the EU’s international trade policies and agreements as constituting a source for own resources; stresses in this connection that the international competitiveness of the EU must not be jeopardised by such measures;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Invites all parties to draw the appropriate conclusions from the HLGOR’s report and to analyse the feasibility of the recommendations to help make the Union budget more transparent, stable, simple, autonomous, fair and predictable; points out, in this regard, that the current system of own resources is characterised by a considerable degree of complexity, involving a lack of transparency which needs to be resolved through a joint effort by EU institutions and Member States;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for an exploration of the possibilities of creating sustainability- and emission- based customs duties and levies on trade in goods and services
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Invites all parties to draw the
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Invites all parties to draw the appropriate conclusions from the HLGOR’s report and to analyse the feasibility of the recommendations to help make the Union budget more stable, simple,
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Highlights the importance of the principle of subsidiarity in any change to the composition of own resources; emphasizes that complementarity between the national and European levels enables the appropriate funding of the EU budget, supports the overall EU policy objectives and allows a targeted use of the budget;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for a
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that these new forms of ORs are postponing the urgency to economise and define the EU's priorities;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to closely monitor the development of international financial flows to and from the European Union following the implementation of the liberalization of financial services and capital flows in the Union’s trade agreements, and to report the result to the European Parliament and Council in 2018;encourages the Commission to take another effort to tax global capital streams in order to develop new own resources for the Union’s budget, and to present the respective proposal in 2018;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls its previous calls for a more effective
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls its previous calls for a more effective EU customs system,
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for own resources reforms that establish a predictable and stable basis for the EU budget which is independent, transparent and balanced and will address the growing pressure on the EU budget, simplify the complex and opaque rebate arrangements,
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for an in-depth reform of the existing own-resources system,
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls its previous calls for a more modern, effective and efficient EU customs system, with the optimisation of the current EU arrangements so that tax evasion and all forms of unfair competition can be addressed and duties and levies can be effectively collected for the EU’s own resources;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that these new types of ORs are essential to finance more recent Union priorities such as migration, internal security and defence and to offset the loss in revenue of EUR 9 to 12 billion a year which could result from Brexit; notes also that new ORs are needed to
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Re
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for own resources that can only be generated by collective European action and have a clear added value for the Union by improving the functioning of the internal market and therefore expects the introduction of a financial transaction tax and the European harmonisation of corporate income taxes and the partial use thereof as new own resources;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that these new types of ORs are essential to finance
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for the introduction of a Union-wide financial transaction tax as a measure to generate own financial recourses while curbing undesirable speculation and achieve more fair and equitable tax collection;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that these new types of ORs are essential to finance more recent Union priorities such as migration, the Paris Climate Agreement and internal security and
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that these new types of ORs are essential to finance more recent Union priorities such as migration, internal security and defence and to offset the loss in revenue of EUR 9 to 12 billion a year which could result from Brexit; notes also that, in order to safeguard the European added value of the EU budget, new ORs are needed to avoid the potential spending cuts to the common agricultural policy (CAP) presented in the Commission’s ‘Reflection Paper on the Future of EU Finances’;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that trade defence instruments (TDIs) are a source for EU own resources
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that these new types of ORs are essential to finance more recent Union priorities such as migration
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that trade defence instruments (TDIs) are a source for EU own resources, but that owing to their nature they cannot be a predictable and stable basis for a consistent contribution to the EU´s own resources; stresses that TDIs should not primarily be used as a EU own resources source, as they should only be established appropriately and proportionally, in line with applicable rules.
Amendment 36 #
4. Points out that these new types of ORs are essential to finance more recent Union priorities such as migration, internal security and defence while creating synergies and minimizing the fiscal burden, and to offset the loss in revenue of EUR 9 to 12 billion a year which could result from Brexit; notes also that new ORs are needed to avoid the potential spending cuts to the common agricultural policy (CAP) presented in the Commission’s ‘Reflection Paper on the Future of EU Finances’;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that trade defence instruments (TDIs) are a source for EU own resources, but that owing to their nature they cannot and must not be a stable basis for a consistent contribution; stresses that TDIs should not primarily be used as a EU own resources source, as they should only be established appropriately and proportionally, in line with applicable rules.
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that the potential spending cuts to the Common Agricultural Policy presented in the Commission’s ‘Reflection Paper on the Future of EU Finances’, are not desirable and should not be retained;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers it inappropriate for Member States to co-finance direct payments, as this could worsen the existing inequality in direct payments between Member States;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for an in-depth reform of the own-resources system without increasing the fiscal burden for European tax payers, including new own resources (ORs) that could reduce the share of GNI-based contributions (which accounted for 65.4 % of the Union’s revenue in 2016) and a phase-out of all forms of rebate; stresses that the current system includes complex and opaque correction mechanisms and contributes to the lack of sufficient payment appropriations each year;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Notes with concern the references to financial instruments in the Reflection Paper on the Future of EU Finances, and recalls that financial instruments are only appropriate for revenue-generating projects; stresses that financial instruments can play a complementary role but should not be used to replace grants; stresses that financial instruments should be bound by the same objectives and targets as the EU budget;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Cautions against the generalised use of such instruments, particularly in rural development, where investment is required to provide a broad range of public goods which do not necessarily generate revenue;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Stresses that financial instruments such as risk management tools can lead to leakage of public money to financial intermediaries, and are of varying efficiency in ensuring stable farm incomes, amongst other CAP objectives;
Amendment 43 #
5. Stresses that agricultural duties are both a policy instrument and a financing tool for the CAP; notes that the HLGOR’s report recommends that they be retained in future since they are a simple, efficient and genuine own resource for the Union; notes that the share of traditional own resources has steadily decreased over the years, as decreases in average tariffs have not been sufficiently compensated by increases in trade volumes;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that agricultural duties are both a policy instrument and a financing tool for the CAP and that free trade agreements will lead to the decrease of revenues from duties; notes that the HLGOR’s report recommends that they be retained in future since they are a simple, efficient and genuine own resource for the Union;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that agricultural duties are both a policy instrument and a financing tool for the CAP; notes that the HLGOR’s report recommends that they be retained within the CAP budget in future since they are a simple, efficient and genuine own resource for the Union;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that there is both the need to maintain the current level of CAP financing as well as the need to prevent continuous price fluctuations; considers it essential that Member State GNI contributions should be increased in response to the CAP budget cuts;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that free trade agreements have often resulted in lowered agricultural duties and therefore contribute to reduced revenue from traditional own resources;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance of linking agricultural duties with contributions to mutual funds to cover damage sustained by farmers following natural phenomena;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for own resources reforms that establish a predictable and stable basis for the EU budget which is independent, transparent and balanced and will address the growing and existing pressure on the EU budget, simplify the current complex and opaque rebate arrangements, and aim to lower the contribution of the Member States (and not increase the tax burden on EU citizens) and decrease the EU’s dependency on the national contributions based on VAT and GNI;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for a
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance of linking agricultural duties with contributions to mutual funds to cover damage sustained by farmers following natural phenomena;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Is opposed to any attempt to use Member States’ contributions to co- finance the CAP;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Points out that a reformed VAT- own resource (replacing the existing one), a corporate income tax-based own resource, a financial transaction tax or other financial activities’ tax would have the advantage of improving the functioning of the Single Market;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the CAP’s added value in strengthening the Union’s long-term food security through more stable farm incomes and rural development measures to prevent rural depopulation; emphasi
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the CAP’s added value in strengthening the Union’s long-term food security and guarantees of food price stability through more stable farm incomes and rural development measures to prevent rural depopulation; emphasises the potential of the CAP to provide more environmental public goods and stresses the need to safeguard the contribution of agricultural duties to EU finances.
