Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | MCALLISTER David ( PPE) | FLECKENSTEIN Knut ( S&D), TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton ( ECR), VAN BAALEN Johannes Cornelis ( ALDE), MESZERICS Tamás ( Verts/ALE), CASTALDO Fabio Massimo ( EFDD), REBEGA Laurenţiu ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ARTHUIS Jean ( ALDE) | Bernd KÖLMEL ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | AFCO |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 408 votes to 132 with 102 abstentions a resolution on the annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy.
Convinced that no single Member State is capable of responding to current issues on its own, Members stressed that common EU action is the most effective way of safeguarding Europe's interests , defending its values, engage in a wider world as an influential global actor, as well as to protect its citizens and Member States from growing threats to their security, including in a global digital sphere.
Parliament recalled the EU’s commitment to develop a Common Foreign and Security Policy guided by the values of democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and compliance with the UN Charter and international law. The EU’s external policies should be consistent with each other and with other policies with an external dimension.
Members stated that the core milestones for the European Union to deliver on the expectations of its citizens are:
1) Coordination of an assessment of profound threats and challenges: facing the current political and security environment: in this area, Parliament stressed the following points:
guaranteeing the security of EU citizens and the integrity of the EU’s territory , stabilising the neighbourhood, especially in the Western Balkans with a focus on more visibility of the EU in this region; combining effective multilateralism, joint soft power and credible hard power can be capable of confronting major security challenges, notably the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the violation of the security order in Europe, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhood, proxy wars, hybrid and information warfare, including digital aggression, and energy insecurity; identify common strategic priorities and visions by addressing the root causes of instability, which is spread mainly through failed or fragile states, as well as forced and irregular migration; counter autocratic and nepotistic trends, to intensify support for democratic forces and to fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours and partners, and to target those groups which seek to encourage EU citizens to fight for their extremist cause. Tackling violent extremism should go hand in hand with upholding universal human rights.
The resolution emphasised that a sustainable solution to the Syrian crisis can only be achieved under the existing UN-agreed framework and needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement involving all relevant stakeholders.
Furthermore, stressing that the possibility of strengthening relations of cooperation with Russia depended on Russia's respect for the European order in matters of security and international law, Members insisted that the Union should reserve the possibility of imposing additional progressive sanctions if Russia continues to violate international law.
Parliament called for the development of a coherent and sound strategy for the Sahel region as well as the update of the EU-Asia strategy .
2) Consolidation and deepening of the European project through enhanced EU capabilities: stressing that the current decision-making process in CFSP, based on unanimity in the Council, was the main obstacle to effective and timely external EU action, Parliament suggested that qualified majority voting should also be applied for CFSP. EU institutions should improve their ability to anticipate conflicts and crises , including by means of an assessment of the short- and long-term impact of its policies.
Europe should:
adopt a comprehensive approach at Union level and a coordinated and structured approach in all its areas of competence that takes into account the UN Sustainable Development Goals and contributes to their achievement, including in the field of humanitarian aid, agriculture, development, trade, energy, climate; step up efforts to increase the EU’s ability to confront hybrid and cyber threats through the development of the industrial and technological resources needed for this purpose; strengthen cooperation on common defence , in order to defend its common values and principles and strategic autonomy; fully exploit the potential of the European Defence Agency (EDA), permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) and EU Battlegroups and have additional funding available for this purpose; develop effective foreign and security policy , and must work together with NATO and other international partners, the UN, NGOs, human rights defenders, and others on issues of shared concern and in order to promote peace, prosperity and stability around the world.
Member States should aim for the target of 2% of GDP on defence spending and allocate 20% of their defence budgets to equipment identified as necessary by the EDA.
3) Cooperation within coalitions and with institutions delivering security: the objective should be to strengthen the rules-based, global political and economic order, including the protection of human rights, and working together with partners to play a leading role in reconciliation, peace-making, peacekeeping and, where needed, peace enforcement.
Parliament considered it desirable that the European Union and the United States should focus on adapting transatlantic structures to current issues, such as the defense of human rights, the fight against climate change, the fight against international terrorism and corruption, the prevention of radicalisation and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, as well as action against attempts by third countries to destabilise the Union.
It stressed the importance of continuing and strengthening cooperation between the EU and the US bilaterally as well as within NATO on common issues.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by David McALLISTER (EPP, DE) on the annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy.
Convinced that no single Member State is capable of responding to current issues on its own, Members stressed that common EU action is the most effective way of safeguarding Europe's interests , defending its values, engage in a wider world as an influential global actor, as well as to protect its citizens and Member States from growing threats to their security, including in a global digital sphere.
Members recalled the EU’s commitment to develop a Common Foreign and Security Policy guided by the values of democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and compliance with the UN Charter and international law. The EU’s external policies should be consistent with each other and with other policies with an external dimension.
Members stated that the core milestones for the European Union to deliver on the expectations of its citizens are:
1) Coordination of an assessment of profound threats and challenges within the EU and a common approach in how to address them; taking into account in particular the prevention of radicalisation, which can lead to recruitment by terrorist groups.
In this perspective, Members highlighted the following points:
guaranteeing the security of EU citizens and the integrity of the EU’s territory , stabilising the neighbourhood, especially in the Western Balkans with a focus on more visibility of the EU in this region; combining effective multilateralism, joint soft power and credible hard power can be capable of confronting major security challenges, notably the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the violation of the security order in Europe, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhood, proxy wars, hybrid and information warfare, including digital aggression, and energy insecurity; identify common strategic priorities and visions by addressing the root causes of instability, which is spread mainly through failed or fragile states, as well as forced and irregular migration; counter autocratic and nepotistic trends, to intensify support for democratic forces and to fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours and partners, and to target those groups which seek to encourage EU citizens to fight for their extremist cause. Tackling violent extremism should go hand in hand with upholding universal human rights.
The report emphasised that a sustainable solution to the Syrian crisis can only be achieved under the existing UN-agreed framework and needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement involving all relevant stakeholders.
2) Consolidating and deepening the European project and the Union's external action by, inter alia , enhancing the EU’s cooperation and capabilities in the field of its common foreign and security policy, including information warfare.
Stressing that the current decision-making process in CFSP, based on unanimity in the Council, was the main obstacle to effective and timely external EU action, Members suggested that qualified majority voting should also be applied for CFSP. EU institutions should improve their ability to anticipate conflicts and crises , including by means of an assessment of the short- and long-term impact of its policies.
Europe should:
step up their efforts to increase the EU’s ability to confront hybrid and cyber threats through the development of the industrial and technological resources needed for this purpose; strengthen cooperation on common defence , in order to defend its common values and principles and strategic autonomy; fully exploit the potential of the European Defence Agency (EDA), permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) and EU Battlegroups and have additional funding available for this purpose; develop effective foreign and security policy , and must work together with NATO and other international partners, the UN, NGOs, human rights defenders, and others on issues of shared concern and in order to promote peace, prosperity and stability around the world.
Member States should aim for the target of 2% of GDP on defence spending and allocate 20% of their defence budgets to equipment identified as necessary by the EDA.
3) Cooperation between Member States, partners, and international organisations and institutions protecting peace within clearly defined and carefully chosen conditions to strengthen the rules-based, global political and economic order, including the protection of human rights, and working together with partners to play a leading role in reconciliation, peace-making, peacekeeping and, where needed, peace enforcement.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0493/2017
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0350/2017
- Committee opinion: PE609.504
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE610.602
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE610.678
- Committee draft report: PE607.921
- Committee draft report: PE607.921
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE610.602
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE610.678
- Committee opinion: PE609.504
Activities
- James CARVER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Annual report on the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy - Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) – opening a new chapter in European Security and Defence Policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Annual report on the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy - Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) – opening a new chapter in European Security and Defence Policy (debate)
- Bill ETHERIDGE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Annual report on the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy - Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) – opening a new chapter in European Security and Defence Policy (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Annual report on the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy - Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) – opening a new chapter in European Security and Defence Policy (debate)
- Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janice ATKINSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Johannes Cornelis van BAALEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Victor BOŞTINARU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Knut FLECKENSTEIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eugen FREUND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ana GOMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrzej GRZYB
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek JUREK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tunne KELAM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaromír KOHLÍČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd KÖLMEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz KORWIN-MIKKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eduard KUKAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne LIETZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sabine LÖSING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michał MARUSIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Clare MOODY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Florian PHILIPPOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Julia PITERA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marcus PRETZELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jozo RADOŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaromír ŠTĚTINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Indrek TARAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivica TOLIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena VALENCIANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bodil VALERO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz ZEMKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister - § 19/2 13/12/2017 14:11:57.000 #
DE | GB | PL | ES | RO | FR | NL | BE | SE | BG | CZ | SK | AT | LT | IE | FI | HR | PT | DK | HU | SI | LU | IT | MT | LV | EE | CY | EL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
78
|
61
|
46
|
45
|
23
|
68
|
24
|
21
|
17
|
15
|
19
|
12
|
18
|
10
|
9
|
9
|
11
|
19
|
9
|
12
|
8
|
5
|
64
|
6
|
8
|
6
|
5
|
17
|
|
PPE |
185
|
Germany PPEFor (29)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Burkhard BALZ, Christian EHLER, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Joachim ZELLER, Manfred WEBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner LANGEN
|
Poland PPEFor (20)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogdan Brunon WENTA, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jerzy BUZEK, Julia PITERA, Krzysztof HETMAN, Marek PLURA, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Against (1) |
Spain PPEFor (12) |
France PPEFor (18)Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Geoffroy DIDIER, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Maurice PONGA, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Renaud MUSELIER, Tokia SAÏFI
Against (1)Abstain (1) |
4
|
4
|
4
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (6) |
Czechia PPEFor (7) |
5
|
5
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
Croatia PPEFor (3)Abstain (2) |
Portugal PPEFor (7) |
Hungary PPEFor (7) |
5
|
2
|
Italy PPEFor (6)Against (6) |
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|||
S&D |
159
|
Germany S&DFor (10)Against (2) |
United Kingdom S&DFor (18)Against (1) |
Poland S&DFor (5) |
9
|
France S&DFor (10)Abstain (1) |
3
|
4
|
5
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (1)Abstain (3) |
2
|
4
|
Austria S&D |
2
|
2
|
2
|
Portugal S&DFor (7) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Italy S&DFor (26)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Gianni PITTELLA, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
Abstain (1) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Greece S&DFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
||
ECR |
61
|
Germany ECR |
United Kingdom ECRFor (17) |
Poland ECRFor (14)Against (2) |
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||
ALDE |
62
|
3
|
1
|
Spain ALDEFor (6)Abstain (1) |
3
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
Belgium ALDEAgainst (2) |
3
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||
Verts/ALE |
48
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (6) |
Spain Verts/ALEAgainst (1) |
France Verts/ALEFor (6) |
2
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||
NI |
16
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
Greece NIAgainst (5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
35
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDD |
4
|
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (14) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
47
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
1
|
Spain GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
3
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||
ENF |
32
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
Italy ENFAgainst (6) |
A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister - § 20/1 13/12/2017 14:12:27.000 #
A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister - § 20/2 13/12/2017 14:12:45.000 #
DE | PL | GB | RO | BE | FR | ES | NL | SE | IT | SK | BG | HR | CZ | FI | AT | PT | LT | DK | SI | HU | IE | EE | MT | LU | LV | CY | EL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
74
|
45
|
59
|
22
|
21
|
66
|
45
|
24
|
18
|
60
|
12
|
14
|
11
|
19
|
9
|
18
|
19
|
10
|
9
|
8
|
12
|
9
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
6
|
5
|
17
|
|
PPE |
180
|
Germany PPEFor (27)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Burkhard BALZ, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Joachim ZELLER, Manfred WEBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner LANGEN
|
Poland PPEFor (21)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogdan Brunon WENTA, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Julia PITERA, Krzysztof HETMAN, Marek PLURA, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
4
|
France PPEFor (18)Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Geoffroy DIDIER, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Maurice PONGA, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Renaud MUSELIER, Tokia SAÏFI
Against (1)Abstain (1) |
Spain PPEFor (11)Against (1) |
4
|
4
|
Italy PPEFor (8)Against (4) |
5
|
Bulgaria PPE |
Croatia PPEFor (4)Abstain (1) |
Czechia PPEFor (7) |
3
|
5
|
Portugal PPEFor (7) |
2
|
5
|
Hungary PPEFor (7) |
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
|||
S&D |
155
|
Germany S&DFor (15)Abstain (3) |
Poland S&DFor (5) |
United Kingdom S&DFor (18)Against (1) |
9
|
4
|
France S&DFor (10)Abstain (1) |
3
|
5
|
Italy S&DFor (26)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Gianni PITTELLA, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
Abstain (1) |
4
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Austria S&DAbstain (1) |
Portugal S&DFor (7) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
||
ECR |
60
|
Germany ECR |
Poland ECRFor (15) |
United Kingdom ECRFor (17) |
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||