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the CAP’s added value in strengthening the Union’s long-term food security through more stable farm incomes and sustainable rural development measures t
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the CAP’s added value in strengthening the Union’s long-term food and environmental security through more stable farm incomes and rural development measures to prevent rural depopulation; emphasises the potential of the CAP to provide more environmental public goods and stresses the need to safeguard the contribution of agricultural duties to EU finances.
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the CAP’s added value in strengthening the Union’s long-term food security through more stable farm incomes and rural development measures to prevent rural depopulation and to harness the potential of rural areas; emphasises the potential of the CAP to provide more environmental public goods and stresses the need to safeguard the contribution of agricultural duties to EU finances.
Amendment 59 #
6a. Also points out that state measures to regulate supply could save on the vast volume of resources currently used to compensate farmers for market instability.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls for own resources reforms that establish a predictable and stable basis for the EU budget which is independent, transparent and balanced and will address the growing pressure on the EU budget,
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that an indirect boost to income is also possible through simplification of, and reducing red tape in, the common agricultural policy;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls for the funding which was allocated via the financial discipline mechanism in the agricultural sector but was not used to be made available in its entirety in the coming budgetary year as direct payments;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the CAP's added value in supporting the agricultural sector, but acknowledges the need for a reform of the CAP to stimulate innovation, competitiveness and sustainability; Stresses that the CAP should not be seen as an instrument to support social policy as social policy is national competence;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses the need to make better use of existing financial instruments such as the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), instead of generating new resources;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the initiatives for a comprehensive reform of the EU own recourses, to increase the members state’s and citizens support for a genuine credible and independent EU budget, fostering the EU’s sustainable economy and generating EU added value;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to define clear and strict priorities as less money will be available as a result of Brexit; calls on the Commission to economise as well: an increase of funding for one policy area, should logically lead to a decrease of funding for another;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Expects that the current VAT- based own resources are replaced by a proper transfer of a share of VAT levied at national level;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls for a reform of the system of own resources in such a way that the own resources share of the EU budget is increased to at least 50 percent;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 source: 615.227
2017/12/11
ECON
95 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Whereas the European Union is a global actor and its action towards the protection, the empowerment and the defence of its citizens needs to be underpinned by a clear, solid and transparent system of own resources;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the work of the High Level Group on Own Resources, and in particular the measures aimed at re
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that the reform of the system of own resources should be guided by the principles of simplicity, stability, flexibility, transparency, fairness, democracy and EU added value, with the aim of allowing citizens to better understand how the EU budget is financed;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that preference should be given to genuine European own resources
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that preference should be given to genuine
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) -1a. Whereas the financing of the European budget broadly relies on the Gross National Income-based contributions and this trend has increased over the last twenty-five years;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that preference should be given to genuine European own resources, such as a tax based on the common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) and a contribution based on a definitive VAT system, thereby delivering a fairer system for European citizens with respect to the EU budget; considers it necessary to reduce considerably the proportion of management costs included in taxes and tariffs paid to national customs agencies;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that preference should be given to genuine, autonomous, transparent and fair European own resources, such as a tax based on the common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) and a contribution based on a
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that preference should be given to genuine European own resources, such as a tax based on the common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) and a contribution based on a definitive VAT system, especially with regard to revenue from cross-border transactions, thereby delivering a fairer system for European citizens with respect to the EU budget;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that preference should be given to genuine European own resources, with a clear value-added component at the EU level, such as a tax based on the common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB)
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that preference should be given to genuine European own resources, such as a tax based on the common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) and a contribution based on a definitive VAT system, thereby delivering a fairer system for European citizens with respect to the EU budget and fighting tax evasion and tax avoidance;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that preference should be given to genuine European own resources, such as a
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the Commission intention to put forward a proposal on the creation of a dedicated euro area budget line within the EU budget providing for four functions: structural reform assistance, a stabilisation function, a backstop for the Banking Union, and a convergence instrument to give pre- accession assistance to Member States on their way to euro membership; Believes that a cohesion instrument is also needed.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses equally the importance of green taxation as particularly suitable mechanisms to contribute to European own resources; highlights the relevance of certain Union policies such as on energy (energy tax), on environment and climate (Union carbon tax, border carbon adjustments) and on transport (road fuel and air ticket taxes) to promote future Union own resources;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that a genuine own resource based on CCCTB meets the principles of fairness and democracy, since it restores our capacity to levy tax on multinational undertakings which are among the biggest beneficiaries of the internal market
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that, despite the need for sufficient financial resources for the EU, not raising the tax burden on citizens is important
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. A severe lack in investments has been one of the root causes of the Union’s economic troubles, yet the Union’s budget is still insufficiently geared towards future-oriented investments. Creating additional Union budget-related resources is possible according to the existing flexibilities of the Treaty. The CCCTB should therefore aim at having a part of the EU fiscal revenues financed from the common consolidated corporate tax base.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. The Commission should make the CCCTB-base down resource available to the EU budget, by way of introducing a common rate within the regulation. This should be a rate of 5% of the common consolidated corporate tax base, which should flow into the European budget as a new genuine own resource, in order to proportionally reduce Member State contributions to it.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Advocates the establishment of a budgetary capacity for the Eurozone that would perform functions of macroeconomic stabilisation and bring about economic and social convergence; considers, moreover, that this capacity should be financed through own resources specific to the euro area, such as a tax on financial transactions, a bank levy and a share of the ECB’s profits; points out that, ECB profits may be transferred through the ordinary legislative procedure under Article 33.1(a) of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Advocates the establishment of a budgetary capacity for the Eurozone with a dedicate budget line in the EU budget that would perform functions of macroeconomic stabilisation