ALDE |
61
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
France ALDEFor (7) |
Spain ALDEFor (6)Abstain (1) |
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
||||||||
Verts/ALE |
46
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
5
|
2
|
5
|
Spain Verts/ALEAgainst (1) |
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Greece NIAgainst (5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
31
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (13) |
4
|
1
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (10) |
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
48
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (2) |
||||||||||||||||
ENF |
32
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Italy ENFAgainst (6) |
4
|
A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister - § 39/2 13/12/2017 14:14:56.000 #
A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister - § 44/2 13/12/2017 14:15:27.000 #
A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister - Am 2 13/12/2017 14:15:43.000 #
SE | LU | SI | DK | EE | CY | MT | LV | LT | FI | IE | HU | HR | GB | BE | AT | SK | CZ | EL | BG | PT | NL | RO | ES | PL | IT | DE | FR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
18
|
5
|
8
|
8
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
8
|
10
|
9
|
9
|
11
|
11
|
60
|
21
|
18
|
12
|
18
|
18
|
15
|
19
|
23
|
25
|
45
|
45
|
64
|
81
|
65
|
|
Verts/ALE |
44
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (5)Abstain (1) |
2
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
4
|
||||||||||||
EFDD |
36
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDFor (13)Against (1) |
1
|
Italy EFDD |
1
|
4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
2
|
Greece NIAgainst (3)Abstain (2) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Italy ENFAgainst (6) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
47
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (1)Against (4) |
4
|
3
|
3
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
3
|
||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
60
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
3
|
3
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
||||||||
ECR |
62
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (17) |
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (16) |
1
|
Germany ECRFor (1)Against (5) |
||||||||||||
S&D |
161
|
Sweden S&DFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (4)Against (14) |
4
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
4
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (7) |
3
|
Romania S&DAgainst (10) |
Poland S&DAbstain (1) |
Italy S&DFor (2)Against (25)
Andrea COZZOLINO,
Brando BENIFEI,
Caterina CHINNICI,
Cécile Kashetu KYENGE,
Damiano ZOFFOLI,
David Maria SASSOLI,
Elena GENTILE,
Elly SCHLEIN,
Enrico GASBARRA,
Flavio ZANONATO,
Gianni PITTELLA,
Goffredo Maria BETTINI,
Isabella DE MONTE,
Luigi MORGANO,
Mercedes BRESSO,
Michela GIUFFRIDA,
Nicola CAPUTO,
Nicola DANTI,
Paolo DE CASTRO,
Patrizia TOIA,
Pier Antonio PANZERI,
Pina PICIERNO,
Renata BRIANO,
Roberto GUALTIERI,
Simona BONAFÈ
|
Germany S&DFor (4)Against (18) |
11
|
||
PPE |
184
|
Sweden PPEAgainst (4) |
2
|
Slovenia PPEFor (1)Against (4) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
5
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (6) |
3
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
Portugal PPEFor (1)Against (6) |
Netherlands PPEAgainst (4) |
Romania PPEAgainst (10) |
Spain PPEAgainst (12) |
Poland PPEAgainst (20)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogdan Brunon WENTA,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Julia PITERA,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Marek PLURA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
Italy PPEFor (2)Against (10) |
Germany PPEFor (1)Against (28)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Burkhard BALZ,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Joachim ZELLER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner LANGEN
|
France PPEAgainst (20)
Alain CADEC,
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Angélique DELAHAYE,
Anne SANDER,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Brice HORTEFEUX,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Franck PROUST,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Geoffroy DIDIER,
Jérôme LAVRILLEUX,
Marc JOULAUD,
Maurice PONGA,
Michel DANTIN,
Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE,
Nadine MORANO,
Philippe JUVIN,
Rachida DATI,
Renaud MUSELIER,
Tokia SAÏFI
|
A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister - § 45/2 13/12/2017 14:16:05.000 #
DE | RO | PL | BE | IT | ES | FR | BG | CZ | PT | HR | AT | SI | SK | NL | EE | HU | LU | SE | FI | LV | LT | MT | CY | DK | GB | EL | IE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
79
|
25
|
45
|
20
|
64
|
44
|
66
|
15
|
19
|
18
|
11
|
18
|
8
|
11
|
24
|
6
|
12
|
5
|
18
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
6
|
5
|
9
|
59
|
17
|
9
|
|
PPE |
183
|
Germany PPEFor (29)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Burkhard BALZ, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Joachim ZELLER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner LANGEN
|
Poland PPEFor (20)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogdan Brunon WENTA, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Julia PITERA, Krzysztof HETMAN, Marek PLURA, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
4
|
Spain PPEFor (11) |
France PPEFor (20)Alain CADEC, Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Geoffroy DIDIER, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Maurice PONGA, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Nadine MORANO, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Renaud MUSELIER, Tokia SAÏFI
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (1) |
Czechia PPEFor (7) |
Portugal PPEFor (6) |
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
4
|
1
|
Hungary PPEFor (7) |
2
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
Ireland PPEFor (1)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
||||
S&D |
159
|
Germany S&DFor (18)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
10
|
Poland S&DFor (5) |
4
|
Italy S&DFor (27)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Gianni PITTELLA, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
|
4
|
2
|
Portugal S&DFor (7) |
2
|
Austria S&DFor (1)Abstain (4) |
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (18) |
Greece S&DFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
|||
ALDE |
62
|
3
|
3
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
France ALDEFor (7) |
4
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||
ECR |
60
|
Germany ECRAbstain (6) |
1
|
Poland ECRAbstain (16) |
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
United Kingdom ECR |
1
|
||||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Greece NIAgainst (5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Italy ENFAgainst (6) |
4
|
3
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
46
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (10) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
||||||||||
EFDD |
36
|
1
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (14) |
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
46
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
3
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
4
|
A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister - Am 4 13/12/2017 14:16:27.000 #
SE | EE | LU | SI | FI | AT | DK | LV | SK | CY | MT | IE | LT | HR | HU | BE | PT | BG | EL | NL | GB | RO | CZ | IT | ES | PL | DE | FR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
18
|
6
|
4
|
8
|
9
|
18
|
9
|
7
|
12
|
5
|
6
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
21
|
18
|
15
|
18
|
23
|
61
|
24
|
19
|
64
|
45
|
45
|
82
|
65
|
|
Verts/ALE |
47
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (5)Abstain (1) |
1
|
4
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (11) |
5
|
||||||||||
EFDD |
36
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDFor (14) |
1
|
14
|
1
|
4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
Greece NIAgainst (3)Abstain (2) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Italy ENFAgainst (6) |
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
47
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
Greece GUE/NGLFor (1)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
3
|
||||||||||||||||
S&D |
160
|
Sweden S&DFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
Austria S&DAgainst (1) |
2
|
1
|
Slovakia S&DFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
Bulgaria S&DFor (2)Abstain (2) |
4
|
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (2)Against (15)Abstain (2) |
Romania S&DAgainst (2)Abstain (4) |
2
|
Italy S&DFor (3)Against (20)
Andrea COZZOLINO,
Brando BENIFEI,
Damiano ZOFFOLI,
Daniele VIOTTI,
David Maria SASSOLI,
Elena GENTILE,
Flavio ZANONATO,
Goffredo Maria BETTINI,
Isabella DE MONTE,
Luigi MORGANO,
Mercedes BRESSO,
Michela GIUFFRIDA,
Nicola DANTI,
Paolo DE CASTRO,
Patrizia TOIA,
Pier Antonio PANZERI,
Pina PICIERNO,
Renata BRIANO,
Roberto GUALTIERI,
Simona BONAFÈ
Abstain (4) |
Poland S&DAgainst (4) |
Germany S&DFor (7)Against (16) |
10
|
|||
ALDE |
61
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
4
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
||||||||
ECR |
61
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (17) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (16) |
Germany ECRAgainst (6) |
|||||||||||||
PPE |
184
|
Sweden PPEFor (1)Against (3) |
1
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
Hungary PPEAgainst (7) |
4
|
Portugal PPEAgainst (6) |
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
3
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (4) |
Romania PPEAgainst (10) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (7) |
Italy PPEFor (1)Against (11) |
Spain PPEAgainst (12) |
Poland PPEAgainst (20)
Adam SZEJNFELD,
Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA,
Andrzej GRZYB,
Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI,
Bogdan Brunon WENTA,
Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI,
Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA,
Danuta Maria HÜBNER,
Dariusz ROSATI,
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA,
Jan OLBRYCHT,
Jarosław KALINOWSKI,
Jarosław WAŁĘSA,
Jerzy BUZEK,
Julia PITERA,
Krzysztof HETMAN,
Marek PLURA,
Michał BONI,
Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN,
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
Germany PPEAgainst (29)
Albert DESS,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN,
Burkhard BALZ,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Elmar BROK,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Joachim ZELLER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Sven SCHULZE,
Thomas MANN,
Werner LANGEN
|
France PPEFor (1)Against (19)
Alain CADEC,
Alain LAMASSOURE,
Angélique DELAHAYE,
Anne SANDER,
Arnaud DANJEAN,
Brice HORTEFEUX,
Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER,
Franck PROUST,
Françoise GROSSETÊTE,
Geoffroy DIDIER,
Jérôme LAVRILLEUX,
Marc JOULAUD,
Maurice PONGA,
Michel DANTIN,
Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE,
Nadine MORANO,
Rachida DATI,
Renaud MUSELIER,
Tokia SAÏFI
|
A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister - § 47/2 13/12/2017 14:16:53.000 #
PL | RO | IT | BG | DE | FR | SK | GB | ES | PT | CZ | HR | BE | LT | NL | EE | HU | LV | FI | SE | SI | LU | DK | MT | CY | AT | EL | IE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
45
|
25
|
63
|
15
|
71
|
66
|
12
|
62
|
45
|
19
|
19
|
11
|
20
|
10
|
24
|
6
|
12
|
8
|
7
|
18
|
8
|
5
|
9
|
6
|
5
|
18
|
18
|
9
|
|
PPE |
182
|
Poland PPEFor (20)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogdan Brunon WENTA, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Julia PITERA, Krzysztof HETMAN, Marek PLURA, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (6) |
Germany PPEFor (27)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Burkhard BALZ, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner LANGEN
|
France PPEFor (19)Alain CADEC, Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Geoffroy DIDIER, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Maurice PONGA, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Nadine MORANO, Rachida DATI, Renaud MUSELIER, Tokia SAÏFI
Against (1) |
5
|
Spain PPEFor (10)Against (2) |
Portugal PPEFor (7) |
Czechia PPEFor (7) |
5
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
Hungary PPEFor (7) |
4
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
4
|
||||
S&D |
154
|
Poland S&DFor (5) |
10
|
Italy S&DFor (25)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Gianni PITTELLA, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
Against (1) |
4
|
Germany S&DFor (6)Against (8) |
4
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (18)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
Portugal S&DFor (7) |
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
4
|
|||
ALDE |
62
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
3
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (6)Against (1) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||
ECR |
61
|
Poland ECRFor (14)Against (2) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Germany ECRFor (6) |
3
|
United Kingdom ECRFor (17) |
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
||||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Greece NIAgainst (5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
2
|
1
|
Italy ENFAbstain (6) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
36
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (14) |
1
|
4
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
46
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (11) |
France Verts/ALEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom Verts/ALEAgainst (6) |
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
47
|
3
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
3
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
4
|
A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister - § 47/3 13/12/2017 14:17:07.000 #
RO | DE | FR | ES | BG | PT | IT | CZ | BE | HR | HU | EE | PL | SK | LT | SI | LU | MT | LV | CY | SE | IE | NL | AT | FI | DK | EL | GB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
25
|
69
|
65
|
42
|
15
|
19
|
61
|
19
|
21
|
11
|
12
|
6
|
45
|
11
|
10
|
8
|
5
|
6
|
8
|
5
|
17
|
9
|
24
|
18
|
8
|
8
|
17
|
62
|
|
PPE |
181
|
Germany PPEFor (28)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Burkhard BALZ, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Joachim ZELLER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner LANGEN
|
France PPEFor (20)Alain CADEC, Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Geoffroy DIDIER, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Maurice PONGA, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Nadine MORANO, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Renaud MUSELIER, Tokia SAÏFI
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (6) |
Portugal PPEFor (7) |
11
|
Czechia PPEFor (7) |
4
|
5
|
Hungary PPEFor (7) |
1
|
Poland PPEFor (20)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogdan Brunon WENTA, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Julia PITERA, Krzysztof HETMAN, Marek PLURA, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
5
|
2
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
Sweden PPEAgainst (1) |
4
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
||||
S&D |
149
|
Romania S&DFor (9)Abstain (1) |
Germany S&DFor (12)Abstain (1) |
4
|
Portugal S&DFor (7) |
Italy S&DFor (25)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Damiano ZOFFOLI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Gianni PITTELLA, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Silvia COSTA
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Poland S&DFor (5) |
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
2
|
2
|
3
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (18)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
|||
ALDE |
62
|
3
|
3
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
4
|
1
|
4
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (3) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Greece NIAgainst (5) |
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
32
|
1
|
1
|
Italy ENFAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
36
|
1
|
4
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (14) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
44
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (8)Abstain (1) |
France Verts/ALEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEAgainst (6) |
||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
46
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
3
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
1
|
||||||||||||||||
ECR |
61
|
1
|
Germany ECRAgainst (5) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (16) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECRAgainst (17) |
A8-0350/2017 - David McAllister - Résolution 13/12/2017 14:17:30.000 #
DE | RO | PL | ES | BE | FR | BG | AT | IT | NL | PT | CZ | HR | SK | HU | LT | SE | FI | EE | SI | LU | MT | LV | GB | IE | CY | DK | EL | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
78
|
23
|
45
|
45
|
21
|
66
|
15
|
18
|
64
|
24
|
19
|
19
|
11
|
12
|
12
|
10
|
18
|
8
|
6
|
7
|
4
|
6
|
8
|
60
|
9
|
5
|
9
|
18
|
|
PPE |
185
|
Germany PPEFor (29)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Burkhard BALZ, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Joachim ZELLER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Sven SCHULZE, Thomas MANN, Werner LANGEN
|
Poland PPEFor (20)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogdan Brunon WENTA, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Jan OLBRYCHT, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Jerzy BUZEK, Julia PITERA, Krzysztof HETMAN, Marek PLURA, Michał BONI, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
Spain PPEFor (12) |
4
|
France PPEFor (19)Alain CADEC, Alain LAMASSOURE, Angélique DELAHAYE, Anne SANDER, Arnaud DANJEAN, Brice HORTEFEUX, Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER, Franck PROUST, Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Geoffroy DIDIER, Jérôme LAVRILLEUX, Marc JOULAUD, Maurice PONGA, Michel DANTIN, Michèle ALLIOT-MARIE, Philippe JUVIN, Rachida DATI, Renaud MUSELIER, Tokia SAÏFI
Against (1) |
Bulgaria PPEAbstain (1) |
5
|
Italy PPEFor (7) |
4
|
Portugal PPEFor (7) |
Czechia PPEFor (7) |
Croatia PPEFor (4)Abstain (1) |
5
|
Hungary PPEFor (7) |
2
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
|||
S&D |
158
|
Germany S&DFor (14)Against (2)Abstain (4) |
Romania S&DFor (8) |
Poland S&DFor (5) |
4
|
Bulgaria S&DFor (3)Abstain (1) |
Austria S&D |
Italy S&DFor (27)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Cécile Kashetu KYENGE, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Gianni PITTELLA, Goffredo Maria BETTINI, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Mercedes BRESSO, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Pina PICIERNO, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Silvia COSTA, Simona BONAFÈ
|
3
|
Portugal S&DFor (7) |
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
Sweden S&DFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (17)Against (1)Abstain (2) |
2
|
2
|
4
|
||||
ALDE |
62
|
3
|
3
|
Belgium ALDEFor (6) |
France ALDEFor (7) |
4
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (7) |
1
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||
Verts/ALE |
44
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (8)Abstain (2) |
4
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (2)Against (1)Abstain (3) |
1
|
||||||||||||
ECR |
61
|
Germany ECRFor (1)Abstain (5) |
1
|
Poland ECRAbstain (16) |
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECR |
3
|
1
|
||||||||||||
NI |
15
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Greece NIAgainst (5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
33
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
Italy ENFAgainst (6) |
3
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
36
|
1
|
4
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (14) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (14) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
46
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
3
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
Amendments | Dossier |
386 |
2017/2121(INI)
2017/09/14
AFET
377 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) – having regard to the key principles enshrined in the Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy, particularly those pertaining to the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the inviolability of borders of states are equally respected by all participating states;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours; urges the need for concerted diplomatic efforts on the part of the EU, the US and other international allies, to convince players in the region, such as Turkey, the Gulf states
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours; urges the need for concerted diplomatic efforts on the part of the EU,
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours; urges the need for concerted diplomatic efforts on the part of the EU, the US and other international allies, to convince players in the region
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours; urges the need for concerted diplomatic efforts on the part of the EU
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours, as well as targeting those groups which seek to encourage EU citizens to fight for their extremist cause; urges the need for concerted diplomatic efforts on the part of the EU, the US and other international allies, to convince players in the region, such as Turkey, the Gulf states and Iran, of the need for a common strategy to address this global challenge; believes that these diplomatic efforts should be accompanied by the wide range of other tools and instruments at the EU’s
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours; urges the need for concerted diplomatic efforts on the part of the EU, the US and other international allies, to convince players in the region, such as Turkey, the Gulf states and Iran, of the need for a common strategy to address this global challenge; believes that these diplomatic efforts should be accompanied by the wide range of other tools and instruments at the EU’s disposal, including those intended to improve the political, social and economic conditions for the achievement of lasting peace;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours; urges the need for concerted diplomatic efforts on the part of the EU, the US and other international allies, to convince players in the region, such as Turkey, the Gulf states and Iran, of the need for a common strategy to address this global challenge; believes that these diplomatic efforts should be accompanied by the wide range of other tools and instruments at the EU’s disposal; stresses the need to intensify pressure on states in the region to end their support for EU-designated terror organizations; reiterates the responsibility of relevant EU authorities in continuing to ensure that no EU funding can directly or indirectly diverted to terrorist organizations or activities that incite these acts; reiterates its unwavering commitment to Israel's security;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours; urges the need for concerted diplomatic efforts on the part of the EU, the US and other international allies, to convince players in the region, such as Turkey, the Gulf states and Iran, of the need for a common strategy to address this global challenge;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Reiterates that a strong, effective and credible EU foreign policy is also an objectives in itself and that neither the EU's foreign policy nor its foreign policy instruments can be instrumentalised for other objectives including 'managing migration';
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis can only be achieved under the existing UN-agreed framework and needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement involving all relevant national and international stakeholders;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. S
Amendment 117 #
7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement involving all relevant national and international stakeholders; supports the call of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Syria on the ceasefire guarantor states to undertake urgent efforts to uphold the ceasefire regime;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement involving all relevant national and international stakeholders; supports the call of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Syria on the ceasefire guarantor states to undertake urgent efforts to uphold the ceasefire regime;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that a sustainable
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 120 #
7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement involving all relevant national and international stakeholders; views with great concern Iran's and its proxies' growing involvement in the conflict in Syria and its destabilizing effect on the region; supports the call of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Syria on the ceasefire guarantor states to undertake urgent efforts to uphold the ceasefire regime; calls on all parties involved, inside and outside Libya, to support both the Libyan political agreement signed on 17 December 2015 and its resulting Presidential Council, which is the only authority recognised by the international community and by the UN; underlines that solving the Libyan crisis is a prerequisite for stability in the Mediterranean; underlines its strong support for the negotiated two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and endorses the 2016 Middle East Quartet Report, which identifies Palestinian incitement and terrorism as a major impediment to peace;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement involving all relevant national and international stakeholders; supports the call of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Syria on the ceasefire guarantor states to undertake urgent efforts to uphold the ceasefire regime; calls on all parties involved, inside and outside Libya, to support both the Libyan political agreement signed on 17 December 2015 and its resulting Presidential Council,
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement, as set out in the Geneva Communiqué of 30 June 2012 and in Resolution 2254(2015) of the UN Security Council, involving all relevant national and international stakeholders; supports the call of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Syria on the ceasefire guarantor states to undertake urgent efforts to uphold the ceasefire regime; calls on all parties involved, inside and outside Libya, to support both the Libyan political agreement signed on 17 December 2015 and its resulting Presidential Council, which is the only authority recognised by the international community and by the UN; underlines that solving the Libyan crisis is a prerequisite for stability in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement involving all relevant national and international stakeholders; supports the call of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Syria on the ceasefire guarantor states to undertake urgent efforts to uphold the ceasefire regime; considers that the EU should coherently support the Member States involved in the coalition against Daesh in Syria and Iraq; calls on all parties involved, inside and outside Libya, to support both the Libyan political agreement signed on 17 December 2015 and its resulting Presidential Council, which is the only authority recognised by the international community and by the UN; underlines that solving the Libyan crisis is a prerequisite for stability in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement involving all relevant national and international stakeholders; supports the call of the UN Secretary-General’s Special
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement involving all relevant national and international stakeholders; supports the call of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Syria on the ceasefire guarantor states to undertake urgent efforts to uphold the ceasefire regime; stresses the importance of ensuring accountability for the mass and widespread abuses committed during the conflict; calls on all parties involved, inside and outside Libya, to support both the Libyan political agreement signed on 17 December 2015 and its resulting Presidential Council, which is the only authority recognised by the international community and by the UN; underlines that solving the Libyan crisis is a prerequisite for stability in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the continued successful implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), agreed by the EU3 +3 with Iran, by all parties, including Iran as confirmed by the reports issued by the IAEA(International Atomic Energy Agency); stresses that the continued full implementation of this agreement by all parties is key to global efforts on non- proliferation and conflict resolution in the Middle East; is therefore concerned by the uncertainty created by the statements of the members of the US administration regarding the US continued commitment to the JCPOA; calls on the Council and the EEAS to prepare effective measures to protect the interests of the EU, including its economic actors, should the US decide to withdraw from the JCPOA, or take actions inconsistent with its letter and spirit; is strongly opposed to the threat of the US extraterritorial sanctions against European companies that engage in legal and transparent business activities in third countries; calls on the Council and the EEAS to consistently raise this concern in their dialogue with the US Government and device a united and effective EU approach to protect the competitiveness and legitimate interests of the European economic actors subject to extraterritorial sanctions; calls on the Council and the Member states to effectively promote compliance with international humanitarian law, as provided in the relevant EU guidelines; calls, in this respect, on all the Member States to strictly adhere to the Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008 on arms trade, and withdraw licences for arms sales in situations where clear violations of the Common Position exist;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Reiterates that a lasting peace between Israel and Palestine remains a priority for the EU and an indispensable element for regional and global stability and security; believes that the best outcome would be a two-state solution on the basis of the 1967 borders, with an independent, democratic, viable and contiguous Palestinian state living side- by-side in peace and security with the secure State of Israel; calls on both parties to remain engaged to credible peace efforts and refrain from steps which could spark further escalation and generate further mistrust; stresses that protecting and preserving the viability of the two-state solution must be the priority in EU policies and action with regard to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Middle-East peace process; stresses the importance of engaging with other international actors in this regard; underlines that, in order to support a genuine European peace initiative, it is the primary duty of the Member states to contribute actively to the shaping of a united European position and to refrain from unilateral initiatives that weaken European action;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the continued successful implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), agreed by the EU3 +3 with Iran, by all parties, including Iran as confirmed by the reports issued by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency); stresses that the continued full implementation of this agreement by all parties is key to global efforts on non- proliferation and conflict resolution in the Middle East; is therefore concerned by the uncertainty created by the statements of the members of the US administration regarding the US continued commitment to the JCPOA; calls on the Council and the EEAS to prepare effective measures to protect the interest of the EU, including its economic actors, should the US decide to withdraw from the JCPOA, or take actions inconsistent with its letter and spirit;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Expresses strong concern over the continuing high instability and tensions in Libya, and calls on all parties involved, inside and outside Libya, to support both the Libyan political agreement signed on 17 December 2015 and its resulting Presidential Council, which is the only authority recognised by the international community and by the UN; believes that further coordination among the European Union, the UN, the African Union and the League of Arab States is essential for a swift and stable solution of the crisis; stresses its commitment to the territorial integrity and national unity of Libya, and underlines that solving the Libyan crisis is a prerequisite for stability in all neighbouring countries and in the Mediterranean more in general;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on all parties involved, inside and outside Libya, to support both the Libyan political agreement signed on 17 December 2015 and its resulting Presidential Council, which is the only authority recognised by the international community and by the UN; calls on all EU member states to refrain from funding or working together with parties and actors in Libya which do not recognise and even undermine the Libyan political agreement; underlines that solving the Libyan crisis is one of the prerequisites for stability in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Takes the view that the EU must act to ensure the continued existence of ethnic-religious minorities in the Middle East, particularly in Iraq and Syria; reiterates that crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide have been committed by Islamic State and that, as a result, there should be targeted European aid to enable the affected ethnic-religious groups to return to the region and reconstruct their villages and towns;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the importance of ensuring coherence of EU policy towards situations of occupation or annexation of territory; recalls that international humanitarian law should guide EU policy towards all such situations, including in cases of protracted occupation such as in Palestine, Western Sahara and the multiple frozen conflicts in the Eastern Partnership countries;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on all parties involved, inside and outside Libya, to support both the Libyan political agreement signed on 17 December 2015 and its resulting Presidential Council, which is the only authority recognised by the international community and by the UN; underlines that solving the Libyan crisis is a prerequisite for stability in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Condemns the repeated use by Russia of its veto powers on the United Nations Security Council and considers it undermines international efforts for peace and conflict resolution in Syria and the European Union’s southern neighbourhood more widely;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Underlines that the lack of progress towards a negotiated two-state solution in the Middle East only leads to further violence and bloodshed; calls on the EU to take its responsibility and become a genuine actor and facilitator in the diplomatic process; calls on the EU institutions and Member States to take urgent steps to protect the viability of the two-state solution and to create a positive dynamic towards genuine peace negotiations; in this regard, calls on the EU and Member States to respond to the expansion of Israeli settlements by applying measures based on international law, notably by distinguishing in their dealings between the State of Israel and the occupied territories, as required by UNSC Resolution 2234; calls on the Israeli authorities to immediately halt and revert its settlement policy; stresses that respect for international human rights and humanitarian law by all parties and in all circumstances remains an essential precondition for achieving a just and lasting peace; underlines the particular responsibility under international law of Israel, as the occupying power, to comply with international humanitarian and human rights law;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Expresses its deep concern about the ongoing humanitarian disaster in Yemen; calls on all parties involved in the conflict in Yemen abide by international humanitarian law and to negotiate a ceasefire; calls in this regards on all EU member states to refrain from selling arms to any party involved in military actions in Yemen; stresses the importance of coherence between all the Unions export control regimes, especially as regards the interpretation of the control criteria; reiterates also the importance of coherence between export control and other foreign policy instruments; stresses the need to develop an approach to situations where Member States make a different analysis for exports of products that are essentially alike, to similar destinations and end-users, in order to preserve the level playing field and the EU’s credibility abroad;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Condemns Iran’s ballistic missile tests and the regime’s threat to withdraw from the 2015 agreement; stresses the security risk posed by Iran’s ballistic missile programme, and believes the EU must take measures to ensure that the programme is halted; stresses the importance of facing up to Iran’s threat to Israel, both in its verbal statements and in the form of a military build-up at the Israeli border; regards Iran’s official anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial as a decisive obstacle to closer relations between the EU and Iran;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Is strongly opposed to the threat of the US extraterritorial sanctions against European companies that engage in legal and transparent business activities in third countries; calls on the Council and the EEAS to consistently raise this concern in their dialogue with the US Government and device a united and effective EU approach to protect the competitiveness and legitimate interests of the European economic actors subject extraterritorial sanctions;
Amendment 14 #
1.