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Advocates the establishment of a budgetary capacity for the Eurozone that would perform functions of macroeconomic stabilisation and bring about economic and social convergence; considers, moreover, that this capacity should be financed through own resources specific to the euro area, such as a tax on financial transactions, a bank levy and a share of the ECB’s profits; underlines that such a system would also allow a better and more concrete coordination of the national economic policies;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Advocates the establishment of a
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Advocates the establishment of a budgetary capacity for the Eurozone that would perform functions of macroeconomic stabilisation and bring about economic and social convergence; considers, moreover, that this capacity should be financed through own resources specific to the euro area, such as a tax on financial transactions
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Advocates the establishment of a budgetary capacity for the Eurozone that would
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Advocates the establishment of a budgetary capacity for the Eurozone that would perform functions of macroeconomic stabilisation and bring about economic and social convergence; considers, moreover, that this capacity should be partly financed through own resources specific to the euro area, such as a tax on financial transactions, a bank levy and a share of the ECB’s profits;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the EU should be able to issue zero-risk debt assets in order to offset the volatility in own resources’ revenues; points out that such a move would be fully compatible with the wording of Article 310 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which means that no reform is necessary;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the EU should be able to issue zero-risk debt assets in order to offset the volatility in own resources’ revenues and to boost the overall economic and financial stability;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the EU should be able to issue
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the EU should
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the EU should not be able to issue
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the EU should be able to issue
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that all currently granted exceptions in form of rebates or corrective mechanisms should be abolished;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the work of the High Level Group on Own Resources, and in particular the measures aimed at reducing the share of the GNI-based contribution, which
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses, with a view to achieving common EU and Eurozone economic governance objectives, the need for adequate financial support, which should be financed by genuine own resources in order to ensure democratic legitimacy; in order to increase public support for European own resources, they should have a clear value-added component at the EU level;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses, with a view to achieving common EU and Eurozone economic governance objectives, the need
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses, with a view to achieving common
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses, with a view to achieving common EU
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses, with a view to achieving common EU and Eurozone economic governance objectives, the
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the work of the High Level Group on Own Resources, and in particular the measures aimed at reducing the share of the GNI-based contribution, which is residual in nature; argues that this
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Supports the
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Supports the creation of a dedicated budget line to support the adoption of the euro by Member States not yet part of the euro area
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Supports the creation of a dedicated euro area budget line within the EU budget to support the adoption of the euro by Member States not yet part of the euro area,
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Supports the creation of a dedicated budget line to support the adoption of the euro by Member States not yet part of the euro area, but calls for it to be made separate from the Eurozone’s budgetary capacity; considers that the budgetary capacity
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for the creation of a budget line to fund support programmes for the Member States seeking to negotiate a Euro exit on the grounds that participation in it has become unsustainable and unbearable; considers that these programmes should provide for adequate compensation for the social and economic damage caused by joining the single currency;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the work of the High Level Group on Own Resources, and in particular the measures aimed at reducing the share of the GNI-based contribution, which is residual in nature; argues that this reduction should be at least proportionally compensated for by the use of genuine own resources;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Supports, on the condition that the democratic accountability of the EU’s economic governance is increased, the proposal to create the post, within the Commission, of European Finance Minister, who would be tasked with managing the budgetary capacity and to ensur
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Supports the proposal to create the post, within the Commission, of a so called "European Finance Minister", who would be tasked with managing the budgetary capacity and ensuring full democratic accountability of the EU’s economic governance, in particular towards the European Parliament and, thus, European citizens; believes that, in order to carry out his duties, the "Finance Minister" should also chair Eurogroup meetings and represent the EU in international fora;
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. S
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Supports the proposal to create the
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Supports the proposal to create the post,
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Supports the proposal to create the post, within the Commission, of European Finance Minister, who would be tasked with
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Supports the proposal to create the post, within the Commission, of European Finance Minister, who would be tasked with managing the budgetary and fiscal capacity and ensuring full democratic accountability of the EU’s economic governance;
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the work of the High Level Group on Own Resources, and in particular the measures aimed at
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Takes note of the Commission's "EMU package" of December 6th, 2017, consisting of three Communications and four legal proposals; considers that these don't yet achieve their stated purpose of deepening the Eurozone, but welcomes the debate on the issue; regrets that the proposal of the Commission on a "European Monetary Fund" does not include a greater role for the European Parliament;
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recommends that proceeds from fines generated by rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union are considered as additional own resource revenue in the next MFF cycle, bringing extra revenue in the Union budget, with no corresponding adjustment of the GNI contributions by Member States;
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Supports the transformation of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) into a European Monetary fund based on EU law;
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Considers that the Council decision on own resources should be taken in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, with full involvement of the European Parliament.