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on the EU institutions, EU's Member States and the US to take urgent steps to protect the viability of the two- state solution to the conflict in the Middle East and to create positive dynamic towards peace negotiations; condemns terrorism and violence and stresses that respect for international human rights and humanitarian law by all parties and in all circumstances remains essential for achieving a just and lasting peace;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls for international investigation into the crimes against humanity committed in Syria, especially mass murders in Saydnaya prison;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Calls on the Council and the Member States to effectively promote compliance with international humanitarian law, as provided in the relevant guidelines; calls, in this respect, on all the Member States to strictly adhere to the Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008 on arms trade, and withdraw licences for arms sales in situations where clear violations of the Common Position exist;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Stresses that the EU can contribute to the peace process in the Middle East by requiring its partners, in various ways, to take decisive action against violence, terrorism, hate propaganda and incitement; accordingly, takes the view that the EU should withdraw financial support where there is reason to believe that EU funds are being used to support violence, terrorism, hate propaganda and incitement;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that further efforts should be made to make legal migration and mobility possible, including at bilateral level, by fostering well-managed mobility between and within continents
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that further efforts should be made to make legal migration and mobility possible, including at bilateral level
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that further efforts should be made to make legal migration and mobility possible
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises th
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that further efforts should be made to make legal migration and mobility possible, including at bilateral level, by fostering well-managed mobility between and within continents, as well as encouraging policies that promote regular channels for migration; underlines the efforts undertaken by individual Member States in this regard; notes that the European Union has struggled to find a unified position on dealing with the migration crisis and that the EU's provision of aid to the victims of disasters, refugees and others in need has delivered mixed results;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that further efforts should be made to make legal migration and mobility possible, including at bilateral level, by fostering well-managed mobility between and within continents, as well as encouraging policies that promote regular channels for migration; regrets, in this regard, the lack of a genuine, balanced and credible European migration and asylum policy as shown by the ongoing crisis in the Mediterranean and calls on the Council and the Member States to act accordingly;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Acknowledges that further efforts should be made to make legal migration and mobility possible, including at bilateral level, by fostering well-managed mobility between and within continents, as well as encouraging policies that promote regular channels for migration, including a European blue card system;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that priority should be given to comprehensive support measures in response to the refugee challenge, giving priority to ensuring the physical and mental integrity of those concerned and taking extremely tough action against individuals and organised criminal groups that seek to exploit vulnerable refugees;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Encourages the European Union and its Member States to distinguish more clearly between refugees fleeing persecution and conflict, and those doing so for purely economic reasons;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU must be a top priority for EU foreign policy;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 158 #
9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU must be a top priority for EU foreign policy
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU must be a top priority for EU foreign policy;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU must be a top priority for EU foreign policy;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU must be a top priority for EU foreign policy;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU must be a top
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU must be a top priority for EU foreign policy;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU must be a top priority for EU foreign policy
Amendment 167 #
9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU through an effective and strengthened application of the "more for more" principle must be a top priority for EU foreign policy; welcomes the prolongation of sanctions against Russia and continues to see full implementation of the Minsk agreements as the basis for a sustainable political solution to the conflict in Eastern Ukraine; reiterates its commitment to the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders as well as of all the Eastern Partnership countries; stresses that Russia’s decision of 21 March 2014 to incorporate Crimea into the Russian Federation remains illegal, and deplores
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU must be a top priority for EU foreign policy; welcomes the prolongation of sanctions against
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU must be a top priority for EU foreign policy; welcomes the prolongation of sanctions against Russia and continues to see full implementation of the Minsk agreements as the basis for a sustainable political solution to the conflict in Eastern Ukraine; reiterates its commitment to the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders; stresses
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that Member States must change their mentality from a national to a European perspective, as the most effective solution to protect Europe from increased threats is common EU
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Welcomes the prolongation of sanctions and calls on the EU to seriously consider to adopt further sanctions, including targeted personal sanctions against Russia and continues to see full implementation of the Minsk agreements as the basis for a sustainable political solution to the conflict in Eastern Ukraine; reiterates its commitment to the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders; stresses that Russia’s decision of 21 March 2014 to incorporate Crimea into the Russian Federation remains illegal, and deplores the subsequent decision of the Russian authorities to give all inhabitants of Crimea Russian passports;
Amendment 171 #
9a. Points out, in this respect, that protracted and frozen conflicts in the Eastern neighbourhood deeply undermine the resilience and the independence of our Eastern partners; regrets that over the last years no significant progress was made as regards the resolution of these conflicts and calls on the High Representative/Vice-President and Council to play a more active and effective role in the ongoing peace processes;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recognises the importance of
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recognises the importance of
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recognises the importance of selective engagement and, where possible, dialogue with Russia
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recognises the importance of selective engagement and, where possible, dialogue with Russia
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recognises the importance of
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recognises the importance of selective engagement and, where possible, dialogue with Russia so as to ensure accountability and to maintain the possibility of future cooperation on resolving global crises where there is a clear
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that Member States must change their mentality from a national to a European perspective, as the most effective solution to protect Europe from increased threats is common EU action; stresses that no single Member State alone can tackle any of the complex security challenges we are facing today, and in order for the EU to be able to respond to these unprecedented internal and external challenges it needs to step up its efforts towards concrete strong cooperation in the context of CFSP/CSDP; is concerned about the EU’s security architecture, which remains fragile in the face of continued and fresh challenges every day and in which a ‘hybrid peace’ has become an unsatisfactory reality; urges the Member States to take action and fulfil the wishes of th
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recognises the importance of selective engagement and, where possible, dialogue with Russia so as to ensure accountability and to maintain the possibility of future cooperation on resolving global crises where there is a
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recognises the importance of selective engagement and, whenever
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recognises the importance of selective engagement and, where possible, dialogue with Russia so as to ensure accountability and to maintain the possibility of future cooperation on resolving global crises where there is a clear EU interest, but regrets that Russia today is more autocratic internally and more aggressive towards its neighbours than at any time since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recognises the importance of selective engagement and, where possible, dialogue with Russia so as to ensure accountability and to maintain the possibility of future cooperation on resolving global crises where there is a clear EU interest;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recognises the importance of a coherent selective engagement and, where possible, dialogue with Russia so as to ensure accountability and to maintain the possibility of future cooperation on resolving global crises where there is a clear EU interest;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Condemns unreservedly Russian aggression in Ukraine, including the illegal annexation of Crimea and the Russian-sponsored conflict in the east of Ukraine, and calls on EU Member States and the international community to speak with one voice in sending a clear message to the Russian Government that its actions will have costs and consequences; further demands a de-escalation of the current crisis and insists that the EU and its Member States work with international partners to put diplomatic, political, economic and other pressures on the Russian Government to end its aggression; reiterates its call to immediately release all political prisoners held in Russia and in the occupied territories;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers that normalized relations are a necessity for both the EU and Russia, and that said relations require compliance with international law and subscribed agreements, such as the Helsinki and Budapest agreements; calls for the causes that have given rise to mutual sanctions to be resolved;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Reiterates that sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of states, as well as inviolability of borders and peaceful settlement of disputes, are key principles of the European security order, applying to all states, both within and beyond the EU’s borders;
Amendment 188 #
10b. Strongly supports all efforts for a lasting peaceful solution respecting the unity, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine and which ensures a stable, prosperous and democratic future for all its citizens;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 c (new) 10c. Calls for more active and effective role of the international community, including the UN and EU, in resolution of the conflict in the east of Ukraine in particular by deployment - with consent of Ukrainian authorities - of an armed peace-building and peace-keeping missions covering the whole territory, which would exclude participation of the aggressor;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that Member States must change their mentality from a national to a European perspective, as the most effective solution to protect Europe from increased threats is common EU action; is concerned about the EU’s security architecture, which remains fragile in the face of continued and fresh internal and external challenges every day and in which a ‘hybrid peace’ has become an unsatisfactory reality; urges the Member States to take action and fulfil the wishes of those European citizens who have repeatedly stressed that EU foreign and security policy is the most important and most necessary of all EU policies;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; is convinced that regional reconciliation and
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration through the transatlantic institutional architecture is the best means to address the dangers stemming from destabilising foreign interference, organised crime, disinformation and hybrid threats;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions and economy; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy and subsequent membership perspective and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration including through the
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration through the transatlantic institutional architecture is the best means to address the dangers stemming from destabilising foreign interference, including the impact of foreign funding in the EU and its immediate neighbourhood in establishing and sustaining large Salafist and Wahhabi networks that have been identified as the most active centres of recruitment of foreign terrorist fighters that have joined the ranks of ISIL/Da'esh; organised crime, disinformation and hybrid threats;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) – having regard to the EU-NATO joint declaration of July 2016 in Warsaw;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that Member States must change their mentality from a national to a European perspective, as the most effective solution to protect Europe from increased threats is common EU action; is concerned about the EU’s security architecture, which remains fragile and fragmented in the face of continued and fresh
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy based on a strict application of the Copenhagen criteria and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; further believes that the stability of the Western Balkans must continue to be a major priority for the European Union; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration through the transatlantic institutional architecture is the best means to address the dangers stemming from destabilising foreign interference, organised crime, disinformation and hybrid threats; in this regard welcomes Montenegro’s accession to NATO;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, recognizing the need for the EU follow through with its ambitions in the region, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration through the transatlantic institutional architecture is the best means to address the dangers stemming from destabilising foreign interference, organised crime, disinformation and hybrid threats; remains dedicated to fostering high-functioning political societies through inter-parliamentary exchanges and open dialogue with candidate countries in the region;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration through the transatlantic institutional architecture is the best means to address the dangers stemming from destabilising foreign interference, organised crime, disinformation and hybrid threats; calls for more efforts in focusing on regional economic development, which will decrease unemployment and poverty in the Western Balkans, as well as the prospects of ethnic and cross-border tensions;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy, also by reconfirming the commitment to enlargement perspective, and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration through the transatlantic institutional architecture is the best means to address the dangers stemming from destabilising foreign interference, organised crime, disinformation and hybrid threats;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to a credible EU enlargement policy and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration through the transatlantic institutional architecture is the best means to address the dangers stemming from destabilising foreign interference, organised crime, disinformation and hybrid threats;
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Regrets that the EU enlargement, in practice, has been put on hold until 2019; expresses its concern at the growing frustration of most candidate countries about some contradicting messages coming from Brussels; urges the Council and the EEAS to adopt a coherent approach based on objective and transparent criteria in the negotiations with the accession countries and send a clear message that the doors of the EU are open for membership once all these criteria are met;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Is concerned about Commission’s proposal to decrease 2018 allocation for Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance by € 90 million; IPA instrument, as one of the most important tools for implementation of necessary reforms for successful prospects for the EU membership; Calls on Commission to rethink the possibility for additional allocation for IPA instrument;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls that the European Union is one of the greatest European achievements and it has brought peace, stability and prosperity to its citizens and exerted its transformative power in its neighbourhood, with many states becoming EU Member States; recalls therefore that Enlargement policy is one of the EU's most successful policies and that it is important it remains credible for the candidate and future candidate countries; emphasises that the EU is one of the largest economic powers, the biggest donor of humanitarian and development assistance and a strong actor and defender of global multilateral diplomacy on issues such as climate change, international justice and human rights;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Welcomes the efforts made by the Berlin Process, and most recently the Trieste Summit, on giving additional impetus on convergence of Western Balkan countries towards the EU membership by supporting regional economic cooperation and supporting infrastructural projects of common interest;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new) 11c. However, reiterates that special attention and support should be given to the implementation of crucial institutional and political reforms in Western Balkans; reminds that those reforms will be the foundation for any other reform in that region;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls for stronger support for the neighbours of our neighbours, in particular in Africa, where close cooperation between European and local small and medium- sized enterprises and support for African countries in building democratic, transparent and effective institutions are needed;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls for stronger support for the neighbours of our neighbours
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls for stronger support for the neighbours of our neighbours, in particular in Africa, where close cooperation between European and local small and medium- sized enterprises and support for African countries in building democratic, transparent and effective institutions are needed; considers international cooperation and development policies to be fundamental instruments for achieving such objectives and urges the need for improved, efficient and effective allocation and use of EU funding and for greater synergies with other international organisations; emphasises the need to address the major security threats in the Sahel, Sahara, Lake Chad, Great Lakes and Horn of Africa regions with a view to eradicating the terrorist threat posed by ISIL/Daesh, al-Qaeda and Boko Haram, or any other affiliated terrorist groups; stresses the need to provide greater and more effective protection for women and their fundamental rights, ensuring them full and effective access to healthcare and education, as well as political and trade union representation; calls for priority to be given to the protection of other social groups in particularly vulnerable situations such as children, juveniles, persons with disabilities, ethnic and religious minorities and the LGTBI community;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls for stronger support for the neighbours of our neighbours, in particular in Africa, where close cooperation between European and local small and medium- sized enterprises and support for African countries in building democratic, transparent and effective institutions are needed; considers international cooperation and development policies to be fundamental instruments for achieving such objectives and urges the need for improved, efficient and effective allocation and use of EU funding and for greater synergies with other international organisations; calls for support to be given to our African partners in establishing security of energy supply through the use of environmentally friendly and sustainable energy sources while at the same time promoting off-grid solutions; emphasises the need to address the major security threats in the Sahel, Sahara, Lake Chad, Great Lakes and Horn of Africa regions with a view to eradicating the terrorist threat posed by ISIL/Daesh, al- Qaeda and Boko Haram, or any other affiliated terrorist groups;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls for stronger support for the neighbours of our neighbours, in particular in Africa, where close cooperation between European and local small and medium-
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls for stronger support for the neighbours of our neighbours, in particular in Africa, where close cooperation between European and local small and medium- sized enterprises and support for African countries in building democratic, transparent and effective institutions are needed; considers international cooperation and development policies to be fundamental instruments for achieving such objectives and urges the need for improved, efficient and effective allocation and use of EU funding and for greater synergies with other international organisations; emphasises the need to address the major security threats in the
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls for stronger support for the neighbours of our neighbours, in particular in Africa, where close cooperation between European and local small and medium- sized enterprises, in partnership with civil society, and support for African countries in building democratic, transparent and effective institutions are needed; considers international cooperation and development policies to be fundamental instruments for achieving such objectives and urges the need for improved, efficient and effective allocation and use of EU funding and for greater synergies with other international organisations; emphasises the need to address the major security threats in the Sahel, Sahara, Lake Chad, Great Lakes and Horn of Africa regions with a view to eradicating the terrorist threat posed by ISIL/Daesh, al-Qaeda and Boko Haram, or any other affiliated terrorist groups;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that the current decision- making process in the EU Foreign Policy based on unanimity at Council level is the main obstacle to an effective and timely external action of the EU; is of the opinion that qualified majority voting should be applied also in foreign policy and urges Member States from now on to refrain from using or from threatening to use the veto power in Foreign Affairs Council meetings;
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls for stronger support for the neighbours of our neighbours, in particular in Africa, where close cooperation between European and local small and medium- sized enterprises and support for African countries in building democratic, transparent and effective institutions are needed; considers international cooperation and development policies to be fundamental instruments for achieving such objectives and urges the need for improved, more transparent, more efficient and effective allocation and use of EU funding and for greater synergies with other international organisations; emphasises the need to address the major security threats in the Sahel, Sahara, Lake Chad, Great Lakes and Horn of Africa regions with a view to eradicating the terrorist threat posed by ISIL/Daesh, al- Qaeda and Boko Haram, or any other affiliated terrorist groups;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls for stronger support for the neighbours of our neighbours, in particular in Africa, where close cooperation between European and local small and medium- sized enterprises and support for African countries in building democratic, transparent and effective institutions are needed; considers international cooperation and development policies to be fundamental instruments for achieving
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Strongly condemns any attempt of sitting presidents to overstay in power by violating, evading or unlawfully amending the existing electoral laws, and in particular the constitution; also condemns any strategy to abolish or circumvent term limits; urges all governments to take measures to ensure the transparency and integrity of the entire electoral process, and to take all necessary measures and precautions to prevent the perpetration of fraud or any illegal practices; expresses in this regard its concern at the political crises, and related violence and violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, in particular countries in the Great Lakes Region; reiterates its belief in strong electoral observation missions, and where necessary, financial, technical and logistical support as means of achieving fair, credible and democratic electoral processes;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Strongly supports the continued full implementation of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) between the EU3+3 and Iran by all sides and the role of the HR/VP Federica Mogherini as the chair of the Joint Commission to oversee the implementation of the agreement; rejects as unfounded statements by some members of the US administration that Iran is in violation of the terms of the agreement, since reports of the International Atomic Energy Agency have repeatedly confirmed Iran´s compliance; warns that the unravelling of the agreement would have profoundly destabilising consequences for the region; reiterates that the opening of the EU delegation in Tehran is urgent and supports all efforts of the EEAS towards that end;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Rejects every proposal which refocuses development policy, in particular in Africa, under the new prism of migration management; stresses that there should be no conditionality between development assistance and cooperation from beneficiary countries on migration issues; opposes any attempts to link aid with border control, management of migratory flows or readmission agreements; recalls in this regard the strengthening and improving of public local services (e.g. health, education, nutrition) and political participation, and that third countries' governments, together with civil society, local and international NGOs, should play a pivotal role;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Points out that the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) includes plans to involve third countries that are neighbours of the EU’s neighbourhood partner countries in the context of extended cooperation frameworks; urges, therefore, that thematic frameworks be set up to offer cooperation between the Union, the Southern neighbourhood partner countries and key regional players, especially in Africa, on regional issues such as security, energy and the management of migratory flows;
Amendment 226 #
12a. Encourages the development of a coherent, robust strategy for the Sahel region aimed at improving governance and the accountability and legitimacy of state and regional institutions, boosting security, tackling radicalization, the trafficking of people, arms and drugs, and strengthening economic and development policies;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Recognises that climate change could have a series effect on regional and global stability, as global warming disputes over territory, food, water, and other resources weaken economies, threaten regional security, and act as a source of migratory flows; further encourages the EU and its Member States to consider how national and EU military planning can include climate change adaption strategies and what would be considered an appropriate capability, priority, and response;
Amendment 228 #
12b. Strongly condemns strikes on civilian neighbourhoods by the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen; calls for independent international investigation of these actions that may amount to war crimes and for holding the responsible accountable; emphasises once again that there can be no military solution to the prolonged conflict in Yemen and supports efforts of the EU and UN towards achieving the ceasefire and laying the ground for peace negotiations;
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Encourages a renewed relationship between the EU, its Member States, and Iran with both sides working closely on bilateral and multilateral issues to ensure a more stable region and effective implementation of the nuclear deal; deplores, however, Iranian actions aimed at destabilising the region;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Believes that the European Union and its Member States must develop effective foreign, security, and defence policies which respect national interests but also seek to work together with NATO and other international partners, the United Nations, NGOs, human rights defenders, and others on issues of shared concern and in order to promote peace, prosperity, and stability around the world;
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends an updated strategy for EU-Asia relations; voices support in this context for stronger cooperation within the framework of the Asia-Europe Meetings, including in terms of its parliamentary dimension; encourages support for closer regional cooperation and trust-building measures in South Asia with a view to reducing tensions between India and Pakistan; recommends continued support for EU peace mediation in the Afghan-led and Afghan-owned peace process;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends an updated strategy for EU-Asia relations; voices support in this context for stronger cooperation within the framework of the Asia-Europe Meetings, including in terms of its parliamentary dimension; encourages support for closer regional cooperation and trust-building measures in South Asia with a view to reducing tensions between India and Pakistan; recommends continued support for EU peace mediation in the Afghan-led and Afghan-owned peace process; recommends developing an updated EU strategy for the North-East Asia region in the light of the
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends an updated strategy for EU-Asia relations; voices support in this context for stronger cooperation within the framework of the Asia-Europe Meetings, including in terms of its parliamentary dimension; encourages support for closer regional cooperation and trust-building measures in South Asia with a view to reducing tensions between India and Pakistan; recommends continued support for EU peace mediation in the Afghan-led and Afghan-owned peace process;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends an updated strategy for EU-Asia relations; voices support in this context for stronger cooperation within the framework of the Asia-Europe
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends an updated strategy for EU-Asia relations; voices support in this context for stronger cooperation within the framework of the Asia-Europe Meetings, including in terms of its parliamentary dimension; encourages support for closer regional cooperation and trust-building measures in South Asia with a view to reducing tensions between India and Pakistan; recommends continued support for EU peace mediation in the Afghan-led and Afghan-owned peace process; recommends developing an updated and more assertive EU strategy for the North-East Asia region in the light of the continued
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recommends an updated strategy for EU-Asia relations; voices support in this context for stronger cooperation within the framework of the Asia-Europe Meetings, including in terms of its parliamentary dimension; encourages support for closer regional cooperation and trust-building measures in South Asia with a view to reducing tensions between India and Pakistan; recommends continued support for EU peace mediation in the Afghan-led and Afghan-owned peace process; recommends developing an updated EU strategy for the North-East Asia region in the light of the continued military build-up by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK); is deeply concerned about the most recent developments in the DPRK and calls for common EU action to persuade its leaders to abandon the weapons of mass destruction;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Re
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses that preserving peace, stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region is of substantial interest to the EU and its Member States; calls on all the parties concerned to solve differences through peaceful means and to refrain from taking unilateral actions to change the status quo, including in the East and South China sea and the Taiwan strait, in order to safeguard regional security; acknowledges the continued good will and flexibility shown by the government of Taiwan in maintaining cross-strait relations and encourages the resumption of bilateral dialogues, which will be conducive to regional peace and stability; reiterates its commitment to supporting Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organisations and activities;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Underlines the role of the European Parliament in shaping a genuine common foreign policy in line with the expectations of the European citizens; calls on the Council to take in due account the positions, the stances and the requests of the European Parliament and to act in concert with the EP during the main phases of the decision-making process and the follow-up;
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses that preserving peace, stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region is of substantial interest to the EU and its member states; calls for all parties concerned in the region to solve differences through peaceful means and to refrain from taking unilateral actions to change the status quo, including in the East and South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, in order to safeguard regional security; acknowledges the continued good will and flexibility shown by the government of Taiwan in maintaining cross-Strait relations and encourages the resumption of bilateral dialogues, which will be conducive to regional peace and stability; reiterates its commitment to supporting Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations and activities;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses that preserving peace, stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region is of substantial interest to the EU and its member states. Calls for all parties concerned in the region to solve differences through peaceful means and to refrain from taking unilateral actions to change the status quo, including in the East and South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, in order to safeguard regional security;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Underlines that the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery remains a growing threat to international peace and security; expresses its concern over the risk of State or non-state actors acquiring such weapons or material; reiterates its condemnation in the strongest terms of all use of weapons of mass destruction; calls in this regard for a more active role to be played by the EU in field of disarmament, non-proliferation and arms control;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Believes that the EU should play a greater role in resolving the Korean's peninsula nuclear crisis by engaging in mediation efforts; considers that the DPRK should enter in a meaningful dialogue with the international community as only a political settlement represents a viable solution to the crisis; calls on all parties to take significant steps to de-escalate the crisis with a focus on the diplomatic approach;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Recalls that Latin America is an important region which shares with the EU common values and principles and a strong belief in effective multilateralism; highlights the relevance of concluding the negotiations for the modernisation of the EU-Mexico Global Agreement by the end of 2017 and of speeding up the EU- Mercosur negotiations, as well as those aimed at the modernisation of the EU- Chile Association Agreement;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Underlines the key importance of EU-China relations, and the need to further engage constructively on issues of common interest, such as peace and security including the DPRK issue, climate change, counter-terrorism, counter-piracy, stability in Asia including Afghanistan; reminds the excellent cooperation on the Iranian deal, and counts on the resolutive role of China also in the case of the DPRK;
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Believes that Latin America is an important partner for the EU and that this partnership should be strengthened to jointly address major global challenges;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Takes the view that the EU should intensify its diplomatic efforts in Asia in order to contribute to greater stability and security in conflict areas with renewed tensions such as the Korean peninsula; strongly condemns in this regard the DPRK's continuation of its nuclear and ballistic missile programmes; underlines that the DPRK's actions undermine the global non-proliferation and disarmament regime; urges the DPRK to comply with its obligations under UN Security Council resolution; urges all states involved in the conflict to refrain from any further provocative action that could increase regional and global tensions; reiterates the importance of close engagement of the EU with all its key partners in the region and worldwide; believes that peace and the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula must be achieved through peaceful means;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Reaffirms its commitment to continue forging strong relations with Latin America, promoting the defence of democracy and human rights in so far as shared core values by both the EU and LAC; expresses its grave concern on the attacks against democratically elected opposition leaders, journalists, human rights defenders, in particular those working on environmental issues and their lawyers; emphasizes that respect to rule of law and to stable political and legal framework, including fight against corruption and impunity, as well as progress towards democracy and the respect for and promotion of fundamental freedoms, are cornerstone for deeper integration and cooperation with LAC;