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Considers that the
source: 615.397
2018/01/31
BUDG
171 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the share of the GNI-based resource has significantly increased over the years, and today represents the largest source of revenue of the EU budget; whereas the GNI-based contribution currently accounts for some 69 % of the EU budget, the VAT resource for around 12 %, the traditional own resources (customs duties, agricultural duties and sugar and isoglucose levies) for around 13 % and the remaining percentage is covered by other revenue, including taxes paid by EU staff or fines paid by companies in breach of competition laws; whereas the Free-Trade Agreements and the increase collection rate decided in 2000 have reduced the revenues stemming from the collection of customs duties;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Suggests that, instead of raising its revenues, the European Union should proceed to rationalising its excessive administrative expenses, to cutting all its wastes such as the EEAS and to evaluating if some funds could be managed more efficiently at national level, in order to guarantee full respect for the subsidiarity principle;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Takes notes of the Commission’s proposals for a CCCTB, while recalling its request that this consolidated base be extended to a
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Takes notes of the Commission’s proposals for a CCCTB, while recalling its request that this consolidated base be extended to a
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Agrees with the HLGOR’s assessment of the CCCTB as a basis for a new own resource, meeting all the criteria set by the Group; underlines that the CCCTB is also a key element in the development of the single market, which is also a European public good, as it prevents both inappropriate tax competition between Member States and fiscal optimisation damaging to the level playing field;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Agrees with the HLGOR’s assessment of the CCCTB as a basis for a new own resource, meeting all the criteria set by the Group; underlines that the CCCTB is also a key element in the development of the single market, which
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 a (new) 38a. Calls for the development of a European tax on corporate tax that harmonises both the tax base at European level, such as the establishment of an effective minimum rate at European level, and tax declarations based on country-by- country reporting, meaning that tax is paid in the place where companies actually conduct their business;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 a (new) 38 a. Considers that, drawing from the conclusions of the review of the CCCTB Directive, the Commission shall propose the terms and conditions to allocate a part of the tax revenues generated from the common consolidated corporate tax base to the budget of the European Union;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Presents this report in order to express its position on the main elements of the reform of the EU’s system of own resources, including the composition of a basket of new own resources, as well as the elements of the current system that should remain in place;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Calls therefore for the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget, to be calculated on a quota based on the volume of transnational activities on the basis of Member States’ revenue from tax levied on companies subject to the CCCTB;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39.
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39 a. Is of the opinion that income stemming for the European Central Bank profits (ECB revenue made from issuing currency) and thus having a direct link to the EU monetary union, shall build a new own resource instead of being paid out to national treasuries;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 12 b. Objective: Reduce financial speculation and
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 13 Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39a. Maintains that the only effective way of achieving equity and tax justice in the EU is by implementing a genuine policy to combat tax avoidance, and taking action to that end;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Recalls that the report of the High Level Group on Own Resources (HLGOR) focuses on what can be reformed under the current institutional setup, taking into account that fiscal competences remain at the national level, and within the overall constraint of budget neutrality so that the reforms of own resources envisaged do not create additional tax burdens on EU citizens; urges the Commission therefore not to increase the overall fiscal burden for the EU taxpayer through its proposals to revise the Own Resources Decision;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41. Considers, however, that such a tax, chargeable at the moment the transaction occurs, must be
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 a (new) 41 a. Urges the other MS to join urgently the a abovementioned group;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42. Shares the HLGOR’s assessment endorsing the FTT as
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Notes the conclusions of the informal Council of finance ministers of 16 September 2017 calling for the development of new digital taxation rules, in response to the Four Finance Ministers’ letter requesting the Commission to examine ‘effective solutions based on the concept of establishing a so-called equalisation tax’ on the turnover generated in the EU by digital companies; emphasises, however, that in its communication of 21 September 2017 entitled ‘A Fair and Efficient Tax System in the European Union for the Digital Single Market’, the Commission reiterated that the CCCTB was an appropriate context within which to review the rules governing the modern and stable taxation of digital companies;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Notes the conclusions of the informal Council of finance ministers of 16 September 2017 calling for the development of new digital taxation rules, in response to the Four Finance Ministers’ letter requesting the Commission to
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that Article 310 TFEU stipulates that ‘the revenue and expenditure shown in the budget shall be in balance’; notes, accordingly, that the revenue should cover the totality of expenditure, as adopted every year by the budgetary authority;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Agrees that the digital economy should have a modern and stable fiscal framework, in order to stimulate innovation, tackle market fragmentation and unfair competition, and enable all players to take advantage of the new equitable and balanced conditions; insists that digital platforms and companies should pay their fair share of taxes, where they generate their profits; points out, moreover, that it is essential to ensure tax
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Agrees that the digital economy should have a modern and stable fiscal framework, in order to stimulate innovation, tackle market fragmentation and enable all players to take advantage of the new equitable and balanced conditions while making sure digital companies pay their due share of taxes; points out, moreover, that it is essential to ensure tax security for business investment and to prevent the emergence of new tax loopholes within the single market;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Considers it crucial that tax measures be taken for the digital market in order to limit tax evasion and
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Calls, in principle, for the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget to be levied on transactions in the digital economy;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47.