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 c (new) 13c. Reiterates its support for the peace process in Colombia, which is decisive for the future of Colombians and for stabilisation in the region of which this country is a part; welcomes the step undertaken by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) for the handover of individual weapons; supports a new Commission established by the UN Security Council to help FARC to reintegrate in society; demands that all FARC assets, including the treasure obtained from drug smuggling be used to indemnify victims of the conflict; also demands that provides full information on the drug-smuggling network in order to fight against those criminal cartels;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 d (new) 13d. Expresses its grave concern at the seriously deteriorating situation as regards democracy, human rights and the socio-economic situation in Venezuela, in a climate of growing political and social instability; strongly condemns the elections to a Constituent Assembly of 30July 2017; stresses that no decision or act adopted by the Constitutive Assembly will be recognised; and calls on the Venezuelan Government to urgently safeguard the separation and independence of branches of powers in the State (legislative, judicial and executive) and to restore full constitutional authority to the National Assembly;
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 e (new) 13e. Condemns the illegal prosecution and repression of the opposition and members of the judiciary, especially of the legitimate Prosecutor General Luisa Ortega Diaz as well as all of the members of the Supreme Court appointed by the legitimate National Assembly of Venezuela; calls on the High Representative/Vice President and the European Council to consider the freezing of assets of those responsible for the repression;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 Consolidation and deepening of the European project through enhanced EU
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States to adopt an EU comprehensive approach
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States to adopt an EU comprehensive approach at every relevant opportunity, and believes that coherent, coordinated action across EU polices, in particular in the areas of humanitarian aid, agriculture, development, trade, energy, climate and science, should be applied in the EU’s external action in a consistent and structured manner; believes that energy security, the respect for human rights and climate diplomacy remain important complementary aspects of the EU’s common foreign and security policy to be addressed as part of the comprehensive approach, and that the Energy Union should be further advanced;
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Commission, the EEAS
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States to adopt an EU comprehensive approach at every relevant opportunity, and believes that coherent, coordinated action across EU polices, in particular in the areas of humanitarian aid, development, trade, energy, climate and science, cyber security and cyber defence, should be applied in the EU’s external action in a consistent and structured manner; believes that energy security and climate diplomacy remain important aspects of the EU’s common foreign and security policy to be addressed as part of the comprehensive approach, and that the Energy Union should be further advanced;
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States to adopt an EU comprehensive approach at every relevant opportunity, and believes that coherent, coordinated action across EU polices, while taking into consideration and implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals, in particular in the areas of humanitarian aid, development, trade, energy, climate and science, should be applied in the EU’s external action in a consistent and structured manner; believes that energy security and climate diplomacy remain important aspects of the EU’s common foreign and security policy to be addressed as part of the comprehensive approach, and that the Energy Union should be further advanced;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States to adopt an EU comprehensive approach at every relevant opportunity, and believes that coherent, coordinated action across EU polices, in particular in the areas of humanitarian aid, development, trade, energy, climate and
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls for stronger political, social and economic links to be forged with Latin America and the Caribbean, a region which must be seen as a key ally of the EU, with which we share a vision and a mission with regard to the current world agenda, and with which we must necessarily take on the challenges we are currently facing with a common agenda in mind: inclusive growth that makes it possible to eradicate poverty, promote peace and security, ensure that globalisation is rigorously and sustainably governed, defend gender equality, tackle climate change, and address the digital transformation and migration management;
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Reminds the EU`s commitment to develop a Common Foreign and Security Policy guided by the values of democracy, rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms and compliance with the UN Charter and international law; considers that, in order to live up to this commitment and to contribute to advancing human rights and democracy in the world, the EU and its Member States need to speak with a united voice and ensure that their message is heard;
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses that the future of European defence cooperation is significantly affected by two major events that took place in 2016: the decision of the United Kingdom, one of the strongest players in European defence, to withdraw from the EU, and the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States;
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Takes the view, in this regard, that in order to make the Common Foreign and Security policy more assertive, effective and value-based the EU should enhance its energy security reducing immediately and freeing it in the medium term from the current dependence on oil and gas supplied by authoritarian regimes;
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Strongly supports the strengthening of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) as an important governing principle in the European Union and its Member States’ work across the conflict spectrum, as well as on human rights and development;
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Recognises that climate change could have a serious effect on regional and global stability, as global warming affects disputes over territory, food, water and other resources, weakens economies, threatens regional security, and is a source of migratory flows; further encourages the EU and Member States to consider how national and EU military planning can include climate change adaption strategies and what would be considered an appropriate capability, priority, and response;
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Considers that the election of the new United States President introduces uncertainty in the transatlantic partnership and considers therefore that the question around the US engagement in transatlantic security should increase the momentum for EU defence and bring about the prioritization of the Union's "strategic autonomy", as embodied in the Global Strategy, and the development of EU capacities;
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 c (new) 14c. Takes the view that the EU must continue to engage with the UK as a major international partner in order to maintain European security; is convinced that both the EU and the UK have an interest in keeping the UK involved in the EU’s military operations and its defence market;
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that, in order for the EU and its Member States to succeed in addressing the challenges it faces, and in particular security threats,
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Takes the view that the EU institutions must work more effectively with Member States in order to improve the
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Takes the view that the EU institutions must improve their capacity to anticipate conflicts and crises; believes that the EU needs to be able to react more swiftly and effectively to developing crises and should place a greater emphasis on preventing conflicts at an early stage; calls in this context on the Member States to put into practice the recommendations contained in the report by the European Parliament on arms exports: implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP ( 2017/2029(INI));
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Takes the view that the EU institutions must improve their capacity to anticipate conflicts and crises; believes that the EU needs to be able to react more swiftly and effectively to developing crises and should place a greater emphasis on preventing conflicts at an early stage, as well as embracing the principles arising from the doctrine of the Responsibility to Protect, with the aim of preserving the protection of human rights and, above all, preventing war crimes and crimes against humanity, including genocide;
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Takes the view that the EU institutions must improve their capacity to anticipate conflicts and crises including through an adequate short and long term impact assessment of its policies in the regions concerned and to address the root causes of the problems; believes that the EU needs to be able to react more swiftly and effectively to developing crises and should place a greater emphasis on preventing conflicts by primarily using civilian tools such as mediation, reconciliation and dialogue at an early stage;
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Takes the view that the EU institutions must improve their capacity to anticipate conflicts and crises liable to entail human rights violations; believes that the EU needs to be able to react more swiftly and effectively to developing crises and should place a greater emphasis on preventing conflicts at an early stage; stresses therefore the need to deepen its cooperation with partner countries and international organisations to adapt to changing circumstances;
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Takes the view that the EU institutions must improve their capacity to anticipate conflicts and crises; urges Member states to cooperate more and spend smarter in the field of defence and security; encourages Member States to meet capacity goals; believes that the EU needs to be able to react more swiftly and effectively to developing crises and should place a greater emphasis on
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Takes the view that the EU institutions must improve their capacity to anticipate conflicts and crises; believes that the EU needs to be able to react more swiftly and effectively to developing crises and should place a greater emphasis on preventing conflicts at an early stage; underlines, in particular, the importance of an effective exchange of information and coordination of preventive actions between the EU institutions, along with EU delegations, common security and defence missions and operations and Member States, together with their diplomatic representations;
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the VP/HR, the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that, in order for the EU to succeed in addressing
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 281 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the VP/HR, the Commission and the Member States to step up their efforts to increase the EU’s ability to confront hybrid threats; calls, in this regard, for the development of joint, comprehensive risk and vulnerability analysis capacities and methods and for bolstering the EU’s
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the VP/HR, the Commission and the Member States to step up their efforts to increase the EU’s ability to confront hybrid threats; calls, in this
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the VP/HR, the Commission and the Member States to step up their efforts to increase the EU’s ability to confront hybrid and cyber threats; calls, in this regard, for the development of joint, comprehensive risk and vulnerability analysis capacities and methods and for bolstering the EU’s strategic communication capabilities;
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to build a community of values and culture that binds together all Europeans;
Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to build a community of values and culture that binds together all Europeans; believes in that context that the
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to build a community of values and culture that binds together all Europeans; believes in that context that the EU plays a major role as a promoter of democracy and human rights and should continue to promote its values outside the EU; underlines that mainstreaming human rights across the external policies of the EU must remain a top priority and the respect for and implementation of human rights should form a central conditionality in the external policies; highlights that cultural diplomacy should become a substantial part of the EU’s external action and urges the Commission to foster the development of ambitious science diplomacy;
Amendment 288 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to build a community of values and respect for diversity of cultures that binds together all Europeans; believes in that context that the EU plays a major role as a promoter of democracy and should continue to promote its values outside the EU, whilst fully respecting different cultures; highlights that cultural diplomacy should become a substantial part of the EU’s external action and urges the Commission to foster the development of ambitious science diplomacy; therefore, calls for closer coordination with the UNESCO and World Heritage Committee;
Amendment 289 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to build a community of values and culture that binds together all Europeans; believes in that context that the EU plays a major role as a promoter of democracy and should continue to promote its values outside the EU; recalls that the EU will only be perceived as a credible normative actor when its foreign policy is consistent and principled; highlights that cultural diplomacy should become a substantial part of the EU’s external action
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that, in order for the EU to succeed in addressing the challenges it faces, and in particular security threats, it needs to both be an
Amendment 290 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to build a community of values and culture that binds together all Europeans; believes in that context that the EU plays a major role as a promoter of democracy and should continue to promote its values outside the EU but believes current crises have exposed weaknesses in the EU and its structures, and calls on Member States to cooperate more effective to address common challenges; highlights that cultural diplomacy should become a substantial part of the EU’s external action and urges the Commission to foster the development of ambitious science diplomacy;
Amendment 291 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to build a community of values and culture that binds together all Europeans; believes in that context that the EU through robust radicalization prevention policies and particularly via the work of the EU Radicalisation Awareness Network plays a major role as a promoter of democracy and should continue to promote its values outside the EU; highlights that cultural diplomacy should become a substantial part of the EU’s external action and urges the Commission to foster the development of ambitious science diplomacy;
Amendment 292 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to build a community of values and culture that binds together all Europeans; believes in that context that the EU plays a major role as a promoter of democracy, rule of law and human rights and should continue to promote its values outside the EU in line with its commitments to pursue these values in all areas of its external action; highlights that cultural diplomacy should become a substantial part of the EU’s external action and urges the Commission to foster the development of ambitious science diplomacy;
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to build a community of values and culture that binds together all Europeans; believes in that context that the EU plays a major role as a promoter of democracy, freedom, equal rights and equal opportunities, and should continue to promote its values outside the EU; highlights that cultural diplomacy should become a substantial part of the EU’s external action and urges the Commission to foster the development of ambitious science diplomacy;
Amendment 294 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to build a community of values and culture that binds together all Europeans; believes in that context that the EU plays a major role as a promoter of democracy and should continue to promote its values outside the EU
Amendment 296 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Points out that human rights are an integral part of the EU’s common foreign and security policy; takes the view that respect for women’s rights and women’s civil liberties is an essential indicator of resilience and good governance within a society;
Amendment 297 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Underlines the role of Non State Actors and Civil Society Organisation as actors of diplomacy and key partners of the EU and stresses the importance of EU assistance to and engagement with them;
Amendment 298 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Emphasises that the EU is committed to promoting and developing international law and to strengthening the role of the United Nations on the international stage;
Amendment 299 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Points out that it was noted in UN Security Council Resolution 1820(2008) of 19 June 2008 that rape and other forms of sexual violence can constitute a war crime, a crime against humanity, or a constitutive act with respect to genocide, and that women must be afforded humanitarian protection in situations of armed conflict;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 b (new) Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that, in order for the EU to succeed in addressing the challenges it faces, and in particular security threats, it needs to both be an effective global player, what implies speaking with one voice and acting together, and focus its resources on strategic priorities;
Amendment 300 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for the industrial and technological resources needed to improve cybersecurity to be developed
Amendment 302 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for the industrial and technological resources needed to improve cyber security to be developed, including through the promotion of a single market for cyber security products; calls for significantly increased financial and human resources to be made available within the EU institutions to increase the EU´s cyber security and cyber defence capacity; emphasises the need to mainstream cyber defence into external action and common foreign and security policy, and calls for closer coordination on cyber defence with NATO;
Amendment 303 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for the industrial and
Amendment 304 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for the industrial and technological resources needed to improve Member States' defence capabilities among others for cyber security
Amendment 305 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for the industrial and technological resources needed to improve cybersecurity to be developed, including through the promotion of a single market for cybersecurity products; calls for significantly increased financial and human resources to be made available within the EU institutions to increase the EU´s cybersecurity and cyber defence capacity; emphasises the need to mainstream cyber defence into external action and common foreign and security policy, and calls for closer coordination on cyber defence with NATO;
Amendment 306 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for the industrial and technological resources needed to improve cybersecurity to be developed, including through the promotion of a single market for cybersecurity products; emphasises the need to mainstream cyber defence into external action and common foreign and security policy and the need for enhanced ability to identify cyber-attacks in the EU that originate in third countries, and calls for closer coordination on cyber defence with NATO;
Amendment 307 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Considers that the development of a strong defence industry is strengthening the technologic independence of the EU; calls for the industrial and technological resources needed to improve cybersecurity to be developed, including through the promotion of a single market for cybersecurity products; emphasises the need to mainstream cyber defence into external action and common foreign and security policy, and calls for closer coordination on cyber defence with NATO;
Amendment 308 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Notes that information and cyber warfare, stemming mainly from Russia and China and targeting European Union Member States and other Western countries, individuals, and organisations, is a deliberate attempt at a state and non- state level to destabilise and discredit political, economic, and social structures;
Amendment 309 #
18b. Emphasises that the security of EU Member States who are also members of NATO is guaranteed under Article 5 of the Alliance;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Takes the view that, in order for the EU to succeed in addressing the challenges it faces, and in particular security threats, it needs to both be an effective, credible and values-based global player and focus its resources on strategic priorities;
Amendment 310 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses th
Amendment 311 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the role of independent media in promoting cultural diversity and
Amendment 312 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the role of independent media in promoting cultural diversity and intercultural competences, and the need to
Amendment 313 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the role of independent media in promoting cultural diversity and intercultural competences, and the need to strengthen such media as a source of credible information, especially in the EU and its neighbourhood, and to further strengthen the
Amendment 314 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the role of independent media in promoting cultural diversity and intercultural competences, and the need to strengthen such media as a source of credible information, especially in the EU and its neighbourhood, and to further strengthen the EU’s capacity to fight fake news and disinformation; highlights in this context the need to develop stronger resilience at EU level against such information spread over the Internet; calls on the Commission to coordinate better with the EEAS on those issues; underlines the need for the EU Strategic Communication Task Force to be reinforced by turning it into a fully- fledged unit within the EEAS, with adequate staffing and budgetary resources;
Amendment 315 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the role of independent media in promoting cultural diversity and intercultural competences, and the need to strengthen such media as a source of credible information, especially in the EU and its neighbourhood, and to further strengthen the EU’s capacity to fight fake news and disinformation; underlines that common EU TV and radio stations should be further enhanced; highlights in this context the need to develop stronger resilience at EU level against such information spread over the Internet; calls on the Commission to coordinate better with the EEAS on those issues;
Amendment 316 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the role of independent media in promoting cultural diversity and intercultural competences, and the need to
Amendment 317 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the role of independent media in promoting cultural diversity and intercultural competences, and the need to strengthen such media as a source of credible information, especially in the EU and its neighbourhood, and to further strengthen the EU’s capacity to fight fake news and disinformation, especially through the East StratCom Task Force; highlights in this context the need to develop stronger resilience at EU level against such information spread over the Internet; calls on the Commission to coordinate better with the EEAS on those issues;
Amendment 318 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the role of independent media both on and offline in promoting cultural diversity and intercultural competences, and the need to strengthen such media as a source of credible information, especially in the EU and its neighbourhood, and to further strengthen the EU’s capacity to fight fake news and disinformation; highlights in this context the need to develop stronger resilience at EU level against such information spread over the Internet; calls on the Commission to coordinate better with the EEAS and Member States on those issues;
Amendment 319 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Notes that various Member States have difficulty to maintain a very broad range of fully operational defensive capabilities, mostly because of financial constraints; calls therefore for more cooperation and coordination about which capabilities to maintain, so that Member States can specialise in certain capabilities and spend their resources more efficiently;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Highlights the raising awareness and political commitment for an urgent implementation of an ambitious, effective and structured CSDP; welcomes the contribution of CSDP missions and operations to international peace and stability and also the initiatives to address their shortcomings to improve their effectiveness and sustainability; calls for adjusting the CSDP structures and procedures in order to deploy and direct civilian and military missions and operations faster and in a more effective and integrated manner; notes that the development of CSDP requires, above all, political will from the Member States, based on common interests and priorities, as well as the setting-up of institutional cooperation structures;
Amendment 320 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Highlights the need to further inter-parliamentary relations between the Union and its partner countries, in a framework of honest dialogue underpinned by mutual understanding and trust, with the aim of promoting human rights effectively;
Amendment 321 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Believes that interoperability is key if Member States forces are to be more compatible and integrated; stresses therefore, that Member States must explore the possibility of joint procurement of defence resources; notes that the protectionist and closed nature of EU defence markets makes this more difficult;
Amendment 322 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 323 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that Europe should increase defence cooperation with European security priorities in mind, including territorial integrity, the link between external and internal security, and risk control in the periphery of Europe;
Amendment 324 #
20. Believes that
Amendment 325 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that Europe should consider increased defence cooperation with European security priorities in mind, including territorial integrity, the link between external and internal security, and risk control in the periphery of Europe
Amendment 326 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that Europe should increase defence cooperation with European security priorities in mind, including territorial integrity, the link between external and internal security, and risk control in the periphery of Europe;
Amendment 327 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that Europe should increase defence cooperation
Amendment 328 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that Europe should increase defence cooperation with European security priorities in mind,
Amendment 329 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that Europe should increase States’ defence cooperation with
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Reminds that the pursuit of rule of law, human rights and democracy, as mutually reinforcing principles, are at the heart of the EU’s foreign policy; recalls therefore that for the EU to be able to increase its international diplomatic and political clout and shape the evolving world order as a credible and legitimate international actor on the global scene, it must continue conducting its foreign policy upholding these principles;
Amendment 330 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that Europe should
Amendment 331 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that
Amendment 332 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that Europe should increase defence cooperation with European security priorities in mind, including territorial integrity, the link between external and internal security, and
Amendment 333 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that Europe should increase defence cooperation with European security priorities in mind, including territorial integrity, the link between external and internal security, and risk control in the periphery of Europe, keeping in mind that the territorial defence of European territory is NATO's responsibility; welcomes in this context the Implementation Plan on Security and Defence; considers that the European Defence Agency (EDA) capabilities and permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) should be used to their full potential;
Amendment 334 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that Europe should
Amendment 335 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Believes that there is the urgent need to advance nuclear disarmament both regionally and globally; reiterates its calls expressed in its resolution of 17 January 2013 on the Recommendations of the Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference regarding the establishment of a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction and its resolution of 27 October 2016 on nuclear security and non-proliferation; calls on all EU Member States to sign the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons adopted by 122 states at the UN on 7 July 2017 which will be open for signature on 20September 2017, at the UN in New York;
Amendment 336 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Rejects the militarisation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CSFP) in general, the Global Strategy's Implementation Plan on Security and Defence as well as the European Defence Fund and PESCO; recalls in this regard that Article41(2) of the TEU prohibits operating expenditure arising from operations having military or defence implications to be charged to the Union budget;
Amendment 337 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Encourages a review of the EU’s approach to civilian CSDP missions from the nature of interventions to their objectives and the people involved, in order to ensure they are properly devised, implemented, and supported;
Amendment 338 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Strongly supports the 2016 Warsaw Summit Declaration, particularly on EU-NATO cooperation and welcomes decisions on closer cooperation between NATO and the EU in numerous areas as well as placement of US, Canadian and other multinational forces at the Eastern flank of the EU;
Amendment 339 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 4 Cooperation within
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Regrets the inability of the EU to communicate and present properly to the European public opinions the actions, merits and achievements of the Common Security and Defence policy with regard, in particular, to its numerous CSDP missions and the assistance provided in many parts of the world; urges the Council, the Commission and the Member States to fill up this gap making the EU external action more accountable and visible;
Amendment 340 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 4 Cooperation within
Amendment 341 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Notes that deadlocks within the UN Security Council are impeding action by the international community and preventing crisis resolution; calls once again on the Member States to support reforms in the composition and functioning of the Security Council;
Amendment 342 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for the EU to con
Amendment 343 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for the
Amendment 344 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for the EU to continue to deepen the transatlantic partnership, while focusing on creating own capabilities to better address regional and international conflicts that have an impact on the EU; believes that the EU and US should focus on adapting transatlantic structures to today’s challenges, such as defending human rights, combating international terrorism
Amendment 345 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 346 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for the EU to continue to deepen the transatlantic partnership, while focusing on creating own capabilities to better address regional and international conflicts that have an impact on the EU; believes that the EU and US should focus on adapting transatlantic structures to today’s challenges, such as defending human rights, combating international terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and countering third- party countries’ efforts to destabilise the EU and NATO; calls on the Vice- President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign and Security Policy and the Council to make clear to the US that unilateral moves deeply weaken the transatlantic partnership and undermine the effectiveness of the external action of both partners;
Amendment 347 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for the EU to continue to deepen the transatlantic partnership, while focusing on creating own capabilities to better address regional and international conflicts that have an impact on the EU; believes that the EU and US should focus on adapting transatlantic structures to today’s challenges, such as defending human rights,
Amendment 348 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for the EU to continue to deepen the transatlantic partnership, while focusing on creating own capabilities to better address regional and international conflicts that have an impact on the EU, while avoiding military involvement in such conflicts; believes that the EU and US should focus on adapting transatlantic structures to today’s challenges, such as defending human rights, combating international terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and countering third-
Amendment 349 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls for the EU to continue to deepen the transatlantic partnership, while focusing on creating own capabilities and developing its strategic autonomy to better address regional and international conflicts that have an impact on the EU;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses the need for the EU’s external policies to be consistent with each other and with other policies with an external dimension, and to pursue the objectives set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union;
Amendment 350 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Believes that the EU should explore the possibilities of keeping the United Kingdom affiliated to the CFSP after Brexit;
Amendment 351 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 352 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 353 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Believes that
Amendment 354 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Believes that Europe
Amendment 355 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Believes that Europe
Amendment 356 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Believes that Europe must build a virtuous alliance between the private and public sectors
Amendment 357 #
22. Believes that Europe must
Amendment 358 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Believes that Europe must build a virtuous alliance between the private and public sectors and should develop a strategic relationship with the US, being the EU’s most important partner in terms of economic and security cooperation; further stresses the importance of continued cooperation between the EU and US bilaterally and through NATO on issues such as Syria, Ukraine, Libya, Iran, North Korea and relations with Russia;
Amendment 359 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Believes that Europe must build a virtuous alliance between the private and
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 Amendment 360 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Believes that Europe must build a virtuous alliance between the private and public sectors and should develop a strategic relationship with the US, bearing in mind the current political circumstances;
Amendment 361 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Recognises the need to look for creative solutions for cooperation between the EU and the UK in the area of the CFSP/CSDP;
Amendment 362 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 Amendment 363 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for increased inter
Amendment 364 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
Amendment 365 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for increased interinstitutional intelligence sharing and coordination between the EU and NATO, and insists that the EU and NATO must continue to cooperate as closely as possible in a complementary manner; acknowledges that information sharing and coordinated action between the EU and NATO will produce results in areas such as response to hybrid threats, situational awareness, resilience building, strategic communications, cybersecurity and capacity building vis-à- vis the EU’s partners; believes that further coordination and closer cooperation with other existing multilateral entities
Amendment 366 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for increased inter institutional intelligence sharing and coordination between the EU, Member States and NATO, and insists that the EU, Member States and NATO must continue to cooperate as closely as possible in a complementary manner; acknowledges that information sharing and coordinated action between the EU, Member States and NATO will produce results in areas such as response to hybrid threats, situational awareness, resilience building, strategic communications, cybersecurity and capacity building vis-à-vis the EU’s partners; believes that further coordination and closer cooperation with other existing