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Calls
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Calls, in principle, for the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget to be levied on speculative financial transactions in the digital economy; considers, however, that in view of the important ongoing negotiations at both EU and OECD level, it is too early to decide on the exact arrangements for the establishment of such a resource;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 16 Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 16 Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Confirms that the fight against climate change
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Reiterates its conviction that only common energy or environmental taxes at EU level can ensure fair competition among businesses and the proper functioning of the single market; in this respect points out that two options can be considered in parallel and must be linked to the border adjustment mechanism so as not to put European manufacturers at a disadvantage: a carbon tax based on emissions and a carbon tax based on the carbon content of products;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Reiterates its conviction that only common energy or environmental taxes at EU level can ensure fair competition among businesses and the proper functioning of the single market;; furthermore, believes that environmental taxes at EU level can be a en engine towards a more progressive and sustainable development model;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Reiterates its conviction that only common energy or environmental taxes at EU level can ensure fair competition among businesses and the proper functioning of the single market; calls on the Commission to establish a tax aimed at the most polluting industries and sectors of the economy;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 a (new) 50 a. calls for a significant proportion of ETS auctioning revenues from Phase4 (2021) onwards to be considered as a new EU own resource; recalls that this option has been discussed in the HLGOR
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Calls for the introduction of a carbon border adjustment tax in the form of import fees levied on goods manufactured in countries without domestic emission pricing systems of their own and the establishment of a new own resource based on a tax on CO2 emissions for multinationals;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Calls for
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Calls for the introduction of a
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 a (new) 51a. Calls for the introduction of an EU tax on plastic and single-use items to encourage, in line with the recent EU strategy, the abandonment of that material in favour of sustainable alternatives;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Underlines that a carbon border adjustment
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that the Treaty of Lisbon introduced new provisions regarding the implementing legislation on own resources, providing for the possibility of the Council adopting a regulation by qualified majority after obtaining the consent of Parliament; regrets, however, that several implementing provisions, especially those relating to the calculation of the GNI resources, still remain in the ORD; therefore calls for a smoother adoption procedure of the ORD, which shall be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure, implying qualified majority voting within Council and co-decision with Parliament; recalls that according to Article 48(7), TEU the European Council may adopt a decision allowing for acts not falling under the ordinary legislative procedure to still be processed under such procedure, which remains far more democratic and open; calls on the European Council to trigger such a mechanism without any delay;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Underlines that a carbon border adjustment tax, as a new own resource for the EU budget, should also have the effect of ensuring a level playing field in international trade and reducing the offshoring of production, while internalising the costs of climate change into the prices of imported goods; emphasises, however, that such a tax must not penalise ordinary consumers;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Underlines that
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 a (new) 53 a. Believes that in the absence of harmonised international measures for kerosene taxation, a levy based on the carbon intensity of flights should be considered, which revenues should be considered as EU own resources;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 a (new) 53 a. Asks the Commission to analyse thoroughly any further possible own resources, such as the introduction of a plastic levy at the EU level without endangering the fiscal sovereignty of Member States;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 a (new) 53 a. Considers that a share of the EU Emission Trading System proceeds from Phase 4 (2021) onwards should contribute to sustainable and low-carbon EU projects;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 b (new) 53 b. Considers that additional emission-based contributions from other sectors, such as aviation and shipping, should contribute to EU innovation in order to promote EU leadership in low- carbon technologies in those sectors;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 c (new) 53 c. Underlines that a new own resource based on an electricity tax would overlap with the scope of the EU Emission Trading System and is therefore not the most suitable new own resource;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 d (new) 53 d. Calls for an analysis of whether a share of proceeds from commonly agreed time-, distance- and emissions-based road user charging schemes can contribute to cross-border infrastructure and low- emission mobility EU projects;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recalls that Member States are responsible for their fiscal policies, and underlines that the power to levy taxes lies at the heart of Member States’ sovereignty; Insists on the fact that the need to reform the own resources does not represent any transfer of sovereignty concerning the power to levy taxes but rather to respect and implement the spirit and the letter of the treaties which have been signed and ratified by the Member states;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 54.
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 a (new) 54 a. Stresses the importance of green taxation as particularly suitable mechanisms to contribute to European own resources; calls on the European Commission to further integrate the proposals for additional ecological own resources, as outlined in the HLGOR Report and by the Commissioner for the European budget, that are in line with certain Union policies such as on energy (energy tax), on environment and climate (plastic tax and ETS) and on transport (road fuel and air ticket taxes) to promote additional future Union own resources;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 a (new) 54a. Points out that agricultural duties are both a policy instrument and a financing tool for the CAP and that the HLGOR report recommends that they be retained in future, since they are a simple, effective and genuine own resource for the Union;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 a (new) 54 a. Underlines that the introduction of environmental related taxes or levies should not affect Member States' right to determine the conditions for exploiting their energy resources, their choice between different energy sources and the general structure of their energy supply;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 17 a (new) Takes the view that an additional source of revenue should be based on the establishment of a European tax on assets and wealth, the primary aim of which would be to have a register of actual owners, along the lines of a property register at European level; points out that such a tax could initially be levied at a minimum rate in order to achieve this first objective;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 57. Regrets that the potential of such other revenue has been neglected so far in the debate on the financing of the EU; believes that, even if such revenue does not represent an alternative to other own resources because of its level, volatility and unpredictability, it nonetheless represents a possible means for covering
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 59.