Amendment 367 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for increased interinstitutional intelligence sharing at national level, between the EU Member States, at international level and with third countries, and coordination between the EU and NATO, and insists that the EU and NATO must continue to cooperate as closely as possible in a complementary manner; acknowledges that information sharing and coordinated action between the EU and NATO will produce results in areas such as response to hybrid threats, situational awareness, resilience building, strategic communications, cybersecurity and capacity building vis-à-
Amendment 368 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for increased interinstitutional intelligence sharing and coordination between the EU and NATO, and insists that the EU and NATO must continue to cooperate as closely as possible in a complementary manner while fully respecting European core values and norms such as the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the European Human Rights Convention, national constitutions, international human rights law and international humanitarian law and proper parliamentary oversight; acknowledges that information sharing and coordinated action between the EU and NATO will produce results in areas such as response to hybrid threats, situational awareness, resilience building, strategic communications, cyber security and capacity building vis-à-
Amendment 369 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
Amendment 37 #
3. Believes that
Amendment 370 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for increased interinstitutional intelligence sharing and coordination between the Member States and between the EU and NATO, and insists that the EU and NATO must continue to cooperate as closely as possible in a complementary manner; acknowledges that information sharing and coordinated action between the EU and NATO will produce results in areas such as response to hybrid threats, situational awareness, resilience building, strategic communications, cybersecurity and capacity building vis-à-
Amendment 371 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls for increased interinstitutional intelligence sharing and coordination between the EU and NATO, and insists that the EU and NATO must continue to cooperate as closely as possible in a complementary manner; acknowledges that information sharing and coordinated action between the EU and NATO will produce results in areas such as terrorism, response to hybrid threats, situational awareness, resilience building, strategic communications, cybersecurity and capacity building vis-à-
Amendment 372 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Reiterates its conviction that a revitalization of the strategic partnerships, seeking to transform them into an effective foreign policy instrument, should be a priority for the EU;
Amendment 373 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 374 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 375 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 376 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the VP/HR to ensure that future annual reports will be more concise and forward-looking, focusing on the most important priorities for the year ahead and an evaluation of the measures launched in the previous year, including their financial implications, providing a comprehensive overview on the EU’s performance in this regard;
Amendment 377 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 1 Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 1 Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) – having regard to the 2011 Commission Communication on Human rights and democracy at the heart of EU external action – towards a more effective approach;
Amendment 40 #
–
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 1 – co
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 1 – coordination of an assessment of profound threats and challenges within the EU, focusing in particular on preventing the phenomenon of radicalisation, which may lead to the recruitment of individuals by terrorist groups,
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 1 – coordination of an assessment of profound threats and challenges within the EU and a coordinated approach in how to address them,
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 1 a (new) – a purely peaceful and civil approach of the CFSP-Policy that is non- discriminatory and in line with international law, which should be focused on civil measures only, stability and human rights, civil conflict resolution and prevention, disarmament, non - proliferation of nuclear weapons, DDR and mediation,
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 2 Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 2 – co
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 2 – consolidation and deepening of the European project
Amendment 48 #
– consolidation and deepening of the European project
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 2 – consolidation and deepening of the European project through enhanced EU
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 2 a (new) – poverty eradication, social security, humanitarian aid, sustainable economic and social development, including favouring balanced economic relations, fair trade and fair distribution of wealth and resources in the EU’s neighbourhood and the rest of the world,
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 3 Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 3 Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 3 – cooperation with
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 3 – closer cooperation between the Member States within coalitions and with institutions delivering security;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 3 – cooperation within coalitions and with institutions delivering security, albeit under clearly defined and carefully determined conditions;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 3 – cooperation within coalitions and with institutions protecting peace and delivering security;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 3 – cooperation within
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 3 – cooperation within
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 3 a (new) Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recognises that the EU’s foreign and security policy ambitions must not adopt a one size fits all approach and must therefore be more flexible and responsive to changing situations in its eastern and southern neighbourhoods in particular; further encourages consideration of the policy of less for less with regard to those countries which go into reverse in terms of governance, democracy, and human rights;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Welcomes the EU Global Strategy’s commitment to NATO as the cornerstone of Europe’s collective security, and to strengthening the United Nations as the bedrock of international order;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 Co
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that guaranteeing the security of EU citizens and the integrity of the EU’s territory, stabilising the neighbourhood, especially stabilising the situation in the Western Balkans with the emphasis on more visibility of the EU on the peace and security issues in this region, and preserving a rules-
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that guaranteeing the security of EU citizens and the integrity of the EU’s territory, stabilising the neighbourhood and preserving a rules-
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that guaranteeing the security of EU citizens and the integrity of the EU’s territory, stabilising the neighbourhood and preserving a rules- based, cooperative international order, tackling the root causes of armed conflicts and enhancing policies of conflict prevention and peaceful conflict resolution are the key conditions for the stability of the EU;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that guaranteeing the security of EU citizens and the integrity of
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that guaranteeing the security of EU citizens and the integrity of the EU’s territory, stabilising the neighbourhood and preserving a rules- based, cooperative political and economic international order are the key conditions for the stability of the EU;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the need for the EU to maintain the commitment it has made to its partners, especially in its neighbourhood, to support economic, social and political reform, to protect human rights and to help establish the rule of law, as the best means of strengthening the international order and ensuring the stability of its neighbourhood;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable,
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable,
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a combination of effective multilateralism, joint soft power
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably the refugee crisis,
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably the refugee crisis, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, proxy wars and hybrid warfare, and challeng
Amendment 77 #
5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable,
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable,
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably t
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable and where democracy is on the retreat, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major short and long term security challenges, notably the refugee crisis, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, proxy wars and hybrid warfare, and challenging assertive behaviour by Russia and China and contradictory unilateral US policies; takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and of forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, dramatic economic inequalities, the lack of economic opportunities, armed conflicts, bad governance, corruption and climate change;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably the refugee crisis, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, proxy wars and hybrid warfare, including cyber-attacks, and challenging assertive behaviour by Russia and China; takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and of forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the lack of economic opportunities, armed conflicts, bad governance and climate change;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably the refugee crisis, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, proxy wars and hybrid warfare, and challenging assertive behaviour by Russia and China; takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and of forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the lack of economic opportunities, the lack of access to education, armed conflicts, bad governance and climate change;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably the refugee crisis, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, proxy wars and hybrid warfare, and challenging assertive behaviour by Russia and China; takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and of forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably the humanitarian dimension of the refugee crisis, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, proxy wars and hybrid warfare, and challenging assertive behaviour by Russia and China; takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and of forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the lack of economic opportunities, armed conflicts, bad governance and climate change;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably the refugee crisis, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, proxy wars and hybrid warfare, and challenging assertive behaviour by Russia and China; takes the view that a more effective foreign and security policy is founded primarily on the definition of shared priorities and strategic visions; takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and of forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the lack of economic opportunities, armed conflicts, bad governance and climate change;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major security challenges, notably the refugee crisis, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, proxy wars and hybrid warfare, and challenging assertive behaviour by Russia and China; takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and of forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the lack of economic opportunities, armed conflicts, bad governance and climate change; recalls the action plan adopted at the Valletta Summit calling for a shared responsibility of countries of origin, transit and destination: emphasizes the importance of breaking the economic model of smuggler networks;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that the route being taken by North Korea is dangerous, irresponsible and contrary to international law; insists on the importance of unity among the international community and of using diplomacy in the search for non-military solutions in response to North Korea’s ballistic and nuclear tests; highlights the efforts made by the international community on nuclear non-proliferation and the reduction of weapons of mass destruction;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls that the EU is among the biggest arms-exporters in the world and closed down all legal and save ways for migration and refugees and recently conditioned its development aid upon holding and taking back refugees and migrants;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours; urges the need for concerted diplomatic efforts
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism
source: 610.602
2017/09/22
BUDG
9 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that while the budgetary appropriations adopted under the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) for 2016 amounted to EUR 326.8 million in commitments and EUR 298.1 million in payments, the proportion of transfers from the CFSP chapter reached an unprecedented EUR 124.4 million in commitments and EUR 69 million in payments in 2016, which means that in fact no proper plan for the chapter had been drawn up;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that CFSP appropriations represented 3.6 % of the Heading 4 commitments in 2016 and 0.2 % of the whole EU budget; regrets that the size and under-implementation of and systematic transfers from the CFSP chapter
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that CFSP appropriations represented 3.6 % of the Heading 4 commitments in 2016 and 0.2 % of the whole EU budget; regrets that the size and under-implementation of and systematic transfers from the CFSP chapter reveal a persistent lack of ambition for the EU to act as a global player; points out that, if the EU is to overcome the challenges it faces, and in particular security threats, it needs to focus its resources on strategic priorities;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Reiterates its call for the full utilisation of the Treaty tools for raising funds under the CFSP and the common security and defence policy (CSDP), namely Permanent Structured Cooperation and the start-up fund for the initial phase of the missions; reiterates the need for synergies in order to improve cost efficiency; believes that European defence cooperation must be strengthened by looking for further avenues for joint purchase, maintenance and upkeep of forces and material as it would lead to boosting EU assets and capabilities and having positive potential effects on defence research and industrial matters; notes that because of Member States’ financial constraints there should be more coordination and clearer choices about which capabilities to maintain, so that Member States can specialise in certain capabilities; calls on the Member States to review and broaden substantially the Athena financing mechanism and to take full advantage of the cooperative projects proposed by the European Defence Agency;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Reiterates its call for the full utilisation of the Treaty tools for raising funds under the CFSP and the common security and defence policy (CSDP), namely Permanent Structured Cooperation and the start-up fund for the initial phase of the missions; reiterates the need for synergies in order to improve cost efficiency; calls on the Member States to review and broaden substantially the Athena financing mechanism and to take full advantage of the cooperative projects proposed by the European Defence Agency, provided that they generate added value for Europe;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to fully reflect the growing security challenges in its proposal for the next multiannual financial framework; considers that both the size and the flexibility of the CFSP budget must match, inter alia, EU citizens’ expectations on the EU’s role as a security provider, and the likely challenges and opportunities for the EU’s standing as a strategic actor
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to fully reflect the growing security challenges in its proposal for the next multiannual financial framework; considers that both the size and the flexibility of the CFSP budget must match, inter alia, EU citizens’ expectations on the EU’s role as a security provider, and the likely challenges and opportunities for the EU’s standing as a strategic actor following Brexit; recognises in this regard the importance to continue strong cooperation between the EU and the UK to provide security for the citizens of Europe; insists on the need for a global vision for EU policy and instruments in the field of security, including fruitful coordination with the proposed European Defence Fund;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to fully reflect the growing security challenges in its proposal for the next multiannual financial framework; considers that both the size and the flexibility of the CFSP budget must match, inter alia, EU citizens’ expectations on the EU’s role as a security provider, and the likely challenges and opportunities for the EU’s standing as a strategic actor following Brexit; insists on the need for a global vision for EU policy and instruments in the field of security, including fruitful coordination with the proposed European Defence Fund; calls on the Member States to aim for the target of 2 % of GDP for defence spending, and to spend 20 % of their defence budgets on equipment identified as necessary through the EDA;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to fully reflect the growing security challenges in its proposal for the next multiannual financial framework; considers that both the size and the flexibility of the CFSP budget must match, inter alia, EU citizens’ expectations on the EU’s role as a security provider, and the likely challenges and
source: 610.696
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE607.921New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-607921_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE610.602New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-610602_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE610.678New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-610678_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE609.504&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-609504_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20171212&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-12-12-TOC_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0350&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0350_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0493New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0493_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/8/10359New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2017-12-11T00:00:00New
2017-12-13T00:00:00 |
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/1 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
AFET/8/10359
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|