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 a (new) 60a. Points out that combating tax evasion and tax avoidance represents a budgetary cost of EUR 1000 billion per year; maintains that there is a need to recoup uncollected tax revenue by means of a coordinated policy to combat tax evasion and avoidance via a framework based on transparency, cooperation and coordination;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recalls that Member States are responsible for their fiscal policies, and underlines that the power to levy taxes lies at the heart of Member States’ sovereignty; recalls therefore the fact that no European authority is entitled to collect taxes in the name of national taxpayers;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 61 61. Underlines the potential for the EU budget of fees required for the implementation of European schemes, such as the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) for third- country nationals; points out that this revenue should not, however, replace local revenue and should be a reasonably low figure in order to prevent adverse effects on tourism, and at least 50% of the revenue should remain with the entry states, in order to reward the more attractive ones; considers that in certain cases such revenue could be earmarked for the same policy or purpose; considers that for the post-2020 generation of EU programmes and policies, this type of prospective income should be considered more systematically, with the aim of providing the EU budget with an additional source of revenue;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 61 a (new) 61 a. Highlights that in 2016, assigned revenues to EU decentralised agencies such as fees and charges from industries and contributions from national budgets amounted to approximately EUR 1 billion, thereby providing a significant contribution to the Union budget; points to the ongoing study commissioned by the European Parliament Budgetary Committee on exploring ways to extend the scope of fee-financing; underlines that some agencies such as ACER, EBA, EIOPA, and ERA provide services to industries, but do not have the possibility to charge fees yet; asks the Commission to propose a consistent approach as regards fee-financing of agencies in the next MFF
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the current system of own resources is highly complex, non- transparent and totally incomprehensible to the EU citizens; points in particular to the opacity of the calculations relating to the national rebates and correction mechanisms which apply to the system of own resources or the statistical VAT-based resource; stresses, moreover, that this system is not subject to any effective parliamentary control at EU level and in essence lacks democratic legitimacy and accountability;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the current system of own resources is highly complex, not fair, non-
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas between 1988 and 2014 the share of own resources (traditional and TVA-based own resources) decreased from 85 % to 23 %of the EU budget and the share of the GNI-based resource has significantly increased
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that the way the system of own resources has evolved, gradually replacing genuine own resources by the so- called ‘national contributions’, places a disproportionate emphasis on net balances between Member States
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that the way the system of own resources has evolved, gradually replacing genuine own resources by the so- called ‘national contributions’, places a disproportionate emphasis on net balances between Member States, thus largely ignoring the
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Is convinced that the dominance of the GNI resource has reinforced the budgetary logic of ‘fair return’ that has prevailed in the debates in the Council, on both the revenue and expenditure sides of the EU budget; recalls, in this context, the introduction of the British rebate and a series of related
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Is convinced that the dominance of the GNI resource has reinforced the budgetary logic of
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers,
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers, in particular, that the decision on the size of the annual EU budget is affected by financial considerations at national level and that the budgetary negotiations often result in a zero-sum game between net payers and net beneficiaries in the Council; considers that, as a result, a number of EU policies that show the highest European added value are often the areas where cost savings are proposed and that the EU project as such is weakened;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes that the national contributions to the EU budget are clearly identified on the expenditure side of national budgets and
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes that the national contributions to the EU budget are clearly identified on the expenditure side of national budgets and are often perceived as a financial burden, outweighing the benefits triggered by areas of EU expenditure
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Points out that tax avoidance in all its forms results in losses to the EU to the tune of EUR 1000 billion per year, according to Commission estimates; takes the view that it is therefore necessary to adopt an effective strategy to combat corruption and tax avoidance, and to bring in upward harmonisation of tax legislation in Europe;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas, since the introduction in 1984 at the Fontainebleau European Council of the British rebate, whereby 66 % of the UK’s net contribution is reimbursed, regrettably various other rebates and correction mechanisms have been progressively introduced in order to address the
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Is convinced, therefore, that the current system of own resources violates, in essence, the letter and the spirit of the Treaty; reiterates its long-standing position that an in-depth reform of EU resources, which does not involve additional costs for citizens, is imperative in order to realign the financing of the EU budget with the requirements of the Treaty and the needs of the Union as a whole;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Is convinced, therefore, that the current system of own resources violates, in essence, the letter and the spirit of the Treaty; reiterates its long-standing position that an in-depth reform of EU resources is imperative in order to realign the financing of the EU budget with the requirements of the Treaty, notably Article 3 TEV, and the needs of the Union as a whole;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Underlines that genuine own resources are needed to move away from the current logic of balancing contributions against benefits from the EU budget; is of the opinion that the EU must depart from the concept of net operating balance as in practice all Member States are beneficiaries of the EU Budget;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Underlines that the post 2020-MFF will need to ensure the proper financing of EU policies and programmes
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Underlines that the post 2020-MFF will need to ensure the
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Underlines that the post 2020-MFF will need to ensure the proper financing of EU policies and programmes with a
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Underlines that the post 2020-MFF will need to ensure the proper financing of EU policies and programmes with a clear European added value, but also to provide additional means for addressing new challenges that have already been identified in fields such as
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Underlines that the post 2020-MFF will need to ensure the proper financing of EU policies and programmes with a clear European added value in social and environmental terms, and for citizens, but also to provide additional means for addressing new challenges that have already been identified in fields such as growth and jobs,
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Underlines that the post 2020-MFF will need to ensure the proper financing of EU policies and programmes with a clear European added value, but also to provide additional means for addressing new challenges that have already been identified in fields such as growth and jobs, competitiveness, cohesion, innovation, migration, EU external borders, security and defence;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses, moreover, the need to avoid the shortcomings of the current MFF
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas, since the introduction in 1984 at the Fontainebleau European Council of the British rebate, whereby 66 % of the UK’s net contribution is reimbursed, various other rebates and correction mechanisms have been progressively introduced in order to address the so-called ‘operating budgetary balances’ of certain Member States; whereas such corrections may concern principally either a reduction on the financing of the UK correction, or a gross reduction in the annual VAT or GNI contribution;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses, moreover, the need to avoid the shortcomings of the current MFF and to provide from the outset for a level of resources that will enable the Union to respond effectively to unforeseen events, environmental disasters or crises that may occur during the period of the next financial framework; recalls the substantial mobilisation of the MFF flexibility provisions that was needed in order to confront the migration and refugee crisis alone;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Expects that, without prejudice to the financial settlement, the consequences of the withdrawal of the UK from the EU will represent an important challenge also for the next MFF and all related budgetary decisions;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Expects that, without prejudice to the financial settlement, the consequences of the withdrawal of the UK from the EU will represent an important challenge also for the next MFF and all related budgetary decisions;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Expects that, without prejudice to the financial settlement, the consequences of the withdrawal of the UK from the EU will represent an important challenge also for the next MFF and all related budgetary decisions;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Expects that, without prejudice to the financial settlement, the consequences of the withdrawal of the UK from the EU will represent an important challenge also for the next MFF and all related budgetary decisions; considers that, ahead of a decision on the post-2020 MFF, options will need to be examined for bridging the ‘Brexit gap’ while excluding a decrease or redeployments in EU resources;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Supports the proposal made by the President of the Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, for the creation of a specific line dedicated to the euro area within the EU budget, included in his ‘state of the union’ speech to the European Parliament and further developed in the Commission communication of 6 December 2017 on new budgetary instruments for a stable euro area within the Union framework;11recalls that European fiscal governance does not release Member States from their national responsibilities and cannot substitute for needed structural reforms; notes that new budgetary instruments could involve protracted net transfers and trigger pervasive problems of moral hazard; believes that with fiscal policy responsibility remaining with the Member States, a credible no-bailout clause lies at the heart of every solution; _________________ 11 COM(2017)0822
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Supports the proposal made by the President of the Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, for the creation of a specific line dedicated to the euro area within the EU budget, included in his ‘state of the union’ speech to the European Parliament and further developed in the Commission communication of 6 December 2017 on new budgetary instruments for a stable euro area within the Union framework;11 11 calls, to this end, for a budgetary capacity within the EU budget above the current ceiling to safeguard investments in times of crisis, accompany the enforcement of structural reforms, assist with the convergence of non-Euro member states, help stabilise Member States’ economies in difficult times and provide a short-term investment protection function to soften the social costs of necessary reforms; _________________ 11 COM(2017)0822
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Supports the proposal made by the President of the Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, for the creation of a specific line dedicated to the euro area within the EU budget, included in his ‘state of the union’ speech to the European Parliament and further developed in the Commission communication of 6 December 2017 on new budgetary instruments for a stable euro area within the Union framework;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas in 2011 the Commission put forward an ambitious legislative package on own resources
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Favours, in order to provide stable finances at EU level, the establishment of a transparent, simpler, more predictable and fairer new system of own resources, building on elements of the current system where they have proved effective;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Favours the establishment of a transparent, simpler and fairer system
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Favours a simplification of the own resources system for the post-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework that could be suitable for the establishment of a transparent, simpler and fairer system of own resources, building on elements of the current system where they have proved effective; considers that Traditional Own Resources and the GNI based own resource respond very well to these criteria; considers that the reform of the system of own resources should be based on a series of guiding principles;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Favours the establishment of a transparent, simpler and fairer system, building on elements of the current system where they have proved effective; considers that the reform of the system of own resources should be based on a series of guiding principles; recalls that tax neutrality is one of the agreed principles for a reform of own resources;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Stresses th
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Stresses the need to link revenues to policy objectives, in particular to the single market, the energy union, and the environment, climate and transport policies; is convinced in this respect that the EU budget should focus on policies with
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20 a. Considers, as the first step, that the EU budget should be predominantly financed by own resources before the end of the post2020 MFF;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas tax evasion and tax avoidance illegally deprive the public purse of resources and render EU countries less able to raise money and implement their economic and social policies; whereas this results in cuts in public services and a less efficient economy;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Considers that the introduction of new own resources should
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Considers that the introduction of new own resources should have a dual purpose, i.e. first, to bring about a substantial reduction in the proportion of GNI-based contributions, thus creating savings for Member State budgets, and second,
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22 a. Considers that the introduction of new own resources should enable the financing of a higher level of EU spending under the post-2020 MFF, also covering the gap resulting from the withdrawal of the UK; recalls in this context that new own resources aim at reducing the overall fiscal burden for the EU citizens;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22 a. Stresses that EU citizens must not be negatively affected by the introduction of new own resources, neither directly nor indirectly (through transfer of cost from private companies or governments);
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22 b. Expects the total share of GNI contributions to be reduced by 40% as a result of the revision;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for the
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for the suppression of all rebates and corrections, while ensuring fair treatment between Member States; underlines in this context that Brexit will mean that the UK rebate and the related ‘rebates on the rebate’ will become obsolete and cease to exist, while reform of the statistical VAT-based own resource will become inevitable; Insists on not creating any new rebate and corrective mechanism in order to compensate or correct the end of the current ones; is of the opinion however that Member states and regions largely affected by the end of the rebate and correction and/or by the creation of new own resources could be supported by EU programmes in line with the EU objectives and targets, especially the fight against climate change;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for the suppression of all rebates and corrections, while ensuring fair treatment between Member States; underlines in this context that Brexit will mean that the UK rebate and the related ‘rebates on the rebate’ will become
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. Recognizes that the costs and benefits of Union membership cannot be measured solely in budgetary terms; acknowledges the possible existence of budgetary imbalances and the need to correct them for Member States sustaining a budgetary burden which is excessive in relation to their relative prosperity; calls for a simplification of the current rebate system;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas, as a result of the 2014- 2020 MFF negotiations, a High Level Group on Own Resources (HLGOR) was established, including representatives of all three main EU institutions and chaired by Mario Monti; whereas in December 2016 the HLGOR presented its final report and recommendations, which
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23 b. Believes that the creation of a basket of new own resources with the gradual introduction of some additional resources combined with the suppression of all rebates and corrections would render the system of own resources opaque and would fuel the budgetary logic of ‘fair return' due to the unequal spread of the financial burden per citizen;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that the traditional own resources, namely customs duties, agricultural duties and the sugar and isoglucose levies, constitute a reliable and genuine source of EU revenue, as they arise directly from the EU being a customs union and from the legal competences and common commercial policy linked to that; takes the view, therefore, that the traditional own resources should be retained as a source of revenue for the EU budget;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that the traditional own resources, namely customs duties, agricultural duties and the sugar and isoglucose levies, constitute a reliable and genuine source of EU revenue, as they
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that the traditional own resources, namely customs duties, agricultural duties and the sugar and isoglucose levies, constitute a reliable and genuine source of EU revenue, as they arise directly from the EU being a customs union and from the legal competences and common commercial policy linked to that; takes the view, therefore, that the traditional own resources should be retained as a source of revenue for the EU budget; considers that
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that the traditional own resources, namely customs duties, agricultural duties and the sugar and isoglucose levies, constitute a reliable and genuine source of EU revenue, as they arise directly from the EU being a customs union and from the legal competences and common commercial policy linked to that;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that the traditional own resources, namely customs duties, agricultural duties
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24 a. Calls for accounting the existing and future own resources such as VAT or custom duties, collected by a Member State on behalf of the EU, in a separate budgetary item in the national budget of the Member State which collects the revenue; deplores that OLAF repeatedly found severe cases of customs fraud in Member states which created a significant loss of income to the Union budget; points to the ECA special report 19/2017 on import procedures and is concerned that fraudsters will continue to find the ‘weakest link’ among Member states as their points of entry to the customs union, and that losses to the Union budget will continue even during the next MFF; calls on the Commission and the Member states to take the necessary measures to stop these activities that are damaging to the Union budget;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Acknowledges that, in the past, the GNI-based contribution
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Acknowledges that the GNI-based contribution provides a reliable and stable source of revenue for the EU budget, and benefits from very strong support from a large majority of Member States; recommends that, with a view to establishing a progressive regime, national contributions should be established that are GNI-based and weighted according to an indicator related to per capita income, with the result being that richer countries make larger contributions; believes, therefore, that it should be preserved as a balancing and residual resource for the EU budget, which would put an end to the budgetary logic of ‘fair return’; stresses the need, in this context, to ensure that the GNI contribution is classified in the same manner in all national budgets, namely as revenue attributed to the EU and not as expenditure of national governments;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Acknowledges that the GNI-based contribution provides a reliable and stable source of revenue for the EU budget, and benefits from very strong support from a large majority of Member States; believes, therefore, that it should be preserved as a balancing and residual resource for the EU budget, which would put an end to the budgetary logic of ‘fair return’;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission will present its proposals on the post-2020 MFF by May 2018; expects that the future MFF proposed by the Commission will include ambitious proposals to revise the Own Resources Decision and all related legislative acts, as well as to introduce new own resources; underlines that both the expenditure and the revenue side of the next MFF will be treated as a single package in the upcoming negotiations between the Council and Parliament; states that it is not prepared to give its consent to the next MFF regulation before the European elections without a reform of the own-resources system;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Acknowledges that the GNI-based contribution provides a reliable
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Acknowledges that the GNI-based contribution
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Acknowledges that the GNI-based contribution provides a reliable and stable source of revenue for the EU budget, and benefits from very strong support from a large majority of Member States; believes, therefore, that it should be preserved as a balancing and residual resource for the EU budget
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25 a. Believes that the new own resources should be easily associated by the citizens with the EU and should strengthen the European dimension and the visibility of the EU as a whole;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Recalls that the report of the High Level Group on Own Resources (HLGOR) proposes the following criteria to identify potential new own resources: equity/fairness; efficiency; sufficiency and stability; transparency and simplicity; democratic accountability and budgetary discipline; focus on European added value; subsidiarity principle and fiscal sovereignty of Member States; and limiting political transaction costs; recalls that the report assumes the overall constraint of budget neutrality so that the reforms of own resources envisaged do not create an additional tax burden on EU citizens;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Recalls that the report of the High Level Group on Own Resources (HLGOR) proposes the following criteria to identify potential new own resources: equity/fairness; efficiency; sufficiency and stability; transparency and simplicity; democratic accountability and budgetary discipline; focus on European added value; subsidiarity principle and fiscal sovereignty of Member States; zero-impact on EU citizens and limiting political transaction costs;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26.
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26 a. In case of any excessive burden caused by one or another own resource on a Member State, it could be alleviated by means of a specific compensation limited in duration and amount, and preferably calculated in terms of lump sums. Such an approach would make the own resources system simpler and fairer;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Recalls that, since its inception almost 50 years ago, VAT has been used as a base for calculating one of the own resources of the EU budget, and that this resource currently represents around 12 % of EU revenue; emphasises, once again, the regressive and unfair nature of VAT and the need to reduce or even eventually abolish it;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Notes, however, that the current system has serious shortcomings: the EU VAT gap is estimated at 12,8% (€152billion) per year and cross-border VAT fraud alone amounts to €50 billion per year, the resource is calculated on a statistical basis; it is unnecessarily complex and has no direct link to the citizens; it represents a mere transfer of a part of revenue collected by the Member States, and thus brings no added value compared to the GNI resource; the contribution base is not transparent and there is no equality among taxpayers; reminds that the VAT is a regressive tax impacting more the poorest people and territories; considers therefore that the revenues coming from a reformed VAT should not become the main source of revenue for the EU budget;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission will present its proposals on the post-2020 MFF by May 2018;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30 a. welcomes the High Level Group’s proposal for its vision of the VAT-based own resource with the aim to make it simpler, to lower its administrative costs and to strengthen the link with EU VAT policy and actual VAT receipts;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Supports an in-depth reform of the VAT system in the EU, which should aim at broadening the tax base, reducing the scope for fraud and compliance costs,
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31.
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Supports an in-depth reform of the VAT system in the EU, which should aim at broadening the tax base, without, however imposing further burdens on EU citizens, reducing the scope for fraud and compliance costs, and generating new revenue; considers that a fraction of such new revenue should be allocated to the EU budget;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Underlines that the Commission has already put forward legislative proposals for a major reform of the EU’s VAT rules, and that additional initiatives are expected in 2018; insists on the necessity to complete the VAT reform as soon as possible and at the latest before the start of the next MFF; is of the opinion that the uniform levy rate should be visible on the VAT receipt, alongside the national or regional VAT rate, in order to increase the visibility of the EU revenues coming from the VAT for the EU citizens;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Underlines that the Commission has already put forward legislative proposals for a major reform of the EU’s VAT rules, and that additional initiatives are expected in 2018; welcomes the fact that the new proposal entails the possibility for all member states to adopt a zero rate on sanitary products; insists on the necessity to complete the VAT reform as soon as possible and at the latest before the start of the next MFF;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35 a. Considers that the reform of the system of own resources could be achieved through a 2-step approach: first, by reviewing and reforming the current own resources, particularly the VAT based resource and second by the gradual introduction of new own resources;
source: 616.885
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AD-606164_EN.html
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-612384_EN.html
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AM-616885_EN.html
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE609.360&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AD-609360_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.164&secondRef=02
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE604.865&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-604865_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.543New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-PR-616543_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE612.212&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-612212_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE612.244&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-612244_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE612.384&secondRef=02
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.885
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180313&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-03-13-TOC_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/8/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0041&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0041_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0076New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0076_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDG/8/09715New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0/committees/7/date |
2017-05-03T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/7/rapporteur |
|
committees/7/date |
2017-05-03T00:00:00
|
committees/7/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/committees/0/date |
2017-05-30T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2017-05-30T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
BUDG/8/09715
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|